Next Article in Journal
Iron-Folic Acid Supplementation During Pregnancy Reduces the Risk of Stunting in Children Less Than 2 Years of Age: A Retrospective Cohort Study from Nepal
Next Article in Special Issue
Anorexia of Aging: Risk Factors, Consequences, and Potential Treatments
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Food Rations and Supplements on Micronutrient Status by Trimester of Pregnancy: Cross-Sectional Studies in the Maela Refugee Camp in Thailand
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Dietary Protein Source and Quantity during Weight Loss on Appetite, Energy Expenditure, and Cardio-Metabolic Responses
Open AccessArticle

Effects of Oral Exposure Duration and Gastric Energy Content on Appetite Ratings and Energy Intake in Lean Men

1
Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands
2
Nestlé Research Center, Nestec Limited, PO Box 44, 1000 Lausanne 26; Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2016, 8(2), 64; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8020064
Received: 16 September 2015 / Revised: 19 January 2016 / Accepted: 20 January 2016 / Published: 26 January 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food and Appetite)
Studies show that longer oral exposure to food leads to earlier satiation and lowers energy intake. Moreover, higher energy content of food has been shown to lead to higher satiety. Up to now, it has not been studied systematically how oral exposure duration and gastric energy content interact in satiety regulation. Thirty-seven men (22 ± 4 years, 22 ± 2 kg/m2) participated in a randomized cross-over trial, in which we independently manipulated: (1) oral exposure duration by modified sham feeding (MSF) for 1 or 8 min; and (2) energy content of gastric load (GL) by a nasogastric tube: 100 kcal/500 mL or 700 kcal/500 mL. Outcome measures were appetite ratings and subsequent energy intake from an ad libitum meal. Energy intake was 35% lower after the GLs with 700 kcal than with 100kcal (p < 0.0001). All appetite ratings were lower in the 700 kcal than in the 100 kcal treatments (area under the curve (AUC); p-values ≤ 0.002); fullness was higher and prospective consumption was lower in the 8 min than in the 1 min MSF treatments (AUC; p-values ≤ 0.02). In conclusion, the current showed that a GL of 700 kcal/500 mL vs. 100 kcal/500 mL increased satiety and lowered energy intake. No additional effects of oral exposure duration could be observed, presumably due to the high contrast in energy between the manipulations. Future research should also focus on the role of oral exposure as such and not only the duration. View Full-Text
Keywords: satiety; appetite; energy intake; oral exposure; gastric energy content satiety; appetite; energy intake; oral exposure; gastric energy content
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Wijlens, A.G.M.; De Graaf, C.; Erkner, A.; Mars, M. Effects of Oral Exposure Duration and Gastric Energy Content on Appetite Ratings and Energy Intake in Lean Men. Nutrients 2016, 8, 64.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop