When Two Become One: How Group Mergers Affect Solidarity
AbstractSolidarity in teamwork situations is important for the success and longevity of teams. This paper studies how helping group members is affected when groups are randomly merged and increase in size. Group mergers put social norms that are prevailing in previously small groups to the test as new team members may not share the same norms and values. I present results from an experiment in which subjects interact in groups and face the decision to help a group member who is in need of help due to an exogenous shock. Subjects interact in small groups in the first part of the experiment and groups are randomly merged to form big groups in the second part of the experiment. Helping rates are higher in merged groups compared with big groups that stay in the same constellation throughout the experiment. Moreover, in merged groups, high helping norms are more influential compared with low helping norms. View Full-Text
- Supplementary File 1:
ZIP-Document (ZIP, 103 KB)
Share & Cite This Article
Schmitz, J. When Two Become One: How Group Mergers Affect Solidarity. Games 2019, 10, 30.
Schmitz J. When Two Become One: How Group Mergers Affect Solidarity. Games. 2019; 10(3):30.Chicago/Turabian Style
Schmitz, Jan. 2019. "When Two Become One: How Group Mergers Affect Solidarity." Games 10, no. 3: 30.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.