Next Article in Journal
Nutrition and Gut Microbiome in the Prevention of Food Allergy
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Dietary Intake in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Using GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cocoa Polyphenols Modulate the Mouse Gut Microbiome in a Site-Specific Manner
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Effect of Phenolic Compounds and Terpenes on the Flavour and Functionality of Plant-Based Foods

by
Natalia Kurhaluk
1,*,
Lyudmyla Buyun
2,
Renata Kołodziejska
3,
Piotr Kamiński
4,5 and
Halina Tkaczenko
1
1
Institute of Biology, Pomeranian University in Słupsk, 76-200 Słupsk, Poland
2
Department of Tropical and Subtropical Plants, M.M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 01103 Kyiv, Ukraine
3
Department of Medical Biology and Biochemistry, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicholaus Copernicus University, M. Karłowicz St. 24, 85-092 Bydgoszcz, Poland
4
Department of Medical Biology and Biochemistry, Division of Ecology and Environmental Protection, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, M. Skłodowska-Curie St. 9, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland
5
Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Zielona Góra, Prof. Z. Szafran St. 1, 65-516 Zielona Góra, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2025, 17(21), 3319; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17213319
Submission received: 19 September 2025 / Revised: 17 October 2025 / Accepted: 18 October 2025 / Published: 22 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bioactive Food Compounds and Human Health)

Abstract

Background: Phytochemicals play a crucial role in determining the sensory qualities and nutritional value of plant-based foods. They influence flavour perception by interacting with aroma, taste, and texture. Terpenes, phenolic compounds, and flavonoids are particularly important as they contribute to the characteristic sensory profiles of foods while offering antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties that support the prevention of diet-related chronic diseases. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE, complemented by Google Scholar. The search focused on peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and meta-analyses published within the last two decades, prioritising studies on phytochemicals, their biosynthesis, the molecular mechanisms of flavour formation, and their functional properties in plant-based foods. Keywords included ‘phytochemicals’, ‘flavour development’, ‘flavonoids’, ‘terpenes’, ‘phenolics’, ‘plant foods’, ‘molecular pathways’, and ‘food processing’. Relevant studies providing mechanistic insights were selected. Results: Terpenes, phenolic compounds, and flavonoids modulate sensory attributes by interacting with taste and olfactory receptors, and they contribute to antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Food processing influences the stability, bioavailability, and efficacy of these compounds, thereby affecting flavour and health-promoting potential. Modern analytical techniques enable the detailed characterisation of these compounds and their sensory and functional roles. Conclusions: By integrating insights from sensory science and nutrition, this review emphasises the dual importance of phytochemicals in enhancing consumer acceptance and promoting health. Understanding their mechanisms and how they respond to processing can inform the development of plant-based foods that are enjoyable and nutritious.

1. Introduction

Food and nutrition security are two major challenges faced by the growing global population, which is estimated to reach 9.7 billion by 2050 [1]. A balanced diet—rich in plant-based foods, high in dietary fibre, low in meat, and minimal in ultra-processed foods—has consistently been linked to improved metabolic health, enhanced immune function, greater stress resilience, and a reduced risk of genetic mutations, all of which are key factors in healthy aging [2].
Phytochemicals play a crucial role in shaping the flavour profile and functional properties of plant-based foods, as these bioactive compounds contribute to a wide range of sensory attributes, including bitterness, astringency, sweetness, and aroma. They are, therefore, integral to food quality and consumer acceptance [3,4]. In addition to their influence on organoleptic characteristics, phytochemicals have significant health-promoting properties, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial activities [5]. As the demand for sustainable and health-conscious dietary choices continues to grow, a comprehensive understanding of the role of phytochemicals in flavour development remains a critical area of investigation within food science and nutrition research [6,7].
The growing preference for natural and functional foods reflects a fundamental shift in consumer behaviour. The shift toward plant-based diets has driven growing interest in foods that not only offer enhanced sensory appeal but also provide functional benefits [8,9]. Consumers are increasingly favouring minimally processed products without synthetic additives, underscoring the importance of naturally occurring phytochemicals as key modulators of taste and bioactivity [10]. In addition, the growing recognition of the relationship between diet and health has fuelled interest in functional foods, where phytochemicals serve a dual function—enhancing flavour while exerting physiological effects [5,11]. Their role as natural antioxidants and anti-inflammatory agents aligns with dietary strategies designed to reduce the risk of chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disorders, neurodegenerative conditions, and metabolic syndromes [12,13]. This underscores their broader importance within contemporary food systems and highlights their potential to improve both food quality and public health outcomes [14,15].
The molecular mechanisms underlying flavour development in plant-based foods remain incompletely understood and require further investigation. The flavour profile of these foods arises from complex biochemical interactions involving the biosynthesis, degradation, and conversion of phytochemicals during plant growth, storage, and processing [16]. For example, flavonoids contribute to bitterness and astringency through their interactions with taste receptors and salivary proteins [17,18], while terpenes impart distinct aromatic characteristics due to their volatile nature [19,20]. In addition, phenolic compounds influence not only taste perception but also oxidative stability, thereby affecting both shelf life and nutritional quality [21,22]. As the phytochemical composition is inherently variable, depending on plant species, cultivation conditions, and post-harvest treatments, extensive studies are required to optimise flavour profiles and ensure consistency in plant-based foods. Elucidation of these molecular pathways can inform food formulation strategies aimed at improving sensory attributes and consumer acceptance of plant-based alternatives [23].
The growing global demand for sustainably produced high-quality chocolate with unique flavour characteristics continues to drive interest in cocoa and chocolate research [24,25,26]. As chocolate production increasingly prioritises the preservation of cocoa’s intrinsic flavour attributes, research has focused on minimally processed approaches and the impact of fermentation on flavour development [27]. This field of research highlights the intersection of food science and production technology, demonstrating how advancements in processing methods can enhance product quality, reflect regional variability, and meet the preferences of health-conscious consumers seeking minimally processed authentic food experiences.
A deeper understanding of the role of phytochemicals in flavour development is critical to driving innovation in plant-based food science. Research in this area not only elucidates the biochemical pathways that govern flavour formation, but also facilitates the development of strategies to optimise sensory properties while preserving health benefits [11]. The application of advanced analytical techniques, including metabolomics and sensory evaluation, further enhances the understanding of phytochemical interactions within food matrices and their impact on human taste perception [28]. In particular, a study conducted by Bickel Haase et al. (2021) [25] highlights the importance of cocoa liquor (a by-product of cocoa bean processing) as a valuable ingredient with multiple culinary applications, contributing to both sustainability and the economic well-being of cocoa farmers. Their analysis of aroma compounds in cocoa liquor from different geographical regions revealed considerable variability in flavour profiles [25]. For example, Vietnamese cocoa pulp had the highest number of aroma-active compounds, indicating a complex and rich flavour profile, while Cameroonian pulp had the lowest number, suggesting a more muted flavour. Specific compounds, such as trans-4,5-epoxy-(E)-decenal, 2- and 3-methylbutanoic acid, and linalool, which had high flavour dilution (FD) factors, were identified as key contributors to the fruity and floral notes characteristic of cocoa pulp. These findings underscore the importance of a deeper understanding of regional flavour differences to support the development of innovative food products [25,29]. In addition, research into food processing technologies that preserve or enhance phytochemical content will be instrumental in creating plant-based products that are both flavourful and nutritionally beneficial [6,30]. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the molecular mechanisms by which phytochemicals influence flavour, highlighting their potential applications in food science and human health.
This review examines the roles of terpenes, phenolic compaunds, and flavonoids in determining the sensory and functional properties of plant-based foods. It analyses the molecular pathways that regulate phytochemical biosynthesis and the interactions between these compounds and taste and olfactory receptors. It also evaluates their contribution to antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Additionally, it evaluates the impact of food processing on the stability and bioavailability of these compounds, offering strategies to preserve flavour and maximise health benefits in plant-based diets. By integrating the latest research, this review aims to help food scientists, nutritionists and the food industry design plant-based foods that combine sensory quality with nutritional value.

2. Methods and Scope of the Review

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and EMBASE, and was supplemented with a Google Scholar search to capture additional references. These sources were selected due to their extensive coverage of the biomedical sciences, food sciences, and phytochemistry. The search focused on peer-reviewed articles, reviews and meta-analyses published within the last twenty years. Studies addressing phytochemicals, their biosynthesis, the molecular pathways involved in flavour formation and their functional properties in plant-based foods were prioritised. A predefined combination of keywords was applied, including “phytochemicals”, “volatile compounds”, “flavour development”, “flavonoids”, “terpenes”, “phenolics”, “plant foods”, “molecular pathways”, and “food processing’. Abstracts were screened for relevance, and only those providing mechanistic insights into phytochemical-mediated flavour formation and biological activity were included. This review critically examines the role of key phytochemicals, including terpenes, phenolic compounds, and flavonoids in shaping the sensory and functional properties of plant foods. It offers an in-depth analysis of the molecular pathways regulating phytochemical biosynthesis, their interactions with taste and olfactory receptors, and their contributions to antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Additionally, the review explores the impact of food processing techniques on the stability and bioavailability of these compounds, offering insights into strategies for optimising both taste and health benefits in plant-based diets. By synthesising current scientific knowledge, this work provides valuable insights for food scientists, nutritionists, and the food industry, thereby contributing to the advancement of plant-based food innovation.

3. Molecular and Physiological Mechanisms of Flavour Perception in Plant-Based Foods

Flavour perception is a complex neurophysiological process that integrates sensory inputs from the gustatory and olfactory systems, ultimately enabling the recognition of distinct flavour profiles [31]. This multisensory process begins when volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released from food interact with olfactory receptors in the nasal cavity, while non-volatile compounds, such as amino acids, sugars, and organic acids, bind to specific taste receptors on the tongue. These signals are then processed in the central nervous system, leading to the conscious perception of taste [32].
At a physiological level, flavour perception is governed by two primary sensory systems: the gustatory system, responsible for detecting the five basic tastes—sweet, sour, bitter, salty, and umami—and the olfactory system, which detects volatile aroma compounds [33,34]. The olfactory system operates through two primary pathways: orthonasal olfaction, which occurs when volatile compounds are inhaled through the nostrils, and retronasal olfaction, which takes place when these compounds are released in the oral cavity during chewing and transported through the nasopharynx to the olfactory epithelium. This retronasal pathway plays a crucial role in taste perception, as it integrates with gustatory inputs to produce the characteristic sensory experience of food [35,36]. Neural pathway of taste perception shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 illustrates the transmission of taste signals—from taste receptors located on the tongue and in the oral cavity, through the cranial nerves (VII, IX, X), to the nucleus of the solitary tract in the medulla, then to the thalamus, and finally to the gustatory cortex, where taste stimuli are integrated with other sensory modalities.
At the molecular level, taste receptors belong to the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily, which mediates the detection of specific chemical compounds [37]. For example, sweetness is primarily detected by the T1R2/T1R3 receptor complex, which binds to mono- and disaccharides (e.g., glucose, fructose, sucrose) as well as certain artificial sweeteners and sugar alcohols [38,39]. Bitter taste perception is mediated by the T2R receptor family, which recognises a wide range of structurally diverse bitter compounds, including alkaloids, polyphenols, and terpenoids [40,41]. The detection of sourness is associated with proton-sensing ion channels that respond to acidic compounds, such as citric acid and acetic acid, while the umami taste is triggered by the binding of L-glutamate and other amino acids to the T1R1/T1R3 receptor complex [42,43]. Saltiness, on the other hand, is primarily mediated by epithelial sodium channels (ENaCs) that detect sodium ions and other mineral salts [43,44].
The olfactory system is responsible for detecting volatile compounds, such as aldehydes, alcohols, esters, terpenes, and sulphur-containing molecules, many of which contribute significantly to the aromatic complexity of plant foods [45]. These compounds are recognised by a large repertoire of olfactory receptors located in the nasal epithelium, with each receptor exhibiting specificity for a particular subset of molecules. The interaction between taste and aroma compounds creates a synergistic effect that enhances the depth and complexity of flavour perception [46,47].
Beyond the molecular interactions at the receptor level, the integration of gustatory and olfactory signals occurs in higher-order brain regions, including the gustatory cortex, olfactory cortex, and orbitofrontal cortex [48,49]. These regions are responsible for processing and synthesising sensory input to facilitate conscious perception of taste [49]. In addition, multisensory integration mechanisms play a crucial role in modulating flavour perception, as such factors as texture, temperature, and previous sensory experiences contribute to an individual’s interpretation of food flavour [50,51].
In plant-based foods, the composition of flavour-determining molecules, including VOCs, amino acids, lipids, and secondary metabolites, varies widely depending on the species, plant cultivar, ripening stage, cultivation practices, and post-harvest processing [45,52]. For example, flavonoids and phenolic acids contribute to bitterness and astringency, while terpenes are responsible for distinct aromatic notes [53]. Lipid oxidation products, such as aldehydes and ketones, play an important role in creating the characteristic flavour of vegetable fats and oils [54,55]. The interactions of these compounds with sensory receptors are fundamental in defining the organoleptic properties of plant-based foods, as illustrated in Figure 2.
A deeper understanding of the molecular and physiological mechanisms underlying flavour perception is essential for optimising the sensory quality of plant-based foods. Advances in flavour chemistry, sensory science and food processing technologies have significant potential to improve the acceptability and consumer preference for plant-based alternatives while maintaining their nutritional and functional benefits [56].
Taste perception is a complex neurophysiological process involving the integration of gustatory, olfactory, and somatosensory signals in the central nervous system [57]. Taste perception is a key element in the interaction between organisms and their environment, as it provides crucial information about the quality and nutritional value of consumed food and allows humans to detect potential dietary hazards [58].
Taste perception begins when chemical stimuli interact with specialised taste receptors located on the tongue and in the oral cavity. These receptors, which belong to the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) and ion channel families, detect the five primary taste modalities: sweet, sour, bitter, salty, and umami [37,42]. When activated, afferent signals from these receptors are transmitted via the cranial nerves (the facial nerve [cranial nerve VII], the glossopharyngeal nerve [cranial nerve IX], and the vagus nerve [cranial nerve X]) to the gustatory nucleus in the nucleus tractus solitarius of the medulla oblongata. From there, signals are relayed to the thalamus, which serves as a critical processing hub, before being projected to the gustatory cortex in the parietal lobe. The gustatory cortex not only deciphers basic taste modalities but also integrates the taste input with other sensory modalities, such as texture and mouthfeel, contributing to the holistic perception of flavour [42,57].
At the same time, olfactory perception is triggered when VOCs released from food bind to olfactory receptors embedded in the olfactory epithelium of the nasal cavity [59]. These receptors, which belong to the largest family of GPCRs in the human genome, detect a wide range of chemical structures and generate neural signals that are transmitted to the olfactory bulb [60]. The olfactory bulb performs primary signal processing before relaying the information to higher brain regions, including the piriform cortex, the amygdala, and the orbitofrontal cortex. The integration of olfactory signals in these regions enables the identification and interpretation of complex aroma profiles that are essential for overall taste perception [57,61].
A critical aspect of taste perception is the multisensory integration of gustatory and olfactory inputs that occurs in higher-order brain regions, particularly the insular cortex and the orbitofrontal cortex [62,63]. The insular cortex, a key centre for interoceptive awareness, plays a central role in merging taste perception with other sensory attributes, such as texture, temperature, and oral somatosensory feedback [64]. The orbitofrontal cortex, on the other hand, serves as a central hub for integrating olfactory, gustatory, and visual cues, facilitating the conscious perception of taste and contributing to the hedonic evaluation of food [65,66]. In addition, the anterior cingulate cortex and the prefrontal cortex are involved in the cognitive and emotional aspects of taste perception, including decision-making processes related to food preference and reward-driven eating behaviour [67,68].
Importantly, the limbic system, particularly the amygdala and the hippocampus, plays a fundamental role in linking flavour perception to emotional and memory-related processes [57,69]. The strong link between the olfactory system and limbic structures explains the well-documented phenomenon in which certain flavours can evoke vivid memories and emotional responses [70]. This link has significant implications for dietary behaviour, as taste preferences and aversions are often shaped by past experiences and conditioned responses [32].
In addition to taste and smell, other sensory modalities contribute to the overall perception of flavour. Temperature influences the activation of taste receptors; for example, the perception of sweetness is enhanced at warmer temperatures, while bitterness may be more pronounced at lower temperatures [71]. Similarly, food texture, perceived by mechanoreceptors in the oral cavity, affects the mouthfeel and palatability of a food product [72]. In addition, visual cues, including colour and presentation, have a significant impact on flavour expectations and perception, as evidenced by studies showing that changes in food colour can alter the perceived intensity of certain flavour attributes [73].
Taste perception is also subject to genetic, environmental, and cultural influences. Genetic polymorphisms in taste receptors, particularly within the TAS2R family responsible for bitter taste perception, contribute to individual differences in taste sensitivity and food preferences [74,75]. Environmental factors, including dietary exposures and early life feeding experiences, play a role in shaping taste perception over time [76,77]. In addition, cultural traditions and culinary practices influence taste preferences by modulating sensory expectations and habitual consumption patterns [78].
Among plant foods, chocolate serves as an exemplary model for studying flavour complexity due to its rich sensory profile and extensive biochemical transformations during processing. The research conducted by Ullrich et al. (2022) provides significant insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying chocolate flavour, with a particular focus on key sensory attributes, such as fruity, floral, and cocoa-like notes [79]. Using aroma extract dilution analysis, the study identified key odour compounds, including esters and aldehydes, contributing to the characteristic chocolate aroma. Acetic acid and fruity esters were found to enhance acidic and fruity flavour components, while sulphur-containing compounds and flavonoids, such as (-)-epicatechin and procyanidins, were associated with roasted and floral attributes. These findings highlight the importance of molecular profiling in flavour optimisation and provide a novel framework for refining the sensory properties of chocolate [79].

4. Functional Attributes in Food as Quality Indicators

There is a growing global trend in the search for functional attributes in food as quality indicators. In the case of cocoa beans, the final qualitative and quantitative content of polyphenols and methylxanthines might be considered as part of the quality indicators affecting the final price of the beans [80]. A critical factor influencing chocolate flavour is the cocoa bean fermentation process, which alters their biochemical composition and impacts the final product [80,81]. A study reported by Lima et al. (2011) highlights the crucial role of microbial consortia, particularly Bacillus spp., in shaping cocoa fermentation outcomes [82]. While the microbial sequence of fermentation varies geographically, key metabolic by-products, including organic acids, alcohols, and volatiles, directly influence flavour development. Further research integrating metagenomic and metabolomic approaches is needed to elucidate the interactions between microbial diversity and flavour precursors, thereby enabling targeted interventions to standardise and enhance cocoa quality. Similarly, Seyfried and Granvogl (2019) and Schlüter et al. (2022) emphasise that such variables as pod ripeness, fermentation duration, and postharvest processing significantly influence cocoa aroma and flavour [83,84].
Recent research carried out by Ac-Pangan et al. (2023) provides further evidence of the crucial role of thermal processing in flavour development [85]. Their study shows that roasting enhances the release of key flavour compounds, such as dimethyltrisulphide and 2-ethyl-3,5-dimethylpyrazine, which contribute to the characteristic roasted chocolate flavour. However, the study also shows that minimal thermal processing techniques help preserve certain fermentation-derived aroma compounds, such as acetic acid, supporting the concept of ‘chocolate terroir’—a term referring to regional and process-related variations in flavour. These results suggest that adjusting of roasting parameters may help preserve or enhance of specific sensory attributes, providing a means to tailor chocolate products to consumer preferences [85].

5. Identification and Quantification of Flavour Compounds in Plant Foods

The sensory attributes of foods, particularly flavour and aroma, are determined by the intricate interplay of volatile and non-volatile compounds that originate from the raw materials used, the biochemical transformations that occur, and the processing techniques employed. These factors all influence consumer perception and product acceptability [4,86]. Accurate identification and quantification of these compounds requires advanced analytical methods combining high-resolution chemical separation, mass spectrometry and sensory evaluation [87].
Among the various instrumental approaches, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) are widely used due to their superior separation efficiency and detection sensitivity [88,89]. GC-MS separates volatile organic compounds (VOCs) based on volatility and polarity, and then identifies them by analysing their mass spectra [90,91]. This technique enables the detection of trace levels and the comprehensive profiling of flavour-active volatiles, providing insights into the formation, degradation and evolution of aroma compounds during food processing and storage [92,93]. In contrast, proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) provides real-time monitoring of volatile compound dynamics without requiring chromatographic separation. This enables the rapid analysis of headspace volatiles in complex matrices, such as fermented foods, coffee and chocolate [94,95,96,97,98]. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy also contributes by providing detailed structural and quantitative information on non-volatile metabolites, such as polyphenols, alkaloids and flavonoids, which influence taste and mouthfeel [99,100,101].
However, instrumental analyses alone are insufficient for fully correlating chemical composition with human sensory experience. Sensory evaluation remains indispensable in flavour research and requires trained sensory panels that can detect subtle differences in taste and aroma [102]. Integrating gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O), which couples instrumental detection with sensory assessment, enables the identification of key odour-active compounds with low perception thresholds that directly influence consumer response [103,104]. Similarly, taste-activity-guided fractionation using HPLC-MS/MS enables the isolation and characterisation of taste-active molecules, such as amino acids, peptides and polyphenols, which are linked to umami, bitterness or astringency [105,106]. By combining molecular data with sensory evaluation, researchers can establish meaningful correlations between chemical profiles and organoleptic attributes [107].
These methods have been applied to various food systems, including cocoa, coffee and Cannabis sativa L. inflorescences. GC-MS and LC-MS analyses have revealed dynamic changes in phenolic compounds, flavonoids and terpenes across different processing or developmental stages [108,109,110,111,112]. Such studies emphasise the importance of advanced analytics in optimising ingredient quality, harvest timing and formulation strategies. Insights from flavour research in chocolate and other plant-based products support the development of improved sensory balance in products by addressing issues such as bitterness, unpleasant aromas, and inadequate umami perception. Techniques such as enzymatic treatment, fermentation, and encapsulation are promising approaches for modulating plant-based flavours and enhancing consumer acceptance [113,114,115].
Advanced analytical techniques play a vital role in ensuring food safety by detecting and quantifying harmful contaminants such as mycotoxins [116,117]. Studies by Mischler et al. (2024) have demonstrated the potential of Bacillus licheniformis for the biological detoxification of mycotoxins such as enniatin B and deoxynivalenol in cereals [118]. These studies have also highlighted the complementary roles of GC-MS and HPLC-MS/MS in monitoring detoxification efficiency. The integration of microbial detoxification strategies with analytical validation contributes to the development of sustainable, low-additive food production systems [119,120].
Together, the comprehensive characterisation of flavour and aroma compounds in plant foods necessitates a multidisciplinary approach that combines advanced analytical techniques with sensory science. Uniting methods such as GC-MS, GC-O, HPLC-MS/MS, PTR-MS and NMR spectroscopy enables researchers to connect molecular composition to human sensory perception, ensuring product safety and sensory excellence. Furthermore, using biotechnology and precision fermentation to produce or improve flavour-active compounds is an emerging area of sustainable food innovation [56,121]. These integrative strategies improve the quality and acceptability of plant-based foods, supporting dietary transitions towards healthier and more environmentally responsible food systems [6,121].

6. Phytochemical Classes and Molecular Interactions Underlying Flavour Perception in Plant-Based Foods

The complex relationship between phytochemicals and human sensory perception is fundamental to the wide range of flavours and aromas found in plant-based foods. These bioactive compounds, primarily terpenes, phenolic compounds, and flavonoids, modulate taste and aroma by interacting with gustatory and olfactory receptors, salivary proteins and the enzymatic systems involved in flavour formation and modification [4,122,123]. Beyond their sensory functions, phytochemicals also enhance the nutritional value, oxidative stability and overall acceptability of foods [124,125].
Phenolic acids and tannins, which are derived from the shikimate pathway, play a dual role in determining the sensory and functional properties of plant-based foods [126]. They impart bitterness and astringency by interacting with salivary proteins, causing proline-rich proteins to precipitate and resulting in the sensation of oral dryness [127,128,129]. Furthermore, phenolic compounds exhibit strong antioxidant activity, stabilising volatile compounds by inhibiting their oxidative degradation and helping to maintain flavour integrity during storage [53,130,131]. Their contribution extends beyond sensory effects to enhance the nutritional and preservative properties of plant-based foods [132].
Flavonoids are a structurally diverse class of polyphenolic compounds synthesised via the phenylpropanoid pathway. This pathway is initiated by the conversion of phenylalanine to cinnamic acid via the enzyme phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) [133]. This pathway produces subclasses such as anthocyanins, flavonols, flavanones and flavones, which contribute different sensory and visual properties [134,135]. Flavonoids primarily influence flavour by inducing bitterness and astringency through binding to bitter taste receptors (TAS2Rs) and interacting with salivary proteins, thereby altering mouthfeel [18,136]. Compounds such as quercetin, catechins and kaempferol also modulate gustatory G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), thereby affecting taste signal transduction downstream and overall sensory perception [137,138]. Furthermore, their pigmentation properties indirectly influence flavour perception by providing visual cues that shape consumer expectations [139].
Terpenes are a major class of volatile organic compounds that are responsible for the characteristic aromas of herbs, citrus fruits and spices [140,141]. They are synthesised via the mevalonate (MVA) and methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathways and encompass monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and diterpenes, which interact with olfactory receptors (ORs) in the nasal epithelium [142,143,144]. Their volatility enables immediate sensory detection, resulting in citrus, woody, or floral notes depending on their molecular structure: limonene imparts a fresh citrus scent, myrcene evokes earthy tones, and linalool provides floral and spicy nuances [20,145,146]. In addition to their olfactory roles, terpenes exhibit antimicrobial and antioxidant properties that improve product safety and extend shelf life [21,147]. Mechanisms and key volatile compounds in the flavour profiles of plant-based foods, e.g., terpenes like limonene and myrcene, interact with olfactory receptors to produce distinctive aromas that contribute to citrus, earthy, and floral notes in plant-based products, as shown in Figure 3. As illustrated in Figure 3, the process of signal transduction initiated by odorant molecules is initiated by the activation of olfactory receptors (ORs). These receptors stimulate a specific G protein called Golf, which in turn activates type III adenylyl cyclase to synthesize cAMP from ATP. The resulting cAMP opens CNG ion channels, allowing the influx of Na+ and Ca2+ ions into the cell. The rise in intracellular Ca2+ concentration subsequently activates calcium-dependent chloride (Cl) channels, leading to the efflux of Cl ions. This further depolarizes the cell membrane. Ultimately, this sequence of events results in the generation of an action potential, which is transmitted along the olfactory neuron to higher brain centers responsible for odor perception.
The biosynthesis of phytochemicals is tightly regulated by enzymatic activity, gene expression and environmental stimuli. Flavonoids, terpenes and phenolic acids originate from different yet interconnected pathways—the phenylpropanoid, MVA/MEP and shikimate pathways—whose flux is modulated by stress signals, the developmental stage and metabolic cross-talk [148,149]. External factors such as light intensity, temperature variation and soil composition can also influence the quantitative and qualitative composition of phytochemicals, contributing to variability in flavour profiles among plant species and cultivation systems [150,151]. Understanding these regulatory mechanisms is essential for optimising agricultural, post-harvest and processing practices that enhance the sensory and nutritional value of plant-based foods.
Thanks to advances in analytical chemistry, we now have a much better understanding of the role of phytochemicals in flavour perception. Techniques such as GC-MS, HPLC-MS/MS, and NMR spectroscopy enable detailed profiling of both volatile and non-volatile compounds [87]. They allow us to elucidate the complex interactions between phytochemicals, sensory receptors, and metabolic processes, offering new insights into how to optimise flavour and functionality in food design [152]. Integrating molecular, sensory, and analytical approaches enables researchers to harness phytochemical diversity more effectively, enhancing the sensory appeal and health-promoting properties of plant-based foods [124,125].

6.1. Terpenes in Plant-Based Foods: Aromatic Complexity and Functional Properties

Terpenes are a diverse class of naturally occurring organic compounds that play a crucial role in shaping the flavour profiles of plant-based foods and beverages [20]. These volatile molecules are responsible for the characteristic aromas that define the sensory experience of fruits, vegetables, herbs, spices, and essential oils [153]. For example, citrus fruits such as oranges, lemons and grapefruits owe their refreshing flavour primarily to limonene [154,155], while mangoes, hops and lemongrass are rich in myrcene [156]. The distinctive notes of apples, peppermint, rosemary and cloves are derived from various terpenes, including menthol, pinene and eugenol [157,158,159].
Depending on their molecular structure and concentration, terpenes such as limonene, pinene, myrcene, linalool and terpinene contribute distinct aromatic qualities—citrusy, pine-like, earthy or floral [160,161,162]. Other compounds, such as caryophyllene, geraniol, humulene and cineole, enrich the sensory experience with spicy, sweet, woody and menthol-like notes [143,163,164,165]. These terpenes enhance flavour and possess antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antimicrobial properties, thereby contributing to the nutritional and therapeutic value of plant-based products [19,141,144].
Terpenes are synthesised via the terpenoid biosynthetic pathway involving enzymes such as terpene synthases, which convert precursors such as geranyl pyrophosphate (GPP) into specific terpenes [166]. The MEP and MVA pathways regulate this process [166]. Once formed, terpenes interact with olfactory receptors in the nasal cavity, triggering neural responses that result in aroma perception [144]. They also modulate taste receptors, influencing sweetness or bitterness [74].
The release of volatile terpenes, such as β-caryophyllene and linalool, during food processing (e.g., heating, crushing, or fermentation) further alters the aroma profile of foods, introducing fresh, floral, citrus, or spicy notes that directly affect the overall flavour experience [167]. Terpenes also exhibit synergistic interactions with other bioactive compounds, including flavonoids, phenolics, and lipids, which can enhance or modify flavour perception [20,21]. It is important to note that each terpene has a different odour threshold, with certain compounds, such as limonene and pinene, having very low thresholds, meaning even small amounts can significantly affect the aroma and flavour of plant-based foods [168]. The molecular mechanisms by which terpenes exert their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties are shown in Figure 4. This figure shows that terpenes act through various mechanisms, including the modulation of signalling pathways, the activation of detoxifying enzymes and the regulation of gene expression related to inflammation and oxidative stress. Their antioxidant properties stem from the ability to scavenge free radicals, helping to protect cells from oxidative damage. Terpenes also exhibit anti-inflammatory effects by inhibiting the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and modulating transcription factors such as NF-κB. Additionally, many terpenes have antimicrobial activity, affecting microbial cell membranes and disrupting their metabolic processes.
During food processing, such as heating, crushing or fermentation, volatile terpenes such as β-caryophyllene and linalool are released. This alters the aroma profile and enhances flavour complexity [167]. Their interactions with flavonoids, phenolic compounds and lipids further modulate sensory perception [21]. These interactions not only enhance the sensory experience, but may also influence the bioavailability of other bioactive compounds, opening up new avenues of research into food functionality.
Recent studies have elucidated the molecular mechanisms underlying terpene-induced sensory effects. For example, limonene, linalool and pinene activate olfactory receptors via GPCR pathways, leading to the generation of secondary messengers such as cAMP and Ca2+. These depolarise sensory neurons and transmit aroma signals to the brain [169,170]. Additionally, terpenes such as linalool interact with gustatory receptors to modulate taste perception [171]. Their interactions with lipids during volatilisation enhance the release of other flavour compounds [20]. From a food technology perspective, these mechanisms could be used to design products with optimised sensory and health-promoting properties. However, our current understanding of odour thresholds and their interaction with other ingredients requires further experimental validation.
In conclusion, terpenes such as limonene, myrcene and pinene play a crucial role in the aromatic complexity and health-promoting properties of plant-based foods. Their biosynthesis, receptor interactions, and synergistic effects with other bioactive compounds highlight their significance in the fields of food science and nutrition [147,172]. From a functional foods perspective, terpenes should be considered integral elements of strategies to improve the sensory quality and health value of plant products, not just aromatic ingredients.

6.2. Phenolic Compounds in Plant Foods

Phenolic compounds constitute a broad class of natural bioactive molecules that play a pivotal role in determining the flavour, colour and sensory attributes of plant-based foods and beverages [172,173]. This group includes phenolic acids, flavonoids and tannins, which give fruits, vegetables, herbs, spices and processed foods their characteristic bitterness, astringency and flavour complexity [124,174]. For example, the astringency and mild bitterness of apples and pears are determined by chlorogenic acid [175], while berries acquire their tart and earthy notes from ellagic acid and tannins [176,177]. In beverages such as tea, coffee, and red wine, tannins, catechins, and resveratrol shape the sensory profile and health-promoting potential [178,179].
Herbs and spices, including cloves, cinnamon and oregano, have diverse flavour profiles due to their high phenolic content, particularly eugenol and rosmarinic acid [180,181]. Phenolic acids also define the robust flavours of darker honeys [182,183] and dark chocolate [184]. While the associations between specific phenolic compounds and flavour traits are well documented, there is still much to learn about how processing and matrix effects alter sensory outcomes in real food systems.
Beyond their sensory contributions, phenolic compounds exhibit strong antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties [185,186]. They scavenge free radicals, modulate redox homeostasis and prevent oxidative damage to lipids, proteins and DNA [187,188]. These effects are partly mediated by the activation of the Nrf2 pathway, which enhances the expression of endogenous antioxidant enzymes [189,190] COX-2, TNF-α and IL-6, thereby modulating inflammation and protecting tissues from chronic damage [191,192].
Phenolic compounds also demonstrate metabolic and enzymatic regulatory functions, including the inhibition of α-glucosidase and α-amylase, which support postprandial glucose control [193,194]. Through AMPK activation, they enhance insulin sensitivity and energy metabolism [195]. However, much of the current evidence is based on in vitro or animal models, and clinical validation of these effects in humans remains limited and inconsistent.
The anticancer properties of phenolic compounds involve the modulation of cell cycle regulators (p21 and p27) and tumour suppressor genes, such as p53, resulting in cell cycle arrest, the induction of apoptosis, and the inhibition of angiogenesis via the downregulation of VEGF [196,197,198]. Numerous studies confirm their role in reducing the incidence of colon, breast, liver and lung cancers [199,200,201,202].
Recent evidence also highlights the neuroprotective effects of flavonoids such as quercetin and kaempferol. These compounds modulate the cholinergic and GABAergic systems, inhibit acetylcholinesterase and reduce neuronal excitability. This supports cognitive health [203,204,205]. Despite these promising mechanistic insights, translating them into dietary recommendations requires careful consideration of bioavailability, metabolism, and interindividual variability. The molecular mechanisms of phenolic compounds, including antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, enzyme inhibition and cell signalling modulation, provide a wide range of health benefits, as shown in Figure 5. This figure shows that polyphenols exhibit strong anti-inflammatory properties by inhibiting the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and enzymes, primarily by suppressing the NF-κB signalling pathway. They also inhibit the activity of key inflammatory enzymes such as cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase. As potent antioxidants, polyphenols neutralize ROS and enhance the activity of endogenous antioxidant enzymes. Polyphenols demonstrate anticancer, antidiabetic, and antimicrobial properties. They modulate important cellular signaling pathways, such as MAPK and PI3K/Akt, which are involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, and metabolic regulation. Moreover, they reduce the absorption of carbohydrates and lipids in the digestive tract, contributing to the maintenance of metabolic balance. Polyphenols interact with microbial cell membranes, disrupting their structure and function.
From a sensory perspective, tannins and flavonoids play a crucial role in flavour perception and mouthfeel [206,207]. Tannins interact with salivary proteins to produce the astringency typical of tea, wine and some fruits [128], while flavonoids such as quercetin and epicatechin are associated with bitterness and astringency [208,209]. These interactions influence taste receptor activation and the overall sensory balance of plant-based foods. Nevertheless, excessive astringency can limit consumer acceptance, which highlights the importance of optimising processing parameters and matrix composition in functional food development.
Dark chocolate is a particularly illustrative example, being rich in gallic, caffeic, and ferulic acids, as well as proanthocyanidins and chlorogenic acids, which define its complex bitterness, astringency, and aroma [184,210,211,212]. These same compounds also underpin its antioxidant capacity and potential cardiometabolic benefits [213].
In summary, phenolic compounds, particularly flavonoids and tannins, are multifunctional dietary components that contribute to the sensory quality and bioactive potential of plant-based foods. Their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, neuroprotective and metabolic regulatory properties highlight their importance in health promotion and chronic disease prevention [132,173,214]. Future studies should prioritise integrative models that combine sensory science, metabolomics and clinical trials, in order to bridge the gap between mechanistic understanding and practical dietary application.

6.3. Flavonoids in Health-Promoting Effects of Plant-Based Foods

Flavonoids are a large and structurally diverse class of polyphenolic compounds that are widely distributed in plant-based foods. They are recognised for their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and multifaceted health-promoting properties [53,135,215]. Structurally, flavonoids share a C6–C3–C6 backbone composed of two aromatic rings linked by a three-carbon bridge [216]. The main subclasses are flavones, flavonols, flavanones, isoflavones, anthocyanins and flavan-3-ols [216,217]. Common dietary sources include quercetin, kaempferol, catechins and anthocyanins, which are found in abundance in fruits, vegetables, tea, red wine and dark chocolate [218]. Their structural diversity gives rise to a wide spectrum of biological and sensory activities, making them a major focus of research in nutrition and phytochemistry [219].
Flavonoids modulate key molecular pathways linked to inflammation, oxidative stress and cellular signalling [220,221,222]. Two of these, quercetin and catechins, have been extensively studied for their protective roles in cardiovascular, neurodegenerative and neoplastic diseases [223,224,225]. These effects are largely attributed to the inhibition of the NF-κB signalling cascade, which results in the downregulation of pro-inflammatory mediators such as TNF-α, IL-6, COX-2 and iNOS [226,227]. Concurrently, activation of the Nrf2 pathway induces antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, GPx and CAT, thereby protecting cells from oxidative damage [228].
Flavonoids also regulate the MAPK cascade, mitigating inflammatory responses by suppressing p38 MAPK and JNK signalling [229,230]. This molecular versatility contributes to their therapeutic potential in conditions such as arthritis [231], asthma [232,233] and inflammatory bowel disease [234]. However, despite robust in vitro and in vivo data, human clinical trials have been inconsistent in demonstrating dose-dependent effects, likely due to the poor bioavailability and rapid metabolism of flavonoids.
Flavonoids exert anticancer effects by modulating apoptosis and cell cycle control, which involves activating p53 and upregulating caspase cascades [235,236,237]. They suppress angiogenesis and inhibit metastasis, offering a promising addition to conventional cancer therapies [238]. Nonetheless, translating these preclinical findings into clinical outcomes requires addressing issues of dosage, synergistic interactions and metabolic conversion.
The neuroprotective mechanisms of flavonoids involve the inhibition of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) to increase acetylcholine levels and improve cognitive performance [239,240]. They also modulate GABAergic neurotransmission; for example, compounds such as luteolin act as positive modulators of GABA_A receptors, contributing to anxiolytic and sedative effects [241,242]. These pleiotropic actions suggest that flavonoids should be further explored as nutraceutical agents that support mental health and cognitive longevity, particularly in ageing populations. Molecular mechanisms of flavonoid action are shown in Figure 6. This figure shows that flavonoids participate in multiple cellular processes, including antioxidant defence, modulation of enzyme activity and regulation of cell signalling pathways involved in inflammation, apoptosis and metabolism. At the molecular level, flavonoids can scavenge ROS and interact with key proteins and receptors, thereby influencing gene expression and cellular homeostasis. Flavonoids have been associated with reduced risk of chronic diseases such as neurodegeneration and certain cancers, largely due to their anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-proliferative effects.
Emerging research demonstrates that flavonoids influence the composition of gut microbiota, promoting the growth of beneficial bacteria and enhancing the bioavailability of other phytochemicals [243,244]. This bidirectional interaction, whereby the microbiota also metabolise flavonoids into more bioactive derivatives, represents a critical yet under-explored mechanism in human nutrition that should be incorporated into future clinical and metabolomic studies.
Beyond their biological functions, flavonoids significantly impact the flavour, colour and texture of plant-based foods [135,216]. For example, quercetin and kaempferol impart bitterness and astringency to foods such as apples, onions and tea by interacting with T2R bitter receptors [18,227]. Anthocyanins contribute to vivid red and purple hues, while catechins and epicatechins influence the complex sensory balance of cocoa and wine [245,246]. Flavonoids also interact synergistically with volatile organic compounds—terpenes, aldehydes, and esters—that determine aroma and taste complexity [20,247]. For example, eugenol and vanillin enhance clove-like and sweet vanilla notes [180,248]. The integration of sensory and biochemical data could therefore provide valuable insights for designing functional foods that balance palatability with bioactive potential.
In summary, flavonoids such as quercetin, kaempferol and catechins are multifunctional dietary constituents that link the sensory appeal of plant-based foods with their biological efficacy. Through antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer and neuroprotective mechanisms, they promote human health and prevent disease [135,192,249]. However, a major scientific challenge lies in bridging the gap between mechanistic insights and real-world bioefficacy, particularly with regard to improving flavonoid stability, bioavailability, and matrix interactions. Future research should focus on integrative approaches combining metabolomics, gut microbiome profiling, and sensory science to better understand how flavonoids function within complex dietary systems. This holistic approach will inform evidence-based strategies for utilising flavonoids as integral components of health-promoting, sensorially appealing plant-based diets.

7. Phytochemicals: Linking Flavour Development, Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Effects in Plant-Based Foods

These compounds play a central role in shaping sensory attributes and health-promoting properties [5,218]. They influence flavour development, aroma and mouthfeel by interacting with taste receptors, olfactory pathways and metabolic processes. At the same time, they modulate the molecular signalling pathways that underpin antioxidant and anti-inflammatory responses [215,250].
Table 1 summarises the main bioactive compounds in plant-based foods, their sensory characteristics, bioactive effects and plant sources.
Flavonoids such as quercetin and kaempferol modulate the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway, which is a key regulator of inflammation and immune responses [258]. NF-κB activation induces the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which can indirectly affect flavour development by altering the metabolic pathways responsible for synthesising volatile aroma compounds [259]. Furthermore, NF-κB signalling influences the composition of the gut microbiota, thereby affecting sensory perception through microbial fermentation and the production of metabolites that interact with food components [260,261]. Inhibiting NF-κB activation with flavonoids and phenolic compounds can therefore attenuate chronic inflammation and reduce the risk of diseases such as arthritis, cardiovascular disease and diabetes, while also improving sensory quality [191,192,262,263,264].
Another critical pathway influenced by phytochemicals is the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/antioxidant response element (ARE) system, which controls cellular antioxidant defences [228,265]. Compounds such as curcumin, resveratrol, sulforaphane, quercetin and baicalein can activate Nrf2 by modifying cysteine residues on Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1). This leads to increased transcription of antioxidant and phase II detoxifying enzymes, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and catalase (CAT) [266,267,268,269,270]. These enzymes scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS), protecting cellular components from oxidative damage and maintaining the integrity of flavour-active phytochemicals, such as polyphenols and carotenoids, which are susceptible to oxidative degradation during food processing and storage [30,271]. Activation of Nrf2 also supports tissue repair and cellular homeostasis, as well as protecting against diseases related to oxidative stress, including cardiovascular and neurodegenerative disorders, and certain cancers [272,273,274,275].
Phytochemicals also modulate the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and activator protein 1 (AP-1) pathways, thereby contributing to anti-inflammatory responses and cellular homeostasis [15,250,276]. Through these mechanisms, they stabilise cellular environments, reduce tissue damage caused by oxidative and inflammatory stress, and preserve the sensory and functional quality of plant-based foods.
These molecular mechanisms not only have physiological effects, but also influence the functional stability and shelf life of plant-based products. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities mitigate oxidative deterioration and rancidity, thereby maintaining the integrity of lipids and other sensitive food components [30,131,277]. Consequently, foods rich in phytochemicals offer dual benefits: enhanced sensory appeal and improved nutritional and protective properties. This aligns with the growing consumer demand for functional foods that support long-term health [278,279,280,281].
In conclusion, the modulation of the NF-κB, Nrf2, MAPK and AP-1 pathways by phytochemicals provides a mechanistic link between flavour development, antioxidant defence and anti-inflammatory effects. By influencing sensory perception and cellular health, these compounds improve the quality, stability and functional properties of plant-based foods. A deeper understanding of these molecular interactions is essential for optimising food formulations and processing strategies, as well as the health-promoting potential of plant-based diets [12,15,221,233,250].

8. Optimising Phytochemical Stability and Bioavailability in Plant-Based Foods Through Processing

The processing of plant foods plays a crucial role in modulating the stability and bioavailability of phytochemicals, which, in turn, influences both the sensory qualities and functional health benefits of these foods [282,283]. Various food processing techniques, including thermal treatments, pH adjustments, and oxidative conditions, can significantly affect the integrity of phytochemicals, altering their chemical structure and bioactivity [30,284]. These changes are particularly important in understanding how processing affects the flavour, nutritional value, and overall health-promoting properties of plant-based diets.
One of the most common processing methods that affect phytochemical stability is thermal processing. High temperatures can lead to the degradation of sensitive phytochemicals such as flavonoids and terpenes, which are critical to the flavour and functional benefits of plant-based foods [283,285]. Flavonoids, for example, are known to undergo structural changes under heat, potentially breaking down into smaller, more bioavailable metabolites [286]. However, this degradation can alter their original bioactivity [287]. In contrast, terpenes, which contribute significantly to the aromatic intensity of plant foods, are volatile compounds that are highly susceptible to heat-induced loss. The evaporation of these compounds during the cooking process can reduce the aromatic complexity of foods, thereby reducing their sensory appeal [20]. In addition, oxidative conditions commonly encountered during cooking or food storage can lead to the formation of reactive species that further degrade phytochemicals, thereby compromising their potential health benefits [288].
To counteract the negative effects of heat and oxidative degradation, innovative technologies such as encapsulation and nanoformulation have been proposed to preserve the stability and bioavailability of sensitive phytochemicals [289,290]. These methods involve encapsulating volatile compounds, such as terpenes and phenolic acids, in protective carriers to protect them from environmental stressors during food preparation and storage [290,291]. Nanoformulation techniques also enhance the bioavailability of phytochemicals by improving their solubility and facilitating their absorption in the gastrointestinal tract [292]. These advanced technologies can maximise the stability and functional benefits of phytochemicals, ensuring that plant-based foods retain their nutritional and sensory properties despite processing [289,290].
While certain food processing methods can degrade phytochemicals, fermentation has been shown to offer distinct advantages by increasing the bioavailability of certain bioactive compounds [293]. During fermentation, microorganisms such as bacteria and yeasts can modify the chemical structure of phytochemicals, making them more bioavailable for absorption by the human body [294,295]. For example, microbial fermentation has been shown to increase the concentration of bioactive flavonoid metabolites, which not only enhance the flavour complexity of plant-based foods, but also improve their potential health benefits [296]. This process can also lead to the production of beneficial metabolites such as short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which support gut health and influence the flavour profile of fermented foods [297,298]. In addition, fermentation can reduce levels of anti-nutritional factors such as phytates and oxalates, thereby improving the bioavailability of minerals and other nutrients in plant-based foods [299].
In addition to thermal and microbial treatments, pH adjustments during food processing can affect the stability and bioavailability of phytochemicals [284]. Acidic or alkaline conditions can affect the solubility, stability, and ionisation of phytochemicals, thereby influencing their sensory attributes and bioactivity [300]. For example, variations in pH can alter the colour, flavour and aroma of flavonoids and other bioactive compounds, affecting both consumer acceptance and functional health effects [301]. It is essential to optimise pH conditions during food processing to preserve the desirable properties of phytochemicals.
To maximise the benefits of phytochemical-rich diets, it is essential to understand the biochemical transformations that occur during food processing. Knowledge of how different processing techniques affect the stability, bioavailability, and functionality of phytochemicals can inform food formulation strategies that preserve both sensory integrity and health benefits [284]. By combining appropriate processing methods, such as controlled thermal processing, fermentation, and innovative encapsulation technologies, food manufacturers can ensure that plant-based foods retain their full range of beneficial compounds. This helps to maximise their nutritional value, flavour complexity, and health-promoting effects, thereby encouraging the consumption of plant-based foods as part of a healthy, sustainable diet.
Table 2 summarises the main bioactive compounds found in plant-based foods, their sensory characteristics, bioactive effects, and plant sources.
In summary, food processing significantly affects the stability and bioavailability of phytochemicals, which are key determinants of both the flavour and functional properties of plant-based foods. While some processes, such as thermal treatment and oxidative exposure, can degrade phytochemicals, advanced technologies such as encapsulation and fermentation can enhance their stability and bioavailability. By understanding and optimising the biochemical transformations that occur during processing, it is possible to preserve the desirable properties of phytochemicals and maximise their health benefits, ultimately supporting the promotion of plant-based diets.

9. Study Limitations

This review summarises the current knowledge on the sensory and health-promoting properties of phytochemicals in plant-based foods. However, several limitations should be acknowledged. Firstly, despite efforts to include a wide range of studies from multiple databases, publication bias and the exclusion of non-English literature may have limited the scope of the review. Secondly, the diversity of experimental models, analytical methods and food matrices across the studies makes direct comparisons difficult and may affect the generalisability of the conclusions. Thirdly, while mechanistic insights are highlighted, many studies focus on in vitro or animal models and human clinical data on the combined effects of multiple phytochemicals on flavour perception and health outcomes remains limited.
Finally, the impact of food processing on phytochemical stability and bioavailability is complex and multifaceted. For example, thermal treatments such as cooking or pasteurisation can enhance or degrade bioactive compounds. Moderate heating can increase the extractability of polyphenols or carotenoids by breaking down plant cell walls, whereas prolonged heating can lead to their degradation. Fermentation can enhance bioavailability and generate new bioactive metabolites, often improving health-promoting properties and sensory profiles by reducing bitterness or astringency, for example. Encapsulation techniques have been shown to protect sensitive compounds, such as carotenoids and volatile terpenes, from oxidation and volatilisation, thereby maintaining functional properties and aroma. Other methods, including pH adjustment, high-pressure processing and light protection, can also influence phytochemical stability and the perception of taste and colour; however, their effects depend heavily on the specific food matrix and processing parameters.
Overall, although general trends can be identified, the effects of processing are highly context-dependent. This makes it challenging to translate laboratory findings directly into real-world dietary applications. Recognising these limitations highlights the need for further controlled human studies and standardised methodologies. This will strengthen the evidence base and guide the development of functional, plant-based foods with optimised sensory and health-promoting properties.

10. Conclusions

This review examines the integral role of phytochemicals in shaping the sensory characteristics and health-promoting properties of plant-based foods. By analysing the biochemical pathways underlying the biosynthesis of key classes of phytochemicals, including flavonoids, terpenes, and phenolic compounds, the review elucidates their significant contributions to the sensory perception and the overall aromatic complexity of plant-based foods. These compounds not only define the sensory profile but also influence critical molecular mechanisms that are central to mediating the health benefits associated with plant-based diets.
In addition to their sensory properties, phytochemicals are involved in the modulation of key signalling pathways, such as NF-κB, Nrf2, MAPK, and AP-1, which regulate inflammation, oxidative stress, and cell survival. These pathways are critical for the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects of phytochemicals, highlighting their potential to reduce the risk of chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, cancer, and neurodegenerative disorders. The intricate interplay between these molecular mechanisms reinforces the importance of phytochemicals in promoting human health and emphasises their dual function as sensory enhancers and health modulators.
In addition, the review emphasises the impact of food processing on the stability and bioavailability of phytochemicals, which is crucial to ensuring that the functional properties of these compounds are maintained throughout food preparation and storage. The discussion highlights the need for optimised processing techniques that minimise degradation while enhancing the bioavailability of phytochemicals. The application of innovative technologies, such as nanoencapsulation, fermentation, and controlled thermal processing, is examined as a promising strategy to improve the retention of phytochemical bioactivity, thereby ensuring the preservation of both their flavour and functional efficacy.

Author Contributions

N.K., H.T., L.B., R.K. and P.K. conceived the concept of the review; N.K., H.T. and L.B. developed the search strategy; N.K., H.T., L.B., R.K. and P.K. coordinated data selection, extraction, analysis, and interpretation; N.K., H.T., R.K. and L.B., critically reviewed the manuscript; N.K., H.T., L.B., R.K. and P.K. drafted the final manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analysed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

Graphical abstract provided by Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, accessed on 1 May 2025).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sultanbawa, Y.; Sivakumar, D. Enhanced nutritional and phytochemical profiles of selected underutilized fruits, vegetables, and legumes. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2022, 46, 100853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Harriden, B.; D’Cunha, N.M.; Kellett, J.; Isbel, S.; Panagiotakos, D.B.; Naumovski, N. Are dietary patterns becoming more processed? The effects of different dietary patterns on cognition: A review. Nutr. Health 2022, 28, 341–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nieto, G.; Martínez-Zamora, L.; Peñalver, R.; Marín-Iniesta, F.; Taboada-Rodríguez, A.; López-Gómez, A.; Martínez-Hernández, G.B. Applications of Plant Bioactive Compounds as Replacers of Synthetic Additives in the Food Industry. Foods 2023, 13, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fabela-Morón, M.F. Bioactive compounds, sensory attributes, and flavor perceptions involved in taste-active molecules in fruits and vegetables. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1427857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kumar, A.; Nirmal, P.; Kumar, M.; Jose, A.; Tomer, V.; Oz, E.; Proestos, C.; Zeng, M.; Elobeid, T.; Sneha, K.; et al. Major Phytochemicals: Recent Advances in Health Benefits and Extraction Method. Molecules 2023, 28, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Alcorta, A.; Porta, A.; Tárrega, A.; Alvarez, M.D.; Vaquero, M.P. Foods for Plant-Based Diets: Challenges and Innovations. Foods 2021, 10, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tachie, C.; Nwachukwu, I.D.; Aryee, A.N.A. Trends and innovations in the formulation of plant-based foods. Food Prod. Proc. Nutr. 2023, 5, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Baker, M.T.; Lu, P.; Parrella, J.A.; Leggette, H.R. Consumer Acceptance toward Functional Foods: A Scoping Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Venter de Villiers, M.; Cheng, J.; Truter, L. The Shift Towards Plant-Based Lifestyles: Factors Driving Young Consumers’ Decisions to Choose Plant-Based Food Products. Sustainability 2024, 16, 9022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Núñez-Gómez, V.; González-Barrio, R.; Periago, M.J. Interaction between Dietary Fibre and Bioactive Compounds in Plant By-Products: Impact on Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Park, K. The Role of Dietary Phytochemicals: Evidence from Epidemiological Studies. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Serafini, M.; Peluso, I. Functional Foods for Health: The Interrelated Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Role of Fruits, Vegetables, Herbs, Spices and Cocoa in Humans. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2016, 22, 6701–6715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Rodríguez-Negrete, E.V.; Morales-González, Á.; Madrigal-Santillán, E.O.; Sánchez-Reyes, K.; Álvarez-González, I.; Madrigal-Bujaidar, E.; Valadez-Vega, C.; Chamorro-Cevallos, G.; Garcia-Melo, L.F.; Morales-González, J.A. Phytochemicals and Their Usefulness in the Maintenance of Health. Plants 2024, 13, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rahaman, M.M.; Hossain, R.; Herrera-Bravo, J.; Islam, M.T.; Atolani, O.; Adeyemi, O.S.; Owolodun, O.A.; Kambizi, L.; Daştan, S.D.; Calina, D.; et al. Natural antioxidants from some fruits, seeds, foods, natural products, and associated health benefits: An update. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023, 11, 1657–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Kalogerakou, T.; Antoniadou, M. The Role of Dietary Antioxidants, Food Supplements and Functional Foods for Energy Enhancement in Healthcare Professionals. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Molino, S.; Pilar Francino, M.; Ángel Rufián Henares, J. Why is it important to understand the nature and chemistry of tannins to exploit their potential as nutraceuticals? Food Res. Int. 2023, 173 Pt 2, 113329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ferrer-Gallego, R.; Brás, N.F.; García-Estévez, I.; Mateus, N.; Rivas-Gonzalo, J.C.; de Freitas, V.; Escribano-Bailón, M.T. Effect of flavonols on wine astringency and their interaction with human saliva. Food Chem. 2016, 209, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Osakabe, N.; Shimizu, T.; Fujii, Y.; Fushimi, T.; Calabrese, V. Sensory Nutrition and Bitterness and Astringency of Polyphenols. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kim, T.; Song, B.; Cho, K.S.; Lee, I.S. Therapeutic Potential of Volatile Terpenes and Terpenoids from Forests for Inflammatory Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Masyita, A.; Mustika Sari, R.; Dwi Astuti, A.; Yasir, B.; Rahma Rumata, N.; Emran, T.B.; Nainu, F.; Simal-Gandara, J. Terpenes and terpenoids as main bioactive compounds of essential oils, their roles in human health and potential application as natural food preservatives. Food Chem. X 2022, 13, 100217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gutiérrez-Del-Río, I.; López-Ibáñez, S.; Magadán-Corpas, P.; Fernández-Calleja, L.; Pérez-Valero, Á.; Tuñón-Granda, M.; Miguélez, E.M.; Villar, C.J.; Lombó, F. Terpenoids and Polyphenols as Natural Antioxidant Agents in Food Preservation. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, Q.; Zhou, J. The application of polyphenols in food preservation. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2021, 98, 35–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Raudone, L.; Savickiene, N. Phytochemical Profiles of Plant Materials: From Extracts to Added-Value Ingredients. Plants 2024, 13, 964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Schlüter, A.; Hühn, T.; Kneubühl, M.; Chatelain, K.; Rohn, S.; Chetschik, I. Novel Time- and Location-Independent Postharvest Treatment of Cocoa Beans: Investigations on the Aroma Formation during “Moist Incubation” of Unfermented and Dried Cocoa Nibs and Comparison to Traditional Fermentation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 10336–10344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bickel Haase, T.; Schweiggert-Weisz, U.; Ortner, E.; Zorn, H.; Naumann, S. Aroma Properties of Cocoa Fruit Pulp from Different Origins. Molecules 2021, 26, 7618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Schlüter, A.; André, A.; Hühn, T.; Rohn, S.; Chetschik, I. Influence of Aerobic and Anaerobic Moist Incubation on Selected Nonvolatile Constituents–Comparison to Traditionally Fermented Cocoa Beans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 16335–16346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chetschik, I.; Kneubühl, M.; Chatelain, K.; Schlüter, A.; Bernath, K.; Hühn, T. Investigations on the Aroma of Cocoa Pulp (Theobroma cacao L.) and Its Influence on the Odor of Fermented Cocoa Beans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 2467–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pedrosa, M.C.; Lima, L.; Heleno, S.; Carocho, M.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R.; Barros, L. Food Metabolites as Tools for Authentication, Processing, and Nutritive Value Assessment. Foods 2021, 10, 2213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Pavagadhi, S.; Swarup, S. Metabolomics for Evaluating Flavor-Associated Metabolites in Plant-Based Products. Metabolites 2020, 10, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Siddiqui, S.A.; Khan, S.; Mehdizadeh, M.; Bahmid, N.A.; Adli, D.N.; Walker, T.R.; Perestrelo, R.; Câmara, J.S. Phytochemicals and bioactive constituents in food packaging—A systematic review. Heliyon 2023, 9, e21196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Small, D.M.; Prescott, J. Odor/taste integration and the perception of flavor. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 166, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Spence, C. What Is the Relationship between the Presence of Volatile Organic Compounds in Food and Drink Products and Multisensory Flavour Perception? Foods 2021, 10, 1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Scott, K. The sweet and the bitter of mammalian taste. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2004, 14, 423–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chaudhari, N.; Roper, S.D. The cell biology of taste. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 190, 285–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Blankenship, M.L.; Grigorova, M.; Katz, D.B.; Maier, J.X. Retronasal Odor Perception Requires Taste Cortex, but Orthonasal Does Not. Curr. Biol. 2019, 29, 62–69.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Xiao, W.; Sun, Z.; Yan, X.; Gao, X.; Lv, Q.; Wei, Y. Differences in olfactory habituation between orthonasal and retronasal pathways. J. Physiol. Sci. 2021, 71, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ahmad, R.; Dalziel, J.E. G Protein-Coupled Receptors in Taste Physiology and Pharmacology. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 587664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fernstrom, J.D.; Munger, S.D.; Sclafani, A.; de Araujo, I.E.; Roberts, A.; Molinary, S. Mechanisms for sweetness. J. Nutr. 2012, 142, 1134S–1141S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gutierrez, R.; Fonseca, E.; Simon, S.A. The neuroscience of sugars in taste, gut-reward, feeding circuits, and obesity. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 3469–3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Meyerhof, W.; Batram, C.; Kuhn, C.; Brockhoff, A.; Chudoba, E.; Bufe, B.; Appendino, G.; Behrens, M. The molecular receptive ranges of human TAS2R bitter taste receptors. Chem. Senses 2010, 35, 157–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pydi, S.P.; Sobotkiewicz, T.; Billakanti, R.; Bhullar, R.P.; Loewen, M.C.; Chelikani, P. Amino acid derivatives as bitter taste receptor (T2R) blockers. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 25054–25066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Roper, S.D.; Chaudhari, N. Taste buds: Cells, signals and synapses. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2017, 18, 485–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Diepeveen, J.; Moerdijk-Poortvliet, T.C.W.; van der Leij, F.R. Molecular insights into human taste perception and umami tastants: A review. J. Food Sci. 2022, 87, 1449–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kinnamon, S.C.; Finger, T.E. Recent advances in taste transduction and signaling. F1000Research 2019, 8, 2117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. El Hadi, M.A.; Zhang, F.J.; Wu, F.F.; Zhou, C.H.; Tao, J. Advances in fruit aroma volatile research. Molecules 2013, 18, 8200–8229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Monahan, K.; Lomvardas, S. Monoallelic expression of olfactory receptors. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015, 31, 721–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Maßberg, D.; Hatt, H. Human Olfactory Receptors: Novel Cellular Functions Outside of the Nose. Physiol. Rev. 2018, 98, 1739–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rolls, E.T. Chemosensory learning in the cortex. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2011, 5, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Samuelsen, C.L.; Vincis, R. Cortical Hub for Flavor Sensation in Rodents. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 772286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Spence, C. Multisensory flavor perception. Cell 2015, 161, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Cornelio, P.; Velasco, C.; Obrist, M. Multisensory Integration as per Technological Advances: A Review. Front. Neurosci. 2021, 15, 652611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Rangel-Huerta, O.D.; Gil, A. Nutrimetabolomics: An Update on Analytical Approaches to Investigate the Role of Plant-Based Foods and Their Bioactive Compounds in Non-Communicable Chronic Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hassanpour, S.H.; Doroudi, A. Review of the antioxidant potential of flavonoids as a subgroup of polyphenols and partial substitute for synthetic antioxidants. Avicenna J. Phytomed. 2023, 13, 354–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shahidi, F.; Hossain, A. Role of Lipids in Food Flavor Generation. Molecules 2022, 27, 5014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Geng, L.; Liu, K.; Zhang, H. Lipid oxidation in foods and its implications on proteins. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1192199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Queiroz, L.P.; Nogueira, I.B.R.; Ribeiro, A.M. Flavor Engineering: A comprehensive review of biological foundations, AI integration, industrial development, and socio-cultural dynamics. Food Res. Int. 2024, 196, 115100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Vincis, R.; Fontanini, A. Central taste anatomy and physiology. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2019, 164, 187–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dobon, B.; Rossell, C.; Walsh, S.; Bertranpetit, J. Is there adaptation in the human genome for taste perception and phase I biotransformation? BMC Evol. Biol. 2019, 19, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Su, C.Y.; Menuz, K.; Carlson, J.R. Olfactory perception: Receptors, cells, and circuits. Cell 2009, 139, 45–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Sharma, A.; Kumar, R.; Aier, I.; Semwal, R.; Tyagi, P.; Varadwaj, P. Sense of Smell: Structural, Functional, Mechanistic Advancements and Challenges in Human Olfactory Research. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2019, 17, 891–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Strauch, C.; Hoang, T.H.; Angenstein, F.; Manahan-Vaughan, D. Olfactory Information Storage Engages Subcortical and Cortical Brain Regions That Support Valence Determination. Cereb. Cortex 2022, 32, 689–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. de Araujo, I.E.; Geha, P.; Small, D.M. Orosensory and Homeostatic Functions of the Insular Taste Cortex. Chemosens Percept. 2012, 5, 64–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. de Araujo, I.E.; Simon, S.A. The gustatory cortex and multisensory integration. Int. J. Obes. 2009, 33 (Suppl. S2), S34-43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, R.; Deng, H.; Xiao, X. The Insular Cortex: An Interface Between Sensation, Emotion and Cognition. Neurosci. Bull. 2024, 40, 1763–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ohla, K.; Toepel, U.; le Coutre, J.; Hudry, J. Visual-gustatory interaction: Orbitofrontal and insular cortices mediate the effect of high-calorie visual food cues on taste pleasantness. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Seubert, J.; Ohla, K.; Yokomukai, Y.; Kellermann, T.; Lundström, J.N. Superadditive opercular activation to food flavor is mediated by enhanced temporal and limbic coupling. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2015, 36, 1662–1676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Rolls, E.T. Taste, olfactory, and food reward value processing in the brain. Prog. Neurobiol. 2015, 127–128, 64–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rolls, E.T. Taste and smell processing in the brain. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2019, 164, 97–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Šimić, G.; Tkalčić, M.; Vukić, V.; Mulc, D.; Španić, E.; Šagud, M.; Olucha-Bordonau, F.E.; Vukšić, M.; Hof, P.R. Understanding Emotions: Origins and Roles of the Amygdala. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Sullivan, R.M.; Wilson, D.A.; Ravel, N.; Mouly, A.M. Olfactory memory networks: From emotional learning to social behaviors. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2015, 9, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Talavera, K.; Ninomiya, Y.; Winkel, C.; Voets, T.; Nilius, B. Influence of temperature on taste perception. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2007, 64, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Liu, D.; Deng, Y.; Sha, L.; Abul Hashem, M.; Gai, S. Impact of oral processing on texture attributes and taste perception. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 54, 2585–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Motoki, K.; Spence, C.; Velasco, C. When visual cues influence taste/flavour perception: A systematic review. Food Qual. Pref. 2023, 111, 104996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Reed, D.R.; Tanaka, T.; McDaniel, A.H. Diverse tastes: Genetics of sweet and bitter perception. Physiol. Behav. 2006, 88, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Diószegi, J.; Llanaj, E.; Ádány, R. Genetic Background of Taste Perception, Taste Preferences, and Its Nutritional Implications: A Systematic Review. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. De Cosmi, V.; Scaglioni, S.; Agostoni, C. Early Taste Experiences and Later Food Choices. Nutrients 2017, 9, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Scudine, K.G.O.; Castelo, P.M.; Hoppe, J.P.M.; Portella, A.K.; Silveira, P.P. Early Influences on Development of Sensory Perception and Eating Habits. Adv. Nutr. 2024, 15, 100325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Drewnowski, A. Taste preferences and food intake. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1997, 17, 237–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ullrich, L.; Casty, B.; André, A.; Hühn, T.; Steinhaus, M.; Chetschik, I. Decoding the Fine Flavor Properties of Dark Chocolates. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 13730–13740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Goya, L.; Kongor, J.E.; de Pascual-Teresa, S. From Cocoa to Chocolate: Effect of Processing on Flavanols and Methylxanthines and Their Mechanisms of Action. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Dahiana Becerra, L.; Yolanda Ruiz-Pardo, R.; Vaillant, F.; Viviana Zuluaga, M.; Boulanger, R.; Santander, M.; Escobar, S. Modulating fine flavor cocoa attributes: Impact of seed-to-bean transformation under controlled conditions on metabolite, volatile and sensory profiles. Food Res. Int. 2024, 196, 115109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Lima, L.J.; Almeida, M.H.; Nout, M.J.; Zwietering, M.H. Theobroma cacao L., “The food of the Gods”: Quality determinants of commercial cocoa beans, with particular reference to the impact of fermentation. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 731–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Seyfried, C.; Granvogl, M. Characterization of the Key Aroma Compounds in Two Commercial Dark Chocolates with High Cocoa Contents by Means of the Sensomics Approach. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 5827–5837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Schlüter, A.; Hühn, T.; Kneubühl, M.; Chatelain, K.; Rohn, S.; Chetschik, I. Comparison of the Aroma Composition and Sensory Properties of Dark Chocolates Made with Moist Incubated and Fermented Cocoa Beans. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2022, 70, 4057–4065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Ac-Pangan, M.F.; Engeseth, N.J.; Cadwallader, K.R. Identification of Important Aroma Components and Sensory Profiles of Minimally Processed (Unroasted) and Conventionally Roasted Dark Chocolates. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2023, 71, 9856–9867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. De Santis, D. Food Flavor Chemistry and Sensory Evaluation. Foods 2024, 13, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Donno, D.; Mellano, M.G.; Gamba, G.; Riondato, I.; Beccaro, G.L. Analytical Strategies for Fingerprinting of Antioxidants, Nutritional Substances, and Bioactive Compounds in Foodstuffs Based on High Performance Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: An Overview. Foods 2020, 9, 1734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Begnaud, F.; Chaintreau, A. Good quantification practices of flavours and fragrances by mass spectrometry. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2016, 374, 20150365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Song, H.; Liu, J. GC-O-MS technique and its applications in food flavor analysis. Food Res. Int. 2018, 114, 187–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Brattoli, M.; Cisternino, E.; Dambruoso, P.R.; de Gennaro, G.; Giungato, P.; Mazzone, A.; Palmisani, J.; Tutino, M. Gas chromatography analysis with olfactometric detection (GC-O) as a useful methodology for chemical characterization of odorous compounds. Sensors 2013, 13, 16759–16800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Perez-Hurtado, P.; Palmer, E.; Owen, T.; Aldcroft, C.; Allen, M.H.; Jones, J.; Creaser, C.S.; Lindley, M.R.; Turner, M.A.; Reynolds, J.C. Direct analysis of volatile organic compounds in foods by headspace extraction atmospheric pressure chemical ionisation mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2017, 31, 1947–1956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Epping, R.; Koch, M. On-Site Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs). Molecules 2023, 28, 1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Xu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, C.; Yu, B.; Wan, C.; Chen, B.; Lu, L.; Yuan, L.; Wu, Z.; Chen, H. The flavor substances changes in Fuliang green tea during storage monitoring by GC-MS and GC-IMS. Food Chem. X 2023, 21, 101047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Aprea, E.; Biasioli, F.; Sani, G.; Cantini, C.; Märk, T.D.; Gasperi, F. Proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) headspace analysis for rapid detection of oxidative alteration of olive oil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 7635–7640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Cappellin, L.; Loreto, F.; Aprea, E.; Romano, A.; del Pulgar, J.S.; Gasperi, F.; Biasioli, F. PTR-MS in Italy: A multipurpose sensor with applications in environmental, agri-food and health science. Sensors 2013, 13, 11923–11955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Acierno, V.; Fasciani, G.; Kiani, S.; Caligiani, A.; van Ruth, S. PTR-QiToF-MS and HSI for the characterization of fermented cocoa beans from different origins. Food Chem. 2019, 289, 591–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Acierno, V.; de Jonge, L.; van Ruth, S. Sniffing out cocoa bean traits that persist in chocolates by PTR-MS, ICP-MS and IR-MS. Food Res. Int. 2020, 133, 109212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Pleil, J.D.; Hansel, A.; Beauchamp, J. Advances in proton transfer reaction mass spectrometry (PTR-MS): Applications in exhaled breath analysis, food science, and atmospheric chemistry. J. Breath Res. 2019, 13, 039002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Alexandri, E.; Ahmed, R.; Siddiqui, H.; Choudhary, M.I.; Tsiafoulis, C.G.; Gerothanassis, I.P. High Resolution NMR Spectroscopy as a Structural and Analytical Tool for Unsaturated Lipids in Solution. Molecules 2017, 22, 1663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Emwas, A.H.; Roy, R.; McKay, R.T.; Tenori, L.; Saccenti, E.; Gowda, G.A.N.; Raftery, D.; Alahmari, F.; Jaremko, L.; Jaremko, M.; et al. NMR Spectroscopy for Metabolomics Research. Metabolites 2019, 9, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Valentino, G.; Graziani, V.; D’Abrosca, B.; Pacifico, S.; Fiorentino, A.; Scognamiglio, M. NMR-Based Plant Metabolomics in Nutraceutical Research: An Overview. Molecules 2020, 25, 1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Saleh, M.; Lee, Y. Instrumental Analysis or Human Evaluation to Measure the Appearance, Smell, Flavor, and Physical Properties of Food. Foods 2023, 12, 3453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Brattoli, M.; de Gennaro, G.; de Pinto, V.; Loiotile, A.D.; Lovascio, S.; Penza, M. Odour detection methods: Olfactometry and chemical sensors. Sensors 2011, 11, 5290–5322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. de-la-Fuente-Blanco, A.; Ferreira, V. Gas Chromatography Olfactometry (GC-O) for the (Semi)Quantitative Screening of Wine Aroma. Foods 2020, 9, 1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. López-Fernández, O.; Domínguez, R.; Pateiro, M.; Munekata, P.E.S.; Rocchetti, G.; Lorenzo, J.M. Determination of Polyphenols Using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Technique (LC-MS/MS): A Review. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Oliva, E.; Fanti, F.; Palmieri, S.; Viteritti, E.; Eugelio, F.; Pepe, A.; Compagnone, D.; Sergi, M. Predictive Multi Experiment Approach for the Determination of Conjugated Phenolic Compounds in Vegetal Matrices by Means of LC-MS/MS. Molecules 2022, 27, 3089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. Recent trends of machine learning applied to multi-source data of medicinal plants. J. Pharm. Anal. 2023, 13, 1388–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Huang, L.F.; Wu, M.J.; Zhong, K.J.; Sun, X.J.; Liang, Y.Z.; Dai, Y.H.; Huang, K.L.; Guo, F.Q. Fingerprint developing of coffee flavor by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and combined chemometrics methods. Anal. Chim. Acta 2007, 588, 216–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. André, A.; Leupin, M.; Kneubühl, M.; Pedan, V.; Chetschik, I. Evolution of the Polyphenol and Terpene Content, Antioxidant Activity and Plant Morphology of Eight Different Fiber-Type Cultivars of Cannabis Sativa L. Cultivated at Three Sowing Densities. Plants 2020, 9, 1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Pellati, F.; Brighenti, V.; Sperlea, J.; Marchetti, L.; Bertelli, D.; Benvenuti, S. New Methods for the Comprehensive Analysis of Bioactive Compounds in Cannabis sativa L. (hemp). Molecules 2018, 23, 2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Tuenter, E.; Delbaere, C.; De Winne, A.; Bijttebier, S.; Custers, D.; Foubert, K.; Van Durme, J.; Messens, K.; Dewettinck, K.; Pieters, L. Non-volatile and volatile composition of West African bulk and Ecuadorian fine-flavor cocoa liquor and chocolate. Food Res. Int. 2020, 130, 108943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Franzin, M.; Ruoso, R.; Del Savio, R.; Niaki, E.A.; Pettinelli, A.; Decorti, G.; Stocco, G.; Addobbati, R. Quantification of 7 cannabinoids in cannabis oil using GC-MS: Method development, validation and application to therapeutic preparations in Friuli Venezia Giulia region, Italy. Heliyon 2023, 9, e15479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Elhalis, H.; See, X.Y.; Osen, R.; Chin, X.H.; Chow, Y. Significance of Fermentation in Plant-Based Meat Analogs: A Critical Review of Nutrition, and Safety-Related Aspects. Foods 2023, 12, 3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Wagner, J.; Wilkin, J.D.; Szymkowiak, A.; Grigor, J. Sensory and affective response to chocolate differing in cocoa content: A TDS and facial electromyography approach. Physiol. Behav. 2023, 270, 114308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Hossain, M.J.; Alam, A.N.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, C.J.; Joo, S.T.; Hwang, Y.H. Techniques and Emerging Trends in Flavor and Taste Development in Meat. Food Sci. Anim. Resour. 2025, 45, 266–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Ahuja, V.; Singh, A.; Paul, D.; Dasgupta, D.; Urajová, P.; Ghosh, S.; Singh, R.; Sahoo, G.; Ewe, D.; Saurav, K. Recent Advances in the Detection of Food Toxins Using Mass Spectrometry. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2023, 36, 1834–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Bharti, A.; Jain, U.; Chauhan, N. Progressive analytical techniques utilized for the detection of contaminants attributed to food safety and security. Talanta Open 2024, 10, 100368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Mischler, S.; André, A.; Chetschik, I.; Miescher Schwenninger, S. Potential for the Bio-Detoxification of the Mycotoxins Enniatin B and Deoxynivalenol by Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bacillus spp. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Lisboa, H.M.; Pasquali, M.B.; dos Anjos, A.I.; Sarinho, A.M.; de Melo, E.D.; Andrade, R.; Batista, L.; Lima, J.; Diniz, Y.; Barros, A. Innovative and Sustainable Food Preservation Techniques: Enhancing Food Quality, Safety, and Environmental Sustainability. Sustainability 2024, 16, 8223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Mafe, A.N.; Büsselberg, D. Mycotoxins in Food: Cancer Risks and Strategies for Control. Foods 2024, 13, 3502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Kussmann, M.; Abe Cunha, D.H.; Berciano, S. Bioactive compounds for human and planetary health. Front. Nutr. 2023, 10, 1193848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Fábián, T.K.; Beck, A.; Fejérdy, P.; Hermann, P.; Fábián, G. Molecular mechanisms of taste recognition: Considerations about the role of saliva. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 5945–5974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Yeshi, K.; Crayn, D.; Ritmejerytė, E.; Wangchuk, P. Plant Secondary Metabolites Produced in Response to Abiotic Stresses Has Potential Application in Pharmaceutical Product Development. Molecules 2022, 27, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Drewnowski, A.; Gomez-Carneros, C. Bitter taste, phytonutrients, and the consumer: A review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 72, 1424–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Soares, S.; Brandão, E.; Guerreiro, C.; Soares, S.; Mateus, N.; de Freitas, V. Tannins in Food: Insights into the Molecular Perception of Astringency and Bitter Taste. Molecules 2020, 25, 2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Pinto, T.; Aires, A.; Cosme, F.; Bacelar, E.; Morais, M.C.; Oliveira, I.; Ferreira-Cardoso, J.; Anjos, R.; Vilela, A.; Gonçalves, B. Bioactive (Poly)phenols, Volatile Compounds from Vegetables, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants. Foods 2021, 10, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Lu, Y.; Bennick, A. Interaction of tannin with human salivary proline-rich proteins. Arch. Oral Biol. 1998, 43, 717–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. McRae, J.M.; Kennedy, J.A. Wine and grape tannin interactions with salivary proteins and their impact on astringency: A review of current research. Molecules 2011, 16, 2348–2364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Bennick, A. Interaction of plant polyphenols with salivary proteins. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 2002, 13, 184–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Costa, M.; Sezgin-Bayindir, Z.; Losada-Barreiro, S.; Paiva-Martins, F.; Saso, L.; Bravo-Díaz, C. Polyphenols as Antioxidants for Extending Food Shelf-Life and in the Prevention of Health Diseases: Encapsulation and Interfacial Phenomena. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Singh, A.K.; Kim, J.Y.; Lee, Y.S. Phenolic Compounds in Active Packaging and Edible Films/Coatings: Natural Bioactive Molecules and Novel Packaging Ingredients. Molecules 2022, 27, 7513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Lin, D.; Xiao, M.; Zhao, J.; Li, Z.; Xing, B.; Li, X.; Kong, M.; Li, L.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; et al. An Overview of Plant Phenolic Compounds and Their Importance in Human Nutrition and Management of Type 2 Diabetes. Molecules 2016, 21, 1374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Liu, W.; Feng, Y.; Yu, S.; Fan, Z.; Li, X.; Li, J.; Yin, H. The Flavonoid Biosynthesis Network in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Sharma, A.; Shahzad, B.; Rehman, A.; Bhardwaj, R.; Landi, M.; Zheng, B. Response of Phenylpropanoid Pathway and the Role of Polyphenols in Plants under Abiotic Stress. Molecules 2019, 24, 2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Panche, A.N.; Diwan, A.D.; Chandra, S.R. Flavonoids: An overview. J. Nutr. Sci. 2016, 5, e47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Pandey, K.B.; Rizvi, S.I. Plant polyphenols as dietary antioxidants in human health and disease. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2009, 2, 270–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Safe, S.; Jayaraman, A.; Chapkin, R.S.; Howard, M.; Mohankumar, K.; Shrestha, R. Flavonoids: Structure-function and mechanisms of action and opportunities for drug development. Toxicol. Res. 2021, 37, 147–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Dabeek, W.M.; Marra, M.V. Dietary Quercetin and Kaempferol: Bioavailability and Potential Cardiovascular-Related Bioactivity in Humans. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Zheng, X.; Zhang, X.; Zeng, F. Biological Functions and Health Benefits of Flavonoids in Fruits and Vegetables: A Contemporary Review. Foods 2025, 14, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Genva, M.; Kenne Kemene, T.; Deleu, M.; Lins, L.; Fauconnier, M.L. Is It Possible to Predict the Odor of a Molecule on the Basis of its Structure? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Singh, B.; Sharma, R.A. Plant terpenes: Defense responses, phylogenetic analysis, regulation and clinical applications. 3 Biotech. 2015, 5, 129–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Zhao, L.; Chang, W.C.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, H.W.; Liu, P. Methylerythritol phosphate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2013, 82, 497–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ninkuu, V.; Zhang, L.; Yan, J.; Fu, Z.; Yang, T.; Zeng, H. Biochemistry of Terpenes and Recent Advances in Plant Protection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Koyama, S.; Heinbockel, T. The Effects of Essential Oils and Terpenes in Relation to Their Routes of Intake and Application. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Jabalpurwala, F.A.; Smoot, J.M.; Rouseff, R.L. A comparison of citrus blossom volatiles. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 1428–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Jiang, H.; Wang, X. Biosynthesis of monoterpenoid and sesquiterpenoid as natural flavors and fragrances. Biotechnol. Adv. 2023, 65, 108151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Câmara, J.S.; Perestrelo, R.; Ferreira, R.; Berenguer, C.V.; Pereira, J.A.M.; Castilho, P.C. Plant-Derived Terpenoids: A Plethora of Bioactive Compounds with Several Health Functions and Industrial Applications—A Comprehensive Overview. Molecules 2024, 29, 3861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Divekar, P.A.; Narayana, S.; Divekar, B.A.; Kumar, R.; Gadratagi, B.G.; Ray, A.; Singh, A.K.; Rani, V.; Singh, V.; Singh, A.K.; et al. Plant Secondary Metabolites as Defense Tools against Herbivores for Sustainable Crop Protection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Reshi, Z.A.; Ahmad, W.; Lukatkin, A.S.; Javed, S.B. From Nature to Lab: A Review of Secondary Metabolite Biosynthetic Pathways, Environmental Influences, and In Vitro Approaches. Metabolites 2023, 13, 895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Yang, L.; Wen, K.S.; Ruan, X.; Zhao, Y.X.; Wei, F.; Wang, Q. Response of Plant Secondary Metabolites to Environmental Factors. Molecules 2018, 23, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Jan, R.; Asaf, S.; Numan, M.; Lubna; Kim, K.-M. Plant Secondary Metabolite Biosynthesis and Transcriptional Regulation in Response to Biotic and Abiotic Stress Conditions. Agronomy 2021, 11, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Custodio-Mendoza, J.A.; Pokorski, P.; Aktaş, H.; Napiórkowska, A.; Kurek, M.A. Advances in Chromatographic Analysis of Phenolic Phytochemicals in Foods: Bridging Gaps and Exploring New Horizons. Foods 2024, 13, 2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Bergman, M.E.; Davis, B.; Phillips, M.A. Medically Useful Plant Terpenoids: Biosynthesis, Occurrence, and Mechanism of Action. Molecules 2019, 24, 3961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Saini, R.K.; Ranjit, A.; Sharma, K.; Prasad, P.; Shang, X.; Gowda, K.G.M.; Keum, Y.S. Bioactive Compounds of Citrus Fruits: A Review of Composition and Health Benefits of Carotenoids, Flavonoids, Limonoids, and Terpenes. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Andrade, M.A.; Barbosa, C.H.; Shah, M.A.; Ahmad, N.; Vilarinho, F.; Khwaldia, K.; Silva, A.S.; Ramos, F. Citrus By-Products: Valuable Source of Bioactive Compounds for Food Applications. Antioxidants 2022, 12, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Surendran, S.; Qassadi, F.; Surendran, G.; Lilley, D.; Heinrich, M. Myrcene-What Are the Potential Health Benefits of This Flavouring and Aroma Agent? Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 699666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Kazemi, A.; Iraji, A.; Esmaealzadeh, N.; Salehi, M.; Hashempur, M.H. Peppermint and menthol: A review on their biochemistry, pharmacological activities, clinical applications, and safety considerations. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2024, 3, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Yashin, A.; Yashin, Y.; Xia, X.; Nemzer, B. Antioxidant Activity of Spices and Their Impact on Human Health: A Review. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Nisar, M.F.; Khadim, M.; Rafiq, M.; Chen, J.; Yang, Y.; Wan, C.C. Pharmacological Properties and Health Benefits of Eugenol: A Comprehensive Review. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 2497354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Salehi, B.; Upadhyay, S.; Erdogan Orhan, I.; Kumar Jugran, A.; Jayaweera, S.L.D.; Dias, D.A.; Sharopov, F.; Taheri, Y.; Martins, N.; Baghalpour, N.; et al. Therapeutic Potential of α- and β-Pinene: A Miracle Gift of Nature. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. An, Q.; Ren, J.N.; Li, X.; Fan, G.; Qu, S.S.; Song, Y.; Li, Y.; Pan, S.Y. Recent updates on bioactive properties of linalool. Food Funct. 2021, 12, 10370–10389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Kosakowska, O.; Węglarz, Z.; Styczyńska, S.; Synowiec, A.; Gniewosz, M.; Bączek, K. Activity of Common Thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.), Greek Oregano (Origanum vulgare L. ssp. hirtum), and Common Oregano (Origanum vulgare L. ssp. vulgare) Essential Oils against Selected Phytopathogens. Molecules 2024, 29, 4617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Scandiffio, R.; Geddo, F.; Cottone, E.; Querio, G.; Antoniotti, S.; Gallo, M.P.; Maffei, M.E.; Bovolin, P. Protective Effects of (E)-β-Caryophyllene (BCP) in Chronic Inflammation. Nutrients 2020, 12, 3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Chen, W.; Viljoen, A.M. Geraniol—A review of a commercially important fragrance material. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2010, 76, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Sharmeen, J.B.; Mahomoodally, F.M.; Zengin, G.; Maggi, F. Essential Oils as Natural Sources of Fragrance Compounds for Cosmetics and Cosmeceuticals. Molecules 2021, 26, 666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Opitz, S.; Nes, W.D.; Gershenzon, J. Both methylerythritol phosphate and mevalonate pathways contribute to biosynthesis of each of the major isoprenoid classes in young cotton seedlings. Phytochemistry 2014, 98, 110–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Fan, M.; Yuan, S.; Li, L.; Zheng, J.; Zhao, D.; Wang, C.; Wang, H.; Liu, X.; Liu, J. Application of Terpenoid Compounds in Food and Pharmaceutical Products. Fermentation 2023, 9, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Sommer, S.; Lang, L.M.; Drummond, L.; Buchhaupt, M.; Fraatz, M.A.; Zorn, H. Odor Characteristics of Novel Non-Canonical Terpenes. Molecules 2022, 27, 3827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Auffarth, B. Understanding smell—The olfactory stimulus problem. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2013, 37, 1667–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Masuo, Y.; Satou, T.; Takemoto, H.; Koike, K. Smell and Stress Response in the Brain: Review of the Connection between Chemistry and Neuropharmacology. Molecules 2021, 26, 2571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Purves, D.; Augustine, G.J.; Fitzpatrick, D.; Katz, L.C.; LaMantia, A.-S.; McNamara, J.O.; Williams, S.M. (Eds.) Neuroscience, 2nd ed.; Taste Receptors and the Transduction of Taste Signals; Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA, 2001. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK11148/ (accessed on 20 May 2025).
  172. Del Prado-Audelo, M.L.; Cortés, H.; Caballero-Florán, I.H.; González-Torres, M.; Escutia-Guadarrama, L.; Bernal-Chávez, S.A.; Giraldo-Gomez, D.M.; Magaña, J.J.; Leyva-Gómez, G. Therapeutic Applications of Terpenes on Inflammatory Diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 704197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Mihaylova, D.; Dimitrova-Dimova, M.; Popova, A. Dietary Phenolic Compounds–Wellbeing and Perspective Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 4769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. de Araújo, F.F.; de Paulo Farias, D.; Neri-Numa, I.A.; Pastore, G.M. Polyphenols and their applications: An approach in food chemistry and innovation potential. Food Chem. 2021, 338, 127535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Commisso, M.; Bianconi, M.; Poletti, S.; Negri, S.; Munari, F.; Ceoldo, S.; Guzzo, F. Metabolomic Profiling and Antioxidant Activity of Fruits Representing Diverse Apple and Pear Cultivars. Biology 2021, 10, 380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Skrovankova, S.; Sumczynski, D.; Mlcek, J.; Jurikova, T.; Sochor, J. Bioactive Compounds and Antioxidant Activity in Different Types of Berries. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 24673–24706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Dhalaria, R.; Verma, R.; Kumar, D.; Puri, S.; Tapwal, A.; Kumar, V.; Nepovimova, E.; Kuca, K. Bioactive Compounds of Edible Fruits with Their Anti-Aging Properties: A Comprehensive Review to Prolong Human Life. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Liczbiński, P.; Bukowska, B. Tea and coffee polyphenols and their biological properties based on the latest in vitro investigations. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 175, 114265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Fujimoto, H.; Narita, Y.; Iwai, K.; Hanzawa, T.; Kobayashi, T.; Kakiuchi, M.; Ariki, S.; Wu, X.; Miyake, K.; Tahara, Y.; et al. Bitterness compounds in coffee brew measured by analytical instruments and taste sensing system. Food Chem. 2021, 342, 128228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Ulanowska, M.; Olas, B. Biological Properties and Prospects for the Application of Eugenol—A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Sarropoulou, V.; Paloukopoulou, C.; Karioti, A.; Maloupa, E.; Grigoriadou, K. Rosmarinic Acid Production from Origanum dictamnus L. Root Liquid Cultures In Vitro. Plants 2023, 12, 299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Becerril-Sánchez, A.L.; Quintero-Salazar, B.; Dublán-García, O.; Escalona-Buendía, H.B. Phenolic Compounds in Honey and Their Relationship with Antioxidant Activity, Botanical Origin, and Color. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Jaśkiewicz, K.; Szczęsna, T.; Jachuła, J. How Phenolic Compounds Profile and Antioxidant Activity Depend on Botanical Origin of Honey—A Case of Polish Varietal Honeys. Molecules 2025, 30, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Samanta, S.; Sarkar, T.; Chakraborty, R.; Rebezov, M.; Shariati, M.A.; Thiruvengadam, M.; Rengasamy, K.R.R. Dark chocolate: An overview of its biological activity, processing, and fortification approaches. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2022, 5, 1916–1943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Tungmunnithum, D.; Thongboonyou, A.; Pholboon, A.; Yangsabai, A. Flavonoids and Other Phenolic Compounds from Medicinal Plants for Pharmaceutical and Medical Aspects: An Overview. Medicines 2018, 5, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Sun, W.; Shahrajabian, M.H. Therapeutic Potential of Phenolic Compounds in Medicinal Plants-Natural Health Products for Human Health. Molecules 2023, 28, 1845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Kumar, N.; Goel, N. Phenolic acids: Natural versatile molecules with promising therapeutic applications. Biotechnol. Rep. 2019, 24, e00370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Sehrawat, R.; Rathee, P.; Akkol, E.K.; Khatkar, S.; Lather, A.; Redhu, N.; Khatkar, A. Phenolic Acids–Versatile Natural Moiety with Numerous Biological Applications. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2022, 22, 1472–1484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Qader, M.; Xu, J.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Cao, S. Natural Nrf2 Activators from Juices, Wines, Coffee, and Cocoa. Beverages 2020, 6, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Rahman, M.M.; Rahaman, M.S.; Islam, M.R.; Rahman, F.; Mithi, F.M.; Alqahtani, T.; Almikhlafi, M.A.; Alghamdi, S.Q.; Alruwaili, A.S.; Hossain, M.S.; et al. Role of Phenolic Compounds in Human Disease: Current Knowledge and Future Prospects. Molecules 2021, 27, 233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Saleh, H.A.; Yousef, M.H.; Abdelnaser, A. The Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Phytochemicals and Their Effects on Epigenetic Mechanisms Involved in TLR4/NF-κB-Mediated Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 606069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Al-Khayri, J.M.; Rashmi, R.; Toppo, V.; Chole, P.B.; Banadka, A.; Sudheer, W.N.; Nagella, P.; Shehata, W.F.; Al-Mssallem, M.Q.; Alessa, F.M.; et al. Plant Secondary Metabolites: The Weapons for Biotic Stress Management. Metabolites 2023, 13, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Hanhineva, K.; Törrönen, R.; Bondia-Pons, I.; Pekkinen, J.; Kolehmainen, M.; Mykkänen, H.; Poutanen, K. Impact of dietary polyphenols on carbohydrate metabolism. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 1365–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Wang, S.; Li, Y.; Huang, D.; Chen, S.; Xia, Y.; Zhu, S. The inhibitory mechanism of chlorogenic acid and its acylated derivatives on α-amylase and α-glucosidase. Food Chem. 2022, 372, 131334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Moon, D.O. Plant-Derived Flavonoids as AMPK Activators: Unveiling Their Potential in Type 2 Diabetes Management through Mechanistic Insights, Docking Studies, and Pharmacokinetics. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 8607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Gupta, S.C.; Kim, J.H.; Prasad, S.; Aggarwal, B.B. Regulation of survival, proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis of tumor cells through modulation of inflammatory pathways by nutraceuticals. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2010, 29, 405–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Lu, K.; Bhat, M.; Basu, S. Plants and their active compounds: Natural molecules to target angiogenesis. Angiogenesis 2016, 19, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Chimento, A.; De Luca, A.; D’Amico, M.; De Amicis, F.; Pezzi, V. The Involvement of Natural Polyphenols in Molecular Mechanisms Inducing Apoptosis in Tumor Cells: A Promising Adjuvant in Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Esmeeta, A.; Adhikary, S.; Dharshnaa, V.; Swarnamughi, P.; Ummul Maqsummiya, Z.; Banerjee, A.; Pathak, S.; Duttaroy, A.K. Plant-derived bioactive compounds in colon cancer treatment: An updated review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 153, 113384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Sair, A.T.; Liu, R.H. Molecular regulation of phenolic compounds on IGF-1 signaling cascade in breast cancer. Food Funct. 2022, 13, 3170–3184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Li, S.; Yin, S.; Ding, H.; Shao, Y.; Zhou, S.; Pu, W.; Han, L.; Wang, T.; Yu, H. Polyphenols as potential metabolism mechanisms regulators in liver protection and liver cancer prevention. Cell Prolif. 2023, 56, e13346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Muller, A.G.; Sarker, S.D.; Saleem, I.Y.; Hutcheon, G.A. Delivery of natural phenolic compounds for the potential treatment of lung cancer. Daru 2019, 27, 433–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Khan, H.; Ullah, H.; Aschner, M.; Cheang, W.S.; Akkol, E.K. Neuroprotective Effects of Quercetin in Alzheimer’s Disease. Biomolecules 2019, 10, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Ríos, J.L.; Schinella, G.R.; Moragrega, I. Phenolics as GABAA Receptor Ligands: An Updated Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 1770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Rojas-García, A.; Fernández-Ochoa, Á.; Cádiz-Gurrea, M.L.; Arráez-Román, D.; Segura-Carretero, A. Neuroprotective Effects of Agri-Food By-Products Rich in Phenolic Compounds. Nutrients 2023, 15, 449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Gutiérrez-Escobar, R.; Aliaño-González, M.J.; Cantos-Villar, E. Wine Polyphenol Content and Its Influence on Wine Quality and Properties: A Review. Molecules 2021, 26, 718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Kumar, Y.; Suhag, R. Impact of Fining Agents on Color, Phenolics, Aroma, and Sensory Properties of Wine: A Review. Beverages 2024, 10, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Zhu, J.; Xu, Q.; Zhao, S.; Xia, X.; Yan, X.; An, Y.; Mi, X.; Guo, L.; Samarina, L.; Wei, C. Comprehensive co-expression analysis provides novel insights into temporal variation of flavonoids in fresh leaves of the tea plant (Camellia sinensis). Plant Sci. 2020, 290, 110306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Liu, C.T.; Tzen, J.T.C. Exploring the Relative Astringency of Tea Catechins and Distinct Astringent Sensation of Catechins and Flavonol Glycosides via an In Vitro Assay Composed of Artificial Oil Bodies. Molecules 2022, 27, 5679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Taofiq, O.; González-Paramás, A.M.; Barreiro, M.F.; Ferreira, I.C. Hydroxycinnamic Acids and Their Derivatives: Cosmeceutical Significance, Challenges and Future Perspectives, A Review. Molecules 2017, 22, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Zhao, X.; Ai, Y.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, L.; Yang, D.; Chen, F.; Wu, X.; Li, Y.; Liao, X. Masking the Perceived Astringency of Proanthocyanidins in Beverages Using Oxidized Starch Hydrogel Microencapsulation. Foods 2020, 9, 756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Chen, Y.; Yu, W.; Niu, Y.; Li, W.; Lu, W.; Yu, L.L. Chemometric Classification and Bioactivity Correlation of Black Instant Coffee and Coffee Bean Extract by Chlorogenic Acid Profiling. Foods 2024, 13, 4016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Hadidi, M.; Liñán-Atero, R.; Tarahi, M.; Christodoulou, M.C.; Aghababaei, F. The Potential Health Benefits of Gallic Acid: Therapeutic and Food Applications. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Eseberri, I.; Trepiana, J.; Léniz, A.; Gómez-García, I.; Carr-Ugarte, H.; González, M.; Portillo, M.P. Variability in the Beneficial Effects of Phenolic Compounds: A Review. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Mutha, R.E.; Tatiya, A.U.; Surana, S.J. Flavonoids as natural phenolic compounds and their role in therapeutics: An overview. Futur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 7, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Dias, M.C.; Pinto, D.C.G.A.; Silva, A.M.S. Plant Flavonoids: Chemical Characteristics and Biological Activity. Molecules 2021, 26, 5377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Chen, S.; Wang, X.; Cheng, Y.; Gao, H.; Chen, X. A Review of Classification, Biosynthesis, Biological Activities and Potential Applications of Flavonoids. Molecules 2023, 28, 4982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Ullah, A.; Munir, S.; Badshah, S.L.; Khan, N.; Ghani, L.; Poulson, B.G.; Emwas, A.H.; Jaremko, M. Important Flavonoids and Their Role as a Therapeutic Agent. Molecules 2020, 25, 5243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Kumar, S.; Pandey, A.K. Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: An overview. Sci. World J. 2013, 2013, 162750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Li, G.; Ding, K.; Qiao, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zheng, L.; Pan, T.; Zhang, L. Flavonoids Regulate Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Cancer. Molecules 2020, 25, 5628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Al-Khayri, J.M.; Sahana, G.R.; Nagella, P.; Joseph, B.V.; Alessa, F.M.; Al-Mssallem, M.Q. Flavonoids as Potential Anti-Inflammatory Molecules: A Review. Molecules 2022, 27, 2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Zahra, M.; Abrahamse, H.; George, B.P. Flavonoids: Antioxidant Powerhouses and Their Role in Nanomedicine. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Chen, X.Q.; Hu, T.; Han, Y.; Huang, W.; Yuan, H.B.; Zhang, Y.T.; Du, Y.; Jiang, Y.W. Preventive Effects of Catechins on Cardiovascular Disease. Molecules 2016, 21, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Amanzadeh, E.; Esmaeili, A.; Rahgozar, S.; Nourbakhshnia, M. Application of quercetin in neurological disorders: From nutrition to nanomedicine. Rev. Neurosci. 2019, 30, 555–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Lotfi, N.; Yousefi, Z.; Golabi, M.; Khalilian, P.; Ghezelbash, B.; Montazeri, M.; Shams, M.H.; Baghbadorani, P.Z.; Eskandari, N. The potential anti-cancer effects of quercetin on blood, prostate and lung cancers: An update. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1077531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Kubatka, P.; Mazurakova, A.; Samec, M.; Koklesova, L.; Zhai, K.; Al-Ishaq, R.; Kajo, K.; Biringer, K.; Vybohova, D.; Brockmueller, A.; et al. Flavonoids against non-physiologic inflammation attributed to cancer initiation, development, and progression-3PM pathways. EPMA J. 2021, 12, 559–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Aghababaei, F.; Hadidi, M. Recent Advances in Potential Health Benefits of Quercetin. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Suraweera, T.L.; Rupasinghe, H.P.V.; Dellaire, G.; Xu, Z. Regulation of Nrf2/ARE Pathway by Dietary Flavonoids: A Friend or Foe for Cancer Management? Antioxidants 2020, 9, 973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Mansuri, M.L.; Parihar, P.; Solanki, I.; Parihar, M.S. Flavonoids in modulation of cell survival signalling pathways. Genes Nutr. 2014, 9, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Zhong, R.; Miao, L.; Zhang, H.; Tan, L.; Zhao, Y.; Tu, Y.; Angel Prieto, M.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Chen, L.; He, C.; et al. Anti-inflammatory activity of flavonols via inhibiting MAPK and NF-κB signaling pathways in RAW264.7 macrophages. Curr. Res. Food Sci. 2022, 5, 1176–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Wahnou, H.; Limami, Y.; Oudghiri, M. Flavonoids and Flavonoid-Based Nanoparticles for Osteoarthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis Management. BioChem 2024, 4, 38–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Tanaka, T.; Takahashi, R. Flavonoids and asthma. Nutrients 2013, 5, 2128–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Rakha, A.; Umar, N.; Rabail, R.; Butt, M.S.; Kieliszek, M.; Hassoun, A.; Aadil, R.M. Anti-inflammatory and anti-allergic potential of dietary flavonoids: A review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 156, 113945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Vezza, T.; Rodríguez-Nogales, A.; Algieri, F.; Utrilla, M.P.; Rodriguez-Cabezas, M.E.; Galvez, J. Flavonoids in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review. Nutrients 2016, 8, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Abotaleb, M.; Samuel, S.M.; Varghese, E.; Varghese, S.; Kubatka, P.; Liskova, A.; Büsselberg, D. Flavonoids in Cancer and Apoptosis. Cancers 2018, 11, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Siddiqui, S.S.; Rahman, S.; Rupasinghe, H.P.V.; Vazhappilly, C.G. Dietary Flavonoids in p53-Mediated Immune Dysfunctions Linking to Cancer Prevention. Biomedicines 2020, 8, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Mir, S.A.; Dar, A.; Hamid, L.; Nisar, N.; Malik, J.A.; Ali, T.; Bader, G.N. Flavonoids as promising molecules in the cancer therapy: An insight. Curr. Res. Pharmacol. Drug Discov. 2023, 6, 100167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  238. de Luna, F.C.F.; Ferreira, W.A.S.; Casseb, S.M.M.; de Oliveira, E.H.C. Anticancer Potential of Flavonoids: An Overview with an Emphasis on Tangeretin. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Liao, Y.; Mai, X.; Wu, X.; Hu, X.; Luo, X.; Zhang, G. Exploring the Inhibition of Quercetin on Acetylcholinesterase by Multispectroscopic and In Silico Approaches and Evaluation of Its Neuroprotective Effects on PC12 Cells. Molecules 2022, 27, 7971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Alexander, C.; Parsaee, A.; Vasefi, M. Polyherbal and Multimodal Treatments: Kaempferol- and Quercetin-Rich Herbs Alleviate Symptoms of Alzheimer’s Disease. Biology 2023, 12, 1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Wasowski, C.; Marder, M. Flavonoids as GABAA receptor ligands: The whole story? J. Exp. Pharmacol. 2012, 4, 9–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Shen, M.L.; Wang, C.H.; Chen, R.Y.; Zhou, N.; Kao, S.T.; Wu, D.C. Luteolin inhibits GABAA receptors in HEK cells and brain slices. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Xiong, H.H.; Lin, S.Y.; Chen, L.L.; Ouyang, K.H.; Wang, W.J. The Interaction between Flavonoids and Intestinal Microbes: A Review. Foods 2023, 12, 320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Wang, H.; Zhao, T.; Liu, Z.; Danzengquzhen; Cisangzhuoma; Ma, J.; Li, X.; Huang, X.; Li, B. The neuromodulatory effects of flavonoids and gut Microbiota through the gut-brain axis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2023, 13, 1197646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Pimentel, F.A.; Nitzke, J.A.; Klipel, C.B.; Vogt de Jong, E. Chocolate and red wine—A comparison between flavonoids content. Food Chem. 2010, 120, 109–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Shilpa, V.S.; Shams, R.; Dash, K.K.; Pandey, V.K.; Dar, A.H.; Ayaz Mukarram, S.; Harsányi, E.; Kovács, B. Phytochemical Properties, Extraction, and Pharmacological Benefits of Naringin: A Review. Molecules 2023, 28, 5623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Ndao, A.; Adjallé, K. Overview of the Biotransformation of Limonene and α-Pinene from Wood and Citrus Residues by Microorganisms. Waste 2023, 1, 841–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Sinha, A.K.; Sharma, U.K.; Sharma, N. A comprehensive review on vanilla flavor: Extraction, isolation and quantification of vanillin and others constituents. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2008, 59, 299–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Pyo, Y.; Kwon, K.H.; Jung, Y.J. Anticancer Potential of Flavonoids: Their Role in Cancer Prevention and Health Benefits. Foods 2024, 13, 2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. Yahfoufi, N.; Alsadi, N.; Jambi, M.; Matar, C. The Immunomodulatory and Anti-Inflammatory Role of Polyphenols. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Kopustinskiene, D.M.; Jakstas, V.; Savickas, A.; Bernatoniene, J. Flavonoids as Anticancer Agents. Nutrients 2020, 12, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Alam, W.; Khan, H.; Shah, M.A.; Cauli, O.; Saso, L. Kaempferol as a Dietary Anti-Inflammatory Agent: Current Therapeutic Standing. Molecules 2020, 25, 4073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Zhang, Q.; Yan, Y. The role of natural flavonoids on neuroinflammation as a therapeutic target for Alzheimer’s disease: A narrative review. Neural Regen. Res. 2023, 18, 2582–2591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Wu, H.Y.; Yang, K.M.; Chiang, P.Y. Roselle Anthocyanins: Antioxidant Properties and Stability to Heat and pH. Molecules 2018, 23, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Srivastava, J.K.; Gupta, S. Extraction, Characterization, Stability and Biological Activity of Flavonoids Isolated from Chamomile Flowers. Mol. Cell. Pharmacol. 2009, 1, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Radeva, L.; Yoncheva, K. Resveratrol—A Promising Therapeutic Agent with Problematic Properties. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Nešović, M.; Gašić, U.; Tosti, T.; Horvacki, N.; Šikoparija, B.; Nedić, N.; Blagojević, S.; Ignjatović, L.; Tešić, Ž. Polyphenol profile of buckwheat honey, nectar and pollen. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2020, 7, 201576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Chagas, M.D.S.S.; Behrens, M.D.; Moragas-Tellis, C.J.; Penedo, G.X.M.; Silva, A.R.; Gonçalves-de-Albuquerque, C.F. Flavonols and Flavones as Potential anti-Inflammatory, Antioxidant, and Antibacterial Compounds. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022, 2022, 9966750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Vieira, S.F.; Reis, R.L.; Ferreira, H.; Neves, N.M. Plant-derived bioactive compounds as key players in the modulation of immune-related conditions. Phytochem. Rev. 2024, 24, 343–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Santhiravel, S.; Bekhit, A.E.A.; Mendis, E.; Jacobs, J.L.; Dunshea, F.R.; Rajapakse, N.; Ponnampalam, E.N. The Impact of Plant Phytochemicals on the Gut Microbiota of Humans for a Balanced Life. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 8124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. Shi, R.; Huang, C.; Gao, Y.; Li, M.; Zhang, C.; Li, M. Gut microbiota axis: Potential target of phytochemicals from plant-based foods. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2023, 12, 1409–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Lawrence, T. The nuclear factor NF-kappaB pathway in inflammation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect. Biol. 2009, 1, a001651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Ysrafil, Y.; Sapiun, Z.; Slamet, N.S.; Mohamad, F.; Hartati, H.; Damiti, S.A.; Alexandra, F.D.; Rahman, S.; Masyeni, S.; Harapan, H.; et al. Anti-inflammatory activities of flavonoid derivates. ADMET DMPK 2023, 11, 331–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. He, W.J.; Lv, C.H.; Chen, Z.; Shi, M.; Zeng, C.X.; Hou, D.X.; Qin, S. The Regulatory Effect of Phytochemicals on Chronic Diseases by Targeting Nrf2-ARE Signaling Pathway. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Sharifi-Rad, J.; Seidel, V.; Izabela, M.; Monserrat-Mequida, M.; Sureda, A.; Ormazabal, V.; Zuniga, F.A.; Mangalpady, S.S.; Pezzani, R.; Ydyrys, A.; et al. Phenolic compounds as Nrf2 inhibitors: Potential applications in cancer therapy. Cell Commun. Signal. 2023, 21, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Qin, S.; Hou, D.-X. The Biofunctions of Phytochemicals and Their Applications in Farm Animals: The Nrf2/Keap1 System as a Target. Engineering 2017, 3, 738–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Zhang, D.D.; Hannink, M. Distinct cysteine residues in Keap1 are required for Keap1-dependent ubiquitination of Nrf2 and for stabilization of Nrf2 by chemopreventive agents and oxidative stress. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23, 8137–8151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  268. Dinkova-Kostova, A.T.; Fahey, J.W.; Kostov, R.V.; Kensler, T.W. KEAP1 and Done? Targeting the NRF2 Pathway with Sulforaphane. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 69 Pt B, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  269. Chi, F.; Cheng, C.; Zhang, M.; Su, B.; Hou, Y.; Bai, G. Resveratrol targeting NRF2 disrupts the binding between KEAP1 and NRF2-DLG motif to ameliorate oxidative stress damage in mice pulmonary infection. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2024, 332, 118353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  270. Yousefi Zardak, M.; Keshavarz, F.; Mahyaei, A.; Gholami, M.; Moosavi, F.S.; Abbasloo, E.; Abdollahi, F.; Hossein Rezaei, M.; Madadizadeh, E.; Soltani, N.; et al. Quercetin as a therapeutic agent activate the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway to alleviate lung ischemia-reperfusion injury. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 23074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Ngo, V.; Duennwald, M.L. Nrf2 and Oxidative Stress: A General Overview of Mechanisms and Implications in Human Disease. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Hine, C.M.; Mitchell, J.R. NRF2 and the Phase II Response in Acute Stress Resistance Induced by Dietary Restriction. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2012, S4, 7329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Reuland, D.J.; Khademi, S.; Castle, C.J.; Irwin, D.C.; McCord, J.M.; Miller, B.F.; Hamilton, K.L. Upregulation of phase II enzymes through phytochemical activation of Nrf2 protects cardiomyocytes against oxidant stress. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2013, 56, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Zhang, M.; An, C.; Gao, Y.; Leak, R.K.; Chen, J.; Zhang, F. Emerging roles of Nrf2 and phase II antioxidant enzymes in neuroprotection. Prog. Neurobiol. 2013, 100, 30–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Sheweita, S.A.; Tilmisany, A.K. Cancer and phase II drug-metabolizing enzymes. Curr. Drug Metab. 2003, 4, 45–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Behl, T.; Rana, T.; Alotaibi, G.H.; Shamsuzzaman, M.; Naqvi, M.; Sehgal, A.; Singh, S.; Sharma, N.; Almoshari, Y.; Abdellatif, A.A.H.; et al. Polyphenols inhibiting MAPK signalling pathway mediated oxidative stress and inflammation in depression. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 146, 112545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Olvera-Aguirre, G.; Piñeiro-Vázquez, Á.T.; Sanginés-García, J.R.; Sánchez Zárate, A.; Ochoa-Flores, A.A.; Segura-Campos, M.R.; Vargas-Bello-Pérez, E.; Chay-Canul, A.J. Using plant-based compounds as preservatives for meat products: A review. Heliyon 2023, 9, e17071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  278. Gupta, A.; Sanwal, N.; Bareen, M.A.; Barua, S.; Sharma, N.; Joshua Olatunji, O.; Prakash Nirmal, N.; Sahu, J.K. Trends in functional beverages: Functional ingredients, processing technologies, stability, health benefits, and consumer perspective. Food Res. Int. 2023, 170, 113046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Sorrenti, V.; Burò, I.; Consoli, V.; Vanella, L. Recent Advances in Health Benefits of Bioactive Compounds from Food Wastes and By-Products: Biochemical Aspects. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  280. Sun, S.; Liu, Z.; Lin, M.; Gao, N.; Wang, X. Polyphenols in health and food processing: Antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant insights. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1456730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Lee, J.H.; Kim, M.J.; Kim, C.Y. The Development of New Functional Foods and Ingredients. Foods 2024, 13, 3038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Toydemir, G.; Gultekin Subasi, B.; Hall, R.D.; Beekwilder, J.; Boyacioglu, D.; Capanoglu, E. Effect of food processing on antioxidants, their bioavailability and potential relevance to human health. Food Chem. X 2022, 14, 100334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Conte, A.; Martini, S.; Tagliazucchi, D. Influence of Processing and Digestion on the Stability, Bioac-Cessibility and Bioactivity of Food Polyphenols. Foods 2023, 12, 851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. DeBenedictis, J.N.; de Kok, T.M.; van Breda, S.G. Impact of Processing Method and Storage Time on Phytochemical Concentrations in an Antioxidant-Rich Food Mixture. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. ElGamal, R.; Song, C.; Rayan, A.M.; Liu, C.; Al-Rejaie, S.; ElMasry, G. Thermal Degradation of Bioactive Compounds during Drying Process of Horticultural and Agronomic Products: A Comprehensive Overview. Agronomy 2023, 13, 1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Juániz, I.; Ludwig, I.A.; Huarte, E.; Pereira-Caro, G.; Moreno-Rojas, J.M.; Cid, C.; De Peña, M.P. Influence of heat treatment on antioxidant capacity and (poly)phenolic compounds of selected vegetables. Food Chem. 2016, 197 Pt A, 466–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  287. Khlifi, R.; Dhaouefi, Z.; Maatouk, M.; Sassi, A.; Boudhiba, N.; Ioannou, I.; Ghedira, K.; Chekir-Ghedira, L.; Kilani-Jaziri, S. Heat treatment improves the immunomodulatory and cellular antioxidant behavior of a natural flavanone: Eriodictyol. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2018, 61, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Pruteanu, L.L.; Bailey, D.S.; Grădinaru, A.C.; Jäntschi, L. The Biochemistry and Effectiveness of Antioxidants in Food, Fruits, and Marine Algae. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Wang, S.; Su, R.; Nie, S.; Sun, M.; Zhang, J.; Wu, D.; Moustaid-Moussa, N. Application of nanotechnology in improving bioavailability and bioactivity of diet-derived phytochemicals. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2014, 25, 363–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  290. Grgić, J.; Šelo, G.; Planinić, M.; Tišma, M.; Bucić-Kojić, A. Role of the Encapsulation in Bioavailability of Phenolic Compounds. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  291. Ozkan, G.; Kostka, T.; Esatbeyoglu, T.; Capanoglu, E. Effects of Lipid-Based Encapsulation on the Bioaccessibility and Bioavailability of Phenolic Compounds. Molecules 2020, 25, 5545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Yang, B.; Dong, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhang, Y. Nanoformulations to Enhance the Bioavailability and Physiological Functions of Polyphenols. Molecules 2020, 25, 4613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  293. Sarıtaş, S.; Portocarrero, A.C.M.; Miranda López, J.M.; Lombardo, M.; Koch, W.; Raposo, A.; El-Seedi, H.R.; de Brito Alves, J.L.; Esatbeyoglu, T.; Karav, S.; et al. The Impact of Fermentation on the Antioxidant Activity of Food Products. Molecules 2024, 29, 3941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  294. Yang, F.; Chen, C.; Ni, D.; Yang, Y.; Tian, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, S.; Ye, X.; Wang, L. Effects of Fermentation on Bioactivity and the Composition of Polyphenols Contained in Polyphenol-Rich Foods: A Review. Foods 2023, 12, 3315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  295. Sawant, S.S.; Park, H.-Y.; Sim, E.-Y.; Kim, H.-S.; Choi, H.-S. Microbial Fermentation in Food: Impact on Functional Properties and Nutritional Enhancement—A Review of Recent Developments. Fermentation 2025, 11, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Luo, X.; Dong, M.; Liu, J.; Guo, N.; Li, J.; Shi, Y.; Yang, Y. Fermentation: Improvement of pharmacological effects and applications of botanical drugs. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1430238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. den Besten, G.; van Eunen, K.; Groen, A.K.; Venema, K.; Reijngoud, D.J.; Bakker, B.M. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J. Lipid Res. 2013, 54, 2325–2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Leeuwendaal, N.K.; Stanton, C.; O’Toole, P.W.; Beresford, T.P. Fermented Foods, Health and the Gut Microbiome. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Samtiya, M.; Aluko, R.E.; Dhewa, T. Plant food anti-nutritional factors and their reduction strategies: An overview. Food Prod. Proc. Nutr. 2020, 2, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Brglez Mojzer, E.; Knez Hrnčič, M.; Škerget, M.; Knez, Ž.; Bren, U. Polyphenols: Extraction Methods, Antioxidative Action, Bioavailability and Anticarcinogenic Effects. Molecules 2016, 21, 901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Stavenga, D.G.; Leertouwer, H.L.; Dudek, B.; van der Kooi, C.J. Coloration of Flowers by Flavonoids and Consequences of pH Dependent Absorption. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 600124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Neural pathway of taste perception. Abbreviations: CALHM 1/3—Calcium homeostasis modulator 1/3; CN—Cranial Nerves; ENaC—Epithelial sodium channel; GPCRs—family of G-protein–coupled receptors (mGluR4—metabotropic glutamate receptor; T1R1—taste receptor type 1 member 1; T1R2—taste receptor type 1 member 2; T1R3—taste receptor type 1 member 3; T2R—taste receptor type 2); OTOP1—Otopetrin 1; TRPM 4/5—Ca2+-activated monovalent cation channels. Image provided by Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, accessed on 1 May 2025).
Figure 1. Neural pathway of taste perception. Abbreviations: CALHM 1/3—Calcium homeostasis modulator 1/3; CN—Cranial Nerves; ENaC—Epithelial sodium channel; GPCRs—family of G-protein–coupled receptors (mGluR4—metabotropic glutamate receptor; T1R1—taste receptor type 1 member 1; T1R2—taste receptor type 1 member 2; T1R3—taste receptor type 1 member 3; T2R—taste receptor type 2); OTOP1—Otopetrin 1; TRPM 4/5—Ca2+-activated monovalent cation channels. Image provided by Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, accessed on 1 May 2025).
Nutrients 17 03319 g001
Figure 2. Mechanism of physiological perception of taste of substances of plant origin. Image provided by Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, accessed on 1 May 2025).
Figure 2. Mechanism of physiological perception of taste of substances of plant origin. Image provided by Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, accessed on 1 May 2025).
Nutrients 17 03319 g002
Figure 3. Signaling cascade triggered by odorants. Abbreviations: AC III—Adenylyl cyclase III; ATP—Adenozyno-5′-trifosforan; cAMP—Cyclic adenosine monophosphate; CNG—Cyclic nucleotide-gated; Golf—specific G protein; OR—Olfactory receptor. Image provided by Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, accessed on 1 May 2025).
Figure 3. Signaling cascade triggered by odorants. Abbreviations: AC III—Adenylyl cyclase III; ATP—Adenozyno-5′-trifosforan; cAMP—Cyclic adenosine monophosphate; CNG—Cyclic nucleotide-gated; Golf—specific G protein; OR—Olfactory receptor. Image provided by Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, accessed on 1 May 2025).
Nutrients 17 03319 g003
Figure 4. Molecular mechanisms of terpene action. Abbreviations: CAT—Catalase; GPx—Glutathione peroxidase; JNK—Janus kinase; p38 MAPK—p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase; NF-кB—Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; Nfr2—Nuclear factor erythroid 2-like 2; SOD—Superoxide dismutase. The red arrows indicate a decrease (↓) or increase (↑) in the respective parameter. Image provided by Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, accessed on 1 May 2025).
Figure 4. Molecular mechanisms of terpene action. Abbreviations: CAT—Catalase; GPx—Glutathione peroxidase; JNK—Janus kinase; p38 MAPK—p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase; NF-кB—Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; Nfr2—Nuclear factor erythroid 2-like 2; SOD—Superoxide dismutase. The red arrows indicate a decrease (↓) or increase (↑) in the respective parameter. Image provided by Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, accessed on 1 May 2025).
Nutrients 17 03319 g004
Figure 5. Molecular mechanisms of polyphenols’ action. Abbreviations: CAT—Catalase; GPx—Glutathione peroxidase; MAPK—Mitogen-activated protein kinase; NF-кB—Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; Nfr2—Nuclear factor erythroid 2-like 2; PI3K/Akt—Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Protein kinase B; ROS—Reactive oxygen species; SOD—Superoxide dismutase. The red arrows indicate a decrease (↓) or increase (↑) in the respective parameter. Image provided by Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, accessed on 1 May 2025).
Figure 5. Molecular mechanisms of polyphenols’ action. Abbreviations: CAT—Catalase; GPx—Glutathione peroxidase; MAPK—Mitogen-activated protein kinase; NF-кB—Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; Nfr2—Nuclear factor erythroid 2-like 2; PI3K/Akt—Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Protein kinase B; ROS—Reactive oxygen species; SOD—Superoxide dismutase. The red arrows indicate a decrease (↓) or increase (↑) in the respective parameter. Image provided by Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, accessed on 1 May 2025).
Nutrients 17 03319 g005
Figure 6. Molecular mechanisms of flavonoid action. Abbreviations: CAT—Catalase; GPx—Glutathione peroxidase; JNK—Janus kinase; p38 MAPK—p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase; NF-кB—Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; Nfr2—Nuclear factor erythroid 2-like 2; ROS—Reactive oxygen species; SOD—Superoxide dismutase; VEGF—Vascular endothelial growth factor. The red arrows indicate a decrease (↓) or increase (↑) in the respective parameter. Image provided by Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, accessed on 1 May 2025).
Figure 6. Molecular mechanisms of flavonoid action. Abbreviations: CAT—Catalase; GPx—Glutathione peroxidase; JNK—Janus kinase; p38 MAPK—p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase; NF-кB—Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells; Nfr2—Nuclear factor erythroid 2-like 2; ROS—Reactive oxygen species; SOD—Superoxide dismutase; VEGF—Vascular endothelial growth factor. The red arrows indicate a decrease (↓) or increase (↑) in the respective parameter. Image provided by Servier Medical Art (https://smart.servier.com/), licensed under CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, accessed on 1 May 2025).
Nutrients 17 03319 g006
Table 1. Summary of main bioactive compounds in plant-based foods, their sensory characteristics, bioactive effects and plant sources.
Table 1. Summary of main bioactive compounds in plant-based foods, their sensory characteristics, bioactive effects and plant sources.
CompoundPlant SourceSensory CharacteristicsBioactive EffectReferences
QuercetinApples, onions, tea, berriesBitter, astringentAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anticancer, neuroprotective, anti-diabetic[135,220,227,251]
KaempferolKale, spinach, teaSlightly bitterAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective, anticancer[220,252,253]
Catechins (e.g., epicatechin)Green tea, dark chocolateAstringent, slightly bitterAntioxidant, cardioprotective, neuroprotective, anticancer[218,223]
AnthocyaninsBerries, hibiscusTart, fruityAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory, neuroprotective[135,254]
ApigeninChamomileSweet, floralNeuroprotective, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant[228,255]
ResveratrolRed wine, grapesSlightly bitter, fruityAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory, cardioprotective, anticancer[245,256]
PinocembrinBuckwheat honeySlightly bitter, robustAntioxidant, neuroprotective[257]
LimoneneCitrus fruitsCitrus, freshAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial[20,154]
PinenePine needles, rosemaryPine, fresh, resinousAnti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant[20,160]
MyrceneHops, mango, lemongrassEarthy, herbaceous, tropicalAnti-inflammatory, analgesic[20,156]
LinaloolLavender, mintFloral, sweetSedative, anti-anxiety, antioxidant[20,161]
TerpineneThyme, oreganoCitrus, herbaceousAntioxidant, antimicrobial[20,162]
CaryophylleneBlack pepper, clovesSpicy, pepperyAnti-inflammatory, analgesic, antimicrobial[20,163]
GeraniolGeranium, roseSweet, floralAntioxidant, anti-inflammatory[20,164]
CitronellolRose, geraniumSweet, floralAntioxidant, antimicrobial[20,164]
EugenolClovesSpicy, clove-likeAntimicrobial, antioxidant, analgesic[159,180]
VanillinVanilla podsSweet, creamyAntioxidant, antimicrobial[20,248]
Chlorogenic acidCoffee, applesSlightly bitter, earthyAntioxidant, anti-diabetic[179,193]
Ellagic acidBerriesTart, earthyAntioxidant, anticancer[176,177]
Gallic acidDark honey, dark chocolateAstringent, slightly bitterAntioxidant, anticancer[182,213]
Table 2. The effects of processing techniques on the stability, bioavailability and sensory properties of major plant-derived bioactive compounds.
Table 2. The effects of processing techniques on the stability, bioavailability and sensory properties of major plant-derived bioactive compounds.
Major CompoundsPlant SourcesProcessing TechniqueEffect on StabilityEffect on BioavailabilityEffect on Sensory ProfileKey References
Quercetin, kaempferol, catechins, anthocyaninsApples, onions, tea, red wine, dark chocolateThermal (blanching, pasteurization, cooking)Partial degradation; anthocyanins sensitive; catechins moderately stableSlight increase due to breakdown into smaller metabolites, but bioactivity may changeColor fading; slight bitterness remains[283,286,287]
Quercetin, kaempferolBerries, citrusFermentationGenerally stable; some microbial transformationEnhanced due to conversion of glycosides to aglyconesImproved flavor complexity[293,296]
Quercetin, catechinsDark chocolate, teaEncapsulation/NanoformulationStabilized against heat, light, and oxidationSignificantly improved solubility and absorptionMinimal impact on taste; reduced astringency[289,290,292]
Quercetin, kaempferolBerries, CitruspH adjustmentAcidic or alkaline conditions can alter stabilityChanges in solubility and ionization may enhance or reduce bioavailabilityAltered color, flavor, aroma[300,301]
Limonene, pinene, myrcene, linaloolCitrus, herbs, mango, hopsThermalHighly volatile; significant lossesReduced due to degradationLoss of aroma and aromatic intensity[20,285]
Linalool, geraniolLavender, mint, roseFermentationSlight biotransformation; relatively stableSlightly improved due to release from matrixEnhanced floral notes; new aroma compounds[164,294]
Limonene, pineneCitrus, pineEncapsulation/NanoformulationHigh stability; protected from heat and oxidationImproved controlled release and absorptionPreserved aroma; prolonged sensory perception[290,291]
Chlorogenic acid, ellagic acid, tannins, resveratrolCoffee, berries, tea, red wineThermalPartial degradation; tannins moderately stableExtractability may increase but degradation reduces bioactivityBitterness and astringency may increase[187,288]
Catechins, flavonoidsTea, coffee, cocoaFermentationMicrobial transformation can produce more bioactive metabolitesIncreased bioavailabilityEnhanced flavor complexity; production of SCFAs[193,298]
Flavonoids, tanninsBerries, chocolateEncapsulation/NanoformulationProtected from oxidationIncreased absorption; targeted releaseMinimal sensory change[125,184]
Flavonoids, phenolic acidsVarious fruits and vegetablesOxidative stress/Storage conditionsDegradation due to reactive oxygen speciesReduced if not stabilizedColor and flavor changes[30,288]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kurhaluk, N.; Buyun, L.; Kołodziejska, R.; Kamiński, P.; Tkaczenko, H. Effect of Phenolic Compounds and Terpenes on the Flavour and Functionality of Plant-Based Foods. Nutrients 2025, 17, 3319. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17213319

AMA Style

Kurhaluk N, Buyun L, Kołodziejska R, Kamiński P, Tkaczenko H. Effect of Phenolic Compounds and Terpenes on the Flavour and Functionality of Plant-Based Foods. Nutrients. 2025; 17(21):3319. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17213319

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kurhaluk, Natalia, Lyudmyla Buyun, Renata Kołodziejska, Piotr Kamiński, and Halina Tkaczenko. 2025. "Effect of Phenolic Compounds and Terpenes on the Flavour and Functionality of Plant-Based Foods" Nutrients 17, no. 21: 3319. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17213319

APA Style

Kurhaluk, N., Buyun, L., Kołodziejska, R., Kamiński, P., & Tkaczenko, H. (2025). Effect of Phenolic Compounds and Terpenes on the Flavour and Functionality of Plant-Based Foods. Nutrients, 17(21), 3319. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17213319

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop