Next Article in Journal
Recent Developments of Acoustic Energy Harvesting: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Multiple Laser Stripe Scanning Profilometry Based on Microelectromechanical Systems Scanning Mirror Projection
Previous Article in Journal
Investigating the Potential of Commercial-Grade Carbon Black-Filled TPU for the 3D Printing of Compressive Sensors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tunable Fiber Laser with High Tuning Resolution in C-band Based on Echelle Grating and DMD Chip
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Hybrid 3D Shape Measurement Using the MEMS Scanning Micromirror

Micromachines 2019, 10(1), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10010047
by Tao Yang 1, Guanliang Zhang 1, Huanhuan Li 1 and Xiang Zhou 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Micromachines 2019, 10(1), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10010047
Submission received: 10 December 2018 / Revised: 2 January 2019 / Accepted: 7 January 2019 / Published: 11 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optical MEMS)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors present a hybrid approach to measure Surface shape. They merge LSS and FPP systems into a single system operating in two regimes simultaneously. The work is interesting however it need further clarification.

1. Please check English for correctness, e.g., words ‘row’ and ‘raw’ are used incorrectly.

2. Please address the issue of fringe pattern nonlinearity.

3. Please discuss in depth the modulation threshold selection for the modulation guided merging procedure of FPP and LSS data.

4. Please discuss in depth differences in FPP and LSS data in areas when both data are available.

5. Define the resolution of the hybrid system and other important parameters like depth of field, field of view etc.


Author Response

We sincerely thank the reviewer for constructive criticisms and valuable comments, which

were of great help in revising the manuscript. Accordingly, the revised manuscript has been

systematically improved with new information and additional interpretations. Our responses

are given in the attachment.



Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see attached review file

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We sincerely thank the reviewer for constructive criticisms and valuable comments, which

were of great help in revising the manuscript. Accordingly, the revised manuscript has been

systematically improved with new information and additional interpretations. Our responses

are given in the attachment.


Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for addressing my remarks in a satisfactory manner. I recommend publication.

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for adapting the manuscript based on the reviewers comments. The added details and explanations lead to a significant improvement and I am happy to recommend the manuscript for publication once a couple of minor things have been addressed:

- The added background in the introduction leads to a non-sequential numbering of references. Please adjust the reference numbering to follow common procedure of reference numbers following a sequential order upon first mention

- In Figure 3, the label on graph H should be "row" not "raw". Additionally, with H usually being horizontal and V being vertical, I would expect the fringe pattern to be 90deg rotated (or the label of H and V be swapped) for both the fringe projection and stripe projection.

Back to TopTop