Next Article in Journal
Viral Proteins as Emerging Cancer Therapeutics
Next Article in Special Issue
LRG1 Promotes Metastatic Dissemination of Melanoma through Regulating EGFR/STAT3 Signalling
Previous Article in Journal
JNK in Tumor Microenvironment: Present Findings and Challenges in Clinical Translation
Previous Article in Special Issue
PPARs and Tumor Microenvironment: The Emerging Roles of the Metabolic Master Regulators in Tumor Stromal–Epithelial Crosstalk and Carcinogenesis
Review

Does Cancer Biology Rely on Parrondo’s Principles?

1
Toulouse Biotechnology Institute, University of Toulouse, INSA, CNRS, INRAE, 31400 Toulouse, France
2
Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, P.O. Box 4400, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada
3
Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Deakin, VIC 3216, Australia
4
CREEC/CANECEV, MIVEGEC (CREES), Centre de Recherches Ecologiques et Evolutives sur le Cancer, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IRD, 34000 Montpellier, France
5
Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Hüfferstrasse 1, 48149 Münster, Germany
6
Laboratory of Rare Human Circulating Cells (LCCRH), University Medical Centre of Montpellier, 34093 Montpellier, France
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: José I. López and Ildefonso M. de la Fuente
Cancers 2021, 13(9), 2197; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13092197
Received: 9 April 2021 / Revised: 29 April 2021 / Accepted: 29 April 2021 / Published: 3 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cell Motility and Cancer)
Parrondo’s paradox, whereby losing strategies or deleterious effects can combine to provide a winning outcome, has been increasingly applied by biologists to explain complex adaptations in many living systems. Here, we suggest that considering this paradox in oncology, particularly in relation to the phenotypic diversity of malignant cells, could also be a promising approach to understand several puzzling aspects of cancer biology. For example, the high genetic and epigenetic instability of cancer cells, their metastatic behavior and their capacity to enter dormancy could be explained by Parrondo’s theory. We also discuss the relevance of Parrondo’s paradox in a therapeutical framework using different examples. This work provides a compelling argument that the traditional separation between medicine and other disciplines remains a fundamental limitation that needs to be overcome if complex processes, such as oncogenesis, are to be completely understood.
Many aspects of cancer biology remain puzzling, including the proliferative and survival success of malignant cells in spite of their high genetic and epigenetic instability as well as their ability to express migrating phenotypes and/or enter dormancy despite possible fitness loss. Understanding the potential adaptive value of these phenotypic traits is confounded by the fact that, when considered separately, they seem to be rather detrimental at the cell level, at least in the short term. Here, we argue that cancer’s biology and success could frequently be governed by processes underlying Parrondo’s paradox, whereby combinations of intrinsically losing strategies may result in winning outcomes. Oncogenic selection would favor Parrondo’s dynamics because, given the environmental adversity in which malignant cells emerge and evolve, alternating between various less optimal strategies would represent the sole viable option to counteract the changing and deleterious environments cells are exposed to during tumorigenesis. We suggest that malignant processes could be viewed through this lens, and we discuss how Parrondo’s principles are also important when designing therapies against cancer. View Full-Text
Keywords: cancer; dormancy; metastasis; Parrondo’s paradox; therapy cancer; dormancy; metastasis; Parrondo’s paradox; therapy
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Capp, J.-P.; Nedelcu, A.M.; Dujon, A.M.; Roche, B.; Catania, F.; Ujvari, B.; Alix-Panabières, C.; Thomas, F. Does Cancer Biology Rely on Parrondo’s Principles? Cancers 2021, 13, 2197. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13092197

AMA Style

Capp J-P, Nedelcu AM, Dujon AM, Roche B, Catania F, Ujvari B, Alix-Panabières C, Thomas F. Does Cancer Biology Rely on Parrondo’s Principles? Cancers. 2021; 13(9):2197. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13092197

Chicago/Turabian Style

Capp, Jean-Pascal, Aurora M. Nedelcu, Antoine M. Dujon, Benjamin Roche, Francesco Catania, Beata Ujvari, Catherine Alix-Panabières, and Frédéric Thomas. 2021. "Does Cancer Biology Rely on Parrondo’s Principles?" Cancers 13, no. 9: 2197. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13092197

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop