You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Francesco Catucci1,
  • Anna Rita Alitto1 and
  • Carlotta Masciocchi1
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors answered most of my comments.
The flow of the paper remains a bit difficult to follow.
Few minor comments :
- Line 37-41: it needs to be re-write in a simpler way

- Line 90: to me it's a retrospective cohort study

Author Response

Reviewer 1

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Authors answered most of my comments.  The flow of the paper remains a bit difficult to follow.

A: We thank the Reviewer 1 for the appreciated comments.

 

Few minor comments :

- Line 37-41: it needs to be re-write in a simpler way

A: Thank you, we followed your suggestion re-writing the sentence in a clearer way.

 

- Line 90: to me it's a retrospective cohort study

A: Thank you, we agree with you that the study can be considered an observational retrospective cohort study. We modified the sentence in a clearer way

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have adequately responded to my comments, and I do not object against publication. 

Author Response

Reviewer 2

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The authors have adequately responded to my comments, and I do not object against publication. 

 A: We thank the Reviewer 2 for the comments.