Skip to Content
MDPIMDPI

Advanced

NutrientsNutrients
PDF
  • Article
  • Open Access

10 December 2025

14 Pages

Iodine Intake and Risk of Mortality: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Korean Cohort

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
…
1
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon 51353, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Internal Medicine, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon 51353, Republic of Korea
3
Department of Research and Support, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon 51353, Republic of Korea
4
Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon 51353, Republic of Korea
Nutrients2025, 17(24), 3859;https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17243859
This article belongs to the Special Issue Micronutrients and Bioactive Molecules: Their Development, Interaction, and Impact on Human Health
Version Notes
Order Reprints

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Iodine intake influences thyroid-related and metabolic diseases that have important public health implications. However, longitudinal evidence of the association between iodine intake and mortality remains scarce and limited to Western populations. Given the markedly high iodine intake among Asians and possible ethnic or regional differences in iodine sensitivity, population-based data from Asian cohorts are needed. Methods: We analyzed 5497 adults from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013–2015) linked with mortality follow-up through 2021. Urinary iodine concentration (UIC) was quantified from spot urine samples using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Iodine intake was estimated from UIC and categorized into four groups: below the estimated average requirement, low-normal, high-normal, and above the tolerable upper level (UL). The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Cardiovascular disease-specific and cancer-specific mortality were also assessed. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models accounting for the complex survey design were used to estimate hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Sensitivity analysis excluded participants with thyroid disease or early death, and subgroup analyses by age and sex were also conducted. Results: During a median 8.4-year follow-up, 139 deaths occurred. Compared with the low-normal intake group, excessive iodine intake (above UL) was not associated with all-cause mortality (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.36–3.27), cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.21–7.61), or cancer mortality (HR 1.71, 95% CI 0.40–7.29). No significant trends were observed across intake categories (p > 0.2), and similar findings were obtained when UIC levels were analyzed. Excluding participants with thyroid disease or early death did not change the results, and no significant interaction was observed by age or sex. Conclusions: In this first population-based Asian study on iodine intake to mortality, neither estimated iodine intake nor UIC was associated with all-cause mortality. These results suggest that the relationship between iodine exposure and mortality may differ across populations, underscoring the need for further large-scale studies.

1. Introduction

Iodine is a key micronutrient required for thyroid hormone synthesis, which regulates diverse metabolic processes in human physiology. Historically, deficiency rather than excess of iodine has been recognized as a major global health problem, leading to goiter and neurodevelopmental impairments [1,2].
Accordingly, national public health agencies, including the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM), have implemented objective monitoring of population iodine status and have promoted iodine supplementation through public health interventions. At the population level, the WHO recommends urinary iodine concentration (UIC) measured from spot urine samples as the primary indicator of iodine status, given that more than 90% of ingested iodine is excreted in the urine within 24 h. Population iodine status is commonly categorized according to median UIC values, with levels below 100 μg/L indicating insufficiency, 100–199 μg/L adequacy, 200–299 μg/L above requirements, and ≥300 μg/L excess [3]. However, at the individual level, UIC may deviate from actual iodine intake depending on factors such as muscle mass, age, and sex. Therefore, to ensure adequate iodine nutrition, IOM emphasizes iodine intake rather than UIC itself, advising consumption above the estimated average requirement (EAR, 150 μg/day) while avoiding intake beyond the tolerable upper intake level (UL, 1100 μg/day) [4]. In addition, spot UIC exhibits substantial day-to-day variability depending on recent dietary intake and may not adequately reflect long-term iodine exposure. Regarding measurement, UIC is typically quantified using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), which provides high analytical sensitivity and precision for trace-level iodine measurement and has been widely adopted in national surveillance programs [2,3,4].
As iodization programs by both the IOM and WHO have expanded [3,4], however, many populations have moved from insufficiency toward sufficiency or even excess [5,6,7]. Therefore, questions have emerged about the broader health effects of varying iodine exposure [8,9,10]. Beyond its impact on thyroid function, iodine exposure may influence long-term health outcomes, including mortality, considering that both hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism have been linked to cardiovascular and metabolic risk [11,12,13]. To minimize the risk of thyroid dysfunction related to iodine excess, national public health agencies have therefore established UL based on thyroid-related adverse outcomes from previous population-based data [4].
In contrast to Western countries [14,15], East Asia represents a distinct iodine-replete region due to habitual seaweed consumption [8,16,17]. According to the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), the median UIC was close to 300 μg/L, and approximately 13.4% of adults consumed iodine above UL [17]. Despite these unique exposure characteristics, virtually all existing longitudinal evidence on iodine excess and long-term health outcomes has been confined to Western populations [14,15]. Given potential ethnic differences in thyroid set-points, genetic sensitivity, and dietary iodine sources, evidence from Asian cohorts is needed. Moreover, previous studies relied on UIC levels, which are less applicable for policy guidance. Estimating iodine intake from standardized UIC-based equations [17,18] may be a better exposure variable for public health interventions.
Therefore, we used nationally representative Korean survey data linked to mortality records to examine the association between estimated iodine intake (and corresponding UIC levels) and all-cause and cause-specific mortality.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) VI (2013–2015) was conducted using a nationally representative, stratified, multistage sampling framework designed to capture the general Korean population (n = 22,948). Participants underwent standardized health interviews and physical examinations, and a subset also provided blood and urine specimens. Study protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Approximately one-third of the total sample was randomly selected for additional thyroid function testing, including serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine, and UIC levels. Mortality was prospectively ascertained through linkage to national mortality records up to December 2021 [19]. Of the 5543 adult participants with linked mortality data and available data for UIC, individuals without available data on covariates (n = 3) or who are pregnant or lactating (n = 43) were excluded. After these exclusions, 5497 participants were retained in the analysis cohort (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Flowchart of participant enrollment.

2.2. Variable Specifications

UIC and estimated iodine intake
UIC was determined from single spot urine samples using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS; PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) (reference range 42–350 µg/L) with an iodine standard solution (Inorganic Venture, Christiansburg, VA, USA). This analytical method provides high sensitivity with a detection limit in the low μg/L range, long-term coefficients of variation of approximately 2–3% across low and high concentration ranges, and near-quantitative recovery in external quality-control urine materials [20].
Because a single UIC measurement may fluctuate due to day-to-day variation, it is considered more appropriate for evaluating population iodine status rather than individual exposure. To estimate iodine intake at the individual level and to facilitate dietary and mortality-related analyses, we used ‘estimated iodine intake’ as the main exposure variable. This variable was derived from a previously validated equation developed for the KNHANES cohort, incorporating age, sex, body weight, urinary creatinine concentration, and creatinine excretion rate. The detailed calculation formula is described as follows [17,18,21,22]:
Estimated iodine intake = UIC × {879.89 + (Body weight × 12.51) − {(6.19 × Age) + (34.51 if black) − (379.42 if women)}/(urine creatinine × 0.92 × 10)
The participants were divided into four categories of estimated iodine intake (µg/day) based on IOM [3]: below the estimated average requirement (EAR) (0–149), low normal (150–299), upper normal (300–1099), and above the tolerable upper intake level (UL) (≥1100). UIC levels (µg/L) were subclassified into five categories using WHO recommendations for population iodine status [4]: very low (0–49), low (50–99), adequate (100–299), high (300–399), and excessive (≥400).
Outcomes
All-cause mortality was selected as the primary endpoint because it represents the most definitive and clinically relevant outcome, integrating the cumulative effects of thyroid dysfunction and its associated cardiometabolic consequences. Cardiovascular disease (CVD)—and cancer-specific mortality were also assessed as secondary outcomes. Mortality status was identified through record linkage with the National Death Index using death certificate information provided by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency. Cause of death was classified according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, as follows: all-cause mortality (A00–Y98), CVD-specific mortality (I00–I99), and cancer-specific mortality (C00–C97).
Other variables
Sociodemographic and lifestyle information, including education level, household income, alcohol consumption, and smoking status, was obtained through standardized questionnaires. Educational attainment was categorized into three groups: middle school, high school, and university graduation. Monthly household income was reported in Korean won and classified into three levels (low, middle, and high).
Anthropometric measurements, laboratory tests, and dietary questionnaires were used to assess body mass index (BMI), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), underlying comorbidities, sodium intake, and the frequency of seaweed consumption. Comorbid conditions included diabetes mellitus (defined as a self-reported physician diagnosis, fasting glucose ≥126 mg/dL, or HbA1c ≥ 6.5%) [23], dyslipidemia (defined as a self-reported physician diagnosis, triglyceride ≥200 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≥ 160 mg/dL or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol <40 mg/dL) [24], hypertension (defined as a self-reported physician diagnosis, or ≥140/90 mmHg) [25], CVD (defined as a self-reported physician diagnosis), and any cancer history (defined as a self-reported physician diagnosis).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Variables with normal distributions are presented as mean ± standard deviation and compared using analysis of variance. Non-normally distributed variables are presented as median (interquartile range, IQR) and compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Categorical variables are expressed as numbers (percentages) and compared using the chi-square test. Two-sided p-values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Descriptive statistics were generated using chi-square tests for categorical variables and analysis of variance for continuous variables. Crude and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for mortality outcomes. Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, income, education, alcohol consumption, and smoking status, whereas Model 2 further included BMI, eGFR, sodium intake, and comorbidities (diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and cancer). Individual food items were not included in the primary models because UIC already captures integrated dietary iodine exposure, and single-day food data are prone to substantial measurement error; sodium intake was adjusted, given its established cardiovascular relevance.
To verify the robustness of our findings, several sensitivity analyses were conducted. First, the analyses were repeated using raw UIC levels instead of estimated iodine intake. Second, we conducted the main analysis after excluding participants with a history of thyroid disease, or those who died within two years after baseline (lag-analysis) were excluded. Third, stratum-specific analyses were performed to evaluate potential effect modification by age (20–39, 40–59, and ≥60 years) and sex. All sensitivity or stratified analyses were performed using multivariable models adjusted for the same covariates as the primary analysis.
All statistical analyses were performed using STATA software (version 22.0, Armonk, NY, USA). Sampling weights were applied to account for the complex survey design, differential probabilities of selection, and nonresponse. Standard methods for descriptive comparisons and Cox proportional hazards regression were applied as previously described [26,27].

3. Results

3.1. Baseline Characteristics

The mean age was 41.3 ± 13.7 years, and 59.0% were men. The median UIC and estimated iodine intake were 275.1 µg/L (IQR 151.5–622.2) and 240.2 µg/day (IQR 129.4–552.6), respectively. The median estimated iodine intake levels in the below EAR, low normal, high normal, and above UL groups were 98.6 µg/day (74.3–123.4), 206.8 µg/day (177.5–246.7), 484.8 µg/day (371.4–677.9), and 2034.7 µg/day (1417.7–3362.7), respectively. Among participants in the above UL group, 326 of 774 individuals (42.1%) exceeded the Korean UL of 2400 µg/day. As expected, higher iodine intake levels were positively associated with frequency of seaweed soup (p = 0.006) or sea lettuce salad consumption (p = 0.001). Demographic, socioeconomic, metabolic parameters, and comorbidities except CVD differed significantly across estimated iodine intake groups. Higher iodine intake was associated with a higher income and educational level, as well as a higher prevalence of metabolic disorders and cancer (Table 1). Additional dietary details from the 24 h recall survey have been clarified in Supplementary Table S1.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the study population.

3.2. Association Between Iodine Exposure and Mortality

In the multivariable Cox models using the low-normal intake group as the reference, estimated iodine intake was not significantly associated with all-cause or cause-specific mortality (Table 2). In the fully adjusted model (Model 2), the HRs (95% CIs) for excessive iodine intake (above UL) were 1.09 (0.36–3.27) for all-cause mortality, 1.12 (0.08, 15.09) for cardiovascular mortality, and 1.72 (0.36, 8.27) for cancer-specific mortality. No significant linear trend was observed across intake categories (all p for trend > 0.2).
Table 2. HRs for all-cause and cause-specific mortality according to estimated iodine intake.
When UIC was used instead of estimated intake, the results remained similar (Table 3). Fully adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for very high UIC (≥400 µg/L) were 0.69 (0.34, 1.40) for all-cause, 0.84 (0.14, 5.13) for cardiovascular, and 0.76 (0.29, 1.97) for cancer-specific mortality (all p for trend > 0.2).
Table 3. HRs for all-cause and cause-specific mortality according to simple UIC levels.

3.3. Sensitivity and Lag-Time Analyses

When participants with thyroid disease at baseline were excluded (n = 4934), the association between excessive iodine intake (above UL) and mortality remained nonsignificant. The fully adjusted HRs (95% CIs) were 0.93 (0.27–3.26) for all-cause, 1.76 (0.23–13.65) for cardiovascular, and 0.60 (0.08–4.44) for cancer-specific mortality (all p for trend > 0.2) (Table 4).
Table 4. HRs for all-cause and cause-specific mortality according to estimated iodine intake (excluding participants with thyroid disease at baseline).
In a lag analysis excluding deaths that occurred within the first 2 years of follow-up, the results were largely unchanged. Fully adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for excessive iodine intake were 1.26 (0.33–4.84) for all-cause mortality. Cancer-specific mortality was modestly elevated in the higher-intake groups in the crude {HR (95% CI) = 2.59 (1.15–5.80)} and Model 1 {HR (95% CI) = 3.13 (1.25–7.81)} analyses, but that association was no longer significant after full adjustment {HR (95% CI) = 2.69 (0.65–11.07)} (Table 5).
Table 5. HRs for all-cause and cause-specific mortality according to estimated iodine intake (extending lag time for the first 2 years).
Overall, both sensitivity and lag analyses did not demonstrate a significant association between estimated iodine intake and mortality.

3.4. Stratified Analyses by Age and Sex

In age-stratified analyses using the low-normal iodine intake group as the reference, no significant associations were observed between excessive iodine intake and all-cause mortality (Supplementary Table S2). Among participants aged 20–39, 40–59, and ≥60 years, the fully adjusted HRs (95% CIs) for excessive iodine intake (above UL) were 0.75 (0.06–8.69), 1.76 (0.41–7.53), and 0.30 (0.02–3.89), respectively. When stratified by sex, the corresponding HRs (95% CIs) were 1.12 (0.32–3.96) for men and 2.17 (0.13–34.94) for women, showing no significant difference across subgroups.

4. Discussion

4.1. Principal Findings

Iodine intake was not clearly associated with all-cause or cause-specific mortality in this large, nationally representative Korean cohort. This first population-based study in Asia provided insight into the long-term health implications of iodine intake.

4.2. Comparison with Previous Studies

There is abundant evidence that both iodine deficiency [1,2] and excess [8,9,10] are linked to adverse health outcomes such as thyroid hormone production impairment, goiter, neurodevelopmental deficits in children, autoimmune thyroid disease, and thyroid cancer. Regarding mortality, however, only two longitudinal national cohorts [14,15] have examined urinary iodine and mortality, both from Western populations. In a Spanish community-based cohort of approximately 2000 adults followed for ten years [15], lower UIC (<100 µg/L) levels were associated with higher all-cause mortality (HR 1.71). Conversely, the U.S. NHANES III study, which included more than 12,000 adults with a 19-year follow-up period, reported a modest increase in all-cause mortality (HR 1.19) at excessive iodine levels (UIC > 400 µg/L), possibly reflecting thyrotoxicosis, or heightened cardiovascular stress induced by chronic iodine excess [14]. Taken together, the available evidence remains inconsistent, limited to Western populations, and has used simple UIC levels. In contrast, in the present Korean cohort, which represents the first population-based Asian data, iodine intake or UIC level was not significantly associated with mortality. In the fully adjusted model (Table 2), high iodine intake was not significantly associated with all-cause mortality, and this null association remained consistent across multiple sensitivity analyses (Table 3).

4.3. Biological and Dietary Explanations

Several biological and population-specific factors could explain this discrepancy. First, genetic differences could lead to the absence of the association between iodine intake and mortality in this Korean cohort. A recent study from Korea demonstrated that thyroid response to iodine exposure differed based on a polymorphism in the sodium–iodide symporter gene (SLC5A5, rs77277498) [28]. In addition to pre-existing genetic traits, generations of exposure to iodine-rich diets may favor alleles tolerant to chronic iodine excess. Consistently, East-Asian populations show higher TSH reference ranges than Western populations [29,30]. Such population-specific adaptations could act as a buffer against systemic impacts of further iodine excess. Second, differences in dietary iodine sources may also play a role. As shown in Table 1, participants with higher iodine intake were more likely to have not only higher sodium intake but also greater seaweed consumption. In Western populations, iodized salt is predominant [5,14], whereas seaweed is the major iodine source in East Asia [8,16]. Although the abovementioned U.S. study presented supplementary models adjusted for salt intake, residual confounding by salt consumption cannot be completely excluded. Apart from this, seaweed provides selenium, polyphenols, and fucoidan [31], which may mitigate oxidative or metabolic stress induced by excess iodine [32]. In line with this suggestion, a Japanese cohort study of 96,000 adults showed that almost-daily seaweed consumption was associated with approximately 20–30% lower cardiovascular mortality [33]. These findings imply that the seaweed sources of iodine may modulate the health impacts of excess intake compared to salt-based iodine.
Alternatively, structural and statistical factors may have contributed to the null findings. In the Korean cohort, the overall distribution of iodine exposure was skewed toward higher values, with 38.6% of participants in the very high UIC group (≥400 µg/L) compared with only 7.9% in the U.S. NHANES III [14]. Such a distribution limits the statistical sensitivity to detect a clear dose–response gradient. In addition, our cohort included 5497 participants and 139 deaths during a median 8.4-year follow-up period, whereas the NHANES III study comprised 12,264 participants and 3159 deaths over 19.2 years [14]. This smaller number of events and shorter observation period inevitably reduced the statistical precision to detect modest hazard ratios.

4.4. Strengths and Methodological Considerations

This study has several notable strengths with clinical implications. First, to our knowledge, the current study is the first nationally representative analysis in an Asian population evaluating the association between iodine exposure and mortality. Even though East Asia is one of the most iodine-replete regions worldwide, such evidence has been lacking. From a public-health perspective, these results suggest that excessive iodine exposure may not substantially affect overall survival in iodine-replete Asian populations, highlighting the need for population-specific studies when developing dietary guidelines for iodine intake. Second, iodine intake rather than simple UIC levels was provided as exposure in this study. Iodine intake, not UIC levels, which varied from even the same iodine intake by individual characteristics, is a modifiable factor. Public-health guidelines recommend an adequate range for iodine intake, not UIC levels [3,34]. Therefore, this study provides a more practical basis for nutritional policy. Third, multiple sensitivity analyses and adjustments for variables demonstrated the robustness of the findings.

4.5. Study Limitations and Future Prospects

Several limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, the number of deaths was modest and the median follow-up relatively short, limiting the power to detect small-to-moderate effects. Although spot-urine iodine concentration is recommended by the WHO and the IOM for population monitoring, it may be influenced by recent dietary or contrast-media exposure and thus not sufficiently reflect long-term iodine status [18]. Future large-scale studies incorporating repeated urine measurements over time are warranted to confirm these results. Second, we should keep in mind that the current upper limits of iodine intake (1110 µg/day in IOM [3], 2400 µg/day in Korean Dietary Reference Intakes [34]) were derived in relation to thyroid disease (TSH elevation, goiter, or autoimmune thyroiditis) rather than mortality [35]. As the KNHANES–mortality linked dataset lacks longitudinal adjudication of thyroid dysfunctions or cardiovascular events, these intermediary outcomes could not be examined in the present study and remain an important topic for future research. Therefore, our findings should not be interpreted as evidence that excessive iodine intake is safe or change the current dietary guideline. Interestingly, a suggestive increase in cancer-specific mortality was observed in the lag-time analysis (Table 5), although this association was attenuated after full multivariable adjustment. While the primary analysis did not show a significant relationship between iodine intake and overall mortality, this finding highlights the need for further well-designed studies to clarify whether chronic iodine excess contributes to cancer mortality. Third, specific iodine-rich foods were not individually adjusted for, considering their role as upstream determinants of urinary iodine and the imprecision of single-day dietary recall; however, residual confounding by overall dietary patterns cannot be completely excluded.
Future studies incorporating repeated measurements of UIC are needed to better characterize long-term iodine exposure. In addition, longitudinal cohorts with adjudicated cardiovascular and cancer outcomes will be essential to clarify cause-specific pathways linking iodine excess to mortality. Further investigations focusing on genetic susceptibility and iodine sources, such as seaweed versus iodized salt, may also help explain population-specific differences in the health effects of iodine excess.

5. Conclusions

As the first population-based study in an Asian cohort, this analysis provides nationally representative evidence on the association between iodine exposure and mortality. Despite the high prevalence of excessive iodine intake in Korea, excessive iodine exposure was not associated with a substantial increase in overall mortality, suggesting that the health impact of chronic iodine excess may differ according to background iodine source or ethnicity. These findings underscore the need for large longitudinal studies across diverse populations to better define susceptible subgroups and clarify the long-term health consequences of sustained iodine excess. The potential associations with cardiovascular outcomes, however, cannot be excluded and warrant further investigation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu17243859/s1, Table S1: Dietary intake of iodine-rich foods and macronutrients according to iodine intake categories; Table S2: HRs for all-cause mortality according to estimated iodine intake stratified by age and sex.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Y.K. and H.I.K.; methodology, N.G.K. and H.I.K.; software, H.P.; formal analysis, J.-H.C., N.G.K. and H.R.B.; investigation, S.W.K. and H.R.B.; data curation, J.Y.K., B.S.K., J.M.H., S.S. and J.C.B.; writing—original draft, J.-H.C., J.Y.K. and H.I.K.; writing—review and editing, N.G.K., H.P., B.S.K., J.M.H., S.S., J.C.B., T.H.K., S.W.K., J.H.C. and H.R.B.; supervision, T.H.K., J.H.C. and H.I.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013-07CON-03-4C, 16 July 2013.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are publicly available from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) conducted by the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency (KDCA), upon approval of a data access request. All data are fully anonymized.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
UICUrinary Iodine Concentration
ULtolerable Upper intake Level
HRHazard Ratio
CIConfidence Interval
IOMInstitute of Medicine
WHOWorld Health Organization
NHANESNational Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
KNHANESKorea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
TSHThyroid-Stimulating Hormone
EAREstimated Average Requirement
CVDCardiovascular Disease
BMIBody Mass Index
eGFRestimated Glomerular Filtration Rate
IQRInterquartile Range

References

  1. Cao, X.Y.; Jiang, X.M.; Dou, Z.H.; Rakeman, M.A.; Zhang, M.L.; O’Donnell, K.; Ma, T.; Amette, K.; DeLong, N.; DeLong, G.R. Timing of vulnerability of the brain to iodine deficiency in endemic cretinism. N. Engl. J. Med. 1994, 331, 1739–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Zimmermann, M.B.; Boelaert, K. Iodine deficiency and thyroid disorders. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015, 3, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. World Health Organization. Assessment of Iodine Deficiency Disorders and Monitoring Their Elimination: A Guide for Programme Managers; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  4. Institute of Medicine (US) Panel on Micronutrients. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  5. Leung, A.M.; Braverman, L.E.; Pearce, E.N. History of U.S. iodine fortification and supplementation. Nutrients 2012, 4, 1740–1746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  6. Li, M.; Eastman, C.J. The changing epidemiology of iodine deficiency. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2012, 8, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Andersson, M.; Karumbunathan, V.; Zimmermann, M.B. Global iodine status in 2011 and trends over the past decade. J. Nutr. 2012, 142, 744–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Park, S.J.; Chen, L.; Wallace, T.C.; Lee, H.J. The association between iodine intake and thyroid disease in iodine-replete regions: The Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study. Nutr. Res. Pract. 2025, 19, 554–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  9. Leung, A.M.; Braverman, L.E. Consequences of excess iodine. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2014, 10, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Teng, W.; Shan, Z.; Teng, X.; Guan, H.; Li, Y.; Teng, D.; Jin, Y.; Yu, X.; Fan, C.; Chong, W.; et al. Effect of iodine intake on thyroid diseases in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 354, 2783–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Gencer, B.; Collet, T.H.; Virgini, V.; Bauer, D.C.; Gussekloo, J.; Cappola, A.R.; Nanchen, D.; den Elzen, W.P.; Balmer, P.; Luben, R.N.; et al. Subclinical thyroid dysfunction and the risk of heart failure events: An individual participant data analysis from 6 prospective cohorts. Circulation 2012, 126, 1040–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Journy, N.M.Y.; Bernier, M.O.; Doody, M.M.; Alexander, B.H.; Linet, M.S.; Kitahara, C.M. Hyperthyroidism, Hypothyroidism, and Cause-Specific Mortality in a Large Cohort of Women. Thyroid 2017, 27, 1001–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Rodondi, N.; den Elzen, W.P.; Bauer, D.C.; Cappola, A.R.; Razvi, S.; Walsh, J.P.; Asvold, B.O.; Iervasi, G.; Imaizumi, M.; Collet, T.H.; et al. Subclinical hypothyroidism and the risk of coronary heart disease and mortality. JAMA 2010, 304, 1365–1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Inoue, K.; Leung, A.M.; Sugiyama, T.; Tsujimoto, T.; Makita, N.; Nangaku, M.; Ritz, B.R. Urinary Iodine Concentration and Mortality Among U.S. Adults. Thyroid 2018, 28, 913–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  15. Maldonado-Araque, C.; Valdés, S.; Badía-Guillén, R.; Lago-Sampedro, A.; Colomo, N.; Garcia-Fuentes, E.; Gutierrez-Repiso, C.; Goday, A.; Calle-Pascual, A.; Castaño, L.; et al. Iodine Deficiency and Mortality in Spanish Adults: Di@bet.es Study. Thyroid 2021, 31, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Kim, S.; Kwon, Y.S.; Kim, J.Y.; Hong, K.H.; Park, Y.K. Association between Iodine Nutrition Status and Thyroid Disease-Related Hormone in Korean Adults: Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey VI (2013–2015). Nutrients 2019, 11, 2757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  17. Kim, H.I.; Oh, H.K.; Park, S.Y.; Jang, H.W.; Shin, M.H.; Kim, S.W.; Kim, T.H.; Chung, J.H. Urinary iodine concentration and thyroid hormones: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013–2015. Eur. J. Nutr. 2019, 58, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Zimmermann, M.B.; Andersson, M. Assessment of iodine nutrition in populations: Past, present, and future. Nutr. Rev. 2012, 70, 553–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Yun, S.; Oh, K. The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data linked Cause of Death data. Epidemiol. Health 2022, 44, e2022021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Laboratory Procedure Manual: Iodine in Urine by ICP-MS (NHANES 2013–2014). Available online: https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes (accessed on 5 December 2025).
  21. Matsushita, K.; Mahmoodi, B.K.; Woodward, M.; Emberson, J.R.; Jafar, T.H.; Jee, S.H.; Polkinghorne, K.R.; Shankar, A.; Smith, D.H.; Tonelli, M.; et al. Comparison of risk prediction using the CKD-EPI equation and the MDRD study equation for estimated glomerular filtration rate. JAMA 2012, 307, 1941–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Remer, T.; Neubert, A.; Maser-Gluth, C. Anthropometry-based reference values for 24-h urinary creatinine excretion during growth and their use in endocrine and nutritional research. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002, 75, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. 2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025. Diabetes Care 2025, 48, S27–S49. [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  24. Rhee, E.J.; Kim, H.C.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, E.Y.; Kim, B.J.; Kim, E.M.; Song, Y.; Lim, J.H.; Kim, H.J.; Choi, S.; et al. 2018 Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidemia in Korea. J. Lipid Atheroscler. 2019, 8, 78–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Kim, H.L.; Lee, E.M.; Ahn, S.Y.; Kim, K.I.; Kim, H.C.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, H.Y.; Lee, J.H.; Park, J.M.; Cho, E.J.; et al. The 2022 focused update of the 2018 Korean Hypertension Society Guidelines for the management of hypertension. Clin. Hypertens. 2023, 29, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  26. Cox, D.R. Regression models and life-tables. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1972, 34, 187–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Hosmer, D.W.; Lemeshow, S.; May, S. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data, 2nd ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hoang, T.; Lee, E.K.; Lee, J.; Hwangbo, Y.; Kim, J. Seaweed and Iodine Intakes and SLC5A5 rs77277498 in Relation to Thyroid Cancer. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022, 37, 513–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Kim, W.G.; Kim, W.B.; Woo, G.; Kim, H.; Cho, Y.; Kim, T.Y.; Kim, S.W.; Shin, M.H.; Park, J.W.; Park, H.L.; et al. Thyroid Stimulating Hormone Reference Range and Prevalence of Thyroid Dysfunction in the Korean Population: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2013 to 2015. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 32, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Jonklaas, J. TSH Reference Intervals: Their Importance and Complexity. Thyroid 2024, 34, 957–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Matos, J.; Cardoso, C.; Serralheiro, M.; Bandarra, N.; Afonso, C. Seaweed bioactives potential as nutraceuticals and functional ingredients: A review. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2024, 133, 106453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Nanri, A.; Mizoue, T.; Shimazu, T.; Ishihara, J.; Takachi, R.; Noda, M.; Iso, H.; Sasazuki, S.; Sawada, N.; Tsugane, S. Dietary patterns and all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular disease mortality in Japanese men and women: The Japan public health center-based prospective study. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Kishida, R.; Yamagishi, K.; Muraki, I.; Sata, M.; Tamakoshi, A.; Iso, H. Frequency of Seaweed Intake and Its Association with Cardiovascular Disease Mortality: The JACC Study. J. Atheroscler. Thromb. 2020, 27, 1340–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Ministry of Health and Welfare; The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans 2020; Ministry of Health and Welfare: Sejong, Republic of Korea, 2020.
  35. Lee, H.S.; Min, H. Iodine Intake and Tolerable Upper Intake Level of Iodine for Koreans. Korean J. Nutr. 2011, 44, 82–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Efficacy and Safety of Placental Extract on Menopausal Symptoms: A Systematic Review
Previous
Clinical Implementation of Sustainable Functional Foods and Nutraceuticals in Metabolic Health: A Feasibility Study
Next