Next Article in Journal
Behaviour Change for Physical Activity Is Feasible and Effective in Women Living with Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Pilot Two-Arm Randomised Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Necessary, Legendary and Detrimental Components of Human Colorectal Organoid Culture Medium: Raising Awareness to Reduce Experimental Bugs
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rewiring Dendritic Cell Immunity: The β-Catenin–TIM-3 Axis as a Target to Improve DC Cancer Vaccines
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Commentary

QSOX1: A Mysterious Golgi-Localized Disulfide Bond Catalyst and an Emerging Cancer Regulator

1
Department of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA
2
Department of Toxicology and Cancer Biology, The University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2026, 18(2), 339; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020339
Submission received: 24 December 2025 / Revised: 16 January 2026 / Accepted: 19 January 2026 / Published: 21 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Cellular Ecosystem of Cancer: New Insights into Cell Biology)

Simple Summary

In this Commentary, we summarize recent advances in understanding the role of the Golgi-localized disulfide bond catalyst QSOX1 in human cancers. Disulfide bond formation is critical for proper protein folding and stability, and its dysregulation contributes to cancer progression by modulating extracellular matrix (ECM) organization and cell signaling. QSOX1 is a unique oxidoreductase that catalyzes de novo disulfide bond formation primarily in the Golgi apparatus and extracellular space, distinguishing it from classical ER-resident enzymes. QSOX1 is upregulated in many cancers through a combination of genetic, transcriptional, microenvironmental, and post-transcriptional mechanisms. Functionally, QSOX1 can promote tumor progression by enhancing matrix metalloproteinase activity, supporting cancer cell survival under oxidative stress, regulating ECM assembly, and fostering immune-suppressive tumor microenvironments. However, QSOX1 also exhibits tumor-suppressive functions in certain cancer contexts, underscoring its context-dependent roles. Although QSOX1 is emerging as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target, further studies are needed to define its regulatory mechanisms, substrates, and isoform-specific functions to enable effective clinical translation.

Abstract

Quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 1 (QSOX1) is a disulfide bond-forming enzyme with both disulfide isomerase and oxidoreductase activities. It plays an important role in protein folding, stability, and secretion. Growing evidence demonstrates that QSOX1 is upregulated in multiple cancer types and influences key behaviors of cancer cells, including proliferation, migration, invasion, and metastasis. Elevated QSOX1 expression is also associated with tumor malignancy and disease relapse. However, the molecular mechanisms by which QSOX1 drives cancer progression remain incompletely understood. In this review, we summarize current knowledge of QSOX1 expression and regulation in cancer, discuss its functional roles, and highlight key unanswered questions to warrant further investigation.

1. Introduction

Disulfide bond formation is one of the most common post-translational modifications in proteins and plays a critical role in ensuring proper protein folding, stability, and function in both intracellular and secreted proteins [1]. In recent years, growing evidence in cancer models has highlighted that dysregulated disulfide bond formation not only alters the stability and secretion of pro-tumorigenic proteins but also shapes the mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM), modulates receptor signaling, and supports metastatic competence [2,3,4,5].
Disulfide bond formation occurs primarily in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) during oxidative protein folding and is mediated by protein disulfide isomerases (PDIs) [6]. Disulfide bonds in the ER are introduced co- and post-translationally by protein PDIs through a redox reaction in which the disulfide bond within PDI’s CXXC active site is reduced as it oxidizes substrate proteins. To sustain this catalytic cycle, ER Oxidoreductin-1α/β (ERO1α/β) re-oxidizes reduced PDI by accepting electrons and transferring them to molecular oxygen, producing H2O2 as a by-product. This replenishes oxidized PDI, enabling continuous rounds of disulfide bond formation [7].
Quiescin Sulfhydryl Oxidases (QSOXs) are a small family of flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD)-dependent oxidoreductases. They are conserved across metazoans and share a characteristic domain organization, including an N-terminal thioredoxin-like domain and a C-terminal FAD-dependent oxidase domain [8] (Figure 1), which together enable efficient electron transfer for oxidative protein folding. To date, QSOX1 is the only confirmed Golgi-resident enzyme that can directly catalyze de novo disulfide bond formation [9], while its homology QSOX2 is much less studied. Unlike PDIs that rely on ERO1 for reoxidation in the ER, QSOX1 integrates both substrate oxidation and electron transfer within a single enzyme [10]. Furthermore, unlike other ER-resident oxidoreductases, QSOX1 is predominantly active outside the ER, carrying out most of its catalytic function in the Golgi apparatus and the extracellular space, allowing it to catalyze de novo disulfide bond formation after proteins leave the ER [9,11,12]. This distinctive functionality positions QSOX1 as a key regulator of extracellular matrix assembly, protein stability, and tumor-stromal interactions in cancer.
Emerging evidence indicates that QSOX1 exhibits context-dependent expression and function across different cancer types [14,15,16,17,18,19]. This review aims to provide an overview of current mechanistic insights into QSOX1 and highlight its significance as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in cancer.

2. Mechanisms Regulating Aberrant QSOX1 Expression in Cancer

Transcriptomic and proteomic analyses have consistently shown that QSOX1 is upregulated at both the mRNA and protein levels in multiple cancers, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [20], breast carcinoma [21], prostate cancer [22], lung cancer [23], and glioblastoma [24]. QSOX1 is located on chromosome 1q25.2, a region that is frequently amplified in several cancer types [25,26]. Genomic analyses reveal that copy-number alterations and focal amplifications of the QSOX1 locus vary widely across cancer types-from rare amplification in renal cell carcinoma (~1.1%) to frequent amplification in breast cancer (~37.4%) [27]. This variability suggests that locus amplification alone cannot fully account for the elevated QSOX1 expression observed in many tumors, underscoring the importance of non-genetic regulatory mechanisms.
Consistent with a role for non-genetic regulation, multiple signaling pathways implicated in tumor progression have been shown to transcriptionally regulate QSOX1 expression. Previous studies have shown that QSOX1 transcription is activated in cancers. NK3 Homeobox 1 (NKX3.1) functions primarily as a tumor suppressor, particularly in prostate cancer, where its loss or reduced expression disrupts epithelial differentiation, increases genomic instability, and drives proliferation and tumor progression [28]. Two studies from the Abdulkadir group further demonstrated that QSOX1 is a direct transcriptional target of NKX3.1 in prostate cancer, and that loss of NKX3.1 leads to elevated QSOX1 expression [29,30]. In addition, oncogenic signaling pathways also regulate QSOX1 transcription. Identification of a Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (STAT)-binding site within the QSOX1 locus suggests that QSOX1 may be under direct transcriptional control of the STAT signaling pathway [31]. Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-β), a master regulator of ECM remodeling and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), also upregulates QSOX1, particularly in fibroblasts and mesenchymal-like cancer cells, thereby reinforcing tumor-stroma interactions [32,33]. Two hypoxia-response elements (HREs) have been identified in the QSOX1 promoter, and transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) can directly bind these sites [34]. Experimental evidence in pancreatic cancer cells shows that QSOX1 expression depends on HIF-1 under hypoxic conditions [34]. However, a preprint study by the Gleghorn group did not reproduce this hypoxia-dependent induction of QSOX1, despite successfully inducing HIF-1 in the same cell line. Instead, they found that QSOX1 expression was strongly upregulated by culture on stiff surfaces such as plastic or glass, but not on soft polyacrylamide gels [35]. In addition, increased QSOX1 expression has been observed in response to oxidative stress induced by pericellular hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) or iron in both PC12 and MCF-7 cells [36]. These observations indicate that QSOX1 expression is responsive not only to intrinsic oncogenic signaling but also to extracellular and mechanical stimuli.
Post-transcriptional mechanisms also contribute to the regulation of QSOX1. RNA 5-methylcytosine (m5C) modification plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of many tumor types [37]. RNA-seq and m5C-BisSeq analyses conducted by the Tian lab identified QSOX1 as a downstream target of aberrant m5C modification. Specifically, the m5C writer NOP2/Sun RNA methyltransferase family member 2 (NSUN2) deposits m5C within the QSOX1 coding sequence, which in turn enhances QSOX1 translation through recognition by the m5C reader Y-box binding protein 1 (YBX1) in gefitinib-resistant EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer cells [38].
Collectively, these findings suggest that QSOX1 expression is regulated through a complex network that extends beyond genetic alterations to encompass transcriptional, microenvironmental, and post-transcriptional mechanisms (Figure 2). This coordinated regulation suggests that QSOX1 expression is dynamically adapted to the evolving demands of the tumor microenvironment. Importantly, such regulatory plasticity positions QSOX1 not merely as a passive marker of malignancy, but as an actively controlled effector whose expression is tightly coupled to the function of cancer cells.

3. The Biological Function of QSOX1 in the Context of Cancer

QSOX1’s impact on cancer biology is highly context-specific, with evidence supporting both pro-tumorigenic and tumor-suppressive functions, depending on the cancer type and potent subsequent signaling pathways (Table 1). Because QSOX1 localizes to both the Golgi apparatus and the extracellular space, its complex function arises from a combination of intracellular functions and extracellular activities. The mechanisms through which QSOX1 mediates cancer progression can be broadly grouped into several major functional categories.

3.1. QSOX1 Mediates Activation of Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs)

QSOX1 is highly expressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [20] (PDAC) and luminal-like breast cancer cell lines [15], particularly elevated levels of the short isoform. In both cancer types, QSOX1 promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. A key conserved finding across studies is that QSOX1 enhances the enzymatic activity of MMP2 and MMP9 without altering their transcription, indicating a post-transcriptional or post-secretory mode of regulation. However, a major unresolved question is how QSOX1 modulates MMP activity at the molecular level. It remains unclear whether MMPs are direct substrates of QSOX1-mediated disulfide bond formation or whether QSOX1 influences MMP function indirectly through other modulators of MMPs. In addition, the specific compartment in which QSOX1 influences MMP activity (e.g., the Golgi lumen, extracellular space, or pericellular space) also remains to be determined.

3.2. QSOX1 Enhances Tumor Cell Survival Under Oxidative Stress

Oxidative stimuli upregulate QSOX1 expression, and in turn, elevated QSOX1 can protect cancer cells from oxidative-stress-induced apoptosis [36]. This protective effect reflects QSOX1’s ability to support redox balance during protein folding and may contribute to the survival of cancer cells under conditions such as hypoxia, inflammation, or metabolic stress. Thus, QSOX1 can function as part of an adaptive stress-response mechanism that enhances tumor resilience.

3.3. QSOX1 Modulates Laminin Maturation and Deposition

QSOX1 plays a critical role in ECM organization by regulating the incorporation and assembly of specific matrix components. Loss of QSOX1 selectively disrupts laminin integration into the ECM generated by quiescent fibroblasts, while exerting limited effects on collagen IV or fibronectin assembly [9]. Mechanistic work further shows that QSOX1 facilitates the formation of laminin heterotrimers, highlighting a direct enzymatic role in matrix assembly.
A recent study demonstrates that QSOX1 is enriched on laminin-coated surfaces, but only minimally detected on collagen- or gelatin-coated surfaces, supporting the specificity of its activity [42]. This study also shows that QSOX1 binds to cysteine-rich fibronectin, although whether fibronectin is a QSOX1 substrate remains elusive. Collectively, these findings suggest that QSOX1 plays a role in ECM remodeling by facilitating the proper assembly and incorporation of specific ECM proteins, thereby shaping a microenvironment that supports invasion and metastasis.

3.4. QSOX1 Influences Paracrine Signaling and Immune Modulation

Within the tumor microenvironment, cancer-associated fibroblasts secrete QSOX1, resulting in the localized production of H2O2. This redox signal activates STAT3 signaling in adjacent dormant cancer stem cells, resulting in upregulation of the immune checkpoint molecule PD-L1 [31]. Elevated PD-L1 expression suppresses CD8+ T-cell infiltration and cytotoxic activity, thereby promoting immune evasion. Through this STAT3-dependent paracrine redox signaling axis, stromal-derived QSOX1 establishes an immune-suppressive niche that supports cancer cell dormancy and long-term tumor persistence.

3.5. QSOX1 Functions as a Tumor Suppressor

Although most studies support a pro-tumorigenic role for QSOX1, several reports describe context-dependent tumor-suppressive functions. In invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast, high QSOX1 expression has been inversely associated with tumor aggressiveness. QSOX1 overexpression reduces MMP-2 activity and significantly suppresses tumor growth in vivo [14]. In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), QSOX1 can enhance susceptibility to oxidative stress by reducing NRF2 activation, thereby lowering the cellular antioxidant capacity. As a result, QSOX1 sensitizes HCC cells to oxidative injury, exhibiting a tumor-suppressive role in this specific context [40,43].

4. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Potential of QSOX1 in Cancer

4.1. QSOX1 as a Biomarker in Cancer Diagnosis

Liquid biopsy has become an increasingly useful tool in cancer diagnostics. Multiple studies have demonstrated that QSOX1 can be secreted by either cancer cells or stromal fibroblasts. Clinically, elevated QSOX1 peptides have been detected in the blood of patients with several malignancies, including lung cancer [45], pancreatic Cancer [46] and HCC [43]. Notably, in early-stage HCC, higher serum levels of core-fucosylated QSOX1 (cf-QSOX1), as well as increased tumor QSOX1 expression, correlate with a longer time to recurrence and improved overall survival, suggesting a favorable prognostic value in this specific context. However, the clinical significance of circulating QSOX1 levels in other cancer types, including lung cancer, remains unclear. Given the limited studies to date, it remains unclear whether QSOX1 can serve as a general biomarker across multiple cancer types or whether its utility is restricted to specific disease contexts.

4.2. QSOX1 as a Therapeutic Target for Cancer Treatment

For cancer types in which QSOX1 exhibits pro-tumorigenic activity, disruption of QSOX1 markedly suppresses cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro, and significantly reduces tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. Consistently, pharmacologic inhibition of QSOX1 using small-molecule inhibitors- SBI-183 [47] and Ebselen [48]— or a monoclonal antibody (MAb492.1) results in comparable suppression of tumor progression [33,49]. These findings collectively highlight QSOX1 as a promising therapeutic target for cancer treatment, while also warranting the need to consider context-dependent effects of QSOX1 inhibition.

5. Discussion

Despite growing evidence linking QSOX1 to cancer progression, the mechanisms that regulate its expression and activity remain largely unclear. For instance, 3′-RACE PCR has identified a QSOX1 mRNA variant containing an extended 3′-UTR, although no corresponding alternative protein isoform has been detected [21]. This finding suggests that post-transcriptional regulation through the 3′-UTR, potentially involving RNA-binding proteins or microRNAs, may modulate QSOX1 stability or translation; however, these regulatory mechanisms have yet to be thoroughly investigated. QSOX1 exists as a long (QSOX1-L, 747 amino acids) and a short (QSOX1-S, 604 amino acids) isoform generated by alternative splicing of exon 12. The two isoforms differ primarily at their C-termini, with the long isoform containing a transmembrane domain that is absent in the short isoform [50]. Given that QSOX1-L can undergo proteolytic cleavage and be secreted into the extracellular space [9], similar to QSOX1-S, it is likely that both isoforms exert comparable functions in the extracellular environment. However, the presence of a transmembrane anchor on QSOX1-L but not on QSOX1-S suggests that the isoforms may differ in their intracellular localization, regulation, and function, aspects that remain poorly explored. In addition, the splicing factors that regulate QSOX1 alternative splicing are currently unknown.
Extensive mechanistic work from Dr. Fass’s group over the past two decades has provided key insights into QSOX1 biology. Their studies demonstrate that QSOX1 regulates extracellular matrix composition by promoting the proper assembly and deposition of laminin, establishing a direct role for QSOX1 in ECM organization [9]. They also identified ZG16 as a potent substrate of QSOX1 in colon cancer [51]; however, the biological relevance of ZG16 in cancer remains unclear. Other groups have shown that QSOX1 can modulate the activity of MMP2 and MMP9, yet these enzymes likely represent only a small fraction of the substrates affected by QSOX1’s disulfide-bond-forming activity. Overall, the molecular mechanisms by which QSOX1 promotes cell proliferation, motility, and ECM remodeling remain poorly defined, and the full spectrum of QSOX1 substrates-both intracellular and extracellular- has not been comprehensively characterized. Notably, while QSOX1 enhances invasion and metastasis in cancers such as PDAC, breast cancer, and lung cancer, it displays tumor-suppressive properties in HCC and in certain breast cancer contexts (Table 1 and Figure 3). Defining QSOX1 substrates and their functional consequences will be essential for understanding how this enzyme contributes to cancer biology, particularly given its context-dependent roles across different tumor types. More recently, Dr. Fass and colleagues uncovered a surprising intracellular role for QSOX1 in the formation of disulfide bonds within specific Golgi glycosyltransferases, including ST6GAL1, ST3GAL1, and B3GALT5 [52]. These enzymes are critical for core glycan synthesis and overall Golgi function [53,54]. However, the extent to which QSOX1-mediated regulation of glycosyltransferases affects oncogenic secretion, glycoprotein maturation, or vesicular transport in the Golgi remains unknown and warrants further investigation.

6. Conclusions

In conclusion, although QSOX1 has emerged as a critical regulator of protein folding, extracellular matrix organization, and tumor–microenvironment interactions, its molecular mechanisms of action remain incompletely understood. Elucidating how QSOX1 expression and activity are regulated, identifying its full repertoire of intracellular and extracellular substrates, and defining the functional differences between its isoforms will be crucial for clarifying its context-dependent roles in cancer. Such knowledge will not only deepen our understanding of Golgi-centered redox biology but also provide a rational framework for the development of QSOX1-based biomarkers and targeted therapeutic strategies tailored to specific cancer types.

Author Contributions

S.W. wrote the manuscript, X.T. and G.-Y.X. contributed to reviewing and editing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by NIH (R03CA280382-02).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The figures were generated using Biorender (https://www.biorender.com/, accessed on 18 January 2026).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bechtel, T.J.; Weerapana, E. From structure to redox: The diverse functional roles of disulfides and implications in disease. Proteomics 2017, 17, 1600391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kuzu, O.F.; Granerud, L.J.T.; Saatcioglu, F. Navigating the landscape of protein folding and proteostasis: From molecular chaperones to therapeutic innovations. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2025, 10, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, L.; Moo-Young, M.; Chou, C.P. Molecular manipulation associated with disulfide bond formation to enhance the stability of recombinant therapeutic protein. Protein Expr. Purif. 2011, 75, 28–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vogel, N.; Kluck, C.J.; Melzer, N.; Schwarzinger, S.; Breitinger, U.; Seeber, S.; Becker, C.M. Mapping of disulfide bonds within the amino-terminal extracellular domain of the inhibitory glycine receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 36128–36136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wu, C.H.; Yuen, K.L.; Molony, R.D.; Silvers, C.R.; Akash, M.M.H.; Messing, E.M.; Lee, Y.F. Protein disulfide isomerase-enriched extracellular vesicles from bladder cancer cells support tumor survival and malignant transformation in the bladder. Oncogene 2025, 44, 2158–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hatahet, F.; Ruddock, L.W. Protein disulfide isomerase: A critical evaluation of its function in disulfide bond formation. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2009, 11, 2807–2850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Frand, A.R.; Kaiser, C.A. Ero1p oxidizes protein disulfide isomerase in a pathway for disulfide bond formation in the endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Cell 1999, 4, 469–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Limor-Waisberg, K.; Ben-Dor, S.; Fass, D. Diversification of quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase in a preserved framework for redox relay. BMC Evol. Biol. 2013, 13, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ilani, T.; Alon, A.; Grossman, I.; Horowitz, B.; Kartvelishvily, E.; Cohen, S.R.; Fass, D. A secreted disulfide catalyst controls extracellular matrix composition and function. Science 2013, 341, 74–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Coppock, D.L.; Cina-Poppe, D.; Gilleran, S. The quiescin Q6 gene (QSCN6) is a fusion of two ancient gene families: Thioredoxin and ERV1. Genomics 1998, 54, 460–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chakravarthi, S.; Jessop, C.E.; Willer, M.; Stirling, C.J.; Bulleid, N.J. Intracellular catalysis of disulfide bond formation by the human sulfhydryl oxidase, QSOX1. Biochem. J. 2007, 404, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rudolf, J.; Pringle, M.A.; Bulleid, N.J. Proteolytic processing of QSOX1A ensures efficient secretion of a potent disulfide catalyst. Biochem. J. 2013, 454, 181–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  13. Alon, A.; Heckler, E.J.; Thorpe, C.; Fass, D. QSOX contains a pseudo-dimer of functional and degenerate sulfhydryl oxidase domains. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584, 1521–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pernodet, N.; Hermetet, F.; Adami, P.; Vejux, A.; Descotes, F.; Borg, C.; Adams, M.; Pallandre, J.R.; Viennet, G.; Esnard, F.; et al. High expression of QSOX1 reduces tumorogenesis, and is associated with a better outcome for breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res. 2012, 14, R136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Katchman, B.A.; Ocal, I.T.; Cunliffe, H.E.; Chang, Y.H.; Hostetter, G.; Watanabe, A.; LoBello, J.; Lake, D.F. Expression of quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 1 is associated with a highly invasive phenotype and correlates with a poor prognosis in Luminal B breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2013, 15, R28, Correction to Breast Cancer Res. 2018, 20, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Das, P.; Siegers, G.M.; Postovit, L.M. Illuminating luminal B: QSOX1 as a subtype-specific biomarker. Breast Cancer Res. 2013, 15, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Araujo, D.G.; Nakao, L.; Gozzo, P.; Souza, C.D.; Balderrama, V.; Gugelmin, E.S.; Kuczynski, A.P.; Olandoski, M.; de Noronha, L. Expression level of quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 1 (QSOX1) in neuroblastomas. Eur. J. Histochem. 2014, 58, 2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Knutsvik, G.; Collett, K.; Arnes, J.; Akslen, L.A.; Stefansson, I.M. QSOX1 expression is associated with aggressive tumor features and reduced survival in breast carcinomas. Mod. Pathol. 2016, 29, 1485–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhou, L.; Chen, H.M.; Qu, S.; Li, L.; Zhao, W.; Liang, Z.G.; Yu, B.B.; Chen, K.H.; Lu, Q.T.; Lin, G.X.; et al. Reduced QSOX1 enhances radioresistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 3230–3241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Katchman, B.A.; Antwi, K.; Hostetter, G.; Demeure, M.J.; Watanabe, A.; Decker, G.A.; Miller, L.J.; Von Hoff, D.D.; Lake, D.F. Quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 1 promotes invasion of pancreatic tumor cells mediated by matrix metalloproteinases. Mol. Cancer Res. 2011, 9, 1621–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Soloviev, M.; Esteves, M.P.; Amiri, F.; Crompton, M.R.; Rider, C.C. Elevated transcription of the gene QSOX1 encoding quiescin Q6 sulfhydryl oxidase 1 in breast cancer. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e57327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baek, J.A.; Song, P.H.; Ko, Y.; Gu, M.J. High expression of QSOX1 is associated with tumor invasiveness and high grades groups in prostate cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2018, 214, 964–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Chen, J.W.; Dhahbi, J. Lung adenocarcinoma and lung squamous cell carcinoma cancer classification, biomarker identification, and gene expression analysis using overlapping feature selection methods. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Geng, Y.; Xu, C.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L. Quiescin Sulfhydryl Oxidase 1 Regulates the Proliferation, Migration and Invasion of Human Glioblastoma Cells via PI3K/Akt Pathway. Onco Targets Ther. 2020, 13, 5721–5729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wiechec, E.; Overgaard, J.; Kjeldsen, E.; Hansen, L.L. Chromosome 1q25.3 copy number alterations in primary breast cancers detected by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and allelic imbalance assays and its comparison with fluorescent in situ hybridization assays. Cell Oncol. 2013, 36, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Alers, J.C.; Rochat, J.; Krijtenburg, P.J.; Hop, W.C.; Kranse, R.; Rosenberg, C.; Tanke, H.J.; Schroder, F.H.; van Dekken, H. Identification of genetic markers for prostatic cancer progression. Lab. Investig. 2000, 80, 931–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  27. The ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium. Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes. Nature 2020, 578, 82–93. [CrossRef]
  28. Antao, A.M.; Ramakrishna, S.; Kim, K.S. The Role of Nkx3.1 in Cancers and Stemness. Int. J. Stem. Cells 2021, 14, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Anderson, P.D.; McKissic, S.A.; Logan, M.; Roh, M.; Franco, O.E.; Wang, J.; Doubinskaia, I.; van der Meer, R.; Hayward, S.W.; Eischen, C.M.; et al. Nkx3.1 and Myc crossregulate shared target genes in mouse and human prostate tumorigenesis. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 1907–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Martinez, E.E.; Anderson, P.D.; Logan, M.; Abdulkadir, S.A. Antioxidant treatment promotes prostate epithelial proliferation in Nkx3.1 mutant mice. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wei, J.R.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, W.M.; Zhang, X.P.; Zeng, T.T.; Li, Y.; Zhu, Y.H.; Guan, X.Y.; Li, L. QSOX1 facilitates dormant esophageal cancer stem cells to evade immune elimination via PD-L1 upregulation and CD8 T cell exclusion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2024, 121, e2407506121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Coppock, D.; Kopman, C.; Gudas, J.; Cina-Poppe, D.A. Regulation of the quiescence-induced genes: Quiescin Q6, decorin, and ribosomal protein S29. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 269, 604–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Feldman, T.; Grossman-Haham, I.; Elkis, Y.; Vilela, P.; Moskovits, N.; Barshack, I.; Salame, T.M.; Fass, D.; Ilani, T. Inhibition of fibroblast secreted QSOX1 perturbs extracellular matrix in the tumor microenvironment and decreases tumor growth and metastasis in murine cancer models. Oncotarget 2020, 11, 386–398, Correction to Oncotarget 2020, 11, 3687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shi, C.Y.; Fan, Y.; Liu, B.; Lou, W.H. HIF1 contributes to hypoxia-induced pancreatic cancer cells invasion via promoting QSOX1 expression. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 32, 561–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Millar-Haskell, C.S.; Thorpe, C.; Gleghorn, J.P. Matrix mechanics, not hypoxia, modulate quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 1 (QSOX1) in pancreatic tumor cells. bioRxiv 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Morel, C.; Adami, P.; Musard, J.F.; Duval, D.; Radom, J.; Jouvenot, M. Involvement of sulfhydryl oxidase QSOX1 in the protection of cells against oxidative stress-induced apoptosis. Exp. Cell Res. 2007, 313, 3971–3982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, F.; Liu, T.; Dong, Y.; Gao, Q.; Lu, R.; Deng, Z. 5-Methylcytosine RNA modification and its roles in cancer and cancer chemotherapy resistance. J. Transl. Med. 2025, 23, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, Y.; Wei, J.; Feng, L.; Li, O.; Huang, L.; Zhou, S.; Xu, Y.; An, K.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, R.; et al. Aberrant m5C hypermethylation mediates intrinsic resistance to gefitinib through NSUN2/YBX1/QSOX1 axis in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Mol. Cancer 2023, 22, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Poillet, L.; Pernodet, N.; Boyer-Guittaut, M.; Adami, P.; Borg, C.; Jouvenot, M.; Delage-Mourroux, R.; Despouy, G. QSOX1 inhibits autophagic flux in breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Sun, J.; Zhou, C.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, X.; Chen, W.; Zhou, Q.; Hu, B.; Gao, D.; Raatz, L.; Wang, Z.; et al. Quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 1 promotes sorafenib-induced ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma by driving EGFR endosomal trafficking and inhibiting NRF2 activation. Redox Biol. 2021, 41, 101942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dutt, R.; Thorpe, C.; Galileo, D.S. QSOX1 Modulates Glioblastoma Cell Proliferation and Migration In Vitro and Invasion In Vivo. Cancers 2024, 16, 3620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Millar-Haskell, C.S.; Sperduto, J.L.; Slater, J.H.; Thorpe, C.; Gleghorn, J.P. Secretion of the disulfide bond generating catalyst QSOX1 from pancreatic tumor cells into the extracellular matrix: Association with extracellular vesicles and matrix proteins. J. Extracell. Biol. 2022, 1, e48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, X.F.; Wang, J.; Jia, H.L.; Zhu, W.W.; Lu, L.; Ye, Q.H.; Nelson, P.J.; Qin, Y.; Gao, D.M.; Zhou, H.J.; et al. Core fucosylated glycan-dependent inhibitory effect of QSOX1-S on invasion and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Discov. 2019, 5, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ma, Q.; Yu, M.; Zhou, B.; Zhou, H. QSOX1 promotes mitochondrial apoptosis of hepatocellular carcinoma cells during anchorage-independent growth by inhibiting lipid synthesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 532, 258–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sung, H.J.; Ahn, J.M.; Yoon, Y.H.; Na, S.S.; Choi, Y.J.; Kim, Y.I.; Lee, S.Y.; Lee, E.B.; Cho, S.; Cho, J.Y. Quiescin Sulfhydryl Oxidase 1 (QSOX1) Secreted by Lung Cancer Cells Promotes Cancer Metastasis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Antwi, K.; Hostetter, G.; Demeure, M.J.; Katchman, B.A.; Decker, G.A.; Ruiz, Y.; Sielaff, T.D.; Koep, L.J.; Lake, D.F. Analysis of the plasma peptidome from pancreas cancer patients connects a peptide in plasma to overexpression of the parent protein in tumors. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 4722–4731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Fifield, A.L.; Hanavan, P.D.; Faigel, D.O.; Sergienko, E.; Bobkov, A.; Meurice, N.; Petit, J.L.; Polito, A.; Caulfield, T.R.; Castle, E.P.; et al. Molecular Inhibitor of QSOX1 Suppresses Tumor Growth In Vivo. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2020, 19, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hanavan, P.D.; Borges, C.R.; Katchman, B.A.; Faigel, D.O.; Ho, T.H.; Ma, C.T.; Sergienko, E.A.; Meurice, N.; Petit, J.L.; Lake, D.F. Ebselen inhibits QSOX1 enzymatic activity and suppresses invasion of pancreatic and renal cancer cell lines. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 18418–18428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Grossman, I.; Alon, A.; Ilani, T.; Fass, D. An inhibitory antibody blocks the first step in the dithiol/disulfide relay mechanism of the enzyme QSOX1. J. Mol. Biol. 2013, 425, 4366–4378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tong, Y.; Gibaut, Q.M.R.; Rouse, W.; Childs-Disney, J.L.; Suresh, B.M.; Abegg, D.; Choudhary, S.; Akahori, Y.; Adibekian, A.; Moss, W.N.; et al. Transcriptome-Wide Mapping of Small-Molecule RNA-Binding Sites in Cells Informs an Isoform-Specific Degrader of QSOX1 mRNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 11620–11625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Javitt, G.; Kinzel, A.; Reznik, N.; Fass, D. Conformational switches and redox properties of the colon cancer-associated human lectin ZG16. FEBS J. 2021, 288, 6465–6475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ilani, T.; Reznik, N.; Yeshaya, N.; Feldman, T.; Vilela, P.; Lansky, Z.; Javitt, G.; Shemesh, M.; Brenner, O.; Elkis, Y.; et al. The disulfide catalyst QSOX1 maintains the colon mucosal barrier by regulating Golgi glycosyltransferases. EMBO J. 2023, 42, e111869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Fan, J.; Huang, S.; Cao, C.; Jin, X.; Su, Y. The roles of ST3Gal1-6 in cancer: Expression profiles and functional implications. Carbohydr. Res. 2025, 559, 109740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhang, J.; Huang, Y.; Li, H.; Xu, P.; Liu, Q.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, T.; Tang, Q.; Jia, Q.; et al. B3galt5 functions as a PXR target gene and regulates obesity and insulin resistance by maintaining intestinal integrity. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 5919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. A schematic illustration of QSOX1 domains. QSOX1 is composed of thioredoxin-like (Trx) domains and sulfhydryl oxidase (Erv) domains connected by a linker. Trx1 contains a redox-active CXXC motif responsible for substrate oxidation and disulfide bond formation. ΨErv represents a degenerated sulfhydryl oxidase domain [13], whereas the Erv domain contains a redox-active CXXC motif essential for de novo disulfide bond formation. C indicates cysteine. XX represents any amino acids other than cysteine.
Figure 1. A schematic illustration of QSOX1 domains. QSOX1 is composed of thioredoxin-like (Trx) domains and sulfhydryl oxidase (Erv) domains connected by a linker. Trx1 contains a redox-active CXXC motif responsible for substrate oxidation and disulfide bond formation. ΨErv represents a degenerated sulfhydryl oxidase domain [13], whereas the Erv domain contains a redox-active CXXC motif essential for de novo disulfide bond formation. C indicates cysteine. XX represents any amino acids other than cysteine.
Cancers 18 00339 g001
Figure 2. An illustration summarizing the current understanding of QSOX1 regulatory mechanisms at the genetic, post-transcriptional levels. ↑ indicates promotion, and ┴ indicates inhibition. ? indicates unknown mechanism. Abbreviations: QSOX1—Quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 1; NKX3.1—NK3 Homeobox 1; STAT—Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription; HIF-1α—Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1-alpha; TGF-β—Transforming Growth Factor Beta; NSUN2—NOP2/Sun RNA methyltransferase family member 2.
Figure 2. An illustration summarizing the current understanding of QSOX1 regulatory mechanisms at the genetic, post-transcriptional levels. ↑ indicates promotion, and ┴ indicates inhibition. ? indicates unknown mechanism. Abbreviations: QSOX1—Quiescin sulfhydryl oxidase 1; NKX3.1—NK3 Homeobox 1; STAT—Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription; HIF-1α—Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1-alpha; TGF-β—Transforming Growth Factor Beta; NSUN2—NOP2/Sun RNA methyltransferase family member 2.
Cancers 18 00339 g002
Figure 3. A schematic depicting QSOX1’s role in cancer progression. In its tumor-promoting role, QSOX1 enhances MMP-2/9 activity, promotes laminin maturation and deposition in the ECM, and upregulates PD-L1 expression. In its tumor-suppressive role, QSOX1 inhibits MMP-2 activity and NRF2 activation. ↑ indicates promotion, and ┴ indicates inhibition. List of abbreviations: MMP—Matrix Metalloproteinase; PD-L1—Programmed Death-Ligand 1; NRF-2—Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2.
Figure 3. A schematic depicting QSOX1’s role in cancer progression. In its tumor-promoting role, QSOX1 enhances MMP-2/9 activity, promotes laminin maturation and deposition in the ECM, and upregulates PD-L1 expression. In its tumor-suppressive role, QSOX1 inhibits MMP-2 activity and NRF2 activation. ↑ indicates promotion, and ┴ indicates inhibition. List of abbreviations: MMP—Matrix Metalloproteinase; PD-L1—Programmed Death-Ligand 1; NRF-2—Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2.
Cancers 18 00339 g003
Table 1. A table summarizing the currently identified functions of QSOX1 in cancer.
Table 1. A table summarizing the currently identified functions of QSOX1 in cancer.
Cancer TypesQSOX1 ExpressionEffect on Cancer CellsPotential MechanismsReferences
Breast CancerReduce cell proliferation and invasion, increase cell adhesionMMP-2 activity ↓, p62 ↑, Autophagosome/Lysosome Fusion ↓[14]
[39]
Cell proliferation and invasionMMP-9 activity ↑[15]
Lung CancerGefitinib resistanceUnknown[38]
Cell proliferation, migration, invasionUnknown[40]
Esophageal cancerCancer stem cell dormancyROS ↑, PD-L1 ↑, CD8+ T cells infiltration ↓[31]
GlioblastomaCell proliferation, colony formation, invasionPI3K/Akt pathway ↓[41]
HCCReduce cell invasion and metastasisIntegrinβ1/FAK and EGFR/Raf/ERK signaling pathway ↓[42]
FerroptosisROS ↑, EGFR activation ↓, NRF2 activation ↓[43]
AnoikisIntracellular fatty acids and cholesterol ↓[44]
PDACCell proliferation and invasionMMP-2/9 activity ↑[20]
↑ indicates upregulation; ↓ indicates downregulation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, S.; Xiao, G.-Y.; Tan, X. QSOX1: A Mysterious Golgi-Localized Disulfide Bond Catalyst and an Emerging Cancer Regulator. Cancers 2026, 18, 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020339

AMA Style

Wang S, Xiao G-Y, Tan X. QSOX1: A Mysterious Golgi-Localized Disulfide Bond Catalyst and an Emerging Cancer Regulator. Cancers. 2026; 18(2):339. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020339

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Shike, Guan-Yu Xiao, and Xiaochao Tan. 2026. "QSOX1: A Mysterious Golgi-Localized Disulfide Bond Catalyst and an Emerging Cancer Regulator" Cancers 18, no. 2: 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020339

APA Style

Wang, S., Xiao, G.-Y., & Tan, X. (2026). QSOX1: A Mysterious Golgi-Localized Disulfide Bond Catalyst and an Emerging Cancer Regulator. Cancers, 18(2), 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18020339

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop