Next Article in Journal
CNS Invasion in Meningioma—How the Intraoperative Assessment Can Improve the Prognostic Evaluation of Tumor Recurrence
Previous Article in Journal
Timing of Development of Symptomatic Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Impact on Symptoms, Treatment, and Survival in the Era of Molecular Treatments
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cancers
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/cancers12123619
cancers-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advances in Targeting Cancer-Associated Genes by Designed siRNA in Prostate Cancer

by
Amirhossein Bahreyni
1,2 and
Honglin Luo
1,2,*
1
Centre for Heart Lung Innovation, St. Paul’s Hospital, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
2
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cancers 2020, 12(12), 3619; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123619
Submission received: 8 November 2020 / Revised: 28 November 2020 / Accepted: 29 November 2020 / Published: 3 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Systematic Review or Meta-Analysis in Cancer Research)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Despite great advancements in early detection and therapeutic strategies, the 5-year survival rate for patients with metastatic prostate cancer remains low (i.e., ~30%). Targeting prostate cancer-associated genes has emerged as a promising treatment for this devastating disease. This review summarizes recent findings in silencing genes that are involved in prostate cancer pathogenesis. Moreover, novel nanotechnology-based platforms for effective delivery of therapeutic RNAs to prostate cancer cells have been discussed. Information provided in this review will benefit both researchers and clinicians to design and develop novel therapeutic approaches for patients suffering from prostate cancer.

Abstract

Short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) have provided novel insights into the field of cancer treatment in light of their ability to specifically target and silence cancer-associated genes. In recent years, numerous studies focus on determining genes that actively participate in tumor formation, invasion, and metastasis in order to establish new targets for cancer treatment. In spite of great advances in designing various siRNAs with diverse targets, efficient delivery of siRNAs to cancer cells is still the main challenge in siRNA-mediated cancer treatment. Recent advancements in the field of nanotechnology and nanomedicine hold great promise to meet this challenge. This review focuses on recent findings in cancer-associated genes and the application of siRNAs to successfully silence them in prostate cancer, as well as recent progress for effectual delivery of siRNAs to cancer cells.

1. Introduction

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonplace malignancy in men along with the second most frequent cause of cancer-related death in males in the Western population, just behind lung cancer [1]. In 2020, it is anticipated that 191,930 American men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer and 33,330 patients will die due to this malignancy [2]. Among more than a million new cases diagnosed with PCa worldwide annually, statistics shows that roughly 30% of patients succumb to this disease [3]. Moreover, in light of higher incidence of this abnormality among the elderly and as a result of enhancement in life expectancy, it is estimated that the number of PCa new cases elevates roughly 80% to more than two million annually by 2040 [4,5], making this malignancy a critical health issue, particularly in developed countries [6]. Despite great advancements in current therapeutic strategies for PCa such as surgery, radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy, the 5-year survival of patients with distant tumors remains low (i.e., ~30%) [7,8]. Therefore, it is exigent to identify novel targets for developing more effective treatments to combat this growing concern.
Recent advancements in genetic research have provided numerous innovative tools for treatment of various abnormalities, from inflammation to diverse types of cancers. In line with this, RNA interference (RNAi) has attracted tremendous attention as a novel therapeutic tool in the clinical setting among the research community merely after it was discovered in the 1990s [9,10]. Short interfering RNAs (siRNAs), also recognized as small RNAi, are double-stranded RNAs with 21–25 nucleotides that are applied to silence target genes in cells [11,12]. siRNAs are made of two single sequences, named sense strand (passenger strand) and antisense strand (guide strand), connected by an active protein complex called the RNA-Induced Silencing Complex (RISC) [13,14]. It has been demonstrated that guide strand acts as the guide for the recognition of complementary mRNAs, and the RISC complex forms through their attachment. As soon as the guide strand binds to the target mRNA, the mRNA is cleaved by argonaute 2 (Ago2), the catalytic subunit of the RISC complex [15,16]. siRNAs have gained importance as effectual drugs against specific genes involved in the pathogenesis of different disorders, including viral infections and cancers [9,17]. The review will discuss the potential value of siRNAs in the treatment of PCa and elaborate novel approaches for siRNA delivery.

2. siRNA as a Therapeutic Agent in Various Types of Cancers

There is growing evidence proving that siRNAs can be considered as promising therapeutics for many human pathologies, namely cancer, cardiovascular diseases, and other abnormalities of genetic etiology [18,19]. Cancer is the most prevalent genetic disorder, provoked from the alteration in precise genes within cancer cells. Various types of gene mutations, which can either activate oncogenes or inactivate tumor suppressor genes in cells, could result in initiating cancer or even exacerbating it [20]. Therefore, one of the promising ways to tackle different types of malignancies is gene therapy to modulate the expression pattern of particular genes participating in tumor pathogenesis [21]. Since their discovery, siRNAs have attracted tremendous attention as novel cancer therapeutics. In line with this, it is proven that elongation factor 2 kinase (EF2K) is overexpressed in breast cancer of patients with mutations in BRCA1 (a human tumor suppressor gene), consequently triggering significant tumor growth and poor survival rate. Using siRNAs to target EF2K significantly declines cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of the cancer cells. Additionally, delivery of EF2K-specific siRNAs into BRCA1-mutated breast cancer in an orthotopic xenograft model by silica-coated cobalt-ferrite nanoparticles considerably diminishes tumor growth and metastasis [22]. Furthermore, acetylation of ATP-binding cassette transporter E1 (ABCE1), which is often induced by a Tat interactive protein 60 kDa (Tip60), has been found to be increased in the tissues and cells of lung cancer. Gene silence of Tip60 in lung cancer cells by designed siRNA reduces the acetylation of ABCE1, accompanied by reduced tumor weight and volume [23]. Consistent with these findings, it was shown that knockdown of neuromedin U receptor 2, a bioactive and highly conserved neuropeptide, through siRNA significantly enhances paw withdrawal threshold value in bone cancer pain via inactivation of PKC/ERK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways in comparison with negative controls [24]. These data suggest that using siRNA to silence genes involved in tumor pathogenesis has potential value for cancer treatment.
Numerous proteins are upregulated in cancers and have crucial roles in cancer development. The precursor of nerve growth factor is one of the proteins that was recently shown to be overexpressed in pancreatic cancer tissues and cell lines. It was reported that knockdown of this specific growth factor by siRNA diminishes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, and promotes anoikis of pancreatic cancer cells [25]. Similar to these findings, Li et al. [26] showed that water channel proteins (aquaporins), which are responsible for the transportation of water molecules, can participate in tumor cell proliferation and metastasis in breast cancer. It was found that silence of aquaporin-5 via siRNA decreases invasion and migration of cancer cells and augments the chemosensitivity of MCF-7/ADR cells to adriamycin, indicating the effectiveness of siRNAs in breast cancer treatment [26]. Additionally, Tang et al. [27] studied the impact of siRNA knockdown of CT45A1 (cancer-testis antigen family 45 member A1) in cancer therapy and showed that depletion of CT45A1 results in significant inhibition of cell viability, migration, and invasion of lung cancer cells, accompanied by reduced expression of Bcl-2, survivin, matrix metallopeptidase (MMP)-2 and -9, phospho-ERK1/2, and phospho-cAMP-responsive element binding protein-1, along with an increase in Bax expression [27]. Another study evaluated the effect of gene silence of STAT6 on tumor growth [28]. STAT6 is highly expressed in tumor cells and its level is positively correlated with a high rate of cell proliferation and poor prognosis. It was proven that STAT6-specific siRNA decreases viability of both HT-29 colorectal cancer and ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells through inhibiting cell proliferation and initiating apoptosis [28]. In vivo studies substantiated the efficiency of siRNA in knocking down STAT6 and subsequent inhibition of tumor growth [28].
siRNAs in combination with other therapeutic agents including chemotherapeutic drugs have exhibited synergetic effects in the treatment of various cancers. It has been shown that gene silencing of Notch-1, Wnt/β-catenin, and STAT3 alone or in combination significantly enhances the chemosensitivity of both doxorubicin-sensitive and -resistant MCF-7 breast cancer cells to doxorubicin, indicating the potential role of siRNA in the enhancement of the anticancer efficacy of conventional therapies [29]. Furthermore, it was reported that siRNA knockdown of Bag-1, an antiapoptotic protein, sensitizes MCF-7 breast cancer cells to apoptosis initiated by chemotherapeutic drugs such as cisplatin or paclitaxel. This combination therapy results in a significant reduction of pro-survival PI3K/Akt/mTOR and ERK1/2 pathways, an enhancement in stress-activated p38 and SAPK/JNK mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways, and an upregulation of tumor suppressors p21 and Rb [30]. Overall, these results indicate that designing and employing siRNAs against oncogenes either alone or in combination with other conventional therapies like chemotherapy can be a promising procedure to combat different malignancies.

3. siRNA-Mediated Cancer-Associated Gene Silencing in Prostate Cancer

As alluded to above, RNAi offers a novel and beneficial strategy in the field of cancer therapy. Despite the late discovery, siRNAs have been developed to silence countless genes responsible for diverse PCa hallmarks, including angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis. In line with this, knockdown of a dual specificity protein kinase TTK, which is involved in chromosome segregation during mitosis, by designed siRNA, has been reported to be able to reduce proliferation, invasion, and migration of PC3 and DU145 PCa cells and initiate cell death [31]. Once applied to tumor-bearing mice, this developed siRNA prevents tumor cells from division in comparison with the control group, signifying a potential target for PCa treatment [31]. It was also reported that knockdown of Rho-associated protein kinase by siRNA significantly reduces migration and invasion of PC-3 and DU145 PCa cells, which are associated with decreased expression of phospho-LIM kinase 1 and MMP-2 [32]. Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) is known as an oncoprotein overexpressed in most human malignancies, especially PCa. Growing evidence suggests that this enzyme could be a potential target for PCa treatment. It was validated that siRNA-mediated gene silencing of PP2A significantly elicits sensitivity of PC-3 cells to docetaxel-induced cell growth inhibition and apoptosis [33]. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) is a nuclear protein that is involved in various cellular processes and has been revealed to have prognostic values in diverse malignancies. Inhibition of PARP1 by chemical inhibitors such as olaparib or rucaparib has demonstrated treatment efficacy in BRCA1/2 mutant tumors [34]. Lai et al. [35] reported that depletion of PARP1 with siRNA diminishes PCa cell progression regardless of the BRCA1/2 mutation. PARP1 silencing reduces cell migration and invasion in vitro and inhibits tumor growth in a PC3 xenograft model. Notably, knockdown of PARP1 increases the induction of apoptosis in PCa treated with docetaxel, implying that PARP1-siRNA may be a potential therapeutic agent against PCa by application either alone or in combination with other therapeutic tools [35].
Fusion genes are a class of oncogenes that have been found in many cancer types including PCa and caused by genomic rearrangements [36]. Gene fusion between a transcription repressor (BMI1) and a transcriptional factor (COMMD3) has been recently identified in PCa, which triggers disease recurrence and poor survival [37]. It was reported that targeting the COMMD3:BMI1 fusion gene with siRNA leads to reduced c-MYC expression and decreased tumor cell proliferation both in vitro and in metastatic tumors in a xenograft mouse model of PCa [37]. Moreover, TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion is the most common genomic alteration identified in PCa, leading to overexpression of the transcription factor ERG [38]. It was shown that TMPRSS2-ERG knockdown mediated by siRNA declines cell viability and inhibits tumor growth. Treatment with flutamide, one of the gold-standard treatments of PCa, and TMPRSS2-ERG siRNA results in similar inhibition of tumor growth in tumor-bearing mice, signifying high efficacy of siRNA treatment in impeding PCa progression [38].
Several cell membrane proteins that are overexpressed in PCa have been shown to play decisive roles in cell development and tumor progression. For example, transmembrane channel-like 5 (TMC5) is upregulated in PCa cells, and knockdown of TMC5 using siRNA leads to inhibition of PCa cell proliferation through cell cycle arrest at the G1 phase [39]. Moreover, cell sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil is remarkably enhanced after silencing TMC5 [39]. Similarly, T-type calcium channels were revealed to be a promising target for different cancers, particularly PCa, in light of their role in tumor growth. SiRNA-based inhibition of these particular calcium channels was able to lessen PC-3 cell survival and proliferation [40]. Transient receptor potential melastatin 2 is another calcium-permeable ion channel and considered as a prognostic marker for PCa [41]. Gene silence of this receptor through siRNA transfection results in altered expression of autophagic genes in PC-3 cells [41]. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit α5 (α5-nAChR) was proven to participate in the pathogenesis of certain solid tumors through induction of angiogenesis and metastasis [42]. To assess the precise role of α5-nAChR in PCa, siRNA was used to silence α5-nAChR in PCa cell lines, DU145 and PC3. Results demonstrated that knockdown of α5-nAChR causes reduced levels of phospho-AKT and phospho-ERK1/2, followed by a significant decrease in cell migration and invasion and an induction of apoptosis, indicating the impact of α5-nAChR on the proliferation and invasion of human PCa cells and the importance of its silencing in PCa treatment [43]. Finally, six transmembrane epithelial antigens of the prostate 1 (STEAP1) was shown to be overexpressed in various types of tumors, particularly in PCa, and knockdown of STEAP1 in LNCaP cells by siRNA decreases cell viability and proliferation, whilst promoting apoptosis [44]. All together, these data suggest that cell membrane proteins could serve as appropriate targets for PCa treatment.
Hypoxia is one of the key characteristics of tumors and correlates with poor prognosis of cancer patients. Dai et al. [45] demonstrated that hypoxia is capable of elevating metastatic-associated cell functions via activating c-Src in PCa cells and that gene silence of Src with siRNA impairs hypoxia-induced metastasis, implying an important role for Src in the progression of prostate malignancy. Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) is a vital enzyme in aerobic glycolysis in normal tissues; however, overexpression of this protein has been reported in various cancers. Knockdown of PKM2 via siRNA was reported to reduce viability and colony formation ability of human PCa DU145 cells [46]. Further investigations revealed that depletion of PKM2 has a major impact on the PKB/mTOR pathway; hence, as a result, reducing the expression of glycolytic enzymes lactate dehydrogenase A and glucose transporter 1. In addition, an enhancement in autophagic cell death was observed after treating cancer cells with PKM2-siRNA, signifying new perspectives in terms of PCa therapy [46]. Consistent with these findings, it was demonstrated that knockdown of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α) by siRNA elicits antitumor activity of cisplatin in a PC-3 xenograft model [47]. Intravenous injection of attenuated Salmonella carrying an HIF-1α siRNA-expressing plasmid in tumor-bearing mice increases the response of PCa cells to cisplatin through promoting the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [47].
There are several proteins in cells that are overexpressed during prostate malignancy and play crucial roles in both tumor formation and invasion. For instance, the association between overexpression of a small ribosomal protein subunit 7 (RPS7) with tumor growth has been highlighted in various studies [48,49]. It was reported that silencing RPS7 using specific siRNA attenuates prostate tumor growth and migration, associated with upregulation in E-cadherin and downregulation in N-cadherin and Snail [50]. Sal-like 4 is a transcription factor that is upregulated in several types of cancers [51]. Research revealed that targeting Sal-like 4 with specific siRNA decreases proliferation and colony formation, and induces apoptosis in PCa C4-2 cells, likely through regulation of the expression of Bcl-2 and Bax [52]. Macrophage-capping protein (CAPG), encoded by the CapG gene, is recognized as an actin regulatory protein [53]. Li et al. [54] showed that silence of CapG using siRNA significantly reduces migratory and invasive capacities of DU145 cells and leads to a noticeable reduction in proliferation and metastasis of DU145 cells. ELK3 is an ETS domain-containing transcription factor involved in diverse physiological and pathological processes from cell proliferation and migration to malignant progression [55]. Silencing ELK3 by siRNA results in increased apoptosis and decreased cell proliferation and migration in DU145 cells, partially owing to upregulation of an endogenous serine protease inhibitor, as well as causes reduced tumor growth in xenograft mice [56]. The histone chaperone protein, anti-silencing function 1B (ASF1B), is also highly expressed in PCa tissues and siRNA knockdown of ASF1B was shown to result in a significant decline in viability and colony formation as well as an increase in apoptosis and cell cycle arrest of both LNCap and C4-2 cells [57].
Another imperative factor in tumor progression is a proteoglycan protein named endothelial cell-specific molecule-1 (ESM-1). It is overexpressed in various malignancies and mediated by inflammatory cytokines and proangiogenic growth factors [58]. Interestingly, it was verified that treatment of PCa cells with ESM-1-siRNA significantly diminishes cell migration with no observable impacts on proliferation [59]. Further investigations revealed that ESM-1-siRNA downregulates the transcriptional and protein levels of the angiogenic chemokine CXCL3, suggesting a role for CXCL3 in ESM-1-mediated cell migration [59].
In summary, there are myriad genes that are overexpressed during prostate malignancy and participate actively in cell proliferation, invasiveness, and tumor progression. Targeting these upregulated genes offers a promising strategy for preventing tumor progression and increasing survival among patients suffering from PCa. As validated in various studies, designing and developing siRNAs that can effectively silence genes involved in tumor pathogenesis has shown encouraging outcomes in PCa treatment. Hence, they might be applied as alternative tools to conventional treatments or be used in combination with other treatments to improve their efficacy. Table 1 summarizes different genes that are involved in PCa formation and pathogenesis, which could be potential targets for siRNAs.

4. Attenuating Drug Resistance in Prostate Cancer Using siRNA

Drug resistance in tumor cells remains the central cause of treatment failure, leading to tumor recurrence and metastasis [60]. Drug resistance in cancer occurs due to one of these two scenarios: inherent resistance (without any drug treatment due to genetic mutations) or acquired drug resistance (as a result of tumor adaptation following cancer treatment) [60]. Combination therapies particularly targeting genes involved in drug resistance have emerged as novel strategies for cancer therapy [61]. Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is associated with the vast majority of PCa-related deaths worldwide. Patients suffering from CRPC have typically shown resistance to common chemotherapeutic agents. Recently, combination therapies using chemotherapeutic drugs and siRNA have served as a promising procedure for the treatment of drug-resistant PCa. In line with this, Zhang et al. [62] developed a nanoparticle delivery system, consisting of a calcium phosphate core, dioleoyl phosphatidic acid and arginine-glycine-aspartic acid peptide-modified polyethylene glycol, for co-delivery of the 78-kDa glucose-regulated protein (GRP78)-specific siRNA and docetaxel as a combination therapy against PC-3 CRPC. Results signify that co-administration of docetaxel and GRP78-siRNA to PC-3 cells elicits enhanced sensitivity of cancer cells to docetaxel both in vitro and in vivo, which might be a result of cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and autophagy mediated by GRP78 knockdown [62]. Similar to this, knockdown of deubiquitinating enzyme ubiquitin-specific protease 33 (USP33), which is overexpressed in PCa cells, with siRNA considerably induces apoptosis mediated by docetaxel in CRPC [63]. In addition, siRNA-mediated knockdown of USP9X notably decreases anchorage-independent growth of prostate carcinoma cells, possibly through increasing ubiquitination and decreasing protein levels of IGFR (insulin-like growth factor receptor) and IRS-2 (insulin receptor substrate-2), indicating the importance of targeting certain ubiquitin-specific proteases in PCa treatment [64]. The gene associated with retinoid-interferon mortality (GRIM-19) has been shown to be related to drug resistance in a number of cancers [65]. The mRNA and protein levels of GRIM-19 were reported to be lower in PCa tissues and cells compared with those in normal tissues [65]. Downregulation of GRIM-19 with designed siRNA increases the resistance of PCa cells to docetaxel, whilst overexpression of GRIM-19 improves the sensitivity through downregulating the expression of Rad23b, a survival gene that facilities DNA damage repair [65]. These data suggest that enhanced expression of GRIM-19, in combination with chemotherapy, could serve as a better strategy of chemotherapy for PCa. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a well-known factor in prostatic tumorigenesis; however, its role in chemoresistance in human PCa is still ambiguous. Hour et al. [66] revealed that there is a direct association between EGFR level and docetaxel resistance in docetaxel-resistant PCa cells, which could occur through Akt-dependent ABCB1 expression in PC cells. It was proven that silencing EGFR expression through siRNA can significantly increase docetaxel sensitivity of docetaxel-resistant PCa cells, while induction of EGFR expression or applying recombinant EGF protein diminishes cytotoxicity of docetaxel toward PC3 cells [66]. Together, these studies have provided increasing evidence that combined administration of chemotherapeutic agents with specific siRNAs can augment the function of chemotherapeutic drugs and recover the sensitivity of resistant cells to conventional drugs such as docetaxel.

5. Improving Antitumoral Immune Response by siRNA

In recent years, cancer immunotherapy has gained vast attention in light of its capabilities of augmenting the host immune response towards cancer cells [67]. siRNA has emerged as a powerful approach for cancer immunotherapy [68]. siRNA can target different molecules, such as programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), as well as interleukin 10 receptor, STAT3, and transforming growth factor-β receptor, on the surface of immune cells and/or tumor cells, which participate actively in the process of immune activation, to lessen tumor evasion from the host’s immune system and boost the immune response against tumors [69,70,71,72]. Consistently, myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are recognized as imperative inhibitors of T-cell responses in numerous malignancies, including PCa. Therefore, alleviation of MDSC-mediated immunosuppression is an effective method to restore immune activity against cancer. It has been confirmed that STAT3 is activated in circulating MDSCs and has a decisive role in MDSC-mediated immunosuppression [73]. It was shown that immunosuppressive impacts of patient-derived MDSCs on effector CD8 (+) T cells can be abrogated through delivery of STAT3-siRNA to MDSCs [74]. Further investigation revealed that inhibitory effects of STAT3-siRNA are contingent on decreased expression and enzymatic activity of arginase-1, a downstream target gene of STAT3 and a potent T cell inhibitor [74]. These results indicate that gene silencing of STAT3, a central immune checkpoint regulator, is a promising strategy to enhance the immune response against PCa. Moreover, the E3 ubiquitin ligase Cbl-b is expressed in all leukocyte subsets and mediates various signaling pathways. Targeting the Cbl-b gene in T lymphocytes by specific siRNA was reported to increase the production of interleukin (IL)-2 and interferon (IFN)-γ and stimulate T cell cytotoxicity towards RM-1 PCa cells, resulting in a noticeable decline of tumor size in immune competent mice compared with controls [75]. Collectively, despite these promising results, further investigations are required to identify more molecules that are associated with tumor evasion to design siRNA in order to target them with high selectivity.

6. Targeted siRNA Delivery

Despite the fact that siRNA therapy is a promising strategy for cancer treatment, there are some concerns regarding their applications in clinical therapy. Naked siRNAs have very short half-lives in vivo and undergo rapid clearance [76]. Moreover, they induce immune responses after in vivo injection [77]. In recent years, advancements in the field of nanotechnology and progress in designing nanocarriers have significantly improved the efficacy of siRNA delivery into cancer cells [78] (Figure 1). For instance, Shi et al. [79] developed a nanocarrier system based on human monoclonal prostate-specific membrane antigen antibody (PSMAab) for targeted delivery of tripartite motif-containing 24 (TRIM24)-siRNA. It was proven that developed nanoparticles not only protect siRNA from enzymatic digestion, but also efficiently deliver siRNA into PCa cells in vitro and in vivo. Release of TRIM24-siRNA, followed by knockdown of TRIM24, significantly suppresses proliferation, colony-formation, and invasion of PSMA+ CRPC cells in vitro, and inhibits tumor growth of PSMA+ CRPC xenografts and bone loss in a PSMA+ CRPC bone metastasis model [79]. Similarly, Lee et al. [80] developed a delivery system composed of Glu-urea-Lys PSMA-targeting ligand/siRNA incorporated into a lipid nanoparticle to target androgen receptors on the surface of PCa. It was demonstrated that, compared with naked siRNA, this system is able to decrease serum prostate-specific antigen, tumor cellular proliferation, and androgen receptor levels significantly. This implies the importance of a targeted delivery system compared with nontarget strategies for treating PCa cells with siRNA [80].
Owing to their unique and easy modification properties, dendrimers have emerged as a promising system for gene/drug delivery in cancer therapy [81,82]. For instance, it has been shown that encapsulation of Hsp27-sticky siRNA in dendrimers significantly enhances the efficacy of gene silencing in different prostate cancer cells [83]. Research by the same group revealed that further modification of these dendrimers with the RGDK peptide allows for selective targeting of ανβ3 integrin and neuropilin-1 (Nrp-1) receptors, which are overexpressed on tumor cells, and effectively prevents tumor cell proliferation in a PC-3 xenograft mouse model [81]. Carbon nanotubes are another type of nanoparticles that are widely applied as superior carriers for siRNA due to their exceptional characteristics such as large surface areas, rich surface chemical functionalities, and good biocompatibility [84]. siRNAs can be attached on the surface of carbon nanotubes through both electrostatic and covalent interaction and effectively delivered to desired regions [85]. Alongside these nanocarriers, it was shown that targeted delivery of NFκB-siRNA through gold nanoparticles capped with polyethylenimine (PEI) and PEGylated anisamide (a ligand known to target the sigma receptor) causes effectual endosomal escape of siRNA and subsequently reduces NFκB gene expression [86]. As a result, considerable tumor growth suppression in a PC-3 xenograft mouse model was achieved. Furthermore, systemic exposure to siRNA parallel with paclitaxel delivery results in a synergistic therapeutic response in terms of tumor growth inhibition [86]. In another study, to evaluate the effect of a combination therapy, docetaxel and ERK1/2-siRNA were loaded into PSMA-conjugated bovine serum albumin-branched polyethylenimine nanoparticles [87]. Co-delivery of docetaxel and ERK1/2-siRNA leads to a marked decrease in α-tubulin and ERK1/2 in CWR22R PCa cells. As a result, cell growth is significantly inhibited as compared to docetaxel alone. Moreover, combined administration of docetaxel and ERK1/2-siRNA remarkably enhances median survival from 18 days to around 45 days in comparison with mice that receive the same dose of free docetaxel. These findings signify the impact of a combined therapy involving siRNA and conventional chemotherapy drug and the development of an effective delivery system in the treatment of PCa [87].
Both the EGFR signaling pathway and survivin are involved in cancer cell proliferation, tumor vascularization, and metastasis [88]. Lui et al. [89] constructed an RNA-based aptamer-siRNA chimera that specifically binds PSMA and targets both EGFR and survivin. This chimera was shown to induce apoptosis effectively both in vitro and in vivo, and inhibit tumor growth and angiogenesis in the C4-2 PCa xenograft model by an EGFR-HIF1α-VEGF-dependent mechanism. These results support that targeted delivery of two siRNAs could be a therapeutic strategy for the treatment of PCa [89]. Serum response factor (SRF) is known as a vital transcription factor and has a significant role in regulating expression of genes involved in cell growth and differentiation [90]. Research revealed that knockdown of both RelA (also known as nuclear factor NFκB p65 subunit) and SRF by specific siRNAs through a non-virally modified cyclodextrin vector causes significant reductions in the invasion potential of the highly metastatic PC-3 cells, partly due to the reduction of MMP-9 [91]. Similar results in terms of a decrease in cell viability of PC-3 cells were achieved through a delivery of siRNAs targeting disintegrin and metalloproteinase 10 (ADAM10) by polyethylene glycol–polyethylenimine–Fe3O4 nanoparticles [92]. Furthermore, Choi et al. [93] discovered that gene silence of Bcl-2, survivin, and androgen receptor with siRNAs, which are encapsulated in pluronic F-68 polymer, along with treatment with benzethonium chloride, triggers apoptosis of human PCa LNCaP-LN3 cells more efficiently in comparison with the silencing of individual gene, suggesting that multiple gene-targeting siRNA/drug delivery system could be a feasible and promising way to combat PCa [93]. Taken together, results obtained by these studies and other investigations in different malignancies revealed that a nanoparticle-mediated delivery system may serve as an effective platform for combined gene therapies with conventional chemotherapies to enhance antitumoral efficacy. Table 2 summarizes recent delivery platforms that are employed for effective and safe delivery of various siRNAs to PCa cells.

7. Conclusions

Since its discovery, siRNA holds great promise to treat a number of diseases, including cancer, owing to its specificity to target and silence genes that are correlated with the pathogenesis of cancer, from cell proliferation and invasion to immunosuppression [94]. Recently, combinatory administration of gene-specific siRNAs with other conventional therapies such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy has shown synergistic effects in the treatment of PCa [79]. More importantly, several studies confirmed that targeting specific genes by siRNA could noticeably restore or even enhance the sensitivity of resistant PCa cells to chemotherapeutic drugs such as docetaxel [95]. Clinical studies have been initiated to evaluate the efficiency of siRNA in various solid tumors either alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents (NCT03087591, NCT00672542). Here we summarized the molecules that could be potential targets of siRNAs for PCa treatment. Despite the promising results, the clinical application of naked siRNAs has demonstrated some limitations because of their labile nature, ability to induce immune responses, and anionic properties [96]. To protect siRNAs from enzymatic cleavage and rapid clearance, it is imperative to shield them in a proper way. Advancements in the field of nanotechnology have provided this opportunity for efficient delivery of siRNAs to target cells and to increase their in vivo cellular uptake [97,98]. Moreover, it is beneficial in terms of combining siRNAs with other therapeutic agents [99]. Further investigations in molecular profiling of patient tumors are needed to determine molecules that are involved in tumor pathogenesis and could be potentially targeted by siRNA, and to explore novel strategies for delivery of siRNAs with high selectivity and safety.

Funding

This work was supported by the Canadian Cancer Research Society, British Columbia Lung Association, Providence Health Care Research Institute (PHCRI), and Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute (VCHRI) Innovation and Translational Research Award.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Gaudreau, P.-O.; Stagg, J.; Soulières, D.; Saad, F. The Present and Future of Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer: Proteomics, Genomics, and Immunology Advancements. Biomarkers Cancer 2016, 8, 15–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Miller, K.D.; Siegel, R.L.; Khan, R.; Jemal, A. Cancer Statistics. Cancer Rehabilitation 2018, 69, 7–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hoey, C.; Liu, S.K. Circulating blood miRNAs for prostate cancer risk stratification: miRroring the underlying tumor biology with liquid biopsies. Res. Rep. Urol. 2019, 11, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Agochukwu, N.Q.; Skolarus, T.A.; Wittmann, D. Telemedicine and prostate cancer survivorship: A narrative review. mHealth 2018, 4, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lam, D.; Clark, S.; Stirzaker, C.; Pidsley, R. Advances in Prognostic Methylation Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hayat, M.J.; Howlader, N.; Reichman, M.E.; Edwards, B.K. Cancer Statistics, Trends, and Multiple Primary Cancer Analyses from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Oncologist 2007, 12, 20–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Tucci, M.; Zichi, C.; Buttigliero, C.; Vignani, F.; Scagliotti, G.V.; Di Maio, M. Enzalutamide-resistant castration-resistant prostate cancer: Challenges and solutions. OncoTargets Ther. 2018, 11, 7353–7368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Messner, E.A.; Steele, T.M.; Tsamouri, M.M.; Hejazi, N.; Gao, A.C.; Mudryj, M.; Ghosh, P.M. The Androgen Receptor in Prostate Cancer: Effect of Structure, Ligands and Spliced Variants on Therapy. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, S.J.; Kim, M.J.; Kwon, I.C.; Roberts, T.M. Delivery strategies and potential targets for siRNA in major cancer types. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2016, 104, 2–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Fire, A.; Xu, S.; Montgomery, M.K.; Kostas, S.A.; Driver, S.E.; Mello, C.C. Potent and specific genetic interference by double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 1998, 391, 806–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Zamore, P.D.; Tuschl, T.; Sharp, P.A.; Bartel, D.P. RNAi: Double-stranded RNA directs the ATP-dependent cleavage of mRNA at 21 to 23 nucleotide intervals. Cell 2000, 101, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kleinman, M.E.; Kaneko, H.; Gil Cho, W.; Dridi, S.; Fowler, B.J.; Blandford, A.D.; Albuquerque, R.J.C.; Hirano, Y.; Terasaki, H.; Kondo, M.; et al. Short-interfering RNAs Induce Retinal Degeneration via TLR3 and IRF3. Mol. Ther. 2012, 20, 101–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Fakhr, E.; Zare, F.; Teimoori-Toolabi, L. Precise and efficient siRNA design: A key point in competent gene silencing. Cancer Gene Ther. 2016, 23, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Parvani, J.G.; Jackson, M.W. Silencing the roadblocks to effective triple-negative breast cancer treatments by siRNA nanoparticles. Endocrine-Related Cancer 2017, 24, R81–R97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Meister, G.; Tuschl, T. Mechanisms of gene silencing by double-stranded RNA. Nat. Cell Biol. 2004, 431, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Martinez, J.; Patkaniowska, A.; Urlaub, H.; Lührmann, R.; Tuschl, T. Single-Stranded Antisense siRNAs Guide Target RNA Cleavage in RNAi. Cell 2002, 110, 563–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Selvam, C.; Mutisya, D.; Prakash, S.; Ranganna, K.; Thilagavathi, R. Therapeutic potential of chemically modified siRNA: Recent trends. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2017, 90, 665–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. NaghiZadeh, S.; Mohammadi, A.; Baradaran, B.; Mansoori, B. Overcoming multiple drug resistance in lung cancer using siRNA targeted therapy. Gene 2019, 714, 143972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Khalil, H.; El Maksoud, A.I.A.; Alian, A.; El-Hamady, W.A.; Daif, A.A.; Awad, A.M.; Guirgis, A.A. Interruption of Autophagosome Formation in Cardiovascular Disease, an Evidence for Protective Response of Autophagy. Immunol. Investig. 2020, 49, 249–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Riahi, A.; Radmanesh, H.; Schürmann, P.; Bogdanova, N.; Geffers, R.; Meddeb, R.; Kharrat, M.; Dork, T. Exome sequencing and case-control analyses identifyRCC1as a candidate breast cancer susceptibility gene. Int. J. Cancer 2018, 142, 2512–2517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Altanerova, U.; Jakubechova, J.; Benejova, K.; Priscakova, P.; Pesta, M.; Pitule, P.; Topolcan, O.; Kausitz, J.; Zduriencikova, M.; Repiska, V.; et al. Prodrug suicide gene therapy for cancer targeted intracellular by mesenchymal stem cell exosomes. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 144, 897–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Asik, E.; Akpinar, Y.; Caner, A.; Kahraman, N.; Guray, T.; Volkan, M.; Albarracin, C.; Pataer, A.; Arun, B.; Ozpolat, B. EF2-kinase targeted cobalt-ferrite siRNA-nanotherapy suppressesBRCA1-mutated breast cancer. Nanomedicine 2019, 14, 2315–2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Liang, Z.; Yu, Q.; Ji, H.; Tian, D. Tip60-siRNA regulates ABCE1 acetylation to suppress lung cancer growth via activation of the apoptotic signaling pathway. Exp. Ther. Med. 2019, 17, 3195–3202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Peng, S.; Lu, Y.; Li, P.; Liu, P.; Shi, X.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, J. The short interference RNA (siRNA) targeting NMUR2 relieves nociception in a bone cancer pain model of rat through PKC-ERK and PI3K-AKT pathways. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 512, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Xu, J.; Song, J.; Yang, X.; Guo, J.; Wang, T.; Zhuo, W. ProNGF siRNA inhibits cell proliferation and invasion of pancreatic cancer cells and promotes anoikis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 111, 1066–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, X.; Pei, B.; Wang, H.; Tang, C.; Zhu, W.; Jin, F. Effect of AQP-5 silencing by siRNA interference on chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells. OncoTargets Ther. 2018, 11, 3359–3368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Tang, F.; Tang, S.; Guo, X.; Yang, C.; Jia, K. CT45A1 siRNA silencing suppresses the proliferation, metastasis and invasion of lung cancer cells by downregulating the ERK/CREB signaling pathway. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 6708–6714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Salguero-Aranda, C.; Sancho-Mensat, D.; Canals-Lorente, B.; Sultan, S.; Reginald, A.; Chapman, L. STAT6 knockdown using multiple siRNA sequences inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis of human colorectal and breast cancer cell lines. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0207558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Alshaer, W.; Alqudah, D.A.; Wehaibi, S.; Abuarqoub, D.; Zihlif, M.; Hatmal, M.M.; Awidi, A. Downregulation of STAT3, β-Catenin, and Notch-1 by Single and Combinations of siRNA Treatment Enhance Chemosensitivity of Wild Type and Doxorubicin Resistant MCF7 Breast Cancer Cells to Doxorubicin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Kilbas, P.O.; Akcay, I.M.; Doganay, G.D.; Arısan, E.D. Bag-1 silencing enhanced chemotherapeutic drug-induced apoptosis in MCF-7 breast cancer cells affecting PI3K/Akt/mTOR and MAPK signaling pathways. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 847–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, S.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Peng, H.; Xiao, L.; Li, C.; Lin, D.; Yang, K. Silencing TTK expression inhibits the proliferation and progression of prostate cancer. Exp. Cell Res. 2019, 385, 111669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gong, H.; Zhou, L.; Khelfat, L.; Qiu, G.; Wang, Y.; Mao, K.; Chen, W. Rho-Associated Protein Kinase (ROCK) Promotes Proliferation and Migration of PC-3 and DU145 Prostate Cancer Cells by Targeting LIM Kinase 1 (LIMK1) and Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2). Med Sci. Monit. 2019, 25, 3090–3099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Soofiyani, S.R.; Hoseini, A.M.; Mohammadi, A.; Shahgoli, V.K.; Baradaran, B.; Hejazi, M.S. siRNA-Mediated Silencing of CIP2A Enhances Docetaxel Activity Against PC-3 Prostate Cancer Cells. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2017, 7, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Konecny, G.E.; Kristeleit, R.S. PARP inhibitors for BRCA1/2-mutated and sporadic ovarian cancer: Current practice and future directions. Br. J. Cancer 2016, 115, 1157–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Lai, Y.; Kong, Z.; Zeng, T.; Xu, S.; Duan, X.; Li, S.; Cai, C.; Zhao, Z.; Wu, W. PARP1-siRNA suppresses human prostate cancer cell growth and progression. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 39, 1901–1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Pederzoli, F.; Bandini, M.; Marandino, L.; Ali, S.M.; Madison, R.; Chung, J.; Ross, J.S.; Necchi, A. Targetable gene fusions and aberrations in genitourinary oncology. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2020, 17, 613–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Umbreen, S.; Banday, M.M.; Jamroze, A.; Mansini, A.P.; Ganaie, A.A.; Ferrari, M.G.; Maqbool, R.; Beigh, F.H.; Murugan, P.; Morrissey, C.; et al. COMMD3:BMI1 Fusion and COMMD3 Protein Regulate C-MYC Transcription: Novel Therapeutic Target for Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2019, 18, 2111–2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Urbinati, G.; De Waziers, I.; Slamiç, M.; Foussignière, T.; Ali, H.M.; Desmaele, D.; Couvreur, P.; Massaad-Massade, L. Knocking Down TMPRSS2-ERG Fusion Oncogene by siRNA Could be an Alternative Treatment to Flutamide. Mol. Ther.-Nucleic Acids 2016, 5, e301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, W.; Wang, S.; Zhang, X.; Liu, K.; Song, J.; Leng, X.; Ran, L.; Ran, L. Transmembrane Channel-Like 5 (TMC5) promotes prostate cancer cell proliferation through cell cycle regulation. Biochimie 2019, 165, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Silvestri, R.; Pucci, P.; Venalainen, E.; Matheou, C.; Mather, R.; Chandler, S.; Aceto, R.; Rigas, S.; Wang, Y.; Rietdorf, K.; et al. T-type calcium channels drive the proliferation of androgen-receptor negative prostate cancer cells. Prostate 2019, 79, 1580–1586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tektemur, A.; Ozaydin, S.; Onalan, E.E.; Kaya, N.; Kuloglu, T.; Ozercan, I.H.; Tekin, S.; Elyas, H.M. TRPM2 mediates distruption of autophagy machinery and correlates with the grade level in prostate cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2019, 145, 1297–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wang, J.C.; Cruchaga, C.; Saccone, N.L.; Bertelsen, S.; Liu, P.; Budde, J.P.; Duan, W.; Fox, L.; Grucza, R.A.; Kern, J.; et al. Risk for nicotine dependence and lung cancer is conferred by mRNA expression levels and amino acid change in CHRNA5. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009, 18, 3125–3135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Qi, J.; Xue, W.; Zhang, Y.; Qu, C.; Lu, B.; Yin, Y.; Liu, K.; Wang, D.; Li, W.; Zhao, Z. Cholinergic α5 nicotinic receptor is involved in the proliferation and invasion of human prostate cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2019, 43, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Gomes, I.M.; Rocha, S.M.; Gaspar, C.; Alvelos, M.I.; Santos, C.R.; Socorro, S.; Baptista, C.J.M. Knockdown of STEAP1 inhibits cell growth and induces apoptosis in LNCaP prostate cancer cells counteracting the effect of androgens. Med. Oncol. 2018, 35, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dai, Y.; Siemann, D. c-Src is required for hypoxia-induced metastasis-associated functions in prostate cancer cells. OncoTargets Ther. 2019, 12, 3519–3529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Dey, P.; Kundu, A.; Sachan, R.; Park, J.H.; Ahn, M.Y.; Yoon, K.; Lee, J.; Kim, N.D.; Kim, I.S.; Lee, B.M.; et al. PKM2 Knockdown Induces Autophagic Cell Death via AKT/mTOR Pathway in Human Prostate Cancer Cells. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 52, 1535–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Gu, J.; Li, Y.; Zeng, J.; Wang, B.; Ji, K.; Tang, Y.; Sun, Q. Knockdown of HIF-1α by siRNA-expressing plasmid delivered by attenuated Salmonella enhances the antitumor effects of cisplatin on prostate cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Zhang, W.; Tong, D.; Liu, F.; Li, D.; Li, J.; Cheng, X.; Wang, Z. RPS7 inhibits colorectal cancer growth via decreasing HIF-1α-mediated glycolysis. Oncotarget 2015, 7, 5800–5814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Wang, Z.; Hou, J.; Lu, L.; Qi, Z.; Sun, J.; Gao, W.; Meng, J.; Wang, Y.; Sun, H.; Gu, H.; et al. Small Ribosomal Protein Subunit S7 Suppresses Ovarian Tumorigenesis through Regulation of the PI3K/AKT and MAPK Pathways. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wen, Y.; An, Z.; Qiao, B.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, Z. RPS7 promotes cell migration through targeting epithelial-mesenchymal transition in prostate cancer. Urol. Oncol. Semin. Orig. Investig. 2019, 37, 297.e1–297.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, T.; Tsang, J.Y.S.; Su, X.; Li, P.; Sun, W.; Wong, I.L.K.; Choy, K.; Yang, Q.; Tse, G.M.K.; Chan, T.H.; et al. SALL4 promotes tumor progression in breast cancer by targeting EMT. Mol. Carcinog. 2020, 59, 1209–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Liu, K.; Shan, Y. Effects of siRNA-mediated silencing of Sal-like 4 expression on proliferation and apoptosis of prostate cancer C4-2 cells. Genet. Mol. Res. 2016, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Mishra, V.S.; Henske, E.P.; Kwiatkowski, D.J.; Southwick, F.S. The Human Actin-Regulatory Protein Cap G: Gene Structure and Chromosome Location. Genomics 1994, 23, 560–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Li, B.; Guo, K.; Li, C.; Li, H.; Zhao, P.; Chen, K.; Liu, C. Influence of suppression of CapG gene expression by siRNA on the growth and metastasis of human prostate cancer cells. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015, 14, 15769–15778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kim, K.-S.; Park, J.-H.; Oh, N.; Cho, H.-J.; Park, K.-S. ELK3 expressed in lymphatic endothelial cells promotes breast cancer progression and metastasis through exosomal miRNAs. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Mao, Y.; Li, W.; Hua, B.; Gu, X.; Pan, W.; Chen, Q.; Xu, B.; Wang, Z.; Lu, C. Silencing of ELK3 Induces S-M Phase Arrest and Apoptosis and Upregulates SERPINE1 Expression Reducing Migration in Prostate Cancer Cells. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 2406159–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Han, G.; Zhang, X.; Liu, P.; Yu, Q.; Li, Z.; Yu, Q.; Wei, X. Knockdown of anti-silencing function 1B histone chaperone induces cell apoptosis via repressing PI3K/Akt pathway in prostate cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 53, 2056–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Jin, H.; Rugira, T.; Ko, Y.S.; Park, S.W.; Yun, S.; Kim, H.J. ESM-1 Overexpression is Involved in Increased Tumorigenesis of Radiotherapy-Resistant Breast Cancer Cells. Cancers 2020, 12, 1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Rebollo, J.; Geliebter, J.; Reyes, N. ESM-1 siRNA Knockdown Decreased Migration and Expression of CXCL3 in Prostate Cancer Cells. Int. J. Biomed. Sci. IJBS 2017, 13, 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  60. Liu, L.; Yan, L.; Liao, N.; Wu, W.-Q.; Shi, J.-L. A Review of ULK1-Mediated Autophagy in Drug Resistance of Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Vasan, N.; Baselga, J.; Hyman, D.M. A view on drug resistance in cancer. Nat. Cell Biol. 2019, 575, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Zhang, X.; He, Z.; Xiang, L.; Li, L.; Zhang, H.; Lin, F.; Cao, H. Codelivery of GRP78 siRNA and docetaxel via RGD-PEG-DSPE/DOPA/CaP nanoparticles for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2019, 13, 1357–1372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Guo, F.; Zhang, C.; Wang, F.; Zhang, W.; Shi, X.; Zhu, Y.; Fang, Z.; Yang, B.; Sun, Y. Deubiquitinating enzyme USP33 restrains docetaxel-induced apoptosis via stabilising the phosphatase DUSP1 in prostate cancer. Cell Death Differ. 2019, 27, 1938–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Furuta, H.; Yoshihara, H.; Fukushima, T.; Yoneyama, Y.; Ito, A.; Worrall, C.; Girnita, A.; Girnita, L.; Yoshida, M.; Asano, T.; et al. IRS-2 deubiquitination by USP9X maintains anchorage-independent cell growth via Erk1/2 activation in prostate carcinoma cell line. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 33871–33883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Lin, H.; Shen, Z.; Liu, H.; Yang, M.; Lin, J.; Luo, L.; Liu, L.; Chen, H. Upregulation of GRIM-19 augments the sensitivity of prostate cancer cells to docetaxel by targeting Rad23b. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2020, 47, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Hour, T.-C.; Chung, S.-D.; Kang, W.-Y.; Lin, Y.-C.; Huang, C.-Y.; Huang, A.-M.; Wu, W.-J.; Huang, S.-P.; Pu, Y.-S. EGFR mediates docetaxel resistance in human castration-resistant prostate cancer through the Akt-dependent expression of ABCB1 (MDR1). Arch. Toxicol. 2015, 89, 591–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yang, Y. Cancer immunotherapy: Harnessing the immune system to battle cancer. J. Clin. Investig. 2015, 125, 3335–3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Sullenger, B.A.; Nair, S. From the RNA world to the clinic. Science 2016, 352, 1417–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Ghafouri-Fard, S.; Ghafouri-Fard, S. siRNA and cancer immunotherapy. Immunotherapy 2012, 4, 907–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Ngamcherdtrakul, W.; Yantasee, W. siRNA therapeutics for breast cancer: Recent efforts in targeting metastasis, drug resistance, and immune evasion. Transl. Res. 2019, 214, 105–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ahn, Y.-H.; Hong, S.-O.; Kim, J.H.; Noh, K.H.; Song, K.-H.; Lee, Y.-H.; Jeon, J.-H.; Kim, D.-W.; Seo, J.H.; Kim, T.W. The siRNA cocktail targeting interleukin 10 receptor and transforming growth factor-β receptor on dendritic cells potentiates tumour antigen-specific CD8 + T cell immunity. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2015, 181, 164–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Hudson, K.; Cross, N.; Jordan-Mahy, N.; Leyland, R. The Extrinsic and Intrinsic Roles of PD-L1 and Its Receptor PD-1: Implications for Immunotherapy Treatment. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 568931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Oweida, A.J.; Mueller, A.C.; Piper, M.; Milner, D.; Van Court, B.; Bhatia, S.; Phan, A.; Bickett, T.; Jordan, K.; Proia, T.; et al. Response to radiotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is enhanced by inhibition of myeloid-derived suppressor cells using STAT3 anti-sense oligonucleotide. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 2020, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Hossain, D.M.S.; Pal, S.K.; Moreira, D.; Duttagupta, P.; Zhang, Q.; Won, H.; Jones, J.; D’Apuzzo, M.; Forman, S.; Kortylewski, M. TLR9-Targeted STAT3 Silencing Abrogates Immunosuppressive Activity of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells from Prostate Cancer Patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 3771–3782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Shi, Z.-D.; Li, X.; Hao, L.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.-X.; Dong, B.-Z.; Chen, W.-H.; Zhang, Z.-G.; Wang, Y.-M.; Fu, Q.; et al. Cbl-b gene silencing in splenic T lymphocytes as a therapeutic strategy to target the prostate cancer RM-1 cell tumors in immune competent mice. Eur. Rev. Med Pharmacol. Sci. 2014, 18, 3819–3830. [Google Scholar]
  76. Tatiparti, K.; Sau, S.; Kashaw, S.K.; Iyer, A.K. siRNA delivery strategies: A comprehensive review of recent developments. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Chen, X.; Mangala, L.S.; Rodriguez-Aguayo, C.; Kong, X.; Lopez-Berestein, G.; Sood, A.K. RNA interference-based therapy and its delivery systems. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2018, 37, 107–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Subhan, M.A.; Torchilin, V.P. Efficient nanocarriers of siRNA therapeutics for cancer treatment. Transl. Res. 2019, 214, 62–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Shi, S.J.; Wang, L.J.; Han, D.H.; Wu, J.H.; Jiao, D.; Zhang, K.L.; Chen, J.W.; Li, Y.; Yang, F.; Zhang, J.L.; et al. Therapeutic effects of human monoclonal PSMA antibody-mediated TRIM24 siRNA delivery in PSMA-positive castration-resistant prostate cancer. Theranostics 2019, 9, 1247–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lee, J.B.; Zhang, K.; Tam, Y.Y.; Quick, J.; Tam, Y.K.; Lin, P.J.; Chen, S.; Liu, Y.; Nair, J.K.; Zlatev, I.; et al. A Glu-urea-Lys ligand-conjugated lipid nanoparticle/siRNA system inhibits androgen receptor expression in vivo. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2016, 5, e348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dong, Y.; Yu, T.; Ding, L.; Laurini, E.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Weng, Y.; Lin, S.; Chen, P.; Marson, D.; et al. A dual targeting dendrimer-mediated siRNA delivery system for effective gene silencing in cancer therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 16264–16274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Dzmitruk, V.; Szulc, A.; Shcharbin, D.; Janaszewska, A.; Shcharbina, N.; Lazniewska, J.; Novopashina, D.; Buyanova, M.; Ionov, M.; Klajnert-Maculewicz, B.; et al. Anticancer siRNA cocktails as a novel tool to treat cancer cells. Part (B). Efficiency of pharmacological action. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 485, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Liu, X.; Liu, C.; Laurini, E.; Posocco, P.; Pricl, S.; Qu, F.; Rocchi, P.; Peng, L. Efficient delivery of sticky siRNA and potent gene silencing in a prostate cancer model using a generation 5 triethanolamine-core PAMAM dendrimer. Mol. Pharm. 2012, 9, 470–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Son, K.H.; Hong, J.H.; Lee, J.W. Carbon nanotubes as cancer therapeutic carriers and mediators. Int. J. Nanomed. 2016, 11, 5163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Apartsin, E.; Buyanova, M.; Novopashina, D.; Venyaminova, A. Hybrids of siRNA with Carbon Nanotubes as RNA Interference Instruments. Nanobiophysics 2015, 33–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Luan, X.; Rahme, K.; Cong, Z.; Wang, L.; Zou, Y.; He, Y.; Yang, H.; Holmes, J.D.; O’Driscoll, C.M.; Guo, J. Anisamide-targeted PEGylated gold nanoparticles designed to target prostate cancer mediate: Enhanced systemic exposure of siRNA, tumour growth suppression and a synergistic therapeutic response in combination with paclitaxel in mice. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2019, 137, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Pang, S.T.; Lin, F.W.; Chuang, C.K.; Yang, H.W. Co-Delivery of docetaxel and p44/42 MAPK siRNA using PSMA antibody-conjugated BSA-PEI layer-by-layer nanoparticles for prostate cancer target therapy. Macromol. Biosci. 2017, 17, 1600421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Yan, X.; Shen, H.; Jiang, H.; Hu, D.; Wang, J.; Wu, X. YXQ-EQ induces apoptosis and inhibits signaling pathways important for metastasis in non-small cell lung carcinoma cells. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 49, 911–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Liu, H.Y.; Yu, X.; Liu, H.; Wu, D.; She, J.X. Co-targeting EGFR and survivin with a bivalent aptamer-dual siRNA chimera effectively suppresses prostate cancer. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Onuh, J.O.; Qiu, H. Serum response factor-cofactor interactions and their implications in disease. FEBS J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Evans, J.C.; McCarthy, J.; Torres-Fuentes, C.; Cryan, J.F.; Ogier, J.; Darcy, R.; Watson, R.W.; O’Driscoll, C.M. Cyclodextrin mediated delivery of NF-kappaB and SRF siRNA reduces the invasion potential of prostate cancer cells in vitro. Gene Ther. 2015, 22, 802–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Panday, R.; Abdalla, A.; Yu, M.; Li, X.; Ouyang, C.; Yang, G. Functionally modified magnetic nanoparticles for effective siRNA delivery to prostate cancer cells in vitro. J. Biomater. Appl. 2019, 34, 952–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Choi, E.; Yoo, W.; Park, J.H.; Kim, S. Simultaneous delivery of electrostatically complexed multiple gene-targeting siRNAs and an anticancer drug for synergistically enhanced treatment of prostate cancer. Mol. Pharm. 2018, 15, 3777–3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Eloy, J.O.; Petrilli, R.; Raspantini, G.L.; Lee, R.J. Targeted liposomes for siRNA delivery to cancer. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018, 24, 2664–2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Shao, L.; Kahraman, N.; Yan, G.; Wang, J.; Ozpolat, B.; Ittmann, M. Targeting the TMPRSS2/ERG fusion mRNA using liposomal nanovectors enhances docetaxel treatment in prostate cancer. Prostate 2020, 80, 65–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Wang, C.; Zhou, Q. Systemic delivery of siRNA: Challenging but promising. Recent Pat. Drug Deliv. Formul. 2012, 6, 19–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kim, H.J.; Yi, Y.; Kim, A.; Miyata, K. Small delivery vehicles of siRNA for enhanced cancer targeting. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19, 2377–2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Rahme, K.; Guo, J.; Holmes, J.D. Bioconjugated gold nanoparticles enhance siRNA delivery in prostate cancer cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1974, 291–301. [Google Scholar]
  99. Chen, J.; Wu, Z.; Ding, W.; Xiao, C.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, S.; Gao, Y.; Cai, W. SREBP1 siRNA enhance the docetaxel effect based on a bone-cancer dual-targeting biomimetic nanosystem against bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Theranostics 2020, 10, 1619–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cancers 12 03619 g001 550
Figure 1. (A) Encapsulation of siRNAs in nanoparticles, modified with targeting ligands. (B) Delivery and release of siRNAs to desired cells, leading to gene silencing.
Figure 1. (A) Encapsulation of siRNAs in nanoparticles, modified with targeting ligands. (B) Delivery and release of siRNAs to desired cells, leading to gene silencing.
Cancers 12 03619 g001
Table
Table 1. Potential targets for siRNA treatment in prostate cancer.
Table 1. Potential targets for siRNA treatment in prostate cancer.
SiRNA-Target GeneKnockdown ConsequencesRef.
Dual specificity protein kinase TTKReduces proliferation, invasion, and migration, as well as initiates cell death process in PC-3 and DU145 PCa cells. [31]
BMI1: COMMD3 fusion geneDiminishes c-MYC expression in PC-3 cells resistant to BRD/BET-inhibitor and suppresses metastasis of tumor in xenograft mouse models.[37]
TMPRSS2:ERG fusion geneDeclines cell viability and inhibits tumor growth of VCaP PCa cells. [38]
Transmembrane channel-like 5 (TMC5)Inhibits cell proliferation and enhances cell sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil in PC-3 and DU145 cells. [39]
T-type calcium channelsLessens cell survival and proliferation of PC-3 cells.[40]
Transient receptor potential melastatin 2 (TRPM2)Induces autophagy in PC-3 cells.[41]
SrcImpairs hypoxia-induced metastasis of PC-3ML and C4-2B cells.[45]
Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2)Inhibits cell viability and the ability of colony formation, as well as induces autophagic cell death in DU145 cells.[46]
Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK)Reduces migration and invasion of PC-3 and DU145 cells.[32]
Protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A)Elicits sensitivity of PC-3 cells to docetaxel.[33]
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1)Reduces PC-3 cell migration and invasion, and decreases xenograft tumor size.[35]
Endothelial cell-specific molecule-1 (ESM-1)Diminishes cell migration with no impact on proliferation of PC-3 cells.[59]
Small ribosomal protein subunit 7Attenuates PCa growth and migration of PC-3 cells.[50]
Sal-like 4 (SALL4)Decreases proliferation and colony formation capacity of C4-2 cells.[52]
Macrophage-capping protein (CAPG)Reduces proliferatory, migratory, and invasive capacities of DU145 cells[54]
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR)Decreases cell migratory and invasive activities, and induces apoptosis of DU145 and PC-3 cells.[43]
Six transmembrane epithelial antigen of the prostate 1 (STEAP1)Declines cell viability and proliferation whilst promoting apoptosis of LnCap PCa cells.[44]
Table
Table 2. siRNA delivery strategies.
Table 2. siRNA delivery strategies.
siRNA TargetDelivery PlatformEffectsRef.
Tripartite motif-containing 24PSMAabSuppresses proliferation, colony formation, and invasion of PSMA+ CRPC cells in vitro, and inhibits tumor growth of PSMA+ CRPC xenografts and bone loss in a PSMA+ CRPC bone metastasis model.[79]
Androgen receptorGlu-urea-Lys PSMA-lipid nanoparticleInhibits serum prostate-specific antigen, tumor cellular proliferation, and androgen receptor levels.[80]
NFκBGold nanoparticle-PEI PEGylated anisamideSuppresses tumor growth in a PC-3 xenograft mouse model. Its combination with paclitaxel leads to a synergistic therapeutic response in terms of tumor growth inhibition.[86]
p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinasePSMAab-Bovine Serum Albumin branched polyethylenimineInhibits cancer cell proliferation.[87]
EGFR and survivinRNA-based aptamer-siRNA chimeraInduces apoptosis both in vitro and in vivo, and diminishes tumor growth and angiogenesis in the C4-2 PCa xenograft model.[89]
RelA and serum response factorNon-viral modified cyclodextrin vectorReduces metastatic potential of PC-3 cells without noticeable impacts on cell viability.[91]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bahreyni, A.; Luo, H. Advances in Targeting Cancer-Associated Genes by Designed siRNA in Prostate Cancer. Cancers 2020, 12, 3619. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123619

AMA Style

Bahreyni A, Luo H. Advances in Targeting Cancer-Associated Genes by Designed siRNA in Prostate Cancer. Cancers. 2020; 12(12):3619. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123619

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bahreyni, Amirhossein, and Honglin Luo. 2020. "Advances in Targeting Cancer-Associated Genes by Designed siRNA in Prostate Cancer" Cancers 12, no. 12: 3619. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123619

APA Style

Bahreyni, A., & Luo, H. (2020). Advances in Targeting Cancer-Associated Genes by Designed siRNA in Prostate Cancer. Cancers, 12(12), 3619. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123619

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop