Next Article in Journal
Constructing Spatially Separated Ru Nanoparticles on Basic Support for the Hydrogenation of Ethyl Levulinate to γ-Valerolactone
Previous Article in Journal
Synthesis of Nanostructured Tungsten-Based Catalyst from Scheelite Ore for Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Progress in WO3-Based Photo(electro)-Catalysis Systems for Green Organic Synthesis and Wastewater Remediation: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Post-Annealing on the Water Splitting Performance of Polymeric Carbon Nitride: The Role of Hydrogen Bonds

1
Instituto de Nanociencia y Materiales de Aragón (INMA), CSIC-Universidad de Zaragoza, Campus Río Ebro, Edificio I+D, C/Poeta Mariano Esquillor, s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
2
Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Tecnologías del Medio Ambiente, Universidad de Zaragoza, Campus Río Ebro, C/María de Luna, 3, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
3
Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología del Carbono, INCAR-CSIC, Francisco Pintado Fe, 26, 33010 Oviedo, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2026, 16(2), 184; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16020184
Submission received: 15 January 2026 / Revised: 3 February 2026 / Accepted: 9 February 2026 / Published: 12 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Photo/Electrocatalysts for Environmental Purification)

Abstract

Post-annealing treatments constitute a simple and cost-effective strategy to tailor the structure and photocatalytic performance of polymeric carbon nitride (PCN). In this work, PCNs synthesized from melamine and urea were subjected to post-annealing at 580 °C under air and CO2 atmospheres to elucidate the role of hydrogen bonding, as well as other structural modifications induced by oxidizing atmospheres, on photocatalytic water splitting. Comprehensive structural, chemical, and textural characterization (XRD, FTIR spectroscopy, XPS, SSNMR, HRTEM, BET, TGA, and UV–Vis DRS) reveals that post-annealing induces markedly different effects depending on the precursor. For melamine-derived PCN, the treatment selectively disrupts hydrogen bonds between melon strands without introducing nitrogen vacancies, amorphization, or framework shortening. This structural rearrangement increases surface area, reduces particle size, slightly widens the band gap, and enhances water–framework interactions, resulting in a twofold improvement in the hydrogen evolution rate (HER), reaching ~3300 µmol h−1 g·cat−1 under visible-light irradiation. In contrast, urea-derived PCN undergoes only minor structural modifications, including slight exfoliation and possible nitrogen deficiency, which do not translate into a measurable enhancement of photocatalytic activity. These results demonstrate that selective hydrogen-bond disruption is a key factor governing charge transport and photocatalytic efficiency in PCN. Importantly, the optimized melamine-derived PCN achieves HER values comparable to those of urea-derived PCN while maintaining a substantially higher synthesis yield, highlighting its potential for scalable solar hydrogen production.

1. Introduction

The urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the effects of fossil fuel overconsumption has sparked intense research into sustainable energy solutions. Among these, photocatalytic water splitting for hydrogen (H2) production stands out as a promising strategy to harness solar energy and generate clean fuel [1,2].
Polymeric carbon nitride (PCN) has emerged as a promising photocatalyst due to its low cost, simple synthesis, chemical stability, and suitable band gap for visible light absorption (in the range of 2.7 eV). Its unique electronic structure provides a strong thermodynamic driving force for various redox reactions, making it useful for applications like water splitting, CO2 reduction, and pollutant degradation. However, despite its advantages, pristine PCN faces significant challenges that hinder its photocatalytic performance, including limited light absorption, small surface area, fast electron-hole recombination, and low electrical conductivity. These limitations must be addressed to fully unlock its potential for sustainable energy and environmental applications [2,3,4,5].
The structure of polymeric carbon nitride (PCN) is primarily based on strands of melon, composed of tri-s-triazine (heptazine) units, which are connected through covalent bonds along the Y-plane. These strands are connected by hydrogen bonds, which preserve the long-range atomic order within each layer, creating a two-dimensional layer structure. These layers are held together by van der Waals interactions along the Z-plane, allowing for the formation of a stable 3D network [6].
Modifying the structure of polymeric carbon nitride is one of the most studied approaches to improve the photocatalytic efficiency of the semiconductor [1,4,5,7,8]. Although many methods, such as copolymerization and heteroatom doping, have shown promising results, they often involve complex processes and high costs. Therefore, developing simple, scalable, and cost-effective approaches to fine-tune the structure and boost the photocatalytic performance of PCN remains a key research focus.
Post-annealing treatments have proven to be a simple and economical method to enhance the photocatalytic efficiency of polymeric carbon nitride by inducing several structural changes:
(1) The incorporation of vacancies/defects [7,9], which has been shown to enhance photocatalytic activity. Nitrogen vacancies inhibit the radiative recombination of photoexcited charges [7], while carbon vacancies facilitate electron transfer from the CB due to a negatively shifted position [9]. Thus, depending on which element creates the vacancy, the properties of PCN can differ significantly. Nitrogen vacancies result in a slightly narrowed band gap and extended visible light absorption [7], whereas carbon vacancies cause a blue shift, decreasing absorption and increasing the band gap [9].
(2) Oxygen doping can occur when the post-annealing treatment takes place under oxidizing atmospheres [3,9]. O-doping in the PCN lattice has been reported to modify its intrinsic electronic and band structure, shifting the absorption edge to 498 nm and enhancing its visible-light photoactivity. This process can increase the surface area, broaden the material’s response to visible light, and improve the separation efficiency of photoinduced charge carriers [3,10].
(3) Amorphism, meaning a reduction in long-range atomic order, has been found to lower the band gap to 1.90 eV by merely heating partially crystalline PCN, which originally has a band gap of 2.82 eV. As a result of this modification, amorphous PCN demonstrated significantly higher hydrogen generation activity compared to crystalline PCN due to its extended light absorption range and suppressed radiative recombination [11].
(4) Reducing the particle size and/or creating holes within the layers [8,12,13,14,15] also boosts the photocatalytic efficiency by increasing the specific surface area, exposing more new edges, and providing additional catalytically active sites. Furthermore, the reduction in particle size leads to an increase in the band gap and a blue shift in absorption due to the quantum confinement effect (QCE). As a result, the photogenerated electrons retain their strong reducing power, while the mobility of the generated holes improves, leading to enhanced oxidation efficiency.
The reduction in particle size can occur through three distinct processes, which are worth differentiating: (4.1) Shortening of melon strands along the Y-plane due to the breaking of covalent bonds, which provides the previously described advantages [15]. (4.2) Breaking of hydrogen bonds along the X-plane [8,14], which is more beneficial than the previous process due to the 7.9 eV potential barrier across the hydrogen-bonded regions, which makes the transport of charge carriers between the melon strands difficult. For this reason, the selective breaking of hydrogen bonds can substantially enhance photocatalytic activity by suppressing radiative electron-hole recombination. (4.3) Decrease in layer alignment along the Z-plane due to exfoliation processes [2,12,16]. As with hydrogen bonds, eliminating these interactions is highly beneficial due to the large 33.2 eV potential barrier between the layers, which prohibits the transport of charge carriers between them [8].
In this study, we focus on further enhancing the catalytic efficiency of these nitrides through a simple and cost-effective post-annealing treatment under two different atmospheres (air and CO2) at 580 °C—a temperature previously identified as optimal for the selective disruption of hydrogen bonds in layered carbon nitride [8], without the use of any additives or salt intercalation. Furthermore, building upon our previous work [1], which established the optimal synthesis conditions for producing PCN from urea and melamine precursors, we evaluate how this post-treatment affects PCNs derived from these different precursors, which naturally yield materials with higher (melamine) or lower (urea) hydrogen-bond densities [17], while also assessing the influence of oxidizing atmospheres that have been shown to enhance the photocatalytic efficiency during PCN synthesis [1].
The photocatalytic performance of polymeric carbon nitride is evaluated through hydrogen production via a photocatalytic photoreforming process in the presence of a sacrificial electron donor. Triethanolamine (TEOA) is used to efficiently scavenge photogenerated holes, thereby suppressing charge recombination, while platinum nanoparticles act as a co-catalyst to promote electron trapping and catalyze proton reduction. This experimental configuration enables a reliable assessment of structure–activity relationships in PCN by minimizing kinetic limitations associated with surface redox reactions [18,19,20].

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of the Photocatalyst

The solid yields obtained in the synthesis of the precursors, i.e., SYCN-M = 48 ± 1 wt.% and SYCN-U = 3 ± 1 wt.%, were similar to those described in our previous article [1] and by other authors [3]. The thermal treatments produced noticeable changes in the coloration and density of the precursors (i.e., CN-M and CN-U) that were visible to the naked eye (Figure 1). Regarding the solid yield (SY), the results were identical for both atmospheres when CN-M was used as a precursor (46–48 wt.%), and slightly different for CN-U, with a lower SY obtained in air compared to CO2 (34 vs. 49 wt.%). These results are in good agreement with the post-treatment (air, 540 °C, 2 h) previously carried out by our group on CN-M in a horizontal furnace using a ceramic crucible [3], highlighting that the different configurations studied (vertical furnace vs. horizontal furnace) do not produce a substantial difference in the post-annealing performance under an air atmosphere. However, with the CO2 atmosphere, differences in the configuration were observed, with the solid yield being much lower in the vertical furnace (46 vs. 86 wt.%) [3]. This suggests a greater effect of the post-reaction, likely due to the increased contact between the gas and the solid.

2.1.1. Chemical Structure Characterization (Elemental Analysis, FTIR, XPS and NMR)

The results from the elemental analysis of the PCN samples are shown in Table 1. The results show that the CHN content of all the samples was very similar, with C = 35.6 ± 0.1 wt.%, N = 61.5 ± 0.5 wt.%, and H = 1.61 ± 0.02 wt.%. Oxygen was the only element whose concentration varied more between samples, ranging from 1.1 to 1.7 wt.%. As expected, the samples synthesized from urea exhibited a larger amount of oxygen (1.3–1.6 wt.%) than those made from melamine (1.06 ± 0.02 wt.%) [1]. Previous studies have reported that PCN exposure to oxidizing atmospheres (i.e., air and CO2) under certain thermal treatments can result in additional oxygen being incorporated within the samples [3,9]. However, under our thermal conditions, only CN-U-Air presents a slight increase in oxygen concentration.
The elemental composition corresponds to an empirical formula of C3.0N4.4H1.6O0.1, which closely matches values previously reported in the literature for materials synthesized using comparable methodologies [18,21]. These results confirm that the obtained material can be identified as Liebig’s melon phase [C3.0N4.5H1.5], whose hydrogen content is known to vary within the range of 1.1–2.0 wt.% depending on synthesis conditions [22,23,24], and the C/N atomic ratio is 0.67. We can evidently rule out the structure of a perfect g-C3N4 (C/N = 0.75) and that of a CN fully composed of s-triazine structures (C/N = 0.60) [1,25]. The slight increase in C/N atomic ratio from 0.67 in the pristine CN-U to 0.68 in the annealed CN-U-Air/CO2 samples could indicate a nitrogen-deficient material [7].
The FTIR spectra (Figure 2) of all PCN samples displayed characteristic infrared vibrations corresponding to the tri-s-triazine unit fingerprint. The peaks at 800 cm−1 and 890 cm−1 are attributed to the out-of-plane bending vibrations of tri-s-triazine and N-H deformation, respectively [26]. The strong absorption bands at 1221 and 1307 cm−1 are characteristic of C-NH-C bridges between cyameluric rings [24]. The vibrations associated with the cyameluric ring and the terminal amines were observed at 1450 cm−1 and 1625 cm−1, respectively. Additionally, all the samples exhibited N-H stretching bands within the range of approximately 2850–3400 cm−1. Peaks at 1730 cm−1 and 2158 cm−1, which can be attributed to oxygen-containing functionalities such as C=O and C-O, have not been detected in our PCN polymers [3,19], indicating again that no significant oxidation process has occurred.
Further observation on an enlarged view of the peak corresponding to the out-of-plane bending vibrations of tri-s-triazine units of PCN samples (Figure A1 in Appendix A) showed a slight shift to higher wavenumbers in the post-annealed PCN samples. This phenomenon is related to the decrease in electron cloud density due to a lower amount of hydrogen bonds in the PCN [17].
The XPS survey spectra presented in Figure 3 show that the main peaks correspond to C 1s (~285 eV) and N 1s (~400 eV). Additionally, all samples displayed a minor peak corresponding to O 1s, which appeared around 530 eV. The main difference between the spectra is the higher intensity of the oxygen peak observable in the CN-U-Air sample, in agreement with the elemental analysis results.
The N 1s signal (Figure 4) showed three distinct peaks: a dominant one at approximately 398.5 eV, attributed to sp2-hybridized pyridine nitrogen in C-N=C from the heterocyclic ring, followed by two smaller peaks at 399.5 eV, corresponding to the N–(C)3 tertiary nitrogen, and 400.8 eV, associated with the terminal amino groups C-NHx [18,20]. The precursors and the annealed samples have presented almost identical signals, demonstrating that the applied thermal treatment does not produce highly significant changes in the chemical structure of the PCNs (Figure 4).
The C 1s signal (Figure 5) displayed two primary peaks: a smaller one at 284.8 eV and a larger one around 287.8 eV. The latter can be attributed to C=C (sp2) from adventitious carbon and to sp2-bonded carbon in N–C=N from the heterocyclic ring [10]. The position and shape of the N–C=N peak remain essentially unchanged across all samples, in agreement with the N 1s spectra, demonstrating the preservation of the carbon–nitrogen backbone after post-annealing. Minor variations in the relative intensity of the C–C contribution are observed, particularly for urea-derived samples, which can be attributed to surface-related effects and adventitious carbon rather than to intrinsic structural modifications of the polymeric carbon nitride.
The 13C CP/MAS SSNMR spectra (Figure A2) display two primary signals: the one between 150 ppm and 160 ppm is attributed to the CN3 units of heptazine, while the signal between 160 ppm and 170 ppm is assigned to amine-bearing carbons, CN2(NHx) [24,27,28]. Consistent with the XPS spectra, the peak shapes observed for the PCN precursors and the annealed samples are nearly identical.
Figure 6 shows the 1H NMR spectra of the PCN samples. The two characteristic signals corresponding to the amino groups (Ha, ca. 8–9 ppm) and residual water (Hw, ca. 3–4 ppm) are clearly observed [28,29,30]. The post-annealing treatment produces opposite effects on the residual water signal depending on the PCN precursor. In the case of melamine-derived PCN (CN-M), post-annealing causes a shift of the Hw peak from 3.6 ppm to 3.7 ppm for both CN-M-Air and CN-M-CO2, indicating the formation of hydrogen bonds between water molecules and the PCN framework [29,31]. In addition, the intensity of the Hw signal gradually increases from pristine CN-M to the post-annealed samples, with CN-M-CO2 exhibiting the highest intensity, suggesting that a larger number of water molecules are strongly associated with the network through hydrogen bonding.
In contrast, post-annealing of urea-derived PCN (CN-U) leads to a shift of the Hw signal from 3.9 ppm toward lower chemical shifts (~3.7 ppm). Moreover, under a CO2 atmosphere, the peak intensity remains nearly unchanged, which suggests a reduced formation of hydrogen bonds between water molecules and the PCN structure [29,31].
Regarding the amino-group signal (Ha), the chemical shift remains essentially constant for all PCN samples. However, a decrease in peak intensity is observed in some cases, particularly for CN-M-Air, indicating an enhanced proton exchange process between the amino groups and adsorbed water molecules [19,29].
To semi-quantitatively evaluate the degree of polymerization, two indices have been calculated using the results from FTIR and NMR techniques. The results are presented in Table 2.
The HNHx/Hring index was calculated as the ratio between the intensity of the NHx band (1625 cm−1) and that of the cyameluric ring region (1450 cm−1) in the FTIR spectra [1]. This index showed very similar values for all PCNs studied, both before and after thermal treatment. The ACN2(NHx)/ACN3 index was also determined from the ratio of the areas of the CN2(NHx) (160–170 ppm) and CN3 (150–160 ppm) regions in the 13C CP/MAS SSNMR spectra (Figure A2). PCNs synthesized from melamine exhibited an ACN2(NHx)/ACN3 ratio of 2.0, slightly higher than that calculated for urea-derived PCNs (1.8–1.9), indicating a greater proportion of carbon species near peripheral –NHx groups [19], in good agreement with the literature [1]. In addition, comparison between PCNs obtained from the same precursor confirms once again that post-annealing does not lead to an increased number of terminal –NHx groups.
Based on the results presented in this section, we conclude that the annealing treatments did not induce very significant changes in the chemical structure, apart from a slight oxidation in the CN-U-Air sample. Furthermore, FTIR, XPS, and NMR analyses, together with the calculated indices, confirm that annealed PCNs do not show any decrease in their degree of polymerization. However, the post-annealing treatment appears to induce noticeable changes in the hydrogen-bonding network, suggesting that a larger number of water molecules are strongly associated with the PCN framework in the post-annealed CN-M samples, together with an enhanced proton exchange process between amino groups and adsorbed water molecules. This behavior may be attributed to the disruption of hydrogen bonds between melon chains, which renders the N–H bridges linking the tri-s-triazine units more accessible for hydrogen bonding with water molecules.

2.1.2. Structural and Textural Characterization (XRD, HRTEM and BET Area)

Figure 7 shows the XRD patterns of the synthesized PCNs. Two typical diffraction peaks centered at ~13.0° and ~27.7° (2θ), ascribed to the (100) and (002) crystal planes, represent in-plane packing and interlayer periodic stacking, respectively.
Consistent with the work of Tyborski and Fina [32], our results indicate that the primary phase of the samples studied was composed of melon sheets. The XRD theoretical patterns of a melon structure proposed by Lotsch et al. [33] are shown with dotted lines.
Further observation of the enlarged view of the (100) peak in Figure A3 reveals the partial disappearance of the (100) crystal plane in the annealed samples, suggesting a decrease in the degree of order in the planar structure unit [34]. The weakening and broadening of the 13.1° peak have been associated with nitrogen vacancies [35] and the breaking of hydrogen bonds in the intralayer framework [8,17]. However, based on the previous observations, only the possibility of hydrogen-bond breaking seems likely.
In agreement with Lan et al., the PCNs synthesized from urea show weaker intensities for the 13.1° peak compared to those made from melamine, indicating a lower amount of interlayer hydrogen bonds formed during the polymerization of urea in comparison to melamine [17]. Furthermore, regarding the annealing atmosphere, this decrease is more pronounced in air than in CO2.
On the other hand, the enlarged view of the (002) peak (Figure 8 and Figure A4) shows that the diffraction angles (2θ) of the (002) peaks for CN-M and CN-U appear at 27.79° and 27.73°, respectively, in good agreement with the results reported for other PCNs synthesized up to 600 °C [1,32,36]. The thermal treatments lead to a decrease in the intensity of the (002) peaks in all cases. Once again, this decrease is more pronounced with the air atmosphere than with CO2. The signal intensity of the samples synthesized from melamine decreases more significantly compared to the precursor, as CN-M exhibits a much more intense peak than CN-U (Figure 8 and Figure A4). Additionally, a shift of the (002) peak to higher diffraction angles is observed (Figure A3), indicating that the thermal treatments cause a reduction in the interlayer distance of the resulting PCNs [34]. This phenomenon could be due to the undulated layers gradually becoming planar during the process [12].
For a deeper understanding of the XRD data, some parameters were calculated (Table 3) via Bragg’s law (Equation (1)) and the Debye–Scherrer equation (Equation (2)).
In agreement with our previous work and studies by other researchers [1,37,38], the in-plane distances of the tri-s-triazine (dTSTZN) and s-triazine (dSTZN) units in the PCN samples were approximately 6.9 and 5.0 Å, respectively. The stack thickness was greater for CN-M-atm samples (9.2–10 nm) compared to CN-U-atm samples (6.8–7.1 nm), consistent with literature reports [1,39,40]. The interlayer distance (dinterlayer) was similar across all samples, with the largest shift observed for the CN-M precursor under a CO2 atmosphere, where dinterlayer changed from 3.21 (CN-M) to 3.19 (CN-M-CO2). As a result, CN-M-atm samples had more layers (29–31) than CN-U-atm samples (21–22) (Table 3).
The decrease in intensity of the (002) XRD peaks has been associated with various factors: (1) nitrogen vacancies [35], (2) lack of long-range order in atomic arrangements (amorphism) [11], (3) a lower number of aligned layers due to exfoliation processes [12,16], and/or (4) a smaller planar size resulting from reduced polymerization or hydrogen bonding [8,12,36,41]. However, based on the results obtained from the techniques discussed above, the shift of the (002) reflection toward higher diffraction angles, and the layer thickness values estimated using Scherrer’s equation (Table 3), amorphization can be ruled out for all PCN samples, as well as exfoliation in the case of the annealed CN-M samples. Instead, the observed changes are more consistently attributed to a reduction in hydrogen bonding between melon strands for these samples. In contrast, the CN-U samples, which did not show evidence of breaking the hydrogen bonds between the strands in the previous analyses, exhibited a slight decrease in the stacking thickness following annealing.
High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images of the PCN samples synthesized from melamine and urea are shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10. The black dots represent Pt nanoparticles (NPs). CN-M exhibits a sheet-like morphology with rolled edges [42], and the thermal treatment clearly reduced the particle size of the CN-M sheets (Figure 9). In contrast, CN-U samples display a two-dimensional, agglomerated, lamellar-like morphology [1]. For PCNs synthesized from urea, no significant change in particle size due to heat treatment is observed. From the HRTEM images, it appears that the PCNs have discotic components stacked in an approximately planar arrangement or polymeric units arranged with a relatively regular spacing, rather than a graphitic structure with stacked layers [43].
Figure 10 shows additional HRTEM images of the PCNs taken at higher magnification. The arrows indicate areas where the smallest Pt NPs have been observed. Additional regions with small Pt NPs in CN-M-Air and CN-M-CO2 are shown in Figure A5 and Figure A6. Furthermore, Figure A7 presents a comparison of a small, isolated Pt NP (~5 nm) and a larger Pt NP (17 × 21 nm), which is composed of the aggregation of smaller nanoparticles (3 × 5 nm) over CN-U-Air.
It appears that the annealed samples (CN-M-Air, CN-M-CO2, and CN-U-CO2) exhibit some areas with very small and well-distributed Pt nanoparticles (≤2 nm), which were not found in the precursors (i.e., CN-M and CN-U). Kang et al. [8] reported that by breaking the hydrogen bonds, the Au NPs disperse more effectively and have smaller sizes. Recent studies have also demonstrated through DFT calculations that metal single atoms can be hosted in the pore cavities of polyheptazine imide (6.81 Å), leading to band gap narrowing and a significant improvement in photocatalytic OER performance [5,44].
The insets in Figure 10 show histograms of the Pt NPs, along with the mean size and the number of particles analyzed. These results indicate that the precursor used in the synthesis of PCNs affects the size of the Pt NPs. PCNs synthesized from melamine exhibit smaller sizes and better distribution. The histograms for CN-M and CN-U show a mode of 2–5 nm and 5–12 nm, respectively.
It seems that the annealing treatment in air reduces the size of the Pt NPs, shifting the mode to 1–3 nm for CN-M-Air and 3–6 nm for CN-U-Air. Regarding the annealing under a CO2 atmosphere, there is no clear evidence of a change in the Pt NP size based on the histograms obtained. However, areas with very small and well-distributed Pt NPs were also observed. This result aligns with the XRD data, where a greater change was observed when annealing occurred in air.
Figure 11 shows the N2 adsorption–desorption isotherms and the BJH pore-size distribution for all the prepared photocatalysts. The values for SBET, total pore volume, and peak pore size for the PCN samples are provided in Table 3. All the samples displayed a type-IV adsorption–desorption isotherm, which is typical of mesoporous materials [42]. The BJH pore-size distribution was consistent across all samples, showing a narrow distribution centered around 3.5 nm and a wider range of pores between 10 and 100 nm, with peaks observed between 42 and 93 nm. However, the total pore volume was significantly influenced by the precursor used. Previous studies suggest that urea-derived samples tend to have higher SBET and pore volume compared to those derived from melamine [4,20,39,42]. This difference has been attributed to the oxygen content in the urea precursor, with the formation of CO2 during polymerization potentially hindering grain growth, thus increasing the surface area of the PCN [42]. However, the urea precursor has also been reported to produce a greater degree of polymerization than melamine [1]. Therefore, it is likely that the inhibition of grain growth is due to the lower amount of hydrogen bonding within a layer.
The results from the present study (Table 4) show that our precursors (CN-M and CN-U) exhibited greater surface areas than PCNs from other studies [4,42,45]. Additionally, it has been shown that all the thermal treatments tested increased the SBET and total pore volume; moreover, this increase was very similar for the two oxidizing atmospheres studied (i.e., air and CO2). However, when compared with the previous literature, it seems that our treatment has not been very effective in increasing the surface area [9,13].
The CN-M precursor experienced the greatest increase in surface area. The BET surface areas of CN-M-Air (48 m2/g) and CN-M-CO2 (58 m2/g) were approximately 2 times higher than that of CN-M (26 m2/g). Bao et al. [46] reported a similar increase in SBET (1.7 times) when CN-M was heated at 500 °C for 4 h in a muffle furnace.
On the other hand, the BET surface areas of CN-U-Air (100 m2/g) and CN-U-CO2 (103 m2/g) were only about 1.4 times higher than that of CN-U (74 m2/g), but the highest surface values were achieved.
The high surface area and large pore volume of the thermally treated PCNs can be attributed again to the reduced layer thickness and/or X–Y size by layer-splitting [36,46], as well as to defects and vacancies [7,9,47].

2.1.3. Thermal Stability (TGA)

The thermal stability of the as-prepared PCN samples was assessed using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The DTG curves for all PCN samples (Figure 12) displayed a distinct peak within the temperature range of 692 to 708 °C. The samples showed stability up to 600 °C (mass loss < 0.6 wt.%), indicating the robust structure of the tri-s-triazine-based units in the materials [37,48]. Consistent with our previous findings and those of other researchers [1,49], differences in thermal stability were observed depending on the precursor; melamine-derived nitrides exhibited greater thermal stability than those derived from urea. Furthermore, it appears that the thermal treatments in both air and CO2 atmospheres reduced the thermal stability of the CN-M precursor. However, for the CN-U precursor, only the CO2 treatment resulted in a decrease in thermal stability.
The reduction in thermal stability of the samples has been attributed to several factors: (1) a higher content of s-triazine units, as s-triazine-based structures have been shown to be less stable than tri-s-triazine-based polymers [50]; (2) the formation of surface defects [2]; (3) small particle size due to low polymerization or hydrogen-bond breaking [15]; and/or (4) a reduced number of layers (exfoliation process) [51]. The differences observed between precursors can be attributed to the fewer layers in the PCNs derived from urea. However, the variations seen between the CN precursors and the annealed PCNs are more likely related to a smaller particle size and/or surface defects.

2.1.4. UV–VIS Absorption Properties

The DRS spectra are presented in Figure 13, with the insets illustrating the different colors of the synthesized PCN samples. The UV–VIS spectra (Figure 13a,b) show that all samples exhibit a peak absorption band at λ < 450 nm. This is attributed to π → π* electron transitions within the conjugated aromatic ring system of the tri-s-triazine and s-triazine units, which are crucial for the photocatalytic activity of the PCNs [18,37]. No significant absorption tail was observed at longer wavelengths, suggesting an absence of n → π* transitions involving lone pairs on the nitrogen atoms at the edges of the heptazine and triazine rings, or a significant deformation in the layers [18,37,52]. The annealing treatment applied to CN-M resulted in a slight reduction in the precursor’s color, making it more whitish and leading to a decrease in absorption. In contrast, when the same treatment was applied to the CN-U precursor, color changes were observed only in the air-treated sample, which turned slightly more yellow, resulting in an increase in absorption. This change in color is entirely consistent with the oxidation observed in the previous analyses [10,11].
Determining the band structure of PCN is a crucial task. The band gaps of photocatalysts designed for water splitting should range from 2 eV to 3.1 eV in order to overcome thermodynamic losses and overpotentials in the photocatalytic process, as well as to enable absorption in the visible range [50]. The band gaps of the polymeric carbon nitride samples were calculated using the Tauc plot (Figure 13c,d). The direct band gap energies of all the photocatalysts were found to be between 2.92 and 3.04 eV. The band gaps calculated in this study align well with the values reported in the literature [20,39,45,49,53]. The annealing treatment performed on the melamine precursor (CN-M) resulted in a slight increase in the band gap. In contrast, the band gaps of CN-U-Air and CN-U-CO2 were identical to that of the precursor. Once again, it is noted that the changes induced in the melamine precursor were different from those in the urea precursor.
The increase in the band gap has been linked to two main factors: (1) a higher content of s-triazine units [1,50]; and/or (2) the Quantum Confinement Effect, due to a reduction in particle size in any direction (X, Y, Z). Lower polymeric PCN and/or the reduced presence of H-bonds in the plane, which cause smaller particle sizes in the X–Y plane, present larger band gaps [54,55,56]. Additionally, the reduced thickness of the stacked layers caused by exfoliation processes results in a blue shift in the wavelength [12,16]. Taking everything mentioned into account, it can be concluded that the decrease in particle size due to the breaking of H-bonds is the most plausible reason for the observed increase in the band gap in the CN-M-Air and CN-M-CO2 samples.
On the other hand, O-doping and the loss of long-range order in the atomic arrangements of PCN samples have been reported to cause red shifts in wavelength, leading to shorter band gaps [10,11]. The O-doping generated in the CN-U-Air sample is too small to cause any modification of the band gap, consistent with the minor increase in the oxygen wt.% observed in the elemental analysis.

2.2. Photocatalytic H2 Production Activity

The results of the photocatalytic analyses are shown in Figure 14. Between 3 and 4 replicates were made for all the PCN samples. To evaluate the statistical power of the results, a two-tailed unpaired t-test was performed with the software GraphPad (8.0.2). The p-values obtained from this test are shown at the top of Figure 14a. The photocatalytic H2 evolution of all PCN photocatalysts for 4 h is presented in Figure 14b. The error bars in the two graphs represent the standard deviation (SD) of the mean.
The results obtained for the precursors’ performance (CN-M and CN-U) are consistent with our previous work [1] and that of other authors. Thus Martin et al. [45] reported a HER value of 3300 µmol/h·gcat for a PCN synthesized by urea. Also, Huang et al. [57] obtained HER values of 1805 µmol/h·gcat with nitrides synthesized from melamine in air atmospheres with 3 wt.% Pt and 10 vol.% TEOA and incident light with λ ≥ 400 nm.
The photocatalytic efficiency of the CN-M precursor (1739 ± 151 µmol/h·gcat) has been improved by the two post-annealing treatments studied, obtaining average HER values of 3185 ± 649 µmol/h·gcat and 3361 ± 879 µmol/h·gcat for air and CO2 atmospheres, respectively. Which implies an improvement factor of ~2 (Table A1). These increases have proved to be significant, with p-values of 0.0140 (CN-M vs. CN-M-Air) and 0.0272 (CN-M vs. CN-M-CO2). However, no differences were found between the atmospheres. These results are in very good agreement with our previous study, where similar post-treatments (Air/CO2, 540 °C, 2 h) were done on CN-M in a horizontal furnace using a ceramic crucible, giving rise to an improvement factor of ~2 (Table A1) [3]. This result makes it clear that the different configurations studied (vertical furnace vs. horizontal furnace) do not produce a substantial difference in the post-annealing effectiveness.
Also, other authors, i.e., Li et al. [13] and Luo et al. [58], have demonstrated that it is possible to improve the photocatalytic efficiency of nitrides synthesized from melamine through post-annealing treatments conducted in air by an improvement factor of 12 and 10. However, differences in the thermal treatment performed or the varying concentration of the co-catalyst studied make it difficult to directly compare their results with ours. Additionally, it should be noted that our precursors exhibit particularly good photocatalytic yields compared to the PCN bulks in the literature, as we have selected the best synthesis conditions obtained in our previous study [1].
On the contrary, these same post-annealing treatments performed on the CN-U precursor have not modified its photocatalytic efficiency. No significant difference was found between the HER values of CN-U (3364 ± 174 µmol/h·gcat), CN-U-Air (3338 ± 674 µmol/h·gcat) and CN-U-CO2 (3811 ± 641 µmol/h·gcat), with p-values of 0.9827 (CN-U vs. CN-U-Air) and 0.3085 (CN-U vs. CN-U-CO2).
To the best of our knowledge, very few studies have evaluated how annealing post-treatments improve the photocatalytic efficiency of nitrides synthesized from urea. Mohamed et al. [59] evaluated the influence of post-annealing temperatures on the fabrication of carbon nitride thin film from urea on FTO glass. The results show an improvement in the photocurrent density at annealing temperatures of 150 °C to 350 °C. However, above that temperature, the treatment was not beneficial. Furthermore, An et al. [60] reported that post-annealing at 670 °C under an inert atmosphere can significantly improve the photocatalytic efficiency with respect to bulk urea’s PCN (improvement factor = 4). However, it should be noted that their PCN was synthesized at 550 °C, compared to the 600 °C we used, so our CN-U exhibits a much better HER, making it more difficult to improve its photoactivity. Additionally, our post-annealing was performed at a much lower temperature. Therefore, it seems consistent that no improvements are observed under our conditions.
The stability was also evaluated for one of the best photocatalysts synthesized, i.e., CN-M-Air, and the precursor for comparison (Figure 15). Stability was evaluated over 12 h (three cycles). The results showed a rapid loss of the photocatalytic efficiency of the improved catalyst (CN-M-Air), reaching HER levels identical to the CN-M precursor in just 12 h.
Although CN-M-Air exhibits a gradual decrease in photocatalytic hydrogen evolution upon consecutive cycles (Figure 15), it is essential to assess whether this loss of activity is associated with structural degradation of the material. To this end, X-ray diffraction measurements were performed on CN-M-Air after one (4 h) and three (12 h) consecutive photocatalytic cycles.
As shown in Figure 16, the XRD patterns recorded after cycling display no significant changes in the position or shape of the characteristic (002) reflection of polymeric carbon nitride when compared with the pristine CN-M and CN-M-Air samples. This observation indicates that the bulk framework and interlayer stacking of PCN remain structurally stable during prolonged photocatalytic operation. Therefore, the observed activity decay upon cycling cannot be attributed to a collapse or transformation of the PCN crystal structure detectable by XRD but is more likely related to surface or interfacial deactivation phenomena, such as co-catalyst deactivation, adsorption of reaction intermediates, or reversible changes in hydrogen-bonding interactions under aqueous reaction conditions.

2.3. Correlation Between Structure Properties and the Photocatalytic Activity

Based on the comprehensive characterization results discussed in the preceding sections, it can be concluded that the post-annealing treatment (580 °C for 2 h under air or CO2) induces markedly different effects depending on the precursor employed, melamine or urea. Melamine-derived polymeric carbon nitride (CN-M) undergoes a disruption of the hydrogen bonds connecting the melon strands, which allows a larger number of water molecules to become strongly associated with the PCN framework in the post-annealed CN-M samples, as evidenced by the 1H NMR results. As a consequence, the annealed CN-M samples exhibit a reduced particle size (HRTEM), decreased thermal stability (TGA), an increased specific surface area (improvement factor ≈ 2, BET), and a slight widening of the band gap from 2.92 to 3.04 eV (UV–Vis). Importantly, these changes are achieved without inducing nitrogen vacancies, amorphization, or shortening of the melon strands, which could otherwise compromise the catalytic performance in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER).
Accordingly, the enhancement in HER activity observed for the CN-M-Air and CN-M-CO2 samples (improvement factor ≈ 2) is attributed to the disruption of hydrogen bonds between melon strands and the consequent increased availability of bridging –NH groups to interact with water molecules and facilitate their redox processes. This interpretation is in good agreement with previous reports [8,17]. In particular, Kang et al. demonstrated that the potential barrier across hydrogen-bonded regions (7.9 eV) is sufficiently high to severely hinder charge carrier transport between melon strands, indicating that hydrogen bonding adversely affects intralayer charge transport [8].
In contrast, urea-derived polymeric carbon nitride (CN-U) does not show an increased association of water molecules with the PCN framework, as indicated by the 1H NMR spectra. Nevertheless, minor structural modifications are observed upon post-annealing. Elemental analysis suggests the possible presence of nitrogen vacancies, while a slight oxygen doping in the CN-U-Air sample is confirmed by elemental analysis, XPS, and UV–Vis measurements. In addition, XRD results indicate a slight degree of exfoliation. These changes lead to a modest increase in specific surface area (improvement factor ≈ 1.4, BET) and a reduction in thermal stability (TGA). However, the structural modifications induced by post-annealing in urea-derived PCN are not sufficiently pronounced to produce a measurable enhancement in the hydrogen evolution rate. These findings are consistent with the intrinsically lower hydrogen-bond density in urea-derived PCNs compared to those derived from melamine, as previously reported [17].
As can be seen from our results (CN-M vs. CN-U) and the literature [4,17,20,39], the photocatalysts synthesized from urea are more efficient at H2 production from water splitting than those synthesized from melamine. However, as previously mentioned, the urea precursor has the major drawback that the yield of its synthesis is very low (SYCN-U = 3 ± 1 wt.%). In contrast, the yield of PCN from melamine is considerably high (SYCN-M = 48 ± 1 wt.%).
With this study, we have demonstrated that it is possible to match the photocatalytic hydrogen production between CN-M and CN-U by performing a simple annealing post-treatment of the CN-M sample under air or CO2 atmospheres (580 °C/2 h), which causes H-bond breaking within the melon strands. This is particularly noteworthy given that the overall yield of the synthesis of the photocatalysts CN-M-Air (23 wt.%) and CN-M-CO2 (22 wt.%) is still considerably higher than the yield of the synthesis of CN-U (3 wt.%). However, as we previously observed, the improvement in photocatalytic efficiency due to the post-treatment is lost in 12 h. X-ray diffraction analysis performed after consecutive photocatalytic cycles indicates that this activity decay is not associated with detectable changes in the bulk crystal structure of polymeric carbon nitride. Further work will focus on improving the long-term stability of the activity enhancement.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Photocatalyst Synthesis

3.1.1. Polymeric Carbon Nitride Synthesis

The polymeric carbon nitride (PCN) synthesis was performed following the methodology established in our previous work [1]. Melamine (M, Alfa Aesar, Ward Hill, MA, USA) and urea (U, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were chosen as precursors for PCN synthesis via thermal polymerization. Approximately 20 g of each precursor was placed in a lidded crucible and calcined at 600 °C for 2 h in a horizontal furnace, with a heating rate of 5 °C/min under a static air atmosphere (20 mL/min). The resulting powders were thoroughly washed with deionized water, followed by sequential treatments with HCl (1M) and NaOH (1M), and rinsed again with deionized water to eliminate unreacted species and potential surface contaminants. The final samples were labeled as CN-precursor (i.e., CN-M and CN-U).

3.1.2. Post-Annealing of PCNs

The experimental setup for the post-annealing treatments, along with the temperature curves recorded by the thermocouple, is shown in Figure 17. A total of 400 mg of bulk PCN was placed on a porous alumina support, positioned at the center of a vertical furnace, and heated to 580 °C at a rate of 5 °C/min under two oxidizing atmospheres: air and CO2 (300 mL/min). After maintaining the target temperature for 2 h, the samples were cooled to room temperature over 9 h and 30 min. The resulting materials were labeled as CN-precursor-atmosphere (i.e., CN-M-Air, CN-M-CO2, CN-U-Air, and CN-U-CO2).

3.1.3. Co-Catalyst Deposition

Platinum (Pt) nanoparticles were deposited onto the photocatalyst surface by means of a photochemical reduction of H2PtCl6. Aqueous stock solutions of deionized water and the platinum precursor (H2PtCl6·(H2O)6) were prepared beforehand, and an appropriate volume was introduced to obtain a final metal loading of 3 wt.%. The photodeposition was conducted in a 500 mL quartz-window Pyrex reactor under ambient pressure and at a controlled temperature of 25 °C.
For each experiment, 29.1 mg of polymeric carbon nitride was dispersed by ultrasonication in 150 mL of an aqueous solution containing 13 vol.% triethanolamine (TEOA), which served as a sacrificial electron donor. Prior to irradiation, the reactor was sealed and purged with nitrogen for 30 min at a flow rate of 200 mL min−1 to remove dissolved oxygen. The suspension was then irradiated for 4 h using a 300 W Xe lamp equipped with a cutoff filter (λ > 320 nm). After completion of the reaction, the photocatalyst was recovered by filtration, thoroughly washed with deionized water, and dried overnight at 80 °C.

3.2. Photocatalyst Characterization

Elemental (ultimate) analysis was carried out according to the ASTM D 5373-02 protocol to quantify the carbon (C), hydrogen (H), and nitrogen (N) contents using a LECO CHN2000 analyzer (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI, USA). The oxygen (O) content was determined separately by direct measurement with a LECO VTF-900 instrument (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, MI, USA).
Thermogravimetric measurements were conducted on a TA Instruments SDT 2960 thermoanalyzer (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) to evaluate the thermal stability of the materials. Approximately 4 mg of each sample was placed in platinum crucibles and heated from room temperature to 900 °C at a ramp rate of 10 °C min−1 under a nitrogen flow of 100 mL min−1.
Diffuse reflectance UV–Vis spectra of the synthesized photocatalysts were recorded using a Shimadzu UV-2450 spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporatio, Kyoto, Japan). The reflectance data were converted using the Kubelka–Munk function, and the apparent optical band gaps were estimated from Tauc plots.
Textural characteristics, including the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller specific surface area (SBET) and total pore volume (Vt), were obtained from nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms measured at 77 K with a Micromeritics ASAP 2420 system (Micromeritics Instrument Corporation, Norcross, GA, USA). Prior to analysis, the samples were degassed under vacuum at 200 °C for 12 h to remove adsorbed moisture and volatile species. Pore-size distributions were calculated using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method based on the Kelvin model.
The crystalline structure of the prepared photocatalysts was examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer equipped with Cu Kα radiation (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). Data were collected over a 2θ range of 5–70° with a scanning speed of 1.2° min−1.
The in-plane distances of tri-s-triazine and s-triazine units, as well as the interlayer spacing of stacked layers, were calculated using Bragg’s law:
d h k l =   n   · λ   2 · sin θ  
where d h k l denotes the spacing between lattice planes with Miller indices (hkl), θ is the Bragg angle, n represents the diffraction order, and λ is the wavelength of the incident radiation (1.5406 Å). The crystallite sizes associated with tri-s-triazine and s-triazine-based polymers, along with the average thickness of graphitic PCN stacks, were estimated using the Debye–Scherrer equation:
C r y s t a l l i t e   s i z e   L =   K   · λ   β · cos θ  
where K is the Scherrer constant (0.9) and β corresponds to the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the diffraction peak.
Surface elemental composition and chemical states were analyzed by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) using a SPECS system equipped with a Phoibos 100 hemispherical analyzer (SPECS Surface Nano Analysis GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Monochromatic Al Kα radiation (1486.74 eV) was employed at an X-ray power of 100 W and an anode voltage of 14.0 kV. Spectra were acquired in constant pass energy mode, using 50 eV for survey scans and 10 eV for high-resolution core-level spectra. Data processing and peak fitting were performed with CasaXPS software (2.3.26).
Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectra were collected on a Bruker Vertex 70 spectrometer fitted with a deuterated triglycine sulfate (DTGS) detector (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) and a Golden Gate diamond ATR accessory. Each spectrum was acquired by averaging 64 scans at a resolution of 4 cm−1 over the range of 4000–500 cm−1.
Solid-state NMR experiments were performed on a Bruker AVANCE III wide-bore spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) operating at 400 MHz and equipped with a 4 mm CP-MAS probe. One-dimensional 1H–13C cross-polarization MAS spectra were recorded using a CP pulse sequence with 2200 scans at a spinning rate of 10 kHz. In addition, one-dimensional 1H single-pulse MAS spectra were acquired using a 4 ms π/2 pulse, 4 scans, and a spinning frequency of 12 kHz.
High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) was performed on a Tecnai F30 (FEI) (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) at 200 kV.

3.3. Photocatalytic Activity Test

Photocatalytic hydrogen evolution tests were carried out using the same experimental setup previously employed for co-catalyst photodeposition. In a typical run, approximately 30 mg of the photocatalyst was ultrasonically dispersed in 150 mL of an aqueous solution containing 13 vol.% triethanolamine (TEOA). The reaction vessel was then sealed and flushed with nitrogen at a flow rate of 200 mL min−1 for 30 min to remove dissolved gases. Subsequently, the nitrogen flow was lowered to 20 mL min−1 and maintained for an additional 30 min prior to light irradiation.
The suspension was irradiated for 4 h using a 300 W xenon lamp equipped with a cutoff filter (λ > 320 nm). The amount of hydrogen generated was quantified at 15 min intervals using an online Agilent 490 micro-gas chromatograph fitted with a thermal conductivity detector and a 5 Å molecular sieve column, with argon employed as the carrier gas.

4. Conclusions

This work demonstrates that post-annealing treatment at 580 °C under air or CO2 atmospheres induces markedly different structural and physicochemical effects in polymeric carbon nitride depending on the precursor used. For melamine-derived PCN (CN-M), post-annealing leads to the disruption of hydrogen bonds between melon strands without introducing nitrogen vacancies, amorphization, or shortening of the polymeric framework. This structural rearrangement increases the accessibility of bridging–NH groups, enhances the interaction with water molecules, and improves charge transport between layers. As a result, CN-M samples exhibit reduced particle size, increased surface area, slightly widened band gap, and significantly enhanced hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) activity (improvement factor ≈ 2).
In contrast, urea-derived PCN (CN-U) shows a much weaker response to post-annealing. Although minor structural changes such as slight exfoliation, O-doping, and possible nitrogen vacancies are observed, these modifications only lead to modest increases in surface area and reduced thermal stability, without a measurable improvement in HER performance.
The photocatalytic efficiency of the CN-M precursor achieved HER values similar to the more efficient, but low-yield, CN-U (≈3300 µmol/h·gcat). This demonstrates a viable method to obtain high-performance photocatalysts with a significantly higher overall synthesis yield (CN-M-Air at 23 wt.%, CN-M-CO2 at 22 wt.%) compared to the CN-U precursor (3 wt.%). However, the results showed that the improvement in catalytic efficiency is lost within 12 h, despite the preservation of the bulk crystal structure as evidenced by XRD analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.F.-M. and C.B.; methodology, L.F.-M. and C.B.; validation, L.F.-M.; formal analysis, L.F.-M.; investigation, L.F.-M., M.F.V. and N.R.; resources, C.B.; data curation, L.F.-M. and M.F.V.; writing—original draft preparation, L.F.-M.; writing—review and editing, C.B.; visualization, L.F.-M.; supervision, C.B.; project administration, C.B.; funding acquisition, C.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC). Project 202080E129.

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting this study are included in the article and its Appendix A.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. HER values for PCN photocatalysts, using Pt as a co-catalyst and TEOA as the sacrificial electron donor.
Table A1. HER values for PCN photocatalysts, using Pt as a co-catalyst and TEOA as the sacrificial electron donor.
PrecursorGasFurnace SP (°C)Dwell (min)Pt (wt.%)TEOA (vol.%)Indicent Light (nm)HER
(μmol/h·g)
Impr.
Factor
Refs.
Melamine---313λ > 3201739-This work
Air580120313λ > 32031851.83This work
CO2580120313λ > 32033611.93This work
Air540120313λ > 32047492.11Catal. Today (2024) [3]
CO2540120313λ > 32038961.77Catal. Today (2024) [3]
Air520270312λ > 400150811.7Adv. Energy Mater. (2016) [13]
St. Air550120110λ > 420~75010Appl. Catal. B-Environ. (2018) [58]
Urea---313λ ≥ 3203364-This work
Air580120313λ ≥ 32033380.99This work
CO2580120313λ ≥ 32038111.13This work
N26701201.110λ > 420~5000~4Appl. Catal. B-Environ. (2022) [60]
DicyandiamideAr540120610λ ≥ 440~150~9Adv. Mater. (2016) [8]
DicyandiamideAr620120310AM 1.5
λ ≥ 200
9.615.5Appl. Catal. B-Environ. (2018) [14]
DicyandiamideAir550120310λ > 4002.012.5RSC Adv., (2020) [61]
CyanamideAir550120310visible light13.72.15Nanoscale, (2015) [62]
Figure A1. Enlargement of the ~800 cm−1 FTIR peak corresponding to the out-of-plane bending vibrations of tri-s-triazine units of PCN samples.
Figure A1. Enlargement of the ~800 cm−1 FTIR peak corresponding to the out-of-plane bending vibrations of tri-s-triazine units of PCN samples.
Catalysts 16 00184 g0a1
Figure A2. 13C CP/MAS SSNMR spectra of PCN samples.
Figure A2. 13C CP/MAS SSNMR spectra of PCN samples.
Catalysts 16 00184 g0a2
Figure A3. Enlargement of the (100) XRD peak corresponding to the intralayer long-range atomic order of PCN samples.
Figure A3. Enlargement of the (100) XRD peak corresponding to the intralayer long-range atomic order of PCN samples.
Catalysts 16 00184 g0a3
Figure A4. Enlargement of the XRD peak corresponding to the interlayer stacking of π-conjugated aromatic systems (002) of all PCN samples.
Figure A4. Enlargement of the XRD peak corresponding to the interlayer stacking of π-conjugated aromatic systems (002) of all PCN samples.
Catalysts 16 00184 g0a4
Figure A5. HRTEM images of CN-M-Air. Areas of the smallest Pt NPs found (≤2 nm) are shown in the images.
Figure A5. HRTEM images of CN-M-Air. Areas of the smallest Pt NPs found (≤2 nm) are shown in the images.
Catalysts 16 00184 g0a5
Figure A6. HRTEM images of CN-M-CO2. Areas of the smallest Pt NPs found (≤2 nm) are shown in the images.
Figure A6. HRTEM images of CN-M-CO2. Areas of the smallest Pt NPs found (≤2 nm) are shown in the images.
Catalysts 16 00184 g0a6
Figure A7. HRTEM images of CN-U-Air. Comparison of isolated Pt NPs (~5 nm) and large Pt NPs (17 × 21 nm) composed of the aggregation of small nanoparticles (3 × 5 nm).
Figure A7. HRTEM images of CN-U-Air. Comparison of isolated Pt NPs (~5 nm) and large Pt NPs (17 × 21 nm) composed of the aggregation of small nanoparticles (3 × 5 nm).
Catalysts 16 00184 g0a7

References

  1. Florentino-Madiedo, L.; Díaz-Faes, E.; Barriocanal, C. Relationship between gCN Structure and Photocatalytic Water Splitting Efficiency. Carbon 2022, 187, 462–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Baca, M.; Rychtowski, P.; Wróbel, R.; Mijowska, E.; Kaleńczuk, R.J.; Zielińska, B. Surface Properties Tuning of Exfoliated Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Multiple Photocatalytic Performance. Sol. Energy 2020, 207, 528–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vega, M.F.; Olivas, C.; Díaz-Faes, E.; Barriocanal, C. Evaluation of Water Splitting Efficiency of G-C3N4 Thermally Etched/Exfoliated under Air and CO2 Atmospheres. Catal. Today 2024, 427, 114412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cheng, C.; Shi, J.; Wen, L.; Dong, C.-L.; Huang, Y.-C.; Zhang, Y.; Zong, S.; Diao, Z.; Shen, S.; Guo, L. Disordered Nitrogen-Defect-Rich Porous Carbon Nitride Photocatalyst for Highly Efficient H2 Evolution under Visible-Light Irradiation. Carbon 2021, 181, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Doustkhah, E. The Effects of Bandgap and Porosity on Catalysis and Materials Characteristics of Layered Carbon Nitrides. Nanoscale 2025, 17, 8415–8435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, Z.; Hu, X.; Zou, G.; Huang, Z.; Tang, Z.; Liu, Q.; Hu, G.; Geng, D. Advances in Constructing Polymeric Carbon-Nitride-Based Nanocomposites and Their Applications in Energy Chemistry. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2019, 3, 611–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Niu, P.; Liu, G.; Cheng, H.-M. Nitrogen Vacancy-Promoted Photocatalytic Activity of Graphitic Carbon Nitride. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 11013–11018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Yin, L.-C.; Kang, X.; Wang, L.; Liu, G.; Cheng, H.-M. Selective Breaking of Hydrogen Bonds of Layered Carbon Nitride for Visible Light Photocatalysis. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 6471–6477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, Y.; Ho, W.; Lv, K.; Zhu, B.; Lee, S.C. Carbon Vacancy-Induced Enhancement of the Visible Light-Driven Photocatalytic Oxidation of NO over g-C3N4 Nanosheets. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 430, 380–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, J.; Shen, B.; Hong, Z.; Lin, B.; Gao, B.; Chen, Y. A Facile Approach to Synthesize Novel Oxygen-Doped g-C3N4 with Superior Visible-Light Photoreactivity. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 12017–12019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Kang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Yin, L.-C.; Kang, X.; Liu, G.; Cheng, H.-M. An Amorphous Carbon Nitride Photocatalyst with Greatly Extended Visible-Light-Responsive Range for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Generation. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 4572–4577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Papailias, I.; Todorova, N.; Giannakopoulou, T.; Ioannidis, N.; Boukos, N.; Athanasekou, C.P.; Dimotikali, D.; Trapalis, C. Chemical vs. Thermal Exfoliation of G-C3N4 for NOx Removal under Visible Light Irradiation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 239, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, Y.; Jin, R.; Xing, Y.; Li, J.; Song, S.; Liu, X.; Li, M.; Jin, R. Macroscopic Foam-Like Holey Ultrathin g-C3N4 Nanosheets for Drastic Improvement of Visible-Light Photocatalytic Activity. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1601273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Iqbal, W.; Qiu, B.; Zhu, Q.; Xing, M.; Zhang, J. Self-Modified Breaking Hydrogen Bonds to Highly Crystalline Graphitic Carbon Nitrides Nanosheets for Drastically Enhanced Hydrogen Production. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 232, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Y.; He, R.; Han, P.; Hou, B.; Peng, S.; Ouyang, C. A New Concept: Volume Photocatalysis for Efficient H2 Generation—Using Low Polymeric Carbon Nitride as an Example. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 279, 119379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Niu, P.; Zhang, L.; Liu, G.; Cheng, H.-M. Graphene-Like Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Improved Photocatalytic Activities. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 22, 4763–4770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lan, H.; Li, L.; An, X.; Liu, F.; Chen, C.; Liu, H.; Qu, J. Microstructure of Carbon Nitride Affecting Synergetic Photocatalytic Activity: Hydrogen Bonds vs. Structural Defects. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 204, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, J.; Fujitsuka, M.; Kim, S.; Wang, Z.; Majima, T. Unprecedented Effect of CO2 Calcination Atmosphere on Photocatalytic H2 Production Activity from Water Using G-C3N4 Synthesized from Triazole Polymerization. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 241, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, X.L.; Fang, W.Q.; Wang, H.F.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, H.; Yao, Y.; Yang, H.G. Surface Hydrogen Bonding Can Enhance Photocatalytic H2 Evolution Efficiency. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 14089–14096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zou, J.-P.; Wang, L.-C.; Luo, J.; Nie, Y.-C.; Xing, Q.-J.; Luo, X.-B.; Du, H.-M.; Luo, S.-L.; Suib, S.L. Synthesis and Efficient Visible Light Photocatalytic H2 Evolution of a Metal-Free g-C3N4/Graphene Quantum Dots Hybrid Photocatalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 193, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhao, Z.; Ma, Y.; Fan, J.; Xue, Y.; Chang, H.; Masubuchi, Y.; Yin, S. Synthesis of Graphitic Carbon Nitride from Different Precursors by Fractional Thermal Polymerization Method and Their Visible Light Induced Photocatalytic Activities. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 735, 1297–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Komatsu, T. The First Synthesis and Characterization of Cyameluric High Polymers. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2001, 202, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Lau, V.W.; Moudrakovski, I.; Botari, T.; Weinberger, S.; Mesch, M.B.; Duppel, V.; Senker, J.; Blum, V.; Lotsch, B.V. Rational Design of Carbon Nitride Photocatalysts by Identification of Cyanamide Defects as Catalytically Relevant Sites. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 12165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lotsch, B.V.; Döblinger, M.; Sehnert, J.; Seyfarth, L.; Senker, J.; Oeckler, O.; Schnick, W. Unmasking Melon by a Complementary Approach Employing Electron Diffraction, Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy, and Theoretical Calculations—Structural Characterization of a Carbon Nitride Polymer. Chem.—A Eur. J. 2007, 13, 4969–4980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gao, J.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Z.; Yan, S.; Wang, N.; Zou, Z. High-Yield Synthesis of Millimetre-Long, Semiconducting Carbon Nitride Nanotubes with Intense Photoluminescence Emission and Reproducible Photoconductivity. Nanoscale 2012, 4, 3687–3692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Monteiro, D.; Silva, M.; Silva, L. Assessment of Reaction Parameters in the Polymeric Carbon Nitride Thermal Synthesis and the Influence in Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2020, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jürgens, B.; Irran, E.; Senker, J.; Kroll, P.; Müller, H.; Schnick, W. Melem (2,5,8-Triamino-Tri-s-Triazine), an Important Intermediate during Condensation of Melamine Rings to Graphitic Carbon Nitride:  Synthesis, Structure Determination by X-Ray Powder Diffractometry, Solid-State NMR, and Theoretical Studies. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 10288–10300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Wang, R. Selective Hydrogen–Deuterium Exchange in Graphitic Carbon Nitrides: Probing the Active Sites for Photocatalytic Water Splitting by Solid-State NMR. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 3985–3994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, C.-Q.; Xiao, Y.-H.; Yu, Y.-X.; Zhang, W.-D. The Role of Hydrogen Bonding on Enhancement of Photocatalytic Activity of the Acidified Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Hydrogen Evolution. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 409–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, X.; Sergeyev, I.V.; Aussenac, F.; Masters, A.F.; Maschmeyer, T.; Hook, J.M. Dynamic Nuclear Polarization NMR Spectroscopy of Polymeric Carbon Nitride Photocatalysts: Insights into Structural Defects and Reactivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 6848–6852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Trébosc, J.; Wiench, J.W.; Huh, S.; Lin, V.S.-Y.; Pruski, M. Solid-State NMR Study of MCM-41-Type Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3057–3068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tyborski, T.; Merschjann, C.; Orthmann, S.; Yang, F.; Lux-Steiner, M.-C.; Schedel-Niedrig, T. Crystal Structure of Polymeric Carbon Nitride and the Determination of Its Process-Temperature-Induced Modifications. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2013, 25, 395402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fina, F.; Callear, S.K.; Carins, G.M.; Irvine, J.T.S. Structural Investigation of Graphitic Carbon Nitride via XRD and Neutron Diffraction. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 2612–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Li, B.; Si, Y.; Zhou, B.-X.; Fang, Q.; Li, Y.-Y.; Huang, W.-Q.; Hu, W.; Pan, A.; Fan, X.; Huang, G.-F. Doping-Induced Hydrogen-Bond Engineering in Polymeric Carbon Nitride to Significantly Boost the Photocatalytic H2 Evolution Performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 17341–17349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, Y.; Zheng, P.; Li, S.; Guo, H.; Hu, X.; Fang, Y.; Duan, R.; Chen, Q. Synthesis of Nitrogen Vacancy-Riched Ultrathin Polymeric Carbon Nitride Nanosheets via Ethanol-Ethylene Glycol Ultrasonic Exfoliation and Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Activity. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2023, 676, 132113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dong, F.; Ou, M.; Jiang, Y.; Guo, S.; Wu, Z. Efficient and Durable Visible Light Photocatalytic Performance of Porous Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Air Purification. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 2318–2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jiménez-Calvo, P.; Marchal, C.; Cottineau, T.; Caps, V.; Keller, V. Influence of the Gas Atmosphere during the Synthesis of G-C3N4 for Enhanced Photocatalytic H2 Production from Water on Au/g-C3N4 Composites. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 14849–14863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tong, Z.; Yang, D.; Xiao, T.; Tian, Y.; Jiang, Z. Biomimetic Fabrication of G-C3N4/TiO2 Nanosheets with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity toward Organic Pollutant Degradation. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 260, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Oh, J.; Lee, J.M.; Yoo, Y.; Kim, J.; Hwang, S.-J.; Park, S. New Insight of the Photocatalytic Behaviors of Graphitic Carbon Nitrides for Hydrogen Evolution and Their Associations with Grain Size, Porosity, and Photophysical Properties. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 218, 349–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Devthade, V.; Kulhari, D.; Umare, S.S. Role of Precursors on Photocatalytic Behavior of Graphitic Carbon Nitride. Mater. Today Proc. 2018, 5, 9203–9210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, C. A Comparison of Graphitic Carbon Nitrides Synthesized from Different Precursors through Pyrolysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2017, 332, 32–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Martha, S.; Nashim, A.; Parida, K.M. Facile Synthesis of Highly Active G-C3N4 for Efficient Hydrogen Production under Visible Light. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 7816–7824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Miller, T.S.; Jorge, A.B.; Suter, T.M.; Sella, A.; Corà, F.; McMillan, P.F. Carbon Nitrides: Synthesis and Characterization of a New Class of Functional Materials. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 15613–15638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liu, S.; Diez-Cabanes, V.; Fan, D.; Peng, L.; Fang, Y.; Antonietti, M.; Maurin, G. Tailoring Metal-Ion-Doped Carbon Nitrides for Photocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction. ACS Catal. 2024, 14, 2562–2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Martin, D.J.; Qiu, K.; Shevlin, S.A.; Handoko, A.D.; Chen, X.; Guo, Z.; Tang, J. Highly Efficient Photocatalytic H2 Evolution from Water Using Visible Light and Structure-Controlled Graphitic Carbon Nitride. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 9240–9245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, Y.; Wang, M.-Q.; Bao, S.-J.; Lu, S.; Xu, M.; Long, D.; Pu, S. Tuning and Thermal Exfoliation Graphene-like Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Superior Photocatalytic Activity. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 18521–18528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kumar, A.; Raizada, P.; Hosseini-Bandegharaei, A.; Thakur, V.K.; Nguyen, V.-H.; Singh, P. C-, N-Vacancy Defect Engineered Polymeric Carbon Nitride towards Photocatalysis: Viewpoints and Challenges. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 111–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, Y.; Wang, B.; Lin, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X. Activation of n → Π* Transitions in Two-Dimensional Conjugated Polymers for Visible Light Photocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 29981–29989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, W.; Zhang, Q.; Dong, F.; Zhao, Z. The Multiple Effects of Precursors on the Properties of Polymeric Carbon Nitride. Int. J. Photoenergy 2013, 2013, 685038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xu, Y.; Gao, S.-P. Band Gap of C3N4 in the GW Approximation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 11072–11080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jia, J.; White, E.R.; Clancy, A.J.; Rubio, N.; Suter, T.; Miller, T.S.; McColl, K.; McMillan, P.F.; Brázdová, V.; Corà, F.; et al. Fast Exfoliation and Functionalisation of Two-Dimensional Crystalline Carbon Nitride by Framework Charging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 12656–12660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Savateev, A.; Pronkin, S.; Epping, J.D.; Willinger, M.G.; Wolff, C.; Neher, D.; Antonietti, M.; Dontsova, D. Potassium Poly(Heptazine Imides) from Aminotetrazoles: Shifting Band Gaps of Carbon Nitride-like Materials for More Efficient Solar Hydrogen and Oxygen Evolution. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chidhambaram, N.; Ravichandran, K. Single Step Transformation of Urea into Metal-Free g-C3N4 Nanoflakes for Visible Light Photocatalytic Applications. Mater. Lett. 2017, 207, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Dong, G.; Ho, W. Construction and Activity of an All-Organic Heterojunction Photocatalyst Based on Melem and Pyromellitic Dianhydride. ChemSusChem 2022, 15, e202200477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sun, S.; Liang, S. Recent Advances in Functional Mesoporous Graphitic Carbon Nitride (Mpg-C3N4) Polymers. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 10544–10578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Xu, J.; Li, Y.; Peng, S.; Lu, G.; Li, S. Eosin Y-Sensitized Graphitic Carbon Nitride Fabricated by Heating Urea for Visible Light Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution: The Effect of the Pyrolysis Temperature of Urea. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 7657–7665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Huang, S.; Ge, F.; Yan, J.; Li, H.; Zhu, X.; Xu, Y.; Xu, H.; Li, H. Synthesis of Carbon Nitride in Moist Environments: A Defect Engineering Strategy toward Superior Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution Reaction. J. Energy Chem. 2021, 54, 403–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Luo, B.; Song, R.; Geng, J.; Jing, D.; Zhang, Y. Facile Preparation with High Yield of a 3D Porous Graphitic Carbon Nitride for Dramatically Enhanced Photocatalytic H2 Evolution under Visible Light. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 238, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mohamed, N.A.; Safaei, J.; Ismail, A.F.; Jailani, M.F.A.M.; Khalid, M.N.; Noh, M.F.M.; Aadenan, A.; Nasir, S.N.S.; Sagu, J.S.; Teridi, M.A.M. The Influences of Post-Annealing Temperatures on Fabrication Graphitic Carbon Nitride, (g-C3N4) Thin Film. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 489, 92–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. An, S.; Guo, Y.; He, X.; Gao, P.; Hou, G.; Hou, J.; Song, C.; Guo, X. Intermediate-Induced Repolymerization for Constructing Self-Assembly Architecture: Red Crystalline Carbon Nitride Nanosheets for Notable Hydrogen Evolution. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2022, 310, 121323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Dong, G.; Wen, Y.; Fan, H.; Wang, C.; Cheng, Z.; Zhang, M.; Ma, J.; Zhang, S. Graphitic Carbon Nitride with Thermally-Induced Nitrogen Defects: An Efficient Process to Enhance Photocatalytic H2 Production Performance. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 18632–18638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Zheng, D.; Huang, C.; Wang, X. Post-Annealing Reinforced Hollow Carbon Nitride Nanospheres for Hydrogen Photosynthesis. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Photographs of 100 mg of polymeric carbon nitride samples synthesized from melamine and urea, together with the corresponding solid yields (SYs) obtained after synthesis and post-annealing treatments.
Figure 1. Photographs of 100 mg of polymeric carbon nitride samples synthesized from melamine and urea, together with the corresponding solid yields (SYs) obtained after synthesis and post-annealing treatments.
Catalysts 16 00184 g001
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of PCN samples.
Figure 2. FTIR spectra of PCN samples.
Catalysts 16 00184 g002
Figure 3. XPS spectra of the PCN samples.
Figure 3. XPS spectra of the PCN samples.
Catalysts 16 00184 g003
Figure 4. Deconvolution of XPS N 1s spectra of PCN samples.
Figure 4. Deconvolution of XPS N 1s spectra of PCN samples.
Catalysts 16 00184 g004
Figure 5. Deconvolution of XPS C 1s spectra of PCN samples.
Figure 5. Deconvolution of XPS C 1s spectra of PCN samples.
Catalysts 16 00184 g005
Figure 6. 1H solid-state MAS NMR spectra of PCN samples synthesized from melamine and urea before and after post-annealing treatments. The signals corresponding to amino protons (Ha) and residual/adsorbed water (Hw) are indicated. The arrows indicate the direction of the shift of the maximum signal for the annealed PCN samples relative to their corresponding precursor materials.
Figure 6. 1H solid-state MAS NMR spectra of PCN samples synthesized from melamine and urea before and after post-annealing treatments. The signals corresponding to amino protons (Ha) and residual/adsorbed water (Hw) are indicated. The arrows indicate the direction of the shift of the maximum signal for the annealed PCN samples relative to their corresponding precursor materials.
Catalysts 16 00184 g006
Figure 7. XRD patterns of PCN samples.
Figure 7. XRD patterns of PCN samples.
Catalysts 16 00184 g007
Figure 8. Enlargement of the (002) XRD peak corresponding to the interlayer stacking of π-conjugated aromatic systems of: (a) PCNs synthesized from melamine and (b) PCNs synthesized from urea. Within the images, the position (2θ) and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of each peak are specified.
Figure 8. Enlargement of the (002) XRD peak corresponding to the interlayer stacking of π-conjugated aromatic systems of: (a) PCNs synthesized from melamine and (b) PCNs synthesized from urea. Within the images, the position (2θ) and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of each peak are specified.
Catalysts 16 00184 g008
Figure 9. HRTEM images of PCN samples.
Figure 9. HRTEM images of PCN samples.
Catalysts 16 00184 g009
Figure 10. High-resolution TEM images of PCN samples showing the morphology of the carbon nitride matrix and the distribution of Pt nanoparticles (dark contrast). Arrows indicate regions where the smallest Pt nanoparticles are observed. Insets show particle size distributions, average particle size, and the number of analyzed particles.
Figure 10. High-resolution TEM images of PCN samples showing the morphology of the carbon nitride matrix and the distribution of Pt nanoparticles (dark contrast). Arrows indicate regions where the smallest Pt nanoparticles are observed. Insets show particle size distributions, average particle size, and the number of analyzed particles.
Catalysts 16 00184 g010
Figure 11. N2-sorption isotherms and pore-size distribution for the PCN samples.
Figure 11. N2-sorption isotherms and pore-size distribution for the PCN samples.
Catalysts 16 00184 g011
Figure 12. DTG curves of the decomposition process of PCN samples when heated at 10 °C/min under N2 atmosphere (300 mL/min).
Figure 12. DTG curves of the decomposition process of PCN samples when heated at 10 °C/min under N2 atmosphere (300 mL/min).
Catalysts 16 00184 g012
Figure 13. UV–VIS diffuse reflectance spectra of CN-M-atm samples (a) and CN-U-atm samples (b). Insets show photographs of the photocatalysts. Kubelka–Munk plots of CN-M-atm samples (c) and CN-U-atm samples (d), showing fits to obtain the band gaps.
Figure 13. UV–VIS diffuse reflectance spectra of CN-M-atm samples (a) and CN-U-atm samples (b). Insets show photographs of the photocatalysts. Kubelka–Munk plots of CN-M-atm samples (c) and CN-U-atm samples (d), showing fits to obtain the band gaps.
Catalysts 16 00184 g013
Figure 14. (a) Comparison of the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution rates (HER) of polymeric carbon nitride samples under visible-light irradiation, including statistical analysis (p-values) obtained from a two-tailed unpaired t-test. (b) Time-dependent H2 evolution profiles measured over 4 h. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean.
Figure 14. (a) Comparison of the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution rates (HER) of polymeric carbon nitride samples under visible-light irradiation, including statistical analysis (p-values) obtained from a two-tailed unpaired t-test. (b) Time-dependent H2 evolution profiles measured over 4 h. Error bars represent the standard deviation of the mean.
Catalysts 16 00184 g014
Figure 15. Stability of CN-M and CN-M-Air for the photocatalytic H2 evolution for 12 h.
Figure 15. Stability of CN-M and CN-M-Air for the photocatalytic H2 evolution for 12 h.
Catalysts 16 00184 g015
Figure 16. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of CN-M, CN-M-Air, and CN-M-Air after one (C1, 4 h) and three (C3, 12 h) consecutive photocatalytic hydrogen evolution cycles, focusing on the (002) reflection of polymeric carbon nitride.
Figure 16. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of CN-M, CN-M-Air, and CN-M-Air after one (C1, 4 h) and three (C3, 12 h) consecutive photocatalytic hydrogen evolution cycles, focusing on the (002) reflection of polymeric carbon nitride.
Catalysts 16 00184 g016
Figure 17. (a) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup used for the post-annealing treatment of polymeric carbon nitride samples under controlled gas atmospheres. (b) Temperature profiles recorded during the thermal treatment of CN-M and CN-U samples under air and CO2 atmospheres.
Figure 17. (a) Schematic diagram of the experimental setup used for the post-annealing treatment of polymeric carbon nitride samples under controlled gas atmospheres. (b) Temperature profiles recorded during the thermal treatment of CN-M and CN-U samples under air and CO2 atmospheres.
Catalysts 16 00184 g017
Table 1. Elemental analysis and C/N atomic ratio.
Table 1. Elemental analysis and C/N atomic ratio.
SampleC (wt.%)H
(wt.%)
N (wt.%)O
(wt.%)
C/N
(a. r.) a
CN-M35.71.662.21.10.67
CN-M-Air35.71.661.81.10.67
CN-M-CO235.71.661.81.10.67
CN-U35.31.661.31.60.67
CN-U-Air35.41.660.71.70.68
CN-U-CO235.61.661.41.30.68
a Atomic ratio.
Table 2. FTIR, XPS and NMR indices.
Table 2. FTIR, XPS and NMR indices.
SampleHNH2/Hring aACN2(NHx)/ACN3
CN-M802.0
CN-M-Air772.0
CN-M-CO2782.0
CN-U771.9
CN-U-Air781.9
CN-U-CO2771.8
a HNH2/Hring index calculated with the height of the bands at 1625 cm−1 (HNH2) and 1450 cm−1 (Hring).
Table 3. In-plane distance of the tri-s-triazine (dTSTZN) and s-triazine (dSTZN) units, the interlayer distance of the layer stack (dinterlayer), the average thickness of graphitic stacks, and the number of layers of PCN samples.
Table 3. In-plane distance of the tri-s-triazine (dTSTZN) and s-triazine (dSTZN) units, the interlayer distance of the layer stack (dinterlayer), the average thickness of graphitic stacks, and the number of layers of PCN samples.
SampledTSTZN (Å)dSTZN (Å)dinterlayer (Å)Thickness of Stacks (nm)No. Layers
CN-M6.895.013.219.229
CN-M-Air6.925.053.209.730
CN-M-CO26.935.023.1910.031
CN-U6.934.983.217.122
CN-U-Air6.885.043.216.821
CN-U-CO26.944.993.207.022
Table 4. The SBET, total pore volume and peak pore size for the PCN samples.
Table 4. The SBET, total pore volume and peak pore size for the PCN samples.
SampleSBET (m2/g)Total Pore Volume (cm3/g)Peak Pore Size (nm)
CN-M26.30.10860
CN-M-Air47.70.18093
CN-M-CO258.40.17770
CN-U74.20.26642
CN-U-Air100.30.29967
CN-U-CO2102.50.31659
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Florentino-Madiedo, L.; Vega, M.F.; Rodríguez, N.; Barriocanal, C. Impact of Post-Annealing on the Water Splitting Performance of Polymeric Carbon Nitride: The Role of Hydrogen Bonds. Catalysts 2026, 16, 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16020184

AMA Style

Florentino-Madiedo L, Vega MF, Rodríguez N, Barriocanal C. Impact of Post-Annealing on the Water Splitting Performance of Polymeric Carbon Nitride: The Role of Hydrogen Bonds. Catalysts. 2026; 16(2):184. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16020184

Chicago/Turabian Style

Florentino-Madiedo, L., M. F. Vega, N. Rodríguez, and C. Barriocanal. 2026. "Impact of Post-Annealing on the Water Splitting Performance of Polymeric Carbon Nitride: The Role of Hydrogen Bonds" Catalysts 16, no. 2: 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16020184

APA Style

Florentino-Madiedo, L., Vega, M. F., Rodríguez, N., & Barriocanal, C. (2026). Impact of Post-Annealing on the Water Splitting Performance of Polymeric Carbon Nitride: The Role of Hydrogen Bonds. Catalysts, 16(2), 184. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16020184

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop