Next Article in Journal
Micro Electrochemical Machining of Array Micro-Grooves Using In-Situ Disk Electrode Fabricated by Micro-WEDM
Next Article in Special Issue
Transient Simulation for the Thermal Design Optimization of Pulse Operated AlGaN/GaN HEMTs
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
T-Channel Field Effect Transistor with Three Input Terminals (Ti-TcFET)

Micromachines 2020, 11(1), 65; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11010065

Article
A 45 nm CMOS Avalanche Photodiode with 8.4-GHz Bandwidth
1
School of IoT Engineering, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
2
Haobang high-tech Co. LTD, Wuxi 214074, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 20 November 2019 / Accepted: 3 January 2020 / Published: 7 January 2020

Abstract

:
Photodiode is one of the key components in optoelectronic technology, which is used to convert optical signal into electrical ones in modern communication systems. In this paper, an avalanche photodiode (APD) is designed and fulfilled, which is compatible with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) 45-nm standard complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) technology without any process modification. The APD based on 45 nm process is beneficial to realize a smaller and more complex monolithically integrated optoelectronic chip. The fabricated CMOS APD operates at 850 nm wavelength optical communication. Its bandwidth can be as high as 8.4 GHz with 0.56 A/W responsivity at reverse bias of 20.8 V. Its active area is designed to be 20 × 20 μm2. The Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis (SPICE) model of the APD is also proposed and verified. The key parameters are extracted based on its electrical, optical and frequency responses by parameter fitting. The device has wide potential application for optical communication systems.
Keywords:
CMOS compatible technology; avalanche photodiode; SPICE model; bandwidth; high responsivity; silicon photodiode

1. Introduction

As one of the promising photoelectric sensors, avalanche photodiode (APD) breaks the limitations of electrical interconnects, which results in high-speed, dense, and low-power interconnects [1]. It has become one of the research hotspots in the field of optical communication in recent years [2]. Avalanche photodiodes are widely used in optical communication systems and optical interconnection equipment, such as local area network, chip-to-chip, and board-to-board interconnect [3]. As one of them, 850 nm optical interconnects are actively being investigated, because 850 nm can be easily available as light sources in the high-speed optical interconnects [4,5]. The monolithically integrated high speed 850 nm wavelength silicon APDs based on standard complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) technology are particularly attractive because of significant advantages in cost, power, and performance that CMOS technology brings [6].
However, the optical absorption coefficient of silicon is fairly low at 850 nm. Since in standard CMOS technology, the silicon substrate is thicker than the penetration depth of light, which generates a large number of carriers in the silicon substrate and diffuses around [6]. Secondly, the maximum support voltage is reduced as the CMOS technology shrinks, which limits the reverse bias voltage for the integrated APDs [7].
Several approaches have been proposed to overcome the deficiencies and improve the performance of CMOS silicon technology. In [8], Huang et al. fabricated a silicon photodiode in standard 0.18 μm CMOS technology. The basic structure of proposed photodiode is formed by multiple p-n diodes with shallow trench isolation (STI) between p and n region. The fabricated photodiode demonstrates the −3 dB bandwidth of 1.6 GHz and a high responsivity of 0.74 A/W. In order to reduce the limit of bandwidth, Lee [9] proposed a spatially modulated avalanche photodiode (SM-APD), which showed a bandwidth of 12 GHz and responsivity of 0.03 A/W. Iiyama et al. fabricated a triple-well structure Si photodiode with standard 0.18 μm CMOS process [10]. The N+ and P+ layers are alternatively arranged and then the electrodes are interdigital structure. The device shows a 10 GHz bandwidth with 0.05 A/W responsivity [10]. Deep N-well CMOS technology can greatly improve the electrical isolation performance between different circuit blocks, which is especially important for integrating RF-to-baseband mixed-mode circuits in a single chip. The device with Deep N-well structure can substantially increase the cut-off frequency. In the paper [11], Chou et al. used extra bias on the Deep N-well in standard CMOS technology, which achieved a high bandwidth (8.7 GHz) with a responsivity of 0.05 A/W under a 11.45 V bias.
In this paper, a P-well/Deep N-well APD based on 45 nm CMOS technology is proposed. The light current, dark current, responsivity, and photodetection frequency response are measured based on the fabricated APD device. The results show that the fabricated APD presents a high responsivity and a high bandwidth. The 8.4 GHz bandwidth is available at 850 nm with 0.56 A/W responsivity. Finally, the key parameters of APD are extracted from the frequency response. A SPICE model is established for future integrated circuit design and simulation.

2. Design and Analysis of CMOS Compatible Avalanche Photodiode (APD)

P-well/Deep N-well structure is considered to be the most suitable structure for fabricating CMOS photodiodes [12]. J. Goy et al. compared various photodiode structures, such as N-well/P-substrate structure, N+/P-substrate structure, and N+/P-well structure. The results indicated that the P-well/Deep N-well structure can improve the responsivity while reducing the parasitic capacitance [12].
Two types of APDs, with different active areas, 20 × 20 μm2 and 50 × 50 μm2, are fabricated, separately. Figure 1 shows the schematic structure of the 20 × 20 μm2 CMOS APD device. The size of 50 × 50 μm2 device is proportional to the 20 × 20 μm2. The design is compatible with TSMC 45 nm standard CMOS technology without any process modification or special substrate. The APD is realized by vertical P-well/Deep N-well with shallow trench isolation (STI).
The contribution of slow diffusion photo-generated carriers in the P-substrate region can be excluded by the Deep N-well [13]. Moreover, the P-substrate is grounded or connected to a negative potential, which can effectively absorb slow diffusion photo-generated carriers. As a result, the P-well/Deep N-well shows a better performance in photodetection bandwidth than N-well/P-substrate photodiode.
When the reverse bias voltage is high, the electric field of the p-n junction increases rapidly. Because of curvature effect, the local electric field is increased, which makes the edge of the photodiode easily to breakdown [14]. It has a detrimental effect on the stability and performance of CMOS photodiodes. The most common method to prevent photodiode edge breakdown is to use a guard ring structure [15]. In this paper, STI with width of 0.15 μm is used as the guard ring (the junction depth is about 0.5 μm). The STI can improve the reverse bias by mitigating the premature edge breakdown during avalanche. A high reverse bias provides better avalanche gain and higher responsivity.
To investigate its characteristics, a 100 μW, 850 nm, 10 Gb/s VCSEL modulated by Agilent E8257D signal generator is used as the light source. Figure 2 shows I-V characterizations of the APDs under light and dark environments, separately. All APDs show very low dark currents, which being less than 0.1 nA before the avalanche breakdown. Due to the influence of the STI structure, the avalanche breakdown voltage is increased from 14.5 V to 21.5 V. When the reverse bias approaches the avalanche breakdown voltage of 21.5 V, the dark current begins to increase sharply because of the occurrence of the avalanche breakdown. The 50 × 50 μm2 APD active area is larger than 20 × 20 μm2, so the photocurrent of 50 × 50 μm2 APD is also larger.
Responsivity is defined as the photocurrent per incident optical power, which is determined by the current under illumination minus the dark current [16]. Figure 3 shows the avalanche gain, and the responsivity obtained from the measured I-V characterization. The dark current will increases to the same level as the photocurrent when the avalanche breakdown occurs. In order to reduce the influence of the dark current noise, the operating point should be slightly less than 21.5 V. Considering all the related aspects, the operating point is set to be 20.8 V, and the gain is about 23 dB. Due to the STI structure, the reverse bias is significantly improved. As the reverse bias increases, the photocurrent and the responsivity of APDs are improved obviously. When the reverse bias voltage is 20.8 V, the responsivity of the APD with area of 50 × 50 μm2 is 0.59 A/W. On the same condition, the responsivity of the APD with area of 20 × 20 μm2 is 0.56 A/W.
Figure 4 shows the frequency response of the two APDs with different active areas. The bandwidth of 50 × 50 μm2 is much lower than that of 20 × 20 μm2. With the increasing of the active area, the parasitic capacitance and the carrier transit time increase accordingly, which deteriorates the frequency property. The APD with active area of 20 × 20 μm2 shows a bandwidth of 8.4 GHz at a reverse bias of 20.8 V.

3. The SPICE Model of the CMOS APD

In order to better understand the photodetection frequency response characterization of the CMOS APD, the SPICE model is set up in the section. We have adjusted and optimized the SPICE model proposed in reference [16] to fit the proposed structure in the paper. The values of the key parameters are extracted from the results of Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4 by parameter fitting. For the parameter fitting, the initial value comes from the theoretical equation and then is manually modified. Figure 5 shows the updated SPICE model based on the detailed structure of the device. The active part is composed by an inductor and a resistor in series, a resistor in parallel and a capacitor. The capacitor C denotes the capacitance of the depletion region. Resistor Rl denotes the resistance of the depletion region [17]. Inductor La indicates the phase delay between the current and voltage caused by the impact ionization [17]. Series resistor Ra indicates reverse saturation current and field-dependent velocity [17]. Rnw indicates the Deep N-well resistance. Rsub indicates the substrate resistance. Csub1 denotes the capacitance between Deep N-well and P-substrate [18]. Rsub and Csub2 are caused by the parasitic effects of P-substrate [18]. The effect of the photo-generated slow carrier transit time is denoted by the current source ftr [16].
Figure 6 shows the extracted parameter values for the simulation. The values of La, C, and Rnw are calculated by the following equations.
L a = τ a / ( 2 α I 0 ) ,   C = ε s A / W D ,   R n w W d / 2 A ε s ν s
where τ a is the transit time across the avalanche region, α’ is the derivative of the ionization coefficient with respect to the electric field, I 0 is the bias current, ε s is the semiconductor permittivity, A is the cross sectional area, W D is the depletion region width, W d is the drift region width, and ν s is the saturation [19].
The ftr is estimated as f t r ( 1 / ( 2 π τ tr ) ) , and τ t r is expressed as τ t r 4 L 2 / ( π 2 D ) , where L is the diffusion length, D is the diffusion coefficient [20]. Later, these parameters will be re-corrected by the parameter fitting of the measured reflection coefficients and the frequency response.
The reflection coefficients were measured by a vector network analyzer (Agilent E8362B) under a 100 μW, 850 nm, 10 Gb/s optical signal. From the measured reflection coefficients (shown in Figure 7a), Y-parameters and Z-parameters were calculated. Ra and Rl were extracted by the calculated Z-parameters. Ra and Rl were also re-corrected by parameter fitting. Then using ADS to perform parameter fitting of SPICE model to obtain the values of other parameters and manually modify them.
The extracted parameters for Rl, La, and Ra are the same for all prepared devices. Rl is defined as the voltage to current ratio near 0 V. The slope of the I-V characterization for all APD is shown in Figure 2, making Rl the same for prepared devices. La does not vary with device area at the same bias voltage, because the prepared APDs have the same avalanche multiplication characteristics based on the P-well/Deep N-well junction and guard ring as shown in Figure 2.
Ra denotes the series resistance associated with the avalanche inductor La, which determines the quality factor of the avalanche inductance [17]. It is not directly related to the device area. The junction capacitance C is proportional to the area. Csub1 and Csub2 are also proportional to the area. Rnw and Rsub do not change much because the increase in lateral resistance makes up for the decrease in vertical resistance.
Figure 7 shows the difference between experiment and simulation of the reflection coefficients and frequency response characterization, respectively. Based on the comparison shown in Figure 7, the simulation result based on the SPICE model coincides with the experiment ones, showing the accuracy of the proposed SPICE model.
Table 1 shows the comparison of the performance of various silicon photodetectors fabricated with standard CMOS technology. Our 20 × 20 μm2 CMOS APD shows the responsivity with 0.56 A/W and a photodetection bandwidth of 8.4 GHz at a reverse bias voltage of 20.8 V.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, an avalanche photodiode is designed and implemented based on 45 nm standard CMOS technology without any process modification. The fabricated CMOS APD shows a high response and high light detection bandwidth. Two types of CMOS APDs with different active areas are prepared, and their I-V characterization, photodetection frequency responses are examined. By reducing the active area from 50 × 50 μm2 to 20 × 20 μm2, the optical detection bandwidth of the prepared APD is increased to 8.4 GHz due to the decreased transit time, and the responsivity achieved 0.56 A/W. At the same time, the SPICE model of the fabricated CMOS APD device is set up for future circuit design and simulation. The key parameters based on the actual structure and the measurements are extracted. The simulation results show the accuracy of the proposed SPICE model. The proposed CMOS APDs are very useful for achieving high responsivity, and high speed 850 nm integrated optical receivers based on the standard CMOS technology.
Our future work will focus on reducing the bias voltage and power consumption of the device, while improving its photoelectric detection performance. Improving the light absorption, optimizing the doping concentration and doping depth can further improve the photoelectric detection performance of the device. Light absorption can be increased by adding an anti-reflection layer on the surface of the device. The optimization of doping concentration and doping depth requires more experiments to explore. On the other hand, optimizing the structure and parameters of the design to suit different wavelengths of photoelectric detection is also one of our future research directions.

Author Contributions

Resources, Q.Q. and P.Y.; Writing—original draft preparation, W.Z.; Writing—review and editing, W.Z. and Y.J.; Funding acquisition, P.Y. and Y.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by NSFC (No.61774078), NSFC (No.51802124), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK 20180626) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JUSRP11858).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tavernier, F.; Steyaert, M.S.J. High-Speed Optical Receivers with Integrated Photodiode in 130 nm CMOS. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 2009, 44, 2856–2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kostov, P.; Gaberl, W.; Hofbauer, M.; Zimmermann, H. Integrated 180 nm CMOS phototransistors with an optimized responsivity-bandwidth-product. In Proceedings of the Photonics Conference, Burlingame, CA, USA, 23–27 September 2012. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kim, Y.S.; Jun, I.S.; Kim, K.H. Design and Characterization of CMOS Avalanche Photodiode With Charge Sensitive Preamplifier. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2008, 55, 1376–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Woodward, T.K.; Krishnamoorthy, A.V. 1-Gb/s integrated optical detectors and receivers in commercial CMOS technologies. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. IEEE J. 1999, 5, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sale, T.E.; Chu, C.; Hwang, J.K.; Koh, G.H.; Nabiev, R.; Tan, L.C.; Giovane, L.M.; Murty, R.M.V. Manufacturability of 850nm data communication VCSELs in high volume. Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 2010, 7615, 761503–761510. [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee, M.J.; Choi, W.Y. Performance Optimization and Improvement of Silicon Avalanche Photodetectors in Standard CMOS Technology. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 2017, 24, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Atef, M.; Polzer, A.; Zimmermann, H. Avalanche Double Photodiode in 40-nm Standard CMOS Technology. IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 2013, 49, 350–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Huang, W.K.; Liu, Y.C.; Hsin, Y.M. A High-Speed and High-Responsivity Photodiode in Standard CMOS Technology. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2007, 19, 197–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lee, M.J. First CMOS Silicon Avalanche Photodetectors with Over 10-GHz Bandwidth. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2015, 28, 276–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Iiyama, K.; Shimotori, T.; Gyobu, R.; Hishiki, T.; Maruyama, T. 10 GHz bandwidth of Si avalanche photodiode fabricated by standard 0.18 μm CMOS process. In Proceedings of the Conference on Optical Fibre Technology, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 6–10 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  11. Chou, F.P.; Wang, C.W.; Li, Z.Y.; Hsieh, Y.C.; Hsin, Y.M. Effect of Deep N-Well Bias in an 850-nm Si Photodiode Fabricated Using the CMOS Process. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2013, 25, 659–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Goy, J.; Courtois, B.; Karam, J.M.; Pressecq, F. Design of an APS CMOS Image Sensor for Low Light Level Applications Using Standard CMOS Technology. Analog Integr. Circuits Signal Process. 2001, 29, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, G.; Cansizoglu, H.; Polat, K.G.; Ghandiparsi, S.; Kaya, A.; Mamtaz, H.H.; Mayet, A.S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yamada, T. Photon-trapping microstructures enable high-speed high-efficiency silicon photodiodes. Nat. Photonics 2017, 11, 301–308. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kang, H.S.; Lee, M.J.; Choi, W.Y. Si avalanche photodetectors fabricated in standard complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor process. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007, 90, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zul, A.F.M.N.; Iiyama, K.; Gyobu, R.; Hishiki, T.; Maruyama, T. Optimizing silicon avalanche photodiode fabricated by standard CMOS process for 8 GHz operation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Telematics & Future Generation Networks, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 26–28 May 2015. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee, M.J.; Choi, W.Y. Area-Dependent Photodetection Frequency Response Characterization of Silicon Avalanche Photodetectors Fabricated With Standard CMOS Technology. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 2013, 60, 998–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.C. Small-signal characteristics of a read diode under conditions of field-dependent velocity and finite reverse saturation current. Solid-State Electron. 1978, 21, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ahn, Y.; Han, K.; Shin, H. A New Physical RF Model of Junction Varactors. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 42, 2110–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sze, S. Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA, 1981; p. 1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, G.; Tokumitsu, T.; Hanawa, I.; Sato, K.; Kobayashi, M. Analysis of high speed p-i-n photodiode S-parameters by a novel small-signal equivalent circuit model. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2002, 12, 378–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nayak, S.; Ahmed, A.H.; Sharkia, A.; Ramani, A.S.; Mirabbasi, S.; Shekhar, S. A 10-Gb/s −18.8 dBm Sensitivity 5.7 mW Fully-Integrated Optoelectronic Receiver With Avalanche Photodetector in 0.13- um CMOS. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 2019, 66, 3162–3173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structure of the designed complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) avalanche photodiode.
Figure 1. Structure of the designed complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor (CMOS) avalanche photodiode.
Micromachines 11 00065 g001
Figure 2. Electrical responses of the avalanche photodiodes (APDs) with different sizes (a) without shallow trench isolation (STI); (b) with STI.
Figure 2. Electrical responses of the avalanche photodiodes (APDs) with different sizes (a) without shallow trench isolation (STI); (b) with STI.
Micromachines 11 00065 g002
Figure 3. Optical responses of the APDs.
Figure 3. Optical responses of the APDs.
Micromachines 11 00065 g003
Figure 4. The frequency response of the fabricated APDs.
Figure 4. The frequency response of the fabricated APDs.
Micromachines 11 00065 g004
Figure 5. Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis (SPICE) model of the CMOS APD.
Figure 5. Simulation Program with Integrated Circuit Emphasis (SPICE) model of the CMOS APD.
Micromachines 11 00065 g005
Figure 6. SPICE model and the extracted parameters of the APD.
Figure 6. SPICE model and the extracted parameters of the APD.
Micromachines 11 00065 g006
Figure 7. Comparison of the reflection coefficient and the frequency response between the measured and the simulated ones (a) reflection coefficients; (b) frequency response.
Figure 7. Comparison of the reflection coefficient and the frequency response between the measured and the simulated ones (a) reflection coefficients; (b) frequency response.
Micromachines 11 00065 g007
Table 1. The performances of various silicon photodetectors.
Table 1. The performances of various silicon photodetectors.
ParametersRef. [9]Ref. [11]Ref. [16]Ref. [21]This Work
Technology0.13 μm0.18 μm0.13 μm0.13 μm45 nm
StructureP+/N-well SM-APDMultiple N+/P-sub APDP+/N-well APDN+/P-well APDDouble P-well/Deep N-well APD
Area (μm2)5 × 550 × 5010 × 1030 × 3020 × 20
Bandwidth (GHz)128.77.63.58.4
Responsivity (A/W)0.030.050.483.920.56
Gain10.662.315.418.823
Bias voltage (V)9.711.4510.251020.8
Back to TopTop