You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Cancers
  • Feature Paper
  • Review
  • Open Access

3 July 2019

Postoperative Management in Patients with Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Section on Medical Neuroendocrinology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
2
Adult Endocrinology Department, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
3
Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
4
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA
This article belongs to the Special Issue Pheochromocytoma (PHEO) and Paraganglioma (PGL)

Abstract

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are rare catecholamine-secreting neuroendocrine tumors of the adrenal medulla and sympathetic/parasympathetic ganglion cells, respectively. Excessive release of catecholamines leads to episodic symptoms and signs of PPGL, which include hypertension, headache, palpitations, and diaphoresis. Intraoperatively, large amounts of catecholamines are released into the bloodstream through handling and manipulation of the tumor(s). In contrast, there could also be an abrupt decline in catecholamine levels after tumor resection. Because of such binary manifestations of PPGL, patients may develop perplexing and substantially devastating cardiovascular complications during the perioperative period. These complications include hypertension, hypotension, arrhythmias, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cerebrovascular accident. Other complications seen in the postoperative period include fever, hypoglycemia, cortisol deficiency, urinary retention, etc. In the interest of safe patient care, such emergencies require precise diagnosis and treatment. Surgeons, anesthesiologists, and intensivists must be aware of the clinical manifestations and complications associated with a sudden increase or decrease in catecholamine levels and should work closely together to be able to provide appropriate management to minimize morbidity and mortality associated with PPGLs.

1. Introduction

Pheochromocytomas (PHEOs) are rare catecholamine-secreting neuroendocrine tumors derived from chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla (80–85%). Paragangliomas (PGLs) are extra-adrenal tumors, originating from similar cells present in both sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglion cells (15–20%) [1]. Catecholamines, i.e., epinephrine (EPI), norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA), are synthesized and secreted from almost all pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) [2,3]. They are either released in large amounts during tumor manipulation or may suddenly drop after tumor resection causing wide swings in hemodynamics [4]. Clinical manifestations of fluctuating perioperative and postoperative hemodynamics are hypertensive crisis, arrhythmias (most commonly tachyarrhythmias), headache, sweating, constipation and anxiety. Therefore, attention should be focused on minimizing tumor manipulation by careful handling of tumor tissue, limiting intra-abdominal pressure, providing adequate anesthesia and maximizing the use of vasoactive agents to achieve intraoperative hemodynamic stability, hence improving outcomes during the postoperative period [4,5]. The use of an appropriate preoperative antihypertensive regimen can be counterproductive when effects continue after surgical tumor removal, i.e., a rapid decline of catecholamine levels may lead to hypotension [6,7]. As such, administration of volume expanders and vasopressor management would be critical in reversing vascular collapse [8]. Reports have shown that patients with higher preoperative metanephrines and catecholamines have higher postoperative complications including organ ischemia, bowel obstruction, hypoglycemia, etc. [9,10,11].
Since the pioneering work by Gagner et al. of the first laparoscopic resection of PHEO in 1992, surgical management of PHEO has considerably improved owing to the advancement in pre, intra, and postoperative care of these patients [12]. Postoperatively, patients are closely monitored in the intensive care unit for hemodynamic fluctuations along with a careful assessment of electrolyte and endocrine abnormalities.
To our best knowledge, most of the published articles focus primarily on preoperative and intraoperative care of PPGL patients, whereas studies detailing postoperative management are only available from individual case reports. It is extremely important for physicians of PPGL patients to provide not only appropriate preoperative evaluation and treatment but also adequate postoperative care.
In this article, we describe the medical approaches to treat these patients after tumor resection based on our unique, long-standing experience with these patients at the National Institutes of Health. Additionally, we present the notable complications physicians should become aware of, including those emergencies that require immediate attention by a well-trained and experienced endocrinologist working alongside intensivists. Finally, this article provides clinical caveats to practicing clinicians regarding postoperative management of these patients.

2. Catecholamines and Adrenoceptors

PPGLs secrete catecholamines with substantial variation in their content based on the expression of various biosynthetic enzymes. Typically, adrenal PHEOs produce either EPI or NE while extra-adrenal and metastatic PHEOs mainly produce NE. Rarely, these tumor cells produce DA. Adrenoceptors (α1, α2, β1, β2) are the final target site of action for these catecholamines. Therefore, it is essential to recognize the impact of catecholamines from PPGL on specific organs (Table 1 and Table 2).
Table 1. Characteristics of subtypes of adrenergic receptors.
Table 2. Responses of effector organs to autonomic nerve impulses.
EPI and NE have some overlapping but distinct effects on α- and β-adrenoceptors. EPI has more potent effects on β2-adrenoceptors than NE, but equivalent effects on β1-adrenoceptor, along with dominant effects on α-adrenoceptors in comparison to NE (Table 1). More than 95% of EPI is released from the adrenal medulla, which acts on the β2-adrenoceptors of skeletal muscle vasculature causing vasodilation leading to hypotension. In contrast, NE released from sympathetic nerve endings within the effector sites causes α1-adrenoceptor mediated vasoconstriction, leading to hypertension and its profound action on β1-adrenoceptors causes increased ionotropic and chronotropic effects in the heart [14]. Eventually, the resulting concentration of catecholamines at effector sites are significant determinants of adrenoceptor mediated responses [14,15].
Persistently high catecholamine levels may lead to adrenoceptor desensitization due to receptors’ internalization, reduction of their numbers on the cell surface, or decreased binding affinity of catecholamines to receptors [16,17]. These mechanisms may partially explain why some patients with PPGL are only moderately hypertensive, despite high plasma catecholamine levels. Decreased or desensitized adrenoceptors, perioperative α-adrenoceptor blockade, and abruptly decreased catecholamine production contributes to postoperative hypotension.
Differences in receptor binding, affinity, and downstream effects explain the spectrum of clinical signs that patients with PPGL develop. Patients with predominantly EPI secreting PPGL have episodic symptoms and signs of palpitation, lightheadedness or syncope, anxiety, and hyperglycemia. Conversely, patients with primarily NE secreting tumors have continuous symptoms and signs of hypertension, sweating, and headache [18,19,20]. These effects could extend to peri and postoperative periods due to excessive catecholamines release while handling the tumor during surgical resection. Thus, it is mandatory that these patients are followed by a multidisciplinary team in a close monitoring setting like the intensive care unit during the postoperative period.

4. Other Complications

4.1. Adrenocortical Insufficiency

Surgical approaches for PHEO resection can lead to primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) in order of ascending frequency: Cortical sparing vs. unilateral vs. bilateral adrenalectomy. Glucocorticoids supplementation is not routinely prescribed for patients undergoing unilateral adrenalectomy because the contralateral adrenal gland can maintain eucortisolemia [101]. An individualized preoperative evaluation to identify risk factors for primary or secondary adrenal insufficiency (AI) is recommended, which includes but are not limited to identification of exposure to exogenous glucocorticoids or other medications that inhibit steroidogenesis, suppression of hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis secondary to endogenous cortisol co-secretion, or patient-related comorbidities. Currently, cortical sparing surgical approach for PHEOs with germline mutations and low risk for metastasis have increased. Adrenal sparing surgery is also preferred in patients with either solitary adrenal gland or bilateral adrenal involvement, as chronic glucocorticoid replacement is associated with decreased quality of life, increased cardiovascular risk, fatigue, infections and decreased resistance to stress [102,103].
When adrenal insufficiency is clinically suspected among patients undergoing bilateral adrenalectomy or in cases of subclinical or overt cortisol co-secretion, hydrocortisone 50 mg intravenous bolus is administered before anesthesia induction followed by 25–50 mg intravenously every eight hours thereafter, with tapering over the next 24–48 h. If no immediate postoperative complications develop, and patient can tolerate oral intake, transition to physiological oral maintenance dose with hydrocortisone 10–12 mg x body surface area (BSA) is recommended [104,105]. The proposed dosages can be individualized based on the patient’s history and length of surgery. If immediate complications develop, patients should remain on supraphysiologic doses of steroids as per clinical judgment.
Clinical surveillance for symptoms suggestive of AI during the postoperative period is paramount. In addition, morning serum cortisol measurements with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels and Cosyntropin stimulation test are routinely used to confirm the diagnosis of AI [106]. Cosyntropin stimulation test can be performed as early as postoperative day 1 (unless precluded by clinical instability) to three to six weeks later to identify those non-critically ill patients who will benefit with glucocorticoid replacement therapy [107]. Once the diagnosis of AI is established, continuation of physiological glucocorticoid replacement is indicated. In cases of cortisol co-secretion or underlying central AI, HPA axis should be evaluated every six months to annually to assess for recovery. In contrast, after bilateral adrenalectomy, lifelong glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid supplementation without further HPA axis testing is recommended [101,108,109].
Mineralocorticoid replacement therapy is indicated among patients with evidence of primary AI or after bilateral adrenalectomy. In these cases, fludrocortisone should be initiated when hydrocortisone dosages fall below 50 mg/day. Fludrocortisone is usually administered at dosages of 50–100 µg/day. Mineralocorticoid replacement is monitored based on the development of clinical symptoms like salt cravings, volume depletion, and orthostatic hypotension, followed by measurement of renin activity levels to a target goal in the upper end of the reference range without development of side effects [106].
Preceding discharge of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of AI, education should be provided for early recognition of adrenal crisis and sick day rules. Patients should be equipped with a steroid emergency card to be placed in wallets, set up on smartphones, and a medical alert bracelet [106].

4.2. Renal Failure

Renal injury is a rare complication associated with PPGL resection. The mechanism of renal injury is due to massive catecholamine release in the postoperative period that can potentially lead to: (1) Stimulatory effects on renin activity and (2) hypertensive crisis from severe vasoconstriction leading to hypoperfusion at the renal bed, ischemia, and necrosis of skeletal muscles provoking rhabdomyolysis [110,111]. In contrast, hypotension due to a rapid drop in catecholamine levels, or intravascular volume depletion, can lead to acute tubular necrosis [111].
Occasionally, “mass effect” from tumor may lead to renal ischemia causing direct compression of the renal artery or vasospasm secondary to catecholamines excess [112,113,114]. Renal artery stenosis has been reported only during a hypertensive crisis. Diagnosis can be established by the use of Doppler ultrasonography, gadolinium-enhanced 3D magnetic resonance angiography, and contrast-enhanced arteriography. Stenosis tends to be transient and reversible after tumor resection. Failure to correct the mass effect on the renal artery may lead to postoperative renal artery thrombosis, resulting in permanent kidney damage. A second surgery to correct renal artery stenosis is risky and might result in secondary nephrectomy [115]. In cases of persistent renal artery stenosis, percutaneous balloon angioplasty is recommended [116]. When angioplasty fails, open surgical revascularization should be attempted [117].
In scenarios of hypertension leading to acute kidney injury, antihypertensive therapy must be initiated as mentioned earlier in this review. In cases of severe rhabdomyolysis-related acute kidney injury, hemodialysis is recommended. Intravenous fluids must be used judiciously. Colloids, such as albumin 4%, are recommended in patients at risk or with pre-existent renal failure and low albumin levels. Nephrotoxic agents should be discontinued, and supportive care should be provided under nephrology guidance.

4.3. Hypoglycemia

PPGL patients can have glucose homeostasis abnormalities mediated by elevated catecholamine secretion leading to increased liver glycogenolysis, inhibited insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells, and increased insulin resistance in the skeletal muscle. These pathological changes can lead to preoperative hyperglycemia [118]. Sudden withdrawal of plasma catecholamines and pre-existence of preoperative hyperglycemia may result in postoperative hypoglycemia [119]. Chen et al. reported other risk factors associated with postoperative hypoglycemia following PPGL resection including tumor size, higher pre-operative 24-h urine metanephrine levels, and prolonged operative time. Similarly, preoperative β-adrenoceptor blockers exposure leads to increased liver glycogenolysis subsequently contributing to hypoglycemia development [9].
Classic symptoms of hypoglycemia (anxiety, sweating, chills, irritability, lightheadedness, nausea, etc.) may be masked in the postoperative period due to residual effects of anesthesia, opioid, or β-adrenoceptor blocker use. If untreated, hypoglycemia may result in neuronal cell death and brain damage [120]. Consequently, serum glucose levels should be monitored at regular intervals for at least 24 h postoperatively following a PPGL resection [121]. If a patient develops hypoglycemia, evaluation of related risk factors (for example, associated medications, critical illness, sepsis, renal or hepatic failure, or adrenal insufficiency, etc.) and identification of reversible culprits are recommended, independent of the catecholamine levels and the surgical approach [122].
Treatment considerations include administration of glucose tablets, glucose gels, or carbohydrate containing juices to provide 15–50 g of glucose. Moreover, if the patient is unable to tolerate oral intake, treatment with Dextrose 5% infusion should be started and titrated to a glucose goal of >100 mg/dL. In emergent situations, where treatment with oral or intravenous dextrose is not feasible, administration of 1 mg intramuscular glucagon should be considered [123,124,125]. Institutional hypoglycemia treatment guidelines and hospital policies should be promptly enforced, depending on individual patient needs and access to available resources [121,126,127,128,129].

4.4. Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction

Increased catecholamine levels in the postoperative period following PPGL resection affects gastrointestinal smooth muscle cells and inhibits acetylcholine release from the parasympathetic nervous system, resulting in complications ranging from transient intestinal motility abnormalities to constipation, pseudo-obstruction, bowel infarction and perforation [130,131]. Moreover, commonly used medications in the postoperative period like analgesics and CCBs might demonstrate these symptoms. Moreover, α-adrenoceptor stimulation induces vasoconstriction of mesenteric arteries leading to ischemic colitis, ulceration, necrosis, and intestinal perforation, particularly in patients with risk factors for atherosclerotic or microvascular disease such as diabetes mellitus [132,133]. Ischemic colitis may be transient and reversible or associated with increased morbidity involving full thickness of the bowel wall, causing infarction and irreversible stricture requiring segmental resection. Paralytic ileus presents as constipation, abdominal distension, and discomfort for more than two to three days postoperatively. Therefore, patients are encouraged to be mobile, constantly change position, and recommended to be in sitting posture soon after surgery. Additionally, pain tolerance should be monitored to reduce analgesic dosage and avoid opioid drugs as soon as possible. Oral intake is slowly advanced starting from liquids to semi-solid and finally solid diet. High fiber diet is supplemented as the patient tolerates an oral diet. However, the use of liquid laxatives (milk of magnesium, magnesium citrate, Miralax) or rectal suppositories (bisacodyl, docusate sodium, polyethylene glycol) is advisable in some patients to relieve discomfort. Conservative management is preferred for patients with colonic distension measured on a plain radiograph as <12 cm, which includes fasting, nasogastric suction, intravenous fluid and electrolytes replacement, and discontinuation of drugs affecting colonic motility (narcotics) [134]. If conservative treatment is inefficient, endoscopic desufflation and pharmacologic treatment are initiated, especially for those who are confirmed to have increased catecholamine levels due to widespread metastatic disease [135]. α-adrenoceptor blockers such as phenoxybenzamine or doxazosin are initially considered as the pharmacological management among those with widespread metastatic disease, due to their additional beneficial effect on the smooth muscle cells of the intestine and blood vessels. Moreover, Metyrosine, a tyrosine analog competitively inhibiting tyrosine hydroxylase (enzyme catalyzing rate-limiting step of conversion of tyrosine to dihydroxyphenylalanine DOPA in catecholamine synthesis) causes significant catecholamine store depletion inside tumor cells. Therefore, it is our strong recommendation to start metyrosine at 250 mg orally twice daily and, if necessary, increase the dose every 48 h. Occasionally, pseudo-obstruction is extremely severe with no improvement, despite using conservative and pharmacologic management. At this point of time, the use of phentolamine (short-acting, competitive α1- and α2-adrenoceptor antagonist) at a dose of 1–5 mg intravenously is justified. Additionally, phentolamine is also helpful in controlling elevated blood pressure following PPGL resection [134,136]. Nevertheless, major drawbacks associated with its use are: (1) Recurrence of pseudo-obstruction following discontinuation of drug and (2) intravenous administration requiring continuous intensive care monitoring to avoid a precipitous drop in blood pressure [137,138,139,140] (Table 5).
Table 5. Postoperative complications following PPGL resection.

5. Other Common Surgical Complications

Complications observed after any surgical procedure which were not mentioned earlier include nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, hemorrhage, and wound infection. These complications are not elaborately described here as they can be managed similarly to any other surgical procedures. Meticulous monitoring along with the skills of a multidisciplinary team of physicians and appropriate nursing care, together with patient cooperation are helpful for faster recovery with no or minimal complications in the postoperative period.
PPGL patients are at a significant risk of bleeding, which is difficult to be identified as hypotension. It is not uncommon after tumor resection. Elevated blood pressure as a result of higher catecholamines causes hemorrhage either intra or postoperatively. Precise surgical technique is crucial to avoid redundant blood loss intraoperatively. Therefore, an experienced surgeon is preferred to resect PPGL, minimize blood loss, and make use of meticulous surgical techniques to accurately scissor out tumor from a complex site. However, in the incidence of major hemorrhage, hemodynamic stability of the patient is assessed, and appropriate transfusion is given as per the needs of the patient and clinical judgment of the surgeon and anesthetist. Depending on the risk to benefit ratio, necessary medications would be stopped or continued during the perioperative period and if in doubt, a consult specialist opinion is considered.
Surgical site/wound infection is a potential cause of morbidity and mortality in the postoperative period. Risk factors depend on location, nature of surgical wound/incision, and the procedure performed [141]. Postoperatively, regular wound inspection, infection control, and strict hygiene (specifically hand hygiene and early removal of clips, sutures, drains, and foreign materials) minimize the risk of wound infection. However, patients with surgical site infection present with pain, swelling, redness, warmth, purulent wound discharge, or dehiscence. Such patients are managed with appropriate laboratory work and targeted empiric antibiotic therapy is initiated as soon as possible.
Urinary retention, commonly regarded as a minor and trivial complication by surgeons, might cause increased restlessness, confusion, and delirium [142]. A catecholamine surge in the postoperative period from PPGL resection inhibits detrusor contraction via α-adrenoceptor mediated increase in bladder outlet and proximal urethral tone. Moreover, residual anesthetic effects cause bladder atony by acting as smooth muscle relaxants and interfering with autonomic regulation of detrusor muscle tone. Furthermore, vasopressors used to treat postoperative hypotension promote urinary retention by their effects on β-adrenoceptor in bladder and α-adrenoceptor in the bladder neck and proximal urethra. Moreover, aggressive fluid administration to correct hypotension might cause overdistension of the urinary bladder resulting in urinary retention. Diagnosis is based on the patient complaining of discomfort, palpable bladder on examination, and ultrasound bladder scanning for rapid and accurate assessment of bladder volume [143,144]. Therefore, the first step in the management of urinary retention in the postoperative period is urethral catheterization. If a prolonged period of urinary retention is observed, the use of indwelling catheter is not advised as it may result in infection. Henceforth, pharmacotherapy with α-adrenoceptor blockers such as tamsulosin, alfuzosin, or long-acting doxazosin is recommended.
Splenectomy is required among those patients who are undergoing unilateral adrenalectomy on the left side due to the presence of a large-sized PHEO. Such patients need to be vaccinated preoperatively against pneumococcus, Hemophilus influenzae, and Meningococcus [2].

6. Conclusions

Patients with PPGL resection must be managed appropriately in the intensive care setting during the postoperative period. Detailed physical examination and complete laboratory workup must be conducted at regular intervals to identify a patient at risk and provide treatment at the right point of time.

Funding

This article was supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Martucci, V.L.; Pacak, K. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: Diagnosis, genetics, management, and treatment. Curr. Probl. Cancer 2014, 38, 7–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pacak, K. Preoperative management of the pheochromocytoma patient. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 92, 4069–4079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Eisenhofer, G.; Peitzsch, M. Laboratory evaluation of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Clin. Chem. 2014, 60, 1486–1499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ramakrishna, H. Pheochromocytoma resection: Current concepts in anesthetic management. J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol. 2015, 31, 317–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Pisarska, M.; Pedziwiatr, M.; Budzynski, A. Perioperative hemodynamic instability in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. Gland. Surg. 2016, 5, 506–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kiernan, C.M.; Du, L.; Chen, X.; Broome, J.T.; Shi, C.; Peters, M.F.; Solorzano, C.C. Predictors of hemodynamic instability during surgery for pheochromocytoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2014, 21, 3865–3871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Domi, R.; Laho, H. Management of pheochromocytoma: Old ideas and new drugs. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2012, 15, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ramachandran, R.; Rewari, V. Current perioperative management of pheochromocytomas. Indian. J. Urol. 2017, 33, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, Y.; Hodin, R.A.; Pandolfi, C.; Ruan, D.T.; McKenzie, T.J. Hypoglycemia after resection of pheochromocytoma. Surgery 2014, 156, 1404–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cruz, S.R.; Colwell, J.A. Pheochromocytoma and ileus. JAMA 1972, 219, 1050–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fee, H.J.; Fonkalsrud, E.W.; Ament, M.E.; Bergstein, J. Enterocolitis with peritonitis in a child with pheochromocytoma. Ann. Surg. 1977, 185, 448–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gagner, M.; Lacroix, A.; Bolte, E. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy in Cushing’s syndrome and pheochromocytoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 1992, 327, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Brunton, L.L.; Hilal-Dandan, R.; Knollmann, B.C. Goodman & Gilman’s: The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 13th ed.; Mcgraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ito, Y.; Fujimoto, Y.; Obara, T. The role of epinephrine, norepinephrine, and dopamine in blood pressure disturbances in patients with pheochromocytoma. World J. Surg. 1992, 16, 759–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Eisenhofer, G.; Kopin, I.J.; Goldstein, D.S. Catecholamine metabolism: A contemporary view with implications for physiology and medicine. Pharmacol. Rev. 2004, 56, 331–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Tsujimoto, G.; Manger, W.M.; Hoffman, B.B. Desensitization of beta-adrenergic receptors by pheochromocytoma. Endocrinology 1984, 114, 1272–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Tsujimoto, G.; Honda, K.; Hoffman, B.B.; Hashimoto, K. Desensitization of postjunctional alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenergic receptor-mediated vasopressor responses in rat harboring pheochromocytoma. Circ. Res. 1987, 61, 86–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Eisenhofer, G.; Walther, M.M.; Huynh, T.T.; Li, S.T.; Bornstein, S.R.; Vortmeyer, A.; Mannelli, M.; Goldstein, D.S.; Linehan, W.M.; Lenders, J.W.; et al. Pheochromocytomas in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 display distinct biochemical and clinical phenotypes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 86, 1999–2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bravo, E.L.; Tarazi, R.C.; Fouad, F.M.; Textor, S.C.; Gifford, R.W., Jr.; Vidt, D.G. Blood pressure regulation in pheochromocytoma. Hypertension 1982, 4, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Ueda, T.; Oka, N.; Matsumoto, A.; Miyazaki, H.; Ohmura, H.; Kikuchi, T.; Nakayama, M.; Kato, S.; Imaizumi, T. Pheochromocytoma presenting as recurrent hypotension and syncope. Intern. Med. 2005, 44, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Whelton, P.K.; Carey, R.M.; Aronow, W.S.; Casey, D.E., Jr.; Collins, K.J.; Dennison Himmelfarb, C.; DePalma, S.M.; Gidding, S.; Jamerson, K.A.; Jones, D.W.; et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension 2018, 71, 1269–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Livingstone, M.; Duttchen, K.; Thompson, J.; Sunderani, Z.; Hawboldt, G.; Sarah Rose, M.; Pasieka, J. Hemodynamic Stability During Pheochromocytoma Resection: Lessons Learned Over the Last Two Decades. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2015, 22, 4175–4180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Weingarten, T.N.; Cata, J.P.; O’Hara, J.F.; Prybilla, D.J.; Pike, T.L.; Thompson, G.B.; Grant, C.S.; Warner, D.O.; Bravo, E.; Sprung, J. Comparison of two preoperative medical management strategies for laparoscopic resection of pheochromocytoma. Urology 2010, 76, 508.e6–508.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Lord, M.S.; Augoustides, J.G. Perioperative management of pheochromocytoma: Focus on magnesium, clevidipine, and vasopressin. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2012, 26, 526–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Kinney, M.A.; Warner, M.E.; vanHeerden, J.A.; Horlocker, T.T.; Young, W.F., Jr.; Schroeder, D.R.; Maxson, P.M.; Warner, M.A. Perianesthetic risks and outcomes of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma resection. Anesth. Analg. 2000, 91, 1118–1123. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Bruynzeel, H.; Feelders, R.A.; Groenland, T.H.; van den Meiracker, A.H.; van Eijck, C.H.; Lange, J.F.; de Herder, W.W.; Kazemier, G. Risk Factors for Hemodynamic Instability during Surgery for Pheochromocytoma. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 678–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aksakal, N.; Agcaoglu, O.; Sahbaz, N.A.; Albuz, O.; Saracoglu, A.; Yavru, A.; Barbaros, U.; Erbil, Y. Predictive Factors of Operative Hemodynamic Instability for Pheochromocytoma. Am. Surg. 2018, 84, 920–923. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Zelinka, T.; Eisenhofer, G.; Pacak, K. Pheochromocytoma as a catecholamine producing tumor: Implications for clinical practice. Stress 2007, 10, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Aronow, W.S. Treatment of hypertensive emergencies. Ann. Transl. Med. 2017, 5, S5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rhoney, D.; Peacock, W.F. Intravenous therapy for hypertensive emergencies, part 1. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2009, 66, 1343–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gray, R.J. Managing critically ill patients with esmolol. An ultra short-acting beta-adrenergic blocker. Chest 1988, 93, 398–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Varon, J.; Marik, P.E. Clinical review: The management of hypertensive crises. Crit. Care 2003, 7, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sibal, L.; Jovanovic, A.; Agarwal, S.C.; Peaston, R.T.; James, R.A.; Lennard, T.W.; Bliss, R.; Batchelor, A.; Perros, P. Phaeochromocytomas presenting as acute crises after beta blockade therapy. Clin. Endocrinol. 2006, 65, 186–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Bravo, E.L. Pheochromocytoma: An approach to antihypertensive management. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2002, 970, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lund-Johansen, P. Pharmacology of combined alpha-beta-blockade. II. Haemodynamic effects of labetalol. Drugs 1984, 28, 35–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kanto, J.; Allonen, H.; Kleimola, T.; Mantyla, R. Pharmacokinetics of labetalol in healthy volunteers. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. Toxicol. 1981, 19, 41–44. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  37. Poopalalingam, R.; Chin, E.Y. Rapid preparation of a patient with pheochromocytoma with labetolol and magnesium sulfate. Can. J. Anaesth. 2001, 48, 876–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Cressman, M.D.; Vidt, D.G.; Gifford, R.W., Jr.; Moore, W.S.; Wilson, D.J. Intravenous labetalol in the management of severe hypertension and hypertensive emergencies. Am. Heart J. 1984, 107, 980–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hecht, J.P.; Mahmood, S.M.; Brandt, M.M. Safety of high-dose intravenous labetalol in hypertensive crisis. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2019, 76, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bravo, E.L. Pheochromocytoma. Cardiol. Rev. 2002, 10, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lehmann, H.U.; Hochrein, H.; Witt, E.; Mies, H.W. Hemodynamic effects of calcium antagonists. Review. Hypertension 1983, 5, II66–II73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nordlander, M.; Sjoquist, P.O.; Ericsson, H.; Ryden, L. Pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic and clinical effects of clevidipine, an ultrashort-acting calcium antagonist for rapid blood pressure control. Cardiovasc. Drug. Rev. 2004, 22, 227–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Awad, A.S.; Goldberg, M.E. Role of clevidipine butyrate in the treatment of acute hypertension in the critical care setting: A review. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2010, 6, 457–464. [Google Scholar]
  44. Kieler-Jensen, N.; Jolin-Mellgard, A.; Nordlander, M.; Ricksten, S.E. Coronary and systemic hemodynamic effects of clevidipine, an ultra-short-acting calcium antagonist, for treatment of hypertension after coronary artery surgery. Acta. Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2000, 44, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Powroznyk, A.V.; Vuylsteke, A.; Naughton, C.; Misso, S.L.; Holloway, J.; Jolin-Mellgard, A.; Latimer, R.D.; Nordlander, M.; Feneck, R.O. Comparison of clevidipine with sodium nitroprusside in the control of blood pressure after coronary artery surgery. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2003, 20, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bussmann, W.D.; Kenedi, P.; von Mengden, H.J.; Nast, H.P.; Rachor, N. Comparison of nitroglycerin with nifedipine in patients with hypertensive crisis or severe hypertension. Clin. Investig. 1992, 70, 1085–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Varon, J.; Marik, P.E. Perioperative hypertension management. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2008, 4, 615–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bryskin, R.; Weldon, B.C. Dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulfate in the perioperative management of a child undergoing laparoscopic resection of bilateral pheochromocytomas. J. Clin. Anesth. 2010, 22, 126–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kaufman, B.H.; Telander, R.L.; van Heerden, J.A.; Zimmerman, D.; Sheps, S.G.; Dawson, B. Pheochromocytoma in the pediatric age group: Current status. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1983, 18, 879–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Minami, T.; Adachi, T.; Fukuda, K. An effective use of magnesium sulfate for intraoperative management of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma in a pediatric patient. Anesth. Analg. 2002, 95, 1243–1244, table of contents. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Iseri, L.T.; French, J.H. Magnesium: nature’s physiologic calcium blocker. Am. Heart J. 1984, 108, 188–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shimosawa, T.; Takano, K.; Ando, K.; Fujita, T. Magnesium inhibits norepinephrine release by blocking N-type calcium channels at peripheral sympathetic nerve endings. Hypertension 2004, 44, 897–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bierlaire, D.; Pea, D.; Monnier, F.; Delbreil, J.P.; Bessout, L. Phaeochromocytoma and pregnancy: Anaesthetic management about two cases. Ann. Fr. Anesth. Reanim. 2009, 28, 988–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Golshevsky, J.R.; Karel, K.; Teale, G. Phaeochromocytoma causing acute pulmonary oedema during emergency caesarean section. Anaesth. Intensive Care 2007, 35, 423–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kasaoka, S.; Tsuruta, R.; Nakashima, K.; Soejima, Y.; Miura, T.; Sadamitsu, D.; Tateishi, A.; Maekawa, T. Effect of intravenous magnesium sulfate on cardiac arrhythmias in critically ill patients with low serum ionized magnesium. Jpn. Circ. J. 1996, 60, 871–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  56. Namekawa, T.; Utsumi, T.; Kawamura, K.; Kamiya, N.; Imamoto, T.; Takiguchi, T.; Hashimoto, N.; Tanaka, T.; Naya, Y.; Suzuki, H.; et al. Clinical predictors of prolonged postresection hypotension after laparoscopic adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma. Surgery 2016, 159, 763–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Kercher, K.W.; Novitsky, Y.W.; Park, A.; Matthews, B.D.; Litwin, D.E.; Heniford, B.T. Laparoscopic curative resection of pheochromocytomas. Ann. Surg. 2005, 241, 919–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chang, R.Y.; Lang, B.H.; Wong, K.P.; Lo, C.Y. High pre-operative urinary norepinephrine is an independent determinant of peri-operative hemodynamic instability in unilateral pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma removal. World J. Surg. 2014, 38, 2317–2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Cryer, P.E. Physiology and pathophysiology of the human sympathoadrenal neuroendocrine system. N. Engl. J. Med. 1980, 303, 436–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Olson, S.W.; Deal, L.E.; Piesman, M. Epinephrine-secreting pheochromocytoma presenting with cardiogenic shock and profound hypocalcemia. Ann. Intern. Med. 2004, 140, 849–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bartels, E.C.; Cattell, R.B. Pheochromocytoma; its diagnosis and treatment. Ann. Surg. 1950, 131, 903–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Frang, H.; Cockcroft, V.; Karskela, T.; Scheinin, M.; Marjamaki, A. Phenoxybenzamine binding reveals the helical orientation of the third transmembrane domain of adrenergic receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 31279–31284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Mannelli, M. Management and treatment of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1073, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kayilioglu, S.I.; Dinc, T.; Sozen, I.; Bostanoglu, A.; Cete, M.; Coskun, F. Postoperative fluid management. World J. Crit. Care Med. 2015, 4, 192–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Bangash, M.N.; Kong, M.L.; Pearse, R.M. Use of inotropes and vasopressor agents in critically ill patients. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2012, 165, 2015–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Herget-Rosenthal, S.; Saner, F.; Chawla, L.S. Approach to hemodynamic shock and vasopressors. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2008, 3, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Maas, J.J.; Pinsky, M.R.; de Wilde, R.B.; de Jonge, E.; Jansen, J.R. Cardiac output response to norepinephrine in postoperative cardiac surgery patients: Interpretation with venous return and cardiac function curves. Crit. Care Med. 2013, 41, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. ECC Committee, Subcommittees and Task Forces of the American Heart Association. 2005 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2005, 112, IV1–IV203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Sato, Y.; Matsuzawa, H.; Eguchi, S. Comparative study of effects of adrenaline, dobutamine and dopamine on systemic hemodynamics and renal blood flow in patients following open heart surgery. Jpn. Circ. J. 1982, 46, 1059–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. De Backer, D.; Creteur, J.; Silva, E.; Vincent, J.L. Effects of dopamine, norepinephrine, and epinephrine on the splanchnic circulation in septic shock: Which is best? Crit. Care Med. 2003, 31, 1659–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dellinger, R.P.; Levy, M.M.; Rhodes, A.; Annane, D.; Gerlach, H.; Opal, S.M.; Sevransky, J.E.; Sprung, C.L.; Douglas, I.S.; Jaeschke, R.; et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013, 39, 165–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Myburgh, J.A.; Higgins, A.; Jovanovska, A.; Lipman, J.; Ramakrishnan, N.; Santamaria, J.; CAT Study Investigators. A comparison of epinephrine and norepinephrine in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008, 34, 2226–2234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Overgaard, C.B.; Dzavik, V. Inotropes and vasopressors: Review of physiology and clinical use in cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2008, 118, 1047–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Augoustides, J.G.; Abrams, M.; Berkowitz, D.; Fraker, D. Vasopressin for hemodynamic rescue in catecholamine-resistant vasoplegic shock after resection of massive pheochromocytoma. Anesthesiology 2004, 101, 1022–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hollenberg, S.M.; Dellinger, R.P. Noncardiac surgery: Postoperative arrhythmias. Crit. Care Med. 2000, 28, N145–N150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Fenster, P.E.; Quan, S.F.; Hanson, C.D.; Coaker, L.A. Suppression of ventricular ectopy with intravenous metoprolol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Crit. Care Med. 1984, 12, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Hilleman, D.E.; Spinler, S.A. Conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation with intravenous amiodarone: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pharmacotherapy 2002, 22, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Neumar, R.W.; Otto, C.W.; Link, M.S.; Kronick, S.L.; Shuster, M.; Callaway, C.W.; Kudenchuk, P.J.; Ornato, J.P.; McNally, B.; Silvers, S.M.; et al. Part 8: Adult advanced cardiovascular life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2010, 122, S729–S767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Savelieva, I.; Camm, A.J. If inhibition with ivabradine: Electrophysiological effects and safety. Drug Saf. 2008, 31, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Swedberg, K.; Komajda, M.; Bohm, M.; Borer, J.S.; Ford, I.; Dubost-Brama, A.; Lerebours, G.; Tavazzi, L.; Investigators, S. Ivabradine and outcomes in chronic heart failure (SHIFT): A randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet 2010, 376, 875–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fox, K.; Ford, I.; Steg, P.G.; Tendera, M.; Ferrari, R.; Investigators, B. Ivabradine for patients with stable coronary artery disease and left-ventricular systolic dysfunction (BEAUTIFUL): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2008, 372, 807–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Costa, G.A.; Tannuri, U.; Delgado, A.F. Bradycardia in the early postoperative period of liver transplantation in children. Transplant. Proc. 2010, 42, 1774–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Habuchi, Y.; Tanaka, H.; Nishio, M.; Yamamoto, T.; Komori, T.; Morikawa, J.; Yoshimura, M. Dopamine stimulation of cardiac beta-adrenoceptors: The involvement of sympathetic amine transporters and the effect of SKF38393. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1997, 122, 1669–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  84. Brown, H.; Goldberg, P.A.; Selter, J.G.; Cabin, H.S.; Marieb, N.J.; Udelsman, R.; Setaro, J.F. Hemorrhagic pheochromocytoma associated with systemic corticosteroid therapy and presenting as myocardial infarction with severe hypertension. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Galetta, F.; Franzoni, F.; Bernini, G.; Poupak, F.; Carpi, A.; Cini, G.; Tocchini, L.; Antonelli, A.; Santoro, G. Cardiovascular complications in patients with pheochromocytoma: A mini-review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2010, 64, 505–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Cheng, T.O. Pheochromocytoma as an MI mimic. Hosp. Pract. (Off. Ed.) 1990, 25, 16. [Google Scholar]
  87. Devereaux, P.J.; Goldman, L.; Yusuf, S.; Gilbert, K.; Leslie, K.; Guyatt, G.H. Surveillance and prevention of major perioperative ischemic cardiac events in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: A review. CMAJ 2005, 173, 779–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Adams, J.E., 3rd; Sicard, G.A.; Allen, B.T.; Bridwell, K.H.; Lenke, L.G.; Davila-Roman, V.G.; Bodor, G.S.; Ladenson, J.H.; Jaffe, A.S. Diagnosis of perioperative myocardial infarction with measurement of cardiac troponin I. N. Engl. J. Med. 1994, 330, 670–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Landesberg, G.; Beattie, W.S.; Mosseri, M.; Jaffe, A.S.; Alpert, J.S. Perioperative myocardial infarction. Circulation 2009, 119, 2936–2944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Adesanya, A.O.; de Lemos, J.A.; Greilich, N.B.; Whitten, C.W. Management of perioperative myocardial infarction in noncardiac surgical patients. Chest 2006, 130, 584–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Fleisher, L.A.; Fleischmann, K.E.; Auerbach, A.D.; Barnason, S.A.; Beckman, J.A.; Bozkurt, B.; Davila-Roman, V.G.; Gerhard-Herman, M.D.; Holly, T.A.; Kane, G.C.; et al. 2014 ACC/AHA guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation and management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014, 130, 2215–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Mulla, C.M.; Marik, P.E. Pheochromocytoma presenting as acute decompensated heart failure reversed with medical therapy. BMJ Case Rep. 2012, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Cohen, J.K.; Cisco, R.M.; Scholten, A.; Mitmaker, E.; Duh, Q.Y. Pheochromocytoma crisis resulting in acute heart failure and cardioembolic stroke in a 37-year-old man. Surgery 2014, 155, 726–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Lee, Y.; Tan, L.Y.R.; Ho, Y.H.; Leow, M.K.S. Giant phaeochromocytoma presenting with an acute stroke: Reappraising phaeochromocytoma surveillance for the neurofibromatosis type 1 phakomatosis. BMJ Case Rep. 2017, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Lin, P.C.; Hsu, J.T.; Chung, C.M.; Chang, S.T. Pheochromocytoma underlying hypertension, stroke, and dilated cardiomyopathy. Tex. Heart Inst. J. 2007, 34, 244–246. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  96. Kam, P.C.; Calcroft, R.M. Peri-operative stroke in general surgical patients. Anaesthesia 1997, 52, 879–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Mashour, G.A.; Sharifpour, M.; Freundlich, R.E.; Tremper, K.K.; Shanks, A.; Nallamothu, B.K.; Vlisides, P.E.; Weightman, A.; Matlen, L.; Merte, J.; et al. Perioperative metoprolol and risk of stroke after noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 2013, 119, 1340–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Ng, J.L.; Chan, M.T.; Gelb, A.W. Perioperative stroke in noncardiac, nonneurosurgical surgery. Anesthesiology 2011, 115, 879–890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Norris, J.W.; Hachinski, V.C. Misdiagnosis of stroke. Lancet 1982, 1, 328–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Adams, H.P., Jr.; del Zoppo, G.; Alberts, M.J.; Bhatt, D.L.; Brass, L.; Furlan, A.; Grubb, R.L.; Higashida, R.T.; Jauch, E.C.; Kidwell, C.; et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Circulation 2007, 115, e478–e534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Shen, W.T.; Lee, J.; Kebebew, E.; Clark, O.H.; Duh, Q.Y. Selective use of steroid replacement after adrenalectomy: Lessons from 331 consecutive cases. Arch. Surg. 2006, 141, 771–774; discussion 774–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. de Graaf, J.S.; Lips, C.J.; Rutter, J.E.; van Vroonhoven, T.J. Subtotal adrenalectomy for phaeochromocytoma in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A. Eur J. Surg. 1999, 165, 535–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. van Heerden, J.A.; Sizemore, G.W.; Carney, J.A.; Grant, C.S.; ReMine, W.H.; Sheps, S.G. Surgical management of the adrenal glands in the multiple endocrine neoplasia type II syndrome. World J. Surg. 1984, 8, 612–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Lamberts, S.W.; Bruining, H.A.; de Jong, F.H. Corticosteroid therapy in severe illness. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997, 337, 1285–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Liu, M.M.; Reidy, A.B.; Saatee, S.; Collard, C.D. Perioperative Steroid Management: Approaches Based on Current Evidence. Anesthesiology 2017, 127, 166–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Bornstein, S.R.; Allolio, B.; Arlt, W.; Barthel, A.; Don-Wauchope, A.; Hammer, G.D.; Husebye, E.S.; Merke, D.P.; Murad, M.H.; Stratakis, C.A.; et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Primary Adrenal Insufficiency: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 364–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Ortiz, D.I.; Findling, J.W.; Carroll, T.B.; Javorsky, B.R.; Carr, A.A.; Evans, D.B.; Yen, T.W.; Wang, T.S. Cosyntropin stimulation testing on postoperative day 1 allows for selective glucocorticoid replacement therapy after adrenalectomy for hypercortisolism: Results of a novel, multidisciplinary institutional protocol. Surgery 2016, 159, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Arlt, W. The approach to the adult with newly diagnosed adrenal insufficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 94, 1059–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Grossman, A.B. Clinical Review#: The diagnosis and management of central hypoadrenalism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 4855–4863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Celik, H.; Celik, O.; Guldiken, S.; Inal, V.; Puyan, F.O.; Tugrul, A. Pheochromocytoma presenting with rhabdomyolysis and acute renal failure: A case report. Ren. Fail. 2014, 36, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Jin, Y.S.; Fan, M.X. Pheochromocytoma Characterizing Both Fever and Acute Renal Failure. Chin. Med. J. 2017, 130, 617–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Pickard, J.L.; Ross, G., Jr.; Silver, D. Coexisting extraadrenal pheochromocytoma and renal artery stenosis: A case report and review of the pathophysiology. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1995, 30, 1613–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Kaufman, J.J. Pheochromocytoma and stenosis of the renal artery. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1983, 156, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  114. Stanley, J.C.; Gewertz, B.L.; Bove, E.L.; Sottiurai, V.; Fry, W.J. Arterial fibrodysplasia. Histopathologic character and current etiologic concepts. Arch. Surg. 1975, 110, 561–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Kota, S.K.; Kota, S.K.; Meher, L.K.; Jammula, S.; Panda, S.; Modi, K.D. Coexistence of pheochromocytoma with uncommon vascular lesions. Indian J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 16, 962–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Burns, A.P.; O’Connell, P.R.; Murnaghan, D.J.; Brady, M.P. Bilateral adrenal phaeochromocytomas associated with unilateral renal artery stenosis. Postgrad. Med. J. 1989, 65, 943–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  117. Gill, I.S.; Meraney, A.M.; Bravo, E.L.; Novick, A.C. Pheochromocytoma coexisting with renal artery lesions. J. Urol. 2000, 164, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Spergel, G.; Bleicher, S.J.; Ertel, N.H. Carbohydrate and fat metabolism in patients with pheochromocytoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 1968, 278, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Reynolds, C.; Wilkins, G.E.; Schmidt, N.; Doll, W.A.; Blix, P.M. Hyperinsulinism after removal of a pheochromocytoma. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1983, 129, 349–353. [Google Scholar]
  120. Auer, R.N. Hypoglycemic brain damage. Metab. Brain Dis. 2004, 19, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Levin, H.; Heifetz, M. Phaeochromocytoma and severe protracted postoperative hypoglycaemia. Can. J. Anaesth. 1990, 37, 477–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Cryer, P.E.; Axelrod, L.; Grossman, A.B.; Heller, S.R.; Montori, V.M.; Seaquist, E.R.; Service, F.J.; Endocrine, S. Evaluation and management of adult hypoglycemic disorders: An Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 94, 709–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Elliott, M.B.; Schafers, S.J.; McGill, J.B.; Tobin, G.S. Prediction and prevention of treatment-related inpatient hypoglycemia. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2012, 6, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Brutsaert, E.; Carey, M.; Zonszein, J. The clinical impact of inpatient hypoglycemia. J. Diabetes Complicat. 2014, 28, 565–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Fischer, K.F.; Lees, J.A.; Newman, J.H. Hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients. Causes and outcomes. N. Engl. J. Med. 1986, 315, 1245–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Meeke, R.I.; O’Keeffe, J.D.; Gaffney, J.D. Phaeochromocytoma removal and postoperative hypoglycaemia. Anaesthesia 1985, 40, 1093–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Eiland, L.; Goldner, W.; Drincic, A.; Desouza, C. Inpatient hypoglycemia: A challenge that must be addressed. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2014, 14, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Hulkower, R.D.; Pollack, R.M.; Zonszein, J. Understanding hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients. Diabetes Manag. 2014, 4, 165–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Araque, K.A.; Kadayakkara, D.K.; Gigauri, N.; Sheehan, D.; Majumdar, S.; Buller, G.; Flannery, C.A. Reducing severe hypoglycaemia in hospitalised patients with diabetes: Early outcomes of standardised reporting and management. BMJ Open Qual. 2018, 7, e000120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kek, P.C.; Ho, E.T.; Loh, L.M. Phaeochromocytoma presenting with pseudo-intestinal obstruction and lactic acidosis. Singap. Med. J. 2015, 56, e131–e133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Osinga, T.E.; Kerstens, M.N.; van der Klauw, M.M.; Koornstra, J.J.; Wolffenbuttel, B.H.; Links, T.P.; van der Horst-Schrivers, A.N. Intestinal pseudo-obstruction as a complication of paragangliomas: Case report and literature review. Neth. J. Med. 2013, 71, 512–517. [Google Scholar]
  132. Wu, H.W.; Liou, W.P.; Chou, C.C.; Chen, Y.H.; Loh, C.H.; Wang, H.P. Pheochromocytoma presented as intestinal pseudo-obstruction and hyperamylasemia. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2008, 26, 971.e1–971.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Sohn, C.I.; Kim, J.J.; Lim, Y.H.; Rhee, P.L.; Koh, K.C.; Paik, S.W.; Rhee, J.C.; Chung, J.H.; Lee, M.S.; Yang, J.H. A case of ischemic colitis associated with pheochromocytoma. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1998, 93, 124–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Saunders, M.D. Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2007, 21, 671–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Loftus, C.G.; Harewood, G.C.; Baron, T.H. Assessment of predictors of response to neostigmine for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2002, 97, 3118–3122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Eisen, G.M.; Baron, T.H.; Dominitz, J.A.; Faigel, D.O.; Goldstein, J.L.; Johanson, J.F.; Mallery, J.S.; Raddawi, H.M.; Vargo, J.J.; Waring, J.P.; et al. Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2002, 56, 789–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Yamaguchi, I.; Kopin, I.J. Differential inhibiton of alpha-1 and alpha-2 adrenoceptor-mediated pressor responses in pithed rats. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 1980, 214, 275–281. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  138. Khafagi, F.A.; Lloyd, H.M.; Gough, I.R. Intestinal pseudo-obstruction in pheochromocytoma. Aust. N. Z. J. Med. 1987, 17, 246–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Hashimoto, Y.; Motoyoshi, S.; Maruyama, H.; Sakakida, M.; Yano, T.; Yamaguchi, K.; Goto, K.; Sugihara, S.; Takano, S.; Kambara, T.; et al. The treatment of pheochromocytoma associated with pseudo-obstruction and perforation of the colon, hepatic failure, and DIC. Jpn. J. Med. 1990, 29, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  140. Marik, P.E.; Rivera, R. Hypertensive emergencies: An update. Curr. Opin. Crit. Care 2011, 17, 569–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Young, P.Y.; Khadaroo, R.G. Surgical site infections. Surg. Clin. N. Am. 2014, 94, 1245–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Darrah, D.M.; Griebling, T.L.; Silverstein, J.H. Postoperative urinary retention. Anesthesiol. Clin. 2009, 27, 465–484, table of contents. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Pavlin, D.J.; Pavlin, E.G.; Gunn, H.C.; Taraday, J.K.; Koerschgen, M.E. Voiding in patients managed with or without ultrasound monitoring of bladder volume after outpatient surgery. Anesth. Analg. 1999, 89, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  144. Sarasin, S.M.; Walton, M.J.; Singh, H.P.; Clark, D.I. Can a urinary tract symptom score predict the development of postoperative urinary retention in patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty under spinal anaesthesia? A prospective study. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2006, 88, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.