Review Reports
- Nadine Spadarotto1,
- Anja Sauck2 and
- Nicolin Hainc3
- et al.
Reviewer 1: Stephen Strum Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsI think this is an excellent contribution and highly important to all physicians involved with PCa patients. I converted the manuscript from PDF to Word so I could more easily use the Review tool in Word to offer my recommendations to you. Your grammar is overall excellent and I only found a few areas where I think the content could be presented more simply and clearly to the reader.
I also feel that you could add text to some of your figures so that they could stand alone as teaching vehicles.
This was the most enjoyable review I have done in the last two years. I hope the other reviewers concur with my assessment.
Congrats to all of you involved.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
See above. I found the manuscript to be very well written. There are only a few sentences that could be restructured for clarity.
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsPlease see attached.
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments and Suggestions for AuthorsThanks for addressing my comments.