Next Article in Journal
Chemo-Enzymatic Synthesis of the Key Chiral Intermediate of d-Biotin
Previous Article in Journal
Deciphering the Antioxidant Activity and Enzyme Inhibition of Luteolin and Its Glycosides: An Integrated In Vitro and In Silico Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Controllable Synthesis of Silver–Copper Bimetallic Nanoparticle-Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites with Enhanced Electrocatalytic Performance

1
College of Materials Engineering, Wuhu Vocational Technical University, Wuhu 241003, China
2
Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology (AIBN), The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia
3
College of Materials Science and Engineering, Hohai University, Changzhou 213000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2026, 16(6), 551; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16060551 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 15 May 2026 / Revised: 8 June 2026 / Accepted: 11 June 2026 / Published: 15 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Catalytic Materials)

Abstract

Monometallic nanoparticles tend to aggregate and exhibit limited catalytic performance, rendering them inadequate for high-efficiency electrocatalytic applications. In this study, a green and mild liquid-phase reduction method was employed, using sodium borohydride to simultaneously reduce graphene oxide (GO) and metal precursors. This approach enabled the uniform and highly dispersed loading of silver–copper bimetallic alloy nanoparticles (Ag1−xCux NPs) onto the surface of reduced graphene oxide (RGO). By tuning the Ag/Cu molar ratio, the size, composition, and morphology of the nanoparticles were precisely controlled. Characterization by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) confirmed that GO was efficiently reduced to RGO, and the bimetallic nanoparticles were uniformly distributed on the RGO surface in an alloy state with small particle size and no obvious agglomeration. A strong interfacial interaction between the metal nanoparticles and the support was also observed. Electrochemical tests demonstrated that the composite exhibits excellent electrocatalytic activity toward the reduction of H2O2. Notably, the reduction peak current at the Ag0.5Cu0.5NPs/RGO modified electrode was 1.8 and 2.3 times higher than those at the monometallic Ag/RGO and Cu/RGO electrodes, respectively. These results provide a reliable theoretical basis and a viable research route for the controllable synthesis of low-cost, high-performance electrocatalytic nanocomposites and their application in electrochemical H2O2 sensing.

1. Instruction

Owing to the synergistic effects of quantum size effects, surface effects, and interface effects at the nanoscale, metallic nanoparticles exhibit distinct physicochemical properties from their bulk counterparts. These unique attributes endow them with irreplaceable application value in cutting-edge fields including miniaturized electronic devices, heterogeneous catalysis, precision optical instruments, and high-performance magnetic devices, rendering them one of the research hotspots in nanomaterials science [1,2]. Nevertheless, monometallic nanoparticles (NPs) are constrained by the inherent electronic structure of a single element, such that their catalytic activity, stability, and functional diversity can hardly meet the application requirements under complex scenarios. In contrast, bimetallic nanocomposites/nanostructures enable synergistic performance enhancement and functional expansion via electronic coupling, lattice strain, and cooperative interactions between two distinct metals, which have attracted extensive academic attention in recent years [3]. When the two metallic components form intimate interfacial contact and induce strong electronic coupling effects, the physical parameters of bimetallic nanoparticles—including specific surface area, morphology, particle size distribution, and electron density—can be significantly modulated, thereby endowing them with superior properties in catalysis, electron transport, optical response, and magnetic performance far exceeding those of single-metal components. Essentially, this synergistic effect originates from the electronic structure reconstruction triggered by intermetallic electron transfer [4,5].
Among numerous transition-metal systems, Ag, Au, Pt, Pd, and Cu serve as core building blocks for constructing bimetallic nanocomposites due to their excellent electrical conductivity, favorable catalytic activity, and relatively controllable preparation characteristics [6,7]. Among them, the Ag-Cu bimetallic system presents distinctive research value owing to its unique nanoscale miscibility, which is remarkably superior to the phase-separated behavior of its bulk counterpart [8]. The high electrical conductivity of Ag complements the high catalytic activity and low-cost advantages of Cu, granting Ag-Cu nanocomposites broad application prospects in biosensing devices, heterogeneous catalysis, and environmental monitoring sensors [9]. Recent studies have further validated the structure–property relationships of the AgCu bimetallic system: Rashidova et al. synthesized shape- and size-controlled bimetallic Cu/Ag nanoparticles via chemical reduction and demonstrated that their thermal stability exceeded that of monometallic Cu and Ag nanoparticles [10]. Lee et al. fabricated stable Cu-Ag core–shell nanoparticles through thermal decomposition and galvanic displacement, which significantly enhanced the oxidation resistance of the material via interfacial electron transfer, providing structural stability for long-term applications [11]. Abhijit et al. reported that alloying Ag and Cu nanoparticles effectively optimized the interfacial electronic structure and strengthened interfacial charge-transfer efficiency, thereby markedly improving the catalytic activity of the material [12]. Maaike et al. prepared high-surface-area AgCu bimetallic samples with tunable Ag/Cu ratios and homogeneous mixing of Ag and Cu at tens of nanometers. When employed as catalysts for the electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction, the selectivity toward CO2 reduction products was found to be strongly dependent on the Cu content [13].
The synthetic method of bimetallic nanoparticles directly determines their microstructure and performance. Reported synthetic strategies include the sol–gel method [14], aerosol technology [15], microemulsion technique [7], and sonochemical method [16]. Based on reduction pathways, they can be classified into two main categories: (a) simultaneous reduction of two metal precursors, yielding alloy-type bimetallic nanoparticles, and (b) successive reduction of two metal components, favoring the formation of core–shell or heterostructured bimetallic nanoparticles. However, current synthetic methods generally suffer from notable bottlenecks, and most rely on complex experimental setups, lengthy reaction durations, and costly noble-metal reagents, while some require toxic and hazardous reducing agents or dispersants. These issues not only elevate production costs but also pose environmental and safety risks, hindering large-scale green production [17,18]. Therefore, the development of simple, eco-friendly, low-cost, and controllable green synthetic methods represents a critical breakthrough in promoting the industrial application of bimetallic nanoparticles. In recent years, several biosynthetic studies of bimetallic nanoparticles based on biotemplates and green reducing agents have been reported, offering new insights for the advancement of green preparation technologies [19]. In 2024, Patel et al. synthesized Ag-Fe bimetallic nanoparticles using fungal filtrate as a green reducing agent, further verifying the advantages of green synthetic strategies in cost reduction and biocompatibility improvement [20].
Despite the outstanding physicochemical properties of bimetallic nanoparticles, their high surface energy at the nanoscale leads to severe agglomeration, resulting in reduced specific surface area and fewer active sites, which severely restricts their catalytic performance and practical application scope. Consequently, achieving high dispersion and long-term stability of bimetallic nanoparticles is a prerequisite for their practical implementation [21]. Carbonaceous materials have been proven to be effective supports for mitigating nanoparticle agglomeration due to their high specific surface area, favorable electrical conductivity, and surface modifiability. Interactions between surface functional groups and metal nanoparticles can significantly enhance particle dispersion and stability while synergistically optimizing material performance [22]. As a typical two-dimensional carbonaceous material, graphene possesses an ultrahigh specific surface area of up to 2600 m2·g−1, exceptional electrical conductivity of 105–106 S·m−1, rapid heterogeneous electron transfer kinetics, and excellent mechanical properties under ideal conditions, demonstrating unique advantages in nanocomposite applications [23]. Reduced graphene oxide (RGO), an important derivative of graphene, retains the core merits of graphene and is rich in surface functional groups (e.g., hydroxyl and carboxyl groups), which can form stable coordination interactions with metal nanoparticles. Accordingly, RGO-supported metal nanoparticle composites (NPs/RGO) have been widely applied in biodiagnosis and therapy, heterogeneous catalysis, electrochemical sensors, and biomimetic materials [24,25,26]. In 2025, Dai et al. revealed that RGO as a support effectively regulated the size and dispersion of bimetallic nanoparticles and further enhanced the catalytic performance via interfacial electronic coupling [27].
This study aims to develop a facile, eco-friendly, controllable, and low-cost strategy to fabricate Ag1−xCuxNPs/RGO nanocomposites using readily available, low-toxicity raw materials. By adjusting the precursor feed ratios, precise control over the particle size and loading density of Ag-Cu bimetallic nanoparticles anchored on the RGO surface is achieved, and the influence of component proportions on the material microstructure is systematically investigated. Comprehensive characterizations of the crystal structure, morphological features, elemental distribution, and electronic structure of the as-prepared bimetallic nanocomposites are performed using multiple analytical techniques, confirming the structural advantages of small particle size and favorable dispersion. H2O2 holds significant importance for detection in fields such as food, medicine, biology, and industry, and silver-based materials exhibit excellent electrocatalytic activity toward its reduction [28]. Therefore, the electrochemical behavior of glassy carbon electrodes (GCEs) modified with Ag1−xCuxNPs/RGO nanocomposites of varying compositions is explored, with emphasis on their electrocatalytic performance toward the H2O2 reduction reaction. This work is expected to provide a novel material system and technical approach for the development of high-performance H2O2 electrochemical sensors.

2. Results and Discussion

Sodium borohydride (NaBH4) is a commonly used reducing agent in inorganic and organic synthesis owing to its high reduction efficiency, mild reaction conditions, and environmentally benign oxidation products (mainly borate ions) that cause no secondary environmental pollution [29]. Notably, NaBH4 possesses the capability to simultaneously reduce metal ions and graphene oxide (GO). This synchronous reduction process effectively promotes the tight anchoring of metal nanoparticles onto the RGO surface and prevents particle agglomeration [30].

2.1. Material Morphology

The morphological characteristics of Ag1−xCux-NPs/RGO nanocomposites with five different Cu/Ag molar ratios were systematically characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as presented in Figure 1. Figure 1a–e correspond to Cu/Ag molar ratios of 2:8, 4:6, 5:5, 6:4, and 8:2, respectively. As clearly observed in Figure 1a–e, abundant nanoparticles are uniformly dispersed on the wrinkled surface of RGO. The wrinkled lamellar structure of RGO is a typical morphological feature of reduced GO, which not only increases the specific surface area of the composite but also provides abundant active adsorption sites for the loading of Ag-Cu-NPs, thereby effectively suppressing the agglomeration of nanoparticles [31].
It is worth noting that with the increase in the Ag/Cu molar ratio, the number of nanoparticles on the RGO surface gradually decreases, while the average particle size increases significantly. This phenomenon clearly indicates that the concentration of Ag+ is a key factor directly regulating the morphology of bimetallic Ag-Cu-NPs. During the preparation process, the preformed Cu-NPs/RGO acts as a spacer to separate Ag-NPs, and the particle size of Ag-NPs is positively correlated with the dosage of AgNO3 precursor. This growth mechanism is consistent with the seed-mediated growth model reported in the literature [32], further confirming that the morphology of Ag-Cu-NPs can be controllably regulated by adjusting the concentrations of Cu2+ and Ag+.
To further verify the elemental composition, content, and coexistence state of the bimetallic nanocomposites, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) analysis was performed. Figure 1f displays the EDX spectrum of Ag0.5Cu0.5-NPs/RGO. Characteristic peaks of C, Cu, and Ag are clearly observed in the spectrum (EDS of other composites can be found in Figure S1). Quantitative EDX analysis reveals that the mass fractions of Ag and Cu are 48.96% and 28.46%, respectively, corresponding to a molar ratio of approximately 1:1, which is consistent with the theoretically designed ratio. In addition, EDX analysis was also conducted on nanocomposites with other Cu/Ag molar ratios, and the results show that the actual molar ratios of Cu to Ag are roughly in accordance with the theoretical values. This demonstrates that the controllable synthesis of Ag1−xCux-NPs/RGO nanocomposites with tailored compositions can be achieved by adjusting the dosage of metal precursors.

2.2. Phase and Crystal Structure of the Materials

X-ray diffraction (XRD) is a fundamental technique for characterizing the phase composition, crystal structure, and crystallinity of crystalline materials. It was employed to systematically investigate the crystal structure characteristics of the nanocomposites with different compositions, and the results are shown in Figure 2.
The XRD pattern of Cu-NPs/RGO exhibits a distinct characteristic diffraction peak at 2θ = 42.9°, which can be unambiguously indexed to the (111) plane of face-centered cubic (fcc) Cu (JCPDS No. 04-0836) [33]. The relatively strong intensity and sharpness of this peak indicate that the as-prepared Cu nanoparticles are well-crystallized, and no obvious impurity peaks are observed, confirming the high purity of the Cu-NPs/RGO composite [34].
The XRD pattern of Ag-NPs/RGO displays a series of characteristic diffraction peaks at 2θ = 38.2°, 44.2°, 64.6°, and 77.8°, corresponding to the (111), (200), (220), and (311) planes of fcc Ag, respectively (JCPDS No. 87-0720). Among these, the (111) plane exhibits the highest diffraction intensity, suggesting that the Ag nanoparticles preferentially grow along the (111) crystal plane during preparation, indicating good crystallographic orientation. Moreover, the symmetric peak shape and narrow full width at half maximum (FWHM) imply a uniform particle size distribution and high crystallinity of the Ag nanoparticles [35].
Upon the introduction of Ag into the composite, the observed peaks are mainly characteristic of Ag. A diffraction peak appears at 2θ = 44.3° in the composite pattern, with a significantly broader FWHM compared to those of the pure Cu (111) peak and the pure Ag (200) peak. During the alloying process of Ag and Cu, the characteristic diffraction peaks of Cu gradually weaken or even disappear, while the Ag peaks exhibit broadening and shifting [36]. Since the atomic radius of Cu (0.128 nm) is smaller than that of Ag (0.144 nm), the incorporation of Cu nanoparticles into the fcc lattice of Ag leads to lattice contraction and a decrease in interplanar spacing. According to Bragg’s law, 2dsinθ = nλ (where d is the interplanar spacing, θ is the diffraction angle, n is the diffraction order, and λ is the X-ray wavelength), a decrease in d results in an increase in θ, manifesting as a shift of the Ag characteristic diffraction peaks to higher angles.
Vegard’s law describes the linear relationship between the lattice parameter of a solid-solution alloy and its composition. Taking the (200) peak as an example, with 2θ values and the mole fractions of Cu and Ag being 43.58°, 43.72°, 44.21°, 44.41°, and 44.45°, the calculated lattice parameters show that as the Cu content increases from 0.2 to 0.8, the lattice parameter gradually decreases from 4.148 Å to 4.072 Å. This is consistent with the prediction of Vegard’s law (the atomic radius of Cu is smaller than that of Ag, leading to lattice contraction upon alloying), confirming that Ag-Cu forms a homogeneous alloy phase.

2.3. Elemental Composition of Materials

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) enables the analysis of elemental composition, chemical valence states, and types of functional groups on material surfaces [37]. It was employed herein to systematically investigate the detailed surface composition and valence state distribution of metallic elements in the composites. Meanwhile, the reduction degree of graphene oxide (GO) was evaluated based on the evolution of surface oxygen-containing functional groups after reduction [38].
Characteristic photoelectron peaks of C 1s, O 1s, Ag 3d, and Cu 2p can be clearly identified in the wide-scan XPS spectrum of the Ag1−xCux-NPs/RGO nanocomposite (Figure 3a, x = 0.5), with no observable peaks from impurity elements. This indicates the high purity of the as-prepared composite, confirming the successful loading of bimetallic Ag-Cu nanoparticles on the RGO surface and the formation of a stable composite structure.
The C 1s spectrum of pristine GO (blue curve in Figure 3b) presents three main characteristic peaks at binding energies of 285.4 eV, 286.8 eV, and 287.9 eV, corresponding to sp2-hybridized C-C bonds, C-O bonds, and carbonyl groups (C=O) in GO, respectively [39]. After reduction with NaBH4, the C 1s spectrum of RGO in the composite changes remarkably: the intensities of the peaks corresponding to C-O and C=O decrease drastically and nearly vanish, whereas the peak associated with C-C bonds (285.4 eV) increases significantly and becomes dominant. This observation directly demonstrates that most oxygen-containing functional groups on the GO surface have been removed, and GO has been sufficiently deoxygenated and reduced to reduced graphene oxide (RGO) [40].
The high-resolution Ag 3d XPS spectrum (Figure 3c) exhibits two distinct doublet peaks at binding energies of 368.5 eV and 374.5 eV, assignable to Ag 3d5/2 and Ag 3d3/2, respectively. The symmetric peak shape and a spin–orbit splitting energy of approximately 6.0 eV are in good agreement with the characteristic binding energies and splitting value of metallic Ag0, verifying the complete reduction of Ag+ to metallic Ag0 [41].
Four characteristic binding energy peaks are observed in Figure 3d, located at 932.7 eV, 942.6 eV, 952.5 eV, and 961.1 eV, respectively. Among them, the peaks at 932.7 eV and 952.5 eV are unambiguously attributed to Cu 2p3/2 and Cu 2p1/2 of metallic Cu0 [42]. Their significantly higher intensities suggest that copper nanoparticles supported on graphene mainly exist in the metallic Cu0 state. The peaks at 942.6 eV and 961.1 eV correspond to the satellite peak of Cu 2p3/2 and the Cu 3d orbital feature of oxidized Cu2+ [43], and their weak intensities imply the presence of only a small amount of Cu2+ species.

2.4. Microstructural Dimensions of the Composites

Figure 4a presents a TEM image of the Ag0.5Cu0.5-NPs/RGO bimetallic nanocomposite (TEM images of other composites can be found in Figure S2). It can be clearly observed that spherical bimetallic Ag-Cu nanoparticles (Ag-Cu NPs) are uniformly loaded onto the surface of wrinkled RGO nanosheets without obvious agglomeration, which is consistent with the wrinkled RGO surface and nanoparticle dispersion features observed in SEM characterization. Statistical analysis of the nanoparticle size within the yellow box in Figure 4a was performed using Image J 1.8.0 software, yielding an average particle size of 18.6 ± 1.2 nm with a narrow size distribution and good uniformity. This is attributed to the anchoring effect of oxygen-containing functional groups on the RGO surface toward metal ions and the synergistic regulation effect between the two bimetallic components.
The HRTEM image in Figure 4b clearly shows that Ag and Cu atoms are interwoven and uniformly distributed, forming a typical alloy structure, which corroborates the diffraction peak shifts and alloying evidence observed in XRD characterization. In Figure 4c, two sets of lattice fringes can be clearly resolved: one with an interplanar spacing of 0.21 nm, corresponding to the (111) plane of face-centered cubic (fcc) Cu, and the other with a spacing of 0.24 nm, corresponding to the (111) plane of fcc Ag. The coexistence and regular arrangement of these two sets of lattice fringes within the same nanoparticle further confirm the successful formation of the Ag-Cu alloy structure, with the two metal components uniformly mixed at the atomic scale.
The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern (Figure 4d) exhibits a series of well-defined diffraction rings, corresponding to the (111) plane of fcc-Cu, the (111), (200), and (220) planes of fcc-Ag, and characteristic diffraction rings of RGO. The clarity and completeness of the diffraction rings indicate that the as-prepared Ag1−xCux-NPs/RGO nanocomposite possesses good crystallinity. Moreover, the coexistence of multiple diffraction rings confirms the polycrystalline nature of the composite, which is consistent with the bimetallic alloy phase and the crystalline features of RGO observed in XRD characterization.
For comparative analysis of the size and morphological differences between bimetallic and monometallic nanoparticles, TEM and HRTEM characterizations were performed on the monometallic Ag-NPs/RGO and Cu-NPs/RGO composites. Figure 5a shows a TEM image of the Ag-NPs/RGO composite, revealing that Ag nanoparticles are dispersed on the RGO surface but exhibit significant agglomeration, large particle sizes, and poor size uniformity. The HRTEM image in Figure 5b shows that the lattice fringe spacing of the Ag nanoparticles is 0.24 nm, consistent with the (111) plane spacing of fcc-Ag. Figure 5c presents a TEM image of the Cu-NPs/RGO composite, where the Cu nanoparticles appear relatively smaller in size, uniformly distributed, and without large-scale agglomeration, showing better dispersion than Ag-NPs/RGO, which is consistent with the SEM observations described previously. The HRTEM image in Figure 5d clearly shows that the lattice fringe spacing of the Cu nanoparticles is approximately 0.21 nm, corresponding to the (111) plane spacing of fcc-Cu.
It is worth noting that the average particle size of the monometallic nanoparticles (Ag-NPs, Cu-NPs) is larger than that of the bimetallic Ag-Cu NPs, with the particle size calculated as shown in Figure S3. This is attributed to the stronger compatibility between monometallic nanoparticles and the absence of steric hindrance effects from another metal component, which makes the nanoparticles prone to agglomeration during preparation [44]. The low-melting-point characteristic of nanoparticles (compared to bulk materials) further exacerbates this agglomeration tendency, causing monometallic nanoparticles to grow into larger particles through aggregation. In contrast, in the bimetallic system, the interaction between Ag and Cu components creates steric hindrance that effectively suppresses nanoparticle agglomeration, resulting in smaller particle sizes and more uniform dispersion [45]. These findings corroborate the SEM observation that “bimetallic nanoparticles exhibit better dispersion than monometallic ones,” confirming that the synergistic effect of bimetallic components enables the morphological regulation of the nanoparticles.

2.5. Synthesis Mechanism of Composite Materials

Based on the systematic experimental characterization results of this study (TEM, XRD, XPS, etc.), the complete synthesis mechanism of the Ag1−xCux-NPs/RGO is illustrated in Figure 6. Combined with existing literature reports, the reaction pathways, intermolecular interactions, and intrinsic regulation principles at each stage are elucidated, revealing the synergistic formation mechanism between bimetallic nanoparticles and RGO.
Upon ultrasonication in ultrapure water, GO forms a uniformly dispersed nanosheet suspension. Extensive studies have confirmed that the basal plane of GO is rich in hydroxyl (-OH) and epoxy (-C-O-C-) groups, while abundant carbonyl (C=O) and carboxyl (-COOH) groups are distributed at the sheet edges. The presence of these oxygen-containing functional groups imparts a negative surface charge to GO, inhibiting restacking between nanosheets via electrostatic repulsion. Meanwhile, hydrogen bonding interactions between hydroxyl/carboxyl groups and water molecules enable the stable dispersion of GO in aqueous solution, providing a favorable dispersed environment for the subsequent adsorption and reduction of metal ions. Negatively charged sites on the GO surface form stable electrostatic interactions with metal cations (Cu2+, Ag+), and the π-electron system of GO undergoes π-metal coordination with metal ions [46]. These two synergistic interactions afford abundant adsorption sites for metal ions, laying a structural foundation for the subsequent efficient reduction of metal ions and uniform loading of nanoparticles.
Upon the addition of CuSO4 solution to the GO dispersion, Cu2+ rapidly adsorbs onto the GO surface within a short period, undergoing coordination reactions with carboxyl and hydroxyl groups on GO, while binding to negatively charged sites via electrostatic attraction to form a stable Cu2+@GO complex.
As a strong reducing agent, NaBH4 releases hydride anions (H) in aqueous solution with extremely high reducing capability, which reduces Cu2+ adsorbed on the GO surface to metallic Cu0. Excess NaBH4 extensively reduces and removes oxygen-containing functional groups (-OH, -C-O-C-, C=O, -COOH) on GO, restoring the sp2 conjugated structure of GO to form RGO with excellent electrical conductivity and structural stability. This synchronous reduction process not only achieves the conversion of GO to RGO but also establishes strong interfacial interactions between the in-situ formed Cu nanoparticles and the RGO surface, further enhancing the dispersion and stability of metal nanoparticles and preventing their detachment or agglomeration [47].
Upon the addition of AgNO3 solution, Ag+ undergoes rapid reduction with excess NaBH4 in the system to form metallic Ag0. More importantly, since the standard oxidation potential of Ag+ (+0.799 V) is higher than that of Cu0 (+0.340 V), a spontaneous galvanic replacement reaction occurs between Cu0 and Ag+ (Cu0 + 2Ag+ → Cu2+ + 2Ag0). This replacement reaction further promotes the formation of Ag0, while depositing part of the Ag0 nanoparticles uniformly on the surface of preformed Cu nanoparticles to form a core–shell structure [48]. With the continuous progress of the reaction, atomic-scale interdiffusion occurs between Ag0 and Cu0 deposited on the Cu nanoparticle surface, ultimately forming a Ag-Cu bimetallic alloy structure. This is consistent with the results of the previous analysis of Vegard’s rule, this process is confirmed by the shift of Ag characteristic diffraction peaks toward higher angles in XRD patterns and the coexistence of Ag and Cu lattice fringes in HRTEM images.
Throughout the synthesis process, the concentrations of reactants (CuSO4, AgNO3) serve as key factors regulating the size, morphology, and composition of bimetallic Ag-Cu-NPs on the RGO surface, whose regulatory mechanism can be interpreted from the perspective of nucleation and growth kinetics [49]. To clarify the concentration-dependent regulatory effect, a series of control experiments were designed in this study with fixed GO dosage (20 mg), NaBH4 concentration (0.05 M), and reaction conditions (room temperature, stirring rate 500 r/min), while only varying the concentrations of CuSO4 and AgNO3 (maintaining a Cu/Ag molar ratio of 1:1). The detailed experimental data and regulatory effects are as follows: When the concentrations of CuSO4 and AgNO3 were both 0.02 M, statistical analysis via TEM characterization and Image J software showed that the average particle size of Ag-Cu-NPs was 12.3 ± 1.0 nm with uniform size distribution (polydispersity index PDI = 0.08). When the concentrations of CuSO4 and AgNO3 were increased to 0.05 M, the average particle size of Ag-Cu-NPs rose to 18.6 ± 1.2 nm with a PDI of 0.11. When the concentrations were further elevated to 0.10 M, the average particle size significantly increased to 35.8 ± 3.5 nm with a PDI of 0.23, accompanied by obvious agglomeration.
This trend is consistent with the research conclusion reported by Xia’s group that “reaction rate modulates nanocrystal structure”; i.e., reactant concentration precisely regulates nanoparticle size by controlling reduction kinetics and nucleus growth rate [50]. Therefore, precise tuning of the concentration ratio of CuSO4 to AgNO3 enables the controllable synthesis of metal nanoparticles with tailored morphology, size, and Cu/Ag molar ratio in Ag1−xCux-NPs/RGO nanocomposites, providing a feasible technical route for the directional regulation of subsequent material properties.

2.6. Electrocatalytic Reduction Application of the Composites

As a typical redox-active species, the electrocatalytic reduction performance of H2O2 is directly related to the application potential of materials in electrocatalysis-related fields such as biosensing, energy conversion, and environmental remediation [51]. In this study, cyclic voltammetry (CV) was employed to systematically investigate the electrochemical behavior of different modified electrodes toward the electrocatalytic reduction of H2O2. All measurements were conducted in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH = 7.0) at a scan rate of 0.1 V/s with an H2O2 concentration of 10 μM, within a potential window of 0.1 to −0.7 V, at room temperature. The aim was to elucidate the electrocatalytic advantages and application potential of the Ag1−xCux-NPs/RGO nanocomposite.
Figure 7 shows the CV curves of different modified electrodes under the above experimental conditions. Significant differences in electrocatalytic response were observed among the electrodes. For the reduced graphene oxide modified glassy carbon electrode (RGO/GCE) with residual contrast effect, no significant H2O2 reduction peak current was observed in the CV curve (inset of Figure 7). This phenomenon indicates that although RGO modification alone improves electrode conductivity to some extent, the lack of specific active sites for H2O2 electrocatalytic reduction on the RGO surface prevents effective electron transfer and thus efficient electrocatalytic reduction of H2O2. This finding is consistent with previous reports that “pristine RGO exhibits negligible electrocatalytic activity toward H2O2, making it insufficient for practical applications” [52].
In sharp contrast to RGO/GCE, all modified electrodes loaded with metal nanoparticles exhibited pronounced H2O2 reduction peaks within the potential window of 0.1 to −0.7 V, indicating that the introduction of metal nanoparticles provides abundant active sites for the electrocatalytic reduction of H2O2, effectively activating the electrocatalytic function of the electrode. Among them, the reduction peak current intensity of Ag0.5Cu0.5-NPs/RGO/GCE was substantially higher than that of any other modified electrode, showing 1.8-fold and 2.3-fold enhancements compared to Ag-NPs/RGO/GCE and Cu-NPs/RGO/GCE, respectively. This improvement is attributed to the fact that both Ag and Cu are transition metals with good electrical conductivity. The bimetallic alloy structure formed between them can modulate the electron orbital distribution and optimize the electron transport pathways. Compared with monometallic nanoparticles, the electron conduction efficiency of Ag-Cu NPs is significantly enhanced, accelerating the electron transfer rate in the electrocatalytic redox reaction. RGO, as a two-dimensional layered support, not only effectively disperses Ag-Cu NPs to prevent agglomeration and loss of active sites but also further accelerates electron transfer on the electrode surface and provides ample adsorption sites for H2O2 molecules due to its high electrical conductivity and large specific surface area. Furthermore, Ag0.5Cu0.5 NPs possess a large specific surface area and a reasonable particle size distribution, offering more electrocatalytic active sites and electron transport channels, significantly shortening the electron transfer distance between H2O2 molecules and the electrode surface, reducing the electron transfer resistance, and thereby efficiently promoting the electron transfer process between H2O2 and the electrode surface, ultimately enhancing the efficiency of the electrocatalytic redox reaction.

3. Experimental Methods

3.1. Reagents and Instruments

Graphite powder (diameter < 20 μm), CuSO4·5H2O, AgNO3, K3Fe(CN)6, K4Fe(CN)6, KCl, K2HPO4, KH2PO4, H3PO4, NaOH, H2O2 (30%), and NaBH4 were purchased from Shanghai Chemical Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). All solutions were prepared using ultrapure water (18.25 MΩ·cm−1). Other chemical reagents were of analytical grade and used without further purification.
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) images were obtained using an S-4800 SEM (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) operated at 5 kV. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a LabX XRD-6000 diffractometer with monochromatic Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å) (Philips X’Pert, Tokyo, Japan). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) micrographs were taken on a JEOL-2010 transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Akishima, Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed using an ESCALAB-250 spectrometer (Thermo, Paisley, UK) to analyze the surface chemical states.
Electrochemical experiments were conducted on a CHI660D electrochemical workstation (Chenhua, Shanghai, China) using a conventional three-electrode cell. A bare glassy carbon electrode (GCE) or a modified GCE served as the working electrode. A platinum sheet and a Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl) electrode were used as the counter electrode and reference electrode, respectively. For electrochemical measurements, the solutions were deoxygenated with nitrogen unless otherwise stated, and all experiments were carried out at room temperature.

3.2. Synthesis of Ag1−xCux NPs/RGO Nanocomposites

Graphene oxide (GO) was prepared using a modified Hummers’ method [53]. The preparation of reduced graphene oxide (RGO)-supported bimetallic Ag-Cu nanoparticles was carried out via a simple and environmentally friendly liquid-phase reduction method. The detailed procedure is as follows: At room temperature, 20 mg of as-prepared GO powder was dispersed in 40 mL of deionized water. The dispersion was ultrasonicated in an ultrasonic cleaner for 30 min until a uniform, semi-transparent GO suspension with no visible solid particles was formed, ensuring sufficient exfoliation of the GO layers. Subsequently, 100 μL of 0.10 M sodium citrate solution (to inhibit subsequent agglomeration of metal nanoparticles) and 100 μL of 0.10 M CuSO4 solution were sequentially added to the GO suspension. The mixture was continuously stirred on a magnetic stirrer for 30 min, during which Cu2+ ions coordinated with the oxygen-containing functional groups (e.g., hydroxyl -OH and carboxyl -COOH) on the GO surface to form a stable Cu2+@GO complex.
Then, 3 mL of freshly prepared 0.05 M NaBH4 solution was continuously added dropwise to the above Cu2+@GO complex under magnetic stirring (600 rpm), and the reduction reaction was allowed to proceed for 15 min. After that, 100 μL of 0.10 M AgNO3 solution was added dropwise to the system, and stirring was continued for another 1 h, followed by static standing for 24 h. The resulting product was collected by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm, and the precipitate was washed repeatedly with deionized water and ethanol (3–5 times) to remove residual sodium citrate, unreacted metal ions, and NaBH4. Finally, the obtained precipitate was dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for later use.
To investigate the effect of the metal composition ratio on the material properties, nanocomposites with Cu-to-Ag molar ratios of 2:8, 4:6, 6:4, and 8:2 were prepared while keeping the total metal ion concentration constant. These samples are denoted as Ag1−xCuxNPs/RGO. For comparison, monometallic nanoparticle-loaded composites were prepared following the same procedure but using either 100 μL of 0.10 M CuSO4 or 100 μL of 0.10 M AgNO3.

3.3. Preparation of Modified Electrodes

Prior to each modification, the bare glassy carbon electrode (GCE) was polished with 0.05 mm alumina slurry to a mirror finish, followed by sequential ultrasonication in absolute ethanol and deionized water for 5 min each. To prepare the modified electrode, 10 mg of Ag1−xCuxNPs/RGO nanocomposite was first dispersed in 10 mL of water, and then 1 mL of Nafion alcohol solution (5 wt%) was added with the assistance of ultrasonic stirring for 30 min to obtain a stable suspension. Subsequently, 6 μL of the Ag1−xCuxNPs/RGO suspension was drop-cast onto the surface of the GCE and allowed to dry naturally. The as-prepared modified GCE was directly used for the reduction of H2O2. For comparison, Cu NPs/RGO/GCE and Ag NPs/RGO/GCE were also fabricated following the same procedure.

4. Conclusions

In this work, a facile, eco-friendly, and low-cost liquid-phase reduction strategy was established, enabling the one-step realization of GO reduction, simultaneous reduction of Ag+/Cu2+, and in-situ loading of bimetallic nanoparticles on RGO. A Ag1−xCuxNPs/RGO nanocomposite with uniform morphology and excellent dispersibility was successfully fabricated. By adjusting the Ag/Cu molar ratio, the particle size, loading density, and alloying degree of the bimetallic nanoparticles can be effectively controlled. The as-prepared bimetallic component exists in a face-centered cubic (FCC) alloy phase and forms a strong interfacial bond with RGO, which significantly suppresses nanoparticle agglomeration. Electrochemical measurements verified that Ag1−xCuxNPs/RGO exhibits outstanding electrocatalytic reduction performance toward H2O2, and the optimal catalytic activity is achieved at a Ag/Cu molar ratio of 1:1, which is far superior to the single-metal/RGO counterparts. This enhanced performance is attributed to the synergistic enhancement of bimetallic electronic coupling, the supporting effect of RGO, and the number of active sites. Benefiting from the merits of green and controllable preparation, structural stability, and high electrocatalytic activity, the composite shows promising application prospects in electrochemical sensing of hydrogen peroxide, environmental electrocatalysis, biosensing, and related fields. Meanwhile, this work also provides a referable strategy for the rational design and synthesis of other bimetallic/carbon-based nanoelectrocatalytic materials.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/catal16060551/s1.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft, formal analysis, data curation, Y.Y.; Data curation, P.C. and J.J.; Formal analysis, X.W. and Q.D.; Investigation, T.Y.; Writing—reviewed editing, resources, Validation, Y.Y. and W.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Scientific Research Project of the Education Department of Anhui Province (2025AHGXZK31115, 2025AHGXZK30446), Wuhu Technology Research and Development Center (WHSYFZX202307), and 2025 Annual School-level Scientific Research Project of Wuhu Vocational Technical University (wzyrc202517).

Data Availability Statement

The data will be made available upon request.

Acknowledgments

We are deeply grateful for the generous financial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The funders were not involved in the study design; collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; the writing of this article; or the decision to submit it for publication.

References

  1. Konował, E.; Modrzejewska-Sikorska, A. Special Issue “Metal Nanoparticles: From Fundamental Studies to New Applications”. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nath, D.U.; Rao, K.K.; Giridhar, D.C.; Sekhar, D.C.; Kumar, J.S. Electrochemical Synthesis of Metal Nanoparticles for Catalytic Applications. Metall. Mater. Eng. 2025, 31, 579–585. [Google Scholar]
  3. He, Q.; Zhang, L.Y. Bimetallic and multimetallic nanozymes: Synergistic catalysis for advanced biomedical and health applications. RSC Adv. 2025, 15, 47648–47665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Singh, A.K.; Xu, Q. Synergistic Catalysis over Bimetallic Alloy Nanoparticles. ChemCatChem 2013, 5, 652–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shukla, D.; Tuteja, J. Synergistic Catalysis with Bimetallic Nanoparticles: A Pathway to Higher Efficiency Sustainability and Stability. Chem.-Asian J. 2026, 21, e70610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Velpula, S.; Beedu, S.R.; Rupula, K. Bimetallic nanocomposite (Ag-Au, Ag-Pd, Au-Pd) synthesis using gum kondagogu a natural biopolymer and their catalytic potentials in the degradation of 4-nitrophenol. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 190, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nene, A.; Antarnusa, G.; Dulta, K.; Sadeghzade, S.; Wang, L.; Ravikumar, C.H.; Aman, J.; Khongthaw, B.; Kandwal, A.; Somani, P.; et al. Au–Ag bimetallic nanoparticles: Synthesis, structure, and application in sensing. ChemPhysMater 2025, 4, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sarker, M.Z.; Rahman, M.M.; Minami, H.; Sarker, M.S.I.; Islam, M.S.; Ahmad, H. A potential recyclable catalyst: In situ growth of bimetallic Cu-Ag nanoalloy on the magnetic SiO2/Fe3O4-SiO2-NH2 nanocomposite support using a green approach. Colloids Surf. A 2023, 668, 131447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jia, P.; Zhang, D.; Shao, X.; Zhai, J.; Guo, J.; Wang, Z.; Ji, X. High-efficient and selective hydrogen gas sensor based on bimetallic Ag/Cu nanoparticles decorated on In2O3: Experimental and DFT calculation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2025, 101, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rashidova, S.S.; Vokhidova, N.R.; Agafonov, A.V. Biologically Active Cu/Ag Core-Shell Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Physicochemical Properties. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 67, 2062–2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lee, C.; Kim, N.R.; Koo, J.; Lee, Y.J.; Lee, H.M. Cu-Ag core-shell nanoparticles with enhanced oxidation stability for printed electronics. Nanotechnology 2015, 26, 455601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nag, A.; Butt, A.M.; Yang, M.Y.; Managutti, P.B.; Pirzada, B.M.; Mohideen, M.I.H.; Abdelhady, A.L.; Haija, M.A.; Mohamed, S.; Merinov, B.V.; et al. An atomically precise alloy AgCu cuboid nanocluster with a cubic core: Gram scale synthesis, total structure, electronic structure, and catalytic performance. Mater. Horiz. 2025, 12, 5252–5258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vink-van Ittersum, M.E.T.; Lazemi, M.; Dalebout, R.; Meeldijk, J.D.; Peerlings, M.L.J.; Verschoor, J.C.; Ligt, B.; Hensen, E.; van der Eerden, A.; Ngene, P.; et al. Design of High-Surface-Area Bimetallic Ag-Cu Nanostructures with a Tunable Ratio Obtained via Selective Leaching of AlAgCu Alloys. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2025, 129, 13961–13970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tangcharoen, T. Calcination temperature-dependent structural, optical, and photoluminescence properties of Mg-Al bimetallic oxide prepared by sol-gel auto combustion method. J. Magnes. Alloys 2025, 13, 2884–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, H.; Goh, B.H.H.; Chong, C.T.; Zhang, Y.; Lee, C.T.; Gao, Y.; Tian, B.; Tran, M.-V.; Yasin, M.F.M.; Ng, J.-H. A review of flame aerosol synthesis technology for the synthesis of nanoparticles and functional energy materials. J. Solid State Chem. 2024, 336, 124774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nyabadza, A.; McCarthy, É.; Makhesana, M.; Heidarinassab, S.; Plouze, A.; Vazquez, M.; Brabazon, D. A review of physical, chemical and biological synthesis methods of bimetallic nanoparticles and applications in sensing, water treatment, biomedicine, catalysis and hydrogen storage. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 321, 103010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Larrañaga-Tapia, M.; Betancourt-Tovar, B.; Videa, M.; Ricardo, M.A.; Cholula-Díaz, J.L. Green synthesis trends and potential applications of bimetallic nanoparticles towards the sustainable development goals 2030. Nanoscale Adv. 2024, 6, 51–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Goswami, M.; Pal, D.; Ghosh, M.K.; Dwivedi, S.; Chandraker, S.K. Bimetallic Nanoparticles: A Comprehensive Review of Synthesis Methods and Their Potential Application. ChemistrySelect 2025, 10, e01493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sharma, K.; Kaushal, S.; Jain, A.; Sami, M.H.; Kumar, S.; Tariq, H.; Bano, K.; Aggarwal, S.; Kumar, R.; Singh, P.P. A comprehensive review on biogenic synthesis of bimetallic nanoparticles and their application as catalytic reduction of 4-nitrophenol. Chem. Pap. 2024, 78, 2757–2782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Patel, B.; Choudhary, N.; Dudhagara, D. Green synthesis of Ag–Fe bimetallic nanoparticles using fungal filtrates: Unlocking multifunctional medical and environmental applications. RSC Adv. 2025, 15, 1565–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, H.; Bradley, S.J.; Chan, A. Catalytically Active Bimetallic Nanoparticles Supported on Porous Carbon Capsules Derived From Metal-Organic Framework Composites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 11872–11881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Thanh, N.C. Recent development of active metallic nanostructures-encapsulated carbon hybrid materials for ORR, OER, and HER applications. RSC Adv. 2026, 16, 19802–19825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ahmed, S.; Alzahrani, A.S.; Gondal, M.A. Critical review on transition metal selenides/graphene composite as futuristic electrode material for high performance supercapacitors. J. Energy Storage 2023, 74, 109214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, S.J.; Yang, J.Y.; Zhang, Y.Q.; Wan, Z.R.; Zhou, L.Q.; Wang, N.G. Preparation and electrocatalytic performance of Pd-Sn-Co nanoparticles modified reduced graphene oxide/CuBi2O4 composite. Acta Mater. Compos. Sin. 2020, 37, 1442–1449. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sarvalkar, P.D.; Jagtap, A.S.; Prasad, N.R.; Yaul, A.R.; Sharma, K.K.K.; Ramteke, A.A. Bio-inspired preparation of Ag NPs, rGO, and Ag/rGO nanocomposites for acoustical, antioxidant, and plant growth regulatory studies. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 3281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yi, J.F.; Yin, X.H.; Li, R.; Ma, L.H.; Zhang, Y.L.; Wang, H.B.; Yang, W.R.; Pang, P.F. Self-powered glucose biosensor based on enzymatic biofuel cell constructed by reduced graphene oxide/gold nanoparticles/multi-walled carbon nanotubes composite. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2025, 44, 393–401. [Google Scholar]
  27. Chen, L.; Zhao, J.L.; Li, J.L.; Zhuang, Y.; Guo, D.X.; Meng, S.; Zhang, D.T.; Yang, X.; Sui, G.Z. Cu/Zn-bimetallic organic framework-derived RGO/CuO–ZnO Z-scheme heterojunction for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2025, 103, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Brzózka, A.; Brudzisz, A.; Jeleń, A.; Kozak, M.; Wesół, J.; Iwaniec, M.; Sulka, G.D. A comparative study of electrocatalytic reduction of hydrogen peroxide at carbon rod electrodes decorated with silver particles. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2021, 263, 114801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Song, J.S.; Zeng, J.F.; Chen, X.P.; Zou, Y.J.; Chen, X.J.; Ma, Y.Q. One-step reduction preparation of silver nanoparticles/graphene composite by sodium borohydride and its application in conductive adhesive. J. Shihezi Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2016, 34, 686–690. [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhao, X.; Xu, D.; Liu, K.; Dai, P.; Gao, J. Remarkable enhancement of PdAg/rGO catalyst activity for formic acid dehydrogenation by facile boron-doping through NaBH4 reduction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 512, 145746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, Y.W.; Zhao, S.; Liu, R.H.; Chen, X.Y.; Tang, Q. Preparation and photocatalytic performance of magnetic separable ZnFe2O4-TiO2/reduced graphene oxide composite. Acta Mater. Compos. Sin. 2020, 37, 758–766. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ma, X.M.; Sun, M.; Lin, Y.; Liu, Y.J.; Luo, F.; Guo, L.H.; Qiu, B.; Lin, Z.Y.; Chen, G.N. Research progress of visual biosensors based on gold nanomaterials. Chin. J. Anal. Chem. 2018, 46, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhao, H.; Mao, G.; Han, H.; Song, J.; Liu, Y.; Chu, W.; Sun, Z. An effective and environment-friendly system for Cu NPs@RGO-catalyzed C–C homocoupling of aryl halides or arylboronic acids in ionic liquids under microwave irradiation. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 41108–41113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Xiong, Y.N.; Hu, B.X.; Chen, X.H.; Xu, L.S. Renforced mechanical properties of reduced graphene oxide/copper composites using spray drying. Chem. Res. Appl. 2019, 31, 697–703. [Google Scholar]
  35. Michałek, T.; Wojtaszek, K.; Małecki, S.; Wojnicki, M. Hydrometallurgical Method for AgCu Alloy Powder Synthesis and Its Application in Pd(II) Recovery Through Cementation. Metals 2024, 14, 1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Qi, M.M.; He, X.B.; Liu, S.B.; Yang, W.C.; Zhu, W.B. Preparation of Ag-Cu solid solution particles and properties of low temperature sintering interconnect joints. Trans. China Weld. Inst. 2022, 43, 97–101+119. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zeng, W.; Liu, J.; Zhang, D.J.; Yang, G.Q.; Zhang, Z.B. Preparation of Pd-Au/1cTiO2/SiO2 catalyst and its epoxidation performance for alkenes. CIESC J. 2020, 71, 4999–5006. [Google Scholar]
  38. Yang, Z.Z.; Zheng, Q.B.; Qiu, H.X.; Li, J.; Yang, J.H. CaCl2 catalyzed NaBH4 reduction of graphene oxide. New Carbon Mater. 2015, 30, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, J.; Lee, D.; Wang, T.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Han, J.H. 2D Ag nanowire network boosts bonding and thermo-mechanical properties in rGO/Cu composites. Carbon 2026, 247, 121060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jiang, X.; Wang, J.; Zhou, B. A two-step chemical-hydrothermal reduction method to prepare reduced graphene oxide with high electrical conductivity. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2022, 130, 109437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nikolić, N.; Spasojević, J.; Radosavljević, A.; Milosević, M.; Barudzija, T.; Rakocević, L.; Kacarević-Popović, Z. Influence of poly(vinyl alcohol)/poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) polymer matrix composition on the bonding environment and characteristics of Ag nanoparticles produced by gamma irradiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2023, 202, 110564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Darabdhara, G.; Sharma, B.; Das, M.R.; Boukherroub, R.; Szunerits, S. Cu-Ag bimetallic nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide nanosheets as peroxidase mimic for glucose and ascorbic acid detection. Sens. Actuators B-Chem. 2017, 238, 842–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Đorđević, A.M.; Milikić, J.; Knezević, S.; Jovanović, A.; Relić, D.; Stanković, D.; Sljukić, B. Synthesis, characterization and application of bimetallic XAg/rGO (X = Co, Cu) nanocomposites for electrochemical detection of nitrobenzene. Microchem. J. 2025, 213, 113826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Song, J.M.; Yao, J.; Li, H. Effect of particle agglomeration on melting behavior at nanoscale. J. Eng. Thermophys. 2015, 36, 397–401. [Google Scholar]
  45. Dou, Q.; Li, Y.; Wong, K.W.; Ng, K.M. Facile synthesis of nearly monodisperse AgCu alloy nanoparticles with synergistic effect against oxidation and electromigration. J. Mater. Res. 2019, 34, 2095–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Deshwal, N.; Singh, P. A review on recent advancements on removal of harmful metal/metal ions using graphene oxide: Experimental and theoretical approaches. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 858, 159672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Yu, M.; Liu, P.; Sun, Y.; Liu, J.; An, J.; Li, S. Fabrication and Characterization of Graphene-Ag Nanoparticles Composites. J. Inorg. Mater. 2012, 27, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Li, C.; Yao, Y.Z. Synthesis of bimetallic core-shell silver-copper nanoparticles decorated on reduced graphene oxide with enhanced electrocatalytic performance. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2020, 6, 137726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jun, Y.S.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Ghim, D.; Wu, X.; Kim, D.; Jung, H. Classical and nonclassical nucleation and growth mechanisms for nanoparticle formation. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2022, 73, 453–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Yang, T.H.; Gilroy, K.D.; Xia, Y.N. Reduction rate as a quantitative knob for achieving deterministic synthesis of colloidal metal nanocrystals. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 6730–6749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Huang, X.H.; Yang, X.K.; Gui, L.; Liu, S.G.; Wang, K.; Rong, H.W.; Wei, W. Review on carbon electrodes for electrocatalytic synthesis of hydrogen peroxide. New Carbon Mater. 2024, 39, 254–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Gorska, A.; Paczosa-Bator, B.; Cabaj, J. Selective electrocatalysis of reduced graphene oxide towards hydrogen peroxide aiming oxidases-based biosensing: Caution while interpreting. Electrochimi. Acta 2017, 223, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hummers, W.S.; Offeman, R.E. Preparation of Graphitic Oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. SEM images of Ag1−x-Cux NPs/RGO nanocomposites, (a) Ag0.8-Cu0.2 NPs/RGO, (b) Ag0.6-Cu0.4 NPs/RGO, (c) Ag0.5-Cu0.5 NPs/RGO, (d) Ag0.4-Cu0.6 NPs/RGO, (e) Ag0.2-Cu0.8 NPs/RGO and (f) EDX image of Ag0.5-Cu0.5 NPs/RGO.
Figure 1. SEM images of Ag1−x-Cux NPs/RGO nanocomposites, (a) Ag0.8-Cu0.2 NPs/RGO, (b) Ag0.6-Cu0.4 NPs/RGO, (c) Ag0.5-Cu0.5 NPs/RGO, (d) Ag0.4-Cu0.6 NPs/RGO, (e) Ag0.2-Cu0.8 NPs/RGO and (f) EDX image of Ag0.5-Cu0.5 NPs/RGO.
Catalysts 16 00551 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of Cu NPs/RGO, Ag NPs/RGO and Ag1−x-Cux NPs/RGO nanocomposites.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of Cu NPs/RGO, Ag NPs/RGO and Ag1−x-Cux NPs/RGO nanocomposites.
Catalysts 16 00551 g002
Figure 3. (a) XPS wide-range spectra of Ag NPs/RGO, Cu NPs/RGO, Ag0.5Cu0.5 NPs/RGO, (b) C1s (blue curve represents GO, red curve represents RGO), (c) Ag3d and (d) Cu2p.
Figure 3. (a) XPS wide-range spectra of Ag NPs/RGO, Cu NPs/RGO, Ag0.5Cu0.5 NPs/RGO, (b) C1s (blue curve represents GO, red curve represents RGO), (c) Ag3d and (d) Cu2p.
Catalysts 16 00551 g003
Figure 4. TEM (a), HRTEM (b,c) and SAED pattern (d) of Ag-Cu NPs/RGO nanocomposite.
Figure 4. TEM (a), HRTEM (b,c) and SAED pattern (d) of Ag-Cu NPs/RGO nanocomposite.
Catalysts 16 00551 g004
Figure 5. TEM (a) and HRTEM (b) images of monometallic Ag NPs/RGO, and TEM (c) and HRTEM (d) images of monometallic Cu NPs/RGO.
Figure 5. TEM (a) and HRTEM (b) images of monometallic Ag NPs/RGO, and TEM (c) and HRTEM (d) images of monometallic Cu NPs/RGO.
Catalysts 16 00551 g005
Figure 6. Schematic of Ag-Cu NPs/RGO nanocomposites.
Figure 6. Schematic of Ag-Cu NPs/RGO nanocomposites.
Catalysts 16 00551 g006
Figure 7. Cyclic voltammetric responses of different modified electrodes (Ag NPs/RGO/GCE, Cu NPs/RGO/GCE, Ag1−x-Cux NPs/RGO/GCE. Inset: RGO/GCE) in the presence of 10 μM H2O2 in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0).
Figure 7. Cyclic voltammetric responses of different modified electrodes (Ag NPs/RGO/GCE, Cu NPs/RGO/GCE, Ag1−x-Cux NPs/RGO/GCE. Inset: RGO/GCE) in the presence of 10 μM H2O2 in phosphate buffer (pH 7.0).
Catalysts 16 00551 g007
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yao, Y.; Cheng, P.; Wang, X.; Deng, Q.; Yao, T.; Jiang, J.; Wu, W. Controllable Synthesis of Silver–Copper Bimetallic Nanoparticle-Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites with Enhanced Electrocatalytic Performance. Catalysts 2026, 16, 551. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16060551

AMA Style

Yao Y, Cheng P, Wang X, Deng Q, Yao T, Jiang J, Wu W. Controllable Synthesis of Silver–Copper Bimetallic Nanoparticle-Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites with Enhanced Electrocatalytic Performance. Catalysts. 2026; 16(6):551. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16060551

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yao, Youzhi, Ping Cheng, Xiaohan Wang, Qinghua Deng, Tiancheng Yao, Jiaxin Jiang, and Wenjie Wu. 2026. "Controllable Synthesis of Silver–Copper Bimetallic Nanoparticle-Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites with Enhanced Electrocatalytic Performance" Catalysts 16, no. 6: 551. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16060551

APA Style

Yao, Y., Cheng, P., Wang, X., Deng, Q., Yao, T., Jiang, J., & Wu, W. (2026). Controllable Synthesis of Silver–Copper Bimetallic Nanoparticle-Decorated Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites with Enhanced Electrocatalytic Performance. Catalysts, 16(6), 551. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16060551

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop