Simple Summary
Advances in diagnostic imaging have led to an increase in the diagnosis and treatment of small-diameter renal cell carcinomas in the elderly. Elderly patients may show impaired operative tolerance; thus, treatment should be more carefully chosen in them than in younger patients. In this study, a retrospective comparison of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) was conducted for small-diameter renal cell carcinomas in elderly patients. Both RAPN (with a slightly high complication rate but a low recurrence rate) and PCA (with a low complication rate but a slightly high recurrence rate) could be performed safely in elderly patients. RAPN proved to be a safe and effective method for treating small-diameter renal cell carcinomas in elderly patients, thereby being the first treatment of choice in such patients. PCA was also a safe and feasible alternative, especially in patients in whom general anesthesia poses a high risk.
Abstract
Advances in imaging technologies have increased the opportunities for treating small-diameter renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) in the elderly. This retrospective study based on real-world clinical practice compared perioperative complications, preoperative and postoperative renal function, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival in elderly patients with RCC who had undergone robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) or percutaneous cryoablation (PCA). A total of 99 patients (aged ≥70 years), including 50 and 49 patients in the RAPN and PCA groups, respectively, were analyzed. In the entire cohort, Clavien–Dindo grade ≥3 complications occurred in only one patient who had undergone RAPN. Renal function was significantly lower in the postoperative period than in the preoperative period in both the RAPN and PCA groups. The recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were worse in the PCA group than in the RAPN group, albeit not significantly. RAPN was considered a safe and effective method for treating RCCs in elderly patients. Moreover, although the recurrence rate was slightly higher in the PCA group than in the RAPN group, PCA was deemed to be a safe alternative, especially for treating patients in whom general anesthesia poses a high risk.