Next Article in Journal
Stress Relaxation and Creep of a Polymer-Aluminum Composite Produced through Selective Laser Sintering
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on the Properties of Transparent Bamboo Prepared by Epoxy Resin Impregnation
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Extracellular Mimicked Hierarchical Nano-Micro-Topography on the Bacteria/Abiotic Interface
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tensile Mechanical Behaviour of Multi-Polymer Sandwich Structures via Fused Deposition Modelling
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 12
Issue 4
10.3390/polym12040829
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bio-Based Aromatic Copolyesters: Influence of Chemical Microstructures on Thermal and Crystalline Properties

by
Keling Hu
†
Key Laboratory of Functional Polymer Materials of MOE, College of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
†
Current address: Division of Chemistry and Biological Chemistry, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637371, Singapore.
Polymers 2020, 12(4), 829; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12040829
Submission received: 15 March 2020 / Revised: 2 April 2020 / Accepted: 3 April 2020 / Published: 5 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bio-Based Polymers: Synthesis and Properties)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Aromatic copolyesters, derived from bio-based nipagin and eugenol, were synthesized with renewable 1,6-hexandiol as the spacer. Number-average, weight-average molecular weights (Mn, Mw), and polydispersity (D) values were determined by size exclusion chromatography (SEC). Chemical structures were confirmed by 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectroscopies. Chemical microstructure analysis suggested that the nipagin and eugenol-derived units were inserted into polymer chains in an arbitrary manner. Due to the short chain of 1,6-hexanediol, the splitting of magnetically different methylene carbons, adjacent to the alcohol-oxygens, proved to be more sensitive towards sequence distributions, at the dyed level, than those from 1,10-decanediol. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) demonstrated that these polyester materials have excellent thermal stability (>360 °C), regardless of the content of eugenol-derived composition incorporated. Differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) and wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WXRD) experiments revealed the semicrystalline nature for this kind of copolyesters. The crystallinities gradually decreased with the increase of eugenol-derived composition. Thermal and crystalline properties were well discussed from the microscopic perspective. The point of this work lies in establishing guidance for future design and modification of high-performance polymer materials from the microscopic perspective.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Mankind is facing severe challenges with the rapid development of economy and population growth. These challenges, include exhaustion of fossil resources, marine pollution, greenhouse effect, and so forth. All these problems urge people to adopt sustainable and green manner for social behaviors [1,2,3,4]. Bio-based polymer materials are attracting more and more attention from both academic and industrial aspects, especially for the synthesis and modification of bio-based degradable polymers (polyester, polyurethane, and polycarbonate) [5,6,7,8]. Recently our group has been dedicated to the study of bio-based polyester materials [9,10]. The initial monomer design and polymerization method have been used to improve the final property, however, strong demand still exists for the acquisition of high-performance bio-based polymeric materials [11,12,13,14].
Polymer properties depend on the chemical structure of material itself essentially [15,16]. For example, thermal and crystalline properties are closely related to structural units, and thus, are caused by different accumulations and motion of chain segments [17,18]. Functional groups on the main chains or side chains are critical for thermal stability. For example, heteroatoms (N, O, S) can easily degraded under high temperature or in the presence of oxygen [19,20,21,22]. Ester, urethane or carbonate groups are also easily attacked by other chemicals in the reaction systems, and thus, cause the scission of polymer chains [23,24,25,26]. Designing materials with specific functionality has advantages. These materials are stable during use, and are easily degraded under mild conditions, following use [27,28,29,30]. Consequently, the priorities involve the elegant design and derivatization of starting building blocks, and understanding how chemical structures influence the final properties, particularly from a microscopic view [31,32].
The compound, 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid, exists naturally in campanulaceae and ericaceous plants [33], and has been widely used as reactant in organic synthesis, especially for the synthesis of parabens. Nipagin, as the most widely studied paraben, can be used for the synthesis of various multifunctional polymeric materials, such as epoxy resins and liquid crystal materials [34,35]. Eugenol, extracted from clove oil [36], has been used for the synthesis of benzoxazines, coatings, etc [37,38]. Based on their availability and cheap price, they have promising uses in industrial applications, such as, food packing and beverage bottles. Recently, nipagin and eugenol are also used for the synthesis of polyester materials in our group. Further studies need to be performed, in order to better understanding the structure-property relationships.
In this study, starting from the renewable nipagin and eugenol, two kinds of diester monomers were synthesized via thiol-ene click chemistry and SN2 reactions [39,40]. Random copolymerization was then carried out in the predetermined composition ratios of diester monomers with another renewable monomer, 1,6-hexanediol, as a comonomer [41,42]. Sulphur atoms, phenoxy-links, and ester groups exist on the polymer main chains. This structural characteristic may have a critical influence on the final thermal and crystalline properties, which were studied and explained from the microscopic perspectives.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and Methods

The chemical reagents and materials, used in this project, and the general instrumentation and methods can be found in the supporting information section of this article. Scheme S1 (Supplementary Materials) illustrates the synthetic routes of N2, E1 and E2 monomers.

2.2. General Procedure for the Synthesis of Polyesters

PHN2 homopolyester and PHN21−xE1x, PHN21−xE2x (x indicates molar ratio of E1 or E2 units, x = 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%) copolyesters were synthesized by melt polycondensation from a mixture of N2, E1 or E2, and 1,6-hexanediol with prescribed feed ratio. The reaction was performed in a 25 mL Schleck round-bottom flask equipped with a magnetic stirrer bar, a nitrogen inlet and a vacuum distillation outlet. The synthetic pathway is illustrated in Scheme 1. A slightly excess molar ratio of diol to diester (1.05:1) was chosen to guarantee the endcap of hydroxyl groups. Tetrabutyl titanate (TBT, 0.6% molar relative to diesters) was adopted as the catalyst. Before transesterification, the reaction system was purged with nitrogen for 15 min to ensure that no oxygen was left in the system, and to prevent the reaction mixture from being oxidized during polymerization. Transesterification was carried out at 140–180 °C for 3–5 h under a low nitrogen flow. Polycondensation was then carried out at 180–220 °C for 3–5 h under a 0.03–0.06 mbar vacuum until stirrer bar got stuck, suggesting the stop of polymerization. The pressure of reaction system was recovered to a normal level with nitrogen to prevent oxidation or degradation of product. The crude product was cooled to room temperature, dissolved in a minimum amount of chloroform and precipitated in an excess volume of methanol, in order to remove the oligomers and unreacted diols. The final product was obtained by suction filtration, washed with methanol, and dried in vacuum overnight.
The SEC traces are depicted in Figures S1 and S2 (Supplementary Materials). Chemical structures of the products were determined by 1H NMR (Figure 1 and Figure S3 in Supplementary Materials), and 13C NMR (Figure 2 and Figure S4 in Supplementary Materials). The peaks assignment was also given in the experimental section of supporting information. From the spectra, all the protons in chemical structures can find the corresponding signals.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Synthesis and Structures of the Polyesters

PHN2 homopolyester and PHN21−xE1x, PHN21−xE2x copolyesters were prepared by the melt polycondensation method in the predesigned composition ratios of nipagin and eugenol-derived dimethyl ester monomers with renewable 1,6-hexanediol as a comonomer. The polymerization pathway is illustrated in Scheme 1 and data are collected in Table 1. The symmetrical characteristic of N2 unit resulted in the high crystallizability of copolyesters. When the eugenol-derived components were below and equal 30% in the series of PHN21−xE1x, these samples can’t dissolve in tetrahydrofuran (THF). Meanwhile, the samples for PHN21−xE2x can dissolve in chloroform (CHCl3) only when eugenol-based components were below and equal 20%.
The high yields of products indicate the high reactivity and purity of these monomers. Nipagin and eugenol-derived units’ ratios in the final products of PHN21−xE2x series matched very well with the feed ratios, indicating the excellent compatibility of the system during the whole polymerization process. However, for PHN21−xE1x series, the units’ ratios in the final products gradually deviated from the feed ratios with the increase of eugenol-derived composition. This phenomenon may be ascribed to the high viscosity of the system at an early stage, resulting in the inadequate reaction of E1.
From the 1H NMR spectra of the two series of copolyesters (Figure 1 and Figure S3), the signal intensity corresponding to eugenol-derived units increases with the gradual insertion of eugenol-based composition, indicating the successful copolymerization of these two types of monomers.
The chemical microstructures were studied by quantitative 13C NMR spectra thanks to the sensitiveness of magnetically different carbon atoms present in polyester backbones towards sequence distributions at the dyed level. [43,44] The possible sequence distributions and splitting modes of methylene carbons in 13C NMR spectra are depicted in Figure 3 and Figure 4, from which we can observe that the signal intensity closely related to the feed ratios. In this study, the methylene carbons connected to the alcohol-oxygen atoms proved to be well resolved in the 13C NMR spectra. All splitting modes of the peaks come from the different orientation of N2, E1, and E2 in polymer chains. However, the splitting mode of PHN21−xE1x was more complicated than that of PHN21−xE2x due to the asymmetrical feature of E1 unit, which generated a difference of head and tail featured by E1 unit when inserted into the polymer chains during copolymerizing. Meanwhile, N2 and E2 units did not have a head and tail difference because they are symmetrical. In the spectra of PHN21−xE1x, ε signal originating from phenoxy-connected carbon in N2 featured a single peak and its signal intensity gradually decreased with the incorporation of eugenol-based composition. An opposite trend was observed for signal δ, which also exhibited a single peak in the whole series, indicating that signal ε and δ were not sensitive to sequence distributions. However, the methylene carbons connected to the alcohol-oxygens were very sensitive to sequence distributions, which split into three groups of signals α vs. α’, β vs. β’ and γ vs. γ’ (Figure 3). The signal intensities of α’, β’ and γ’ gradually increase compared with α, β and γ, respectively. Until the eugenol-based composition reached 50% the signal intensities in each group became almost the same. The opportunities of the six different sequence distributions were not equal when the amounts of nipagin and eugenol-based components were not the same. This phenomenon disappeared when feed ratio of the two diester monomers was 1:1.
As for PHN21−xE2x series, another situation appeared as shown in Figure 4. Signal δ and γ also displayed single peaks as same as PHN21−xE1x, but the methylene carbons connected to the alcohol-oxygen atoms split into only two groups of peaks (α vs. α’ and β vs. β’) between 64–66 ppm. The reason for this was due to the same magnetic environment of the ester groups in respective N2 and E2 units. In each group, the peak intensities also grow from inequivalence to equivalence with the increase of eugenol-derived composition.
Furthermore, when compared with our previous report regarding the 1,10-decanediol derived copolyesters (Figures S5 and S6 in Supplementary Materials) [45], the splitting situation of methylene carbons adjacent to the alcohol-oxygens in PHN21−xE1x and PHN21−xE2x are more sensitive to sequence distributions because the chain length of 1,6-hexanediol is shorter than 1,10-decanediol. Consequently, the nipagin and eugenol-based units in polymer chains may have different constructions when the eugenol-based composition is the same. This difference may have critical influence on the final thermal and crystalline properties, which will be discussed in the following sections.

3.2. Thermal Properties

Thermal properties of the copolyesters were measured by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The weight-loss curves and corresponding derivative DTG curves are depicted in Figure 5 and Figure 6, and Figures S7 and S8 (Supplementary Materials), respectively, and the thermal parameters are gathered in Table 2. Thermal stability of PHN21−xE1x and PHN21−xE2x copolyesters gradually decreases with the increase of eugenol-based composition, compared with the parent PHN2 homopolyester. When the content of eugenol-derived composition reached 50%, the temperature at which 5% weight loss (T5%) decreased about 30 °C for PHN21−xE1x and 20 °C for PHN21−xE2x relative to PHN2. Furthermore, PHN21−xE1x featured almost the same temperature for maximum degradation rate (Td) with PHN21−xE2x when the eugenol-derived compositions were identical. From the above results, we conclude that the thermal stability of the final products gradually decreases with the incorporation of eugenol-derived composition. The T5% values were still above 365 °C even though the content of eugenol-derived composition reached 50%. The Td values were almost fixed at 420 °C when the eugenol-derived composition increased to 40% for PHN21−xE1x series. The Td value decreased about 10 °C when the eugenol-derived composition increased to 50% for PHN21−xE1x. In the series of PHN21−xE2x, we also see the same trend, that is, the Td values were completely the same at 420 °C when the eugenol-derived composition below or equal to 30%. The Td value decreased about 10 °C when the eugenol-derived composition exceeded 30%. From the microscopic view to explain this, the asymmetrical nature of E1 and E2 units and the existence of phenoxy and sulphur atoms both accelerate the degradation of samples. The asymmetrical structure of monomers leads to the loose packing of polymer chains and thus causes to be easily degraded under heat flow. Phenoxy and sulphur functional groups are all known sites to be attacked by impurities (O2) in the systems, resulting in the coloring of products. Consequently, T5% and Td values decrease with the eugenol-derived composition gradually increases.
Except for the parent PHN2 homopolyester, all the PHN21−xE1x comopolyesters featured a two-step degradation mechanism. As for PHN21−xE2x, PHN290%E210% and PHN280%E220% had a two-step degradation mechanism. However, single-step degradation was observed when the eugenol-derived composition was above 20%. This phenomenon can be explained by the mismatch of chain conformations at specific compositions [46,47]. When the eugenol-based composition was below (≤ 20%), asymmetrical eugenol-derived units were not averagely aligned along polymer chains. The nipagin-derived composition was the major and firstly degraded. Soon afterward, the second composition started to degrade with the increase of temperature. From the TGA data we can draw the conclusion that this kind of polyester materials have excellent thermal stabilities, and the eugenol-based composition has a critical influence on the final thermal stability from the microscopic perspective.
Differential scanning calorimetric (DSC) analysis was used to study their other thermal and crystalline properties, like glass transition (Tg), melting and crystallization temperatures (Tm, Tc), as well as their relevant melting and crystallization enthalpies (ΔHm, ΔHc), because these are critical factors to industry production and engineering applications [48,49]. The second DSC heating traces are depicted in Figure 7, and the corresponding thermal data are collected in Table 2. The full heating and cooling scans of DSC curves for PHN21−xE1x and PHN21−xE2x copolyesters are shown in Figures S9 and S10. Tgs are found to become obvious with the gradual increase of eugenol-based composition because of the gradual increase of free volumes for segmental motion. In each series, Tg values gradually decrease with the insertion of eugenol-based composition. When the eugenol-based compositions were the same in the two series, PHN21−xE1x has a slightly higher Tg value than PHN21−xE2x, suggesting that E2 unit features a higher asymmetry than E1 unit. Except for the sample PHN250%E250%, all the other samples have the only melting peaks in the second heating runs. The ΔHm values also gradually decrease with increase of eugenol-based composition in each series. More interestingly, PHN2 homopolyester and PHN290%E110%, PHN290%E210% copolyesters have small melting peaks in front of the main melting peaks, indicating the second crystallization in the first cooling runs during DSC tests despite the relevant ΔHm values are very small. However, PHN250%E250% could not crystalize from the melt during the first cooling run (Figure S9 in Supplementary Materials). When the temperature reached about 34 °C, the conformation matching resulted in the start of crystallization. When temperature further increased, the melting peak appeared. In the microscopic level, the insertion of asymmetrical eugenol-based composition was unfavorable for the locally ordered packing of chain segments. The sequence distribution of head-head, head-tail, and tail-tail of nipagin and eugenol-derived units adopts an arbitrary manner along the polymer chains. Consequently, the variation trends of Tg, Tm, Tc and their corresponding ΔHm and ΔHc values can be explained reasonably.

3.3. Powder X-ray Diffraction Analysis

Powder wide-angle X-ray diffraction analysis (WXRD) was carried out to supplement the DSC results. The WXRD curves are depicted in Figure 8 and Figure S11. From the traces, we observe that the polymer samples can form well discrete diffraction signals with the main peaks at about 24.5° characteristic of semi-crystalline materials. PHN2 homopolyester has a scattering pattern with four distinct reflections at 16.00°, 16.88°, 21.02° and 24.56°, respectively, which exactly correspond to the triclinic crystal structure just like displayed by PBT [50,51]. The diffraction pattern was reserved in the copolyesters, taking both diffraction angles and relative intensities into consideration, thereby suggesting that the crystalline manner of PHN2 could be retained in the copolyester samples. The crystallinity values calculated as the quotient between crystalline area and total area of the diffraction curves were given in Table 3. The crystallinities were found to decrease with the increase of eugenol-derived composition. The samples for WXRD were obtained directly from precipitation in methanol, which resulted in the slow alignment of polymer chains and certain degree of crystallization. Polymer chains became increasingly difficult to array orderly with the gradual increase of asymmetrical eugenol-based units. Consequently, the WXRD curves became increasingly smoother, particularly for the series of PHN21−xE2x. Although, X-ray diffraction analysis can only qualitatively or semi-quantitatively allow the study the crystalline behavior, the consistency of DSC and WXRD results can provide good insight into the thermal and crystalline properties for this kind of polyester materials. The influence factors can be explained from the microscopic view, that is, chemical microstructures.

4. Conclusions

The correlations of thermal, crystalline properties with chemical microstructures were studied from the microscopic perspective, in order to gain a better understanding of the structure-property relationships of polymer materials. Renewable nipagin and eugenol-derived aromatic copolyester materials were firstly synthesized by the melt polycondensation method. The chemical structures and microstructures were confirmed by 1H NMR and 13C NMR. The effect of chemical microstructures on thermal and crystalline properties was emphatically investigated. When different amounts of asymmetrical eugenol-derived composition were incorporated, this kind of units were distributed in polymer chains evenly or not. Consequently, polymer chains became loose and easily degraded. DSC and WXRD results can also explain the crystalline properties from the microscopic perspective. With the insertion of asymmetrical eugenol-based composition, the locally ordered packing of chain segments could be easily destroyed. The sequence distribution of eugenol-derived units along the polymer chains leads to a decrease in crystallinity. The aim of this study is to provide a new perspective to study the influence factors for material properties and provide guidance for the future design and modification of polymer materials with high-performance.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/4/829/s1, Chemical reagents and materials in experimental section used in this project. General instrumentation and methods. Synthesis of nipagin and eugenol-derived dimethyl esters. Scheme S1: Synthetic routes for the preparation of the nipagin and eugenol based dimethyl esters. Figure S1: SEC traces of polyester samples tested by CHCl3-phase GPC and the sample names are indicated in the figure. Figure S2: SEC traces of polyester samples tested by THF-phase GPC and the sample names are indicated in the figure. Figure S3: 1H NMR spectra of PHN21−xE2x copolyesters. Figure S4: 13C NMR spectra of PHN21−xE2x copolyesters. Figure S5: The splitting situations of the methylene carbons adjacent to the hydroxy-oxygens for PDN21−xE1x copolyesters with the indications of the dyads to which they are assigned. Figure S6: The splitting situations of the methylene carbons adjacent to the hydroxy-oxygens for PDN21−xE2x copolyesters with the indications of the dyads to which they are assigned. Figure S7: TGA curves of PHN21−xE2x copolyesters. Figure S8: TGA derivative curves of PHN21−xE2x copolyesters. Figure S9: Powder WXRD profiles for PHN21−xE2x copolyesters. Figure S10: The full heating and cooling scan of DSC curves of PHN21−xE2x after precipitating from methanol carried out from 30 to 210 °C at a heating/cooling rate of 10 °C min−1. Figure S11: Powder WXRD profiles for PHN21−xE2x copolyesters.

Author Contributions

K.H., conceptualization, formal analysis, investigation, methodology, data curation, writing—Original draft preparation, writing—Review and editing, visualization. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by NSFC (51203079), the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin (14JCYBJC18100) and PCSIRT (IRT1257).

Acknowledgments

Author gratefully acknowledges professional technical of staff (College of Chemistry, Nankai University) for assistance in SEC, NMR, DSC, TGA, and WXRD measurement and analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, G.-Q.; Patel, M.K. Plastics derived from biological sources: Present and future: A technical and environmental review. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 2082–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhu, Y.; Romain, C.; Williams, C.K. Sustainable polymers from renewable resources. Nature 2016, 540, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Artz, J.; Müller, T.E.; Thenert, K. Sustainable conversion of carbon dioxide: An integrated review of catalysis and life cycle assessment. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 434–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Alexandratos, S.D.; Barak, N.; Bauer, D.; Davidson, F.T.; Gibney, B.R.; Hubbard, S.S.; Taft, H.L.; Westerhof, P. Sustaining water resources: Environmental and economic impact. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 2879–2888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Lambert, S.; Wagner, M. Environmental performance of bio-based and biodegradable plastics: The road ahead. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 6855–6871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Laycock, B.; Nikolić, M.; Colwell, J.M.; Gauthier, E.; Halley, P.; Bottle, S.; George, G. Lifetime prediction of biodegradable polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2017, 71, 144–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Tardy, A.; Nicolas, J.; Gigmes, D.; Lefay, C.; Guillaneuf, Y. Radical ring-opening polymerization: Scope, limitations, and application to (bio)degradable materials. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 1319–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Haider, T.P.; Völker, C.; Kramm, J.; Landfester, K.; Wurm, F.R. Plastics of the future? The impact of biodegradable polymers on the environment and on society. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 50–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hu, K.; Zhao, D.; Wu, G.; Ma, J. Synthesis and properties of polyesters derived from renewable eugenol and α,ω-diols via a continuous overheating method. Polym. Chem. 2015, 6, 7138–7148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hu, K.; Zhao, D.; Wu, G.; Ma, J. Toughened aromatic poly-(decylene terephthalate) copolyesters with two renewable eugenol-based components via a random copolymerization method. Polym. Chem. 2016, 7, 1096–1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Auvergne, R.; Caillol, S.; David, G.; Boutevin, B.; Pascault, J.-P. Biobased thermosetting epoxy: present and future. Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 1082–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gandini, A.; Lacerda, T.M. From monomers to polymers from renewable resources: Recent advances. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2015, 48, 1–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ye, H.; Zhang, K.; Kai, D.; Li, Z.; Loh, X.J. Polyester elastomers for soft tissue engineering. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 4545–4580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, Z.; Ganewatta, M.S.; Tang, C. Sustainable polymers from biomass: Bridging chemistry with materials and processing. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2020, 101, 101197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Z.; Chueh, C.-C.; Jen, A.K.-Y. Recent advances in molecular design of functional conjugated polymers for high-performance polymer solar cells. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2019, 99, 101175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Herzberger, J.; Sirrine, J.M.; Williams, C.B.; Long, T.E. Polymer design for 3D printing elastomers: Recent advances in structure, properties, and printing. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2019, 97, 101144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Su, W.-F.A.; Chen, K.C.; Tseng, S.Y. Effects of chemical structure changes on thermal, mechanical, and crystalline properties of rigid rod epoxy resins. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2000, 78, 446–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Papageorgiou, G.Z.; Papageorgiou, D.G.; Terzopoulou, Z.; Bikiaris, D.N. Production of bio-based 2,5-furan dicarboxylate polyesters: Recent progress and critical aspects in their synthesis and thermal properties. Eur. Polym. J. 2016, 83, 202–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McKiernan, R.L.; Cardoen, G.; Boutevin, B.; Améduri, B.; Gido, S.P.; Penelle, J. Macromolecular crystal engineering based on segmented polymers: Influence of heteroatoms on the thermal properties and crystallization of m,n-polyurethanes derived from long-chain, heteroatom-containing, monodisperse α,ω-diols. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2003, 204, 961–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. İçli-Özkut, M.; Mersini, J.; Önal, A.M.; Cihaner, A. Substituent and heteroatom effects on the electrochromic properties of similar systems. J. Polym. Sci. Part A Polym. Chem. 2012, 50, 615–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Glassner, M.; Vergaelen, M.; Hoogenboom, R. Poly(2-oxazoline)s: A comprehensive overview of polymer structures and their physical properties. Polym. Int. 2018, 67, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mutlu, H.; Ceper, E.B.; Li, X.; Yang, J.; Dong, W.; Ozmen, M.M.; Theato, P. Sulfur chemistry in polymer and materials science. Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2019, 40, 1800650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Chattopadhyay, D.K.; Webster, D.C. Thermal stability and flame retardancy of polyurethanes. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2009, 34, 1068–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Z.P.; Rong, M.Z.; Zhang, M.Q. Polymer engineering based on reversible covalent chemistry: A promising innovative pathway towards new materials and new functionalities. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2018, 80, 39–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Fakirov, S. Condensation polymers: Their chemical peculiarities offer great opportunities. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2019, 89, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bartnikowski, M.; Dargaville, T.R.; Ivanovski, S.; Hutmacher, D.W. Degradation mechanisms of polycaprolactone in the context of chemistry, geometry and environment. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2019, 96, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hillmyer, M.A.; Tolman, W.B. Aliphatic polyester block polymers: Renewable, degradable, and sustainable. Acc. Chem. Res. 2014, 47, 2390–2396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Iwata, T. Biodegradable and bio-based polymers: Future prospects of eco-friendly plastics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 3210–3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Miller, K.A.; Morado, E.G.; Samanta, S.R.; Walker, B.A.; Nelson, A.Z.; Sen, S.; Tran, D.T.; Whitaker, D.J.; Ewoldt, R.H.; Braun, P.V.; et al. Acid-triggered, acid-generating, and self-amplifying degradable polymers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 2838–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hsu, T.-G.; Zhou, J.; Su, H.-W.; Schrage, B.R.; Ziegler, C.J.; Wang, J. A polymer with “Locked” degradability: Superior backbone stability and accessible degradability enabled by mechanophore installation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 2100–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lavilla, C.; Gubbels, E.; Ilarduya, A.M.de.; Noordover, B.A.J.; Koning, C.E.; Muñoz-Guerra, S. Solid-state modification of PBT with cyclic acetalized galactitol and D-mannitol: Influence of composition and chemical microstructure on thermal properties. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 4335–4345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, M.; Cui, F.; Li, Y.; Tao, Y.; Wang, X. Crystalline regio-/stereoregular glycine-bearing polymers from ROMP: Effect of microstructures on materials performances. Macromolecules 2016, 49, 9415–9424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tomizawa, S.; Chuah, J.-A.; Matsumoto, K.; Doi, Y.; Numata, K. Understanding the limitations in the biosynthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) from lignin derivatives. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 1106–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Lee, J.Y.; Jang, J. The effect of mesogenic length on the curing behavior and properties of liquid crystalline epoxy resins. Polymer 2006, 47, 3036–3042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Taylor, J.E.; Romo-Uribe, A.; Libera, M.R. Bimodal orientation defects in main-chain thermotropic liquid crystalline polymer fibers. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 1751–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lummiss, J.A.M.; Oliveira, K.C.; Pranckevicius, A.M.T.; Santos, A.G.; dos Santos, E.N.; Fogg, D.E. Chemical plants: High-Value molecules from essential oils. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 18889–18891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Shi, W.; Zhang, X.; Ji, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Li, W.; Jia, X. Sustainable Preparation of bio-based polybenzoxazine resins from amino acid and their application in CO2 adsorption. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 17313–17324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Watanabe, H.; Takahashi, M.; Kihara, H.; Yoshida, M. Photocurable urushiol analogues bearing methacryloxy-containing side chains. Langmuir 2019, 35, 4534–4539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hoyle, C.E.; Bowman, C.N. Thiol-ene click chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1540–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yearty, K.L.; Maynard, R.K.; Cortes, C.N.; Morrison, R.W. A multioutcome experiment for the Williamson ether synthesis. J. Chem. Educ. 2020, 97, 578–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Japu, C.; Alla, A.; Ilarduya, A.M.de.; García-Martín, M.G.; Benito, E.; Galbis, J.A.; Muñoz-Guerra, S. Bio-based aromatic copolyesters made from 1,6-hexanediol and bicyclic diacetalized D-glucitol. Polym. Chem. 2012, 3, 2092–2101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Burt, S.P.; Barnett, K.J.; McClelland, D.J.; Wolf, P.; Dumesic, J.A.; Huber, G.W.; Hermans, I. Production of 1,6-hexanediol from tetrahydropyran-2-methanol by dehydration-hydration and hydrogenation. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 1390–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Japu, C.; Ilarduya, A.M.de.; Alla, A.; García-Martín, M.G.; Galbis, J.A.; Muñoz-Guerra, S. D-Glucose-derived PET copolyesters with enhanced Tg. Polym. Chem. 2013, 4, 3524–3536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lavilla, C.; Gubbels, E.; Alla, A.; Ilarduya, A.M.de.; Noordover, B.A.J.; Koning, C.E.; Muñoz-Guerra, S. Carbohydrate-based PBT copolyesters from a cyclic diol derived from naturally occurring tartaric acid: A comparative study regarding melt polycondensation and solid-state modification. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 1789–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Hu, K.; Wu, G.; Ma, J. Aromatic copolyesters with enhanced crystallizability and mechanical properties byadding the renewable nipagin-based composition. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 21555–21563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tanzer, J.D.; Bartels, C.R.; Crist, B. Dimensions of polymer chains in the semicrystalline solid state. Macromolecules 1984, 17, 2708–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Tsao, H.-K.; Chen, J.Z.Y.; Sheng, Y.-J. Effect of intrachain mismatch on loop-to-coil transition of an associating chain. Macromolecules 2003, 36, 5863–5872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hisano, M.; Takeda, K.; Takashima, T.; Jin, Z.; Shiibashi, A.; Matsumoto, A. Sequence-controlled radical copolymerization of N-substituted maleimides with olefins and polyisobutene macromonomers to fabricate thermally stable and transparent maleimide copolymers with tunable glass transition temperatures and viscoelastic properties. Macromolecules 2013, 46, 7733–7744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mazidi, M.M.; Edalat, A.; Berahman, R.; Hosseini, F.S. Highly-toughened polylactide-(PLA-) based ternary blends with significantly enhanced glass transition and melt strength: Tailoring the interfacial interactions, phase morphology, and performance. Macromolecules 2018, 51, 4298–4314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Shen, Z.; Luo, F.; Bai, H.; Si, P.; Lei, X.; Ding, S.; Ji, L. A study on mediating the crystallization behavior of PBT through intermolecular hydrogen-bonding. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 17510–17518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Japu, C.; de Ilarduya, A.M.; Alla, A.; García-Martín, M.G.; Galbis, J.A.; Muñoz-Guerra, S. Bio-based PBT copolyesters derived from D-glucose: Influence of composition on properties. Polym. Chem. 2014, 5, 3190–3202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 12 00829 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthetic pathway for the preparation of nipagin and eugenol-based PHN21−xE1x and PHN21−xE2x.
Scheme 1. Synthetic pathway for the preparation of nipagin and eugenol-based PHN21−xE1x and PHN21−xE2x.
Polymers 12 00829 sch001
Polymers 12 00829 g001 550
Figure 1. Compared 1H NMR spectra of PHN21−xE1x.
Figure 1. Compared 1H NMR spectra of PHN21−xE1x.
Polymers 12 00829 g001
Polymers 12 00829 g002 550
Figure 2. Compared 13C NMR spectra of PHN21−xE1x.
Figure 2. Compared 13C NMR spectra of PHN21−xE1x.
Polymers 12 00829 g002
Polymers 12 00829 g003 550
Figure 3. The splitting modes of the methylene carbons adjacent to the alcohol-oxygens for PHN21−xE1x with the indications of the dyads to which they are assigned.
Figure 3. The splitting modes of the methylene carbons adjacent to the alcohol-oxygens for PHN21−xE1x with the indications of the dyads to which they are assigned.
Polymers 12 00829 g003
Polymers 12 00829 g004 550
Figure 4. The splitting modes of the methylene carbons adjacent to the alcohol-oxygens for PHN21−xE2x with the indications of the dyads to which they are assigned.
Figure 4. The splitting modes of the methylene carbons adjacent to the alcohol-oxygens for PHN21−xE2x with the indications of the dyads to which they are assigned.
Polymers 12 00829 g004
Polymers 12 00829 g005 550
Figure 5. TGA curves of PHN21−xE1x recorded from 25–800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under a nitrogen atmosphere.
Figure 5. TGA curves of PHN21−xE1x recorded from 25–800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under a nitrogen atmosphere.
Polymers 12 00829 g005
Polymers 12 00829 g006 550
Figure 6. TGA derivative curves of PHN21−xE1x recorded from 25–800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under a nitrogen atmosphere.
Figure 6. TGA derivative curves of PHN21−xE1x recorded from 25–800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under a nitrogen atmosphere.
Polymers 12 00829 g006
Polymers 12 00829 g007 550
Figure 7. The second heating DSC curves for PHN21−xE1x and PHN21−xE2x after precipitating from methanol carried out from −30 to 210 °C at a heating/cooling rate of 10 °C min−1.
Figure 7. The second heating DSC curves for PHN21−xE1x and PHN21−xE2x after precipitating from methanol carried out from −30 to 210 °C at a heating/cooling rate of 10 °C min−1.
Polymers 12 00829 g007
Polymers 12 00829 g008 550
Figure 8. Powder WXRD profiles for PHN21−xE1x.
Figure 8. Powder WXRD profiles for PHN21−xE1x.
Polymers 12 00829 g008
Table
Table 1. Molar composition, molecular weight, polydispersity, isolated yield of the PHN21−xE1x and PHN21−xE2x.
Table 1. Molar composition, molecular weight, polydispersity, isolated yield of the PHN21−xE1x and PHN21−xE2x.
CopolyesterYield (%)Molar CompositionMolecular Weight
Feed RatioFinal Product 3
XN2XEXN2XEMnMwD
PHN2 186%1000 100014200243001.7
PHN290%E110% 183%9010 89.310.718600359001.9
PHN280%E120% 185%8020 80.619.419200378002.0
PHN270%E130% 187%7030 70.829.220900421002.0
PHN260%E140% 281%6040 62.537.515100283001.9
PHN250%E150% 285%5050 53.246.819900354001.8
PHN290%E210% 182%9010 89.310.719800393002.0
PHN280%E220% 187%8020 80.020.020400402002.0
PHN270%E230% 286%7030 69.930.120400375001.8
PHN260%E240% 289%6040 59.940.114300259001.8
PHN250%E250% 288%5050 49.850.221000374001.8
1 SEC carried out in CHCl3 against PS standards. 2 SEC carried out in THF against PS standards. 3 Molar composition of the final product determined by integration of the 1H NMR spectra.
Table
Table 2. Thermal property parameters of PHN11−xE1x and PHN11−xE2x.
Table 2. Thermal property parameters of PHN11−xE1x and PHN11−xE2x.
PolyesterTGADSC
T5%1
(°C)		Td2
(°C)		W3
(%)		First Cooling 4 Second Heating 5
Tc
(°C)		ΔHc
(J g−1)		Tg
(°C)		Tc
(°C)		ΔHc
(J g−1)		Tm
(°C)		ΔHm
(J g−1)
PHN2395432/6142.1131.0163.8 32.2--Tm1 = 152.4
Tm2 = 160.3		ΔHm1 = 16.5
ΔHm2 = 147.8
PHN290%E110%38842217.5118.4139.2 23.2--Tm1 = 144.3
Tm2 = 154.3		ΔHm1 = 8.3
ΔHm2 = 130.5
PHN280%E120%38141918.6105.9109.2 12.5--144.3108.7
PHN270%E130%37441819.383.378.9 6.3--134.379.2
PHN260%E140%36741717.063.354.3 0.5--124.254.6
PHN250%E150%36540815.830.828.2 -5.8--111.728.5
PHN290%E210%3874203.9115.9123.8 18.6--151.8123.4
PHN280%E220%3844205.398.498.7 6.4--141.899.2
PHN270%E230%37742015.473.371.3 1.8--129.370.9
PHN260%E240%37841213.435.849.1 -0.5--119.248.7
PHN250%E250%37641012.1-- -2.434.626.3106.625.8
1 Temperature at which 5% weight loss. 2 Temperature for maximum degradation rate. 3 Remaining weight at 800 °C. 4 Crystallization temperatures (Tc) and crystallization enthalpies (ΔHc) calculated from the first cooling DSC traces of the precipitated samples at a cooling rate of 10 °C min−1. 5 Glass transition, crystallization and melting temperatures (Tg, Tc, Tm), melting and crystallization enthalpies (ΔHm, ΔHc) calculated from the second heating DSC traces of the precipitated samples at a heating rate of 10 °C min-1.
Table
Table 3. Powder X-ray diffraction data for PHN2, PHN21−xE1x, and PHN21−xE2x.
Table 3. Powder X-ray diffraction data for PHN2, PHN21−xE1x, and PHN21−xE2x.
PolyesterX-ray Diffraction Data
2θ (°) 1Xc2
PHN216.00 m16.88 m21.02 w24.56 s0.22
PHN290%E110%16.00 m16.88 m21.02 w24.56 s0.19
PHN280%E120%16.00 m16.88 m21.02 w24.56 s0.18
PHN270%E130%16.00 m16.88 m21.02 w24.56 s0.16
PHN260%E140%16.00 w16.88 w21.02 m24.56 s0.15
PHN250%E150%16.00 w16.88 w21.02 w24.56 m0.18
PHN290%E210%16.00 m16.88 m21.02 w24.56 s0.16
PHN280%E220%16.00 m16.88 m21.02 w24.56 s0.15
PHN270%E230%16.00 w16.88 w21.02 m24.56 s0.13
PHN260%E240%16.00 w16.88 w21.02 w24.56 m0.11
PHN250%E250%-----
1 The diffraction angles measured in powder diffraction patterns for samples coming directly from precipitation in methanol and dried overnight. Intensities visually estimated as follows: m: medium; s: strong; w: weak. 2 Crystallinity indices calculated as the quotient between crystalline area and total area. Crystalline and amorphous areas in the X-ray diffraction pattern were quantified using PeakFit v4.12 software.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, K. Bio-Based Aromatic Copolyesters: Influence of Chemical Microstructures on Thermal and Crystalline Properties. Polymers 2020, 12, 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12040829

AMA Style

Hu K. Bio-Based Aromatic Copolyesters: Influence of Chemical Microstructures on Thermal and Crystalline Properties. Polymers. 2020; 12(4):829. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12040829

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Keling. 2020. "Bio-Based Aromatic Copolyesters: Influence of Chemical Microstructures on Thermal and Crystalline Properties" Polymers 12, no. 4: 829. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12040829

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop