Next Article in Journal
Laparoscopic Cytoreduction Combined with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Peritoneal Surface Malignancies (PSM): Italian PSM Oncoteam Evidence and Literature Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Innovative Invasive Loco-Regional Techniques for the Treatment of Lung Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Radiotherapy Fraction in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Modern Era: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 8006 Reconstructed Individual Patient Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Cross-Sectional Study on the Acceptability of Implementing a Lung Cancer Screening Program in Belgium

by
Paloma Diab Garcia
1,2,
Annemiek Snoeckx
3,
Jan P. Van Meerbeeck
4,5 and
Guido Van Hal
6,*
1
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
2
IQVIA RDS & Integrated Services Belgium NV/SA, Corporate Village-Davos Building, Da Vincilaan 7, 1930 Zaventem, Belgium
3
Department of Radiology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
4
Department of Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
5
Laboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, Infla-Med Center of Excellence, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
6
Social Epidemiology and Health Policy, University of Antwerp, 2610 Antwerp, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2023, 15(1), 278; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010278
Submission received: 17 November 2022 / Revised: 22 December 2022 / Accepted: 27 December 2022 / Published: 31 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Thoracic Oncology)

Simple Summary

Lung cancer is the most common and deadliest cancer worldwide, and the number of new cases per year is expected to grow. Belgium is among the top 10 countries with most new cases of lung cancer in the world, with lung cancer incidence accounting for 11.8% of all cancers diagnosed and 23.8% of all cancer-related deaths. This study aimed to determine the overall acceptability of a lung cancer screening program in the Flemish population and the main factors that would influence the overall acceptability of such a program. Modeling of the results of a questionnaire distributed to the Flemish population showed 92% acceptability. Furthermore, policymakers should aim for it to be reimbursed, and campaigns should be gender-specific, focused on those with lower educational and socioeconomic status, along with investment in increasing total knowledge about lung cancer and about protective factors.

Abstract

Lung cancer is the most common and deadliest cancer in the world, and its incidence is expected to grow. Nonetheless, this growth can be contained through smoking cessation programs and effective lung cancer screening programs. In 2018, Belgium had the seventh highest incidence of lung cancer in the world, with lung cancer incidence accounting for 11.8% of all cancers diagnosed and 23.8% of all cancer-related deaths that same year. The aims of this study were to determine the overall acceptability of a lung cancer screening program in the Flemish population and to determine the main factors that would influence the overall acceptability of such a program. A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was performed in the Flemish population and distributed online and on paper. The results are presented with the variables of interest and the main outcome, i.e., the acceptability of participating in such a program if implemented. Odds ratios were used to compare acceptability between subgroups. A multivariate regression model was used to determine the key factors that would have the largest impact on the level of acceptability and, thus, on the possible efficiency of such a program. This study estimated that acceptability of participating in a lung cancer screening program was 92%. Irrespective of the smoking status, levels of acceptability were higher than 89%. The key factors which could significantly influence the acceptability of a lung cancer screening program were individuals with low education, low protective factor knowledge and total knowledge, and lung cancer screening reimbursement, which were significantly associated with acceptability (0.01, 0.001, 0.01, and 0.05 respectively). Low protective factor knowledge decreased the log odds of acceptability 3.08-fold. In conclusion, the acceptability of implementing a lung cancer screening program in Flanders seems to be extremely high and would be well received by all. When implementing such a program, policymakers should aim for it to be reimbursed, campaigns should be gender-specific, focused on those with lower educational and socioeconomic status, and there should be investment in increasing total knowledge about lung cancer and knowledge about protective factors.
Keywords: lung cancer screening; prevention; Belgium; acceptability lung cancer screening; prevention; Belgium; acceptability

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Diab Garcia, P.; Snoeckx, A.; Van Meerbeeck, J.P.; Van Hal, G. A Cross-Sectional Study on the Acceptability of Implementing a Lung Cancer Screening Program in Belgium. Cancers 2023, 15, 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010278

AMA Style

Diab Garcia P, Snoeckx A, Van Meerbeeck JP, Van Hal G. A Cross-Sectional Study on the Acceptability of Implementing a Lung Cancer Screening Program in Belgium. Cancers. 2023; 15(1):278. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010278

Chicago/Turabian Style

Diab Garcia, Paloma, Annemiek Snoeckx, Jan P. Van Meerbeeck, and Guido Van Hal. 2023. "A Cross-Sectional Study on the Acceptability of Implementing a Lung Cancer Screening Program in Belgium" Cancers 15, no. 1: 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010278

APA Style

Diab Garcia, P., Snoeckx, A., Van Meerbeeck, J. P., & Van Hal, G. (2023). A Cross-Sectional Study on the Acceptability of Implementing a Lung Cancer Screening Program in Belgium. Cancers, 15(1), 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010278

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop