Next Article in Journal
Homogeneous Photo-Fenton Degradation and Mineralization of Model and Simulated Pesticide Wastewaters in Lab- and Pilot-Scale Reactors
Next Article in Special Issue
The Evolution of Hexagonal Cobalt Nanosheets for CO2 Electrochemical Reduction Reaction
Previous Article in Journal
Photocatalytic Transformations of the Resveratrol Derivative in Microflow Reactor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Towards High CO2 Conversions Using Cu/Zn Catalysts Supported on Aluminum Fumarate Metal-Organic Framework for Methanol Synthesis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced CuAl2O4 Catalytic Activity via Alkalinization Treatment toward High CO2 Conversion during Reverse Water Gas Shift Reaction

1
College of Environment, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
2
Hangzhou Environmental Group Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310020, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2022, 12(12), 1511; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12121511
Submission received: 15 October 2022 / Revised: 15 November 2022 / Accepted: 23 November 2022 / Published: 25 November 2022

Abstract

:
CO2 catalytic conversion to CO would likely be an important part of CO2 mitigation and utilization. In this work, CuAl2O4 was developed with a spinel structure that acts as an active and stable catalyst for this reaction. Here, the fundamental characteristics of CuAl2O4 catalyst were studied to understand the catalytic mechanism for the Reverse Water Gas Shift reaction. Based on the catalytic mechanism, the CuAl2O4 catalyst was found to have exceptional catalytic activity due to the high dispersion of copper on its surface, and it could have higher catalytic activity by increasing the oxygen vacancies on the surface of the catalyst via alkalinization treatment. By combining with XPS spectra, the relationship between the Raman mode and the oxygen vacancy structure on the CuAl2O4 surface was proved. Through these studies, it was proved that alkalinization treatment can regulate the oxygen vacancies on the surface of the catalyst and thus enhance the catalytic activity.

1. Introduction

Excess CO2 emissions have caused catastrophic global environmental impacts, such as climate change and ocean acidification [1]. To mitigate this threat, developing techniques for CO2 capture and utilization has become an urgent and significant task. Catalytic conversion of CO2 to value-added chemicals is currently being investigated extensively. Despite significant advances in direct CO2 conversion to methanol as a green fuel, this process still results in low methanol yield due to the high stability of CO2 [2,3]. As an alternative, the conversion of CO2 to CO, which occurs in thermal catalysis via the Reverse Water Gas Shift (RWGS) reaction, has drawn more and more attention. Unlike thermodynamically stable CO2, CO is much more active and it can be further converted into a variety of chemicals [4,5].
During the RWGS reaction, Cu-based and other transition/noble metallic catalysts have been widely employed due to their relatively high activity and high selectivity [6,7,8,9,10]. Previous studies have shown that increasing the dispersity of Cu can significantly improve the catalytic activity of Cu-based catalysts, because the dispersity of Cu affects the Cu-O interface, which is widely accepted as the active site of the RWGS reaction [11]. However, the traditional Cu-based catalysts are easily deactivated by the fierce aggregation of supported Cu particles at high temperatures, and their regeneration requires a complex activation process [12,13,14,15]. As a result, the poor stability of Cu-based catalysts is the primary barrier to their industrial application. How to enhance Cu dispersion and anchor the Cu particles over the substrate to prevent high-temperature sintering is a major concern for the construction of effective and long-lifetime RWGS catalysts.
Spinel oxides (AB2O4), in which cations are located at the tetrahedral and octahedral holes in a dense cubic packing of oxygen anions, have always been a research hotspot in the field of catalytic materials, mainly because of their high mechanical resistance, high thermal stability, low temperature sinter ability, low surface acidity, and high ability of cation diffusion. These materials exhibit high performance in various reactions such as water gas shift, CO oxidation, and steam reforming of dimethyl ether, ethanol, and methanol [16]. However, most copper-based spinel oxides (e.g., Cu-Fe, Cu-Mn, Cu-Cr spinel oxides) show a poor copper dispersion on the surface of materials. Therefore, finding an appropriate B-site metal to improve the copper dispersion on the surface of materials is a major concern for the application of copper-based spinel materials in RWGS reactions. Li et al. [17] investigated H2 production from methanol decomposition using Cu-Al spinel catalysts, and the results indicated that CuAl2O4 was a reservoir of Cu, slowly releasing Cu and preventing Cu from quick sintering. Generally, the spinel with a CuAl2O4 composition consists of a divalent copper ion (Cu2+) usually occupying a tetrahedral site and a trivalent aluminum ion (Al3+) normally occupying the octahedral sites of a cubic oxide lattice. It is precisely because of the special structure of the spinel that the Al3+ can effectively prevent the sintering of copper. However, the catalytic behavior of Cu-Al spinel oxides in the RWGS reaction is still unclear.
In addition to the dispersion of copper on the material surface, the catalytic activity of catalysts is also affected by oxygen vacancies [18]. Recently, more and more studies have been conducted on regulating the oxygen vacancies on the catalyst surface to improve catalytic activity. Based on previous literature, many methods are employed to generate oxygen vacancies, such as vacuum calcining, doping, solid solution generation, hydrogen treatment, nitric acid treatment, plasma treatment, and alkaline treatment [19]. Bahmanpour et al. [18], through coprecipitation of copper and aluminum, followed by hydrogen treatment, obtained a Cu-Al spinel, and proved that it has remarkable stability and higher activity in the RWGS reaction. Subsequently, they employed alkaline treatment to create oxygen vacancies in the Co-Al catalyst and tested it in the RWGS reaction. The results indicated that the oxygen vacancies were vital for CO2 adsorption and activation on the spinel surfaces. However, increasing the oxygen vacancies of Cu-Al spinel by alkali treatment toward its reactivity in RWGS has not been investigated.
Herein, in this study, enhanced CuAl2O4 catalytic activity via alkalinization treatment toward high CO2 conversion during RWGS reaction was investigated. The objectives of this study were (1) to investigate the catalytic activity of CuAl2O4 via alkalinization treatment or not in the RWGS reaction, (2) to explore the catalytic mechanism of CuAl2O4 in the RWGS reaction, and (3) to verify that the increase in oxygen vacancies is beneficial to enhance CuAl2O4 catalytic activity in the RWGS reaction.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Catalytic Activity

The catalytic performance in the RWGS reaction of the CuAl2O4 catalysts was evaluated at various temperatures under 60,000 mL/gcat/h. As shown in Figure 1a, the CO2 conversion increased with increasing reaction temperature. The CO2 conversion on the CuAl2O4 catalyst reached 37.72% when the reaction temperature increased from 300 °C to 400 °C. The significant increase in CO2 conversion is predominantly because the CO2 RWGS reaction is a reversible thermodynamic endothermic reaction. According to the thermodynamic equilibrium, increasing the temperature is conducive to the balance movement in the direction of generating CO to improve CO2 conversion. Collision theory states that the amount and movement velocity of activated molecules can increase with increasing reaction temperature. This phenomenon increases the effective collision probability between active molecules and accelerates the reaction to promote CO2 conversion [20]. Therefore, CO2 conversion over the CuAl2O4 catalysts increased with increasing reaction temperature. However, the increase in catalytic performance between 350 °C and 400 °C is higher than that between 300 °C and 350 °C. The reason could be because the surface of the CuAl2O4 catalyst begins to decompose and precipitate highly dispersed CuO. Meanwhile, some of the CuO is reduced to highly dispersed Cu0 by H2. During the reaction, the isolated surface Cu2+ and the highly dispersed Cu0 can serve as active sites, promoting the improvement of catalytic activity [21]. However, the effect of the reduction degree of copper on the catalytic performance is relatively complex. When copper is in the state of CuO, it plays the role of catalyst, and its catalytic effect is mainly based on the intermediate mechanism; when copper is reduced to Cu0, it also plays the role of catalyst, and its catalytic effect is mainly based on the redox mechanism [22,23]. Therefore, its specific effect needs to be further studied.
As shown in Figure 1a, the CuAl2O4 catalyst kept 100% CO selectivity during the reaction temperature range. These results could be attributed to the following reasons: transition metals generally display more d-orbital holes, i.e., unoccupied d orbitals in the d energy band, strong adsorption abilities for reactants, and bond forming abilities, which can promote the absorption and activation of H2 molecules to form active hydrogen species. Consequently, deep hydrogenation of CO2 molecules is promoted to generate CH4, and the generated CO molecules can also facilitate the hydrogenation reaction on the active centers of the corresponding catalyst to form CH4 molecules [24]. However, Cu has no d-orbital holes, that is, the d orbits of Cu are completely occupied, which is not conducive to the adsorption and bonding of H species. By contrast, the O of CO2 has lone pair electrons, which can pair with the d electrons of Cu0 [20]. This characteristic can be beneficial to the adsorption and activation of CO2 molecules. Therefore, the CuAl2O4 catalyst not only had a high CO2 conversion rate but also exhibited 100% CO selectivity. CO2 conversion rates of the CuAl2O4 catalysts were analyzed and compared to some referenced catalysts in Table 1. The results indicated that the CuAl2O4 catalyst had higher conversion rates at relatively lower temperatures. The reason is due to the CuAl2O4 catalyst outperforming the conventional supported copper-based catalyst in copper dispersion, which is particularly conducive to carbon dioxide adsorption and activation.
The stability of the CuAl2O4 catalyst at different temperatures is shown in Figure 1b. It can be noted that no detectable deactivation was observed within 20 h, and the activity of the CuAl2O4 catalyst gradually decreased after 20 h at 400 °C. Therefore, the CuAl2O4 catalysts (reaction for 0, 20, and 40 h) were characterized to analyze the catalytic and inactivation mechanisms, respectively. In comparison, the catalysts were rapidly deactivated within 10 h at 500 and 600 °C. This is due to the low Taman temperature of copper oxide. For example, the Taman temperatures of CuO, Cu2O, and Cu are 526 °C, 481 °C, and 405 °C, respectively. Therefore, the catalyst is susceptible to agglutination and sintering at a high temperature of more than 400 °C, which could lead to the reduction in its redox activity and even affect its catalytic performance.

2.2. Catalyst Characterization

In order to investigate the variations of R0, R20, and R40 catalysts (reaction for 0, 20, and 40 h, respectively), H2-TPR was conducted in the temperature range of the catalytic activity tests. As shown in Figure 2a, two peaks were identified on the catalyst before the reaction. The first peak (180–210 °C) is assigned to the reduction of the bulk CuO crystals, produced during catalyst preparation. This is because the CuAl2O4 spinel is formed under the solid–solid interaction between CuO and Al2O3. The CuAl2O4 would inhibit the diffusion of CuO into the Al2O3 support when enough CuAl2O4 spinel is formed. The second peak (350–400 °C) is assigned to reduction of the CuO obtained from the decomposition of CuAl2O4. Therefore, it can be inferred that the catalyst begins to decompose and precipitate CuO when the reaction temperature reaches 350 °C. However, Agzamova et al. [27] reported that the CuAl2O4 spinel could decompose into CuO and Al2O3 at 800 °C. The different decomposition and reduction temperatures of CuAl2O4 spinel may be due to the presence of hydrogen in this study. In the case of R20 and R40, the reduction peaks appeared at (150–170 °C), (180–210 °C), and (220–240 °C), corresponding to the reduction of highly dispersed CuO, the bulk CuO, and Cu2O [28]. It can also be noted that the second peak of R20 was higher than that of R40, and the third peak of R20 was lower than that of R40, which indicated that the main component of the catalyst changed from CuO to Cu2O with the passage of reaction time.
In order to analyze the changes in non-reducing components in the catalyst with the reaction, XRD characterization was analyzed and the results are shown in Figure 2b. The peaks at 2θ of 31.29°, 36.87°, and 44.98° are attributed to the diffraction of the CuAl2O4 spinel structure (Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction File No. 33-0448). The peaks at 2θ of 35.67° and 38.71° are attributed to the diffraction of CuO. The peaks at 2θ of 29.48° and 36.26° are attributed to the diffraction of Cu2O. This result is similar to H2-TPR, which revealed that the main component of the catalyst before the reaction was CuAl2O4, and then began to decompose into CuO, and CuO content gradually decreased while Cu2O content gradually increased as the reaction progressed. However, in addition to the patterns of the CuO and Cu2O, diffractions of metallic Cu0 appeared at 43.21° and 50.34° in the R20 and R40. This indicates that the CuO produced by CuAl2O4 decomposition was partially reduced to Cu0 by H2.
In order to better understand the valence state change of Cu (Cu0/Cu+/Cu2+) on the surface of the catalyst during the reaction, the surface structure was investigated using XPS (as shown in Figure 3a). Deconvolution of the acquired spectra for the Cu 2p 3/2 and Cu 2p 1/2 regions for all catalysts showed the presence of mainly a Cu2+ peak before reaction (933.7 eV). In the case of R20, the Cu2+ peak in the catalyst spectra dramatically reduced, showing partial conversion of Cu2+ to Cu0 (931.9 eV) and Cu+ (932.8 eV) [29]. The intensity of the Cu0 peak was higher than that of Cu+, which was the opposite in the case of R40. This indicates that the CuO produced by CuAl2O4 decomposition may be reduced to Cu0 by H2 before being converted to Cu2O, and the Cu0 content decreased as the reaction progressed during the deactivation of the catalyst.
Moreover, the structure of catalysts with different reaction times was characterized by using SEM. As shown in Figure 3b, the crystal particles of R0 were smooth, small, and numerous, which resulted in the acceptable catalytic performance of the CuAl2O4 catalyst. The surface of the R20 crystal particles began to precipitate out the fine particles. This is because the catalyst surface gradually decomposed and precipitated highly dispersed CuO under the condition of high temperature reduction reaction, and the CuO would be further reduced. Meanwhile, the size of the crystal particles became larger because the catalyst crystal particles agglomerated at high temperatures. In the case of R40, the precipitated particles on the catalyst surface became larger and the catalyst structure basically sintered. This is the reason why the catalytic performance gradually weakens with the passage of reaction time.

2.3. Alkalinization of the Catalyst

According to the catalytic mechanism of the catalyst, regulating the oxygen vacancy on the surface of the catalyst may improve the catalytic activity of the catalyst.
In order to confirm the effect of oxygen vacancy density on the performance of the CuAl2O4 catalysts in the RWGS reaction, the CuAl2O4 catalyst was treated with NaOH of different concentrations to create oxygen vacancies on the surface of the CuAl2O4 catalyst. After treatment with NaOH solution, N0, N0.25, N0.5, N0.75, and N1 (soaked with 0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 mol/L of NaOH, respectively) was washed thoroughly to avoid the presence of Na on the catalyst surface [30].
To confirm the formation of the oxygen vacancies, the O 1s spectra of the treated catalysts were collected using XPS. Figure 4 shows that the O 1s spectra of all catalysts are deconvoluted into two main peaks. The first peak is assigned to the lattice oxygen (OL) on the surface, while the second peak presents the surface adsorbed oxygen (OA), which can form due to the adsorption of O2 on an oxygen vacancy [18]. By comparing the OA/(OA + OL) ratio, the OA peak clearly increased due to the alkalinization, which confirmed that the alkalinization increased the oxygen vacancies on the catalyst surface. In addition, the OA/(OA + OL) ratio is lower for N1-deactivated (0.12) compared to N1 (0.38). This indicates that the deactivation of catalysts is partly due to the reduction in oxygen vacancies.
Previous studies have shown that oxygen vacancies may affect the Raman mode of crystals. Liu et al. [31] studied the surface oxygen vacancy position in SnO2 nanocrystals by Raman spectroscopy and suggested that the Raman mode does not shift in frequency but increases in intensity as the number of oxygen vacancies increases. Therefore, Raman spectra were also collected to study the oxygen vacancies’ effect on the surface structure of all catalysts, and the results are shown in Figure 5a.
All catalysts show a Raman peak at 295.3 cm−1, which is attributed to Cu-O of CuAl2O4 [32]. The peak shifted by comparing the Raman spectra of N1 and N1-deactivated. This is because most of the CuO in the catalyst was converted to Cu2O after deactivation. It can also be noted that both N0.5 and N1 catalysts showed obvious Raman peaks at 619.8 cm−1 and 780.3 cm−1, the intensity of which clearly increased due to the alkalinization. These peaks were not observed in the case of N1-deactivated. Combined with the O 1s spectra of XPS, these two peaks were attributed to the lattice vibration caused by oxygen vacancies. It proved that the alkalinization increased the oxygen vacancies of the catalyst.
To demonstrate the effect of oxygen vacancy on catalytic activity, all catalysts were subsequently tested at the same conditions for the RWGS reaction. As shown in Figure 5b, the catalytic activity of catalysts clearly increased due to the alkalinization. When the concentration reached 0.5 mol/L, the increasing trend gradually flattened out, indicating that the limiting factor at this time is no longer the number of oxygen vacancies, but may be the dissociation rate of carbon dioxide. Meanwhile, the increase trend of catalytic activity decreased significantly with the catalytic reaction temperature exceeding 350 °C. Combined with the catalytic mechanism, it can be concluded that CuAl2O4 was gradually decomposed into CuO when the reaction temperature exceeded the decomposition temperature of the catalyst, and the oxygen vacancy structure was destroyed so that the catalytic activity of the catalysts with different concentrations of alkalinization had no significant difference. Therefore, the regulation of oxygen vacancies is more suitable for RWGS catalytic reactions at relatively low temperatures.

2.4. Possible Catalytic Mechanism

Recently, researchers have employed in situ infrared, isotope tracer experiments, and DFT theoretical calculations to investigate the adsorption species on the catalyst surface in the RWGS reaction and inferred that the catalytic mechanism is mainly divided into surface redox mechanism and intermediate mechanism [33,34,35,36]. The main difference between these is whether the active H species is involved in the generation of carbon-containing intermediates (formate, carboxylate, etc.).
For the redox mechanism, the concept of the oxidation and reduction cycle was suggested. CO2 oxidized Cu0 and generated CO. H2 reduced Cu+ to Cu0 and formed H2O. CO can be produced from CO2 alone over the Cu catalyst. The reactant, H2, plays the role of activating the catalyst for the reduction of Cu2+  metallic Cu0 and regenerating the catalyst for the reduction of Cu2O [37]. Zhang et al. [29] studied the RWGS reaction on Cu/β-Mo2C and suggested that the redox process dominated the reaction mechanism. The proposed reactions occurring in this study are shown below:
CO2 + 2 Cu0 ↔ Cu2O + CO
H2 + Cu2O ↔ 2 Cu0 + H2O
In addition to variable-valence metal sites, oxygen vacancies can also act as active sites for the redox mechanism. CO2 adsorbs on the oxygen vacancies on the oxide surface and dissociates to produce CO. The activated dissociated H species reduce the oxygen species filled on the oxygen vacancies, realizing the regeneration of oxygen vacancies and the production of H2O, and finally completing the whole redox process [38]. This explains why the catalyst had some catalytic activity before the reaction temperature reached the temperature at which the catalyst decomposes. The proposed reactions occurring in this study are shown below:
CO2 + Ov ↔ CO + O*
H2 ↔ 2 H*
2 H* + O* ↔ H2O + Ov
The other model, the intermediate mechanism, suggested that CO could be formed from the decomposition of the formate intermediate (HCOO∗) derived from the association of hydrogen with CO2. The HCOO∗ species could be decomposed into CO and OH∗, and these OH∗ species could lead to the production of H2O. Bahmanpour et al. [39] studied the RWGS reaction on Cu/Al2O3 and observed formate on the catalyst surface during the reaction by in situ DRIFTS. The proposed reactions occurring are shown below:
CO2 + Ov ↔ CO2*
H2 ↔ 2 H*
CO2* + H* ↔ HCOO*
HCOO* ↔ CO* + OH*
CO* ↔ CO + Ov
OH* + H* ↔ H2O
Therefore, based on the above analysis, the possible catalytic mechanism of the CuAl2O4 catalyst was mainly divided into two stages (as shown in Figure 6). In the first stage, when the reaction temperature was lower than the decomposition temperature of the catalyst, the catalytic activity of the CuAl2O4 catalyst was mainly based on the intermediate mechanism of oxygen vacancies as the active site. According to the H2-TPR profile of R0, the Cu2+ on the catalyst surface has not been converted to Cu0 at this time. The catalytic activity is mainly limited by the number of oxygen vacancies and dissociation rate of CO2. In the second stage, when the reaction temperature reached the decomposition temperature, the CuAl2O4 began to decompose and precipitate highly dispersed CuO, which was gradually reduced to Cu0 by H2. This is a disadvantage of common metal oxide catalysts—the metal oxide in the catalyst is easily reduced to a metallic state during the reaction process, resulting in catalyst deactivation. However, the CuAl2O4 catalyst turned this disadvantage into an advantage, in which CuO was reduced to Cu0 and used as a supported metal catalyst to further catalyze the RWGS reaction through the redox mechanism, thus continuing and improving its catalytic performance. As the active site of redox mechanism, the increase in Cu0 leads to the further improvement of the catalytic activity of the catalyst. However, the surface structure of the catalyst gradually changes with the passage of reaction time. The catalyst crystal particles begin to agglomerate and sinter, leading to the reduction in oxygen vacancies in the catalyst. At this time, there is relatively more highly dispersed Cu0 on the surface of the catalyst, which leads to the main active site of the catalytic reaction being transferred from the oxygen vacancy to the variable metal Cu0, so that the catalytic activity can still be maintained at a high level. Therefore, the catalyst still has a high CO2 conversion rate after 20 h of reaction at 400 °C. However, with the passage of reaction time, the catalytic activity of the catalyst decreased gradually. There are two main reasons for catalyst deactivation. The first is that the agglomeration and sintering of the catalyst crystal particles on the surface became more and more serious, which can be seen in Figure 3b, leading to a decrease in the number of active sites of the catalyst. Secondly, with the sintering of catalyst, it is difficult for Cu0 to be regenerated by H2 after being oxidized to Cu2O, which can be seen in Figure 3a.

3. Experimental Method

3.1. Catalyst Synthesis

We employed the coprecipitation method followed by calcination for CuAl2O4 catalyst synthesis. As the copper and aluminum precursors, Cu(NO3)2∙3H2O and Al(NO3)3∙9H2O with a 2:1 M ratio of Al:Cu were dissolved in deionized water and mixed. A 1 M aqueous solution of Na2CO3 as a precipitant was added dropwise to the salt mixture at room temperature. The resulting suspension was stirred at 75 °C for 6 h, filtered, and washed thoroughly, after which the formed sample was dried overnight at 120 °C. Subsequently, the dried powder was calcined at 900 °C for 5 h, which is the lowest temperature for stable spinel formation. Alkalinization was employed to create further oxygen vacancies in the CuAl2O4 catalyst. The alkaline-treated CuAl2O4 catalyst was prepared by treating 0.2 g of CuAl2O4 with 30 mL of various concentrations NaOH aqueous solution (0, 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1 mol/L) at room temperature for 30 min. The resulting suspension was centrifuged and washed thoroughly and then dried at 120 °C for 4 h.

3.2. Characterizations

3.2.1. X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

XRD patterns were collected on a powder diffractometer (Empyrean, PANalytical, Almelo, Netherlands) using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.1541 nm). Samples were tested on 2θ = 10–90° at a scan rate of 10° min−1.

3.2.2. H2-Temperature-Programmed Reduction (H2-TPR)

Temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) experiments were performed in a packed bed flow microreactor (AutoChem II 2920, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). Samples of 50 mg mixed with 200 mg of SiO2 were first pretreated under He at 300 °C for 1 h. The samples were then cooled to 50 °C and heated from 50 °C to 800 °C at 10 °C/min under 10% H2/Ar.

3.2.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Samples were characterized by Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscopy (HITACHI-S-4700, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Samples were observed at 10,000 and 50,000 × magnification.

3.2.4. X-ray Photoelectron Spectra (XPS)

X-ray photoelectron spectra were acquired using a scanning XPS microprobe (K-Alpha, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). When the sample chamber pressure was less than 2.0 × 10−7 mbar, the sample was sent to the analysis room with the spot size of 400 μm, the working voltage of 12 kV, and the filament current of 6 mA. OriginPro 2022b (64-bit 9.9.5.167) was applied for peak deconvolution.

3.2.5. Raman Spectra

Samples were characterized by a confocal Raman electron microscope (Lab RAM HR800, Horiba, Kyoto, French). Raman spectra of samples were recorded in the range of 50–3400 cm−1 with a 2 cm−1 spectral resolution.

3.3. Activity Tests

The catalytic performance evaluation was performed in a continuous flow fixed-bed quartz reactor at atmospheric pressure. The reactor was a quartz tube with an inner diameter (ID) of 35 mm, in which 50 mg of catalyst (40−60 mesh) diluted with inert SiO2 (200 mg) was sandwiched between quartz wool layers. At the start of each test, the as-prepared catalysts were treated with 20 mL/min H2 flow at 300 °C for 1 h. The main purpose of hydrogen pretreatment is threefold; the first is to dry the water vapor adsorbed on the surface of the catalyst, the second is to exhaust all the air in the gas chamber, and the third is to reduce the CuO impurities produced in the preparation process to avoid the interference of CuO impurities with the catalytic performance of CuAl2O4 in the first stage. After that, the catalysts were exposed to the feed gas (a stream of H2/CO2 at 50 mL/min with a 2:1 ratio). Stephen Dzuryk and Ebrahim Rezaei [40] studied the influence of gas ratio on the catalytic performance of CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 catalyst in the RWGS reaction system. This research selected a gas ratio with relatively strong catalytic performance and relatively low hydrogen concentration, which is more in line with the economic benefits of industrial production. Meanwhile, the further use of gas products (such as Fischer–Tropsch synthesis, etc.) is also considered. At each temperature, the products were analyzed after 60 min of steady-state reaction. The product was analyzed by using a gas chromatograph (GC-2014, SHIMADZU) with a TCD detector. The intake gas was first switched from the feed gas to argon after the reaction. After the temperature dropped to normal temperature, the catalyst was taken out and collected, and weighed after vacuum drying. After weighing, the catalyst was put into the sample bag with desiccant.
Performances of the catalysts were characterized in terms of CO2 conversion. The CO2 conversion was defined as the molar ratio of CO2 removed in the reaction to the feed CO2. CO2 conversion, CO selectivity, and CO2 conversion rate were defined as follows:
X CO 2 % = n CO 2 i n n CO 2 o u t n CO 2 i n × 100
S CO % = n CO o u t n CO o u t + n CH 4 o u t × 100
r = F × X CO 2 W
where n CO o u t , n CO 2 o u t , and n CH 4 o u t are the flow rates of CO, CO2, and CH4 in the outlet, and n CO 2 i n is the flow rate of CO2 in the feed. F is the CO2 flow rate (mol/s) and W is the catalyst weight (g).

4. Conclusions

In the present work, the CuAl2O4 catalyst of spinel structure was prepared. The catalyst showed exceptional activity at temperatures higher than 300 °C, reaching a conversion rate of 9.36 × 10−5 mol CO2/gcat/s and 100% of CO selectivity at 400 °C in the RWGS reaction. A complete change path of the CuAl2O4 catalyst composition and structure in the reaction system was learned through the characterization of the catalyst. The influence of regulating oxygen vacancies on the catalytic activity by alkalinization was studied using XPS and Raman spectroscopy. In addition, the relationship between the Raman mode and the oxygen vacancy structure on the CuAl2O4 surface was also proved. The possible catalytic mechanism of the RWGS reaction was analyzed. The results revealed that in the first stage of reaction, the intermediate mechanism was predominant, and in the second stage, the redox mechanism was predominant. In both stages, oxygen vacancies and active metals act as active sites. Therefore, the CuAl2O4 catalyst has better catalytic activity because of the high dispersion of copper on its surface, and alkalinization can regulate the oxygen vacancy structure on the catalyst surface to enhance catalytic performance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.H. and H.H.; methodology, H.H.; software, S.T.; validation, M.H., H.H. and S.T.; formal analysis, H.H.; investigation, H.H.; resources, M.H.; data curation, S.T.; writing—original draft preparation, H.H.; writing—review and editing, M.H.; visualization, H.H.; supervision, M.H.; project administration, Z.P.; funding acquisition, Z.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (21706087).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zachos, J.C.; Dickens, G.R.; Zeebe, R.E. An Early Cenozoic Perspective on Greenhouse Warming and Carbon-Cycle Dynamics. Nature 2008, 451, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Atsbha, T.A.; Yoon, T.; Seongho, P.; Lee, C.-J. A Review on the Catalytic Conversion of CO2 Using H2 for Synthesis of CO, Methanol, and Hydrocarbons. J. CO2 Util. 2021, 44, 101413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Arena, F.; Barbera, K.; Italiano, G.; Bonura, G.; Spadaro, L.; Frusteri, F. Synthesis, Characterization and Activity Pattern of Cu–ZnO/ZrO2 Catalysts in the Hydrogenation of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol. J. Catal. 2007, 249, 185–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, H.-X.; Li, S.-Q.; Wang, W.-W.; Yu, W.-Z.; Zhang, W.-J.; Ma, C.; Jia, C.-J. Partially Sintered Copper–Ceria as Excellent Catalyst for the High-Temperature Reverse Water Gas Shift Reaction. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zakharova, A.; Iqbal, M.W.; Madadian, E.; Simakov, D.S.A. Reverse Microemulsion-Synthesized High-Surface-Area Cu/γ-Al2O3 Catalyst for CO2 Conversion via Reverse Water Gas Shift. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 22082–22094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Porosoff, M.D.; Yan, B.; Chen, J.G. Catalytic Reduction of CO2 by H2 for Synthesis of CO, Methanol and Hydrocarbons: Challenges and Opportunities. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Álvarez Galván, C.; Schumann, J.; Behrens, M.; Fierro, J.L.G.; Schlögl, R.; Frei, E. Reverse Water-Gas Shift Reaction at the Cu/ZnO Interface: Influence of the Cu/Zn Ratio on Structure-Activity Correlations. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 195, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Arena, F.; Mezzatesta, G.; Zafarana, G.; Trunfio, G.; Frusteri, F.; Spadaro, L. Effects of Oxide Carriers on Surface Functionality and Process Performance of the Cu–ZnO System in the Synthesis of Methanol via CO2 Hydrogenation. J. Catal. 2013, 300, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gao, P.; Li, F.; Zhan, H.; Zhao, N.; Xiao, F.; Wei, W.; Zhong, L.; Wang, H.; Sun, Y. Influence of Zr on the Performance of Cu/Zn/Al/Zr Catalysts via Hydrotalcite-like Precursors for CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol. J. Catal. 2013, 298, 51–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Graciani, J.; Mudiyanselage, K.; Xu, F.; Baber, A.E.; Evans, J.; Senanayake, S.D.; Stacchiola, D.J.; Liu, P.; Hrbek, J.; Sanz, J.F.; et al. Highly Active Copper-Ceria and Copper-Ceria-Titania Catalysts for Methanol Synthesis from CO2. Science 2014, 345, 546–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Reske, R.; Mistry, H.; Behafarid, F.; Roldan Cuenya, B.; Strasser, P. Particle Size Effects in the Catalytic Electroreduction of CO2 on Cu Nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 6978–6986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yue, H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhao, S.; Wang, B.; Ma, X.; Gong, J. A Copper-Phyllosilicate Core-Sheath Nanoreactor for Carbon–Oxygen Hydrogenolysis Reactions. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Chen, C. Study of Iron-Promoted Cu/SiO2 Catalyst on High Temperature Reverse Water Gas Shift Reaction. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2004, 257, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, W.; Wang, S.; Ma, X.; Gong, J. Recent Advances in Catalytic Hydrogenation of Carbon Dioxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3703–3727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chen, C.S.; Lin, J.H.; You, J.H.; Chen, C.R. Properties of Cu(Thd)2 as a Precursor to Prepare Cu/SiO2 Catalyst Using the Atomic Layer Epitaxy Technique. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 15950–15951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Maiti, S.; Llorca, J.; Dominguez, M.; Colussi, S.; Trovarelli, A.; Priolkar, K.R.; Aquilanti, G.; Gayen, A. Combustion Synthesized Copper-Ion Substituted FeAl2O4 (Cu0.1Fe0.9Al2O4): A Superior Catalyst for Methanol Steam Reforming Compared to Its Impregnated Analogue. J. Power Sources 2016, 304, 319–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Li, G.; Gu, C.; Zhu, W.; Wang, X.; Yuan, X.; Cui, Z.; Wang, H.; Gao, Z. Hydrogen Production from Methanol Decomposition Using Cu-Al Spinel Catalysts. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 183, 415–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bahmanpour, A.M.; Héroguel, F.; Kılıç, M.; Baranowski, C.J.; Schouwink, P.; Röthlisberger, U.; Luterbacher, J.S.; Kröcher, O. Essential Role of Oxygen Vacancies of Cu-Al and Co-Al Spinel Oxides in Their Catalytic Activity for the Reverse Water Gas Shift Reaction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2020, 266, 118669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xu, Y.; Qu, Z.; Ren, Y.; Dong, C. Enhancement of Toluene Oxidation Performance over Cu–Mn Composite Oxides by Regulating Oxygen Vacancy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2021, 560, 149983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dai, B.; Zhou, G.; Ge, S.; Xie, H.; Jiao, Z.; Zhang, G.; Xiong, K. CO2 Reverse Water-Gas Shift Reaction on Mesoporous M-CeO2 Catalysts: CO2 Reverse Water-Gas Shift Reaction on Mesoporous. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 95, 634–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bahmanpour, A.M.; Le Monnier, B.P.; Du, Y.-P.; Héroguel, F.; Luterbacher, J.S.; Kröcher, O. Increasing the Activity of the Cu/CuAl2O4/Al2O3 Catalyst for the RWGS through Preserving the Cu2+ Ions. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 1153–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Shi, H.; Cheng, X.; Peng, J.; Feng, H.; Yang, X.; Quan, L.; Jiang, L.; Tontiwachwuthikul, P. Structure–Activity Correlation Analyses of MEA + 3A1P/MAE Isomers with a Coordinative Effect Study. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2022, 61, 3091–3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Shi, H.; Peng, J.; Cheng, X.; Yang, X.; Jin, J.; Hu, J. The CO2 Desorption Analysis of Tri-Solvent MEA+BEA+DEEA with Several Commercial Solid Acid Catalysts. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2022, 116, 103647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, Y.; Gao, J.; Liu, Q.; Gu, F.; Lu, X.; Jia, L.; Xu, G.; Zhong, Z.; Su, F. Preparation of High-Surface-Area Ni/α-Al2O3 Catalysts for Improved CO Methanation. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 7539–7546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, C.-S.; Cheng, W.-H.; Lin, S.-S. Mechanism of CO Formation in Reverse Water–Gas Shift Reaction over Cu/Al2O3 Catalyst. Catal. Lett. 2000, 68, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, C.-S.; Cheng, W.-H.; Lin, S.-S. Study of Reverse Water Gas Shift Reaction by TPD, TPR and CO2 Hydrogenation over Potassium-Promoted Cu/SiO2 Catalyst. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2003, 238, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Agzamova, P.A.; Belik, A.A.; Streltsov, S.V. Structural Stability of CuAl2O4 under Pressure. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2021, 33, 035403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Bridier, B.; López, N.; Pérez-Ramírez, J. Partial Hydrogenation of Propyne over Copper-Based Catalysts and Comparison with Nickel-Based Analogues. J. Catal. 2010, 269, 80–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, X.; Zhu, X.; Lin, L.; Yao, S.; Zhang, M.; Liu, X.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.-W.; Shi, C.; Ma, D. Highly Dispersed Copper over β-Mo2C as an Efficient and Stable Catalyst for the Reverse Water Gas Shift (RWGS) Reaction. ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 912–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, Y.; Wei, B.; Xu, L.; Gao, H.; Zhang, M. Generation of Oxygen Vacancy and OH Radicals: A Comparative Study of Bi2WO6 and Bi2WO6−x Nanoplates. Chem. Cat. Chem 2015, 7, 4076–4084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, L.Z.; Wu, X.L.; Gao, F.; Shen, J.C.; Li, T.H.; Chu, P.K. Determination of Surface Oxygen Vacancy Position in SnO2 Nanocrystals by Raman Spectroscopy. Solid State Commun. 2011, 151, 811–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, W.; Tu, Y.; Wang, L.; Liang, Y.; Shi, H. Transmission Electron Microscopy and Raman Characterization of Copper (I) Oxide Microspheres Composed of Nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 264, 399–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kim, S.S.; Lee, H.H.; Hong, S.C. A Study on the Effect of Support’s Reducibility on the Reverse Water-Gas Shift Reaction over Pt Catalysts. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2012, 423–424, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kalamaras, C.M.; Panagiotopoulou, P.; Kondarides, D.I.; Efstathiou, A.M. Kinetic and Mechanistic Studies of the Water–Gas Shift Reaction on Pt/TiO2 Catalyst. J. Catal. 2009, 264, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, L.C.; Tahvildar Khazaneh, M.; Widmann, D.; Behm, R.J. TAP Reactor Studies of the Oxidizing Capability of CO2 on an Au/CeO2 Catalyst—A First Step toward Identifying a Redox Mechanism in the Reverse Water–Gas Shift Reaction. J. Catal. 2013, 302, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kattel, S.; Yan, B.; Chen, J.G.; Liu, P. CO2 Hydrogenation on Pt, Pt/SiO2 and Pt/TiO2: Importance of Synergy between Pt and Oxide Support. J. Catal. 2016, 343, 115–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Zhu, M.; Tian, P.; Ford, M.E.; Chen, J.; Xu, J.; Han, Y.-F.; Wachs, I.E. Nature of Reactive Oxygen Intermediates on Copper-Promoted Iron–Chromium Oxide Catalysts during CO2 Activation. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 7857–7863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bobadilla, L.F.; Santos, J.L.; Ivanova, S.; Odriozola, J.A.; Urakawa, A. Unravelling the Role of Oxygen Vacancies in the Mechanism of the Reverse Water–Gas Shift Reaction by Operando DRIFTS and Ultraviolet–Visible Spectroscopy. ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 7455–7467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bahmanpour, A.M.; Héroguel, F.; Kılıç, M.; Baranowski, C.J.; Artiglia, L.; Röthlisberger, U.; Luterbacher, J.S.; Kröcher, O. Cu–Al Spinel as a Highly Active and Stable Catalyst for the Reverse Water Gas Shift Reaction. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 6243–6251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dzuryk, S.; Rezaei, E. Intensification of the Reverse Water Gas Shift Reaction by Water-Permeable Packed-Bed Membrane Reactors. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 18907–18920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) CO2 conversion rate and CO selectivity of the CuAl2O4 catalyst at various temperatures. (b) The stability of the CuAl2O4 catalysts at various temperatures.
Figure 1. (a) CO2 conversion rate and CO selectivity of the CuAl2O4 catalyst at various temperatures. (b) The stability of the CuAl2O4 catalysts at various temperatures.
Catalysts 12 01511 g001
Figure 2. (a) H2-TPR profile of the CuAl2O4 catalysts of various reaction times. (b) XRD patterns of the CuAl2O4 catalysts of various reaction times.
Figure 2. (a) H2-TPR profile of the CuAl2O4 catalysts of various reaction times. (b) XRD patterns of the CuAl2O4 catalysts of various reaction times.
Catalysts 12 01511 g002
Figure 3. (a) Cu 2p XPS spectra of the CuAl2O4 catalyst after various reaction times. (b) SEM images of the CuAl2O4 catalyst after various reaction times.
Figure 3. (a) Cu 2p XPS spectra of the CuAl2O4 catalyst after various reaction times. (b) SEM images of the CuAl2O4 catalyst after various reaction times.
Catalysts 12 01511 g003
Figure 4. O 1s spectra of the CuAl2O4 catalyst after alkalinization.
Figure 4. O 1s spectra of the CuAl2O4 catalyst after alkalinization.
Catalysts 12 01511 g004
Figure 5. (a) Raman spectra of the CuAl2O4 catalyst after alkalization. (b) Catalytic activity of the CuAl2O4 catalyst after alkalization.
Figure 5. (a) Raman spectra of the CuAl2O4 catalyst after alkalization. (b) Catalytic activity of the CuAl2O4 catalyst after alkalization.
Catalysts 12 01511 g005
Figure 6. The catalytic mechanism of the CuAl2O4 catalyst.
Figure 6. The catalytic mechanism of the CuAl2O4 catalyst.
Catalysts 12 01511 g006
Table 1. Comparison of CO2 conversion rate and CO selectivity for the as-prepared and referenced catalysts.
Table 1. Comparison of CO2 conversion rate and CO selectivity for the as-prepared and referenced catalysts.
CatalystTemperature (°C)Pressure
(MPa)
Rate
(×10−5 molCO2/gcat/s)
CO Selectivity
(%)
Ref.
CuAl2O44000.19.36100This work
Cu/Al2O36000.14.9100[25]
Cu/SiO25000.13.34100[13]
Cu−Fe/SiO25000.16.7100[13]
Cu−K/SiO26000.17.3100[26]
Cu/CeO24000.12.38100[20]
Ni/CeO24000.15.3731.7[20]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, M.; Hu, H.; Tang, S.; Pan, Z. Enhanced CuAl2O4 Catalytic Activity via Alkalinization Treatment toward High CO2 Conversion during Reverse Water Gas Shift Reaction. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1511. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12121511

AMA Style

Hu M, Hu H, Tang S, Pan Z. Enhanced CuAl2O4 Catalytic Activity via Alkalinization Treatment toward High CO2 Conversion during Reverse Water Gas Shift Reaction. Catalysts. 2022; 12(12):1511. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12121511

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hu, Mian, Hongyu Hu, Suqin Tang, and Zhiyan Pan. 2022. "Enhanced CuAl2O4 Catalytic Activity via Alkalinization Treatment toward High CO2 Conversion during Reverse Water Gas Shift Reaction" Catalysts 12, no. 12: 1511. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12121511

APA Style

Hu, M., Hu, H., Tang, S., & Pan, Z. (2022). Enhanced CuAl2O4 Catalytic Activity via Alkalinization Treatment toward High CO2 Conversion during Reverse Water Gas Shift Reaction. Catalysts, 12(12), 1511. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal12121511

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop