Next Article in Journal
A Risk Assessment of Aflatoxin M1 Exposure in Low and Mid-Income Dairy Consumers in Kenya
Next Article in Special Issue
The Genotoxicity of Caecal Water in Gilts Exposed to Low Doses of Zearalenone
Previous Article in Journal
Snake Venoms in Cancer Therapy: Past, Present and Future
Previous Article in Special Issue
Low Levels of Chito-Oligosaccharides Are Not Effective in Reducing Deoxynivalenol Toxicity in Swine Jejunal Explants
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxins
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/toxins10090347
toxins-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Colon Microbiome of Pigs Fed Diet Contaminated with Commercial Purified Deoxynivalenol and Zearalenone

by
Kondreddy Eswar Reddy
1,†,
Jin Young Jeong
1,†,
Jaeyong Song
1,
Yookyung Lee
1,
Hyun-Jeong Lee
1,
Dong-Wook Kim
1,2,
Hyun Jung Jung
1,
Ki Hyun Kim
1,
Minji Kim
1,
Young Kyoon Oh
1,
Sung Dae Lee
1,* and
Minseok Kim
1,3,*
1
Animal Nutrition & Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal Science, Rural Development Administration, #1500 Kongjwipatjwi-ro, Iseo-myeon, Wanju 55365, Korea
2
Department of Poultry Science, Korea National College of Agriculture and Fisheries, #1515 Kongjwipatjwi-ro, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju-si 54874, Korea
3
Department of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University, Gwangju 61186, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Toxins 2018, 10(9), 347; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10090347
Submission received: 9 June 2018 / Revised: 10 August 2018 / Accepted: 27 August 2018 / Published: 29 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Effects of Mycotoxins on the Intestine)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEN) can seriously affect animal health, with potentially severe economic losses. Previous studies have demonstrated that gut microbiota plays a significant role in detoxification. We analyzed the colon contents from three groups of pigs (fed either a standard diet, or a diet with 8 mg/kg DON or ZEN). Bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplicons were obtained from the colon contents, and sequenced using next-generation sequencing on the MiSeq platform. Overall, 2,444,635 gene sequences were generated, with ≥2000 sequences examined. Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the dominant phyla in all three groups. The sequences of Lactobacillus, Megasphaera, and Faecalibacterium genera, and the unclassified Clostridiaceae family, represented more than 1.2% of the total, with significantly different abundances among the groups. Lactobacillus was especially more abundant in the DON (7.6%) and ZEN (2.7%) groups than in the control (0.2%). A total of 48,346 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were identified in the three groups. Two OTUs, classified as Lactobacillus, were the most dominant in the DON and ZEN groups. The abundances of the remaining OTUs were also significantly different among the groups. Thus, the mycotoxin-contaminated feed significantly affected the colon microbiota, especially Lactobacillus, which was the most abundant. Therefore, we speculate that Lactobacillus plays a major role in detoxification of these mycotoxins.
Keywords:
deoxynivalenol; zearalenone; pig; colon microbiota; Lactobacillus; detoxification
Key Contribution: Collectively, our results indicate that Lactobacillus was the most abundant in the DON and ZEN dietary groups and less abundant in the control, suggesting that members of this genus may play a key role in the detoxification of dietary DON and ZEN in pigs.

1. Introduction

Deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEN) are Fusarium mycotoxins that cause significant economic losses of crops globally, and frequently contaminate food and animal feed, such as maize, wheat, barley, rice, rye, oats, sorghum, and triticale. DON and ZEN cause damage to the gastrointestinal and immune systems in both humans and farm animals, resulting in vomiting, diarrhea, hemorrhage, leukopenia, and shock [1,2,3]. Among animal species, pigs show a comparatively high sensitivity to DON and ZEN, likely because of a high percentage of cereals in the porcine diet, posing a greater risk of exposure to these two mycotoxins. Furthermore, the front portion of the pig small intestine lacks microorganisms that are able to degrade mycotoxins before they are absorbed by the small intestine [4,5].
DON has been known to cause toxic effects in both animals and humans. Following DON exposure, the initial adverse effect in pigs is a reduced feed intake. DON adversely affects the growth performance, immune response, and reproductive performance in growing pigs [6,7]. A DON-contaminated diet influences the gastrointestinal tract, causing epithelial wounds in the stomach and intestine and, foremost, an intestinal inflammatory response in pigs [8,9]. According to Pierron et al. [10], in vitro and in vivo studies confirmed that DON severely inhibited intestinal nutrient absorption, changed the intestinal cell functions, and caused severe intestinal barrier damage.
ZEN and its metabolites clinically cause hyperestrogenism and reproductive disorders. ZEN metabolites compete with endogenous estrogens for estrogen receptor binding sites, and ultimately affect RNA and protein synthesis, leading to the deregulation of estrogenic activities [11]. Compared to chickens and ruminants, pigs are more sensitive to ZEN exposure, even at low levels [12]. According to Dänicke et al. [13], ZEN is regularly found in piglets under normal conditions, and these animals are initially exposed to ZEN in the uterus through placental transfer from the exposed sow, or through release of stored ZEN via suckling. ZEN also shows numerous genotoxic and cytotoxic effects in vitro and ex vivo, and is potentially carcinogenic [14]. Further, ZEN is recognized to be immunotoxic; nonetheless, its function in the inflammatory response is not yet completely understood [15].
The animal gastrointestinal tract is colonized by a rich variety of microorganisms, and quantitative and qualitative permanence of these organisms is an important factor in the maintenance of animal health [16]. The gut microbiota exerts obvious effects on basic host physiology and metabolism [17]. According to Richards et al. [16], the animal intestinal microbiota exhibits nutritional and protective functions, stimulates the immunity, produces fermentation products, and prevents colonization by pathogens. Bauer and his team [18] have demonstrated that the gut microbiota is influenced by various factors, such as the animal health, individual characteristics of the animal, and the feed type and quality. Microorganisms may also prevent harmful effects on animal health; in fact, it has been suggested that intestinal microbiota may play a protective role against mycotoxins as potential risk factors for inflammatory bowel disease [19]. As shown by Bauer and Williams [18], pathogenic microorganisms produce toxic metabolites and fecal enzymes that may increase the levels of carcinogenic substances, or convert procarcinogenic compounds into carcinogenic ones.
However, studies of the effects of the DON and ZEN mycotoxins on the pig gastrointestinal microbiota are lacking; in particular, the effect of ZEN on the pig gut microbiota remains unclear. Recently, Li et al. [20] have studied the intestinal microbial diversity in pigs fed a basal diet, naturally DON-contaminated wheat, and a feed contaminated with Clostridium sp. WJ06. In another study, DON and ZEN, separately and together, induced negative effects on the microbial diversity in the ascending colon of pigs [21].
Recently, 16S rRNA gene (rrs) sequencing using the Illumina MiSeq platform was used to compare the intestinal bacterial biota in DON-contaminated wheat-fed pigs and the rumen microbiota of steers fed various diets, demonstrating that DON and different diets greatly affected the microbiota of pigs and cattle, respectively [20,22]. However, direct effects of purified DON and ZEN on the colon microbiota composition have not yet been reported in pigs. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to comparatively investigate the abundance of unculturable microorganisms in control and mycotoxin-treated groups of pigs to gain insights into the community structure of the pig colon microbiota. We hypothesized that the community structure of the colon microbiome of pigs would be influenced by toxic effects of DON and ZEN.

2. Results

2.1. Sequencing and Bacterial Abundance

Quality control of clean rrs sequences, obtained from the colon contents of the control, DON, and ZEN dietary groups, resulted in a total of 2,444,635 sequences, with read lengths averaging 500 nucleotides. Of these, 740,744 sequences represented control feces, while 884,437 and 819,454 represented DON and ZEN feces (Table 1). The numbers of rrs sequences from individual control samples ranged from 158,817 to 192,996; those from DON-treated samples ranged from 166,967 to 196,160, while those from ZEN-treated samples ranged from 140,276 to 195,822.
Almost 99.8% of all rrs sequences from the colon contents of the three groups were classified into known phyla. As shown in Figure 1 and Supplementary Table S1, the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were highly abundant, and were represented by 57.3% and 35.00% of all rrs sequences, respectively. The next most abundant phylum was Proteobacteria, which was represented by 3.2% of the total sequences; the remaining phyla were each represented by <2.00% of all rrs sequences. The phyla Spirochaetes and Actinobacteria were represented by 1.7% and 1.0% of all rrs sequences, respectively. Planctomycetes, Tenericutes, and candidate division TM7 were represented by less than 1.00% of all rrs sequences. The genus Prevotella comprised 23.7% of the 5,279,245 rrs sequences.
At the genus level, Prevotella was highly abundant, being represented by 18.8% of the 2,444,635 rrs sequences. Other genera, represented by at least 0.5% of the total sequences, were Lactobacillus (3.8%), Dialister (2.3%), Bacteroides (2.3%), Megasphaera (2.1%), Phascolarctobacterium (1.6%), Treponema (1.6%), Ruminococcus (1.4%), Faecalibacterium (1.2%), CF231 (1.2%), Oscillospira (1.1%), Lachnospira (1.0%), Bulleidia (0.9%), Coprococcus (0.8%), Parabacteroides (0.8%), Blautia (0.8%), Campylobacter (0.8%), Shuttleworthia (0.7%), p-75-a5 (0.5%), Dorea (0.5%), Roseburia (0.5%), Acidaminococcus (0.5%), Clostridium (0.5%), and Desulfovibrio (0.5%). Some taxa were not classified at the genus level but showed high abundance at the phylum level, such as Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. The orders Clostridiales (8.5%) and Bacteroidales (2.8%) were dominant, and at the family level, Ruminococcaceae (14.4%) was highly abundant, followed by S24-7 (5.7%), Lachnospiraceae (3.9%), Veillonellaceae (2.7%), Paraprevotellaceae (2.5%), Clostridiaceae (1.3%), Christensenellaceae (0.5%), and Erysipelotrichaceae (0.5%).
A total of 192,724 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were identified at a 0.03 dissimilarity cutoff level for all samples. All reads were normalized and analyzed using the Shannon diversity index, Chao1 richness estimator, and the Simpson index. OTUs of normalized samples did not vary (p > 0.05) among the three dietary treatment groups. The data of the richness estimate showed significant differences (p < 0.05) in the numbers of OTUs among the groups (Table 1).

2.2. Taxonomic Composition

Analysis of the taxonomic abundance in samples from the control, DON, and ZEN dietary groups showed differences at the phylum and genus levels (Figure 1A,B and Supplementary Table S1). The microbial data for all three dietary treatment groups were analyzed to determine the mean comparative abundance (taxon reads/total reads in a sample). At the genus level, Lactobacillus (p = 0.002), Megasphaera (p = 0.01), and Faecalibacterium (p = 0.045), as well as the order Clostridiales (p = 0.05), showed significant differences in the abundance among the DON, ZEN, and control groups. Analysis of the abundances at the taxonomic levels from the phylum to genus revealed differences among the DON, ZEN, and control groups. These variations were most obvious for Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Prevotella, Lactobacillus, the family Ruminococcaceae, and the order Clostridiales.
As shown in Figure 2A, the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were highly abundant, while the remaining phyla were represented by <5% of all sequences. Furthermore, no significant differences were observed at the phylum level among the three dietary treatment groups. Prevotella was the most abundant known genus, represented by 18.8% of all sequences. The abundance of Prevotella was higher (p = 0.72) in the control group (21.7%) than in the DON (17.5%) and ZEN (17.7%) groups (Figure 2B). The abundance of Lactobacillus, which was represented by 3.8% of the total sequences, was significantly different (p = 0.002) among the groups. Interestingly, Lactobacillus was significantly (p = 0.002) more abundant in the DON group (7.6%), compared to 2.7% and 0.2% in the ZEN and control groups, respectively. The abundance of Megasphaera, which was represented by 2.1% of all sequences, was significantly higher (p = 0.01) in the ZEN group (3.0%) than in the control group (1.7%), but no significant difference was observed between the DON (1.6%) and control groups. The abundance of Faecalibacterium, which was represented by 1.2% of the total sequences, was also significantly different (p = 0.045) among the three dietary treatment groups; compared with that in the control group (1.3%), the abundance was lower (0.7%) in the DON group, and slightly higher (1.5%) in the ZEN group. The abundance of the unclassified family Clostridiaceae was significantly different (p = 0.05) among the three dietary treatment groups, being much lower in the DON group (0.6%) and moderately lower in the ZEN group (1.2%) than that in the control group (2.1%).
Approximately 60% of the Firmicutes sequences could not be classified at the genus level. The following five unclassified groups were dominant: Ruminococcaceae (14.4%), Clostridiales (8.5%), Lachnospiraceae (3.8%), Veillonellaceae (2.7%), and Clostridiaceae (1.3%). Similar results have been reported for the feces of cattle fed different diets [23]; however, in the present study, none of the unclassified groups showed significant differences (p > 0.05) among the three dietary treatments. Approximately 32% of Bacteroidetes could not be classified at the genus level either, including S24-7, Bacteroidales, and Paraprevotellaceae, nor did these taxa show any differences (p > 0.05) among the dietary treatments.

2.3. Analysis of Diversity

The diversity of the pig colon microbiota was compared among the control and two mycotoxin-treated groups. We analyzed the species-level OTUs at a cutoff of 0.03 from all the samples to evaluate the diversity of the colon microbiota from the three dietary groups, and identified a total of 48,346 OTUs from all the samples. Nine of the 48,346 OTUs were represented by ≥0.1% of all sequences in at least one dietary group, but three of the nine OTUs could not be classified into known genera (Table 2).
OTU denovo31941, classified into Ruminococcaceae, was the most dominant among the nine OTUs in the collective data, and its abundance was the highest (p = 0.025) in the ZEN group and the lowest (p = 0.025) in the DON group (Table 2). The second most dominant OTU was that representing the genus Megasphaera (denovo92866), and it showed the highest abundance (p = 0.006) in the DON group and the lowest abundance (p = 0.006) in the control group. The next most abundant OTU was that representing the genus Lactobacillus (denovo28392), which was the most abundant (p = 0.006) in the DON group, moderately abundant (p = 0.006) in the ZEN group, and of the lowest abundance (p = 0.006) in the control group. Moreover, another OTU, also belonging to Lactobacillus (denovo218634), was highly, moderately, and lowly abundant (p = 0.049) in the DON, ZEN, and control groups, respectively. The abundances of three additional OTUs, representing Clostridiaceae (denovo231303; p = 0.019), Bulleidia (denovo254063; p = 0.011), and Clostridiales (denovo63294; p = 0.005), were much lower in the DON and ZEN groups than in the control group. An OTU of the genus Prevotella (denovo47686) was highly abundant in the ZEN group, moderately abundant in the DON group, and of the lowest abundance in the control group (p = 0.001). One OTU, classified as Faecalibacterium, was highly abundant in the ZEN group, and of relatively low abundance in the DON group compared with that in the control group (p = 0.001).

3. Discussion

Until now, few studies have been conducted to investigate the effects of the DON and ZEN mycotoxins on the pig gastrointestinal microbiota; in particular, the effects of ZEN on the gastrointestinal microbiota are largely unknown. Previous studies have examined the effects of naturally mycotoxin-contaminated feeds on the gut microbiota, but no reports are available on the microbial composition of the colonic contents of pigs fed commercially purified DON and ZEN [20,24]. Therefore, we analyzed the colon contents of pigs fed commercially purified DON and ZEN, to compare microbial abundances in the control, DON, and ZEN dietary groups, for the first time.
The animal digestive tract is suitable for microbial mass reproduction. Usually, various bacterial species are preferentially localized in different regions of the gastrointestinal tract, and not all regions are heavily colonized. According to Jia et al. [25], microbial communities in the small and large intestines play an important role in managing the host’s health, including the energy intake from food, immune system function, generation of important metabolites, and the response to gastrointestinal diseases. Swanson et al. [26] have reported the function of fecal and intestinal microbiota in the metabolism of trichothecenes, which was studied by anaerobically incubating microbial suspensions from the feces of swine, cattle, horses, dogs, chickens, and rats with diacetoxyscirpenol (DAS). The microbiota from pigs, cattle, and rats fully transformed DAS, primarily to de-epoxy monoacetoxyscirpenol and de-epoxy scirpentriol. This research clearly indicated that the function of intestinal microbiota involves more than just binding DAS. A study by McCormick [27] has reported anaerobic bacterial degradation of trichothecenes in animal systems. The toxic impact of trichothecenes on animals was mitigated by intestinal or rumen bacteria that could detoxify the compounds. Kabak and Dobson [28,29] have also discussed in their reviews the role of microorganisms in detoxification.
In the present study, Firmicutes (57.3%) and Bacteroidetes (35.0%) were the most abundant groups of bacteria in the colon contents from the DON, ZEN, and control groups at the phylum level, but their levels were not significantly different between the control and treatment groups. By contrast, abundances of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were significantly different in the ileum, cecum, and colon of growing pigs fed naturally DON-contaminated wheat [20]. Feeding a diet with a 100 µg/kg body weight dose of DON for 4 weeks by oral gavage increased the abundances of Bacteroides and Prevotella in rat intestines [30]. In another study, compared with the control group, the DON-treated mouse group showed significantly lower species abundances of Bacteroidetes and higher abundances of Proteobacteria [31]. According to Scaldaferri et al. [32], the abundance of Bacteroidetes significantly decreased as a result of intestinal ulceration or inflammation in humans. We speculated that these inconsistencies were due to variations in the type and age of animals, dietary concentrations of DON and ZEN, conditions of toxins (natural contamination or a purified powder), the duration of treatment, weather conditions, and the diet composition.
At the genus level, Lactobacillus was significantly more abundant in the DON and ZEN groups, particularly in the DON group, than in the control. Similar to our findings, Lactobacillus was the most abundant in the ileum, cecum, and colon of growing pigs fed a diet naturally contaminated with DON [20]. Some studies have already proven the many physiological effects of Lactobacillus on the host, including microbial interference, antimicrobial effects, nutritional supplementation, a decrease in the serum cholesterol, antitumor effects, a decrease in the necessary antibiotic treatments, and immunomodulatory effects, among others [20,33,34]. Investigators have previously found that the pig small intestine is commonly dominated by Lactobacillus, and generally, the bacterial density increases quickly as the animal grows [35,36]. Lactobacillus is an important natural constituent of the intestinal microbiota in healthy animals and humans; in fact, bacteria of this genus have been shown in in vitro and in vivo studies to bind various mycotoxins [37,38]. Lactobacillus spp. are also able to rapidly form a complex bacterial community, which protects the host from infections by pathogenic bacteria [39]. Lactobacillus can successfully remove trichothecenes, such as DON, fusarenon, and DAS from liquid media [40]. Lactobacillus species are potential probiotics, shown to participate in the removal of ZEN in an in vitro study [41]. El-Nezami and his team [42] have investigated the binding affinity interactions of ZEN and its derivative α-zearalenol with two food-grade strains of Lactobacillus. Lactobacillus spp. can produce lactic acid as a byproduct of carbohydrate fermentation, and have been reported to extracellularly bind ZEN, DON, and aflatoxins [42,43,44]. Cell wall polysaccharides and peptidoglycans are two key elements accountable for the binding of mutagens to Lactobacillus cells [45]. Consequently, the high proportion of Lactobacillus, detected in the current study, might have resulted from a competitive advantage related to the capability of Lactobacillus to metabolize DON and ZEN. Many investigators have examined the interactions between bacteria and trichothecenes and revealed that those can occur through metabolic degradation and the conversion of trichothecenes into considerably less toxic forms [46,47,48]. The effects of DON on the intestinal microbial abundance and diversity in mice have also been explored using an Illumina MiSeq high-throughput sequencing method [31]. Robert et al. [49] have demonstrated that the mucus and microbiota are important targets for dietary mycotoxins, especially DON. Using in vitro and ex vivo models, Pinton et al. [50] demonstrated that the inhibitory effect of DON on mucus secretion by human and porcine goblet cells relies on its ability to suppress the expression of the resistin-like molecule beta (RELM-beta). Generally, the presence of the gastrointestinal mucus can lower the capacity of probiotics to bind mycotoxins because the mucus may interfere with the adsorption of a mycotoxin to the bacterial cell wall of the probiotic. However, in the current study, the regular administration of the probiotic Lactobacillus during the dietary treatment period may have reduced the effect of the mucus. Consequently, it could be hypothesized that, as the number of colony-forming units increased, the effect of the mucus on the adsorption of DON and ZEN by the Lactobacillus cell wall was reduced. Previously, similar results have been reported by Gratz et al. [51] who used the probiotic Lactobacillus in aflatoxin B1-fed rats.
In the present study, the abundances of Faecalibacterium and the family Clostridiaceae were significantly lower in the DON and ZEN groups than in the control group. However, the relative abundances of these two bacterial taxa differed between the DON and ZEN dietary groups. This difference might have been caused by the use of DON and ZEN at different doses, which led to different effects on these two dominant bacterial taxa. These results suggest that the growth of these bacteria was inhibited by the highly toxic DON, and slightly inhibited by the low-toxic ZEN. Similarly, the abundance of Clostridium significantly decreased in the ileum and colon of DON-treated pigs, but increased in the colon of pigs fed DON-contaminated wheat in combination with Clostridium sp. WJ06, which is used as a detoxicant [20]. According to a study by Rotter et al. [52], before mycotoxin-contaminated food enters the small intestine of poultry and ruminants, DON comes into contact with high concentrations of microbes, which can change DON to de-epoxy-deoxynivalenol (DOM-1). These results suggest that DON may have induced intestinal lesions by destroying the integrity of the intestinal barrier in pigs, consistent with the data from previous studies on DON-fed pigs [20,53]. In the current study, bacteria of the genus Megasphaera were highly abundant in the ZEN and DON treatment groups, with no significant difference between the dietary groups. This genus is an important member of the gut microbiota, and exerts useful effects on the host [54]. Shetty et al. [55] have reported that Megasphaera plays a key role in the complex gut environment and performs the complete metabolic functions of the human gut microbiome. We assumed that because of the low concentration of ZEN, Megasphaera may have developed resistance to the low-toxic condition and, therefore, was abundant in the ZEN dietary group. Currently, there has been no published research on the microbial effects in ZEN-fed pigs. The absorption rates of DON and ZEN show substantial variance among animals; pigs show the highest absorption rate (82%), followed by chickens (19%), sheep (9.9%), and cows (1%) [56,57]. Frey et al. [58] have demonstrated that differences in absorption are mostly associated with the distribution of microorganisms before or after the small intestine. In particular, in monogastric animals and humans, bacteria are absent in the front portion of the small intestine; thus, compared to ruminants and poultry, pigs and humans are highly sensitive to DON [59,60]. Waché et al. [2] have revealed that DON-contaminated feed could increase the abundance of anaerobic bacteria in pigs, while decreasing the number of anaerobic sulfite-reducing bacteria. Based on the above observations, we speculated that the colon microbial structure and composition were mainly affected by the DON and ZEN doses, animal type, age, and health, as well as by environmental conditions and the duration of treatment.
To date, no OTU information has been available for intestinal or fecal samples from DON- or ZEN-treated pigs. In the present study, nine OTUs were identified whose abundances were significantly different among the three dietary treatment groups. Among these OTUs, two represented Lactobacillus and one each represented Prevotella, Megasphaera, Bulleidia, Faecalibacterium, unclassified Ruminococcaceae, unclassified Clostridiales, and unclassified Clostridiaceae. Similarly, except for Megasphaera and Bulleidia, the remaining seven OTU species were found in the colon contents of cattle fed different diets [23]. Species related to these nine main OTUs may have considerably contributed to the colon bacterial ecosystem, irrespective of the dietary treatment group. In particular, two OTUs representing Lactobacillus and Megasphaera were highly abundant in the DON group, and three OTUs, including Prevotella, Faecalibacterium, and Ruminococcaceae, were dominant in the ZEN group. Species associated with these OTUs may have played a major role in the metabolism of DON and ZEN. In particular, the Lactobacillus species corresponding to the two OTUs were shown to be highly abundant in the DON and ZEN groups, compared with their abundances in the control, and might have bound the DON and ZEN mycotoxins and detoxified them, protecting the pig immune system. For further clarification, isolation and characterization of Lactobacillus species will need to be performed to reveal their function in the pig gastrointestinal microbial community.
In summary, our results showed that the abundances of microbiota components were significantly different in the pig colon contents from the control, DON, and ZEN groups; in particular, the DON group showed the highest abundance of Lactobacillus among the treatment groups, possibly indicating a major role of Lactobacillus in detoxification. Based on the El-Nezami et al. [42] data, we believe that our results are due to the physical phenomenon of the binding of the DON and ZEN toxins to Lactobacillus via weak non-covalent bond interactions, such as those related to hydrophobic pockets on the bacterial surface. Consistent with this phenomenon, the Lactobacillus abundance was higher in the DON- and ZEN-treated groups than in the control group. There may be numerous tolerant, adaptable, and inducible members of the microbiota in the pig gastrointestinal tract following exposure to particular doses of DON and ZEN, but this possibility needs to be examined further. Additional studies are needed to investigate the chemical nature of mycotoxin-binding sites of Lactobacillus, and the types of chemical interactions involved in the binding mechanism. These future studies may also clarify the potential relationships between DON and ZEN, and the gut microbiota, facilitating the development of effective therapeutic methods to control DON- and ZEN-induced diseases.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Ethics Statement

The protocols for the animal experimental procedures were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institute of Animal Science, South Korea (No. 2015-147, 29 May 2015).

4.2. Animals

The current study was carried out with 14 castrated 8-week-old male piglets (Landrace × Yorkshire = Large White Landrace; ~19 kg) obtained from a commercial pig farm. All piglets, which originated from different litters, were randomly selected. Each piglet was housed in a separate pen (2.1 m × 1.4 m) with free access to water from drinking nipples, and they were fed individually. The piglets were allowed to acclimate to their new housing conditions for 1 week at 25 ± 1 °C, and were subsequently allocated to three dietary groups, the control (n = 4), DON (n = 5), and ZEN (n = 5) groups, with approximately equal body weights. Piglets in the control group were supplied a standard diet (Table 3) to meet their nutritional requirements [61], and those in the treatment groups were supplied the control diet with added DON or ZEN. Commercially available purified DON and ZEN powders (Biomin Singapore Pte. Ltd., Singapore) were properly mixed into the feed at 8 mg/kg and 0.8 mg/kg, respectively. During the entire 4-week experimental period, the control and DON- and ZEN-contaminated diets, as well as water, were supplied to the pigs ad libitum. Ethical guidelines for animal protection rights were observed.

4.3. Mycotoxin Analysis

The DON and ZEN quantities in the DON- and ZEN-supplemented corn feed were examined by ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC). A homogenized DON-contaminated grain sample (1 g) was extracted with 20 mL of distilled water by shaking for 30 min. A ZEN-contaminated corn sample (1 g) was mixed with 0.5 g of NaCl and 20 mL of acetonitrile (ACN), and then shaken for 1 h. After filtering the extracts through Whatman No. 1 paper, 5 mL of the DON-contaminated filtrate was diluted in 20 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and 5 mL of the ZEN-mixed grain filtrate was diluted in 20 mL of a 1% Tween 20 solution. The extracted DON- and ZEN-mixed samples were loaded separately onto immunoaffinity chromatography columns. The DON column was allowed to dry, then washed with 10 mL each of PBS and distilled water, and eluted with 0.5 mL of methanol (MeOH) and 1.5 mL of ACN. In the case of ZEN, the column was washed with 10 mL of distilled water and eluted with 1.5 mL of MeOH. The eluates were dried under N2 gas, and 10 µL of each sample was injected into a UPLC instrument (Acquity UPLC® H Class; Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The mobile phase used to separate DON and ZEN consisted of water/ACN/MeOH (90:5:5 for DON and 43:35:22 for ZEN). The samples were separated isocratically at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Photodiode array and fluorescence detectors were used to detect DON and ZEN, respectively. Waters Acquity UPLC® BEH C18 columns (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm particle size) were used for both DON and ZEN toxin analyses. The complete details of the mass spectrometry system running method, the excitation and emission wavelengths, and the limits of detection and quantification, were as described by Reddy et al. [7]. We found that the amounts of DON and ZEN in the mixed corn feed were 7.38 and 0.67 mg/kg, respectively; these values were close to the original concentrations. No DON and ZEN contamination was found in the control feed.

4.4. Sampling and Processing

A total of 14 male piglets were used to examine the colon microbiota composition in the standard diet and DON and ZEN mycotoxin-contaminated feed groups. After 4 weeks of treatment, all pigs were euthanized by an overdose of the anesthetic pentobarbital. After cardiac arrest, the colon contents of all pigs were aseptically collected directly into sample containers, rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at −80 °C for further analysis.

4.5. DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Total community DNA was extracted from the 14 samples of colon contents using the repeated bead beating plus column method [62], and stored at −20 °C before sequencing. From each DNA sample, 14 amplicon libraries were generated using the 341F (5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and 805R (5′-GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′) primers, which produce approximately 450 bp products. The resultant 14 amplicon libraries were sequenced using a 2 × 300 bp paired-end protocol with the MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) at the Macrogen sequencing facility (Macrogen, Inc., Seoul, Korea). Paired reads were assembled using the FLASH program [63]. The assembled sequences were demultiplexed using the default parameters and quality filtered using a Q20 minimum value with the QIIME software package 1.9.1 [64]. Taxa were identified using the Greengenes reference database [65], while OTUs were determined at 97% sequence similarity using the uclust program [66]. After 100,000 sequences were subsampled from each colon sample to normalize the number of OTUs, alpha diversity indices (number of OTUs, Chao1, PD_whole_tree distance, and Shannon diversity index) were determined.

4.6. Statistical Analysis

Taxa (or OTUs) representing, on average, ≥0.2% of the total sequences were regarded as major taxa (or OTUs), and used for statistical analysis. The mean proportion of each taxon or OTU in the total sequences was compared among the three diet groups using analysis of variance, followed by Duncan’s test, in the XLSTAT statistical software version 18.07 (Addinsoft, New York, NY, USA). A significant difference was considered at p < 0.05.

4.7. Nucleotide Sequence Accession Number

The 16S rRNA gene sequence data used in the current study are available from the EMBL European Nucleotide Archive under accession number PRJEB27663.

Supplementary Materials

The following is available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/10/9/347/s1, Table S1: Relative abundance of taxa in the control and DON and ZEN mycotoxin dietary treatment groups.

Author Contributions

S.D.L., M.K. (Minseok Kim), and K.E.R. designed and performed the experiments; J.Y.J. and J.S. developed methods and contributed reagents/materials; H.-J.L., D.-W.K., Y.L., and H.J.J. performed the experiments; K.H.K. and M.K. (Minji Kim) analyzed and discussed the data; Y.K.O. created the illustrations; K.E.R. wrote the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was carried out with the support of the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ01093202) and the 2017 RDA Fellowship Program of the National Institute of Animal Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Creppy, E.E. Update of survey, regulation and toxic effects of mycotoxins in Europe. Toxicol. Lett. 2002, 127, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wache, Y.J.; Valat, C.; Postollec, G.; Bougeard, S.; Burel, C.; Oswald, I.P.; Fravalo, P. Impact of deoxynivalenol on the intestinal microflora of pigs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Smith, M.C.; Madec, S.; Coton, E.; Hymery, N. Natural co-occurrence of mycotoxins in foods and feeds and their in vitro combined toxicological effects. Toxins 2016, 8, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ghareeb, K.; Awad, W.A.; Böhm, J.Q.; Zebeli, K.G. Impacts of the feed contaminant deoxynivalenol on the intestine of monogastric animals: Poultry and swine. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2015, 35, 327–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lewczuk, B.B.; Przybylska-Gornowicz, M.; Gajecka, K.; Targonska, N.; Ziolkowska, M.; Gajecki, M. Histological structure of duodenum in gilts receiving low doses of zearalenone and deoxynivalenol in feed. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2016, 68, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Etienne, M.; Wache, Y. Biological and physiological effects of deoxynivalenol (DON) in the pig. In Mycotoxins in Farm Animals, 1st ed.; Oswald, I.P., Taranu, I., Eds.; Research Signpost: Kerala, India, 2008; pp. 113–130. [Google Scholar]
  7. Reddy, K.E.; Song, J.; Lee, H.-J.; Kim, M.; Kim, D.-W.; Jung, H.J.; Kim, B.; Lee, Y.; Yu, D.; Kim, D.-W.; et al. Effects of high levels of deoxynivalenol and zearalenone on growth performance, and hematological and immunological parameters in pigs. Toxins 2018, 10, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Romero, A.A.; Ramos, I.; Castellano, E.; Martinez, V.; Martinez-Larranaga, M.; Anadon, M.R.; Martinez, M.A. Mycotoxins modify the barrier function of Caco-2 cells through differential gene expression of specific claudin isoforms: Protective effect of illite mineral clay. Toxicology 2016, 353, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Yu, M.L.; Chen, Z.; Peng, A.K.; Nussler, Q.; Wu, L.; Liu, W.Y. Mechanism of deoxynivalenol effects on the reproductive system and fetus malformation: Current status and future challenges. Toxicol. In Vitro 2017, 41, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pierron, A.; Alassane-Kpembi, I.; Oswald, I.P. Impact of two mycotoxins deoxynivalenol and fumonisin on pig intestinal health. Porc. Health Manag. 2016, 2, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Döll, S.; Dänicke, S. The Fusarium toxins deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZON) in animal feeding. Prev. Vet. Med. 2011, 102, 132–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhang, Y.; Gao, R.; Liu, M.; Shi, B.; Shan, A.; Cheng, B. Use of modified halloysite nanotubes in the feed reduces the toxic effects of zearalenone on sow reproduction and piglet development. Theriogenology 2015, 83, 932–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dänicke, S.; Brüssow, K.P.; Goyarts, T.; Valenta, H.; Ueberschär, K.H.; Tiemann, U. On the transfer of the Fusarium toxins deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZON) from the sow to the full-term piglet during the last third of gestation. Food Chem. Toxicol 2007, 45, 1567–1574. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ghedira-Chekir, L.; Maaroufi, K.; Creppy, E.E.; Bacha, H. Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of zearalenone: Prevention by vitamin E. J. Toxicol. Toxin Rev. 1999, 18, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Reddy, K.E.; Lee, W.; Jeong, J.Y.; Lee, Y.; Lee, H.-J.; Kim, M.; Kim, D.-W.; Yu, D.; Cho, A.; Oh, Y.K.; et al. Effects of deoxynivalenol- and zearalenone-contaminated feed on the gene expression profiles in the kidneys of piglets. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 31, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Richards, J.D.; Gong, J.; de Lange, C.F.M. The gastrointestinal microbiota and its role in monogastric nutrition and health with an emphasis on pigs: Current understanding, possible modulations, and new technologies for ecological studies. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2005, 85, 421–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Sommer, F.; Backhed, F. The gut microbiota-masters of host development and physiology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bauer, E.; Williams, B.A.; Smidt, H.; Mosenthin, R.; Verstegen, M.W.A. Influence of dietary components on development of the microbiota in single-stomached species. Nutr. Res. Rev. 2006, 19, 63–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Maresca, M.; Fantini, J. Some food-associated mycotoxins as potential risk factors in humans predisposed to chronic intestinal inflammatory diseases. Toxicon 2010, 56, 282–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Li, F.; Wang, J.; Huang, L.; Chen, H.; Wang, C. Effects of adding Clostridium sp. WJ06 on intestinal morphology and microbial diversity of growing pigs fed with natural deoxynivalenol contaminated wheat. Toxins 2017, 9, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Stich, N.; Model, N.; Samstag, A.; Gruener, C.S.; Wolf, H.M.; Eibl, M.M. Toxic shock syndrome toxin-1-mediated toxicity inhibited by neutralizing antibodies late in the course of continual in vivo and in vitro exposure. Toxins 2014, 6, 1724–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Myer, P.R.; Smith, T.P.L.; Wells, J.E.; Kuehn, L.A.; Freetly, H.C. Rumen microbiome from steers differing in feed efficiency. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0129174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kim, M.; Kuehn, L.A.; Bono, J.L.; Berry, D.D.; Kalchayanand, N.; Freetly, H.C.; Benson, A.K.; Well, J.E. Investigation of bacterial diversity in the feces of cattle fed different diets. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 92, 683–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Piotrowska, M.; Sliżewska, K.; Nowak, A.; Zielonka, L.; Zakowska, Z.; Gajęcka, M.; Gajęcki, M. The effect of experimental fusarium mycotoxicosis on microbiota diversity in porcine ascending colon contents. Toxins 2014, 6, 2064–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Jia, J.; Frantz, N.; Khoo, C.; Gibson, G.R.; Rastall, R.A.; McCartney, A.L. Investigation of the faecal microbiota associated with canine chronic diarrhea. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2010, 71, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Swanson, S.P.; Helaszek, C.; Buck, W.B.; Rood, H.D., Jr.; Haschek, W.M. The role of intestinal microflora in the metabolism of trichothecene mycotoxins. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1988, 26, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. McCormick, S.P. Microbial detoxification of mycotoxins. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39, 907–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kabak, B.; Dobson, A.D.; Var, I. Strategies to prevent mycotoxins contamination of food and animal feed: A review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2006, 46, 593–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Kabak, B.; Dobson, A.D.W. Biological strategies to counteract the effects of mycotoxins. J. Food Protect. 2009, 72, 2006–2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saint-Cyr, M.J.; Perrin-Guyomard, A.; Houée, P.; Rolland, J.G.; Laurentie, M. Evaluation of an oral subchronic exposure of deoxynivalenol on the composition of human gut microbiota in a model of human microbiota associated rats. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Yang, J.; Zhao, Z.; Guo, W.; Guo, J. Effects of deoxynivalenol on intestinal microbiota of mice analyzed by Illumina-MiSeq high-throughput sequencing technology. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2017, 29, 158–167. [Google Scholar]
  32. Scaldaferri, F.; Gerardi, V.; Lopetuso, L.R.; Del Zompo, F.; Mangiola, F.; Boškoski, I.; Bruno, G.; Petito, V.; Laterza, L.; Cammarota, G.; et al. Gut microbial flora, prebiotics, and probiotics in IBD: Their current usage and utility. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 307–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Arqués, J.L.; Rodríguez, E.; Langa, S.; Landete, J.M.; Medina, M. Antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria in dairy products and gut: Effect on pathogens. BioMed. Res. Int. 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Goyal, N.; Rishi, P.; Shukla, G. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG antagonizes Giardia intestinalis induced oxidative stress and intestinal disaccharidases: An experimental study. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 29, 1049–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Konstantinov, S.R.; Awati, A.; Smidt, H.; Williams, B.A.; Akkermans, A.D.L.; de Vos, W.M. Specific response of a novel and abundant Lactobacillus amylovorus-like phylotype to dietary prebiotics in the guts of weaning piglets. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 3821–3830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Hill, J.E.; Hemmingsen, S.M.; Goldade, B.G.; Dumonceaux, T.J.; Klassen, J.; Zijlstra, R.T.; Goh, S.H.; Van Kessel, A.G. Comparison of ileum microflora of pigs fed corn-, wheat, or barley-based diets by chaperonin–60 sequencing and quantitative PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 867–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. El-Nezami, H.S.; Mykkänen, H.; Kankaanpää, P.E.; Suomalainen, T.; Ahokas, J.T.; Salminen, S. The ability of a mixture of Lactobacillus and Propionibacterium examining to influence the fecal recovery of aflatoxins in healthy Egyptian volunteers: A pilot clinical study. Biosci. Microflora 2000, 19, 41–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Pieridis, M.; El-Nezami, H.; Peltonen, K.; Salminen, S.; Ahokas, J. Ability of dairy strains of lactic acid bacteria to bind aflatoxin M1 in a food model. J. Food Prot. 2000, 63, 645–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sonnenburg, J.L.; Backhed, F. Diet-microbiota interactions as moderators of human metabolism. Nature 2016, 535, 56–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. El-Nezami, H.S.; Chrevatidis, A.; Auriola, S.; Salminen, S.; Mykkanen, H. Removal of common Fusarium toxins in vitro by strains of Lactobacillus and Propionibacterium. Food Addit. Contam. 2002, 19, 680–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Yang, W.C.; Hsu, T.C.; Cheng, K.C.; Liu, J.R. Expression of the Clonostachys rosea lactonohydrolase gene by Lactobacillus reuteri to increase its zearalenone-removing ability. Microb. Cell Fact. 2017, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. El-Nezami, H.; Polychronaki, N.; Salminen, S.; Mykkänen, H. Binding rather than metabolism may explain the interaction of two food-grade Lactobacillus strains with zearalenone and its derivative α-zearalenol. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68, 3545–3549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Haskard, C.; El-Nezami, H.S.; Kankaanpää, P.; Salminen, S.; Ahokas, J. Surface binding of aflatoxin B1 by lactic acid bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2001, 67, 3086–3091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhou, T.; He, J.; Gong, J. Microbial transformation of trichothecene mycotoxins. World Mycotoxin J. 2008, 1, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rajendran, R.; Ohta, Y. Binding of heterocyclic amines by lactic acid bacteria from miso, a fermented Japanese food. Can. J. Microbiol. 1998, 44, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Yoshizawa, T.; Takeda, H.; Ohi, T. Structure of a novel metabolite from deoxynivalenol, a trichothecene mycotoxin, in animals. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1983, 47, 2133–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cote, L.M.; Dahlem, A.M.; Yoshizawa, T.; Swanson, S.P.; Buck, W.B. Excretion of deoxynivalenol and its metabolite in milk, urine and feces of lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1986, 69, 2416–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Shima, J.; Takase, S.; Takahashi, Y.; Iwai, Y.; Fujimoto, H.; Yamazaki, M.; Ochi, K. Novel detoxification of the trichothecene mycotoxin deoxynivalenol by a soil bacterium isolated by enrichment culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1997, 63, 3825–3830. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Robert, H.; Payros, D.; Pinton, P.; Théodorou, V.; Mercier-Bonin, M.; Oswald, I.P. Impact of mycotoxins on the intestine: Are mucus and microbiota new targets? J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 2017, 20, 249–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Pinton, P.; Graziani, F.; Pujol, A.; Nicoletti, C.; Paris, O.; Ernouf, P.; Di Pasquale, E.; Perrier, J.; Oswald, I.P.; Maresca, M. Deoxynivalenol inhibits the expression by goblet cells of intestinal mucins through a PKR and MAP kinase dependent repression of the resistin-like molecule β. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2015, 59, 1076–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Gratz, S.; Mykkanen, H.; Ouwehand, A.C.; Juvonen, R.; Salminen, S.; El-Nezami, H. Intestinal mucus alters the ability of probiotic bacteria to bind aflatoxin B1 in vitro. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 6306–6308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Rotter, B.A.; Prelusky, D.B.; Pestks, J.J. Toxicology of deoxynivalenol (vomitoxin). J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 1996, 48, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Lessard, M.C.; Savard, K.; Deschene, K.; Lauzon, V.A.; Pinilla, C.A.; Gagnon, J.; Lapointe, F.; Chorfi, Y. Impact of deoxynivalenol (DON) contaminated feed on intestinal integrity and immune response in swine. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015, 80, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Klieve, A.V.; Hennessy, D.; Ouwerkerk, D.; Forster, R.J.; Mackie, R.I.; Attwood, G.T. Establishing populations of Megasphaera elsdenii YE 34 and Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens YE 44 in the rumen of cattle fed high grain diets. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2003, 95, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Shetty, S.A.; Marathe, N.P.; Lanjekar, V.; Ranade, D.; Shouche, Y.S. Comparative genome analysis of Megasphaera sp. reveals niche specialization and its potential role in the human gut. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Barnett, A.M.; Roy, N.C.; McNabb, W.C.; Cookson, A.L. The interactions between endogenous bacteria, dietary components and the mucus layer of the large bowel. Food Funct. 2012, 3, 690–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Osselaere, A.M.; Devreese, J.; Goossens, V.; Vandenbroucke, S.; De Baere, P.; Croubels, S. Toxicokinetic study and absolute oral bioavailability of deoxynivalenol, T-2 toxin and zearalenone in broiler chickens. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 51, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Frey, J.C.; Pell, A.N.; Berthiaume, R.; Lapierre, H.S.; Lee, J.K.; Ha, J.E.; Angert, E.R. Comparative studies of microbial populations in the rumen, duodenum, ileum and faeces of lactating dairy cows. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 108, 1982–1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Prelusky, D.B.; Veira, D.M.; Trenholm, H.L. Plasma pharmacokinetics of the mycotoxin deoxynivalenol following oral and intravenous administration to sheep. J. Environ. Sci. Health 1985, 20, 603–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Eriksen, G.S.; Pettersson, H.; Johnsen, K.; Lindberg, J.E. Transformation of trichothecenes in ileal digesta and faeces from pigs. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2002, 56, 263–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrition Requirements of Swine, 11th ed.; National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  62. Yu, Z.; Morrison, M. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques 2004, 36, 808–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Magoc, M.; Salzberg, S. FLASH: Fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 2011, 27, 2957–2963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Caporaso, J.G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F.D.; Costello, E.K.; Fierer, N.; Pena, A.G.; Goodrich, J.K.; Gordon, J.I.; et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 335–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. DeSantis, T.Z.; Hugenholtz, P.; Larsen, N.; Rojas, M.; Brodie, E.L.; Keller, K.; Huber, T.; Dalevi, D.; Hu, P.; Andersen, G.L. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 5069–5072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Edgar, R.C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 2460–2461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Toxins 10 00347 g001 550
Figure 1. Microbial taxonomic profiles from the colon contents of the three dietary treatment groups at the phylum (A) and genus (B) levels, classified by the representation of >1% of the total sequences. Taxonomic compositions of the colon microbiota among the control, deoxynivalenol (DON), and zearalenone (ZEN) groups were compared based on the relative abundance (taxon reads/total reads in the colon contents).
Figure 1. Microbial taxonomic profiles from the colon contents of the three dietary treatment groups at the phylum (A) and genus (B) levels, classified by the representation of >1% of the total sequences. Taxonomic compositions of the colon microbiota among the control, deoxynivalenol (DON), and zearalenone (ZEN) groups were compared based on the relative abundance (taxon reads/total reads in the colon contents).
Toxins 10 00347 g001
Toxins 10 00347 g002 550
Figure 2. Relative abundances of the colon microbiota between the control and deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEN) mycotoxin groups. (A) Variations in the relative abundance of the colon microbiota at the phylum level. (B) Variations in the relative abundance of the colon microbiota at the genus level. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, followed by Duncan’s test.
Figure 2. Relative abundances of the colon microbiota between the control and deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEN) mycotoxin groups. (A) Variations in the relative abundance of the colon microbiota at the phylum level. (B) Variations in the relative abundance of the colon microbiota at the genus level. Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). Data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, followed by Duncan’s test.
Toxins 10 00347 g002
Table
Table 1. Diversity statistics of the reads in control and dietary deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEN) treatment samples.
Table 1. Diversity statistics of the reads in control and dietary deoxynivalenol (DON) and zearalenone (ZEN) treatment samples.
Sample GroupSampling TypeNo. of SequencesNo. of Observed OTUs 1Chao1Phylogenetic Diversity Whole TreeShannonSample Group
Control (n = 4)Subsampled reads100,00016,961 a58,020 a791 a9.805 a0.990 a
DON (n = 5)Subsampled reads100,00016,003 a52,108 a,b772 a9.692 a0.991 a
ZEN (n = 5)Subsampled reads100,00014,565 a45,882 b696 a9.353 a0.989 a
1 The number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) was normalized by subsampling 100,000 sequences from each colon contents. Means among the three groups were compared using analysis of variance, followed by Duncan’s test. Values with different superscript letters in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Relative abundances of significantly different operational taxonomic units (OTUs), calculated for the control, deoxynivalenol (DON), and zearalenone (ZEN) dietary groups.
Table 2. Relative abundances of significantly different operational taxonomic units (OTUs), calculated for the control, deoxynivalenol (DON), and zearalenone (ZEN) dietary groups.
OTU ID 1ClassificationPercentage of Total Sequences 2
Collective DataControlDONZENSEMp-Value
denovo28392Lactobacillus1.030.01 b2.77 a0.29 a,b0.0050.006
denovo31941Unclassified Ruminococcaceae2.322.39 a,b1.34 b3.23 a0.0050.025
denovo47686Prevotella0.170.06 b0.14 a,b0.31 a0.0010.001
denovo63294Unclassified Clostridiales0.210.32 a0.10 b0.21 a,b0.0010.005
denovo92866Megasphaera1.130.63 b1.88 a0.89 b0.0020.006
denovo218634Lactobacillus0.900.07 b1.57 a1.05 a,b0.0040.049
denovo231303Unclassified Clostridiaceae0.390.77 a0.04 b0.34 a,b0.0020.019
denovo254063Bulleidia0.180.29 a0.04 b0.22 a,b0.0010.011
denovo274039Faecalibacterium0.390.45 a,b0.21 b0.52 a0.0010.001
1 A total of 192,724 de novo OTUs were numbered in consecutive order. 2 Values represent the means. Values with different superscript letters in the same row are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Ingredients and chemical composition of the piglet standard diet (as-fed basis).
Table 3. Ingredients and chemical composition of the piglet standard diet (as-fed basis).
ItemControl Diet
Ingredients(%)
Ground corn58.56
Soybean meal (46% crude protein)14.00
Extruded soybean meal12.00
Whey powder (12% crude protein)7.00
Fish meal3.45
Soybean oil1.60
L-Lysine-HCl (78%)0.43
DL-Methionine (99%)0.14
L-Threonine (99%)0.12
Calcium hydrophosphate1.08
Limestone0.60
Choline chloride (50%)0.20
Sodium chloride0.32
Vitamin–trace mineral premix 10.50
Calculated nutrients(%)
Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg)3444
Crude fiber2.29
Crude protein20.78
Crude fat3.44
Ash4.35
Lysine1.47
Methionine0.49
Calcium0.75
Phosphorus0.45
1 The following quantities (per kilogram of complete diet) were provided: vitamin A, 11,000 IU; vitamin D3, 1500 IU; vitamin E, 44.1 IU; vitamin K3, 4.0 mg; vitamin B1, 1.4 mg; vitamin B2, 5.22 mg; vitamin B5, 20.0 mg; vitamin B12, 0.01 mg; niacin, 26.0 mg; pantothenic acid, 14 mg; folic acid, 0.8 mg; biotin, 44 mg; Fe, 100.0 mg (as iron sulfate); Cu, 16.50 mg (as copper sulfate); Zn, 90.0 mg (as zinc sulfate); Mn, 35.0 mg (as manganese sulfate); I, 0.30 mg (as calcium iodate).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reddy, K.E.; Jeong, J.Y.; Song, J.; Lee, Y.; Lee, H.-J.; Kim, D.-W.; Jung, H.J.; Kim, K.H.; Kim, M.; Oh, Y.K.; et al. Colon Microbiome of Pigs Fed Diet Contaminated with Commercial Purified Deoxynivalenol and Zearalenone. Toxins 2018, 10, 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10090347

AMA Style

Reddy KE, Jeong JY, Song J, Lee Y, Lee H-J, Kim D-W, Jung HJ, Kim KH, Kim M, Oh YK, et al. Colon Microbiome of Pigs Fed Diet Contaminated with Commercial Purified Deoxynivalenol and Zearalenone. Toxins. 2018; 10(9):347. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10090347

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reddy, Kondreddy Eswar, Jin Young Jeong, Jaeyong Song, Yookyung Lee, Hyun-Jeong Lee, Dong-Wook Kim, Hyun Jung Jung, Ki Hyun Kim, Minji Kim, Young Kyoon Oh, and et al. 2018. "Colon Microbiome of Pigs Fed Diet Contaminated with Commercial Purified Deoxynivalenol and Zearalenone" Toxins 10, no. 9: 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10090347

APA Style

Reddy, K. E., Jeong, J. Y., Song, J., Lee, Y., Lee, H.-J., Kim, D.-W., Jung, H. J., Kim, K. H., Kim, M., Oh, Y. K., Lee, S. D., & Kim, M. (2018). Colon Microbiome of Pigs Fed Diet Contaminated with Commercial Purified Deoxynivalenol and Zearalenone. Toxins, 10(9), 347. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins10090347

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop