Next Article in Journal
A Novel Variable Stiffness Torque Sensor with Adjustable Resolution
Previous Article in Journal
Enhanced Photoelectrochemical Performance of BiVO4 Photoanodes Co-Modified with Borate and NiFeOx
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design and Study of a Novel P-Type Junctionless FET for High Performance of CMOS Inverter
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Stepped-Spacer FinFET Design for Enhanced Device Performance in FPGA Applications

1
Department of Design, Manufacturing and Engineering Management, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK
2
Faculty of Technology, School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth PO1 3DJ, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2025, 16(8), 867; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16080867 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 18 June 2025 / Revised: 18 July 2025 / Accepted: 25 July 2025 / Published: 27 July 2025

Abstract

As transistor dimensions continue to scale below 10 nm, traditional MOSFET architectures face increasing limitations from short-channel effects, gate leakage, and variability. FinFETs, especially junctionless FinFETs on silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrates, offer improved electrostatic control and simplified fabrication, making them attractive for deeply scaled nodes. In this work, we propose a novel Stepped-Spacer Structured FinFET (S3-FinFET) that incorporates a three-layer HfO2/Si3N4/HfO2 spacer configuration designed to enhance electrostatics and suppress parasitic effects. Using 2D TCAD simulations, the S3-FinFET is evaluated in terms of key performance metrics, including transfer/output characteristics, ON/OFF current ratio, subthreshold swing (SS), drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL), gate capacitance, and cut-off frequency. The results show significant improvements in leakage control and high-frequency behavior. These enhancements make the S3-FinFET particularly well-suited for Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), where power efficiency, speed, and signal integrity are critical to performance in reconfigurable logic environments.

1. Introduction

As semiconductor technology continues its push into the sub-10 nm regime, conventional bulk MOSFET architectures are increasingly limited by short-channel effects, high leakage currents, and variability induced by process scaling [1,2,3]. To address these challenges, FinFETs built on silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrates have become a widely adopted alternative due to their excellent electrostatic control, lower off-state leakage, and scalability [4,5]. Among these, junctionless FinFETs, where the source, drain, and channel are uniformly doped, offer added benefits of fabrication simplicity and reduced variability, making them suitable for ultra-scaled nodes [6].
Field-Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), known for their flexibility and reconfigurability, are particularly sensitive to device-level characteristics such as leakage power, switching delay, and gate capacitance [7]. Traditional CMOS-based FPGAs face scaling bottlenecks due to increasing static power and degraded signal integrity [8]. Several studies have explored the use of FinFETs to improve FPGA performance [9,10]. For instance, prior work has demonstrated that FinFET-based FPGA fabrics can achieve significant reductions in power consumption and delay compared to planar CMOS, owing to superior channel control and reduced leakage [11]. Furthermore, FinFETs allow for multi-threshold tuning and better trade-offs between performance and power, which are key requirements in modern FPGA design [12].
However, as FinFET gate lengths shrink below 10 nm, new challenges arise. Even SOI-based and junctionless FinFETs suffer from increased gate leakage, drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL), and subthreshold degradation, especially due to fringing fields from the drain and the gate spacers. To improve FinFET performance and mitigate these effects, several studies have explored the impact of gate spacer engineering. Sachid et al. investigated high-κ spacers, demonstrating improved drive current and reduced short-channel effects due to enhanced electrostatic control, albeit with increased parasitic capacitance [13]. Studies on wavy FinFET structures have compared various materials such as SiO2, Si3N4, and HfO2, finding that HfO2 spacers deliver a significant leakage reduction and improved ION/IOFF ratio [14]. Moreover, hybrid spacer stacks combining low-κ and high-κ dielectrics have been applied in DG-TFET and planar transistors, where SiO2/HfO2 configurations yield optimal tunneling efficiency and retention in memory-type devices [15]. Also, asymmetric spacer configurations, such as dual-κ or corner spacers, have been proposed to tailor source/drain fringe fields independently, resulting in enhanced capacitance characteristics and inverter responses in TFETs and negative-capacitance FinFETs [16].
Building upon these spacer engineering strategies, this work introduces a novel FinFET architecture, termed the S3-FinFET (Stepped-Spacer Structured FinFET), which employs a three-layer spacer stack composed of HfO2/Si3N4/HfO2 arranged in a stepped vertical configuration. This design not only enhances fringe field coupling near the gate, but also screens unwanted electric field penetration near the source/drain terminals, thus improving both ON- and OFF-state behavior. Through rigorous 2D TCAD simulations using the Silvaco Atlas platform, the S3-FinFET is evaluated for key performance metrics including transfer and output characteristics, subthreshold swing, DIBL, ON/OFF current ratio, gate capacitance profiles, and cut-off frequency.
Despite the advantages mentioned above, integrating FinFET technology into FPGA fabrics remains a nontrivial task. The performance of FPGAs is heavily dependent on the behavior of their constituent devices under static conditions, particularly in routing paths and configuration logic, where leakage and capacitance directly impact power and speed. Moreover, as gate lengths scale below 10 nm, even advanced FinFET structures encounter worsening electrostatic integrity, fringing field effects, and layout-induced variability. These challenges underscore the need for novel device architectures that specifically address FPGA-centric requirements.
The study of the S3-FinFET design reported here highlights its strong potential for FPGA applications. Its excellent electrostatic gate control makes it a promising candidate for integration into next-generation FPGA fabrics, enabling energy-efficient, high-speed reconfigurable systems at deeply scaled technology nodes.

2. Device Architecture and Simulation Framework

The S3-FinFET investigated in this work is simulated using 2D Silvaco TCAD simulator [17]. The device features a gate length of 5 nm and is designed on an SOI platform, which includes an 80 nm buried oxide layer for substrate isolation, as shown in Figure 1. A high work-function metal gate (4.8 eV) is placed atop a SiO2 gate dielectric, with the oxide thickness set to an equivalent oxide thickness (EOT) that meets advanced technology node requirements [18].
Unlike in traditional designs, the source, drain, and channel regions are doped entirely and uniformly to a concentration of 1 × 1019 cm−3, ensuring junctionless conduction. Both source/drain and spacer lengths are fixed at 12 nm, as shown in the top view of the proposed structure in Figure 2. The key differentiator in this structure is the use of a three-layer spacer stack. An inner HfO2 layer adjacent to the gate enhances gate-to-channel coupling; a middle Si3N4 layer acts as a dielectric buffer; and a second outer HfO2 layer near the source/drain junctions further screens fringing fields. These spacers are arranged in a stepped structure, with the HfO2 spacer near the gate having the greatest height, which gradually decreases toward the source and drain sides.
The simulations incorporate advanced physical models to capture quantum and high-doping effects. Carrier transport is modeled using the drift–diffusion approach, enhanced with Fermi–Dirac statistics. The quantum density-gradient model accounts for confinement and tunneling, while bandgap narrowing and band-to-band tunneling models address heavy doping and leakage. Mobility degradation from interface scattering and phonon interactions is considered via the Lombardi model, and carrier recombination is modeled using the Shockley–Read–Hall (SRH) approach.
Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed S3-FinFET exhibits improved performance due to the use of the three-layer spacer structure. For recombination, the Shockley–Read–Hall (SRH) model is used, which calculates the recombination rate based on carrier lifetimes and trap-assisted transitions. The SRH rate is formulated using the following formula [17]:
R S H R = n p n i , e f f 2 τ p n + n 1 + τ n ( p + p 1 )
where n and p are the electron and hole concentrations, ni,eff is the effective intrinsic carrier concentration, τn and τp are the carrier lifetimes, and n1 and p1 are the trap densities.
To simplify the fabrication process, the lengths of all three spacers are kept the same. The fabrication of the proposed S3-FinFET begins with the formation of a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate, followed by thinning of the top silicon layer and fin patterning using lithography and anisotropic etching. A gate oxide is then deposited using chemical vapor deposition (CVD), and a metal gate is formed. Subsequently, a tri-layer spacer structure is created. An inner HfO2 spacer is deposited and etched first, followed by the deposition and patterning of a middle Si3N4 spacer; finally, the outer HfO2 spacer is formed after source/drain extension implantation. Ion implantation is performed for the source/drain extensions, using a photoresist mask to protect the gate and spacer stack [19]. Afterward, selective epitaxial growth is used to form the heavily doped source and drain regions, followed by high-temperature annealing to activate the dopants. The process concludes with metallization to establish electrical contacts, completing the device structure.
Additional device parameters are provided in Table 1.

3. Results and Discussion

The transfer characteristics of the proposed S3-FinFET, compared to two other FinFET structures, a three-spacer FinFET without a stepped design and a conventional FinFET using only Si3N4 as a spacer, demonstrate the effectiveness of the novel stepped high-k spacer configuration. This design enhances fringe field penetration into the channel, thereby improving gate control across the entire fin body, which is especially beneficial at ultra-short gate lengths. The inclusion of an inner HfO2 layer with high permittivity extends the gate’s electrostatic reach without physically increasing gate length, improving barrier formation and reducing channel length modulation.
As shown in Figure 3, the transfer characteristics indicate that the S3-FinFET achieves lower sub-threshold leakage current due to a higher vertical electric field in the OFF state, while maintaining unaffected drive current in the ON state owing to a near-zero lateral electric field. Furthermore, the subthreshold swing (SS) of the S3-FinFET is significantly improved compared to the other two structures, highlighting its superior suppression of thermionic leakage and excellent interface control.
To further validate the performance enhancements introduced by the proposed HfO2/Si3N4/HfO2 stepped spacer structure, a comparative analysis was conducted between the S3-FinFET and a conventional FinFET (C-FinFET) without any spacer. Figure 4 presents the output characteristics of both devices, highlighting the superior current-driving capability of the S3-FinFET across a range of gate voltages. This enhancement is attributed to the improved electrostatic control enabled by the high-k stepped spacer, which strengthens gate-to-channel coupling.
Additionally, Figure 5 shows the transfer characteristics of both devices. It can be seen that the S3-FinFET exhibits a significantly higher ION/IOFF ratio, confirming the effectiveness of the proposed spacer in enhancing device performance. These comparisons provide clear evidence that the S3-FinFET structure offers substantial benefits over conventional designs in terms of both current driving and short-channel control.
To evaluate the current-driving capability and short-channel behavior of the proposed S3-FinFET under different biasing conditions, output characteristics were analyzed at two gate voltages, VGS = 0.5 V and VGS = 1 V, as shown in Figure 6. In the figure, the curves exhibit a clear transition from the linear region to the saturation region, reflecting strong channel modulation and proper saturation behavior. At VGS = 0.5 V, the drain current increases linearly with VD in the low-voltage region, indicating good channel formation, while saturation occurs at higher VD values, demonstrating effective gate control. At VGS = 1 V, a significantly higher drain current is observed across all VD values, highlighting the structure’s ability to support strong inversion and enhanced carrier injection due to improved electrostatics. The stepped high-k spacer in the S3-FinFET enhances fringe field coupling and reinforces gate control across the fin body, minimizing channel length modulation even at scaled dimensions. The saturation region shows minimal slope, which further confirms the suppression of drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL). The nearly ideal output behavior at both gate voltages supports the effectiveness of the proposed design in maintaining high drive current and strong saturation, making it well-suited for ultra-scaled low-power applications.
Figure 7 presents ION/IOFF ratio values of the proposed S3-FinFET. In the figure, a peak value exceeding 108 can be seen. This high ratio reflects the device’s excellent ability to combine low leakage with strong drive current. The OFF-state current remains impressively low, in the order of ~10−13 A/μm, primarily due to the junctionless design and the well-engineered potential barrier within the channel. Uniform doping prevents abrupt junction transitions that typically act as leakage paths, resulting in smooth conduction band profiles and suppressed leakage in the OFF state. Moreover, the stepped spacer structure effectively reduces source-to-drain tunnelling by decoupling the drain electric field from the source/channel interface, maintaining a robust potential barrier under reverse bias. At the same time, the high ON current is enabled by efficient carrier injection from the source into the heavily doped channel, facilitated by the absence of depletion zones typical of junction-based devices. Additionally, quantum confinement within the narrow fin slightly increases the effective bandgap, further reducing OFF-state leakage and enhancing overall device switching performance.
The DIBL and subthreshold swing (SS) of the proposed S3-FinFET are plotted in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively. DIBL is calculated by measuring the change in threshold voltage (Vth) with respect to the change in drain voltage (VD), using the following formula [20]:
D I B L = V t h ( V D = l o w ) V t h ( V D = h i g h ) V D , h i g h V D , l o w
where Vth(VD=low) and Vth(VD=high) are the threshold voltages extracted at low and high drain biases, respectively. This parameter quantifies the extent to which the drain voltage influences the channel barrier, indicating short-channel effects.
The DIBL remains below 50 mV/V across the entire simulated gate length range, reflecting excellent suppression of drain-induced barrier lowering in the S3-FinFET. This performance is attributed to the serial capacitance effect of the three-layer spacer stack. Specifically, the low-k Si3N4 middle layer acts as a bottleneck that impedes the penetration of the drain’s electric field into the channel. As a result, a significant portion of the drain-induced voltage drops across the spacer itself, minimizing potential modulation of the channel barrier and enhancing threshold voltage stability under bias stress.
Meanwhile, the subthreshold swing exhibits minimal variation with changes in gate length and fin width, owing to the strong electrostatic insulation provided by the silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate and buried oxide (BOX) layer. These layers effectively block substrate-related parasitic effects, leading to consistent and improved subthreshold characteristics.
Figure 10 illustrates the gate-to-drain capacitance (Cgd) and total gate capacitance (Cgg) of the proposed S3-FinFET as functions of the gate voltage (VGS), while the cut-off frequency (fT) versus VGS is presented in Figure 11. The relatively low Cgd, commonly known as the Miller capacitance or feedback capacitance, plays a crucial role in minimizing delay and dynamic power consumption, especially in FPGA interconnects and logic switches where fast and efficient signal transitions are essential. The S3-FinFET exhibits good behavior in terms of gate-to-drain capacitance. Additionally, the total gate capacitance, Cgg, is the sum of Cgs and Cgd, reflecting both the intrinsic gate-channel coupling and parasitic capacitances. The near-linear variation of Cgg with VGS suggests stable gate modulation with minimal charge trapping effects across the operating voltage range, indicating reliable device behavior under different bias conditions.
The cut-off frequency (fT), calculated using a small-signal approximation, captures the high-frequency performance of the device. This figure of merit benefits from the combination of high transconductance and relatively low total gate capacitance, both resulting from the optimized gate electrostatics and spacer engineering in the S3-FinFET. Efficient coupling between the gate and the channel reduces capacitive delays, enabling the device to sustain high-speed operation, which is critical for RF and high-frequency digital applications.
Negative Bias Temperature Instability (NBTI) is a key reliability concern in transistors [21]. NBTI occurs when a device is subjected to negative gate bias (VG < 0) at elevated temperatures, which is typical during circuit operation. Over time, this stress causes the generation of interface traps and positive fixed charges in the gate dielectric near the interface. These defects lead to a shift in the threshold voltage (ΔVth), reducing drive current and degrading device performance. As device dimensions scale, quantum confinement pushes the inversion-layer charge centroid away from the interface [21]. Therefore, understanding and mitigating NBTI in a device’s structure is critical for ensuring long-term device reliability.
In this study, NBTI stress is simulated using Silvaco by applying a negative gate bias to the channel device to replicate the stress conditions responsible for NBTI degradation. Interface trap generation and recovery behavior are approximated using defined trap parameters at the Si/SiO2 interface within the simulation environment. Transient simulations are employed to observe the evolution of threshold voltage shift (ΔVth) during both stress and recovery intervals. This method enables an estimation of NBTI effects on device reliability under realistic operating conditions. The results are shown in Figure 12 and Figure 13. During NBTI stress, the threshold voltage shift (ΔVth) increases over time, mainly due to the continuous growth of interface traps. This causes ΔVth to worsen as stress time progresses. When the stress is stopped and recovery begins, ΔVth decreases gradually because of trap passivation and neutralization, but this recovery happens over a much longer time scale compared to the fast initial increase during stress.
The impacts of spacer height and length scaling are critical factors influencing the electrical performance of the proposed S3-FinFET structure. Figure 14 and Figure 15 show the effects of variations in spacer height and spacer length, respectively.
Increasing the spacer height in the proposed S3-FinFET, while keeping gate and spacer length fixed, reduces the gate’s ability to effectively control the channel. This weaker control allows more leakage current to flow when the transistor should be off, decreasing power efficiency. Additionally, as spacers’ heights increase, the aspect ratio of the spacer’s height to its length decreases, meaning that the spacer becomes relatively thinner compared to its height. This change in device geometry further contributes to increased leakage currents and degraded overall device performance.
Decreasing the spacer length brings the source and drain regions closer to the gate, which can improve short-channel control and enhance the ION/IOFF ratio. This happens because a narrower spacer reduces the distance between the gate and the lightly doped drain extension regions, allowing the gate to better suppress leakage and enhance drive current. However, too much reduction in spacer length can lead to parasitic capacitance increase and short-channel effects, which may eventually impair performance. Moderate spacer length scaling can therefore increase ION/IOFF.
To evaluate the advantages of the proposed S3-FinFET structure, a performance comparison was conducted with another configuration: a FinFET using only HfO2 as the spacer material. Key device parameters, including ION/IOFF ratio, drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL), and subthreshold swing (SS) are summarized in Table 2.
The S3-FinFET achieves a significantly higher ION/IOFF ratio, indicating that drive current is improved while low off-state leakage is maintained. Furthermore, the S3-FinFET exhibits markedly reduced DIBL and SS values, suggesting better electrostatic control and reduced short-channel effects. These results confirm that the S3 spacer configuration offers superior device performance compared to the FinFET with HfO2-only spacer.

4. Conclusions

This work presents the S3-FinFET, a novel junctionless SOI FinFET architecture featuring a stepped high-k three-layer spacer structure. The proposed design significantly enhances gate control and suppresses short-channel effects through improved fringe field coupling and electric field screening. TCAD simulation results demonstrate superior performance in terms of subthreshold swing, DIBL, ON/OFF current ratio, and high-frequency response when compared to conventional FinFET structures. The low Miller capacitance and high cut-off frequency make the device particularly attractive for FPGA applications, where reduced leakage and high-speed operation are essential. The compact and manufacturable design of the S3-FinFET makes it a promising candidate for energy-efficient, ultra-scaled logic components in next-generation reconfigurable systems.

Author Contributions

Software, M.M.; Writing—original draft, M.Z.; Writing—review & editing, A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jain, P.U.; Tomar, V.K. FinFET Technology: As a Promising Alternative for Conventional MOSFET Technology. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics (ESCI), Pune, India, 12–14 March 2020; pp. 43–47. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lamba, A.; Chaujar, R.; Deen, M.J. Negative capacitance FinFETs for low power applications: A review. Micro Nanostruct. 2025, 205, 208177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhao, F.; Li, Y.; Luo, H.; Jia, X.; Zhang, J.; Mao, X.; Li, Y. Stacked SiGe/Si I/O FinFET device preparation in a vertically stacked gate-all-around technology. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2023, 164, 107634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Singh, J.; Ciavatti, J.; Sundaram, K.; Wong, J.S.; Bandyopadhyay, A.; Zhang, X.; Li, S.; Bellaouar, A.; Watts, J.; Lee, J.G.; et al. 14-nm FinFET technology for analog and RF applications. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2018, 65, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mehrad, M.; Zareiee, M. Using hetro-structure window in nano scale junctionless SOI MOSFET for high electrical performance. ECS J. Solid-State Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 111005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Prasanth, S.; Patil, S.U.; Bhattacharyya, P. Performance investigation of different low power SRAM cell topologies using stacked-channel tri-gate junctionless FinFET. Microelectron. J. 2024, 142, 106122. [Google Scholar]
  7. Poovarasan, S.; Brindha, R. Survey of various techniques to reduce leakage power in FPGA. Int. J. Commun. Comput. Technol. 2016, 4, 19–22. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sasi, G.; Vayanaperumal, R. Performance comparison and analysis of signal integrity in an SoC based FPGA processor. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2014, 23, 20371–20382. [Google Scholar]
  9. El-Din, M.M.; Mostafa, H.; Fahmy, H.A.H.; Ismail, Y.; Abdelhamid, H. Performance evaluation of FinFET-based FPGA cluster under threshold voltage variation. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 13th International New Circuits and Systems Conference (NEWCAS), Grenoble, France, 7–10 June 2015; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rostami-Sani, S.; Khan, F.F.; Razzaq, A.; Ye, A. Measuring the accuracy of layout area estimation models of tile-based FPGAs in FinFET technology. In Proceedings of the 2020 30th International Conference on Field-Programmable Logic and Applications (FPL), Gothenburg, Sweden, 31 August–4 September 2020; pp. 181–184. [Google Scholar]
  11. Pal, R.S.; Sharma, S.; Dasgupta, S. Recent trend of FinFET devices and its challenges: A review. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Emerging Devices and Smart Systems (ICEDSS), Mallasamudram, India, 3–4 March 2017; pp. 150–154. [Google Scholar]
  12. Sani, S.R.; Razzaq, A.; Ye, A. Evaluating the impact of using multiple-metal layers on the layout area of switch blocks for tile-based FPGAs in FinFET 7 nm. ACM Trans. Reconfigurable Technol. Syst. 2024, 17, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sachid, A.B.; Chen, M.-C.; Hu, C. FinFET with high-κ spacers for improved drive current. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2016, 37, 852–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chakkikavil, A.; Kuruvilla, N.; Khan, A.; Hameed, S. Structural optimization of wavy FinFET for leakage reduction and performance enhancement. Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. J. 2017, 2, 913–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mallikarjunarao; Ranjan, R.; Pradhan, K.P.; Sahu, P.K. Dielectric engineered symmetric underlap double gate tunnel FET (DGTFET): An investigation towards variation of dielectric materials. Superlattices Microstruct. 2016, 96, 226–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Virani, H.G.; Adari, R.B.R.; Kottantharayil, A. Dual-spacer device architecture for the improvement of performance of silicon n-channel tunnel FETs. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2010, 57, 2410–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. S. C. SILVACO ATLAS Device Simulation Sofware, CA, USA, and O. A. Available online: https://silvaco.com (accessed on 1 January 2020).
  18. Ragnarsson, L.-Å.; Chiarella, T.; Togo, M.; Schram, T. Ultrathin EOT high-κ/metal gate devices for future technologies: Challenges, achievements and perspectives (invited). Microelectron. Eng. 2011, 88, 1317–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sreenivasulu, V.B.; Vadthiya, N. Performance Improvement of Spacer Engineered n-Type SOI FinFET at 3-nm Gate Length. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2021, 137, 153803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zareiee, M.; Mehrad, M. A reliable nano device with appropriate performance in high temperatures. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2017, 6, M50–M53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Schroder, D.K.; Babcock, J.A. Negative bias temperature instability: Road to cross in deep submicron silicon semiconductor manufacturing. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 94, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The proposed S3-FinFET (Stepped-Spacer Structured FinFET) structure.
Figure 1. The proposed S3-FinFET (Stepped-Spacer Structured FinFET) structure.
Micromachines 16 00867 g001
Figure 2. Top view of the proposed S3-FinFET transistor.
Figure 2. Top view of the proposed S3-FinFET transistor.
Micromachines 16 00867 g002
Figure 3. Transfer characteristics (ID–VGS) of the proposed S3-FinFET compared to a non-stepped three-spacer FinFET and a conventional FinFET with a single Si3N4 spacer.
Figure 3. Transfer characteristics (ID–VGS) of the proposed S3-FinFET compared to a non-stepped three-spacer FinFET and a conventional FinFET with a single Si3N4 spacer.
Micromachines 16 00867 g003
Figure 4. Output characteristics of S3-FinFET and conventional FinFET.
Figure 4. Output characteristics of S3-FinFET and conventional FinFET.
Micromachines 16 00867 g004
Figure 5. Transfer characteristics of S3-FinFET and conventional FinFET.
Figure 5. Transfer characteristics of S3-FinFET and conventional FinFET.
Micromachines 16 00867 g005
Figure 6. Output characteristics (ID–VDS) of the proposed S3-FinFET at VGS = 0.5 V and VGS = 1 V.
Figure 6. Output characteristics (ID–VDS) of the proposed S3-FinFET at VGS = 0.5 V and VGS = 1 V.
Micromachines 16 00867 g006
Figure 7. ION/IOFF ratio values of the S3-FinFET, showing peak performance exceeding 108 due to low leakage and efficient carrier injection.
Figure 7. ION/IOFF ratio values of the S3-FinFET, showing peak performance exceeding 108 due to low leakage and efficient carrier injection.
Micromachines 16 00867 g007
Figure 8. DIBL versus gate length for the S3-FinFET.
Figure 8. DIBL versus gate length for the S3-FinFET.
Micromachines 16 00867 g008
Figure 9. Subthreshold swing (SS) versus gate length for the S3-FinFET, demonstrating stable and low SS enabled by SOI isolation.
Figure 9. Subthreshold swing (SS) versus gate length for the S3-FinFET, demonstrating stable and low SS enabled by SOI isolation.
Micromachines 16 00867 g009
Figure 10. Gate-to-drain capacitance (Cgd) and total gate capacitance (Cgg) of the S3-FinFET versus VGS.
Figure 10. Gate-to-drain capacitance (Cgd) and total gate capacitance (Cgg) of the S3-FinFET versus VGS.
Micromachines 16 00867 g010
Figure 11. Cut-off frequency (fT) of the S3-FinFET versus VGS, highlighting high-speed performance enabled by optimized gate and spacer design.
Figure 11. Cut-off frequency (fT) of the S3-FinFET versus VGS, highlighting high-speed performance enabled by optimized gate and spacer design.
Micromachines 16 00867 g011
Figure 12. NBTI-induced threshold voltage shift during stress.
Figure 12. NBTI-induced threshold voltage shift during stress.
Micromachines 16 00867 g012
Figure 13. Threshold voltage recovery after removal of NBTI stress.
Figure 13. Threshold voltage recovery after removal of NBTI stress.
Micromachines 16 00867 g013
Figure 14. Spacer-height dependence of electrical performance in the S3-FinFET, showing the trade-off between leakage suppression and electrostatic control.
Figure 14. Spacer-height dependence of electrical performance in the S3-FinFET, showing the trade-off between leakage suppression and electrostatic control.
Micromachines 16 00867 g014
Figure 15. Impact of spacer length reduction on the ION/IOFF ratio, demonstrating improved gate control with optimal scaling.
Figure 15. Impact of spacer length reduction on the ION/IOFF ratio, demonstrating improved gate control with optimal scaling.
Micromachines 16 00867 g015
Table 1. Device parameters of the S3-FinFET used in TCAD simulations.
Table 1. Device parameters of the S3-FinFET used in TCAD simulations.
ParameterValue
Gate length (LG)5 nm
Fin length12 nm
Fin thickness (tFin)8 nm
Gate oxide thickness0.75 nm
HfO2 spacer height in gate side (HHFO2-G)8 nm
HfO2 spacer height in source/drain side (HHFO2-SD)4 nm
Si3N4 height6 nm
Spacer length4 nm
Source/drain doping1 × 1019 cm−3
Source/drain length12 nm
Buried oxide thickness80 nm
Table 2. Comparison of performance metrics between S3-FinFET and FinFET with HfO2-only spacer.
Table 2. Comparison of performance metrics between S3-FinFET and FinFET with HfO2-only spacer.
StructureION/IOFFDIBL (mV/V)SS (mV/dec)
S3-FinFET1.41 × 10936.266.3
FinFET with only HfO2 spacer9.34 × 10852.772.1
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zareiee, M.; Mehrad, M.; Tawfik, A. A Stepped-Spacer FinFET Design for Enhanced Device Performance in FPGA Applications. Micromachines 2025, 16, 867. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16080867

AMA Style

Zareiee M, Mehrad M, Tawfik A. A Stepped-Spacer FinFET Design for Enhanced Device Performance in FPGA Applications. Micromachines. 2025; 16(8):867. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16080867

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zareiee, Meysam, Mahsa Mehrad, and Abdulkarim Tawfik. 2025. "A Stepped-Spacer FinFET Design for Enhanced Device Performance in FPGA Applications" Micromachines 16, no. 8: 867. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16080867

APA Style

Zareiee, M., Mehrad, M., & Tawfik, A. (2025). A Stepped-Spacer FinFET Design for Enhanced Device Performance in FPGA Applications. Micromachines, 16(8), 867. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16080867

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop