Next Article in Journal
The Principle and Application of Achromatic Metalens
Previous Article in Journal
Common Food-Wrap Film as a Cost-Effective and Readily Available Alternative to Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) Membranes for Microfluidic On-Chip Valves and Pumps
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Time-Dependent Growth of Sputtered MoS2 Films on ZnO Nanorods for Enhanced NO2 Sensing Performance

1
School of Basic and Applied Sciences, K.R. Mangalam University, Gurugram 122103, Haryana, India
2
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
3
Department of Engineering and System Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu 300044, Taiwan
4
State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Atomic-Level Manufacturing, School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Micromachines 2025, 16(6), 659; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16060659
Submission received: 30 April 2025 / Revised: 26 May 2025 / Accepted: 28 May 2025 / Published: 30 May 2025

Abstract

Molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) has gained attention for its promising gas-sensing capabilities due to its high surface area and tunable electronic properties. In this study, we investigate the time-dependent growth (under constant conditions) of sputtered MoS2 films on ZnO nanorods and their impact on NO2 sensing performance. ZnO nanorods, synthesized via a hydrothermal method, provide a high-surface-area template to enhance charge transport and gas adsorption. Gas-sensing experiments revealed a strong correlation between MoS2 thickness and NO2 response, with the 25-min-sputtered MoS2 film exhibiting the highest response of 20.9%. The synergistic interaction between MoS2 and ZnO nanorods facilitated charge transfer and enhanced adsorption sites for NO2 molecules. These findings emphasize the critical role of time-dependent growth of MoS2 film in modulating gas-sensing performance and provide insights into designing high-sensitivity NO2 sensors at room temperature. This study contributes to the development of hybrid MoS2/ZnO nanostructures for next-generation environmental monitoring applications.

1. Introduction

Air pollution has become a significant environmental and public health concern due to the increasing release of hazardous gases from industrial, vehicular, and agricultural activities [1]. Among these pollutants, nitrogen dioxide (NO2) is a highly toxic gas known for its adverse effects on human health and the environment [2]. Exposure to even low concentrations of NO2 can cause respiratory disorders, cardiovascular diseases, and contribute to the formation of acid rain and photochemical smog [3]. Major sources of NO2 emissions include automobile exhausts, industrial combustion processes, and agricultural waste decomposition [4]. Sensors play a vital role in detecting chemical, biological, and environmental changes across diverse applications [5]. Given its harmful impact, the development of reliable, highly sensitive, and selective gas sensors for NO2 detection is crucial for real-time environmental monitoring and pollution control [6]. In this regard, semiconductor-based gas sensors have gained significant attention due to their low cost, high sensitivity, and ease of fabrication [7]. Over the past two decades, semiconductor metal–oxide nanomaterials (SMONs) such as ZnO [8,9], SnO2 [10], TiO2 [11], WO3 [12], and In2O3 [13] have been widely explored as chemoresistive gas sensors due to their high sensitivity, fast response, low power consumption, cost-effective synthesis, and miniaturization potential. Among them, ZnO-based sensors have gained significant attention [14,15].
Transition-metal dichalcogenide (TMD)-based materials have emerged as promising candidates for a wide range of applications, including transistors, gas sensors, wearable electronics, energy storage, and catalysis [16,17,18]. TMDs possess a thickness-dependent bandgap and exceptional thermal stability, which enhance charge transport and gas adsorption properties, making them ideal candidates for next-generation sensing technologies. Among various TMDs, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) has been extensively investigated for gas-sensing applications in various forms, including monolayer and multilayer nanosheets, liquid-phase exfoliated sensors on flexible substrates, and atomic layer deposition-based sensors [19,20]. Since gas sensing primarily occurs at the material’s surface, various surface functionalization strategies such as doping, noble metal catalyst loading, metal oxide incorporation, and nanocomposite formation have been established as effective approaches to enhance sensing performance [21,22,23]. Among these, surface doping plays a crucial role as it not only influences the concentration of free charge carriers but also regulates their mobility. First-principles studies indicate that transition metal doping can significantly modify the electronic structure and magnetic properties while also improving gas molecule adsorption and activation, leading to enhanced sensor performance [24]. More recently, MoS2 deposited via direct current sputtering has been utilized as a NO2 sensor, where a transition from the as-deposited state to the oxidized state resulted in a decrease in conductance. Neetika et al. investigated a MoS2 (n-type)/Si (p-type) heterojunction-based NO2 gas sensor, reporting a response of less than 32% at 100 ppm NO2 when operated at 150 °C [25]. However, by optimizing the operating temperature, the sensor’s performance could be further enhanced. It is well-established that p–n or n–p heterojunction-based gas sensors are highly attractive due to their enhanced gas sensing performance, which arises from significant modulation in current across the junction [26].
In this study, MoS2/ZnO heterojunction nanorods were grown using the DC magnetron sputtering technique. The structural properties, surface morphology, and room-temperature NO2 gas-sensing properties of the as-grown ZnO nanorods and MoS2/ZnO heterojunction nanorods were systematically analyzed. The MoS2/ZnO heterostructure nanorods exhibited excellent gas-sensing performance, demonstrating their potential for the fabrication of high-efficiency room-temperature NO2 gas sensors.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Synthesis of ZnO Nanorods, MoS2 Films, and MoS2/ZnO Heterostructures

The electrodes were fabricated on a thermally oxidized silicon wafer using standard photolithography, electron-beam (e-beam) evaporation, and lift-off techniques. The interdigitated two-finger electrodes consist of a Ti (15 nm)/Au (300 nm) bilayer. The channel gap between the electrodes is 15 µm, which defines the active sensing region where the MoS2/ZnO composite was deposited. The growth of ZnO nanorods was realized by a hydrothermal method in our previous work [15]. The MoS2 target (2” diameter) with high purity (99.99%) was purchased from Ultimate Materials Technology Co., Ltd., (UMAT), Hsinchu, Taiwan. The base pressure of the sputtering chamber was maintained at approximately 1 × 10−6 Torr. Sputtering was performed using a DC power of 20 W in an argon atmosphere at a working pressure of 5 × 10−3 Torr [27]. MoS2 films were deposited at a substrate temperature of 400 °C with an Ar flow rate of 40 sccm. The film thickness was controlled by varying the deposition time to 2.5, 5, and 25 min, respectively. The resulting samples were labeled M1Z, M2Z, and M3Z, corresponding to the increasing deposition durations. The approximate deposition rate for our MoS2 film was around 2 nm/min. The schematic representations of the synthesis of MoS2/ZnO heterostructures are shown in Scheme 1.

2.2. Gas-Sensing Measurements

A 500 ppm NO2 gas diluted with N2 gas at a flow rate of 8 sccm was introduced into an 8 L chamber. The electrical measurements were obtained at an ambient pressure of 1 atm. All sensors operated at room temperature (27 °C). The sensor chip was mounted within a sensing module that included a 365 nm UV LED for activation. The relative humidity (RH) during gas sensing was maintained at 55% except for the humidity effect tests. For low RH (25%), dry air was introduced into the chamber and monitored using a humidity sensor. For high RH (85%), a homemade humidifier generated water vapor to achieve the desired level. The sensor current was measured at a 5 V bias using a source-measure unit (Keithley 2400). The sensing response A was calculated from the following equation.
A ( % ) = I g I a I a × 100 %
where Ig and Ia are the sensor currents in NO2 gas and air, respectively.

2.3. Characterization

The surface morphologies of the MoS2, ZnO, and MoS2/ZnO bilayer thin films were examined under a field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, JEOL JSM-6500F, Tokyo, Japan). Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS, Hitachi S-4800, Tokyo, Japan) was used to determine the elemental composition and mapping analysis. The chemical state information of the MoS2/ZnO heterojunction thin-film sample was determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Ulvac-PHI 5000 Versa Probe II, Chigasaki, Japan). Photoluminescence (PL) spectra were recorded using a Hitachi F-7000 (Tokyo, Japan) fluorescence spectrophotometer equipped with a 150 W Xe lamp and an excitation wavelength of 325 nm.

3. Results

3.1. Structural Properties

Figure 1a,b show the FE-SEM images of the MoS2 film grown by the sputtering method. The SEM image reveals a uniform and compact surface morphology with densely packed nanograins. The film exhibits a continuous structure without visible cracks, indicating good adhesion and coverage on the underlying substrate. The EDS spectrum (Figure 1c) confirms the presence of molybdenum (Mo) and sulfur (S) elements, indicating the successful deposition of MoS2 on the Si substrate. The ZnO nanorods, with an average diameter of approximately 100 nm, were uniformly distributed across the surface, as shown in the inset of Figure 1d. As the growth time increases, the flower-like morphology of MoS2 becomes more pronounced, with larger and more well-defined nanosheets forming due to the continued accumulation and crystallization of Mo and S atoms on the ZnO nanorod surface. Figure 1d presents a top-view SEM image of the ZnO nanorods, revealing their predominantly vertical growth with random orientations. As the MoS2 sputtering time increases, the surface of the nanorods becomes progressively rougher (Figure 1e), indicating the gradual deposition and coverage of MoS2 on the ZnO surface. The SEM image of the MoS2/ZnO heterostructure reveals a distinct flower-like morphology (shown in Figure 1f), where the MoS2 nanosheets are elegantly grown on the tips and sidewalls of vertically aligned ZnO nanorods. This petal-like arrangement of MoS2 gives the overall structure a floral appearance, enhancing the surface area and providing a high density of active sites. The growth of MoS2 on the tips of the ZnO nanorods occurs because the tips possess higher surface energy, increased density of dangling bonds, and often more oxygen vacancies compared to the sidewalls, making them energetically favorable sites for nucleation. During sputtering, the adatoms (Mo and S) tend to migrate and accumulate at these reactive tip sites, leading to the vertical growth of MoS2 nanosheets and the formation of a flower-like morphology.
The high-resolution XPS analysis of the MoS2/ZnO heterostructure sputtered for 25 min (M3Z) provides detailed insights into the elemental composition and chemical states of Mo, S, Zn, and O, as shown in Figure 2. The Mo 3d spectrum exhibits two prominent peaks at approximately 228.8 eV and 232 eV, corresponding to Mo 3d5/2 and Mo 3d3/2, respectively, confirming the presence of Mo in the +4 oxidation state. Additionally, two distinct peaks at 235.1 eV and 238.5 eV are observed, corresponding to the Mo6+ 3d5/2 and Mo6+ 3d3/2 states, respectively. These higher oxidation states are attributed to the presence of geometric edge defects (Figure 2a). The peak at the binding energy of 225.5 eV is primarily ascribed to S 2s. The S 2p spectrum shows peaks around 162.2 eV and 163.4 eV, attributed to S 2p3/2 and S 2p1/2, respectively, further validating the formation of MoS2 (Figure 2b). The Zn 2p spectrum reveals peaks at ~1021.6 eV and ~1044.7 eV, corresponding to Zn 2p3/2 and Zn 2p1/2, indicating the presence of Zn2+ in ZnO [28]. Additionally, the O 1s spectrum displays a peak near 530.1 eV, associated with lattice oxygen in ZnO, along with a shoulder at higher binding energy, which may be attributed to surface-adsorbed species or oxygen-related defects. No other impurity was observed on the surface of the sample other than Mo, S, Zn, and O elements. These results collectively confirm the successful deposition of MoS2 onto ZnO nanorods while maintaining the integrity of both components in the heterostructure.
Photoluminescence (PL) analysis reveals significant changes in the emission properties upon the formation of the MoS2/ZnO heterostructure (Figure 3a). For pristine ZnO nanorods, a strong near-band-edge (NBE) emission peak is observed at 392 nm, along with a broad visible emission attributed to oxygen vacancies. However, in the MoS2/ZnO heterostructure, the main emission peak shifts to 441 nm, indicating a strong interfacial interaction and possible charge transfer between MoS2 and ZnO. Additionally, the oxygen vacancy-related emission becomes narrower and less intense, suggesting a reduction in surface defects due to MoS2 coverage and improved passivation at the interface.
The current–voltage (I–V) characteristics of the MoS2/ZnO heterostructures with varying MoS2 sputtering times (M1Z, M2Z, and M3Z) were recorded under a bias voltage range of −5 V to +5 V (Figure 3b). All samples exhibit a linear I–V relationship, indicating ohmic contact behavior. However, the current decreases progressively with increasing sputtering time, with M1Z showing the highest current and M3Z the lowest. This decline in current can be attributed to the increasing thickness of the MoS2 layer, which may act as a barrier to charge transport by increasing resistance and limiting carrier mobility across the heterojunction. The denser MoS2 coverage at longer deposition times could also reduce the number of active charge transfer pathways between MoS2 and ZnO.

3.2. Gas-Sensing Characteristics

The NO2 gas-sensing performance of the MoS2/ZnO heterostructure samples (M1Z, M2Z, and M3Z) was evaluated at a concentration of 500 ppb, and the results demonstrate a significant enhancement in the response with increasing MoS2 deposition time. Among the three samples, M1Z (2.5-min sputtering) exhibited an average response of 7.2% (Figure 4a), while M2Z (5-min sputtering) showed a slightly higher response of 8.5% (Figure 4b), indicating the initial improvement in sensing performance with increased MoS2 coverage. Notably, the M3Z sample (25-min sputtering) displayed a substantial enhancement, achieving an average response of 20.9% (Figure 4c). This marked increase can be attributed to the well-developed flower-like MoS2 structure on the ZnO nanorods, which provides a larger surface area, more active sites, and improved charge separation, thereby facilitating more efficient adsorption and reaction with NO2 molecules. The hybrid heterostructure benefits from the synergistic effect between MoS2 and ZnO, where MoS2 acts as a p-type semiconductor and ZnO as an n-type, forming a p–n junction that enhances the gas-sensing response by promoting electron depletion in ZnO upon NO2 exposure. Furthermore, all samples demonstrated complete recovery after gas removal, highlighting their excellent reversibility and stability. A comparative response curve plotted over two cycles, as shown in Figure 4d, clearly illustrates the increasing trend in average response from M1Z to M3Z, validating the role of MoS2 thickness and morphology in tuning the gas-sensing behavior of the MoS2/ZnO heterostructures.
Humidity tests were conducted for the M3Z sample at relative humidity (RH) levels of 25%, 55%, and 85%, resulting in NO2 sensing responses of 34.6%, 20.9%, and 6.5%, respectively (Figure 5a). The observed decline in response to increasing humidity is attributed to the competitive adsorption of water molecules on the active sensing sites, which interferes with the adsorption and reaction of NO2 molecules on the MoS2/ZnO surface. Additionally, a selectivity test was performed using two representative gases, NO2 (an oxidizing gas) and NH3 (a reducing gas), at concentrations of 500 ppb and 5 ppm, respectively (Figure 5b). The sensor exhibited a significantly higher response to NO2 (20.9%) compared to NH3 (4.7%), highlighting its strong selectivity toward oxidizing gases. This enhanced selectivity can be attributed to the favorable charge transfer interactions between the electron-withdrawing NO2 and the p-type MoS2 in the MoS2/ZnO heterostructure, which leads to a more pronounced resistance change compared to the interaction with the electron-donating NH3.
Various MoS2/ZnO composite structures have been developed using different synthesis methods, as outlined in Table 1. Techniques such as hydrothermal growth, solvothermal methods, sputtering, and chemical vapor deposition (CVD) have been employed to tailor the morphology and interface of the heterostructures. Each method influences the structural and electronic properties, which directly impact device performance. Notably, sputtered MoS2 films on ZnO nanorods offer uniform coating and controlled thickness, making them suitable for sensing applications. These diverse fabrication strategies highlight the versatility of MoS2/ZnO composites for functional device development.

3.3. Gas-Sensing Mechanism

The gas-sensing mechanism of sputtered MoS2/ZnO heterostructures toward NO2 primarily relies on the modulation of charge carrier concentration at the interface of the p–n heterojunction formed between p-type MoS2 and n-type ZnO (Figure 6). When these two materials are combined, electrons from ZnO diffuse into MoS2 and holes from MoS2 diffuse into ZnO until their Fermi levels align, leading to the formation of a depletion region at the interface. This built-in electric field facilitates charge separation and enhances the sensitivity of the heterostructure. In air, oxygen molecules adsorb on the surface of the heterostructure and capture free electrons from ZnO, forming ionized oxygen species (O2), which further widen the depletion layer and decrease conductivity.
O 2 + e O 2 ( ads )
Upon exposure to NO2 gas, which is a strong oxidizing agent, additional electrons from the conduction band of ZnO and MoS2 are withdrawn due to the high electron affinity of NO2. This further increases the depletion width and significantly reduces the overall conductivity of the sensor.
NO 2 + e NO 2 ( ads )
When NO2 is pumped out from the system, the desorption of chemisorbed NO2 molecules occurs slowly under ambient conditions. However, under UV activation, the presence of photogenerated holes facilitates and accelerates the desorption process.
NO 2 + h + NO 2
In the MoS2/ZnO system, the flower-like morphology of MoS2 provides a high surface area and abundant active sites for gas adsorption, while the underlying ZnO nanorods offer rapid electron transport pathways. The synergistic effect between MoS2 and ZnO results in enhanced gas-sensing performance, including higher sensitivity and faster response/recovery. After the removal of NO2, the adsorbed species desorb from the surface, restoring the original electrical state, thus enabling full recovery of the sensor signal.

4. Conclusions

In this study, MoS2/ZnO heterostructures were successfully fabricated using a DC sputtering technique with varying MoS2 deposition durations. Structural and morphological analyses confirmed the uniform growth of flower-like MoS2 structures on vertically aligned ZnO nanorods, which enhanced the surface area and provided abundant active sites for gas interaction. XPS analysis verified the chemical states of Mo, S, Zn, and O, confirming the successful formation of the heterostructure. Photoluminescence measurements revealed a redshift in emission and a narrowing of oxygen vacancy-related peaks upon MoS2 decoration, indicating strong interfacial interactions. Notably, NO2 gas-sensing performance at 500 ppb significantly improved with longer sputtering times, with the M3Z sample showing the highest average response of 20.9% and complete recovery. The enhanced sensing behavior is attributed to the synergistic effect of the p–n heterojunction and the increased surface reactivity of the MoS2 nanoflowers. These findings demonstrate the potential of sputtered MoS2/ZnO heterostructures for high-performance, low-concentration NO2 gas-sensing applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.R.K., A.k.A., A.K. and H.-N.L.; Formal analysis, R.R.K. and A.K.; Funding acquisition, H.-N.L.; Investigation, R.R.K. and S.G.; Methodology, R.R.K., S.G. and A.k.A.; Project administration, N.-H.T., C.-H.L. and H.-N.L.; Resources, S.G., A.k.A., N.-H.T. and C.-H.L.; Supervision, N.-H.T., C.-H.L. and H.-N.L.; Visualization, R.R.K.; Writing—original draft, R.R.K.; Writing—review and editing, S.G., A.k.A., A.K. and H.-N.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, through Grant No. 113-2221-E-007-074.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kelly, F.J.; Fussell, J.C. Air pollution and public health: Emerging hazards and improved understanding of risk. Environ. Geochem. Health 2015, 37, 631–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wolfe, A.H.; Patz, J.A. Reactive nitrogen and human health: Acute and long-term implications. Ambio A J. Hum. Environ. 2002, 31, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Manisalidis, I.; Stavropoulou, E.; Stavropoulos, A.; Bezirtzoglou, E. Environmental and health impacts of air pollution: A review. Front. Public Health 2020, 8, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, S.; Song, W.; Zhan, H.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, W.; Tong, S.; Pei, C.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y. Contribution of vehicle emission and NO2 surface conversion to nitrous acid (HONO) in urban environments: Implications from tests in a tunnel. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 15616–15624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shen, J.; Rajalakshmi, K.; Muthusamy, S.; Ahn, D.H.; Song, J.W.; Choi, K.Y.; Xi, C.; Dai, J.; Zhou, Z.; Kannan, P.; et al. Multifunctional Sensors for Successive Detection of Endogenous ONOO–and Mitochondrial Viscosity: Discriminating Normal to Cancer Models. Anal. Chem. 2024, 96, 16289–16297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ramadan, M.N.; Ali, M.A.; Khoo, S.Y.; Alkhedher, M.; Alherbawi, M. Real-time IoT-powered AI system for monitoring and forecasting of air pollution in industrial environment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2024, 283, 116856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Krishna, K.G.; Parne, S.; Pothukanuri, N.; Kathirvelu, V.; Gandi, S.; Joshi, D. Nanostructured metal oxide semiconductor-based gas sensors: A comprehensive review. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2022, 341, 113578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Galstyan, V.; Comini, E.; Baratto, C.; Faglia, G.; Sberveglieri, G. Nanostructured ZnO chemical gas sensors. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 14239–14244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. kumar Anbalagan, A.; Gupta, S.; Kumar, R.R.; Tripathy, A.R.; Chaudhary, M.; Haw, S.-C.; Murugesan, T.; Lin, H.-N.; Chueh, Y.-L.; Tai, N.-H. Gamma-ray engineered surface defects on zinc oxide nanorods towards enhanced NO2 gas sensing performance at room temperature. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 369, 132255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, S.; Yang, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y.; Gao, X.; Wang, L.; Zhu, Z. One-pot synthesis of 3D hierarchical SnO2 nanostructures and their application for gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 207, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Garzella, C.; Comini, E.; Tempesti, E.; Frigeri, C.; Sberveglieri, G. TiO2 thin films by a novel sol–gel processing for gas sensor applications. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2000, 68, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Paleczek, A.; Grochala, D.; Staszek, K.; Gruszczynski, S.; Maciak, E.; Opilski, Z.; Kałużyński, P.; Wójcikowski, M.; Cao, T.-V.; Rydosz, A. An NO2 sensor based on WO3 thin films for automotive applications in the microwave frequency range. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 376, 132964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kumar, R.R.; Gupta, S.; Huang, H.-F.; Murugesan, T.; Tai, N.-H.; Lin, H.-N. Light intensity effects on the performance of In2O3 gas sensors: Insights into adsorption and desorption dynamics. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2025, 337, 130639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fazio, E.; Spadaro, S.; Corsaro, C.; Neri, G.; Leonardi, S.G.; Neri, F.; Lavanya, N.; Sekar, C.; Donato, N.; Neri, G. Metal-Oxide Based Nanomaterials: Synthesis, Characterization and Their Applications in Electrical and Electrochemical Sensors. Sensors 2021, 21, 2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kumar, R.R.; Murugesan, T.; Chang, T.-W.; Lin, H.-N. Defect controlled adsorption/desorption kinetics of ZnO nanorods for UV-activated NO2 gas sensing at room temperature. Mater. Lett. 2021, 287, 129257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, J.; Liu, L.; Yang, Y.; Huang, Q.; Li, D.; Zeng, D. A review on two-dimensional materials for chemiresistive-and FET-type gas sensors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2021, 23, 15420–15439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, Y.; Duan, X.; Huang, Y.; Duan, X. Two-dimensional transistors beyond graphene and TMDCs. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47, 6388–6409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gupta, A.; Sakthivel, T.; Seal, S. Recent development in 2D materials beyond graphene. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2015, 73, 44–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ganatra, R.; Zhang, Q. Few-Layer MoS2: A Promising Layered Semiconductor. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 4074–4099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cho, B.; Hahm, M.G.; Choi, M.; Yoon, J.; Kim, A.R.; Lee, Y.-J.; Park, S.-G.; Kwon, J.-D.; Kim, C.S.; Song, M.; et al. Charge-transfer-based Gas Sensing Using Atomic-layer MoS2. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rajalakshmi, K.; John, S.A. Highly sensitive determination of nitrite using FMWCNTs-conducting polymer composite modified electrode. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 215, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jiang, C.-H.; Yao, C.-B.; Wang, L.-Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, Z.-M.; Yin, H.-T. Interface engineering of modified ZnO@MoS2 heterostructure to efficiently enhance charge transfers and carrier regulation. J. Lumin. 2023, 255, 119546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, M.; Wang, L.; Liu, Q.; You, W.; Che, R. Interface compatibility engineering of Multi-shell Fe@C@TiO2@MoS2 heterojunction expanded microwave absorption bandwidth. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 429, 132191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kumar, R.R.; Habib, M.R.; Khan, A.; Chen, P.-C.; Murugesan, T.; Gupta, S.; Anbalagan, A.k.; Tai, N.-H.; Lee, C.-H.; Lin, H.-N. Sulfur Monovacancies in Liquid-Exfoliated MoS2 Nanosheets for NO2 Gas Sensing. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2021, 4, 9459–9470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kumar, A.; Chandra, R.; Malik, V.K. MoS2 nanoworm thin films for NO2 gas sensing application. Thin Solid Films 2021, 725, 138625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tang, H.; Li, Y.; Sokolovskij, R.; Sacco, L.; Zheng, H.; Ye, H.; Yu, H.; Fan, X.; Tian, H.; Ren, T.-L.; et al. Ultra-High Sensitive NO2 Gas Sensor Based on Tunable Polarity Transport in CVD-WS2/IGZO p-N Heterojunction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 40850–40859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Anbalagan, A.K.; Hu, F.C.; Chan, W.K.; Gandhi, A.C.; Gupta, S.; Chaudhary, M.; Chuang, K.W.; Ramesh, A.K.; Billo, T.; Sabbah, A.; et al. Gamma-ray irradiation induced ultrahigh room-temperature ferromagnetism in MoS2 sputtered few-layered thin films. ACS Nano 2023, 17, 6555–6564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Anbalagan, A.k.; Gupta, S.; Kumar, A.; Haw, S.-C.; Kulkarni, S.S.; Tai, N.-H.; Tseng, F.-G.; Hwang, K.C.; Lee, C.-H. Gamma Ray Irradiation Enhances the Linkage of Cotton Fabrics Coated with ZnO Nanoparticles. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 15129–15135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kumar, R.R.; Yu, W.-C.; Murugesan, T.; Chen, P.-C.; Ranjan, A.; Lu, M.-Y.; Lin, H.-N. Formation of large-scale MoS2/Cu2O/ZnO heterostructure arrays by in situ photodeposition and application for ppb-level NO2 gas sensing. J. Alloys Compd. 2023, 952, 169984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhao, S.; Wang, G.; Liao, J.; Lv, S.; Zhu, Z.; Li, Z. Vertically aligned MoS2/ZnO nanowires nanostructures with highly enhanced NO2 sensing activities. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 456, 808–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ikram, M.; Lv, H.; Liu, Z.; Shi, K.; Gao, Y. Hydrothermally derived p–n MoS2–ZnO from p–p MoS2-ZIF-8 for an efficient detection of NO2 at room temperature. J. Mater. Chem. A 2021, 9, 14722–14730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Shahid, A.; Hussain, S.; Liaqat, M.J.; Begi, A.N.; Ibrahim, T.K.; Amu-Darko, J.N.O.; Fouda, A.M.; Manavalan, R.K.; Zhang, X.; Liu, G.; et al. Nano architecture of MoS2/ZnO nanocomposite for efficient NO2 gas-sensing properties. Mater. Today Commun. 2025, 43, 111577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhou, Y.; Gao, C.; Guo, Y. UV assisted ultrasensitive trace NO2 gas sensing based on few-layer MoS2 nanosheet–ZnO nanowire heterojunctions at room temperature. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 10286–10296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Schematic representation for the growth of MoS2/ZnO heterostructures.
Scheme 1. Schematic representation for the growth of MoS2/ZnO heterostructures.
Micromachines 16 00659 sch001
Figure 1. FESEM images of (a,b) MoS2 thin films and (c) the EDX spectrum of a MoS2 thin film. FESEM images of MoS2/ZnO heterostructures for samples (d) M1Z, (e) M2Z, and (f) M3Z, respectively.
Figure 1. FESEM images of (a,b) MoS2 thin films and (c) the EDX spectrum of a MoS2 thin film. FESEM images of MoS2/ZnO heterostructures for samples (d) M1Z, (e) M2Z, and (f) M3Z, respectively.
Micromachines 16 00659 g001
Figure 2. High-resolution XPS spectra of M3Z for (a) Mo 3d, (b) S 2p, (c) Zn 2p, and (d) O1s, respectively.
Figure 2. High-resolution XPS spectra of M3Z for (a) Mo 3d, (b) S 2p, (c) Zn 2p, and (d) O1s, respectively.
Micromachines 16 00659 g002
Figure 3. (a) PL spectrum of as-grown ZnO nanorods and MoS2/ZnO heterostructure. (b) I–V characteristics for M1Z, M2Z, and M3Z, respectively.
Figure 3. (a) PL spectrum of as-grown ZnO nanorods and MoS2/ZnO heterostructure. (b) I–V characteristics for M1Z, M2Z, and M3Z, respectively.
Micromachines 16 00659 g003
Figure 4. NO2 gas-sensing response of MoS2/ZnO heterostructures (a) M1Z, (b) M2Z, (c) M3Z. (d) Comparison of responses at 500 ppb.
Figure 4. NO2 gas-sensing response of MoS2/ZnO heterostructures (a) M1Z, (b) M2Z, (c) M3Z. (d) Comparison of responses at 500 ppb.
Micromachines 16 00659 g004
Figure 5. (a) Gas-sensing response of the M3Z sensor under varying relative humidity conditions (25%, 55%, and 85%). (b) Selectivity analysis toward NO2 (500 ppb) and NH3 (5 ppm).
Figure 5. (a) Gas-sensing response of the M3Z sensor under varying relative humidity conditions (25%, 55%, and 85%). (b) Selectivity analysis toward NO2 (500 ppb) and NH3 (5 ppm).
Micromachines 16 00659 g005
Figure 6. Schematic illustration of depletion layer expansion upon gas adsorption and energy band alignment at the p–n heterojunction.
Figure 6. Schematic illustration of depletion layer expansion upon gas adsorption and energy band alignment at the p–n heterojunction.
Micromachines 16 00659 g006
Table 1. Summary of MoS2/ZnO composite structures prepared by different synthesis methods and their key features.
Table 1. Summary of MoS2/ZnO composite structures prepared by different synthesis methods and their key features.
MaterialNanocomposite Synthesis MethodTemperatureConcentrationResponse (%)Ref.
MoS2ZnO
MoS2/CuxO/ZnOPhoto depositionHydrothermal methodRT500 ppb890[29]
MoS2/ZnO nanowiresMo—Sputtering
S—Sulfurization
Hydrothermal method200 °C50 ppm31.2[30]
MoS2/ZnO nanorodsHydrothermal methodHydrothermal methodRT50 ppm34.91[31]
MoS2/ZnO compositesHydrothermal methodHydrothermal method200 °C10 ppm33.77[32]
MoS2/ZnOLiquid exfoliationHydrothermal methodRT200 ppb188[33]
MoS2/ZnOMoS2 as target—SputteringHydrothermal methodRT500 ppb20.9This work
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kumar, R.R.; Gupta, S.; Anbalagan, A.k.; Khan, A.; Tai, N.-H.; Lee, C.-H.; Lin, H.-N. Time-Dependent Growth of Sputtered MoS2 Films on ZnO Nanorods for Enhanced NO2 Sensing Performance. Micromachines 2025, 16, 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16060659

AMA Style

Kumar RR, Gupta S, Anbalagan Ak, Khan A, Tai N-H, Lee C-H, Lin H-N. Time-Dependent Growth of Sputtered MoS2 Films on ZnO Nanorods for Enhanced NO2 Sensing Performance. Micromachines. 2025; 16(6):659. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16060659

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kumar, Rishi Ranjan, Shivam Gupta, Aswin kumar Anbalagan, Afzal Khan, Nyan-Hwa Tai, Chih-Hao Lee, and Heh-Nan Lin. 2025. "Time-Dependent Growth of Sputtered MoS2 Films on ZnO Nanorods for Enhanced NO2 Sensing Performance" Micromachines 16, no. 6: 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16060659

APA Style

Kumar, R. R., Gupta, S., Anbalagan, A. k., Khan, A., Tai, N.-H., Lee, C.-H., & Lin, H.-N. (2025). Time-Dependent Growth of Sputtered MoS2 Films on ZnO Nanorods for Enhanced NO2 Sensing Performance. Micromachines, 16(6), 659. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi16060659

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop