Next Article in Journal
Low-Temperature Sintering and Piezoelectric Properties of Pb(Fe2/3W1/3)O3-Doped 0.7Pb(Zr0.46Ti0.54)O3–0.1Pb(Zn1/3Nb2/3)O3–0.2Pb(Ni1/3Nb2/3)O3 Ceramics for Free-Standing Silver-Electrode Co-Fired Multilayer Piezoelectric Devices
Previous Article in Journal
Crystal-Orientation-Dependent Material Removal and Subsurface Damage of AlN During Laser-Assisted Single-Grit Nanogrinding: An Atomistic Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cadmium-Doped ZnS Thin Films via SILAR for Buffer-Layer Applications: An Experimental and mBJ-DFT Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Oxidation Resistance of the B4C-SiO2-Albite Coating Influenced by the In Situ Formation and Self-Healing Ability of Borosilicate Glass at 1173 K

1
School of Resources, Environment and Materials, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Featured Metal Materials and Life-Cycle Safety for Composite Structures, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
3
MOE Key Laboratory of New Processing Technology for Nonferrous Metals and Materials, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2026, 16(5), 292; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16050292
Submission received: 2 April 2026 / Revised: 23 April 2026 / Accepted: 25 April 2026 / Published: 29 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Thin-Film Materials and Their Applications)

Abstract

The electrolytic aluminum industry is facing severe challenges, such as excessive carbon consumption, resulting in more cost and environmental pollution due to the oxidation of carbon anodes. The isothermal oxidation resistance of B4C-SiO2-Albite (BSA) composite coating influenced by the in situ formation behavior and self-healing ability of the borosilicate glass at 1173 K was investigated through XRD, TG-DSC, Raman, FTIR spectroscopy, and SEM/EDS in this paper. The results show that the composite coating with 20 wt% B4C has a relatively low mass gain rate of −0.082% after 24 h at 1173 K. It depends on the in situ formation of the amorphous borosilicate phase layer that can effectively protect the carbon anode from oxidation, which depends on the content of B4C. The amorphous borosilicate glass forms from the reaction between the SiO2 and the B2O3, from the oxidation of B4C during exposure. More B4C promotes the formation and volatilization of B2O3, which improves the viscosity and stability of the borosilicate glass by changing the glass network coupled with Na+ and Al3+ from Albite. It is a feasible strategy for designing durable coatings with appropriate B4C addition for high-temperature applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Aluminum alloys serve as one of the key non-ferrous metals in modern industrial society, as a rich resource with excellent performance, extensive application, and recoverable-reusable materials. Currently, global electrolytic aluminum production widely employs the cryolite alumina molten salt electrolysis process system [1,2,3]. The anode carbon materials are continuously consumed and release substantial greenhouse gases during the production process [4]. The gas given off by electrolytic cell is dominated by carbon dioxide, accompanied by characteristic pollutants such as fluorinated gases and fluorinated dust [5,6]. This renders the electrolytic aluminum industry the sector with the highest carbon emission intensity among non-ferrous metal industries [7]. The surface coating protection method is considered a promising approach for protecting the carbon materials from oxidation [8]. Currently, antioxidant systems for carbon materials mainly include glass coating systems and ceramic coating systems [9,10,11,12,13,14]. The glass coating systems primarily include phosphate [15,16], borate [17,18,19,20], and silicate glasses [21].
The B4C content plays important role in the antioxidation performance of borosilicate glass coatings prepared by the slurry brushing method [22]. The results indicated that the coating containing 25 wt% B4C exhibited excellent self-healing property and antioxidant performance under high-temperature conditions. A SiO2-B4C-glass coating for Al2O3-C refractory materials achieved a weight gain of only −1.721% after duration for 100 h in an oxidative environment at 800 °C [23]. Modification of the HfB2-SiC coating with B4C successfully broadened the application range of this ceramic coating in intermediate- and low-temperature environments [24]. The ZrB2-MoSi2-SiC gradient coating displayed good oxidation resistance performance due to a triple mechanism of oxidative consumption glass phase formation stable phase generation [25]. It is indicated that `SiO2 with ZrO2 forms ZrSiO4, reducing the volatilization rate of SiO2 and enhancing the high-temperature stability of the oxide layer.
Suppressing the high-temperature oxidation of carbon anodes is of great significance for both enhancing the economic benefits of the aluminum electrolysis industry and achieving its environmental protection goals [26,27]. Carbon anodes function within a temperature field of 1203 K–823 K in electrolytic cells. The submerged bottom region where electrochemical reactions occur reaches 1203 K, while the unsubmerged middle section remains in a high-temperature environment of about 1173 K [28]. The isothermally high temperature oxidation resistance performance of the B4C-SiO2-Albite (BSA) composite coating at 1173 K were investigated in this paper. The effect of the B4C addition, Na+ and Al3+ from albite on the in situ formation behavior and self-healing ability of the borosilicate glass, volatilization of B2O3, viscosity and stability of the borosilicate glass were discussed in detail. The research innovatively utilizes the high oxygen barrier property of amorphous materials to protect carbon anodes. The prepared coating forms a flowable amorphous melt in situ at 1173 K, shielding the carbon anode from oxygen attack, while the fluidity of the amorphous phase also provides the coating with a self-healing capability.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation

The preparation process of BSA coated carbon anodes is illustrated in Figure 1. Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC, Tianjin Guangfu Fine Chemical Research Institute, Tianjin, China) was first dissolved in deionized water under stirring for 10 min to form an aqueous solution. B4C, SiO2 (Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) and Albite (Na2O·Al2O3·6SiO2, Henan Borun Foundry Materials Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, China) powders were subsequently added, and the mixture was stirred for another 2 h to obtain a homogeneous BSA coating slurry. The slurry was uniformly coated onto the cylindrical carbon anode (50 × 50 mm) and dried to obtain the sample bearing the BSA coating. The final coating thickness was controlled within 240 ± 20 μm by measuring dimensional changes post-drying. Insufficiently thick coatings were recoated, while excessively thick ones were slightly polished using 2000 grit SiC paper. The mass percentage of the components in the BSA coating are presented in Table 1. The B4C content ranges from 15 wt% to 30 wt% for the samples. The BSA coatings coated samples were labeled as 15BSA, 20BSA, 25BSA, and 30BSA according to the B4C content, respectively.

2.2. Evaluation of Oxidation Property

The antioxidant test refers to placing a specimen of carbon anode material with a composite coating prepared on its surface into a muffle furnace for high-temperature oxidation testing at a set temperature. The composite coating’s oxidation resistance can be quantitatively evaluated through the mass gain rate of the coating found on the carbon block substrate before and after oxidation. The initial mass of the prepared specimen was measured using an electronic analytical balance with a precision of ±0.1 mg. Subsequently, the specimens were placed in a muffle furnace for 100 h at 1173 K (KSL-1700 X, Hefei Kejing Material Technology Co, Ltd., Hefei, China). The specimens were heated to the test temperature at a heating rate of 5 °C/min, maintained at that temperature for a specified duration, and subsequently furnace-cooled to room temperature. Finally, the specimens were reweighed, and the oxidation mass gain rate was calculated using Equation (1) to assess the antioxidant property of the coating.
Δ w = ( m 1 m 0 ) / m 0 × 100 %
Here Δw is the mass gain rate of the coated sample after oxidation, %; m0 is the mass of the coated sample before oxidation, g; m1 is the mass of the coated sample after oxidation for 100 h at 1173 K, g.

2.3. Characterization

An X-ray diffraction (XRD) technique was employed to characterize the phase composition of materials (XRD, D8 Advance, Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). The TG/DTG simultaneous thermal analyzer characterized the temperature-dependent weight variations associated with chemical reactions in the coating powder mixtures (TG-DSC, STA449 F5, Netzsch, Selb, Germany). The furnace was heated from room temperature to 1273 K at a rate of 10 K/min in an air atmosphere. Raman spectroscopy was utilized to obtain molecular structure information by analyzing characteristic peak positions (Raman, inVia Reflex, Renishaw, Wotton-under-Edge, UK). Molecular bonds in the amorphous phase formed after thermal exposure were characterized by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR, Nicolet iS 50, TMO, Waltham, MA, USA). Morphological evaluation of the composite coating was conducted using SEM on both surface and cross-section, with simultaneous elemental mapping via EDS (SEM, S-3400 N, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). This aimed to investigate the coating densification, thereby analyzing the microstructure and underlying mechanisms of the material phenomena.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Analysis of Oxidation Property

The isothermal oxidation performance of the B4C-SiO2-Albite (BSA) composite coating coated with carbon block at 1173 K is shown in Table 2 and Figure 2. The pure carbon substrate exhibits severe mass gain, with a rapid reduction of −20.726 wt% within 1 h and a near complete gain of −96.340 wt% after 24 h exposure. Coatings of 15BSA, 20BSA, 25BSA, and 30BSA applied on carbon blocks effectively protect the substrate, reducing the mass gain rates to −0.2101%, −0.082%, −0.152%, and −0.510%, respectively, after 24 h of exposure. The BSA composite coating shows good anti-oxidation property during exposure when the B4C addition is 20 wt%. The coating with relatively less B4C such as 15BSA exhibits negative mass gain during high temperature, and it is about −0.010% after 1 h of exposure. They display positive gains for 20BSA, 25BSA, and 30BSA samples, which are 0.001%, 0.015%, and 0.046%, respectively. The oxidation of B4C drives the experimentally observed mass gain via the retention of excess oxygen atoms during B2O3 formation, with the resultant molten B2O3 reacting with SiO2 to form a dense, self-healing glassy phase [29]. The masses of the samples begin to decrease after 1 h, and the 30BSA sample shows the most significant drop from 0.046% at 1 h to −0.002% after 4 h due to the volatilization of B2O3 at high temperature.
The 15BSA underwent a pronounced mass loss over the same exposure period, albeit through a mechanistic pathway fundamentally different from that of 30BSA. Portions of the carbon blocks were directly exposed to the ambient atmosphere and underwent accelerated oxidation, driven by the contraction and curling of the 15BSA in situ-formed amorphous phase at elevated temperatures. Thermally induced structural deformation arose from the marked increase in high-temperature viscosity and surface tension of the amorphous matrix, induced by the elevated fraction of defect-induced tetrahedral [BO4] units derived from B2O3 in the phase. The 20BSA and 25BSA coatings exhibited the most superior oxidation resistance in thermal exposure performance tests. This exceptional high-temperature performance stems from the moderate B4C loading in these two formulations, which endowed the in situ-formed amorphous phase with well-tailored flowability and structural stability. The amorphous phase can both heal micro-pores and cracks induced by gas erosion via viscous flow during high-temperature service [19], and retain the full architectural integrity of the coating under sustained thermal flux with this optimized viscoelastic property.
Figure 2b–f shows the macroscopic morphologies of BSA-coated specimens with different B4C contents and the uncoated carbon negative electrode specimen after exposure for 24 h at 1173 K. The 15BSA-coated specimen has a smooth and dense surface, but vitreous shrinkage creates large exposed areas and oxidizes the carbon substrate beneath coating gaps (Figure 2b). This results from the excessive surface tension of the glass at high temperatures caused by insufficient boron carbide content, inducing curling and shrinkage that damages coating integrity. Smooth and dense surfaces are exhibited by 20BSA, 25BSA, and 30BSA specimens with increasing B4C content. No bubbles or cracks are observed, indicating a dense glassy phase formed to shield the carbon substrate against oxidation (Figure 2c,d). Numerous micro-pits appear on the surface of the 30BSA-coated specimen after gas pore healing. Excellent self-healing ability is demonstrated, enabling the rapid repair of gas pores during oxidation (Figure 2e). The high B4C content endowed the 30BSA-coated specimen with self-healing properties but also caused damage. Excess B2O3 generated from B4C continuously volatilized, creating numerous tiny pores in the glass phase [30]. Numerous micro-pits remained after gas pore healing, as high temperature impairs rapid and complete coating self-repair. These micro-pits are more likely to become channels for oxygen diffusion in subsequent oxidation. The uncoated carbon anode specimens exhibit a mass gain of −96.340% after exposure at 1173 K for 24 h, approaching complete oxidation (Figure 2f). It is indicated that the BSA composite coating shows good oxidation resistance to high temperature exposure, consistent with that of Figure 2a.

3.2. Analysis of Microstructure Evolution for the Coating

BSA-coated specimen before oxidation, distinct diffraction peaks of B4C, SiO2, and Albite were detected. Among these, B4C diffraction peaks show high intensity, which increases with its content (Figure 3a). BSA coatings prepared by slurry brushing possess sufficient thickness to fully cover the carbon cathode substrate, and no carbon characteristic peaks are detected in any coatings. In the XRD pattern of the BSA specimen after exposure, weak diffraction peaks of SiO2 and Albite can be observed. Compared with Figure 3a, the diffraction peaks of B4C disappear completely in Figure 3b and are replaced by the characteristic broad peaks of the amorphous phase. The in situ formed B2O3 and SiO2 combine to form a borosilicate amorphous phase, resulting in the absence of sharp characteristic diffraction peaks and only the presence of broad amorphous diffuse humps in the XRD patterns. The amorphization degree of oxidized BSA samples shows a clear positive correlation with boron carbide content, and the 30BSA sample displays more pronounced amorphous characteristic peaks in its oxidized XRD pattern. Such results demonstrate the full oxidation of B4C to B2O3 on coating surfaces, with BSA specimens existing as amorphous glass phases at 1173 K.
The microscopic morphology images of the BSA coating specimens are shown in Figure 4a. No obvious bubbles or large cracks were observed on the coating surface, indicating that the coating prepared by the slurry brushing method is relatively dense. However, fine gaps exist between the coating particles. The organic binder CMC forms a temporary bonding network to immobilize particles and preserve coating morphology via van der Waals forces, hydrogen bonding and capillary effects during slurry drying. This stage involves physical bonding and cannot fully form a dense coating. The optimal thickness for superior coating performance is approximately 240 ± 20 µm. Cross-sectional morphologies of the BSA-coated specimens reveal no distinct gaps at the coating substrate interface, indicating excellent interfacial bonding stability (Figure 4b). The prepared coating exhibits a uniform thickness and is free of critical defects including through-thickness cracks and large-sized internal pores. Only uniformly distributed microporous structures are observed within the coating, with a measured porosity of 21.754%. The pore structure provides sufficient space for the flow-induced healing of the glass phase at elevated temperatures. The bonding interface between the coating and the carbon substrate is smooth and dense without obvious gaps or delamination, which effectively prevents oxygen from rapidly diffusing along the interface to erode the substrate during high-temperature oxidation, and provides a core structural basis for the long-term anti-oxidation protection of the coating.
BSA coatings form a dense glass layer after oxidation at 1173 K for 24 h as shown in Figure 5, and exhibit a significant reduction in porosity from the as-prepared 21.754% to approximately 10%. At this stage, the residual porosity in the coatings is dominated by the gaseous volatilization of borides. BSA coating forms a flowing amorphous phase that adheres tightly to the substrate under the effect of fluidity at elevated temperatures. Due to the beneficial densification effect caused by the flowing amorphous phase, the coating did not develop through-thickness cracks but contained a small number of pores. Among the samples, 15BSA and 25BSA exhibit more fine pores, while 20BSA show relatively fewer (Figure 5a–c). The number of internal pores within the as-prepared coatings decrease with increasing B4C content. Surface defects of the coatings increase with rising B4C content. The opposing trends are attributed to volatilization behavior induced by increased B2O3 content. The 15BSA coating form unfilled voids in its central region at elevated temperatures. The relatively low boron carbide loading in the 15BSA coating result in the insufficient formation of boron trioxide, thereby hindering its effective fluxing role for SiO2. Consequently, the system exhibit high viscosity and low flowability at elevated temperatures, which promote the formation of unfilled voids in the central region of the coating. Increased B4C content in the 20BSA coating induce a general downward trend in melt viscosity, and the internal porosity of the coatings drop continuously across the formulation gradient from 11.712% for 15BSA to 8.357% for 30BSA. The 25BSA and 30BSA coatings exhibit rapidly reduced viscosity and enhanced flowability, and achieve the rapid self-healing of inherent coating defects. Extensive boride volatilization in 30BSA leave residual pores within the glass phase, and the low viscosity of the amorphous melt enable the rapid migration of these pores to the coating surface, ultimately resulting in a loose surface structure with abundant surface voids in the 30BSA coating (Figure 5b–d). These depressions reduce the thickness of the dense layer, making it a weak link in the oxygen barrier, to a certain extent.
The coating is dense and uniform after exposure (Figure 6a). Si elemental distribution analysis reveals a tightly bonded interface between the coating and substrate, indicating effective adhesion and surface protection provided by the coating. It blocks oxygen permeation. It also inhibits chemical reactions between oxygen and the substrate (Figure 6b). Meanwhile, the Si element is uniformly distributed in the coating, as it serves as the matrix of the glass network. Na element is partially dispersed into the glass components (Figure 6c), as Na+ acts as a glass network modifier that breaks Si-O bonds and promotes glass formation. However, most Na elements aggregate with Al elements (Figure 6d). This occurs because Al3+ can substitute for Si4+ to enter tetrahedral coordination [AlO4], but the [AlO4] tetrahedron carries a net negative charge. As per the charge compensation mechanism, this negative charge must be neutralized by a neighboring positively charged network modifier cation Na+ to maintain electrical neutrality and stability. The charge compensation effect of sodium enables aluminum to enter the network in tetrahedral form, partially repairing the network breakage caused by the introduction of network modifiers with Na2O. The modification process significantly enhances the chemical stability, mechanical strength, and viscosity of the glass. Simultaneously, the process inhibits the separation of B enriched and SiO2 enriched phases to a certain extent, thereby maintaining coating stability.

3.3. Analysis of the In Situ Formed Amorphous Borosilicate

BSA coatings with different B4C additions exhibited smooth and dense surfaces after oxidation at 1173 K for 1 h (Figure 7). Originating from the high-temperature oxidation of boron carbide to B2O3, the latter further reacts with silica to form borosilicate glass. By acting as a glass network modifier, the Na+ in Albite disrupts the Si-O bonds in silica, reduces melt viscosity and melting point, thus allowing the glassy phase to form at a relatively lower temperature meanwhile. The limited oxidation period led to the incomplete dissolution of SiO2 and a failure in glass component formation, with consequent observation of SiO2 particles on the glass surface. Notably, a relatively smaller amount of SiO2 was detected in BSA30, indicating that more B4C promoted the formation of sufficient borosilicate glass [22]. The coating rapidly and successfully formed a continuous amorphous glass layer within 1 h, effectively inhibiting oxygen diffusion and protecting the substrate from oxidation, consistent with the XRD results shown in Figure 3.
SiO2 possesses characteristics such as a high melting point, excellent thermal stability, chemical inertness, and an amorphous nature, making it a core raw material for preparing silicate glasses. Albite (Na2O·Al2O3·6SiO2) is an important flux in glass preparation; adding Albite can reduce the melting point of raw materials and the viscosity of the melt, forming a low-melting-point liquid phase melt at lower temperatures. B4C exerts a critical role in the high-temperature oxidation resistance of the coatings, and undergoes oxidation to form B2O3 at an exposure temperature of 823 K [31]. The generated B2O3 undergoes further reaction with silica within the system to yield an in situ-formed amorphous borosilicate glass phase. The low temperature-formed amorphous phase rapidly constructs a dense barrier layer to effectively inhibit the oxidation reaction between oxygen and the carbon substrate. The flowing amorphous phase at elevated temperatures diffuses to fill microcracks within the coating and completes the self-healing process of the protective layer upon the mechanical damage of the coating [22]. The Raman spectra in Figure 8a and peak assignment analysis in Table 3 indicate that the BSA coating forms an amorphous borosilicate glass after exposure at 1173 K for 1 h.
Specifically, the diffraction peak at 463 cm−1 is attributed to the bending vibration of Si-O-Si bonds, indicating that amorphous silicates exist in a network form constituting the glass matrix skeleton. The broad peak in the range of 686–752 cm−1 originates from the vibration of [BO4] tetrahedra, reflecting the partial conversion of B2O3 into tetra-coordinated boron. The broad peak at 1350 cm−1 stems from the asymmetric stretching vibration of [BO3], confirming that part of B2O3 exists in the glass network as tri-coordinated boron. Subsequently, the diffraction peak at 805 cm−1 is assigned to the mixed vibration of [SiO4] and [BO4] tetrahedra, directly proving that boron is covalently incorporated into the silicon oxygen network. Critically, the diffraction peak at 1085 cm−1 corresponds to the stretching vibration of Q3 silicon oxygen units, which feature a structure of [SiO4] tetrahedra containing Si-O-Si bridging bonds and Si-O non-bridging bond. This peak confirms Na+ in Albite as a network modifier, breaking Si-O-Si bonds to form non-bridging oxygen (Si-O·Na+) and inducing network depolymerization. Together, the characteristic Raman peaks and XRD broad diffuse peaks confirm the system’s amorphous nature. Meanwhile, the infrared characteristic peaks of [BO3] and [BO4] are shown in Table 4. FTIR analysis further reveals that B2O3 ultimately exists stably in the glass network in the form of [BO4] tetrahedra network formers and [BO3] triangles isolated structural units (Figure 8b). The peak intensity of [BO4] units greatly exceeds that of [BO3] units in FITR spectra, and B2O3 exists dominantly as [BO4] in amorphous BSA after 1 h thermal exposure.
The internal B4C is oxidized at high temperatures to generate B2O3, which reacts with SiO2 to contribute to the formation of the amorphous borosilicate glass. The B2O3 exists as [BO3] and [BO4] units in the borosilicate glass after 1 h exposure of the BSA coating at 1173 K. The viscosity of the glass melt continuously decreases and its fluidity significantly improves with the increase in the [BO3]/[BO4] ratio [35]. The [BO3] units adopt layered or cyclic structures, while [BO4] units exhibit a three-dimensional network structure [36]. [BO4] tetrahedra form a three-dimensional network structure to enhance the glass network crosslinking and thus increase surface tension. [BO3] units adopt a loose two-dimensional layered structure to reduce the surface tension of the glass phase. However, [BO4] possesses a three-dimensional crosslinked network, forming strong Si-O-B covalent bonds with silicate units to densify the structure and enhance rigidity, continuity, and deformation resistance.
Figure 9 presents B 1s spectra for as-prepared BSA coatings after 1 h of isothermal exposure at 1173 K. [BO3] structural units show a binding energy of 191.90 eV, with [BO4] units at 192.60 eV [37]. Both [BO3] and [BO4] structural units coexist in the BSA amorphous phase, as all B 1s peaks exhibit binding energies above 193 eV after isothermal exposure [38]. The fraction of [BO3] increases from 2.91% to 9.91% as B4C loading rises from 15 wt% to 30 wt%. The observed trend confirms that rising B4C loading increases the proportion of [BO3] structural units in the amorphous phase, which results in a gradual improvement in high-temperature flowability. Albite introduces Na+ and Al3+ into the borosilicate system synchronously after high-temperature melting, with the two ions synergistically regulating borate structure and comprehensive properties of the glass phase. On one hand, the low melting point of Albite significantly reduces the melting temperature of the system, realizes uniform melting of SiO2 and B2O3 at 1173 K, and ensures the formation of a continuous amorphous glass phase in the coatings. On the other hand, the Na+ and Al3+ acts preferentially as a charge compensator to promote the conversion of neutral planar triangular [BO3] units into negatively charged tetrahedral [BO4] units [39,40], further enhancing the crosslinking and the surface tension of the glass network.
The 15BSA delivers the highest surface tension, with the highest Albite and SiO2 content across the gradient. Sufficient Na+ maximizes [BO4] tetrahedra fraction and glass network crosslinking degree. The coupling of high surface tension and high flowability leads to severe high-temperature shrinkage and deformation, failing to form a uniform flat protective layer. 20BSA exhibits the optimal deformation resistance and structural stability, with moderate Albite and SiO2 content. Moderate Na+ content enables balanced [BO3] to [BO4] conversion, endowing the glass phase with suitable crosslinking degree and surface tension. The precise balance between viscosity and flowability prevents both excessive shrinkage and spreading failure at elevated temperatures. 25BSA with further reduced Albite and SiO2 content shows excellent film-forming ability with no obvious high-temperature shrinkage. The 30BSA presents the lowest surface tension across the gradient, with the lowest Albite and SiO2 content. Insufficient Na+ leads to a [BO3] dominated structure, and abundant B2O3 gives extremely high flowability. Lower surface tension effectively inhibits high-temperature shrinkage and enables the formation of a continuous amorphous protective layer. Excessively low crosslinking degree causes a slight decline in high-temperature structural stability. Gaseous volatilization of B2O3 simultaneously exerts a more pronounced destructive effect on the amorphous structure. These results are consistent with the macroscopic morphology analysis of BSA coatings after 1173 K exposure in Figure 2b–e.

3.4. Analysis of the Antioxidant Mechanism

The composite coating exhibits excellent oxidation resistance, a property attributed to the rapid formation of an amorphous glass layer and its exceptional oxygen diffusion resistance. All three components in the BSA layer exhibit melting points higher than approximately 1100 °C. Nevertheless, the mass of the mixed powder increases when heated beyond 579.1 °C, owing to chemical reactions within the mixture. The reaction peak temperature is 747.8 °C, and the end temperature of significant mass increase is 874.1 °C (Figure 10). During the initial heating process, the volatilization of crystalline water in the raw material powder leads to a decrease in sample mass. According to Li’s study [41], B4C undergoes a chemical reaction in air as the temperature increases, as shown in Equation (2). Additional oxygen incorporation during the oxidation of boron carbide accounts for the mass gain of the sample, starting at 580 °C.
B4C + 4O2 = 2B2O3 (l) + CO2
B2O3 (l) = B2O3 (g)
Meanwhile, the Gibbs free energy of the oxidation of B4C to B2O3 is negative at 423 °C, indicating that the reaction proceeds spontaneously at this temperature. Large-scale generation of B2O3 occurs between 600 °C and 850 °C, with the sample exhibiting a significant mass increase and a distinct exothermic peak. The spontaneity of the reaction diminishes with rising temperatures, as reflected by the ΔG shift from −2.5 (kJmol−1) × 10−3 at 423 °C to −2.25 (kJmol−1) × 10−3 at 1023 °C [41]. The TG curve shows an inflection point at 870 °C, attributed to the volatilization of B2O3 at high temperatures (Equation (3)). According to thermodynamic calculations, its volatilization rate is still much lower than the generation rate of B2O3 [42]. Therefore, oxidative weight gain still dominates despite volatilization beginning, as the sample’s mass rises but its rate slows due to volatilization loss. At this stage, the sample still retains a large amount of B2O3 and is in a mass-increasing state.
B2O3 remains solid below 438 °C but forms a liquid phase with silica via eutectic melting above 500 °C, as the phase diagram [32]. Elevated B4C content induces a proportional increase in both the liquid phase fraction and the eutectic phase of B2O3 and SiO2 within the coating structure. This microstructural evolution directly enhances the coating softening and promotes the formation of an extensive glass liquid phase. Within this binary system, inverse relationship between B2O3 content and liquidus temperature is pronounced, exhibiting a distinct negative dependence. A higher boron content leads to a lower liquid phase transition temperature. Such thermodynamic behavior gives rise to a self-regulating mechanism wherein elevated B2O3 generation intrinsically reduces the phase transition temperature, thereby facilitating enhanced glass formation under reduced thermal budgets [43]. By adjusting the B4C addition amount to control the generation of B2O3, the fluidity of BSA glass is ultimately regulated to achieve optimal antioxidant performance.
Before exposure, the internal structure of the coating is relatively dense and uniform. B4C particles in the coating react rapidly with O2 to form B2O3 during exposure to a high-temperature oxidation atmosphere at 1173 K. The generated B2O3 undergoes eutectic melting with SiO2 to form amorphous glass with a low melting point and superior fluidity, effectively filling defects produced in the coating during exposure (Figure 11). Na+ introduced by Albite effectively lowers the temperature of glass-forming reactions, while Al3+ stabilizes the glass network structure and improves its stability. A BSA glass layer can form rapidly and serve as an outstanding oxygen diffusion barrier to effectively suppress O2 penetration under the synergistic effect of Na and B. Long-term coating degradation primarily results from continuous B2O3 volatilization, which induces porosity development and thickness reduction within the protective layer. These structural changes create oxygen diffusion pathways that progressively compromise barrier effectiveness. When the formation of irreversible macrocracks and pores exceeds the self-repair capacity of the glass phase, the coating ultimately fails to maintain its protective function. Therefore, the glass coating exhibits good self-healing properties and antioxidant performance, representing a promising strategy to protect the substrate carbon blocks from oxidation under high-temperature exposure.

4. Conclusions

The oxidation behavior and the oxidation mass gain rate of the B4C-SiO2-Albite (BSA) coating were deeply discussed in this work. The result shows that it is a promising coating candidate, coating material with the appropriate B4C addition for the electrolytic aluminum industry due to its strong oxidation resistance.
(1) The oxidation resistance of B4C-SiO2-Albite composite coating greatly depends on the B4C content, and the coating with 20 wt% B4C exhibits the best oxidation property among the samples for the minimum mass gain rate of only—0.082% after 24 h exposure at 1173 K.
(2) Increased B4C promotes the formation of liquid B2O3 and amorphous borosilicate phase, while Na+ and Al3+ from Albite markedly improve the viscosity and stability of the borosilicate glass. Synergistic control of both components dictates the integrity of the BSA coating during service.
(3) The continuity and completeness of the in situ formed amorphous borosilicate covered layer shows the long-term protection from oxidation for the carbon substrate due to the self-healing ability, influenced by the volatilization of B2O3.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.L. (Tianquan Liang); Investigation, Characterization, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing and editing, Q.L.; Investigation and Characterization, J.Y.; Investigation and Characterization, X.Z.; Characterization and Supervision, X.W.; Characterization and Supervision, H.H.; Characterization and Data curation, A.H.; Investigation and Supervision, T.L. (Tao Liu). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52561015), and the Guangxi Science and Technology Base and Talent Special Project (AD25069063, AD25069078) and Innovation Project of Guangxi Graduate Education (YCSW2024036).

Data Availability Statement

The raw processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Thonstad, J.; Felner, P.; Haarberg, G.M.; Híveś, J.; Kvande, H.; Sterten, A. Aluminium Electrolysis, 3rd ed.; Aluminum-Verlag: Düsseldorf, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  2. Sørlie, M.; Øye, H. Cathodes in Aluminum Electrolysis, 3rd ed.; Aluminium-Verlag: Düsseldorf, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  3. Grjotheim, K.; Krohn, C.; Malinovský, M.; Matiasovsky, K. Aluminum Electrolysis Fundamentals of the Hall-Héroult Process; Aluminum-Verlag: Düsseldorf, Germany, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  4. Li, S.; Zhang, T.; Niu, L.; Yue, Q. Analysis of the development scenarios and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in China’s aluminum industry till 2030. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 290, 125859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kermeli, K.; Weer, P.-H.T.; Crijns-Graus, W.; Worrell, E. Energy efficiency improvement and GHG abatement in the global production of primary aluminium. Energy Effic. 2015, 8, 629–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Danielik, V.; Fellner, P.; Sýkorová, A.; Thonstad, J. Solubility of Aluminum in Cryolite-Based Melts. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2010, 41, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, J.; Zhao, Q.; Ning, P.; Wen, S. Greenhouse gas contribution and emission reduction potential prediction of China’s aluminum industry. Energy 2024, 290, 130183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tian, Y.; Cui, H.; Jiang, Y.; Wang, N. Research progress in antioxidation and anti-ablation coatings of carbon-based materials: A review. Resour. Chem. Mater. 2024, 3, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, S. High Temperature Ceramic Materials. Materials 2021, 14, 2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Li, T.; Zhang, J.; Wang, P.; Fu, Y.; Zhang, Y. A CrSi2-SiC-Si multiphase ceramic coating for SiC coated C/C composites against oxidation at 1773 K and 1973 K. Ceram. Int. 2025, 51, 28763–28770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, K.-J.; Yi, E.-J.; Kang, Y.; Hwang, H. A novel method of silicon carbide coating to protect porous carbon against oxidation. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 2021, 99, 105596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yuan, M.; Lu, J.; Kong, G. Effect of SiO2:Na2O molar ratio of sodium silicate on the corrosion resistance of silicate conversion coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2010, 204, 1229–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, T.; Xie, W.; Zhang, P.; Li, H. A compound glass coating with micro-pores to protect SiC-coated C/C composites against oxidation at 1773 K and 1973 K. Corros. Sci. 2022, 195, 109983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, P.; Bai, Y.; Zhao, X.; Ren, X.; Sun, W. Oxidation protection of CrSi2-HfB2-SiC/SiC coating for graphite in variable-temperature environment. Corros. Sci. 2022, 199, 110165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wan, F.; Luo, F.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, W.; Zhu, D. A glass coating for SiC fiber reinforced aluminum phosphate matrix (SiCf/AlPO4) composites for high-temperature absorbing wave applications. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 264, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tian, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, L.; Ouyang, J.; Zhou, Y.; Jia, D. Oxidation Resistance of Al PO4 Bonded Ceramic Coating Formed on Titanium Alloy for High-Temperature Applications. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2015, 12, 614–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shao, G.; Wu, X.; Kong, Y.; Cui, S.; Shen, X.; Jiao, C.; Jiao, J. Thermal shock behavior and infrared radiation property of integrative insulations consisting of MoSi2/borosilicate glass coating and fibrous ZrO2 ceramic substrate. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 270, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, W.; Ren, J.; Tang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Y. Effect of heat treatment on microstructure and oxidation resistance of SiO2-B4C-glass coating on alumina-carbon refractories. Ceram. Int. 2025, 51, 7825–7839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Deng, J.; Hu, K.; Lu, B.; Ma, X.; Li, H.; Wang, J.; Fan, S.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, L. Effect of B4C addition on the oxidation behavior of borosilicate glass repairing coating for C/C brake materials. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 14496–14504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fan, S.; Ma, X.; Ji, B.; Li, Z.; Xie, Z.; Deng, J.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, L. Oxidation resistance and thermal shock properties of self-healing SiCN/borosilicate glass-B4C-Al2O3 coatings for C/C aircraft brake materials. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 550–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhou, W.; Xiao, P.; Luo, W.; Li, Y. Microstructural evolution of SiC coating on C/C composites exposed to 1500 °C in ambient air. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 854–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Deng, J.; Hu, K.; Lu, B.; Zheng, B.; Fan, S.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, L. Influence of B4C on oxidation resistance of PSN/borosilicate glass-B4C field-based repair coating of C/C aircraft brake materials at 700–900 °C. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 20860–20872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lv, C.; Ren, J.; Duan, Y.; Wu, Y.; Li, X. Effect of SiO2 content on the oxidation resistance of SiO2–B4C-glass coating for alumina–carbon refractories. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 8554–8564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, P.; Zhang, M.; Sun, W.; Ren, X. Oxidation protection of B4C modified HfB2-SiC coating for C/C composites at 1073-1473 K. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 3206–3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, L.; Dong, S.; Cui, T.; Xin, J.; Chen, G.; Hong, C.; Zhang, X. Novel gradient ZrB2 -MoSi2 -SiC dense layer with enhanced emissivity and long-term oxidation resistance at ultra-high temperatures. Rare Met. 2025, 44, 2043–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, G.; Wu, Q.; Wang, S.; Zhang, H.; Wen, M.; Li, Z.; Li, J.; Chang, H.; Wang, C.; You, X.; et al. Nitrous Oxide Emissions: A Long-Neglected Challenge in the Aluminum Electrolysis Industry. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 2025, 12, 799–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, T.; Fan, Z.; Zhang, R.; Wang, B. Aluminium electrolysis inert anode material oxidation and corrosion behaviour: Progress, applications and prospects. Mater. Today Chem. 2025, 50, 103209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Han, J.; Feng, B.; Chen, Z.; Liang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Liang, X. Simulation and Application of a New Type of Energy-Saving Steel Claw for Aluminum Electrolysis Cells. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lv, Y.; Zhou, W.; Dong, Z.; Yuan, S.; Ding, X.; Ma, T.; Cui, S. Influence of CaO-B2O3-SiO2 crystallizable glass on microstructure and microwave dielectric of LiMg0.9Zn0.1PO4 ceramics for LTCC substrate applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 844, 156212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Young, C.; Zhang, C.; Loganathan, A.; Nautiyal, P.; Boesl, B.; Agarwal, A. Densification and oxidation behavior of spark plasma sintered Hafnium Diboride-Hafnium Carbide composite. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 14625–14631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rockett, T.J.; Foster, W.R. Phase Relations in the System Boron Oxide-Silica. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1965, 48, 75–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, Y.; Lai, F.; Li, J. Effect of B2O3 on Structure of Glassy F-Free CaO-SiO2-B2O3 Systems by 29Si MAS NMR and Raman Spectroscopy. JOM 2020, 72, 1414–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qian, G.; Wang, Z.; Gong, X.; Sun, L. The Importance of Slag Structure to Boron Removal from Silicon during the Refining Process: Insights from Raman and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2017, 48, 3239–3250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, W.; Dai, S.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, J.; Tian, W.; Xu, J. Viscosity and structure of MgO-SiO2-based slag melt with varying B2O3 content. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 3631–3636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hu, C.; Pang, S.; Tang, S.; Yang, Z.; Wang, S.; Cheng, H.-M. Long-term oxidation behavior of carbon/carbon composites with a SiC/B4C-B2O3-SiO2-Al2O3 coating at low and medium temperatures. Corros. Sci. 2015, 94, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Haas, L. Reprints available directly from the publisher Photocopying permitted by license only. Rev. Educ. Pedagog. Cult. Stud. 1995, 17, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cui, L.; Ni, P.; Lv, W.; Li, Y. A review on viscosity and structure of high-temperature borosilicate melts. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2025, 666, 123683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kumari, K.; Ram, S.; Kotnala, R.K. Self-controlled growth of Fe3BO6 crystallites in shape of nanorods from iron-borate glass of small templates. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2011, 129, 1020–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bertani, M.; Pallini, A.; Cocchi, M.; Menziani, M.C.; Pedone, A. A new self-consistent empirical potential model for multicomponent borate and borosilicate glasses. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 105, 7254–7271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bruns, S.; Uesbeck, T.; Weil, D.; Möncke, D.; Van Wüllen, L.; Durst, K.; De Ligny, D. Influence of Al2O3 Addition on Structure and Mechanical Properties of Borosilicate Glasses. Front. Mater. 2020, 7, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, Y.Q.; Qiu, T. Oxidation behaviour of boron carbide powder. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2007, 444, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hou, X.; Chou, K.-C. Quantitative investigation of oxidation behavior of boron carbide powders in air. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 573, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, J.; Yi, Y.; Zhou, M.; Cui, J. Effects of B2O3 content on crystallization behavior and properties of low temperature co-fired CaO-B2O3-SiO2 glass-ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2024, 35, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic Diagram of BSA Coating Preparation.
Figure 1. Schematic Diagram of BSA Coating Preparation.
Crystals 16 00292 g001
Figure 2. (a) The mass gain rates of the BSA coated specimens and bare C substrate at 1173 K. The macroscopic morphologies of the samples (be) 15–30BSA and (f) C substrate at 1173 K for 24 h.
Figure 2. (a) The mass gain rates of the BSA coated specimens and bare C substrate at 1173 K. The macroscopic morphologies of the samples (be) 15–30BSA and (f) C substrate at 1173 K for 24 h.
Crystals 16 00292 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns of the surface of BSA coating samples: (a) prepared coatings, (b) after 1 h exposure.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of the surface of BSA coating samples: (a) prepared coatings, (b) after 1 h exposure.
Crystals 16 00292 g003
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of 20BSA coating sample: (a) Surface, (b) Cross-section.
Figure 4. SEM micrographs of 20BSA coating sample: (a) Surface, (b) Cross-section.
Crystals 16 00292 g004
Figure 5. Cross-sectional morphologies of the BSA coated samples after oxidation at 1173 K for 24 h: (a) 15BSA, (b) 20BSA, (c) 25BSA, (d) 30BSA.
Figure 5. Cross-sectional morphologies of the BSA coated samples after oxidation at 1173 K for 24 h: (a) 15BSA, (b) 20BSA, (c) 25BSA, (d) 30BSA.
Crystals 16 00292 g005
Figure 6. (a) Cross-sectional elemental mappings of the 20BSA sample after oxidation at 1173 K for 24 h, (b) Si distribution, (c) Na distribution, and (d) Al distribution.
Figure 6. (a) Cross-sectional elemental mappings of the 20BSA sample after oxidation at 1173 K for 24 h, (b) Si distribution, (c) Na distribution, and (d) Al distribution.
Crystals 16 00292 g006
Figure 7. Surface morphologies of the BSA coated samples after oxidation at 1173 K for 1 h: (a) 15BSA, (b) 20BSA, (c) 25BSA, (d) 30BSA.
Figure 7. Surface morphologies of the BSA coated samples after oxidation at 1173 K for 1 h: (a) 15BSA, (b) 20BSA, (c) 25BSA, (d) 30BSA.
Crystals 16 00292 g007
Figure 8. (a) Raman and (b) FTIR spectra of the BSA coating after exposure for 1 h.
Figure 8. (a) Raman and (b) FTIR spectra of the BSA coating after exposure for 1 h.
Crystals 16 00292 g008
Figure 9. (ad) 15–35BSA XPS B 1s spectra of the samples after isothermal exposure at 1173 K for 1 h, the green line corresponds to the [BO3] peak, the pink line to the [BO4] peak, the orange-red line to the fitted curve, and the blue dotted line to the original data; (e) molecular structure schematics [36].
Figure 9. (ad) 15–35BSA XPS B 1s spectra of the samples after isothermal exposure at 1173 K for 1 h, the green line corresponds to the [BO3] peak, the pink line to the [BO4] peak, the orange-red line to the fitted curve, and the blue dotted line to the original data; (e) molecular structure schematics [36].
Crystals 16 00292 g009
Figure 10. TG/DSC of B4C-SiO2-Albite coating mixed powders.
Figure 10. TG/DSC of B4C-SiO2-Albite coating mixed powders.
Crystals 16 00292 g010
Figure 11. Diagram of high-temperature oxidation resistance mechanism.
Figure 11. Diagram of high-temperature oxidation resistance mechanism.
Crystals 16 00292 g011
Table 1. The chemical composition of the components in BSA coating (wt%).
Table 1. The chemical composition of the components in BSA coating (wt%).
CoatingsB4CSiO2Albite
15BSA154045
20BSA204040
25BSA254035
30BSA304030
Table 2. The mass gain rate of samples after thermal exposure.
Table 2. The mass gain rate of samples after thermal exposure.
Exposure
Time (h)
Mass Gain Rate (%)
BSA15BSA20BSA25BSA30C
000000
1−0.0100.0010.0150.046−20.726
2−0.032−0.002−0.0010.026−36.486
3−0.059−0.006−0.0220.017−52.953
4−0.087−0.012−0.052−0.002−66.580
8−0.323−0.029−0.080−0.069−80.899
12−0.550−0.057−0.114−0.121−90.283
20−1.330−0.070−0.134−0.321−94.380
24−2.101−0.082−0.152−0.510−96.340
Table 3. Raman peak assignments and structural characteristics of the BSA coating after exposure at 1173 K for 1 h.
Table 3. Raman peak assignments and structural characteristics of the BSA coating after exposure at 1173 K for 1 h.
Band Position (cm−1)AssignmentReference
463Si-O-Si bond[32]
686–752[BO4] stretching[32]
805B–O–Si bond[33]
1085Q3 silicon–oxygen units[33]
1250–1400[BO3] stretching[33]
Table 4. FTIR peak assignments and structural characteristics of the BSA coating after exposure at 1173 K for 1 h.
Table 4. FTIR peak assignments and structural characteristics of the BSA coating after exposure at 1173 K for 1 h.
Band Position (cm−1)AssignmentReference
800–1200[BO4] stretching[34]
1200–1600[BO3] stretching[34]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luo, Q.; Yang, J.; Zhang, X.; Wei, X.; He, H.; He, A.; Liu, T.; Liang, T. The Oxidation Resistance of the B4C-SiO2-Albite Coating Influenced by the In Situ Formation and Self-Healing Ability of Borosilicate Glass at 1173 K. Crystals 2026, 16, 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16050292

AMA Style

Luo Q, Yang J, Zhang X, Wei X, He H, He A, Liu T, Liang T. The Oxidation Resistance of the B4C-SiO2-Albite Coating Influenced by the In Situ Formation and Self-Healing Ability of Borosilicate Glass at 1173 K. Crystals. 2026; 16(5):292. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16050292

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luo, Quanhao, Jiaming Yang, Xueliang Zhang, Xuanchen Wei, Huan He, Aoping He, Tao Liu, and Tianquan Liang. 2026. "The Oxidation Resistance of the B4C-SiO2-Albite Coating Influenced by the In Situ Formation and Self-Healing Ability of Borosilicate Glass at 1173 K" Crystals 16, no. 5: 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16050292

APA Style

Luo, Q., Yang, J., Zhang, X., Wei, X., He, H., He, A., Liu, T., & Liang, T. (2026). The Oxidation Resistance of the B4C-SiO2-Albite Coating Influenced by the In Situ Formation and Self-Healing Ability of Borosilicate Glass at 1173 K. Crystals, 16(5), 292. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst16050292

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop