Next Article in Journal
Tying Together Multiscale Calculations for Charge Transport in P3HT: Structural Descriptors, Morphology, and Tie-Chains
Previous Article in Journal
Shear-Thickening Fluid Using Oxygen-Plasma-Modified Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes to Improve the Quasi-Static Stab Resistance of Kevlar Fabrics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hyaluronic Acid-Based Nanomaterials for Cancer Therapy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Polymers
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/polym10121357
polymers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Contemporary Polymer-Based Nanoparticle Systems for Photothermal Therapy

by
Jeremy B. Vines
1,
Dong-Jin Lim
2,* and
Hansoo Park
3,*
1
Organogenesis, Surgical and Sports Medicine, Birmingham, AL 35216, USA
2
Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
3
School of Integrative Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Polymers 2018, 10(12), 1357; https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10121357
Submission received: 31 October 2018 / Revised: 28 November 2018 / Accepted: 30 November 2018 / Published: 7 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Polymeric Micro/Nanoparticles for Bio-Medical Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Current approaches for the treatment of cancer, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and surgery, are limited by various factors, such as inadvertent necrosis of healthy cells, immunological destruction, or secondary cancer development. Hyperthermic therapy is a promising strategy intended to mitigate many of the shortcomings associated with traditional therapeutic approaches. However, to utilize this approach effectively, it must be targeted to specific tumor sites to prevent adverse side effects. In this regard, photothermal therapy, using intravenously-administered nanoparticle materials capable of eliciting hyperthermic effects in combination with the precise application of light in the near-infrared spectrum, has shown promise. Many different materials have been proposed, including various inorganic materials such as Au, Ag, and Germanium, and C-based materials. Unfortunately, these materials are limited by concerns about accumulation and potential cytotoxicity. Polymer-based nanoparticle systems have been investigated to overcome limitations associated with traditional inorganic nanoparticle systems. Some of the materials that have been investigated for this purpose include polypyrrole, poly-(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(4-styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS), polydopamine, and polyaniline. The purpose of this review is to summarize these contemporary polymer-based nanoparticle technologies to acquire an understanding of their current applications and explore the potential for future improvements.

1. Introduction

In 2017, cancer was the second-most common cause of death in the United States, comprising 22.5% of the total number of deaths; 591,699 people died from complications related to cancer in 2017 [1]. Unfortunately, owing to the heterogenous nature of cancer, there are currently no fully comprehensive approaches for treatment; options are mainly limited to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and surgery. Although these approaches provide some therapeutic efficacy, they are limited by their risk to normal, healthy cells, their potential to destroy the immune system, or by conferring an increased risk for the development of secondary cancers [2,3,4].
Owing to the limitations currently associated with standard cancer treatment modalities, the focus of research has shifted to alternative techniques that may mitigate the limitations associated with traditional cancer therapies. One of these treatment modalities is known as hyperthermic therapy. Hyperthermia, the state of elevated body temperature, has been thoroughly explored for cancer therapy. In this process, cancer cells are subjected to thermal stress, which induces apoptosis. In clinical settings, hyperthermic therapy is utilized either alone or in a combinational approach with radiotherapy (RT) or chemotherapy (CT) [5]. For example, when clinically-relevant drugs for malignant melanoma are combined with low or high hyperthermia (43 °C and 45 °C, respectively), intrinsic or extrinsic ER-mediated apoptosis was induced [6].
This was first demonstrated when human T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines were used to show the bimodality of hyperthermia and RT. It was shown that radiation-induced cancer cell death could be enhanced [7]. The mechanism of this synergism comes from the potential heat-induced inhibition of DNA repair; the heat prevented the cancer cells from restoring their viability after exposure to radiation-induced DNA damage [8].
To date, there have been many preclinical studies confirming that hyperthermia can enhance RT or chemoradiotherapy (RTCT) [9]. However, conventional HT techniques are not considered to be ideal as they are not tumor-focused, are not minimally invasive, and create a uniform generation of heat throughout the body [10]. These factors lead to substantial undesirable side effects. For example, whole-body hyperthermia may cause gastrointestinal symptoms and cardiovascular side effects [11]. Hence, nanoparticle-mediated localized hyperthermia would be a more promising modality for cancer treatment. One such promising treatment modality that continues to gain attention and is currently under investigation for potential widespread use is photothermal therapy (PTT) [12,13]. PTT is based on the principle of the conversion of light energy (usually in the near-infrared region) into heat energy, which then induces cellular necrosis or apoptosis [14].
Compared with other methods, light is an ideal external stimulus as it is easily regulated, focused, and remotely controlled. This ease of focus and control enable better targeted treatments that lead to less damage to healthy tissues [15,16,17]. However, photodynamic therapy of tissues mediated by either laser or visible light is limited by the depth of penetration of the light [18,19,20]. However, near-infrared (NIR) light (in the wavelength range of 800–1200 nm) has much greater body transparency and is preferred for photothermal therapy. In contrast to photodynamic therapy (PDT), which relies on the presence of oxygen to generate reactive oxygen species, and is considerably limited in application due to its limited depth of penetration [20], PTT mainly exerts effects by increasing the local temperature within tumors [21]. Regarding this, it has been demonstrated that in order to completely destroy cancer cells in vitro, a threshold temperature ranging between 70 °C and 80 °C is required [22]. Furthermore, at temperatures ranging from 55 to 95 °C, tumorigenic damage is evident within in vivo conditions [23].
To be considered an ideal candidate for PTT, a specific set of requirements should be met. For example, the ideal PTT candidate should be: (i) of a suitable nanoparticulate size and of uniform shape; (ii) have good dispersibility in aqueous solutions; (iii) respond to light in the NIR range of 650–950 nm to prevent damage to surrounding healthy tissues, provide sufficient photothermal efficiency, and to enable sufficient depth of penetration; (iv) be sufficiently photostable to ensure adequate diffusion time to reach tumors before losing their photosensitivity, (v) exhibit low or no cytotoxicity in living systems [24].
Currently, the available PTT-enabling agents mainly comprise metal nanoparticles (gold (Au) [25,26,27,28,29], silver (Ag) [30,31,32], palladium [33,34], and germanium (Ge) [35], semiconducting nanoparticles [36,37,38], and carbon-based nanomaterials (carbon nanotubes and graphenes) [36,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. A majority of the currently available PTT-enabling nanoparticle technologies use inorganic photothermal agents, sometimes consisting of heavy metals, which are non-biodegradable and may remain in the body for long periods, thus precluding their utilization for long-term cancer therapies owing to accumulation and potential toxicity concerns. Although many inorganic nanoparticle-based materials, such as gold and carbon, have shown initial promise in both in vivo and in vitro studies, their potential long-term toxicity is as an obstacle to immediate clinical translation [41,46,47,48,49]. For example, it is known that carbon-based nanomaterials may induce many toxic responses, such as pulmonary inflammation and the generation of reactive oxygen species [50,51].
Alternatively, polymeric materials geared towards applications in PTT have attracted much attention. To date, polypyrrole, poly-(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(4-styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS), dopamine-melanin (polydopamine), and polyaniline nanoparticles have been reported to show photothermal effects [52,53,54,55] (Table 1). The interest in these materials has grown as they are typically considered superior on account of their enhanced biodegradability and biocompatibility in conjunction with considerable photothermal efficiency. Therefore, in this review, we have explored the commonly investigated polymer-based nanoparticle systems intended for photothermal therapy to determine their potential applications in treatment.

2. Polyaniline-Based Systems

Among the polymeric materials discussed in this review, polyaniline is perhaps one of the oldest conducting polymers utilized for PTT (Figure 1) [24]. This material is consistently recognized for its low cost, good conductivity, and mechanical flexibility [77]. In addition, polyaniline is known to be non-cytotoxic and was used as an electroactive tissue for studying cellular proliferation prior to its utilization in PTT [78].
The utilization of polyaniline for photothermal ablation of cancer cells was first proposed by Huh et al. in 2011 [56]. In this study, the synthesis of polyaniline nanoparticles was achieved by doping polyaniline-based nanoparticles via a chemical oxidation polymerization method. Using this synthesis method, polyaniline nanoparticles were obtained in the form of an emeraldine salt. These particles exhibited strong NIR absorption, making them viable for potential PTT applications. Although this was an important leap, the synthesized polyaniline nanoparticles were relatively large, with a mean diameter of 115.6 nm. In addition, although their photothermal capabilities were assessed in in vitro experiments, their in vivo applications in PTT were not investigated.
Therefore, to rectify the issues regarding size and to assess their in vivo photothermal capabilities, Zhou et. al synthesized polyaniline nanoparticles of a suitable size and uniform shape by using an environmentally-friendly hydrothermal method; nanoparticle sizes of 48.5 ± 1.5 nm were achieved [24]. The nanoparticles were further functionalized by capping with F-127 surfactant (F-PANPs) to increase their hydrophilic conversion. NIR photothermal conversion efficiencies and molar extinction coefficients were first determined, followed by the in vitro and in vivo assessment of the photothermal efficacy of the nanoparticles. In vitro assessments using HCT116 cancer cells demonstrated increased apoptosis via NIR-mediated photothermal induction and in vivo experiments using mice bearing HCT116 xenograft tumors revealed photothermal-mediated tumor suppression. Biochemical indicators for hepatic and kidney functions were measured from the blood serum collections and were found to be within the normal ranges, indicating that the nanoparticle injections did not result in any noticeable cytotoxicity.
Multifunctional nanoparticles were developed to facilitate photodynamic and photothermal therapy, and consisted of indocyanine green loaded onto PEGylated nanoparticles containing a silver nanoparticle core with a polyaniline shell (ICG-Ag@PANI) [57]. The combination of polyaniline and indocyanine green led to a synergistic effect in which the hyperthermal efficacy of the nanoparticles was enhanced, allowing rapid reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation via NIR light-mediated temperature increases to 56.8 °C within 5 min. The ability of these nanoparticles to elicit cytotoxic effects in HeLa cells was demonstrated in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated tumor growth inhibition.
Multifunctional polyaniline-based nanoparticles were created through the synthesis of polyaniline with methotrexate (MTX), a well-known chemotherapeutic agent [58]. To enhance the tumor-selective targeting and uptake, lanreotide (LT), a synthetic analog of somatostatin, was conjugated to the surface of the nanoparticles (LT-MTX/PANI NPs) to target the somatostatin surface receptors, which are overexpressed in many cancer cells. The multifunctional capabilities of these nanoparticle systems were supported by the enhanced apoptosis enabled by the heat-associated drug release of MTX in response to NIR. Enhanced tumor targeting and uptake were also found in xenograft tumor-bearing mice and led to the improved suppression of tumor development, when compared with MTX, PANI NPs, or MTX/PANI NPs alone.
To allow selective targeting and to enhance biodegradability and tumor uptake, polyaniline nanoparticles were first coated with a lipid layer and then conjugated with folic acid (FA-Lipid-PANI NPs) [59]. The lipid-coated polyaniline showed enhanced biodegradability, which reduced cytotoxicity and enhanced tumor permeability. The conjugation with folic acid enabled active tumor targeting through folic receptor-mediated transcytosis. In vitro experiments with HeLa cells and in vivo experiments with BALB/c mice expressing HeLa-induced tumors demonstrated that the nanoparticles could elicit NIR light-mediated cellular necrosis and apoptosis both in vitro and in vivo, as well as selective tumor targeting and suppression in vivo.
Multifunctional nanoparticles were created in which WS2 nanodots were coated with polyaniline shells [60]. In this configuration. WS2 nanodots conferred radiosensitivity and polyaniline provided the hyperthermic capability. Subsequently, the shells were loaded with hyaluronic acid and chlorin e6 (Ce6) to provide selective tumor targeting via HA and photodynamic capability via Ce6. The multi-functional particles exhibited enhanced tumor uptake and were capable of facilitating multi-modal imaging (PA, CT, and FL). Additionally in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated photothermal capability, as illustrated by the fact that the particles exhibited photothermal effects both in vitro and in vivo, with no signs of cytotoxicity in vivo.
In a recent study, multifunctional nanoparticles capable of selective tumor targeting and photothermal effects were created via the encapsulation of polyaniline and cisplastin within folate-poly (ethylene glycol)-distearoylphosphatidylcholine (FA-PEG-DSPE), cRGD [cyclic (Arg-Gly-Asp-D-Phe-Lys)]-PEG-DSPE, and lecithin conjugates dubbed FA/cRGD-PNPs [61]. The synthesis procedure led to nanoparticles with a uniform size of 102.7 nm and an enhanced apoptosis rate in MDA-MB-231 cells compared with chemotherapy or photothermal treatment alone, to achieve a cellular death rate of approximately 92.6% after 24 h of treatment.

3. Polypyrrole-Based Systems

Polypyrrole (PPy) serves as one of the most commonly utilized base materials for use in hyperthermia-based PTT cancer treatments (Figure 2) [79,80]. PPy was first documented in the early 20th century, where it was known as “pyrrole black”, as it was a black precipitate from acidic pyrrole/H2O2 aqueous solutions. PPy has recently found popularity as an electroresponsive material in biomedical engineering applications [81,82,83] as it is generally regarded as biocompatible, with little or no adverse effect on health [84,85].
Since its initial discovery, various methods, such as electrochemical synthesis, have been explored for the synthesis of PPy. The most common method of PPy synthesis is through an oxidative reaction in which pyrrole is polymerized via a pseudo-polycondensation mechanism [86,87]. In this process, pyrrole is first converted to a radical cation via a one-electron oxidation, after which two pyrrole radical cations couple to form 2,2′-bipyrrole, which can then couple with yet another radical cation. This sequence is then repeated to form longer chains. This technique is highly convenient, as it can be completed chemically by using a chemical oxidant in solution (e.g., (NH4)2S2O8, FeCl3, H2O2) [88,89,90] or electrochemically by using an electrode to apply an oxidizing potential [91,92]. The end morphology of PPy is strongly dependent on the synthesis conditions and methodology used. Most current synthesis methods result in the production of bulk configurations of PPy, such as sheets; however, to be feasible for in vivo cancer therapies, particulates between 30 nm and 300 nm should be created.
In many cases, PPy NPs have been shown to exhibit higher photothermal conversion efficiencies than even Au nanorods, which are well-known photothermal agents [62]. PPy NPs with an average size of ~50 nm were prepared using aqueous dispersion polymerization with FeCl3 as an oxidation agent. PVP was then used as a capping agent. The synthesized PPy NPs demonstrated a strong NIR absorption peak at approximately 850 nm [55]. These NPs were highly biocompatible, inducing no negative effects on QSG-7701 human hepatocyte cells up to 200 ppm. To demonstrate the photothermal efficiency of these PPy NPs, an in vivo NT1 tumor model was constructed in BALB/c mice.
PPy NPs with an average diameter of 46 nm were created [62]. In this study, PPy NPs had no cytotoxic effect on human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), but induced the death of HeLa cells in combination with NIR irradiation, which demonstrated their ability to elicit targeted cell death via hyperthermia.
Much like other nanomaterials, PPy-based therapeutic platforms can be further functionalized by loading with anti-tumorigenic medications (chemotherapeutics) or conjugated with tumor-specific antibodies to enhance their specificity compared with other nanoparticles. An injectable system of hollow microspheres as developed to produce localized heat upon stimulation with NIR light to mediate antibiotic release [93].
Inorganic materials may also be used to serve as intermediary molecules to allow the conjugation of other functional units. For example, mesoporous amino-functionalized dendrimer-like silica nanoparticles (DSNs-NH2) were created via the hydrolysis of tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) and 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane (APTES) in a special emulsion to form nanoparticles with a 233 nm diameter [63]. PPy chains were then formed on the nanoparticles. To further improve biocompatibility, the resultant PPy@DSNs-NH2 nanoparticles were conjugated with poly(ethylene glycol) monomethyl ether at the carboxyl group (PEG-COOH) to obtain PEG. The nanoparticles were then loaded with doxorubicin (DOX) to enable a dual-acting therapeutic approach wherein either pH or NIR light could trigger DOX release, thus combining a chemotherapeutic approach with a hyperthermic approach provided by the presence of PPy.
Owing to the flexibility of PPy synthesis, PPy drug carriers with different morphologies may be developed by using different shaped templates. In one study, spindle-like polypyrrole hollow nanocapsules (PPy HNCs) were created by using spindle-like Fe2O3 particles as a template [64]. By loading DOX within these hollow PPy nanoparticles, more effective cell penetration was enabled in comparison with spherical PPy nanoparticles of the same size (~155 nm). This hybrid chemo- and photothermal platform was demonstrated to be effective in a HepG2 tumor model in BALB/c nude mice.
It was also shown that PPy could be combined with other functional platforms to improve tumor specificity and efficacy. For example, PPy and the chemotherapeutic agent rapamycin were loaded into liposomes conjugated with trastuzumab (a monoclonal antibody targeting the HER2/neu receptor) to create a combined chemo-photothermal therapy system (LRPmAB) [65]. This system showed enhanced uptake in BT-474 cells, whereas cells that did not overexpress the HER2/neu receptors showed comparatively lower uptake.

4. Polydopamine-Based Systems

As previously discussed, polymeric-based nanomaterials have been investigated for many years. However, the degradation properties of many of these polymers are still not fully understood; hence, there is the potential for unknown adverse effects. However, polydopamine, a natural occurring polymer, has established biodegradation properties that do not result in adverse effects [94].
Polydopamine nanoparticles were first explored as a potential photothermal agent by Liu et al. [53]. They created dopamine–melanin colloidal nanospheres through the oxidation and self-polymerization of dopamine in a mixture containing water, ethanol, and ammonia at room temperature. Melanin, a naturally occurring biopolymer, is known to have many functions in living organisms, including thermoregulation and protection from ultraviolet injury [95]. To perform these functions, the absorption of melanin can extend into the NIR region. By tuning the molar ratio of ammonia to dopamine, the size of the fabricated nanoparticles could be controlled: an increase from 11.3 to 17, created dopamine-melanin nanoparticles of ~70 nm. To confirm the hyperthermic capability of these nanoparticles was tested in vitro with HeLa and 4T1 cells along with in vivo testing in BALB/c mice exhibiting 4T1 tumors. The results demonstrated tumor reduction and continued tumor suppression. Furthermore, serum biochemistry analysis of five hepatic indicators revealed results within the normal ranges, which demonstrated that the injection did not cause any systematic toxicity.
However, while PDA nanoparticles exhibited initial promise, their mass-extinction co-efficient in the NIR region was relatively low, making less than ideal for phototherapy. Owing to this limitation, a study was conducted in which PDA nanoparticles were synthesized via the oxidation-induced self-polymerization of dopamine in an alkaline environment [66]. The nanoparticles were then PEGylated to enhance their physiological stability and conjugated with ICG to shift the absorbance peak from 780 nm to 800 nm (PDA-ICG-PEG). By taking advantage of π-π stacking and hydrophobic interactions, the chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin was able to be loaded to the nanoparticles at 150% loading capacity (DOX/PDA w/w). Prior to this study, chemotherapeutic approaches had not been explored in combination with photothermal approaches using PDA.
As with many materials, PEGylation is a commonly employed modification that is utilized to enhance tumorigenic targeting and uptake. Polydopamine is no exception, and PEGylation has been employed to polydopamine nanoparticles in other studies as well for this same reason [67]. In this same study, anticancer drugs, such as 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycampthotheticin (SN38), were loaded onto the PDA-PEG nanoparticles via π-π interactions. Owing to the nature of these interactions, the drug compounds remained conjugated at physiological conditions until they were released in an on-demand fashion following exposure to NIR light. In vivo experiments demonstrated that nanoparticles loaded with SN38 suppressed tumor growth via the combined approach of chemo- and photothermal therapies.
In another study employing a similar combinatorial approach, a novel core-shell nanoparticle system consisting of doxorubicin (Dox-M) encapsulated within DSPE-PEG micelles was developed and then coated with polydopamine [68]. The monoclonal antibody bortezomib (Btz), which has an affinity for proteasomes associated with many cancers, was conjugated to polydopamine to enhance targeting and efficacy of the therapy (Dox-M@PDA-Btz). By combining Dox, Btz, and PDA into a single nanoplatform, an enhanced chemo-photothermal therapy approach was created, allowing for NIR mediated hyperthemic therapies along with pH-mediated release of chemotherapeutics for the treatment of breast cancer.
Polydopamine has been used in a few instances to enhance the biocompatibility of and confer hyperthermic functionality to inorganic substances for a multifunctional approach. For example, a couple of studies coated iron oxide nanoparticles with polydopamine to create multifunctional particles capable of magnetic field targeting for improved photothermal cancer therapy [69,70]. In other studies, pre-existing photothermal substances, such as gold nanorods, were coated with polydopamine to provide synergistic enhancements to their photothermal efficiency [71,72]. Therefore, the surface modification with polydopamine is recognized as a good strategy to enhance the biocompatibility of non-biodegradable substances [96].

5. Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(4-styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS)

Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(4-styrenesulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) is another class of polymer-based nanoparticles commonly used for NIR-mediated hyperthermic therapy.
In perhaps the first documented study of this material for photothermal cancer therapy, PEGylated PEDOT:PSS nanoparticles (PDOT:PSS-PEG) were synthesized via a layer-by-layer approach, creating nanoparticles of approximately 80 nm in diameter [52]. Owing to the inherent properties of this material, a long blood circulation half-life of 21.4 ± 3.1 h was found, which permitted considerable accumulation of the particles within tumors owing to the EPR effect. Experiments with mice bearing 4T1 tumors demonstrated the ability of these PDOT:PSS-PEG nanoparticles to eliminate tumors via NIR-mediated photothermal ablation. In addition, blood panel and serum biochemistry tests conducted at 7 and 40 days post-injection were within normal parameters, which demonstrated that the nanoparticles were not cytotoxic in vivo.
In a follow-up study, PEDOT:PSS nanoparticles were conjugated with other molecules for a multifunctional approach [73]. Following initial PEGylation (PEDOT:PSS-PEG), the chemotherapeutic drugs doxorubicin and SN38, as well as Ce6, were loaded onto the nanoparticles via hydrophobic interactions and π-π stacking. Unexpectedly, it was also shown that the solubility of water-insoluble drugs, such as SN38, can be enhanced by loading the PEDOT:PSS-PEG nanoparticles while maintaining cytotoxicity. Through the combination of chemotherapeutic drugs and photothermal enhancers such as Ce6, synergism was established, which improved the therapeutic efficacy.
In a recent study, tri-modal nanoparticles were fabricated by using a combination of magnetic nanoparticles, PEDOT:PSS, Cyanine7 (Cy7), and 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG)-polyethylene glycol (MNP@PES-Cy7/2-DG) to combine nanomagnetic-based hyperthermia with NIR fluorescence. Additionally, owing to the inclusion of 2-deoxyglucose, a glucose analog, nanoparticle uptake was enhanced for more selective targeting of tumor cells [74]. This has been demonstrated to occur in other polymeric-based hyperthermic systems, as PEDOT:PSS was used to simultaneously enhance the biocompatibility of, and confer hypothermic ability to, inorganic materials, such as iron oxide, to enable simultaneous multimodal image-guided hyperthermia [75].

6. Other Polymer-Based Nanoparticle Systems and Future Approaches

Although the majority of polymer-based photothermal therapy systems are based on polypyrrhole, polyaniline, or PEDOT:PSS, novel polymer-based nanomaterial systems for PTT have continued to emerge, displaying enhanced functionality.
NIR light at wavelengths of 750–1000 nm (NIR-I) has been typically used in PTT as it enables much greater depth of tissue penetration than light in the visible spectrum [97,98,99,100,101,102,103]. However, there has been growing interest in even deeper NIR light (NIR-II), which involves the utilization of NIR light of wavelengths of 1000–1700 nm (Figure 3) [76]. The advantage of utilizing light in this range is even deeper tissue penetration compared with light in the NIR-I range and a higher maximum permissible exposure to lasers [104,105,106,107].
Taking this fact into consideration, Xie et al. developed a novel NIR-II photothermal nanoagent by functionalizing a narrow band gap D-A conjugated polymer (TBDOPV-DT), with 2,2-bithiophene serving as a donor and thiophene-fused benzodifurandione-based oligo(p-phenylenevinylene) as an acceptor (TBDOPV-DT NPs) [76]. By utilizing this novel nanoparticle system that is responsive to light in the NIR-II range, a much greater depth of tissue penetration was achieved, exhibiting greater temperature elevations at up to 8 mm of depth compared with NIR-I-responsive nanomaterials. In vivo studies of HeLa xenograft tumor-bearing mice demonstrated that the nanoparticle system was capable of eliciting considerable tumor suppression. Serum biochemistry assessments for liver and kidney functional markers fell within normal ranges, demonstrating a lack of apparent cytotoxicity.
Therefore, the development of polymers capable of responding to light in the NIR-II range will enable enhanced therapeutic outcomes and should be considered in the future development of polymer-based nanoparticle systems. As discussed in this review, several polymeric nanoparticle systems have been demonstrated to be activated by the NIR spectrum, providing sufficient energy to exert hyperthermic effects. However, compared with inorganic materials, the performance of polymeric nanoparticles is likely to be weak because of photobleaching effects. To overcome this innate drawback, more sophisticated photothermal therapy based on polymeric nanoparticle systems should be pursed. Improved antitumor response by advanced NIR-triggered drug release might be able to overcome the natural pitfalls of polymeric-based nanoparticle systems.

7. Conclusions

Cancer is recognized as the second major cause of death in the United States. Unfortunately, traditional methods for the treatment of cancer, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and surgery are plagued by limitations, which either resulting in incomplete tumor removal or the induction of undesirable side effects. Materials such as polypyrrole, polyaniline, polydopamine, and PEDOT:PSS have proven to be flexible platforms with the capability of multifunctional modifications that enabling synergistic approaches with traditional cancer therapies, potentially mitigating any adverse side effects. These technologies have shown great promise, and new technologies with enhanced capabilities, such as those enabling PTT via the utilization of light in the NIR-II range, thereby achieving greater depth of penetration have started to emerge.

Author Contributions

The conceptualization of the review paper was agreed upon by all authors of this manuscript. A majority of the literature review and writing was completed initially by J.B.V. with some assistance from D.-J.L. and H.P. The figures included in this paper were decided upon by D.-J.L.

Funding

Funding was received from the Convergence of Conventional Medicine and Traditional Korean Medicine R&D Program, funded by the Ministry of Health and Welfare through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) (H16C0322).

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Convergence of Conventional Medicine and Traditional Korean Medicine R&D program, funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) (HI16C0322).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Heron, M.P. Deaths: Leading Causes for 2016; National Vital Statistics Reports; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2018; Volume 67.
  2. Kievit, F.M.; Zhang, M. Surface engineering of iron oxide nanoparticles for targeted cancer therapy. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 853–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vogel, A.; Venugopalan, V. Mechanisms of pulsed laser ablation of biological tissues. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 577–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nolsoe, C.P.; Torp-Pedersen, S.; Burcharth, F.; Horn, T.; Pedersen, S.; Christensen, N.E.; Olldag, E.S.; Andersen, P.H.; Karstrup, S.; Lorentzen, T.; et al. Interstitial hyperthermia of colorectal liver metastases with a US-guided Nd-YAG laser with a diffuser tip: A pilot clinical study. Radiology 1993, 187, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kampinga, H.H. Cell biological effects of hyperthermia alone or combined with radiation or drugs: A short introduction to newcomers in the field. Int. J. Hyperth. 2006, 22, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mantso, T.; Vasileiadis, S.; Anestopoulos, I.; Voulgaridou, G.P.; Lampri, E.; Botaitis, S.; Kontomanolis, E.N.; Simopoulos, C.; Goussetis, G.; Franco, R.; et al. Hyperthermia induces therapeutic effectiveness and potentiates adjuvant therapy with non-targeted and targeted drugs in an in vitro model of human malignant melanoma. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 10724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cohen, J.D.; Robins, H.I.; Mulcahy, R.T.; Gipp, J.J.; Bouck, N. Interactions between Hyperthermia and Irradiation in Two Human Lymphoblastic Leukemia Cell Lines in Vitro. Cancer Res. 1988, 48, 3576–3580. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Kampinga, H.H.; Dikomey, E. Hyperthermic radiosensitization: Mode of action and clinical relevance. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 2001, 77, 399–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Peeken, J.C.; Vaupel, P.; Combs, S.E. Integrating Hyperthermia into Modern Radiation Oncology: What Evidence Is Necessary? Front. Oncol. 2017, 7, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kaur, P.; Aliru, M.L.; Chadha, A.S.; Asea, A.; Krishnan, S. Hyperthermia using nanoparticles—Promises and pitfalls. Int. J. Hyperth. 2016, 32, 76–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chatterjee, D.K.; Diagaradjane, P.; Krishnan, S. Nanoparticle-mediated hyperthermia in cancer therapy. Ther. Deliv. 2011, 2, 1001–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bardhan, R.; Lal, S.; Joshi, A.; Halas, N.J. Theranostic nanoshells: From probe design to imaging and treatment of cancer. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 936–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Melancon, M.P.; Zhou, M.; Li, C. Cancer theranostics with near-infrared light-activatable multimodal nanoparticles. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 947–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ray, P.C.; Khan, S.A.; Singh, A.K.; Senapati, D.; Fan, Z. Nanomaterials for targeted detection and photothermal killing of bacteria. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3193–3209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Yang, X.; Liu, X.; Liu, Z.; Pu, F.; Ren, J.; Qu, X. Near-infrared light-triggered, targeted drug delivery to cancer cells by aptamer gated nanovehicles. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 2890–2895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Khaletskaya, K.; Reboul, J.; Meilikhov, M.; Nakahama, M.; Diring, S.; Tsujimoto, M.; Isoda, S.; Kim, F.; Kamei, K.; Fischer, R.A.; et al. Integration of porous coordination polymers and gold nanorods into core-shell mesoscopic composites toward light-induced molecular release. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10998–11005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, C.; Ninh, C.; Bettinger, C.J. Photoreconfigurable polymers for biomedical applications: Chemistry and macromolecular engineering. Biomacromolecules 2014, 15, 3474–3494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Benov, L. Photodynamic therapy: Current status and future directions. Med. Princ. Pract. 2015, 24 (Suppl. 1), 14–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ochsner, M. Photophysical and photobiological processes in the photodynamic therapy of tumours. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 1997, 39, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wilson, B.C.; Patterson, M.S. The physics, biophysics and technology of photodynamic therapy. Phys. Med. Biol. 2008, 53, R61–R109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, J.; Qiu, J. A review of organic nanomaterials in photothermal cancer therapy. Cancer Res. Front 2016, 2, 67–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Huang, X.; El-Sayed, I.H.; Qian, W.; El-Sayed, M.A. Cancer cell imaging and photothermal therapy in the near-infrared region by using gold nanorods. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 2115–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Thomsen, S. Pathologic analysis of photothermal and photomechanical effects of laser-tissue interactions. Photochem. Photobiol. 1991, 53, 825–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhou, J.; Lu, Z.; Zhu, X.; Wang, X.; Liao, Y.; Ma, Z.; Li, F. NIR photothermal therapy using polyaniline nanoparticles. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 9584–9592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xia, Y.; Li, W.; Cobley, C.M.; Chen, J.; Xia, X.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, M.; Cho, E.C.; Brown, P.K. Gold nanocages: From synthesis to theranostic applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 914–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kuo, W.S.; Chang, Y.T.; Cho, K.C.; Chiu, K.C.; Lien, C.H.; Yeh, C.S.; Chen, S.J. Gold nanomaterials conjugated with indocyanine green for dual-modality photodynamic and photothermal therapy. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 3270–3278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Everts, M.; Saini, V.; Leddon, J.L.; Kok, R.J.; Stoff-Khalili, M.; Preuss, M.A.; Millican, C.L.; Perkins, G.; Brown, J.M.; Bagaria, H.; et al. Covalently linked Au nanoparticles to a viral vector: Potential for combined photothermal and gene cancer therapy. Nano Lett. 2006, 6, 587–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. You, J.; Zhang, G.; Li, C. Exceptionally high payload of doxorubicin in hollow gold nanospheres for near-infrared light-triggered drug release. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 1033–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dykman, L.; Khlebtsov, N. Gold nanoparticles in biomedical applications: Recent advances and perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2256–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, W.; Shen, J.; Banerjee, P.; Zhou, S. Water-dispersible multifunctional hybrid nanogels for combined curcumin and photothermal therapy. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 598–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wu, W.; Shen, J.; Banerjee, P.; Zhou, S. Core-shell hybrid nanogels for integration of optical temperature-sensing, targeted tumor cell imaging, and combined chemo-photothermal treatment. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 7555–7566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kang, H.; Trondoli, A.C.; Zhu, G.; Chen, Y.; Chang, Y.J.; Liu, H.; Huang, Y.F.; Zhang, X.; Tan, W. Near-infrared light-responsive core-shell nanogels for targeted drug delivery. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 5094–5099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fang, W.; Tang, S.; Liu, P.; Fang, X.; Gong, J.; Zheng, N. Pd nanosheet-covered hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a platform for the chemo-photothermal treatment of cancer cells. Small 2012, 8, 3816–3822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Huang, X.; Tang, S.; Liu, B.; Ren, B.; Zheng, N. Enhancing the photothermal stability of plasmonic metal nanoplates by a core-shell architecture. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3420–3425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lambert, T.N.; Andrews, N.L.; Gerung, H.; Boyle, T.J.; Oliver, J.M.; Wilson, B.S.; Han, S.M. Water-soluble germanium(0) nanocrystals: Cell recognition and near-infrared photothermal conversion properties. Small 2007, 3, 691–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Tian, B.; Wang, C.; Zhang, S.; Feng, L.; Liu, Z. Photothermally enhanced photodynamic therapy delivered by nano-graphene oxide. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 7000–7009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tian, Q.; Tang, M.; Sun, Y.; Zou, R.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, M.; Yang, S.; Wang, J.; Wang, J.; Hu, J. Hydrophilic flower-like CuS superstructures as an efficient 980 nm laser-driven photothermal agent for ablation of cancer cells. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 3542–3547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hessel, C.M.; Pattani, V.P.; Rasch, M.; Panthani, M.G.; Koo, B.; Tunnell, J.W.; Korgel, B.A. Copper selenide nanocrystals for photothermal therapy. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2560–2566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, J.W.; Galanzha, E.I.; Shashkov, E.V.; Moon, H.M.; Zharov, V.P. Golden carbon nanotubes as multimodal photoacoustic and photothermal high-contrast molecular agents. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 688–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Meng, L.; Zhang, X.; Lu, Q.; Fei, Z.; Dyson, P.J. Single walled carbon nanotubes as drug delivery vehicles: Targeting doxorubicin to tumors. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 1689–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, X.; Wang, C.; Cheng, L.; Lee, S.T.; Liu, Z. Noble metal coated single-walled carbon nanotubes for applications in surface enhanced Raman scattering imaging and photothermal therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 7414–7422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhou, F.; Wu, S.; Song, S.; Chen, W.R.; Resasco, D.E.; Xing, D. Antitumor immunologically modified carbon nanotubes for photothermal therapy. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 3235–3242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Shen, Y.; Skirtach, A.G.; Seki, T.; Yagai, S.; Li, H.; Mohwald, H.; Nakanishi, T. Assembly of fullerene-carbon nanotubes: Temperature indicator for photothermal conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8566–8568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhou, F.; Wu, S.; Wu, B.; Chen, W.R.; Xing, D. Mitochondria-targeting single-walled carbon nanotubes for cancer photothermal therapy. Small 2011, 7, 2727–2735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yang, K.; Feng, L.; Shi, X.; Liu, Z. Nano-graphene in biomedicine: Theranostic applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 530–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Robinson, J.T.; Tabakman, S.M.; Liang, Y.; Wang, H.; Casalongue, H.S.; Vinh, D.; Dai, H. Ultrasmall reduced graphene oxide with high near-infrared absorbance for photothermal therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 6825–6831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Ji, X.; Shao, R.; Elliott, A.M.; Stafford, R.J.; Esparza-Coss, E.; Bankson, J.A.; Liang, G.; Luo, Z.; Park, K.; Markert, J.T.; et al. Bifunctional Gold Nanoshells with a Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide-Silica Core Suitable for Both MR Imaging and Photothermal Therapy. J. Phys. Chem. C Nanomater. Interfaces 2007, 111, 6245–6251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Zhou, F.; Xing, D.; Ou, Z.; Wu, B.; Resasco, D.E.; Chen, W.R. Cancer photothermal therapy in the near-infrared region by using single-walled carbon nanotubes. J. Biomed. Opt. 2009, 14, 021009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Jang, B.; Park, S.; Kang, S.H.; Kim, J.K.; Kim, S.K.; Kim, I.H.; Choi, Y. Gold nanorods for target selective SPECT/CT imaging and photothermal therapy in vivo. Quant. Imaging Med. Surg. 2012, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nel, A.; Xia, T.; Madler, L.; Li, N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 2006, 311, 622–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sharifi, S.; Behzadi, S.; Laurent, S.; Forrest, M.L.; Stroeve, P.; Mahmoudi, M. Toxicity of nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 2323–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Cheng, L.; Yang, K.; Chen, Q.; Liu, Z. Organic stealth nanoparticles for highly effective in vivo near-infrared photothermal therapy of cancer. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 5605–5613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Liu, Y.; Ai, K.; Liu, J.; Deng, M.; He, Y.; Lu, L. Dopamine-melanin colloidal nanospheres: An efficient near-infrared photothermal therapeutic agent for in vivo cancer therapy. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 1353–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yang, K.; Xu, H.; Cheng, L.; Sun, C.; Wang, J.; Liu, Z. In vitro and in vivo near-infrared photothermal therapy of cancer using polypyrrole organic nanoparticles. Adv. Mater. 2012, 24, 5586–5592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Chen, M.; Fang, X.; Tang, S.; Zheng, N. Polypyrrole nanoparticles for high-performance in vivo near-infrared photothermal cancer therapy. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 8934–8936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yang, J.; Choi, J.; Bang, D.; Kim, E.; Lim, E.K.; Park, H.; Suh, J.S.; Lee, K.; Yoo, K.H.; Kim, E.K.; et al. Convertible organic nanoparticles for near-infrared photothermal ablation of cancer cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2011, 50, 441–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Tan, X.; Wang, J.; Pang, X.; Liu, L.; Sun, Q.; You, Q.; Tan, F.; Li, N. Indocyanine Green-Loaded Silver Nanoparticle@Polyaniline Core/Shell Theranostic Nanocomposites for Photoacoustic/Near-Infrared Fluorescence Imaging-Guided and Single-Light-Triggered Photothermal and Photodynamic Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 34991–35003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Nguyen, H.T.; Phung, C.D.; Thapa, R.K.; Pham, T.T.; Tran, T.H.; Jeong, J.H.; Ku, S.K.; Choi, H.G.; Yong, C.S.; Kim, J.O. Multifunctional nanoparticles as somatostatin receptor-targeting delivery system of polyaniline and methotrexate for combined chemo-photothermal therapy. Acta Biomater. 2018, 68, 154–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wang, J.; Yan, R.; Guo, F.; Yu, M.; Tan, F.; Li, N. Targeted lipid-polyaniline hybrid nanoparticles for photoacoustic imaging guided photothermal therapy of cancer. Nanotechnology 2016, 27, 285102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, J.; Pang, X.; Tan, X.; Song, Y.; Liu, L.; You, Q.; Sun, Q.; Tan, F.; Li, N. A triple-synergistic strategy for combinational photo/radiotherapy and multi-modality imaging based on hyaluronic acid-hybridized polyaniline-coated WS2 nanodots. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 5551–5564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gao, Z.; You, C.; Wu, H.; Wang, M.; Zhang, X.; Sun, B. FA and cRGD dual modified lipid-polymer nanoparticles encapsulating polyaniline and cisplatin for highly effective chemo-photothermal combination therapy. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2018, 29, 397–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zha, Z.; Yue, X.; Ren, Q.; Dai, Z. Uniform polypyrrole nanoparticles with high photothermal conversion efficiency for photothermal ablation of cancer cells. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 777–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chen, R.; Yang, F.; Xue, Y.; Wei, X.; Song, L.; Liu, X. Polypyrrole confined in dendrimer-like silica nanoparticles for combined photothermal and chemotherapy of cancer. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 38931–38942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Tang, R. Spindle-like polypyrrole hollow nanocapsules as multifunctional platforms for highly effective chemo-photothermal combination therapy of cancer cells in vivo. Chemistry 2014, 20, 11826–11834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Nguyen, H.T.; Tran, T.H.; Thapa, R.K.; Phung, C.D.; Shin, B.S.; Jeong, J.H.; Choi, H.G.; Yong, C.S.; Kim, J.O. Targeted co-delivery of polypyrrole and rapamycin by trastuzumab-conjugated liposomes for combined chemo-photothermal therapy. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 527, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Dong, Z.; Gong, H.; Gao, M.; Zhu, W.; Sun, X.; Feng, L.; Fu, T.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z. Polydopamine Nanoparticles as a Versatile Molecular Loading Platform to Enable Imaging-guided Cancer Combination Therapy. Theranostics 2016, 6, 1031–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Wang, X.; Wang, C.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Cheng, Y. A Polydopamine Nanoparticle-Knotted Poly(ethylene glycol) Hydrogel for On-Demand Drug Delivery and Chemo-photothermal Therapy. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29, 1370–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, R.; Su, S.; Hu, K.; Shao, L.; Deng, X.; Sheng, W.; Wu, Y. Smart micelle@polydopamine core-shell nanoparticles for highly effective chemo-photothermal combination therapy. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 19722–19731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lin, L.S.; Cong, Z.X.; Cao, J.B.; Ke, K.M.; Peng, Q.L.; Gao, J.; Yang, H.H.; Liu, G.; Chen, X. Multifunctional Fe3O4@polydopamine core-shell nanocomposites for intracellular mRNA detection and imaging-guided photothermal therapy. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 3876–3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wu, M.; Zhang, D.; Zeng, Y.; Wu, L.; Liu, X.; Liu, J. Nanocluster of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles coated with poly (dopamine) for magnetic field-targeting, highly sensitive MRI and photothermal cancer therapy. Nanotechnology 2015, 26, 115102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Black, K.C.; Yi, J.; Rivera, J.G.; Zelasko-Leon, D.C.; Messersmith, P.B. Polydopamine-enabled surface functionalization of gold nanorods for cancer cell-targeted imaging and photothermal therapy. Nanomedicine 2013, 8, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Li, J.; Wang, W.; Zhao, L.; Rong, L.; Lan, S.; Sun, H.; Zhang, H.; Yang, B. Hydroquinone-assisted synthesis of branched au-ag nanoparticles with polydopamine coating as highly efficient photothermal agents. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 11613–11623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Gong, H.; Cheng, L.; Xiang, J.; Xu, H.; Feng, L.; Shi, X.; Liu, Z. Near-Infrared Absorbing Polymeric Nanoparticles as a Versatile Drug Carrier for Cancer Combination Therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 6059–6067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yan, H.; Shang, W.; Sun, X.; Zhao, L.; Wang, J.; Xiong, Z.; Yuan, J.; Zhang, R.; Huang, Q.; Wang, K.; et al. “All-in-One” Nanoparticles for Trimodality Imaging-Guided Intracellular Photo-magnetic Hyperthermia Therapy under Intravenous Administration. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1705710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yan, H.; Zhao, L.; Shang, W.; Liu, Z.; Xie, W.; Qiang, C.; Xiong, Z.; Zhang, R.; Li, B.; Sun, X.; et al. General synthesis of high-performing magneto-conjugated polymer core–shell nanoparticles for multifunctional theranostics. Nano Res. 2017, 10, 704–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Sun, T.; Dou, J.-H.; Liu, S.; Wang, X.; Zheng, X.; Wang, Y.; Pei, J.; Xie, Z. Second Near-Infrared Conjugated Polymer Nanoparticles for Photoacoustic Imaging and Photothermal Therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 7919–7926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Li, D.; Huang, J.; Kaner, R.B. Polyaniline nanofibers: A unique polymer nanostructure for versatile applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Heeger, A.J. Semiconducting and Metallic Polymers: The Fourth Generation of Polymeric Materials (Nobel Lecture). Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2001, 40, 2591–2611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Wang, M. Emerging multifunctional NIR photothermal therapy systems based on polypyrrole nanoparticles. Polymers 2016, 8, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Manivasagan, P.; Quang Bui, N.; Bharathiraja, S.; Santha Moorthy, M.; Oh, Y.-O.; Song, K.; Seo, H.; Yoon, M.; Oh, J. Multifunctional biocompatible chitosan-polypyrrole nanocomposites as novel agents for photoacoustic imaging-guided photothermal ablation of cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Ateh, D.D.; Navsaria, H.A.; Vadgama, P. Polypyrrole-based conducting polymers and interactions with biological tissues. J. R. Soc. Interface 2006, 3, 741–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Balint, R.; Cassidy, N.J.; Cartmell, S.H. Conductive polymers: Towards a smart biomaterial for tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 2341–2353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Svirskis, D.; Travas-Sejdic, J.; Rodgers, A.; Garg, S. Electrochemically controlled drug delivery based on intrinsically conducting polymers. J. Control. Release 2010, 146, 6–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. George, P.M.; Lyckman, A.W.; LaVan, D.A.; Hegde, A.; Leung, Y.; Avasare, R.; Testa, C.; Alexander, P.M.; Langer, R.; Sur, M. Fabrication and biocompatibility of polypyrrole implants suitable for neural prosthetics. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 3511–3519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fahlgren, A.; Bratengeier, C.; Gelmi, A.; Semeins, C.M.; Klein-Nulend, J.; Jager, E.W.; Bakker, A.D. Biocompatibility of Polypyrrole with Human Primary Osteoblasts and the Effect of Dopants. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0134023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Reinisch, G.; Gohlke, U.; Ulrich, H.H. Dispersion polycondensation. Die Makromol. Chem. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 1979, 3, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Tan, Y.; Ghandi, K. Kinetics and mechanism of pyrrole chemical polymerization. Synth. Met. 2013, 175, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zong, B.-Y.; Ho, P.; Zhang, Z.-G.; Ng, G.-M.; Yao, K.; Guo, Z.-B. Polypyrrole: FeOx·ZnO nanoparticle solar cells with breakthrough open-circuit voltage prepared from relatively stable liquid dispersions. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 58608–58614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Armes, S.P. Optimum reaction conditions for the polymerization of pyrrole by iron (III) chloride in aqueous solution. Synth. Met. 1987, 20, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhang, X.; Lin, M.; Lin, X.; Zhang, C.; Wei, H.; Zhang, H.; Yang, B. Polypyrrole-enveloped Pd and Fe3O4 nanoparticle binary hollow and bowl-like superstructures as recyclable catalysts for industrial wastewater treatment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Rodriguez, I.; Scharifker, B.; Mostany, J. In situ FTIR study of redox and overoxidation processes in polypyrrole films. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2000, 491, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Cosnier, S.; Holzinger, M. Electrosynthesized polymers for biosensing. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 2146–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Chiang, W.L.; Lin, T.T.; Sureshbabu, R.; Chia, W.T.; Hsiao, H.C.; Liu, H.Y.; Yang, C.M.; Sung, H.W. A rapid drug release system with a NIR light-activated molecular switch for dual-modality photothermal/antibiotic treatments of subcutaneous abscesses. J. Control. Release 2015, 199, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Ball, V. Polydopamine Nanomaterials: Recent Advances in Synthesis Methods and Applications. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Simon, J.D. Spectroscopic and dynamic studies of the epidermal chromophores trans-urocanic acid and eumelanin. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Hong, S.; Kim, K.Y.; Wook, H.J.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, K.D.; Lee, D.Y.; Lee, H. Attenuation of the in vivo toxicity of biomaterials by polydopamine surface modification. Nanomedicine 2011, 6, 793–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Cheng, X.; Sun, R.; Yin, L.; Chai, Z.; Shi, H.; Gao, M. Light-Triggered Assembly of Gold Nanoparticles for Photothermal Therapy and Photoacoustic Imaging of Tumors In Vivo. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29, 1604894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Lyu, Y.; Xie, C.; Chechetka, S.A.; Miyako, E.; Pu, K. Semiconducting polymer nanobioconjugates for targeted photothermal activation of neurons. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 9049–9052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lee, C.; Hwang, H.S.; Lee, S.; Kim, B.; Kim, J.O.; Oh, K.T.; Lee, E.S.; Choi, H.G.; Youn, Y.S. Rabies Virus-Inspired Silica-Coated Gold Nanorods as a Photothermal Therapeutic Platform for Treating Brain Tumors. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ni, D.; Jiang, D.; Valdovinos, H.F.; Ehlerding, E.B.; Yu, B.; Barnhart, T.E.; Huang, P.; Cai, W. Bioresponsive Polyoxometalate Cluster for Redox-Activated Photoacoustic Imaging-Guided Photothermal Cancer Therapy. Nano Lett. 2017, 17, 3282–3289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Li, L.; Fu, S.; Chen, C.; Wang, X.; Fu, C.; Wang, S.; Guo, W.; Yu, X.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Z.; et al. Microenvironment-Driven Bioelimination of Magnetoplasmonic Nanoassemblies and Their Multimodal Imaging-Guided Tumor Photothermal Therapy. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 7094–7105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Wang, Y.; Yang, T.; Ke, H.; Zhu, A.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Shen, J.; Liu, G.; Chen, C.; Zhao, Y.; et al. Smart Albumin-Biomineralized Nanocomposites for Multimodal Imaging and Photothermal Tumor Ablation. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 3874–3882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Rengan, A.K.; Bukhari, A.B.; Pradhan, A.; Malhotra, R.; Banerjee, R.; Srivastava, R.; De, A. In vivo analysis of biodegradable liposome gold nanoparticles as efficient agents for photothermal therapy of cancer. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 842–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Yu, X.; Li, A.; Zhao, C.; Yang, K.; Chen, X.; Li, W. Ultrasmall semimetal nanoparticles of bismuth for dual-modal computed tomography/photoacoustic imaging and synergistic thermoradiotherapy. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 3990–4001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Cao, Y.; Dou, J.-H.; Zhao, N.-j.; Zhang, S.; Zheng, Y.-Q.; Zhang, J.-P.; Wang, J.-Y.; Pei, J.; Wang, Y. Highly efficient NIR-II photothermal conversion based on an organic conjugated polymer. Chem. Mater. 2016, 29, 718–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Bashkatov, A.; Genina, E.; Kochubey, V.; Tuchin, V. Optical properties of human skin, subcutaneous and mucous tissues in the wavelength range from 400 to 2000 nm. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2005, 38, 2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Smith, A.M.; Mancini, M.C.; Nie, S. Bioimaging: Second window for in vivo imaging. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2009, 4, 710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Polymers 10 01357 g001 550
Figure 1. An example of polyaniline-based nanoparticles for photothermal therapy. (A) Photothermal images of a mouse after intratumoral injection of F127-modified polyaniline nanoparticles (F-PANPs) (1 mg/mL) with an 808 nm laser (0.5 W cm−2, 3 min). When irradiated within the white circle area, the tumor (Point 1) and the surrounding tissue (Point 2) were heated. (B) Photothermal images of the tumor obtained at different time points. The scale bar indicates the temperature difference between 30 °C and 50 °C. (C) The relationship between sample temperature and laser illumination time is shown in (A). Reproduced from [24] with permission, copyright Elsevier, 2013.
Figure 1. An example of polyaniline-based nanoparticles for photothermal therapy. (A) Photothermal images of a mouse after intratumoral injection of F127-modified polyaniline nanoparticles (F-PANPs) (1 mg/mL) with an 808 nm laser (0.5 W cm−2, 3 min). When irradiated within the white circle area, the tumor (Point 1) and the surrounding tissue (Point 2) were heated. (B) Photothermal images of the tumor obtained at different time points. The scale bar indicates the temperature difference between 30 °C and 50 °C. (C) The relationship between sample temperature and laser illumination time is shown in (A). Reproduced from [24] with permission, copyright Elsevier, 2013.
Polymers 10 01357 g001
Polymers 10 01357 g002 550
Figure 2. A polypyrrole-based nanocomposite for near-infrared (NIR) photothermal therapy. NIR thermographic images (a) and temperature change (b) in tumor-bearing mice after intratumoral injection of PBS and chitosan-polypyrrole nanocomposites (CS-PPy NCs) and irradiation with an 808 nm laser (2.0 W cm−2, 5 min). (c) The change in tumor size between Day 0 (before treatment) and 20 days after treatment. (d) Tumor volume growth curves for different groups of mice after different treatments. (e) The body weight after different treatments indicated over 20 days. The error bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation. Reproduced from [80] under open access license.
Figure 2. A polypyrrole-based nanocomposite for near-infrared (NIR) photothermal therapy. NIR thermographic images (a) and temperature change (b) in tumor-bearing mice after intratumoral injection of PBS and chitosan-polypyrrole nanocomposites (CS-PPy NCs) and irradiation with an 808 nm laser (2.0 W cm−2, 5 min). (c) The change in tumor size between Day 0 (before treatment) and 20 days after treatment. (d) Tumor volume growth curves for different groups of mice after different treatments. (e) The body weight after different treatments indicated over 20 days. The error bars indicate the mean ± standard deviation. Reproduced from [80] under open access license.
Polymers 10 01357 g002
Polymers 10 01357 g003 550
Figure 3. The NIR-II photothermal approach by a novel nanoagent. In vivo photothermal therapy of tumors. Mice were subjected to whole-body IR images after injection with a narrow band gap D–A conjugated polymer (TBDOPV–DT), with 2,2-bithiophene as the donor and thiophene-fused benzodifurandione-based oligo(p-phenylenevinylene) as the acceptor. (a) Intratumoral (0.56 mg kg−1, 0.9 W cm−2, and a 1064 nm laser) or (b) intravenous (1.94 mg kg−1, 1.3 W cm−2) administration. (c) Growth rates of tumors after different treatments. (d) Representative size of the excised tumors. (e) Weight of tumor in each condition. (f) Changes in body weight of the mice with tumors. ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001. (g) H&E staining of tumor regions in different groups. Scale bars indicate 100 μm. Reproduced from [76] with permission, copyright American Chemical Society, 2018.
Figure 3. The NIR-II photothermal approach by a novel nanoagent. In vivo photothermal therapy of tumors. Mice were subjected to whole-body IR images after injection with a narrow band gap D–A conjugated polymer (TBDOPV–DT), with 2,2-bithiophene as the donor and thiophene-fused benzodifurandione-based oligo(p-phenylenevinylene) as the acceptor. (a) Intratumoral (0.56 mg kg−1, 0.9 W cm−2, and a 1064 nm laser) or (b) intravenous (1.94 mg kg−1, 1.3 W cm−2) administration. (c) Growth rates of tumors after different treatments. (d) Representative size of the excised tumors. (e) Weight of tumor in each condition. (f) Changes in body weight of the mice with tumors. ** p ≤ 0.01; *** p ≤ 0.001. (g) H&E staining of tumor regions in different groups. Scale bars indicate 100 μm. Reproduced from [76] with permission, copyright American Chemical Society, 2018.
Polymers 10 01357 g003
Table
Table 1. Summary of Polymer Based Nanoparticle Systems for Photothermal Therapy.
Table 1. Summary of Polymer Based Nanoparticle Systems for Photothermal Therapy.
PolymerConfigurationTesting StageReference
PolyanilineNanoparticleIn-Vitro[56]
F-127 Conjugated NanoparticleIn-Vitro and In-Vivo[24]
Silver nanoparticle core, polyaniline shell (ICG-Ag@PANI)In-Vitro and In-Vivo[57]
Nanoparticles with lanreotide and methotrexate (LT-MTX/PANI NPs)In-Vitro and In-Vivo[58]
Nanoparticles with lipid layer and folic acid conjugation (FA-Lipid-PANI NPs)In-Vitro and In-Vivo[59]
WS core, polyaniline shell with hyaluronic acid and clorin e6 (Ce6)In-Vitro and In-Vivo[60]
polyaniline and cisplastin within folate-poly (ethylene glycol)-distearoylphosphatidylcholine (FA-PEG-DSPE), cRGD [cyclic (Arg-Gly-Asp-D-Phe-Lys)]-PEG-DSPE, and lecithin conjugates dubbed FA/cRGD-PNPsIn-Vitro and In-Vivo[61]
PolypyrroleBase NanoparticlesIn-Vitro and In-Vivo[55]
Base NanoparticlesIn-Vitro[62]
Polypyrrole chains synthesized on mesoporous amno-functionalized dendrimer-like silica nanoparticles (DSNs-NH2) PPy@DSNs-NH2 loaded with doxorubicinIn-Vitro[63]
Spindle-like hollow polypyrrole nanocapsules (PPy HNCs) loaded with doxorubicinIn-Vivo[64]
Ppy and rapamycin loaded into liposomes conjugated with trastuzumab (LRPmAB)In-Vitro[65]
PolydopamineDopamine-melanin colloidal nanospheresIn-Vitro and In-Vivo[53]
PEGYlated polydopamine nanoparticles conjugatd with ICG (PDA-ICG-PEG) loaded with doxorubicinIn-Vitro[66]
PEGylated nanoparticles loaded with 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycampthotheticin (SN38)In-Vivo[67]
Doxorubicin encapsulated within DSPE-PEG micelles coated with polydopamineIn-Vitro and In-Vivo[68]
Fe(3)O(4) core polydopamine coated nanoshellIn-Vitro[69,70]
polydopamine coated gold nanorodsIn-Vitro[71]
Polydopamine coated gold/silver nanoparticlesIn-Vitro[72]
PEDOT:PSSPEGylated PEDOT:PSS nanoparticles (PDOT:PSS-PEG)In-Vivo[52]
PEDOT:PSS-PEG loaded with doxorubicin, SN38, and Ce6In-Vitro[73]
Magnetic nanoparticles with PEDOT:PSS, Cyanine7 (Cy7), and 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG)-polyethylene glcol (MNP@PES-Cy7/2-DG)In-Vitro and In-Vivo[74]
Magnetic nanoparticles with PEDOT:PSS coatingIn-Vivo[75]
TBDOPV-DTD-A conjugated polymer (TBDOPV-DT), with 2,2-bithiophene serving as a donor and thiophene-fused benzodifurandione-based oligo(p-phenylenevinylene) as an acceptor (TBDOPV-DT NPs)In-Vitro and In-Vivo[76]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vines, J.B.; Lim, D.-J.; Park, H. Contemporary Polymer-Based Nanoparticle Systems for Photothermal Therapy. Polymers 2018, 10, 1357. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10121357

AMA Style

Vines JB, Lim D-J, Park H. Contemporary Polymer-Based Nanoparticle Systems for Photothermal Therapy. Polymers. 2018; 10(12):1357. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10121357

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vines, Jeremy B., Dong-Jin Lim, and Hansoo Park. 2018. "Contemporary Polymer-Based Nanoparticle Systems for Photothermal Therapy" Polymers 10, no. 12: 1357. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10121357

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop