Next Article in Journal
CO2 Valorization by CH4 Tri-Reforming on Al2O3-Supported NiCo Nanoparticles
Previous Article in Journal
Conventional and Intensified Steam Reforming of Bio-Oil for Renewable Hydrogen Production: Challenges and Future Perspectives
Previous Article in Special Issue
Interfacial Engineering of CN-B/Ti3C2 MXene Heterojunction for Synergistic Solar-Driven CO2 Reduction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nonmetallic Heteroatom Engineering in Copper-Based Electrocatalysts: Advances in CO2 Reduction

by
Ningjing Li
1,2,
Hongzhen Peng
3,
Xue Liu
3,
Jiang Li
3,
Jing Chen
3,* and
Lihua Wang
3,*
1
Division of Physical Biology, Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
Institute of Materiobiology, College of Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2026, 16(1), 61; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16010061
Submission received: 28 November 2025 / Revised: 21 December 2025 / Accepted: 29 December 2025 / Published: 4 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Photo/Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction)

Abstract

With the escalating challenges of global warming and the energy crisis, electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) has emerged as a promising strategy to mitigate atmospheric CO2 concentrations while converting it into high-value-added chemicals. Among various CO2RR catalysts, copper-based materials exhibit unique capabilities for C-C coupling, yet their practical application remains constrained by several limitations: Low selectivity for C2+ products (typically <60%); Catalyst instability due to dynamic reconfiguration of active sites under high overpotentials; poor energy efficiency caused by competing hydrogen evolution reactions (HERs), etc. Recent studies demonstrate that nonmetallic heteroatom doping or functionalized ligand incorporation can effectively modulate the electronic structure and surface microenvironment of Cu-based catalysts, thereby enhancing CO2RR performance. In this review, we comprehensively summarize recent advances in such strategies. We first systematically elucidate the unique advantages of copper-based catalysts as benchmark materials for multi-carbon (C2+) product synthesis, along with the current challenges they face. Subsequently, we highlight recent advances in modulating copper-based catalysts through the incorporation of diverse nonmetallic heteroatoms (e.g., N, S, B, P, halogens) or the introduction of functionalized ligands, with a particular focus on mechanistic insights and characterization methods aimed at enhancing C-C coupling efficiency and improving C2+ product selectivity. Finally, we present perspectives on the remaining opportunities and challenges in this research field.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR) has emerged as a pivotal technological pathway for the storage of renewable electricity, owing to its ability to convert CO2 into high-value carbon-based fuels such as ethylene, ethanol, and propanol [1,2,3]. Compared with conventional carbon capture and storage (CCS), CO2RR not only directly mitigates the greenhouse effect but also enables the closed-loop utilization of carbon retem [4,5,6].
In the research field of CO2RR catalysts, all major material systems encounter notable performance bottlenecks. Noble metal catalysts (such as Au and Ag) exhibit outstanding catalytic activity, yet their industrial scalability is severely limited by high costs and scarce natural reserves [7,8]. Transition-metal oxides (e.g., In2O3, TiO2) generally suffer from insufficient current density and poor long-term stability [9,10]. Emerging two-dimensional materials (such as Cu2Te and MXenes) are restricted by surface chemical inertness and structural stability issues [11,12]. Single-atom catalysts (e.g., Fe-N-C, Co-N-C) demonstrate excellent CO selectivity (>90%) under laboratory conditions; however, their intricate synthesis processes (high-temperature pyrolysis and acid leaching) and stringent stability requirements (prevention of metal atom agglomeration) render them incapable of meeting the rigorous cost and durability demands of industrial-scale production [13].
Due to their distinctive catalytic characteristics, copper-based catalysts have emerged as a focal point in the investigation of CO2RR. They are capable of significantly improving product selectivity, facilitating the formation of a wide range of high-value products such as CO, CH4, C2H4, and C2H5OH, which are of considerable interest for sustainable energy and chemical production [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Compared to other metallic catalysts, Cu-based materials exhibit unparalleled capabilities in facilitating C-C coupling, primarily attributed to their specific d-orbital electronic characteristics that can effectively stabilize the key *CO intermediate [25], thereby facilitating C-C bond formation [26]. Experimental studies have demonstrated that precise surface engineering strategies—such as the control of crystal facet exposure and the construction of surface defects—can boost the selectivity toward C2+ products to over 60% [27,28]. Furthermore, the high natural abundance of copper in the Earth’s crust and its low raw material cost offer critical support for large-scale industrial implementation [29,30]. These combined advantages establish Cu-based catalysts as the sole catalytic system currently capable of efficiently generating multi-carbon products in CO2RR research [6].
However, copper-based catalysts for CO2RR still face significant challenges in performance optimization. First, the intrinsic electronic structure of copper results in a “volcano-type” distribution of adsorption energies for key intermediates (e.g., *CO, *OCCO), severely limiting the selectivity for C2+ products (typically <80%) [31]. Second, under reductive potentials, the surface of copper catalysts undergoes dynamic reconstruction (e.g., via oxide-derived processes). Such uncontrolled structural evolution compromises the retention of active crystal facets and metastable sites, thereby resulting in an intrinsic incompatibility between catalytic activity and durability [32]. Third, the CO2RR process involves up to eighteen coupled electron–proton transfer steps, where intense competition between the HER and carbon chain growth pathways (C1 vs. C2+) markedly lowers the overall energy efficiency. The synergistic effects of these factors result in a significant decline in C2+ selectivity under industrial-scale current densities (>300 mA cm−2), representing a critical bottleneck for large-scale implementation.
Various strategies have been successfully developed to fabricate efficient copper-based catalysts with enhanced selectivity and stability toward C2+ products, including structural engineering, alloying, coordination environment modulation, surface functionalization, and elemental doping [33,34,35]. Extensive literature evidence suggests nonmetal-element-modified metal catalysts have emerged as one of the most promising candidates for achieving high CO2RR performance [36]. Compared with metal-element modification, nonmetal modification—owing to the higher electronegativity of nonmetal species—exhibits superior tunability in enhancing CO2RR activity, selectivity, and stability. However, a comprehensive understanding of nonmetal-element-modified Cu catalysts for the CO2RR remains lacking, which has severely hindered progress in this research field. In this review, we provide a systematic summary of recent advances in incorporating various nonmetallic heteroatoms into Cu-based catalysts for the electrochemical production of multi-carbon products. We then elaborate on the specific mechanisms by which nonmetallic heteroatom doping strategies—such as N, S, B, P, and halogens—precisely modulate the electronic structure of copper-based catalysts, stabilize catalyst–electrolyte interfaces, and optimize reaction pathways. In addition, we discuss the considerable potential of nonmetallic heteroatom-functionalized ligands in fine-tuning the electronic environment and spatial configuration of copper active sites, thereby enhancing C-C coupling capability and product selectivity. Finally, we outline future research directions and persistent challenges in the field, offering insights to advance CO2 electroreduction technology toward higher efficiency, stability, and cost-effectiveness.

2. Nonmetallic Heteroatom Doping

Nonmetal element doping can break the structural symmetry of Cu active sites, thereby enabling precise modulation of their electronic structure and optimizing the adsorption strength of key reaction intermediates (e.g., *COOH, *CO, *OCCO). This significantly enhances both CO2 electroreduction activity and product selectivity. Theoretical calculations and experimental studies demonstrate that such electronic structure regulation reduces the energy barrier for C-C coupling or stabilizes specific intermediates, offering a novel strategy for the directional synthesis of high-value products (e.g., multi-carbon alcohols, formic acid). Recent advances in CO2 electroreduction highlight nonmetal doping systems primarily involving N, S, B, P, and halogens.

2.1. Nitrogen (N) Doping

Nitrogen modification of copper catalysts can generally be categorized into two distinct approaches. In the first approach, nitrogen is doped into the carbon support, which can markedly enhance the interaction between the supported copper species and the support [18,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45]. This serves as an effective strategy for electronic structure tuning, thereby significantly optimizing the catalytic performance. In the second approach, N is directly incorporated into the copper-based catalysts, enabling modulation of the chemical state of Cu or the introduction of vacancies. Such modifications facilitate the adsorption of *CO on the metallic sites, thus promoting C-C coupling [46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. Table 1 summarizes the CO2RR performance of representative N-modified Cu catalysts reported in the literature.

2.1.1. N Doping into Carbon Support

By introducing diverse N configurations (e.g., pyridinic and graphitic N) into the carbon framework [54], N doping disrupts the intrinsic electronic uniformity of an ideal sp2 carbon lattice [55], thereby markedly modulating the local density of states and charge distribution of the carbon support and creating a polarity-enhanced, electronically tunable surface microenvironment. Meanwhile, it induces the formation of defect sites such as edges and vacancies, which provide strongly coordinating anchoring sites for metal species. Thereby influencing the local electronic structure and coordination environment of the supported Cu species. This modulation governs the adsorption, reaction, and desorption behaviors of reaction intermediates, significantly enhancing both the selectivity toward multi-carbon products and the overall reaction stability.
Engineering precatalysts to regulate electron transfer and to in situ generate ultrasmall metal clusters anchored on the substrate as highly dispersed asymmetric sites represents a particularly important strategy for promoting the formation of asymmetric products. Su et al. synthesized CuO clusters supported on N-doped carbon nanosheets (Cu/NXC) as a dispersed electrocatalyst (x = 0.14, 0.11, 0.02, 0; x denotes the mass ratio of nitrogen to carbon), achieving high CO2RR performance in terms of stability, activity, and selectivity [41]. Characterizations including atomic force microscopy (AFM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) indicated that N species in the samples suppress excessive aggregation of Cu atoms and maintain atomic-scale dispersion of Cu species; notably, in Cu/N0.14C, Cu sites are coordinated exclusively with graphitic-like N. When x = 0, the Cu/C catalyst produced only trace amounts of C2+ products; as the N content increased, the Faradaic efficiency (FE) toward C2+ products rose accordingly. In particular, Cu/N0.14C delivered an FE as high as 73% for C2+ products at −1.1 V (vs. RHE) (Figure 1A), with ethanol accounting for 51% FE, and maintained stable CO2RR performance over a 10 h test (Figure 1B). Operando XAS, X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) simulation, and quasi-in situ XPS revealed that the reduced CuO clusters underwent reversible transformation under applied potential (Figure 1C,D). When the potential was below −1.1 V, the absorption edge position appeared between those of Cu foil and Cu2O, indicating that the copper ions reached an average valence state of approximately +0.5. This suggests a transformation from dispersed CuO clusters to Cu2-CuN3 clusters (Figure 1E). The in situ generated Cu2-CuN3 cluster was identified as the optimal site for the electrochemical reduction of CO2 to ethanol. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations revealed an asymmetric charge distribution between the Cu atoms within the Cu2-CuN3 cluster, with the predominant charge transfer occurring at the Cu-N3 moiety. This charge asymmetry is further amplified upon CH3* adsorption, which is proposed to account for the markedly enhanced asymmetric pathway toward ethanol formation.
For CO2RR, carbon-based materials serve as the primary supports for single-atom catalysts [56]. Single-atom Cu catalysts anchored on Cu-N-C are attractive electrocatalysts for CO2RR owing to their unique electronic properties and maximized atom utilization [15,57,58]. Guan and co-workers dispersed single-atom Cu species on N-doped carbon via an N-coordination strategy [39]. The presence of nitrogen enables atomic Cu to be uniformly dispersed and stably anchored within the N-doped carbon framework in the form of Cu-Nx configurations. By tuning the carbonization temperature, both the Cu doping concentration and the Cu-Nx coordination environment can be precisely regulated. At a relatively high Cu loading (4.9 mol%), the intersite distance between neighboring Cu-Nx moieties becomes sufficiently small to facilitate C-C coupling, thereby promoting C2H4 formation; in contrast, when the Cu content is below 2.4 mol%, the Cu-Nx sites are more spatially separated, and the catalyst preferentially yields C1 products such as CH4.
Surface-functionalized carbon supports can effectively tailor the coordination environment of metal centers, thereby modulating their electronic and geometric structures and tuning the catalytic properties of the active metal sites to achieve enhanced electrocatalytic performance [54]. Wang and co-workers reported a functional group–directed strategy to modify single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) by introducing various aryl radicals and covalently grafting them onto the SWCNT framework, thereby constructing carbon materials with specific functionalities (R-SWCNTs; R = –CH2NH2, –CN, –CH2COOH, –OH, –COOH) [45]. This functionalization enables Cu nanoparticles to directly anchor to the functional groups on the aryl radicals, and the resulting composites are denoted as Cu/R-SWCNT (Figure 2A). In a flow-cell electrolyzer, Cu/CH2NH2 exhibited an FE for C2+ products of 66.2% and a partial current density of −270 mA cm−2, outperforming Cu/CN and pristine Cu/SWCNTs (Figure 2B,C). DFT calculations indicated that, compared to the electron-withdrawing cyano group, the electron-donating amine group facilitated electron transfer from the carbon support to Cu atoms, resulting in an upward shift in the Cu d-band center (Figure 2D). This shift strengthened the adsorption of *CO and its hydrogenated derivatives on the Cu surface (Figure 2E), thereby enhancing the selectivity toward C2 products. In situ infrared and Raman spectroscopy confirmed that the increased surface coverage of the key intermediate *CHO effectively promoted the C-C coupling process.

2.1.2. N Doping into Cu-Based Catalyst

Owing to the strong Cu-N metal–nitrogen bond energy, N dopants on Cu-based catalysts exhibit relatively high stability under CO2RR/CORR conditions. N doping can regulate the chemical states of Cu or introduce vacancies, which is beneficial for tuning *CO adsorption on metal sites to enhance C-C coupling [46,47]. For example, Niu et al. developed a facile method to synthesize a lattice-strain-stabilized N-doped Cu (LSN-Cu) catalyst by treating the CuO surface with N2 plasma followed by an electroreduction step. This plasma treatment spontaneously introduces defect sites, compressive lattice strain, and surface N doping. XPS analysis provides in-depth insight into the local electronic structure of the LSN-Cu catalyst (Figure 3a). The surface N content was quantified to be ~4.9%, and the N 1 s binding-energy peaks at approximately 398 and 400 eV were assigned to lattice N atoms and N vacancies, respectively. DFT calculations indicate that, under compressive strain, the formation energies of oxygen vacancies (VO) on both pristine Cu2O/Cu and N-doped Cu2O/Cu surfaces increase significantly. When a 4% compressive strain is applied to the model surface, the increase is most pronounced, and the VO formation energy reaches its maximum (Figure 3b). Under these conditions, the elevated formation energy implies a stronger resistance to oxygen removal from the reactive surface, thereby helping stabilize the Cu2O lattice and retain the N dopants. The high-frequency band (HFB) ratio of the *CO adsorption band (HFB/(HFB + low-frequency band (LFB))) is also an important indicator for evaluating *CO coverage on defect-rich nitride/oxide-derived Cu catalysts. Compared with the Cu sample, the LSN-Cu catalyst exhibits a distinctly higher HFB ratio, which is attributed to the generation of low-coordination defect sites (Figure 3c). The formation of low-coordination defect sites on the LSN-Cu surface strengthens CO binding, thereby increasing surface CO coverage. Meanwhile, the compressive-strain-stabilized N dopants enhance C-C coupling, delivering an FE of 54 ± 3% for n-propanol, a half-cell n-propanol energy efficiency (EE) of 29%, and an n-propanol partial current density of 71 ± 7 mA cm−2 (Figure 3d).
Ampere-level current densities for C2+ production are rarely achieved on Cu-based catalysts, largely because the HER, which dominates at high overpotentials, suppresses CO2RR [12,59]. Incorporation of N can in situ construct specific Cu proximal cooperative microenvironments during catalysis, thereby inhibiting *H adsorption while optimizing the adsorption of key intermediates such as *CO. Zheng and co-workers employed N-heteroatom engineering to synthesize a nanocubic Cu3N precatalyst. Under CO2RR conditions, electroreduction of the parent Cu3N drives N conversion and induces in situ reconstruction of the precatalyst into an N-Cu active phase, enabling reliable ampere-level CO2 electrolysis to C2+ products [42]. The catalyst achieved a C2+ FE of 73.7% at −1100 mA cm−2 and exhibited a low propensity for H2 evolution. In situ attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) and in situ surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) measurements confirmed that an increased *CO coverage and suppressed HER on N-Cu steer the reaction pathway toward C2+ formation. DFT calculations further evaluated *CO and *H adsorption at five distinct adsorption sites on the N-Cu (100) surface, revealing favorable (i.e., stronger) *CO adsorption together with an increased free energy for H adsorption. These results indicate that *CO adsorption is markedly enhanced while HER is inhibited, thereby facilitating C-C coupling and promoting CO2-to-C2+ conversion.

2.2. Sulfur (S) Doping

In Cu-based electrocatalytic CO2 reduction systems, sulfur doping—owing to its moderate electronegativity and strong coordination ability—can act as a “solid-state ligand” to form stable Cu-S motifs with Cu, thereby enabling fine regulation of active sites at both the electronic and structural levels [20,60,61,62,63,64]. Accordingly, Table 2 summarizes the CO2RR performance of representative S-doped Cu-based catalysts reported in the literature.
For instance, Wang and co-workers constructed sulfur-modified polycrystalline Cu and oxide-derived Cu electrodes (SM-OD-Cu) via a simple surface-impregnation method [19]. The resulting SM-OD-Cu electrode, prepared by applying sulfur modification to an OD-Cu substrate, delivered a formate FE of 58.6% at −0.75 V vs. RHE. Sulfur modification altered both the spatial distribution and morphology of Cu2S on the electrode surface, thereby optimizing the hydrophilic microenvironment at the reaction interface and improving the electrocatalytic performance. DFT calculations further suggested that Cu2S suppresses CO formation and the HER, while promoting H* formation; the generated H* more readily couples with HCOO* to yield formate.
Introducing vacancy defects into metallic structures can modulate the electronic structure of neighboring atoms and alter the energy barriers of key intermediates involved in rate-determining steps, thereby impacting electrocatalytic performance [65]. Copper sulfide architectures offer a viable route to generate stable surface defects and to regulate the surface vacancy density in a controllable manner [66,67]. Zhuang and co-workers systematically investigated the effect of surface defects on the thermodynamics of the adsorbed CH2CHO intermediate by constructing three model systems [62]: a pristine Cu slab, a Cu slab containing a single-atom vacancy, and a Cu2S-Cu core–shell model featuring surface atomic vacancies (Figure 4a). DFT calculations showed that vacancies on the Cu shell supported by a Cu2S core increase the energy barrier along the ethylene pathway, whereas the ethanol pathway is essentially unaffected. The combined effects of subsurface S atoms and Cu-vacancy defects suppress ethylene formation, thereby shifting the selectivity toward ethanol (Figure 4b). Guided by these DFT insights, the authors synthesized a Cu2S-Cu core–shell catalyst enriched with surface vacancies. DFT calculations indicated that, although both ethylene and ethanol formation are thermodynamically feasible, the ethylene pathway features a lower kinetic barrier. Furthermore, in an H-cell at a fixed potential of −0.95 V (vs. RHE), the distribution of C2+ products was compared across various Cu-based catalysts: most control Cu catalysts still favored ethylene as the dominant C2 product, with ethanol exhibiting a lower FE than ethylene, yielding alcohol/olefin FE ratios below 1. In contrast, the Cu2-S-Cu-V catalyst delivered a markedly higher FE for ethanol while suppressing ethylene formation, resulting in the highest alcohol/olefin ratio among all samples. This strategy proposes that synergistic multiple active sites enable end-to-end control, spanning from C-C coupling to product selectivity.
Precisely controlling the local structure of precatalysts under CO2RR conditions to regenerate stable active sites remains a major challenge, particularly for producing C2+ products [68,69,70]. Metal–organic framework (MOF)–derived materials, featuring tunable size/shape, high surface area, chemical modularity, and open metal sites, are promising precatalysts that provide an atomic-level platform for integrating isolated active species. Wen and co-workers rationally constructed isolated Cu-S motifs on an HKUST-1 precatalyst via a localized sulfur-doping strategy, yielding S-HKUST-1 (Figure 5a) [60].The catalyst achieved a remarkable current density of up to 400 mA cm−2, with an FE for ethylene reaching 57.2%, and a total FE for multi-carbon products (ethylene, ethanol, and acetic acid) as high as 88.4% (Figure 5b). To gain deeper insight into the origin of this high performance, the team employed multiple advanced operando characterization techniques, such as operando X-ray synchrotron absorption spectroscopy, confirming that the discrete Cu-S components could stabilize highly active Cuδ+ species under CO2 reduction conditions (Figure 5c). Furthermore, DFT calculations clarified the mechanistic role of copper-based structures with varying degrees of sulfidation (surface configurations) in the CO2 reduction process. The computational results revealed a significant change in the interatomic distance between Cu atoms, increasing from 2.5 Å on pristine Cu surfaces to 3.9 Å in Cu2S (Figure 5d). In the CO2 reduction process, CO dimerization is a critical step toward forming multi-carbon products, typically requiring two CO molecules to approach and adsorb on adjacent metal atoms. DFT calculations further demonstrated that at the Cu/Cu2S interface, the spatial separation between Cu0 and Cuδ+ sites is moderate. This configuration can synergistically lower the activation barrier for the C-C coupling step, thereby effectively promoting CO dimerization and providing favorable conditions for the efficient synthesis of multi-carbon products.

2.3. Boron (B) Doping

Cu+ is considered crucial in determining the selectivity toward C2+ products during CO2RR [71,72,73,74,75]. However, under harsh CO2RR conditions at highly negative potentials, Cu+ is inevitably reduced to metallic Cu, leading to additional issues such as limited catalyst lifetime, unstable product distributions, and poorly controlled reaction pathways. Various types of strong interactions have been shown to help stabilize metal oxidation states [75,76,77,78,79,80]. The incorporation of a small quantity of boron into the lattice of transition metals results in the formation of boron-rich transition metal structures. Such surface boron arrangements markedly improve the stability of Cu+ species while maintaining their intrinsic catalytic activity [78]. Accordingly, Table 3 compares the CO2RR performance of representative B-doped Cu-based catalysts reported in the literature. Figure 6 illustrates a schematic of B doping in Cu oxides.
For example, Li introduced boron dopants into CuO and demonstrated that B-mediated regulation of the Cu-O bond and the local electronic structure stabilizes a higher density of Cu+/Cuδ+ active sites during electroreduction, thereby optimizing the adsorption and coupling environment of key intermediates (e.g., *CO) and significantly enhancing the activity and selectivity for converting CO2 to C2+ multicarbon products [82]. Patra, primarily using in situ/operando spectroscopic techniques, revealed that B doping alters the electroreduction-induced reconstruction behavior of CuO and the Cu+/Cu0 ratio, modulates the local electronic structure and *CO adsorption/coverage, and thus constructs an active interface more favorable for C-C coupling, leading to higher selectivity toward C2+ products from CO2 reduction [80]. Yan et al. doped boron (B) into the Cu2O lattice (Figure 7a) [81], which strengthened Cu-O hybridization and bond strength, thereby stabilizing Cu+ and moderately weakening *CO binding to promote C-C coupling. Benefiting from B’s low electronegativity and available empty orbitals, B doping modulated the Cu 3d-O 2p electronic structure, reduced the driving force for oxygen migration and Cu+ reduction, and thus ensured structural and valence-state stability under strongly cathodic bias. B-doped Cu2O catalysts achieving remarkable stabilization of Cu+ active sites at high cathodic potentials and boosting C2H4 selectivity by 3.5-fold compared with undoped Cu2O. The B-Cu2O catalyst reached a maximum FE for ethylene of 26.13% at 1.2 V (Figure 7b), significantly higher than the 9.20% obtained with pristine Cu2O (Figure 7c). After electrolysis at −1.2 V for 60 min, Cu+ and Cu0 species coexisted on the surface of the B-Cu2O catalyst. Even after 120 min of electrolysis at −1.2 V, the catalyst still exhibited a distinct Cu+ characteristic peak at 918.6 eV. This revealed that the catalyst retained the structural characteristics of Cu2O, demonstrating excellent structural stability (Figure 7d). DFT calculations indicate that hybridization between Cu 3d and O 2p orbitals is the key to Cu+ stabilization. This electronic structure modification decreases the binding energy of *CO (Figure 7e) while suppressing lattice oxygen evolution, thus preserving the integrity of active sites.
To further enhance the stability of Cu+ species, Zhou et al. synthesized hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) nanosheet–modified cuprous oxide (Cu2O) nanoparticles (denoted as Cu2O-BN) (Figure 8a) [83]. The strong electronic interaction and interfacial confinement between h-BN and Cu2O were leveraged to stabilize surface Cu+ species, suppress H* adsorption, and increase CO coverage as well as the selectivity toward C-C coupling. Compared with the control Cu2O catalyst, Cu2O-BN exhibited an increased C2H4 selectivity, rising from 12% to 17% (Figure 8b,c), and sustained C2H4 production was achieved for up to 14 h under continuous electrolysis (Figure 8d). DFT analysis indicates that h-BN modification lowers the free-energy barriers along the CO2RR pathway (Figure 8e), accelerating the reaction while preserving product selectivity.
Wu et al. developed a hollow-fiber penetration electrode (HF) featuring high electrode/system stability, reduced ohmic losses, and improved structural robustness, enabling the eCO2RR to readily reach ampere-level current densities [84,85,86,87]. In their recent work, they adopted a boron-doped Cu HF strategy to fabricate a B-Cu HF catalyst, achieving ampere-level CO2-to-ethanol conversion [83]. For B-Cu HF, pre-reduction in NaBH4 solution introduced boron dopants, and a subsequent two-step treatment—chemical reduction followed by H2 annealing—further tuned the electronic structure of copper. In contrast, H-Cu HF was prepared by directly reducing CuO in a H2/Ar atmosphere, yielding undoped hollow-fiber copper (Figure 9a). Cu K-edge XANES analysis revealed that the absorption edge of B-Cu HF lies between that of metallic copper (Cu0) and cuprous oxide (Cu2O, Cu+), indicating that the Cu species are in an intermediate oxidation state (Cuδ+, 0 < δ < +1). By comparison, the Cu valence state in the reference H-Cu HF sample is closer to metallic Cu0 (Figure 9b). FT-EXAFS measurements further compared the local structures of B-doped copper, electrochemically treated copper, metallic copper, and cuprous oxide. The results show that B doping substantially perturbs the Cu coordination environment, reducing the Cu-Cu coordination number (B-Cu HF: 4.9 vs. reference Cu: 12.0) and inducing lattice distortion, which increases the Cu-Cu distance (from 2.53 Å to 2.54 Å) (Figure 9c). This dual effect—altering the Cu valence state while decreasing the coordination number—not only enhances the adsorption and accumulation of locally asymmetric CO and CHO intermediates but also promotes asymmetric C-C coupling pathways. The B-Cu HPE achieved an FE of 52.4% for CO2-to-ethanol conversion and maintained stable operation for 150 h in 3.0 M KCl at an ultrahigh ethanol partial current density of 1.25 A cm−2. The corresponding ethanol production rate reached 3.87 mmol cm−2 h−1, together with a C2+ FE of 78.9% and a total current density of 2.4 A cm−2. As a result, under an optimal current density of 2.4 A cm−2 sustained over 150 h, the FE for C2+ products reached a maximum of 78.9% (Figure 9d).

2.4. Phosphorus (P) Doping

Phosphorus (P) doping represents an important non-metal strategy for tuning the performance of Cu-based catalysts, offering both electronic structure modulation and surface chemical modification. Owing to its high electronegativity and strong bonding capability, P atoms can form Cu-P coordination structures on the copper surface or partially substitute oxygen atoms in the lattice. These interactions markedly shift the d-band center and alter the local charge distribution of the catalyst [21,88,89,90,91,92], stabilizing *CO and active H2O [93,94,95]. Schematic illustration of P doping in metallic Cu catalysts as shown in Figure 10. Table 4 compares the CO2RR performance of representative phosphorus-doped Cu-based catalysts reported in the literature.
Li et al. tailored the surface chemical composition of copper-plated electrodes to introduce phosphorus species [94]. The resulting Cu-P electrodes exhibited stronger CO adsorption capability and dramatically reduced the activation barrier for CO dimerization (C-C coupling) to approximately 0.25 eV, achieving FE for C2+ products (ethylene and ethanol) exceeding 50%, nearly twice that of conventional polycrystalline Cu. In situ Raman spectroscopy combined with DFT calculations further revealed that P doping introduces surface defect sites and optimizes local proton concentration, effectively promoting multi-carbon product formation while suppressing C1 product generation.
Kong and co-workers synthesized a high-phosphorus-content catalyst, via a gas-phase phosphidation method using NaH2PO4·H2O as the phosphorus source [95]. In this process, a copper substrate was treated at 400 °C under N2, followed by gradient tuning of the reduction temperature in H2 (400 °C or 600 °C) to adjust the phosphorus doping level. These samples are denoted as Cu, Cu0.95P0.05, Cu0.92P0.08, and Cu0.90P0.10, respectively. Incorporation of phosphorus effectively stabilized the oxidation state of copper (Cuδ+) and significantly modulated the CO adsorption strength. XPS analysis revealed that, as the P/Cu molar ratio increased from 0 to 0.10, the d-band center of copper shifted from 4.22 eV toward the Fermi level to 3.58 eV (Figure 11a), indicating a substantial enhancement in electronic interactions between the catalyst surface and adsorbates. This electronic effect directly strengthened the chemisorption of CO, thereby optimizing the C-C coupling pathway. Electrochemical performance tests showed that at a phosphorus doping level of 8.3%, the catalyst achieved an FE of 64% for C2+ products at a current density of 210 mA cm−2. Further optimization to a Cu0.92P0.08 composition increased the partial current density for C2+ products to a peak value of 176 mA cm−2 under a total current density of 300 mA cm−2, representing a nearly 1.9-fold improvement over undoped copper (Figure 11b). Both theoretical calculations and experimental results confirm that this optimized electronic structure provides CO adsorption on the Cu-P catalyst surface of ideal strength: strong enough to ensure sufficient CO coverage and overcome the limitations of weak adsorption, yet moderate enough to avoid excessive site blocking that can result from overly strong adsorption.

2.5. Halogen Doping

Halogen elements (X = F, Cl, Br, I), characterized by high electronegativity and strong coordination ability, can form stable Cu-X chemical bonds on the copper surface, thereby enabling dual regulation of catalytic performance through both electronic and geometric effects. Halogen-modified Cu-based catalysts not only optimize the adsorption strength of CO intermediates and lower the reaction energy barrier of C-C coupling but also induce surface dynamic reconstruction to form stable Cu+ active sites. These effects markedly enhance the selectivity and reaction kinetics toward C2+ products in CO2RR [96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104]. Accordingly, Table 5 summarizes the CO2RR performance of representative halogen (X = F, Cl, Br, I)–modified Cu-based catalysts reported in the literature.
The halogen-modified copper catalysts (X-Cu) exhibit variations in catalyst morphology, halide content, and electrochemically active surface area (ECSA), which makes it challenging to elucidate the intrinsic role of surface halide species [106]. Ma and co-workers innovatively proposed a hydrogen-assisted C-C coupling pathway [101]. Fluorine modification promotes H2O dissociation, and the hydrogenation of *CO to *CHO becomes the rate-determining step on the F-Cu catalyst. In addition, fluorine enhances CO adsorption by increasing the density of surface Cuδ+ sites, thereby promoting C-C coupling. They synthesized a Cu(OH)F precursor via a solvothermal method and subsequently prepared a fluorine-modified Cu catalyst (Cu(OH)F) by electrochemical reduction. They further investigated anion-exchange reactions between Cu(OH)F and ammonium halides (NH4Cl, NH4Br, or NH4I), followed by electrochemical reduction to yield halogen-modified Cu catalysts denoted as X-Cu (X = Cl, Br, I). The X-Cu series catalysts exhibit similar morphology, halogen content, and ECSA, providing an appropriate model system for elucidating the role of surface halides in CO2RR toward C2+ compounds. Among these, F-Cu exhibited the highest catalytic performance, achieving an FE of 80% for multi-carbon (C2+) products under a high current density of 1.6 A cm−2 (Figure 12a). This group innovatively proposed a hydrogen-mediated C-C coupling pathway and conducted H/D kinetic isotope effect (KIE) tests on different X-Cu catalysts. The measured KIE values were 2.0, 1.8, 1.5, 1.3, and 1.2 for Cu, I-Cu, Br-Cu, Cl-Cu, and F-Cu, respectively. The KIE on the F-Cu catalyst decreased to nearly unity, indicating that H2O dissociation is no longer the rate-determining step on this catalyst. Therefore, the presence of F- on Cu accelerates H2O activation. DFT calculations revealed that halogen modification progressively reduces the energy barrier for H2O activation, with fluorine showing the most pronounced effect—effectively lowering the barrier for water molecule dissociation so that H2O activation no longer serves as the rate-limiting step, thereby accelerating C2H4 production. In situ ATR-FTIR spectra showed a distinct absorption peak at 1754 cm−1, conclusively confirming the presence of chemically adsorbed CHO intermediates on the F-Cu catalyst surface. In contrast, no such spectral feature was detected on unmodified copper catalysts. Mechanistic DFT studies further revealed that fluorine doping significantly strengthens CO intermediate adsorption and promotes its hydrogenation to CHO species, thereby providing a key driving force for subsequent C-C coupling steps (Figure 12b).
Yan et al. incorporated NH4F into a copper precursor (CuCl2), and after co-reduction and annealing, obtained particles predominantly composed of CuO, with fluorine uniformly distributed across the particle surface [102]. Fluorine atoms modulate the local electronic structure of Cu and the CO adsorption environment (Figure 12c). Specifically, F doping facilitates interfacial electron transfer on F-Cu. Moreover, grain boundaries formed on F-Cu provide a local microenvironment that stabilizes *CO intermediates and promotes subsequent C-C coupling steps. In addition, fluorine incorporation increases the hydrophobicity of F-Cu, a change that is generally beneficial for suppressing the competing HER. This fluorine-doping strategy yielded a high-performance Cu-based catalyst capable of efficiently producing C2+ products under industrial-level current densities (>400 mA cm−2), achieving an FE of 70.4%. No appreciable performance degradation was observed during a continuous 12 h stability test (Figure 12d). In situ SERS combined with electrochemical performance analysis revealed that CO2 can be reduced to CO at relatively low potentials (Figure 12e), a process that facilitates subsequent C-C coupling steps and promotes the formation of C2+ products.
The Cu0/Cu+ interfacial sites in partially oxidized Cu matrices are conducive to CO2 activation and the subsequent C-C coupling [107]. Accordingly, halide-modification strategies are regarded as an effective means to tune the activity and selectivity of Cu catalysts [101]. Li and co-workers designed a Cu-CuI composite catalyst featuring abundant Cu0/Cu+ interfacial sites by physically mixing copper nanoparticles with copper (I) iodide (CuI) powder [104]. In a flow cell, the composite catalyst achieved a maximum FE of 71% toward C2+ products, with a partial current density for C2+ of 591 mA cm−2 at −1.0 V vs. RHE—significantly higher than that of either Cu or CuI alone (Figure 13a,b). At −0.8 V vs. RHE, the catalyst maintained a geometric current density of ~550 mA cm−2 over 85 h, with only a slight decrease in the FE for ethylene and overall C2+ products (Figure 13c). DFT calculations revealed that surface-reconstructed Cu+ species and adsorbed iodine atoms are the primary contributors to the high C2+ selectivity observed with the Cu-CuI composite catalyst. The adsorbed iodine species play a dual role: stabilizing Cu+ species to enhance C-C coupling and directly promoting C-C coupling by modulating the adsorption strength of CO intermediates (Figure 13d).
Furthermore, Yang’s team designed a novel halogen-containing catalyst precursor, Cu4(OH)6FCl nanosheets (Figure 14a) [105]. Upon activation under the reaction conditions, the precursor was transformed into a porous Cu catalyst. Detailed post-reaction analyses of the catalyst deposited on the electrode revealed that the activated material exhibited a sheet-like porous metallic copper structure composed of Cu crystallites. XPS confirm that the residual Cl atoms in porous metallic Cu can induce the formation of stable mixed-valence Cu species (Figure 14b). During the process, the F element showed instability (Figure 14c) and gradually leached out as the reaction proceeded. In contrast, Cl atoms remained stably incorporated in the activated Cu catalyst throughout the reaction (Figure 14d). Together with the preserved sheet-like porous morphology during operation, this stability endowed the catalyst with high C2+ selectivity and excellent durability. Even after 240 h of continuous electrolysis, the catalyst maintained a high C2+ selectivity (Figure 14e). Under optimal conditions, the Faradaic efficiency and partial current density for C2+ products reached 53.8% and 15.0 mA·cm−2, respectively.

3. Nonmetal-Heteroatom-Functionalized Ligands

In CO2RR, the arrangement of surface atoms and the electronic structure of the catalyst are critical determinants of reaction selectivity and energy efficiency [76,108,109]. In recent years, researchers have proposed a strategy of introducing nonmetal-heteroatom-functionalized ligands onto the surface of Cu-based catalysts. Through targeted chemical modification, this approach enables precise tuning of both the electronic environment and spatial configuration of the active sites, thereby modulating the adsorption behavior and conversion pathways of reaction intermediates [110,111]. Distinct from conventional metal-centered modulation, functionalized ligands can coordinate directly to metal centers, incorporating heteroatoms with specific electronic attributes (such as N, F, Cl, and O). These heteroatoms can regulate the metal’s electron density and chemical reactivity via electron-donating or electron-withdrawing effects, while synergistically enhancing selectivity and stability through steric hindrance, modulation of the local surface microenvironment, and stabilization of key intermediates [112].
Yang et al. constructed a class of structurally stable copper coordination polymers (Cu-CPs) by self-assembling copper salts with meticulously designed organic ligands (Figure 15a) under either solution-phase or hydrothermal conditions [113]. The Cu coordination environment and oxidation state can be precisely regulated via ligand electronic and steric effects, thereby optimizing the d-band position and Lewis acidity to stabilize co-adsorbed *CO intermediates and promote C-C coupling. This approach established a molecular platform enabling precise modulation of the electronic structure of the metal centers (Figure 15b,c). By systematically tuning the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) energy levels of the ligands, the authors achieved broad control over the electronic states of Cu active sites, thereby markedly enhancing the C-C coupling capability of Cu-CP catalysts in the electrochemical reduction of CO2. Electrocatalytic results revealed a pronounced dependence of product distribution on ligand structure. In particular, the L2-Cu catalyst exhibited the highest selectivity toward C2+ products (FEC2+ = 77%), while effectively suppressing the formation of C1 byproducts (Figure 15d). In situ Cu K-edge XANES analysis demonstrated that, within the potential range of −0.69 V to −0.79 V, the XANES spectra of L2-Cu remained highly consistent with those in its initial state, with no detectable signals corresponding to Cu2+ or metallic Cu aggregation. This observation indicates that the Cu centers persist in a low-valent state and remain stably coordinated to the ligand framework throughout the reaction (Figure 15e). To elucidate the behavior of reaction intermediates, CO desorption kinetics (time-decay method) were employed to quantitatively evaluate the *CO adsorption strength of various Ln-Cu catalysts, using the time to reach a normalized intensity of 0.5 (t0.5) as a descriptor of desorption rate. L2-Cu exhibited the largest t0.5 value (≈120 s), corresponding to the slowest CO desorption and therefore the strongest *CO binding (Figure 15f). By correlating t0.5 with *CO vibrational frequencies obtained from in situ Raman spectroscopy, the authors established a relationship between *CO binding strength and ηC–C (C-C coupling efficiency parameter). The results reveal a characteristic volcano-type dependence: under moderate binding strength conditions (e.g., L2-Cu, t0.5 ≈ 120 s, Raman shift ≈ 2030 cm−1), ηC-C reaches a peak value (>0.8), whereas excessively strong or weak binding significantly reduces coupling efficiency (Figure 15g). This work quantitatively links *CO binding strength at homogeneous Cu active sites to C-C coupling efficiency, underscoring the critical role of molecular ligand engineering in optimizing metal–intermediate interactions. The authors suggest that future research could focus on synthesizing coordination polymers with broader tunability of electronic properties and intermediate adsorption energies, thereby deepening the mechanistic understanding of structure–performance relationships and enabling the development of more efficient CO2RR catalysts.
Wu et al. proposed a strategy based on aryl diazonium salt-functionalized copper catalysts to achieve precise regulation of the C-C coupling step in the CO2 electroreduction reaction (CO2RR) [114]. In this method, copper catalysts are first prepared via electrodeposition on acid-treated gas diffusion electrodes (GDEs) at a current density of −15 mA cm−2 in an electrolyte containing CuBr2, sodium tartrate, and KOH. The obtained copper catalysts are subsequently subjected to surface chemical reactions with aryl diazonium salts bearing different substituents (Figure 16a), thereby constructing a continuous functionalization layer of approximately 5–8 nm thickness. This layer is predominantly anchored to the metallic surface through azo bonds, enabling effective modulation of the Cu valence state without substantially altering the catalyst morphology, thus facilitating the coupling of CO intermediates. Cu K-edge XANES spectra of the functionalized catalysts after electrochemical reduction reveal that distinct aryl substituents can achieve fine-tuning of the electronic structure of the copper surface. In particular, the Cu-NN catalyst exhibits an average Cu valence state of approximately +0.26, correlating with the highest FE toward ethylene—achieving 83% ethylene selectivity and a specific current density of 212 mA cm−2 at relatively low overpotentials (Figure 16b). This catalyst maintains stable performance over 120 h of continuous operation (Figure 16c) and effectively suppresses the formation of undesired byproducts such as CH4 and H2. DFT calculations further elucidate the underlying mechanism of this strategy: aryl functionalization optimizes the CO adsorption energy and stabilizes key intermediates, making ethylene formation a more favorable thermodynamic pathway.

4. Conclusions and Outlook

For Cu-based catalysts, elucidating the structure–activity relationship is essential for achieving rational design. However, there is currently a lack of universal theoretical models capable of reliably predicting the impact of electronic structure modulation, and materials development still relies heavily on empirical trial-and-error and extensive experimental screening. Heteroatom incorporation can significantly alter the d-band center, Fermi level, local charge density, and surface adsorption energies of the Cu matrix, thereby influencing CO2 activation and the reaction pathways of key intermediates such as *CO and *CHO. These effects are highly dependent on factors including the intrinsic properties of the heteroatom, doping site, doping concentration, distribution uniformity, and the dynamic surface evolution under operating conditions. Due to the complex coupling among these parameters, the same strategy may yield opposite outcomes across different systems. This highlights an urgent need for predictive, cross-system models that can rationalize heteroatom effects and guide the design of Cu-based CO2RR catalysts.

4.1. Current Challenges and Outlook for Heteroatom-Doped Copper-Based Catalysts

The face-centered cubic lattice of copper-based catalysts exhibits high sensitivity to the incorporation site of heteroatoms such as N, S, and B, with different doping configurations—substitutional, interstitial, and surface adsorption—significantly altering the local electronic structure and catalytic performance. Conventional synthesis methods (e.g., high-temperature solid-state reaction, wet-chemical reduction) often fail to precisely control doping sites, typically resulting in random distributions that induce lattice distortion [115] and generate inactive phases such as Cu2O, Cu3C, and CuS. These phases decrease electrical conductivity, weaken CO2 adsorption and *CO coupling capability, and ultimately reduce Faradaic efficiency [95]. Random doping also leads to heterogeneous active sites and inconsistent electronic structures, thereby impairing the adsorption of key intermediates (*CO, *COOH). Under CO2RR conditions, doped atoms are prone to leaching, migration, or over-reduction, which disrupts coordination structures, triggers surface reconstruction, deteriorates reaction kinetics, and results in diminished activity and selectivity. Therefore, the development of synthetic strategies capable of precisely controlling doping positions is essential to enhance the binding energy between heteroatoms and the Cu lattice, introduce multiple coordination environments, and adjust potential and reaction conditions during operation to improve long-term stability.

4.2. Key Challenges in Heteroatom Functionalization of Ligands

Heteroatom functionalization of ligands offers a promising route to enhance the activity, selectivity, and stability of Cu-based electrocatalysts for the CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR). By modulating the electronic structure and local reaction microenvironment at the catalyst surface, heteroatoms can effectively facilitate the formation and conversion of key intermediates, such as *CO and *CHO. Nevertheless, this strategy still faces multiple challenges at both theoretical and practical levels, requiring continuous advances in mechanistic understanding, materials design, and scalable synthesis.
Chemical stability represents a critical bottleneck limiting the long-term operation of Cu-based ligand catalysts. Many organic ligands and their heteroatom functional groups are prone to dissociation, degradation, or structural reconstruction under strongly reducing potentials and complex electrolytes, resulting in the deactivation of active sites. To address this, future strategies may incorporate conjugated polymers, rigid macrocyclic frameworks, or inert heteroatoms to improve resistance against reductive conditions. In terms of performance tuning, precise control over intermediate adsorption and product distribution is essential. Introducing sterically hindered architectures could modulate the spacing between Cu sites and alter binding kinetics, offering new avenues for optimizing reaction pathways. Moreover, multi-heteroatom synergistic designs—such as N/S, N/P, or O/N combinations—can integrate the benefits of electron donation, steric modulation, and proton-transfer kinetics to meet the complex requirements of the multi-step CO2RR process, thereby achieving comprehensive improvements in catalytic stability and selectivity. For example, Hua and co-workers developed a coordination-engineering strategy to precisely tune the electronic structure of copper clusters. N doping promotes CO2 activation, whereas S doping lowers the adsorption barrier of *CO and facilitates H2O activation. This synergy directs an asymmetric *CO-*COH coupling pathway, thereby reducing the reaction energy barrier. Moreover, S/N co-doping precisely modulates the adsorption energies of oxygenated intermediates and induces redistribution of electron density at O sites. This weakens Cu-O bonding while strengthening C-O bonding and simultaneously suppresses competing reactions (e.g., ethylene formation), ultimately promoting alcohol production [64].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.L. and L.W.; investigation, J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, N.L.; writing—review and editing, J.C.; supervision, X.L.; project administration, H.P.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China, grant number 2023YFC3404200.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
HERhydrogen evolution reactions
CO2RRelectrochemical carbon dioxide reduction
CCScarbon capture and storage
AFMatomic force microscopy
XASX-ray absorption spectroscopy
XANESX-ray absorption near edge structure
XPSX-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
FTIRFourier Transform infrared spectroscopy
DFTDensity functional theory
FEFaradaic efficiency
EEenergy efficiency
VOoxygen vacancies
OCopen circuit
Cu-N-Ccopper-based nitrogen-doped carbon
SWCNTssingle-walled carbon nanotubes
PDOSProjected density of states
LSN-Culattice-strain-stabilized N-doped Cu
HFBhigh-frequency band
LFBlow-frequency band
ATR-FTIRattenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
SERSsurface-enhanced Raman scattering
SM-OD-Cusulfur-modified polycrystalline Cu and oxide-derived Cu electrodes
CSVEcore–shell-vacancy engineering
MOFMetal–organic framework
h-BNhexagonal boron nitride
HFhollow-fiber penetration electrode
TEMTransmission Electron Microscopy
HOMOhighest occupied molecular orbital
GDEsgas diffusion electrodes

References

  1. Jia, S.; Ma, X.; Sun, X.; Han, B. Electrochemical Transformation of CO2 to Value-Added Chemicals and Fuels. CCS Chem. 2022, 4, 3213–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Das, S.; Pérez-Ramírez, J.; Gong, J.; Dewangan, N.; Hidajat, K.; Gates, B.C.; Kawi, S. Core–shell structured catalysts for thermocatalytic, photocatalytic, and electrocatalytic conversion of CO2. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49, 2937–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Yao, Z.; He, X.; Lin, R. Electrochemical Carbon Dioxide Reduction in Acidic Media. Electrochem. Energy Rev. 2024, 7, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hu, J.; Chen, X.; Liu, J.; Guan, J. Advances in the CO2 electroreduction to multi-carbon products. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 516, 164199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kim, K.-H. The doping–defect interplay in carbon capturing materials: From atomic design to practical feasibility. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2026, 226, 116485. [Google Scholar]
  6. Huang, H.; Tian, J.; Jiang, M.; Wu, D. Dynamic valence engineering of CuOx catalysts for selective and stable CO2 electroreduction to ethylene and ethanol. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2025, 166, 101060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jouny, M.; Luc, W.; Jiao, F. General Techno-Economic Analysis of CO2 Electrolysis Systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 2165–2177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. De Luna, P.; Hahn, C.; Higgins, D.; Jaffer, S.A.; Jaramillo, T.F.; Sargent, E.H. What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? Science 2019, 364, eaav3506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Fan, L.; Xia, C.; Yang, F.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Lu, Y. Strategies in catalysts and electrolyzer design for electrochemical CO2 reduction toward C2+ products. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, eaav3111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xia, C.; Wang, X.; He, C.; Qi, R.; Zhu, D.; Lu, R.; Li, F.-M.; Chen, Y.; Chen, S.; You, B.; et al. Highly Selective Electrocatalytic CO2 Conversion to Tailored Products through Precise Regulation of Hydrogenation and C-C Coupling. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 20530–20538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Luc, W.; Fu, X.; Shi, J.; Lv, J.-J.; Jouny, M.; Ko, B.H.; Xu, Y.; Tu, Q.; Hu, X.; Wu, J.; et al. Two-dimensional copper nanosheets for electrochemical reduction of carbon monoxide to acetate. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 423–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Seh, Z.W.; Kibsgaard, J.; Dickens, C.F.; Chorkendorff, I.; Nørskov, J.K.; Jaramillo, T.F. Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: Insights into materials design. Science 2017, 355, eaad4998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Möller, T.; Scholten, F.; Thanh, T.N.; Sinev, I.; Timoshenko, J.; Wang, X.; Jovanov, Z.; Gliech, M.; Roldan Cuenya, B.; Varela, A.S.; et al. Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction on CuOx Nanocubes: Tracking the Evolution of Chemical State, Geometric Structure, and Catalytic Selectivity using Operando Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 17974–17983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cai, Y.; Fu, J.; Zhou, Y.; Chang, Y.-C.; Min, Q.; Zhu, J.-J.; Lin, Y.; Zhu, W. Insights on forming N, O-coordinated Cu single-atom catalysts for electrochemical reduction CO2 to methane. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cai, R.; Zhu, H.; Yang, F.; Ju, M.; Huang, X.; Wang, J.; Gu, M.D.; Gao, J.; Yang, S. The Proximal Protonation Source in Cu-NHx-C Single Atom Catalysts Selectively Boosts CO2 to Methane Electroreduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, 64, e202424098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zheng, W.; Yang, J.; Chen, H.; Hou, Y.; Wang, Q.; Gu, M.; He, F.; Xia, Y.; Xia, Z.; Li, Z. Atomically defined undercoordinated active sites for highly efficient CO2 electroreduction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020, 30, 1907658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pan, F.; Fang, L.; Li, B.; Yang, X.; O’Carroll, T.; Li, H.; Li, T.; Wang, G.; Chen, K.-J.; Wu, G. N and OH-Immobilized Cu3 Clusters In Situ Reconstructed from Single-Metal Sites for Efficient CO2 Electromethanation in Bicontinuous Mesochannels. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2024, 146, 1423–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, C.; Zhi, X.; Vasileff, A.; Wang, D.; Jin, B.; Jiao, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Qiao, S.-Z. Highly selective two-electron electrocatalytic CO2 reduction on single-atom Cu catalysts. Small Struct. 2021, 2, 2000058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, F.; Jing, W.; Bai, S.; Liu, Y.; Guo, L. Enhanced formate production from sulfur modified copper for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Energy 2024, 313, 133817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wu, Q.J.; Si, D.H.; Sun, P.P.; Dong, Y.L.; Zheng, S.; Chen, Q.; Ye, S.H.; Sun, D.; Cao, R.; Huang, Y.B. Atomically Precise Copper Nanoclusters for Highly Efficient Electroreduction of CO2 towards Hydrocarbons via Breaking the Coordination Symmetry of Cu Site. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202306822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Qu, G.; Xiang, K.; Ning, P.; Du, W.; Pan, K.; Cai, Y.; Li, J. Preparation of phosphorus-doped Cu-based catalysts by electrodeposition modulates* CHxO adsorption to facilitate electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to CH4. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy 2025, 360, 124525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, Y.; Xu, H.; Liu, Y.; Jang, J.; Qiu, X.; Delmo, E.P.; Zhao, Q.; Gao, P.; Shao, M. A sulfur-doped copper catalyst with efficient electrocatalytic formate generation during the electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2024, 63, e202313858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dai, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, C.; Xue, W.; Zhang, M.; Zhao, D.; Xue, J.; Li, J.; Luo, L.; Liu, C. Manipulating local coordination of copper single atom catalyst enables efficient CO2-to-CH4 conversion. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Downes, C.A.; Libretto, N.J.; Harman-Ware, A.E.; Happs, R.M.; Ruddy, D.A.; Baddour, F.G.; Ferrell, J.R., III; Habas, S.E.; Schaidle, J.A. Electrocatalytic CO2 reduction over Cu3P nanoparticles generated via a molecular precursor route. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 10435–10446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xiang, K.; Shen, F.; Fu, Y.; Wu, L.; Wang, Z.; Yi, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, P.; Liu, M.; Lin, Z.; et al. Boosting CO2 electroreduction towards C2+ products via CO* intermediate manipulation on copper-based catalysts. Environ. Sci. Nano 2022, 9, 911–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Luo, P.; Yang, Z.; Jin, Y.; Li, S.; Hao, Y.; Duan, Y.; Huang, W.; Liu, L.; Yan, K.; Abudula, A. Surface Behavior Regulation of Intermediates on the Copper-Based Catalysts for Enhancing Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction to Ethylene. Small 2025, 21, e10845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, Z.; Bian, L.; Tian, H.; Liu, Y.; Bando, Y.; Yamauchi, Y.; Wang, Z.L. Tailoring the Surface and Interface Structures of Copper-Based Catalysts for Electrochemical Reduction of CO2 to Ethylene and Ethanol. Small 2022, 18, e2107450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Ma, W.; He, X.; Wang, W.; Xie, S.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y. Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 and CO to multi-carbon compounds over Cu-based catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 12897–12914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xi, W.; Zhou, H.; Yang, P.; Huang, H.; Tian, J.; Ratova, M.; Wu, D. Pulse Manipulation on Cu-Based Catalysts for Electrochemical Reduction of CO2. ACS Catal. 2024, 14, 13697–13722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wu, H.; Yu, H.; Chow, Y.L.; Webley, P.A.; Zhang, J. Toward Durable CO2 Electroreduction with Cu-Based Catalysts via Understanding Their Deactivation Modes. Adv. Mater. 2024, 36, 2403217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wang, Z.; She, X.; Yu, Q.; Zhu, X.; Li, H.; Xu, H. Minireview on the Commonly Applied Copper-Based Electrocatalysts for Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. Energy Fuels 2021, 35, 8585–8601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Tountas, A.A.; Ozin, G.A.; Sain, M.M. Solar methanol energy storage. Nat. Catal. 2021, 4, 934–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qu, J.; Cao, X.; Gao, L.; Li, J.; Li, L.; Xie, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Wu, M.; Liu, H. Electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction to ethylene: From mechanistic understanding to catalyst surface engineering. Nano-Micro Lett. 2023, 15, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cheng, D.; Zhang, G.; Li, L.; Shi, X.; Zhen, S.; Zhao, Z.-J.; Gong, J. Guiding catalytic CO2 reduction to ethanol with copper grain boundaries. Chem. Sci. 2023, 14, 7966–7972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Rhimi, B.; Zhou, M.; Yan, Z.; Cai, X.; Jiang, Z. Cu-based materials for enhanced C2+ product selectivity in photo-/electro-catalytic CO2 reduction: Challenges and prospects. Nano-Micro Lett. 2024, 16, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ding, J.; Wu, J.; Hu, W.; Wang, Y.; Duan, Y.; Xia, L.; Yu, D.; Tao, X.; Gan, L.; Zhou, X. Non-Metallic Element Modification: A Promising Strategy Toward Efficient Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 35, 2423433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guan, A.; Fan, Y.; Xi, S.; Huang, H.; Zhang, Q.; Lyu, N.; Wu, B.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.; Yang, C. Nitrogen-adsorbed hydrogen species promote CO2 methanation on Cu single-atom electrocatalyst. ACS Mater. Lett. 2022, 5, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bai, X.; Li, Q.; Shi, L.; Niu, X.; Ling, C.; Wang, J. Hybrid Cu0 and Cux+ as atomic interfaces promote high-selectivity conversion of CO2 to C2H5OH at low potential. Small 2020, 16, 1901981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guan, A.; Chen, Z.; Quan, Y.; Peng, C.; Wang, Z.; Sham, T.-K.; Yang, C.; Ji, Y.; Qian, L.; Xu, X. Boosting CO2 electroreduction to CH4 via tuning neighboring single-copper sites. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 1044–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhao, K.; Nie, X.; Wang, H.; Chen, S.; Quan, X.; Yu, H.; Choi, W.; Zhang, G.; Kim, B.; Chen, J.G. Selective electroreduction of CO2 to acetone by single copper atoms anchored on N-doped porous carbon. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Su, X.; Jiang, Z.; Zhou, J.; Liu, H.; Zhou, D.; Shang, H.; Ni, X.; Peng, Z.; Yang, F.; Chen, W.; et al. Complementary Operando Spectroscopy identification of in-situ generated metastable charge-asymmetry Cu2-CuN3 clusters for CO2 reduction to ethanol. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zheng, M.; Wang, P.; Zhi, X.; Yang, K.; Jiao, Y.; Duan, J.; Zheng, Y.; Qiao, S.-Z. Electrocatalytic CO2-to-C2+ with Ampere-Level Current on Heteroatom-Engineered Copper via Tuning *CO Intermediate Coverage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 14936–14944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sun, Y.; Jing, H.; Wu, Z.; Yu, J.; Gao, H.; Zhang, Y.; He, G.; Lei, W.; Hao, Q. High Efficient Catalyst of N-doped Carbon Modified Copper Containing Rich Cu-N-C Active Sites for Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction. ChemistrySelect 2022, 7, e202200557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Karapinar, D.; Huan, N.T.; Ranjbar Sahraie, N.; Li, J.; Wakerley, D.; Touati, N.; Zanna, S.; Taverna, D.; Galvão Tizei, L.H.; Zitolo, A. Electroreduction of CO2 on single-site copper-nitrogen-doped carbon material: Selective formation of ethanol and reversible restructuration of the metal sites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019, 58, 15098–15103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, K.; Huang, K.; Wang, Z.; An, G.; Zhang, M.; Liu, W.; Fu, S.; Guo, H.; Zhang, B.; Lian, C. Functional Group Engineering of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Anchoring Copper Nanoparticles Toward Selective CO2 Electroreduction to C2 Products. Small 2025, 2502733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Shen, Y.; Qian, L.; Xu, Q.; Wang, S.; Chen, Y.; Lu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Ye, J.; Zhao, J.; Gao, X. N-doped Cu2O with the tunable Cu0 and Cu+ sites for selective CO2 electrochemical reduction to ethylene. J. Environ. Sci. 2025, 150, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wang, N.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; An, T.; Xiang, D.; Cai, K. Electron Delocalization and dp Orbital Coupling Regulation: Nitrogen-Mediated Efficient CO2 Electroreduction to Ethylene and Enhanced Rechargeable Zn-CO2 Battery Performance. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy 2025, 384, 126161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, R.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y. Imidazolium ligand-modified Cu2O catalysts for enhancing C2+ selectivity in CO2 electroreduction via local* CO enrichment. Ind. Chem. Mater. 2025, 3, 431–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhuo, L.L.; Chen, P.; Zheng, K.; Zhang, X.W.; Wu, J.X.; Lin, D.Y.; Liu, S.Y.; Wang, Z.S.; Liu, J.Y.; Zhou, D.D. Flexible cuprous triazolate frameworks as highly stable and efficient electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction with tunable C2H4/CH4 selectivity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202204967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Deng, H.; Guo, C.; Shi, P.; Zhao, G. Amino Assisted Protonation for Carbon-Carbon Coupling During Electroreduction of Carbon Dioxide to Ethylene on Copper (I) Oxide. ChemCatChem 2021, 13, 4325–4333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Niu, W.; Feng, J.; Chen, J.; Deng, L.; Guo, W.; Li, H.; Zhang, L.; Li, Y.; Zhang, B. High-efficiency C3 electrosynthesis on a lattice-strain-stabilized nitrogen-doped Cu surface. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 7070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yue, K.; Qin, Y.; Huang, H.; Lv, Z.; Cai, M.; Su, Y.; Huang, F.; Yan, Y. Stabilized Cu0-Cu1+ dual sites in a cyanamide framework for selective CO2 electroreduction to ethylene. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 7820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. He, R.; Huang, K.; Yang, X.; Xu, J.; Tong, Z. Copper electrocatalyst modified with pyridinium-based ionic liquids for the efficient synthesis of ethylene through electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 502, 158067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Li, H.; Pan, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yu, Y.; Xiong, J.; Du, H.; Lai, J.; Wang, L.; Feng, S. Coordination engineering of cobalt phthalocyanine by functionalized carbon nanotube for efficient and highly stable carbon dioxide reduction at high current density. Nano Res. 2022, 15, 3056–3064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Boas, C.; Focassio, B.; Marinho, E., Jr.; Larrude, D.; Salvadori, M.C.; Leão, C.R.; Dos Santos, D.J. Characterization of nitrogen doped graphene bilayers synthesized by fast, low temperature microwave plasma-enhanced chemical vapour deposition. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 13715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, L.; Jiao, M.; Ye, C. Single-Atom Catalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction: The Role of Supports, Coordination Environments, and Synergistic Effects. Nanomaterials 2025, 15, 1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wu, J.-X.; Hou, S.-Z.; Zhang, X.-D.; Xu, M.; Yang, H.-F.; Cao, P.-S.; Gu, Z.-Y. Cathodized copper porphyrin metal–organic framework nanosheets for selective formate and acetate production from CO2 electroreduction. Chem. Sci. 2019, 10, 2199–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ju, W.; Bagger, A.; Hao, G.-P.; Varela, A.S.; Sinev, I.; Bon, V.; Roldan Cuenya, B.; Kaskel, S.; Rossmeisl, J.; Strasser, P. Understanding activity and selectivity of metal-nitrogen-doped carbon catalysts for electrochemical reduction of CO2. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Goyal, A.; Marcandalli, G.; Mints, V.A.; Koper, M.T. Competition between CO2 reduction and hydrogen evolution on a gold electrode under well-defined mass transport conditions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 4154–4161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wen, C.F.; Zhou, M.; Liu, P.F.; Liu, Y.; Wu, X.; Mao, F.; Dai, S.; Xu, B.; Wang, X.L.; Jiang, Z.; et al. Highly Ethylene-Selective Electrocatalytic CO2 Reduction Enabled by Isolated Cu-S Motifs in Metal-Organic Framework Based Precatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 61, e202111700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, D.; Zhang, L.H.; Du, J.; Wang, H.; Guo, J.; Zhan, J.; Li, F.; Yu, F. A Tandem Strategy for Enhancing Electrochemical CO2 Reduction Activity of Single-Atom Cu-S1N3 Catalysts via Integration with Cu Nanoclusters. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 24022–24027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Yap, F.M.; Yuan, S.; Loh, J.Y.; Wang, J.; Zeng, X.; Ong, W.J. In-Situ Probing CO Activation in Sulfur-Enhanced Paired Electrocatalysis for CO2-to-C2+ Conversion with Alcohol Oxidation. Angew. Chem. 2025, 137, e202513840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhuang, T.-T.; Liang, Z.-Q.; Seifitokaldani, A.; Li, Y.; De Luna, P.; Burdyny, T.; Che, F.; Meng, F.; Min, Y.; Quintero-Bermudez, R. Steering post-C-C coupling selectivity enables high efficiency electroreduction of carbon dioxide to multi-carbon alcohols. Nat. Catal. 2018, 1, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hua, Q.; Feng, G.; Su, L.; Zhang, A.; Zhai, W.; Yang, Y.; Li, J.; Luo, M.; Mei, H.; Tian, H. Atomic Coordination Engineering of Sub-Nanometer Cu Clusters for Selective CO2 Electroreduction to Multi-Carbon Alcohols. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2025, e202518377. [Google Scholar]
  65. Kasatkin, I.; Kurr, P.; Kniep, B.; Trunschke, A.; Schlögl, R. Role of lattice strain and defects in copper particles on the activity of Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts for methanol synthesis. Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 7465–7468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Zhou, B.; Law, W.C.; Cartwright, A.N.; Swihart, M.T. Size-controlled synthesis of Cu2-xE (E= S, Se) nanocrystals with strong tunable near-infrared localized surface plasmon resonance and high conductivity in thin films. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2013, 23, 1256–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Luther, J.M.; Jain, P.K.; Ewers, T.; Alivisatos, A.P. Localized surface plasmon resonances arising from free carriers in doped quantum dots. Nat. Mater. 2011, 10, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liang, Z.-Q.; Zhuang, T.-T.; Seifitokaldani, A.; Li, J.; Huang, C.-W.; Tan, C.-S.; Li, Y.; De Luna, P.; Dinh, C.T.; Hu, Y. Copper-on-nitride enhances the stable electrosynthesis of multi-carbon products from CO2. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhou, Y.; Che, F.; Liu, M.; Zou, C.; Liang, Z.; De Luna, P.; Yuan, H.; Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Xie, H. Dopant-induced electron localization drives CO2 reduction to C2 hydrocarbons. Nat. Chem. 2018, 10, 974–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Qin, T.; Qian, Y.; Zhang, F.; Lin, B.-L. Cloride-derived copper electrode for efficient electrochemical reduction of CO2 to ethylene. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2019, 30, 314–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wu, Z.-Z.; Gao, F.-Y.; Gao, M.-R. Regulating the oxidation state of nanomaterials for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021, 14, 1121–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, J.; Tan, H.Y.; Zhu, Y.; Chu, H.; Chen, H.M. Linking the dynamic chemical state of catalysts with the product profile of electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. 2021, 133, 17394–17407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Arán-Ais, R.M.; Scholten, F.; Kunze, S.; Rizo, R.; Roldan Cuenya, B. The role of in situ generated morphological motifs and Cu (i) species in C2+ product selectivity during CO2 pulsed electroreduction. Nat. Energy 2020, 5, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yin, Z.; Yu, C.; Zhao, Z.; Guo, X.; Shen, M.; Li, N.; Muzzio, M.; Li, J.; Liu, H.; Lin, H. Cu3N nanocubes for selective electrochemical reduction of CO2 to ethylene. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 8658–8663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lin, S.-C.; Chang, C.-C.; Chiu, S.-Y.; Pai, H.-T.; Liao, T.-Y.; Hsu, C.-S.; Chiang, W.-H.; Tsai, M.-K.; Chen, H.M. Operando time-resolved X-ray absorption spectroscopy reveals the chemical nature enabling highly selective CO2 reduction. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lee, S.H.; Lin, J.C.; Farmand, M.; Landers, A.T.; Feaster, J.T.; Avilés Acosta, J.E.; Beeman, J.W.; Ye, Y.; Yano, J.; Mehta, A. Oxidation state and surface reconstruction of Cu under CO2 reduction conditions from in situ X-ray characterization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 143, 588–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Velasco-Velez, J.-J.; Mom, R.V.; Sandoval-Diaz, L.-E.; Falling, L.J.; Chuang, C.-H.; Gao, D.; Jones, T.E.; Zhu, Q.; Arrigo, R.; Roldan Cuenya, B. Revealing the active phase of copper during the electroreduction of CO2 in aqueous electrolyte by correlating in situ X-ray spectroscopy and in situ electron microscopy. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 2106–2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Trinh, Q.T.; Banerjee, A.; Yang, Y.; Mushrif, S.H. Sub-surface boron-doped copper for methane activation and coupling: First-principles investigation of the structure, activity, and selectivity of the catalyst. J. Phys. Chem. C 2017, 121, 1099–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, Z.; Yang, X.; Fang, Q.; Cheng, T.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Tang, J. Boron-modified CuO as catalyst for electroreduction of CO2 towards C2+ products. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2024, 647, 158919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Patra, K.K.; Park, S.; Song, H.; Kim, B.; Kim, W.; Oh, J. Operando spectroscopic investigation of a boron-doped CuO catalyst and its role in selective electrochemical C-C coupling. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 11343–11349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yao, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, D.; Chi, X.; Wang, X.; Zhao, R.; Zhang, H.; Sun, Y. Restraining lattice oxygen of Cu2O by enhanced Cu-O hybridization for selective and stable production of ethylene with CO2 electroreduction. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 20914–20923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhou, Y.; Yao, Y.; Zhao, R.; Wang, X.; Fu, Z.; Wang, D.; Wang, H.; Zhao, L.; Ni, W.; Yang, Z. Stabilization of Cu+ via strong electronic interaction for selective and stable CO2 electroreduction. Angew. Chem. 2022, 134, e202205832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Wu, G.; Zhu, C.; Mao, J.; Li, G.; Li, S.; Dong, X.; Chen, A.; Song, Y.; Feng, G.; Liu, X. Ampere-level CO2-to-ethanol conversion via boron-incorporated copper electrodes. ACS Energy Lett. 2023, 8, 4867–4874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Zhu, C.; Song, Y.; Dong, X.; Li, G.; Chen, A.; Chen, W.; Wu, G.; Li, S.; Wei, W.; Sun, Y. Ampere-level CO2 reduction to multicarbon products over a copper gas penetration electrode. Energy Environ. Sci. 2022, 15, 5391–5404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Li, S.; Chen, W.; Dong, X.; Zhu, C.; Chen, A.; Song, Y.; Li, G.; Wei, W.; Sun, Y. Hierarchical micro/nanostructured silver hollow fiber boosts electroreduction of carbon dioxide. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 3080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Chen, A.; Dong, X.; Mao, J.; Chen, W.; Zhu, C.; Li, S.; Wu, G.; Wei, Y.; Liu, X.; Li, G. Gas penetrating hollow fiber Bi with contractive bond enables industry-level CO2 electroreduction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. Energy 2023, 333, 122768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Li, S.; Dong, X.; Mao, J.; Chen, W.; Chen, A.; Wu, G.; Zhu, C.; Li, G.; Wei, Y.; Liu, X. Highly efficient CO2 reduction at steady 2 A cm−2 by surface reconstruction of silver penetration electrode. Small 2023, 19, 2301338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Shen, Y.; Chen, C.; Zou, Z.; Hu, Z.; Fu, Z.; Li, W.; Pan, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yu, Z. Geometric and electronic effects of Co@NPC catalyst in chemoselective hydrogenation: Tunable activity and selectivity via N, P co-doping. J. Catal. 2023, 421, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. You, S.; Xiao, J.; Liang, S.; Xie, W.; Zhang, T.; Li, M.; Zhong, Z.; Wang, Q.; He, H. Doping engineering of Cu-based catalysts for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to multi-carbon products. Energy Environ. Sci. 2024, 17, 5795–5818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wu, Y.; Zhuang, Z.; Chen, C.; Li, J.; Xiao, F.; Chen, C. Atomic-level regulation strategies of single-atom catalysts: Nonmetal heteroatom doping and polymetallic active site construction. Chem. Catal. 2023, 3, 100586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Qin, F.; Chen, W. Copper-based single-atom alloys for heterogeneous catalysis. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 2710–2723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhang, H.; Li, Y.; Zeng, L.; Pan, Y. Atomic-Level Regulation of Cu-Based Electrocatalyst for Enhancing Oxygen Reduction Reaction: From Single Atoms to Polymetallic Active Sites. Small 2024, 20, 2307384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Han, S.; Xia, W.; Jia, S.; Jiao, J.; Yao, T.; Dong, X.; Wang, M.; Zhai, J.; Yang, J.; Xie, Y. Boosting promote C2 products formation in electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction via phosphorus-enhanced proton feeding. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 479, 147735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Li, H.; Qin, X.; Jiang, T.; Ma, X.Y.; Jiang, K.; Cai, W.B. Changing the product selectivity for electrocatalysis of CO2 reduction reaction on plated Cu electrodes. ChemCatChem 2019, 11, 6139–6146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Kong, X.; Wang, C.; Zheng, H.; Geng, Z.; Bao, J.; Zeng, J. Enhance the activity of multi-carbon products for Cu via P doping towards CO2 reduction. Sci. China Chem. 2021, 64, 1096–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Qiu, Z.F.; Zhang, X.Y.; Chen, J.Q.; Zhao, Y.; Gong, F.; Sun, W.Y. Tailoring Coordination Microenvironment of Cu(I) in Metal-Organic Frameworks for Enhancing Electroreduction of CO2 to CH4. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2203677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ou, L.; You, W.; Jin, J. Mechanistic insights into the effect of halide anions on electroreduction pathways of CO2 to C1 product at Cu/H2O electrochemical interfaces. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2023, 13, 7149–7161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Varela, A.S.; Ju, W.; Reier, T.; Strasser, P. Tuning the Catalytic Activity and Selectivity of Cu for CO2 Electroreduction in the Presence of Halides. ACS Catal. 2016, 6, 2136–2144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lu, Y.F.; Dong, L.Z.; Liu, J.; Yang, R.X.; Liu, J.J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Wang, Y.R.; Li, S.L.; Lan, Y.Q. Predesign of catalytically active sites via stable coordination cluster model system for electroreduction of CO2 to ethylene. Angew. Chem. 2021, 133, 26414–26421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wang, R.; Liu, J.; Huang, Q.; Dong, L.Z.; Li, S.L.; Lan, Y.Q. Partial Coordination-Perturbed Bi-Copper Sites for Selective Electroreduction of CO2 to Hydrocarbons. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 19829–19835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ma, W.; Xie, S.; Liu, T.; Fan, Q.; Ye, J.; Sun, F.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Cheng, J.; Wang, Y. Electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to ethylene and ethanol through hydrogen-assisted C-C coupling over fluorine-modified copper. Nat. Catal. 2020, 3, 478–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Yan, X.; Chen, C.; Wu, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Feng, R.; Zhang, J.; Han, B. Boosting CO2 electroreduction to C2+ products on fluorine-doped copper. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 1989–1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Liu, Y.; Tang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Lin, B.-L. Improved catalytic performance of CO2 electrochemical reduction reaction towards ethanol on chlorine-modified Cu-based electrocatalyst. Nano Res. 2024, 17, 3761–3768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Li, H.; Liu, T.; Wei, P.; Lin, L.; Gao, D.; Wang, G.; Bao, X. High-rate CO2 electroreduction to C2+ products over a copper-copper iodide catalyst. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 14329–14333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Li, M.; Ma, Y.; Chen, J.; Lawrence, R.; Luo, W.; Sacchi, M.; Jiang, W.; Yang, J. Residual chlorine induced cationic active species on a porous copper electrocatalyst for highly stable electrochemical CO2 reduction to C2+. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 11487–11493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Gao, D.; Sinev, I.; Scholten, F.; Arán-Ais, R.M.; Divins, N.J.; Kvashnina, K.; Timoshenko, J.; Roldan Cuenya, B. Selective CO2 electroreduction to ethylene and multicarbon alcohols via electrolyte-driven nanostructuring. Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 17203–17209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Xiao, H.; Goddard, W.A., III; Cheng, T.; Liu, Y. Cu metal embedded in oxidized matrix catalyst to promote CO2 activation and CO dimerization for electrochemical reduction of CO2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 6685–6688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Xie, Z.; Wang, Q.; Yang, H.; Feng, J.; Chen, J.; Song, S.; Meng, C.; Wang, K.; Tong, Y. Surface Facets Reconstruction in Copper-Based Materials for Enhanced Electrochemical CO2 Reduction. Small 2024, 20, 2401530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Nitopi, S.; Bertheussen, E.; Scott, S.B.; Liu, X.; Engstfeld, A.K.; Horch, S.; Seger, B.; Stephens, I.E.; Chan, K.; Hahn, C. Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 7610–7672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Kim, K.; Wagner, P.; Wagner, K.; Mozer, A.J. Electrochemical CO2 reduction catalyzed by copper molecular complexes: The influence of ligand structure. Energy Fuels 2022, 36, 4653–4676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lu, T.; Shi, G.; Liu, Y.; Luo, X.; Shen, Y.; Chang, M.; Wu, Y.; Gao, X.; Wu, J.; Li, Y. Local Coordination Environment-Driven Structural Dynamics of Single-Atom Copper and the CO2 Electroreduction Pathway. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2025, 147, 26425–26436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Conte, A.; Alberoni, C.; Carlotto, S.; Baron, M.; Bonacchi, S.; Aliprandi, A.; Antonello, S. Modulating C2 Selectivity in CO2 Electroreduction through Molecular Surface Engineering of Copper Nanowires. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2025, 8, 16818–16828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Yang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, C.; Shi, Y.; Li, J.; Johannessen, B.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Song, Q.; Zhang, H.; et al. Ligand-tuning copper in coordination polymers for efficient electrochemical C-C coupling. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 6316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Wu, H.; Huang, L.; Timoshenko, J.; Qi, K.; Wang, W.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, S.; Petit, E.; Flaud, V.; et al. Selective and energy-efficient electrosynthesis of ethylene from CO2 by tuning the valence of Cu catalysts through aryl diazonium functionalization. Nat. Energy 2024, 9, 422–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Wu, J.; Chen, W.; Hao, B.; Jiang, Z.J.; Jin, G.; Jiang, Z. Garnet-Type Solid-State Electrolytes: Crystal-Phase Regulation and Interface Modification for Enhanced Lithium Metal Batteries. Small 2025, 21, 2407983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (A) FE distributions for catalysts with varying nitrogen doping levels. (B) Time-dependent current density and ethanol FE of the Cu/N0.14C catalyst at −1.1 V (vs. RHE). (C) Cu K-edge operando XANES spectra of Cu/N0.14C recorded from open circuit (OC) to −1.4 V (vs. RHE) in 0.1 M KHCO3 electrolyte. (D) Operando FT-EXAFS spectra of Cu/N0.14C. (E) Schematic illustration of the reversible formation of catalytically active Cun-CuN3 clusters [21]. Copyright 2022 Springer Nature.
Figure 1. (A) FE distributions for catalysts with varying nitrogen doping levels. (B) Time-dependent current density and ethanol FE of the Cu/N0.14C catalyst at −1.1 V (vs. RHE). (C) Cu K-edge operando XANES spectra of Cu/N0.14C recorded from open circuit (OC) to −1.4 V (vs. RHE) in 0.1 M KHCO3 electrolyte. (D) Operando FT-EXAFS spectra of Cu/N0.14C. (E) Schematic illustration of the reversible formation of catalytically active Cun-CuN3 clusters [21]. Copyright 2022 Springer Nature.
Catalysts 16 00061 g001
Figure 2. (A) Preparation of SWCNTs with different functional moieties and subsequent deposition of Cu to obtain Cu/R-SWCNTs. Cu was deposited on pristine SWCNTs and functionalized R-SWCNTs (R = –CH2NH2, –CN, –CH2COOH, –OH, –COOH). (B) FE for C2H4 production and (C) partial current density (jC2) for Cu/CH2NH2, Cu/CN, and Cu/SWCNTs in CO2 electroreduction. (D) Projected density of states (PDOS) and d-band center of Cu 3d. (E) Adsorption energies of *CO and *H2O [22]. Copyright 2025 Wiley.
Figure 2. (A) Preparation of SWCNTs with different functional moieties and subsequent deposition of Cu to obtain Cu/R-SWCNTs. Cu was deposited on pristine SWCNTs and functionalized R-SWCNTs (R = –CH2NH2, –CN, –CH2COOH, –OH, –COOH). (B) FE for C2H4 production and (C) partial current density (jC2) for Cu/CH2NH2, Cu/CN, and Cu/SWCNTs in CO2 electroreduction. (D) Projected density of states (PDOS) and d-band center of Cu 3d. (E) Adsorption energies of *CO and *H2O [22]. Copyright 2025 Wiley.
Catalysts 16 00061 g002
Figure 3. (a) High-resolution N 1sspectra of the LSN-Cu catalyst. The spectra of the Cu catalyst were listed for comparison. (b) The formation energies of VO on the N-doped and pristine Cu2O/Cu surface with different lattice compression (0%, 2%, 4%, and 6%), inset, the N-doped Cu2O/Cu interfaces model. Orange, red, and purple spheres represent Cu, O, and N atoms, respectively. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. (c) Operando Raman spectra of the LSN-Cu. (d) CORR products distribution under different potentials for the LSN-Cu electrodes, the potential is with a 70% iR correction [51]. Copyright 2024 Springer Nature.
Figure 3. (a) High-resolution N 1sspectra of the LSN-Cu catalyst. The spectra of the Cu catalyst were listed for comparison. (b) The formation energies of VO on the N-doped and pristine Cu2O/Cu surface with different lattice compression (0%, 2%, 4%, and 6%), inset, the N-doped Cu2O/Cu interfaces model. Orange, red, and purple spheres represent Cu, O, and N atoms, respectively. Source data are provided as a Source Data file. (c) Operando Raman spectra of the LSN-Cu. (d) CORR products distribution under different potentials for the LSN-Cu electrodes, the potential is with a 70% iR correction [51]. Copyright 2024 Springer Nature.
Catalysts 16 00061 g003
Figure 4. (a) Schematic illustration of Cu2S-u-V CSVE electrocatalyst design for production of multi-carbon alcohols from CO2 reduction (core–shell-vacancy engineering (CSVE)). (b) FE of alcohols (ethanol and propanol) and ethylene on different catalysts at −0.95 V versus RHE [27]. Copyright 2025 MDPI.
Figure 4. (a) Schematic illustration of Cu2S-u-V CSVE electrocatalyst design for production of multi-carbon alcohols from CO2 reduction (core–shell-vacancy engineering (CSVE)). (b) FE of alcohols (ethanol and propanol) and ethylene on different catalysts at −0.95 V versus RHE [27]. Copyright 2025 MDPI.
Catalysts 16 00061 g004
Figure 5. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis process for S-HKUST-1. (b) FE of HKUST-1 and S-HKUST-1. (c) Operando Cu K-edge XANES spectra of S-HKUST-1 and HKUST-1 after 15 min of electrochemical reaction at 1.30 V vs. RHE in 0.1 M KHCO3. (d) Top-view surface configurations of Cu-based structures with varying degrees of sulfurization [24]. Copyright 2021 Wiley.
Figure 5. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis process for S-HKUST-1. (b) FE of HKUST-1 and S-HKUST-1. (c) Operando Cu K-edge XANES spectra of S-HKUST-1 and HKUST-1 after 15 min of electrochemical reaction at 1.30 V vs. RHE in 0.1 M KHCO3. (d) Top-view surface configurations of Cu-based structures with varying degrees of sulfurization [24]. Copyright 2021 Wiley.
Catalysts 16 00061 g005
Figure 6. Schematic illustration of B doping in Cu-based oxide catalysts.
Figure 6. Schematic illustration of B doping in Cu-based oxide catalysts.
Catalysts 16 00061 g006
Figure 7. (a) HAADF-STEM image of B-Cu2O. (b) FE for CO and C2H4 on B-Cu2O. (c) FE for CO and C2H4 on Cu2O. (d) Quasi in situ XPS Cu Auger LMM spectra of B-Cu2O after electrolysis at 1.2 V for 60 min and 120 min. (e) Reaction energy diagram for CO2RR to C2H4 on B-Cu2O (111) and Cu2O (111) facets [28]. Copyright 2022 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 7. (a) HAADF-STEM image of B-Cu2O. (b) FE for CO and C2H4 on B-Cu2O. (c) FE for CO and C2H4 on Cu2O. (d) Quasi in situ XPS Cu Auger LMM spectra of B-Cu2O after electrolysis at 1.2 V for 60 min and 120 min. (e) Reaction energy diagram for CO2RR to C2H4 on B-Cu2O (111) and Cu2O (111) facets [28]. Copyright 2022 Royal Society of Chemistry.
Catalysts 16 00061 g007
Figure 8. (a) HAADF-STEM image of Cu2O-BN. (b) FE for CO and C2H4 on Cu2O. (c) FE for CO and C2H4 on Cu2O-BN. (d) Free-energy diagrams for CO2 electroreduction to different intermediates on Cu2O and Cu2O-BN. (e) i–t curves and C2H4/CO ratios for Cu2O and Cu2O-BN at a constant potential of 1.4 V [29]. Copyright 2022 Wiley.
Figure 8. (a) HAADF-STEM image of Cu2O-BN. (b) FE for CO and C2H4 on Cu2O. (c) FE for CO and C2H4 on Cu2O-BN. (d) Free-energy diagrams for CO2 electroreduction to different intermediates on Cu2O and Cu2O-BN. (e) i–t curves and C2H4/CO ratios for Cu2O and Cu2O-BN at a constant potential of 1.4 V [29]. Copyright 2022 Wiley.
Catalysts 16 00061 g008
Figure 9. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis processes for H-Cu HF and B-Cu HF. (b) Cu K-edge XANES spectra, with the average oxidation state of Cuδ+ species shown in the inset. (c) FT-EXAFS spectra of B-Cu HF, H-Cu HF, reference Cu foil, and Cu2O. (d) Operational stability of B-Cu HF during galvanostatic electrolysis at 2.4 A cm−2 for 150 h [30]. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society.
Figure 9. (a) Schematic illustration of the synthesis processes for H-Cu HF and B-Cu HF. (b) Cu K-edge XANES spectra, with the average oxidation state of Cuδ+ species shown in the inset. (c) FT-EXAFS spectra of B-Cu HF, H-Cu HF, reference Cu foil, and Cu2O. (d) Operational stability of B-Cu HF during galvanostatic electrolysis at 2.4 A cm−2 for 150 h [30]. Copyright 2023 American Chemical Society.
Catalysts 16 00061 g009
Figure 10. Schematic illustration of P doping in Cu-based catalysts.
Figure 10. Schematic illustration of P doping in Cu-based catalysts.
Catalysts 16 00061 g010
Figure 11. (a) Surface valence band photoemission spectra. (b) partial current density of Cu-P for C2+ [38]. Copyright 2024 RSC Publishing.
Figure 11. (a) Surface valence band photoemission spectra. (b) partial current density of Cu-P for C2+ [38]. Copyright 2024 RSC Publishing.
Catalysts 16 00061 g011
Figure 12. (a) FEs of C2+ products at various applied potentials over X-Cu catalysts in 1 M KOH. (b) The FE (left) and a proposed reaction mechanism (right) over Cu catalysts with different halogen element [42]. Copyright 2022 Royal Society Of Chemistry. (c) Schematic illustration of the structures of Cu and F-Cu catalysts. (d) Long-term stability evaluation of the F-Cu catalyst at −0.97 V (vs. RHE) in 1 M KOH over a continuous 12 h operation. (e) In situ SERS spectra of the F-Cu catalyst recorded at various applied potentials during the CO2 electroreduction reaction (CO2RR) [43]. Copyright 2024 RSC Publishing.
Figure 12. (a) FEs of C2+ products at various applied potentials over X-Cu catalysts in 1 M KOH. (b) The FE (left) and a proposed reaction mechanism (right) over Cu catalysts with different halogen element [42]. Copyright 2022 Royal Society Of Chemistry. (c) Schematic illustration of the structures of Cu and F-Cu catalysts. (d) Long-term stability evaluation of the F-Cu catalyst at −0.97 V (vs. RHE) in 1 M KOH over a continuous 12 h operation. (e) In situ SERS spectra of the F-Cu catalyst recorded at various applied potentials during the CO2 electroreduction reaction (CO2RR) [43]. Copyright 2024 RSC Publishing.
Catalysts 16 00061 g012
Figure 13. (a) FE for C2+ products obtained over Cu-CuI, Cu-Cu2O, and Cu2O electrodes. (b) Geometric partial current densities for C2+ products on the same electrodes. (c) Long-term stability test of the Cu-CuI electrode at −0.8 V vs. RHE. (d) Calculated CO adsorption energies and optimized adsorption configurations on Cu (100), Cu (100)-I, Cu clusters, and CuI clusters supported on Cu (100) [44]. Copyright 2021 Wiley.
Figure 13. (a) FE for C2+ products obtained over Cu-CuI, Cu-Cu2O, and Cu2O electrodes. (b) Geometric partial current densities for C2+ products on the same electrodes. (c) Long-term stability test of the Cu-CuI electrode at −0.8 V vs. RHE. (d) Calculated CO adsorption energies and optimized adsorption configurations on Cu (100), Cu (100)-I, Cu clusters, and CuI clusters supported on Cu (100) [44]. Copyright 2021 Wiley.
Catalysts 16 00061 g013
Figure 14. (a) Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) image of CuOHFCl nanosheets (NSs). (bd) XPS spectra of the electrodes after electrocatalysis: (b) Cu LMM, (c) F 1s, and (d) Cu 2p. (e) FEs of all products during the long-term stability test [45]. Copyright 2021 Wiley.
Figure 14. (a) Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) image of CuOHFCl nanosheets (NSs). (bd) XPS spectra of the electrodes after electrocatalysis: (b) Cu LMM, (c) F 1s, and (d) Cu 2p. (e) FEs of all products during the long-term stability test [45]. Copyright 2021 Wiley.
Catalysts 16 00061 g014
Figure 15. (a) Chemical structures of the modeled ligand molecules. (b) HOMO energies of the ligands; the anionic forms, rather than neutral forms, were used in the calculations to account for deprotonation effects. (c) Synthetic routes for the ligands and coordination polymers. (d) CO2RR activity of L2-Cu over applied potentials ranging from −0.77 to −0.95 V. (e) Operando Cu K-edge XANES spectra of L2-Cu at applied potentials between −0.69 V and −0.79 V during CO2RR in a customized flow cell. (f) CO decay profiles illustrating the desorption rates of adsorbed CO from Cu active sites in different catalysts. (g) Correlation between *CO binding strength and ηC-C coupling, inferred from the observed trend in HOMO energy [51]. Copyright 2024 Springer Nature.
Figure 15. (a) Chemical structures of the modeled ligand molecules. (b) HOMO energies of the ligands; the anionic forms, rather than neutral forms, were used in the calculations to account for deprotonation effects. (c) Synthetic routes for the ligands and coordination polymers. (d) CO2RR activity of L2-Cu over applied potentials ranging from −0.77 to −0.95 V. (e) Operando Cu K-edge XANES spectra of L2-Cu at applied potentials between −0.69 V and −0.79 V during CO2RR in a customized flow cell. (f) CO decay profiles illustrating the desorption rates of adsorbed CO from Cu active sites in different catalysts. (g) Correlation between *CO binding strength and ηC-C coupling, inferred from the observed trend in HOMO energy [51]. Copyright 2024 Springer Nature.
Catalysts 16 00061 g015
Figure 16. (a) Molecular structures of various diazonium salts. (b) Correlation between FEC2H4 and the theoretical valence states of Cu sites in the different catalysts. (c) CO2RR performance of NN-Cu at a full-cell potential of −3.55 V with a CO2 feed rate of 10 sccm over a 120 h continuous operation. Copyright 2025 Tsinghua University Press [52]. Copyright 2024 Wiley.
Figure 16. (a) Molecular structures of various diazonium salts. (b) Correlation between FEC2H4 and the theoretical valence states of Cu sites in the different catalysts. (c) CO2RR performance of NN-Cu at a full-cell potential of −3.55 V with a CO2 feed rate of 10 sccm over a 120 h continuous operation. Copyright 2025 Tsinghua University Press [52]. Copyright 2024 Wiley.
Catalysts 16 00061 g016
Table 1. Comparative summary of CO2 reduction performance over N-modified Cu-catalysts.
Table 1. Comparative summary of CO2 reduction performance over N-modified Cu-catalysts.
TypeReactor TypeElectrocatalystMain ProductsFE (%)Potential (V vs. RHE)Current Density (mA cm−2)Ref.
N doping into carbon supportFlow cellCu-NxC2H424.8−0.76−25[39]
H-type cellCu-N-CC2H5OH31−0.93−22[43]
GDECu-N-CC2H5OH55−1.2−100[44]
Flow cellR-SWCNTsC2+66.2−1.08−270[45]
H-type cellCu-SA/NPCCH3COCH336.7−0.5−1[40]
H-type cellCu2-CuN3C2H5OH51−1.1−14.4[41]
GDECu–NxC2+73.7−1.15−1100[42]
N doping into Cu-based catalystGDEOMIm-Cu2OC2+63.3−0.5−600[48]
H-type cellMAF-2C2H451.2−1.3−12[49]
H-type cellNH2-Cu2OC2H418−0.9−10[50]
Flow cellC3n-propanol54−0.53−300[51]
Flow cellCuδ+NCNC2H477.7−1.6−77.7[52]
Flow cellCu@PyILsC2H431.88−1.15−188[53]
Note: RHE refers to the reversible hydrogen electrode.
Table 2. Performance comparison of sulfur-doped copper-based catalysts.
Table 2. Performance comparison of sulfur-doped copper-based catalysts.
ElectrocatalystReactor TypeMain ProductsFE (%)Potential (V vs. RHE)Current Density (mA cm−2)Ref.
S-HKUST 1H-type cellC2H460−1.32−400[60]
Cu2SGDEC2H5OH32−0.95−126[63]
Cu/SNCGDEC2+ alcohols59.1−1.4−200[64]
Table 3. Comparison of the CO2RR performance of representative boron-doped Cu-based catalysts.
Table 3. Comparison of the CO2RR performance of representative boron-doped Cu-based catalysts.
ElectrocatalystReactor TypeMain ProductsFE (%)Potential (V vs. RHE)Current Density (mA cm−2)Ref.
Cu(B)-2H-type cellC2+79−1−55[70]
B-CuO NSH-type cellC2+54.78−1.2−16.75[79]
B-CuOGDEC2+62.1−0.62−125[80]
B-Cu2OH-type cellC2H426.13−1.2−35[81]
Cu2O-BNH-type cellC2H47−1.4−35[82]
B-Cu HFFlow cellC2+78.9−0.91−2400[83]
Table 4. Comparison of the CO2RR performance of representative phosphorus-doped Cu-based catalysts.
Table 4. Comparison of the CO2RR performance of representative phosphorus-doped Cu-based catalysts.
ElectrocatalystReactor TypeMain ProductsFE (%)Potential (V vs. RHE)Current Density (mA cm−2)Ref.
SCB/NGFlow-cellC2+92.4−1.8 −50[62]
P-CuH-type cellC2+80.2−1.2−40.4[93]
Cu-PH-type cellC2+53.5−1.15−16[94]
Cu0.92P0.08Flow-cellC2+64−2−210[95]
Table 5. CO2RR performance of representative halogen (X = F, Cl, Br, I)–modified Cu-based catalysts.
Table 5. CO2RR performance of representative halogen (X = F, Cl, Br, I)–modified Cu-based catalysts.
ElectrocatalystReactor TypeMain ProductsFE (%)Potential (V vs. RHE)Current Density (mA cm−2)Ref.
Cu3-XGDEC2H455.01−1.05−15[99]
Cu-PzHFlow cellC2H460−1−346.46[100]
Cu-PzIFlow cellCH452−0.9−287.52[100]
F-CuGDEC2+80−0.8−1600[101]
Cu-ClGDEC2H5OH26.2−0.74−343.2[103]
Cu-CuIGDEC2+71−1−550[104]
Cu-FGDEC2+70.4−1.1−400[102]
Cu4(OH)6FClH-cellC2+53.8−1−15[105]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, N.; Peng, H.; Liu, X.; Li, J.; Chen, J.; Wang, L. Nonmetallic Heteroatom Engineering in Copper-Based Electrocatalysts: Advances in CO2 Reduction. Catalysts 2026, 16, 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16010061

AMA Style

Li N, Peng H, Liu X, Li J, Chen J, Wang L. Nonmetallic Heteroatom Engineering in Copper-Based Electrocatalysts: Advances in CO2 Reduction. Catalysts. 2026; 16(1):61. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16010061

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Ningjing, Hongzhen Peng, Xue Liu, Jiang Li, Jing Chen, and Lihua Wang. 2026. "Nonmetallic Heteroatom Engineering in Copper-Based Electrocatalysts: Advances in CO2 Reduction" Catalysts 16, no. 1: 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16010061

APA Style

Li, N., Peng, H., Liu, X., Li, J., Chen, J., & Wang, L. (2026). Nonmetallic Heteroatom Engineering in Copper-Based Electrocatalysts: Advances in CO2 Reduction. Catalysts, 16(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16010061

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop