Next Article in Journal
Unconfined Compressive Strength and Splitting Tensile Strength of Lime Soil Modified by Nano Clay and Polypropylene Fiber
Next Article in Special Issue
Research on the Impact-Induced Deflagration Behavior by Aluminum/Teflon Projectile
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Non-Metallic Inclusions on Local Deformation and Damage Behavior of Modified 16MnCrS5 Steel
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dynamic Response and Numerical Interpretation of Three Kinds of Metals for EFP Liner under Explosive Loading
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dynamic Simulation and Parameter Analysis of Contact Mechanics for Mimicking Geckos’ Foot Setae Array

1
Aerospace System Engineering Shanghai, Shanghai 201109, China
2
School of Mechanical Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China
3
Xi’an North Qinghua Electrical Co., Ltd., Xi’an 710025, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Crystals 2022, 12(2), 282; https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12020282
Submission received: 23 January 2022 / Revised: 13 February 2022 / Accepted: 16 February 2022 / Published: 18 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dynamic Behavior of Materials)

Abstract

According to the dynamic characteristics of the adhesion desorption process between gecko-like polyurethane setae and the contact surface, the microcontact principle of an elastic sphere and plane is established based on the Johnson–Kendall–Robert model. On this basis, combined with the cantilever beam model, microscale adhesive contact models in the case of a single and an array of setae are obtained. The contact process is numerically simulated and verified by the adhesion desorption test. After that, the effects of external preload, the elastic modulus of setae material, the surface energy, and the surface roughness on the contact force and depth during the dynamic contact process of setae are studied. The results show that the error between the simulation and test is 15.9%, and the simulation model could reflect the real contact procedure. With the increase in preload, the push-off force of the setae array would grow and remain basically constant after reaching saturation. Increasing the elastic modulus of setae material would reduce the contact depth, but have little effect on the maximum push-off force; with the increase in the surface energy of the contact object, both the push-off force between the objects and the contact depth during desorption would increase. With the increase in wall roughness, the push-off force curve of the setae array becomes smoother, but the maximum push-off force would decrease. By exploring the dynamic mechanical characteristics of the micro angle of setae, the corresponding theoretical basis is provided for the numerical simulation of the adsorption force of macro materials.
Keywords: Johnson–Kendall–Robert model; polyurethane setae array; surface energy; modeling; simulation Johnson–Kendall–Robert model; polyurethane setae array; surface energy; modeling; simulation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lin, Q.; Wu, C.; Yue, S.; Jiang, Z.; Du, Z.; Li, M. Dynamic Simulation and Parameter Analysis of Contact Mechanics for Mimicking Geckos’ Foot Setae Array. Crystals 2022, 12, 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12020282

AMA Style

Lin Q, Wu C, Yue S, Jiang Z, Du Z, Li M. Dynamic Simulation and Parameter Analysis of Contact Mechanics for Mimicking Geckos’ Foot Setae Array. Crystals. 2022; 12(2):282. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12020282

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lin, Qing, Chunbo Wu, Shuai Yue, Zhonghui Jiang, Zhonghua Du, and Mengsheng Li. 2022. "Dynamic Simulation and Parameter Analysis of Contact Mechanics for Mimicking Geckos’ Foot Setae Array" Crystals 12, no. 2: 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12020282

APA Style

Lin, Q., Wu, C., Yue, S., Jiang, Z., Du, Z., & Li, M. (2022). Dynamic Simulation and Parameter Analysis of Contact Mechanics for Mimicking Geckos’ Foot Setae Array. Crystals, 12(2), 282. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst12020282

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop