Next Article in Journal
Synergistic Effects of Ni-Co Alloy Active Sites and Promoter Modification on Nickel-Based Catalysts for Enhanced Performance in Dry Reforming Reactions
Previous Article in Journal
Nitrogen-Functionalized Graphite Felt for Tetracycline Degradation in Chlorinated Wastewater via Metal-Free Electro-Fenton
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of K on the Basicity and Selectivity of Pt/m-ZrO2 Catalysts for Methanol Steam Reforming with co-fed H2
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Study of Mono- and Bimetallic (Ni–Co–Fe) Catalysts Supported on LaCeO3 for Ammonia Decomposition

Chemical and Materials Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box 80204, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2026, 16(6), 564; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16060564 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 8 May 2026 / Revised: 12 June 2026 / Accepted: 16 June 2026 / Published: 18 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Catalytic Processes for Green Hydrogen Production)

Abstract

Ammonia decomposition over non-precious metal thermos-catalysts offers a viable and cost-effective pathway for sustainable hydrogen production. In this study, LaCeO3 perovskite was synthesized using a citric acid complexation method and employed as a support for mono- and bimetallic catalysts prepared by incipient wetness impregnation, maintaining a total metal loading of 10 wt%. Structural and surface properties were systematically investigated using BET, XRD, H2-TPR, SEM, TEM, and CO2-TPD. Among the monometallic catalysts (Ni, Co, and Fe), 10%Ni/LaCeO3 exhibited the highest activity, which is attributed to its enhanced reducibility and optimal surface basicity, facilitating NH3 activation. Bimetallic systems (Ni-Co, Ni-Fe, and Co-Fe) with equal metal loadings (5 wt% each) showed better activity compared to their monometallic counterparts following the order: 5%Ni–5%Co/LaCeO3 > 5%Ni–5%Fe/LaCeO3 > 5%Co–5%Fe/LaCeO3. The improved performance of the Ni-Co system is due to structural interactions between Ni and Co, which promote hydrogen desorption and accelerate N–H bond cleavage, while suppressing nitrogen recombination as the rate-limiting step. Further systematic optimization of the Ni/Co ratio showed that 8%Ni–2%Co/LaCeO3 had the highest catalytic activity with consistent performance over 50 h. This optimal composition provides a balanced distribution of active metallic sites and moderate-to-strong basic sites, enhancing NH3 adsorption and intermediate transformation. These findings show that LaCeO3-supported Ni-Co catalysts are promising candidates for efficient hydrogen production from ammonia without using noble metals.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Hydrogen, as an ideal alternative to fossil energy, has the advantages of high energy density, zero carbon emissions, and easy access. However, the large-scale application of hydrogen is hindered by challenges related to its storage and transportation [1,2,3,4]. Ammonia as an ideal hydrogen carrier has the following advantages: low-cost production, a high energy density, ease of liquefaction for storage and transportation, and carbon-free participation in the whole process [5,6,7]. Nowadays, hydrogen production by ammonia decomposition has been regarded as a promising solution for hydrogen storage and transportation; thus, developing efficient and durable ammonia decomposition catalysts is the key to realizing this application [6]. In the last few decades, plenty of metal catalysts, such as Ruthenium (Ru), Nickel (Ni), Cobalt (Co), Iron (Fe), Copper (Cu), etc., have been found to have high ammonia decomposition activity [8,9,10,11,12]. Ru-based catalysts show the highest activity at low temperatures among them, but the scarce resources and exorbitant market costs of Ru hinder its large-scale industrial application. Much effort has therefore been devoted to developing non-precious metal catalysts for ammonia decomposition, and among them, Fe, Co, and Ni have attracted particular attention.
According to literature, the weak binding energy between metal (M) and nitrogen (N) in non-noble metal catalysts limits their effectiveness in ammonia decomposition. In a bimetallic system, the M-N binding energy can be tuned; hence, bimetallic catalysts have turned out to be potential materials for ammonia decomposition in comparison with their monometallic counterparts [13,14]. This is majorly attributed to the synergistic effect of the metal-metal combination in bimetallic catalysts [15]. Fujitani’s group examined the role of support materials in enhancing nickel’s catalytic activity for ammonia decomposition. Their findings revealed that the electronic structure of nickel, and consequently the Ni-N bond strength, is significantly influenced by the choice of support [16].
Over the past decades, researchers have examined various materials as support for H2 production from NH3 such as MgO, SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2, ZrO2, carbon (activated), porous (meso and micro) materials, multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), etc. [13,17,18,19,20,21]. Literature research has shown that the basicity of a catalyst is crucial for its effectiveness in decomposing ammonia. Additionally, studies have demonstrated that using La2O3 or CeO2 with a catalyst can enhance its intrinsic activity [22,23,24]. These rare earth oxides had been widely considered as catalyst carriers or important catalyst components, especially for ammonia decomposition reactions [25,26,27,28].
On the other hand, perovskite-type oxides (ABO3) are proven remarkable materials due to their exceptional properties, like structural integrity even when modified with diverse elements or compositions, high conductivity, and high thermal stability [29]. Based on the above considerations, we chose LaCeO3 perovskite oxide as support for the ammonia decomposition reaction. In this work, we studied several bimetallic systems on LaCeO3 and compared the activity with their monometallic counterparts for ammonia decomposition. A review of the available literature indicates that studies on ammonia decomposition related to this system remain limited or have not been widely reported.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Textural Properties

The calcined catalysts are used for surface area analysis. The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms and pore-size distribution patterns of all prepared catalysts are shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2. The support LaCeO3 showed type-IV isotherm with H3 hysteresis, indicating the presence of aggregates of plate-like particles giving rise to slit-shaped pores. All calcined monometallic catalysts displayed type-IV isotherms with an H3 hysteresis loop and showed mesopores with an average pore size in the range of 20–70 nm except 10%Fe/LaCeO3 [30]. The 10%Fe/LaCeO3 catalyst exhibited a type IV isotherm with H2 hysteresis, designating the existence of ink-bottle-shaped pores.
The BET specific surface area, total pore volume, and average pore diameter values are listed in Table 1. The LaCeO3 support showed a lower surface area than all catalysts prepared in this work. The BET specific surface areas increased after the addition of active metal, and the increment is high in 10%Fe/LaCeO3 catalyst. This increase in catalyst surface area indicates either introducing pores or increased surface roughness within the composite, rather than pore blockage. As a result, there is a reduction in pore size upon metal in addition to the support. It is observed from Figure 1 that the LaCeO3 showed pores in the 4 to 30 nm range. With the addition of cobalt to LaCeO3 i.e., in 10%Co/LaCeO3 there is a slight change in distribution of pores in the range of 5 to 20 nm. With the addition of Ni, the pores are predominantly distributed in the range of 2–20 nm. Finally, with the addition of Fe to LaCeO3 the pores are distributed in the range of 5–15 nm, and the pore volume also changes. The order of surface area of single metallic catalysts is 10%Co/LaCeO3 < 10%Ni/LaCeO3 < 10%Fe/LaCeO3. It was observed that the average pore width is higher in the 10%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst than in the other mono-metallic catalysts supported on LaCeO3.
On the other hand, the bimetallic catalyst showed both high pore volume and pore width, which indicates the pore size of the bimetallic catalyst markedly shifts to a larger pore size. As a result, the bimetallic catalysts were slightly higher in surface area. The order of surface area of bimetallic catalysts is 5%Ni-5% Fe/LaCeO3 ~ 5%Co-5%Fe/LaCeO3 < 5%Ni-5% Co/LaCeO3.

2.2. XRD-Analysis

The XRD results of prepared lanthanum cerate are shown in Figure 3A. The diffraction peaks exhibit characteristic reflections of perovskite crystal structure, consistent with the standard JCPDS file No.: 01-080-5546, confirming cubic symmetry. As reported by Butt et al. [31], LaCeO3 nanoparticles prepared via the precipitation method exhibit reflections at 2θ values of 27.79°, 31.93°, 45.51°, 54.74°, which are indexed to the (1,1,1), (2,0,0), (2,2,0) and (3,1,1) planes, respectively. The XRD pattern shown in Figure 3A displays similar diffraction peaks at corresponding 2θ positions, indicating good agreement with the reported structure. Furthermore, according to Mangu et al. [32], the planes (1,1,1) and (2,0,0) are highly reactive and play a significant role in enhancing the oxygen vacancy formation. Notably, no diffraction peaks corresponding to lanthanum oxide phases are observed, suggesting the complete formation of the perovskite structure.
The XRD patterns of mono- and bimetallic catalysts are presented in Figure 3B,C. Phase identification of the collected diffraction data was performed using Match! software. All catalyst samples exhibit diffraction patterns similar to that of the LaCeO3 perovskite support, indicating that the perovskite structure is preserved even after metal addition. No additional diffraction peaks corresponding to Ni, Co, or Fe oxide phases are observed in any of the catalysts. The absence of distinct metal oxide reflections cannot be solely attributed to their amorphous nature or low crystallinity. Instead, several factors may contribute to this observation. First, the active metal species are likely highly dispersed on the LaCeO3 support surface. When metal oxide particles are present as very small crystallites, their diffraction peaks become significantly broadened and weak, often falling below the detection limit of conventional XRD analysis. Second, the strong diffraction peaks associated with the crystalline LaCeO3 perovskite structure can mask the weak reflections originating from highly dispersed metal oxide species. This effect is particularly significant in the bimetallic catalysts, where the individual metal loading is lower due to the distribution of the total metal content between two active components.
Furthermore, strong interactions between the transition metal species and the LaCeO3 support may facilitate the formation of highly dispersed surface species or partial incorporation of metal ions into the perovskite lattice, thereby preventing the formation of large segregated crystalline metal oxide domains. Similar observations have been reported for supported Ni-, Co-, and Fe-based catalysts, where the absence of detectable metal oxide peaks has been associated with high metal dispersion and strong metal–support interactions [22,25]. The lack of any observable bulk metal oxide phases in the present study suggests that the active metals are well dispersed throughout the support matrix, which is beneficial for maximizing the number of accessible catalytic active sites for ammonia decomposition.
Additionally, the overall diffraction peak intensities of the catalysts are slightly lower than those of the support, indicating a reduction in crystallinity after metal incorporation. This decrease may result from slight structural distortion of the perovskite lattice and the introduction of defects or oxygen vacancies arising from metal-support interactions. These observations collectively confirm that the perovskite framework remains intact following metal loading while promoting a highly dispersed distribution of active metal species.

2.3. TPR Studies

The reducibility of all prepared catalysts and support was analyzed by H2-TPR. The TPR patterns of support material & single metal catalysts are presented in Figure 4A. There is one small peak at 500 °C observed for the support material LaCeO3 which might be due to the reduction of surface ceria species [23,33]. Based on the literature, the Ni catalysts, either on La2O3 or on CeO2 showed reduction peaks in the temperature range of 220–430 °C which correspond to weak, medium, and strong interactions between NiO and the support [34]. The TPR profile of 10%Ni/LaCeO3 showed a peak between 290 and 500 °C, which corresponds to weakly and medium interacted NiO species. A small lower temperature peak at 240 °C observed in the TPR pattern of the 10%Ni/LaCeO3 catalyst that corresponds to non-interacted NiO species with support. According to literature, the TPR pattern of the cobalt catalyst shows two-step reduction profiles. In the first step Co3O4 reduced to CoO (Co3O4 + H2 → 3CoO + H2O), and in the second step CoO reduced to metallic cobalt (CoO + H2 → Co + H2O) [26,35]. The TPR profiles of 10%Co/LaCeO3 showed multiple peaks that are related to the reduction of non-interacted and interacted cobalt species with support.
The TPR profile of iron oxide typically shows two successive reduction steps: (i) a small peak within the 350–450 °C temperatures, representing the reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+ ions; and (ii) a broad reduction peak between 750 and 800 °C temperatures, indicating the subsequent reduction Fe2+ to Fe0 [36].
The TPR profile of 10%Fe/LaCeO3 exhibits a low-intensity reduction peak around 400 °C corresponds to the reduction of Fe3+ to Fe2+. The reduction of Fe2+ to Fe0 is happening above 850 °C thus not detected in Figure 4A. These results clearly indicate a strong metal-support interaction in 10%Fe/LaCeO3, which consequently leads to low metal reducibility in this catalyst.
Table 2 summarizes the hydrogen consumption values obtained from the TPR experiments for all catalysts. The results clearly indicate that the 10%Ni/LaCeO3 catalyst exhibits the highest reducibility, while the 10%Fe/LaCeO3 catalyst shows the lowest. The theoretical hydrogen consumption for the 10%Ni/LaCeO3 catalyst was calculated to be approximately 1704 µmol g−1, compared to the experimentally measured value of about 1530 µmol g−1. Based on these values, the degree of reduction was determined to be 89.8%.
The TPR patterns of bimetallic catalysts are presented in Figure 4B. There is clear change in TPR profiles of bimetallic catalysts compared to single-metal catalysts. The Ni-Co catalyst showed a reduction peak in the range of 300–400 °C which corresponds to overlapped peaks for NiO and Co3O4 reduction. A small reduction peak also observed at 250 °C corresponds to the reduction peak of NiO not interacted with the support. The TPR profiles of 5%Ni-5%Fe/LaCeO3 catalyst showed two main reduction peaks, a peak ranging from 207 to 310 °C and another peak between 317 and 560 °C. All these TPR peaks correspond to the reduction of NiO and Fe3O4 species. The TPR profiles of 5%Co-5%Fe/LaCeO3 catalyst showed three reduction peaks, a peak ranging from 185 to 303 °C and another peak between 360 and 585 °C. In addition, there is a small peak observed in the TPR profile of 5%Co-5%Fe/LaCeO3 catalyst at a temperature range from 303 to 357 °C. All these TPR peaks correspond to the reduction of Co3O4 and Fe3O4 species. From Figure 4B and Table 2, it can be concluded that the metal reducibility increased in the bimetallic catalyst compared to the single metallic catalyst, especially in comparison to 10%Fe/LaCeO3 & 10% Co/LaCeO3. On other hand, the 10%Ni/LaCeO3 catalyst showed the highest reducibility among all catalysts. The TPR results clearly indicate that Ni-based catalysts supported on LaCeO3 exhibit enhanced metal reducibility. Consequently, a higher density of accessible active sites is expected for the Ni-based catalysts.

2.4. CO2-TPD

CO2-TPD analysis was performed to evaluate the total basicity of the catalysts prepared in this study. Figure 5A presents the CO2 desorption profiles of the LaCeO3 support and all monometallic catalysts, while Figure 5B shows the profiles for the bimetallic catalysts. The CO2-TPD pattern of the LaCeO3 support (Figure 5A) displays three types of basic sites: (i) weak basic sites (<150 °C), (ii) moderate basic sites (200–400 °C), and (iii) strong basic sites (650–850 °C). Upon incorporation of single active metals (Ni, Co, or Fe) into the LaCeO3 support, noticeable changes in the distribution of basic sites occur, particularly in the Ni/LaCeO3 and Fe/LaCeO3 catalysts. In contrast, only a slight change in basicity is observed for the 10%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst relative to the support. Among all monometallic catalysts, 10%Ni/LaCeO3 exhibits the highest concentration of moderate basic sites.
Table 2 summarizes the basicity values obtained from the CO2-TPD experiments. The basicity of the LaCeO3 support is lower than that of all the catalysts, except for 10%Fe/LaCeO3, which shows the lowest basicity overall, likely due to strong Fe-support interactions. The 10%Ni/LaCeO3 catalyst demonstrates the highest total basicity, dominated by medium-strength basic sites. The 10%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst shows the second-highest basicity, with strong basic sites contributing most significantly. In contrast, the 10%Fe/LaCeO3 catalyst exhibits the lowest basicity, attributed to strong metal-support interactions. The overall observation is that incorporating active metals significantly enhances the basicity of LaCeO3, with Ni imparting the highest increase, while Fe results in the lowest basicity due to strong metal-support interactions.
The basicity profiles of the bimetallic catalysts, shown in Figure 5B, follow trends similar to those of the monometallic samples. The 5%Ni–5%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst demonstrates the highest basicity among the bimetallic formulations, with a significant contribution from medium-strength basic sites. In contrast, the 5%Co–5%Fe/LaCeO3 and 5%Ni–5%Fe/LaCeO3 catalysts exhibit a predominance of strong basic sites. Among the bimetallic catalysts, 5%Ni–5%Fe/LaCeO3 shows the lowest total basicity. Overall, bimetallic catalysts maintain similar basic site distributions to monometallic catalysts but exhibit enhanced basicity depending on the metal combination.

2.5. SEM Studies

The morphology of the supported nickel, cobalt and iron catalysts are studied by scanning electron microscopy characterization. The SEM images of all prepared catalysts are displayed in Figure 6. According to literature [32], the LaCeO3 perovskite exhibits the morphology of nanoaggregates with a microstructure that has a large amount of honeycomb-like macropores. The addition of metal to LaCeO3 morphology changed. The 10%Ni/LaCeO3 catalyst showed aggregates of plates with narrow edges having slit-shaped pores with high surface roughness.
The 10%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst contains aggregations of small plates in different shapes. The 10%Fe/LaCeO3 catalyst contains bulk aggregates having space inside. From Figure 6 it seems 10%Fe/LaCeO3 catalyst possesses pores with narrow width outside and wider pore inside. The SEM results are in good agreement with the BET data. The morphology of a bimetallic catalyst slightly changes in comparison to that of a monometallic catalyst. The 5%Ni-5%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst showed aggregates of small plates with increased porosity. The bimetallic catalyst having Fe showed similar morphology with less porosity.
The EDS spectra for the selected area of the 10%Ni/LaCeO3 catalyst are presented in Figure S1A. The quantitative results showed the presence of 39%, 37%, and 11% atomic weight percentages of La, Ce, and Ni, respectively. The scanning image and the EDS spectra analysis of the 10%Co/LaCeO3 sample are displayed in Figure S1B. The quantification results showed that 33%, 33% and 12% atomic percentages of La, Ce, and Co, respectively, are present in the 10%Co/LaCeO3 sample. The scanning image and the EDS spectra analysis of the 10%Fe/LaCeO3 sample are displayed in Figure S1C. The quantification results showed that 41%, 35%, 9% and 13% atomic percentages of La, Ce, Fe, and O, respectively, are present in the 10%Fe/LaCeO3 sample. Overall, the EDS analyses confirm the successful incorporation and uniform distribution of Ni, Co, and Fe on the LaCeO3 support, with elemental compositions close to the intended loadings. The presence of La and Ce as major components in all samples, along with the corresponding transition metals, verifies the effective formation of the metal-supported LaCeO3 catalysts without significant elemental loss or segregation during preparation.
The scanning image and the EDS spectra analysis of the 5%Ni-5%Co/LaCeO3 sample are displayed in Figure S2A. The quantification results showed that 36%, 35%, 4%, 4% and 18% atomic percentages of La, Ce, Ni, Co, and O, respectively, are present in the 5%Ni-5%Co/LaCeO3 sample. The Scanning image and the EDS spectra analysis of 5%Ni-5%Fe/LaCeO3 sample are displayed in Figure S2B. The quantification results showed that 36%, 36%, 5%, 5% and 16% atomic percentages of La, Ce, Ni, Fe, and O, respectively, are present in 5%Ni-5%Fe/LaCeO3 sample. The Scanning image and the EDS spectra analysis of 5%Co-5%Fe/LaCeO3 sample are displayed in Figure S2C. The quantification results showed that 36%, 36%, 4%, 4% and 14% atomic percentages of La, Ce, Co, Fe, and O, respectively, are present in the 5%Co-5%Fe/LaCeO3 sample.
These EDS results clearly demonstrate the successful co-incorporation of Ni-Co, Ni-Fe, and Co-Fe bimetallic species onto the LaCeO3 support, with elemental compositions closely matching the nominal loadings. The comparable La and Ce contents across all samples and the uniform presence of both metal components indicate effective dispersion of the bimetallic phases without preferential segregation, confirming the formation of well-defined bimetallic LaCeO3-based catalysts.

2.6. Catalyst Performance Studies

All prepared catalysts were evaluated for their catalytic performance in ammonia decomposition to hydrogen. The reaction was carried out using pure ammonia (100 vol%) at ambient pressure with a space velocity of 6000 mL gcat−1 h−1, over a temperature of 300–600 °C. Figure 7A presents the catalytic activities of the monometallic catalysts, namely 10%Ni/LaCeO3, 10%Co/LaCeO3 and 10%Fe/LaCeO3. As expected, ammonia conversion increased with rising temperature, which is consistent with the endothermic nature of the ammonia decomposition reaction [35].
Among the Ni, Co, and Fe catalysts on LaCeO3, the 10%Ni/LaCeO3 catalyst showed high activity. At 600 °C; the 10%Ni/LaCeO3 catalyst achieved an NH3 conversion of 95%, whereas 10%Co/LaCeO3 and 10%Fe/LaCeO3 catalysts showed lower conversions of 90% and 88% respectively. To better elucidate the differences in catalytic performance, the activities of the catalysts at 550 °C are compared in Figure S3A. A clear variation in activity among the monometallic catalysts is observed, with 10%Ni/LaCeO3 showing the highest activity and 10%Fe/LaCeO3 the lowest.
Perovskite oxides have strong electron-donating capability due to the presence of abundant basic sites, which facilitates electron transfer to the supported metal species [37]. According to Yin et al., [38] the conductivity of the support is very important for high catalytic efficiency, as it promotes electron transfer from the support to metal. This process facilitates the recombinative desorption of surface N atoms. Furthermore, the incorporation of active metal increases the basicity of monometallic catalyst, thereby facilitating nitrogen recombination.
Zhang et al. [39] reported that La and Ce promoters significantly influence the physicochemical properties of Ni catalysts, leading to enhanced activity in ammonia decomposition. Similarly, Liu et al. [40] demonstrated that La2O3 increases weak and medium-strength basic sites and improves the reducibility of metal species, particularly Ni.
A similar trend is observed in LaCeO3-supported catalysts, where the Ni-based catalyst exhibited a high degree of reduction (90%), resulting in a greater number of active sites. In contrast, the 10%Fe/LaCeO3 catalyst showed the lowest activity, attributed to strong metal-support interaction that limits metal reducibility (degree of reduction 26%). Although the 10%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst exhibited significant basicity, particularly strong basic sites, its activity remained lower than that of the Ni catalyst due to its comparatively lower metal reducibility (31.5%). These results indicate that Ni is more favorable than Co and Fe for ammonia decomposition over LaCeO3 support.
Figure 7B shows the catalytic activities of the bimetallic catalysts 5%Ni-5%Co/LaCeO3, 5%Ni-5%Fe/LaCeO3, 5%Co-5%Fe/LaCeO3. The bimetallic catalysts are more active than the mono metallic catalysts except 5%Co-5%Fe/LaCeO3. Catalysts 5%Ni-5%Co/LaCeO3 and 5%Ni-5%Fe/LaCeO3 showed 100% conversion at 600 °C.
The bimetallic catalysts showed higher surface area values than the pure support and monometallic catalysts. Notably, the metal reducibility increased, especially in Fe-based catalysts relative to their monometallic catalysts. On the other hand, the Ni-Co catalyst showed lower metal reducibility and reduced basicity compared to 10%Ni/LaCeO3. The results suggest that the metal-support interactions decreased in Ni-Fe and Co-Fe systems whereas in Ni-Co system the interactions slightly increased relative to their mono metallic catalysts.
Despite its relatively lower basicity and reducibility, the Ni-Co catalyst exhibited superior catalytic activity among all catalysts studied. Haihua et al. [14] studied Ni, Co, and Ni-Co catalysts on CeO2 support for the ammonia decomposition reaction. According to them, the synergy between Co and Ni can decrease the bond energy between N and the active phase. Hence, the nitrogen re-combinative desorption is fast, which is the rate-limiting step of the NH3 decomposition reaction. The reduced bond energy can be used to explain the much-enhanced catalytic activity of the Ni-Co bimetallic catalyst. A similar synergistic effect is expected in this study; the synergy between Ni-Co catalysts leads to higher activity. To further clarify activity differences, catalytic performance at 550 °C was compared (Figure S3B). The sequential order activity by bimetallic catalysts is as follows: 5%Ni-5%Co/LaCeO3 > 5%Ni-5%Fe/LaCeO3 > 5%Co-5%Fe/LaCeO3.

2.7. Optimization of Metal Loading in Bimetallic Catalysts

To finalize the study and optimize the active metal loading in Ni-Co bimetallic catalysts, samples with different Ni/Co weight percentages, namely 7%Ni–3%Co/LaCeO3 and 8%Ni–2%Co/LaCeO3 in addition to the 5%Ni–5%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst, were synthesized and evaluated. As summarized in Table 1, the specific surface area increased with increasing Ni content, following the order: 5%Ni–5%Co < 7%Ni–3%Co < 8%Ni–2%Co.
The XRD patterns of the bimetallic catalysts with varying metal loadings are presented in Figure S4. No significant changes in the diffraction patterns were observed upon variation of the Ni/Co ratio, indicating that changes in metal loading did not substantially affect the crystal structure or crystallite size of the catalysts.
The H2-TPR profiles of the calcined bimetallic catalysts used for loading optimization are shown in Figure 8A. As discussed previously, the Ni-Co catalysts exhibit a main reduction peak in the temperature range of 300–400 °C, corresponding to the overlapping reduction of NiO and Co3O4 species interacting with the support. In addition, a minor reduction peak observed around 250 °C is attributed to the reduction of NiO species weakly interacting with the support.
Comparison of the TPR profiles of 5%Ni–5%Co/LaCeO3 and 7%Ni–3%Co/LaCeO3 reveals no significant difference in their reduction behavior. However, for the 8%Ni–2%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst, the reduction peak in the range of 170–275 °C becomes more intense and dominant, corresponding to an increased fraction of non-interacting or weakly interacting NiO species. Furthermore, as shown in Table 2, the overall reducibility of the catalysts increases with increasing Ni content from 5 to 8 wt%, indicating enhanced reduction characteristics at higher Ni loadings.
The basicity of the catalysts, evaluated by CO2-TPD, is shown in Figure 8B. As previously discussed, Ni-Co bimetallic catalysts exhibit a significant contribution from medium-to-strong basic sites. A comparison among 5%Ni–5%Co/LaCeO3, 7%Ni–3%Co/LaCeO3, and 8%Ni–2%Co/LaCeO3 reveals a similar distribution of basic sites; however, the total basicity is highest for the 5%Ni–5%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst. In particular, the concentration of medium-strength basic sites is more pronounced in this sample. As summarized in Table 2, the total basicity decreases with increasing Ni content from 5 to 8 wt%, indicating that a reduction in Co loading leads to a corresponding decrease in surface basicity.
Overall, the combined H2-TPR and CO2-TPD results demonstrate that metal reducibility is enhanced by higher Ni loading, whereas surface basicity is favored by higher Co content on the LaCeO3 support.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was employed to investigate the morphology of the calcined 8%Ni–2%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst. A representative TEM image is shown in Figure 9A, and the corresponding energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectra are presented in Figure 9B. The calcined catalyst exhibits a nano-platelet–like morphology with stacked structures forming relatively large agglomerates, which can provide extended interfacial contact between the active metal species and the LaCeO3 support.
The EDX analysis confirms the presence of O, La, Ce, Ni, and Co in the calcined 8%Ni–2%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst, with atomic percentages of 71.77, 9.04, 10.64, 6.13, and 2.43%, respectively, in good agreement with the nominal composition.
The HRTEM image of the 8%Ni–2%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst is presented in Figure 10a. Clear and well-defined lattice fringes are observed, with interplanar spacings of 0.148 nm and 0.124 nm, which are attributed to the NiO (220) and CoO (220) crystallographic planes, respectively [41]. According to the literature [41,42,43], these planes correspond to face-centered cubic (FCC) metal oxide phases at the interface. High-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) combined with EDS elemental mapping was carried out to evaluate the spatial distribution of the active metal species. The HAADF-STEM images acquired at a 10 nm scale, together with the corresponding elemental mapping (Figure 10b), reveal a uniform dispersion of Ni and Co species over the LaCeO3 support. Such homogeneous dispersion and suitable metal-support interactions are known to enhance N-H bond activation by increasing the density of accessible bimetallic active sites, while simultaneously suppressing metal sintering at reaction temperatures. Consequently, these structural characteristics favor higher ammonia conversion and contribute to the excellent catalytic stability observed during prolonged ammonia decomposition tests.
Figure 11A presents the catalytic performance of all Ni-based catalysts prepared in this study for ammonia decomposition. The introduction of optimally balanced Ni-Co compositions over LaCeO3 support significantly enhances catalytic activity. The ammonia conversion increased as the Ni loading was raised from 5 to 8 wt%. Among the investigated samples, 8%Ni–2%Co/LaCeO3 exhibited the highest catalytic activity. Based on ammonia conversion, catalytic performance follows the order: 8%Ni-2%Co/LaCeO3 > 7%Ni-3%Co/LaCeO3 > 5%Ni-5%Co/LaCeO3 > 10%Ni/LaCeO3 > 10%Co/LaCeO3.
The variation in the H2 formation rate at 550 °C is clearly illustrated in Figure 11B. These results indicate that the incorporation of a small amount of Co is beneficial for enhancing the activity of Ni-based catalysts supported on LaCeO3. He et al. [14] studied the Ni-Co bimetallic system on CeO2 support and reported that doping of Co into the Ni-based catalysts significantly reduced the reaction order and followed the Temkin-Pyzhev mechanism. A similar phenomenon is expected in this study.
According to Fu et al., [44], the addition of cobalt to the Ni system reduces the energy barrier for the associative decomposition of M-N to form N2 which is the step dictating ammonia decomposition. Cobalt reveals strong metal-support interactions, which can promote its dispersion on the LaCeO3 surface and facilitate electronic interaction between Co and Ni species [45]. This interaction may enable electron transfer from the support to Ni via Co, thereby enhancing the intrinsic activity of Ni active sites. In contrast, higher Co loadings may partially block Ni-Co interfacial contact or hinder Ni accessibility, leading to a gradual decline in catalytic performance. These observations suggest that low, optimized Co content is sufficient to maximize the promotional effect.
The time-on-stream stability test was conducted using the 8%Ni-2%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst at 550 °C and 600 °C for a total duration of 50 h, and the results are presented in Figure 12. Initially, the catalyst was evaluated at 550 °C for 15 h. Subsequently, the reaction temperature increased to 600 °C and was maintained for 20 h. Finally, the temperature decreased back to 550 °C, and the catalyst was tested for an additional 15 h. Remarkably, the 8%Ni-2%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst exhibited excellent stability in terms of NH3 conversion throughout the entire 50 h test period at both 550 °C and 600 °C. A time-on-stream study at a higher GHSV (12,000 h−1) was conducted using the 8%Ni–2%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst at 550 °C for 25 h. The results are presented in Figure S6. The conversion decreased to 85%. However, the catalyst exhibited stable performance even at this high space velocity throughout the 25 h test.
Previous studies have reported that synergistic interactions between Ni and Co species can influence the adsorption–desorption behavior of hydrogen and thereby enhance ammonia decomposition activity [14,46]. However, direct evidence for such effects, including hydrogen desorption measurements or operando spectroscopic investigations, was not obtained in the present study. Therefore, the enhanced catalytic performance of the Ni–Co bimetallic catalysts observed herein should be interpreted as being potentially associated with synergistic metal–metal interactions reported in the literature.
In addition, surface basic sites enhance electron donation to adsorbed ammonia molecules, thereby promoting N-H bond activation. While Co addition over LaCeO3 increases surface basicity and strengthens metal-support interactions, resulting in decreased metal reducibility. Ni species supported on LaCeO3 exhibit higher reducibility but comparatively lower basicity. Therefore, appropriate Co doping achieves a balance between metal reducibility and surface basicity, leading to improved catalytic activity of Ni-based catalysts for ammonia decomposition.
The reducible nature of the LaCeO3 support (TPR results) may also contribute to catalytic performance through possible hydrogen spillover phenomena. Hydrogen atoms generated on Ni and Co active sites during ammonia decomposition can potentially migrate to the support surface via the metal–support interface, where they interact with oxygen vacancies and reducible surface species. Such processes may assist in the removal of adsorbed hydrogen from metallic active sites and contribute to enhanced catalytic activity [47].
Arrhenius plots of ln (k) versus 1/T for M/LaCeO3 catalysts (M = Ni, Co, Fe, 5%Ni–5%Co, 7%Ni–3%Co, and 8%Ni–2%Co) are presented in Figure S5, and the corresponding apparent activation energies (Eₐ) are summarized in the inset. The monometallic catalysts 10%Ni/LaCeO3, 10%Co/LaCeO3, and 10%Fe/LaCeO3 exhibit apparent activation energies of 68.66, 72.05, and 82.25 kJ mol−1, respectively, indicating comparatively slower ammonia decomposition kinetics.
In contrast, the Ni-Co bimetallic catalysts show substantially lower activation energies, with values of 55.52, 52.52, and 51.92 kJ mol−1 for 5%Ni-5%Co/LaCeO3, 7%Ni-3%Co/LaCeO3, and 8%Ni-2%Co/LaCeO3, respectively. The progressive decrease in activation energy with increasing Ni content and optimized Co loading clearly demonstrates the promotional effect of Co on Ni-based catalysts.
These kinetic results are consistent with the catalytic activity trends and H2 formation rates discussed earlier, where 8%Ni-2%Co/LaCeO3 exhibited the highest ammonia conversion and hydrogen production. The reduced activation energy can be attributed to the synergistic interaction between Ni and Co. Among all investigated catalysts, 8%Ni-2%Co/LaCeO3 exhibits the lowest activation energy, further confirming that an optimal, low Co loading maximizes the synergistic effect and leads to superior intrinsic catalytic activity for hydrogen production from ammonia.
Table 3 compares the NH3 decomposition performance of the catalysts prepared in this study with those reported in the literature under comparable reaction conditions at 550 °C. The monometallic catalysts investigated in this work (10%Ni/LaCeO3, 10%Co/LaCeO3, and 10%Fe/LaCeO3) exhibit ammonia conversions of 76.0%, 68.8%, and 62.9%, respectively, which are comparable to Ni- and Co-based catalysts supported on conventional oxides such as CeZrYO and Al2O3 reported in previous studies. Notably, the bimetallic catalysts synthesized in this study demonstrate improved performance relative to their monometallic counterparts. In particular, 5%Ni-5%Co/LaCeO3 achieves an ammonia conversion of 82.6% with an H2 production rate of 5.53 mmol g−1 min−1 at a GHSV of 6000 mL g−1 h−1, which is comparable to or higher than several reported non-noble metal catalysts, including Co-BaCeO and Ni/CeZrYO systems. Although noble-metal-based catalysts such as Ru/CeO2 and Ru/La0.33Ce0.67Ox exhibit superior performance, the Ni–Co/LaCeO3 catalysts developed in this study show competitive activity among noble-metal-free systems, highlighting the effectiveness of LaCeO3-supported bimetallic formulations for ammonia decomposition.

3. Experimental

3.1. Chemicals

All chemicals were obtained from Fluka and Aldrich and used as received without further purification. The chemicals Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (Fluka), Ni(NO3)2·6H2O (Fluka), Co(NO3)2·6H2O (Fluka), La(NO3)3·6H2O (Aldrich), Ce(NO3)3·6H2O (Aldrich), and citric acid (Aldrich) were used in catalyst preparation.

3.2. Synthesis of LaCeO3 Perovskite Oxides

The support material (ABO3-like) was prepared by using a combustion preparation technique with citric acid (CIA) as an organic fuel and enhancing gelation additive (metal precursor: CIA = 2). To prepare LaCeO3 support, (0.0181 mol) of La(NO3)3·6H2O and (0.0181 mol) of Ce(NO3)3·6H2O salts were dissolved in de-ionized water (50 mL). The metal-to-CIA molar ratio of 1 was made by dissolving 0.0367 mol of CIA in 50 mL of de-ionized H2O. Afterwards, the CIA solution was slowly added, while stirring, to the solution of metal precursors. To make a viscous gel, heat the mixture of metal precursor and CIA on a hot plate until it thickens. Additionally, the thick gel was immersed in a water bath and heated to 90 °C for a full day. After 24 h, the catalyst was dried in a standard oven set at 110 °C for 12 h. The resulting solid ground into a powder and subjected to a 6-h thermal treatment in a traditional muffle furnace at 650 °C. The synthesized oxide support is labelled LaCeO3.

3.3. Preparation of LaCeO3—Supported Catalysts

Using the standard wet-impregnation technique in a rotary evaporator, all catalysts were prepared with calcined LaCeO3 oxide support material. In all catalysts, the total active metal loading was maintained as a nominal 10 wt%. After preparation, the catalyst was dried at 110 °C for 12 h. Next, the catalyst was calcined at 550 °C for 5 h in a muffle furnace. Nickel, cobalt and iron are impregnated on LaCeO3 to prepare single active metallic catalysts and labelled as 10%Ni/LaCeO3, 10%Co/LaCeO3 and 10%Fe/LaCeO3. The Ni-Co, Ni-Fe, and Co-Fe were impregnated on LaCeO3 to prepare bimetallic active catalysts maintained equal weight percentage (5 wt%) and labelled as 5%Ni-5%Co/LaCeO3, 5%Ni-5%Fe/LaCeO3, 5%Co-5%Fe/LaCeO3. The other catalysts were prepared with different metal loadings labeled as 7%Ni-3%Co/LaCeO3 and 8%Ni-2%Co/LaCeO3.

3.4. Catalyst Characterization

The crystallographic properties of the calcined catalysts were examined by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) using a Shimadzu XRD-6100 diffractometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). Diffraction patterns were collected employing Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å) over a 2θ range of 20–80° at a scanning rate of 5° min−1. The diffractometer was operated at an accelerating voltage of 30 kV and a current of 30 mA. The diffraction data obtained were analyzed using Match! software 1.1 (Crystal Impact, Bonn, Germany), and phase identification was carried out by comparison with standard patterns from the Powder Diffraction File (PDF) database.
The textural properties of the calcined catalysts, including specific surface area and pore size distribution, were evaluated using a NOVA 2200e surface area and pore size analyzer (Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL, USA). Nitrogen adsorption-desorption measurements were carried out at −196 °C. Prior to analysis, the samples were degassed under vacuum at 200 °C for 2 h to remove physically adsorbed species.
The hydrogen temperature-programmed reduction (H2-TPR) experiment was performed using a Micromeritics Autochem II 2950 (Micromeritics Instrument Corp., Norcross, GA, USA) apparatus equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) under atmospheric pressure. Initially, 100 mg of the calcined sample was loaded into a U-shaped quartz reactor. Prior to the reduction step, the catalyst was pretreated by heating it linearly from room temperature to 120 °C under a He gas flow of 15 mL min−1 and maintaining this temperature for 60 min. This pretreatment is performed to remove any adsorbed water from the catalyst surface. Following the pretreatment, the catalyst cooled to 40 °C in the He atmosphere. Finally, the pretreated catalyst was subjected to a linear temperature ramp from 40 °C to 850 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 in a flowing mixture of 10% hydrogen (H2) and 90% argon (Ar) with a total flow rate of 40 mL min−1.
A CO2-TPD analysis was performed to evaluate the basic properties of the prepared catalysts. These analyses were carried out using the same instrument employed for H2-TPR. Initially, 100 mg of calcined catalyst was reduced in a 10% H2 and 90% Ar gas mixture (50 mL min−1) at 550 °C for 2 h. The sample was then cooled to 50 °C under a helium flow (50 mL min−1). Subsequently, a gas mixture containing 10% CO2 in He (50 mL/min) was introduced into the sample bed for 1 h. After CO2 adsorption, the catalyst was purged with He for 30 min. Finally, the sample was heated from 50 to 850 °C, and the amount of desorbed CO2 was measured using a thermal conductivity detector (TCD).
The morphological properties of all prepared catalysts were determined using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) with a JEOL JSM-6390LV instrument (JEOL Ltd., Akishima, Tokyo, Japan) operating at an accelerating voltage of 20 keV. This system was contained with an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) system for elemental analysis.

3.5. Evaluation of Catalytic Performance

A fixed-bed microreactor with an outer diameter of 9 mm was used for catalyst activity. 0.2 g of catalysts was used to load the reactor for ammonia decomposition. Before the test, the catalyst was reduced under a mixture of gases (H2/N2 = 1:1 volume ratio) at 550 °C for 5 h. After reduction, the system was cooled down to 300 °C and flushed with N2 gas. A space velocity of 6000 h−1 to feed pure 100% NH3 into the reactor. The experiments were conducted at a temperature range of 300–600 °C with 50 °C step intervals. The results were gathered once the NH3 decomposition reaction was stabilized at each temperature. The Varian 450 GC was used to test the gases at the outlet of the reactor with the help of a TCD. The following calculation was used to figure out the conversion % (X) of NH3.
A m m o n i a   c o n v e r s i o n X % = n N H 3 i n N H 3 o n N H 3 i 100
where niNH3 = NH3 number of moles at reactor inflow and noNH3 = moles of NH3 at reactor outflow
H 2   formation   rate   ( mmol / g / min ) = V N H 3 22.4 C o n v e r s i o n ( X ) 3 2 m c a t
The rate of H2 formation is calculated using the above equation, where VNH3 represents ammonia volumetric flow rate.

4. Conclusions

LaCeO3 perovskite support was successfully synthesized using the citric acid complexation method and subsequently employed for the preparation of mono- and bimetallic catalysts via the impregnation technique. Monometallic M/LaCeO3 catalysts (M = Ni, Co, and Fe) with a fixed metal loading of 10 wt% were evaluated for ammonia decomposition. Among these catalysts, 10%Ni/LaCeO3 exhibited superior catalytic activity compared to 10%Co/LaCeO3 and 10%Fe/LaCeO3. This enhanced performance is attributed to the higher reducibility of Ni species combined with a moderate surface basicity, which together facilitate efficient N-H bond activation. In contrast, 10%Fe/LaCeO3 showed the lowest activity, which can be ascribed to strong metal-support interactions leading to decreased metal reducibility and lower surface basicity.
Bimetallic catalysts containing equal weight percentages of the active metals were also synthesized and tested. All bimetallic formulations demonstrated improved catalytic performance relative to their monometallic counterparts. 5%Ni–5%Co/LaCeO3 outperformed both 5%Ni–5%Fe/LaCeO3 and 5%Co–5%Fe/LaCeO3, highlighting the beneficial synergistic interaction between Ni and Co. This synergy is proposed to weaken the binding strength of surface nitrogen species on active sites, thereby facilitating recombinative desorption of N2 during ammonia decomposition.
To enhance catalytic performance further, the Ni/Co ratio was systematically optimized. Among the investigated compositions, 8%Ni–2%Co/LaCeO3 exhibited the highest catalytic activity. The superior performance of this catalyst is attributed to an optimal balance between high metal reducibility, enhanced surface basicity, and suitable Ni-Co synergistic interactions, which collectively promote hydrogen formation and improve intrinsic reaction kinetics.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal16060564/s1, Figure S1: Scanning image and EDS results of calcined (A) 10%Ni/LaCeO3, (B) 10%Co/LaCeO3 and (C)10%Fe/LaCeO3 catalyst; Figure S2: Scanning image and EDS results of calcined (A) 5%Ni-5%Co/LaCeO3, (B) 5%Ni-5%Fe /LaCeO3 and (C) 5%Co-5%Fe /LaCeO3 catalyst; Figure S3: Activity comparison of (A) mono and (B) bimetallic catalyst at 550 °C; Figure S4: XRD patterns of (a) 5%Ni-5%Co/LaCeO3 (b)7%Ni-5%Fe/LaCeO3 (c) 8%Co-5%Fe/LaCeO3; Figure S5: Arrhenius plots for (A) mono metallic, (B) bimetallic catalysts in the range of 400 to 550 °C temperature and at ambient pressure; Figure S6: Stability performance over 8%Ni-2%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst at 550 °C with 12,000 h–1 space velocity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.P.; methodology, A.A.; validation, S.P. and M.A.A.; investigation, A.A.; resources, M.A.A.; data curation, S.P. and N.P.; writing—original draft preparation, S.P.; writing—review and editing, M.A.A. and N.P.; visualization, A.A.; supervision, S.P.; project administration, S.P.; funding acquisition, S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work was funded by Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia under the grant No. IPP: 635-135-2025.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary Materials. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The Project was funded by Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia under the grant No. IPP: 635-135-2025. The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR for technical and financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Almisbaa, Z.; Sautet, P. Ba promoter effect on cobalt-catalyzed ammonia decomposition kinetics: A theoretical analysis. J. Energy Chem. 2024, 99, 182–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Qin, C.; Ruan, S.; He, C.; Zhang, L. Nickel perovskite catalysts for ammonia decomposition: DFT calculations and microreaction kinetics. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 691, 133898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guo, X.-Y.; Wang, J.-H.; Zhang, Q.; Li, T.-Z.; Dong, H.; Jia, C.-J.; Li, C.; Zhang, Y.-W. Alkaline earth metal promoted hydrogen production from ammonia decomposition over Ni/La2O3-based catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy 2024, 348, 123844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yu, X.; Yin, F.; Li, G.; Zhang, J.; Chen, B. Preparation of nickel aluminate supported Ni nanocatalyst and its catalytic activity for ammonia decomposition to produce hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 104, 184–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pfeifer, M.; Holtz, D.; Müller, K. Energy Efficient Transshipment of Ammonia: A Numerical Study of Various Terminal Concepts. Energy Technol. 2025, 13, 2300869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Adamou, P.; Bellomi, S.; Hafeez, S.; Harkou, E.; Al-Salem, S.M.; Villa, A.; Dimitratos, N.; Manos, G.; Constantinou, A. Recent progress for hydrogen production from ammonia and hydrous hydrazine decomposition: A review on heterogeneous catalysts. Catal. Today 2023, 423, 114022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Podila, S.; Al-Zahrani, A.A.; Pasupulety, N.; Alamoudi, M.A. Influence of CaCe ratio on the hydrogen production from ammonia over CaO-CeO2 supported Co catalysts. Arab. J. Chem. 2023, 16, 105235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, W.; Fu, Y.; Wang, W.; Xiang, M.; Chen, G.; Su, Y.; Duan, J. Ammonia decomposition over La-doped Al2O3 supported Co catalyst. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 36604–36614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Ren, J.; Zhou, W.; Wang, Z. Ammonia decomposition for carbon-free hydrogen production over Ni/Al-Ce catalysts: Synergistic effect between Al and Ce. Fuel 2024, 358, 130176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shin, J.; Jung, U.; Kim, J.; Kim, K.D.; Song, D.; Park, Y.; An, B.-S.; Koo, K.Y. Elucidating the effect of Ce with abundant surface oxygen vacancies on MgAl2O4-supported Ru-based catalysts for ammonia decomposition. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2024, 340, 123234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Podila, S.; Driss, H.; Zaman, S.F.; Ali, A.M.; Al-Zahrani, A.A.; Daous, M.A.; Petrov, L.A. MgFe and Mg–Co–Fe mixed oxides derived from hydrotalcites: Highly efficient catalysts for COx free hydrogen production from NH3. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 873–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hajduk, Š.; Dasireddy, V.D.B.C.; Likozar, B.; Dražić, G.; Orel, Z.C. COx-free hydrogen production via decomposition of ammonia over Cu–Zn-based heterogeneous catalysts and their activity/stability. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 211, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, Z.-W.; Li, X.; Qin, Y.-H.; Deng, L.; Wang, C.-W.; Jiang, X. Ammonia decomposition over SiO2-supported Ni–Co bimetallic catalyst for COx-free hydrogen generation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 15263–15269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. He, H.; Jiang, H.; Yang, F.; Liu, J.; Zhang, W.; Jin, M.; Li, Z. Bimetallic NixCo10-x/CeO2 as highly active catalysts to enhance mid-temperature ammonia decomposition: Kinetics and synergies. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 48, 5030–5041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Khan, W.U.; Alasiri, H.S.; Ali, S.A.; Hossain, M.M. Recent advances in bimetallic catalysts for hydrogen production from ammonia. Chem. Rec. 2022, 22, e202200030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nakamura, I.; Fujitani, T. Role of metal oxide supports in NH3 decomposition over Ni catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2016, 524, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Podila, S.; Alhamed, Y.A.; AlZahrani, A.A.; Petrov, L.A. Hydrogen production by ammonia decomposition using Co catalyst supported on Mg mixed oxide systems. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 15411–15422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, H.; Alhamed, Y.A.; Kojima, Y.; Al-Zahrani, A.A.; Miyaoka, H.; Petrov, L.A. Structure and catalytic properties of Ni/MWCNTs and Ni/AC catalysts for hydrogen production via ammonia decomposition. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yin, S.F.; Xu, B.Q.; Wang, S.J.; Ng, C.F.; Au, C.T. Magnesia–Carbon Nanotubes (MgO–CNTs) Nanocomposite: Novel Support of Ru Catalyst for the Generation of COx-Free Hydrogen from Ammonia. Catal. Lett. 2004, 96, 113–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ju, X.; Liu, L.; Zhang, X.; Feng, J.; He, T.; Chen, P. Highly Efficient Ru/MgO Catalyst with Surface-Enriched Basic Sites for Production of Hydrogen from Ammonia Decomposition. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 4161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ji, J.; Duan, X.; Qian, G.; Zhou, X.; Tong, G.; Yuan, W. Towards an efficient CoMo/γ-Al2O3 catalyst using metal amine metallate as an active phase precursor: Enhanced hydrogen production by ammonia decomposition. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 12490–12498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lucentini, I.; Casanovas, A.; Llorca, J. Catalytic ammonia decomposition for hydrogen production on Ni, Ru and NiRu supported on CeO2. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2019, 44, 12693–12707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yu, Y.; Gan, Y.-M.; Huang, C.; Lu, Z.-H.; Wang, X.; Zhang, R.; Feng, G. Ni/La2O3 and Ni/MgO–La2O3 catalysts for the decomposition of NH3 into hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 16528–16539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Podila, S.; Driss, H.; Zaman, S.F.; Alhamed, Y.A.; AlZahrani, A.A.; Daous, M.A.; Petrov, L.A. Hydrogen generation by ammonia decomposition using Co/MgO–La2O3 catalyst: Influence of support calcination atmosphere. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2016, 414, 130–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Al-attar, O.A.; Podila, S.; Al-Zahrani, A.A. Preparation and Study of XCeO3 (X: Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba) Perovskite-type oxide supported Cobalt Catalyst for Hydrogen Production by Ammonia Decomposition. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2022, 48, 8667–8677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Podila, S.; Driss, H.; Ali, A.M.; Al-Zahrani, A.A.; Daous, M.A. Influence of Ce substitution in LaMO3 (M = Co/Ni) perovskites for COx-free hydrogen production from ammonia decomposition. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15, 103547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pinzón, M.; Sánchez-Sánchez, A.; Sánchez, P.; de la Osa, A.; Romero, A. Ammonia as a carrier for hydrogen production by using lanthanum based perovskites. Energy Convers. Manag. 2021, 246, 114681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pinzón, M.; Sánchez-Sánchez, A.; Romero, A.; de la Osa, A.R.; Sánchez, P. Self-combustion Ni and Co-based perovskites as catalyst precursors for ammonia decomposition. Effect of Ce and Mg doping. Fuel 2022, 323, 124384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. AlAmoudi, O.M.; Ullah Khan, W.; Hantoko, D.; Bakare, I.A.; Ali, S.A.; Hossain, M.M. Catalytic activity of Co/γ-Al2O3 catalysts for decomposition of ammonia to produce hydrogen. Fuel 2024, 372, 132230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, J.; Li, H. Perovskite: Crystallography, Chemistry and Catalytic Performance; Nova Publishers: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  31. Butt, T.M.; Janjua, N.K.; Mujtaba, A.; Zaman, S.A.; Ansir, R.; Rafique, A.; Sumreen, P.; Mukhtar, M.; Pervaiz, M.; Yaqub, A. B-site doping in lanthanum cerate nanomaterials for water electrocatalysis. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 026503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mangu, S.; Suares, V.; Gupta, A.; Anantharaman, A.P. Synthesis, characterization and density Functional theory (DFT) study of LaCeO3. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 57, 1892–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Greluk, M.; Gac, W.; Rotko, M.; Słowik, G.; Turczyniak-Surdacka, S. Co/CeO2 and Ni/CeO2 catalysts for ethanol steam reforming: Effect of the cobalt/nickel dispersion on catalysts properties. J. Catal. 2021, 393, 159–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Du, X.; Zhang, D.; Shi, L.; Gao, R.; Zhang, J. Morphology dependence of catalytic properties of Ni/CeO2 nanostructures for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 10009–10016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sun, S.; Jiang, Q.; Zhao, D.; Cao, T.; Sha, H.; Zhang, C.; Song, H.; Da, Z. Ammonia as hydrogen carrier: Advances in ammonia decomposition catalysts for promising hydrogen production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 169, 112918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, P.; Liu, S.; Ma, X.; He, Y.; Alshammari, A.S.; Deng, Y. Binary Mg–Fe oxide as a highly active and magnetically separable catalyst for the synthesis of ethyl methyl carbonate. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 25849–25856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Muroyama, H.; Saburi, C.; Matsui, T.; Eguchi, K. Ammonia decomposition over Ni/La2O3 catalyst for on-site generation of hydrogen. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2012, 443–444, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yin, S.-F.; Zhang, Q.-H.; Xu, B.-Q.; Zhu, W.-X.; Ng, C.-F.; Au, C.-T. Investigation on the catalysis of COx-free hydrogen generation from ammonia. J. Catal. 2004, 224, 384–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, J.; Xu, H.; Jin, X.; Ge, Q.; Li, W. Characterizations and activities of the nano-sized Ni/Al2O3 and Ni/La–Al2O3 catalysts for NH3 decomposition. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2005, 290, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, H.; Wierzbicki, D.; Debek, R.; Motak, M.; Grzybek, T.; Da Costa, P.; Gálvez, M.E. La-promoted Ni-hydrotalcite-derived catalysts for dry reforming of methane at low temperatures. Fuel 2016, 182, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lin, H.; Liao, F.; Chu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, D.; Cui, K.; Yang, L. Mesoporous multi-shell spongy nanosphere NiCo metal/metal oxide hybrid for decarboxylation of fatty acid and upgrading of sludge bio-crude. J. Catal. 2025, 442, 115862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhu, C.; Wen, D.; Leubner, S.; Oschatz, M.; Liu, W.; Holzschuh, M.; Simon, F.; Kaskel, S.; Eychmüller, A. Nickel cobalt oxide hollow nanosponges as advanced electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 7851–7854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yan, H.; Yao, S.; Liang, W.; Zhao, S.; Jin, X.; Feng, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Yang, C. Ni–Co oxide catalysts with lattice distortions for enhanced oxidation of glycerol to glyceric acid. J. Catal. 2020, 381, 248–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fu, E.; Qiu, Y.; Lu, H.; Wang, S.; Liu, L.; Feng, H.; Yang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Xie, Y.; Gong, F. Enhanced NH3 decomposition for H2 production over bimetallic M (M = Co, Fe, Cu) Ni/Al2O3. Fuel Process. Technol. 2021, 221, 106945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Vergara, H.R.; Brijaldo, M.H.; Martinez, J.J.; Rojas, H.A.; Pedraza, J.; Passos, F.B.; Pereira da Costa, L.; Gonzalez-Vera, D.; Osorio-Vargas, P. Effect of metal content on ethanol decomposition over Ni-Co catalysts supported on La-Ce oxides. Materials 2020, 13, 759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tabassum, H.; Mukherjee, S.; Chen, J.; Holiharimanana, D.; Karakalos, S.; Yang, X.; Hwang, S.; Zhang, T.; Lu, B.; Chen, M. Hydrogen generation via ammonia decomposition on highly efficient and stable Ru-free catalysts: Approaching complete conversion at 450 °C. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 4190–4200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Xi, S.; Wu, W.; Yao, W.; Han, R.; He, S.; Wang, W.; Zhang, T.; Yu, L. Hydrogen production from ammonia decomposition: A mini-review of metal oxide-based catalysts. Molecules 2024, 29, 3817. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Huang, C.; Li, H.; Yang, J.; Wang, C.; Hu, F.; Wang, X.; Lu, Z.-H.; Feng, G.; Zhang, R. Ce0. 6Zr0. 3Y0. 1O2 solid solutions-supported NiCo bimetal nanocatalysts for NH3 decomposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 478, 708–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Deng, Q.-F.; Zhang, H.; Hou, X.-X.; Ren, T.-Z.; Yuan, Z.-Y. High-surface-area Ce0.8Zr0.2O2 solid solutions supported Ni catalysts for ammonia decomposition to hydrogen. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 15901–15907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Alamoudi, M.A.; Podila, S. Role of Perovskite Phase in CeXO3 (X = Ni, Co, Fe) Catalysts for Low-Temperature Hydrogen Production from Ammonia. Catalysts 2025, 15, 1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Le, T.A.; Kim, Y.; Kim, H.W.; Lee, S.-U.; Kim, J.-R.; Kim, T.-W.; Lee, Y.-J.; Chae, H.-J. Ru-supported lanthania-ceria composite as an efficient catalyst for COx-free H2 production from ammonia decomposition. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2021, 285, 119831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Okura, K.; Miyazaki, K.; Muroyama, H.; Matsui, T.; Eguchi, K. Ammonia decomposition over Ni catalysts supported on perovskite-type oxides for the on-site generation of hydrogen. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 32102–32110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhou, H.; Wang, Q.; Pan, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Pan, S.; Bai, J.; Cui, D.; Wu, D.; Sun, C. Tunable Structure-Activity Correlation in Ni/MgO Catalysts for Ammonia Decomposition: Insights into Preparation and Precipitant Effects. J. Energy Inst. 2026, 126, 102517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) N2 adsorption & desorption isotherms, (B) pore size_distribution of calcined monometallic catalysts.
Figure 1. (A) N2 adsorption & desorption isotherms, (B) pore size_distribution of calcined monometallic catalysts.
Catalysts 16 00564 g001
Figure 2. (A) N2 adsorption and desorption isotherms, and (B) pore size distribution of the bimetallic calcined catalysts.
Figure 2. (A) N2 adsorption and desorption isotherms, and (B) pore size distribution of the bimetallic calcined catalysts.
Catalysts 16 00564 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns of calcined catalysts. (A): LaCeO3 support; (B): (i) 10%Ni/LaCeO3, (ii) 10%Co/LaCeO3 (iii) 10%Fe/LaCeO3, (C): (i) 5%Ni-5%Co/LaCeO3 (ii) 5%Ni-5%Fe/LaCeO3 (iii) 5%Co-5%Fe/LaCeO3.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of calcined catalysts. (A): LaCeO3 support; (B): (i) 10%Ni/LaCeO3, (ii) 10%Co/LaCeO3 (iii) 10%Fe/LaCeO3, (C): (i) 5%Ni-5%Co/LaCeO3 (ii) 5%Ni-5%Fe/LaCeO3 (iii) 5%Co-5%Fe/LaCeO3.
Catalysts 16 00564 g003
Figure 4. H2-TPR patterns of calcined (A) Monometallic (B) Bimetallic catalysts supported LaCeO3.
Figure 4. H2-TPR patterns of calcined (A) Monometallic (B) Bimetallic catalysts supported LaCeO3.
Catalysts 16 00564 g004
Figure 5. CO2-TPD results of (A) Mono- and (B) Bimetallic catalysts.
Figure 5. CO2-TPD results of (A) Mono- and (B) Bimetallic catalysts.
Catalysts 16 00564 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of calcined (A) Mono- and (B) Bi-metallic catalysts supported by LaCeO3.
Figure 6. SEM images of calcined (A) Mono- and (B) Bi-metallic catalysts supported by LaCeO3.
Catalysts 16 00564 g006aCatalysts 16 00564 g006b
Figure 7. NH3 decomposition catalytic performance of (A) Mono-metalic (B) Bi-metallic catalysts at a GHSV of 6000 h−1.
Figure 7. NH3 decomposition catalytic performance of (A) Mono-metalic (B) Bi-metallic catalysts at a GHSV of 6000 h−1.
Catalysts 16 00564 g007
Figure 8. (A) H2-TPR patterns (B) CO2 TPD patterns of Bimetallic catalysts with different loadings.
Figure 8. (A) H2-TPR patterns (B) CO2 TPD patterns of Bimetallic catalysts with different loadings.
Catalysts 16 00564 g008
Figure 9. (A) HRTEM and (B) EDX results of calcined 8%Ni–2%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst.
Figure 9. (A) HRTEM and (B) EDX results of calcined 8%Ni–2%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst.
Catalysts 16 00564 g009
Figure 10. (a) HRTEM image (b) STEM-HAADF analysis and the corresponding EDS elemental mapping of 8%Ni-2%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst.
Figure 10. (a) HRTEM image (b) STEM-HAADF analysis and the corresponding EDS elemental mapping of 8%Ni-2%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst.
Catalysts 16 00564 g010
Figure 11. Temperature dependence of (A) ammonia conversion (B) hydrogen formation over bimetallic catalyst with different Ni/Co loadings.
Figure 11. Temperature dependence of (A) ammonia conversion (B) hydrogen formation over bimetallic catalyst with different Ni/Co loadings.
Catalysts 16 00564 g011
Figure 12. Stability performance over 8%Ni-2%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst at 550 °C and 600 °C with 6000 h−1 space velocity.
Figure 12. Stability performance over 8%Ni-2%Co/LaCeO3 catalyst at 550 °C and 600 °C with 6000 h−1 space velocity.
Catalysts 16 00564 g012
Table 1. Textural properties of catalysts supported on LaCeO3.
Table 1. Textural properties of catalysts supported on LaCeO3.
CatalystSurface AreaPore VolumePore Width
(m2/g)(cc/g)(nm)
LaCeO36.60.02652.0
10%Ni/LaCeO314.60.06539.7
10%Co/LaCeO313.40.054133.8
10%Fe/LaCeO321.40.07893.3
5%Ni-5% Co/LaCeO316.30.073133.8
5%Co-5% Fe/LaCeO312.70.062191.7
5%Ni-5% Fe/LaCeO312.40.051133.8
7% Ni-3%Co/LaCeO314.00.062133.8
8%Ni-2%Co/LaCeO318.20.072133.8
Table 2. Hydrogen consumption of H2-TPR profiles & TPD Quantification.
Table 2. Hydrogen consumption of H2-TPR profiles & TPD Quantification.
CatalystH2 ConsumptionTotal Basicity
(µ mol g−1)(µ mol g−1)
LaCeO3241.7285.74
10%Ni/LaCeO31530.2581.72
10%Co/LaCeO3537.1494.01
10%Fe/LaCeO3442.8183.40
5%Ni-5% Co/LaCeO3727.8485.47
5%Co-5% Fe/LaCeO3613.8423.11
5%Ni-5% Fe/LaCeO3769.0315.18
7% Ni-3%Co/LaCeO3972.3474.88
8% Ni-2%Co/LaCeO31053.2448.94
Table 3. Comparison of catalytic activities with reported literature values at 550 °C.
Table 3. Comparison of catalytic activities with reported literature values at 550 °C.
CatalystGHSV
(ml/g/h)
Conversion
(%)
H2 Production
(mmol/g/min)
Ref.
Ni1Co9/CeZrYO600091.66.13[48]
Co/CeZrYO600067.84.54[48]
Ni/CeZrYO600066.74.47[48]
4Ni/Ce0.8Zr0.2O2-SA450095.73.99[49]
CeNiO3600099.06.5[50]
30%Ni/CeO2 600075.04.8[50]
Ni5Co5/SiO2600094.76.34[13]
La-Ce-Co600092.06.2[26]
La0.5Ce0.5NiO3600099.06.7[26]
Ni7.5Co2.5/CeO2 30,0004013.4[14]
Ru/La0.33Ce0.67 a60001006.7[51]
Ru/Ce1 a600098.16.6[51]
5Co-BaCeO600080.05.40[25]
Mg-Co-Fe600099.06.63[11]
10%Ni/La2O3600062.74.20[37]
40%Ni/Al2O3 600070.04.7[52]
40%Ni/LaAlO3600078.05.2[52]
10%Ni/MgO-WI12,00025.03.35[53]
10%Ni/MgO-CPT12,00097.317.1[53]
10%Ni/LaCeO3600076.05.09This study
10%Co/LaCeO3600068.84.61This study
10%Fe/LaCeO3600062.94.21This study
5%Ni-5%Co/LaCeO3600082.65.53This study
5%Ni-5%Fe/LaCeO3600080.14.72This study
5%Co-5%Fe/LaCeO3600070.55.41This study
7%Ni-3%Co/LaCeO3600085.35.71This study
8%Ni-2%Co/LaCeO3600090.36.05This study
a at 450 °C.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Podila, S.; Alsobhi, A.; Alamoudi, M.A.; Pasupulety, N. Comparative Study of Mono- and Bimetallic (Ni–Co–Fe) Catalysts Supported on LaCeO3 for Ammonia Decomposition. Catalysts 2026, 16, 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16060564

AMA Style

Podila S, Alsobhi A, Alamoudi MA, Pasupulety N. Comparative Study of Mono- and Bimetallic (Ni–Co–Fe) Catalysts Supported on LaCeO3 for Ammonia Decomposition. Catalysts. 2026; 16(6):564. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16060564

Chicago/Turabian Style

Podila, Seetharamulu, Ahmad Alsobhi, Majed A. Alamoudi, and Nagaraju Pasupulety. 2026. "Comparative Study of Mono- and Bimetallic (Ni–Co–Fe) Catalysts Supported on LaCeO3 for Ammonia Decomposition" Catalysts 16, no. 6: 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16060564

APA Style

Podila, S., Alsobhi, A., Alamoudi, M. A., & Pasupulety, N. (2026). Comparative Study of Mono- and Bimetallic (Ni–Co–Fe) Catalysts Supported on LaCeO3 for Ammonia Decomposition. Catalysts, 16(6), 564. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16060564

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop