Next Article in Journal
Omnivores and Vegetarians Think Alike About Taste, Familiarity, and Price of Meat and Meat Analogs
Next Article in Special Issue
Dietary β-1,3/1,6-Glucan from Baker’s Yeast Supports Upper Respiratory Mucosal Immune Health in Healthy Adults: Evidence from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Association Between Vitamin D Deficiency and Systemic Outcomes in Patients with Glaucoma: A Real-World Cohort Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phytochemicals Prime RIG-I Signaling and Th1-Leaning Responses in Human Monocyte-Derived Dendritic Cells
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nutritional Modulation of the Gut–Kidney Axis

by
Razvan George Bogdan
1,
Felicia Gabriela Gligor
2,
Paula Anderco
2,*,
Livia Mirela Popa
2,*,
Adriana Popescu
2,
Vlad Adam Bloanca
1,
Elisa Leonte
1,
Mihai Iliescu Glaja
1,
Zorin Petrisor Crainiceanu
1 and
Cristian Ichim
2
1
Faculty of Medicine, “Victor Babes” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
2
Faculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, 550169 Sibiu, Romania
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2026, 18(2), 263; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18020263
Submission received: 11 December 2025 / Revised: 8 January 2026 / Accepted: 12 January 2026 / Published: 14 January 2026

Abstract

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents a state of persistent, sterile low-grade inflammation in which sustained innate immune activation accelerates renal decline and cardiovascular complications. Diet-induced gut dysbiosis and intestinal barrier dysfunction lower mucosal immune tolerance, promote metabolic endotoxemia, and position the gut as an upstream modulator of systemic inflammatory signaling along the gut–kidney axis. Scope: Most studies address microbiota-derived metabolites, food-derived bioactive peptides, or omega-3 fatty acids separately. This review integrates evidence across these domains and examines their convergent actions on epithelial barrier integrity, immune polarization, oxidative-inflammatory stress, and inflammasome-dependent pathways relevant to CKD progression. Key mechanisms: CKD-associated dysbiosis is characterized by reduced short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production and increased generation and accumulation of uremic toxins and co-metabolites, including indoxyl sulfate, p-cresyl sulfate, trimethylamine N-oxide, and altered bile acids. Reduced SCFA availability weakens tight junction-dependent barrier function and regulatory immune programs, favoring Th17-skewed inflammation and endotoxin translocation. Bioactive peptides modulate inflammatory mediator networks and barrier-related pathways through effects on NF-κB/MAPK signaling and redox balance, while omega-3 fatty acids and specialized pro-resolving mediators support resolution-phase immune responses. Across these modalities, shared control points include barrier integrity, metabolic endotoxemia, oxidative stress, and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Conclusions: Although evidence remains heterogeneous and largely preclinical, combined nutritional modulation targeting these convergent pathways may offer greater immunomodulatory benefit than isolated interventions. Future multi-omics-guided, factorial trials are required to define responder phenotypes and translate precision immunonutrition strategies into clinical CKD care.

1. Introduction

Within biomedical science, inflammatory activity is increasingly viewed as a temporal spectrum rather than a single uniform process. At one end lies acute inflammation, a short-lived, tightly regulated response that is particularly well described in the context of bacterial infection [1]. When microbes enter the host, they release endo- or exotoxins that trigger innate immune sensors, prompting immune cells to secrete inflammatory cytokines and chemokines [2]. These mediators attract leukocytes and activate complement at the affected site, where recruited cells generate proteolytic enzymes and reactive oxygen species to neutralize and clear the invading pathogens [3,4]. In this setting, the inflammatory cascade is self-limited and ultimately serves a protective role by restoring tissue integrity and preserving homeostasis [5].
At the opposite end of the spectrum is chronic inflammation (CI), which arises when the eliciting factor cannot be eradicated within a relatively short timeframe [6]. Under these conditions, immune cells remain continuously stimulated and maintain an ongoing production of inflammatory cytokines, driving a persistent inflammatory state throughout the organism [7]. Sustained activation of these pathways is thought to impose a substantial metabolic burden, with increased protein turnover and energy expenditure contributing to progressive functional decline [8]. Importantly, CI is not restricted to unresolved infections; dysregulated metabolism and persistent environmental exposures can also perpetuate inflammatory signaling [9,10,11].
In recent years, this conceptual spectrum from acute to CI has been increasingly applied to non-communicable diseases, including cardiometabolic and renal disorders, in which low-grade but persistent inflammatory activity amplifies tissue injury and accelerates organ failure [12,13,14]. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) exemplifies this paradigm, representing a state of sterile, non-infectious inflammation closely linked to cardiovascular morbidity. Sterile activation of the innate immune system is now recognized as a major pathogenic driver of CKD onset and progression and of its association with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), with central involvement of inflammasome-dependent pathways such as NLRP3 [15,16]. Together, these observations support the view that CKD is not only a state of reduced glomerular filtration but also a prototypical model of chronic, sterile inflammation.
Modern dietary patterns rich in ultra-processed foods can disrupt gut microbial ecology and weaken mucosal immune tolerance, thereby lowering the threshold for chronic low-grade inflammation [17,18,19,20,21,22]. Through diet-driven dysbiosis and barrier impairment, the gut becomes an upstream modulator of systemic inflammatory signaling relevant to cardio–renal disease.
The intestine represents a central immunometabolic interface, hosting a dense microbiota and a specialized epithelial barrier that separates the luminal environment from the internal milieu [23,24]. Along the gastrointestinal tract, bacterial load and composition are spatially stratified as follows: the stomach/proximal small intestine hosts low-density communities enriched for facultative anaerobes, whereas the colon contains the highest biomass and is dominated by obligate anaerobes within Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes [25]. Across the lifespan, the gut microbiome matures rapidly in early life (first ~3 years) and later remodels in older age, often with reduced diversity and relative expansion of Proteobacteria [26,27,28].
In CKD, gut dysbiosis, impaired barrier function, and increased intestinal permeability are frequently observed, together with the passage of bacterial products such as lipopolysaccharide into the circulation [29]. This state of metabolic endotoxemia sustains low-grade activation of innate immune receptors, amplifies systemic inflammation, and contributes to the progression of renal and cardiovascular injury [29,30]. These interactions form the basis of the gut–kidney axis concept, positioning the intestine as an upstream modulator of renal inflammation.
However, the existing literature typically addresses microbiota-derived metabolites, bioactive peptides, or omega-3 fatty acids in isolation. An integrated framework that considers their convergent actions on epithelial barrier integrity, metabolic endotoxemia, immune polarization, and inflammasome activation remains insufficiently developed. Accordingly, this review synthesizes current evidence on how microbial metabolites, food-derived bioactive peptides, and omega-3-derived specialized pro-resolving mediators can be combined within a precision immunonutrition framework to modulate the gut–immune–kidney axis in CKD.

2. Search Strategy

A targeted yet comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify experimental and clinical studies addressing the interplay between chronic low-grade inflammation, the gut–immune axis, and dietary modulators such as microbial metabolites, bioactive peptides, and omega-3 fatty acids. The search covered the literature up to December 2025, with earlier publications included when judged mechanistically or historically relevant. The main electronic database used was PubMed, complemented by Web of Science and Scopus to capture additional experimental and translational work. Search terms combined controlled vocabulary and free-text keywords grouped into four core domains as follows:
  • Chronic inflammation and immune dysregulation (“chronic inflammation”, “low-grade inflammation”, “systemic inflammation”, “innate immunity”, “NLRP3 inflammasome”, and “intestinal permeability”);
  • Gut–immune/gut–kidney axis (“gut–immune axis”, “gut–kidney axis”, “intestinal microbiota”, “microbiome-derived metabolites”, “dysbiosis”, “metabolic endotoxemia”, and “lipopolysaccharide”);
  • Microbial metabolites and bioactive peptides (“short-chain fatty acids”, “SCFA”, “acetate”, “propionate”, “butyrate”, “bioactive peptides”, “food-derived peptides”, and “protein hydrolysates”);
  • Omega-3 fatty acids and related lipid mediators (“omega-3 fatty acids”, “DHA”, “specialized pro-resolving mediators”, and “resolvins”).
The search was restricted to peer-reviewed articles published in English. Eligible studies included mechanistic in vitro work, animal models, human observational cohorts, interventional trials, and high-quality systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Abstracts, conference proceedings without full text, narrative commentaries lacking mechanistic depth, and articles not reporting any immune, inflammatory, or barrier-related outcomes were excluded.

3. Dietary Immunomodulators in the Gut–Kidney Axis

3.1. Gut Dysbiosis and Diet-Dependent Microbial Metabolic Remodeling in CKD

Under physiological conditions, the intestinal microbiota contribute fundamentally to host homeostasis across multiple organ systems by shaping metabolic activity, maintaining epithelial barrier integrity, and fine-tuning innate and adaptive immune responses, a balanced state commonly referred to as “symbiosis” [31]. By contrast, a community structure that promotes host damage has been termed “dysbiosis” [32].
In patients with CKD, gut dysbiosis was first characterized in a systematic manner in 2013 and has since been consistently confirmed and refined by studies using both 16S rRNA gene profiling and shotgun metagenomic sequencing [33,34]. These analyses demonstrate profound alterations in gut microbial ecology, with expansion of pathobionts (commensals that become harmful when overrepresented), depletion of beneficial commensal taxa and their metabolites, and a global reduction in microbial diversity, disturbances that mirror those observed in other chronic inflammatory and metabolic disorders [35,36,37,38].
In CKD cohorts, these alterations typically manifest as reduced α-diversity, overgrowth of Enterobacteriaceae as a prototypical pathobiont group, and a decline in commensal Firmicutes at phylum level [39,40,41,42]. The drivers of this dysbiotic state are incompletely understood but likely include low-fiber dietary patterns, muscle wasting, polypharmacy, uremic toxin accumulation, and constipation, all of which favor proteolytic fermentation over saccharolytic metabolism [43]. Beyond taxonomic shifts, CKD-associated dysbiosis is increasingly recognized as a state of functional remodeling, in which microbial metabolic output is redirected toward pathways that promote systemic inflammation and host injury.
In parallel with the reduction in saccharolytic fermentation and short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) production, CKD-associated dysbiosis is characterized by a shift toward proteolytic and choline- and carnitine-dependent microbial metabolism, resulting in increased generation and systemic accumulation of microbiota-derived uremic toxins and other pro-inflammatory co-metabolites [44,45].
Among the most extensively studied compounds are indoxyl sulfate (IS) and p-cresyl sulfate (p-CS), which originate from bacterial metabolism of dietary tryptophan and tyrosine/phenylalanine, respectively, followed by hepatic sulfation [46,47]. In CKD, impaired renal clearance combined with sustained intestinal overproduction leads to marked elevations of circulating IS and p-CS, which have been consistently associated with endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, vascular calcification, and accelerated progression of renal and cardiovascular disease [48,49,50].
Importantly, these solutes function as biologically active signaling molecules rather than inert retention products, activating redox-sensitive pathways and NF-κB–dependent inflammatory programs in renal tubular, endothelial, and immune cells, thereby reinforcing the chronic inflammatory milieu characteristic of CKD [51,52].
Trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) represents another diet–microbiome–host co-metabolite of relevance to the gut–kidney axis. TMAO is generated when gut microbiota convert dietary choline, phosphatidylcholine, and L-carnitine into trimethylamine (TMA), which is subsequently oxidized to TMAO in the liver [53,54,55]. Elevated circulating TMAO concentrations have been reported in patients with CKD and have been associated with increased cardiovascular risk and adverse outcomes, potentially through effects on endothelial function, platelet reactivity, lipid metabolism, and inflammatory signaling [56,57,58]. Although the causal role of TMAO remains debated and may depend on dietary context and host factors, the uremic environment is characterized by reduced renal excretion and an altered microbial ecosystem that together favor TMAO accumulation and may amplify its downstream pathophysiological effects [59,60,61].

3.2. Short-Chain Fatty Acids as Regulators of Barrier Integrity and Immune Tolerance

SCFAs such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate are key microbial metabolites generated through colonic fermentation of dietary fiber and act as central mediators of microbiota–host crosstalk [62,63]. By engaging G-protein-coupled receptors including GPR41, GPR43, and, in the kidney, GPR109A and by inhibiting histone deacetylases, SCFAs modulate innate and adaptive immune responses, promote regulatory T-cell differentiation, and support epithelial barrier integrity [62,63,64,65].
In CKD, gut dysbiosis is typically accompanied by a decline in SCFA production, resulting in attenuation of these anti-inflammatory and barrier-protective effects [66]. At the immune level, SCFAs promote the expansion and function of regulatory T cells, thereby constraining the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and interleukin-6 [67,68]. More broadly, microbiota-derived SCFAs contribute to systemic immune homeostasis by regulating the balance between pro-inflammatory T helper 17 (Th17) cells and regulatory T cells (Tregs), a central axis in immune-mediated tissue injury [69,70].
In CKD, dysbiosis and reduced availability of immunoregulatory microbial metabolites shift this balance toward Th17 polarization and/or functional expansion, while impairing Treg differentiation and suppressive capacity, thereby amplifying IL-17-driven inflammatory programs [45,71,72,73]. This Th17/Treg imbalance is increasingly recognized as a mechanistic link between intestinal dysregulation and extraintestinal pathology, including renal inflammation, where Th17-associated pathways promote leukocyte recruitment, cytokine amplification, and tissue injury [74,75,76].
Clinical and experimental data indicate that reduced circulating and fecal SCFAs concentrations in CKD correlate with markers of renal dysfunction, including elevated serum creatinine and lower glomerular filtration rate and that restoration of SCFA availability can ameliorate kidney injury [77]. Mechanistically, SCFAs attenuate systemic inflammation by suppressing TNF-α and interleukin-6 production and by modulating intracellular signaling pathways and cellular energy metabolism in renal and immune cells [78].
In parallel, SCFAs reinforce intestinal barrier function by upregulating tight junction proteins, thereby limiting bacterial translocation and endotoxemia, a recognized driver of CKD progression [79]. Experimental models further show that SCFAs can mitigate mitochondrial oxidative stress, reduce renal fibrosis, and help preserve tubular architecture, highlighting their potential as modulators of kidney structural integrity [80]. Collectively, these pleiotropic actions suggest that restoring SCFA signaling represents a promising strategy to slow CKD progression and improve renal outcomes [81].
Dietary manipulation is a practical means of enhancing SCFA generation. High-fiber diets and prebiotic substrates such as resistant starch and inulin increase the abundance and activity of butyrate-producing bacteria, thereby strengthening gut barrier function and reducing endotoxemia [82,83]. In CKD populations, such interventions have been associated with lower inflammatory markers and improved metabolic profiles, supporting a beneficial impact on the gut–kidney axis [84,85]. Moreover, combining a low-protein diet with prebiotics appears to further attenuate the burden of uremic toxins while reinforcing microbiota-dependent renoprotective mechanisms [86].
Beyond diet and prebiotics, microbiota-targeted approaches such as fecal microbiota transplantation have been explored as a means to restore microbial diversity and SCFA production in CKD [63,87,88]. However, evidence remains early and heterogeneous, and FMT should currently be considered experimental rather than a routine adjunct in CKD care [89,90].

3.3. Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction and Metabolic Endotoxemia

CKD and uremia profoundly impair intestinal epithelial barrier integrity, giving rise to a “leaky gut” phenotype characterized by increased intestinal permeability [91]. Elevated luminal urea diffuses into the gut, where bacterial urease activity generates ammonia and ammonium hydroxide, leading to the disruption of tight junction proteins and epithelial injury [92,93].
As a consequence, translocation of endotoxins such as lipopolysaccharide and other microbial products into the systemic circulation is facilitated, promoting metabolic endotoxemia [45]. This persistent influx of microbial-derived inflammatory stimuli sustains low-grade systemic inflammation through activation of innate immune receptors and cytokine release, thereby exacerbating renal injury and accelerating CKD progression [94,95,96].
Experimental and clinical studies in CKD and ESRD consistently demonstrate altered tight junction expression, increased circulating endotoxin levels, and heightened inflammatory markers, underscoring intestinal barrier dysfunction as a central pathogenic component of the gut–kidney axis [97,98,99,100]. Consequently, the gut–immune–kidney axis should be viewed not only as a metabolic circuit, but also as an immunologic relay through which dysbiosis may exacerbate immune-mediated kidney disease phenotypes. In this context, interventions that restore epithelial integrity and reduce endotoxin translocation may help attenuate systemic inflammation in CKD.

3.4. Bile Acid Metabolism and Additional Microbiota-Related Signaling Pathways

Beyond SCFAs and classical uremic toxins, gut dysbiosis in CKD also alters bile acid metabolism. Primary bile acids that escape ileal reabsorption are transformed by intestinal bacteria into secondary bile acids, which act as signaling molecules through host receptors such as the farnesoid X receptor and the G protein-coupled bile acid receptor TGR5 [101,102]. These pathways regulate glucose and lipid metabolism, epithelial barrier integrity, and immune homeostasis [102,103]. Experimental and clinical data indicate that CKD is associated with quantitative and qualitative alterations in the bile acid pool, which may contribute to metabolic inflammation, impaired barrier function, and dysregulated immune signaling along the gut–kidney axis [104,105]. Collectively, these observations underscore that CKD is marked not only by depletion of protective microbial metabolites such as SCFAs but also by enrichment of pro-inflammatory and vasculotoxic co-metabolites, many of which are strongly diet-dependent and therefore represent actionable targets for nutritional intervention.

3.5. Food-Derived Bioactive Peptides

Over recent years, naturally derived bioactive ingredients have attracted increasing interest, particularly phenolic compounds and food-derived peptides with health-promoting potential [106,107]. BAPs can be liberated from a wide array of animal- and plant-based proteins, including soybean, cereal germ, potato, nuts, dairy, egg, and meat [108,109]. In their parent protein sequences, these fragments are usually cryptic, but they acquire biological activity following proteolysis by enzymatic, chemical, or microbial processes, with enzymatic hydrolysis generally regarded as the most efficient and controllable approach [106,107,110]. Once released, many of these low-molecular-weight peptides are readily absorbed across the intestinal epithelium, enter the circulation, and reach peripheral targets, supporting their in vivo bioavailability and physiological effects [110].
Food-derived peptides are now recognized as multifunctional components capable of contributing to disease prevention and health maintenance [111]. Reported activities include antihypertensive, antithrombotic, anticancer, antimicrobial, antioxidant, immunomodulatory, and opioid agonist or antagonist effects, underscoring their broad bioactivity profile [112]. These functions are highly context-dependent and can be shaped by multiple variables, such as the protein source, pre-treatment, the primary amino-acid structure, and overall residue composition, in addition to molecular size and charge topology, pH, processing conditions, and specific chemical or physical treatments [106,107,113].
BAPs act on multiple organs, including the cardiovascular system, bone, and gut, and may also support immune function, stress adaptation, and mood [114,115]. Their activity is shaped by protein source, hydrolysis conditions, and enzyme choice, while antioxidant, antimicrobial, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitory effects depend on peptide length, amino acid composition, sequence, and overall structure and charge [116,117,118].
Interestingly, protein hydrolysates from various sources often display stronger antioxidant activity than individual purified peptide fractions, suggesting synergistic interactions among peptide mixtures and other co-extracted components [119]. Antioxidant and immunomodulatory peptides have been identified across diverse food matrices, supporting the concept that dietary proteins are a broad reservoir of bioactive sequences [120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130].
Recent investigations have substantially expanded the repertoire of food-derived peptides with antioxidant, dipeptidyl peptidase IV-inhibitory, and ACE–inhibitory activities, many of which display convincing bioactivity in chemical assays and cell culture models [131,132,133,134,135]. Together, these findings reinforce the view that peptides released from diverse dietary proteins constitute a rich source of candidates for future nutritional and pharmacological strategies [135,136,137,138]. Selected examples of milk-derived peptides with antioxidant, DPP-IV-inhibitory, and ACE-inhibitory activities are summarized in Table 1 [131,132,133,134,136,137,138,139,140].

3.6. Omega-3 Fatty Acids and Specialized Pro-Resolving Mediators

Omega-3 fatty acids are integral components of a healthy diet and have been proposed as adjunctive therapy for the management of CKD-related complications, as they can favorably modulate atherogenic lipid profiles, oxidative stress, systemic inflammation, and arterial hypertension [141,142]. At the cellular level, they participate in eicosanoid biosynthesis, influence membrane structure and fluidity, modulate multiple metabolic signaling cascades, and regulate the expression of numerous genes [143].
Several investigations have shown that patients with CKD have substantially lower circulating omega-3 fatty acid levels than the general population, a finding that may reflect reduced dietary intake, persistent inflammation, malabsorption, and underlying metabolic disturbances [141,144,145]. In individuals receiving hemodialysis, the burden of oxidative stress is further increased and may compromise omega-3 bioavailability and accelerate their depletion [146].
However, the clinical evidence remains inconsistent. Despite growing scientific interest over recent decades, omega-3 fatty acid supplements are still not widely used in CKD care, likely because the therapeutic advantages remain insufficiently defined and data are heterogeneous. While some studies have documented reductions in inflammatory markers in hemodialysis patients receiving oral omega-3 preparations, others have failed to detect meaningful effects on inflammatory indices or clinical outcomes [142,147,148].

4. Convergent Pathways and Potential Synergy

The gut microbiota act as a metabolically active ecosystem that links diet to immune signaling and barrier function through a limited set of recurrent molecular pathways [149,150,151,152,153]. In CKD, these pathways become particularly relevant because dysbiosis and barrier failure can sustain systemic innate immune activation and thereby amplify cardio–renal inflammatory injury.
Diet is a major determinant of microbiota composition and function and thereby shapes the pool of microbiota-derived metabolites that influence host physiology [154,155,156]. Complex carbohydrates escaping digestion are fermented by gut bacteria into SCFAs, while the amino acid tryptophan is converted into indole and related derivatives and cholesterol-derived primary bile acids are transformed into more soluble secondary bile acids in the distal gut [157,158,159]. These metabolites act as key mediators of microbiota–host crosstalk. Altered levels of SCFAs, indoles and secondary bile acids have been linked to disturbed metabolic and inflammatory states, whereas restoring their balance can attenuate disease progression in experimental and clinical settings [160,161,162,163,164,165]. Although many of these bacterial metabolites have been carefully identified and quantified in humans, the mechanistic routes through which they modulate systemic immunity and organ-specific inflammation are only partially understood [166,167,168].
BAPs with immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory properties have emerged as promising candidates to support intestinal barrier repair and dampen mucosal inflammation, offering a potential adjunct or alternative to conventional enteritis treatments [169]. In a dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis model, the walnut-derived tripeptide leucine–proline–phenylalanine promoted epithelial barrier restitution, lowered pro-inflammatory cytokine levels, and reduced intestinal epithelial apoptosis, while also partially normalizing gut microbial composition at selected doses [170]. Similarly, a fish collagen-derived preparation shifted macrophages towards an anti-inflammatory, immunotolerant, and antioxidative phenotype via a mannose receptor-dependent mechanism and ameliorated experimental colitis [171]. Antimicrobial peptides can also contribute to mucosal protection: the proteolysis-resistant peptide R7I attenuated inflammatory mediator release, preserved tight junction integrity, and restored near-normal intestinal histology in murine models of bacterial enteritis, highlighting its potential as a lead compound for enteritis therapy [172].
Inflammatory mediators encompass a wide range of low-molecular-weight molecules released by activated cells or present in body fluids during inflammation, including prostaglandins, nitric oxide, interleukins, chemokines, and other cytokines that collectively orchestrate the inflammatory response [173]. Engagement of toll-like receptors on innate immune cells induces production of interleukin-6, TNF-α, and TGF-β, while activating downstream nuclear factor-κB and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways that further amplify pro-inflammatory signaling [174,175]. Cytokines, broadly categorized into pro-inflammatory mediators such as interleukin-1β and TNF-α and anti-inflammatory mediators such as interleukin-10, play a pivotal role in orchestrating immune cell proliferation, differentiation, and the resolution of inflammatory responses [176,177].
Multiple studies indicate that BAPs can modulate these mediator networks. Egg white-derived peptides reduced TNF-α and interleukin-6 production and downregulated messenger RNA expression of TNF-α, interleukin-6, interleukin-17, interleukin-1β, interferon-γ, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in murine colitis models [174]. Bovine bone gelatin peptides lowered lipopolysaccharide-induced secretion of interleukin-6, nitric oxide, and TNF-α in RAW264.7 macrophages, and alleviated dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis in vivo [178]. In a lipopolysaccharide-induced pneumonia model, the synthetic peptide SET-M33, designed to target Gram-negative bacteria, markedly decreased pulmonary levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as keratinocyte-derived chemokine, macrophage inflammatory protein-1α, interferon-inducible protein-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and TNF-α [179].
Although microbial metabolites, food-derived BAPs, and omega-3 fatty acids arise from distinct nutritional sources, their immunomodulatory actions cluster around a limited set of shared molecular hubs, particularly epithelial barrier integrity, metabolic endotoxemia, inflammasome activation, and the balance between inflammation-driving and inflammation-resolving immune programs in gut and kidney [180,181]. Figure 1 summarizes the convergent dietary, microbial, and immune pathways that link intestinal dysbiosis to systemic inflammation and renal injury in chronic kidney disease.
Oxidative stress is a key contributor to the decline in renal function in CKD, with higher stages of CKD showing increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) [182]. This excess arises from mechanisms such as mitochondrial dysfunction, enhanced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase activity, and endothelial nitric oxide synthase uncoupling [2,182]. Oxidative stress and inflammation reinforce each other as follows: ROS amplify inflammatory cascades, while persistent inflammation further boosts ROS generation, sustaining a vicious cycle mediated by stress-activated kinases and redox-sensitive transcription factors [183,184,185,186]. Uremic toxins such as asymmetric dimethylarginine intensify this process by promoting ROS and reactive nitrogen species, which damage vascular structures, proteins, DNA, and mitochondria, activate NF-κB-driven cytokine production, and stimulate the renin–angiotensin system, thereby further increasing IL-6 and hepatic C-reactive protein synthesis [187,188,189,190]. Thus, oxidative stress is a central driver of CI in CKD rather than a secondary phenomenon [183].

4.1. Common Control Points: NLRP3 Inflammasome and Innate Immune Signaling

The NLRP3 inflammasome integrates danger signals derived from dysbiotic microbiota, oxidized lipids, uremic toxins, and metabolic stress, leading to caspase-1 activation and maturation of interleukin-1β and interleukin-18, which are key drivers of chronic kidney and cardiovascular injury [191]. Data from genetic mouse models indicate that NLRP3-dependent cytokine signaling actively contributes to both CKD progression and ASCVD, rather than merely reflecting secondary activation in advanced disease [192,193]. In parallel, interleukin-6, one of the most tightly regulated proinflammatory cytokines, has been implicated as a central mediator of systemic inflammation that fuels CKD progression and its cardiovascular complications, including ASCVD [194]. These observations underscore the direct pathogenic relevance of sustained innate immune activation and cytokine signaling to CKD progression and its cardio–renal complications.
SCFAs attenuate inflammasome activity primarily through G-protein-coupled receptors and histone deacetylase inhibition, which downregulate NF-κB-dependent priming and reduce NLRP3 activation in intestinal and extra-intestinal tissues [195,196]. In models of inflammatory bowel disease, SCFA supplementation reduces pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and interleukin-1β, improves mucosal histology, and lowers systemic inflammatory markers, indirectly supporting reduced inflammasome activity in the gut–kidney axis [126,197,198].
Food-derived bioactive peptides influence the same molecular hubs predominantly at the level of NF-κB, MAPK, and redox balance, thereby modulating the priming step required for full NLRP3 inflammasome activation [169,199]. Experimental studies show that peptides generated from milk, egg, and plant proteins can suppress pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and interleukin-6, reduce inducible nitric oxide synthase expression, and lower reactive oxygen species, all of which would be expected to constrain inflammasome activation in intestinal and renal tissues [173,200,201,202,203]. Beyond direct effects on immune cells, several bioactive peptides enhance tight junction protein expression and epithelial restitution, reducing translocation of pathogen-associated molecular patterns that otherwise sustain NLRP3 signaling [199,204].
Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and their specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs), including resolvins, target NLRP3 through complementary mechanisms, notably membrane re-organization, reduction in oxidative stress, and active promotion of resolution-phase programs [205,206,207]. In a spinal cord injury model, dietary omega-3 fatty acids reduced expression of NLRP3 components and downstream caspase-1 activation, illustrating inflammasome modulation by systemic omega-3 supplementation [205]. Aspirin-triggered resolvin D1, derived from docosahexaenoic acid, suppressed NLRP3 activation via autophagy-dependent mechanisms in neuropathic pain models, highlighting a direct link between omega-3-derived SPMs, inflammasome regulation, and tissue-specific inflammatory resolution [208].

4.2. Metabolic Endotoxemia and Epithelial Barrier Integrity

Low-grade metabolic endotoxemia, driven by increased intestinal permeability and translocation of lipopolysaccharide and other microbial products, has emerged as a key mechanism linking Western dietary patterns to systemic inflammation, metabolic syndrome, and chronic kidney disease [30]. Dysbiosis in chronic kidney disease is characterized by reduced SCFA-producing commensals and expansion of proteolytic and endotoxin-generating taxa, favoring luminal accumulation of uremic toxins and bacterial metabolites that impair gut barrier function [209,210]. SCFAs mitigate endotoxemia by supporting colonocyte metabolism and reinforcing tight junction-dependent barrier function, thereby reducing systemic exposure to microbial products [195,211].
Food-derived bioactive peptides add a second layer of protection at the epithelial interface. Several milk-, egg-, and plant-derived peptides reinforce tight junction organization, stimulate mucin secretion, and modulate innate immune receptors on epithelial cells, thereby attenuating barrier disruption in models of colitis and metabolic syndrome [169,199]. In addition, peptides with antioxidant and radical-scavenging properties decrease oxidative damage to epithelial and endothelial cells, which is an important cofactor in barrier failure and endotoxemia in both gut and kidney microvasculature [169].
Omega-3 fatty acids and their SPMs further stabilize barriers by modulating membrane composition, reducing endothelial activation, and promoting resolution of microvascular inflammation [206,212]. In experimental colitis, omega-3-derived resolvins reduce leukocyte adhesion, enhance epithelial restitution, and lower mucosal cytokine production, collectively limiting luminal–systemic molecular flux [180,206].

4.3. Organ-Specific Inflammatory Injury in Gut and Kidney

In the gastrointestinal tract, SCFAs have demonstrated therapeutic and immunologic benefits in models of inflammatory bowel disease, including reduced inflammation, lower expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and restoration of tight junction architecture [180]. These effects translate into decreased systemic inflammatory load and may indirectly mitigate kidney damage in settings where intestinal inflammation is a major contributor to the gut–kidney axis [213,214].
For omega-3-derived mediators, direct renal benefit has been demonstrated in experimental models. Resolvin D1 reduced tubular necrosis, inflammatory infiltrates, and serum cytokines in ischemia–reperfusion-triggered acute kidney injury by elevating regulatory T-cell frequencies via the ALX/FPR2 receptor pathway, suggesting an organ-specific mechanism of immune re-balancing [215]. In diabetic mice, the same mediator attenuated susceptibility to ischemic acute kidney injury by down-modulating NF-κB signaling and apoptosis, further supporting the concept that omega-3-derived SPMs can directly protect renal parenchyma under metabolic stress conditions [216].

5. Future Directions: Towards Precision Immunonutrition

Clinical data on SCFA-oriented interventions in CKD are still limited, but high-fiber, plant-forward dietary patterns and prebiotic supplementation have been associated with improved inflammatory profiles, reduced uremic toxin levels, and slower renal function decline in small trials and observational cohorts [217,218].
These observations align with the concept that diet is the most proximate upstream driver of the gut–kidney axis, with multiple nutrient classes exerting predictable effects on microbial ecology and host inflammation. First, higher intake of fermentable fiber and prebiotic substrates supports saccharolytic fermentation and SCFA production, and clinical trials/meta-analyses in CKD suggest this may reduce gut-derived uremic toxins and inflammatory markers [219,220]. Conversely, higher protein loads, particularly with lower fiber intake, can increase proteolytic fermentation and the generation of protein-bound uremic toxins, reinforcing systemic inflammation [221].
Beyond macronutrient balance, excess dietary sodium can also act as an immunomodulatory cofactor by reshaping the gut microbiome and promoting pro-inflammatory immune polarization (including Th17-associated programs), thereby potentially aggravating cardio–renal inflammatory stress [222,223]. In parallel, phosphorus intake (including inorganic phosphate additives) is clinically relevant in CKD and has been linked to measurable shifts in the intestinal microbiome in controlled dietary studies, supporting phosphorus management as part of a gut-aware renal nutrition strategy [224,225].
Finally, plant (poly)phenols may influence gut microbial composition and metabolite output, providing an additional lever to reduce oxidative-inflammatory signaling, while probiotics/synbiotics have been evaluated in randomized trials and meta-analyses with mixed but overall promising signals for improving inflammatory or uremic toxin-related endpoints [226,227].
However, these studies are heterogeneous in design, use different fiber sources and doses, and rarely include direct measurements of SCFA levels or microbiome composition, limiting mechanistic inferences. Selected recent mechanistic and clinical studies illustrating how microbial metabolites, bioactive peptides, and omega-3 fatty acids modulate the gut–immune axis and renal outcomes are summarized in Table 2.
Evidence for bioactive peptide-rich foods or peptide supplements in human gastro–renal disease is even more preliminary. Most data derive from animal models or early-phase studies focusing on blood pressure, vascular function, or surrogate inflammatory markers rather than hard renal or gastrointestinal endpoints [169,199,236]. The bioavailability and in vivo stability of specific peptides, their interaction with host proteases and microbiota, and inter-individual differences in digestion and absorption are major sources of variability that remain insufficiently characterized.
In parallel, antioxidant defenses are compromised. Vitamin D enhances nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 activity, upregulates antioxidant enzymes, and downregulates redox-sensitive inflammatory genes, but deficiency is frequent in CKD, blunting these protective effects [237,238]. Supplementation with vitamin D analogs, such as paricalcitol, has been associated with reduced C-reactive protein levels, suggesting a modulatory effect on systemic inflammation [239]. Serum albumin, the principal antioxidant protein in the circulation, is also depleted in CKD due to oxidative consumption and additional factors such as dietary restriction, impaired absorption, and diuretic use, which together lower plasma albumin concentrations [240]. In selected patients, albumin repletion may help to attenuate systemic low-grade inflammation by partially restoring antioxidant capacity [240].
For omega-3 fatty acids, several trials in CKD and dialysis populations have examined effects on cardiovascular risk factors, inflammation, and renal function, with mixed results that likely reflect differences in baseline diet, dose, formulation, and outcome selection [141,142,241]. Most studies have not stratified patients by inflammatory phenotype, microbiota composition, or genetic variation in fatty acid metabolism, which are crucial determinants of response and may partly explain neutral findings [242,243,244,245].
Precision nutrition frameworks in CKD propose integrating clinical, biochemical, and omics-based biomarkers to move beyond “one-size-fits-all” dietary prescriptions, aligning interventions with individual metabolic, inflammatory, and microbiome profiles [246]. While the concept of personalized or precision dietary modulation of the gut–kidney axis is conceptually attractive, its translation into routine clinical practice remains challenging. Inter-individual variability in CKD phenotype and stage, comorbid metabolic and cardiovascular disease, medication burden (including antibiotics, phosphate binders, iron preparations, and immunosuppressive agents), baseline dietary habits, and environmental exposures all shape gut microbiota composition and metabolic output, thereby influencing responsiveness to nutritional interventions [225,247,248,249].
In addition, host genetic factors, residual renal function, and dialysis modality further modulate immune and metabolic responses, limiting the applicability of uniform dietary prescriptions. These sources of heterogeneity likely contribute to the inconsistent results observed across clinical trials and underscore the need for stratified or biomarker-guided approaches rather than one-size-fits-all recommendations [246,250,251]. Accordingly, personalized nutrition in CKD should be viewed as a dynamic, iterative process that integrates clinical context, dietary feasibility, and emerging microbiome- and metabolite-based markers, rather than a fixed algorithmic intervention.
Within this paradigm, microbial metabolites, bioactive peptides, and omega-3 fatty acids can be viewed as modular levers that can be combined and titrated according to dominant pathophysiological axes in a given patient, such as barrier dysfunction, inflammasome activation, or oxidative stress [105,252].
From a practical perspective, a precision immunonutrition strategy for gastro–renal disease could include
-
a high-fiber, plant-rich base diet to restore SCFA production;
-
targeted use of prebiotics and microbiota-directed foods (including fermented, peptide-enriched products);
-
personalized omega-3 supplementation optimized for dose, EPA/DHA ratio, and timing relative to inflammatory flares [199,218,253,254,255].
Emerging multi-omics studies indicate that diet-induced changes in microbiota-derived metabolites, including SCFAs, indoles, and secondary bile acids, can be mapped onto systemic inflammatory signatures and organ-specific outcomes, providing a framework for iterative refinement of such combined interventions [251,256,257]. Key methodological priorities include designing trials that incorporate deep phenotyping of the gut microbiome, metabolome, inflammatory mediators, and renal function, which explicitly test factorial combinations of fiber, peptide-rich foods, and omega-3 supplementation rather than evaluating each component in isolation.
Attention to inter-individual variability, arising from genetics, comorbidities, medication use, and baseline diet, will be essential to identify responder subgroups and build predictive models that can be translated into clinical decision tools for nephrology and gastroenterology practice.
Aging is a major, clinically relevant determinant of gut–kidney axis biology, because the gut microbiome changes across the lifespan and older adults tend to exhibit reduced microbial diversity, depletion of beneficial SCFA-producing taxa, and enrichment of pro-inflammatory pathobionts [258]. These age-associated shifts are frequently accompanied by impaired epithelial barrier resilience and “inflammaging”, a chronic low-grade inflammatory state driven by immunosenescence and sustained innate immune activation [259]. In CKD, where the disease burden is concentrated in older populations, age-related microbiome remodeling can therefore amplify dysbiosis, metabolic endotoxemia, and immune dysregulation, and may partly explain variability in response to dietary or microbiome-targeted interventions [260]. Accordingly, future trials should consider age and frailty/sarcopenia where relevant, as a stratification factor, and incorporate age-sensitive microbiome and metabolite endpoints to improve clinical translatability.

6. Conclusions

Chronic kidney disease exemplifies a state of persistent low-grade inflammation in which dysbiosis, barrier failure, and innate immune activation converge along the gut–kidney axis. In this context, microbiota-derived metabolites, food-derived bioactive peptides, and omega-3 fatty acids represent complementary nutritional levers that act on shared molecular hubs, including epithelial integrity, metabolic endotoxemia, redox balance, and NLRP3 inflammasome signaling.
Current evidence, although still fragmented and largely preclinical, supports the view that stacking these interventions by combining high-fiber, plant-rich dietary patterns that restore SCFA production with peptide-enriched foods and tailored omega-3 supplementation, may achieve more robust immunomodulatory effects than any single component alone. Future multi-omics-guided, factorial intervention trials in CKD are needed to disentangle causal pathways, define responder phenotypes, and translate this integrative framework into practical precision immunonutrition strategies for nephrology and gastroenterology practice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and Design: L.M.P., R.G.B., P.A. and C.I.; Methodology: R.G.B., L.M.P. and P.A.; Formal Analysis: M.I.G., V.A.B., and E.L.; Investigation: M.I.G., A.P. and E.L.; Resources: P.A., L.M.P. and Z.P.C.; Software and Data Analysis: V.A.B. and F.G.G.; Supervision: F.G.G.; Validation: A.P. and C.I.; Writing—Original Draft: P.A., C.I. and Z.P.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We would like to acknowledge VICTOR BABES UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND PHARMACY TIMISOARA for their support in covering the costs of publication for this research paper.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  1. Furman, D.; Campisi, J.; Verdin, E.; Carrera-Bastos, P.; Targ, S.; Franceschi, C.; Ferrucci, L.; Gilroy, D.W.; Fasano, A.; Miller, G.W.; et al. Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1822–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yan, Z.; Shao, T. Chronic Inflammation in Chronic Kidney Disease. Nephron 2024, 148, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Crijns, H.; Vanheule, V.; Proost, P. Targeting Chemokine—Glycosaminoglycan Interactions to Inhibit Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Soares, C.L.R.; Wilairatana, P.; Silva, L.R.; Moreira, P.S.; Vilar Barbosa, N.M.M.; Da Silva, P.R.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; De Menezes, I.R.A.; Felipe, C.F.B. Biochemical aspects of the inflammatory process: A narrative review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 168, 115764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Soliman, A.M.; Barreda, D.R. Acute Inflammation in Tissue Healing. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 24, 641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ferguson, L.R. Chronic inflammation and mutagenesis. Mutat. Res. Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2010, 690, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Baechle, J.J.; Chen, N.; Makhijani, P.; Winer, S.; Furman, D.; Winer, D.A. Chronic inflammation and the hallmarks of aging. Mol. Metab. 2023, 74, 101755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ikizler, T.A. Nutrition, inflammation and chronic kidney disease. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2008, 17, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Karstoft, K.; Pedersen, B.K. Exercise and type 2 diabetes: Focus on metabolism and inflammation. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2016, 94, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lontchi-Yimagou, E.; Sobngwi, E.; Matsha, T.E.; Kengne, A.P. Diabetes Mellitus and Inflammation. Curr. Diabetes Rep. 2013, 13, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pollard, K.M. Silica, Silicosis, and Autoimmunity. Front. Immunol. 2016, 7, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Phillips, C.M.; Chen, L.-W.; Heude, B.; Bernard, J.Y.; Harvey, N.C.; Duijts, L.; Mensink-Bout, S.M.; Polanska, K.; Mancano, G.; Suderman, M.; et al. Dietary Inflammatory Index and Non-Communicable Disease Risk: A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cheng, W.; Du, Z.; Lu, B. Chronic low-grade inflammation associated with higher risk and earlier onset of cardiometabolic multimorbidity in middle-aged and older adults: A population-based cohort study. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 22635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wagenaar, C.A.; Van De Put, M.; Bisschops, M.; Walrabenstein, W.; De Jonge, C.S.; Herrema, H.; Van Schaardenburg, D. The Effect of Dietary Interventions on Chronic Inflammatory Diseases in Relation to the Microbiome: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Alfaddagh, A.; Martin, S.S.; Leucker, T.M.; Michos, E.D.; Blaha, M.J.; Lowenstein, C.J.; Jones, S.R.; Toth, P.P. Inflammation and cardiovascular disease: From mechanisms to therapeutics. Am. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2020, 4, 100130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Speer, T.; Dimmeler, S.; Schunk, S.J.; Fliser, D.; Ridker, P.M. Targeting innate immunity-driven inflammation in CKD and cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2022, 18, 762–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Patel, S.S.; Bains, A.; Sharma, M.; Kumar, A.; Stephen Inbaraj, B.; Chawla, P.; Sridhar, K. Recent Trends in Advanced Glycation End Products in Foods: Formation, Toxicity, and Innovative Strategies for Extraction, Detection, and Inhibition. Foods 2024, 13, 4045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Maki, K.A.; Sack, M.N.; Hall, K.D. Ultra-processed foods: Increasing the risk of inflammation and immune dysregulation? Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2024, 24, 453–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rondinella, D.; Raoul, P.C.; Valeriani, E.; Venturini, I.; Cintoni, M.; Severino, A.; Galli, F.S.; Mora, V.; Mele, M.C.; Cammarota, G.; et al. The Detrimental Impact of Ultra-Processed Foods on the Human Gut Microbiome and Gut Barrier. Nutrients 2025, 17, 859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chassaing, B.; Koren, O.; Goodrich, J.K.; Poole, A.C.; Srinivasan, S.; Ley, R.E.; Gewirtz, A.T. Dietary emulsifiers impact the mouse gut microbiota promoting colitis and metabolic syndrome. Nature 2015, 519, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Arifuzzaman, M.; Collins, N.; Guo, C.-J.; Artis, D. Nutritional regulation of microbiota-derived metabolites: Implications for immunity and inflammation. Immunity 2024, 57, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dawson, S.L.; Todd, E.; Ward, A.C. The Interplay of Nutrition, the Gut Microbiota and Immunity and Its Contribution to Human Disease. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Di Vincenzo, F.; Del Gaudio, A.; Petito, V.; Lopetuso, L.R.; Scaldaferri, F. Gut microbiota, intestinal permeability, and systemic inflammation: A narrative review. Intern. Emerg. Med. 2024, 19, 275–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nie, H.-Y.; Ge, J.; Huang, G.-X.; Liu, K.-G.; Yue, Y.; Li, H.; Lin, H.-G.; Zhang, T.; Yan, H.-F.; Xu, B.-X.; et al. New insights into the intestinal barrier through “gut-organ” axes and a glimpse of the microgravity’s effects on intestinal barrier. Front. Physiol. 2024, 15, 1465649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Vuik, F.; Dicksved, J.; Lam, S.; Fuhler, G.; Van Der Laan, L.; Van De Winkel, A.; Konstantinov, S.; Spaander, M.; Peppelenbosch, M.; Engstrand, L.; et al. Composition of the mucosa-associated microbiota along the entire gastrointestinal tract of human individuals. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2019, 7, 897–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Odamaki, T.; Kato, K.; Sugahara, H.; Hashikura, N.; Takahashi, S.; Xiao, J.; Abe, F.; Osawa, R. Age-related changes in gut microbiota composition from newborn to centenarian: A cross-sectional study. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Donaldson, G.P.; Lee, S.M.; Mazmanian, S.K. Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 20–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yatsunenko, T.; Rey, F.E.; Manary, M.J.; Trehan, I.; Dominguez-Bello, M.G.; Contreras, M.; Magris, M.; Hidalgo, G.; Baldassano, R.N.; Anokhin, A.P.; et al. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature 2012, 486, 222–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Amini Khiabani, S.; Asgharzadeh, M.; Samadi Kafil, H. Chronic kidney disease and gut microbiota. Heliyon 2023, 9, e18991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mohammad, S.; Thiemermann, C. Role of Metabolic Endotoxemia in Systemic Inflammation and Potential Interventions. Front. Immunol. 2021, 11, 594150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Belkaid, Y.; Harrison, O.J. Homeostatic Immunity and the Microbiota. Immunity 2017, 46, 562–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Weiss, G.A.; Hennet, T. Mechanisms and consequences of intestinal dysbiosis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2017, 74, 2959–2977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Holle, J.; Bartolomaeus, H.; Löber, U.; Behrens, F.; Bartolomaeus, T.U.P.; Anandakumar, H.; Wimmer, M.I.; Vu, D.L.; Kuhring, M.; Brüning, U.; et al. Inflammation in Children with CKD Linked to Gut Dysbiosis and Metabolite Imbalance. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2022, 33, 2259–2275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Behrens, F.; Bartolomaeus, H.; Wilck, N.; Holle, J. Gut-immune axis and cardiovascular risk in chronic kidney disease. Clin. Kidney J. 2024, 17, sfad303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Vaziri, N.D.; Wong, J.; Pahl, M.; Piceno, Y.M.; Yuan, J.; DeSantis, T.Z.; Ni, Z.; Nguyen, T.-H.; Andersen, G.L. Chronic kidney disease alters intestinal microbial flora. Kidney Int. 2013, 83, 308–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ren, Z.; Fan, Y.; Li, A.; Shen, Q.; Wu, J.; Ren, L.; Lu, H.; Ding, S.; Ren, H.; Liu, C.; et al. Alterations of the Human Gut Microbiome in Chronic Kidney Disease. Adv. Sci. 2020, 7, 2001936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, H.; Ainiwaer, A.; Song, Y.; Qin, L.; Peng, A.; Bao, H.; Qin, H. Perturbed gut microbiome and fecal and serum metabolomes are associated with chronic kidney disease severity. Microbiome 2023, 11, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Levy, M.; Kolodziejczyk, A.A.; Thaiss, C.A.; Elinav, E. Dysbiosis and the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2017, 17, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Zhou, W.; Wu, W.; Si, Z.; Liu, H.; Wang, H.; Jiang, H.; Liu, Y.; Alolga, R.N.; Chen, C.; Liu, S.; et al. The gut microbe Bacteroides fragilis ameliorates renal fibrosis in mice. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 6081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, H.-B.; Xu, M.-L.; Xu, X.-D.; Tang, Y.-Y.; Jiang, H.-L.; Li, L.; Xia, W.-J.; Cui, N.; Bai, J.; Dai, Z.-M.; et al. Faecalibacterium prausnitzi attenuates CKD via Butyrate-Renal GPR43 Axis. Circ. Res. 2022, 131, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sato, N.; Kakuta, M.; Hasegawa, T.; Yamaguchi, R.; Uchino, E.; Murashita, K.; Nakaji, S.; Imoto, S.; Yanagita, M.; Okuno, Y. Metagenomic profiling of gut microbiome in early chronic kidney disease. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2021, 36, 1675–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, X.; Yang, S.; Li, S.; Zhao, L.; Hao, Y.; Qin, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, C.; Bian, W.; Zuo, L.; et al. Aberrant gut microbiota alters host metabolome and impacts renal failure in humans and rodents. Gut 2020, 69, 2131–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Schlender, J.; Behrens, F.; McParland, V.; Müller, D.; Wilck, N.; Bartolomaeus, H.; Holle, J. Bacterial metabolites and cardiovascular risk in children with chronic kidney disease. Mol. Cell Pediatr. 2021, 8, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Koppe, L.; Fouque, D.; Soulage, C.O. The Role of Gut Microbiota and Diet on Uremic Retention Solutes Production in the Context of Chronic Kidney Disease. Toxins 2018, 10, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Alobaidi, S. The gut-kidney axis in chronic kidney disease: Mechanisms, microbial metabolites, and microbiome-targeted therapeutics. Front. Med. 2025, 12, 1675458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Borges, N.A.; Barros, A.F.; Nakao, L.S.; Dolenga, C.J.; Fouque, D.; Mafra, D. Protein-Bound Uremic Toxins from Gut Microbiota and Inflammatory Markers in Chronic Kidney Disease. J. Ren. Nutr. 2016, 26, 396–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hobby, G.P.; Karaduta, O.; Dusio, G.F.; Singh, M.; Zybailov, B.L.; Arthur, J.M. Chronic kidney disease and the gut microbiome. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2019, 316, F1211–F1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Lin, C.-J.; Wu, V.; Wu, P.-C.; Wu, C.-J. Meta-Analysis of the Associations of p-Cresyl Sulfate (PCS) and Indoxyl Sulfate (IS) with Cardiovascular Events and All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Opdebeeck, B.; D’Haese, P.C.; Verhulst, A. Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms that Induce Arterial Calcification by Indoxyl Sulfate and P-Cresyl Sulfate. Toxins 2020, 12, 58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vanholder, R.; Schepers, E.; Pletinck, A.; Nagler, E.V.; Glorieux, G. The Uremic Toxicity of Indoxyl Sulfate and p-Cresyl Sulfate: A Systematic Review. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014, 25, 1897–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Tumur, Z.; Shimizu, H.; Enomoto, A.; Miyazaki, H.; Niwa, T. Indoxyl Sulfate Upregulates Expression of ICAM-1 and MCP-1 by Oxidative Stress-Induced NF-ĸB Activation. Am. J. Nephrol. 2010, 31, 435–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shimizu, H.; Yisireyili, M.; Higashiyama, Y.; Nishijima, F.; Niwa, T. Indoxyl sulfate upregulates renal expression of ICAM-1 via production of ROS and activation of NF-κB and p53 in proximal tubular cells. Life Sci. 2013, 92, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Koeth, R.A.; Wang, Z.; Levison, B.S.; Buffa, J.A.; Org, E.; Sheehy, B.T.; Britt, E.B.; Fu, X.; Wu, Y.; Li, L.; et al. Intestinal microbiota metabolism of l-carnitine, a nutrient in red meat, promotes atherosclerosis. Nat. Med. 2013, 19, 576–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Organ, C.L.; Otsuka, H.; Bhushan, S.; Wang, Z.; Bradley, J.; Trivedi, R.; Polhemus, D.J.; Tang, W.H.W.; Wu, Y.; Hazen, S.L.; et al. Choline Diet and Its Gut Microbe–Derived Metabolite, Trimethylamine N-Oxide, Exacerbate Pressure Overload–Induced Heart Failure. Circ. Heart Fail. 2016, 9, e002314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Cho, C.E.; Aardema, N.D.J.; Bunnell, M.L.; Larson, D.P.; Aguilar, S.S.; Bergeson, J.R.; Malysheva, O.V.; Caudill, M.A.; Lefevre, M. Effect of Choline Forms and Gut Microbiota Composition on Trimethylamine-N-Oxide Response in Healthy Men. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kim, R.B.; Morse, B.L.; Djurdjev, O.; Tang, M.; Muirhead, N.; Barrett, B.; Holmes, D.T.; Madore, F.; Clase, C.M.; Rigatto, C.; et al. Advanced chronic kidney disease populations have elevated trimethylamine N-oxide levels associated with increased cardiovascular events. Kidney Int. 2016, 89, 1144–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Missailidis, C.; Hällqvist, J.; Qureshi, A.R.; Barany, P.; Heimbürger, O.; Lindholm, B.; Stenvinkel, P.; Bergman, P. Serum Trimethylamine-N-Oxide Is Strongly Related to Renal Function and Predicts Outcome in Chronic Kidney Disease. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0141738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhu, W.; Gregory, J.C.; Org, E.; Buffa, J.A.; Gupta, N.; Wang, Z.; Li, L.; Fu, X.; Wu, Y.; Mehrabian, M.; et al. Gut Microbial Metabolite TMAO Enhances Platelet Hyperreactivity and Thrombosis Risk. Cell 2016, 165, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Evans, M.; Dai, L.; Avesani, C.M.; Kublickiene, K.; Stenvinkel, P. The dietary source of trimethylamine N-oxide and clinical outcomes: An unexpected liaison. Clin. Kidney J. 2023, 16, 1804–1812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Pelletier, C.C.; Croyal, M.; Ene, L.; Aguesse, A.; Billon-Crossouard, S.; Krempf, M.; Lemoine, S.; Guebre-Egziabher, F.; Juillard, L.; Soulage, C.O. Elevation of Trimethylamine-N-Oxide in Chronic Kidney Disease: Contribution of Decreased Glomerular Filtration Rate. Toxins 2019, 11, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Holle, J.; McParland, V.; Anandakumar, H.; Gerritzmann, F.; Behrens, F.; Schumacher, F.; Thumfart, J.; Eckardt, K.-U.; Kleuser, B.; Bartolomaeus, H.; et al. Gut dysbiosis contributes to TMAO accumulation in CKD. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2024, 39, 1923–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Cao, C.; Zhu, H.; Yao, Y.; Zeng, R. Gut Dysbiosis and Kidney Diseases. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 829349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Magliocca, G.; Mone, P.; Di Iorio, B.R.; Heidland, A.; Marzocco, S. Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Chronic Kidney Disease: Focus on Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Regulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Tan, J.; McKenzie, C.; Potamitis, M.; Thorburn, A.N.; Mackay, C.R.; Macia, L. Chapter Three—The Role of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Health and Disease. Adv. Immunol. 2014, 121, 91–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Huang, W.; Guo, H.-L.; Deng, X.; Zhu, T.-T.; Xiong, J.-F.; Xu, Y.-H.; Xu, Y. Short-Chain Fatty Acids Inhibit Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Mesangial Cells Induced by High Glucose and Lipopolysaccharide. Exp. Clin. Endocrinol. Diabetes 2017, 125, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Li, L.-Z.; Tao, S.-B.; Ma, L.; Fu, P. Roles of short-chain fatty acids in kidney diseases. Chin. Med. J. 2019, 132, 1228–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Podkowińska, A.; Formanowicz, D. Chronic Kidney Disease as Oxidative Stress- and Inflammatory-Mediated Cardiovascular Disease. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Huang, W.; Man, Y.; Gao, C.; Zhou, L.; Gu, J.; Xu, H.; Wan, Q.; Long, Y.; Chai, L.; Xu, Y.; et al. Short-Chain Fatty Acids Ameliorate Diabetic Nephropathy via GPR43-Mediated Inhibition of Oxidative Stress and NF-κ B Signaling. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2020, 2020, 4074832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Turner, J.-E.; Paust, H.-J.; Steinmetz, O.M.; Panzer, U. The Th17 immune response in renal inflammation. Kidney Int. 2010, 77, 1070–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, G.; Xiong, Y.; Li, Z.; Yu, Q.; Li, S.; Xie, J.; Zeng, S.; Yu, D.; Yang, Y.; Yu, J. Gut microbiota-derived metabolites modulate Treg/Th17 balance: Novel therapeutic targets in autoimmune diseases. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1710733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Pantazi, A.C.; Kassim, M.A.K.; Nori, W.; Tuta, L.A.; Mihai, C.M.; Chisnoiu, T.; Balasa, A.L.; Mihai, L.; Lupu, A.; Frecus, C.E.; et al. Clinical Perspectives of Gut Microbiota in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Kidney Disease: Where Do We Stand? Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Jia, J.; Han, Z.; Wang, J. Th17/Treg imbalance in inflammatory bowel disease: Immunological mechanisms and microbiota-driven regulation. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1651063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Paquissi, F.C.; Abensur, H. The Th17/IL-17 Axis and Kidney Diseases, With Focus on Lupus Nephritis. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 654912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Cheng, H.; Guan, X.; Chen, D.; Ma, W. The Th17/Treg Cell Balance: A Gut Microbiota-Modulated Story. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Wang, J.; Hou, Y.; Mu, L.; Yang, M.; Ai, X. Gut microbiota contributes to the intestinal and extraintestinal immune homeostasis by balancing Th17/Treg cells. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2024, 143, 113570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Chan, A.J.; Alikhan, M.A.; Odobasic, D.; Gan, P.Y.; Khouri, M.B.; Steinmetz, O.M.; Mansell, A.S.; Kitching, A.R.; Holdsworth, S.R.; Summers, S.A. Innate IL-17A–Producing Leukocytes Promote Acute Kidney Injury via Inflammasome and Toll-Like Receptor Activation. Am. J. Pathol. 2014, 184, 1411–1418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wang, S.; Lv, D.; Jiang, S.; Jiang, J.; Liang, M.; Hou, F.; Chen, Y. Quantitative reduction in short-chain fatty acids, especially butyrate, contributes to the progression of chronic kidney disease. Clin. Sci. 2019, 133, 1857–1870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Corte-Iglesias, V.; Saiz, M.L.; Andrade-Lopez, A.C.; Salazar, N.; Bernet, C.R.; Martin-Martin, C.; Borra, J.M.; Lozano, J.-J.; Aransay, A.M.; Diaz-Corte, C.; et al. Propionate and butyrate counteract renal damage and progression to chronic kidney disease. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2024, 40, 133–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Guan, Y.; Chen, K.; Quan, D.; Kang, L.; Yang, D.; Wu, H.; Yan, M.; Wu, S.; Lv, L.; Zhang, G. The Combination of Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi and Sophora japonica L. ameliorate Renal Function by Regulating Gut Microbiota in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 11, 575294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kawabata, C.; Hirakawa, Y.; Inagi, R.; Nangaku, M. Acetate attenuates kidney fibrosis in an oxidative stress-dependent manner. Physiol. Rep. 2023, 11, e15774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Sun, X.; Chen, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhu, S.; Wang, S.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Sun, W. Yishen Qingli Heluo Granule Ameliorates Renal Dysfunction in 5/6 Nephrectomized Rats by Targeting Gut Microbiota and Intestinal Barrier Integrity. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 858881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Snelson, M.; Kellow, N.J.; Coughlan, M.T. Modulation of the Gut Microbiota by Resistant Starch as a Treatment of Chronic Kidney Diseases: Evidence of Efficacy and Mechanistic Insights. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, 303–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lakshmanan, A.P.; Al Za’abi, M.; Ali, B.H.; Terranegra, A. The influence of the prebiotic gum acacia on the intestinal microbiome composition in rats with experimental chronic kidney disease. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 133, 110992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lai, S.; Mazzaferro, S.; Muscaritoli, M.; Mastroluca, D.; Testorio, M.; Perrotta, A.; Esposito, Y.; Carta, M.; Campagna, L.; Di Grado, M.; et al. Prebiotic Therapy with Inulin Associated with Low Protein Diet in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: Evaluation of Nutritional, Cardiovascular and Psychocognitive Parameters. Toxins 2020, 12, 381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ondrussek-Sekac, M.; Navas-Carrillo, D.; Orenes-Piñero, E. Intestinal microbiota alterations in chronic kidney disease and the influence of dietary components. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021, 61, 1490–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. De Mauri, A.; Carrera, D.; Bagnati, M.; Rolla, R.; Vidali, M.; Chiarinotti, D.; Pane, M.; Amoruso, A.; Del Piano, M. Probiotics-Supplemented Low-Protein Diet for Microbiota Modulation in Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease (ProLowCKD): Results from a Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Arteaga-Muller, G.Y.; Flores-Treviño, S.; Bocanegra-Ibarias, P.; Robles-Espino, D.; Garza-González, E.; Fabela-Valdez, G.C.; Camacho-Ortiz, A. Changes in the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients Undergoing Fecal Microbiota Transplantation. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Liu, X.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.; Liu, P.; Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Ren, F. Fecal microbiota transplantation restores normal fecal composition and delays malignant development of mild chronic kidney disease in rats. Front. Microbiol. 2022, 13, 1037257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Cooper, T.E.; Khalid, R.; Chan, S.; Craig, J.C.; Hawley, C.M.; Howell, M.; Johnson, D.W.; Jaure, A.; Teixeira-Pinto, A.; Wong, G. Synbiotics, prebiotics and probiotics for people with chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2023, 2023, CD013631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Dudzicz-Gojowy, S.; Więcek, A.; Adamczak, M. The Role of Probiotics in the Prevention of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. Nutrients 2024, 16, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lau, W.L.; Vaziri, N.D. The Leaky Gut and Altered Microbiome in Chronic Kidney Disease. J. Ren. Nutr. 2017, 27, 458–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Beker, B.M.; Colombo, I.; Gonzalez-Torres, H.; Musso, C.G. Decreasing microbiota-derived uremic toxins to improve CKD outcomes. Clin. Kidney J. 2022, 15, 2214–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Vaziri, N.D.; Yuan, J.; Norris, K. Role of Urea in Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction and Disruption of Epithelial Tight Junction in Chronic Kidney Disease. Am. J. Nephrol. 2013, 37, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Ramezani, A.; Raj, D.S. The Gut Microbiome, Kidney Disease, and Targeted Interventions. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2014, 25, 657–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Meijers, B.; Farré, R.; Dejongh, S.; Vicario, M.; Evenepoel, P. Intestinal Barrier Function in Chronic Kidney Disease. Toxins 2018, 10, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tsuji, K.; Uchida, N.; Nakanoh, H.; Fukushima, K.; Haraguchi, S.; Kitamura, S.; Wada, J. The Gut–Kidney Axis in Chronic Kidney Diseases. Diagnostics 2024, 15, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Feroze, U.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Sterling, K.A.; Molnar, M.Z.; Noori, N.; Benner, D.; Shah, V.; Dwivedi, R.; Becker, K.; Kovesdy, C.P.; et al. Examining Associations of Circulating Endotoxin with Nutritional Status, Inflammation, and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients. J. Ren. Nutr. 2012, 22, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Vaziri, N.D.; Yuan, J.; Nazertehrani, S.; Ni, Z.; Liu, S. Chronic Kidney Disease Causes Disruption of Gastric and Small Intestinal Epithelial Tight Junction. Am. J. Nephrol. 2013, 38, 99–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Georgopoulou, G.-A.; Papasotiriou, M.; Bosgana, P.; De Lastic, A.-L.; Koufou, E.-E.; Papachristou, E.; Goumenos, D.S.; Davlouros, P.; Kourea, E.; Zolota, V.; et al. Altered Expression of Intestinal Tight Junctions in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Pathogenetic Mechanism of Intestinal Hyperpermeability. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Adda-Rezig, H.; Carron, C.; Pais De Barros, J.-P.; Choubley, H.; Charron, É.; Rérole, A.-L.; Laheurte, C.; Louvat, P.; Gaiffe, É.; Simula-Faivre, D.; et al. New Insights on End-Stage Renal Disease and Healthy Individual Gut Bacterial Translocation: Different Carbon Composition of Lipopolysaccharides and Different Impact on Monocyte Inflammatory Response. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 658404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Song, G.; Xie, Y.; Yi, L.; Cheng, W.; Jia, H.; Shi, W.; Liu, Q.; Fang, L.; Xue, S.; Liu, D.; et al. Bile acids affect intestinal barrier function through FXR and TGR5. Front. Med. 2025, 12, 1607899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kiriyama, Y.; Nochi, H. Physiological Role of Bile Acids Modified by the Gut Microbiome. Microorganisms 2021, 10, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Anderson, K.M.; Gayer, C.P. The Pathophysiology of Farnesoid X Receptor (FXR) in the GI Tract: Inflammation, Barrier Function and Innate Immunity. Cells 2021, 10, 3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Li, R.; Zeng, L.; Xie, S.; Chen, J.; Yu, Y.; Zhong, L. Targeted metabolomics study of serum bile acid profile in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis. PeerJ 2019, 7, e7145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wakino, S.; Hasegawa, K.; Tamaki, M.; Minato, M.; Inagaki, T. Kidney-Gut Axis in Chronic Kidney Disease: Therapeutic Perspectives from Microbiota Modulation and Nutrition. Nutrients 2025, 17, 1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Rezvani, M.; Hesari, J.; Peighambardoust, S.H.; Manconi, M.; Hamishehkar, H. Development and Characterization of Nanostructured Pharmacosomal Mesophases: An Innovative Delivery System for Bioactive Peptides. Adv. Pharm. Bull. 2018, 8, 609–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Karami, Z.; Peighambardoust, S.H.; Hesari, J.; Akbari-Adergani, B.; Andreu, D. Identification and synthesis of multifunctional peptides from wheat germ hydrolysate fractions obtained by proteinase K digestion. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43, e12800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Borrajo, P.; Pateiro, M.; Barba, F.J.; Mora, L.; Franco, D.; Toldrá, F.; Lorenzo, J.M. Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity of Peptides Extracted from Meat By-products: A Review. Food Anal. Methods 2019, 12, 2401–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Kim, S.-K.; Wijesekara, I. Development and biological activities of marine-derived bioactive peptides: A review. J. Funct. Foods 2010, 2, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Erdmann, K.; Cheung, B.W.Y.; Schröder, H. The possible roles of food-derived bioactive peptides in reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2008, 19, 643–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Elias, R.J.; Kellerby, S.S.; Decker, E.A. Antioxidant Activity of Proteins and Peptides. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2008, 48, 430–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Peighambardoust, S.H.; Karami, Z.; Pateiro, M.; Lorenzo, J.M. A Review on Health-Promoting, Biological, and Functional Aspects of Bioactive Peptides in Food Applications. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. De Castro, R.J.S.; Sato, H.H. A response surface approach on optimization of hydrolysis parameters for the production of egg white protein hydrolysates with antioxidant activities. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2015, 4, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mada, S.B.; Ugwu, C.P.; Abarshi, M.M. Health Promoting Effects of Food-Derived Bioactive Peptides: A Review. Int. J. Pept. Res. Ther. 2020, 26, 831–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Bhat, Z.F.; Kumar, S.; Bhat, H.F. Bioactive peptides of animal origin: A review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 5377–5392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Liu, Z.; Dong, S.; Xu, J.; Zeng, M.; Song, H.; Zhao, Y. Production of cysteine-rich antimicrobial peptide by digestion of oyster (Crassostrea gigas) with alcalase and bromelin. Food Control 2008, 19, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Lorenzo, J.M.; Munekata, P.E.S.; Gómez, B.; Barba, F.J.; Mora, L.; Pérez-Santaescolástica, C.; Toldrá, F. Bioactive peptides as natural antioxidants in food products—A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 79, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Sarmadi, B.H.; Ismail, A. Antioxidative peptides from food proteins: A review. Peptides 2010, 31, 1949–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Xiong, S.; Yao, X.; Li, A. Antioxidant Properties of Peptide from Cowpea Seed. Int. J. Food Prop. 2013, 16, 1245–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Revilla, E.; Maria, C.S.; Miramontes, E.; Bautista, J.; García-Martínez, A.; Cremades, O.; Cert, R.; Parrado, J. Nutraceutical composition, antioxidant activity and hypocholesterolemic effect of a water-soluble enzymatic extract from rice bran. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42, 387–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sakanaka, S.; Tachibana, Y. Active oxygen scavenging activity of egg-yolk protein hydrolysates and their effects on lipid oxidation in beef and tuna homogenates. Food Chem. 2006, 95, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Liu, J.-R.; Chen, M.-J.; Lin, C.-W. Antimutagenic and Antioxidant Properties of Milk−Kefir and Soymilk−Kefir. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 2467–2474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Xie, Z.; Huang, J.; Xu, X.; Jin, Z. Antioxidant activity of peptides isolated from alfalfa leaf protein hydrolysate. Food Chem. 2008, 111, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Li, X.; Han, L.; Chen, L. In vitro antioxidant activity of protein hydrolysates prepared from corn gluten meal. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 1660–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Megías, C.; Pedroche, J.; Yust, M.M.; Girón-Calle, J.; Alaiz, M.; Millán, F.; Vioque, J. Production of copper-chelating peptides after hydrolysis of sunflower proteins with pepsin and pancreatin. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2008, 41, 1973–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Hwang, J.-Y.; Shyu, Y.-S.; Wang, Y.-T.; Hsu, C.-K. Antioxidative properties of protein hydrolysate from defatted peanut kernels treated with esperase. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 43, 285–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Je, J.-Y.; Lee, K.-H.; Lee, M.H.; Ahn, C.-B. Antioxidant and antihypertensive protein hydrolysates produced from tuna liver by enzymatic hydrolysis. Food Res. Int. 2009, 42, 1266–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. López-Pedrouso, M.; Franco, D.; Serrano, M.P.; Maggiolino, A.; Landete-Castillejos, T.; De Palo, P.; Lorenzo, J.M. A proteomic-based approach for the search of biomarkers in Iberian wild deer (Cervus elaphus) as indicators of meat quality. J. Proteom. 2019, 205, 103422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Qian, Z.-J.; Jung, W.-K.; Kim, S.-K. Free radical scavenging activity of a novel antioxidative peptide purified from hydrolysate of bullfrog skin, Rana catesbeiana Shaw. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 1690–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Sheih, I.-C.; Wu, T.-K.; Fang, T.J. Antioxidant properties of a new antioxidative peptide from algae protein waste hydrolysate in different oxidation systems. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 3419–3425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Shi, Y.; Wei, G.; Huang, A. Simulated in vitro gastrointestinal digestion of traditional Chinese Rushan and Naizha cheese: Peptidome profiles and bioactivity elucidation. Food Res. Int. 2021, 142, 110201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Zenezini Chiozzi, R.; Capriotti, A.L.; Cavaliere, C.; La Barbera, G.; Piovesana, S.; Samperi, R.; Laganà, A. Purification and identification of endogenous antioxidant and ACE-inhibitory peptides from donkey milk by multidimensional liquid chromatography and nanoHPLC-high resolution mass spectrometry. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2016, 408, 5657–5666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Guo, H.; Zang, C.; Zheng, L.; Ding, L.; Yang, W.; Ren, S.; Guan, H. Novel Antioxidant Peptides from Fermented Whey Protein by Lactobacillus rhamnosus B2-1: Separation and Identification by in Vitro and in Silico Approaches. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 72, 23306–23319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Corrochano, A.R.; Ferraretto, A.; Arranz, E.; Stuknytė, M.; Bottani, M.; O’Connor, P.M.; Kelly, P.M.; De Noni, I.; Buckin, V.; Giblin, L. Bovine whey peptides transit the intestinal barrier to reduce oxidative stress in muscle cells. Food Chem. 2019, 288, 306–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Meleti, E.; Koureas, M.; Manouras, A.; Giannouli, P.; Malissiova, E. Bioactive Peptides from Dairy Products: A Systematic Review of Advances, Mechanisms, Benefits, and Functional Potential. Dairy 2025, 6, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Nongonierma, A.B.; Paolella, S.; Mudgil, P.; Maqsood, S.; FitzGerald, R.J. Identification of novel dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV) inhibitory peptides in camel milk protein hydrolysates. Food Chem. 2018, 244, 340–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Gong, H.; Gao, J.; Wang, Y.; Luo, Q.W.; Guo, K.R.; Ren, F.Z.; Mao, X.Y. Identification of novel peptides from goat milk casein that ameliorate high-glucose-induced insulin resistance in HepG2 cells. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 4907–4918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Mudgil, P.; Baby, B.; Ngoh, Y.-Y.; Kamal, H.; Vijayan, R.; Gan, C.-Y.; Maqsood, S. Molecular binding mechanism and identification of novel anti-hypertensive and anti-inflammatory bioactive peptides from camel milk protein hydrolysates. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 112, 108193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Arai, S.; Kurimoto, M.; Nakada, H.; Tanaka, M.; Ochi, H.; Tanaka, M.; Okochi, M. Screening of novel DPP-IV inhibitory peptides derived from bovine milk proteins using a peptide array platform. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2024, 137, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Zhang, D.; Yu, M.; Dong, W.; Yan, G.; Shi, Y.; Huang, A.; Wang, X. Peptide Profile Changes in Buffalo Milk Cheese during Different Storage Periods and Characterization of Novel Bioactive Peptides through Peptidomics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2025, 73, 571–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Ristic-Medic, D.; Takic, M.; Pokimica, B.; Terzic, B.; Kojadinovic, M.; Lepic, T.; Radjen, S.; Vucic, V. Dietary Omega-3 PUFA Intake in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: The Association with Vitamin D Deficiency, Intima–Media Thickness and Blood Pressure. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 5593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Fazelian, S.; Moradi, F.; Agah, S.; Hoseini, A.; Heydari, H.; Morvaridzadeh, M.; Omidi, A.; Pizarro, A.B.; Ghafouri, A.; Heshmati, J. Effect of omega-3 fatty acids supplementation on cardio-metabolic and oxidative stress parameters in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2021, 22, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Hall, W.L. The future for long chain n-3 PUFA in the prevention of coronary heart disease: Do we need to target non-fish-eaters? Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2017, 76, 408–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Inoue, T.; Tanaka, M.; Masuda, S.; Ohue-Kitano, R.; Yamakage, H.; Muranaka, K.; Wada, H.; Kusakabe, T.; Shimatsu, A.; Hasegawa, K.; et al. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids suppress the inflammatory responses of lipopolysaccharide-stimulated mouse microglia by activating SIRT1 pathways. Biochim. Biophys. Acta BBA Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 2017, 1862, 552–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Pinto, A.M.; MacLaughlin, H.L.; Hall, W.L. Heart Rate Variability and Long Chain n-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients on Haemodialysis: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Labonté, M.-È.; Dewailly, É.; Lucas, M.; Couture, P.; Lamarche, B. Association of red blood cell n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids with plasma inflammatory biomarkers among the Quebec Cree population. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 68, 1042–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Ong, K.L.; Marklund, M.; Huang, L.; Rye, K.-A.; Hui, N.; Pan, X.-F.; Rebholz, C.M.; Kim, H.; Steffen, L.M.; Van Westing, A.C.; et al. Association of omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids with incident chronic kidney disease: Pooled analysis of 19 cohorts. Br. Med. J. 2023, 380, e072909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Zeinalabedini, M.; Shapouri, M.; Mirzaee, P.; Kamali, M.; Mahmoudi, Z.; Noriani, N.; Saeedirad, Z.; Adabi, S.B.; Mobarakeh, K.A.; Shamsi-Goushki, A.; et al. The Effect of Omega-3 Supplements on Renal Function Indices in Chronic Kidney Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis. Nutr. Metab. Insights 2025, 18, 11786388251345518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Tierney, B.T.; Yang, Z.; Luber, J.M.; Beaudin, M.; Wibowo, M.C.; Baek, C.; Mehlenbacher, E.; Patel, C.J.; Kostic, A.D. The Landscape of Genetic Content in the Gut and Oral Human Microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 2019, 26, 283–295.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Tap, J.; Mondot, S.; Levenez, F.; Pelletier, E.; Caron, C.; Furet, J.; Ugarte, E.; Muñoz-Tamayo, R.; Paslier, D.L.E.; Nalin, R.; et al. Towards the human intestinal microbiota phylogenetic core. Environ. Microbiol. 2009, 11, 2574–2584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Den Besten, G.; Van Eunen, K.; Groen, A.K.; Venema, K.; Reijngoud, D.-J.; Bakker, B.M. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 2325–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Gensollen, T.; Iyer, S.S.; Kasper, D.L.; Blumberg, R.S. How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system. Science 2016, 352, 539–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Masse, K.E.; Lu, V.B. Short-chain fatty acids, secondary bile acids and indoles: Gut microbial metabolites with effects on enteroendocrine cell function and their potential as therapies for metabolic disease. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1169624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Louis, P.; Flint, H.J. Diversity, metabolism and microbial ecology of butyrate-producing bacteria from the human large intestine. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2009, 294, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Bäckhed, F.; Ding, H.; Wang, T.; Hooper, L.V.; Koh, G.Y.; Nagy, A.; Semenkovich, C.F.; Gordon, J.I. The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 15718–15723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Miller, T.L.; Wolin, M.J. Pathways of acetate, propionate, and butyrate formation by the human fecal microbial flora. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62, 1589–1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Cummings, J.H.; Pomare, E.W.; Branch, W.J.; Naylor, C.P.; Macfarlane, G.T. Short chain fatty acids in human large intestine, portal, hepatic and venous blood. Gut 1987, 28, 1221–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Yokoyama, M.; Carlson, J. Microbial metabolites of tryptophan in the intestinal tract with special reference to skatole. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1979, 32, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Ridlon, J.M.; Kang, D.-J.; Hylemon, P.B. Bile salt biotransformations by human intestinal bacteria. J. Lipid Res. 2006, 47, 241–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Abildgaard, A.; Elfving, B.; Hokland, M.; Wegener, G.; Lund, S. The microbial metabolite indole-3-propionic acid improves glucose metabolism in rats, but does not affect behaviour. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 124, 306–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Özcan, U.; Yilmaz, E.; Özcan, L.; Furuhashi, M.; Vaillancourt, E.; Smith, R.O.; Görgün, C.Z.; Hotamisligil, G.S. Chemical Chaperones Reduce ER Stress and Restore Glucose Homeostasis in a Mouse Model of Type 2 Diabetes. Science 2006, 313, 1137–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Schwiertz, A.; Taras, D.; Schäfer, K.; Beijer, S.; Bos, N.A.; Donus, C.; Hardt, P.D. Microbiota and SCFA in Lean and Overweight Healthy Subjects. Obesity 2010, 18, 190–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Van Der Beek, C.M.; Canfora, E.E.; Lenaerts, K.; Troost, F.J.; Olde Damink, S.W.M.; Holst, J.J.; Masclee, A.A.M.; Dejong, C.H.C.; Blaak, E.E. Distal, not proximal, colonic acetate infusions promote fat oxidation and improve metabolic markers in overweight/obese men. Clin. Sci. 2016, 130, 2073–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Canfora, E.E.; Van Der Beek, C.M.; Jocken, J.W.E.; Goossens, G.H.; Holst, J.J.; Olde Damink, S.W.M.; Lenaerts, K.; Dejong, C.H.C.; Blaak, E.E. Colonic infusions of short-chain fatty acid mixtures promote energy metabolism in overweight/obese men: A randomized crossover trial. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Bennion, L.J.; Grundy, S.M. Effects of Diabetes Mellitus on Cholesterol Metabolism in Man. N. Engl. J. Med. 1977, 296, 1365–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Zheng, X.; Xie, G.; Zhao, A.; Zhao, L.; Yao, C.; Chiu, N.H.L.; Zhou, Z.; Bao, Y.; Jia, W.; Nicholson, J.K.; et al. The Footprints of Gut Microbial–Mammalian Co-Metabolism. J. Proteome Res. 2011, 10, 5512–5522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Chen, M.X.; Wang, S.-Y.; Kuo, C.-H.; Tsai, I.-L. Metabolome analysis for investigating host-gut microbiota interactions. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2019, 118, S10–S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Alnouti, Y.; Csanaky, I.L.; Klaassen, C.D. Quantitative-profiling of bile acids and their conjugates in mouse liver, bile, plasma, and urine using LC–MS/MS. J. Chromatogr. B 2008, 873, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Liu, H.; Zhang, L.; Yu, J.; Shao, S. Advances in the application and mechanism of bioactive peptides in the treatment of inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2024, 15, 1413179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Zhi, T.; Hong, D.; Zhang, Z.; Li, S.; Xia, J.; Wang, C.; Wu, Y.; Jia, Y.; Ma, A. Anti-inflammatory and gut microbiota regulatory effects of walnut protein derived peptide LPF in vivo. Food Res. Int. 2022, 152, 110875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Rahabi, M.; Salon, M.; Bruno-Bonnet, C.; Prat, M.; Jacquemin, G.; Benmoussa, K.; Alaeddine, M.; Parny, M.; Bernad, J.; Bertrand, B.; et al. Bioactive fish collagen peptides weaken intestinal inflammation by orienting colonic macrophages phenotype through mannose receptor activation. Eur. J. Nutr. 2022, 61, 2051–2066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Su, Y.; Sun, T.; Gao, J.; Zhang, C.; Liu, X.; Bi, C.; Wang, J.; Shan, A. Anti-Proteolytic Peptide R7I Protects the Intestinal Barrier and Alleviates Fatty Acid Malabsorption in Salmonella typhimurium-Infected Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Patil, K.R.; Mahajan, U.B.; Unger, B.S.; Goyal, S.N.; Belemkar, S.; Surana, S.J.; Ojha, S.; Patil, C.R. Animal Models of Inflammation for Screening of Anti-inflammatory Drugs: Implications for the Discovery and Development of Phytopharmaceuticals. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Tornatore, L.; Thotakura, A.K.; Bennett, J.; Moretti, M.; Franzoso, G. The nuclear factor kappa B signaling pathway: Integrating metabolism with inflammation. Trends Cell Biol. 2012, 22, 557–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Grivennikov, S.I.; Greten, F.R.; Karin, M. Immunity, Inflammation, and Cancer. Cell 2010, 140, 883–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. López-Pedrouso, M.; Zaky, A.A.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Camiña, M.; Franco, D. A review on bioactive peptides derived from meat and by-products: Extraction methods, biological activities, applications and limitations. Meat Sci. 2023, 204, 109278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Yang, F.; Chen, X.; Huang, M.; Yang, Q.; Cai, X.; Chen, X.; Du, M.; Huang, J.; Wang, S. Molecular characteristics and structure–activity relationships of food-derived bioactive peptides. J. Integr. Agric. 2021, 20, 2313–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Xing, L.; Fu, L.; Cao, S.; Yin, Y.; Wei, L.; Zhang, W. The Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Bovine Bone-Gelatin-Derived Peptides in LPS-Induced RAW264.7 Macrophages Cells and Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced C57BL/6 Mice. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Cresti, L.; Cappello, G.; Vailati, S.; Melloni, E.; Brunetti, J.; Falciani, C.; Bracci, L.; Pini, A. In Vivo Efficacy and Toxicity of an Antimicrobial Peptide in a Model of Endotoxin-Induced Pulmonary Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 7967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Ventura, I.; Chomon-García, M.; Tomás-Aguirre, F.; Palau-Ferré, A.; Legidos-García, M.E.; Murillo-Llorente, M.T.; Pérez-Bermejo, M. Therapeutic and Immunologic Effects of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 10879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Dalli, J.; Gomez, E.A.; Jouvene, C.C. Utility of the Specialized Pro-Resolving Mediators as Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers in Disease. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Daenen, K.; Andries, A.; Mekahli, D.; Van Schepdael, A.; Jouret, F.; Bammens, B. Oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2019, 34, 975–991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Mittal, M.; Siddiqui, M.R.; Tran, K.; Reddy, S.P.; Malik, A.B. Reactive Oxygen Species in Inflammation and Tissue Injury. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014, 20, 1126–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Biswas, S.K. Does the Interdependence between Oxidative Stress and Inflammation Explain the Antioxidant Paradox? Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 2016, 5698931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Castellani, P.; Balza, E.; Rubartelli, A. Inflammation, DAMPs, Tumor Development, and Progression: A Vicious Circle Orchestrated by Redox Signaling. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2014, 20, 1086–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Samsu, N. Diabetic Nephropathy: Challenges in Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 1497449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Yilmaz, M.I.; Saglam, M.; Caglar, K.; Cakir, E.; Sonmez, A.; Ozgurtas, T.; Aydin, A.; Eyileten, T.; Ozcan, O.; Acikel, C.; et al. The Determinants of Endothelial Dysfunction in CKD: Oxidative Stress and Asymmetric Dimethylarginine. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2006, 47, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Muneer, P.M.A.; Chandra, N.; Haorah, J. Interactions of Oxidative Stress and Neurovascular Inflammation in the Pathogenesis of Traumatic Brain Injury. Mol. Neurobiol. 2015, 51, 966–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Duni, A.; Liakopoulos, V.; Roumeliotis, S.; Peschos, D.; Dounousi, E. Oxidative Stress in the Pathogenesis and Evolution of Chronic Kidney Disease: Untangling Ariadne’s Thread. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Neade, T.; Uribarri, J. Diet, Inflammation, and Chronic Kidney Disease: Getting to the Heart of the Matter. Semin. Dial. 2008, 21, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Castejón-Vega, B.; Giampieri, F.; Alvarez-Suarez, J.M. Nutraceutical Compounds Targeting Inflammasomes in Human Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Vilaysane, A.; Chun, J.; Seamone, M.E.; Wang, W.; Chin, R.; Hirota, S.; Li, Y.; Clark, S.A.; Tschopp, J.; Trpkov, K.; et al. The NLRP3 Inflammasome Promotes Renal Inflammation and Contributes to CKD. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010, 21, 1732–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Baldrighi, M.; Mallat, Z.; Li, X. NLRP3 inflammasome pathways in atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2017, 267, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Su, H.; Lei, C.-T.; Zhang, C. Interleukin-6 Signaling Pathway and Its Role in Kidney Disease: An Update. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Du, Y.; He, C.; An, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Fu, W.; Wang, M.; Shan, Z.; Xie, J.; Yang, Y.; et al. The Role of Short Chain Fatty Acids in Inflammation and Body Health. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 7379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. He, J.; Zhang, P.; Shen, L.; Niu, L.; Tan, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhao, Y.; Bai, L.; Hao, X.; Li, X.; et al. Short-Chain Fatty Acids and Their Association with Signalling Pathways in Inflammation, Glucose and Lipid Metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 6356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Shin, Y.; Han, S.; Kwon, J.; Ju, S.; Choi, T.; Kang, I.; Kim, S. Roles of Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Lee, J.G.; Lee, J.; Lee, A.; Jo, S.V.; Park, C.H.; Han, D.S.; Eun, C.S. Impact of short-chain fatty acid supplementation on gut inflammation and microbiota composition in a murine colitis model. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2022, 101, 108926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Martínez-Augustin, O.; Rivero-Gutiérrez, B.; Mascaraque, C.; Sánchez De Medina, F. Food Derived Bioactive Peptides and Intestinal Barrier Function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 22857–22873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Yami, H.A.; Tahmoorespur, M.; Javadmanesh, A.; Tazarghi, A.; Sekhavati, M.H. The immunomodulatory effects of lactoferrin and its derived peptides on NF-κB signaling pathway: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 2023, 11, e972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Borges, T.; Coelho, P.; Prudêncio, C.; Gomes, A.; Gomes, P.; Ferraz, R. Bioactive Peptides from Milk Proteins with Antioxidant, Anti-Inflammatory, and Antihypertensive Activities. Foods 2025, 14, 535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Meram, C.; Wu, J. Anti-inflammatory effects of egg yolk livetins (α, β, and γ-livetin) fraction and its enzymatic hydrolysates in lipopolysaccharide-induced RAW 264.7 macrophages. Food Res. Int. 2017, 100, 449–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Tao, C.; Xiang, X.; Kwame Amakye, W.; Ren, J. Soy peptides ameliorate the progression of chronic kidney disease in mice via inhibition of inflammation. Food Biosci. 2023, 56, 103204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. De Medina, F.S.; Ortega-González, M.; González-Pérez, R.; Capitán-Cañadas, F.; Martínez-Augustin, O. Host–microbe interactions: The difficult yet peaceful coexistence of the microbiota and the intestinal mucosa. Br. J. Nutr. 2013, 109, S12–S20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Baazm, M.; Behrens, V.; Beyer, C.; Nikoubashman, O.; Zendedel, A. Regulation of Inflammasomes by Application of Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids in a Spinal Cord Injury Model. Cells 2021, 10, 3147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Li, C.; Wu, X.; Liu, S.; Shen, D.; Zhu, J.; Liu, K. Role of Resolvins in the Inflammatory Resolution of Neurological Diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Serhan, C.N.; De La Rosa, X.; Jouvene, C.C. Cutting Edge: Human Vagus Produces Specialized Proresolving Mediators of Inflammation with Electrical Stimulation Reducing Proinflammatory Eicosanoids. J. Immunol. 2018, 201, 3161–3165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Wang, Y.-H.; Tang, Y.-R.; Gao, X.; Zhang, N.-N.; Lv, Q.-Q.; Liu, J.; Li, Y. Aspirin-triggered Resolvin D1 ameliorates activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome via induction of autophagy in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 971136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Coll, E.; Cigarran, S.; Portolés, J.; Cases, A. Gut Dysbiosis and Its Role in the Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease. Toxins 2024, 16, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Chung, S.; Barnes, J.L.; Astroth, K.S. Gastrointestinal Microbiota in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, 888–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Yan, H.; Ajuwon, K.M. Butyrate modifies intestinal barrier function in IPEC-J2 cells through a selective upregulation of tight junction proteins and activation of the Akt signaling pathway. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Serini, S.; Cassano, R.; Curcio, F.; Trombino, S.; Calviello, G. Nutraceutical-Based Nanoformulations for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 12032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Montagnani, M.; Bottalico, L.; Potenza, M.A.; Charitos, I.A.; Topi, S.; Colella, M.; Santacroce, L. The Crosstalk between Gut Microbiota and Nervous System: A Bidirectional Interaction between Microorganisms and Metabolome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Charitos, I.A.; Scacco, S.; Cotoia, A.; Castellaneta, F.; Castellana, G.; Pasqualotto, F.; Venneri, M.; Ferrulli, A.; Aliani, M.; Santacroce, L.; et al. Intestinal Microbiota Dysbiosis Role and Bacterial Translocation as a Factor for Septic Risk. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Luan, H.; Wang, C.; Sun, J.; Zhao, L.; Li, L.; Zhou, B.; Shao, S.; Shen, X.; Xu, Y. Resolvin D1 Protects Against Ischemia/Reperfusion-Induced Acute Kidney Injury by Increasing Treg Percentages via the ALX/FPR2 Pathway. Front. Physiol. 2020, 11, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Li, Z.; Liu, Z.; Lu, H.; Dai, W.; Chen, J.; He, L. RvD1 Attenuated Susceptibility to Ischemic AKI in Diabetes by Downregulating Nuclear Factor-κ B Signal and Inhibiting Apoptosis. Front. Physiol. 2021, 12, 651645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Apetrii, M.; Timofte, D.; Voroneanu, L.; Covic, A. Nutrition in Chronic Kidney Disease—The Role of Proteins and Specific Diets. Nutrients 2021, 13, 956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Nogueira-Rio, N.; Mondragon Portocarrero, A.D.C.; Lamas Freire, A.; Franco, C.M.; Canbolat, A.A.; Karav, S.; Miranda Lopez, J.M. Rethinking Nutrition in Chronic Kidney Disease: Plant Foods, Bioactive Compounds, and the Shift Beyond Traditional Limitations: A Narrative Review. Foods 2025, 14, 3355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Wathanavasin, W.; Cheungpasitporn, W.; Thongprayoon, C.; Fülöp, T. Effects of Dietary Fiber Supplementation on Modulating Uremic Toxins and Inflammation in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Toxins 2025, 17, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Cedillo-Flores, R.; Cuevas-Budhart, M.A.; Cavero-Redondo, I.; Kappes, M.; Ávila-Díaz, M.; Paniagua, R. Impact of Gut Microbiome Modulation on Uremic Toxin Reduction in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Nutrients 2025, 17, 1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  221. Koppe, L.; Soulage, C.O. The impact of dietary nutrient intake on gut microbiota in the progression and complications of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2022, 102, 728–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Wilck, N.; Matus, M.G.; Kearney, S.M.; Olesen, S.W.; Forslund, K.; Bartolomaeus, H.; Haase, S.; Mähler, A.; Balogh, A.; Markó, L.; et al. Salt-responsive gut commensal modulates TH17 axis and disease. Nature 2017, 551, 585–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Balan, Y.; Packirisamy, R.M.; Mohanraj, P.S. High dietary salt intake activates inflammatory cascades via Th17 immune cells: Impact on health and diseases. Arch. Med. Sci. 2020, 18, 459–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Zhang, J.; Niu, C.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, M.; Ni, L.; Liu, J.; Rong, X.; Zhao, C.; Chen, J. Full-Scale Clinical Data and Reshaped Intestinal Microbiome on a Short-Term Low-Phosphorus Diet among Healthy Adults. J. Ren. Nutr. 2021, 31, 448–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Rahbar Saadat, Y.; Niknafs, B.; Hosseiniyan Khatibi, S.M.; Ardalan, M.; Majdi, H.; Bahmanpoor, Z.; Abediazar, S.; Zununi Vahed, S. Gut microbiota; an overlooked effect of phosphate binders. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2020, 868, 172892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Lobene, A.J.; Biruete, A.; Mirmohammadali, S.N.; Ellis, L.M.; Cladis, D.P. Dietary (Poly)phenols in the Management of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Narrative Review. Dietetics 2025, 4, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Liu, C.; Yang, L.; Wei, W.; Fu, P. Efficacy of probiotics/synbiotics supplementation in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1434613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Vyhlídalová, B.; Krasulová, K.; Pečinková, P.; Marcalíková, A.; Vrzal, R.; Zemánková, L.; Vančo, J.; Trávníček, Z.; Vondráček, J.; Karasová, M.; et al. Gut Microbial Catabolites of Tryptophan Are Ligands and Agonists of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor: A Detailed Characterization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Sinha, A.K.; Laursen, M.F.; Brinck, J.E.; Rybtke, M.L.; Hjørne, A.P.; Procházková, N.; Pedersen, M.; Roager, H.M.; Licht, T.R. Dietary fibre directs microbial tryptophan metabolism via metabolic interactions in the gut microbiota. Nat. Microbiol. 2024, 9, 1964–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Furusawa, Y.; Obata, Y.; Fukuda, S.; Endo, T.A.; Nakato, G.; Takahashi, D.; Nakanishi, Y.; Uetake, C.; Kato, K.; Kato, T.; et al. Commensal microbe-derived butyrate induces the differentiation of colonic regulatory T cells. Nature 2013, 504, 446–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Ye, K.; Zhao, Y.; Huang, W.; Zhu, Y. Sodium butyrate improves renal injury in diabetic nephropathy through AMPK/SIRT1/PGC-1α signaling pathway. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 17867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Lu, Y.; Fan, C.; Li, P.; Lu, Y.; Chang, X.; Qi, K. Short Chain Fatty Acids Prevent High-fat-diet-induced Obesity in Mice by Regulating G Protein-coupled Receptors and Gut Microbiota. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Voroneanu, L.; Burlacu, A.; Brinza, C.; Covic, A.; Balan, G.G.; Nistor, I.; Popa, C.; Hogas, S.; Covic, A. Gut Microbiota in Chronic Kidney Disease: From Composition to Modulation towards Better Outcomes—A Systematic Review. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Rivera-Jiménez, J.; Berraquero-García, C.; Pérez-Gálvez, R.; García-Moreno, P.J.; Espejo-Carpio, F.J.; Guadix, A.; Guadix, E.M. Peptides and protein hydrolysates exhibiting anti-inflammatory activity: Sources, structural features and modulation mechanisms. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 12510–12540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Günay, S.; Taşova, F.; Yılmaz, H.E.; Paköz, Z.B.; Çekiç, C. Serum Resolvin E1 Levels and Its Relationship with Disease Activity in Ulcerative Colitis. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2019, 2019, 6258327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Zhang, J.; Cianciosi, D.; Islam, M.O.; Zhang, L. Editorial: Intervention effects of food-derived polyphenols and bioactive peptides on chronic inflammation. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1493706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Norris, K.C.; Olabisi, O.; Barnett, M.E.; Meng, Y.-X.; Martins, D.; Obialo, C.; Lee, J.E.; Nicholas, S.B. The Role of Vitamin D and Oxidative Stress in Chronic Kidney Disease. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. Chau, Y.-Y.; Kumar, J. Vitamin D in Chronic Kidney Disease. Indian. J. Pediatr. 2012, 79, 1062–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Alborzi, P.; Patel, N.A.; Peterson, C.; Bills, J.E.; Bekele, D.M.; Bunaye, Z.; Light, R.P.; Agarwal, R. Paricalcitol Reduces Albuminuria and Inflammation in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Randomized Double-Blind Pilot Trial. Hypertension 2008, 52, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Soeters, P.B.; Wolfe, R.R.; Shenkin, A. Hypoalbuminemia: Pathogenesis and Clinical Significance. J. Parenter. Enter. Nutr. 2019, 43, 181–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. De Boer, I.H.; Zelnick, L.R.; Ruzinski, J.; Friedenberg, G.; Duszlak, J.; Bubes, V.Y.; Hoofnagle, A.N.; Thadhani, R.; Glynn, R.J.; Buring, J.E.; et al. Effect of Vitamin D and Omega-3 Fatty Acid Supplementation on Kidney Function in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 322, 1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Rapaport, M.H.; Nierenberg, A.A.; Schettler, P.J.; Kinkead, B.; Cardoos, A.; Walker, R.; Mischoulon, D. Inflammation as a predictive biomarker for response to omega-3 fatty acids in major depressive disorder: A proof-of-concept study. Mol. Psychiatry 2016, 21, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Skulas-Ray, A.C. Omega-3 fatty acids and inflammation: A perspective on the challenges of evaluating efficacy in clinical research. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2015, 116–117, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Chilton, F.H.; Manichaikul, A.; Yang, C.; O’Connor, T.D.; Johnstone, L.M.; Blomquist, S.; Schembre, S.M.; Sergeant, S.; Zec, M.; Tsai, M.Y.; et al. Interpreting Clinical Trials with Omega-3 Supplements in the Context of Ancestry and FADS Genetic Variation. Front. Nutr. 2022, 8, 808054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Costantini, L.; Molinari, R.; Farinon, B.; Merendino, N. Impact of Omega-3 Fatty Acids on the Gut Microbiota. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Pradhan, N.; Kerner, J.; Campos, L.A.; Dobre, M. Personalized Nutrition in Chronic Kidney Disease. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Bloom, P.P.; Garrett, W.S.; Penniston, K.L.; Winkler, M.-K.H.; Hazen, S.L.; Agudelo, J.; Suryavanshi, M.; Babiker, A.; Dodd, D.; Fischbach, M.A.; et al. Microbiota and kidney disease: The road ahead. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2025, 21, 702–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Favero, C.; Carriazo, S.; Cuarental, L.; Fernandez-Prado, R.; Gomá-Garcés, E.; Perez-Gomez, M.V.; Ortiz, A.; Fernandez-Fernandez, B.; Sanchez-Niño, M.D. Phosphate, Microbiota and CKD. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Liu, H.; Wu, W.; Luo, Y. Oral and intravenous iron treatment alter the gut microbiome differentially in dialysis patients. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2022, 55, 759–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Chen, C.; Wang, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, W.; Ou, S. Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Synbiotics for Patients on Dialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Ren. Nutr. 2023, 33, 126–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Wu, I.-W.; Chang, L.-C.; Wu, Y.-L.; Yang, H.-Y.; Twu, Y.-C.; Tsai, P.-Y.; Paulus, S.; Resnick, R.; Chung, W.-H.; Yang, C.-W.; et al. Gut flora metagenomic analysis coupled with metabolic and deep immune profiling in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2024, 39, 1333–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Szrejder, M.; Piwkowska, A. Gut Microbiome-Derived Short-Chain Fatty Acids in Glomerular Protection and Modulation of Chronic Kidney Disease Progression. Nutrients 2025, 17, 2904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Sherratt, S.C.R.; Mason, R.P.; Libby, P.; Steg, P.G.; Bhatt, D.L. Do patients benefit from omega-3 fatty acids? Cardiovasc. Res. 2024, 119, 2884–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Banaszak, M.; Dobrzyńska, M.; Kawka, A.; Górna, I.; Woźniak, D.; Przysławski, J.; Drzymała-Czyż, S. Role of Omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (DHA) as modulatory and anti-inflammatory agents in noncommunicable diet-related diseases—Reports from the last 10 years. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2024, 63, 240–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Amlashi, M.A.; Payahoo, A.; Maskouni, S.J.; Dehghani, E.; Talandashti, M.K.; Ghelichi, Y.; Nikoumanesh, M.; Rezvani, S.; Shahinfar, H.; Shidfar, F. Dose-dependent effects of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on C-reactive protein concentrations in cardiometabolic disorders: A dose–response meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Inflammopharmacology 2025, 33, 2325–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Fu, T.; Huan, T.; Rahman, G.; Zhi, H.; Xu, Z.; Oh, T.G.; Guo, J.; Coulter, S.; Tripathi, A.; Martino, C.; et al. Paired microbiome and metabolome analyses associate bile acid changes with colorectal cancer progression. Cell Rep. 2023, 42, 112997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Liu, W.; Wang, L.; Ou, J.; Peng, D.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, W.; Wang, Y. Gut Microbiota Metabolites and Chronic Diseases: Interactions, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 3752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  258. Caldarelli, M.; Rio, P.; Marrone, A.; Giambra, V.; Gasbarrini, A.; Gambassi, G.; Cianci, R. Inflammaging: The Next Challenge—Exploring the Role of Gut Microbiota, Environmental Factors, and Sex Differences. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 1716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Ramasinghe, C.; Bordiga, M.; Xu, B. A Comprehensive Review of the Triangular Relationship Among Diet, Gut Microbiota, and Aging. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 8785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  260. Rahbar Saadat, Y.; Barzegari, A.; Saadatian, Z.; Montazersaheb, S.; Zununi Vahed, S. Gut microbiota and kidney aging: Insights into current research. Nutr. Metab. 2025, 22, 133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Nutritional modulation of the gut–immune–kidney axis. Schematic overview of the gut–immune–kidney axis in chronic kidney disease. Dietary patterns modulate gut microbiota composition and metabolic output, influencing intestinal barrier integrity, immune polarization, and renal inflammation. Dysbiosis-associated loss of beneficial metabolites and increased translocation of microbial products amplify chronic inflammation and kidney injury, while targeted nutritional strategies may restore microbial–immune homeostasis.
Figure 1. Nutritional modulation of the gut–immune–kidney axis. Schematic overview of the gut–immune–kidney axis in chronic kidney disease. Dietary patterns modulate gut microbiota composition and metabolic output, influencing intestinal barrier integrity, immune polarization, and renal inflammation. Dysbiosis-associated loss of beneficial metabolites and increased translocation of microbial products amplify chronic inflammation and kidney injury, while targeted nutritional strategies may restore microbial–immune homeostasis.
Nutrients 18 00263 g001
Table 1. Selected milk-derived BAPs with antioxidant, DPP-IV-inhibitory, and ACE-inhibitory activities, with potential relevance to cardio–metabolic and gastro–renal pathways. (Abbreviations: ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme, DPP-IV: dipeptidyl peptidase IV, IC50: half-maximal inhibitory concentration, μM: micromolar, mM: millimolar, H2O2: hydrogen peroxide, C2C12: mouse myoblast cell line, and HepG2: human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line).
Table 1. Selected milk-derived BAPs with antioxidant, DPP-IV-inhibitory, and ACE-inhibitory activities, with potential relevance to cardio–metabolic and gastro–renal pathways. (Abbreviations: ACE: angiotensin-converting enzyme, DPP-IV: dipeptidyl peptidase IV, IC50: half-maximal inhibitory concentration, μM: micromolar, mM: millimolar, H2O2: hydrogen peroxide, C2C12: mouse myoblast cell line, and HepG2: human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line).
Source/MatrixPeptide(s)Primary BioactivityExperimental Model/Key Finding
Antioxidant peptides
β-lactoglobulin (bovine)ALPM, AVEGPKAntioxidantReduced free radical formation in C2C12 myotubes (5 mM); ALPM protected HepG2 cells against oxidative injury
β-lactoglobulin (HepG2)PKYPVEPF, LEASPEVI, YPFPGPIHNSAntioxidantStrong antioxidant activity in vitro; markedly improved survival of HepG2 cells exposed to H2O2-induced oxidative stress
Donkey milkEWFTFLKEAGQGAKDMWR, GQGAKDMWRAntioxidantEndogenous antioxidant peptides, structurally defined and functionally validated
Buffalo milk cheeseAYF, YPFPGPIPKAntioxidantNewly described antioxidant peptides in buffalo milk cheese
ACE-inhibitory peptides
β-lactoglobulinYPFPGPIH, LKNWGEGW, RELEEIR, HPHPHLSACE-inhibitoryLow IC50 values (109.5, 77.7, 196.6, and 64.30 μM, respectively), indicating high inhibitory potency
Donkey milkREWFTFLK, MPFLKSPIVPFACE-inhibitoryIsolated and structurally characterized as angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitory peptides
Buffalo milk cheeseLRF, APFPEVFGKACE-inhibitoryNewly described angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitory peptides in buffalo milk cheese
In silico (docking)CLSPLQFR, TLMPQWW, CLSPLQMRACE-inhibitory (in silico candidates)Showed favorable binding profiles at the catalytic site of ACE in molecular docking analyses
DPP-IV-inhibitory peptides
β-lactoglobulin (screening)LPV, IPT, PPL, PPQ, APL, PPT, APF, PPF, HPI, APSDPP-IV-inhibitoryIdentified by peptide-array screening as novel dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors
Camel milk (trypsin hydrolysate)FQLGASPY, FLQY, ILDKEGIDY, ILELA, SPVVPF, LQALHQGQIV, LPVP, MPVQA, LLQLEAIRDPP-IV-inhibitoryIdentified as dipeptidyl peptidase IV-inhibitory sequences in camel milk hydrolysates
Metabolic/insulin-related peptides
Goat milk caseinSDIPNPIGSE, NPWDQVKR, SLSSSEESITH, QEPVLGPVRGPFPInsulin-sensitizing/metabolicImproved indices of insulin resistance in experimental models
Table 2. Recent experimental and clinical studies on microbial metabolites, bioactive peptides, and omega-3 fatty acids in gut–immune and gastro–renal inflammation (Abbreviations: AhR: aryl hydrocarbon receptor, SCFAs: short-chain fatty acids, CKD: chronic kidney disease, AKI: acute kidney injury, DSS: dextran sodium sulfate, UC: ulcerative colitis, EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid, DPA: docosapentaenoic acid, DHA: docosahexaenoic acid, ALA: alpha-linolenic acid, MCT: medium-chain triglycerides, Treg: regulatory T cell, NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa B, MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase).
Table 2. Recent experimental and clinical studies on microbial metabolites, bioactive peptides, and omega-3 fatty acids in gut–immune and gastro–renal inflammation (Abbreviations: AhR: aryl hydrocarbon receptor, SCFAs: short-chain fatty acids, CKD: chronic kidney disease, AKI: acute kidney injury, DSS: dextran sodium sulfate, UC: ulcerative colitis, EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid, DPA: docosapentaenoic acid, DHA: docosahexaenoic acid, ALA: alpha-linolenic acid, MCT: medium-chain triglycerides, Treg: regulatory T cell, NF-κB: nuclear factor kappa B, MAPK: mitogen-activated protein kinase).
Category/PathwayModel/PopulationIntervention/ExposureKey FindingsReference
Microbial tryptophan catabolites and AhR signalingHuman intestinal and hepatic cell models, AhR reporter assaysPanel of gut microbial tryptophan catabolites (indole, skatole, indole-3 derivatives, and kynurenines)Multiple microbial tryptophan catabolites act as AhR ligands, indicating that shifts in microbial tryptophan metabolism can directly modulate epithelial and hepatic immune signaling.[228]
Fiber-directed microbial tryptophan metabolismDefined three-species community, human fecal cultures, and gnotobiotic miceFermentable fiber (pectin) reshaping competition for tryptophan among gut bacteriaFermentable fiber redirects microbial tryptophan catabolism away from indole towards indole-3-lactic and indole-3-propionic acids, reducing potentially harmful indole production, and enhancing barrier-protective metabolites.[229]
Butyrate, Treg cells, and colitisMouse models of colitis, in vitro T-cell polarizationSodium butyrate supplementationButyrate promotes colonic Foxp3+ regulatory T-cell differentiation and ameliorates experimental colitis, linking commensal butyrate production to mucosal immune tolerance.[230]
SCFAs and CKD progression54 CKD patients + mouse model of AKI-to-CKD transitionFecal propionate/butyrate measurement; oral SCFA treatment in micePropionate and butyrate levels fall with CKD severity and SCFA supplementation in mice attenuates renal inflammation, fibrosis, and progression to CKD.[78]
Butyrate in diabetic nephropathyMice with diabetic nephropathyOral sodium butyrateButyrate improves albuminuria and renal histology and modulates AMPK/SIRT1/PGC-1α and mitochondrial dynamics, reducing inflammation and fibrosis in diabetic kidneys.[231]
SCFAs, obesity, and low-grade inflammationC57BL/6 mice on high-fat dietHigh-fat diet with added acetate, propionate, butyrate, or SCFA mixDietary SCFAs limit weight gain, improve lipid profile, and reduce inflammatory cytokines while reshaping gut microbiota towards a less obesogenic pattern.[232]
CKD, gut microbiota, and microbiota-targeted therapyCKD and ESKD patients; systematic review of observational and interventional studiesDiet, prebiotics, probiotics, and synbioticsCKD is consistently associated with loss of SCFA-producing taxa and expansion of uremic toxin producers, while small trials suggest microbiota-directed therapies can lower toxin load and inflammation.[233]
Fish collagen peptides and colitisDSS-induced colitis in mice; human monocyte-derived macrophagesOral bioactive fish collagen peptides Fish collagen peptides reduce colitis severity, promote anti-inflammatory macrophage polarization, improve tight-junction integrity, and partially normalize gut microbiota.[171]
Antimicrobial peptide R7I and enteritisSalmonella-induced enteritis in miceOral, proteolysis-resistant peptide R7IR7I lowers mucosal pro-inflammatory cytokines, preserves villus structure and tight junction proteins, and improves gut barrier function in bacterial enteritis.[172]
Anti-inflammatory food-derived peptides (review)In vitro, in vivo, and in silico peptide studiesDairy, fish, plant, and by-product protein hydrolysatesShort, hydrophobic, and basic residue-rich peptides consistently suppress NF-κB/MAPK pathways and pro-inflammatory mediators, highlighting structural motifs for designing anti-inflammatory bioactive peptides.[234]
Serum resolvin E1 and ulcerative colitis51 patients with ulcerative colitis + 30 controlsSerum resolvin E1 measurementRvE1 levels are modestly higher in UC than in controls but do not clearly distinguish active disease from remission, limiting their utility as a stand-alone activity biomarker.[235]
Circulating marine n-3 PUFAs and incident CKD19 population-based cohorts without CKD at baselineBaseline EPA, DPA, DHA, ALA, and fish/ω-3 intake; prospective follow-upHigher circulating marine n-3 PUFAs (especially DHA) are associated with lower risk of incident CKD and slower eGFR decline, whereas ALA shows no clear association.[147]
Omega-3 supplements in CKD patients on hemodialysis120 CKD patients undergoing hemodialysis (randomized trial)3 × 1000 mg/day omega-3 capsules vs. 3 × 1000 mg/day MCT placebo for 2 monthsOmega-3 supplementation in hemodialysis patients significantly lowers BUN and serum creatinine compared with placebo, without affecting serum Na, K, Ca, or P.[148]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bogdan, R.G.; Gligor, F.G.; Anderco, P.; Popa, L.M.; Popescu, A.; Bloanca, V.A.; Leonte, E.; Iliescu Glaja, M.; Crainiceanu, Z.P.; Ichim, C. Nutritional Modulation of the Gut–Kidney Axis. Nutrients 2026, 18, 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18020263

AMA Style

Bogdan RG, Gligor FG, Anderco P, Popa LM, Popescu A, Bloanca VA, Leonte E, Iliescu Glaja M, Crainiceanu ZP, Ichim C. Nutritional Modulation of the Gut–Kidney Axis. Nutrients. 2026; 18(2):263. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18020263

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bogdan, Razvan George, Felicia Gabriela Gligor, Paula Anderco, Livia Mirela Popa, Adriana Popescu, Vlad Adam Bloanca, Elisa Leonte, Mihai Iliescu Glaja, Zorin Petrisor Crainiceanu, and Cristian Ichim. 2026. "Nutritional Modulation of the Gut–Kidney Axis" Nutrients 18, no. 2: 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18020263

APA Style

Bogdan, R. G., Gligor, F. G., Anderco, P., Popa, L. M., Popescu, A., Bloanca, V. A., Leonte, E., Iliescu Glaja, M., Crainiceanu, Z. P., & Ichim, C. (2026). Nutritional Modulation of the Gut–Kidney Axis. Nutrients, 18(2), 263. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18020263

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop