Article Versions Notes

Cicero L, Puleio R, Cassata G, Cirincione R, Camarda L, Caracappa D, D’Itri L, Licciardi M, Vigni GE. Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures. Polymers. 2023; 15(16):3398. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15163398

Cicero, Luca, Roberto Puleio, Giovanni Cassata, Roberta Cirincione, Lawrence Camarda, Dario Caracappa, Lorenzo D’Itri, Mariano Licciardi, and Giulio Edoardo Vigni. 2023. "Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures" Polymers 15, no. 16: 3398. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15163398

Cicero, L., Puleio, R., Cassata, G., Cirincione, R., Camarda, L., Caracappa, D., D’Itri, L., Licciardi, M., & Vigni, G. E. (2023). Peripheral Nerve Regeneration at 1 Year: Biodegradable Polybutylene Succinate Artificial Scaffold vs. Conventional Epineurial Sutures. Polymers, 15(16), 3398. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15163398