Next Article in Journal
First-Principles Investigation of Excited-State Lattice Dynamics and Mechanical Properties in Diamond
Previous Article in Journal
High-Performance Two-Stage DC/DC Converter Based on LADRC-PI Hybrid Control for PEM Electrolyzer Hydrogen Production
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hybrid Energy Harvesting Applications of ZnO Nanorods for Future Implantable and Wearable Devices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Fabrication and Characterization of Self-Powered P-I-N Perovskite Photodetectors Using Yttrium-Doped Cuprous Thiocyanate

1
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
2
Center for Micro/Nano Science and Technology, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2025, 16(6), 666; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16060666
Submission received: 8 May 2025 / Revised: 26 May 2025 / Accepted: 29 May 2025 / Published: 31 May 2025

Abstract

:
In the first part of this study, Y2O3-doped copper thiocyanate (CuSCN) with different x wt% (named CuSCN-xY, x = 0, 1, 2, and 3) films were synthesized onto ITO substrates using the spin coating method. UV-vis, SEM, AFM, EDS, and cyclic voltammetry were used to investigate the material properties of the proposed films. The conductivity and carrier mobility of the films increased with additional yttrium doping. It was found that the films with 2% Y2O3 (CuSCN-2Y) have the smallest valence band edges (5.28 eV). Meanwhile, CuSCN-2Y films demonstrated the densest surface morphology and the smallest surface roughness (22.8 nm), along with the highest conductivity value of 764 S cm−1. Then, P-I-N self-powered UV photodetectors (PDs) were fabricated using the ITO substrate/ZnO seed layer/ZnO nanorod/CsPbBr3/CuSCN-xY/Ag structure, and the characteristics of the devices were measured. In terms of response time, the rise time and fall time were reduced from 26 ms/22 ms to 9 ms/5 ms; the responsivity was increased from 243 mA/W to 534 mA/W, and the on/off ratio was increased to 2.47 × 106. The results showed that Y2O3 doping also helped improve the P-I-N photodetector’s device performance, and the mechanisms were investigated. Compared with other published P-I-N self-powered photodetectors, our proposed devices show a fairly high on/off ratio, quick response times, and high responsivity and detectivity.

1. Introduction

With the evolution of human society and technological advances, sensors with low response times and high on/off ratios are becoming increasingly important. Self-powered photodetectors that do not require additional energy have also attracted widespread attention [1,2]. Photodetectors can be divided into infrared, visible light, and ultraviolet light sensors based on their wavelength bands. Ultraviolet light sensors have a wide range of applications, ranging from military missile tracking, communication, and flame detectors to ozone layer rupture detectors and ultraviolet sensing. Reported self-powered UV photodetectors have largely comprised P-N or P-I-N structures [3,4,5,6,7,8].
In P-I-N self-powered UV sensors, most of the materials used for the N layer include Ga2O3 [9], TiO2 [10], and ZnO [11,12]. Meanwhile, the materials used in the P layer could be MoO3 [13], NiO [14], CuO [15], or organic materials [16] such as Spiro-OMeTAD [17]. Lastly, the materials used in the I layer could be PEDOT [18], CsPbCl3 [19], and CsPbBr3 [20].
Among N-type materials, zinc oxide (ZnO) offers high stability, low cost, and a large bandwidth of 3.37 eV; furthermore, it belongs to the hexagonal close-packed (HCP) structure in the hexagonal crystalline system [21,22]. In addition, depending on the doping material, different optical bandgap energies of the zinc oxide can be obtained, and the nanostructures can be adjusted. Zinc oxide also has other advantages, such as high carrier mobility, low preparation temperature, non-toxicity, and ease of preparation, among others [23].
In layer I, the organic and inorganic perovskite materials [24,25] should have a high light absorption capacity, generate more photo-induced carriers, improve the separation efficiency of the carriers, and reduce the recombination. To date, there have been various methods employed to deposit the perovskite layer, including the sol–gel method, solid-state reaction, wet impregnation method, and spray drying method [26]. However, organic perovskite materials may degrade the composition and structure, as well as cause thermal and chemical instability due to moisture or oxygen in the manufacturing process. Therefore, the emergence of fully inorganic calcite materials, such as CsPbI3 and CsPbBr3, significantly improves the thermal and optical stability of illumination [27,28,29].
Fanglin Wang et al. proposed an asymmetric Y2O3-coated BFBD device in which the channel is covered by a layer of an Y2O3 film and an overlap between the Sc electrode and the Y2O3 film is designed. The Y2O3 film provides p-type doping to the channel. The overlap section increases the length of the base of the pn junction, and the diffusion current of holes is suppressed. Doping from the Y2O3 film provides a large forward current and stable photocurrent generation [30].
For the P-type layer, the most typical material for the hole transport layer is Spiro-OMeTAD. However, it is expensive and unstable. On the other hand, CuSCN, which is not expensive, has become one of the most desirable candidates to replace Spiro-OMeTAD. Copper thiocyanate (CuSCN) is an inorganic p-type semiconductor with the properties of high optical transparency, a wide bandgap (>3.4 eV), and good thermal stability [31,32], which makes CuSCN an ideal hole transport layer (HTL) for applications such as perovskite solar cells, organic photovoltaic devices, and organic light-emitting diodes [33,34,35]. The deposition of CuSCN thin films mainly includes electrochemical deposition, spray-coating, spin-coating, drop-casting, and ink-jet printing. However, the mobility of CuSCN films still needs to be improved. Doping with Co, Zn, F4TCNQ, and Cl2 can improve the conductivity of CuSCN [35,36,37]. On the other hand, Y2O3 is a transparent oxidized material with good thermal stability, which can be used as a surface passivation layer to improve surface defects and enhance the conductivity of the material [38,39]. However, the Y2O3 doping effects of CuSCN films are seldom discussed, which is one of the motivations of this study.
In this experiment, we continue our previous work [40]. Firstly, we prepared CuSCN doped with different proportions of Y2O3 via the sol–gel method to improve the hole mobility; then, we fabricated an ITO substrate/ZnO seed layer/ZnO nanorod/CsPbBr3/CuSCN-xY/Ag structure using the proposed CuSCN-based films as a P-type hole transport layer, which effectively improved the response of the device. The response time, switching ratio, and responsiveness of the device were effectively improved. The related mechanisms were also analyzed in detail.

2. Experimental Method and Characterization

Part 1: CuSCN film synthesis
We pretreated the ITO glass substrate using a series of organic solvents (including deionized water, ethanol, and isopropanol) for the ITO section. We treated the ITO surface with UV–ozone for 20 min.
Figure 1 shows the schematic diagram of CuSCN films doped with Y2O3. CuSCN films were synthesized using the spin-coating method. CuSCN powders of 140 mg were dissolved in 4 mL of diethyl sulfide with 0% wt, 1% wt, 2% wt, and 3% wt of Y2O3 before being spin-coated on the ITO substrates for 30 s at 5000 rpm. Then, the samples with a thickness of 100 nm were heated to 80 °C for 30 min.
Part 2: P-I-N photodetector fabrications
Figure 2 shows the structure of the device. The zinc oxide seed layer was prepared using the atomic layer deposition method (ALD). Diethylzinc (DEZn) and water vapor (DI) were used as Zn and O precursors, respectively. Argon gas was injected into the ALD chamber for purging after each reaction step, and the pulse duration was set to 0.1 s for DEZn and 5 s for DI. The total number of cycles for the growth of the ZnO seed layer was maintained at approximately 500 per growth in order to achieve a thickness of around 100 nm. The temperature of the substrate was set at 80 °C.
In the ZnO nanostructure section, the hydrothermal method was used, with 1.09 g of zinc acetate and 0.41 g of hexamethylamine added to 100 mL of deionized water. The samples with the ZnO seed layer were placed into a hydrothermal autoclave reactor. Then, it was heated in an oven at 80 °C for 4 h.
For the perovskite film section, a PbBr2 solution consisting of 3.67 g PbBr2 was poured into a bottle, along with 4 mL of DMF and 6 mL of DMSO mixed solvent. The temperature was set to 75 °C. The CsBr solution consisted of 1.48 g of CsBr poured into a 100 mL volumetric flask, with anhydrous methanol added before the flask was closed tightly. The sample was spin-coated with approximately 100 μL of PbBr2 at 3000 rpm for 30 s and annealed for 30 min at 75 °C. Then, the sample was soaked in CsBr for 15 min and annealed for 5 min at 250 °C. The thickness of the film was about 400 nm.
CuSCN films were synthesized via the spin-coating method; CuSCN powder was dissolved in diethyl sulfide and mixed with different proportions of yttrium in spin-coats at 5000 rpm for 30 s. Finally, the 100 nm silver electrode was deposited at a plating rate of 4.0 Å/s [1].
Field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, HITACHI SU8000, The HITACHI SU8000 is manufactured in Japan by HITACHI.) was used to characterize the morphology of the CuSCN-xY films. A UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-3000) was used to measure the absorption spectra of the CuSCN-xY films at different doping concentrations. The elemental composition of CuSCN-xY films was analyzed using a multi-function environmental field emission scanning electron microscope (EDS, HITACHI SU-5000). The roughness of the CuSCN-xY films was measured using an atomic force microscope (AFM). Conductivity was measured using 4155C and determined via the two-point probe method. The electrochemical properties of the samples were investigated via cyclic voltammetry (CV) tests using a software-controlled conventional three-electrode electrochemical cell (Autolab PGSTAT302N) consisting of the as-prepared samples as the working electrode, Ag/AgCl as the reference electrode, a Pt foil as the counter electrode, and a 0.1 M KCl solution as the electrolyte at room temperature. A potential window in the range from 0 V to +0.4 V was used in all the measurements. The CV measurements were performed at different scan rates at 100 mV/s. The current/time (I-t) characteristics were measured using a Hitachi F-7000 as the light source and a 4155C as the current meter. The monochromatic light provided by the spectrometer was used to measure the response time, photocurrent, and dark current of the PD. The PD was irradiated with low-intensity UV light (2.558 mW/cm2).

3. Discussion and Results

Figure 3 shows the cyclic voltammetry diagram of the proposed CuSCN-based films. The increase in current with increasing doping concentration indicates an enhancement of redox reactions, which is presumed to result from Y doping increasing the hole density in the CuSCN electrode. From Figure 3, the oxidation onset value Eox of the films can be obtained as shown in Table 1.
The valence band edges of the films were calculated according to Equation (1) as follows:
Valence band edge = −{(0.22 + 4.5) + Eox}
where 4.5 is the difference between the potential of the standard hydrogen electrode and vacuum, and 0.22 is the potential difference between silver chloride and the standard hydrogen electrode. Table 1 shows the calculated valence band edge of the proposed films. We can see from Table 1 that the oxidation onset value tends to decrease as the doping concentration is increased, and the valence band edge decreases from 5.32 eV (CuSCN-0Y) to 5.26 eV (CuSCN-3Y). Yttrium exhibits multi-coordination, in contrast to the single coordination observed in copper within CuSCN. The unique properties of yttrium facilitate robust bonding with thiocyanate counter ions, consequently leading to a weakened SCN–Cu bond. This phenomenon introduces alternative energy pathways for electronic excitation, resulting in reduced photon energy required for excitation within a diminished modified band gap [41,42].
Figure 4a shows the energy bandgaps derived from the absorption spectra of CuSCN films. The Tauc method is used to obtain the bandgap. We observe that the energy gap of CuSCN-0Y is 3.68 eV; with the doping of Y2O3, the minimum energy gap of 3.43 eV is obtained at 2%, which indicates that the doped of Y2O3 decreases the band gap of CuSCN. As the doping concentration increases, the valence band also decreases and reduces the energy gap, as shown in Table 1. The conductivity at 2% doping Y2O3 measured using 4155C shows a maximum value of 764 S cm−1. Additionally, we obtained the band gap using the Tauc equation and determined the conduction band based on the previously obtained valence band. Using the band gap, valence band, and conduction band, we constructed the diagram shown in Figure 4b.
The SEM photographs of CuSCN films are shown in Figure 5a–d, and it can be found that the quality of the films becomes better when the doping ratio increases; the highest quality of the films is obtained when the doping is 2% Y2O3. When doped with 1% Y2O3, the surface morphology is improved. When doped with 2% Y2O3, a denser film is formed on the surface. When doped with 3% Y2O3, the grain size and distribution are differentiated, and more clusters are formed on the surface.
Table 2 shows the EDS of CuSCN films. As the Y2O3 doping ratio increases, it can be seen that the atomic percentages of mixed sulfur atoms, carbon atoms, and nitrogen atoms are basically the same for each of them, whereas the atomic percentage of Cu decreases from 19.61 at.% to 9.74 at.%, 9.25 at.%, and 8.21 at.% when Y2O3 content is changed from 0 at.%, 1.01 at.%, 2.10 at.%, and 2.83 at.%, indicating that Y atoms replace some of the Cu atoms, resulting in a decrease in the Cu percentage.
Figure 6 shows the AFM diagram of all the films. It is observed that the Ra of CuSCN-0Y and CuSCN-2Y is 31.6 and 22.8 nm. When we doped 3% Y2O3, the roughness increased to 41.6 nm, which is in agreement with the SEM data. From the SEM and AFM results, it is suggested that the maximum solubility of the Y2O3 doping is about 2 wt%. Figure 7 shows the I-t diagram of the devices with different CuSCN HTLs measured with a light source at 360 nm. It can be observed that the photocurrent is 1.26 × 10−6 A for the device using CuSCN-0Y as HTL, and the highest photocurrent of 3.51 × 10−6 A is obtained when CuSCN-2Y is used. Detailed device performances are shown in Table 3. The highest on/off ratios of 2.47 × 106 were obtained at 2% Y2O3. After 3% doping of Y2O3, the on/off ratio decreased, which may be due to defects in the surface clusters. This corresponds to the poor surface roughness at 3%, which affects the interfacial quality between the HTL and the active layer. An excessively rough surface may lead to an increase in interfacial defects, which, in turn, leads to an increase in the carrier recombination rate and a decrease in the photogenerated charge collection efficiency. In order to further evaluate the detection performance of each device in a comprehensive manner, the responsivity can be calculated by the equation R (λ) = (Iλ − Id)/(Pλ S), where R (λ) is the responsivity, Iλ is the UV-irradiated photocurrent, Id is the dark current, and Pλ S represents the illumination power intensity and effective light area. The other important PD parameter, detectivity, is based on the equation D = (R × S1/2)/(2 eId)1/2, where e is the Planck constant. We obtained a detectivity of 2.03 × 1012 Jones in CuSCN-2Y, while responsivity was 685 mA/W at 0 V bias, and the enhancement of these characteristics is attributed to increased mobility resulting in faster carrier movement.
Figure 8 demonstrates the I-t spectra of the devices after 2 weeks in the atmospheric environment. When the devices are placed for two weeks, the current value becomes about 0.8 times the original one. This is because CuSCN is a hydrophobic material that protects the perovskite layer from water vapor erosion.
Table 4 shows the device performance comparison with the published P-I-N self-powered UV photodetectors. Our devices show the highest on/off ratio, quickest rise time/fall time, and highest responsivity and detectivity. The best rise time/fall time we obtained was 9 ms/5 ms. Responsivity was 685 mA/W, and we obtained a detectivity of 2.03 × 1012 Jones.

4. Conclusions

In the first part of this study, copper thiocyanate (CuSCN) doped with Y2O3 was synthesized using the spin coating method, and the EDS analysis proved that Y2O3 was doped into CuSCN to increase the electrical conductivity by replacing copper. We determined that the Y2O3 mixed at 2% has the smallest valence band edge (5.28 eV). Meanwhile, with the increase in the mixing ratio, the densest surface morphology and the most compact surface morphology were obtained at 2%. In terms of conductivity, the highest value of 764 S cm−1 was obtained.
Then, we fabricated a P-I-N self-powered UV photodetector using CuSCN-based films as the HTL. The rise and fall times were reduced to 9 ms/5 ms in response time; the responsivity increased to 685 mA/W; and the on/off ratio increased to 2.47 × 106. These results show that mixing Y2O3 enhances the device performance of P-I-N photodetectors by improving the carrier mobility of the HTL.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-H.W.; validation, S.-Y.C.; writing—original draft preparation, J.-H.W.; writing—review and editing, B.-C.C. and S.-Y.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lin, B.; Fu, Z.; Jia, Y. Green luminescent center in undoped zinc oxide films deposited on silicon substrates. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 79, 943–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ahmad, B.E.; Mohamad, H.W.; Noha, G. Fibroblast growth factor-23 is independently associated with the left ventricular mass index in hemodialysis patients. Kasr Al Ainy Med. J. 2018, 24, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Chu, J.; Wang, Z.; Guan, L.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, R. Integrated polarization dependent photodetector and its application for polarization navigation. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2014, 26, 469–472. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang, Q.; Chang, J.; Cong, Z.; Wang, Z. Application of quartz tuning fork in photodetector based on photothermal effect. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2019, 31, 1592–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zeng, Y.; Huang, H.; Zhao, X.; Ding, M.; Hou, X.; Zou, Y.; Du, J.; Liu, J.; Yu, S.; Han, K.; et al. Self-Powered a-SnO x/c-Ga2O3 Pn Heterojunction Solar-Blind Photodetector with High Responsivity and Swift Response Speed. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 2023, 44, 2003–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huo, T.-t.; Zhang, D.-d.; Shi, X.-l.; Pan, Y.; Sun, L.; Su, Y. High-performance self-powered photodetectors based on the carbon nanomaterial/GaAs vdW heterojunctions. Chin. Opt. 2022, 15, 373. [Google Scholar]
  7. Guo, D.; Su, Y.; Shi, H.; Li, P.; Zhao, N.; Ye, J.; Wang, S.; Liu, A.; Chen, Z.; Li, C.; et al. Self-powered ultraviolet photodetector with superhigh photoresponsivity (3.05 A/W) based on the GaN/Sn: Ga2O3 pn junction. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 12827–12835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wu, H.; Ma, C.; Zhang, J.; Cao, H.; Lin, R.; Bai, W.; Pan, Z.; Yang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y.; et al. High-performance photodetectors with an ultrahigh photoswitching ratio and a very fast response speed in self-powered Cu2ZnSnS4/CdS PN heterojunctions. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2021, 3, 4135–4143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pintor-Monroy, M.I.; Barrera, D.; Murillo-Borjas, B.L.; Ochoa-Estrella, F.J.; Hsu, J.W.; Quevedo-Lopez, M.A. Tunable electrical and optical properties of nickel oxide (NiO x) thin films for fully transparent NiO x–Ga2O3 p–n junction diodes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 38159–38165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mahala, P.; Patel, M.; Ban, D.-K.; Nguyen, T.T.; Yi, J.; Kim, J. High-performing self-driven ultraviolet photodetector by TiO2/Co3O4 photovoltaics. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 827, 154376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Tsai, S.-Y.; Hon, M.-H.; Lu, Y.-M. Fabrication of transparent p-NiO/n-ZnO heterojunction devices for ultraviolet photodetectors. Solid-State Electron. 2011, 63, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Patel, M.; Kim, H.-S.; Kim, J.; Yun, J.-H.; Kim, S.J.; Choi, E.H.; Park, H.-H. Excitonic metal oxide heterojunction (NiO/ZnO) solar cells for all-transparent module integration. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. cells 2017, 170, 246–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xu, Y.; Shen, H.; Li, Y.; Yue, Z.; Zhang, W.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, Z. Self-powered and fast response MoO3/n-Si photodetectors on flexible silicon substrates with light-trapping structures. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. 2022, 4, 4641–4652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sarcan, F.; Doğan, U.; Althumali, A.; Vasili, H.B.; Lari, L.; Kerrigan, A.; Kuruoğlu, F.; Lazarov, V.K.; Erol, A. A novel NiO-based pin ultraviolet photodiode. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 934, 167806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Y.; Wei, X.; Yang, Q.; Zhang, J.; Wang, W.; Dong, L.; Gao, B.; Li, C.; Sun, X.; Ma, Y. Fast-response self-powered flexible transparent ultraviolet photodetectors based on a CuO/ZnO nanowire array heterojunction. New J. Chem. 2023, 47, 6397–6404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Serkjan, N.; Liu, X.; Abdiryim, T.; Liu, F.; Zhang, H.; Kadir, A.; Liu, Y.; Tang, X.; Cheng, Q. Organic-inorganic face-to-face ZnO NRs-based self-powered UV photodetectors: Heterojunction with poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxyselenophene) and enhanced responsivity by carbon quantum dots. Carbon 2023, 204, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Luo, G.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, W.; Zhang, J.; Hao, X.; Wang, W. Enhanced performance of ZnO nanorod array/CuSCN ultraviolet photodetectors with functionalized graphene layers. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 7682–7692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zheng, Z.; Wang, W.; Wu, F.; Wang, Z.; Shan, M.; Zhao, Y.; Liu, W.; Jian, P.; Dai, J.; Lu, H.; et al. Flexible assembly of the PEDOT: PSS/exfoliated β-Ga2O3 microwire hybrid heterojunction for high-performance self-powered solar-blind photodetector. Opt. Express 2022, 30, 21822–21832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, Y.; Cheng, X.; Tu, D.; Gong, Z.; Li, R.; Yang, Y.; Zheng, W.; Xu, J.; Deng, S.; Chen, X. Engineering the bandgap and surface structure of CsPbCl3 nanocrystals to achieve efficient ultraviolet luminescence. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 9693–9698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, J.; Yang, F.; Ding, G.; Hong, X.; Yang, Q. Large Orthorhombic Polyhedral CsPbBr3 Nanocrystals for Ultrasensitive Photodetectors with Type-I Structures. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2023, 8, 2300252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chen, X.; Huang, S.; Nasiri, N. Facile fabrication of UV photodetectors using spin-coating flame-synthesized ZnO nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 3589–3600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kislov, A.N.; Zatsepin, A.F. Structural and vibrational properties of wurtzite ZnO with oxygen-deficient defects: Ab initio and potential-based calculations. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2023, 25, 16354–16362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Wagner, R.S.; Ellis, W.C. Vapor-liquid-solid mechanism of single crystal growth. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1964, 4, 89–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, Y.; Cai, Z.; Hua, X.-N.; Sun, B. Novel One-Dimensional Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Halide Perovskite Material with Coexistence of High Phase Transition Temperature and Corresponding Dielectric Response. J. Phys. Chem. C 2024, 128, 3400–3407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhong, J.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; Kong, A.; Tan, Q.; Fan, J.; Peng, Y.; Liang, G.; Ku, Z. Enhancing Organic–Inorganic Perovskite Thin Film Crystallization via Vapor–Solid Reaction by Modifying PbI2 Precursors Films with Pyridinium Trifluoromethanesulfonate. Sol. RRL 2024, 8, 2400016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hossain, M.K.; Mohammed, M.K.; Pandey, R.; Arnab, A.; Rubel, M.; Hossain, K.; Ali, M.H.; Rahman, M.F.; Bencherif, H.; Madan, J. Numerical analysis in DFT and SCAPS-1D on the influence of different charge transport layers of CsPbBr3 perovskite solar cells. Energy Fuels 2023, 37, 6078–6098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhou, Q.; Liu, X.; Liu, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Lu, J.; Chen, Z.; Li, C.; Wang, J.; Xue, Q.; He, F.; et al. Annual research review of perovskite solar cells in 2023. Mater. Futures 2024, 3, 022102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Kan, M.; Zhao, Y. Bifunctional stabilization of all-inorganic α-CsPbI3 perovskite for 17% efficiency photovoltaics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018, 140, 12345–12348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, W.; Zhang, J.; Xu, G.; Xue, R.; Li, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Hou, J.; Li, Y. A semitransparent inorganic perovskite film for overcoming ultraviolet light instability of organic solar cells and achieving 14.03% efficiency. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, F.; Xu, H.; Huang, H.; Ma, Z.; Wang, S.; Peng, L.-M. Performance improvement induced by asymmetric Y2O3-coated device structure to carbon-nanotube-film based photodetectors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 111, 193105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jaffe, J.E.; Kaspar, T.C.; Droubay, T.C.; Varga, T.; Bowden, M.E.; Exarhos, G.J. Electronic and defect structures of CuSCN. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 9111–9117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kumara, G.; Konno, A.; Senadeera, G.; Jayaweera, P.; De Silva, D.; Tennakone, K. Dye-sensitized solar cell with the hole collector p-CuSCN deposited from a solution in n-propyl sulphide. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2001, 69, 195–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Garnier, J.; Parize, R.; Appert, E.; Chaix-Pluchery, O.; Kaminski-Cachopo, A.; Consonni, V. Physical properties of annealed ZnO nanowire/CuSCN heterojunctions for self-powered UV photodetectors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 5820–5829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ashtar, M.; Yang, J.; Yang, Y.; Al-Ahmary, K.M.; Cao, D. Improved photodetection performance of self-powered UV photodetector based on PZT/CuSCN heterojunction. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2024, 270, 112812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Taleghani, N.M.; Heydari, Z.; Madani, M.; Nasiri, A.F.; Kolahdouz, M.; Abdy, H. Study of metal-Co/Zn-doped CuSCN contacts for efficient hole transport in perovskite solar cells. Opt. Mater. 2022, 133, 113009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liang, J.-W.; Firdaus, Y.; Azmi, R.; Faber, H.; Kaltsas, D.; Kang, C.H.; Nugraha, M.I.; Yengel, E.; Ng, T.K.; De Wolf, S.; et al. Cl2-doped CuSCN Hole transport layer for organic and perovskite solar cells with improved stability. ACS Energy Lett. 2022, 7, 3139–3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Luo, X.; Huang, Z.; Zhong, Z.; Quan, H.; Peng, F.; An, K.; Li, N.; Ying, L. Improving performance of organic photodetectors by using TCNQ doped copper thiocyanate as the anode interfacial layer. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2024, 12, 2301929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Baskut, S.; Ozer, S.C.; Turan, S. The effects of in-situ formed phases on the microstructure, mechanical properties and electrical conductivity of spark plasma sintered B4C containing Y2O3. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 42, 1272–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sun, Q.; Liu, T.; Wen, T.; Yu, J. Optimization of particle size, dispersity, and conductivity of 8 mol% Y2O3 doped tetragonal zirconia polycrystalline nanopowder prepared by modified sol-gel method via activated carbon absorption. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 42, 5831–5841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Liu, Y.-H.; Wang, L.-W.; Wang, J.-H.; Wu, T.-Y.; Huang, Y.-T.; Chu, S.-Y. The fabrication of self-powered PIN perovskite photodetectors with high on-off ratio using cuprous thiocyanate as hole transport layer. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2023, 362, 114614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Baig, S.; Hendsbee, A.D.; Kumar, P.; Ahmed, S.; Li, Y. Yttrium-doped CuSCN thin film transistor: Synthesis and optoelectronic characterization study. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 14543–14554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wu, M.-K.; Ashburn, J.R.; Torng, C.; Hor, P.-H.; Meng, R.L.; Gao, L.; Huang, Z.J.; Wang, Y.; Chu, a. Superconductivity at 93 K in a new mixed-phase Y-Ba-Cu-O compound system at ambient pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 58, 908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chen, W.; Xu, X.; Li, M.; Kuang, S.; Zhang, K.H.; Cheng, Q. A fast self-powered solar-blind ultraviolet photodetector realized by Ga2O3/GaN PIN heterojunction with a fully depleted active region. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2023, 11, 2202847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kan, H.; Zheng, W.; Fu, C.; Lin, R.; Luo, J.; Huang, F. Ultrawide band gap oxide nanodots (Eg > 4.8 eV) for a high-performance deep ultraviolet photovoltaic detector. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 6030–6036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Xu, C.; Du, Z.; Huang, Y.; Dong, M.; Lin, R.; Li, Y.; Wang, B.; Zheng, W.; Huang, F. Amorphous-MgGaO film combined with graphene for vacuum-ultraviolet photovoltaic detector. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 42681–42687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xue, M.; Zhou, H.; Ma, G.; Yang, L.; Song, Z.; Zhang, J.; Wang, H. Investigation of the stability for self-powered CsPbBr3 perovskite photodetector with an all-inorganic structure. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2018, 187, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of thin films of CuSCN doped with Y2O3.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of thin films of CuSCN doped with Y2O3.
Micromachines 16 00666 g001
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of device structure.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram of device structure.
Micromachines 16 00666 g002
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammetry plots of the films.
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammetry plots of the films.
Micromachines 16 00666 g003
Figure 4. (a) Tauc plots and (b) energy band plots of CuSCN-based films with different Y2O3 doping concentrations.
Figure 4. (a) Tauc plots and (b) energy band plots of CuSCN-based films with different Y2O3 doping concentrations.
Micromachines 16 00666 g004
Figure 5. SEM images of CuSCN films with different Y2O3 dopings: (a) 0% Y2O3, (b) 1% Y2O3, (c) 2% Y2O3, and (d) 3% Y2O3.
Figure 5. SEM images of CuSCN films with different Y2O3 dopings: (a) 0% Y2O3, (b) 1% Y2O3, (c) 2% Y2O3, and (d) 3% Y2O3.
Micromachines 16 00666 g005
Figure 6. AFM diagrams of (a) 0%, (b) 2%, (c) 2%, and (d) 3% doping ratios of Y2O3.
Figure 6. AFM diagrams of (a) 0%, (b) 2%, (c) 2%, and (d) 3% doping ratios of Y2O3.
Micromachines 16 00666 g006
Figure 7. I-t diagram of the devices at 0 V bias voltage.
Figure 7. I-t diagram of the devices at 0 V bias voltage.
Micromachines 16 00666 g007
Figure 8. I-t spectra of the devices using CuSCN-2Y as the HTL after 2 weeks in the atmospheric environment.
Figure 8. I-t spectra of the devices using CuSCN-2Y as the HTL after 2 weeks in the atmospheric environment.
Micromachines 16 00666 g008
Table 1. Energy bandgaps, valence/conduction band edges, and conductivity of CuCSN-based films.
Table 1. Energy bandgaps, valence/conduction band edges, and conductivity of CuCSN-based films.
Doped RatioEoxEg (eV)Valence Band Edge (eV)Conduction Band Edge (eV)Conductivity
(S cm−1)
0%0.603.685.321.64218
1%0.573.515.291.78516
2%0.563.435.281.85764
3%0.543.495.261.77654
Table 2. EDS of CuSCN-based films.
Table 2. EDS of CuSCN-based films.
Doping RatioCu (at.%)S (at.%)C (at.%)N (at.%)Y2O3 (at.%)
0%19.6114.941.0623.730
1%9.746.2338.4244.61.01
2%9.256.138.3344.212.10
3%8.215.9638.344.72.83
Table 3. Parameters of device performances with different CuSCN-based HTLs.
Table 3. Parameters of device performances with different CuSCN-based HTLs.
Y2O3Light Current
(μA)
Dark Current
(pA)
On/Off Ratio
(106)
Rise Time (ms)/Fall Time (ms)Responsivity
(mA/W)
Detectivity
(1012 Jones)
0%1.261.360.92626/224521.37
1%2.171.571.38×23/195211.47
2%3.511.422.47×9/56852.03
3%2.621.521.72×20/175861.68
Table 4. Comparison with other published P-I-N self-powered photodetectors.
Table 4. Comparison with other published P-I-N self-powered photodetectors.
On/Off RatioResponsivity
(mA/W)
Rise Time
/Fall Time
Detectivity
(Jones)
ITO/ZnO/CsPbBr3/CuSCN mixing Y2O3/Ag [This work] (0v@360 nm)2.47 × 1066859 ms
/5 ms
2.03 × 1012
p-GaN/i-Ga2O3/n-Ga2O3 (0v@360 nm) [43]1.88 × 104497 ms
/19 ms
1.22 × 1012
Graphene/γ-Ga2O3/SiC (0v@250 nm) [44]325.830 ms
/196 ms
7.6 × 1010
Graphene/MgZnO/SiC (0v@260 nm) [45]226.42.6478.2 ms
/162 ms
-
ITO/ZnO/CsPbBr3/CuSCN/Ag [This work] (0v@360 nm) [40]3.96 × 106497.9<10 ms6.81 × 1010
ZnO NRs/CsPbBr3/MoO3/Au [46]450300200 ms/500 ms-
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, J.-H.; Chen, B.-C.; Chu, S.-Y. The Fabrication and Characterization of Self-Powered P-I-N Perovskite Photodetectors Using Yttrium-Doped Cuprous Thiocyanate. Micromachines 2025, 16, 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16060666

AMA Style

Wang J-H, Chen B-C, Chu S-Y. The Fabrication and Characterization of Self-Powered P-I-N Perovskite Photodetectors Using Yttrium-Doped Cuprous Thiocyanate. Micromachines. 2025; 16(6):666. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16060666

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Jai-Hao, Bo-Chun Chen, and Sheng-Yuan Chu. 2025. "The Fabrication and Characterization of Self-Powered P-I-N Perovskite Photodetectors Using Yttrium-Doped Cuprous Thiocyanate" Micromachines 16, no. 6: 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16060666

APA Style

Wang, J.-H., Chen, B.-C., & Chu, S.-Y. (2025). The Fabrication and Characterization of Self-Powered P-I-N Perovskite Photodetectors Using Yttrium-Doped Cuprous Thiocyanate. Micromachines, 16(6), 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16060666

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop