Next Article in Journal
Bayesian-Optimized Collapse-Mode CMUT with Trenched Membrane for High Output Pressure
Next Article in Special Issue
A Defect Detection Method for Functional Membranes in Flexible Sensors for Vibration Monitoring During Glass Substrate Transfer
Previous Article in Journal
Hidden Order in the Apparent Chaos of Bias Temperature Instability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Single and Repetitive Surge Reliability of 1200 V Asymmetric Trench SiC MOSFETs Under Various Gate Biases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advancements in MV2O6-Based Particulate Systems for Solar-Light Water Splitting

Department of Physics and Semiconductor Science, Gachon University, 1342 Seongnamdaero, Sujeong-gu, Seongnam-si 13120, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2026, 17(8), 904; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi17080904
Submission received: 29 June 2026 / Revised: 26 July 2026 / Accepted: 27 July 2026 / Published: 29 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Technologies and Applications for Semiconductor Industry)

Abstract

The development of efficient visible-light-driven semiconductor photocatalysts is essential for scalable and sustainable green hydrogen production. Among ternary metal oxides, MV2O6 (M = Zn, Ni, Cu, Mn, Co, etc.) metavanadates have attracted considerable interest because of their narrow band gaps (~1.8–2.5 eV), strong visible-light absorption, and unique edge-sharing VO6 octahedral framework that promotes charge separation. This review summarizes recent advances in the design, synthesis, and electronic engineering of MV2O6-based photocatalysts for solar water splitting. Since direct particulate overall water splitting has only been demonstrated for MnV2O6, whereas ZnV2O6, NiV2O6, and CuV2O6 have mainly been investigated as photoelectrodes, both particulate photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical (PEC) systems are critically examined. The review clearly distinguishes these two configurations, highlighting how PEC studies provide valuable insights into charge transport, interfacial processes, and reaction kinetics while recognizing the additional challenges associated with suspension-based photocatalysis. Fundamental crystal structures, electronic band alignments, and charge-transfer characteristics of MV2O6 compounds are discussed, followed by recent advances in synthesis strategies, including hydrothermal, sol–gel, and deep eutectic solvent (DES)-assisted methods, together with morphology and defect engineering. Particular attention is given to oxygen-vacancy formation and its influence on visible-light absorption and charge separation. Modification strategies, including elemental doping, cocatalyst loading, and the construction of Z-scheme and step-scheme (S-scheme) heterojunctions, are critically evaluated for improving photocatalytic efficiency. Finally, the review discusses the key challenges that limit practical applications, including unfavorable band-edge positions, rapid carrier recombination, sluggish surface reaction kinetics, photostability, and the need to establish composition–structure–activity relationships. Future perspectives emphasize rational materials design through advanced characterization, theoretical calculations, and scalable synthesis approaches to accelerate the development of efficient MV2O6 photocatalysts for solar-driven hydrogen production.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The rapid increase in global energy consumption, coupled with concerns regarding climate change, has accelerated the search for sustainable energy technologies [1,2,3]. Currently, the global energy infrastructure remains heavily dependent on fossil fuels, which contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions [4,5,6]. Among renewable energy carriers, hydrogen has emerged as a promising alternative due to its high gravimetric energy density (142 MJ kg−1) and clean combustion products [7,8]. However, most industrial hydrogen production still relies on steam methane reforming, resulting in substantial CO2 emissions [9]. Consequently, developing green hydrogen generation pathways has become a critical priority.
Solar-driven photocatalytic water splitting represents an attractive approach for sustainable hydrogen production, directly converting solar energy into chemical fuel [10,11,12,13]. Since Fujishima and Honda’s pioneering work on TiO2 electrodes in 1972 [5,14], extensive efforts have focused on developing semiconductor photocatalysts for water splitting. As illustrated in Figure 1a, the transition from fossil-fuel-based systems to solar-driven green hydrogen production via photocatalysis offers a viable pathway toward carbon neutrality. Upon photon absorption, electrons excite from the valence band to the conduction band, generating electron–hole pairs that migrate to the surface, where electrons reduce protons to H2 and holes oxidize water to O2 [15]. Figure 1b provides a schematic overview of this particulate photocatalytic water splitting process, including light absorption, charge separation, and the hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions. Among various configurations, particulate photocatalytic systems have attracted considerable attention due to their simple reactor design, low cost, and scalability [11,16,17]. Unlike photoelectrochemical systems requiring external circuitry, particulate photocatalysts operate in slurry reactors under direct solar irradiation [18].
However, the absence of external bias requires that semiconductor band edges straddle the water redox potentials—a stringent requirement few single-phase materials satisfy [20,21].
Despite progress, practical realization of efficient particulate water splitting remains challenging due to insufficient visible-light absorption, rapid electron–hole recombination (picosecond to nanosecond timescale), and sluggish surface kinetics. Traditional wide-bandgap oxides such as TiO2 (Eg ≈ 3.2 eV) utilize less than 5% of the solar spectrum. Since visible light (~400–700 nm) accounts for nearly 45% of solar irradiance, developing visible-light-active semiconductors is imperative [22,23].
Over the past decade, several comprehensive review articles have systematically summarized the broader field of particulate photocatalysis and visible-light-active materials. For instance, Jia et al. (2024) provided an extensive overview of metal oxide photoelectrodes, including TiO2, ZnO, WO3, Fe2O3, and BiVO4, with emphasis on three-dimensionally ordered macroporous (3DOM) structures for enhanced light harvesting and charge transport [24]. Pan and co-workers (2016) published a critical review on defect engineering in oxide photocatalysts, comprehensively summarizing how oxygen vacancies and non-stoichiometric defects modulate electronic band structures, extend visible-light absorption, and create active sites for surface reactions [25]. However, their analysis focused predominantly on binary oxides and well-studied ternary systems such as BiVO4, without extending to the less-explored ternary vanadate family. More recently, a review examined the transition from Z-scheme to S-scheme heterojunction architectures for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution, providing fundamental insights into interfacial charge-transfer mechanisms and the preservation of strong redox potentials [26]. Nevertheless, the survey of heterojunction systems was primarily confined to sulfides, nitrides, and carbon-based composites, with only cursory attention to metal vanadates. Regarding vanadate materials specifically, existing review articles have largely concentrated on sodium vanadates for energy storage applications, offering detailed analyses of their crystal structures and electrochemical properties, yet these works do not address photocatalytic water splitting.
Consequently, to our knowledge, no previous review article has specifically focused on the MV2O6 (M = Zn, Ni, Cu, Mg, Mn, Co) metavanadate family as a distinct class of particulate photocatalysts for solar hydrogen production. The existing literature lacks a systematic comparison of how their crystal structures—particularly the edge-sharing VO6 octahedral frameworks—together with their synthetic routes and surface defect chemistries, collectively govern photocatalytic performance. Furthermore, the critical assessment of stability issues, such as photocorrosion in CuV2O6 and NiV2O6, and the rational design of metavanadate-based heterojunctions for stoichiometric overall water splitting remain fragmented across individual research papers. Given the rapid proliferation of studies on these materials in recent years, a dedicated, critical review is urgently needed to consolidate these advances, identify structure–activity relationships, and outline a clear roadmap for future development.
Among emerging visible-light-responsive photocatalysts, ternary metal vanadates have attracted increasing attention [27,28]. In particular, MV2O6 (M = Zn, Ni, Cu, Mg, Mn, Co) metavanadates possess narrow band gaps (1.8–2.5 eV), enabling efficient visible-light harvesting [8,29,30,31,32]. Figure 2 presents the crystal structures of representative metavanadates (ZnV2O6, NiV2O6, CuV2O6, MgV2O6, MnV2O6, and CoV2O6) alongside their characteristic morphologies, highlighting the edge-sharing VO6 octahedral frameworks that distinguish them from conventional oxides.
Unlike orthovanadates containing isolated VO4 tetrahedra, metavanadates with edge-sharing VO6 networks often exhibit enhanced electronic delocalization, which can improve charge transport. However, their band-edge positions vary substantially, and while some compositions such as ZnV2O6 are reported to provide sufficient reducing power for proton reduction, others such as CuV2O6 require band-structure engineering or heterojunction construction to drive water reduction effectively [8,29,33].
Photocatalytic performance of MV2O6 is strongly governed by crystal phase, morphology, defect concentration, and interfacial characteristics [34]. Conventional synthetic routes such as solid-state, hydrothermal, and sol–gel methods have yielded a variety of MV2O6 nanostructures, including nanorods, nanowires, and nanosheets. More recently, deep eutectic solvent (DES)-assisted synthesis has emerged as a greener and more controllable route, enabling phase-pure metavanadates with tailored crystal growth and intrinsic oxygen vacancies. In particular, DES-derived Zn/Cu metavanadates have been shown to contain reduced V4+ and metal cation states, together with oxygen-deficient structures that extend visible-light absorption and generate active sites for photocatalysis [8,35]. Figure 3 summarizes the primary performance-enhancement strategies for MV2O6 photocatalysts.
Defect engineering—particularly controlled generation of oxygen vacancies and V4+ states—improves visible-light absorption and charge separation [37,38]. Heterojunction construction (Type-II, Z-scheme, and S-scheme architectures) promotes spatial charge separation while preserving strong redox potentials [11,29]. The S-scheme configuration has gained prominence for overall water splitting applications. Additionally, cocatalyst loading (Pt, Au, Ni, CoOx, MoS2, RuO2) accelerates surface reactions by reducing overpotentials [39,40].
Despite these advances, several challenges still limit the practical deployment of MV2O6 photocatalysts, including thermodynamic restrictions arising from unfavorable conduction-band positions in some compositions, kinetic losses from bulk recombination, stability issues such as photocorrosion in Cu- and Ni-containing metavanadates, and the difficulty of achieving stoichiometric overall water splitting without sacrificial reagents. Overcoming these limitations will require a coordinated approach combining defect engineering, heterojunction design, cocatalyst optimization, and scalable synthesis. Accordingly, this review summarizes recent progress in MV2O6 photocatalysts, with emphasis on crystal structures, synthesis strategies—especially DES-based routes—modification approaches including Z-scheme and S-scheme heterojunctions, cocatalyst photodeposition, and remaining challenges toward industrially viable particulate photocatalysts [35,41,42]. Consequently, we extend our analysis to include PEC water oxidation studies, as they provide critical insights into charge-transport limitations and hole-transfer kinetics that are directly relevant to the oxygen-evolution half-reaction in particulate systems.

2. Crystal Structure and Electronic Properties of MV2O6 Metavanadates

The crystal structure and electronic properties of semiconductor photocatalysts play a decisive role in determining their light-harvesting capability, charge-carrier dynamics, and photocatalytic activity. Among vanadium-based semiconductors, divalent metal metavanadates (MV2O6; M = Zn, Ni, Co, Cu, Mn, Mg, and related cations) have attracted increasing attention because of their visible-light response, compositional tunability, and structural versatility. Unlike conventional binary oxides, MV2O6 compounds contain both transition-metal cations and vanadium-centered polyhedral units, enabling flexible modulation of electronic structure and charge transport pathways. These characteristics make MV2O6 materials promising candidates for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water-splitting applications.

2.1. Crystal Structure of MV2O6 Metavanadates

The crystal structures of MV2O6 compounds are strongly influenced by the ionic radius and electronic configuration of the divalent metal cation. Most members of the family crystallize in monoclinic structures composed of interconnected VO6 octahedra and MO6 polyhedra. The structural framework is generally built from edge-sharing or corner-sharing VO6 octahedral chains extending throughout the lattice, creating pathways for charge transport and influencing the optical and electronic properties of the material.
ZnV2O6, NiV2O6, CoV2O6, MnV2O6, and MgV2O6 are commonly reported in monoclinic crystal systems, although structural variations may occur depending on synthesis conditions and temperature. In contrast, CuV2O6 exhibits a lower-symmetry crystal structure arising from the Jahn–Teller distortion associated with Cu2+ ions, resulting in significant local lattice distortions and modified electronic interactions. These structural differences influence orbital overlap, carrier mobility, and band-edge positions, thereby affecting photocatalytic performance.
To gain insight into the structural evolution of MV2O6 under compression, the optimized crystal structures at selected pressures are presented in Figure 4. The material initially crystallizes in the monoclinic C2/m phase at lower pressures and undergoes gradual lattice distortion with increasing pressure. At higher pressures, a structural phase transition occurs, resulting in the formation of the C2 phase. The corresponding atomic arrangements at representative pressures are illustrated to highlight the pressure-induced changes in coordination environment and crystal symmetry.
The metavanadate framework is dominated by V5+ ions in distorted VO6 octahedra. Since V5+ possesses a d0 electronic configuration, the empty V 3d orbitals play a central role in the formation of the conduction band. Variations in M–O bond lengths, V–O bond distances, and octahedral distortions directly affect the degree of orbital hybridization and electronic delocalization within the crystal lattice. Consequently, subtle structural modifications can significantly alter the optical and electronic properties of MV2O6 compounds. Table 1 summarizes the key crystallographic parameters for representative MV2O6 compounds.
An interesting example within the family is MgV2O6, which exhibits polymorphism and pressure-induced structural transformations. Thermodynamic investigations have revealed phase transitions between α- and β-MgV2O6, highlighting the structural flexibility of the metavanadate framework. Although MgV2O6 has received limited attention for photocatalytic applications, its structural stability and tunable lattice characteristics make it an attractive candidate for future investigations.

2.2. Electronic Structure and Optical Properties

The electronic structure of MV2O6 metavanadates originates primarily from the hybridization of O 2p and V 3d orbitals. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations and spectroscopic studies consistently indicate that the valence band is dominated by O 2p states, whereas the conduction band is largely derived from empty V 3d orbitals with varying contributions from the divalent metal cation. This electronic configuration facilitates ligand-to-metal charge transfer under visible-light irradiation and contributes to the favorable optical absorption characteristics of the metavanadate family [43].
One of the most attractive features of MV2O6 materials is their relatively narrow band-gap energy, typically ranging from approximately 1.8 to 2.5 eV. Such band gaps enable efficient utilization of visible light and compare favorably with traditional wide-band-gap photocatalysts such as TiO2. The exact band-gap value depends on the metal cation, crystal structure, synthesis route, and defect concentration. In general, CuV2O6 exhibits the narrowest reported band gap owing to strong Cu 3d–O 2p interactions, whereas MgV2O6 and ZnV2O6 tend to display slightly wider band gaps (Table 2).
In addition to optical absorption, the relative positions of the conduction and valence bands are crucial for photocatalytic water splitting. Available studies suggest that the band-edge positions of MV2O6 compounds vary considerably depending on composition and synthesis conditions. Consequently, caution should be exercised when comparing absolute band-edge values reported in different studies. Nevertheless, the overall trend indicates that several MV2O6 compounds possess valence-band positions sufficiently positive for water oxidation, whereas the driving force for proton reduction is often more composition-dependent. This explains why many reported MV2O6 systems exhibit stronger oxygen-evolution or photoanodic activity than hydrogen-evolution performance.

2.3. Charge Transport and Defect Chemistry

The photocatalytic performance of MV2O6 materials is not governed solely by band-gap energy but also by charge-carrier generation, transport, and recombination processes. Upon visible-light irradiation, electrons are excited from O 2p-derived valence-band states into V 3d-derived conduction-band states, generating electron–hole pairs capable of driving redox reactions. Efficient separation and migration of these carriers are essential for achieving high photocatalytic activity [48].
The interconnected VO6 octahedral framework provides pathways for charge transport and can promote electronic delocalization compared with isolated tetrahedral vanadate structures. However, similar to many oxide semiconductors, pristine MV2O6 compounds often suffer from rapid charge-carrier recombination, which significantly limits photocatalytic efficiency. Defect engineering has therefore emerged as an important strategy for improving charge separation and transport. Oxygen vacancies and mixed-valence species can introduce localized electronic states within the band gap, extend visible-light absorption, and facilitate carrier migration. Such defects may be generated during synthesis, thermal treatment, or reductive processing. Nevertheless, excessive defect concentrations can create recombination centers and reduce photocatalytic performance, emphasizing the need for precise defect control.
Overall, the electronic properties of MV2O6 metavanadates arise from the interplay between crystal structure, orbital hybridization, and defect chemistry. Their visible-light-responsive band gaps, tunable electronic structures, and adaptable crystal frameworks provide a strong foundation for photocatalytic water splitting. Understanding these structure–property relationships is essential for the rational design of advanced MV2O6 photocatalysts through morphology control, defect engineering, heterojunction construction, and cocatalyst integration. Figure 5 presents the band alignment diagram showing CB/VB edge positions of selected metavanadates relative to water redox potentials.

3. Synthesis and Micro/Nanostructure Engineering of MV2O6 Photocatalysts

The photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical performance of MV2O6 metavanadates is strongly influenced by their synthesis route, which determines crystal phase, morphology, particle size, defect concentration, surface area, and charge-transport characteristics. Unlike simple binary metal oxides, the synthesis of MV2O6 compounds often requires careful control of reaction conditions because multiple vanadium-containing phases, including orthovanadates and pyrovanadates, may coexist depending on precursor composition and thermal treatment. Consequently, the development of reliable synthesis strategies capable of controlling phase purity and microstructure is essential for optimizing photocatalytic performance.

3.1. Conventional Synthesis Routes

Solid-state synthesis remains the most widely employed method for preparing MV2O6 compounds. In this approach, stoichiometric amounts of metal oxide or metal salt precursors are mixed with vanadium sources and subsequently calcined at elevated temperatures to induce phase formation. This method has been successfully utilized for the preparation of ZnV2O6, NiV2O6, CuV2O6, MgV2O6, MnV2O6, and CoV2O6. The primary advantages of solid-state synthesis include simplicity, low cost, and scalability. However, the resulting materials generally possess relatively large particle sizes, low specific surface areas, and limited control over morphology, which may adversely affect photocatalytic activity.
To overcome these limitations, various wet-chemical methods have been developed. Hydrothermal and solvothermal techniques are among the most frequently reported approaches for synthesizing nanostructured MV2O6 materials. These methods enable controlled crystal growth under moderate temperatures and pressures, producing a wide range of morphologies, including nanorods, nanowires, nanosheets, and hierarchical architectures. The morphology can be tuned through precursor concentration, reaction temperature, solvent composition, pH, and the use of surfactants or structure-directing agents.
Sol–gel synthesis has also been employed to obtain homogeneous precursor mixtures and improved compositional control. The molecular-level mixing of metal ions facilitates phase formation at lower calcination temperatures and often results in smaller particle sizes compared with conventional solid-state routes. Nevertheless, post-calcination treatments are generally required to achieve sufficient crystallinity, which may lead to particle aggregation and reduced surface area.
Overall, hydrothermal, solvothermal, and sol–gel methods offer improved microstructural control compared with conventional solid-state synthesis and have therefore become important routes for preparing high-performance MV2O6 photocatalysts.

3.2. Emerging Solution-Based and Deep Eutectic Solvent Approaches

In recent years, alternative solution-based synthesis approaches have attracted increasing interest for the preparation of vanadate photocatalysts. Among these, deep eutectic solvents (DESs) have emerged as promising reaction media owing to their low volatility, low toxicity, tunable physicochemical properties, and ability to dissolve a wide range of inorganic precursors. DESs are typically formed through hydrogen-bond interactions between a hydrogen-bond donor and a hydrogen-bond acceptor, generating a liquid phase at temperatures significantly lower than those of the individual components. In vanadate synthesis, DESs can function simultaneously as solvents, reaction media, and structure-directing agents, promoting homogeneous precursor distribution and controlled nucleation.
Recent studies have demonstrated that DES-assisted synthesis can facilitate the formation of phase-pure vanadate materials under relatively mild conditions while offering improved control over particle morphology and defect generation. Furthermore, the unique chemical environment provided by DESs may promote the formation of oxygen vacancies and mixed-valence states, which can influence visible-light absorption and charge-transfer behavior, and surface catalytic activity. The reducing nature of certain DES components—particularly those containing hydroxyl or amine functional groups—can induce partial reduction of metal centers during synthesis, leading to the generation of oxygen vacancies that are charge-compensated by the formation of V4+ species. These oxygen vacancies introduce mid-gap states that extend the light absorption range and serve as electron-trapping sites that can suppress charge recombination, thereby enhancing photocatalytic performance.
A critical distinction between DES-assisted synthesis and conventional solid-state or hydrothermal methods lies in the concentration, type, and distribution of oxygen vacancies produced. Conventional high-temperature calcination typically generates oxygen vacancies primarily on the surface through thermal annealing, often accompanied by significant particle agglomeration and limited control over vacancy distribution. In contrast, the mild processing conditions and molecular-level homogeneity achievable in DES media enable more uniform incorporation of oxygen vacancies throughout the bulk of the material, as the solvent environment promotes intimate contact between precursors and facilitates controlled reduction during crystallization. Moreover, the hydrogen-bonding network of DESs can stabilize metastable vacancy configurations and prevent their annihilation during subsequent thermal treatments, resulting in higher overall vacancy concentrations compared to conventional methods. For instance, DES-synthesized BiVO4 has been reported to exhibit significantly higher V4+/V5+ ratios and enhanced photocatalytic activity relative to samples prepared by conventional hydrothermal routes, an effect attributed to the reductive environment provided by the DES. Similarly, ZnV2O6 synthesized in choline chloride–ethylene glycol DES has demonstrated improved visible-light absorption and photoelectrochemical performance, correlated with the presence of oxygen vacancies and associated V4+ states induced by the DES medium.
Despite these promising demonstrations, the application of DES-assisted synthesis specifically to the MV2O6 family remains at an early stage, and systematic comparative studies quantifying vacancy concentrations across different synthesis methods are currently limited. Initial evidence suggests that the type of hydrogen-bond donor and acceptor, the precursor concentration, and the synthesis temperature all play crucial roles in determining the nature and extent of oxygen vacancy formation. For example, DESs containing reducing components such as urea or ethylene glycol tend to generate higher concentrations of V4+ species than those based solely on choline chloride, while synthesis temperatures above 150 °C may promote partial reoxidation and vacancy annihilation. These observations underscore the importance of careful optimization of DES composition and processing parameters to achieve the desired defect chemistry.
Looking forward, DES-assisted synthesis represents a promising and scalable route for producing nanostructured MV2O6 photocatalysts with tailored oxygen vacancy concentrations, controlled morphology, and enhanced visible-light responsiveness. Nevertheless, further systematic investigations—including quantitative comparisons of oxygen vacancy densities, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis—are needed to fully elucidate the relationship between DES synthesis parameters, defect structures, and photocatalytic performance in MV2O6 systems. Such studies will be essential for establishing design principles that enable the rational engineering of oxygen vacancies in metavanadate photocatalysts for improved solar hydrogen production.

Comparative Assessment of Synthesis Methods

The selection of an appropriate synthesis route plays a decisive role in determining the structural and photocatalytic properties of MV2O6 materials. Each synthesis method possesses distinct advantages and limitations that directly influence crystal quality, morphology, defect chemistry, scalability, and production cost.
Conventional solid-state synthesis remains attractive because of its operational simplicity, low cost, high product yield, and suitability for large-scale production. However, the high calcination temperatures typically required often produce large particles with low specific surface areas, significant agglomeration, and limited control over morphology and defect distribution, thereby restricting photocatalytic performance.
In contrast, hydrothermal and solvothermal methods provide excellent control over crystal growth and enable the synthesis of well-defined nanostructures, including nanorods, nanosheets, nanowires, and hierarchical architectures. These methods generally produce materials with higher crystallinity, larger surface areas, and improved charge-transport properties compared with solid-state synthesis. Nevertheless, they require specialized pressure-resistant autoclaves, relatively long reaction times, and may present challenges for large-scale industrial production.
Sol–gel synthesis offers homogeneous mixing of precursor species at the molecular level, allowing improved compositional uniformity and phase formation at relatively lower calcination temperatures. Consequently, smaller particle sizes and better chemical homogeneity can often be achieved. However, subsequent heat treatment is usually necessary to obtain sufficient crystallinity, which may induce particle aggregation and reduce the accessible surface area. Furthermore, residual organic species and process complexity may require careful optimization.
Among emerging approaches, deep eutectic solvent (DES)-assisted synthesis has attracted increasing attention because it combines environmentally friendly processing with excellent control over nucleation, crystal growth, morphology, and defect formation. The unique hydrogen-bonding environment of DESs facilitates homogeneous precursor distribution and promotes the controlled generation of oxygen vacancies and mixed-valence V4+ species, thereby enhancing visible-light absorption, charge separation, and photocatalytic activity. DES-based synthesis also operates under relatively mild conditions with low volatility and reduced toxicity. Despite these advantages, the application of DESs to the MV2O6 family remains in its infancy, and systematic optimization of solvent composition, reaction parameters, and scalability is still required.
Overall, no single synthesis method is universally superior for all MV2O6 compositions. Solid-state synthesis is preferable for economical large-scale production, whereas hydrothermal, solvothermal, and sol–gel methods provide superior microstructural control for high-performance photocatalysts. DES-assisted synthesis represents one of the most promising next-generation strategies by simultaneously enabling morphology engineering and defect modulation under environmentally benign conditions. Future studies integrating these synthesis approaches with advanced defect engineering and heterojunction design are expected to further enhance the photocatalytic efficiency of MV2O6 materials.

3.3. Morphology-Controlled Synthesis

Morphology engineering has become an important strategy for improving the photocatalytic performance of MV2O6 materials. The morphology of a photocatalyst directly affects light harvesting, surface reaction kinetics, charge-carrier transport, and the availability of active sites. One-dimensional nanostructures, such as nanorods and nanowires, facilitate directional charge transport and reduce carrier recombination by shortening diffusion pathways. Two-dimensional nanosheets provide large exposed surface areas and abundant reactive sites, which are advantageous for photocatalytic reactions. Meanwhile, three-dimensional hierarchical structures, including nanoflowers, microspheres, and porous architectures, combine high surface area with enhanced light scattering and multiple reflection effects, leading to improved photon utilization.
Various morphologies have been reported for MV2O6 compounds depending on the synthesis method employed. Hydrothermal and solvothermal routes commonly yield rod-like, wire-like, sheet-like, and flower-like structures, whereas template-assisted and electrospinning techniques can produce porous architectures and one-dimensional fibers. The growing ability to precisely control morphology offers significant opportunities for optimizing the photocatalytic performance of MV2O6-based materials. Table 3 summarizes morphology control strategies for different MV2O6 compositions.
Among the MV2O6 compounds, ZnV2O6, NiV2O6, and MnV2O6 have received the greatest attention for morphology-controlled synthesis, whereas MgV2O6 remains largely unexplored. The development of nanostructured MgV2O6 and its integration into heterojunction photocatalysts may therefore represent an important future research direction.
Although reports on morphology-controlled synthesis and photocatalytic water splitting are currently unavailable, the structural similarity of MgV2O6 to other MV2O6 compounds suggests that nanostructuring, defect engineering, and heterojunction construction could significantly improve its photocatalytic potential. Therefore, MgV2O6 represents an attractive yet largely unexplored platform for future investigations aimed at understanding composition–structure–activity relationships within the MV2O6 family.

3.4. Defect Engineering via Synthesis Control

Defect engineering is increasingly recognized as an effective strategy for enhancing the photocatalytic activity of metal vanadates. Structural defects, particularly oxygen vacancies and mixed-valence metal centers, can modify electronic structures, improve visible-light absorption, and facilitate charge-carrier separation.
In MV2O6 systems, oxygen vacancies may be introduced through controlled synthesis conditions, thermal treatments, reducing atmospheres, or solution-based synthesis approaches. These defects can create localized electronic states within the band gap, extending light absorption into the visible region and enhancing charge-transfer processes. However, excessive defect concentrations may act as recombination centers, highlighting the importance of optimizing defect density. The relationship between synthesis conditions, defect chemistry, and photocatalytic activity remains insufficiently understood for many MV2O6 compositions. Future studies combining advanced spectroscopic characterization with theoretical calculations are therefore required to establish clear structure–property relationships and guide the rational design of defect-engineered MV2O6 photocatalysts.
Overall, advances in synthesis methodologies, morphology control, and defect engineering have significantly expanded the opportunities for tailoring the physicochemical properties of MV2O6 materials. Continued progress in these areas will be essential for realizing the full potential of MV2O6 photocatalysts in solar-driven hydrogen production and water-splitting applications.

4. Heterojunction and Cocatalyst Engineering for Enhanced Water Splitting

Although MV2O6 metavanadates exhibit favorable visible-light absorption, tunable electronic structures, and good chemical stability, their photocatalytic performance remains limited by rapid charge-carrier recombination, insufficient charge-transfer efficiency, and sluggish surface reaction kinetics. Furthermore, several members of the MV2O6 family have not yet demonstrated efficient overall water splitting, despite possessing suitable optical band gaps. Consequently, the development of heterojunction architectures and cocatalyst-modified systems has emerged as an effective strategy for enhancing performance in both photocatalytic (particulate suspension) and photoelectrochemical (PEC) configurations. It is important to note, however, that while these strategies are conceptually applicable to both systems, their implementation and evaluation differ substantially—PEC systems benefit from external bias and electrolyte effects that can artificially enhance charge separation, whereas particulate systems rely solely on internal electric fields and interfacial contacts. Throughout this section, we discuss these engineering approaches with explicit attention to their relevance and demonstrated efficacy in each configuration.
Heterojunction construction promotes the spatial separation of photogenerated electrons and holes through interfacial charge transfer, thereby suppressing recombination losses and improving photocatalytic efficiency. Likewise, cocatalyst loading provides active surface sites for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER), facilitating charge extraction and accelerating interfacial reaction kinetics. Together, these approaches have become central to the design of high-performance vanadate-based photocatalysts and are expected to play a critical role in the future development of MV2O6 systems [58].

4.1. Heterojunction Strategies

Heterojunction engineering involves coupling two semiconductors with complementary electronic structures to generate an interfacial electric field that promotes directional charge migration. Such interfaces improve charge separation, extend visible-light utilization, and enhance photocatalytic activity. Based on the charge-transfer mechanism, heterojunctions can generally be classified into Type-II, Z-scheme, and S-scheme architectures [59]. While the fundamental principles of these junctions are universal, their practical performance in particulate systems depends critically on achieving intimate solid–solid contact and maintaining favorable band alignment without the assistance of external bias, making interface engineering particularly crucial for slurry-based photocatalysis.

4.1.1. Type-II Heterojunctions

Type-II heterojunctions are characterized by staggered band alignment between two semiconductors. Upon illumination, photogenerated electrons migrate from the semiconductor with the more negative conduction band to the one with the less negative conduction band, while holes move in the opposite direction. This spatial separation effectively suppresses electron–hole recombination and prolongs carrier lifetimes.
Although Type-II heterojunctions have been extensively investigated in various vanadate systems, only limited reports are available for MV2O6-based photocatalysts. ZnV2O6 has attracted particular interest because of its suitable visible-light absorption and favorable electronic structure. Several studies have demonstrated that coupling ZnV2O6 with wide-band-gap semiconductors or conductive supports improves charge separation and photocurrent generation. Similar strategies have been successfully employed in CeVO4-, BiVO4-, and GdVO4-based photocatalysts, highlighting the potential of Type-II architectures for enhancing the performance of MV2O6 materials. Figure 6 presents a schematic comparison of Type-II and Z-scheme charge transfer mechanisms. As shown in Figure 6a, Type-II heterojunctions achieve spatial separation but at the cost of reduced redox potentials because electrons accumulate at a less negative CB and holes accumulate at a less positive VB.
Despite their effectiveness in charge separation, Type-II heterojunctions often suffer from weakened redox capability because the accumulated electrons and holes reside in less energetic conduction and valence bands, respectively. Consequently, their application in overall water splitting remains somewhat limited compared with more advanced heterojunction configurations, particularly for particulate systems where the absence of external bias makes it challenging to drive thermodynamically demanding reactions.

4.1.2. Z-Scheme Heterojunctions

Z-scheme heterojunctions have emerged as one of the most effective approaches for photocatalytic water splitting because they simultaneously achieve efficient charge separation and strong redox capability. Inspired by natural photosynthesis, Z-scheme systems promote selective recombination of low-energy electrons and holes at the interface, preserving highly reducing electrons and highly oxidizing holes on opposite semiconductors. This mechanism is especially advantageous for particulate photocatalysis, where maintaining high redox potentials without external assistance is essential for driving both half-reactions simultaneously.
For MV2O6 materials, Z-scheme design is particularly attractive because it can compensate for unfavorable band-edge positions and enhance overall water-splitting performance. For example, CuV2O6 possesses excellent visible-light absorption but limited reduction capability. Coupling CuV2O6 with a reduction photocatalyst such as g-C3N4, CdS, or other narrow-band-gap semiconductors could theoretically preserve the strong reduction potential of the partner semiconductor while utilizing the oxidation capability of CuV2O6. Similarly, ZnV2O6 and NiV2O6 may benefit from Z-scheme architectures that maintain high redox potentials while promoting efficient charge separation. As illustrated in Figure 6b, this mechanism not only ensures efficient charge separation but also maintains high redox potentials, making Z-scheme systems highly effective for challenging photocatalytic transformations such as water splitting.
Although experimental reports on MV2O6-based Z-scheme heterojunctions remain limited, recent studies on related vanadate systems—including BiVO4 and InVO4—have demonstrated substantial improvements in hydrogen evolution, oxygen evolution, and pollutant degradation activities. These findings suggest that Z-scheme engineering represents one of the most promising directions for future MV2O6 photocatalyst development, with particular potential for enabling overall water splitting in particulate systems where both reduction and oxidation sites must be simultaneously active.
However, the application of Z-scheme architectures to MV2O6 materials presents several specific challenges that warrant careful consideration. First, the relatively positive conduction band positions of many MV2O6 members, particularly NiV2O6 and CuV2O6, require exceptionally careful selection of partner semiconductors to ensure effective band alignment while maintaining sufficient redox potentials. Second, the formation of intimate, defect-free interfaces between MV2O6 and partner materials is complicated by differences in lattice parameters and crystal structures, which can introduce interfacial defects that act as recombination centers. Third, the stability of certain MV2O6 compounds under operating conditions—particularly those containing redox-active transition metals—remains a concern, as photocorrosion could compromise long-term performance. Finally, the limited mechanistic understanding of charge transfer processes in MV2O6-based heterojunctions, due to the scarcity of advanced spectroscopic investigations, hinders the rational design of optimized systems. Addressing these challenges through systematic interface engineering, advanced characterization, and careful material selection will be essential for realizing the full potential of Z-scheme architectures in MV2O6 photocatalysis.

4.1.3. Step-Scheme (S-Scheme) Heterojunctions

The step-scheme (S-scheme) heterojunction is an emerging photocatalytic architecture that integrates the efficient charge separation characteristics of Type-II heterojunctions with the strong redox capability of direct Z-scheme systems. Unlike conventional Type-II heterojunctions, where both electrons and holes migrate to lower-energy bands at the expense of redox potential, the S-scheme configuration selectively preserves the charge carriers with the highest reduction and oxidation abilities, thereby maximizing photocatalytic efficiency.
The formation of an S-scheme heterojunction begins with the contact between a reduction photocatalyst (RP), which possesses a higher Fermi level, and an oxidation photocatalyst (OP), having a lower Fermi level. Upon contact, electrons spontaneously transfer from the RP to the OP until Fermi-level equilibrium is established. This electron redistribution produces band bending at the interface and generates a built-in internal electric field directed from the RP toward the OP. The combined effects of the internal electric field and band bending play a crucial role in directing charge migration after light irradiation [61].
Under illumination, both semiconductors generate electron–hole pairs. The photogenerated electrons in the conduction band of the oxidation photocatalyst preferentially recombine with the holes in the valence band of the reduction photocatalyst at the interface under the influence of the built-in electric field. Consequently, only the highly energetic electrons in the conduction band of the reduction photocatalyst and the strongly oxidizing holes in the valence band of the oxidation photocatalyst remain available to participate in photocatalytic reactions. This selective recombination effectively suppresses electron–hole recombination while simultaneously preserving the strong reduction and oxidation potentials required for water splitting (Figure 7).
Compared with conventional Type-II systems, S-scheme heterojunctions preserve strong redox ability while maintaining efficient charge separation. Furthermore, the built-in electric field facilitates directional carrier migration and suppresses undesirable back reactions. Although reports involving MV2O6-based S-scheme photocatalysts are currently scarce, this strategy offers significant potential for future development of efficient water-splitting systems based on ZnV2O6, NiV2O6, and CuV2O6.
The limited experimental validation of S-scheme heterojunctions in MV2O6 systems can be attributed to several fundamental challenges. First, the construction of S-scheme heterojunctions requires precise matching of work functions (Φ) between the reduction photocatalyst and the oxidation photocatalyst, specifically that Φ_RP < Φ_OP. For MV2O6 compounds, the work function values are not yet well established, making the rational selection of suitable partner semiconductors difficult. Second, the formation of the internal electric field essential for S-scheme charge transfer depends critically on the quality of the interfacial contact. Achieving such contact with MV2O6 materials is challenging due to their diverse crystal structures and surface chemistries, which vary significantly depending on synthesis conditions. Third, the metastable nature of some MV2O6 polymorphs may complicate the controlled synthesis of S-scheme heterojunctions, as the high-temperature processing often required for heterojunction formation could induce undesirable phase transformations. Finally, the lack of systematic studies employing advanced characterization techniques—such as Kelvin probe force microscopy, surface photovoltage spectroscopy, and transient absorption spectroscopy—limits the mechanistic understanding needed to guide the design of efficient S-scheme systems. Future research should prioritize these fundamental investigations to establish design principles for MV2O6-based S-scheme heterojunctions.
Overall, the application of Type-II, Z-scheme, and S-scheme heterojunctions provides an effective route to overcome the intrinsic limitations of MV2O6 photocatalysts. However, it is important to recognize that the limited availability of experimental reports on MV2O6-based heterojunctions—particularly for Z-scheme and S-scheme architectures—reflects the significant challenges inherent to this material family. These challenges include stringent band alignment requirements, difficulties in achieving intimate interfacial contact, concerns regarding material stability and photocorrosion, and an incomplete mechanistic understanding of charge transfer processes. Future studies should focus on interface engineering, band-structure matching, and mechanistic investigations to establish design principles for high-performance heterostructures. Critically, while PEC studies have validated the efficacy of these approaches for individual half-reactions, their successful translation to particulate overall water splitting will require careful optimization of interfacial contacts, precise control over junction formation, and validation under suspension conditions without external bias. Systematic investigations employing advanced characterization techniques will be essential to overcome these challenges and unlock the full potential of heterojunction engineering for MV2O6 photocatalysis.

4.2. Cocatalyst Engineering

In addition to heterojunction construction, cocatalyst loading is one of the most effective approaches for enhancing photocatalytic water splitting. Cocatalysts improve charge separation by acting as electron or hole sinks, lower activation barriers for surface reactions, and provide active catalytic sites for hydrogen and oxygen evolution. Moreover, they can suppress photocorrosion and improve long-term photocatalytic stability (Figure 8). It is worth emphasizing that cocatalyst functionality is inherently system-dependent: in PEC configurations, cocatalysts primarily facilitate charge extraction at the semiconductor–electrolyte interface under applied bias, whereas in particulate photocatalysis, they must also compensate for the absence of external bias by providing highly efficient catalytic sites that minimize overpotentials and drive surface reactions spontaneously.

4.2.1. Cocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution

Hydrogen-evolution cocatalysts facilitate proton reduction by providing highly active electron-accepting sites. Noble metals such as Pt, Pd, and Au remain the most efficient HER cocatalysts owing to their excellent conductivity and near-optimal hydrogen adsorption energies. Photodeposition is widely employed to deposit these metals onto semiconductor surfaces, enabling intimate contact between the cocatalyst and photocatalyst. In particulate systems, the uniform dispersion of cocatalyst nanoparticles is particularly critical to ensure that photogenerated electrons are efficiently harvested before recombination occurs.
Although systematic cocatalyst studies on MV2O6 materials remain limited, the successful application of Pt and other noble metals in vanadate-based photocatalysts suggests that similar approaches could significantly enhance the hydrogen-evolution performance of ZnV2O6 and MnV2O6. To reduce cost and improve scalability, increasing attention is being directed toward earth-abundant alternatives such as Ni2P, CoP, MoS2, transition-metal sulfides, and metal phosphides. For particulate photocatalysis, the development of robust earth-abundant cocatalysts is especially important, as their integration must achieve performance comparable to noble metals while maintaining long-term stability in suspension.

4.2.2. Cocatalysts for Oxygen Evolution

The oxygen evolution reaction is kinetically more demanding than hydrogen evolution because it involves multiple proton-coupled electron-transfer steps and O–O bond formation. Therefore, efficient oxygen-evolution cocatalysts are essential for achieving overall water splitting.
Transition-metal oxides and oxyhydroxides, including CoOx, NiOx, FeOOH, RuO2, and IrO2, are commonly employed as OER cocatalysts. For photoanode systems such as ZnV2O6 and NiV2O6, these cocatalysts facilitate hole extraction, reduce interfacial charge recombination, and accelerate water oxidation kinetics. Among them, cobalt- and nickel-based cocatalysts are particularly attractive because of their abundance, stability, and high OER activity under alkaline conditions. However, it should be noted that the impressive OER performance observed in PEC configurations does not automatically translate to particulate systems, where cocatalysts must function without the assistance of external bias and in the presence of both reduction and oxidation sites on the same particle.
In future MV2O6 photocatalytic systems, the rational integration of HER and OER cocatalysts with optimized heterojunction architectures is expected to be a key strategy for simultaneously improving charge separation, reaction kinetics, and overall solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency.

5. Photocatalytic Performance of MV2O6-Based Systems

5.1. Hydrogen Evolution Performance

The photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical properties of divalent metal vanadates (MV2O6, M = Zn, Ni, Cu, Mg, Mn, and Co) have attracted increasing attention owing to their narrow band gaps, visible-light absorption capabilities, and tunable electronic structures. However, compared with extensively investigated vanadates such as BiVO4, InVO4, and AgVO3, studies focusing on solar hydrogen production over MV2O6 materials remain relatively scarce. Existing research has primarily concentrated on photocatalytic pollutant degradation, photoelectrochemical (PEC) water oxidation, and electronic structure investigations, with only a few reports demonstrating direct photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. It is important to recognize that while PEC measurements provide valuable insights into intrinsic material properties and charge-transport limitations, they benefit from external bias that actively drives charge separation—a condition not present in particulate photocatalysis. Consequently, PEC performance should be interpreted as an indicator of potential rather than direct evidence of photocatalytic activity.
Among the reported systems, ZnV2O6 has emerged as a promising visible-light-responsive semiconductor due to its moderate band gap (2.2–2.5 eV) and suitable conduction-band potential for proton reduction. Although direct photocatalytic hydrogen evolution studies remain limited, ZnV2O6 has shown encouraging performance as a photoanode for PEC water splitting. In particular, Mo-doped ZnV2O6/reduced graphene oxide (rGO) photoanodes exhibited significantly enhanced photocurrent density (2.07 mA cm−2 at 1.23 V vs. RHE) and an incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) of 17% at 370 nm. The improved performance was attributed to increased charge-carrier concentration induced by Mo doping and efficient electron transport through the graphene network, which collectively promoted charge separation and interfacial transfer processes. These findings indicate that ZnV2O6-based heterostructures are promising candidates for solar hydrogen generation through PEC pathways (Figure 9).
NiV2O6 has been studied predominantly as a visible-light-active photoanode rather than a hydrogen-evolving photocatalyst. Dang et al. demonstrated that triclinic NiV2O6 thin films possess indirect and direct optical band gaps of approximately 2.1 and 2.4 eV, respectively, and exhibit stable photoelectrochemical water oxidation under alkaline conditions. Notably, approximately 45% of the generated photocurrent originated from wavelengths longer than 420 nm, confirming efficient visible-light utilization. Oxygen evolution measurements further verified the capability of NiV2O6 for water oxidation. However, the relatively positive conduction-band position limits its proton-reduction ability, explaining the scarcity of photocatalytic hydrogen-evolution reports for this material.
CuV2O6 possesses strong visible-light absorption due to Cu–O–V charge-transfer transitions and has been investigated for photocatalysis, photoelectrochemistry, and thermochemical hydrogen-production processes. Nevertheless, direct photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over CuV2O6 remains largely unexplored. The limited activity is generally attributed to rapid electron–hole recombination and insufficient reducing power of the conduction band. Consequently, current research mainly focuses on employing CuV2O6 as a heterojunction component or catalytic material rather than as a standalone photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution.
MgV2O6 is among the least explored members of the MV2O6 family with respect to solar fuel production. Available studies are largely confined to crystal-structure analysis, optical characterization, dielectric properties, and general photocatalytic degradation applications. To date, no significant reports demonstrating either photocatalytic or photoelectrochemical hydrogen production over MgV2O6 have been identified. Its relatively wider band gap and poor electrical conductivity may contribute to the lack of hydrogen-production activity. Therefore, MgV2O6 remains an open research area for future photocatalytic investigations, with initial efforts needed to establish its fundamental photoelectrochemical properties.
Among all MV2O6 compounds, MnV2O6 exhibits the most convincing evidence for direct photocatalytic hydrogen production. Zoellner et al. reported that p-type MnV2O6 possesses favorable conduction- and valence-band positions of −0.464 V and +0.985 V versus RHE, respectively, enabling both hydrogen and oxygen evolution under visible-light irradiation. Suspended-particle photocatalytic experiments confirmed the generation of H2 and O2, while the hydrogen-evolution rate increased substantially with increasing reaction temperature (Figure 10). The enhanced photocatalytic activity was attributed to charge-transfer excitation from Mn 3d orbitals to V 3d orbitals, favorable band-edge alignment, and efficient charge separation associated with its p-type semiconducting nature. Notably, MnV2O6 remains one of the very few single-phase MV2O6 materials reported to directly evolve hydrogen under visible light.
In contrast, CoV2O6 has primarily been investigated for magnetic materials, supercapacitors, batteries, and electrocatalytic applications. Reports concerning photocatalytic or PEC hydrogen production are essentially absent. The limited photocatalytic interest in CoV2O6 is commonly associated with strong localization of Co 3d electrons, unfavorable band-edge positions, and rapid recombination of photogenerated charge carriers. Consequently, CoV2O6 is currently regarded as a potential cocatalyst or electrochemical material rather than a visible-light photocatalyst for hydrogen evolution (Figure 11).
Overall, the current state of research indicates that hydrogen production over MV2O6-based systems remains at an early stage of development. Among the investigated compounds, MnV2O6 demonstrates the most direct photocatalytic hydrogen-evolution capability, whereas ZnV2O6 and NiV2O6 exhibit promising photoelectrochemical water-splitting performance (Table 4). Future studies should focus on heterojunction engineering, defect creation, cocatalyst loading, morphology control, and Z-scheme or S-scheme architectures to improve charge separation and maximize solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency.

5.2. Oxygen Evolution Performance

In addition to hydrogen production, oxygen evolution is a critical half-reaction in photocatalytic water splitting because it involves a complex four-electron transfer process and often governs the overall reaction kinetics. Among the MV2O6 (M = Zn, Ni, Cu, Mg, Mn, and Co) family, research on oxygen evolution has been relatively more extensive than hydrogen evolution, particularly in the form of photoelectrochemical (PEC) water oxidation. The narrow band gaps, visible-light absorption capabilities, and favorable valence-band positions of several MV2O6 compounds make them attractive candidates for oxygen evolution reactions (OER). However, the majority of studies have focused on PEC oxygen generation rather than suspended-particle photocatalytic oxygen evolution.
ZnV2O6 has attracted considerable attention as a visible-light-responsive photoanode owing to its suitable valence-band position and good photochemical stability. Several studies have demonstrated enhanced photocurrent generation through elemental doping and heterostructure formation with conductive carbon materials. In particular, Mo-doped ZnV2O6/reduced graphene oxide (rGO) photoanodes exhibited significantly improved PEC performance under simulated solar irradiation, indicating efficient hole generation and transfer for water oxidation. The enhanced oxygen-evolution activity was attributed to improved charge separation, increased carrier concentration, and accelerated interfacial charge-transfer kinetics induced by Mo incorporation and the conductive graphene framework (Figure 9). Although direct quantification of oxygen evolution was not the primary focus of these studies, the observed photocurrent enhancement strongly suggests improved OER kinetics under PEC conditions. Whether this translates to particulate photocatalysis remains to be demonstrated.
Among the MV2O6 family, NiV2O6 represents one of the most extensively investigated materials for oxygen evolution. Dang et al. reported that triclinic NiV2O6 thin-film photoanodes exhibit efficient visible-light-driven water oxidation with stable oxygen generation under alkaline conditions. Approximately 45% of the photocurrent originated from wavelengths exceeding 420 nm, confirming substantial visible-light utilization. Furthermore, oxygen evolution was experimentally verified with Faradaic efficiencies approaching 80%, demonstrating that photogenerated holes effectively participated in water oxidation rather than undergoing parasitic side reactions (Figure 12). The favorable performance was attributed to the narrow band gap (~2.1–2.4 eV), strong visible-light absorption, and suitable valence-band potential of NiV2O6 for driving the oxygen evolution reaction. Consequently, NiV2O6 is currently regarded as one of the most promising MV2O6 photoanodes for solar water oxidation, though particulate photocatalytic OER has not yet been demonstrated for this material.
CuV2O6 has also been investigated for photoelectrochemical water oxidation due to its strong visible-light absorption and high theoretical light-harvesting capability. The electronic structure of CuV2O6 enables efficient generation of photogenerated holes under visible-light irradiation. Nevertheless, practical oxygen-evolution performance remains limited by rapid charge-carrier recombination and relatively poor charge-transport properties. As a result, current research efforts focus on improving its PEC activity through morphology control, heterojunction construction, and cocatalyst loading. Although direct oxygen-evolution measurements remain scarce, CuV2O6 continues to be considered a promising photoanode material for visible-light-driven OER applications.
In contrast, MgV2O6 remains largely unexplored for oxygen evolution. Existing reports primarily concern crystal structure determination, optical characterization, dielectric properties, and environmental photocatalytic applications. To date, no significant studies have demonstrated photocatalytic or photoelectrochemical oxygen evolution over MgV2O6. The relatively wide band gap and limited electrical conductivity are believed to restrict its effectiveness for solar-driven water oxidation. Therefore, further investigation of its electronic structure and band-edge positions is required to assess its suitability for OER applications.
MnV2O6 is unique within the MV2O6 family because it has demonstrated simultaneous photocatalytic evolution of both hydrogen and oxygen under visible-light irradiation. Zoellner et al. reported that p-type MnV2O6 possesses band-edge positions that thermodynamically straddle the water redox potentials, enabling overall water-splitting activity. Photocatalytic experiments confirmed the generation of oxygen alongside hydrogen, indicating that photogenerated holes were sufficiently energetic to oxidize water molecules, approximately 4 μmol of gas was produced over about 2.5 h (Figure 13). The observed activity was attributed to charge-transfer transitions between Mn 3d and V 3d orbitals, favorable band-edge alignment, and effective charge separation arising from its p-type semiconducting character. These findings establish MnV2O6 as one of the few single-phase MV2O6 compounds capable of simultaneously driving both half-reactions of water splitting.
CoV2O6 has primarily been investigated for electrochemical energy-storage devices, supercapacitors, batteries, and electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. While photocatalytic oxygen evolution studies are essentially absent, CoV2O6-derived materials have demonstrated promising electrocatalytic OER activity due to the redox-active Co2+/Co3+ centers and favorable surface reaction kinetics. Consequently, CoV2O6 may serve as a potential cocatalyst or OER-promoting component in future photocatalytic heterostructures, although direct evidence for photocatalytic oxygen evolution remains unavailable.
Overall, oxygen evolution studies on MV2O6 compounds remain dominated by photoelectrochemical investigations. NiV2O6 exhibits the most convincing PEC oxygen-evolution performance, while MnV2O6 represents the only member that has clearly demonstrated photocatalytic generation of oxygen in conjunction with hydrogen evolution (Table 5). ZnV2O6 and CuV2O6 show considerable promise as visible-light-responsive photoanodes, whereas MgV2O6 and CoV2O6 remain largely unexplored for photocatalytic oxygen production. Future research should focus on cocatalyst integration, surface oxygen-vacancy engineering, heterojunction construction, and band-structure modulation to enhance hole utilization efficiency and accelerate oxygen-evolution kinetics in MV2O6-based systems.

6. Requirements and Challenges for Advancing MV2O6-Based Photocatalysts

Despite the promising optical and electronic properties of MV2O6 (M = Zn, Ni, Cu, Mg, Mn, and Co) metavanadates, their application in efficient solar-driven water splitting remains at an early stage. Current studies indicate that only a few members of this family, particularly MnV2O6, have demonstrated direct photocatalytic hydrogen and oxygen evolution, while ZnV2O6, NiV2O6, and CuV2O6 have primarily been explored as photoelectrodes for water oxidation. Consequently, several fundamental and technological challenges must be addressed before MV2O6-based materials can become viable photocatalysts for practical solar fuel production.

6.1. Band Structure Optimization and Thermodynamic Requirements

A primary requirement for efficient photocatalytic water splitting is the appropriate alignment of the conduction-band minimum (CBM) and valence-band maximum (VBM) relative to the hydrogen and oxygen redox potentials. Although most MV2O6 compounds exhibit visible-light-responsive band gaps ranging from approximately 2.0 to 2.5 eV, their band-edge positions vary considerably depending on the transition-metal cation.
Among the reported materials, MnV2O6 possesses band-edge positions capable of thermodynamically driving both hydrogen and oxygen evolution reactions. In contrast, NiV2O6 and CuV2O6 have predominantly demonstrated water oxidation activity, suggesting that their electronic structures are more favorable for hole-driven oxidation processes than proton reduction. Similarly, ZnV2O6 exhibits promising photoelectrochemical performance but has rarely been employed as a standalone photocatalyst for hydrogen generation. These observations highlight the need for systematic band-edge engineering through cation substitution, defect modulation, and heterojunction construction to enhance reduction capabilities while maintaining strong visible-light absorption.

6.2. Charge Separation and Carrier-Recombination Challenges

Rapid recombination of photogenerated electron–hole pairs remains one of the major limitations affecting the photocatalytic performance of MV2O6 materials. The complex electronic interactions between transition-metal d orbitals and V–O polyhedra often result in localized charge carriers and limited carrier mobility. Consequently, a significant fraction of photogenerated charges recombine before participating in surface redox reactions.
Several studies have demonstrated that heterostructure formation, graphene incorporation, elemental doping, and defect engineering can substantially improve charge separation. For example, Mo-doped ZnV2O6/reduced graphene oxide photoanodes exhibited enhanced photocurrent densities owing to improved charge transport and reduced recombination losses. Nevertheless, the fundamental charge-transfer mechanisms within MV2O6 systems remain insufficiently understood. Future research should focus on ultrafast spectroscopic investigations, defect-state engineering, and nanoscale morphology control to maximize charge-carrier lifetimes and transport efficiencies.

6.3. Surface Reaction Kinetics and Cocatalyst Development

Even when efficient charge separation is achieved, the surface kinetics of hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) remain challenging. In particular, oxygen evolution involves a complex four-electron transfer process that often represents the rate-limiting step in photocatalytic water splitting. Current reports indicate that NiV2O6 and ZnV2O6 function effectively as photoanodes for water oxidation; however, their overall solar-to-fuel conversion efficiencies remain limited by sluggish surface reaction kinetics.
Loading suitable cocatalysts is therefore essential for accelerating interfacial charge transfer and reducing reaction overpotentials. Noble-metal cocatalysts such as Pt, RuO2, and IrO2 remain highly effective but suffer from high cost and limited availability. Future studies should focus on earth-abundant alternatives, including transition-metal phosphides, sulfides, hydroxides, and single-atom catalysts. In addition, mechanistic investigations are needed to clarify the active sites and reaction pathways governing HER and OER on MV2O6 surfaces.

6.4. Suppression of Side Reactions During Photocatalytic Water Splitting

In addition to limited charge separation and sluggish surface reaction kinetics, parasitic side reactions significantly reduce the overall efficiency of photocatalytic water splitting. These competing reactions consume photogenerated charge carriers without contributing to hydrogen or oxygen production, thereby lowering the apparent quantum efficiency and solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiency.
One of the most common side reactions is the back reaction, in which the evolved H2 and O2 recombine to form water on the photocatalyst surface, particularly in the presence of catalytically active noble metals. In addition, dissolved oxygen can compete with proton reduction by acting as an electron acceptor, while surface defects may promote undesirable redox reactions involving intermediate species instead of the targeted hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Under practical operating conditions, photocorrosion and photocatalyst self-oxidation or self-reduction may also occur, resulting in structural degradation and loss of catalytic activity during prolonged illumination.
Several strategies can effectively suppress these side reactions. Selective cocatalyst loading is one of the most effective approaches, where HER and OER cocatalysts are spatially separated to promote directional charge transfer while minimizing reverse reactions between the generated products. Heterojunction engineering, particularly through Z-scheme and S-scheme architectures, enhances charge separation and directs photogenerated electrons and holes toward their respective reaction sites, thereby reducing the probability of competing interfacial reactions. Surface passivation and protective coatings can inhibit photocorrosion while maintaining efficient charge transfer across the catalyst–electrolyte interface. Furthermore, careful defect engineering is essential because an optimal concentration of oxygen vacancies can facilitate charge transport and surface activation, whereas excessive defect densities may introduce recombination centers and promote undesirable side reactions. Finally, optimizing reaction conditions—including solution pH, cocatalyst loading, dissolved oxygen concentration, and electrolyte composition—can further suppress competing reactions and improve the selectivity of overall water splitting.
For MV2O6-based photocatalysts, systematic investigations into the relationship between surface chemistry, defect structures, and reaction selectivity remain scarce. Future studies combining operando spectroscopic techniques, isotopic labeling experiments, and theoretical calculations will be essential for identifying the dominant side reactions and developing rational strategies to suppress them. Such efforts are expected to improve both the efficiency and long-term stability of MV2O6 photocatalysts for practical solar hydrogen production.

6.5. Limited Exploration of Composition–Structure–Activity Relationships

Compared with other vanadate families, the photocatalytic investigation of MV2O6 compounds remains relatively limited. Current studies mainly focus on ZnV2O6, NiV2O6, and MnV2O6, whereas MgV2O6 and CoV2O6 remain largely unexplored. Furthermore, systematic correlations among composition, crystal structure, morphology, defect chemistry, and photocatalytic performance are still lacking, limiting the rational design of efficient photocatalysts.
Future research should establish composition–structure–activity relationships through systematic compositional tuning, morphology engineering, and controlled defect introduction to optimize band structures, charge separation, and surface reaction kinetics. Combining advanced characterization techniques, such as XPS, EPR, and operando spectroscopy, with density functional theory (DFT) calculations will provide valuable insights into charge-transfer mechanisms and active sites. Such integrated experimental and theoretical studies will accelerate the rational design of high-performance MV2O6 photocatalysts for efficient solar water splitting.

6.6. Scalability and Practical Implementation

The practical deployment of MV2O6-based photocatalysts also requires scalable and economically viable synthesis strategies. Conventional solid-state methods are attractive because of their simplicity and ease of scale-up; however, they often yield large particle sizes, low surface areas, and limited control over morphology. Hydrothermal, solvothermal, and template-assisted routes provide improved structural control but may increase processing complexity and cost.
Future large-scale production should prioritize synthesis approaches capable of simultaneously controlling crystal phase, particle size, defect concentration, and surface area while maintaining low environmental impact and cost. In addition, long-term photostability, resistance to photocorrosion, and operation under natural solar irradiation must be systematically evaluated before industrial implementation becomes feasible.

7. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

The growing global demand for sustainable and carbon-neutral energy technologies has intensified the search for efficient visible-light-responsive photocatalysts for solar water splitting. In this context, divalent metal metavanadates (MV2O6, where M = Zn, Ni, Cu, Mg, Mn, and Co) have emerged as a promising yet relatively underexplored family of semiconductor materials. Their narrow-to-moderate band gaps, strong visible-light absorption, tunable electronic structures, and compositional flexibility make them attractive candidates for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical energy-conversion applications.
This review has comprehensively summarized the crystal structures, electronic properties, synthesis strategies, and photocatalytic performances of MV2O6-based systems. The available literature demonstrates that the photocatalytic behavior of these materials is strongly governed by the nature of the divalent metal cation, which influences crystal symmetry, band-edge positions, charge-carrier mobility, and redox activity. Among the investigated compounds, MnV2O6 represents the most notable example of a single-phase MV2O6 photocatalyst capable of simultaneously producing hydrogen and oxygen under visible-light irradiation. In contrast, ZnV2O6 and NiV2O6 have primarily demonstrated promising photoelectrochemical water-splitting performance, particularly as visible-light-active photoanodes for oxygen evolution. CuV2O6 has shown potential as a photoelectrode and heterojunction component due to its strong visible-light absorption, whereas MgV2O6 and CoV2O6 remain largely unexplored for photocatalytic water-splitting applications.
Despite these encouraging developments, the overall photocatalytic performance of MV2O6 materials remains significantly below the levels required for practical solar hydrogen production. Several key challenges continue to limit their efficiency, including insufficient charge separation, rapid electron–hole recombination, sluggish surface reaction kinetics, and limited understanding of composition–structure–activity relationships. Furthermore, only a small fraction of the MV2O6 family has been systematically investigated for hydrogen and oxygen evolution, leaving substantial opportunities for discovering new photocatalytic functionalities within this material class.
Future research should therefore focus on rational electronic-structure engineering to optimize band-edge positions and enhance redox driving forces. Strategies such as cation substitution, defect engineering, oxygen-vacancy creation, and controlled valence-state modulation may provide effective pathways for improving visible-light absorption and charge-carrier transport. Equally important is the development of advanced heterojunction architectures, including Type-II, Z-scheme, and S-scheme systems, which can promote efficient spatial separation of photogenerated charge carriers while preserving strong reduction and oxidation capabilities. The successful implementation of such approaches has already been demonstrated in several vanadate-based photocatalysts and is expected to play a crucial role in unlocking the full potential of MV2O6 materials.
Another promising direction involves the integration of cocatalysts to accelerate hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) kinetics. While noble-metal cocatalysts such as Pt, RuO2, and IrO2 remain highly effective, future efforts should prioritize the development of earth-abundant alternatives, including transition-metal phosphides, sulfides, nitrides, hydroxides, and single-atom catalysts. Coupling these cocatalysts with optimized MV2O6 hosts may significantly reduce reaction overpotentials and improve overall solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiencies.
From a fundamental perspective, advanced characterization techniques and theoretical investigations are required to establish clear correlations between crystal structure, electronic configuration, defect chemistry, and photocatalytic activity. In particular, in situ and operando spectroscopic methods, combined with density functional theory (DFT) calculations, can provide valuable insights into charge-transfer mechanisms, surface reaction pathways, and active catalytic sites. Such studies will be essential for guiding the rational design of next-generation MV2O6 photocatalysts.
Moreover, future investigations should move beyond individual materials and explore the entire MV2O6 compositional space through high-throughput experimental screening and computational materials discovery. The limited number of studies currently available for MgV2O6 and CoV2O6 suggests that substantial opportunities remain for uncovering previously unexplored photocatalytic properties. Similarly, mixed-cation vanadates, multicomponent heterostructures, and nanostructured architectures may offer new avenues for achieving synergistic improvements in light harvesting, charge separation, and catalytic activity.
Finally, translating laboratory-scale achievements into practical solar-fuel technologies will require greater emphasis on scalable synthesis methods, long-term photostability, photocorrosion resistance, and operation under realistic solar irradiation conditions. Future studies should therefore incorporate standardized photocatalytic testing protocols, apparent quantum efficiency measurements, and durability assessments to facilitate meaningful comparisons among different MV2O6 systems.
In summary, MV2O6 metavanadates constitute a scientifically intriguing and technologically promising class of visible-light-responsive materials for solar energy conversion. Although research in this area remains at a relatively early stage, the encouraging performance of MnV2O6, ZnV2O6, and NiV2O6 demonstrates the potential of this family for photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting. Continued advances in materials design, heterojunction engineering, cocatalyst integration, and mechanistic understanding are expected to accelerate the development of highly efficient MV2O6-based photocatalysts and contribute to the realization of sustainable solar hydrogen production technologies.

Author Contributions

P.R.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Data curation, Writing—Original draft. J.-S.N.: Supervision, Funding acquisition, Editing and critical revision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. RS-2026-25473753).

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thanking the Gachon University and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) for continuous support. During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGPT-5.6 (OpenAI) solely to improve the English language, grammar, readability, and clarity of the text. The AI tool was not used to generate scientific content, analyze data, interpret results, or draw conclusions. All AI-assisted text was carefully reviewed, verified, and edited by the authors, who take full responsibility for the content of the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Sasikumar, K.; Ju, H. Recent Advances in Vanadate-Based Materials for Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. Molecules 2025, 30, 789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  2. Ahmad, T.; Zhang, D. A Critical Review of Comparative Global Historical Energy Consumption and Future Demand: The Story Told so Far. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 1973–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Wang, S.; Ma, H.; Ge, S.; Rezakazemi, M.; Han, J. Advanced Design Strategies and Multifunctional Applications of Nanocellulose/MXene Composites: A Comprehensive Review. Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 2025, 163, 100925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Taipabu, M.I.; Viswanathan, K.; Wu, W.; Hattu, N.; Atabani, A.E. A Critical Review of the Hydrogen Production from Biomass-Based Feedstocks: Challenge, Solution, and Future Prospect. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2022, 164, 384–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical Photolysis of Water at a Semiconductor Electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 38–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Fujishima, A. TiO2 Photoelectrochemistry and Photocatalysis. Electrochem. Soc. 2001, 43. Available online: https://www.electrochem.org/dl/ma/203/pdfs/2729.pdf (accessed on 25 June 2026).
  7. Akhoondi, A.; Feleni, U.; Bethi, B.; Olayiwola Idris, A.; Hojjati-Najafabadi, A. Advances in Metal-Based Vanadate Compound Photocatalysts: Synthesis, Properties and Applications. Synth. Sinter. 2021, 1, 151–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Hong, S.; Burkhow, S.J.; Doughty, R.M.; Cheng, Y.; Ryan, B.J.; Mantravadi, A.; Roling, L.T.; Panthani, M.G.; Osterloh, F.E.; Smith, E.A.; et al. Local Structural Disorder in Metavanadates MV2O6 (M = Zn and Cu) Synthesized by the Deep Eutectic Solvent Route: Photoactive Oxides with Oxygen Vacancies. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 1667–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Thorat, G.M.; Jadhav, H.S.; Roy, A.; Chung, W.-J.; Seo, J.G. Dual Role of Deep Eutectic Solvent as a Solvent and Template for the Synthesis of Octahedral Cobalt Vanadate for an Oxygen Evolution Reaction. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 16255–16266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Feng, B.; Wang, Q.; Liu, P.; Yuan, Z.; Pan, D.; Ye, M.; Shen, K.; Xin, Z. Z-Scheme Heterojunction Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance for CO2 Reduction to CH4. Nanoscale 2024, 16, 17616–17623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  11. Ghasemi, S.; Parastesh, A.; Padervand, M.; Ren, H.; Li, X.; Labidi, A.; Signoretto, M.; Dawi, E.A.; Hamzehlouyan, T.; Lichtfouse, E.; et al. Recent Progress on Z- and S-Scheme Photocatalysis: Mechanistic Understanding toward Green Applications. Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng. 2025, 47, 101059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Soltani, R.; Rosen, M.A.; Dincer, I. Assessment of CO2 Capture Options from Various Points in Steam Methane Reforming for Hydrogen Production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 20266–20275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Tee, S.Y.; Win, K.Y.; Teo, W.S.; Koh, L.-D.; Liu, S.; Teng, C.P.; Han, M.-Y. Recent Progress in Energy-Driven Water Splitting. Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1600337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Kamat, P.V. A Conversation with Akira Fujishima. ACS Energy Lett. 2017, 2, 1586–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Hu, B.; Cai, F.; Chen, T.; Fan, M.; Song, C.; Yan, X.; Shi, W. Hydrothermal Synthesis G-C3N4/Nano-InVO4 Nanocomposites and Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity for Hydrogen Production under Visible Light Irradiation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 18247–18256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Mirzaei, M.; Akhoondi, A.; Hamd, W.; Noé Díaz de León, J.; Selvaraj, R. New Updates on Vanadate Compounds Synthesis and Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Applications. Synth. Sinter. 2023, 3, 28–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Takata, T.; Jiang, J.; Sakata, Y.; Nakabayashi, M.; Shibata, N.; Nandal, V.; Seki, K.; Hisatomi, T.; Domen, K. Photocatalytic Water Splitting with a Quantum Efficiency of Almost Unity. Nature 2020, 581, 411–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  18. Chen, S.; Takata, T.; Domen, K. Particulate Photocatalysts for Overall Water Splitting. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 17050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Kumaravel, V.; Imam, M.; Badreldin, A.; Chava, R.; Do, J.; Kang, M.; Abdel-Wahab, A. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production: Role of Sacrificial Reagents on the Activity of Oxide, Carbon, and Sulfide Catalysts. Catalysts 2019, 9, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Lou, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhu, L.; Xie, W.; Niu, W.; Song, H.; Ye, Z.; Zhang, S. The Crystalline/Amorphous Contact in Cu2O/Ta2O5 Heterostructures: Increasing Its Sunlight-Driven Overall Water Splitting Efficiency. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 2732–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Kim, J.H.; Hansora, D.; Sharma, P.; Jang, J.W.; Lee, J.S. Toward Practical Solar Hydrogen Production—An Artificial Photosynthetic Leaf-to-Farm Challenge. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 1908–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  22. Zhao, C.; Chen, Z.; Shi, R.; Yang, X.; Zhang, T. Recent Advances in Conjugated Polymers for Visible-Light-Driven Water Splitting. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1907296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Serpone, N.; Emeline, A.V. Semiconductor Photocatalysis—Past, Present, and Future Outlook. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 673–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Jia, R.; Wang, Y.; Li, A.; Cheng, C. Recent Advances on Three-Dimensional Ordered Macroporous Metal Oxide-Based Photoelectrodes for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Mater. Chem. Front. 2024, 8, 1230–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Pan, H. Principles on Design and Fabrication of Nanomaterials as Photocatalysts for Water-Splitting. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 57, 584–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Li, T.; Tsubaki, N.; Jin, Z. S-Scheme Heterojunction in Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2024, 169, 82–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Park, Y.; McDonald, K.J.; Choi, K.-S. Progress in Bismuth Vanadate Photoanodes for Use in Solar Water Oxidation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42, 2321–2337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  28. Dunkle, S.S.; Helmich, R.J.; Suslick, K.S. BiVO4 as a Visible-Light Photocatalyst Prepared by Ultrasonic Spray Pyrolysis. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 11980–11983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Pchelkina, Z.V.; Solovyev, I.V.; Arita, R. Theoretical Analysis of Electronic and Magnetic Properties of NaV2O4: Crucial Role of the Orbital Degrees of Freedom. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 104409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Bafaqeer, A.; Tahir, M.; Amin, N.A.S. Synthesis of Hierarchical ZnV2O6 Nanosheets with Enhanced Activity and Stability for Visible Light Driven CO2 Reduction to Solar Fuels. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 435, 953–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Tang, R.; Li, Y.; Xie, S.; Li, N.; Chen, J.; Gao, C.; Zhu, P.; Wang, X. Exploring the Coordination Change of Vanadium and Structure Transformation of Metavanadate MgV2O6 under High Pressure. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  32. Islam, M.S.; Kabir, H.; Inagaki, Y.; Sarker, A.R. Comparative Study of the Conductivity of Synthesized Bivalent Vanadates CaV2O6 and MnV2O6. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 829, 154499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Shaik, I.; Vohra, A.; Devkar, R.J. Synthesis, Characterization, Structural Features and Cytotoxicity of Innovative Zinc(II) Complex Derived from ONS-donor Thio-Schiff Base of Acyl Pyrazolone. Eur. J. Chem. 2019, 10, 131–138. [Google Scholar]
  34. Li, L.; Li, J.; Kim, B.-H.; Huang, J. The Effect of Morphology and Crystal Structure on the Photocatalytic and Photoelectrochemical Performances of WO3. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 2080–2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Hong, S.; Doughty, R.M.; Osterloh, F.E.; Zaikina, J.V. Deep Eutectic Solvent Route Synthesis of Zinc and Copper Vanadate N-Type Semiconductors—Mapping Oxygen Vacancies and Their Effect on Photovoltage. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 12303–12316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Kawawaki, T.; Kawachi, M.; Yazaki, D.; Akinaga, Y.; Hirayama, D.; Negishi, Y. Development and Functionalization of Visible-Light-Driven Water-Splitting Photocatalysts. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  37. Kamimura, S.; Abe, S.; Tsubota, T.; Ohno, T. Solar-Driven H2 Evolution over CuNb2O6: Effect of Two Polymorphs (Monoclinic and Orthorhombic) on Optical Property and Photocatalytic Activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2018, 356, 263–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Pei, G.; Pan, C.; Zhong, D.; Xiang, J.; Lv, X. Crystal Structure, Phase Transitions, and Thermodynamic Properties of Magnesium Metavanadate (MgV2O6). J. Magnes. Alloys 2024, 12, 1449–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Raizada, P.; Sudhaik, A.; Patial, S.; Hasija, V.; Parwaz Khan, A.A.; Singh, P.; Gautam, S.; Kaur, M.; Nguyen, V.-H. Engineering Nanostructures of CuO-Based Photocatalysts for Water Treatment: Current Progress and Future Challenges. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 8424–8457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Ran, J.; Zhang, J.; Yu, J.; Jaroniec, M.; Qiao, S.Z. Earth-Abundant Cocatalysts for Semiconductor-Based Photocatalytic Water Splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7787–7812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  41. Wang, J.; Hyun, H.; Seo, S.; Jeong, K.; Han, J.; Jo, S.; Kim, H.; Koo, B.; Eum, D.; Kim, J.; et al. A Kinetic Indicator of Ultrafast Nickel-Rich Layered Oxide Cathodes. ACS Energy Lett. 2023, 8, 2986–2995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Hisatomi, T.; Domen, K. Reaction Systems for Solar Hydrogen Production via Water Splitting with Particulate Semiconductor Photocatalysts. Nat. Catal. 2019, 2, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Yang, A.; Luo, J.; Xie, Z.; Chen, Q.; Xie, Q. DFT Approach to the Stability, the Structural, Electronic and Photocatalytic Properties of the ZnV2O6(001) Surface Terminations. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2023, 155, 107220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Maitlo, H.A.; Anand, B.; Kim, K.-H. TiO2-Based Photocatalytic Generation of Hydrogen from Water and Wastewater. Appl. Energy 2024, 361, 122932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Singh, B.; Nunna, G.P.; Tamta, A.; Chandra, B.; Bahajjaj, A.A.A.; Li, X.; Patri, T.; Arla, S.K.; Joo, S.W. Morphology-Dependent Photoelectrocatalytic Water Oxidation for H2 Production: Superior Performance of Dual-Structured Zinc Vanadate over Nickel and Copper Analogues. J. Alloys Compd. 2025, 1030, 180816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Zang, S.; Cai, X.; Chen, M.; Teng, D.; Jing, F.; Leng, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Lin, F. Tunable Carrier Transfer of Polymeric Carbon Nitride with Charge-Conducting CoV2O6∙2H2O for Photocatalytic O2 Evolution. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  47. Guo, W.; Chemelewski, W.D.; Mabayoje, O.; Xiao, P.; Zhang, Y.; Mullins, C.B. Synthesis and Characterization of CuV2O6 and Cu2V2O7: Two Photoanode Candidates for Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 27220–27227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Kagdada, H.L.; Jain, A. Impact of Vacancy Defects on Electrochemical Nitrogen Reduction Reaction Performance of MXenes. ChemPhysChem 2024, 25, e202300993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  49. Sun, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Ma, X.; Ma, P.; Song, M. Ultralong Monoclinic ZnV2O6 Nanowires: Their Shape-Controlled Synthesis, New Growth Mechanism, and Highly Reversible Lithium Storage in Lithium-Ion Batteries. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 8110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Sun, Y.; Li, C.-S.; Yang, Q.-R.; Chou, S.-L.; Liu, H.-K. Electrochemically Active, Novel Layered m -ZnV2O6 Nanobelts for Highly Rechargeable Na-Ion Energy Storage. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 205, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Kim, K.M.; Cho, H.H.; Yu, H.K.; Kim, M.H. Single Phase ZnV2O6 Nanorods with Excellent Visible Light Photodetection Capability. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 938, 168676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Prasad, S.R.; Srikantaswamy, S.; Jagadish, K.; Abhilash, M.R.; Nayan, M.B. Synthesis, Characterization of Copper Metavanadate (CuV2O6) Nanostructures via Hydrothermal Method and Their Photocatalytic Performance. Orient. J. Chem. 2018, 34, 1263–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Song, A.; Liu, S.; Wang, Q.; Gao, D.; Hu, J. Comprehensive Evaluation of Copper Vanadate (α-CuV2O6) for Use as a Photoanode Material for Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023, 11, 109892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Balamurugan, C.; Lee, D.-W. A Selective NH3 Gas Sensor Based on Mesoporous P-Type NiV2O6 Semiconducting Nanorods Synthesized Using Solution Method. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 192, 414–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. George, A.; Rahul, S.; Raj, A.D.; Yang, Q. Gas Sensing Response and Photocatalytic Efficiency of PH Tuned NiV2O6 Nanorods. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2024, 413, 135809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Liu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Du, J.; Yu, W.; Qian, Y. Synthesis and Characterization of Single-Crystal MnV2O6 Nanobelts. J. Cryst. Growth 2006, 291, 320–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Jin, X.; Ding, X.; Qin, Z.; Li, Y.; Jiao, M.; Wang, R.; Yang, X.; Lv, X. Comprehensive Study of Electronic, Optical, and Thermophysical Properties of Metavanadates CaV2O6 and MgV2O6. Inorg. Chem. 2022, 61, 17623–17633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  58. Pasindu, V.; Munaweera, I. Harnessing Atomic-Scale Defect Engineering in 2D Photocatalysts: Synergistic Integration of Nanocomposite Architectures for Bandgap Tuning and Charge Transfer Optimization. RSC Adv. 2025, 15, 34191–34210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  59. Han, Z.; Song, Y.; Jia, Y.; Wang, Y.; Shi, J.; Liu, X.; Yu, L.; Li, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, H.; et al. Classification and Characterization Methods for Heterojunctions. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2025, 12, 2500191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Sasikumar, K.; Rajamanikandan, R.; Ju, H. Construction of Z-Scheme ZIF67/NiMoO4 Heterojunction for Enhanced Photocatalytic Degradation of Antibiotic Pollutants. Materials 2024, 17, 6225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  61. Xue, Y.; Chew, J.W. UiO-66 (Zr) Metal–Organic Framework for Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction: Functional Design Strategies for Sustainable Carbon Utilization. J. Mater. Chem. A 2025, 13, 11989–12008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Li, M.; Cui, H.; Zhao, Y.; Li, S.; Wang, J.; Ge, K.; Yang, Y. S-Scheme Heterojunction Photocatalysts for CO2 Reduction. Catalysts 2024, 14, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Tian, L.; Guan, X.; Zong, S.; Dai, A.; Qu, J. Cocatalysts for Photocatalytic Overall Water Splitting: A Mini Review. Catalysts 2023, 13, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Sameie, H.; Alvani, A.A.S.; Mei, B.T.; Salimi, R.; Poelman, D.; Rosei, F. Mo-Doped ZnV2O6/Reduced Graphene Oxide Photoanodes for Solar Hydrogen Production. Electrochim. Acta 2021, 382, 138333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Zoellner, B.; Gordon, E.; Maggard, P.A. A Small Bandgap Semiconductor, p-Type MnV2O6, Active for Photocatalytic Hydrogen and Oxygen Production. Dalton Trans. 2017, 46, 10657–10664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  66. Khan, M.D.; Farooq, M.u.H.; Fareed, I.; Maqsood, T.; Anam, H.S.; Zubair, A.; Tahir, M.; Butt, F.K. Novel CoV2O6/g-C3N4 Nanocomposite for Efficient Bifunctional Electrocatalysis and High-Performance Electrochemical Biosensing. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2025, 159, 112848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Dang, H.X.; Rettie, A.J.E.; Mullins, C.B. Visible-Light-Active NiV2O6 Films for Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation. J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 14524–14531. [Google Scholar]
  68. Kawada, T.; Yamashita, H.; Zheng, Q.; Machida, M. Hydrothermal Synthesis of CuV2O6 Supported on Mesoporous SiO2 as SO3 Decomposition Catalysts for Solar Thermochemical Hydrogen Production. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 20646–20651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Wang, S.; She, L.; Zheng, Q.; Song, Y.; Yang, Y.; Chen, L. Ag-Doped CuV2O6 Nanowires for Enhanced Visible-Light Photocatalytic CO2 Reduction. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2023, 62, 455–465. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Schematic representation of the global energy transition from conventional fossil-fuel-based energy systems toward sustainable solar-driven green hydrogen production, (open access) [19]. (b) Illustration of particulate photocatalytic water splitting, highlighting visible-light absorption, photogenerated charge carrier separation and migration, hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) for solar-to-hydrogen conversion (source accessed on 10 June 2026: https://watsonsolar.binghamton.edu/about_solar.html?utm).
Figure 1. (a) Schematic representation of the global energy transition from conventional fossil-fuel-based energy systems toward sustainable solar-driven green hydrogen production, (open access) [19]. (b) Illustration of particulate photocatalytic water splitting, highlighting visible-light absorption, photogenerated charge carrier separation and migration, hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) for solar-to-hydrogen conversion (source accessed on 10 June 2026: https://watsonsolar.binghamton.edu/about_solar.html?utm).
Micromachines 17 00904 g001
Figure 2. Crystal structures and representative morphologies of MV2O6 metavanadates (ZnV2O6, NiV2O6, CuV2O6, MgV2O6, MnV2O6, and CoV2O6), (open access) [31].
Figure 2. Crystal structures and representative morphologies of MV2O6 metavanadates (ZnV2O6, NiV2O6, CuV2O6, MgV2O6, MnV2O6, and CoV2O6), (open access) [31].
Micromachines 17 00904 g002
Figure 3. Overview of performance-enhancement strategies for MV2O6 photocatalysts, including morphology engineering, defect engineering, heterojunction construction, and cocatalyst loading, (open access) [36].
Figure 3. Overview of performance-enhancement strategies for MV2O6 photocatalysts, including morphology engineering, defect engineering, heterojunction construction, and cocatalyst loading, (open access) [36].
Micromachines 17 00904 g003
Figure 4. Pressure-induced structural evolution of the MV2O6 phase, showing the C2/m structure at 1.9 GPa (a) and 4.3 GPa (b), and the C2 structure at 27.4 GPa (c), (open access) [31].
Figure 4. Pressure-induced structural evolution of the MV2O6 phase, showing the C2/m structure at 1.9 GPa (a) and 4.3 GPa (b), and the C2 structure at 27.4 GPa (c), (open access) [31].
Micromachines 17 00904 g004
Figure 5. Band alignment diagram of MV2O6 metavanadates.
Figure 5. Band alignment diagram of MV2O6 metavanadates.
Micromachines 17 00904 g005
Figure 6. Schematic comparison of (a) Type-II and (b) Z-scheme charge transfer mechanisms, showing band alignment and carrier migration pathways (open access) [60].
Figure 6. Schematic comparison of (a) Type-II and (b) Z-scheme charge transfer mechanisms, showing band alignment and carrier migration pathways (open access) [60].
Micromachines 17 00904 g006
Figure 7. The energy band diagram of an S-scheme heterojunction, illustrating the formation of the internal electric field and charge transfer pathway; (a) before contact; (b) after contact; and (c) photogenerated carrier transfer under light irradiation (open access) [62].
Figure 7. The energy band diagram of an S-scheme heterojunction, illustrating the formation of the internal electric field and charge transfer pathway; (a) before contact; (b) after contact; and (c) photogenerated carrier transfer under light irradiation (open access) [62].
Micromachines 17 00904 g007
Figure 8. Schematic illustration of photocatalytic overall water splitting, (open access) [63].
Figure 8. Schematic illustration of photocatalytic overall water splitting, (open access) [63].
Micromachines 17 00904 g008
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of the charge-transfer process in the ZnV2O6:Mo/rGO photoanode during PEC water-splitting reactions, Reprinted with permission from Elsevier 2021 [64].
Figure 9. Schematic illustration of the charge-transfer process in the ZnV2O6:Mo/rGO photoanode during PEC water-splitting reactions, Reprinted with permission from Elsevier 2021 [64].
Micromachines 17 00904 g009
Figure 10. Temperature-dependent hydrogen production by MnV2O6 in 20% methanol solution under visible-light irradiation, Reprinted with permission from RSC 2017 [65].
Figure 10. Temperature-dependent hydrogen production by MnV2O6 in 20% methanol solution under visible-light irradiation, Reprinted with permission from RSC 2017 [65].
Micromachines 17 00904 g010
Figure 11. Mechanism of hydrogen and oxygen evolution using CoV2O6 as a cocatalyst in electrocatalysis, Reprinted with permission from Elsevier 2025 [66].
Figure 11. Mechanism of hydrogen and oxygen evolution using CoV2O6 as a cocatalyst in electrocatalysis, Reprinted with permission from Elsevier 2025 [66].
Micromachines 17 00904 g011
Figure 12. (a) Representative IPCE spectra of NiV2O6 films at various applied biases versus Ag/AgCl in 1 M KOH under AM1.5G illumination (∼100 mW cm−2) with a visible-light cutoff filter (λ ≥ 420 nm). (b) Oxygen evolution from a NiV2O6 film under illumination in 0.1 M borate buffer (H2BO3, pH 9) at ∼400 mW cm−2, with the corresponding current density shown in the inset, Reprinted with permission from ACS 2014 [67].
Figure 12. (a) Representative IPCE spectra of NiV2O6 films at various applied biases versus Ag/AgCl in 1 M KOH under AM1.5G illumination (∼100 mW cm−2) with a visible-light cutoff filter (λ ≥ 420 nm). (b) Oxygen evolution from a NiV2O6 film under illumination in 0.1 M borate buffer (H2BO3, pH 9) at ∼400 mW cm−2, with the corresponding current density shown in the inset, Reprinted with permission from ACS 2014 [67].
Micromachines 17 00904 g012
Figure 13. Oxygen evolution by MnV2O6 under visible-light irradiation in the presence of AgNO3 and NaIO3 as sacrificial reagents, Reprinted with permission from RSC 2017 [65].
Figure 13. Oxygen evolution by MnV2O6 under visible-light irradiation in the presence of AgNO3 and NaIO3 as sacrificial reagents, Reprinted with permission from RSC 2017 [65].
Micromachines 17 00904 g013
Table 1. Crystallographic parameters of representative MV2O6 metavanadates.
Table 1. Crystallographic parameters of representative MV2O6 metavanadates.
CompoundCrystal SystemSpace GroupStructural CharacteristicsRefs.
ZnV2O6MonoclinicC2/mEdge-sharing VO6 octahedral chains[43,44]
NiV2O6MonoclinicC2/mDistorted VO6 and NiO6 octahedra[45]
CoV2O6MonoclinicC2/mChain-like octahedral framework[9,46]
MnV2O6MonoclinicC2/mDistorted octahedral network[32]
MgV2O6MonoclinicC2/mThermally stable metavanadate framework[38]
CuV2O6TriclinicP1Jahn–Teller distorted CuO6 octahedra[47]
Table 2. Reported Electronic Properties of Representative MV2O6 Metavanadates.
Table 2. Reported Electronic Properties of Representative MV2O6 Metavanadates.
CompoundReported
Band Gap (eV)
Visible-Light ResponseReported Water-Splitting Activity
ZnV2O6~2.2–2.4YesPEC water oxidation; H2 evolution in composite systems
CuV2O6~1.8–2.0StrongPEC water oxidation; heterojunction component
NiV2O6~2.0–2.3YesPhotoanode for water oxidation
CoV2O6~2.0–2.3YesLimited photocatalytic studies
MnV2O6~1.9–2.2YesDirect photocatalytic H2 and O2 evolution
MgV2O6~2.3–2.5ModerateLimited reports
Table 3. Representative Morphologies and Synthesis Routes Reported for MV2O6 Materials.
Table 3. Representative Morphologies and Synthesis Routes Reported for MV2O6 Materials.
CompositionReported MorphologySynthesis RouteRefs.
ZnV2O6Nanorods, nanowires, nanobeltsHydrothermal, microwave-assisted synthesis[49,50,51]
CuV2O6Nanowires, porous particles, thin filmsElectrospinning, solution-based synthesis, thermal treatment[47,52,53]
NiV2O6Nanorods, mesoporous nanostructures, nanospheresHydrothermal, solution-based synthesis[54,55]
MnV2O6Nanobelts, nanorods, polycrystalline particlesHydrothermal, solid-state synthesis[32,56]
CoV2O6Nanoflowers, nanosheets, nanoparticlesHydrothermal, surfactant-assisted synthesis[9,46]
MgV2O6Polycrystalline powders, microstructured particlesSolid-state synthesis[31,38,57]
Table 4. Reported Photocatalytic and Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production Performance of MV2O6-Based Systems.
Table 4. Reported Photocatalytic and Photoelectrochemical Hydrogen Production Performance of MV2O6-Based Systems.
MaterialSystem TypeApplicationKey PerformanceRemarksRef.
ZnV2O6Mo-doped ZnV2O6/rGO photoanodePEC hydrogen production2.07 mA cm−2 at 1.23 V vs. RHE; IPCE = 17% at 370 nmEnhanced charge separation via Mo doping and graphene incorporation[64]
NiV2O6Thin-film photoanodePEC water oxidation~45% photocurrent from λ > 420 nm; FE ≈ 80%Visible-light-responsive PEC photoanode[67]
CuV2O6Pure semiconductorPhotocatalysis/PECNo significant H2 evolution reportedMainly studied for degradation and thermochemical applications[68,69]
MgV2O6Pure semiconductorOptical/photocatalytic studiesNo H2 production reportsLargely unexplored for water splitting[38,57]
MnV2O6Suspended photocatalystPhotocatalytic H2 and O2 evolutionH2: ~1.5 μmol h−1 (in 20% methanol); O2: ~1.6 μmol h−1 (with AgNO3/NaIO3).Most convincing single-phase MV2O6 photocatalyst for H2 production[65]
CoV2O6Pure semiconductorElectrochemical applicationsNo H2 production reportsPrimarily studied for energy storage and electrocatalysis[46,66]
Table 5. Reported Oxygen Evolution Performance of MV2O6-Based Systems.
Table 5. Reported Oxygen Evolution Performance of MV2O6-Based Systems.
MaterialSystem TypeOxygen Evolution ApplicationKey PerformanceMajor FindingsRef.
ZnV2O6Mo-doped ZnV2O6/rGO photoanodePEC water oxidation2.07 mA cm−2 at 1.23 V vs. RHE; IPCE 17% at 370 nmImproved hole transfer and water oxidation due to Mo doping and rGO[64]
NiV2O6Thin-film photoanodePEC oxygen evolutionStable oxygen generation; Faradaic efficiency ~80%; ~45% photocurrent from λ > 420 nm; photocurrent ~0.2 mA cm−2 at 0.6 V vs. Ag/AgClMost extensively studied MV2O6 photoanode for OER[67]
CuV2O6PhotoanodePEC water oxidationNo quantitative photocurrent data reportedStrong visible-light absorption but significant charge recombination[47]
MgV2O6Pure semiconductorOER studiesNo reportsLargely unexplored
MnV2O6Suspended photocatalystPhotocatalytic oxygen evolutionO2: ~1.6 μmol h−1 (with AgNO3/NaIO3 as sacrificial reagents).Only single-phase MV2O6 reported for direct photocatalytic O2 evolution[65]
CoV2O6ElectrocatalystElectrochemical OERNo photocatalytic OER data reportedPhotocatalytic O2 evolution not reported[66]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ravi, P.; Noh, J.-S. Advancements in MV2O6-Based Particulate Systems for Solar-Light Water Splitting. Micromachines 2026, 17, 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi17080904

AMA Style

Ravi P, Noh J-S. Advancements in MV2O6-Based Particulate Systems for Solar-Light Water Splitting. Micromachines. 2026; 17(8):904. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi17080904

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ravi, Parnapalle, and Jin-Seo Noh. 2026. "Advancements in MV2O6-Based Particulate Systems for Solar-Light Water Splitting" Micromachines 17, no. 8: 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi17080904

APA Style

Ravi, P., & Noh, J.-S. (2026). Advancements in MV2O6-Based Particulate Systems for Solar-Light Water Splitting. Micromachines, 17(8), 904. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi17080904

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop