Next Article in Journal
Trend and Joinpoint Analysis of Cancer Incidence and 1-Year Mortality in North-East Spain 2005–2020
Next Article in Special Issue
ONCOBREAST-TEST Is a Quick Diagnostic, Prognostic and Predictive Method of Response to Systemic Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring the In Vitro and In Vivo Therapeutic Potential of BRAF and MEK Inhibitor Combination in NRAS-Mutated Melanoma
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 15
Issue 23
10.3390/cancers15235529
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

CD4, CD20 and PD-L1 as Markers of Recurrence in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

by
Aleksandra Semeniuk-Wojtaś
1,
Magdalena Modzelewska
2,*,
Karolina Poddębniak-Strama
3,
Sylwia Kołaczyńska
3,
Arkadiusz Lubas
4,
Barbara Górnicka
2,
Anna Jakieła
3 and
Rafał Stec
1
1
Oncology Department, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
2
Pathomorphology Department, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland
3
Oncology Department, 4 Military Clinical Hospital with a Polyclinic, 53-114 Wroclaw, Poland
4
Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology and Dialysis, Military Institute of Medicine—National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2023, 15(23), 5529; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15235529
Submission received: 23 October 2023 / Revised: 13 November 2023 / Accepted: 15 November 2023 / Published: 22 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oncology: State-of-the-Art Researches in Poland)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

BCG immunotherapy plays an important role in bladder cancer treatment. Unfortunately, we do not know how exactly the tumor microenvironment influences cancer cells and which cells have the most important impact on the outcome. The aim of the study was to assess how the components of the microenvironment affect tumor recurrence. We show that patients with intense CD4+ cell infiltration (>4.6%) or weak CD20+ cell infiltration (<10%), as well as patients with high PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (≥1%), could be characterized by a higher risk of recurrence. Our results provide data with potential clinical utility and may be essential for the assessment of tumor immunological status, which would be taken into account when selecting a follow-up and treatment strategy.

Abstract

Introduction: A tumor microenvironment plays an important role in bladder cancer development and in treatment response. Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess how the components of the microenvironment affect tumor recurrence and to find the potential biomarkers for immunotherapy in NMIBC. Methods: The study group consisted of 55 patients with primary NMIBC. Immunohistochemistry was performed on sections of primary papillary urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Cox proportional hazard multiple regression analysis was performed to characterize tumors with the highest probability of an unfavorable outcome. Results: Multivariate analysis confirmed that the CD4 (p = 0.001), CD20 (p = 0.008) and PD-L1 expressed on tumor cells (p = 0.01) were independently associated with the risk of recurrence of bladder cancer. Patients with weak CD4+ cell infiltration (<4.6%) and severe CD20+ infiltration (>10%) belong to the group with a lower risk of recurrence. The cancer in this group also frequently recurs after 12 months (p = 0.0005). Conclusions: The evaluation of CD4+ and CD20+ cells in the tumor microenvironment, in addition to PD-L1 on tumor cells, facilitates the determination of a group of patients with a low risk of recurrence.

1. Introduction

Bladder cancer (BC) is the seventh most commonly diagnosed cancer in the male population worldwide, while it drops to tenth when both genders are considered [1]. Bladder cancer incidence and mortality rates vary across countries due to differences in risk factors, detection and diagnostic practices and the availability of treatments. Approximately 75% of patients with BC present with a disease confined to the mucosa (stage Ta, CIS) or submucosa (stage T1); in younger patients (<40), this percentage is even higher [2]. Patients with Ta, T1 and CIS have a high prevalence due to long-term survival in many cases and a lower risk of cancer-specific mortality compared to T2-4 tumors [1,3].
The standard of care for patients who have high-risk non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) at presentation is a combination of endoscopic resection and intravesical BCG instillation. While BCG immunotherapy is currently the best treatment for NMIBC, ~30% of patients show no response to this treatment. A study found that multifocality, lymphovascular invasion and high grade on re-TURB were independent predictors for response to BCG treatment [4]. Bacillus Calmette-Guérin intravesical treatment is associated with burdensome local and systemic side effects that could cause treatment stoppage. Serious side effects are encountered in <5% of patients [5]. In addition, BCG infections after BCG instillations have also been reported [6]. The difficulties in conducting BCG treatment are also interruptions in the availability of BCG and that can lead to the need to modify treatment, which may reduce its effectiveness. The blockade of the immune checkpoint pathway involving the programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor and its ligands, CD274 (PD-L1) and CD273 (PD-L2), has recently been shown to be effective in the treatment of various cancers, including urothelial carcinoma (UC) [7,8,9]. Immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors is usually tolerable, but high frequencies of adverse events leading to discontinuation have also been reported, and thus predictive biomarkers should be established [10]. The PD-L1 expression is not enough to determine which patients may receive the largest benefit from BCG treatment; however, Zheng et al. confirmed that dysregulation of the immune microenvironment promoted the malignant progression from NMIBC to muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and that an immune prognostic signature can stratify patients into different risk groups with distinct immunotherapeutic susceptibility, thus facilitating personalized immunotherapy [11,12].
The impact of immune components of the tumor microenvironment on the disease has been analyzed by many researchers. Galon et al. and Mlecnik and colleagues determined that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) affect the clinical attributes of cancer [13,14]. Thompson et al. found that patients with specimens that demonstrated high levels of lymphocyte B7-H1 expression were significantly more likely to die of RCC, even after adjusting for other pathologic features predictive of outcome [15]. Minari et al. confirmed that there were less neutrophils in a tumor at the low clinical stage than in the more advanced tumor [16]. Toge et al. and Komohara et al. proved that the presence of macrophages in the tumor was an independent factor affecting survival [17,18]. The presence of M2 macrophages in tumor cells is associated with a shorter OS. Dense infiltration of CD45R0 and CD4 cells also has a negative impact on the survival of patients [19]. Liu et al. detected that tumor-infiltrating neutrophils were independent unfavorable prognosis markers related to a high risk of recurrence in NMIBC patients and poor overall survival rates [20]. Also, a study found that high counts of Treg and TAM were associated with shorter recurrence-free survival in NMIBC patients [21].
The high efficacy of immunotherapy suggests that genomic alterations are only partly responsible for bladder cancer expansion despite the high efficacy of the fibroblast growth factor receptor pathway inhibitors [22]. It seems that the immune system and the tumor microenvironment are closely related to bladder cancer and play an important role in carcinogenesis, by maintaining and spreading the cancer, and in the treatment response. The studies conducted thus far have analyzed single, selected elements of the microenvironment, but it is not certain how exactly the tumor microenvironment (TME) influences cancer cells and which cells have the most important impact on the outcome. For this reason, a decision was made to investigate the microenvironment comprehensively. The aim of the study was to assess the components of the microenvironment in terms of the potential cells affecting tumor growth and NMIBC recurrence, as well as to find the potential biomarkers for immunotherapy. The acquired knowledge on the relationship between tumor cells and the immune system, and blood vessels, provides the basis for further research and a deeper understanding of the biology of bladder cancer, which may result in the design of novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. There is a high probability that the elements of the microenvironment that we decided to incorporate in this study show a significant impact on the biology of the tumor and thus prognosis. Due to the universal nature of the study’s design, the method can be successfully used in the study of other types of cancer.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

For this retrospective study, clinical data from patients’ medical history and paraffin-embedded sections of primary papillary urothelial carcinoma from the 4th Military Clinical Hospital with Polyclinic in Wroclaw, removed during the transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) between 2017 and 2020, were used. The study was approved by the Bioethics Committee of the Medical University of Warsaw. Patients who enrolled in the study were subjected to control cystoscopy. Patients whose follow-up period was shorter than 12 months and those with tumor recurrence within the upper urinary tract were excluded from the study. A second TURBT was performed in selected patients 2 to 4 weeks after initial resection. In those in whom neoplastic lesions were detected during the cystoscopy, TURBT was performed, and the removed tissues were transferred for histopathological examination. Histopathologically confirmed bladder cancer detected during the second TURBT was interpreted as an incomplete resection and was not assessed as a recurrence. Recurrence was defined as a reappearance of histopathologically proven urothelial carcinoma detected during control cystoscopy. The progression of the disease was defined as a deeper invasion in bladder tissue in the recurrent tumor than in the primary tumor. Time to recurrence was defined as time from the first TURBT to the first local recurrence or distant recurrence.

2.2. Immunohistochemistry

The tumor samples were assessed by independent pathologists before the beginning of the immunohistochemistry analysis. The hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained tissue blocks were retrieved and reevaluated by a pathologist, and the representative areas corresponding to tumor classification and grading were selected. The tumor zones with crush artifacts, necrosis, and regressive hyalinization were excluded. Tumor histological differentiation was graded according to the 2004/2016 WHO classification, and the assessment of the clinical stage of cancer was based on the criteria of the eight editions of tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification by the International Union Against Cancer (UICC, Union Internationale Contre le Cancer) [23]. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 4 μm thick tissue sections. Monoclonal mouse antibodies (DAKO) were used to evaluate the expression of the analyzed antigens (CD4—clone 4B12; CD8—clone C8/144B; CD15—clone Carb-3; CD56—clone 123C3; CD68—clone PG-M1; CD20—clone L26; CD31—clone; PD-L1—clone 28-8 pharmDX). Immunohistochemistry analyses were performed in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Slides were scanned using the Hamamatsu NanoZoomer 2.0 HT. The CD31 expression was presented as a number of stained small vessels presented on 1 mm2 of the tumor. Counting of PD-L1+ cells was assessed in two steps. First, representative areas were determined using a magnification of ×10 field and then an accurate analysis was performed using a magnification of ×20 and ×40. The PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and on immune cells was assessed separately and the proportion of tumor area occupied by PD-L1 expressing tumor cells (TCs) and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (ICs) was determined. In TCs, a positive protein expression was defined as a membranous expression, and, in the case of ICs, membranous and cytoplasmatic expression were approved. The evaluation of each sample was based on the extent of PD-L1 staining, irrespective of intensity. IHC scoring was grouped by percentage and was completed on a 1–3 scale: <1%—low; 1–5%—moderate; >5%—high expression. Only intratumoral immune cells were taken into account. The intensity of the color reaction with antibodies against CD4, CD8, CD15, CD20, CD56, CD68 and CD31 was assessed using the QuPath software, version 0.2.3. The proportion of immune-cell infiltration, defined by the above-mentioned antigens, was examined in representative areas encompassing at least 1 mm2 of the tumor and presented as a percentage of stained cells to all cells present on the examined area. Zones with necrosis or coagulation damage were excluded from the analyses. In the cases of CD4, CD8, CD15, CD20, CD56, CD68 and CD31, IHC scoring was not grouped.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses of the results were performed using the Statistica software, version 13.3. (StatSoft Polska SP z o. o., Cracow, Poland). If the test probability, p, was lower than the type I error value of 0.05, then the results were considered significant. The results are presented as frequency and percentage or as median and extreme values. The correlation analysis between the variables was calculated using the Spearman or Pearson correlation test, depending on distribution normality (Shapiro–Wilk test). To test the association between dichotomous and continuous variables, the point-biserial correlation was performed. To assess the potential influence of the examined variables derived from the immunohistochemical study on recurrence-free survival (RFS), the Cox proportional hazard multiple regression analysis was performed. The cut-off point that separates the population into two groups with a different outcome was determined using ROC analysis. RFS rates were compared using the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, with groups stratified by determined variables, and the differences between groups were checked with the F-Cox test.

3. Results

3.1. Clinicopathological Characteristics of the Study Population

The analyzed group consisted of 70 patients. After the verification of the samples by the independent investigator, 15 patients were excluded from the study, so analyses were made for 55 patients. Detailed characteristics of the group are presented in Table 1. The adjuvant BCG treatment was administered only to 15.54% of the examined group; therefore, this feature was not included in further investigations. The overall median follow-up period was 15 (range 2–54) months. During the inspected period, neoplastic disease recurred in 31 patients, which constituted 56.36% of the investigated population. In the group of patients with recurrence of the disease, 22.5% had ≥2 recurrences of the disease, 9.6% had diagnosed muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) during the first recurrence and 19.3% had a cystectomy due to bladder cancer (MIBC or high-risk NMIBC). The median time to recurrence was 9 (range 2–40) months.

3.2. Immunohistochemical Assessment of the Tumor Microenvironment Components

The levels of CD4, CD8, CD15, CD56, CD68, CD20, CD31 and PD-L1 in primary papillary bladder cancer removed during transurethral resection of the tumor were evaluated using IHC. Expression of the analyzed protein was confirmed in 50 of the examined tissues (90%). The expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells was determined as low in 42 patients (84%), moderate in 5 patients and high in 3 patients (10% and 6%, respectively). The expression of PD-L1 on immune cells was low in 17 patients (34%) and moderate also in 17 patients (34%). High expression was found in 16 patients (32%). The details of these results are summarized in Table 2. Representative photographs are presented (Scheme 1).

3.3. Correlations between the Microenvironment Components

In the analyzed tumor samples, a correlation between examined TME components was found. Detailed data about the analyzed variables that are statistically significant are presented in Table 3. No statistically significant correlation was found between PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and the remaining components of the microenvironment.

3.4. Correlations between the Microenvironment Components and Clinical and Pathological Variables

Correlations of CD4, CD8, CD15, CD20, CD56, CD68, CD31 and PD-L1 on the expression of tumor and immune cells in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer with patient age, histopathological malignancy (LG or HG tumors), the depth of bladder-wall invasion by the tumor and the diameter and number of tumor lesions were assessed. We also evaluated the correlations between the TME components and the recurrence, progression and cystectomy, as well as the time to tumor recurrence, progression and cystectomy.
The analyses reveal a correlation between CD4, CD15 and CD68 and between the histopathological malignancy of the NMIBC (r = 0.4832, 0.3343 and 0.3729, respectively; p = 0.000, 0.018 and 0.008, respectively). CD15 correlated with the recurrence (r = 0.2990, p = 0. 035) and CD20 with the NMIBC in the recurrent tumor (r = −0.4024, p = 0. 034). The frequency of CD68 correlated with the depth of bladder-wall invasion by the cancer (r = 0.4167, p = 0.002) and with the time to cystectomy (r = 0.8857, p = 0. 018). Also, PD-L1 expression on tumor cells correlated with the time to cystectomy (r = 0.8366, p = 0.037). PD-L1 expression on tumor cells additionally correlated with the presence of many recurrences (r = 0.4065, p = 0.032). When analyzing the expression of the PD-L1 protein on immune cells, a statistically significant relationship was found between patient age (r = 0.2989, p = 0.034) and the depth of the bladder-wall invasion by the cancer (r = 0.3139, p = 0.026).
In addition, we found a correlation trend between the PD-L1 protein on tumor cells, as well as CD15+ cell density, and the depth of the bladder-wall invasion by the cancer. There was also a correlation between CD8+ cell density and the age and presence of many recurrences, but it was not statistically significant.

3.5. Evaluation of the Prognostic Value of the Tumor Microenvironment in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer

The CD4, CD20 and PD-L1 expressed on tumor cells were independently associated with the risk of recurrence of bladder cancer in the Cox proportional hazard multiple regression analysis of recurrence-free survival (Table 4).
In the case of PD-L1, analyses revealed that the probability of tumor recurrence was similar in patients with high and moderate PD-L1 expression on tumor cells. The significant decrease in the risk of recurrence was found only in patients with low PD-L1 expression (<1%) on tumor cells compared to the others (Figure 1).
When patients were stratified into groups according to the cut-off points determined by the ROC curves and considering the best recurrence predictive value, we found that the probability of recurrence was lower in the group of patients with low CD4+ density (<4.6%), defined by statistical analyses, than with high CD4+ density (p = 0.005). Regarding the CD20+ cells, the separate point determined by the same statistical method was 10%, and patients with high CD20+ density (>10%) had a lower risk of recurrence (p = 0.052) (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
As a tumor microenvironment is a dynamic space and cells interact with each other, we decided to separate the group of patients with the highest risk of an unfavorable outcome. We found that patients with weak CD4+ cell infiltration and severe CD20+ cell infiltration belong to the group with a low risk of recurrence and the cancer in this group rarely occurs after 10 months (p = 0.0005) (Figure 4). Patients with intense CD4+ cell infiltration or weak CD20+ cell infiltration, as well as patients with high PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (≥1%), could be characterized by a higher risk of recurrence. In both groups, the second tumor was usually diagnosed during the first year after the primary tumor resection, but, in the first group, the probability of recurrence was significantly lower.

4. Discussion

In the present study, we examined the prognostic value of the tumor microenvironment in NMIBC patients. We demonstrated a correlation between CD4+ and CD20+ tumor-infiltrated lymphocytes (TILs) in the primary tumor and clinical outcomes. Moreover, we identified that patients with a high risk of recurrence could be characterized by severe CD4+ and weak CD20+ cell infiltration. In addition, moderate and high PD-L1 expression (≥1%) on tumor cells might be recognized as a marker of unfavorable prognosis, but this cannot be analyzed as a single factor.
The connection between the density and composition of immune infiltration and the outcome have been analyzed, but the studies published thus far have presented inconsistent results. In many publications, it has been found that abundant CD3+ and CD8+ infiltration correlates with a longer survival without cancer in patients with NMIBC [10,19]. The CD3 antigen is connected with the T-cell receptor (TCR) complex and participates in the recognition of antigens and subsequent activation of immunocompetent T lymphocytes, while CD8+ T cells are called cytotoxic T cells and are able to kill malignant cells after activation by the secretion of cytokines, the release of cytotoxic granules along the immune synapse and caspase cascade activation [24,25].
In our study, we found that CD4+ T cells (known also as T-helper cells), similarly to CD20+ cells (B cells), were the main type of lymphocytes influencing the outcome. Similar data were published by Zhang et al., who discovered that CD4+ T cells belong to the cells that are significantly more frequent in the high-risk group with a poorer prognosis [26,27]. The essential function of CD4+ T cells was further proved by Oh et al., as they detected that gene signatures of proliferating cytotoxic CD4+ T cells are associated with a response to a PD-1 blockade in bladder transitional cell carcinoma patients [28]. Unfortunately, our results are contradictory to some published data. Karpina et al. did not find a significant difference in infiltration by CD4+ or CD20+ between recurrent and non-recurrent NMIBC patients, and they detected lower numbers of infiltrating CD3+ and CD8+ T cells in the group of patients without recurrence. Other studies reported that high CD4+ T-cell density in the TME is associated with a low risk of recurrence [29,30]. It is difficult to determine the source of the differences between the studies, but there were dissimilar characteristics of the analyzed populations. In the Karpina et al. study, patients were included with papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP) and low-grade NMIBC, and, in our study, we analyzed patients with low-grade and high-grade NMIBC. Furthermore, in the Karpina et al. study, patients with multiple tumors and patients with a solid or flat aspect of the tumor were excluded. Moreover, in the Karpina et al. study, the mean recurrence time in recurrent cases was longer than in our study. Despite this, the recurrence rate was similar in both studies. On the other hand, there are also divergences between the end points of the studies. Karpina et al. found that the cells correlated with cancer recurrence. We separated a group of patients with a high risk of recurrence also after 12 months after the primary tumor resection. What is more, CD4+ T cells can be split into four lineages, encompassing Th1, Th2, Th17 and Tregs, that have an ambivalent role in cancer. CD4+ T cells subsets are plastic and can be converted to another lineage during tumor growth characterized by the opposite function [27], so an antitumor response depends on the cytokines presented in the tumor microenvironment and may be changed. Nevertheless, CD4+ T cells are crucial for destroying cancer. Investigators have demonstrated that CD4+ T cells are essential for the effective induction and maintenance of cytotoxic CD8+ cells through both promoting the production of inflammatory cytokines and the direct licensing of dendritic cells [31]. The CD4+ Th1 subtype is also responsible for DC licensing, which is necessary for DC maturation [32,33]. Additionally, the activity of CD4+ Th1 cells influences tumor-killing promotion by NK and M1-type macrophages [34,35]. As a consequence, CD8+ T cells maturing in the absence of CD4+ T cells fail to fully activate cytotoxic abilities leading to the expansion of anergic CD8+ T cells with dysfunctional phenotypes [36,37,38]. Additionally, CD4+ T cells have the ability to induce tumor rejection via the major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II)-dependent pathway as well as regulation by Tregs.
In the case of CD20+ cells, our findings were similar to previous publications; although, in another investigation no significant difference in infiltration by CD20+ cells between recurrent and non-recurrent NMIBC patients was found [28]. Researchers have reported that CD20+ cells were significantly more frequent in MIBC than in high-grade NMIBC, and we detected that low CD20 expression in accordance with high CD4 expression is a marker of unfavorable outcomes [27]. It has been found that tumor-infiltrating B cells could promote bladder cancer development, and it might seem that mechanisms involved in this process are also implicated for recurrence [39]. It has also been reported that the increased presence of CD20+ follicle-like structures (FLSs) in tumor tissue may be associated with increased survival in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients. It seems that a favorable outcome is connected with FLSs as investigators have also found some cases of FLSs that were absent despite the presence of CD20+ cells in the tissues, and, in the second group, cancer-specific survival was shorter [40]. Previously, it has been reported that tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs) correlated with favorable prognosis for the patients [41], and it appears that Zirakzadeh et al. detected that B cells are also able to organize in FLSs in patients with improved prognosis. Moreover, it has been speculated that the degree of TLS formation and TLSs maturity may be associated with the aggressiveness of the disease and the severity of the stromal inflammatory response [42]. B cells are known as producers of immunoglobulins that bind to pathogens. However, they also have the ability to uptake and draw up circulating antigens, with the purpose to present them in the MHC class II for CD4+ T cells [43], so B cells may act as antigen-presenting cells, leading to the activation of T cells.
PD-L1 is expressed by cancer cells as well as some immune cells. Recently published studies have shown that 4.6–46% of NMIBC cases express PD-L1, whereas in our study the expression was detected in 6% of examined tissues [44,45,46,47]. Similar to other reports, PD-L1 expression on infiltrating immune cells was higher than on cancer cells. In addition, we found that PD-L1 expression on tumor cells ≥1% is connected with an unfavorable outcome associated with a higher probability of cancer recurrence after the first year following primary tumor resection. Similar results regarding RFS depending on PD-L1 expression have been published [27,48]. Other reports have presented opposite data [49,50,51,52], but, as we detected, the PD-L1 expression cannot be analyzed separately as a biomarker because the immune component of the tumor is a dynamic space.
In this situation, the expression of a single antigen is not enough to determine the outcome. The probability for the appropriate determination of patient risk is higher when we assess a few elements of the microenvironment. The analysis of CD4+ and CD20+ tumor-infiltrated lymphocytes as well as PD-L1 expression on tumor cells make it possible to determine a group of patients with a high risk of recurrence. In addition, in this group, the second cancer could also be recognized after 12 months following primary tumor resection, which means that this group of patients should be closely monitored with cystoscopy for a few years after the primary TURBT. It is very important mainly when we take into consideration that almost 10% of patients had diagnosed muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) during the first recurrence. The unfavorable outcome in this group of NMIBC patients might be associated with TIL dysfunction caused by the lack of CD4+ cells in the tumor microenvironment, which play a key role in antitumor immunity [53]. This small frequency could be connected with some kind of poorly immunogenic cancer cell variants, while in the same tissue samples an immune infiltration was generally not large and only an abundance of CD20+ cell infiltration was found. In this group of patients, a rich CD20+ cell infiltration cannot be recognized as enough to secure tissues for cancer recurrence because the CD4+ cells are dysfunctional and are not able to induce the proper cytotoxicity of other cells. They need the support of anti-PD-L1/PD-1 treatment. What is more, it has been detected that in melanoma patients a high CD20+ expression was connected with significant benefits caused by treatment with PD-L1/PD-1 pathway inhibition [54,55], so we can presume that in NMIBC patients this would be the same. There are also data indicating that CD4 cells are a marker of response [28,56,57], but it seems that the baseline level is less important than their ability to increase during treatment [58]. In this situation, we can assume that patients in the second group characterized by high CD4+ cell infiltration will benefit from anti-PD-L1/PD-1 treatment as well. However, we have detected that CD4+ expression correlates with PD-L1 expression on immune cells, and this could be a sign of T-cell exhaustion [59]. It seems that exhausted T cells are not the aim of anti-PD-L1/PD-1 treatment [53].
Overall, we concentrated on finding a marker of recurrence in the immune component of the tumor that reflects tumor aberrations, so we did not include classical risk factors in the analysis, which are used to determine the risk of tumor progression to muscle-invasive status, such as tumor stage, tumor grade or number of tumors. Thanks to that, we found potential biomarkers of immunotherapy, as using PD-L1 expression is not enough to determine the effectiveness of immunotherapy [60,61]. Moreover, the discussed markers are simple, feasible and relatively inexpensive.
This study has the known limitations of retrospective design. In addition, the number of cases remains comparatively small, and thus the results need further validation, preferably in prospective studies. In addition, in the study, patients were included who underwent TURBT despite their adjuvant BCG treatment status and that might have had an impact on the outcome.

5. Conclusions

The infiltration of both the T and B cells as well as PD-L1 expression on tumor cells have emerged as important players in the immune response against cancer. This observation has potential clinical utility and may be essential for the assessment of tumor immunological status, which, in future, would be taken into account when selecting a follow-up and treatment strategy. The data from our study have enhanced the knowledge about biomarkers in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer and indicate a course of additional analyses. However, further studies aimed at better understanding the changing tumor immunogenicity during bladder cancer development are warranted. In addition, as it is a retrospective study, the results need to be validated with a prospective study.

Author Contributions

A.S.-W. was responsible for conceptualization, methodology, supervision and writing. K.P.-S. and S.K. collected the data and followed up the patients. M.M. performed the analyses and was responsible for supervision. A.L. performed the statistical analysis. R.S., A.J. and B.G. were responsible for the formal analysis and reviewing revisions. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Pfizer Polska Sp. z o.o. (Pfizer Tracking Number GMGS Request #68288599).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board of the Medical University of Warsaw; AKBE/250/2021; 13 December 2021.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Compérat, E.; Larré, S.; Roupret, M.; Neuzillet, Y.; Pignot, G.; Quintens, H.; Houéde, N.; Roy, C.; Durand, X.; Varinot, J.; et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of urothelial bladder cancer in patients less than 40 years old. Virchows Arch. 2015, 466, 589–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Burger, M.; Catto, J.W.F.; Dalbagni, G.; Grossman, H.B.; Herr, H.; Karakiewicz, P.; Kassouf, W.; Kiemeney, L.A.; La Vecchia, C.; Shariat, S.; et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur. Urol. 2013, 63, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ferro, M.; Barone, B.; Crocetto, F.; Lucarelli, G.; Busetto, G.M.; Del Giudice, F.; Maggi, M.; Crocerossa, F.; Cantiello, F.; Damiano, R.; et al. Predictive clinico-pathological factors to identify BCG, unresponsive patients, after re-resection for T1 high grade non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urol. Oncol. 2022, 40, 490.e13–490.e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. van der Meijden, A.P.; Sylvester, R.J.; Oosterlinck, W.; Hoeltl, W.; Bono, A.V. Maintenance Bacillus Calmette-Guerin for Ta T1 bladder tumors is not associated with increased toxicity: Results from a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genito-Urinary Group Phase III Trial. Eur. Urol. 2003, 44, 429–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Larsen, E.S.; Nordholm, A.C.; Lillebaek, T.; Holden, I.K.; Johansen, I.S. The epidemiology of bacille Calmette-Guérin infections after bladder instillation from 2002 through 2017: A nationwide retrospective cohort study. BJU Int. 2019, 124, 910–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brahmer, J.R.; Tykodi, S.S.; Chow, L.Q.M.; Hwu, W.-J.; Topalian, S.L.; Hwu, P.; Drake, C.G.; Camacho, L.H.; Kauh, J.; Odunsi, K.; et al. Safety and activity of anti-PD-L1 antibody in patients with advanced cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 2455–2465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Topalian, S.L.; Hodi, F.S.; Brahmer, J.R.; Gettinger, S.N.; Smith, D.C.; McDermott, D.F.; Powderly, J.D.; Carvajal, R.D.; Sosman, J.A.; Atkins, M.B.; et al. Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 2443–2454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jiang, Y.; Chen, M.; Nie, H.; Yuan, Y. PD-1 and PD-L1 in cancer immunotherapy: Clinical implications and future considerations. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2019, 15, 1111–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bellmunt, J.; Hussain, M.; E Gschwend, J.; Albers, P.; Oudard, S.; Castellano, D.; Daneshmand, S.; Nishiyama, H.; Majchrowicz, M.; Degaonkar, V.; et al. Adjuvant atezolizumab versus observation in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (IMvigor010): A multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021, 22, 525–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Roumiguié, M.; Compérat, E.; Chaltiel, L.; Nouhaud, F.X.; Verhoest, G.; Masson-Lecomte, A.; Colin, P.; Audenet, F.; Houédé, N.; Larré, S.; et al. PD-L1 expression and pattern of immune cells in pre-treatment specimens are associated with disease-free survival for HR-NMIBC undergoing BCG treatment. World J. Urol. 2021, 39, 4055–4065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zheng, Z.; Mao, S.; Zhang, W.; Liu, J.; Li, C.; Wang, R.; Yao, X. Dysregulation of the Immune Microenvironment Contributes to Malignant Progression and Has Prognostic Value in Bladder Cancer. Front. Oncol. 2020, 10, 542492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Galon, J.; Costes, A.; Sanchez-Cabo, F.; Kirilovsky, A.; Mlecnik, B.; Lagorce-Pagès, C.; Tosolini, M.; Camus, M.; Berger, A.; Wind, P.; et al. Type, density, and location of immune cells within human colorectal tumors predict clinical outcome. Science 2006, 313, 1960–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Mlecnik, B.; Tosolini, M.; Kirilovsky, A.; Berger, A.; Bindea, G.; Meatchi, T.; Bruneval, P.; Trajanoski, Z.; Fridman, W.-H.; Pagès, F.; et al. Histopathologic-based prognostic factors of colorectal cancers are associated with the state of the local immune reaction. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 610–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Thompson, R.H.; Gillett, M.D.; Cheville, J.C.; Lohse, C.M.; Dong, H.; Webster, W.S.; Krejci, K.G.; Lobo, J.R.; Sengupta, S.; Chen, L.; et al. Costimulatory B7-H1 in renal cell carcinoma patients: Indicator of tumor aggressiveness and potential therapeutic target. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 17174–17179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Minárik, I.; Lašťovička, J.; Budinský, V.; Kayserová, J.; Špíšek, R.; Jarolím, L.; Fialová, A.; Babjuk, M.; Bartůňková, J. Regulatory T cells, dendritic cells and neutrophils in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Immunol. Lett. 2013, 152, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Toge, H.; Inagaki, T.; Kojimoto, Y.; Shinka, T.; Hara, I. Angiogenesis in renal cell carcinoma: The role of tumor-associated macrophages. Int. J. Urol. 2009, 16, 801–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Komohara, Y.; Hasita, H.; Ohnishi, K.; Fujiwara, Y.; Suzu, S.; Eto, M.; Takeya, M. Macrophage infiltration and its prognostic relevance in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2011, 102, 1424–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hotta, K.; Sho, M.; Fujimoto, K.; Shimada, K.; Yamato, I.; Anai, S.; Konishi, N.; Hirao, Y.; Nonomura, K.; Nakajima, Y. Prognostic significance of CD45RO+ memory T cells in renal cell carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer. 2011, 105, 1191–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, K.; Zhao, K.; Wang, L.; Sun, E. The prognostic values of tumor-infiltrating neutrophils, lymphocytes and neutrophil/lymphocyte rates in bladder urothelial cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2018, 214, 1074–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Miyake, M.; Tatsumi, Y.; Gotoh, D.; Ohnishi, S.; Owari, T.; Iida, K.; Ohnishi, K.; Hori, S.; Morizawa, Y.; Itami, Y.; et al. Regulatory T Cells and Tumor-Associated Macrophages in the Tumor Microenvironment in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated with IntravesicalBacille Calmette-Guérin: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study of a Japanese Cohort. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ascione, C.M.; Napolitano, F.; Esposito, D.; Servetto, A.; Belli, S.; Santaniello, A.; Scagliarini, S.; Crocetto, F.; Bianco, R.; Formisano, L. Role of FGFR3 in bladder cancer: Treatment landscape and future challenges. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2023, 115, 102530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Moch, H.; Cubilla, A.L.; Humphrey, P.A.; Reuter, V.E.; Ulbright, T.M. The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part A: Renal, Penile, and Testicular Tumours. Eur. Urol. 2016, 70, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, H.; Parkhouse, R.M.; Wileman, T. Monoclonal antibodies that identify the CD3 molecules expressed specifically at the surface of porcine gammadelta-T cells. Immunology 2005, 115, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mittrücker, H.W.; Visekruna, A.; Huber, M. Heterogeneity in the differentiation and function of CD8⁺ T cells. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2014, 62, 449–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Zhang, Q.; Hao, C.; Cheng, G.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.; Li, C.; Qiu, J.; Ding, K. High CD4⁺ T cell density is associated with poor prognosis in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 11510–11516. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Viveiros, N.; Flores, B.C.; Lobo, J.; Martins-Lima, C.; Cantante, M.; Lopes, P.; Deantonio, C.; Palu, C.; Sainson, R.C.; Henrique, R.; et al. Detailed bladder cancer immunoprofiling reveals new clues for immunotherapeutic strategies. Clin. Transl. Immunol. 2022, 11, e1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Oh, D.Y.; Kwek, S.S.; Raju, S.S.; Li, T.; McCarthy, E.; Chow, E.; Aran, D.; Ilano, A.; Pai, C.-C.S.; Rancan, C.; et al. Intratumoral CD4+ T Cells Mediate Anti-tumor Cytotoxicity in Human Bladder Cancer. Cell 2020, 181, 1612–1625.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Krpina, K.; Babarović, E.; Jonjić, N. Correlation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes with bladder cancer recurrence in patients with solitary low-grade urothelial carcinoma. Virchows Arch. 2015, 467, 443–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. He, Y.; Wu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, B.; Jiang, N.; Xu, P.; Xu, A. Identification of Signature Genes Associated With Invasiveness and the Construction of a Prognostic Model That Predicts the Overall Survival of Bladder Cancer. Front. Genet. 2021, 12, 694777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sacher, A.G.; St Paul, M.; Paige, C.J.; Ohashi, P.S. Cytotoxic CD4+ T Cells in Bladder Cancer-A New License to Kill. Cancer Cell 2020, 38, 28–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Greyer, M.; Whitney, P.G.; Stock, A.T.; Davey, G.M.; Tebartz, C.; Bachem, A.; Mintern, J.D.; Strugnell, R.A.; Turner, S.J.; Gebhardt, T.; et al. T Cell Help Amplifies Innate Signals in CD8(+) DCs for Optimal CD8(+) T Cell Priming. Cell Rep. 2016, 14, 586–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Escors, D.; Lopes, L.; Lin, R.; Hiscott, J.; Akira, S.; Davis, R.J.; Collins, M.K. Targeting dendritic cell signaling to regulate the response to immunization. Blood 2008, 111, 3050–3061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Peng, P.; Lou, Y.; Wang, J.; Wang, S.; Liu, P.; Xu, L.X. Th1-Dominant CD4+ T Cells Orchestrate Endogenous Systematic Antitumor Immune Memory After Cryo-Thermal Therapy. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 944115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Eisel, D.; Das, K.; Dickes, E.; König, R.; Osen, W.; Eichmüller, S.B. Cognate Interaction With CD4+ T Cells Instructs Tumor-Associated Macrophages to Acquire M1-Like Phenotype. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ahrends, T.; Busselaar, J.; Severson, T.M.; Bąbała, N.; de Vries, E.; Bovens, A.; Wessels, L.; van Leeuwen, F.; Borst, J. CD4+ T cell help creates memory CD8+ T cells with innate and help-independent recall capacities. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Janssen, E.M.; Lemmens, E.E.; Wolfe, T.; Christen, U.; von Herrath, M.G.; Schoenberger, S.P. CD4+ T cells are required for secondary expansion and memory in CD8+ T lymphocytes. Nature 2003, 421, 852–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Laidlaw, B.J.; Craft, J.E.; Kaech, S.M. The multifaceted role of CD4(+) T cells in CD8(+) T cell memory. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 16, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Ou, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; Li, L.; Yeh, S.; Qi, L.; Chang, C. Tumor microenvironment B cells increase bladder cancer metastasis via modulation of the IL-8/androgen receptor (AR)/MMPs signals. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 26065–26078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zirakzadeh, A.A.; Sherif, A.; Rosenblatt, R.; Bergman, E.A.; Winerdal, M.; Yang, D.; Cederwall, J.; Jakobsson, V.; Hyllienmark, M.; Winqvist, O.; et al. Tumour-associated B cells in urothelial urinary bladder cancer. Scand. J. Immunol. 2020, 91, e12830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Colbeck, E.J.; Ager, A.; Gallimore, A.; Jones, G.W. Tertiary Lymphoid Structures in Cancer: Drivers of Antitumor Immunity, Immunosuppression, or Bystander Sentinels in Disease? Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Koti, M.; Xu, A.S.; Ren, K.Y.M.; Visram, K.; Ren, R.; Berman, D.M.; Siemens, D.R. Tertiary Lymphoid Structures Associate with Tumour Stage in Urothelial Bladder Cancer. Bladder Cancer 2017, 3, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zirakzadeh, A.A.; Marits, P.; Sherif, A.; Winqvist, O. Multiplex B cell characterization in blood, lymph nodes, and tumors from patients with malignancies. J. Immunol. 2013, 190, 5847–5855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Wankowicz, S.A.; Werner, L.; Orsola, A.; Novak, J.; Bowden, M.; Choueiri, T.K.; de Torres, I.; Morote, J.; Freeman, G.J.; Signoretti, S.; et al. Differential Expression of PD-L1 in High Grade T1 vs Muscle Invasive Bladder Carcinoma and its Prognostic Implications. J. Urol. 2017, 198, 817–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Aydin, A.M.; Baydar, D.E.; Hazir, B.; Babaoglu, B.; Bilen, C.Y. Prognostic significance of pre- and post-treatment PD-L1 expression in patients with primary high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with BCG immunotherapy. World J. Urol. 2020, 38, 2537–2545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hashizume, A.; Umemoto, S.; Yokose, T.; Nakamura, Y.; Yoshihara, M.; Shoji, K.; Wada, S.; Miyagi, Y.; Kishida, T.; Sasada, T. Enhanced expression of PD-L1 in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer after treatment with Bacillus Calmette-Guerin. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 34066–34078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Martínez, R.; Tapia, G.; De Muga, S.; Hernández, A.; Cao, M.G.; Teixidó, C.; Urrea, V.; García, E.; Pedreño-López, S.; Ibarz, L.; et al. Combined assessment of peritumoral Th1/Th2 polarization and peripheral immunity as a new biomarker in the prediction of BCG response in patients with high-risk NMIBC. Oncoimmunology 2019, 8, 1602460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Blinova, E.; Buzdin, A.; Enikeev, D.; Roshchin, D.; Suntsova, M.; Samyshina, E.; Drobyshev, A.; Deryabina, O.; Demura, T.; Blinov, D.; et al. Prognostic Role of FGFR3 Expression Status and Tumor-Related MicroRNAs Level in Association with PD-L1 Expression in Primary Luminal Non-Muscular Invasive Bladder Carcinoma. Life 2020, 10, 305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Damrauer, J.S.; Roell, K.R.; Smith, M.A.; Sun, X.; Kirk, E.L.; Hoadley, K.A.; Benefield, H.C.; Iyer, G.; Solit, D.B.; Milowsky, M.I.; et al. Identification of a Novel Inflamed Tumor Microenvironment Signature as a Predictive Biomarker of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Immunotherapy in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 27, 4599–4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Eich, M.-L.; Chaux, A.; Guner, G.; Taheri, D.; Rodriguez, M.A.M.; Peña, M.D.C.R.; Baras, A.S.; Hahn, N.M.; Drake, C.; Sharma, R.; et al. Tumor immune microenvironment in non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Hum. Pathol. 2019, 89, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Breyer, J.; Wirtz, R.M.; Otto, W.; Erben, P.; Worst, T.S.; Stoehr, R.; Eckstein, M.; Denzinger, S.; Burger, M.; Hartmann, A. High PDL1 mRNA expression predicts better survival of stage pT1 non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2018, 67, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kubon, J.; Sikic, D.; Eckstein, M.; Weyerer, V.; Stöhr, R.; Neumann, A.; Keck, B.; Wullich, B.; Hartmann, A.; Wirtz, R.M.; et al. AAnalysis of CXCL9, PD1 and PD-L1 mRNA in Stage T1 Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer and Their Association with Prognosis. Cancers 2020, 12, 2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Escors, D.; Bocanegra, A.; Chocarro, L.; Blanco, E.; Piñeiro-Hermida, S.; Garnica, M.; Fernandez-Rubio, L.; Vera, R.; Arasanz, H.; Kochan, G. Systemic CD4 Immunity and PD-L1/PD-1 Blockade Immunotherapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Amaria, R.N.; Reddy, S.M.; Tawbi, H.A.; Davies, M.A.; Ross, M.I.; Glitza, I.C.; Cormier, J.N.; Lewis, C.; Hwu, W.-J.; Hanna, E.; et al. Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade in high-risk resectable melanoma. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 1649–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Griss, J.; Bauer, W.; Wagner, C.; Simon, M.; Chen, M.; Grabmeier-Pfistershammer, K.; Maurer-Granofszky, M.; Roka, F.; Penz, T.; Bock, C.; et al. B cells sustain inflammation and predict response to immune checkpoint blockade in human melanoma. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zuazo, M.; Arasanz, H.; Fernández-Hinojal, G.; García-Granda, M.J.; Gato, M.; Bocanegra, A.; Martínez, M.; Hernández, B.; Teijeira, L.; Morilla, I.; et al. Functional systemic CD4 immunity is required for clinical responses to PD-L1/PD-1 blockade therapy. EMBO Mol. Med. 2019, 11, e10293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rochigneux, P.; Lisberg, A.; Garcia, A.; Granjeaud, S.; Madroszyk, A.; Fattori, S.; Gonçalves, A.; Devillier, R.; Maby, P.; Salem, N.; et al. Mass Cytometry Reveals Classical Monocytes, NK Cells, and ICOS+ CD4+ T Cells Associated with Pembrolizumab Efficacy in Patients with Lung Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2022, 28, 5136–5148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Spitzer, M.H.; Carmi, Y.; Reticker-Flynn, N.E.; Kwek, S.S.; Madhireddy, D.; Martins, M.M.; Gherardini, P.F.; Prestwood, T.R.; Chabon, J.; Bendall, S.C.; et al. Systemic Immunity Is Required for Effective Cancer Immunotherapy. Cell 2017, 168, 487–502.e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Miggelbrink, A.M.; Jackson, J.D.; Lorrey, S.J.; Srinivasan, E.S.; Waibl-Polania, J.; Wilkinson, D.S.; Fecci, P.E. CD4 T-Cell Exhaustion: Does It Exist and What Are Its Roles in Cancer? Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 27, 5742–5752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Powles, T.; Kockx, M.; Rodriguez-Vida, A.; Duran, I.; Crabb, S.J.; Van Der Heijden, M.S.; Szabados, B.; Pous, A.F.; Gravis, G.; Herranz, U.A.; et al. Clinical efficacy and biomarker analysis of neoadjuvant atezolizumab in operable urothelial carcinoma in the ABACUS trial. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1706–1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Li, H.; van der Merwe, P.A.; Sivakumar, S. Biomarkers of response to PD-1 pathway blockade. Br. J. Cancer 2022, 126, 1663–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Cancers 15 05529 sch001
Scheme 1. Immunohistochemical stains presenting high-grade tumors (×20): (A) low PD-L1 expression; (B) high PD-L1 expression; (C) low CD4+ density; (D) high CD4+ density; (E) low CD20+ density; (F) high CD20+ density.
Scheme 1. Immunohistochemical stains presenting high-grade tumors (×20): (A) low PD-L1 expression; (B) high PD-L1 expression; (C) low CD4+ density; (D) high CD4+ density; (E) low CD20+ density; (F) high CD20+ density.
Cancers 15 05529 sch001
Cancers 15 05529 g001
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier curves of recurrence-free survival by risk groups, according to PD-L1 expression on tumor cells. (Group 1 = low expression, <1% of tumor cells; group 2 = moderate and high expression, >1% of tumor cells); F-Cox test: p = 0.07601.
Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier curves of recurrence-free survival by risk groups, according to PD-L1 expression on tumor cells. (Group 1 = low expression, <1% of tumor cells; group 2 = moderate and high expression, >1% of tumor cells); F-Cox test: p = 0.07601.
Cancers 15 05529 g001
Cancers 15 05529 g002
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves of recurrence-free survival by risk groups according to CD4+ cell density determined by ROC curves. (Group 1 = low CD4 expression (<4.6%)); F-Cox test: p = 0.00593.
Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier curves of recurrence-free survival by risk groups according to CD4+ cell density determined by ROC curves. (Group 1 = low CD4 expression (<4.6%)); F-Cox test: p = 0.00593.
Cancers 15 05529 g002
Cancers 15 05529 g003
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curves of recurrence-free survival by risk groups according to CD20+ cell density determined by ROC curves (Group 1 = low CD20 expression (<10%)); F-Cox test: p = 0.05215.
Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier curves of recurrence-free survival by risk groups according to CD20+ cell density determined by ROC curves (Group 1 = low CD20 expression (<10%)); F-Cox test: p = 0.05215.
Cancers 15 05529 g003
Cancers 15 05529 g004
Figure 4. Kaplan–Meier curves of recurrence-free survival by risk groups. (Group 1 = low CD4+ density according to ROC (<4.6%) and high CD20+ density according to ROC (>10%); group 2 = high CD4+ density (>4.6%) according to ROC or low CD20+ density (<10%) according to ROC or PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (≥1%)); F-Cox test: p = 0.00056.
Figure 4. Kaplan–Meier curves of recurrence-free survival by risk groups. (Group 1 = low CD4+ density according to ROC (<4.6%) and high CD20+ density according to ROC (>10%); group 2 = high CD4+ density (>4.6%) according to ROC or low CD20+ density (<10%) according to ROC or PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (≥1%)); F-Cox test: p = 0.00056.
Cancers 15 05529 g004
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
Table 1. Patient characteristics.
FeatureNumber of Patients (n)Percentage (%)
Stage
Tis11.8
Ta3665.5
T11832.7
Concomitant Tis
Yes11.8
No5498.2
Grade
LG2647.3
HG2952.7
Number of tumors
13156.4
2–31832.7
≥459.1
Not known11.8
Diameter of the largest tumor
<1 cm47.3
1–2.5 cm2647.3
≥3 cm2138.2
Not known47.3
BCG adjuvant treatment
Yes814.5
No4785.5
Tis—carcinoma in situ (CIS), “flat tumor”; Ta—non-invasive papillary carcinoma, exophytic tumors confined largely to the mucosa; T1—tumor invades subepithelial connective tissue; LG—low-grade tumors; HG—high-grade tumors.
Table 2. Immunohistochemical staining for CD4, CD8, CD15, CD20, CD56, CD68 and CD31 in all analyzed samples.
Table 2. Immunohistochemical staining for CD4, CD8, CD15, CD20, CD56, CD68 and CD31 in all analyzed samples.
FeatureMedianMinimumMaximum
CD4 [%]7.190.0724.41
CD8 [%]9.531.8031.86
CD15 [%]4.320.7718.92
CD20 [%]4.070.2027.76
CD56 [%]0.540.058.21
CD68 [%]22.1910.1444.06
CD31+ vessels (on 1 mm2)83.0023.00244.00
Table 3. Statistically significant correlations in the immune component of the tumor microenvironment in all analyzed samples.
Table 3. Statistically significant correlations in the immune component of the tumor microenvironment in all analyzed samples.
Rp
CD4 [%] & CD15 [%]0.463<0.001
CD4 [%] & CD20 [%]0.3760.007
CD4 [%] & CD31 (na 1 mm2)−0.3280.019
CD4 [%] & PD-L1 (IC): 1 = low; 2 = moderate; 3 = high0.4030.003
CD8 [%] & CD20 [%]0.350.012
CD8 [%] & CD56 [%]−0.30.034
CD8 [%] & CD68 [%]0.3660.008
CD56 [%] & CD68 [%]−0.3160.024
R—correlation coefficient; p—statistical significance level.
Table 4. Multiple analysis of relationship between recurrence-free survival and selected pathological variables in all analyzed samples.
Table 4. Multiple analysis of relationship between recurrence-free survival and selected pathological variables in all analyzed samples.
HR95% Confidence Intervalp
CD4 [%]1.191.07–1.320.001
CD8 [%]1.000.90–1.120.87
CD15 [%]1.060.93–1.200.33
CD20 [%]0.900.84–0.970.008
CD56 [%]0.830.62–1.100.2
CD68 [%]0.970.89–1.040.44
CD31+ vessels (on 1 mm2)1.0040.99–1.010.34
PD-L1 (TC) low vs. high0.050.008–0.290.01
PD-L1 (TC) moderate vs. high0.050.003–0.800.19
PD-L1 (IC) low vs. high1.60.51–4.980.14
PD-L1 (IC) moderate vs. high0.580.18–1.870.13
HR—hazard ratio; p—statistical significance level.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Semeniuk-Wojtaś, A.; Modzelewska, M.; Poddębniak-Strama, K.; Kołaczyńska, S.; Lubas, A.; Górnicka, B.; Jakieła, A.; Stec, R. CD4, CD20 and PD-L1 as Markers of Recurrence in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Cancers 2023, 15, 5529. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15235529

AMA Style

Semeniuk-Wojtaś A, Modzelewska M, Poddębniak-Strama K, Kołaczyńska S, Lubas A, Górnicka B, Jakieła A, Stec R. CD4, CD20 and PD-L1 as Markers of Recurrence in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer. Cancers. 2023; 15(23):5529. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15235529

Chicago/Turabian Style

Semeniuk-Wojtaś, Aleksandra, Magdalena Modzelewska, Karolina Poddębniak-Strama, Sylwia Kołaczyńska, Arkadiusz Lubas, Barbara Górnicka, Anna Jakieła, and Rafał Stec. 2023. "CD4, CD20 and PD-L1 as Markers of Recurrence in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer" Cancers 15, no. 23: 5529. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15235529

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop