Next Article in Journal
Beyond Glycaemic Thresholds: Towards a Comprehensive Metabolic Understanding of Gestational Diabetes
Previous Article in Journal
Comparative Effectiveness of Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Nausea and Vomiting in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Exploratory Pilot Study of Inflammatory Cytokine Gene Polymorphisms and Residual Postoperative Outcomes in Older Women One Year After Bariatric Surgery

by
Dante Mafra Tourino Teixeira
1,
Antonio Avelino Ferreira Soares
1,
Renata de Souza Freitas
1,
Larissa Sousa Silva Bonasser
2,
Caroline Ferreira Fratelli
1,
Calliandra Maria de Souza Silva
1,3,
Evelyn Mikaela Kogawa
4,
Linconl Agudo Oliveira Benito
5 and
Izabel Cristina Rodrigues da Silva
1,2,*
1
Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technology, University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia-Federal District (DF), Brasilia 72220-900, Brazil
2
Postgraduate Program in Clinical Psychology and Culture, Institute of Psychology, University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasília-Federal District (DF), Brasilia 72220-900, Brazil
3
Academic Unit of Biotechnology Engineering (UAEB), Center for Sustainable Development of the Semi-Arid Region (CDSA), Sumé Campus, Federal University of Campina Grande, Sumé-Paraíba, Sumé 58540-000, Brazil
4
Department of Dentistry, School of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia (UnB), Brasilia-Federal District (DF), Brasilia 70910-900, Brazil
5
Nursing Department, Centro Universitário de Brasilia, Asa Norte Campus, Brasilia-Federal District (DF), Brasilia 70790-075, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2026, 18(8), 1294; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18081294
Submission received: 30 December 2025 / Revised: 11 February 2026 / Accepted: 13 February 2026 / Published: 20 April 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition in Women)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Obesity is characterized by chronic low-grade inflammation, and bariatric surgery promotes substantial metabolic and inflammatory improvement. However, residual obesity and microvascular complications may persist in some individuals, suggesting potential genetic influences on postoperative outcomes. This exploratory pilot study investigated the association between inflammatory cytokine gene polymorphisms and clinical, metabolic, and inflammatory outcomes in older women one year after bariatric surgery. Methods: This cross-sectional, hypothesis-generating pilot study included 21 women aged ≥50 years (mean 61.6 ± 5.0) who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at a public bariatric center in Brazil. Anthropometry, body composition, biochemical markers, and serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were assessed 12 months postoperatively. Genotyping for IL6-174G/C (rs1800795) and TNFA-308G/A (rs1800629) was performed using PCR-RFLP. Associations were analyzed using non-parametric statistical tests. Results: Notably, the IL6-174CC genotype was associated with persistent obesity, whereas carriers of the TNFA-308A allele showed a higher prevalence of diabetic retinopathy. These results highlight genotype-specific postoperative outcomes. No significant genotype-related differences were observed for most anthropometric, biochemical, or inflammatory parameters, indicating substantial overall metabolic improvement after surgery regardless of genetic background. However, the observed associations were based on a small sample and should be interpreted cautiously. Conclusions: This exploratory pilot study revealed associations between inflammatory cytokine gene polymorphisms and selected postoperative outcomes, particularly persistent obesity and diabetic retinopathy, in older women one year after bariatric surgery. These hypothesis-generating findings emphasize the need for larger, longitudinal studies to clarify the role of genetic factors in postoperative heterogeneity after bariatric surgery.

1. Introduction

Obesity is a chronic, multifactorial condition characterized by abnormal lipid accumulation and excessive adipose tissue, which contributes to a persistent low-grade systemic inflammation [1,2]. This inflammatory milieu contributes to the development of insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and other metabolic complications, disproportionately affecting older adults due to age-related metabolic and physiological changes [3,4]. As global population aging progresses, obesity in elderly individuals has emerged as a growing public health concern, with substantial clinical and economic implications [5,6].
Bariatric surgery is currently recognized as the most effective therapeutic strategy for sustained weight loss and improvement of obesity-related comorbidities [7,8]. Beyond mechanical restriction and nutrient malabsorption, procedures such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) induce profound metabolic and immunological remodeling, leading to reductions in systemic inflammation and improvement of glycemic and lipid profiles [9,10]. Consequently, bariatric surgery has increasingly been conceptualized as “metabolic surgery” [11]. Although these benefits are well established, postoperative outcomes are heterogeneous, and a subset of patients continues to exhibit residual obesity or obesity-related complications despite adequate surgical intervention [12].
In older populations, this heterogeneity is further accentuated. Aging is associated with reductions in basal metabolic rate, loss of lean mass, altered adipose tissue distribution, and impaired inflammatory resolution, potentially limiting the magnitude or durability of postoperative metabolic improvement [4]. Despite growing evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of bariatric surgery in older adults, age-related physiological changes may interact with inflammatory pathways, influencing long-term outcomes [12,13].
Patients’ genetic background represents a potential contributor to this variability. Polymorphisms in genes encoding pro-inflammatory cytokines may influence cytokine expression, inflammatory tone, and tissue responses to metabolic stress [14,15]. Among these, interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) play central roles in obesity-related inflammation, insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction, and microvascular injury [3,16]. The IL6-174G/C (rs1800795) polymorphism has been associated with differential transcriptional activity and circulating IL-6 levels, while the TNFA-308G/A (rs1800629) polymorphism has been linked to increased TNF-α expression and susceptibility to metabolic and vascular complications [16,17,18].
However, evidence regarding the influence of these polymorphisms on postoperative outcomes after bariatric surgery remains limited and inconsistent. Most previous studies have focused on younger or mixed-age populations and have primarily evaluated short-term metabolic endpoints, with limited attention to inflammatory resolution or microvascular outcomes in older adults [7,14]. Data specifically addressing whether inflammatory gene polymorphisms modulate residual obesity or microvascular complications in older women after bariatric surgery are scarce.
Despite the well-established metabolic and inflammatory benefits of bariatric surgery, substantial interindividual variability in postoperative outcomes persists, particularly among older adults. Age-related metabolic alterations, prolong exposure to obesity-associated inflammation, and reduced physiological resilience may contribute to heterogeneous responses, including persistent obesity and microvascular complications.
Although inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) are central to obesity-related inflammation and vascular dysfunction, evidence on whether genetic polymorphisms in these pathways affect postoperative outcomes after bariatric surgery remains limited, particularly in older women. Most available studies have focused on younger or mixed-age populations and have seldom addressed residual clinical outcomes in older women.
Therefore, this exploratory, hypothesis-generating pilot study investigated associations between the IL6-174G/C (rs1800795) and TNFA-308G/A (rs1800629) polymorphisms and postoperative anthropometric, biochemical, inflammatory, and clinical outcomes in older women one year after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, with particular attention to persistent obesity and microvascular complications.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants

This study was designed as a cross-sectional, exploratory, and analytical investigation, conducted 12 months after bariatric surgery. The objective was to explore associations between inflammatory cytokine gene polymorphisms and postoperative anthropometric, biochemical, inflammatory, and clinical outcomes. Due to its cross-sectional design, this study does not allow for causal inference or for assessing temporal changes following surgery.
The study population comprised 21 women aged ≥50 years (mean 61.6 ± 5.0 years) who had undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) exactly one year prior to data collection. All participants were recruited from the bariatric surgery reference service of the Federal District’s State Health Department (SESDF), Brazil, a public tertiary center operating under standardized multidisciplinary postoperative follow-up protocols.
Given its exploratory design and the limited sample size, this study was not intended to establish causal relationships or definitive genetic associations but rather to generate hypotheses regarding potential genotype–phenotype relationships in this specific population.

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion criteria were: (i) female sex; (ii) age ≥50 years at the time of evaluation; (iii) completion of at least 12 months of postoperative follow-up after RYGB; (iv) bariatric surgery performed at the Regional Hospital of Asa Norte (HRAN); and (v) cognitive ability to understand and respond to study procedures.
Exclusion criteria included: (i) age < 50 years; (ii) bariatric surgery performed less than 12 months prior to evaluation; (iii) bariatric procedures performed at other institutions; and (iv) documented psychiatric or neurological conditions that could compromise informed consent or data reliability. No participants reported diagnosed autoimmune or chronic inflammatory diseases or use of immunosuppressive therapy at the time of evaluation; however, residual confounding by unmeasured inflammatory conditions cannot be entirely excluded.

2.3. Ethical Considerations

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Health Sciences Teaching and Research Foundation (FEPECS), State Secretariat of Health of the Federal District (approval number 1.910.166). All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation.

2.4. Clinical and Anthropometric Assessment

Clinical and anthropometric data were obtained during routine postoperative follow-up visits and from medical records. Trained healthcare professionals measured body weight and height, and body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height2 (m2).
Persistent obesity was operationally defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 at 12 months after surgery, in accordance with World Health Organization criteria. Obesity-related clinical conditions (e.g., hypertension, dyslipidemia, neuropathy) were identified from documented medical diagnoses in patient records.
Preoperative anthropometric and metabolic data were not available for comparison, as the present analysis focused exclusively on postoperative outcomes at 12 months. Therefore, changes over time could not be assessed.
Diabetic retinopathy was considered present when recorded in the medical chart by an ophthalmologist during routine diabetes follow-up; no additional ophthalmological examinations were conducted specifically for this study.

2.5. Clinical and Laboratory Evaluation

Blood samples were collected 12 months postoperatively following an overnight fast. All biochemical analyses—including fasting blood glucose, lipid profile (total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, VLDL-C, triglycerides), and total lipid concentration—were performed in the same certified laboratory using standardized commercial assays.
Serum total vitamin D [25-hydroxyvitamin D, 25(OH)D] concentrations were measured using a chemiluminescence immunoassay (LIAISON® 25(OH)D Total Assay, DiaSorin, Via Crescentino s.n.c., 13040-Saluggia, Vercelli, Italy), with a functional sensitivity of <10 nmol/L and an inter-assay coefficient of variation of 7.8%.
Serum concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits specific for human cytokines (Invitrogen/Thermo Fisher Scientific, 81 Wyman Street, Waltham, MA, USA). The minimum detectable concentrations were 1.1 pg/mL for IL-6 and 4.8 pg/mL for TNF-α. Cytokine measurements were obtained at a single time point; therefore, intraindividual variability over time could not be assessed.
Information regarding diabetes duration, historical glycemic control (e.g., HbA1c), detailed dietary intake, physical activity levels, and medication use was not systematically available and therefore could not be included in the analyses.

2.6. Body Composition Assessment

Body composition was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Lunar Prodigy Advance, GE Healthcare, 500 West Monroe Street, Chicago, IL, USA). Measurements of fat mass, lean mass, and total body bone mineral density were performed by the same trained operator. Participants were instructed to fast for at least 4 h and to avoid physical activity for 24 h before the exam. The DXA device was calibrated before each measurement session. The coefficients of variation in the laboratory were 1.03% for fat mass, 1.35% for lean mass, and 0.83% for bone mineral density.

2.7. Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood samples using standard procedures. Genotyping of IL6-174G/C (rs1800795) polymorphism was performed using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) combined with restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis [19]. The forward and reverse primers used to amplify IL6-174G/C (rs1800795) were 5′-ATG CCA AAG TGC TGA GTC ACT A-3′ and 5′-GGA AAA TCC CAC ATT TGA TA-3′, respectively. The cycling program used for amplification was as follows: an initial denaturing step of 5 min at 94 °C and subsequently 35 denaturing cycles of 1 min at 94 °C, annealing of 1 min at 55 °C and extension of 50 s at 72 °C, ending with a final extension of 7 min at 72 °C. The PCR product was subjected to RFLP analysis with the restriction enzyme NlaIII (New England BioLabs Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA). The resulting product should consist of 232 base pairs in the absence of polymorphism (GG), while the presence (CC) should result in two bands, one band of 125 base pairs and another of 107 base pairs. PCR-RFLP products were visualized in a 3% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and exposed to ultraviolet light.
The TNFA-308G/A (rs1800629) polymorphism was also genotyped using PCR-RFLP [20]. The forward and reverse primers used to amplify TNFA-308G/A (rs1800629) were 5′-AGG CAA TAG GTT TTG AGG GCC AT-3′ and 5′-TCC TCC CTG CTC CGA TTC CG-3′, respectively. The amplification was performed using the following cycle program: an initial denaturing step at 95 °C for 10 min, then 38 denaturing cycles at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 57 °C for 1 min and extension to 72 °C for 1 min, followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 8 min. 107 bp PCR products were subsequently incubated for 90 min at 37 °C with the enzyme NcoI. The allele G was cut into two fragments of 87 and 20 bp, while allele A remained undigested. These fragments were visualized in a 3.5% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and exposed to ultraviolet light.
Genotype distributions were evaluated within a phenotype-enriched clinical sample. For the IL6-174G/C polymorphism, GG and GC genotypes were combined in subsequent analyses due to the low frequency of heterozygotes and to improve analytical stability in this exploratory study.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Clinical characteristics were expressed as categorical variables or genotypic frequencies. Differences between TNFA-308G/A and IL6-174G/C genotypes and anthropometric, biochemical, and immunological parameters were evaluated using non-parametric tests, with results presented as quartiles. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was assessed using the chi-square test (df = 1) based on observed genotype frequencies in the study sample. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 29.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), with a significance level of 5%.
Given the small sample size and exploratory nature of the study, all statistical analyses were conducted with the primary aim of identifying preliminary associations rather than establishing definitive genetic effects. Therefore, findings should be interpreted with caution and regarded as hypothesis-generating.
The sample size (n = 21) was estimated using a 95% confidence interval, a 15% margin of error, a population size of 28, and a response rate of 50%, yielding a minimum of 18 participants after accounting for a 15% loss rate. It is acknowledged that this sample size is limited for formal genetic association studies and may increase the risk of type I error. Accordingly, the present analyses were designed to be exploratory and descriptive in nature.

3. Results

3.1. TNFA-308 G/A Polymorphism

A comprehensive analysis of anthropometric, biochemical, and clinical variables according to the TNFA-308G/A polymorphism is presented in Table 1 and Table 2. TNF-α serum concentrations did not differ significantly between individuals with the GG genotype and those heterozygous for AG (p = 0.485). Percentile distributions of TNF-α values (P25, median, P75) showed substantial overlap between genotypes, indicating that the presence of the A allele did not influence circulating TNF-α levels in this cohort. This lack of genotypic effect was consistent across all additional biochemical markers assessed, including fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol, LDL-C, HDL-C, VLDL, triglycerides, non-HDL cholesterol, vitamin D, and total lipid concentration. For all parameters, p-values exceeded the conventional threshold (p > 0.05), indicating a homogeneous metabolic profile across genotype.
Similarly, body composition metrics obtained by densitometric analysis—namely, total fat mass, lean mass, and total bone mineral density—showed no significant differences between individuals with the GG genotype and those with the AG genotype. Percentile distributions once again exhibited substantial overlap, reinforcing the interpretation that the TNFA-308G/A polymorphism does not exert a significant influence on adiposity, musculoskeletal composition, or bone density in this clinical sample.
Table 2 summarizes the distribution of qualitative and clinical variables. Across multiple comorbidities and symptoms—including hypertension, depression/anxiety, fibromyalgia, dyslipidemia, vaginal dryness, history of hyperosmolar coma, gastrointestinal symptoms (dysphagia or dyspepsia), neuropathy, amputation, and musculoskeletal pain (arthralgia or myalgia)—no significant associations with genotype were observed (all p > 0.05). These findings suggest that the TNFA-308G/A variant does not influence the expression of these clinical conditions in individuals undergoing bariatric surgery.
The sole statistically significant association identified was with diabetic retinopathy. Carriers of the TNFA-308 A allele showed a higher prevalence of retinopathy compared to GG genotype carriers (p = 0.027). This result is based on a limited number of cases and should therefore be interpreted cautiously, particularly given the exploratory nature of the study and the absence of longitudinal clinical data.
Genotypic frequency analysis revealed that 61.9% of participants carried the GG genotype and 38.1% the AG genotype, while the AA genotype was absent, consistent with a low minor allele frequency. The distribution conformed to Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (p = 0.281), indicating no evidence of selective pressure, nonrandom mating, or mutational distortion at this locus.

3.2. IL6-174G/C Polymorphism

Table 3 displays biochemical and anthropometric variables stratified by IL6-174 G/C genotype. Median IL-6 serum concentrations did not differ significantly between GG+GC carriers and CC homozygotes (p = 0.240). Although CC homozygotes exhibited a broader interquartile range, the lack of statistical significance suggests that IL-6 level variability was not attributable to this polymorphism. Similarly, no significant differences were observed for fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-C, HDL-C, VLDL, non-HDL cholesterol, total lipids, vitamin D levels, and densitometric markers (fat mass, lean mass, and bone mineral density), with all p > 0.05. These findings collectively indicate that this IL6 gene variant does not contribute to interindividual variability in biochemical or anthropometric parameters in this cohort.
Table 4 outlines the distribution of qualitative variables by genotype. As with the TNFA polymorphism, most clinical conditions—including hypertension, depression/anxiety, fibromyalgia, dyslipidemia, hyperosmolar coma, vaginal dryness, retinopathy, nephropathy, neuropathy, amputation, musculoskeletal pain, and gastrointestinal symptoms—showed no significant associations (all p > 0.05), suggesting that the IL6 promoter variant is not an essential determinant of these clinical features within this cohort.
A notable exception was observed for obesity. A statistically significant association was found between the IL6-174 CC genotype and persistent obesity at 12 months post-surgery (p = 0.035). However, this association was based on a very small number of cases, and no significant differences were detected for continuous anthropometric, biochemical, or inflammatory variables across genotypes.
Genotypic frequencies were 47.62% for GG, 19.05% for GC, and 33.33% for CC. Genotypic distribution for the IL6-174G/C polymorphism deviated from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (p = 0.005), which is likely attributable to the phenotype-enriched nature of the sample, consisting exclusively of older women with a history of severe obesity undergoing bariatric surgery, rather than to genotyping error.
Overall, postoperative anthropometric, biochemical, and inflammatory profiles improved substantially across genotypes. Apart from the associations described above, no consistent genotype-related differences were observed, reinforcing the exploratory and descriptive nature of these findings.

4. Discussion

This exploratory pilot study investigated whether polymorphisms in inflammatory cytokine genes (IL6-174G/C and TNFA-308G/A) are associated with postoperative anthropometric, inflammatory, and clinical outcomes in older women one year after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Two preliminary genotype–phenotype associations were observed: persistent obesity among carriers of the IL6-174 CC genotype and a higher prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among carriers of the TNFA-308 A allele. In contrast, most anthropometric, biochemical, and inflammatory parameters demonstrated substantial postoperative improvement irrespective of genotype [8,10].
Given the cross-sectional design, small sample size, and reliance on single-time-point inflammatory measurements, these findings should be interpreted cautiously and regarded as hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory.

4.1. IL6-174G/C Polymorphism and Obesity Persistence

The association between the IL6-174 CC genotype and persistent obesity observed in this study should be interpreted with caution. Although the C allele has been characterized as a low-producing IL6 variant in functional studies, circulating IL-6 concentrations did not differ significantly between genotypes in the present sample [21,22]. This apparent discrepancy may reflect the dominant anti-inflammatory effects of bariatric surgery, age-related alterations in inflammatory regulation, and the limitation of single postoperative cytokine measurements [23].
Importantly, the observed association was based on a very small number of CC carriers with persistent obesity, and no significant genotype-related differences were detected for continuous anthropometric or body composition variables. Therefore, this finding should be considered preliminary and may reflect residual variability in metabolic adaptation rather than a direct genetic effect [2,3].

4.2. TNFA-308G/A Polymorphism and Retinopathy

The TNFA-308G/A polymorphism was not associated with postoperative metabolic parameters or circulating TNF-α levels in this cohort. Carriers of the TNFA-308 A allele exhibited a higher prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in this cohort. This finding is biologically plausible, as the −308 A allele has been associated with increased TNF-α transcriptional activity and susceptibility to microvascular complications in previous studies. However, the present analysis did not assess the onset, progression, or regression of retinopathy following bariatric surgery [17,24,25].
Consequently, this association most likely reflects the persistence of pre-existing microvascular damage rather than an insufficient metabolic response to surgery. Chronic inflammatory exposure and endothelial dysfunction may result in irreversible structural changes that are not fully reversed despite substantial postoperative metabolic improvement [3,26].

4.3. Genotype-Independent Metabolic Improvements

Despite genotype-specific associations, the majority of anthropometric, biochemical, and body composition parameters improved substantially across all genotypes. These findings are consistent with previous evidence demonstrating that bariatric surgery induces broad metabolic and inflammatory benefits, largely independent of genetic background [7,11]. Long-term reductions in low-grade systemic inflammation after surgery have been consistently reported, although not all inflammatory mediators normalize uniformly [8,10].
The lack of significant differences in circulating IL-6 and TNF-α levels across genotypes may also be explained by the profound systemic anti-inflammatory effects induced by bariatric surgery. In older individuals, postoperative inflammatory profiles may be more strongly influenced by surgical, metabolic, and age-related factors than by modest genetic variation. Furthermore, circulating cytokine concentrations may not adequately reflect tissue-specific inflammatory signaling relevant to adipose tissue or microvascular compartments.

4.4. Clinical Implications and Future Directions

Although the present findings do not support a major role for inflammatory gene polymorphisms in determining overall metabolic response to bariatric surgery, they suggest that genetic background may contribute to residual heterogeneity in specific postoperative outcomes, such as persistent obesity or microvascular complications. In older women—who may have longer exposure to metabolic stress and reduced physiological resilience—such genetic influences may have implications for individualized postoperative monitoring strategies [12,13].
Future studies should include larger, more diverse populations, longitudinal inflammatory profiling, and adjustment for key clinical confounders, such as obesity duration, diabetes history, glycemic control, and lifestyle factors. Integration of genetic data with epigenetic and transcriptomic analyses may further elucidate mechanisms underlying postoperative heterogeneity and support the development of more personalized postoperative care strategies [14,15].
Several limitations should be acknowledged. The small sample size limits statistical power and increases the risk of type I error, precluding definitive genetic association inferences. The cross-sectional design and absence of preoperative data or a non-surgical control group prevent assessment of temporal changes and causal relationships. Additionally, information on diabetes duration, historical glycemic control, lifestyle factors, medication use, and potential age-related confounders was unavailable.
Deviations from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for the IL6 polymorphism are likely due to the phenotype-enriched nature of this bariatric cohort rather than genotyping error. Collectively, these limitations reinforce the exploratory character of the study and underscore the need for cautious interpretation.
Despite these limitations, the present findings suggest that host genetic background may contribute to residual heterogeneity in selected postoperative outcomes after bariatric surgery, particularly in older women with long-standing metabolic burden. Rather than supporting immediate clinical application, these results highlight the importance of further longitudinal studies integrating genetic, inflammatory, and clinical data to clarify mechanisms underlying postoperative variability and to inform personalized postoperative monitoring strategies.

5. Conclusions

This exploratory pilot study evaluated associations between inflammatory cytokine gene polymorphisms and postoperative outcomes in older women one year after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. While substantial metabolic, anthropometric, and inflammatory improvements were observed across the cohort irrespective of genotype, two preliminary genotype–phenotype associations were identified: persistent obesity among carriers of the IL6-174 CC genotype and a higher prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among carriers of the TNFA-308 A allele.
Given the cross-sectional design, small sample size, and absence of preoperative data, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and interpreted with caution. They do not support causal inference or immediate clinical application, but rather highlight the potential contribution of host genetic background to postoperative heterogeneity in selected outcomes, particularly in older women with long-standing metabolic burden.
Future studies with larger samples, longitudinal designs, and integrated clinical and inflammatory profiling are warranted to confirm these associations and to clarify the role of inflammatory gene polymorphisms in shaping long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.A.O.B., E.M.K. and I.C.R.d.S.; methodology, R.d.S.F., L.S.S.B., C.M.d.S.S. and I.C.R.d.S.; formal analysis D.M.T.T., A.A.F.S. and I.C.R.d.S.; investigation, D.M.T.T., A.A.F.S. and I.C.R.d.S.; resources, C.F.F., E.M.K. and I.C.R.d.S.; data curation, C.M.d.S.S. and I.C.R.d.S.; writing—original draft preparation D.M.T.T. and A.A.F.S.; writing—review and editing D.M.T.T., A.A.F.S., C.M.d.S.S. and I.C.R.d.S.; supervision E.M.K. and I.C.R.d.S.; project administration, L.A.O.B., E.M.K. and I.C.R.d.S.; funding acquisition, E.M.K. and C.F.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)—Finance Code: 001 (students’ scholarships), the Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal (FAPDF)—Finance Code: EDITAL Nº 09/2023, Protocol: 35116.162.29708.18082023, Process nº 00193-00002187/2023-24—and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) with the Ministério da Saúde/Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia (MS/Decit)—Finance Code: 444755/2023-3, Brazil.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee Review Board) of Health Sciences Teaching and Research Foundation (FEPECS) (protocol code 1.910.166 and date of approval: 6 February 2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The research data are contained in the article’s tables.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the patients for their valuable participation in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kessler, C. Pathophysiology of Obesity. Nurs. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 56, 465–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Battineni, G.; Sagaro, G.G.; Chintalapudi, N.; Amenta, F.; Tomassoni, D.; Tayebati, S.K. Impact of Obesity-Induced Inflammation on Cardiovascular Diseases (CVD). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Rohm, T.V.; Meier, D.T.; Olefsky, J.M.; Donath, M.Y. Inflammation in Obesity, Diabetes, and Related Disorders. Immunity 2022, 55, 31–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kian, R.S.; de Aguiar Barbosa Scaliante, V.; Silva, T.B. da Obesidade No Brasil entre os anos de 2013 e 2019: Uma revisão narrativa da literatura e análise epidemiológica. Braz. J. Health Rev. 2024, 7, e71770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Okunogbe, A.; Nugent, R.; Spencer, G.; Powis, J.; Ralston, J.; Wilding, J. Economic Impacts of Overweight and Obesity: Current and Future Estimates for 161 Countries. BMJ Glob. Health 2022, 7, e009773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. World Health Organization. Obesity and Overweight. Available online: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. (accessed on 25 December 2025).
  7. Eisenberg, D.; Shikora, S.A.; Aarts, E.; Aminian, A.; Angrisani, L.; Cohen, R.V.; De Luca, M.; Faria, S.L.; Goodpaster, K.P.S.; Haddad, A.; et al. 2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders (IFSO): Indications for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. 2022, 18, 1345–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gulinac, M.; Miteva, D.G.; Peshevska-Sekulovska, M.; Novakov, I.P.; Antovic, S.; Peruhova, M.; Snegarova, V.; Kabakchieva, P.; Assyov, Y.; Vasilev, G.; et al. Long-Term Effectiveness, Outcomes and Complications of Bariatric Surgery. World J. Clin. Cases 2023, 11, 4504–4512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ionut, V.; Bergman, R.N. Mechanisms Responsible for Excess Weight Loss after Bariatric Surgery. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 2011, 5, 1263–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lautenbach, A.; Stoll, F.; Mann, O.; Busch, P.; Huber, T.B.; Kielstein, H.; Bähr, I.; Aberle, J. Long-Term Improvement of Chronic Low-Grade Inflammation After Bariatric Surgery. Obes. Surg. 2021, 31, 2913–2920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Caiazzo, R.; Marciniak, C.; Rémond, A.; Baud, G.; Pattou, F. Future of Bariatric Surgery beyond Simple Weight Loss: Metabolic Surgery. J. Visc. Surg. 2023, 160, S55–S62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Iranmanesh, P.; Boudreau, V.; Ramji, K.; Barlow, K.; Lovrics, O.; Anvari, M. Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery in Elderly Patients: A Registry-Based Cohort Study with 3-Year Follow-Up. Int. J. Obes. 2022, 46, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pajecki, D.; Dantas, A.C.B.; Kanaji, A.L.; de Oliveira, D.R.C.F.; de Cleva, R.; Santo, M.A. Bariatric Surgery in the Elderly: A Randomized Prospective Study Comparing Safety of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (BASE Trial). Surg. Obes. Relat. Dis. 2020, 16, 1436–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rodrigues, K.F.; Pietrani, N.T.; Bosco, A.A.; Campos, F.M.F.; Sandrim, V.C.; Gomes, K.B. IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-10 Levels/Polymorphisms and Their Association with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity in Brazilian Individuals. Arch. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 61, 438–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Azeez, S.H. Influence of IL-10, IL-6 and TNF-α Gene Polymorphism on Obesity. Cell Mol. Biol. 2023, 69, 277–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Curti, M.L.R.; Pires, M.M.; Barros, C.R.; Siqueira-Catania, A.; Rogero, M.M.E.; Ferreira, S.R.G. Associations of the TNF-Alpha -308 G/A, IL6 -174 G/C and AdipoQ 45 T/G Polymorphisms with Inflammatory and Metabolic Responses to Lifestyle Intervention in Brazilians at High Cardiometabolic Risk. Diabetol. Metab. Syndr. 2012, 4, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Yu, G.I.; Ha, E.; Park, S.H.; Park, J.H.; Jang, H.S.; Bae, J.H.; Chung, I.S.; Shin, D.H.; Song, D.K. Association of Tumor Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) Promoter Polymorphisms with Overweight/Obesity in a Korean Population. Inflamm. Res. 2011, 60, 1099–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vaxillaire, M.; Veslot, J.; Dina, C.; Proença, C.; Cauchi, S.; Charpentier, G.; Tichet, J.; Fumeron, F.; Marre, M.; Meyre, D.; et al. Impact of Common Type 2 Diabetes Risk Polymorphisms in the DESIR Prospective Study. Diabetes 2008, 57, 244–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Cekin, N.; Akin, S.; Pinarbasi, E.; Doğan, O.H. Impact of IL-6 Rs1800795 and Rs1800796 Polymorphisms on Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19: A Study on Severity of Disease in Turkish Population. Mamm. Genome 2025, 36, 213–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Trapali, M.; Houhoula, D.; Batrinou, A.; Kanellou, A.; Strati, I.F.; Siatelis, A.; Halvatsiotis, P. Association of Tnf-α -308G/A and Lepr Gln223Arg Polymorphisms with the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Genes. 2021, 13, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fishman, D.; Faulds, G.; Jeffery, R.; Mohamed-Ali, V.; Yudkin, J.S.; Humphries, S.; Woo, P. Interleukin-6 Polymorphisms and Systemic-Onset Juvenile Chronic Arthritis The Effect of Novel Polymorphisms in the Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Gene on IL-6 Transcription and Plasma IL-6 Levels, and an Association with Systemic-Onset Juvenile Chronic Arthritis. J. Clin. Invest. 1998, 102, 1369–1376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Burzotta, F.; Iacoviello, L.; Castelnuovo, A.D.; Glieca, F.; Luciani, N.; Zamparelli, R.; Schiavello, R.; Donati, M.B.; Maseri, A.; Possati, G.; et al. Relation of the 174 G/C Polymorphism of Interleukin-6 to Interleukin-6 Plasma Levels and to Length of Hospitalization After Surgical Coronary Revascularization. Am. J. Cardiol. 2001, 88, 1125–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Jensen, R.T.; Thuesen, A.C.B.; Huang, Y.; Stinson, S.E.; Juel, H.B.; Madsbad, S.; Bendtsen, F.; Hansen, T.; Pedersen, J.S. Changes in Inflammatory Markers Following Bariatric Surgery and the Impact of the Surgical Procedure: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study. Obes. Surg. 2025, 35, 2626–2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sesti, L.F.C.; Crispim, D.; Canani, L.H.; Polina, E.R.; Rheinheimer, J.; Carvalho, P.S.; Gross, J.L.; Santos, K.G. The −308G > a Polymorphism of the TNF Gene Is Associated with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy in Caucasian Brazilians with Type 2 Diabetes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2015, 56, 1184–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  25. Liu, M.; Shang, M.; Wang, Y.; Li, Q.; Liu, X.; Yang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, K.; Liu, S.; Nie, F.; et al. Effects of TNF-α-308G/A Polymorphism on the Risk of Diabetic Nephropathy and Diabetic Retinopathy: An Updated Meta-Analysis. Horm. Metab. Res. 2020, 52, 724–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yu, C.W.; Park, L.J.; Pinto, A.; Ma, O.N.; Lee, Y.; Gupta, R.; Chaudhary, V.; Doumouras, A.G.; Hong, D. The Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 225, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Anthropometric and biochemical characteristics according to TNFA-308G/A genotype.
Table 1. Anthropometric and biochemical characteristics according to TNFA-308G/A genotype.
TNFA-308G/A
GG (N = 13)AG (N = 8)
P25MedianP75P25MedianP75p
[TNF-α] pg/mL10.3513.8817.8913.5815.9217.440.485
Fasting Blood Glucose84.0090.5097.0074.0076.5093.000.180
Total Cholesterol154.00179.00200.00187.00202.00212.000.240
Triglycerides96.00107.50135.0091.00110.00130.000.589
HDL59.0061.0063.0056.0060.5084.000.818
LDL71.8094.50106.6085.40115.00129.400.394
VLDL19.2021.5027.0018.2022.0026.000.589
Non-HDL Cholesterol91.00116.00151.00119.00134.50148.000.485
Total lipids481.00555.00635.00597.50617.50643.000.394
Vitamin D19.0030.5039.7023.7026.7530.600.818
Fat Mass (g)23,724.0028,165.0033,423.0028,298.0034,242.5047,495.500.185
Lean Mass (g)39,428.0041,134.0042,962.0041,535.5043,100.5047,274.500.076
Total bone mineral density (g)1903.001990.002370.001987.002112.502354.000.645
Table 2. Symptoms, habits and other clinical variables according to the TNFA-308G/A genotype.
Table 2. Symptoms, habits and other clinical variables according to the TNFA-308G/A genotype.
TNFA-308G/A
GGAG
N%N%p
HypertensionYes1076.9%8100.0%0.142
No323.1%00.0%
Depression/anxietyYes538.5%337.5%0.965
No861.5%562.5%
FibromyalgiaYes215.4%112.5%0.854
No1184.6%787.5%
DyslipidemiaYes1184.6%112.5%0.854
No215.4%787.5%
Hyperosmolar comaYes17.7%00.0%0.421
No1292.3%8100.0%
Vaginal drynessYes323.1%225.0%0.920
No1076.9%675.0%
ObesityYes17.7%112.5%0.716
No1292.3%787.5%
RetinopathyYes17.7%450.0%0.027 *
No1292.3%450.0%
NephropathyYes00.0%00.0%0.646
No13100.0%8100.0%
NeuropathyYes17.7%00.0%0.421
No1292.3%8100.0%
AmputationYes17.7%00.0%0.421
No1292.3%8100.0%
Arthralgia or myalgiaYes323.1%450.0%0.204
No1076.9%450.0%
Dysphagia or dyspepsiaYes215.4%00.0%0.243
No1194.6%8100.0%
* p < 0.05.
Table 3. Anthropometric and biochemical characteristics according to IL6-174G/C genotype.
Table 3. Anthropometric and biochemical characteristics according to IL6-174G/C genotype.
IL6-174 G/C
GG+GC (N = 14)CC (N= 7)
P25MedianP75P25MedianP75p
[IL-6] pg/mL11.1612.3713.6812.2716.3733.670.240
Fasting blood glucose74.0079.5084.0088.0093.0097.000.093
Total Cholesterol180.00191.50200.00162.00202.00212.000.699
Triglycerides96.00132.50193.0091.0098.00113.000.180
HDL51.0058.5063.0059.0062.5067.000.240
LDL77.0096.00129.4082.60103.60129.200.999
VLDL19.2026.5038.6018.2019.6022.600.180
Non-HDL Cholesterol103.00134.50151.00103.00124.00148.000.818
Total lipids568.00616.25643.00507.00607.00643.000.699
Vitamin D23.7030.5035.0019.0026.7530.600.589
Fat Mass (g)26,751.0030,814.5033,596.0020,971.0027,737.0042,248.000.856
Lean Mass (g)39,766.0041,642.5042,962.0040,920.0042,991.0047,910.000.224
Total bone mineral density (g)1947.002005.502336.001903.002364.002372.000.636
Table 4. Symptoms, habits and other clinical variables according to the IL6-174G/C genotype.
Table 4. Symptoms, habits and other clinical variables according to the IL6-174G/C genotype.
IL6-174 G/C
GG+GCCC
N%N%p
HypertensionYes1178.6%7100.0%0.186
No321.4%00.0%
Depression/anxietyYes428.6%457.1%0.204
No1071.4%342.9%
FibromyalgiaYes214.3%114.3%0.999
No1285.7%685.7%
DyslipidemiaYes17.1%228.6%0.186
No1392.9%571.4%
Hyperosmolar comaYes00.0%114.3%0.147
No14100.0%685.7%
Vaginal drynessYes214.3%342.9%0.182
No1285.7%457.1%
ObesityYes00.0%228.6%0.035 *
No14100.0%571.4%
RetinopathyYes428.6%114.3%0.469
No1071.4%685.7%
NephropathyYes00.0%00.0%n/a #
No14100.0%7100.0%
NeuropathyYes17.1%00.0%0.469
No1392.9%7100.0%
AmputationYes00.0%114.3%0.147
No14100.0%685.7%
Arthralgia or myalgiaYes535.7%228.6%0.743
No964.3%571.4%
Dysphagia or dyspepsiaYes214.3%00.0%0.293
No1285.7%7100.0%
# not applicable. * p < 0.05
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mafra Tourino Teixeira, D.; Avelino Ferreira Soares, A.; Freitas, R.d.S.; Sousa Silva Bonasser, L.; Ferreira Fratelli, C.; de Souza Silva, C.M.; Kogawa, E.M.; Agudo Oliveira Benito, L.; Rodrigues da Silva, I.C. An Exploratory Pilot Study of Inflammatory Cytokine Gene Polymorphisms and Residual Postoperative Outcomes in Older Women One Year After Bariatric Surgery. Nutrients 2026, 18, 1294. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18081294

AMA Style

Mafra Tourino Teixeira D, Avelino Ferreira Soares A, Freitas RdS, Sousa Silva Bonasser L, Ferreira Fratelli C, de Souza Silva CM, Kogawa EM, Agudo Oliveira Benito L, Rodrigues da Silva IC. An Exploratory Pilot Study of Inflammatory Cytokine Gene Polymorphisms and Residual Postoperative Outcomes in Older Women One Year After Bariatric Surgery. Nutrients. 2026; 18(8):1294. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18081294

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mafra Tourino Teixeira, Dante, Antonio Avelino Ferreira Soares, Renata de Souza Freitas, Larissa Sousa Silva Bonasser, Caroline Ferreira Fratelli, Calliandra Maria de Souza Silva, Evelyn Mikaela Kogawa, Linconl Agudo Oliveira Benito, and Izabel Cristina Rodrigues da Silva. 2026. "An Exploratory Pilot Study of Inflammatory Cytokine Gene Polymorphisms and Residual Postoperative Outcomes in Older Women One Year After Bariatric Surgery" Nutrients 18, no. 8: 1294. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18081294

APA Style

Mafra Tourino Teixeira, D., Avelino Ferreira Soares, A., Freitas, R. d. S., Sousa Silva Bonasser, L., Ferreira Fratelli, C., de Souza Silva, C. M., Kogawa, E. M., Agudo Oliveira Benito, L., & Rodrigues da Silva, I. C. (2026). An Exploratory Pilot Study of Inflammatory Cytokine Gene Polymorphisms and Residual Postoperative Outcomes in Older Women One Year After Bariatric Surgery. Nutrients, 18(8), 1294. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18081294

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop