Next Article in Journal
Targeting CAR to the Peptide-MHC Complex Reveals Distinct Signaling Compared to That of TCR in a Jurkat T Cell Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Isoliquiritigenin Reverses Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Through Modulation of the TGF-β/Smad Signaling Pathway in Endometrial Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Synergistic Effects of Lenvatinib (E7080) and MEK Inhibitors against Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer in Preclinical Models
Previous Article in Special Issue
Chemopreventive Potential of Caryophyllane Sesquiterpenes: An Overview of Preliminary Evidence
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Precision Nutrition to Activate Thermogenesis as a Complementary Approach to Target Obesity and Associated-Metabolic-Disorders

Cancers 2021, 13(4), 866; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040866
by Marina Reguero 1,2,†, Marta Gómez de Cedrón 1,*,†, Sonia Wagner 1,3, Guillermo Reglero 4, José Carlos Quintela 2 and Ana Ramírez de Molina 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Cancers 2021, 13(4), 866; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13040866
Submission received: 22 December 2020 / Revised: 15 February 2021 / Accepted: 16 February 2021 / Published: 18 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Medicinal Plants and Their Active Ingredients in Cancer)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This review is very interesting, well documented, with a lot of new information.

Some remarks:

The abstract - is a bit long. Lines 521, 523 - ginkgo biloba.

Please correct with a large G.

Lines 567 - The beginning of this sentence is missing: "137 found that diets rich in isoflavones also increased triiodothyronine levels and…."

To arrange the table (it has no beginning: table head);

Ginkgo Biloba (with small b); and so on The medicinal plants, extracts or active ingredients taken in this study are all numbered with the letter A. Why?

Line 687 - summarizes All in all (?)

     

 

             

Author Response

See attached document

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript was prepared very well. I congratulate the authors for the preparation of the manuscript

However, I have the following comments:

  • All the figures in the manuscript: The figures are of their creation? What design program was used to make it? Indicate in the figure footer all the acronyms
  • Table 1: please reconstruct the table. In the 1st column include author, year and reference. In another column include the type of trial: controlled, randomized...Even if you include the extracts, do all the effects correspond to the same active principle of the extract? The table should have its own acronyms in a legend at the end. Include the table in the results section.
  • Methods: It should include a full methodology section. That includes search terms (MeSH), inclusion and exclusion criteria, strategies, search dates, methodological quality of the items included in the results table...
  • Even if you include different sections in the manuscript, include a results section and a discussion section. Rewrite the manuscript. In these sections you can include them in these new sections. This would make the article more understandable.
  • Include a set of practical applications
  • Review all acronyms in the text. The first time they appear, they should be explained
  • The references do not conform to the journal's standards. Neither the numbers of citations nor the format of the references

 

Author Response

See attached document

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I would like to congratulate the authors for the changes made and the work done in solving the suggestions. I have no further suggestions

Back to TopTop