Next Article in Journal
Fabrication and Ultraviolet Response Characteristics of All-Oxide Bi2O3/Ga2O3 Heterojunction
Previous Article in Journal
Ultra-Low Dielectric Constant Ca3(BO3)2 Microwave Ceramics and Their Performance Simulation in 5G Microstrip Patch Antennas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Sm3+ Doping on Energy Storage Property and Thermal Stability of BaSnxTi1−xO3 Ceramics

1
The State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210009, China
2
Jiangsu National Synergetic Innovation Center for Advanced Materials (SICAM), Nanjing 211816, China
3
Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Inorganic Function Composites, Nanjing 211816, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2025, 15(7), 600; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15070600
Submission received: 5 June 2025 / Revised: 23 June 2025 / Accepted: 25 June 2025 / Published: 26 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Polycrystalline Ceramics)

Abstract

Dielectric capacitors have become a key component for energy storage systems, owing to their exceptional power density and swift charge–discharge performance. In a series of lead-free ferroelectric ceramic materials, BaSnxTi1-xO3 (BTS) received widespread attention due to its unique properties. However, BTS ceramics with high Sn content have high efficiency (η) but low recovery energy storage density (Wrec). We incorporated the Sm element into BTS ceramics and aimed to optimize both efficiency and recoverable energy density at moderate Sn content. With the synergistic effect between Sm and Sn, the optimal composition was found at 5% Sn content with 1% low-level Sm dopants, where the energy storage density reached 0.2310 J/cm3 at 40 kV/cm. Furthermore, the thermal stability of the ceramic was investigated using temperature-dependent dielectric spectroscopy, in situ XRD, and temperature-dependent hysteresis loops. With Sm doping, the fluctuation of Wrec decreased from 18.48% to 12.01%. In general, this work not only enhances the understanding of samarium dopants but also proposes strategies for developing lead-free ferroelectric ceramics with superior energy storage properties.

1. Introduction

The challenges of an energy crisis and environmental pollution are becoming increasingly prominent, and there is an urgent need to develop high-performance energy storage systems. Dielectric capacitors have gained critical importance, a status attributable to their exceptional power density and swift charge–discharge performance [1,2,3,4]. Lead-based ceramics are deployed commercially owing to their remarkable energy storage density. However, the use of lead has caused environmental issues. In the last decade, a series of lead-free ferroelectric ceramic materials have been investigated. Among these materials, barium titanate (BaTiO3, BT) is receiving widespread attention and has been used in various electronics devices, such as electronic ceramics, positive temperature coefficient thermistors, and capacitors.
The key performance of capacitors in practical use is the recovery energy storage density (Wrec) and efficiency (η). However, the Wrec and η of ferroelectric materials are relatively low, making it difficult to meet the needs of practical applications [5,6]. To address these limitations, research over the past decade has been focusing on building a morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) by compositional solid substitution [7,8,9,10]. For instance, researchers seek to improve performance by substituting at the B-site with elements such as Sn4+, Hf4+, and Zr4+ [11,12,13,14], where research has shown that these elements have significant advantages in improving the piezoelectricity and energy storage capacity of BT-based ceramics. Sn4+ is one of the most effective dopants, while Yao et al. reported the existence of a quasi-four-phase critical point in BaSnxTi1−xO3 (BTS) system ceramics [15]. Concurrently, extensive research has examined how Sn dopants intrinsically and extrinsically enhance material properties. For instance, Shi et al. investigated Ba(Ti0.8Sn0.2)O3 ceramics with high-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy and observed that the low Sn concentration region formed polar nanoregions (PNRs). The Sn doping manipulated the crystal electronic structure and also increased the dielectric properties in the PNR [16]. Wu et al. observed that with the increase in stannum doping, the domains became smaller and eventually disappeared. The evolution of domain structure leads to polarization anisotropy and also a decrease in domain wall energy, which eventually significantly promote the external piezoelectric response [17]. For now, BTS is used in various potential applications, such as capacitors, thermal radiometers, actuators, and microwave phase shifters [14,18,19].
However, high Sn4+ content will lead to a reduction in Pmax. As a result, although the efficiency is improved, the recovered energy storage density still remains with room for further improvement. Another way to improve BT-based ceramics is doping with elements, such as La3+, Sm3+, Nd3+, etc. [20,21,22,23]. Different from the elements that can form a solid perovskite structure, these elements usually only require a few atomic percentages and have various doping effects [24]. On one hand, acceptor doping hinders the movement of the domain walls, making ferroelectrics “hard”. On the other hand, doping ferroelectrics with donors “softens” the ceramics because of the internal stress caused by vacancies, and also electrons transfer between the ionized vacancies [25]. Meanwhile, the primary charge compensation mechanism in donor-doped ferroelectrics remains an open question [26,27]. Among these dopants, Sm3+ demonstrates distinctive chemical properties: while exerting minimal influence on the phase structure, it significantly enhances the inherent characteristics of the host material [28,29,30,31,32]. Sm appears to exhibit a more pronounced effect compared to other rare-earth elements when employed as a dopant. For instance, Sm3+ has been utilized in photocatalysts, optoelectronic displays, and sensors owing to its UV absorption capacity and orange-red luminescence [33]. Moreover, Sm3+ is commonly used as an effective luminescent center in the corresponding devices [34].
Nevertheless, systematic investigations into the effects of Sm3+ doping on the energy storage properties of BaTiO3-based ceramics remain limited. The physical mechanisms of the effect of Sm3+ doping on the ferroelectric properties of BT-based ceramics are also not clear. In this paper, the doping strategy is shown in Figure 1. Due to the decrease in Pmax caused by excessive Sn content, we chose to incorporate the Sm element into the lower Sn component to further improve η and eventually achieve optimization of both Pmax and η. We synthesized a series of samples with different Sn contents (2–14%) and Sm doping (0–1.75%) through solid-state reactions and systematically studied the synergistic effect of Sn and Sm on the energy storage performance of BaTiO3 ceramics. The thermal stability property of Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3 was further investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

The Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3 (x = 0.02–0.14, y = 0–0.0175) was prepared by a solid-state reaction method. The raw materials we used are as follows: titanium dioxide (TiO2, Shanghai Lingfeng Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.; 99.0%, Shanghai, China), barium carbonate (BaCO3, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.; 99.0%, Shanghai, China), tin oxide (SnO2, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.; 99.5%), and samarium oxide (Sm2O3, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.; 99.9%). The raw powders were precisely weighed and subjected to alcohol-based ball milling for 12 h. After drying, the powders were calcined at 1200 °C for 4 h. The calcined products were re-milled and subsequently pressed into disks using 7 wt% polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) as a binder. Finally, the green bodies were sintered at 1400 °C for 4 h.
The crystalline phase structure of the samples was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD; Rigaku SmartLab 9 kW, Tokyo, Japan), and the scanning rate was maintained at 5°/min. Surface morphology analysis was performed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JSM-6510, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Temperature-dependent dielectric properties were measured from −80 °C to 120 °C using an impedance analyzer (Agilent 4294A, Palo Alto, CA, USA). Hysteresis loops and strain curves were evaluated under an applied electric field of 40 kV/cm via a ferroelectric analyzer (Radiant Technologies Precision Premier II, Albuquerque, NM, USA).

3. Discussion

A series of Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3 (x = 2–14%, y = 0–1.75%) samples were investigated for their energy storage properties. The properties, for instance, Wd, η, and Wrec, were calculated for each component of the ceramics and are shown in Figure 2a–c, respectively. The relationship of the properties is realized with Equations (1)–(3):
W d = 0 P m a x E d P
W r e c = P r P m a x E d P
η = W r e c W d × 100 %
where Wd stands for the total charged energy, while Wrec is the energy that can be discharged. Pmax, Pr and E stand for the maximum polarization, remnant polarization, and applied electric field, separately, which are the key factors impacting the energy storage properties. Generally speaking, Wd and η are directly connected to a hysteresis loop, since a high Wd is usually proportional to a high Pmax, while a high η can be directly observed with a “slim” loop. As indicated in Equation (2), Wrec differs from Wd in that Wrec is influenced not only by Pmax but also by Pr. Doping is an exceedingly complex behavior that may alter the lattice parameters, domain structure, and phase composition of the ceramics. However, these changes are often nonlinear, which results in the variation of Wrec not exhibiting a monotonic trend [35,36]. Meanwhile, to investigate the effect of changes in these energy storage properties from the chemical doping component, we extracted the hysteresis loops from the binary phase diagrams and show them in Figure 2d–f.
In general, from these binary phase diagrams, we can find that Wd (shown in Figure 2a) remains unchanged with various Sm contents but decreases as the Sn component increases. As shown in Figure 2e, for pure BTS (namely, y = 0 in Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3), the P-E curves become increasingly “narrow” with the increase in x, and Pmax values significantly decrease. This trend is identical to previously reported findings [37], where the maximum Pmax (24.40 μC/cm2) occurs at x = 0.05. A similar trend is observed for y = 0.01 and x ranging from 0.02 to 0.14 (see Figure 2f). The emergence of this trend may stem from a reduction in the long-range ferroelectric order and the reduction in the polar regions. Meanwhile, η increases with the increase in both Sm and Sn content. Both types of element doping can cause chemical inhomogeneity, leading to the disruption of long-range order. Previous studies have shown that “slim” hysteresis loops arise from the reduction in domain size and the lowered energy barrier for domain switching [17]. For pure BTS, η increases from 26.25% to 75.77%. When Sm is incorporated into a component of 0.01, η ranges from 69.92% to 91.99% (Figure 2f). Overall, η can be enhanced through the synergistic effects of Sn and Sm. When it comes to Wrec, we find it does not vary monotonically with either Sm or Sn because Wrec is a combination of both Wd and η. Wd decreases while η increases with the Sn component. For a small amount of Sm doping, Wd remains unchanged and η increases. As shown in Figure 2d, η increases from 35.78% to 70.40%, while Wd varies only slightly from 0.3320 J/cm3 to 0.3281 J/cm3. In general, we find that Wd can be optimized with the fine-tuning of both the Sm and Sn components. The highest energy storage density is achieved (Wrec = 0.2310 J/cm3 at 40 kV/cm) at x = 0.05 and y = 0.01.
To investigate the microstructure origin of the improvement of energy storage properties, X-ray diffraction was performed on each component of the Ba1−3/2ySmySn0.05Ti0.95O3 ceramics. As shown in Figure 3a, the ceramics display a single perovskite structure with no detectable secondary phase, indicating that Sm is fully incorporated into the perovskite structure. Meanwhile, the (200) peak position shifts to a higher angle (see Figure 2b), which is attributed to the difference in ionic radii between Sm3+ and Ba2+. The ionic radius of Sm3+ (approximately 1.24 Å) is smaller than that of Ba2+ (approximately 1.61 Å), resulting in a decrease in the average ionic radius at the A site, which theoretically leads to a decrease in the unit cell volume. The interplanar spacing (d) for each composition was calculated using Bragg’s law (nλ = 2d sinθ), revealing a decrease from 2.8343 Å to 2.8236 Å. Consequently, the diffraction angle (2θ) should increase, which is consistent with experimental phenomena.
Figure 4 shows the scanning electron microscope (SEM) images and grain size distribution of Ba1−3/2ySmySn0.05Ti0.95O3 ceramics, as shown in a bar chart in each corresponding figure, respectively. For pure BTS (y = 0), the average grain size is 46.15 μm, calculated using Nano Measurer software (v 1.2). With the doping of Sm, the grain size is significantly reduced. Specifically, when y = 0.01, the average grain size is 1.05 μm. The decrease indicates that the Sm element suppresses grain growth. This phenomenon is commonly observed for Sm doping in various ceramics [38,39,40]. However, when the concentration of Sm increases, the average grain size remains relatively stable, with values of 1.07 μm, 1.05 μm, 0.84 μm, 0.77 μm, and 0.67 μm corresponding to y = 0.0075, 0.01, 0.0125, 0.015, and 0.0175, respectively (see Figure 4g). Meanwhile, the grain size becomes much more uniform. Numerous studies have systematically investigated the influence of grain size on the properties of ceramic materials, particularly their electronic characteristics. Empirical observations consistently indicate that increased grain dimensions correlate with enhanced saturation polarization and remanent polarization. Notably, contradictory findings have been reported in the literature regarding this relationship [41]. There are also studies that indicated that a reduction in grain size has an optimizing effect on energy storage performance. In our case, the improved performance of this system may be partially attributed to the optimization of the grain size [42,43,44]. Nevertheless, the exact mechanisms remain unclear and require further investigation. In addition, the density is an important indicator for evaluating the performance of ceramics [45]. We employed the Archimedes drainage method to measure the relative density of the ceramics. With an increasing Sm content, a slight decrease in densification was observed, while all ceramic samples maintained stable relative densities within the range of 94–96%.

4. Prospective Studies

In the energy storage application of dielectric ceramic capacitors, thermal stability is an equally important evaluation index for energy storage density and efficiency. Operational heat generation in capacitors compromises dielectric performance, diminishes equipment reliability, and reduces the service life of energy-storage devices. Furthermore, temperature exerts a substantial influence on the energy-storage characteristics of ceramic dielectrics. The observed thermal stability in energy-storage performance originates fundamentally from the material’s inherent temperature-resistant dielectric properties. The temperature dependence of the dielectric constant of Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3 ceramic samples is shown in Figure 5.
Many studies have shown that replacing Ti with Sn in BTS systems significantly reduces the Curie temperature [46,47], and our study also obtains a similar result, as shown in Figure 5a. Multiple phase transition peaks gradually merge into a quasi-quadruple point as the Sn content increases, which results in the disappearance of the polarization switching energy barrier and also results in an increase in energy storage properties. When Sm was introduced into the system, a similar trend was observed in the temperature-dependent dielectric spectrum. As shown in Figure 5b, where y = 0.01, the merging of multiple dielectric peaks and the decrease in Curie temperature can also be observed. However, compared to the component without Sm, its ferroelectric–paraelectric transition peak becomes smoother. By further comparing the effects of Sm doping on the system (Figure 5c), we find that with the increase in Sm content, the ferroelectric–paraelectric transition peak becomes broader, while the dielectric peak intensity is not lost. This indicates that as the Sm content increases, the ferroelectric–paraelectric transition becomes “diffuse”, which is consistent with changes in the relaxation factor (γ). The relaxation factor is calculated based on the modified Curie–Weiss law (1/ε − 1/εm) = (TTm)^γ/C (where C is the Curie constant). As shown in Figure 5d, with increasing Sm content, γ increases from 1.5 to 1.75. This phenomenon indicates that the system tends to be more like a relaxor and further proves the effectiveness of Sm element modulation. Especially when x = 0.05 and y = 0.01, the Curie temperature of the system approaches room temperature. This indicates that the system can achieve good room thermal stability through element doping to meet the requirements of the energy storage devices. Meanwhile, this composition exhibits no significant frequency dispersion behavior (see Figure 5e), which is consistent with its relatively small relaxation factor value.
We further explored the thermal stability of Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3 (x = 0.05 and y = 0.01) ceramics and the microscopic mechanism for the broadening of their dielectric peaks. In situ XRD technology was used to analyze the evolution of the phase structure of the material. The diffraction peaks collected in the temperature range of 20–120 °C are shown in Figure 6a–f. Further, lattice parameters were determined using the Rietveld refinement method with GSAS-II software [48]. During the refinement process, the rhombohedral phase with the space group (PDF#252271, Amm2) structure model [49], the orthorhombic phase with the space group (PDF#252272, P4mm) structure model, and the cubic phase with space group (PDF#56093, Pm3m) were employed [49]. The results of the refinement are shown in Table 1, where all results have χ2 < 3 and Rwp < 10%. When the ambient temperature is 20 °C, the ceramic exhibits a coexistence of orthorhombic and tetragonal phases. When the temperature rises to 40 °C, the orthorhombic phase volume fraction decreases (from 38.70% to 15.37%) and the tetragonal phase volume fraction increases (from 61.30% to 84.63%). This indicates that the ceramic undergoes an O-T phase transition. When the temperature is between 60 and 80 °C, the ceramic undergoes a phase transition from the tetragonal to the cubic phase. As the temperature continues to increase, it transforms into the cubic phase. The trend of multiphase changes indicates that after Sm doping, Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3 ceramics undergo a relatively gentle phase transition process when the temperature changes, which is in line with the behavior of the temperature-dependent permittivity of this component shown in Figure 5. Meanwhile, these phase transition characteristics also indicate that the material may have good thermal stability.
Hysteresis loops were tested for both Sm-doped components (y = 0.01) and undoped components (y = 0), in the temperature range of 20–80 °C. As shown in Figure 7, when the temperature rises, the maximum polarization intensity (Pmax) decreases for both components. This may be due to thermal disturbance, which hinders the dipole orientation arrangement inside the material and thereby weakens the polarization ability. When x = 0.05 and y = 0, the fluctuation amplitude of Wrec within this temperature range was calculated to be 18.48% (from 0.1188 J/cm3 to 0.0968 J/cm3, see Figure 7c). When x = 0.05 and y = 0.01, the fluctuation amplitude of Wrec is 12.01% (from 0.2310 J/cm3 to 0.2033 J/cm3). This indicates that doping Sm in BTS can optimize the thermal stability of the system.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the energy storage performance and thermal stability of Sm-doped BTS ceramics were investigated. To solve the problem that Pmax decreases in BTS ceramics with high Sn content, we incorporate the Sm element into BTS ceramics with low Sn content. The results indicate that Sm doping can improve the relaxor behavior of the material and effectively enhance energy storage efficiency without significantly reducing Pmax. Binary diagrams of energy storage performance were drawn, with different Sm and Sn components. The optimal component for the synergistic effect of Sm and Sn was found to be 5% Sn content with 1% low-level Sm dopants, with an energy storage density of 0.2310 J/cm3 at 40 kV/cm and an efficiency of 70.40%. Furthermore, the thermal stability of the ceramic was investigated using temperature dielectric spectroscopy, in situ XRD, and temperature-dependent hysteresis loops. Compared to undoped BTS ceramic, the fluctuation of Wrec decreases from 18.48% to 12.01%. These results indicate that the incorporation of the Sm element effectively improves the energy storage performance and thermal stability of BTS ceramics, which has practical significance for dielectric capacitors. This study elucidates the role of samarium dopants and proposes novel design strategies for developing lead-free ferroelectric ceramics exhibiting enhanced energy-storage performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G.; Methodology, Z.Q.; Software, Z.Q. and Z.W.; Validation, S.G. and Z.Q.; Formal Analysis, Z.Q. and Z.W.; Investigation Z.Q. and H.Z.; Resources, J.L., Y.L. (Yunfei Liu) and Y.L. (Yinong Lyu); Writing—Original Draft, Z.W.; Writing—Review and Editing, S.G.; Supervision, S.G., Y.L. (Yunfei Liu) and Y.L. (Yinong Lyu); Project Administration, S.G.; Funding Acquisition, S.G., H.Z. and J.L.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11904164, 51902155, 52202137), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. BK20210187).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Li, J.; Shen, Z.; Chen, X.; Yang, S.; Zhou, W.; Wang, M.; Wang, L.; Kou, Q.; Liu, Y.; Li, Q.; et al. Grain-orientation-engineered multilayer ceramic capacitors for energy storage applications. Nat. Mater. 2020, 19, 999–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Han, S.; Kim, J.S.; Park, E.; Meng, Y.; Xu, Z.; Foucher, A.C.; Jung, G.Y.; Roh, I.; Lee, S.; Kim, S.O.; et al. High energy density in artificial heterostructures through relaxation time modulation. Science 2024, 384, 312–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, M.; Lan, S.; Yang, B.B.; Pan, H.; Liu, Y.Q.; Zhang, Q.H.; Qi, J.L.; Chen, D.; Su, H.; Yi, D.; et al. Ultrahigh energy storage in high-entropy ceramic capacitors with polymorphic relaxor phase. Science 2024, 384, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Gao, Y.; Qiao, W.; Lou, X.; Song, Z.; Zhu, X.; He, L.; Yang, B.; Hu, Y.; Shao, J.; Wang, D.; et al. Ultrahigh energy storage in tungsten bronze dielectric ceramics through a weakly coupled relaxor design. Adv. Mater. 2023, 36, 2310559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, D.; Zhou, D.; Wang, D.; Zhao, W.; Guo, Y.; Shi, Z.; Zhou, T.; Sun, S.-K.; Singh, C.; Trukhanov, S.; et al. Lead-free relaxor ferroelectric ceramics with ultrahigh energy storage densities via polymorphic polar nanoregions design. Small 2022, 19, 2206958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hu, Q.; Tian, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Bian, J.; Jin, L.; Du, H.; Alikin, D.O.; Shur, V.Y.; Feng, Y.; Xu, Z.; et al. Achieve ultrahigh energy storage performance in BaTiO3-Bi(Mg1/2Ti1/2)O3 relaxor ferroelectric ceramics via nano-scale polarization mismatch and reconstruction. Nano Energy 2019, 67, 104264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nayak, R.L.; Dash, S.S.; Zhang, Y.; Sahoo, M.P.K. Enhanced dielectric, thermal stability, and energy storage properties in compositionally engineered lead-free ceramics at morphotropic phase boundary. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 17220–17233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, T.; Yan, B.; Ma, J.; He, Q.; An, L.; Chen, K. Enhanced energy storage properties in BNT-based ceramics with a morphotropic phase boundary modified by Sr(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3. J. Mater. Chem. C 2023, 11, 15294–15302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Neha; Richa, P.; Manoj, B.; Parveen, K.; Rajesh Kumar, M.; Chandra, P. Improved dielectric and energy storage properties in (1-x)BaTi0.80Zr0.20O3-xBa0.70Ca0.30Ti0.99Fe0.01O3 ceramics near morphotropic phase boundary. Mater. Lett. 2022, 318, 132126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sharma, S.; Nandan, R.; Malhotra, P.; Kumar, S.; Kumar, R.; Negi, N.S. Morphotropic phase boundary evolution with synergistic effect of sintering temperature to improve electrocaloric and energy storage performances of lead-free Ba0.95Ca0.05Sn0.09Ti0.91O3 (BCST) ceramic. J. Energy Storage 2024, 99, 113295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Co, K.; Khassaf, H.; Alpay, S.P. Electrocaloric and pyroelectric properties of barium zirconate titanate. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 127, 174102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, G.; Yu, W.; Wang, Y.; Feng, H.; Hao, M.; Wu, G.; Li, Q.; Yu, K.; Fan, B.; Jin, L.; et al. Electrocaloric effect of (Ba1-xSrx)(HfxTi1-x)O3 lead-free ferroelectric ceramics with phase structure regulation. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 34387–34396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wei, X.; Feng, Y.; Wan, X.; Yao, X. Evolvement of dielectric relaxation of barium stannate titanate ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2004, 30, 1397–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, H.; Giddens, H.; Saunders, T.G.; Palma, M.; Abrahams, I.; Yan, H.; Hao, Y. Microwave tunability in tin substituted barium titanate. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 44, 1627–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yonggang, Y.; Chao, Z.; Duchao, L.; Dong, W.; Haijun, W.; Yaodong, Y.; Xiaobing, R. Large piezoelectricity and dielectric permittivity in BaTiO3-xBaSnO3 system: The role of phase coexisting. EPL 2012, 98, 27008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shi, T.; Xie, L.; Gu, L.; Zhu, J. Why Sn doping significantly enhances the dielectric properties of Ba(Ti1-xSnx)O3. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, B.; Zheng, H.; Wu, Y.-Q.; Huang, Z.; Thong, H.-C.; Tao, H.; Ma, J.; Zhao, C.; Xu, Z.; Liu, Y.-X.; et al. Origin of ultrahigh-performance barium titanate-based piezoelectrics: Stannum-induced intrinsic and extrinsic contributions. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 7700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Marković, S.; Jovalekić, Č.; Veselinović, L.; Mentus, S.; Uskoković, D. Electrical properties of barium titanate stannate functionally graded materials. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 30, 1427–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Manisha, K.; Sarun, M. High-temperature impedance, modulus spectroscopy, and conductivity study of Nd modified barium stannate titanate electroceramics. ECS Trans. 2022, 107, 11497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ben Mrad, M.; Hannachi, R.; Dammak, M.; Abdelmoula, N.; Zghal, S.; Khemakhem, H. Zirconium and lanthanide effects on the structural, dielectric and optical properties of Na0.8Ba0.2Nb0.8Ti0.2O3 ferroelectric ceramic. Mater. Today Commun. 2020, 24, 101223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gu, Z.; Qiu, Q.; Shi, C.; He, L.; Xing, Y.; Peng, J.; Li, H.; Chu, Y.; et al. Enhancement of Photoluminescence and Anomalous Thermal Quenching Behavior of Er/Yb/Zr co-doped BaTiO3 Ceramic. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 18866–18874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bajpai, K.K.; Sreenivas, K.; Thakur, O.P.; James, A.R.; Shukla, A.K. Influence of Cd doping on the electro-strain of barium zirconate titanate ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, 1963–1967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kang, N.; Kim, M.; Song, H.; Ryu, J. Effects of Sm2O3 addition on the dielectric and energy storage properties of BaTiO3 ceramics. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 2024, 61, 1070–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, Y.-X.; Yao, X.; Wang, X.-S.; Hao, Y.-B. Studies of dielectric properties of rare earth (Dy, Tb, Eu) doped barium titanate sintered in pure nitrogen. Ceram. Int. 2012, 38, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, Z.; Yu, J.; Hao, S.; Janolin, P.-E. Enhancing properties of lead-free ferroelectric BaTiO3 through doping. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 42, 4693–4701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cuiying, M.; Huiling, D.; Jia, L.; Xian, D.; Danni, F. Charge compensation mechanisms of BaTiO3 ceramics co-doped with La2O3 and Bi2O3. Ceram. Int. 2021, 48, 5428–5433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pandey, A.H.; Gupta, S.M. Role of charge compensation mechanism on phase formation, dielectric and ferroelectric properties in aliovalent Gd3+ ion modified PbMg1/3Nb2/3O3 ceramics. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 253, 114495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jing, L.; Li, J.; Ye, T.; Chao, C.; Yu, L.; Qingyuan, H.; Chao, L.; Xiaoyong, W.; Haixue, Y. Enhanced energy storage performance under low electric field in Sm3+ doped AgNbO3 ceramics. J. Mater. 2021, 8, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiaqi, C.; Ping, P.; Yongde, L.; Hengchang, N.; Genshui, W. Electrostrain optimization of bismuth sodium titanate-based ceramics by Sm doping. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2025, 108, 20415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Qiaoli, L.; Junwei, L.; Yongfu, L.; Meijing, W.; Weihao, W.; Dayong, L. Structure-dependent dielectric relaxations in Sm-doped BaTiO3 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 34042–34049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, C.; Li, Y.; Sun, P.; Yang, S.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Q. Electrical transport properties of Sm-doped La0.7Ca0.3MnO3 polycrystalline ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 25281–25286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhou, Y.; Ye, F.; Cai, Y.; Li, H. Enhanced dielectric and relaxation properties in Sm3+ doped KNNT ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 27596–27606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guan, P.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, J.; Zheng, M. Effect of Sm3+ doping on ferroelectric, energy storage and photoluminescence properties of BaTiO3 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2022, 49, 11796–11802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Nikolić, M.G.; Jovanović, D.J.; Đorđević, V.; Antić, Ž.; Krsmanović, R.M.; Dramićanin, M.D. Thermographic properties of Sm3+-doped GdVO4phosphor. Phys. Scr. 2012, 2012, T149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Benyoussef, M.; Zannen, M.; Belhadi, J.; Manoun, B.; Dellis, J.-L.; El Marssi, M.; Lahmar, A. Dielectric, ferroelectric, and energy storage properties in dysprosium doped sodium bismuth titanate ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 19451–19460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, Y.; Hu, T.; Chen, X.; Xie, J.; Shi, Y. Achieving high energy storage performance in PbHfO3-based antiferroelectric ceramics by Sr element doping. J. Alloys Compd. 2024, 994, 174651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ma, X.; Shi, W.; Yang, Y.; Alikin, D.O.; Shur, Y.Y.; Gao, J.; Wei, X.; Liu, G.; Du, H.; Jin, L. Giant electrocaloric effect and high-field electrostrictive properties in Ba(Ti1−xSnx)O3 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 18517–18524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dong, S.; Guo, F.; Zhou, H.; Long, W.; Fang, P.; Li, X.; Xi, Z. Phase structures and electrical properties of Sm doped PSN-PMN-PT ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 881, 160621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bag, S.; Behera, B. Transport phenomena and conductivity mechanism in Sm doped Bi4V2−xSmxO11 ceramics. J. Sci. Adv. Mater. Dev. 2016, 108, 20415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, Q.; Bao, S.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Jing, Y.; Li, J. Influence of lightly Sm-substitution on crystal structure, magnetic and dielectric properties of BiFeO3 ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 682, 672–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ghayour, H.; Abdellahi, M. A brief review of the effect of grain size variation on the electrical properties of BaTiO3-based ceramics. Powder Technol. 2016, 292, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, Z.; Bin, C.; Zheng, S.; Wang, J. Effect of grain size and grain boundary on the energy storage performance of polycrystalline ferroelectrics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2024, 125, 152903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yangfei, G.; Xiaopei, Z.; Bian, Y.; Peng, S.; Ruirui, K.; Ye, Y.; Qida, L.; Ming, W.; Jinghui, G.; Xiaojie, L. Grain size modulated (Na0.5Bi0.5)0.65Sr0.35TiO3-based ceramics with enhanced energy storage properties. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 433, 133584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Wang, X.; Huan, Y.; Zhao, P.; Liu, X.; Wei, T.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, X. Optimizing the grain size and grain boundary morphology of (K,Na)NbO3-based ceramics: Paving the way for ultrahigh energy storage capacitors. J. Mater. 2021, 7, 780–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Klym, H.; Karbovnyk, I.; Luchechko, A.; Kostiv, Y.; Pankratova, V.; Popov, A.I. Evolution of Free Volumes in Polycrystalline BaGa2O4 Ceramics Doped with Eu3+ Ions. Crystals 2021, 11, 1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ansari, M.A.; Sreenivas, K. Effects of disorder activated scattering and defect-induced phase on the ferroelectric properties of BaSnxTi1-xO3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.28) ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 20738–20749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xiaoyong, W.; Yujun, F.; Xi, Y. Dielectric relaxation behavior in barium stannate titanate ferroelectric ceramics with diffused phase transition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 2031–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zaitouni, H.; Hajji, L.; Mezzane, D.; Choukri, E.; Gagou, Y.; Hoummada, K.; Charai, A.; Alimoussa, A.; Rožič, B.; El Marssi, M.; et al. Structural, dielectric, ferroelectric and tuning properties of Pb-free ferroelectric Ba0.9Sr0.1Ti1-xSnxO3. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 27275–27282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kalyani, A.K.; Krishnan, H.; Sen, A.; Senyshyn, A.; Ranjan, R. Polarization switching and high piezoelectric response in Sn-modified BaTiO3. Phys. Rev. B 2015, 91, 024101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Doping strategy in this paper. The Sm element was incorporated into the lower Sn component to achieve optimization of both Pmax and η.
Figure 1. Doping strategy in this paper. The Sm element was incorporated into the lower Sn component to achieve optimization of both Pmax and η.
Crystals 15 00600 g001
Figure 2. Binary diagrams of Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3 (x = 2–14%, y = 0–1.75%) ceramics of (a) Wd, (b) η, (c) Wrec, and P-E loops of Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3 at 40 kV/cm: (d) x = 0.05, (e) y = 0, (f) y = 0.01.
Figure 2. Binary diagrams of Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3 (x = 2–14%, y = 0–1.75%) ceramics of (a) Wd, (b) η, (c) Wrec, and P-E loops of Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3 at 40 kV/cm: (d) x = 0.05, (e) y = 0, (f) y = 0.01.
Crystals 15 00600 g002
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns (20–80°) of Ba1−3/2ySmySn0.05Ti0.95O3 ceramics and (b) magnified views in the intervals of 44–46°.
Figure 3. (a) XRD patterns (20–80°) of Ba1−3/2ySmySn0.05Ti0.95O3 ceramics and (b) magnified views in the intervals of 44–46°.
Crystals 15 00600 g003
Figure 4. The SEM images of Ba1−3/2ySmySn0.05Ti0.95O3 ceramics sintered with the grain size distribution: (a) y = 0, (b) y = 0.0075, (c) y = 0.01, (d) y = 0.0125, (e) y = 0.015, and (f) y = 0.0175 and (g) line graph of average grain size variation.
Figure 4. The SEM images of Ba1−3/2ySmySn0.05Ti0.95O3 ceramics sintered with the grain size distribution: (a) y = 0, (b) y = 0.0075, (c) y = 0.01, (d) y = 0.0125, (e) y = 0.015, and (f) y = 0.0175 and (g) line graph of average grain size variation.
Crystals 15 00600 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of temperature-dependent permittivity of Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3 ceramics at 100 kHz frequency: (a) y = 0, (b) y = 0.01, and (c) x = 0.05, (d) relaxation factors of Ba1−3/2ySmySn0.05Ti0.95O3, and (e) curves of dielectric constant and dielectric loss of Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3(x = 0.05, y = 0.01) as a function of temperature at different frequencies.
Figure 5. Comparison of temperature-dependent permittivity of Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3 ceramics at 100 kHz frequency: (a) y = 0, (b) y = 0.01, and (c) x = 0.05, (d) relaxation factors of Ba1−3/2ySmySn0.05Ti0.95O3, and (e) curves of dielectric constant and dielectric loss of Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3(x = 0.05, y = 0.01) as a function of temperature at different frequencies.
Crystals 15 00600 g005
Figure 6. Rietveld-refined XRD patterns of Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1-xO3(x = 0.05, y = 0.01) ceramics at different temperatures: (a) 20 °C, (b) 40 °C, (c) 60 °C, (d) 80 °C, (e) 100 °C, and (f) 120 °C.
Figure 6. Rietveld-refined XRD patterns of Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1-xO3(x = 0.05, y = 0.01) ceramics at different temperatures: (a) 20 °C, (b) 40 °C, (c) 60 °C, (d) 80 °C, (e) 100 °C, and (f) 120 °C.
Crystals 15 00600 g006
Figure 7. Temperature dependence of P-E hysteresis loops of Ba1−3/2ySmySn0.05Ti0.95O3: (a) y = 0, (b) y = 0.01 and (c) the line graph of the value of Wrec in relation to temperature changes.
Figure 7. Temperature dependence of P-E hysteresis loops of Ba1−3/2ySmySn0.05Ti0.95O3: (a) y = 0, (b) y = 0.01 and (c) the line graph of the value of Wrec in relation to temperature changes.
Crystals 15 00600 g007
Table 1. Lattice parameters, cell volume, and reliability factors of Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3(x = 0.05 and y = 0.01) ceramics.
Table 1. Lattice parameters, cell volume, and reliability factors of Ba1−3/2ySmySnxTi1−xO3(x = 0.05 and y = 0.01) ceramics.
T (°C)Space GroupUnit Cell ParametersPhase Fraction (%)χ2Rwp (%)
a(Å)b(Å)c(Å)V(Å3)
20Amm24.05044.03995.642392.32638.702.416.5
P4mm4.0230-4.005064.81961.30
40Amm24.04754.02105.644091.85515.372.268.3
P4mm4.0231-4.004164.80684.63
60P4mm4.01204.01204.026664.81335.742.246.2
Pm3m4.0511--64.48464.26
80P4mm4.0140-4.029664.92312.192.296.5
Pm3m4.0488--66.3787.81
100Pm3m4.0201--64.9671002.338.2
120Pm3m4.0195--64.9391002.687.8
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qin, Z.; Wang, Z.; Gao, S.; Zheng, H.; Luo, J.; Liu, Y.; Lyu, Y. Effect of Sm3+ Doping on Energy Storage Property and Thermal Stability of BaSnxTi1−xO3 Ceramics. Crystals 2025, 15, 600. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15070600

AMA Style

Qin Z, Wang Z, Gao S, Zheng H, Luo J, Liu Y, Lyu Y. Effect of Sm3+ Doping on Energy Storage Property and Thermal Stability of BaSnxTi1−xO3 Ceramics. Crystals. 2025; 15(7):600. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15070600

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qin, Zhengchao, Zhiyi Wang, Si Gao, Hongjuan Zheng, Jin Luo, Yunfei Liu, and Yinong Lyu. 2025. "Effect of Sm3+ Doping on Energy Storage Property and Thermal Stability of BaSnxTi1−xO3 Ceramics" Crystals 15, no. 7: 600. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15070600

APA Style

Qin, Z., Wang, Z., Gao, S., Zheng, H., Luo, J., Liu, Y., & Lyu, Y. (2025). Effect of Sm3+ Doping on Energy Storage Property and Thermal Stability of BaSnxTi1−xO3 Ceramics. Crystals, 15(7), 600. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst15070600

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop