Next Article in Journal
PSMA Theranostics: Review of the Current Status of PSMA-Targeted Imaging and Radioligand Therapy
Next Article in Special Issue
Back to the Future: Rethinking the Great Potential of lncRNAS for Optimizing Chemotherapeutic Response in Ovarian Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Tailoring Chemometric Models on Blood-Derived Cultures Secretome to Assess Personalized Cancer Risk Score
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 12
Issue 6
10.3390/cancers12061365
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Emerging Therapeutic RNAs for the Targeting of Cancer Associated Fibroblasts

by
Laura Santana-Viera
†,
Maria L. Ibba
†,
Deborah Rotoli
†,
Silvia Catuogno
*,‡ and
Carla L. Esposito
*,‡
Institute Experimental Endocrinology and Oncology “Gaetano Salvatore” (IEOS), National Research Council (CNR), 80145 Naples, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors equally contributed.
‡
These authors equally contributed.
Cancers 2020, 12(6), 1365; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061365
Submission received: 8 May 2020 / Revised: 23 May 2020 / Accepted: 24 May 2020 / Published: 26 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue RNA Drugs in Tumor Microenvironment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Tumor mass consists of a complex ensemble of malignant cancer cells and a wide variety of resident and infiltrating cells, secreted factors, and extracellular matrix proteins that are referred as tumor microenvironment (TME). Cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are key TME components that support tumor growth, generating a physical barrier against drugs and immune infiltration, and contributing to regulate malignant progression. Thus, it is largely accepted that therapeutic approaches aimed at hampering the interactions between tumor cells and CAFs can enhance the effectiveness of anti-cancer treatments. In this view, nucleic acid therapeutics have emerged as promising molecules. Here, we summarize recent knowledge about their role in the regulation of CAF transformation and tumor-promoting functions, highlighting their therapeutic utility and challenges.

1. Introduction

A growing body of literature is demonstrating that cancer progression is a multi-factorial process to which the transformation of the tumor cells contributes only in part. Indeed, the presence of a complex tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a crucial role in tumorigenesis and metastasis and tumor resistance to therapeutic interventions [1,2,3]. Key components of TME are cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Differently from normal fibroblasts (NFs), CAFs are proliferative and metabolically active cells with a myofibroblastic phenotype characterized by the overexpression of some biomarkers, such as α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) and fibroblast activation protein (FAP) [4]. It is believed that CAFs actively regulate malignant progression and drug resistance through the secretion of various tumor growth factors, cytokines and matrix remodeling proteins and the induction of the epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) [5,6]. Even if a complete understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in CAF transformation and functions is still lacking, it is evident that effective anti-cancer strategies should address CAF targeting.
Therefore, there are growing efforts to characterize gene pathways and epigenetic networks implicated in CAF phenotype in order to identify key targetable proteins and RNAs that can allow the development of new precise and effective therapeutics. In this view, endogenous non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) and synthetic oligonucleotides (ONs), including microRNA (miR)-based molecules, long ncRNAs (lncRNAs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), mRNA therapeutics, and nucleic acid aptamers, offer effective and specific therapeutic tools to regulate the expression or the function of target proteins by distinct mechanisms. These molecules show unique advantages compared to conventional therapies, being endowed with high target-specificity and allowing drugs to address previously intractable targets [7]. NcRNAs are a large group of molecules that comprises, among the most studied, short miRs and siRNAs. These molecules are able to inhibit gene expression at a post transcriptional level through the interference RNA (iRNA) process, either blocking protein translation or causing target mRNA degradation. IRNAs play a crucial role in several pathologies, including cancer, and in the last years they appear to be causally involved in CAF transformation and in the regulation of their tumor promoting effects. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that CAFs can influence cancer cells by releasing miRs into the tumor environment [8]. These studies suggest that mi/siRNAs represent “ideal” therapeutic tools for TME targeting. In addition, short therapeutic ASOs can be also used to degrade RNAs over-expressed in CAFs, thus interfering with their phenotype and pro-tumor functions. Further, endogenous lncRNAs are recently emerging as mediators of CAF communication with cancer cells, and are attracting a great interest as potential new drug targets [9]. In recent years, the use of exogenous mRNAs for therapeutic purposes has also had a great expansion thanks to accumulated knowledge on nucleic acid chemistry and the reduction in production costs, as well as the rapid progression and development of proper delivery methods [10,11,12]. MRNA-based therapeutics can be used for the treatment of different disorders, including cancer, and can be potentially developed also to interfere with CAFs phenotype and pro-tumor functions. Differently from other RNA-based drugs, nucleic acid aptamers are synthetic short single-strand oligonucleotides that bind their target forming 3D globular structures [13]. These molecules are high affinity ligands and potential antagonists of disease-associated proteins with many advantages [14]. Despite a relevant application of aptamers to CAF targeting having not yet been described, the exploration of these molecules shows great potential. In this review, we provide an overview of the recent advances in RNA therapeutics for CAF targeting, discussing key examples as well as the main challenges and perspectives in the field.

2. Role of CAFs in Tumor Development and Progression

CAFs are activated mesenchymal cells, representing the most abundant population of stromal cells within the TME [5,15]. They are present in almost all the solid tumors in different proportions [16]. They are a heterogeneous cell population, that can originate from diverse cell types [5,17] through different stimuli, including local hypoxia, oxidative stress, and growth factors and cytokines, such as transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ), released from the neighboring tumor cells and infiltrating immune cells [18,19]. Interestingly, CAFs interact with tumor cells in a reciprocal manner and have been involved in tumor development at each stage [20] (Figure 1).
CAFs produce autocrine and/or paracrine growth factors and cytokines, which in turn promote main biological features of tumors, such as their migratory and invasive properties, growth, and survival. Among others, the production of TGFβ, leukemia inhibitory factor, growth arrest-specific protein 6, fibroblast growth factors (FGFs), growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet derived growth factors (PDGFs), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) has been reported [21].
In addition, widely studied CAF-derived proinflammatory cytokines influencing tumor growth and invasion include the CXC-chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12). It is the ligand of CXCR4 expressed on cancer cells and plays an important regulatory role in both cancer initiation, angiogenesis, and metastasis [22]. It has been demonstrated that CXCL12 is able to induce angiogenesis by recruiting endothelial progenitor cells in breast cancer (BC), thereby providing sufficient nutrients to guarantee tumor growth and metastasis in vivo [23]. Notably, when mice bearing BC were treated with antibodies targeting CXCL12, reduced tumor volume and cell number were observed. Further, it has been shown that CAF-derived CXCL12 may function as an important EMT inducer BC cells by regulating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, thus promoting tumor cell migration and invasion. The involvement of CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in tumor invasion and metastasis was also confirmed in other several cancer types, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), gastric cancer (GC) [24,25], and prostatic carcinoma (PCa) [26], and also linked to the promotion of cancer stem cell proliferation [27,28]. In addition to chemokines, CAFs also release several cytokines from the interleukin (IL) family, such as IL-6, able to promote the invasion of cancer cells into the surrounding matrix [29,30].
Besides, CAFs increase the invasiveness of cancer cells through the modification of cell–cell interactions and the re-modelling of the adjacent ECM. Indeed, they are a key source of ECM proteins, such as fibronectin and type I collagen, and actively modify the stromal ECM by enhancing matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), including MMP9 and MMP13. These effects combined with CAF ability to control Rho/RAB mediated adhesion pathways, generate a permissive track in the stroma and help tumor cells to move to other sites [31].
The exchange of metabolites between cancer cells and the surrounding CAFs is an additional way of communication that can induce specific programs of cancer cell differentiation or metabolic switches further influencing tumor progression [32].
In recent years, extracellular endosome-derived vesicles called exosomes are also attracting growing interest as mediators of the crosstalk between CAFs and cancer cells. Exosomes are vesicles with a diameter of 50–150 nm, secreted by cells into circulation and containing nucleic acids and proteins. Several studies are showing that CAF-secreted exosomes can alter tumor phenotype and that, vice versa, cancer-derived exosomes can activate CAFs [33].
Concerning other pro-tumor functions of CAFs, their secretome and changes in ECM organization strongly influence cancer therapeutic response resulting in a protective effect that allows cancer cells to evade common therapies. In addition to limit drug penetration, CAF-remodeled ECM determines the gain of adhesive properties of cancer cells and induces EMT leading to therapeutic resistance [34,35]. This occurs by determining cell cycle arrest or by altering the expression of cellular transporters for drug uptake [36]. Moreover, CAFs may confer resistance to anticancer drugs through their soluble factors such as TGFβ, IL-6, and HGF [5].
Another important aspect is the participation of stromal cells in creating the unique cancer environment of chronic inflammation and immune tolerance. Stromal cells are a source of cytokines and chemokines which have both positive and negative effects on immuno responses [37]. However, CAFs predominantly sustain immunosuppressive processes. For example, key roles in reducing T-cell response have been demonstrated for IL-6, CXCL9, and TGFβ. As mentioned, CAFs excessively secrete MMPs which degrade basement membrane, and cleaved products of MMPs are chemotactic for leukocytes and modulate the proliferation of the immune cells. In addition, it has been recently observed that CAFs can cross-present antigens leading to the activation of CD4+ T cells and the suppression of CD8+ T cells.
All these studies highlight the great potential of therapeutic anti-cancer strategies targeting CAFs. However, it should be considered that the biology of CAF population remains still poorly defined and that despite CAF predominant functions are pro-tumorigenic, a higher complexity is recently emerging, suggesting a controversial tumor-suppressive role of some CAF “subtypes” [38].

3. Role of Endogenous ncRNAs in CAFs

3.1. MicroRNAs in CAFs

MicroRNAs are a class of small (17–25 nt) endogenous ncRNAs that regulate gene expression at a post-transcriptional level, both by messenger RNA degradation and protein translation suppression. miRs have the ability to regulate hundreds of target genes simultaneously thereby controlling multiple signaling pathways. As such, they have been shown to regulate every aspect of cellular activity, including differentiation and development, metabolism, proliferation and apoptosis [39,40]. They play a crucial role in human cancer development and tumorigenesis as their expression is frequently deregulated in many tumor types, functioning either as tumor suppressors or as oncogenes (oncomiRs). So far, increasing evidence indicates that miRNAs are involved in the transformation from NFs into CAFs and contribute to CAF-mediated cancer progression, metastasis, and chemoresistance (Figure 2) [41,42]. This section provides some key examples (summarized in Table 1).

3.1.1. miRNA Deregulation in CAF Activation and Tumor-Promoting Functions

Several studies have focused on the differential miRNA expression pattern between CAFs and NFs to determine the key miRs contributing to the transformation of CAFs and to their tumor-promoting ability [74].
In one of the first examples, miRNA microarrays were used to analyze established primary cultures of CAFs and paired NFs from six resected BC tissues and served to identified 11 dysregulated miRNAs in CAFs: Three were up-regulated (miR-221-5p, miR-31-3p, miR-221-3p), while eight were down-regulated (miR-205, miR-200b, miR-200c, miR-141, miR-101, miR-342-3p, let-7g, miR-26b). Their target genes are known to affect cell differentiation, adhesion, migration, proliferation, secretion, and cell–cell interaction, indicating that the differentially expressed miRNAs might be involved in the tumor-promoting function of CAFs in BC [43]. A similar study was conducted on bladder cancer, concluding that the differentially expressed miRNAs (upregulation of miR-16 and miR-320, and downregulation of miR-243, miR-145 and miR-130) influence crucial cell processes and are involved in tumor development and progression of urinary bladder cancer [45].
Other studies, focusing on miRNA differential expression among CAFs and NFs, have exposed different functions of miRNAs in fibroblast reprogramming. Mitra et al. found that in ovarian CAFs, miR-31 and miR-214 were downregulated while miR-155 was upregulated when compared to normal or tumor-adjacent fibroblasts. Mimicking this deregulation by transfecting miRs and miR inhibitors induced a functional conversion of NFs into CAFs. This results in a large number of upregulated genes, highly enriched in chemokines, which are known to be important for CAF function. The most up-regulated chemokine, CCL5, was found to be a direct target of miR-214 [41].
A representative widely studied oncomiR is miR-21. It is up-regulated in various cancers and as such, its role in CAFs has begun to attract much attention. First notions of its role in fibroblast activation came from a couple of studies on primary cultured fibroblast that showed an induced upregulation of miR-21 after exposure to the TGFβ-1 and culture media from cancer cells [46,47]. In colorectal cancer (CRC), miR-21 overexpression was shown to drive the fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation through the upregulation of α-SMA [48]. More recently the effect of miR-21 has been studied in lung adenocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and pancreatic cancer. Kunita et al. reported that conditioned medium from A549 lung cancer cells increased miR-21 expression in MRC-5 and IMR-90 lung fibroblasts through the TGFβ pathway, and induced CAF-like morphology and migratory capacity [49]. Further, miR-21 was associated to the metabolic alteration of CAFs and the effect of this alteration on pancreatic cancer cells. The authors demonstrated that compared with NFs, CAFs showed enhanced glucose uptake capacity, lactic acid production, and elevated miR-21 expression, and that after indirect co-culture with CAFs, oxidative phosphorylation and invasion ability of the pancreatic cancer cells was increased [50].
In PCa, studies on the molecular mechanisms leading to the activation of CAFs from tissue-resident fibroblasts have undercover several miRNAs, whose expression in normal prostate fibroblasts led to their conversion into CAF-like cells able to promote tumor induction and EMT. Among them, there are miR-409 [51], hypoxia-induced miR-210 [52], and muscle-specific miR-133b [53]. In addition to this upregulated miRs, Musumeci et al. demonstrated that miR-15 and miR-16 were downregulated in fibroblasts surrounding prostate tumor, and that such downregulation in CAFs promoted tumor growth and progression through the reduced post-transcriptional repression of FGF-2 and its receptor FGFR1, which act on both stromal and tumor cells to enhance cancer cell survival, proliferation, and migration [54].
The role of CAFs’ miRs in GC has as well been documented in the latest years. Yang et al. investigated the differential expression of miRs in CAFs obtained from GC tissues versus matched normal gastric mucosa fibroblasts, revealing that miR-106b was significantly upregulated, a fact that was related to enhancing the proliferation, migration and invasion of tumor cells. Tumor suppressor gene, PTEN, was identified as a direct target of miR-106b [55]. Li at al. then identified miR-149 as a critical factor for the transformation of NFs into CAFs. MiR-149 expression levels were markedly lower in GC CAFs than in NFs, corresponding with higher secretion of its identified target, IL-6. Through the regulation of IL-6 expression, low levels of miR-149 promote the pro-tumor activity of CAFs by inducing EMT and stem-like traits in GC cells [56]. In another study, it was discovered that miR-214 was significantly downregulated in CAFs of GC compared with NFs, accelerating migration and invasion capabilities of GC cells by the EMT process. Secretory growth factor FGF9 was proved to be a direct target gene of miR-214 [75].
Among dowregulated miRs, analyses in human CAFs isolated from endometrial cancer and normal endometrial fibroblasts identified miR-31 as being the most downregulated. Homeobox gene SATB2 was demonstrated to be its direct target, whose expression was significantly elevated in CAFs and correlated with the expression of a number of genes involved in cell invasion, migration, and scattering [57]. The same authors discovered later the down-regulation of miR-148a in CAFs from endometrial cancer and confirmed WNT10B as a direct target gene of miR-148a [58].
In subsequent years, Yang et al. tried to unravel the role of miR-31 in CRC-associated fibroblasts. In this study, they conversely found that the expression of miR-31 in CAFs was higher than in NFs and demonstrated that miR-31 can inhibit autophagy in CAFs and increase the radiosensitivity of CRC, hypothesizing miR-31 as a new target for CRC treatments [59]. Similarly, Shen et al. revealed that miR-31 was up-regulated in lung CAFs. The authors also found miR-1 and miR-206 down-regulated. Importantly, modifying the expression of these three deregulated miRNAs induced a functional conversion of NFs into CAFs and promote the migration, colony formation, and tumor growth, as well as recruitment of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). VEGFA, CCL2, and FOXO3a were identified as direct targets of miR-1, miR-206, and miR-31, respectively [60].
Noteworthy, a cluster of miRs well characterized in CAFs is miR-200 family, including miR-200a, miR-200b, miR-200c, and miR-141. Tang et al. demonstrated that the miR-200 family were often downregulated in CAFs compared with paired NFs derived from BC patients. The downregulation of miR-200s can induce CAF-like characteristics in NFs in terms of increased expression of the CAF markers α-SMA and FAP and enhanced migration and invasion activity, contributing to enhance ECM remodeling and metastasis of BC [44].
In addition to tumor-promotion, most studies proposed CAFs to be closely associated with cancer chemoresistance and dysregulation of miRs in CAFs were involved in this function. For example, Tanaka et al. examined the role of extracellular miRs in the response to chemotherapy in esophageal cancer and discovered that high expression levels of miR-27a/b correlated with poor response to chemotherapy. Furthermore, MiR-27a/b transfected normal fibroblast showed α-SMA expression and increased production of TGF-β, indicating that miR-27a/b is involved in resistance to chemotherapy through the transformation of NFs into CAFs [61].

3.1.2. MiRNA Transfer between CAFs and Tumor Cells through Extracellular Vesicles

More recently, increasing evidences suggest that miRs may be transferred between cells through extracellular vesicles, including exosomes.
A study aiming to identify and characterize exosomal miRs as key effectors of the communication between stroma and tumor cells in CRC, demonstrated that fibroblast exosomes are transferred to CRC cells, with a resultant increase in cellular miRNA levels, cancer proliferation and chemoresistance. An exosomal cancer-associated fibroblast signature consisting of miRNAs 329, 181a, 199b, 382, 215, and 21 was identified, being miR-21 the most abundant. Orthotopic xenografts established with miR-21-overexpressing fibroblasts and CRC cells led to increased liver metastases compared to those established with control fibroblasts [62].
The role of CAF exosomes and their miRs in the induction of the stemness and EMT phenotype of cancer cells have been documented in BC. Three miRs (miRs -21, -378e, and -143) were found to be overexpressed in exosomes from CAFs as compared from NFs, according to the study conducted by Donnarumma et al. They proved that miRs were transferred from CAFs to BC cells via exosomes, increasing mammosphere formation, stem cell and EMT markers, and anchorage-independent cell growth [63]. A very recent study proving as well that CAF-derived exosomes can transfer miRs in BC was conducted by Wang et al. They demonstrated the ability of miR-181d-5p to enhance the aggressiveness of BC through targeting caudal-related homeobox 2 (CDX2), a transcription factor binding to the promoter of homeobox A5 (HOXA5), whose overexpression is known to retard BC cell proliferation, invasion, migration, EMT and apoptosis. Effect of the downregulation of these two genes was proved in vivo showing that CAF-derived exosomes containing miR-181d-5p promoted the tumor growth in mice xenografts of MCF-7 cells [64].
In addition, Sun et al. discovered a new mechanism of CAF facilitated oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) progression through exosomal release of miR-382-5p, pointing out that its overexpression was responsible for OSCC cell migration and invasion. Interestingly, CAF density in tumor tissues was found to be relevant to OSCC lymph node metastasis and tumor node metastasis stage [66].
A key role of exosomal miR transfer between CAFs and cancer cells was also associated to chemoresistance. Yeung et al. identified significantly higher levels of miR-21 in exosomes and tissue lysates isolated from CAFs than in those from ovarian cancer cells and demonstrated that miR-21 transferred from CAFs to cancer cells suppressed ovarian cancer apoptosis and conferred chemoresistance. This occurred by miR-21 regulation of the apoptotic protease activating factor 1 [67].
Concerning tumor drug response, it has been shown that CAFs exposed to chemotherapy play an active role in regulating the survival and proliferation of cancer cells. Richards et al. found that CAFs are intrinsically resistant to gemcitabine (GEM), the chemotherapeutic standard of care for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Further, they discovered that CAFs exposed to GEM prolifically secrete exosomes that contain chemoresistance-promoting factors like miR-146a, along with mRNA of its upstream transcription factor, Snail, which promotes chemoresistance, EMT, and metastasis [68]. In a later study Fang et al. found out that miR-106b level was as well upregulated in CAFs and CAFs-exosomes following GEM treatment and demonstrated its role in causing GEM resistance of pancreatic cancer [69].
Cisplatin resistance is a major drawback for advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment. Under such premise, X. Qin et al. recently discovered a role for CAFs in regulating HNC cell survival and proliferation by delivering functional miR-196a from CAFs to tumor cells via exosomes. Exosomal miR-196a then binds novel targets, CDKN1B and ING5, to endow HNC cells with cisplatin resistance. Moreover, they also found that high levels of plasma exosomal miR-196a were clinically correlated with poor overall survival and chemoresistance [70]. Further, J. Hu et al. showed that CAFs contribute to growth, invasion, metastasis, and therapy resistance of human CRC by the transfer of CAF secreted exosomes to CRC cells, leading to a significant increase of miR-92a-3p. Mechanically, increased expression of miR-92a-3p activates Wnt/β-catenin pathway and inhibits mitochondrial apoptosis, contributing to cell stemness, EMT, metastasis, and 5-FU/L-OHP resistance [71].
Collectively these studies demonstrate how the transfer of miRs from CAFs to tumor cells participates in many CAF-promoting functions. Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that cancer cells can in turn use the same mechanism to communicate with the surrounding stroma inducing its transformation and initiating a “feed forward loop” where transformed stromal cells further sustain the tumors. For example, Zhou et al. showed that HCC cells exhibited a great capacity to convert normal hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) to CAFs. Crosstalk between tumor cells and HSCs was mediated by tumor-derived exosomes carrying miR-21 that directly targeted PTEN, leading to activation of PDK1/AKT signaling in HSCs. Activated CAFs further promoted tumor development by secreting different angiogenic cytokines [72]. A similar study was carried out by Fang et al. They reported that high-metastatic HCC cells secrete exosomal miR-1247-3p that directly targets B4GALT3, leading to activation of β1-integrin–NF-κB signaling in fibroblasts. Activated CAFs promote cancer progression by secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-6 and IL-8. [73]. Further, another recent report regarding the development of CAFs from NFs in BC, showed that the transfer of miR-125b in EVs secreted from BC cells was responsible for fibroblast activation [65].
Summing up (Table 1), the above data support the idea that miRs mediate the crosstalk between tumor cells and CAFs, promoting and sustaining the progression of many solid tumors. All these evidences underline the great potential of using miRNA mimicking or miRNA inhibitors in order to enhance or reduce miR levels, respectively, reverting CAF phenotype, thus improving the effectiveness of the anticancer strategies.

3.2. lncRNAs in CAFs

LncRNAs are a heterogeneous class of ncRNA transcripts with a length of more than 200 nucleotides. They are transcribed from large intergenic regions or overlapping protein-coding genes and modulate different biological processes through a wide range of mechanisms including epigenetic, transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation, RNA splicing and editing [76]. So far, many lncRNAs have been involved in cancer by acting directly as tumor suppressors or oncogenes, or by altering tumor suppressors and oncogenes [77]. More recently, it is emerging a significant role of lncRNAs in the regulation of TME components as well, including CAFs [78] (Table 2).
An essential role of lncRNAs as mediators of CAF pro-tumor factor network has been demonstrated. Zhuang et al. found that ZEB2NAT lncRNA is essential for the TGFβ-1-dependent processes involved in CAF-mediated induction of EMT and invasion of bladder cancer cells [79]. Similar results were found in BC by Ren Y et al. [80] that demonstrated that the TGF-β1 secreted by CAFs promotes EMT and metastasis through the induction of lnc-HOTAIR expression. Further, Zhang et al. [81] found that CAFs contribute to enhance the levels of midkine (MK), a heparin-binding growth factor promoting cancer drug resistance. MK released by CAFs enhances cisplatin resistance via the induction of lncRNA ANRIL. Likewise, it has been shown that CAFs promote the expression of the lncRNA DNM3OS in esophageal cancer cells, conferring radioresistance by regulating DNA damage response [82].
For instance, lncRNAs have been directly implicated in CAF transformation. In OSCC, a novel lncRNA, named Lnc-CAF, was found up-regulated in CAFs. Lnc-CAF is able to regulate NF reprogramming to CAFs inducing IL-33 levels by preventing its p62-dependent autophagy-lysosome degradation [83]. In addition, in ovarian cancer, it has been demonstrated a double action of LINC00092 lncRNA [84]. Indeed, LINC00092 contributes to maintain CAF-phenotype and simultaneously, is upregulated and induces a glycolytic phenotype in ovarian cancer cells in response to the chemokine CXCL14 released by CAFs.
In addition to miRs, the therapeutic potential of lncRNA carried by exosomes secreted by CAFs is also appearing in literature. Ren et al. [85] showed that lncRNA-H19 is up-regulated in CAFs as compared to NFs and that the transfer of H19 included in CAF-derived exosomes can promote stemness and chemoresistance in CRC. The mechanism of this effect involves H19 sponge action on miR-141 that results in the activation of the β-catenin pathway.
Despite, the clinical relevance of lncRNAs in TME is still at its infancy, these studies indicated their potential as therapeutic targets to be inhibit by means of specific molecules, such as siRNAs and ASOs, in order to improve anti-cancer strategies.

4. Synthetic RNA-Based Therapeutic Approaches for CAF Targeting

4.1. SiRNA Therapeutics in CAFs

SiRNAs are a class of small synthetic double-stranded RNAs which can induce gene silencing through sequence-specific cleavage of perfectly complementary mRNA [86]. In the last decades, the potential of siRNA-based therapy in cancer treatment has determined a huge concentration of studies and led to promising results on the inhibition of cancer cell growth and migration and the enhancement of drug response [87,88,89,90,91,92]. Recently, many investigators have focused their efforts on the use of siRNA-based therapy to reprogram the TME and alter the crosstalk between stromal and cancer cells [93,94,95,96,97,98] (Table 3).
In a study conducted in 2014, Leung and colleagues observed that the CAF-derived microfibrillar-associated protein 5 (MFAP5) is a negative prognostic marker in ovarian cancer and that its silencing inhibits the FAK/CREB/TNNC1 signaling pathway and significantly decreases ovarian tumor growth and metastasis in vivo [94]. In another recent investigation, Yang et al. demonstrated that the concomitant knockdown of glutamine synthase in the stroma and of glutaminase in cancer cells in a high-grade serous ovarian adenocarcinoma orthotopic mouse model disturbs the metabolic cross talk between cancer cells and CAFs. This leads to tumor regression, reducing tumor weight, nodules, and metastasis [95]. Furthermore, Chan and colleagues observed that the silencing of the nuclear receptor genes overexpressed in CAFs (RARβ, PPARβ/δ, VDR, GR, or AR) reduced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) proliferation, invasiveness, energy metabolism, ROS production, and chemoresistance [96].
Recently, the influence of CAFs on the immune microenvironment have been investigated. Ford and colleagues found out that CAF-mediated suppression was due to the specific exclusion of CD8+ T cells from tumors. Furthermore, the authors demonstrated that the knockdown of NOX4 expression in CAFs inhibits CAF-dependent immunotherapy resistance in several murine CAF-reach tumor models, by overcoming the CD8+ T cells exclusion [98]. Another recent investigation showed that the crosstalk between CAFs and GC cells via the TNF-α/IL-33/ ST2L signaling pathway participates in GC progression. The authors demonstrated that the silencing of ST2L expression in cancer cells or of IL-33 in CAFs inhibited peritoneal spreading and metastatic capacity of GC cells in nude mice [97].

4.2. ASOs in CAFs

ASOs are small nucleic acids (usually 15-18 mer) complementary to a specific target mRNA. The hybridization of the ASO with the mRNA results in mRNA cleavage by the RNAse H, an enzyme which cleaves the RNA in an RNA-DNA duplex. The mRNA is thus no longer available for protein translation. Different ASOs have been proposed for the treatment of different human cancers [99] representing the first ON drugs widely used in clinical trials.
Even if the use of ASOs to alter CAF phenotype has been poorly explored, some of them, inhibiting important mediators of CAF pro-tumor functions, could show a potentiality also in CAF targeting. Main examples are represented by ASOs against TGF-β2 that are in clinical trials for the treatment of recurrent high-grade glioma, advanced pancreatic carcinoma, and metastatic melanoma [100], ASOs targeting angiogenic factors, such as epidermal growth factor receptor, in clinical trials for the treatment of e recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and VEGF, in clinical trials for the treatment of Kaposi sarcoma, mesothelioma, and renal cancer [101] or ASOs against bFGF [102] that are under preclinical investigations.

4.3. mRNAs Therapeutics in CAFs

mRNA therapeutics are a very promising class of drugs for the treatment of various pathologies, such as infectious diseases and cancer. However, for a long time their application has been limited by their instability and inefficient in vivo delivery. In recent years, advanced knowledge about the chemical modifications useful to improve mRNA pharmacology and the development of numerous nanomaterials aimed at protecting mRNAs from extracellular degradation and facilitating cellular uptake and endosomal escape have given an important boost to the field of mRNA-based anticancer vaccines [11]. Indeed, these approaches have demonstrated encouraging results in both animal models and humans. Currently, many clinical trials focused on the use of mRNA therapeutics for cancer treatment are ongoing. Some examples include the mRNA coding for the Wilms’ tumor protein (WT1) in clinical trial for the treatment of acute and chronic myeloid leukemia, multiple myeloma, mesothelioma, and glioblastoma; the mRNA coding for CD40L in clinical trial for the treatment of renal and pancreatic cancer; and a brain tumor stem cells-specific mRNA for the treatment of glioblastoma. Such an approach shows a great potentiality and may represent a valid system for CAF targeting in order to improve the efficacy of anticancer therapies [103].

4.4. Nucleic Acid-Based Aptamers in CAFs

Nucleic-acid aptamers are short single-stranded oligonucleotides (of DNA or RNA) that bind their target by folding in specific 3D structures (Figure 3a). Therefore, aptamer mode of action is comparable to that of monoclonal antibodies to which they are often likened. Aptamers show low affinity as antibodies and possess many advantages including superior specificity and stability, easier production and cost-effectiveness. In addition, no immunogenicity has been reported for aptamers and their chemistry is suitable for easy modification to allow their labeling or to improve their stability and pharmacokinetic [104]. Aptamers are selected in vitro by a combinatorial chemistry approach named SELEX (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential enrichment) (Figure 3b) that has been applied to many different targets [105], leading to the isolation of a wide range of aptamers against therapeutically relevant targets in human pathologies including cancer [106]. Thanks to their unique features, aptamers offer exquisite tools to: 1) Specifically recognize cancer epitopes; 3) act as inhibitor to antagonize the malignant phenotype; and 4) act as delivery carriers for cancer therapeutics allowing their specific internalization within the target cells thus reducing unwanted off target effects [107].
So far, within the TME, aptamers have been mostly applied to the development of innovative immunotherapeutic strategies redirecting the immune system cells and favoring the anti-tumor immune-mediated responses [108]. On the contrary, the use of aptamers to alter CAF phenotype has been poorly explored up to date. In this regard, an interesting study has been recently reported by Camorani et al. [109]. They demonstrated that a previously characterized aptamer binding and inhibiting the PDGF receptor beta [110] blocks bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells trans-differentiation into CAFs reducing their recruitment into TME and their pro-metastatic action in triple negative BC. This study underlines how exploring aptamers to target CAF phenotype shows great potential to open innovative horizons in the current therapeutic approaches.
Further, since it has been demonstrated that aptamers against cell surface receptors may specifically internalize within the target cells, the use of aptamers as delivery carriers has emerged powerfully in the last decades. One main limit for the development of RNA therapeutics for cancer treatment is represented by the difficulty in delivering them to the site of interest because of the presence in the organism of several functional and physical obstacles impeding their penetration into target cells following systemic administration. Thus, the use of ligands enabling active binding and internalization represents an attractive strategy and a key step toward their clinical development. In this context, the high affinity and specificity for their targets, combined to their easily modifiable chemical nature, have supported the development of different aptamer-based conjugates for the targeted delivery of several secondary reagents, including RNA therapeutics [111]. It has been widely demonstrated that aptamers can allow the selective receptor-dependent RNA internalization within the target cells, thus avoiding the occurrence of unwanted off-target effects [112].

5. Conclusions

The development of strategies aimed to specifically target CAF pro-tumor function should enhance the effectiveness of the therapeutic interventions. In this view, the selective CAF targeting represent a great challenge in oncology and nucleic acid therapeutics may provide promising molecules. There is a growing effort in characterizing the role of ncRNAs in the regulation of CAFs and uncovering novel master gene regulators that can guide the design of siRNA-based therapeutic tools. All these RNA-based therapeutics are very promising, however, there are some issues to be resolved to improve their use in clinical trials, such as the effective intracellular delivery to the target site, improvement of their stability and reduction of non-specific toxicity [113,114]. In particular, a major challenge is represented by their appropriate delivery to target cells, comprising cellular uptake across the lipid bilayer, endosomal escape, and localization. To overcome these limitations, RNA-based therapeutics can be delivered via nonspecific uptake using nano-sized carriers, such as polymeric nanoparticles, lipid nanoparticles, mesoporous silica nanoparticles, gold and magnetic nanoparticles, and single-walled carbon nanotubes. These intracellular delivery systems would enable an encapsulation of the loading cargo and its protection from degradation. An alternative to the use of nanoparticles is to directly conjugate a bioactive ligand to the RNA, allowing for a receptor-mediated uptake. Examples of this technique includes the conjugation of N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc) for liver targeting, as well as the use of specific antibodies and aptamers [115,116]. By taking advantage of their high affinity and specificity and their ability to be effectively internalized into cells, a variety of aptamers specific to cancer biomarkers have been conjugated with therapeutic RNA agents as siRNAs and miRs have proved to be valid alternatives for targeted delivery in a cell type-specific manner [117], without inducing undesired toxic effects in the organism. In addition, CAFs are heterogeneous populations and the detailed characterization of their profiles is still a challenging point towards the development of effective molecules for their therapeutic targeting.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.L.E. and S.C.; writing—review and editing, L.S.-V., M.L.I., D.R., S.C., and C.L.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by POR Campania FESR 2014-2020 “SATIN” to CLE.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hinshaw, D.C.; Shevde, L.A. The Tumor Microenvironment Innately Modulates Cancer Progression. Cancer Res. 2019, 79, 4557–4566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wang, M.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, L.; Wei, F.; Lian, Y.; Wu, Y.; Gong, Z.; Zhang, S.; Zhou, J.; Cao, K.; et al. Role of tumor microenvironment in tumorigenesis. J. Cancer 2017, 8, 761–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Holohan, C.; Van Schaeybroeck, S.; Longley, D.B.; Johnston, P.G. Cancer drug resistance: An evolving paradigm. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2013, 13, 714–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ishii, G.; Ochiai, A.; Neri, S. Phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of cancer-Associated fibroblast within the tumor microenvironment. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 99, 186–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kalluri, R. The biology and function of fibroblasts in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2016, 16, 582–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Alderton, G. Tumour microenvironment: Driving relapse. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2015, 15, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. MacLeod, A.R.; Crooke, S.T. RNA Therapeutics in Oncology: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2017, 57, S43–S59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Eichelmann, A.-K.; Matuszcak, C.; Hummel, R.; Haier, J. Role of miRNAs in cell signaling of cancer associated fibroblasts. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2018, 101, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, D.; Lu, T.; Tan, J.; Li, H.; Wang, Q.; Wei, L. Long Non-coding RNAs as Communicators and Mediators between the Tumor Microenvironment and Cancer Cells. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Devoldere, J.; Dewitte, H.; De Smedt, S.C.; Remaut, K. Evading innate immunity in nonviral mRNA delivery: Don’t shoot the messenger. Drug Discov. Today 2016, 21, 11–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Li, B.; Zhang, X.; Dong, Y. Nanoscale platforms for messenger RNA delivery. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol. 2018, 11, e1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Grabbe, S.; Haas, H.; Diken, M.; Kranz, L.M.; Langguth, P.; Sahin, U. Translating nanoparticulate-personalized cancer vaccines into clinical applications: Case study with RNA-Lipoplexes for the treatment of melanoma. Nanomedicine (Lond.) 2016, 11, 2723–2734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Esposito, C.L.; Catuogno, S.; De Franciscis, V.; Cerchia, L. New insight into clinical development of nucleic acid aptamers. Discov. Med. 2011, 11, 487–496. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Keefe, A.D.; Pai, S.; Ellington, A.D. Aptamers as therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 537–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Singh, P.S. Cancer associated fibroblasts phenotypic and functional heterogeneity. Front. Biosci. 2020, 25, 961–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gascard, P.; Tlsty, T.D. Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts: Orchestrating the composition of malignancy. Genome Res. 2016, 30, 1002–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, T.; Han, C.; Wang, S.; Fang, P.; Ma, Z.; Xu, L.; Yin, R. Cancer-Associated fibroblasts: An emerging target of anti-cancer immunotherapy. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 12, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mueller, L.; Goumas, F.A.; Affeldt, M.; Sandtner, S.; Gehling, U.M.; Brilloff, S.; Walter, J.; Karnatz, N.; Lamszus, K.; Rogiers, X.; et al. Stromal Fibroblasts in Colorectal Liver Metastases Originate From Resident Fibroblasts and Generate an Inflammatory Microenvironment. Am. J. Pathol. 2007, 171, 1608–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Gallagher, P.G.; Bao, Y.; Prorock, A.; Zigrino, P.; Nischt, R.; Politi, V.; Mauch, C.; Dragulev, B.; Fox, J.W. Gene Expression Profiling Reveals Cross-Talk between Melanoma and Fibroblasts: Implications for Host-Tumor Interactions in Metastasis. Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 4134–4146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Balkwill, F.R.; Capasso, M.; Hagemann, T. The tumor microenvironment at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125, 5591–5596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Sahai, E.; Astsaturov, I.; Cukierman, E.; DeNardo, D.G.; Egeblad, M.; Evans, R.M.; Fearon, D.; Greten, F.R.; Hingorani, S.R.; Hunter, T.; et al. A framework for advancing our understanding of cancer-Associated fibroblasts. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2020, 20, 174–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Liu, T.; Zhou, L.; Li, D.; Andl, T.; Zhang, Y. Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Build and Secure the Tumor Microenvironment. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 7, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Orimo, A.; Gupta, P.B.; Sgroi, D.C.; Arenzana-Seisdedos, F.; Delaunay, T.; Naeem, R.; Carey, V.J.; Richardson, A.L.; Weinberg, R.A. Stromal Fibroblasts Present in Invasive Human Breast Carcinomas Promote Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis through Elevated SDF-1/CXCL12 Secretion. Cell 2005, 121, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wald, O.; Uzi, I.; Amir, G.; Kirshberg, S.; Shlomai, Z.; Zamir, G.; Peled, A.; Shapira, O.M. Interaction between neoplastic cells and cancer-Associated fibroblasts through the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis: Role in non–Small cell lung cancer tumor proliferation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2011, 141, 1503–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Izumi, D.; Ishimoto, T.; Miyake, K.; Sugihara, H.; Eto, K.; Sawayama, H.; Yasuda, T.; Kiyozumi, Y.; Kaida, T.; Kurashige, J.; et al. CXCL12/CXCR4 activation by cancer-Associated fibroblasts promotes integrin β1 clustering and invasiveness in gastric cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 138, 1207–1219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jung, Y.; Kim, J.K.; Shiozawa, Y.; Wang, J.; Mishra, A.; Joseph, J.; Berry, J.E.; McGee, S.; Lee, E.; Sun, H.; et al. Recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells into prostate tumours promotes metastasis. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Li, X.; Bu, W.; Meng, L.; Liu, X.; Wang, S.; Jiang, L.; Ren, M.; Fan, Y.; Sun, H. CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway orchestrates CSC-Like properties by CAF recruited tumor associated macrophage in OSCC. Exp. Cell Res. 2019, 378, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jobe, N.P.; Rosel, D.; Dvorankova, B.; Kodet, O.; Lacina, L.; Mateu, R.; Smetana, K.; Brábek, A.J.; Smetana, K. Simultaneous blocking of IL-6 and IL-8 is sufficient to fully inhibit CAF-induced human melanoma cell invasiveness. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2016, 146, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, L.; Cao, L.; Wang, H.; Liu, B.; Zhang, Q.; Meng, Z.; Wu, X.; Zhou, Q.; Xu, K. Cancer-Associated fibroblasts enhance metastatic potential of lung cancer cells through IL-6/STAT3 signaling pathway. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 76116–76128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Guan, J.; Zhang, H.; Wen, Z.; Gu, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, T.; Jia, C.; Lu, Z.; Chen, J. Retinoic acid inhibits pancreatic cancer cell migration and EMT through the downregulation of IL-6 in cancer associated fibroblast cells. Cancer Lett. 2014, 345, 132–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kwa, M.Q.; Herum, K.M.; Brakebusch, C. Cancer-Associated fibroblasts: How do they contribute to metastasis? Clin. Exp. Metastasis 2019, 36, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sanford-Crane, H.; Abrego, J.; Sherman, M.H. Fibroblasts as Modulators of Local and Systemic Cancer Metabolism. Cancers 2019, 11, 619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Yang, X.; Li, Y.; Zou, L.; Zhu, Z. Role of Exosomes in Crosstalk Between Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts and Cancer Cells. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Sui, H.; Zhu, L.; Deng, W.; Li, Q. Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Drug Resistance: Role, Molecular Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Strategies. Oncol. Res. Treat. 2014, 37, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Chang, J.T.; Mani, S.A. Sheep, wolf, or werewolf: Cancer stem cells and the Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal transition. Cancer Lett. 2013, 341, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Zheng, X.; Carstens, J.; Kim, J.; Scheible, M.; Kaye, J.; Sugimoto, H.; Wu, C.-C.; LeBleu, V.S.; Kalluri, R. Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal transition is dispensable for metastasis but induces chemoresistance in pancreatic cancer. Nature 2015, 527, 525–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Xing, F. Cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in tumor microenvironment. Front. Biosci. 2010, 15, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Gieniec, K.A.; Butler, L.M.; Worthley, D.L.; Woods, S.L. Cancer-Associated fibroblasts-heroes or villains? Br. J. Cancer 2019, 121, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Falcone, G.; Felsani, A.; D’Agnano, I. Signaling by exosomal microRNAs in cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 34, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Yang, F.; Ning, Z.; Ma, L.; Liu, W.; Shao, C.; Shu, Y.; Shen, H. Exosomal miRNAs and miRNA dysregulation in cancer-Associated fibroblasts. Mol. Cancer 2017, 16, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mitra, A.K.; Zillhardt, M.; Hua, Y.; Tiwari, P.; Murmann, A.E.; Peter, M.E.; Lengyel, E. MicroRNAs reprogram normal fibroblasts into cancer-Associated fibroblasts in ovarian cancer. Cancer Discov. 2012, 2, 1100–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Schoepp, M.; Ströse, A.J.; Haier, J. Dysregulation of miRNA Expression in Cancer Associated Fibroblasts (CAFs) and Its Consequences on the Tumor Microenvironment. Cancers 2017, 9, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Zhao, L.; Sun, Y.; Hou, Y.; Peng, Q.; Wang, L.; Luo, H.; Tang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Liu, M. MiRNA expression analysis of cancer-Associated fibroblasts and normal fibroblasts in breast cancer. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 44, 2051–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tang, X.; Hou, Y.; Yang, G.; Wang, X.; Tang, S.; Du, Y.-E.; Yang, L.; Yu, T.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, M.; et al. Stromal miR-200s contribute to breast cancer cell invasion through CAF activation and ECM remodeling. Cell Death Differ. 2015, 23, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Enkelmann, A.; Heinzelmann, J.; Von Eggeling, F.; Walter, M.; Berndt, A.; Wunderlich, H.; Junker, K. Specific protein and miRNA patterns characterise tumour-associated fibroblasts in bladder cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2010, 137, 751–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, Q.; Zhang, D.; Wang, Y.; Sun, P.; Hou, X.; Larner, J.; Xiong, W.; Mi, J. MiR-21/Smad 7 signaling determines TGF-beta1-induced CAF formation. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yao, Q.; Cao, S.; Li, C.; Mengesha, A.; Kong, B.; Wei, M.Q. Micro-RNA-21 regulates TGF-β-induced myofibroblast differentiation by targeting PDCD4 in tumor-stroma interaction. Int. J. Cancer 2010, 128, 1783–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Bullock, M.D.; Pickard, K.M.; Nielsen, B.S.; Sayan, A.E.; Jenei, V.; Mellone, M.; Mitter, R.; Primrose, J.N.; Thomas, G.J.; Packham, G.K.; et al. Pleiotropic actions of miR-21 highlight the critical role of deregulated stromal microRNAs during colorectal cancer progression. Cell Death Dis. 2013, 4, e684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kunita, A.; Morita, S.; Irisa, T.U.; Goto, A.; Niki, T.; Takai, D.; Nakajima, J.; Fukayama, M. MicroRNA-21 in cancer-Associated fibroblasts supports lung adenocarcinoma progression. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 8838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, S.; Chen, X.; Shan, T.; Ma, J.; Lin, W.; Li, W.; Kang, Y. MiR-21-mediated Metabolic Alteration of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts and Its Effect on Pancreatic Cancer Cell Behavior. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 14, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Josson, S.; Gururajan, M.; Sung, S.Y.; Hu, P.; Shao, C.; Zhau, H.E.; Liu, C.; Lichterman, J.; Duan, P.; Li, Q.; et al. Stromal fibroblast-derived miR-409 promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and prostate tumorigenesis. Oncogene 2014, 34, 2690–2699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Taddei, M.L.; Cavallini, L.; Comito, G.; Giannoni, E.; Folini, M.; Marini, A.; Gandellini, P.; Morandi, A.; Pintus, G.; Raspollini, M.R.; et al. Senescent stroma promotes prostate cancer progression: The role of miR-210. Mol. Oncol. 2014, 8, 1729–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Doldi, V.; Callari, M.; Giannoni, E.; D’Aiuto, F.; Maffezzini, M.; Valdagni, R.; Chiarugi, P.; Gandellini, P.; Zaffaroni, N. Integrated gene and miRNA expression analysis of prostate cancer associated fibroblasts supports a prominent role for interleukin-6 in fibroblast activation. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 31441–31460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Musumeci, S.; Coppola, V.; Addario, A.; Patrizii, M.; Maugeri, M.; Memeo, L.; Colarossi, C.; Francescangeli, F.; Biffoni, M.; Collura, D.; et al. Control of tumor and microenvironment cross-talk by miR-15a and miR-16 in prostate cancer. Oncogene 2011, 30, 4231–4242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Yang, T.-S.; Yang, X.; Chen, X.; Wang, X.; Hua, J.; Zhou, D.-L.; Zhou, B.; Song, Z.-S. MicroRNA-106b in cancer-Associated fibroblasts from gastric cancer promotes cell migration and invasion by targeting PTEN. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 2162–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Li, P.; Shan, J.-X.; Chen, X.-H.; Zhang, D.; Su, L.-P.; Huang, X.-Y.; Yu, B.-Q.; Zhi, Q.-M.; Li, C.-L.; Wang, Y.-Q.; et al. Epigenetic silencing of microRNA-149 in cancer-Associated fibroblasts mediates prostaglandin E2/interleukin-6 signaling in the tumor microenvironment. Cell Res. 2015, 25, 588–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Aprelikova, O.; Yu, X.; Palla, J.; Wei, B.-R.; John, S.; Yi, M.; Stephens, R.; Simpson, R.M.; Risinger, J.I.; Jazaeri, A.; et al. The role of miR-31 and its target gene SATB2 in cancer-Associated fibroblasts. Cell Cycle 2010, 9, 4387–4398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Aprelikova, O.; Palla, J.; Hibler, B.; Yu, X.; Greer, Y.E.; Yi, M.; Stephens, R.; Maxwell, G.L.; Jazaeri, A.; Risinger, J.I.; et al. Silencing of miR-148a in cancer-Associated fibroblasts results in WNT10B-Mediated stimulation of tumor cell motility. Oncogene 2012, 32, 3246–3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Yang, X.; Xu, X.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, S.; Wu, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, K.; Xing, C.; Cao, J.; Zhu, H.; et al. miR-31 affects colorectal cancer cells by inhibiting autophagy in cancer-Associated fibroblasts. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 79617–79628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Shen, H.; Yu, X.; Yang, F.; Zhang, Z.; Shen, J.; Sun, J.; Choksi, S.; Jitkaew, S.; Shu, Y. Reprogramming of Normal Fibroblasts into Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts by miRNAs-Mediated CCL2/VEGFA Signaling. PLoS Genet. 2016, 12, e1006244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tanaka, K.; Miyata, H.; Sugimura, K.; Fukuda, S.; Kanemura, T.; Yamashita, K.; Miyazaki, Y.; Takahashi, T.; Kurokawa, Y.; Yamasaki, M.; et al. miR-27 is associated with chemoresistance in esophageal cancer through transformation of normal fibroblasts to cancer-Associated fibroblasts. Carcinogenesis 2015, 36, 894–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Bhome, R.; Goh, R.W.; Bullock, M.D.; Pillar, N.; Thirdborough, S.M.; Mellone, M.; Mirnezami, R.; Galea, D.; Veselkov, K.; Gu, Q.; et al. Exosomal microRNAs derived from colorectal cancer-Associated fibroblasts: Role in driving cancer progression. Aging 2017, 9, 2666–2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Donnarumma, E.; Fiore, D.; Nappa, M.; Roscigno, G.; Adamo, A.; Iaboni, M.; Russo, V.; Affinito, A.; Puoti, I.; Quintavalle, C.; et al. Cancer-Associated fibroblasts release exosomal microRNAs that dictate an aggressive phenotype in breast cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 19592–19608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Wang, H.; Wei, H.; Wang, J.; Li, L.; Chen, A.; Li, Z. MicroRNA-181d-5p-Containing Exosomes Derived from CAFs Promote EMT by Regulating CDX2/HOXA5 in Breast Cancer. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2020, 19, 654–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Vu, T.L.; Peng, B.; Zhang, D.X.; Ma, V.; Mathey-Andrews, C.A.; Lam, C.K.; Kiomourtzis, T.; Jin, J.; McReynolds, L.; Huang, L.; et al. Tumor-secreted extracellular vesicles promote the activation of cancer-Associated fibroblasts via the transfer of microRNA-125b. J. Extracell. Vesicles 2019, 8, 1599680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Sun, L.; Xu, K.; Cui, J.; Yuan, D.; Zou, B.; Li, J.; Liu, J.; Li, K.; Meng, Z.; Zhang, B. Cancer-Associated fibroblast-Derived exosomal miR-382-5p promotes the migration and invasion of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 42, 1319–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yeung, C.L.A.; Co, N.-N.; Tsuruga, T.; Yeung, T.-L.; Kwan, S.Y.; Leung, C.S.; Li, Y.; Lu, E.S.; Kwan, K.; Wong, K.K.; et al. Exosomal transfer of stroma-derived miR21 confers paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer cells through targeting APAF1. Nat. Commun. 2016, 7, 11150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Richards, K.E.; Zeleniak, A.E.; Fishel, M.; Wu, J.; Littlepage, L.E.; Hill, R. Cancer-Associated fibroblast exosomes regulate survival and proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells. Oncogene 2016, 36, 1770–1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Fang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Rong, Y.; Kuang, T.; Xu, X.; Wu, W.; Wang, D.; Lou, W. Exosomal miRNA-106b from cancer-Associated fibroblast promotes gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer. Exp. Cell Res. 2019, 383, 111543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Qin, X.; Guo, H.; Wang, X.; Zhu, X.; Yan, M.; Wang, X.; Xu, Q.; Shi, J.; Lu, E.; Chen, W.; et al. Exosomal miR-196a derived from cancer-Associated fibroblasts confers cisplatin resistance in head and neck cancer through targeting CDKN1B and ING5. Genome Biol. 2019, 20, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hu, J.L.; Wang, W.; Lan, X.L.; Zeng, Z.C.; Liang, Y.S.; Yan, Y.R.; Song, F.Y.; Wang, F.F.; Zhu, X.H.; Liao, W.; et al. CAFs secreted exosomes promote metastasis and chemotherapy resistance by enhancing cell stemness and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in colorectal cancer. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Zhou, Y.; Ren, H.; Dai, B.; Li, J.; Shang, L.; Huang, J.; Shi, X. Hepatocellular carcinoma-derived exosomal miRNA-21 contributes to tumor progression by converting hepatocyte stellate cells to cancer-Associated fibroblasts. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 37, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Fang, T.; Lv, H.; Lv, G.; Li, T.; Wang, C.; Han, Q.; Yu, L.; Su, B.; Guo, L.; Huang, S.; et al. Tumor-Derived exosomal miR-1247-3p induces cancer-Associated fibroblast activation to foster lung metastasis of liver cancer. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Aprelikova, O.; Green, J.E. MicroRNA regulation in cancer-Associated fibroblasts. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2011, 61, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  75. Wang, R.; Sun, Y.-Q.; Yu, W.; Yan, Y.; Qiao, M.; Jiang, R.; Guan, W.; Wang, L. Downregulation of miRNA-214 in cancer-Associated fibroblasts contributes to migration and invasion of gastric cancer cells through targeting FGF9 and inducing EMT. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Quinn, J.J.; Chang, H. Unique features of long non-coding RNA biogenesis and function. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2015, 17, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Bach, D.-H.; Lee, S.K. Long noncoding RNAs in cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2018, 419, 152–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Del Vecchio, F.; Lee, G.H.; Hawezi, J.; Bhome, R.; Pugh, S.; Sayan, A.E.; Thomas, G.; Packham, G.; Primrose, J.; Pichler, M.; et al. Long non-Coding RNAs within the tumour microenvironment and their role in tumour-Stroma cross-Talk. Cancer Lett. 2018, 421, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Zhuang, J.; Lu, Q.; Shen, B.; Huang, X.; Shen, L.; Zheng, X.; Huang, R.; Yan, J.; Guo, H. TGFβ1 secreted by cancer-Associated fibroblasts induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition of bladder cancer cells through lncRNA-ZEB2NAT. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ren, Y.; Jia, H.-H.; Xu, Y.-Q.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, X.-H.; Wang, Y.-F.; Song, X.; Zhu, Z.-Y.; Sun, T.; Dou, Y.; et al. Paracrine and epigenetic control of CAF-induced metastasis: The role of HOTAIR stimulated by by TGF-ss1 secretion. Mol. Cancer 2018, 17, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, D.; Ding, L.; Li, Y.; Ren, J.; Shi, G.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, S.; Ni, Y.; Hou, Y. Midkine derived from cancer-Associated fibroblasts promotes cisplatin-resistance via up-regulation of the expression of lncRNA ANRIL in tumour cells. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Zhang, H.; Hua, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Yue, J.; Shi, M.; Zhen, X.; Zhang, X.; Yang, L.; Zhou, R.; Wu, S.; et al. Cancer-Associated Fibroblast–promoted LncRNA DNM3OS Confers Radioresistance by Regulating DNA Damage Response in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 25, 1989–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Ding, L.; Ren, J.; Zhang, D.; Li, Y.; Huang, X.; Hu, Q.-G.; Wang, H.; Song, Y.; Ni, Y.; Hou, Y. A novel stromal lncRNA signature reprograms fibroblasts to promote the growth of oral squamous cell carcinoma via LncRNA-CAF/interleukin-33. Carcinogenesis 2018, 39, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zhao, L.; Ji, G.; Le, X.; Wang, C.; Xu, L.; Feng, M.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, H.; Xuan, Y.; Yang, Y.; et al. Long Noncoding RNA LINC00092 Acts in Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts to Drive Glycolysis and Progression of Ovarian Cancer. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 1369–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Ren, J.; Ding, L.; Zhang, D.; Shi, G.; Xu, Q.; Shen, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, T.; Hou, Y. Carcinoma-associated fibroblasts promote the stemness and chemoresistance of colorectal cancer by transferring exosomal lncRNA H19. Theranostics 2018, 8, 3932–3948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. De Fougerolles, A.; Vornlocher, H.-P.; Maraganore, J.; Lieberman, J. Interfering with disease: A progress report on siRNA-based therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Jagani, H.; Rao, J.V.; Palanimuthu, V.R.; Chandrashekar, H.R.; Gang, S. A nanoformulation of siRNA and its role in cancer therapy: In vitro and in vivo evaluation. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2012, 18, 120–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Soutschek, J.; Akinc, A.; Bramlage, B.; Charisse, K.; Constien, R.; Donoghue, M.; Elbashir, S.; Geick, A.; Hadwiger, P.; Harborth, J.; et al. Therapeutic silencing of an endogenous gene by systemic administration of modified siRNAs. Nature 2004, 432, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ptasznik, A.; Nakata, Y.; Kalota, A.; Emerson, S.G.; Gewirtz, A.M. Short interfering RNA (siRNA) targeting the Lyn kinase induces apoptosis in primary, and drug-resistant, BCR-ABL1(+) leukemia cells. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 1187–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kim, S.H.; Jeong, J.H.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, S.W.; Park, T.G. Local and systemic delivery of VEGF siRNA using polyelectrolyte complex micelles for effective treatment of cancer. J. Control. Release 2008, 129, 107–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bai, Z.; Zhang, Z.-T.; Qu, X.; Han, W.; Ma, X. Sensitization of breast cancer cells to taxol by inhibition of taxol resistance gene 1. Oncol. Lett. 2011, 3, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. He, L.-Y.; Ye, Q.-F.; Zhang, Y.-C.; Peng, X.-Q.; Long, Z.; Ming, Y.-Z. Silencing Notch-1 induces apoptosis and increases the chemosensitivity of prostate cancer cells to docetaxel through Bcl-2 and Bax. Oncol. Lett. 2012, 3, 879–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Yeung, T.-L.; Leung, C.S.; Mok, S.C. CAF reprogramming inhibits ovarian cancer progression. Cell Cycle 2014, 13, 3783–3784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Leung, C.S.; Yeung, T.-L.; Yip, K.-P.; Pradeep, S.; Balasubramanian, L.; Liu, J.; Wong, K.K.; Mangala, L.S.; Armaiz-Pena, G.N.; Lopez-Berestein, G.; et al. Calcium-dependent FAK/CREB/TNNC1 signalling mediates the effect of stromal MFAP5 on ovarian cancer metastatic potential. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Yang, L.; Achreja, A.; Yeung, T.-L.; Mangala, L.S.; Jiang, D.; Han, C.; Baddour, J.; Marini, J.; Ni, J.; Nakahara, R.; et al. Targeting Stromal Glutamine Synthetase in Tumors Disrupts Tumor Microenvironment-Regulated Cancer Cell Growth. Cell Metab. 2016, 24, 685–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Chan, J.S.K.; Sng, M.K.; Teo, Z.Q.; Chong, H.C.; Twang, J.S.; Tan, N.S. Targeting nuclear receptors in cancer-Associated fibroblasts as concurrent therapy to inhibit development of chemoresistant tumors. Oncogene 2017, 37, 160–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Zhou, Q.; Wu, X.; Wang, X.; Yu, Z.; Pan, T.; Li, Z.; Chang, X.; Jin, Z.; Li, J.; Zhu, Z.; et al. The reciprocal interaction between tumor cells and activated fibroblasts mediated by TNF-α/IL-33/ST2L signaling promotes gastric cancer metastasis. Oncogene 2019, 39, 1414–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Ford, K.; Hanley, C.J.; Mellone, M.; Szyndralewiez, C.; Heitz, F.; Wiesel, P.; Wood, O.; Machado, M.; Lopez, M.-A.; Ganesan, A.-P.; et al. NOX4 Inhibition Potentiates Immunotherapy by Overcoming Cancer-Associated Fibroblast-Mediated CD8 T-cell Exclusion from Tumors. Cancer Res. 2020, 80, 1846–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Wacheck, V.; Zangemeister-Wittke, U. Antisense molecules for targeted cancer therapy. Crit. Rev. Oncol. 2006, 59, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Calon, A.; Tauriello, D.V.F.; Batlle, E. TGF-Beta in CAF-Mediated tumor growth and metastasis. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2014, 25, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Le, B.T.; Raguraman, P.; Kosbar, T.R.; Fletcher, S.; Wilton, S.D.; Veedu, R.N. Antisense Oligonucleotides Targeting Angiogenic Factors as Potential Cancer Therapeutics. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2018, 14, 142–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Netzer, P.; Domek, M.; Pai, R.; Halter, F.; Tarnawski, A. Inhibition of human colon cancer cell growth by antisense oligodeoxynucleotides targeted at basic fibroblast growth factor. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2001, 15, 1673–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Pardi, N.; Hogan, M.; Porter, F.W.; Weissman, D. mRNA vaccines—A new era in vaccinology. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018, 17, 261–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Zhou, G.; Wilson, G.; Hebbard, L.; Duan, W.; Liddle, C.; George, J.; Qiao, L. Aptamers: A promising chemical antibody for cancer therapy. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 13446–13463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Catuogno, S.; Esposito, C.L. Aptamer Cell-Based Selection: Overview and Advances. Biomedicines 2017, 5, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Morita, Y.; Leslie, M.; Kameyama, H.; Volk, D.E.; Tanaka, T. Aptamer Therapeutics in Cancer: Current and Future. Cancers 2018, 10, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Zhou, J.; Rossi, J.J. Aptamers as targeted therapeutics: Current potential and challenges. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016, 16, 181–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Pastor, F.; Berraondo, P.; Etxeberria, I.; Frederick, J.; Sahin, U.; Gilboa, E.; Melero, I. An RNA toolbox for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2018, 17, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Camorani, S.; Hill, B.S.; Fontanella, R.; Greco, A.; Gramanzini, M.; Auletta, L.; Gargiulo, S.; Albanese, S.; Lucarelli, E.; Cerchia, L.; et al. Inhibition of Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Homing Towards Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Microenvironment Using an Anti-PDGFRβ Aptamer. Theranostics 2017, 7, 3595–3607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Camorani, S.; Esposito, C.; Rienzo, A.; Catuogno, S.; Iaboni, M.; Condorelli, G.; De Franciscis, V.; Cerchia, L. Inhibition of Receptor Signaling and of Glioblastoma-derived Tumor Growth by a Novel PDGFRβ Aptamer. Mol. Ther. 2014, 22, 828–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Nuzzo, S.; Roscigno, G.; Affinito, A.; Ingenito, F.; Quintavalle, C.; Condorelli, G. Potential and Challenges of Aptamers as Specific Carriers of Therapeutic Oligonucleotides for Precision Medicine in Cancer. Cancers 2019, 11, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Wan, L.-Y.; Yuan, W.-F.; Ai, W.-B.; Ai, Y.-W.; Wang, J.-J.; Chu, L.-Y.; Zhang, Y.-Q.; Wu, J.-F. An exploration of aptamer internalization mechanisms and their applications in drug delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2019, 16, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Whitehead, K.A.; Langer, R.; Anderson, D.G. Knocking down barriers: Advances in siRNA delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2009, 8, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Catuogno, S.; Esposito, C.L.; Condorelli, G.; De Franciscis, V. Nucleic acids delivering nucleic acids. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2018, 134, 79–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Shen, H.; Huang, X.; Min, J.; Le, S.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Dogan, A.A.; Liu, X.; Zhang, P.; Draz, M.S.; et al. Nanoparticle Delivery Systems for DNA/RNA and their Potential Applications in Nanomedicine. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2019, 19, 2507–2523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Kaczmarek, J.C.; Kowalski, P.; Anderson, D.G. Advances in the delivery of RNA therapeutics: From concept to clinical reality. Genome Med. 2017, 9, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Zhou, J.; Bobbin, M.L.; Burnett, J.; Rossi, J.J. Current Progress of RNA Aptamer-Based Therapeutics. Front. Genet. 2012, 3, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Cancers 12 01365 g001 550
Figure 1. Cancer associated fibroblast (CAF) origins and pro-tumor functions. Potential cellular sources of CAFs include pre-existing resident fibroblasts and stellate cells, epithelial cells, endothelial cells, mesenchymal stem cells, circulating fibrocytes, pericytes, smooth muscle cells, and adipocytes. Activated CAFs exhibit enhanced proliferative and migratory properties and produce components of the extracellular matrix (ECM), growth factors and cytokines promoting ECM remodeling, angiogenesis, tumor cell survival, proliferation, tumor cell stemness maintenance, recruitment of immunosuppressive cells into the TME to assist in immune evasion, drug resistance, and tumor microenvironment (TME) metabolic reprogramming.
Figure 1. Cancer associated fibroblast (CAF) origins and pro-tumor functions. Potential cellular sources of CAFs include pre-existing resident fibroblasts and stellate cells, epithelial cells, endothelial cells, mesenchymal stem cells, circulating fibrocytes, pericytes, smooth muscle cells, and adipocytes. Activated CAFs exhibit enhanced proliferative and migratory properties and produce components of the extracellular matrix (ECM), growth factors and cytokines promoting ECM remodeling, angiogenesis, tumor cell survival, proliferation, tumor cell stemness maintenance, recruitment of immunosuppressive cells into the TME to assist in immune evasion, drug resistance, and tumor microenvironment (TME) metabolic reprogramming.
Cancers 12 01365 g001
Cancers 12 01365 g002 550
Figure 2. miRNAs play key role in the communication among normal fibroblasts (NFs), cancer associated fibroblast (CAFs), and cancer cells.
Figure 2. miRNAs play key role in the communication among normal fibroblasts (NFs), cancer associated fibroblast (CAFs), and cancer cells.
Cancers 12 01365 g002
Cancers 12 01365 g003 550
Figure 3. Nucleic acid-based aptamers. (a) Schematic representation of aptamer-target binding that depends on aptamer folding. (b) The SELEX (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential enrichment) process permits to select aptamers from high complex library of a random oligonucleotides through repeated rounds of binding, partitioning, and amplification of bound oligonucleotides.
Figure 3. Nucleic acid-based aptamers. (a) Schematic representation of aptamer-target binding that depends on aptamer folding. (b) The SELEX (Systematic Evolution of Ligands by EXponential enrichment) process permits to select aptamers from high complex library of a random oligonucleotides through repeated rounds of binding, partitioning, and amplification of bound oligonucleotides.
Cancers 12 01365 g003
Table
Table 1. Most relevant miRNAs implied in CAFs activation and their tumor prompting functions.
Table 1. Most relevant miRNAs implied in CAFs activation and their tumor prompting functions.
Operating ModeMiRNADe-Regulation DirectionMechanism of ActionCancer Type
miRNA deregulation in CAF activation and tumor-promoting functionsmiR-221-5p, miR-31-3p, miR-221-3pUp-regulationDifferentiation, adhesion, migration, proliferation, and cell–cell interactionBreast cancer [43,44]
miR-205, miR-200b, miR-200c, miR-141, miR-101, miR-342-3p, let-7g, miR-26bDown-regulation
miRs-200 family, miR-141Down-regulationConversion of normal fibroblasts (NFs) into CAFs
miR-16, miR-320Up-regulationTumor development and progressionBladder cancer [45]
miR-243, miR-145 and miR-130Down-regulation
miR-155Up-regulationConversion of NFs into CAFsOvarian cancer [41]
miR-31, miR-214Down-regulation
miR-21Up-regulationCAF activationColorectal cancer, lung adenocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma [46,47,48,49]
Up-regulationMetabolic alterations of CAFsPancreatic cancer [50]
miR-409, miR-210, miR-133bUp-regulationConversion of NFs into CAFs
Tumor induction and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT)		Prostate carcinoma [51,52,53,54]
miR-15, miR-16Down-regulationTumor growth and progression
miR-106Up-regulationProliferation, migration and invasion of tumor cellsGastric cancer [55,56]
miR-149Down-regulationTransformation of NFs into CAFs
miR-214Down-regulationEMT
miR-31Down-regulationCell invasion, migration and scatteringEndometrial cancer [57,58]
miR-148Down-regulationActivation of the WNT/b-catenin pathway
miR-31Up-regulationCancer developmentColorectal cancer [59,60]
miR-1, miR-206Down-regulationConversion of NFs into CAFs
Migration, colony formation, and tumor growth
Recruitment of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs)
miR-27a/bUp-regulationPoor response to chemotherapyEsophageal cancer [61]
MiRNA transfer between CAFs and tumor cells through extracellular vesiclesmiR-329, miR-181a, miR-199b, miR-382, miR-215, miR-21Over-expressionCancer proliferation and chemoresistanceColorectal cancer [62]
miR-21, miR-378e, miR-143Induction of the stemness and EMT phenotype of cancer cellsBreast Cancer [63,64,65]
miR-125bDevelopment of CAFs from NFs
miR-181d-5pCell proliferation, invasion, migration, EMT and apoptosis
miR-382-5pCell migration and invasionOral squamous cell carcinoma [66]
miR-21ChemoresistanceOvarian cancer [67]
miR-146a, miR-106bGemcitabine (GEM) resistancePancreatic cancer [68,69]
miR-196aCisplatin resistanceHead and neck cancer [70]
miR-92a-3pCell stemness, EMT, metastasis and 5-FU/L-OHP resistanceColorectal cancer [71]
miR-21CAF activationHepatocellular carcinoma [72,73]
miR-1247-3p
Table
Table 2. Examples of lncRNAs involved in the crosstalk between CAFs and tumor cells.
Table 2. Examples of lncRNAs involved in the crosstalk between CAFs and tumor cells.
lncRNAMechanisms of ActionCancer Type
ZEB2NATCAF-secreted TGFβ1 induces EMT and invasion via lncRNA-ZEB2NATBladder cancer [79]
HOTAIRCAF-secreted TGFβ1 induces EMT and metastasis via LncRNA-HOTAIRBreast cancer [80]
ANRILMK released by CAFs enhances cisplatin resistance via the induction of lncRNA-ANRIL.Oral squamous cell carcinoma [81]
DNM3OSCAFs confer radioresistance promoting the expression lncRNA-DNM3OS via PDGFβ/PDGFRβ/FOXO1 signaling pathwayEsophageal cancer cells [82]
Lnc-CAFLnc-CAF increase IL-33 expression inducing CAF transformationOral squamous cell carcinoma [83]
LINC00092LINC00092 maintains CAF-phenotype and is simultaneously induced in cancer cells by CAFs-secreted CXCL14 promoting cancer metastasisOvarian cancer [84]
H19LncRNA-H19 carried by CAF-derived exosomes can promote stemness and chemoresistanceColorectal cancer [85]
Table
Table 3. Examples of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) involved in the crosstalk between CAFs and tumor cells.
Table 3. Examples of small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) involved in the crosstalk between CAFs and tumor cells.
siRNA TargetMechanisms of ActionCancer Type
MFAP5Silencing of MFAP5 expression in CAFs, inhibited ovarian tumor growth, invasion, and metastasishigh-grade serous ovarian cancer [94]
Stromal glutamine synthetase and cancer cell glutaminaseThe simultaneous silencing of glutamine synthetase in the stroma and glutaminase in cancer cells, disrupts CAFs/cancer cells metabolic crosstalk, inducing tumor regressionhigh-grade serous ovarian adenocarcinoma [95]
RARβ, PPARβ/δ, VDR, GR and ARknockdown in CAFs leads to attenuation of SCC invasiveness, proliferation, energy metabolism, ROS production and response to chemotherapySquamous cell carcinoma [96]
IL-33 ior ST2LTargeting IL-33 expression in CAFs or ST2L expression in gastric cancer (GC) cells inhibits the metastatic capacity of GC cells in nude mice.Gastric cancer [97]
NOX4NOX4 inhibition suppresses CAF-mediated immunotherapy resistancelung, colorectal and breast cancers [98]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santana-Viera, L.; Ibba, M.L.; Rotoli, D.; Catuogno, S.; Esposito, C.L. Emerging Therapeutic RNAs for the Targeting of Cancer Associated Fibroblasts. Cancers 2020, 12, 1365. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061365

AMA Style

Santana-Viera L, Ibba ML, Rotoli D, Catuogno S, Esposito CL. Emerging Therapeutic RNAs for the Targeting of Cancer Associated Fibroblasts. Cancers. 2020; 12(6):1365. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061365

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santana-Viera, Laura, Maria L. Ibba, Deborah Rotoli, Silvia Catuogno, and Carla L. Esposito. 2020. "Emerging Therapeutic RNAs for the Targeting of Cancer Associated Fibroblasts" Cancers 12, no. 6: 1365. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061365

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop