Next Article in Journal
Micro-Ultrasonic Viscosity Model Based on Ultrasonic-Assisted Vibration Micro-Injection for High-Flow Length Ratio Parts
Next Article in Special Issue
Durability of an Epoxy Resin and Its Carbon Fiber- Reinforced Polymer Composite upon Immersion in Water, Acidic, and Alkaline Solutions
Previous Article in Journal
Destruction of Polyelectrolyte Microcapsules Formed on CaCO3 Microparticles and the Release of a Protein Included by the Adsorption Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Investigation of the Thermal Conductivity of Resin-Based Lightweight Composites Filled with Hollow Glass Microspheres
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/polym12030521
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of UHMWPE Fiber Surface Modification and the Properties of UHMWPE/Epoxy Composite

by
Lei Han
,
Haifeng Cai
,
Xu Chen
,
Cheng Zheng
and
Weihong Guo
*
Polymer Processing Laboratory, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Advanced Polymeric Materials, Key Laboratory for Ultrafine Materials of Ministry of Education, School of Material Science and Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2020, 12(3), 521; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12030521
Submission received: 23 January 2020 / Revised: 25 February 2020 / Accepted: 25 February 2020 / Published: 1 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epoxy Resins and Composites)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE)/epoxy composites with excellent adhesive properties were prepared by forming an interface membrane on the UHMWPE fiber surface. The interface membrane of the UHMWPE fiber and epoxy resin was polymerized by an aldol condensation between polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and glutaraldehyde. Different surface treatment methods of UHMWPE fibers were optimized and the two-step PVA-glutaraldehyde condensation (Corona-PG-2S) method is the best. The interfacial adhesion between UHMWPE fiber and epoxy resin was enhanced, and the adhesive properties of the composite were improved. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and energy dispersive spectrum (EDS) results of the fiber treated by Corona-PG-2S shows that the surface oxygen content was up to 25.0 wt %, with an increase of 17.3 wt % compared with the surface oxygen content of unmodified UHMWPE fiber, which indicated that the surface polarity was greatly enhanced. The adhesive properties were improved by improving the polarity of the surface. The peel strength, ultimate cohesive force, tensile strength and flexural strength of the composite treated by Corona-PG-2S were greatly increased to 262.8%, 166.9%, 139.7%, 200.6% compared with those of unmodified samples. The composite prepared by Corona-PG-2S had excellent adhesive properties, demonstrating that the Corona-PG-2S method plays a major role in significantly improving the composite adhesive properties.

1. Introduction

Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fiber has many excellent properties, such as high tensile strength, low specific density, high impact resistance and excellent chemical resistance. It is widely used as bullet material, aerospace material, biomedical material, fishing material, etc [1,2,3]. UHMWPE fiber has an extremely high degree of crystallinity (>99%) and macromolecular orientation (>95%) due to the full extension during the gel spinning procedure, which results in high modulus and tenacity of UHMWPE fiber [4,5,6]. UHMWPE fiber-reinforced composite has received great attention due to its outstanding properties. However, the simple methylene structure leads to an inert chemical surface, which makes the fiber difficult to react with epoxy resin. In addition, highly oriented UHMWPE fiber is not easily permeated by epoxy resin and it has poor hydrophilicity, which limits the wide application of UHMWPE fiber. Therefore, improving the adhesive properties of UHMWPE fiber has become one of the topics of great concern.
At present, there are many modification methods of UHMWPE fiber [7,8,9,10,11], such as: plasma treatment [12,13,14,15,16], UV-initiated grafting [17], electron beam irradiation-induced grafting [18], X-ray irradiation grafting [19,20] and so on [21]. Corona treatment technology has been widely used to modify the surface of UHMWPE fiber for decades. At the same time, it is an environmentally friendly process and an effective way to improve polymer surface adhesion by introducing polar groups and increasing the surface roughness without affecting the bulk properties [22,23,24,25].
Rodrigues used low-pressure RF plasma to explore the influence of factors such as treatment power, treatment time and oxygen content [26]. Shi introduced hydrophilic groups on the surface of UHMWPE fiber by atmospheric pressure argon plasma treatment [27]. They proved that this method had a good effect on increasing the durability. In order to improve the adhesive properties of UHMWPE fiber, Ren Yu modified the UHMWPE fiber by air dielectric barrier discharge plasma and great results were achieved [28]. The test showed that the adhesive property of the UHMWPE fiber was improved from 1.27 MPa to 2.10 MPa after modification, with an increased rate of 65%. Xing Zhe et al. grafted methyl acrylate (MA) monomer on the surface of UHMWPE fiber by γ-ray pre-irradiation. After a 2 h reaction, at the condition of 50 kGy, 60 °C, 80% monomer volume fraction, the grafting rate reached 190.4%. After grafting, the surface of UHMWPE fiber was rough and oxygen-containing functional groups were introduced.
Compared with X-ray irradiation grafting, the Corona-PG-2S method is safer and easier to commercialize. Compared with plasma treatment, the Corona-PG-2S method can further improve the content of oxygen groups on the surface, thus the adhesive properties can be further improved. In this research, a simple and effective method of two-step surface treatment of UHMWPE fiber treated by corona (Corona-PG-2S) was proposed. The adhesive properties between UHMWPE fiber and epoxy resin were improved due to the introduced oxygen groups on the fiber surface through the corona. However, the oxygen groups on the surface of the composite treated by corona were relatively fewer, therefore, an effective modification method should be proposed. Based on corona treatment, a two-step PVA-glutaraldehyde condensation method was proposed to increase the oxygen groups. The corona treated UHMWPE fiber reacted with PVA firstly, and then polymerized with glutaraldehyde. Finally, a polarized membrane with many oxygen-containing groups was formed on the UHMWPE fiber surface. The composite prepared by Corona-PG-2S had excellent adhesive properties, thus the Corona-PG-2S method played an important role in improving the properties of the composite significantly.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials and Instruments

2.1.1. Materials

UHMWPE fiber and UHMWPE fiber cloth were provided by Honeywell Integrated Technology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). Glutaraldehyde and Polyvinyl alcohol were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). Epoxy resin (E-44), silicone oil cleaning agent, curing agent (synthesis of diethylenetriamine and propylene oxide butyl ether) were purchased from Kunshan South Asia Epoxy Resin Co., Ltd (Jiangsu, China) [29]. Table 1 is the data of the physical properties of UHMWPE fiber.

2.1.2. Instruments

Corona processor (Honeywell Integrated Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) was used to treat UHMWPE fiber. The corona voltage was 100 V and the corona current was 2.40 A, lasting for 1 min.
Flat vulcanizer (Hua Kang Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) was used to prepare the UHMWPE/epoxy composite. The vulcanization temperature was 20 °C and the vulcanization pressure was 10 MPa, lasting for 8 h.

2.2. Modification of UHMWPE Fiber

Figure 1 is the mechanism of an aldol condensation. The reaction between PVA and glutaraldehyde generates hemiacetal firstly, and then hemiacetal continues to generate acetal. As a result, the surface of the formed membrane contains a large number of ether bonds. Therefore, the adhesive properties of the UHMWPE fiber were greatly improved by aldol condensation method. Compared with the method of corona, Corona-PG-2S forms a protective membrane on the UHMWPE fiber surface, which reduces the damage to the UHMWPE fiber surface and increases oxygen-containing groups. Therefore, the adhesive properties are significantly improved. In order to further explore the influencing factors of two-step PVA-glutaraldehyde condensation, one-step PVA-glutaraldehyde condensation, and corona, surface treatment methods of the UHMWPE fiber surface are listed in Table 2.

2.3. Preparation of UHMWPE/Epoxy Composite

Figure 2 is the preparation process of the composite. In order to facilitate the sample preparation process, the fiber was replaced by fiber cloth to prepare the UHMWPE/epoxy composite. The UHMWPE fiber cloth was treated by H2SO4 and PVA, glutaraldehyde solution respectively, then epoxy resin and the curing agent were thoroughly mixed and uniformly coated on the dried UHMWPE fiber cloth. The composite was pressed by the flat vulcanizer. The vulcanization temperature was 20 °C and the vulcanization pressure was 10 MPa, lasting for 8 h. A rectangular sheet with a thickness of 2 mm was molded and cut into strips for testing. Table 3 is the mass fraction of epoxy, curing agent, the fiber in the UHMWPE/epoxy composite.
Figure 3 is the mechanism of Corona-PG-2S of UHMWPE fiber [30]. Figure 3 shows that some oxygen-containing groups can be introduced on the surface of the UHMWPE fiber when the fiber treated by corona, including some –OH groups and a few C=O groups. However, the oxygen-containing groups are relatively few and unevenly distributed and the corona does certain damages to the surface of the UHMWPE fiber, thus the improvement of adhesive properties of the UHMWPE/epoxy composite is not obvious.
After treated by corona, the UHMWPE fiber was soaked in the aqueous solution of H2SO4 and PVA. During the process of reacting with PVA, a new layer of PVA on the fiber surface was formed. The UHMWPE fiber treated by corona and PVA has more –OH groups than that treated by corona. The third step was to soak the PVA coated UHMWPE fiber in the glutaraldehyde solution, and then the aldol condensation reaction occurs. Finally, a new membrane with C–O–C groups on the UHMWPE fiber surface was prepared. The introduced C–O–C groups are beneficial for the adhesive properties of the UHMWPE/epoxy composite. Therefore, UHMWPE fiber treated by the Corona-PG-2S has better adhesive properties than the unmodified fiber and the fiber treated by corona.

2.4. Characterization

2.4.1. Characterization of UHMWPE Fiber

The Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were recorded on a Nicolet 6700 FTIR spectrometer (New York, NY, USA) at a scan number of 32 and a resolution of 4 cm−1. The surface morphology was observed using an S-4800 field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, Tokyo, Japan). All samples were coated with a thin gold layer before SEM observation, and the element content on the surface was calculated by using an energy dispersive spectrum (EDS) system (QUANTAX 400-30, New York, NY, USA) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, ESCALAB 250Xi, New York, NY, USA) with an Mg Kαphoton energy of 1253.6 eV.

2.4.2. Characterization of UHMWPE/Epoxy Composite

The peel strength, ultimate cohesive force, tensile strength and bending strength of the UHMWPE/epoxy composite were tested by using an MTS E44 testing machine in accordance with ISO 4578, ISO 527 and ISO 178, respectively [30]. At least five independent measurements were conducted for each sample (80 × 10 × 2 mm for tensile and ultimate cohesive force test, 50 × 10 × 2 mm for peel strength test). The bending properties were tested in a three-point bending mode. At least five independent measurements were conducted for each sample (60 × 10 × 2 mm for bending strength test).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Properties of UHMWPE/Epoxy Composite

Figure 4 is the peel strength of the UHMWPE/epoxy composite with different PVA concentrations (The results of ultimate cohesive force, tensile strength and bending strength tests can be found in Supplementary Materials). In order to make the experiment more convincing, we also prepared and tested the UHMWPE fiber/epoxy composite treated by Uncorona-PG-1S, Uncorona-PG-2S and Corona-PG-1S. Figure 4 shows that six modification methods have different effects on the adhesive properties of the UHMWPE/epoxy composite. F-f in Figure 4 shows that Corona-PG-2S is the best method among these methods. The UHMWPE/epoxy composite treated by corona has higher adhesive properties than the unmodified composite, this is because more –OH groups were introduced on the surface of the fiber after treated by corona.
The methods F-a, F-b and F-f in Figure 4 show that the peel strength of the composite treated by Corona-PG-2S is 2.01 N/mm, with an increase of 262.82% compared with that of unmodified UHMWPE fiber and 30.52 % compared with that of fiber UHMWPE treated by corona, respectively.
The comparison result between the method F-d and F-f in Figure 4 shows that method F-f has higher peel strength, the reasons are: 1) the fiber treated by corona can react with –OH groups of PVA firstly, therefore PVA can be adsorbed on the surface of the fiber better; 2) the immediate materials can react with glutaraldehyde to form a uniform membrane on the fiber surface. If the fiber isn’t treated by corona, PVA will only attach on the surface of the fiber and there will not be a chemical bond. As a result, the formed membrane is loose when reacting with glutaraldehyde. The loose membrane will result in poor adhesive properties of the composite.
The comparison result between the method F-e and F-f in Figure 4 shows that the fiber treated by two-step PVA-glutaraldehyde condensation has higher peel strength than that of one-step method. This is because when PVA and glutaraldehyde were added into the beaker at the same time in a one-step method, some PVA and glutaraldehyde will react immediately before the PVA attaches on the UHMWPE fiber surface, which affects the formation of the membrane. The two-step PVA-glutaraldehyde condensation can ensure that PVA is evenly distributed on the surface of the fiber firstly, and then the PVA on the surface of the fiber reacts with glutaraldehyde, forming a dense membrane on the UHMWPE fiber surface. The membrane so formed is tighter and more compact. Therefore, the two-step method has higher adhesive properties than one-step method.
Figure 4 shows the UHMWPE/epoxy composite has the highest peel strength when the PVA concentration is about 0.1 g/mL. Figure 5 is the peel strength of the smaller PVA concentration gradient of Corona-PG-2S. Figure 5 shows that the peel strength is the highest when the PVA concentration is 0.10 g/mL. The peel strength of UHMWPE fiber is improved with the increase of PVA concentration firstly, and the peel strength reaches the best when the PVA concentration is 0.10 g/mL, with the increase of PVA concentration, the peel strength of the composite became poor.
Figure 4 and Figure 5 show that the six methods have similar curves and all the methods have their highest peel strength when the PVA concentration is 0.10 g/mL. This is because when the PVA concentration is more than 0.10 g/mL, PVA will aggregate on the surface of the UHMWPE fiber, which results in an uneven distribution of PVA, thus the formed membrane is loose. When the concentration of PVA is less than 0.10 g/mL, the content of PVA is too low to form a complete membrane structure on UHMWPE fiber. The similar curves of the six methods prove that the most suitable concentration for forming a dense membrane structure is 0.10 g/mL. Incomplete membrane structure makes the fiber is not completely covered, which leads to relatively few oxygen groups of the surface, as a result, the membrane is also easy to separate from the fiber. The loose membrane leads to a poor combination between the fiber and resin. Therefore, both the loose membrane and incomplete membrane can lead to the poor peel strength, and the peel strength is the best when the concentration is 0.10 g/mL.
Figure 6 is the typical stress–strain curve of the composite of the surface treatment methods. Figure 6 shows that the UHMWPE fiber treated by Corona-PG-2S has the best tensile strength, as a result, the tensile strength is 258.91 Mpa. Because the method of Corona-PG-2S is the best modification method we have explored, this article will research the properties of unmodified fiber, fiber treated by corona and fiber treated by Corona-PG-2S in the later exploration.

3.2. Properties of UHMWPE Fiber

3.2.1. Surface Morphology

Figure 7 is the surface morphology of unmodified UHMWPE fiber, UHMWPE fiber treated by corona and UHMWPE fiber treated by Corona-PG-2S at 0.10 g/mL PVA concentration. Method F-a in Figure 7 shows that the surface of unmodified UHMWPE fiber is rough, but the surface is smoother than that of UHMWPE fiber treated by corona. The method F-b in Figure 7 shows the surface of the fiber treated by corona is extremely rough. This is because the UHMWPE fiber treated by corona was etched and mechanical meshing points on the surface were much more than unmodified fiber. The meshing point means the increase of the fiber surface roughness, thus the adhesive properties between the fiber and epoxy can be improved. Figure 7 shows that the surface of UHMWPE fiber treated by Corona-PG-2S is the smoothest, and a dense membrane is formed on the surface of the fiber. Although there are no mechanical meshing points, the formed membrane contains lots of oxygen groups on the fiber surface. As a result, the adhesive properties of UHMWPE fiber treated by Corona-PG-2S are better than these properties of the fiber treated by corona and unmodified fiber.

3.2.2. Functional Groups

Figure 8 is functional groups of FTIR spectra of the fiber treated by method F-a, F-b and F-f at 0.10 g/mL PVA. In Figure 8, the broad bands at 2918 cm−1 and 2850 cm−1 belong to the Asymmetric and Symmetric Stretching Absorption of –CH2–, respectively; the broad bands at 1465 cm−1 and 720 cm−1 belong to the bending and rocking deformation absorption of –CH2–, respectively [31]. Compared with unmodified UHMWPE fiber, three new absorption peaks are observed at around 1715 cm−1, 1175 cm−1 and 1050 cm−1 in method F-b and method F-f, which belongs to the characteristic absorption of the C=O [32], C–O–C and –OH, respectively.
The method F-b in Figure 8 shows that the –OH, C=O and C–O–C groups have been successfully introduced on the surface of fiber treated by corona. The method F-f in Figure 8 shows that the –OH, C=O and C–O–C groups have been successfully introduced on the surface of fiber treated by Corona-PG-2S. The method F-f shows the C–O–C groups were formed on the fiber. This is because the –OH groups of PVA can react with the glutaraldehyde to form C–O–C groups in the process of the aldol condensation reaction. As a result, the method F-f in Figure 8 shows that C–O–C groups are formed on the UHMWPE fiber surface.

3.2.3. Fiber Surface Element Content Analysis of EDS

Table 4 is the EDS diagram of the carbon and oxygen content of UHMWPE fiber surface. The measurement spectrum provides a qualitative description of the elements of the fiber surface. Table 4 shows that the oxygen content of the unmodified fiber surface is 7.69 wt %, while the oxygen content of the fiber surface treated by corona and Corona-PG-2S is 18.18 wt % and 25.07 wt %, respectively. Compared with the fiber treated by corona, the oxygen content of fiber treated by Corona-PG-2S increased by 6.89 %. The EDS result shows that the oxygen content of the fiber surface treated by Corona-PG-2S is higher than that of the fiber surface treated by corona.

3.2.4. Fiber Surface Element Content Analysis of XPS Spectra

Figure 9 shows the UHMWPE fiber surface element analysis of the XPS spectra of different surface treatment methods. Figure 9 shows the chemical composition of the fiber surface and it proves that there are only carbon and oxygen elements on the fiber surface. The measurement spectrum provides a qualitative description of elements of the fiber surface, and a qualitative description of the high-resolution spectra of O1S and C1S, which determines the chemical state and quantifies the compositions.
Figure 10A,B shows the XPS diagrams of oxygen and carbon content of the unmodified fiber. From Figure 10A,B, the ratio of carbon content and oxygen content is 12:1. This is because the surface of the unmodified fiber is formed by CH2 straight-chain structure, and the oxygen content of the fiber surface is very low, thus the carbon content of the fiber surface is much higher than the oxygen content. Figure 10A shows one peak of the oxygen element. The peak at 531.8 eV belongs to –OH. Figure 10B shows two peaks of carbon element. The peaks at 284.6 eV and 285.0 eV belong to C–C and C–OH. Figure 10A,B proves that there are few –OH and no C–O–C on the surface of the unmodified fiber, indicating that the adhesive properties of the fiber are poor.
Figure 11A,B shows the XPS diagrams of oxygen and carbon content of the fiber treated by corona. Figure 11A,B shows the ratio of carbon content and oxygen content is 4.5:1. This is because when the fiber is treated by corona, some oxygen-containing groups are formed on the surface of the fiber.
Figure 11A shows two peaks of oxygen element, the peaks at 531.8 eV and 533.3 eV belong to –OH and C=O, there are few C–O–C groups. However, the content of C=O is very low, and the –OH is the main functional group of the fiber surface treated by corona. Figure 11B shows three peaks of carbon element, the peaks at 284.6 eV, 285.0 eV and 287.5 eV belong to C–C, C–OH and C=O [33]. Figure 11A,B proves that the amount of –OH and C=O increases after the fiber is treated by corona, thus the method of corona improves the adhesive properties of UHMWPE fiber.
Figure 12A,B is the XPS diagrams of oxygen and carbon content of the fiber treated by Corona-PG-2S. Figure 12A,B shows the ratio of carbon content and oxygen content is 3:1, and the oxygen content is further increased. Figure 12A shows two peaks of oxygen element. The peaks at 531.8 eV and 532.7 eV belong to –OH and C–O–C. The C–O–C contains 74.6% of the oxygen-containing groups, thus the content of C–O–C increases a lot, because C–O–C is formed during the aldol condensation process. Figure 12B shows three peaks of carbon element, the peaks at 284.6 eV, 285.0 eV and 288.7 eV belong to C–C, C–OH and C–O–C. Figure 12A,B proves that C–O–C of the fiber surface increases a lot after it is treated by Corona-PG-2S, thus the fiber treated by Corona-PG-2S has the best adhesive properties.
Figure 12 proves that the oxygen content of the fiber treated by Corona-PG-2S is higher than that of the fiber treated by corona. This is because during the first step, a new reaction occurs between –OH of PVA and the –OH of the fiber treated by corona, thus more –OH of PVA is introduced on the fiber surface. The –OH of the fiber surface reacts with glutaraldehyde in the second step. Therefore, the fiber treated by Corone-PG-2S has more oxygen content than the fiber treated by corona, which indicates that the fiber treated by Corone-PG-2S has better adhesive properties.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the two-step PVA-glutaraldehyde condensation method (Corona-PG-2S) was proposed to improve the adhesive properties of the fiber. The corona method can increase the oxygen groups of the fiber surface, but the effect is not obvious. Compared with the corona method, the proposed Corona-PG-2S method can form a membrane with more oxygen groups by PVA-glutaraldehyde condensation on the basis of the corona. Compared with the fiber treated by corona, the oxygen content of the fiber surface increased 6.9 wt % and the C–O–C content of the fiber surface increased significantly. The result of SEM shows that a smooth membrane was formed on the surface of the UHMWPE fiber. The mechanical result shows that the membrane can tightly wrap the fiber when the PVA concentration is 0.10 g/mL. The peel strength, ultimate cohesive force, tensile strength and flexural strength of the composite treated by Corona-PG-2S were 2.01 N/mm, 24.09 N, 258.91 MPa, 58.29 MPa, with an increase of 30.52%, 26.59%, 32.82%, 32.42% compared with these properties of the fiber treated by corona. Therefore, in this study, compared with the corona method, the Corona-PG-2S method increased the content of oxygen groups and it has the best adhesive properties.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/12/3/521/s1.

Author Contributions

Data curation, L.H.; Formal analysis, L.H.; Investigation, L.H., C.Z., H.C. and X.C.; Methodology, L.H.; Project administration, W.G.; Writing—original draft, L.H.; Writing—review & editing, W.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Honeywell integrated technology (China) Co., Ltd.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Huang, W.; Wang, Y.; Xia, Y. Statistical dynamic tensile strength of UHMWPE-fibers. Polymer 2004, 45, 3729–3788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ratner, S.; Pegoretti, A.; Migliaresi, C.; Weinberg, A.; Marom, G. Relaxation processes and fatigue behavior of crosslinked UHMWPE fiber compacts. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2005, 65, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, Z.; Zhang, W.; Wang, X.; Mai, Y.; Zhang, Y. Surface modification of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene fibers via the sequential photoinduced graft polymerization. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2011, 257, 7600–7608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lin, S.; Han, J.; Yeh, J.; Chang, F.; Hsieh, K. Surface modification and physical properties of various UHMWPE fiber reinforced modified epoxy composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2007, 104, 655–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Ruan, S.; Gao, P.; Yu, T. Ultra-strong gel-spun UHMWPE fibers reinforced using multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Polymer 2006, 47, 1604–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yeh, J.T.; Lin, S.C.; Tu, C.W.; Hsie, K.H.; Chang, F.C. Investigation of the drawing mechanism of UHMWPE fibers. J. Mater. Sci. 2008, 43, 4892–4900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Debnath, S.; Ranade, R.; Wunder, S.L.; Baran, G.R.; Zhang, J.; Fisher, E.R. Chemical surface treatment of ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene for methacrylate resins. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2005, 96, 1564–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Li, W.; Meng, L.; Wang, L.; Mu, J.; Pan, Q. Surface modification of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene fibers by chromic acid. Surf. Interface Anal. 2016, 48, 1316–1319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chanunpanich, N.; Ulman, A.; Strzhemechny, Y.M.; Schwarz, S.A.; Janke, A.; Braun, H.G.; Kraztmuller, T. Surface modification of polyethylene through bromination. Langmuir 1999, 15, 2089–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Balamurugana, S.; Mandaleb, A.B.; Badrinarayananb, S.; Vernekara, S.P. Photochemical bromination of polyolefin surfaces. Polymer 2001, 42, 2501–2512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kazimi, M.R.; Shah, T.; Ahmed, I. Sulfonation of low density polyethylene and its impact on polymer properties. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2014, 54, 2522–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Huang, C.Y.; Wu, J.Y.; Tsai, C.S.; Hsieh, K.H.; Yeh, J.T.; Chen, K.N. Effects of argon plasma treatment on the adhesive property of ultra high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) textile. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2013, 231, 507–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ji, F.; Hong, Y.; Peng, S.; He, T.; Sun, J.; Yao, L.; Qiu, Y. Effect of glycerol coating on the atmospheric pressure plasma treatment of UHMWPE fibers. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2012, 26, 289–301. [Google Scholar]
  14. Moon, S.I.; Jang, J. The effect of the oxygen-plasma treatment of UHMWPE fiber on the transverse properties of UHMWPE-fiber/vinylester composites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1999, 59, 487–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Teodoru, S.; Kusano, Y.; Rozlosnik, N.; Michelsen, P.K. Continuous plasma treatment of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibres for adhesion improvement. Plasma Process. Polym. 2009, 6, S375–S381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ren, Y.; Wang, C.; Qiu, Y. Aging of surface properties of ultra high modulus polyethylene fibers treated with He/O2 atmospheric pressure plasma jet. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2008, 202, 2670–2676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, J.; Liang, G.; Zhao, W.; Lü, S.; Zhang, Z. Studies on surface modification of UHMWPE fibers via UV initiated grafting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006, 253, 668–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sakurai, K.; Kondo, Y.; Miyazaki, K.; Okamoto, T.; Irie, S.; Sasaki, T. Ultrahigh-molecular-weight-polyethylene-fiber surface treatment by electron-beam-irradiation-induced graft polymerization and its effect on adhesion in a styrene butadiene rubber matrix. J. Polym. Sci. Part. B-Polym. 2004, 42, 2595–2603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xing, Z.; Wang, M.; Hu, J.; Wu, G. Crystal structure and mechanical properties of UHMWPE-g-PMA fiber prepared by radiation grafting. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2013, 86, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Enomoto, I.; Katsumura, Y.; Kudo, H.; Soeda, S. Graft polymerization using radiation-induced peroxides and application to textile dyeing. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2011, 80, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ruan, F.; Bao, L. Mechanical enhancement of UHMWPE fibers by coating with carbon nanoparticles. Fibers Polym. 2014, 15, 723–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Hegemann, D.; Brunner, H.; Oehr, C. Plasma treatment of polymers for surface and adhesion improvement. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. B-Beam Interact. Mater. At. 2003, 208, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Salem, T.; Uhlmann, S.; Nitschke, M.; Calvimontes, A.; Hund, R.D.; Simon, F. Modification of plasma pre-treated PET fabrics with poly-DADMAC and its surface activity towards acid dyes. Prog. Org. Coat. 2011, 72, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shahidi, S.; Ghoranneviss, M.; Wiener, J. Improving synthetic and natural dyeability of polyester fabrics by dielectric barrier discharge. J. Plast. Film. Sheeting 2015, 31, 286–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, C.; Ogino, A.; Wang, X.; Nagatsu, M. Plasma treatment of multiwall carbon nanotubes for dispersion improvement in water. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010, 96, 131504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rodrigues, M.M.; Fontoura, C.P.; Martins, S.T.; Figueroa, C.A. Investigation of plasma treatment on UHMWPE surfaces: Impact on physicochemical properties, sterilization and fibroblastic adhesion. Mater. Sci. Eng. C-Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 102, 264–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shi, S.C.; Chang, T.W. FTIR study of the surface properties and tribological behaviors of plasma-modified UHMWPE and zirconia. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2018, 50, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ren, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.N.; Zang, C.F.; Zhang, W. Surface properties and adhesion force of air dielectric barrier discharge treated UHMWPE fibers. Acta Polym. Sin. 2016, 10, 1439–1446. [Google Scholar]
  29. Li, W.W.; Liu, X.J.; Huang, M.M.; Ma, R.L. Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Fibers/Epoxy Composites: Effect of Fiber Treatment on Properties. Fibers Polym. 2019, 20, 421–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yuan, W.J.; Cui, J.Y.; Cai, Y.B.; Xu, S.A. A novel surface modification for calcium sulfate whisker used for reinforcement of poly(vinyl chloride). J. Polym. Res. 2015, 22, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lu, Y.H.; Wu, C.F.; Xu, S.A. Mechanical, thermal and flame retardant properties of magnesium hydroxide filled poly(vinyl chloride) composites: The effect of filler shape. Compos. Part. A-Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 113, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Meng, L.; Li, W.W.; Ma, R.L.; Huang, M.M.; Cao, Y.B.; Wang, J.W. Mechanical properties of rigid polyurethane composites reinforced with surface treated ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene fibers. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2018, 29, 843–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ren, Y.; Ding, Z.R.; Wang, C.X.; Zang, C.F.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, L. Influence of DBD plasma pretreatment on the deposition of chitosan onto UHMWPE fiber surfaces for improvement of adhesion and dyeing properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 396, 1571–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Polymers 12 00521 g001 550
Figure 1. The mechanism of an aldol condensation.
Figure 1. The mechanism of an aldol condensation.
Polymers 12 00521 g001
Polymers 12 00521 g002 550
Figure 2. Preparation of the UHMWPE/epoxy composite.
Figure 2. Preparation of the UHMWPE/epoxy composite.
Polymers 12 00521 g002
Polymers 12 00521 g003 550
Figure 3. Mechanism of the UHMWPE fiber treated by Corona-PG-2S.
Figure 3. Mechanism of the UHMWPE fiber treated by Corona-PG-2S.
Polymers 12 00521 g003
Polymers 12 00521 g004 550
Figure 4. Peel Strength of the composite with different polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) concentration of the six methods.
Figure 4. Peel Strength of the composite with different polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) concentration of the six methods.
Polymers 12 00521 g004
Polymers 12 00521 g005 550
Figure 5. Peel Strength of the composite treated by the Corona-PG-2S with smaller PVA concentration gradient.
Figure 5. Peel Strength of the composite treated by the Corona-PG-2S with smaller PVA concentration gradient.
Polymers 12 00521 g005
Polymers 12 00521 g006 550
Figure 6. Typical stress–strain curve of the composite of surface treatment methods.
Figure 6. Typical stress–strain curve of the composite of surface treatment methods.
Polymers 12 00521 g006
Polymers 12 00521 g007 550
Figure 7. Surface morphology of the fiber treated by method F-a, F-b and F-f at 0.10 g/mL PVA.
Figure 7. Surface morphology of the fiber treated by method F-a, F-b and F-f at 0.10 g/mL PVA.
Polymers 12 00521 g007
Polymers 12 00521 g008 550
Figure 8. Functional groups of FTIR spectra of the fiber treated by method F-a, F-b and F-f at 0.10 g/mL PVA.
Figure 8. Functional groups of FTIR spectra of the fiber treated by method F-a, F-b and F-f at 0.10 g/mL PVA.
Polymers 12 00521 g008
Polymers 12 00521 g009 550
Figure 9. Fiber surface element analysis of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of the fiber treated by method F-a, F-b and F-f at 0.10 g/mL PVA.
Figure 9. Fiber surface element analysis of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of the fiber treated by method F-a, F-b and F-f at 0.10 g/mL PVA.
Polymers 12 00521 g009
Polymers 12 00521 g010 550
Figure 10. Fiber surface element analysis of XPS spectra of the fiber treated by method F-a. (A) O 1S, (B) C 1S.
Figure 10. Fiber surface element analysis of XPS spectra of the fiber treated by method F-a. (A) O 1S, (B) C 1S.
Polymers 12 00521 g010
Polymers 12 00521 g011 550
Figure 11. Fiber surface element analysis of XPS spectra of the fiber treated by method F-b. (A) O 1S, (B) C 1S.
Figure 11. Fiber surface element analysis of XPS spectra of the fiber treated by method F-b. (A) O 1S, (B) C 1S.
Polymers 12 00521 g011
Polymers 12 00521 g012 550
Figure 12. Fiber surface element analysis of XPS spectra of the fiber treated by method F-f. (A) O 1S, (B) C 1S.
Figure 12. Fiber surface element analysis of XPS spectra of the fiber treated by method F-f. (A) O 1S, (B) C 1S.
Polymers 12 00521 g012
Table
Table 1. Physical properties of the Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fiber.
Table 1. Physical properties of the Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fiber.
Molecular WeightDensity (g/cm3)Elastic Modulus (MPa)Water Absorption (%)
5.3 × 1060.927–0.941600<0.01
Table
Table 2. Surface treatment methods of the UHMWPE fiber.
Table 2. Surface treatment methods of the UHMWPE fiber.
ModificationAbbreviation
F-aF-bF-cF-dF-eF-f
CoronaNYNNYY
PG-1SNNYNYN
PG-2SNNNYNY
F-a: Unmodified UHMWPE fiber; F-b: UHMWPE fiber treated by corona; F-c: UHMWPE fiber treated by the method of Uncorona-PG-1S; F-d: UHMWPE fiber treated by the method of Uncorona-PG-2S; F-e: UHMWPE fiber treated by the method of Corona-PG-1S; F-f: UHMWPE fiber treated by the method of Corona-PG-2S; Corona: UHMWPE fiber treated by corona for 1 min, the conditions were: 100V power supply voltage, 2.4 A power supply current; PG-1S: The fiber was soaked in H2SO4 and PVA and glutaraldehyde solution for 1 h and dried at 60 °C for 4 h; PG-2S: The fiber was soaked in H2SO4 and PVA solution for 0.5 h and in glutaraldehyde solution for 0.5 h and dried at 60 °C for 4 h.
Table
Table 3. Mass fraction of epoxy, curing agent, the fiber in UHMWPE/epoxy composite.
Table 3. Mass fraction of epoxy, curing agent, the fiber in UHMWPE/epoxy composite.
ElementSample
F-aF-bF-cF-dF-eF-f
Epoxy ResinWeight (wt %)35 ± 0.535 ± 0.535 ± 0.535 ± 0.535 ± 0.535 ± 0.5
Curing AgentWeight (wt %)5 ± 0.25 ± 0.25 ± 0.25 ± 0.25 ± 0.25 ± 0.2
Dried UHMWPEWeight (wt %)60 ± 1.060 ± 1.060 ± 1.060 ± 1.060 ± 1.060 ± 1.0
Table
Table 4. Mass fraction of carbon and oxygen on the UHMWPE fiber surface.
Table 4. Mass fraction of carbon and oxygen on the UHMWPE fiber surface.
ElementUnmodifiedCoronaCorona-PG-2S
[wt %][wt %][wt %]
Carbon92.3181.8274.93
Oxygen7.6918.1825.07

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Han, L.; Cai, H.; Chen, X.; Zheng, C.; Guo, W. Study of UHMWPE Fiber Surface Modification and the Properties of UHMWPE/Epoxy Composite. Polymers 2020, 12, 521. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12030521

AMA Style

Han L, Cai H, Chen X, Zheng C, Guo W. Study of UHMWPE Fiber Surface Modification and the Properties of UHMWPE/Epoxy Composite. Polymers. 2020; 12(3):521. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12030521

Chicago/Turabian Style

Han, Lei, Haifeng Cai, Xu Chen, Cheng Zheng, and Weihong Guo. 2020. "Study of UHMWPE Fiber Surface Modification and the Properties of UHMWPE/Epoxy Composite" Polymers 12, no. 3: 521. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12030521

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop