Next Article in Journal
Dairy-Gut Microbiome Interactions: Implications for Immunity, Adverse Reactions to Food, Physical Performance and Cardiometabolic Health—A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Body Composition and Survival in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Age-Stratified Trends in Nutrition and Lifestyle Transitions in Korea: Findings from KNHANES 2013–2022
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Digital Microinterventions in Nutrition: Virtual Culinary Medicine Programs and Their Effectiveness in Promoting Plant-Based Diets—A Narrative Review

by
Virág Zábó
1,2,3,†,
Andrea Lehoczki
1,2,3,†,
János Tamás Varga
4,
Ágnes Szappanos
5,6,
Ágnes Lipécz
1,2,
Tamás Csípő
1,2,
Vince Fazekas-Pongor
1,2,3,
Dávid Major
1,2,3 and
Mónika Fekete
1,2,3,*
1
Institute of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Semmelweis University, 1089 Budapest, Hungary
2
Fodor Center for Prevention and Healthy Aging, Semmelweis University, 1089 Budapest, Hungary
3
Doctoral College, Health Sciences Division, Semmelweis University, 1089 Budapest, Hungary
4
Department of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, 1083 Budapest, Hungary
5
Heart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, 1122 Budapest, Hungary
6
Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Semmelweis University, 1085 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Shared first authorship.
Nutrients 2025, 17(20), 3310; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17203310
Submission received: 20 September 2025 / Revised: 15 October 2025 / Accepted: 19 October 2025 / Published: 21 October 2025

Abstract

Background: Plant-based diets are associated with reduced risk of chronic diseases and improved health outcomes. However, sustaining dietary changes remains challenging. Digital interventions—including virtual culinary medicine programs, web-based nutrition coaching, SMS and email reminders, mobile application–based self-management, and hybrid community programs—offer promising strategies to support behavior change, enhance cooking skills, and improve dietary adherence. These approaches are relevant for both healthy individuals and those living with chronic conditions. Methods: We conducted a narrative review of studies published between 2000 and 2025 in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science, supplemented with manual searches. Included studies comprised randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental designs, feasibility studies, and qualitative research. Interventions were categorized by modality (SMS, email, web platforms, mobile apps, virtual culinary programs, and hybrid formats) and population (healthy adults, patients with chronic diseases). Outcomes examined included dietary quality, self-efficacy, psychosocial well-being, and program engagement. Results: Most studies reported improvements in dietary quality, cooking skills, nutrition knowledge, and psychosocial outcomes. Virtual cooking programs enhanced dietary adherence and engagement, particularly among individuals at cardiovascular risk. Digital nutrition education supported behavior change in chronic disease populations, including patients with multiple sclerosis. SMS and email reminders improved self-monitoring and participation rates, while mobile applications facilitated real-time feedback and goal tracking. Hybrid programs combining online and in-person components increased motivation, social support, and long-term adherence. Reported barriers included limited technological access or skills, lack of personalization, and privacy concerns. Conclusions: Virtual culinary medicine programs and other digital microinterventions—including SMS, email, web, mobile, and hybrid formats—are effective tools to promote plant-based diets. Future interventions should focus on personalized, accessible, and hybrid strategies, with attention to underserved populations, to maximize engagement and sustain long-term dietary change.

1. Introduction

Chronic, non-communicable diseases—including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and certain cancers—are leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide [1,2,3]. According to estimates by the World Health Organization (WHO), these conditions account for approximately 74% of all deaths and impose a substantial economic and societal burden on healthcare systems and communities [4]. Dietary factors play a crucial role in the prevention and progression of these diseases [5,6,7,8,9,10]. The causes of diet-related diseases include poor nutritional choices, limited access to healthy foods, socio-economic factors, and lack of education or skills regarding meal preparation. The consequences extend beyond health outcomes, such as obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular complications, to social and economic impacts, including increased healthcare costs and reduced quality of life.
Plant-based diets—emphasizing the consumption of whole grains, vegetables, fruits, legumes, and nuts [11,12,13,14]—have been shown to reduce the incidence and severity of chronic diseases [8,15,16,17,18,19]. Numerous prospective cohort studies and randomized clinical trials demonstrate that plant-based nutrition lowers serum LDL cholesterol and blood pressure, improves glycemic control, and positively affects body weight and inflammatory markers [20,21,22,23].
Despite growing dietary guidelines and clinical recommendations emphasizing the benefits of plant-based diets, their adoption at the population level remains limited. Barriers include inadequate cooking skills, time constraints, limited access to appropriate foods, and reduced motivation. Moreover, not all individuals can benefit from digital solutions due to limited internet connectivity, low digital literacy, or socio-economic constraints. Supporting digitally excluded populations is therefore essential and can be achieved through offline resources, community-based programs, or hybrid interventions that combine in-person and digital components.
To address these challenges, digital microinterventions—short, targeted, and easily accessible strategies—have gained increasing attention for promoting lifestyle changes and sustaining behavior modification. Virtual “culinary medicine” programs, which integrate medical knowledge with culinary skill development, enable participants to acquire the knowledge and techniques required for plant-based cooking in an interactive, online format from their own kitchens [24]. Complementary digital strategies—including nutrition coaching via mobile applications, SMS and email reminders, web-based platforms, and hybrid community programs—support behavior change by facilitating personalized goal setting, self-monitoring, and social support across both healthy individuals and populations with chronic conditions [25,26]. Understanding the reach, benefits, and limitations of these interventions is crucial for designing effective dietary programs, informing educational initiatives, and promoting social change. By addressing barriers to access, including digital exclusion, and evaluating both short- and long-term outcomes, such interventions have the potential to enhance the effectiveness of dietary recommendations, improve public health education, and foster healthier eating patterns at the community and population level.
The aim of this narrative review is to synthesize the literature published between 2000 and 2025 on how virtual culinary medicine programs and other digital microinterventions contribute to the adoption and maintenance of plant-based diets, thereby potentially reducing the burden of chronic diseases. Special attention is given to evidence of effectiveness, implementation challenges, and directions for future development.

2. Methods

We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify studies published between 2000 and 2025 that evaluated the effectiveness of plant-based diets and digital nutrition microinterventions. Searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, supplemented by manual searches to identify additional relevant articles through reference screening. Keywords included “culinary medicine,” “virtual cooking program,” “digital health intervention,” “telehealth intervention,” “plant-based diet,” “dietary behavior,” and “behavior change,” combined using Boolean operators.
Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies conducted in adult populations, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental studies, feasibility studies, and qualitative research; (2) interventions aimed at promoting plant-based diets, with a particular focus on improving cooking skills, nutritional self-efficacy, and behavior change; (3) publications in English; and (4) full-text availability. Exclusion criteria included animal studies, pediatric populations, weight-loss–only programs, and studies without a digital or virtual component. The literature search yielded 1864 records (PubMed/MEDLINE: 452; Scopus: 792; Web of Science: 620). After removing duplicates and irrelevant studies, 213 records were screened in full text, of which 60 studies met the inclusion criteria.
Selected studies were analyzed using a narrative synthesis approach, highlighting intervention type, target population, and outcomes. Digital interventions encompassed a broad spectrum, including virtual cooking programs, online nutrition coaching, mobile applications, SMS and email reminders, web-based platforms, and hybrid community programs, implemented among both healthy adults and individuals with chronic conditions. Outcomes of interest included diet quality, cooking skills, nutritional self-efficacy, and psychosocial well-being.
The narrative analysis allowed for comparison across heterogeneous research domains and methodologies, enabling identification of key trends, evidence of effectiveness, and frequently reported implementation challenges. This methodology aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of the role of diverse digital microinterventions in promoting and sustaining plant-based diets, considering the variety of intervention formats and target populations.

3. The “Food Is Medicine” Movement: Nutrition Prescribed as Treatment

The Food Is Medicine (FIM) movement in healthcare is founded on the principle that nutrient-dense foods can be as important for disease prevention and management as pharmaceutical treatments [27]. The most commonly implemented forms include medically tailored meals, produce prescriptions, and medically tailored groceries [28].
The primary aim of FIM interventions is to reduce food insecurity and improve outcomes related to diet-associated chronic diseases (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular conditions) while demonstrably lowering healthcare costs [27]. Simulation models suggest that, when combined with public nutrition support programs, FIM approaches could achieve savings in the billions for populations with diabetes [28].
Comprehensive analyses indicate that FIM interventions, such as prescription-based fruit and vegetable programs, significantly improve food security, diet quality, glycemic control, blood pressure, body weight, self-management, and cost-effectiveness. However, the available evidence often derives from quasi-experimental designs, highlighting the need for larger randomized trials [29].
Within the FIM framework, microinterventions—short, targeted lifestyle interventions capable of eliciting measurable changes in dietary behaviors—are gaining increasing attention. Virtual “culinary medicine” programs, which combine cooking skills development with dietary education, have shown particular promise by enhancing participants’ cooking competence, self-efficacy, and motivation to adopt a plant-based diet in an interactive, home-accessible format [30,31] (Figure 1).
Randomized and pilot studies demonstrate that online culinary programs improve diet quality, increase fruit and vegetable intake, and reduce cardiometabolic risk factors. For example, a 9-week virtual plant-based culinary medicine intervention significantly increased participants’ diet quality scores and skin carotenoid levels, objectively confirming the dietary impact [32].
Digital health supports—such as recipe and meal-planning applications, grocery purchasing incentives, and online cooking workshops—extend microintervention accessibility to low-income and marginalized populations. These solutions operationalize the FIM philosophy, promoting plant-based dietary adoption and contributing to chronic disease risk reduction [29,33].

4. Digital Nutrition Interventions

4.1. Online Cooking Courses/Culinary Medicine

Culinary medicine programs—integrating medical knowledge with culinary skill development—represent a promising approach for promoting wider adoption of plant-based diets. With the proliferation of digital technologies, previously in-person CM education is increasingly delivered virtually, allowing broader reach and cost-effective implementation [32]. Virtual CM programs offer dual benefits: they facilitate the practical adoption of plant-based diets in daily life while positively influencing participants’ psychological well-being and quality of life. This is particularly important for the prevention and management of chronic diseases, as sustained dietary changes require both motivation and psychosocial support in addition to nutrition knowledge [32].

4.2. Digital Nutrition Education

Advances in digital health technologies have created significant opportunities for nutrition education in recent years. Online programs, mobile applications, web-based platforms, asynchronous learning modules, email campaigns, and SMS-based messaging enable participants to access evidence-based nutrition information and behavior change tools without geographic or temporal constraints. Digital education provides a personalized, flexible, and interactive learning environment, supporting sustainable improvements in dietary behaviors by leveraging individual motivation and skill development [34].
Numerous studies have demonstrated that digital nutrition programs positively influence diet adherence, food choices, nutrition knowledge, and chronic disease risk factors [35,36,37]. For example, online cooking courses and culinary medicine programs allow participants to acquire not only theoretical knowledge but also practical skills that support the integration of plant-based foods into everyday diets. Other interventions, such as smartphone apps, web-based self-monitoring platforms, and SMS reminders, leverage behavior change theories (e.g., self-regulation, goal setting) to facilitate self-monitoring, goal tracking, and long-term engagement [38,39].
Digital nutrition education is particularly valuable for populations with limited access to healthcare or where traditional in-person education faces logistical or cost-related barriers. Interactive, multimodal content—including videos, infographics, microlearning units, and recipe databases—enhances engagement, improves the user experience, and supports long-term sustainability. At the same time, the effectiveness of digital interventions is influenced by user engagement, technological access, and personalization, which remain key areas for future research and development [40,41].

4.3. Conceptual Framework of Digital Nutrition Interventions

Digital health interventions—including online cooking courses, asynchronous learning programs, mobile applications, web platforms, email-based modules, and simpler technologies such as SMS—can complement each other in promoting broader adoption of plant-based diets and preventing chronic diseases [42]. Common features of these interventions include multi-level support for behavior change:
  • Knowledge and literacy enhancement: Interactive content, educational videos and expert materials improve nutritional literacy.
  • Motivation reinforcement: Goal setting, feedback, and social support sustain engagement.
  • Skill development: Culinary medicine programs provide practical cooking skills, while short digital content (e.g., brief videos, app-based tips) facilitates home adaptation.
  • Accessibility increase: Asynchronous online platforms, mobile technologies (apps, SMS), and web-based resources lower barriers to entry, especially for individuals facing geographic or temporal constraints.
The underlying mechanism aligns with the COM-B model (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation→Behavior): digital interventions enhance participants’ capabilities (knowledge, skills), opportunities (access, support), and motivation (internal and external incentives), ultimately leading to positive, sustainable dietary changes (Figure 2). As a result, nutritional behaviors improve, adherence to plant-based diets increases, and chronic disease risk is reduced.

5. Summary of Previous Research and Findings

5.1. Promoting Plant-Based Diets in Healthy Populations

Digital interventions in healthy populations have frequently aimed to increase plant-based dietary intake, particularly fruit and vegetable consumption. Web-based programs [43,44,45,46,47,48,49] have been predominantly implemented among adults and youth, demonstrating significant short- and long-term improvements in dietary behaviors. The effectiveness of these interventions was strongly influenced by participant engagement and activity levels [49,50]. Mobile applications and digital self-monitoring tools have also shown promise, particularly among young adults and ethnic minority populations [51,52,53]. Gamification elements and social media integration were shown to enhance user participation, self-regulation, and adherence. Simpler digital strategies, such as email- and SMS-based microinterventions, were also effective in increasing fruit and vegetable intake [50,54].
Personalized online nutrition counseling provided additional benefits. In the Food4Me study [55] significant improvements were observed in adherence to the Mediterranean diet, while the DASH for Health program [56] was associated with favorable changes in blood pressure and body weight. Similarly, long-term, web-based, computer-tailored nutrition programs [45,47] improved fruit and vegetable consumption through cognitive and environmental feedback mechanisms.
In recent years, virtual cooking courses and Culinary Medicine programs have gained increasing prominence in preventive nutrition. These programs not only improved cooking competence and dietary quality but also positively influenced biomarkers, such as skin carotenoid status [30,31,32,57,58,59]. Further randomized trials demonstrated that online Culinary Medicine programs significantly increased Whole Plant Food Density (WPFD) scores, cooking skills, mindful control, and psychological well-being in older adults and individuals at cardiovascular risk [30,31,32,60].
In special populations—including older adults, postmenopausal women, and food-insecure groups—digital education and virtual cooking workshops directly contributed to improvements in dietary habits and quality of life [52,60,61,62,63,64]. Traditional, in-person programs have also shown positive effects, particularly in enhancing practical cooking skills and providing direct social support, offering a useful benchmark for evaluating digital approaches.
Overall, the evidence supports that a wide range of digital and virtual strategies can effectively promote plant-based diets across healthy adults, youth, and special populations, with engagement, self-regulation, and personalization being critical factors for maximizing effectiveness. These programs have been implemented in various formats, including 12 web-based studies, 7 traditional in-person programs, 3 mobile applications, 5 virtual education initiatives (such as Zoom or online cooking classes), and 1 email-based intervention, highlighting the diversity of approaches available to support dietary behavior change (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3).

5.2. Digital Nutrition Interventions in Patients with Chronic Diseases

A total of 32 randomized controlled trials and clinical studies were analyzed, examining digital nutrition interventions in populations living with chronic diseases. The interventions can be classified into five main categories: (1) simple message-based programs (SMS or email reminders), (2) smartphone applications and integrated monitoring systems, (3) web-based platforms and e-coaching programs, (4) virtual culinary medicine and digital nutrition education, and (5) hybrid approaches that combine community-based and digital elements.

5.2.1. SMS- and Email-Based Digital Interventions and Dietary Adherence

Several studies have shown that SMS- or email-based reminders are effective in improving dietary adherence among patients with chronic conditions. In the study by Akhu-Zaheya & Shiyab [68], SMS reminders significantly increased adherence to a Mediterranean diet in patients with cardiovascular diseases. Cicolini et al. [69] found that weekly email reminders combined with phone follow-ups enhanced fruit consumption, reduced salt intake, and improved adherence to a low-saturated-fat diet in hypertensive adults. Donaldson et al. [70] reported that personalized SMS messages increased fruit and vegetable intake, supported regular breakfast consumption, and helped meet daily step targets in overweight and obese adults. Vinitha et al. [71] observed that SMS interventions promoted healthier dietary patterns in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients, while Kelly et al. [72] showed that dietitian-led phone coaching combined with tailored messages increased vegetable and fiber intake in patients with chronic kidney disease. Overall, these findings suggest that SMS- and email-based interventions are particularly effective in promoting plant-based, Mediterranean-style diets rich in fruits and vegetables while reducing salt and saturated fat intake. Their low cost and scalability further enhance the potential of these digital interventions to improve dietary adherence (Table 4).

5.2.2. Digital Nutrition Interventions Through Mobile Applications and Smartphone-Based Systems

A growing body of evidence has demonstrated that smartphone-based nutrition interventions can effectively support dietary behavior change among patients living with chronic diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, or hypertension [76,77,78,79,80] (Table 5). These interventions included stand-alone applications for self-monitoring, integrated platforms that combined dietary logging with real-time feedback, as well as personalized messaging systems [76,78].
Studies have reported improvements in adherence to healthy dietary patterns, particularly greater adherence to the Mediterranean diet, increased fruit and vegetable consumption, and reduced sodium intake [76,77,78,80]. For example, the use of the Noom Coach application among adults with type 2 diabetes improved self-reported dietary self-management and supported glycemic control [78], while the LowSalt4Life app contributed to reductions in sodium intake among hypertensive participants [80].
Overall, these mobile interventions have been associated with improvements in diet quality, enhanced use of self-management behaviors, and, in some cases, modest weight loss [76,77,79]. Their low cost, scalability, and ease of integration into daily life highlight the potential of smartphone-based tools to promote sustainable dietary improvements in populations living with chronic diseases [76,77,78,79,80].

5.2.3. Web-Based Platforms and e-Coaching

Interactive web-based platforms and e-coaching interventions have shown significant potential in improving dietary knowledge, dietary patterns, and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic diseases. Multiple randomized controlled trials and interventional studies reported beneficial effects in individuals with atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, metabolic syndrome, obesity, cancer survivors, and multiple sclerosis [81,82,83,84] (Table 6).
For instance, a multi-component remote program in Spain significantly increased adherence to the Mediterranean diet and improved nutrient intake among patients post-catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation [85]. Similarly, automated or dietitian-led web-based coaching programs enhanced diet quality indices, reduced sugar and sodium intake, and improved fiber consumption in adults with type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome [81,82,83,84]. Improvements in dietary self-management were also reflected in favorable metabolic outcomes, including reductions in HbA1c, blood pressure, and lipid levels.
Other studies highlighted the role of digital coaching in special populations. Among patients with chronic kidney disease, online or telehealth interventions promoted reductions in sodium intake, increased vegetable and fiber consumption, and supported safe dietary management without adverse biochemical effects [72,86]. In obesity management, web-based coaching combined with phone calls and text messaging enhanced adherence to dietary goals and produced clinically relevant weight loss [87]. In cancer survivorship, a web-based self-management program improved fruit and vegetable intake, diet quality, physical activity, and quality of life [88]. Furthermore, among people with multiple sclerosis, an asynchronous nutrition education program increased nutrition literacy, food literacy behaviors, and was well accepted, while qualitative evaluation confirmed improvements in motivation, capability, and opportunity to change dietary behaviors [89,90].
Taken together, web-based platforms and e-coaching programs consistently demonstrate improvements in diet quality, nutrition literacy, and health-related behaviors, with additional benefits for weight management, quality of life, and cardiometabolic risk factors. Their scalability, low cost, and adaptability across diverse populations highlight their potential as sustainable dietary interventions in chronic disease management.
Table 6. Summary of studies on web-based platforms and online nutrition coaching.
Table 6. Summary of studies on web-based platforms and online nutrition coaching.
Author, Year, CountrySample DemographicsTiming of Outcome AssessmentMethod of Nutrition AssessmentType of Digital InterventionNutritional OutcomesOther Outcomes
Goni et al., 2020, Spain [85]720 adults post-catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (365 intervention, 355 control); recruited from 4 hospitalsBaseline, 12, 24 months14-item MEDAS (phone-administered), semi-quantitative FFQ (dietitian-administered)Multi-component remote program (website, app, printed materials, quarterly phone calls) with menus, tips, education, self-assessment tools↑ Mediterranean diet adherence; ↑ fruits, olive oil, whole grains, legumes, nuts, fish, white meat; ↓ refined cereals, red/processed meat, sweets; ↑ fiber and omega-3, ↓ carbohydrates and saturated fatsHigh retention (95.6% at 12 mo, 94.4% at 24 mo); improved lifestyle, PA, QoL, biomarkers; atrial tachyarrhythmia monitored
Hansel et al., 2017, France [81]120 adults (18–75 y) with T2DM and abdominal obesity; mean BMI 33, mean HbA1c 7.2%; 67% womenBaseline, 16 weeks24 h dietary recall via web-based moduleFully automated web-based e-coaching program (ANODE) with diet/PA self-monitoring, nutritional assessment, menu generator, PA prescription↑ DQI-I (+4.55 vs. −1.68; p < 0.001)↓ weight (−2.3 vs. −0.4 kg), ↓ waist circumference (−3.1 vs. −0.9 cm), ↓ HbA1c (−0.4% vs. −0.1%); ↑ VO2 max (NS)
Abu-Saad et al., 2019, Israel [82]50 overweight/obese Arab adults (40–62 y) with poorly controlled T2DM; 25 per arm (I-ACE vs. SLA)Baseline, 3, 6, 12 monthsFFQ, PA questionnaire, anthropometryI-ACE software: interactive lifestyle assessment and education tool delivered during 4 dietitian-led in-person sessions↑ DM-related dietary knowledge; ↓ added sugar intake (−2.6% TEI); ↑ fiber intake (+2.7 g/1000 kcal)Trends toward ↑ PA; ↓ HbA1c in both groups
Green et al., 2014, USA [91]101 adults (35–69 y); BMI> 26; elevated BP; Framingham 10-y CVD risk 10–25%6 months3-day food diary, self-reported fruit/vegetable intake, PA questionnaireDietitian-led web-based intervention: initial in-person visit, personalized plan, BP monitor, scale, pedometer, secure messaging↑ fruit and vegetable intake; adoption of DASH diet↓ weight (net −3.2 kg), improved BP control (NS), reduced CVD risk (trend), high satisfaction
Humalda et al., 2020, The Netherlands [86]99 adults with CKD (stages 1–4) or kidney transplant; mean eGFR 55 ± 22; sodium intake > 130 mmol/d3 months (end of intervention), 9 months (post-maintenance)24 h urinary sodium excretionWeb-based self-management program (SUBLIME): interactive diary, self-monitoring, goal setting, motivational e-coaching, group sessions↓ sodium excretion (−24.8 mmol/d vs. control; p = 0.049) at 3 months (effect attenuated by 9 months)↓ SBP (140→132 mmHg at 3 months); QoL, proteinuria, costs, self-management assessed (no long-term differences)
Kelly et al., 2020, Australia [72]80 adults with stage 3–4 CKD (mean age 62 ± 12; 64% male)3 months, 6 monthsAHEI and exploratory dietary measuresTelehealth coaching: dietitian phone calls (biweekly, 3 mo) + tailored text messages, followed by 3 mo text-only supportNo change in overall AHEI; improvements in vegetable, fiber, and core food group intake↓ weight; no effect on BP; intervention safe, no adverse events
Lewis et al., 2019, Australia [87]61 adults with class III obesity (BMI > 40), enrolled in public obesity management serviceBaseline, 4, 8 monthsSelf-monitored dietary goals and behavior trackingTelephone and SMS adjunct to standard care: monthly calls (10–30 min) + 3 texts/weekImproved dietary goal adherence↓ weight (−4.87 kg vs. +0.38 kg); ↑ self-efficacy, treatment regulation, adherence
Ramadas et al., 2018, Malaysia [84]128 adults with T2DM (HbA1c ≥ 7.0%); literate in English/Malay; internet accessBaseline, 6 months, follow-upDKAB and DSOC questionnairesWeb-based program (myDIDeA): 6-month intervention with 12 modules, tailored dietary advice, fortnightly web access↑ DKAB scores (post: 11.1 vs. 6.5; follow-up: 19.8 vs. 7.6); ↑ DSOC↓ fasting glucose (7.9 vs. 8.9 mmol/L), ↓ HbA1c (8.5% vs. 9.1%)
Jahangiry et al., 2017, Iran [83]160 adults ≥20 y with metabolic syndrome (80 intervention, 80 control)Baseline, 6 monthsSelf-reported food records, dietary questionnaires; PA (MET-min/week)Web-based program “My Healthy Heart Profile”: tailored calorie restriction, CVD risk assessment, feedback, messaging↓ cholesterol (−88.4 vs. −8.3 mg/day), ↓ calories (−430 vs. −393 kcal/day), ↓ sodium (1337 vs. 1342 mmol/day); ↑ PA (moderate PA +260 vs. +102 MET-min/week)↑ HRQoL (general health, vitality); improvements in anthropometry, CVD risk factors
Lee et al., 2014, South Korea [88]59 breast cancer patients (stage 0–III) post-curative surgery; completed primary treatment within 12 monthsBaseline, 12 weeks3-day dietary recall; DQIWeb-based self-management program (WSEDI) using TTM strategies (assessment, education, action planning, SMS feedback)↑ fruit/vegetable intake (≥5 servings/day); ↑ diet quality (DQI)↑ aerobic exercise (≥150 min/week); ↑ HRQoL; ↓ fatigue; ↑ self-efficacy
Russell et al., 2024, Australia [89]Adults with MS (≥18 y); recruited via MSWA channels; English-speakingBaseline, 9 weeksOnline surveys: DHQ, CNLT, FLBCOnline program “Eating Well with MS”: 7 asynchronous modules + mailed resources (recipes, workbook)↑ DHQ (dietary habits), ↑ CNLT (nutrition literacy), ↑ FLBC (food literacy behaviors)Feasibility: high recruitment (n = 70), 54% completion, high acceptability
Russell et al., 2024, Australia [90] 16 adults with MS (10 completed full program, 6 partial)~1 month post-programQualitative analysis (interviews, COM-B framework)“Eating Well with MS” (asynchronous modules + resources)Reported acquisition of nutrition knowledge, improved food literacyIdentified facilitators/barriers (social support, time, motivation); COM-B mapping confirmed impact on capability, opportunity, motivation
Abbreviations: AHEI, Alternative Healthy Eating Index; ANODE, Automated Nutrition and Exercise (web-based e-coaching program); BMI, Body Mass Index; BP, Blood Pressure; CKD, Chronic Kidney Disease; CNLT, Critical Nutrition Literacy Tool; COM-B, Capability, Opportunity, Motivation—Behaviour model; CVD, Cardiovascular Disease; DHQ, Diet Habits Questionnaire; DKAB, Dietary Knowledge, Attitude, and Behaviour questionnaire; DQI, Diet Quality Index; DQI-I, Diet Quality Index-International; DSOC, Dietary Stages of Change; eGFR, estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; FFQ, Food Frequency Questionnaire; FLBC, Food Literacy Behaviour Checklist; HbA1c, Glycated Hemoglobin A1c; HRQoL, Health-Related Quality of Life; I-ACE, Interactive Lifestyle Assessment, Counseling and Education tool; MEDAS, Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener; MET, Metabolic Equivalent of Task; MS, Multiple Sclerosis; MSWA, Multiple Sclerosis Western Australia; NS, Not Significant; PA, Physical Activity; QoL, Quality of Life; SBP, Systolic Blood Pressure; SLA, Standard Lifestyle Advice; SUBLIME, Self-management to Reduce Salt Intake in CKD patients program; TEI, Total Energy Intake; T2DM, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; TTM, Transtheoretical Model; VO2 max, Maximal Oxygen Uptake; WSEDI, Web-based Self-Management Exercise and Diet Intervention, ↑—increase; ↓—decrease.

5.2.4. Digital Education and the Benefits of Plant-Based Diets

Digital culinary medicine programs play a pivotal role in promoting plant-based dietary patterns and facilitating their practical adoption. These interventions not only enhance cooking skills but also support increased consumption of fruits, vegetables, and other plant-based foods, thereby improving overall dietary behaviors (Table 7).
The Virtual Culinary Medicine Toolkit (VCMT) developed in the United States [33] demonstrated that digital tools and educational resources effectively increased patients’ knowledge of healthy eating, particularly regarding fruit and vegetable intake and the use of whole, minimally processed foods. Similarly, a bilingual virtual culinary medicine program [92] led to significant improvements in fruit and vegetable consumption among ethnically diverse patients with type 2 diabetes, alongside enhanced cooking confidence and nutrition knowledge.
In a recent randomized crossover trial in the United States, a virtual teaching kitchen–based vegan diet intervention [93] showed that participants could maintain high adherence to plant-based dietary patterns. The program improved dietary quality while also delivering psychosocial benefits, including reduced stress and improved well-being. Evidence from Japan [94] further supports the value of dietary education and self-monitoring, where participants adopting cooking instructions achieved reduced sodium intake and increased potassium intake—primarily through plant-based food sources—resulting in favorable changes in cardiometabolic risk factors. Overall, these findings highlight that digital culinary medicine and educational interventions effectively support the adoption of plant-based diets, which are essential in the prevention and management of diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular diseases.
Table 7. Digital Education and Virtual Culinary Medicine Programs.
Table 7. Digital Education and Virtual Culinary Medicine Programs.
Author, Year, CountrySample DemographicsTiming of Outcome AssessmentMethod of Nutrition AssessmentType of Digital InterventionNutritional OutcomesOther Outcomes
Ai et al., 2024, USA [33]Low-income adults with type 2 diabetes (n not specified)During sessions; follow-up not explicitly reportedInteractive videos, handouts; diabetes education metrics (knowledge, skills, self-efficacy)Virtual Culinary Medicine Toolkit (VCMT): animated videos, infographics, recipes, interactive handouts; provider toolkit for standardized messaging↑ Food literacy, cooking skills, knowledge of MyPlate, carbohydrate management, and diabetes-related behaviors↑ Engagement, retention, self-efficacy for preparing healthy foods; ↑ perceived social support and normative beliefs
Kitaoka et al., 2013, Japan [94]71 hypertensive men (40–75 y); 39 intervention, 32 controlBaseline and post-intervention (duration not specified)Dietary self-monitoring; urinary sodium and potassium excretionSelf-monitoring logbook with dietary education and cooking instructions↓ Sodium intake, ↑ potassium intake; improved sodium-to-potassium ratio↓ DBP (93→87 mmHg, significant); ↓ SBP (149→143 mmHg, NS); no changes in control
Krenek et al., 2025, USA [93]40 adults at risk for CVD (75% female, mean age 64.4 ± 8.6 y); ≥5% ASCVD risk; mostly college educatedPre- and post-4-week diet interventions (crossover design)Adherence to vegan diet; intake monitored via teaching kitchen sessions and self-reportVirtual culinary medicine teaching kitchen (8 weekly 90 min Zoom classes, group format)Adherence to vegan diet (high vs. low EVOO); experiential cooking-based learning↓ Perceived stress (−19%), ↓ negative affect (−13%), ↑ positive affect (+6–8%); improved energy/fatigue and HRQoL
Macias-Navarro et al., 2024, USA [92] Adults (18–70 y), ethnically diverse, T2DM with HbA1c > 7.0; recruited from community clinics; English/Spanish speakersBaseline and post-intervention (5 sessions)Questionnaires (dietary intake, cooking, shopping, self-management, barriers, knowledge); EMR (HbA1c, BMI, BP)Virtual culinary medicine program: 5 × 90 min WebEx classes; bilingual delivery; asynchronous videos, handouts, culturally adapted recipes; grocery cards provided↑ Fruit/vegetable intake, ↑ healthy food consumption, ↑ cooking confidence, ↑ diabetes-related knowledgeFeasibility confirmed (recruitment, retention, satisfaction); trends in HbA1c, BMI, BP; ↑ diabetes self-management and self-efficacy
Abbreviations: ASCVD, Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease; BMI, Body Mass Index; BP, Blood Pressure; CVD, Cardiovascular Disease; DBP, Diastolic Blood Pressure; EMR, Electronic Medical Record; EVOO, Extra Virgin Olive Oil; HbA1c, Hemoglobin A1c; HRQoL, Health-Related Quality of Life; NS, Not Significant; SBP, Systolic Blood Pressure; T2DM, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; VCMT, Virtual Culinary Medicine Toolkit, ↑—increase; ↓—decrease.

5.2.5. Hybrid Programs Combining Community and Digital Elements

The four reviewed hybrid programs demonstrated that combining digital and community elements can improve dietary adherence and diet quality (Table 8). Alonso-Domínguez et al. [95] implemented a multifactorial intervention among adults with T2DM, including a smartphone app, a 90 min food workshop, and weekly heart-healthy walks, which significantly increased adherence to the Mediterranean diet (ΔMEDAS +2.2) and diet quality (ΔDQI +2.5), while also enhancing physical activity. Villarini et al. [96] conducted a lifestyle intervention supported by SMS reminders, resulting in a slight increase in adherence to a healthy diet, with reductions in weight, BMI, and total cholesterol, although program attendance was low. Penn et al. [97] used ongoing support via mobile text messages, emails, and newsletters to promote healthy eating and cooking skills, leading to significant reductions in weight and waist circumference, along with increased physical activity. Shahar et al. [98] implemented group-based nutrition education with visual and printed materials, which decreased waist circumference in women and maintained total cholesterol in men. Overall, hybrid programs combining community and digital support appear effective in improving dietary adherence and diet quality, while promoting participant engagement and physical activity.

6. Discussion

The available body of evidence clearly indicates that digital nutrition interventions can improve dietary adherence, clinical biomarkers (e.g., HbA1c, body weight, blood pressure), and patient-reported outcomes such as self-efficacy and quality of life in both healthy and clinical populations. Interventions using simple digital tools—such as SMS reminders or email notifications—effectively supported basic dietary consistency and engagement in community-based activities. More complex approaches, including smartphone applications, web-based platforms, and multicomponent digital programs, enabled intensive self-management, real-time monitoring, and personalized feedback, thereby facilitating more substantial and sustained behavior change.
Hybrid programs that combined community-based activities (e.g., cooking workshops, group exercise, face-to-face counseling) with digital components (apps, online education, SMS/email reminders) demonstrated particularly promising outcomes among both healthy adults and individuals with chronic conditions such as type 2 diabetes and metabolic syndrome. For example, interventions integrating the principles of culinary medicine with digital support improved diet quality scores, increased adherence to Mediterranean or other healthy dietary patterns, and led to clinically meaningful reductions in body weight, waist circumference, and glycemic indices.
Key findings from this review highlight that digital microinterventions—especially when combined with culinary education and behavioral support—can effectively bridge the gap between knowledge and sustained dietary behavior change. Unlike previous reviews that primarily focused on general eHealth or tele-nutrition programs, this synthesis uniquely emphasizes the intersection of plant-based dietary promotion, culinary medicine principles, and digital microintervention delivery. This innovative perspective illustrates how technology-supported, food-centered education can translate dietary recommendations into practical and sustainable everyday habits. The inclusion of diverse study designs—from feasibility studies to randomized controlled trials—enabled a comprehensive interpretation of both behavioral and clinical outcomes.
Furthermore, recent geroscience research suggests that plant-based nutrition not only plays a key role in the prevention of chronic diseases but also serves as a cornerstone of healthy aging. High-quality plant-based diets have been shown to slow biological aging by reducing oxidative stress and systemic inflammation while supporting mitochondrial function and epigenetic stability [6,7,8,9,17,19,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108]. Consequently, plant-based dietary patterns may contribute to prolonged healthspan and delayed functional decline, which is particularly relevant for public health strategies targeting aging populations.
Despite these promising results, substantial heterogeneity exists among studies in terms of intervention duration, intensity, digital modality, outcome measures, and follow-up periods. This variability limits direct comparability and highlights the need for standardized protocols, validated dietary assessment tools, and long-term follow-up to fully establish the efficacy and sustainability of digital nutrition interventions. Although current evidence generally indicates favorable effects, most studies focus on short-term outcomes, leaving the long-term sustainability of behavior change insufficiently explored. More standardized methodologies, validated measurement tools, and long-term controlled studies are needed to accurately determine the effectiveness and clinical relevance of digital interventions.
Our findings contribute to the growing recognition that culinary-based digital programs offer a practical and scalable strategy for promoting plant-based diets, particularly in clinical and community settings where access to in-person education is limited. By identifying the components most consistently associated with positive outcomes—such as interactive content, feedback mechanisms, and hybrid delivery models—this review adds meaningful insight to guide the design of future interventions.

7. Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that digital nutrition interventions—including virtual culinary medicine programs, mobile applications, web platforms, SMS/email reminders, and hybrid programs—effectively facilitate the adoption and maintenance of plant-based diets, fulfilling the study’s aim of evaluating their impact on dietary behavior and clinical outcomes. Evidence shows improvements in diet quality, cooking skills, nutrition knowledge, self-efficacy, and clinical measures such as HbA1c, body weight, and blood pressure across both healthy populations and individuals with chronic conditions. Hybrid approaches that integrate digital and community-based activities appear particularly effective in sustaining behavior change and engagement. Future interventions should prioritize personalization, accessibility, cultural adaptation, and integration into healthcare systems. Overall, interactive content, feedback mechanisms, and hybrid delivery models consistently support long-term dietary change, highlighting the potential of culinary-based digital programs as scalable strategies for chronic disease prevention and public health promotion.
The adaptability of these digital nutrition and culinary medicine programs to the Hungarian context warrants particular attention. Hungary is among the most rapidly aging countries in Europe and faces a disproportionate burden of diet-related chronic diseases and functional decline associated with unhealthy aging [109]. Integrating virtual culinary medicine, mobile health, and hybrid digital nutrition programs into national public health strategies—such as workplace health promotion and healthy aging initiatives coordinated by Semmelweis University [109,110]—could offer a cost-effective and scalable approach to improve dietary behaviors and prevent age-associated chronic diseases. Tailoring these interventions to local sociocultural factors and digital literacy levels may enhance engagement, support health equity, and contribute meaningfully to extending healthspan in the Hungarian population.

Author Contributions

A.L., V.Z., J.T.V., Á.S., Á.L., T.C., V.F.-P., D.M. and M.F. contributed to the conceptualization and design of the study, drafted the manuscript, critically revised it for important intellectual content, and read and approved the final version. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Project: no. TKP2021-NKTA-47 was funded by the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund under TKP2021-NKTA, with support from the Ministry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary. The project was funded by the Ministry of Innovation and Technology under the National Cardiovascular Laboratory Program (RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00003) from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund. This work was also supported by the European University for Well-Being (EUniWell) program (grant agreement number: 101004093/EUniWell/EAC-A02-2019/EAC-A02-2019-1). The funding sources had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Abbreviations

HbA1c—Hemoglobin A1c, SMS—Short Message Service, T2D—Type 2 Diabetes, BMI—Body Mass Index, RCT—Randomized Controlled Trial, MET—Metabolic Equivalent of Task, mHealth—Mobile Health, eHealth—Electronic Health, DI—Digital Intervention, CBI—Community-Based Intervention, HI—Hybrid Intervention (combined digital and community-based approach), QoL—Quality of Life, PA—Physical Activity, DM—Diabetes Mellitus, CGM—Continuous Glucose Monitoring, app—Mobile Application, WB—Web-Based intervention, CM—Culinary Medicine, MedDiet—Mediterranean Diet, SB—Sedentary Behavior, FPG—Fasting Plasma Glucose, BP—Blood Pressure, LDL—Low-Density Lipoprotein, HDL—High-Density Lipoprotein, TG—Triglycerides, WC—Waist Circumference, HCP—Healthcare Professional, SMS/E—SMS or Email reminders.

References

  1. Soto, A.; Guillen-Grima, F.; Morales, G.; Munoz, S.; Aguinaga-Ontoso, I. Trends in mortality from stroke in the European Union, 1996–2015. Eur. J. Neurol. 2021, 28, 182–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gallagher, E.J.; LeRoith, D. Obesity and Diabetes: The Increased Risk of Cancer and Cancer-Related Mortality. Physiol. Rev. 2015, 95, 727–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Morgan, E.; Arnold, M.; Gini, A.; Lorenzoni, V.; Cabasag, C.J.; Laversanne, M.; Vignat, J.; Ferlay, J.; Murphy, N.; Bray, F. Global burden of colorectal cancer in 2020 and 2040: Incidence and mortality estimates from GLOBOCAN. Gut 2023, 72, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. World Health Organization. Advancing the Global Agenda on Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2000 to 2020: Looking Forwards to 2030; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  5. Fekete, M.; Lehoczki, A.; Kryczyk-Poprawa, A.; Zábó, V.; Varga, J.T.; Bálint, M.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Csípő, T.; Rząsa-Duran, E.; Varga, P. Functional Foods in Modern Nutrition Science: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Public Health Implications. Nutrients 2025, 17, 2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ungvari, Z.; Fekete, M.; Varga, P.; Lehoczki, A.; Munkácsy, G.; Fekete, J.T.; Bianchini, G.; Ocana, A.; Buda, A.; Ungvari, A.; et al. Association between red and processed meat consumption and colorectal cancer risk: A comprehensive meta-analysis of prospective studies. Geroscience 2025, 47, 5123–5140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zábó, V.; Lehoczki, A.; Fekete, M.; Szappanos, Á.; Varga, P.; Moizs, M.; Giovannetti, G.; Loscalzo, Y.; Giannini, M.; Polidori, M.C.; et al. The role of purpose in life in healthy aging: Implications for the Semmelweis Study and the Semmelweis-EUniWell Workplace Health Promotion Model Program. Geroscience 2025, 47, 2817–2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ungvari, Z.; Fekete, M.; Fekete, J.T.; Grosso, G.; Ungvari, A.; Gyorffy, B. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet and its protective effects against colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 26 studies with 2,217,404 participants. Geroscience 2025, 47, 1105–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ungvari, Z.; Fekete, M.; Varga, P.; Fekete, J.T.; Buda, A.; Szappanos, Á.; Lehoczki, A.; Mózes, N.; Grosso, G.; Menyhart, O.; et al. Impact of adherence to the Mediterranean diet on stroke risk. Geroscience 2025, 47, 3565–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kunutsor, S.K.; Jassal, D.S.; Ravandi, A.; Lehoczki, A. Dietary flaxseed: Cardiometabolic benefits and its role in promoting healthy aging. Geroscience 2025, 47, 2895–2923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Hsu, C.Y.; Alzahrani, A.A.; Maabreh, H.G.; Prasad, K.D.V.; Bokov, D.O.; Kareem, A.H.; Alawadi, A.; Ihsan, A.; Shakir, M.N.; Alasheqi, M.Q. Effect of walnut consumption on markers of endothelial function in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Phytother. Res. 2024, 38, 1358–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bizzozero-Peroni, B.; Diaz-Goni, V.; Beneit, N.; Oliveira, A.; Jimenez-Lopez, E.; Martinez-Vizcaino, V.; Mesas, A.E. Nut consumption is associated with a lower risk of all-cause dementia in adults: A community-based cohort study from the UK Biobank. Geroscience 2024, 47, 1721–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Nishi, S.K.; Sala-Vila, A.; Julvez, J.; Sabate, J.; Ros, E. Impact of Nut Consumption on Cognition across the Lifespan. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ni, J.; Nishi, S.K.; Babio, N.; Ros, E.; Basterra-Gortari, F.J.; Corella, D.; Martínez, J.A.; Alonso-Gómez, Á.M.; Wärnberg, J. Higher versus lower nut consumption and changes in cognitive performance over two years in a population at risk of cognitive decline: A cohort study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2023, 118, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Tomé-Carneiro, J.; Visioli, F. Plant-Based Diets Reduce Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review of Recent Evidence. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2023, 25, 127–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fekete, M.; Major, D.; Feher, A.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Lehoczki, A. Geroscience and pathology: A new frontier in understanding age-related diseases. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 2024, 30, 1611623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fekete, M.; Varga, P.; Ungvari, Z.; Fekete, J.T.; Buda, A.; Szappanos, Á.; Lehoczki, A.; Mózes, N.; Grosso, G.; Godos, J.; et al. The role of the Mediterranean diet in reducing the risk of cognitive impairement, dementia, and Alzheimer’s disease: A meta-analysis. Geroscience 2025, 47, 3111–3130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Talavera-Rodríguez, I.; Banegas, J.R.; de la Cruz, J.J.; Martínez-Gómez, D.; Ruiz-Canela, M.; Ortolá, R.; Hershey, M.S.; Artalejo, F.R.; Sotos-Prieto, M. Mediterranean lifestyle index and 24-h systolic blood pressure and heart rate in community-dwelling older adults. Geroscience 2024, 46, 1357–1369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Maroto-Rodriguez, J.; Delgado-Velandia, M.; Ortola, R.; Carballo-Casla, A.; Garcia-Esquinas, E.; Rodriguez-Artalejo, F.; Sotos-Prieto, M. Plant-based diets and risk of frailty in community-dwelling older adults: The Seniors-ENRICA-1 cohort. Geroscience 2023, 45, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lamberg-Allardt, C.; Bärebring, L.; Arnesen, E.K.; Nwaru, B.I.; Thorisdottir, B.; Ramel, A.; Söderlund, F.; Dierkes, J.; Åkesson, A. Animal versus plant-based protein and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. Food Nutr. Res. 2023, 67, 9003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gardner, C.D.; Coulston, A.; Chatterjee, L.; Rigby, A.; Spiller, G.; Farquhar, J.W. The effect of a plant-based diet on plasma lipids in hypercholesterolemic adults: A randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2005, 142, 725–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Thaiudom, S.; Posridee, K.; Liangchawengwong, S.; Chiaranai, C.; Chularee, S.; Samanros, A.; Oonsivilai, A.; Singha-Dong, N.; Oonsivilai, R. Plant-Based Diet for Glycemic Control, Insulin Sensitivity, and Lipid Profile in Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review. Foods 2025, 14, 1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ayyanar, M.P.; Vijayan, M. A review on gut microbiota and miRNA crosstalk: Implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Geroscience 2025, 47, 339–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Thomas, O.W.; Reilly, J.M.; Wood, N.I.; Albin, J. Culinary medicine: Needs and strategies for incorporating nutrition into medical education in the United States. J. Med. Educ. Curric. Dev. 2024, 11, 23821205241249379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Salas-Groves, E.; Galyean, S.; Alcorn, M.; Childress, A. Behavior change effectiveness using nutrition apps in people with chronic diseases: Scoping review. JMIR mHealth uHealth 2023, 11, e41235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chatterjee, A.; Prinz, A.; Gerdes, M.; Martinez, S. Digital interventions on healthy lifestyle management: Systematic review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e26931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Bleich, S.N.; Dupuis, R.; Seligman, H.K. Food Is Medicine Movement-Key Actions Inside and Outside the Government. JAMA Health Forum 2023, 4, e233149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chang, A.R.; Bailey-Davis, L. Food Is Medicine, but Are Produce Prescriptions? Diabetes Care 2023, 46, 1140–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mozaffarian, D.; Aspry, K.E.; Garfield, K.; Kris-Etherton, P.; Seligman, H.; Velarde, G.P.; Williams, K.; Yang, E. “Food Is Medicine” Strategies for Nutrition Security and Cardiometabolic Health Equity: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2024, 83, 843–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sommer, S.; Pelletier, A.; Roche, A.; Klein, L.; Dawes, K.; Hellerstein, S. Evaluation of dietary habits and cooking confidence using virtual teaching kitchens for perimenopausal women. BMC Public Health 2023, 23, 622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Charles, J.A.; Wood, N.I.; Neary, S.; Moreno, J.O.; Scierka, L.; Brink, B.; Zhao, X.; Gielissen, K.A. “Zoom”ing to the Kitchen: A Novel Approach to Virtual Nutrition Education for Medical Trainees. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Krenek, A.M.; Aggarwal, M.; Chung, S.T.; Courville, A.B.; Guo, J.; Mathews, A. Plant-Based Culinary Medicine Intervention Improves Cooking Behaviors, Diet Quality, and Skin Carotenoid Status in Adults at Risk of Heart Disease Participating in a Randomized Crossover Trial. Nutrients 2025, 17, 1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ai, D.; Heredia, N.I.; Cruz, V.; Guevara, D.C.; Sharma, S.V.; Woods, D.; Danho, M.; McWhorter, J.W. Development of a Culinary Medicine Toolkit to Improve Implementation of Virtual Cooking Classes for Low-Income Adults with Type 2 Diabetes. Healthcare 2024, 12, 343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Domper, J.; Gayoso, L.; Goni, L.; Perezábad, L.; Razquin, C.; de la O, V.; Etxeberria, U.; Ruiz-Canela, M. An Intensive Culinary Intervention Programme to Promote Healthy Ageing: The SUKALMENA-InAge Feasibility Pilot Study. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Duan, Y.; Shang, B.; Liang, W.; Du, G.; Yang, M.; Rhodes, R.E. Effects of eHealth-based multiple health behavior change interventions on physical activity, healthy diet, and weight in people with noncommunicable diseases: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e23786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Barnett, A.; Wright, C.; Stone, C.; Ho, N.Y.; Adhyaru, P.; Kostjasyn, S.; Hickman, I.J.; Campbell, K.L.; Mayr, H.L.; Kelly, J.T. Effectiveness of dietary interventions delivered by digital health to adults with chronic conditions: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2023, 36, 632–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. El Khoury, C.F.; Karavetian, M.; Halfens, R.J.; Crutzen, R.; Khoja, L.; Schols, J.M. The effects of dietary mobile apps on nutritional outcomes in adults with chronic diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2019, 119, 626–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Paramastri, R.; Pratama, S.A.; Ho, D.K.N.; Purnamasari, S.D.; Mohammed, A.Z.; Galvin, C.J.; Hsu, Y.-H.E.; Tanweer, A.; Humayun, A.; Househ, M.; et al. Use of mobile applications to improve nutrition behaviour: A systematic review. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2020, 192, 105459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Scarry, A.; Rice, J.; O’Connor, E.M.; Tierney, A.C. Usage of mobile applications or mobile health technology to improve diet quality in adults. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yousuf, H.; Reintjens, R.; Slipszenko, E.; Blok, S.; Somsen, G.; Tulevski, I.; Hofstra, L. Effectiveness of web-based personalised e-Coaching lifestyle interventions. Neth. Heart J. 2019, 27, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Mair, J.L.; Salamanca-Sanabria, A.; Augsburger, M.; Frese, B.F.; Abend, S.; Jakob, R.; Kowatsch, T.; Haug, S. Effective behavior change techniques in digital health interventions for the prevention or management of noncommunicable diseases: An umbrella review. Ann. Behav. Med. 2023, 57, 817–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Young, C.; Campolonghi, S.; Ponsonby, S.; Dawson, S.L.; O’Neil, A.; Kay-Lambkin, F.; McNaughton, S.A.; Berk, M.; Jacka, F.N. Supporting Engagement, Adherence, and Behavior Change in Online Dietary Interventions. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 2019, 51, 719–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Alexander, G.L.; McClure, J.B.; Calvi, J.H.; Divine, G.W.; Stopponi, M.A.; Rolnick, S.J.; Heimendinger, J.; Tolsma, D.D.; Resnicow, K.; Campbell, M.K.; et al. A randomized clinical trial evaluating online interventions to improve fruit and vegetable consumption. Am. J. Public Health 2010, 100, 319–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Buller, D.B.; Woodall, W.G.; Zimmerman, D.E.; Slater, M.D.; Heimendinger, J.; Waters, E.; Hines, J.M.; Starling, R.; Hau, B.; Burris-Woodall, P.; et al. Randomized trial on the 5 a day, the Rio Grande Way Website, a web-based program to improve fruit and vegetable consumption in rural communities. J. Health Commun. 2008, 13, 230–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tapper, K.; Jiga-Boy, G.; Maio, G.R.; Haddock, G.; Lewis, M. Development and preliminary evaluation of an internet-based healthy eating program: Randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2014, 16, e231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Springvloet, L.; Lechner, L.; de Vries, H.; Candel, M.J.; Oenema, A. Short- and medium-term efficacy of a Web-based computer-tailored nutrition education intervention for adults including cognitive and environmental feedback: Randomized controlled trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2015, 17, e23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Springvloet, L.; Lechner, L.; de Vries, H.; Oenema, A. Long-term efficacy of a Web-based computer-tailored nutrition education intervention for adults including cognitive and environmental feedback: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Franko, D.L.; Cousineau, T.M.; Trant, M.; Green, T.C.; Rancourt, D.; Thompson, D.; Ainscough, J.; Mintz, L.B.; Ciccazzo, M. Motivation, self-efficacy, physical activity and nutrition in college students: Randomized controlled trial of an internet-based education program. Prev. Med. 2008, 47, 369–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Lippke, S.; Corbet, J.M.; Lange, D.; Parschau, L.; Schwarzer, R. Intervention Engagement Moderates the Dose-Response Relationships in a Dietary Intervention. Dose Response 2016, 14, 1559325816637515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lange, D.; Richert, J.; Koring, M.; Knoll, N.; Schwarzer, R.; Lippke, S. Self-regulation prompts can increase fruit consumption: A one-hour randomised controlled online trial. Psychol. Health 2013, 28, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rodgers, R.F.; Pernal, W.; Matsumoto, A.; Shiyko, M.; Intille, S.; Franko, D.L. Capitalizing on mobile technology to support healthy eating in ethnic minority college students. J. Am. Coll. Health 2016, 64, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nour, M.; Chen, J.; Allman-Farinelli, M. Young adults’ engagement with a self-monitoring app for vegetable intake and the impact of social media and gamification: Feasibility study. JMIR Form. Res. 2019, 3, e13324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Staffileno, B.A.; Tangney, C.C.; Fogg, L. Favorable Outcomes Using an eHealth Approach to Promote Physical Activity and Nutrition Among Young African American Women. J. Cardiovasc. Nurs. 2018, 33, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Kothe, E.J.; Mullan, B.A. Factors affecting acceptability of an email-based intervention to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Livingstone, K.M.; Celis-Morales, C.; Navas-Carretero, S.; San-Cristobal, R.; Macready, A.L.; Fallaize, R.; Forster, H.; Woolhead, C.; O’donovan, C.B.; Cyril, M.; et al. Effect of an Internet-based, personalized nutrition randomized trial on dietary changes associated with the Mediterranean diet: The Food4Me Study. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 104, 288–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Moore, T.J.; Alsabeeh, N.; Apovian, C.M.; Murphy, M.C.; Coffman, G.A.; Cullum-Dugan, D.; Jenkins, M.; Cabral, H. Weight, blood pressure, and dietary benefits after 12 months of a Web-based Nutrition Education Program (DASH for health): Longitudinal observational study. J. Med. Internet Res. 2008, 10, e52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Glickman, O.; Kakaty-Monzo, J.; Roberts, M.; Daghigh, F. Exploring the effectiveness of virtual and in-person instruction in culinary medicine: A survey-based study. BMC Med. Educ. 2024, 24, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Razavi, A.C.; Latoff, A.; Dyer, A.; Albin, J.L.; Artz, K.; Babcock, A.; Cimino, F.; Daghigh, F.; Dollinger, B.; Fiellin, M.; et al. Virtual teaching kitchen classes and cardiovascular disease prevention counselling among medical trainees. BMJ Nutr. Prev. Health 2023, 6, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Shavit, Y.; Tepper, S.; Teodorescu, K. Exploring culinary diversity to enhance Mediterranean diet adherence: A randomized controlled trial. Appetite 2024, 201, 107597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ghammachi, N.; Mihrshahi, S.; Ronto, R. Web-based experiential nutrition education intervention “the green hub” to promote sustainable and healthy diets among young adults in Australia. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Peters, N.C.; Contento, I.R.; Kronenberg, F.; Coleton, M. Adherence in a 1-year whole foods eating pattern intervention with healthy postmenopausal women. Public Health Nutr. 2014, 17, 2806–2815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Moreau, M.; Plourde, H.; Hendrickson-Nelson, M.; Martin, J. Efficacy of Nutrition Education-Based Cooking Workshops in Community-Dwelling Adults Aged 50 Years and Older. J. Nutr. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2015, 34, 369–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Diallo, A.F.; Falls, K.; Hicks, K.; McQueen Gibson, E.; Obaid, R.; Slattum, P.; Zanjani, F.; Price, E.; Parsons, P. The Healthy Meal Program: A food insecurity screening and referral program for urban dwelling older adults. Public Health Nurs. 2020, 37, 671–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kwon, J.; Yoshida, Y.; Yoshida, H.; Kim, H.; Suzuki, T.; Lee, Y. Effects of a combined physical training and nutrition intervention on physical performance and health-related quality of life in prefrail older women living in the community: A randomized controlled trial. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2015, 16, 263.e1–263.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Lindsay, S.; Bellaby, P.; Smith, S.; Baker, R. Enabling healthy choices: Is ICT the highway to health improvement? Health 2008, 12, 313–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Delichatsios, H.K.; Hauser, M.E.; Burgess, J.D.; Eisenberg, D.M. Shared Medical Appointments: A Portal for Nutrition and Culinary Education in Primary Care-A Pilot Feasibility Project. Glob. Adv. Health Med. 2015, 4, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Janko, R.K.; Haussmann, I.; Patel, A. The Effect of a Lecture-Based Educational Intervention to Improve the Nutrition Knowledge and Behavior of Plant-Based Seventh-Day Adventists Living in the United Kingdom. Health Sci. Rep. 2025, 8, e70440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Akhu-Zaheya, L.M.; Shiyab, W.Y. The effect of short message system (SMS) reminder on adherence to a healthy diet, medication, and cessation of smoking among adult patients with cardiovascular diseases. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2017, 98, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cicolini, G.; Simonetti, V.; Comparcini, D.; Celiberti, I.; Di Nicola, M.; Capasso, L.M.; Flacco, M.; Bucci, M.; Mezzetti, A.; Manzoli, L. Efficacy of a nurse-led email reminder program for cardiovascular prevention risk reduction in hypertensive patients: A randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2014, 51, 833–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Donaldson, E.L.; Fallows, S.; Morris, M. A text message based weight management intervention for overweight adults. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2014, 27 (Suppl. S2), 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Vinitha, R.; Nanditha, A.; Snehalatha, C.; Satheesh, K.; Susairaj, P.; Raghavan, A.; Ramachandran, A. Effectiveness of mobile phone text messaging in improving glycaemic control among persons with newly detected type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2019, 158, 107919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Kelly, J.T.; Conley, M.; Hoffmann, T.; Craig, J.C.; Tong, A.; Reidlinger, D.P.; Reeves, M.M.; Howard, K.; Krishnasamy, R.; Kurtkoti, J.; et al. A Coaching Program to Improve Dietary Intake of Patients with CKD: ENTICE-CKD. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2020, 15, 330–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Dawson, J.; Campbell, K.L.; Craig, J.C.; Tong, A.; Teixeira-Pinto, A.; Brown, M.A.; Howard, K.; Howell, M.; Khalid, R.; Sud, K.; et al. A Text Messaging Intervention for Dietary Behaviors for People Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Feasibility Study of KIDNEYTEXT. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2021, 78, 85–95.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Yasmin, F.; Nahar, N.; Banu, B.; Ali, L.; Sauerborn, R.; Souares, A. The influence of mobile phone-based health reminders on patient adherence to medications and healthy lifestyle recommendations for effective management of diabetes type 2: A randomized control trial in Dhaka, Bangladesh. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2020, 20, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Islam, S.M.S.; George, E.S.; Maddison, R. Effectiveness of a mobile phone text messaging intervention on dietary behaviour in patients with type 2 diabetes: A post-hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Mhealth 2021, 7, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Choi, B.G.; Dhawan, T.; Metzger, K.; Marshall, L.; Akbar, A.; Jain, T.; Young, H.A.; Katz, R.J. Image-Based Mobile System for Dietary Management in an American Cardiology Population: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Dietary Coaching Delivered via a Smartphone App Versus Traditional Counseling. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2019, 7, e10755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Allen, J.K.; Stephens, J.; Himmelfarb, C.R.D.; Stewart, K.J.; Hauck, S. Research Article Randomized Controlled Pilot Study Testing Use of Smartphone Technology for Obesity Treatment. J. Obes. 2013, 2013, 151597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Ku, E.J.; Park, J.I.; Jeon, H.J.; Oh, T.; Choi, H.J. Clinical efficacy and plausibility of a smartphone-based integrated online real-time diabetes care system via glucose and diet data management: A pilot study. Intern. Med. J. 2020, 50, 1524–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Boels, A.M.; Vos, R.C.; Dijkhorst-Oei, L.-T.; Rutten, G.E. Effectiveness of diabetes self-management education and support via a smartphone application in insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: Results of a randomized controlled trial (TRIGGER study). BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 2019, 7, e000981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dorsch, M.P.; Cornellier, M.L.; Poggi, A.D.; Bilgen, F.; Chen, P.; Wu, C.; An, L.C.; Hummel, S.L. Effects of a Novel Contextual Just-In-Time Mobile App Intervention (LowSalt4Life) on Sodium Intake in Adults with Hypertension: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020, 8, e16696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Hansel, B.; Giral, P.; Gambotti, L.; Lafourcade, A.; Peres, G.; Filipecki, C.; Kadouch, D.; Hartemann, A.; Oppert, J.-M.; Bruckert, E.; et al. A Fully Automated Web-Based Program Improves Lifestyle Habits and HbA1c in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Abdominal Obesity: Randomized Trial of Patient E-Coaching Nutritional Support (The ANODE Study). J. Med. Internet Res. 2017, 19, e360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Abu-Saad, K.; Murad, H.; Barid, R.; Olmer, L.; Ziv, A.; Younis-Zeidan, N.; Kaufman-Shriqui, V.; Gillon-Keren, M.; Rigler, S.; Berchenko, Y.; et al. Development and Efficacy of an Electronic, Culturally Adapted Lifestyle Counseling Tool for Improving Diabetes-Related Dietary Knowledge: Randomized Controlled Trial Among Ethnic Minority Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J. Med. Internet Res. 2019, 21, e13674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Jahangiry, L.; Montazeri, A.; Najafi, M.; Yaseri, M.; Farhangi, M.A. An interactive web-based intervention on nutritional status, physical activity and health-related quality of life in patient with metabolic syndrome: A randomized-controlled trial (The Red Ruby Study). Nutr. Diabetes 2017, 7, e240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ramadas, A.; Chan, C.K.Y.; Oldenburg, B.; Hussein, Z.; Quek, K.F. Randomised-controlled trial of a web-based dietary intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes: Changes in health cognitions and glycemic control. BMC Public Health 2018, 18, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Goni, L.; de la O, V.; Barrio-López, M.T.; Ramos, P.; Tercedor, L.; Ibañez-Criado, J.L.; Castellanos, E.; Criao, A.I.; Ruiz, R.M.; Garcia-Bolao, I.; et al. A Remote Nutritional Intervention to Change the Dietary Habits of Patients Undergoing Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e21436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Humalda, J.K.; Klaassen, G.; de Vries, H.; Meuleman, Y.; Verschuur, L.C.; Straathof, E.J.M.; Laverman, G.D.; Bos, W.J.W.; van der Boog, P.J.; Vermeulen, K.M.; et al. A Self-management Approach for Dietary Sodium Restriction in Patients With CKD: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2020, 75, 847–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Lewis, E.; Huang, H.C.; Hassmén, P.; Welvaert, M.; Pumpa, K.L. Adding Telephone and Text Support to an Obesity Management Program Improves Behavioral Adherence and Clinical Outcomes. A Randomized Controlled Crossover Trial. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2019, 26, 580–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lee, M.K.; Yun, Y.H.; Park, H.A.; Lee, E.S.; Jung, K.H.; Noh, D.Y. A Web-based self-management exercise and diet intervention for breast cancer survivors: Pilot randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2014, 51, 1557–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Russell, R.D.; Begley, A.; Daly, A.; Dunlop, E.; Mazahery, H.; Pham, M.N.; Grech, L.; Black, L.J. Feasibility of a co-designed online nutrition education program for people with multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2024, 90, 105816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Russell, R.D.; He, J.; Black, L.J.; Begley, A. Evaluating Experiences in a Digital Nutrition Education Program for People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Study. Health Expect 2024, 27, e70012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Green, B.B.; Anderson, M.L.; Cook, A.J.; Catz, S.; Fishman, P.A.; McClure, J.B.; Reid, R.J. e-Care for heart wellness: A feasibility trial to decrease blood pressure and cardiovascular risk. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2014, 46, 368–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Macias-Navarro, L.; McWhorter, J.W.; Guevara, D.C.; Bentley, S.S.; Sharma, S.V.; Torres, J.H.; Ai, D.; Heredia, N.I. A virtual culinary medicine intervention for ethnically diverse individuals with type 2 diabetes: Development of the Nourishing the Community through Culinary Medicine. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1383621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Krenek, A.M.; Aggarwal, M.; Chung, S.T.; Courville, A.B.; Farmer, N.; Guo, J.; Mathews, A. Influence of a Virtual Plant-Based Culinary Medicine Intervention on Mood, Stress, and Quality of Life Among Patients at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease. Nutrients 2025, 17, 1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Kitaoka, K.; Nagaoka, J.; Matsuoka, T.; Shigemura, C.; Harada, K.; Aoi, W.; Wada, S.; Asano, H.; Sakane, N.; Higashi, A. Dietary intervention with cooking instructions and self-monitoring of the diet in free-living hypertensive men. Clin. Exp. Hypertens. 2013, 35, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Alonso-Domínguez, R.; García-Ortiz, L.; Patino-Alonso, M.C.; Sánchez-Aguadero, N.; Gómez-Marcos, M.A.; Recio-Rodríguez, J.I. Effectiveness of A Multifactorial Intervention in Increasing Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet among Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Type 2: A Controlled and Randomized Study (EMID Study). Nutrients 2019, 11, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Villarini, M.; Lanari, C.; Barchiesi, L.; Casciari, E.; Tabascio, A.; Castellini, M.; Levorato, S.; Vannini, S.; Fornaciari, G.; Moretti, M.; et al. Effects of the “PreveDi” lifestyle modification trial on metabolic syndrome. Ann. Ig. 2015, 27, 595–606. [Google Scholar]
  97. Penn, L.; Ryan, V.; White, M. Feasibility, acceptability and outcomes at a 12-month follow-up of a novel community-based intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes in adults at high risk: Mixed methods pilot study. BMJ Open 2013, 3, e003585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Shahar, S.; Adznam, S.N.; Lee, L.K.; Yusof, N.A.; Salleh, M.; Mohamed Sakian, N.I. A nutrition education intervention for anthropometric and biochemical profiles of rural older Malays with metabolic syndrome. Public Health Nurs. 2013, 30, 140–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Polom, J.; Boccardi, V. Employing Nutrition to Delay Aging: A Plant-Based Telomere-Friendly Dietary Revolution. Nutrients 2025, 17, 2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Ungvari, Z.; Fekete, M.; Varga, P.; Lehoczki, A.; Fekete, J.T.; Ungvari, A.; Győrffy, B. Overweight and obesity significantly increase colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis of 66 studies revealing a 25–57% elevation in risk. Geroscience 2025, 47, 3343–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Fekete, M.; Csípő, T.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Fehér, Á.; Szarvas, Z.; Kaposvári, C.; Horváth, K.; Lehoczki, A.; Tarantini, S.; Varga, J.T. The effectiveness of supplementation with key vitamins, minerals, antioxidants and specific nutritional supplements in COPD—A review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Fekete, M.; Csípő, T.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Bálint, M.; Csizmadia, Z.; Tarantini, S.; Varga, J.T. The possible role of food and diet in the quality of life in patients with COPD—A state-of-the-art review. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Fekete, M.; Lehoczki, A.; Tarantini, S.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Csípő, T.; Csizmadia, Z.; Varga, J.T. Improving Cognitive Function with Nutritional Supplements in Aging: A Comprehensive Narrative Review of Clinical Studies Investigating the Effects of Vitamins, Minerals, Antioxidants, and Other Dietary Supplements. Nutrients 2023, 15, 5116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Lehoczki, A.; Csípő, T.; Lipécz, Á.; Major, D.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Csík, B.; Mózes, N.; Fehér, Á.; Dósa, N.; Árva, D.; et al. Western Diet and Cognitive Decline: A Hungarian Perspective-Implications for the Design of the Semmelweis Study. Nutrients 2025, 17, 2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Madarász, B.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Szarvas, Z.; Fekete, M.; Varga, J.T.; Tarantini, S.; Csiszar, A.; Lionetti, V.; Tabák, A.G.; Ungvari, Z.; et al. Survival and longevity of European rulers: Geographical influences and exploring potential factors, including the Mediterranean diet—A historical analysis from 1354 to the twentieth century. GeroScience 2024, 46, 3801–3818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Fekete, M.; Szarvas, Z.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Feher, A.; Csipo, T.; Forrai, J.; Dosa, N.; Peterfi, A.; Lehoczki, A.; Tarantini, S.; et al. Nutrition strategies promoting healthy aging: From improvement of cardiovascular and brain health to prevention of age-associated diseases. Nutrients 2022, 15, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ungvari, Z.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Csiszar, A.; Kunutsor, S.K. The multifaceted benefits of walking for healthy aging: From Blue Zones to molecular mechanisms. Geroscience 2023, 45, 3211–3239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Ungvari, Z.; Sonntag, W.E.; de Cabo, R.; Baur, J.A.; Csiszar, A. Mitochondrial protection by resveratrol. Exerc. Sport. Sci. Rev. 2011, 39, 128–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Ungvari, Z.; Tabak, A.G.; Adany, R.; Purebl, G.; Kaposvari, C.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Csípő, T.; Szarvas, Z.; Horváth, K.; Mukli, P.; et al. The Semmelweis Study: A longitudinal occupational cohort study within the framework of the Semmelweis Caring University Model Program for supporting healthy aging. Geroscience 2024, 46, 191–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Zábó, V.; Lehoczki, A.; Buda, A.; Varga, P.; Fekete, M.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Moizs, M.; Giovannetti, G.; Loscalzo, Y.; Giannini, M.; et al. The role of burnout prevention in promoting healthy aging: Frameworks for the Semmelweis Study and Semmelweis-EUniWell Workplace Health Promotion Program. Geroscience 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Conceptual framework linking plant-based diets, digital microinterventions, and patient outcomes. Plant-based diets (whole grains, vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts, seeds) combined with digital microinterventions (virtual cooking programs, coaching, apps) may enhance patient adherence and engagement, thereby reducing the burden of chronic disease.
Figure 1. Conceptual framework linking plant-based diets, digital microinterventions, and patient outcomes. Plant-based diets (whole grains, vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts, seeds) combined with digital microinterventions (virtual cooking programs, coaching, apps) may enhance patient adherence and engagement, thereby reducing the burden of chronic disease.
Nutrients 17 03310 g001
Figure 2. Pathways of digital nutrition interventions (culinary medicine programs, online education, and SMS-based support) in facilitating plant-based dietary adoption, conceptualized within the COM-B behavior change framework. ↑—increase/improvement.
Figure 2. Pathways of digital nutrition interventions (culinary medicine programs, online education, and SMS-based support) in facilitating plant-based dietary adoption, conceptualized within the COM-B behavior change framework. ↑—increase/improvement.
Nutrients 17 03310 g002
Table 1. Characteristics and outcomes of web-based digital nutrition interventions promoting plant-based diets in healthy populations.
Table 1. Characteristics and outcomes of web-based digital nutrition interventions promoting plant-based diets in healthy populations.
Author, Year, CountrySample DemographicsTiming of Outcome AssessmentMethod of Nutrition AssessmentType of Digital InterventionNutritional OutcomesOther Outcomes
Alexander et al., 2010, USA [43]n = 2540 adults (21–65 y), 5 health insurers, oversampled ethnic minoritiesBaseline, 3, 6, 12 months16-item NCI FFQ, 2-item short questionnaireWeb-based MENU program: (1) control, (2) tailored web, (3) tailored web + email MIFV intake + 2 servings/day in all arms; largest increase in arm 3 (+2.8 servings, p = 0.05)High satisfaction, easy scalability, good acceptability
Buller et al., 2008, USA [44]n = 755 adults, 65% Hispanic, 9% Native American, 88% female, ruralBaseline, 4 monthsFFQ (All-Day Screener), single-item FV questionWeb-based “5 a Day, the Rio Grande Way” site (recipes, tips, community info)FV intake ↑ (FFQ: ns; single-item: significant ↑, OR = 1.84, p < 0.05)Website usage low/variable; activity associated with FV increase
Lippke et al., 2016, Germany [49]n = 701 adults, mean age 38 y, 81% female, high educationBaseline (T1), 1 week (T2), 1 month (T3)Self-report, FV servings/day, planning scalesInternet-based action and coping planning modules (vs. active and waitlist control)FV intake ↑ (T3); planning mediated changeEngagement moderated effect (inverse U); intervention clarified by moderated mediation
Moore et al., 2008, USA [56]n = 2834 adults (EMC employees + family), 26% active at 12 monthsBaseline, 12 monthsSelf-report (weight, BP, dietary logs); DASH 24 h recall validated vs. FFQWeb-based DASH for Health program with weekly articles, emails, self-monitoringFV intake ↑, soda ↓, grains ↓Overweight: −4.2 lbs; hypertensive: SBP −6.8 mmHg; dose–response with log-ins
Livingstone et al., 2016, 7 EU countries [55]n = 1607 adults ≥18 y, 7 countriesBaseline, 3, 6 monthsOnline FFQ (157 items), MedDiet score (PREDIMED 14-point)6-month, 4-arm RCT (general advice vs. personalized nutrition [diet/phenotype/genotype])MedDiet score higher in PN group, highest in genotype-based PNBaseline MedDiet score linked to BMI, physical activity; PN group showed moderate but significant improvement
Springvloet et al., 2015, The Netherlands [47] n = 1349 adults (20–65 y), randomized (basic n = 456, plus n = 459, control n = 434)Baseline, 9 monthsOnline questionnaire: FV, snacks, saturated fat, BMI, self-regulationWeb-based tailored nutrition education (basic: cognitive; plus: cognitive + environmental)Basic: vegetable intake ↑ in low/medium educated (ES = 0.32); no effect in high-educatedLong-term effect limited; self-regulation change smaller in intervention than control
Lange et al., 2013, Germany [50]n = 791; age M = 37.7 (14–79), 79% women, BMI M = 25.6, 70% college degreeBaseline & 1 week follow-upSelf-reported fruit intake (portions/day)1 h online self-regulation intervention with volitional prompts↑ Fruit consumption in intervention vs. controlImproved dietary planning and action control; brief intervention effective despite short duration
Tapper et al., 2014, UK [45]n = 100; age M = 39, 82% female, BMI M = 27.7, 93% whiteBaseline, 3, 6 monthsBlock Fat/Sugar/FV FFQ + BMI, WHR, HRV, IPAQ, alcohol & smoking questionnairesInternet-based healthy eating program with 24 weekly sessions, reminders, gamified incentives↓ Saturated fat & added sugar intake, ↑ F&V intakeImprovements in BMI, WHR, HRV; adherence monitored; incentives improved participation
Franko et al., 2008, USA [48]n = 476 undergraduates, 18–24 y, 6 US universitiesBaseline, post-test, 3 & 6 monthsFFQ, single-item F&V servings, Nutrition Knowledge TestMyStudentBody.com-Nutrition, interactive web program + booster session↑ F&V intake (0.33 & 0.24 servings), ↑ nutrition knowledge↑ Motivation, self-efficacy, social support; attitude toward exercise improved
Springvloet et al., 2015, The Netherlands [46]n = 1349 adults (20–65 y), general populationBaseline, 1 month, 4 months postinterventionSelf-reported FV, high-energy snacks, saturated fatWeb-based computer-tailored nutrition education (basic vs. plus with environmental feedback)FV intake ↑ (plus version), high-energy snacks ↓ (both), saturated fat ↓ (basic)More effective than generic info, especially in high-educated; email reminders improved engagement
Lindsay et al., 2008, UK [65]n = 108 adults (50–74 y) with CHD from deprived areaBaseline, 6 monthsSelf-reported diet (bad foods), alcohol, exercise, smoking, mental health, social supportPassword-protected health portal with weekly sessions, phone support, forums↓ Frequency of “bad foods”↑ Health visits; slight improvements in diet, alcohol, smoke exposure; peer support engagement
Ghammachi et al., 2022, Australia [60]n = 17 young adults (18–25 y)Pre- and post-program (4 weeks)Online surveys: knowledge, attitudes, practices, FV intake; Facebook engagement4-week web-based experiential program via private Facebook group (quizzes, videos, challenges)Improved knowledge, attitudes, motivation; FV intake improved (pilot, no sig. testing)Engagement data via Facebook; certificate of completion; prize draws
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CHD, coronary heart disease; DASH, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension; EMC, EMC Corporation; ES, effect size; EU, European Union; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire; FV, fruit and vegetable(s); HRV, heart rate variability; IPAQ, International Physical Activity Questionnaire; MedDiet, Mediterranean Diet; MI, motivational interviewing; M, mean; NCI, National Cancer Institute; ns, non-significant; OR, odds ratio; PN, personalized nutrition; PREDIMED, Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SBP, systolic blood pressure; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; y, years, ↑—increase; ↓—decrease.
Table 2. Summary of digital nutrition interventions using mobile applications, virtual cooking classes (Zoom teaching kitchens), and email programs to promote plant-based dietary behaviors.
Table 2. Summary of digital nutrition interventions using mobile applications, virtual cooking classes (Zoom teaching kitchens), and email programs to promote plant-based dietary behaviors.
Author, Year, CountrySample DemographicsTiming of Outcome AssessmentMethod of Nutrition AssessmentType of Digital InterventionNutritional OutcomesOther Outcomes
Rodgers et al., 2016, USA [51]n = 43 minority female university students, BMI ≥ 25 and <21 subgroupsBaseline, 3 weeks, 10-week follow-upSelf-report (FV, SSB intake), baseline BMIMobile food photography + 3 daily motivational SMSBMI ≥ 25: FV ↑; BMI < 21: fruit ↓, vegetables ↔; SSB ↔Short-term support for healthy eating; effect differed by BMI
Nour et al., 2019, Australia [52]n = 97 young adults, mean 24.8 y, 49% adhered for 4 weeksBaseline, 4 weeksApp logging (vegetable intake) + engagement dataSmartphone self-monitoring and goal-setting app ± gamification and/or Facebook supportApp usage duration associated with ↑ vegetable intake (p < 0.001)Gamification/social support had no direct effect; engagement higher in persistent users
Staffileno et al., 2018, USA [53]n = 26 young African American women, 18–45 y, prehypertensionBaseline, 12 weeks6-item DASH screener, pedometer, BP, BMIWeb-based eHealth platform (12 modules, DASH vs. PA arm), mobile access + coachingDASH group: DASH score ↑ (p = 0.001); large effect on FV and dairy intakePA group: +39% steps, weight loss; engagement differed (71% vs. 48%)
Sommer et al., 2023, USA [30]n = 609 peri- & postmenopausal women, mean age 58.8, 88% WhitePre- & post-intervention surveysSelf-reported weight, BMI, FFQ (FV, fish, beans, red meat, sugary drinks, grains), cooking confidence surveyNuCook virtual teaching kitchen, synchronous online classes with live cooking & nutrition discussion↑ FV, fish, beans; ↓ red meat, sugary drinks, white grains; small weight loss↑ Cooking self-efficacy & confidence; ↓ BMI in obese subgroup
Glickman et al., 2024, USA [57]n = 360 osteopathic medical students (249 in-person, 111 virtual)Post-course survey after 4-module culinary medicine courseSelf-generated survey: knowledge (5 items), enjoyment (2 items), Likert scaleVirtual (Blackboard Collaborate) or in-person culinary medicine courseKnowledge ↑ in in-person groupEnjoyment ↑ in in-person group (Cohen’s d = 0.807); high satisfaction; reliability acceptable (Cronbach’s α: knowledge = 0.74, enjoyment = 0.77)
Charles et al., 2023, USA [31]n = 80 physician assistant students, medical traineesPre-intervention, immediately post-intervention, 4 weeks post-interventionSelf-reported knowledge, attitudes, confidence, personal dietary behaviorsInteractive, single-session virtual curriculum (didactic + assessment/counseling + virtual culinary medicine via Zoom)Knowledge ↑ (48.9%→78.9%, retained 75.8% at 4 weeks); FV counseling confidence ↑Attitudes improved on diet–disease reversal; scalable teaching kitchen; engagement via Zoom breakout rooms
Krenek et al., 2025, USA [32]n = 40 adults, 75% female, age 64 ± 9 y, BMI 32 ± 7, ≥5% ASCVD riskBaseline and post each 4-week diet periodASA-24 Automated 24 h Dietary Recall, VeggieMeter® skin carotenoidsWeekly virtual vegan culinary medicine sessions via Zoom↑ Whole Plant Food Density, diet quality, vegan adherence↑ Cooking confidence, diet knowledge, perceived heart health control, CAFPAS; high satisfaction
Razavi et al., 2023, USA [58]n = 1433 medical trainees (519 virtual culinary medicine, 914 standard nutrition), mean age 27, >50% womenCross-sectional survey post-courseCHOP-MT survey: diet, MedDiet adherence, nutritional attitudes, competenciesVirtual culinary medicine (Zoom/WebEx), team-based cooking & discussionsMedDiet adherence ↑ (fruit intake OR 1.37)↑ Lifestyle medicine competencies (fiber OR 4.03, T2DM prevention OR 4.69, omega fatty acids OR 5.21, MedDiet counseling OR 5.73)
Kothe & Mullan, 2014, Australia [54]n = 275 university students (≥18 y)Baseline, 30 daysSelf-reported FV intake (servings/day)30-day email intervention (daily vs. every 3-day messages)FV intake ↑ in both groupsHigh-frequency messages perceived as excessive; acceptability moderated effect
Abbreviations: ASCVD, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; ASA-24, Automated Self-Administered 24 h Dietary Recall; BMI, body mass index; BP, blood pressure; CAFPAS, Cooking and Food Provisioning Action Scale; CHOP-MT, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia Medical Trainee survey; DASH, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension; FFQ, food frequency questionnaire; FV, fruit and vegetable(s); OR, odds ratio; PA, physical activity; SSB, sugar-sweetened beverage; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; ↑—increase; ↓—decrease; ↔—no significant change.
Table 3. Summary of traditional, group-based, and hybrid interventions (cooking classes, community programs, and Zoom-delivered nutrition education) promoting plant-based dietary behaviors.
Table 3. Summary of traditional, group-based, and hybrid interventions (cooking classes, community programs, and Zoom-delivered nutrition education) promoting plant-based dietary behaviors.
Author, Year, CountryPopulation & SettingTimelineMeasuresInterventionMain OutcomesAdditional Findings
Diallo et al., 2020, USA [63]566 older adults (60% female, 81% African American, age 45–95, low-income)Ongoing during programUSDA Six-Item Food Security, Lubben Social Network ScaleHealthy Meal Program: weekly congregate meals, home delivery, mobile market, 8-week Kitchen Clinic↑ Access to vegetables, ↑ fresh produce intake↓ Food insecurity, ↓ social isolation; strong engagement in education
Delichatsios et al., 2015, USA [66]70 adults with ≥1 cardiovascular risk factor, primary care17 SMA sessions over 4 yearsPatient surveys (knowledge & satisfaction)Shared Medical Appointments with cooking demos + nutrition education↑ Nutrition knowledge, ↑ cooking skills, improved dietary strategiesHigh satisfaction; cost-effective; labs and meds adjusted during sessions
Kwon et al., 2015, Japan [64] 89 prefrail women ≥70 yBaseline, 12 weeks, 6 monthsDietary variety score, cooking classes, HRQOLGroup-based exercise + nutrition program↑ Dietary variety, ↑ HRQOL domains↑ Handgrip, balance, walking speed
Peters et al., 2014, USA [61]Healthy postmenopausal women, 50–72 y, BMI 18–30Baseline, 6 m, 12 mMonthly 24 h food recalls, adherence scoreHands-on cooking + behavioral (social cognitive theory)Significant adoption & maintenance of diet patterns↓ Non-adherence; psychosocial predictors important
Moreau et al., 2015, Canada [62]144 community-dwelling adults ≥50 yPre- & post-8 workshopsElderly Nutrition Screening Q., session surveysCooking + nutrition workshops↑ Knowledge, confidence, ↑ intake of whole grains, F&V, milk alternativesConfidence linked to healthier diet; autonomy unchanged
Shavit et al., 2024, Israel [59]211 adults, plant-based MedDiet (Fixed n = 95, Changing n = 116)Baseline, 6 w, 3 m FU, 6 m FUFood diversity, I-MEDAS, % plant foodsWeekly Zoom sessions + digital menusFixed menu: sustained MedDiet adherence, ↑ plant foodsHigh completion (97%); variety explored; taste ratings collected
Janko et al., 2025, UK [67]37 Seventh-day Adventists (vegan/veg/pesc.)Pre, post, 4 w FU25-item nutrition knowledge test, follow-up surveySingle 30 min Zoom lecture by nutrition expert↑ Knowledge (8.5→20.0/25), ↑ supplement useBehavior changes at 4 w; framed by Health Belief Model
Abbreviations: SMA, Shared Medical Appointment; HRQOL, Health-Related Quality of Life; MedDiet, Mediterranean Diet; I-MEDAS, Israeli Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener; F&V, Fruits and Vegetables; FU, Follow-up, ↑—increase; ↓—decrease.
Table 4. SMS- and email-based interventions to promote dietary change in patient populations.
Table 4. SMS- and email-based interventions to promote dietary change in patient populations.
Author, Year, CountrySample DemographicsTiming of Outcome AssessmentMethod of Nutrition AssessmentType of Digital InterventionNutritional OutcomesOther Outcomes
Akhu-Zaheya & Shiyab, 2016, Jordan [68]160 adult outpatients with CVDs (≥18 y; excluded DM, renal, neurological disease)Baseline, 3 monthsMEDASSMS reminders (diet-focused) vs. placebo SMS vs. control↑ Mediterranean diet adherence (p < 0.001)↑ Medication adherence (p = 0.001); no effect on smoking
Dawson, 2021, Australia [73]130 adults on hemodialysis; ≥18 y; English-speakingBaseline, 3, 6 months24 h recall, portion models, FoodworksSMS (3/week; personalized 0–3 m, general 4–6 m)No significant adherence to protein, K, P, Na guidelines; exploratory ↓ intake of these nutrientsRecruitment 48%, retention 88%; themes of acceptability; IDWG, electrolytes, binder use, QoL, healthcare use
Vinitha et al., 2019, India [71]248 adults with newly diagnosed T2DM, mean age 43.3 ± 8.7 yBaseline, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months24 h recall, nutrient intake per NIN guidelines2–3 SMS/week on lifestyle + medication adherencePromoted healthier dietary patterns (details not specified)↓ HbA1c, ↓ LDL, ↓ weight, ↓ waist, ↓ BP, ↑ QoL, ↑ PA; high acceptability
Yasmin et al., 2020, Bangladesh [74]320 adults with T2DM (160 I, 160 C; 273 completed)Baseline, 12–16 monthsStructured interviews; anthropometry & labsMobile phone interactive voice calls every 10 d + 24/7 call center↑ Adherence to dietary advice↑ Medication & exercise adherence, ↓ tobacco use, ↑ glycemic control
Cicolini et al., 2014, Italy [69]198 hypertensive adults, mean age 59 ± 14.5 yBaseline, 1, 3, 6 monthsValidated diet questionnaires, daily self-assessment, food group tablesNurse-led weekly emails + phone follow-up↑ Fruit intake, ↓ obesity prevalence, ↑ adherence to low-salt, low-fat diet↓ BP, ↓ LDL, ↓ total cholesterol, ↓ TG, ↓ glucose; ↑ PA, ↑ med adherence, ↑ smoking cessation
Donaldson et al., 2014, UK [70]34 obese/overweight adults (BMI ≥ 30 or ≥28 + comorbidity); post-LEAP programPre- and post-12 weeksSelf-reported F&V & breakfast intake; step count; QoL questionnairesSMS twice weekly; feedback loop with practitioner↑ F&V, ↑ breakfast intake, ↑ adherence to step goals↓ Weight (−1.6 kg), ↓ BMI (−0.6), ↓ waist (−2.2 cm), ↑ QoL, better follow-up
Islam et al., 2021, Bangladesh [75]236 adults with T2DM, ≤5 years since diagnosis, on oral medsBaseline, 6 monthsWHO STEPS survey + FFQ; weekly servingsDaily SMS × 6 months (diet, PA, meds, diabetes education)No significant change in fruit/vegetable intake; ↓ sugared beverage intake (NS); ↑ sugar in tea (+0.94 tsp/w, p < 0.05)HbA1c, BP, anthropometry measured; no major clinical effect; feasible
Kelly et al., 2020, Australia [72]80 adults with stage 3–4 CKD, mean age 62 ± 12 y3 months (end Phase 1), 6 months (end Phase 2)AHEI; exploratory diet measures (veg, fiber, food groups)Telehealth coaching: 3 m dietitian calls + SMS, then 3 m SMS onlyNo significant effect on AHEI; improved veg intake, fiber, core food groups↓ Weight; no BP change; safe, no adverse events
Abbreviations: CVD, Cardiovascular Disease; DM, Diabetes Mellitus; MEDAS, Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener; SMS, Short Message Service; T2DM, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; NIN, National Institute of Nutrition; I, Intervention; C, Control; BP, Blood Pressure; LDL, Low-Density Lipoprotein; TG, Triglycerides; PA, Physical Activity; F&V, Fruits and Vegetables; FFQ, Food Frequency Questionnaire; WHO STEPS, World Health Organization STEPwise survey; AHEI, Alternative Healthy Eating Index; QoL, Quality of Life; IDWG, Interdialytic Weight Gain; NS, Not Significant, ↑—increase; ↓—decrease.
Table 5. Mobile Application and Smartphone-Based Nutrition Interventions.
Table 5. Mobile Application and Smartphone-Based Nutrition Interventions.
Author, Year, CountrySample DemographicsTiming of Outcome AssessmentMethod of Nutrition AssessmentType of Digital InterventionNutritional OutcomesOther Outcomes
Choi, B.G. et al., 2019, USA [76]100 cardiology patients (mean age ~57, 60% male, 20–35% CAD)Baseline, 1, 3, 6 monthsMediterranean Diet Score (MDS)Smartphone app with asynchronous dietary counseling (custom app by Vibrent Health), 60 min RD interaction; SOC: 2 extra face-to-face sessions at 1 and 3 months↑ Adherence to Mediterranean diet over time in both EXP and SOC groups; no significant difference between groups↑ Weight loss (EXP 3.3 lbs vs. SOC 3.1 lbs, p = 0.04); ↑ diet satisfaction over time; BP, lipids, HbA1c, CRP showed no significant differences
Allen, J.K. et al., 2013, USA [77]n = 68; 78% female; 49% African American; mean age 45 ± 11 years; BMI 34.3 ± 3.9 kg/m2Baseline and 6 months3-day food records analyzed via NDSRSmartphone app (“Lose It!”) for self-monitoring diet, exercise, weight; delivered alone or with intensive/less intensive behavioral counselingTrends toward improved dietary intake in counseling + smartphone groups (specifics not detailed)BMI, waist circumference, physical activity, feasibility, acceptability, adherence to intervention
Ku, E.J. et al., 2020, South Korea [78]40 adults with T2DM (20 SC, 20 CC), aged 20–80; exclusion: cognitive impairment, inability to use smartphone, medications affecting glucose controlBaseline and 12 weeksDietary logging via Noom Coach app (SC group), SDSCA questionnaire (all participants)Smartphone-based integrated online real-time diabetes care system: Noom Coach app for dietary logging, CareSens N NFC glucose meter, individualized text feedback, social network support (SC group)↑ Self-reported dietary management (general diet, specific diet) in SC vs. CC; SDSCA scores increased in both groupsGlycaemic control: higher proportion achieving A1C < 6.5% in SC vs. CC (47.1% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.019); improvements in blood glucose testing and foot care; no major adverse events reported
Boels, A.M. et al., 2019, The Netherlands [79]228 adults with T2DM, aged 40–70, on insulin ≥3 months, HbA1c > 7%; intervention n = 114, control n = 114Baseline, 6 months follow-up, additional 3-month sustainability follow-up (intervention group)FFQSmartphone app delivering unidirectional evidence-based messages on diet, physical activity, hypoglycaemia prevention, and glucose variability; frequency, topics, and duration tailored by patient (6–9 months)Not explicitly reported yet; app targeted dietary habits and self-management behaviorsPrimary: HbA1c and % achieving HbA1c ≤ 7% without hypoglycaemia; Secondary: BMI, waist circumference, insulin dose, lipid profile, BP, hypoglycaemic events, glycaemic variability, self-management (SDSCA), physical activity, health status, diabetes-dependent QoL, treatment satisfaction, cost-effectiveness, sustainability
Dorsch, M.P. et al., 2020, USA [80]50 adults ≥ 18 y, hypertensive, iPhone users; excluded CKD, heart failure, severe HTN, insulin-treated diabetes, loop diuretics, corticosteroids, NSAIDsBaseline and week 824 h urinary sodium (spot & collection), FFQ, ASA24 24-h dietary recall, sodium screenerJust-in-time adaptive mobile app (LowSalt4Life) with push notifications, geolocation-based suggestions, low-sodium food alternatives, restaurant/grocery search↓ Sodium intake (spot urine: App −462 mg vs. No App +381 mg, p = 0.03; FFQ: App −1553 mg vs. No App −515 mg, p = 0.01)BP: App −7.5 mmHg vs. No App −0.7 mmHg (p = 0.12); Self-confidence in following low-sodium diet: no significant difference
Abbreviations: CAD, Coronary artery disease; SOC, Standard of care; EXP, Experimental group; BMI, Body mass index; MDS, Mediterranean Diet Score; RD, Registered dietitian; T2DM, Type 2 diabetes mellitus; SC, Smartphone care group; CC, Conventional care group; SDSCA, Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities; FFQ, Food Frequency Questionnaire; ASA24, Automated Self-Administered 24 h Dietary Recall; BP, Blood pressure; HbA1c, Glycated hemoglobin; CRP, C-reactive protein; QoL, Quality of life, ↑—increase; ↓—decrease.
Table 8. Hybrid Programs Combining Community and Digital Elements.
Table 8. Hybrid Programs Combining Community and Digital Elements.
Author, Year, CountrySample DemographicsTiming of Outcome AssessmentMethod of Nutrition AssessmentType of Digital InterventionNutritional OutcomesOther Outcomes
Alonso-Domínguez et al., 2019, Spain [95] 204 adults with T2DM (25–70 yrs, mean 60.6; excluded CVD, musculoskeletal, neuropsychological disease)Baseline, 3 months, 12 monthsMEDAS questionnaire, Diet Quality Index (DQI)Multifactorial: smartphone app (EVIDENT II) for 3 months; 90 min food workshop; weekly heart-healthy walks (5 weeks)↑ Adherence to Mediterranean diet (ΔMEDAS +2.2 at 3 months, sustained at 12 months); ↑ Diet quality (ΔDQI +2.5 at 3 months)↑ Physical activity (weekly walks attendance 80–90%); ↑ app engagement (days of use recorded); biomedical parameters monitored (glucose, HbA1c)
Villarini et al., 2015, Italy [96]186 adults aged ≥45, community pharmacy volunteersBaseline, 6 monthsSelf-reported adherence to healthy diet; measured anthropometrics and clinical parameters in pharmaciesLifestyle intervention with digital support: SMS reminders for conferences, cooking classes, physical activity sessionsSlight increase in adherence to healthy diet in males; no significant changes in diet-related biomarkersSignificant reductions in weight, BMI, total cholesterol; no significant change in waist circumference, BP, fasting glucose, triglycerides; metabolic syndrome prevalence decreased non-significantly in women; session attendance low
Penn et al., 2013, UK [97]218 adults aged 45–65 at high risk of T2D (FINDRISC ≥ 11), socioeconomically deprived area; 134 completed follow-up (61%)Baseline, 6 months, 12 monthsSelf-report dietary questionnaire on fruit, vegetable, bread, milk, fat consumption; aligned with dietary adviceOngoing support via mobile text messages, emails; newsletters with information and recipes↑ Adherence to healthy eating; use of healthy cooking demonstrated in sessionsWeight decreased by 5.7 kg (men) and 2.8 kg (women); waist circumference decreased 7.2 cm (men) and 6.0 cm (women); PA level increased 7.9 MET h/day (men) and 6.7 MET h/day (women); high intervention acceptability and retention
Shahar et al., 2013, Malaysia [98]47 older Malays with metabolic syndrome (60–75 yrs; 24 intervention, 23 control; 50.6% men, 49.4% women)Baseline, 6 monthsAnthropometric measurements (weight, waist); dietary counselling using culturally tailored materialsGroup-based nutrition education sessions with flipcharts, booklets, placemats, cooking & exercise demonstrations (interactive visual aids, print materials)Women: ↓ waist circumference; Men: maintained total cholesterolFasting blood glucose, lipid profile, BP, CRP; adherence/compliance assessed weekly then monthly
Abbreviations: T2DM, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, CVD, Cardiovascular Disease, MEDAS, Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener, DQI, Diet Quality Index, SMS, Short Message Service, BP, Blood Pressure, PA, Physical Activity, CRP, C-reactive protein, ↑—increase; ↓—decrease.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zábó, V.; Lehoczki, A.; Varga, J.T.; Szappanos, Á.; Lipécz, Á.; Csípő, T.; Fazekas-Pongor, V.; Major, D.; Fekete, M. Digital Microinterventions in Nutrition: Virtual Culinary Medicine Programs and Their Effectiveness in Promoting Plant-Based Diets—A Narrative Review. Nutrients 2025, 17, 3310. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17203310

AMA Style

Zábó V, Lehoczki A, Varga JT, Szappanos Á, Lipécz Á, Csípő T, Fazekas-Pongor V, Major D, Fekete M. Digital Microinterventions in Nutrition: Virtual Culinary Medicine Programs and Their Effectiveness in Promoting Plant-Based Diets—A Narrative Review. Nutrients. 2025; 17(20):3310. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17203310

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zábó, Virág, Andrea Lehoczki, János Tamás Varga, Ágnes Szappanos, Ágnes Lipécz, Tamás Csípő, Vince Fazekas-Pongor, Dávid Major, and Mónika Fekete. 2025. "Digital Microinterventions in Nutrition: Virtual Culinary Medicine Programs and Their Effectiveness in Promoting Plant-Based Diets—A Narrative Review" Nutrients 17, no. 20: 3310. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17203310

APA Style

Zábó, V., Lehoczki, A., Varga, J. T., Szappanos, Á., Lipécz, Á., Csípő, T., Fazekas-Pongor, V., Major, D., & Fekete, M. (2025). Digital Microinterventions in Nutrition: Virtual Culinary Medicine Programs and Their Effectiveness in Promoting Plant-Based Diets—A Narrative Review. Nutrients, 17(20), 3310. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17203310

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop