Next Article in Journal
Antiproliferative Activity of Triterpene Glycoside Nutrient from Monk Fruit in Colorectal Cancer and Throat Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Flavonoids, Flavonoid Subclasses, and Esophageal Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Epidemiologic Studies
Project Report

Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old

1
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK
2
Human Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
3
Open Lab, School of Computing Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 8HW, UK
4
School of Mathematics and Statistics, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2016, 8(6), 358; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8060358
Received: 19 April 2016 / Revised: 25 May 2016 / Accepted: 31 May 2016 / Published: 9 June 2016
Online dietary assessment tools offer a convenient, low cost alternative to traditional dietary assessment methods such as weighed records and face-to-face interviewer-led 24-h recalls. INTAKE24 is an online multiple pass 24-h recall tool developed for use with 11–24 year-old. The aim of the study was to undertake a comparison of INTAKE24 (the test method) with interviewer-led multiple pass 24-h recalls (the comparison method) in 180 people aged 11–24 years. Each participant completed both an INTAKE24 24-h recall and an interviewer-led 24-h recall on the same day on four occasions over a one-month period. The daily energy and nutrient intakes reported in INTAKE24 were compared to those reported in the interviewer-led recall. Mean intakes reported using INTAKE24 were similar to the intakes reported in the interviewer-led recall for energy and macronutrients. INTAKE24 was found to underestimate energy intake by 1% on average compared to the interviewer-led recall with the limits of agreement ranging from minus 49% to plus 93%. Mean intakes of all macronutrients and micronutrients (except non-milk extrinsic sugars) were within 4% of the interviewer-led recall. Dietary assessment that utilises technology may offer a viable alternative and be more engaging than paper based methods, particularly for children and young adults. View Full-Text
Keywords: INTAKE24; 24-h dietary recall; interviewer-led 24-h dietary recall; automated multiple-pass method; AMPM; dietary assessment methods; online dietary assessment tools INTAKE24; 24-h dietary recall; interviewer-led 24-h dietary recall; automated multiple-pass method; AMPM; dietary assessment methods; online dietary assessment tools
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

Bradley, J.; Simpson, E.; Poliakov, I.; Matthews, J.N.S.; Olivier, P.; Adamson, A.J.; Foster, E. Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old. Nutrients 2016, 8, 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8060358

AMA Style

Bradley J, Simpson E, Poliakov I, Matthews JNS, Olivier P, Adamson AJ, Foster E. Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old. Nutrients. 2016; 8(6):358. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8060358

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bradley, Jennifer, Emma Simpson, Ivan Poliakov, John N.S. Matthews, Patrick Olivier, Ashley J. Adamson, and Emma Foster. 2016. "Comparison of INTAKE24 (an Online 24-h Dietary Recall Tool) with Interviewer-Led 24-h Recall in 11–24 Year-Old" Nutrients 8, no. 6: 358. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8060358

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop