Food-Related Behavioral Patterns in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: The Role of Food Involvement and Health Engagement
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design and Participants
2.2. Measures
2.2.1. Sociodemographic and Disease-Related Characteristics
2.2.2. Food Involvement
2.2.3. Health Engagement
2.2.4. Food Choice Motives
2.2.5. Emotional States
2.2.6. Food-Related Quality of Life
2.3. Statistical Analysis
- (i)
- Interpretability of the final clusters’ averages and ANOVA’s p-values;
- (ii)
- Number of participants in each cluster (closer to homogeneity is better);
- (iii)
- Pseudo-F values, calculated according to the procedure described by Calinski and Harabasz [43]: higher pseudo-Fs are an indication of a better solution;
- (iv)
- Finally, to address the stability of the identified best solution, the Rand index [44] was calculated; the Rand index is considered acceptable above the 0.70 threshold.
3. Results
3.1. Participant Characteristics
3.2. Scale Scoring and Descriptive Statistics
3.3. Cluster Analysis
- (i)
- A cluster comprising patients with higher PHE-s® scores and lower FIS scores is labeled as the “Health-conscious” group.
- (ii)
- Another group characterized by higher scores on PHE-s® and FIS is the “Balanced” group.
- (iii)
- A cluster with higher FIS scores and lower PHE-s® scores is identified as the “Hedonist” group.
- (iv)
- Lastly, a cluster of patients with lower scores on both PHE-s® and FIS is called the “Careless” group.
3.3.1. Differences between Clusters
Sociodemographic and Disease-Related Characteristics
Food-Related Quality of Life
Motives behind Food Choices
4. Discussion
4.1. Limitations
4.2. Relevance for Clinical Practice
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Zhao, M.; Gönczi, L.; Lakatos, P.L.; Burisch, J. The burden of inflammatory bowel disease in Europe in 2020. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2021, 15, 1573–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, R.; Li, Z.; Liu, S.; Zhang, D. Global, regional and national burden of inflammatory bowel disease in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019: A systematic analysis based on the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. BMJ Open 2023, 13, e065186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Johansen, I.; Småstuen, M.C.; Løkkeberg, S.T.; Kristensen, V.A.; Høivik, M.L.; Lund, C.; Olsen, B.; Strande, V.; Huppertz-Hauss, G.; Aabrekk, T.B. Symptoms and symptom clusters in patients newly diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease: Results from the IBSEN III Study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023, 23, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jones, J.L.; Nguyen, G.C.; Benchimol, E.I.; Bernstein, C.N.; Bitton, A.; Kaplan, G.G.; Murthy, S.K.; Lee, K.; Cooke-Lauder, J.; Otley, A.R. The impact of inflammatory bowel disease in Canada 2018: Quality of life. J. Can. Assoc. Gastroenterol. 2019, 2 (Suppl. 1), S42–S48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ananthakrishnan, A.N.; Bernstein, C.N.; Iliopoulos, D.; Macpherson, A.; Neurath, M.F.; Ali, R.A.R.; Vavricka, S.R.; Fiocchi, C. Environmental triggers in IBD: A review of progress and evidence. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 15, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Campmans-Kuijpers, M.J.; Dijkstra, G. Food and food groups in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD): The design of the groningen anti-inflammatory diet (GrAID). Nutrients 2021, 13, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yan, J.; Wang, L.; Gu, Y.; Hou, H.; Liu, T.; Ding, Y.; Cao, H. Dietary patterns and gut microbiota changes in inflammatory bowel disease: Current insights and future challenges. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Levine, A.; Boneh, R.S.; Wine, E. Evolving role of diet in the pathogenesis and treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases. Gut 2018, 67, 1726–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Peters, V.; Spooren, C.E.; Pierik, M.J.; Weersma, R.K.; van Dullemen, H.M.; Festen, E.A.; Visschedijk, M.C.; Masclee, A.A.; Hendrix, E.M.; Almeida, R.J. Dietary intake pattern is associated with occurrence of flares in IBD patients. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2021, 15, 1305–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rizzello, F.; Spisni, E.; Giovanardi, E.; Imbesi, V.; Salice, M.; Alvisi, P.; Valerii, M.C.; Gionchetti, P. Implications of the westernized diet in the onset and progression of IBD. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolte, L.A.; Vila, A.V.; Imhann, F.; Collij, V.; Gacesa, R.; Peters, V.; Wijmenga, C.; Kurilshikov, A.; Campmans-Kuijpers, M.J.; Fu, J. Long-term dietary patterns are associated with pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory features of the gut microbiome. Gut 2021, 70, 1287–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tayyem, R.F.; Qalqili, T.R.; Ajeen, R.; Rayyan, Y.M. Dietary patterns and the risk of inflammatory bowel disease: Findings from a case-control study. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Khalili, H.; Håkansson, N.; Chan, S.S.; Chen, Y.; Lochhead, P.; Ludvigsson, J.F.; Chan, A.T.; Hart, A.R.; Olén, O.; Wolk, A. Adherence to a Mediterranean diet is associated with a lower risk of later-onset Crohn’s disease: Results from two large prospective cohort studies. Gut 2020, 69, 1637–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Papada, E.; Amerikanou, C.; Forbes, A.; Kaliora, A.C. Adherence to Mediterranean diet in Crohn’s disease. Eur. J. Nutr. 2020, 59, 1115–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marsh, A.; Kinneally, J.; Robertson, T.; Lord, A.; Young, A.; Radford–Smith, G. Food avoidance in outpatients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease–Who, what and why. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2019, 31, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bischoff, S.C.; Escher, J.; Hébuterne, X.; Kłęk, S.; Krznaric, Z.; Schneider, S.; Shamir, R.; Stardelova, K.; Wierdsma, N.; Wiskin, A.E. ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical Nutrition in inflammatory bowel disease. Clin. Nutr. 2020, 39, 632–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Marsh, A.; Rindfleish, S.; Bennett, K.; Croft, A.; Chachay, V. Outcomes of dietary management approaches in active ulcerative colitis: A systematic review. Clin. Nutr. 2022, 41, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szeto, J.; Noejovich, C.; Verma, R.; Miranda, P.; Pinto-Sanchez, M.; Verdu, E.; Armstrong, D. Barriers to dietary modification in Inlammatory Bowel Disease (IBD): A mixed-methods assessment of patient perceptions. J. Can. Assoc. Gastroenterol. 2024, 7 (Suppl. 1), 213–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richard, A.; Meule, A.; Blechert, J. Implicit evaluation of chocolate and motivational need states interact in predicting chocolate intake in everyday life. Eat. Behav. 2019, 33, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, T.T.; Tu, W.-J.; Li, Y.-T.; Xu, W.-J.; Xu, G.-H. ‘Eating is like experiencing a gamble’: A qualitative study exploring the dietary decision-making process in adults with inflammatory bowel disease. Health Expect. 2023, 27, e13873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palamenghi, L.; Figliuc, P.; Leone, S.; Graffigna, G. Food and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A scoping review on the impact of food on patients’ psychosocial quality of life. Health Soc. Care Community 2022, 30, 1695–1712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuong, K.H.; Haw, J.; Stintzi, A.; Mack, D.R.; O’Doherty, K.C. Dietary strategies and food practices of pediatric patients, and their parents, living with inflammatory bowel disease: A qualitative interview study. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-Being 2019, 14, 1648945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rines, J.; Daley, K.; Loo, S.; Safari, K.; Walsh, D.; Gill, M.; Moayyedi, P.; Fernandes, A.; Marlett, N.; Marshall, D. A patient-led, peer-to-peer qualitative study on the psychosocial relationship between young adults with inflammatory bowel disease and food. Health Expect. 2022, 25, 1486–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Coccurello, R.; Maccarrone, M. Hedonic eating and the “delicious circle”: From lipid-derived mediators to brain dopamine and back. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barnhart, W.R.; Braden, A.L.; Price, E. Emotion regulation difficulties interact with negative, not positive, emotional eating to strengthen relationships with disordered eating: An exploratory study. Appetite 2021, 158, 105038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castellini, G.; Graffigna, G. Assessing involvement with food: A systematic review of measures and tools. Food Qual. Prefer. 2022, 97, 104444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bell, R.; Marshall, D.W. The construct of food involvement in behavioral research: Scale development and validation. Appetite 2003, 40, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mak, A.H.; Lumbers, M.; Eves, A.; Chang, R.C. The effects of food-related personality traits on tourist food consumption motivations. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2017, 22, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vorage, L.; Wiseman, N.; Graca, J.; Harris, N. The association of demographic characteristics and food choice motives with the consumption of functional foods in emerging adults. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dziewa, M.; Bańka, B.; Herbet, M.; Piątkowska-Chmiel, I. Eating disorders and diabetes: Facing the dual challenge. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Leeds, J.; Keith, R.; Woloshynowych, M. Food and Mood: Exploring the determinants of food choices and the effects of food consumption on mood among women in Inner London. World Nutr. 2020, 11, 68–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graffigna, G.; Barello, S.; Bonanomi, A.; Lozza, E. Measuring patient engagement: Development and psychometric properties of the Patient Health Engagement (PHE) Scale. Front. Psychol. 2015, 6, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barello, S.; Guida, E.; Leone, S.; Previtali, E.; Graffigna, G. Does patient engagement affect IBD patients’ health-related quality of life? Findings from a cross-sectional study among people with inflammatory bowel diseases. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2021, 19, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Graffigna, G.; Barello, S. Spotlight on the Patient Health Engagement model (PHE model): A psychosocial theory to understand people’s meaningful engagement in their own health care. Patient Prefer. Adherence 2018, 2018, 1261–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Barello, S.; Palamenghi, L.; Graffigna, G. The mediating role of the patient health engagement model on the relationship between patient perceived autonomy supportive healthcare climate and health literacy skills. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cengiz, D.; Agrali, H.; Korkmaz, F.; Akyar, I. Mediation role of patient engagement on the association between health literacy and self-care behaviours in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Int. J. Nurs. Pract. 2022, 28, e13051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Graffigna, G.; Barello, S.; Bonanomi, A. The role of Patient Health Engagement Model (PHE-model) in affecting patient activation and medication adherence: A structural equation model. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0179865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Day, A.S.; Yao, C.K.; Costello, S.P.; Andrews, J.M.; Bryant, R.V. Food avoidance, restrictive eating behaviour and association with quality of life in adults with inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic scoping review. Appetite 2021, 167, 105650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Onwezen, M.; Reinders, M.; Verain, M.; Snoek, H. The development of a single-item Food Choice Questionnaire. Food Qual. Prefer. 2019, 71, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hughes, L.D.; King, L.; Morgan, M.; Ayis, S.; Direkze, N.; Lomer, M.C.; Lindsay, J.O.; Whelan, K. Food-related quality of life in inflammatory bowel disease: Development and validation of a questionnaire. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2016, 10, 194–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrich, D. A structure of index and causal variables. Rasch Meas. Transac. 2014, 28, 1475–1477. [Google Scholar]
- Linacre, J. A User’s Guide to WINSTEPS Ministeps. Rasch-Model Computer Program; Program Manual 3.71. 70. 2011. Available online: https://www.winsteps.com/winman/copyright.htm (accessed on 9 April 2024).
- Caliński, T.; Harabasz, J. A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 1974, 3, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rand, W.M. Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. Am. Stat. Assoc. Bull. 1971, 66, 846–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharpe, D. Chi-square test is statistically significant: Now what? Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 2019, 20, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farragher, T.; Wang, W.C.; Worsley, A. The associations of vegetable consumption with food mavenism, personal values, food knowledge and demographic factors. Appetite 2016, 97, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Medoro, C.; Cianciabella, M.; Magli, M.; Daniele, G.M.; Lippi, N.; Gatti, E.; Volpe, R.; Longo, V.; Nazzaro, F.; Mattoni, S. Food involvement, food choices, and bioactive compounds consumption correlation during COVID-19 pandemic: How food engagement influences consumers’ food habits. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Castellini, G.; Graffigna, G. “Food is more than just a source of nutrients”: A qualitative phenomenological study on Food Involvement. Appetite 2022, 178, 106179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hadgkiss, E.J.; Jelinek, G.A.; Taylor, K.L.; Marck, C.H.; van der Meer, D.M.; Pereira, N.G.; Weiland, T.J. Engagement in a program promoting lifestyle modification is associated with better patient-reported outcomes for people with MS. Neurol. Sci. 2015, 36, 845–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Graffigna, G.; Barello, S.; Libreri, C.; Bosio, C.A. How to engage type-2 diabetic patients in their own health management: Implications for clinical practice. BMC Public Health 2014, 14, 648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bédard, A.; Lamarche, P.-O.; Grégoire, L.-M.; Trudel-Guy, C.; Provencher, V.; Desroches, S.; Lemieux, S. Can eating pleasure be a lever for healthy eating? A systematic scoping review of eating pleasure and its links with dietary behaviors and health. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0244292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wardle, R.A.; Thapaliya, G.; Nowak, A.; Radford, S.; Dalton, M.; Finlayson, G.; Moran, G.W. An examination of appetite and disordered eating in active Crohn’s disease. J. Crohn’s Colitis 2018, 12, 819–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ngorsuraches, S.; Da Rosa, P.; Ge, X.; Djira, G.; Michael, S.; Wey, H. Patient engagement as a predictor for health outcomes and costs in multiple chronic conditions. Value Health 2018, 21, S88–S89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graffigna, G.; Bosio, C.; Pagnini, F.; Volpato, E.; Previtali, E.; Leone, S.; D’Amico, F.; Armuzzi, A.; Danese, S. Promoting psycho-social wellbeing for engaging inflammatory bowel disease patients in their care: An Italian consensus statement. BMC Psychol. 2021, 9, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Participant Characteristics | n | % |
---|---|---|
Gender | ||
Male | 355 | 39.9 |
Female | 535 | 60.1 |
Diagnosis | ||
Colitis (ulcerative or indeterminate) | 445 | 50.0 |
Crohn’s disease | 445 | 50.0 |
Level of education | ||
Middle school or lower | 87 | 9.8 |
High school | 422 | 47.4 |
University or higher | 381 | 42.8 |
Existing comorbidities | ||
Yes | 197 | 22.1 |
No | 693 | 77.9 |
IBD relapses/hospitalizations in the last year | ||
Yes | 352 | 39.6 |
No | 538 | 60.4 |
Ever undergone surgery for IBD | ||
Yes | 336 | 37.8 |
No | 554 | 62.2 |
Currently taking drugs/medications for IBD | ||
Yes | 784 | 88.1 |
No | 106 | 11.9 |
Variables | Min | Max | Mean | SD | Skewness | Kurtosis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Food-related quality of life (Fr-QoL-29) | 1.00 | 4.97 | 3.10 | 0.85 | −0.344 | −0.443 |
Food choice motives (FCQ) (It is important to me that the food I eat on a typical day…) | ||||||
is healthy | 1 | 7 | 5.96 | 1.02 | −1.275 | 2.645 |
is a way of monitoring my mood | 1 | 7 | 5.03 | 1.50 | −0.810 | 0.329 |
is convenient | 1 | 7 | 4.99 | 1.42 | −0.835 | 0.568 |
provides me with pleasurable sensations | 1 | 7 | 5.57 | 1.11 | −1.105 | 1.987 |
is natural | 1 | 7 | 5.58 | 1.18 | −0.878 | 1.023 |
is affordable | 1 | 7 | 4.93 | 1.39 | −0.618 | 0.322 |
helps me control my weight | 1 | 7 | 4.75 | 1.66 | −0.696 | −0.154 |
is familiar | 1 | 7 | 4.47 | 1.41 | −0.502 | 0.134 |
is environmentally friendly | 1 | 7 | 5.28 | 1.29 | −0.755 | 0.626 |
is animal friendly | 1 | 7 | 5.18 | 1.42 | −0.628 | −0.027 |
is fairly traded | 1 | 7 | 4.47 | 1.14 | −0.410 | 0.038 |
helps me control my symptoms | 1 | 7 | 6.18 | 0.96 | −1.224 | 1.753 |
Emotional states | ||||||
Happiness | 0 | 100 | 58.66 | 26.37 | −0.571 | −0.331 |
Sadness | 0 | 100 | 36.46 | 27.68 | 0.514 | −0.694 |
Hopefulness | 0 | 100 | 54.93 | 29.13 | −0.235 | −0.865 |
Fear | 0 | 100 | 28.72 | 27.95 | 0.868 | −0.239 |
Satisfaction | 0 | 100 | 52.49 | 27.60 | −0.180 | −0.860 |
Anger | 0 | 100 | 33.49 | 30.43 | 0.670 | −0.776 |
Disgust | 0 | 100 | 19.44 | 25.92 | 1.56 | 1.550 |
Anxiety | 0 | 100 | 37.37 | 30.19 | 0.423 | −0.977 |
Distress | 0 | 100 | 46.65 | 31.28 | 0.090 | −1.170 |
Boredom | 0 | 100 | 29.65 | 29.30 | 0.778 | −0.524 |
Food involvement (FIS) | 2.75 | 6.33 | 4.57 | 0.64 | −0.76 | −0.308 |
Health engagement (PHE-s®) | −5.52 | 8.28 | 2.40 | 2.86 | −0.148 | −0.337 |
Variables | Clusters | Welch’s F | p | η2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1: Health-Conscious (n = 261) | 2: Balanced (n = 241) | 3: Hedonist (n = 187) | 4: Careless (n = 201) | ||||
PHE-s® cluster mean | 0.75 a | 0.71 a | −0.90 b | −0.94 b | 626.597 | <0.001 | 0.681 |
FIS cluster mean | −0.80 c | 0.77 b | 0.92 a | −0.73 c | 594.238 | <0.001 | 0.667 |
Variables | Clusters | χ2 | p | Cramer’s V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1: Health-Conscious | 2: Balanced | 3: Hedonist | 4: Careless | ||||
Gender | 39.529 | <0.001 | 0.21 | ||||
Male | 53.3% (5.2) | 33.2% (−2.5) | 26.2% (−4.3) | 43.3% (1.1) | |||
Female | 46.7% (−5.2) | 66.8% (2.5) | 73.8% (4.3) | 56.7% (−1.1) | |||
Diagnosis | |||||||
Colitis | 48.7% (−0.5) | 48.5% (−0.5) | 47.1% (−0.9) | 56.2% (2.0) | |||
Crohn’s disease | 51.3% (0.5) | 51.5% (0.5) | 53.9% (0.9) | 43.8% (−2.0) | 4.418 | n. s. | |
Level of education | 7.525 | n. s. | - | ||||
Middle school or lower | 11.5% (1.1) | 8.7% (−0.6) | 5.9% (−2.0) | 12.4% (1.4) | |||
High school | 47.9% (0.2) | 46.9% (−0.2) | 46.5% (−0.3) | 48.3% (0.3) | |||
University or higher | 40.6% (−0.9) | 44.4% (0.6) | 47.6% (1.5) | 39.3% (−1.1) | |||
Comorbidities | 0.132 | n. s. | - | ||||
Yes | 22.2% (0.0) | 21.6% (−0.2) | 23.0% (0.3) | 21.9% (−0.1) | |||
No | 77.8% (0.0) | 78.4% (0.2) | 77.0% (−0.3) | 78.1% (0.1) | |||
Hospitalizations | 24.616 | <0.001 | 0.16 | ||||
Yes | 4.6% (−4.1) | 10.8% (−0.4) | 19.3% (3.8) | 13.9% (1.2) | |||
No | 95.4% (4.1) | 89.2% (0.4) | 80.7% (−3.8) | 86.1% (−1.2) | |||
Relapses | 92.681 | <0.001 | 0.32 | ||||
Yes | 21.8% (−7.0) | 31.1% (−3.1) | 61.5% (6.9) | 52.2% (4.2) | |||
No | 78.2% (7.0) | 68.9% (3.1) | 38.5% (−6.9) | 47.8% (−4.2) |
Variables | Clusters | Welch’s F | p | η2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1: Health-Conscious | 2: Balanced | 3: Hedonist | 4: Careless | ||||
Food-related quality of life | 2.66 c | 2.81 c | 3.68 a | 3.49 b | 104.161 | <0.001 | 0.257 |
Food choice motives (It is important to me that the food I eat on a typical day…) | |||||||
is healthy | 5.84 b | 6.16 a | 6.02 a | 5.81 b | 6.749 | <0.001 | 0.020 |
is a way of monitoring my mood | 4.64 | 4.98 b | 5.42 a | 5.24 | 12.476 | <0.001 | 0.038 |
is convenient | - | - | - | - | 1.776 | n. s. | - |
provides me with pleasurable sensations | 5.38 b | 5.70 | 5.73 a | 5.52 a,b | 5.193 | 0.002 | 0.017 |
is natural | - | - | - | - | 2.344 | n. s. | - |
is affordable | 4.75 b | 5.03 a,b | 5.13 a | 4.87 a,b | 3.668 | 0.012 | 0.011 |
helps me control my weight | - | - | - | - | 0.636 | n. s. | - |
is familiar | - | - | - | - | 0.626 | n. s. | - |
is environmentally friendly | 5.33 a,b | 5.40 a | 5.28 a,b | 5.05 b | 2.604 | 0.051 | 0.010 |
is animal friendly | - | - | - | - | 1.013 | n. s. | - |
is fairly traded | - | - | - | - | 1.854 | n. s. | - |
helps me control my symptoms | 5.90 c | 6.18 b | 6.43 a | 6.31 a,b | 13.054 | <0.001 | 0.044 |
Variables | Clusters | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1: Health-Conscious | 2: Balanced | 3: Hedonist | 4: Careless | |
Defining variables | High health engagement and low food involvement | High health engagement and high food involvement | Low health engagement and high food involvement | Low health engagement and low food involvement |
Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics | Males, with no hospitalization or relapses in the last year, higher average age | Females, with no relapses in the last year | Females with relapses and/or hospitalizations in the previous year | Diagnosis of colitis, with relapses in the last year and no surgical treatment in the past |
Food-related quality of life and emotional state | High food-related quality of life | High food-related quality of life | Reported food-related quality of life is the lowest among groups | Reported food-related quality of life is low |
Food choice drivers | This group does not show a particular driver regarding food. Compared to the other groups, these participants reported less interest in healthiness, mood modulation, sensations, affordability, and friendliness toward the environment. Food is not deemed essential for symptom management either | More interest in food’s healthiness and its pleasurable sensations. However, seeking pleasure is unrelated to mood modulation, as they reported this driver as less critical. Attention toward the environment and symptom management are also present (the latter is not as high as for other clusters) | Higher interest in food’s healthiness and its pleasurable sensations. In this case, however, there is also a reported use of food as a means to regulate mood, which is an essential driver for this group. Affordability and symptom control are also important drivers | This group shows a low interest in the healthiness of food and a high use of food for mood regulation. Inconsistently, they also report the importance of managing symptoms through food. Environmental friendliness is not essential |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Palamenghi, L.; Usta, D.; Leone, S.; Graffigna, G. Food-Related Behavioral Patterns in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: The Role of Food Involvement and Health Engagement. Nutrients 2024, 16, 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16081185
Palamenghi L, Usta D, Leone S, Graffigna G. Food-Related Behavioral Patterns in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: The Role of Food Involvement and Health Engagement. Nutrients. 2024; 16(8):1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16081185
Chicago/Turabian StylePalamenghi, Lorenzo, Dilara Usta, Salvo Leone, and Guendalina Graffigna. 2024. "Food-Related Behavioral Patterns in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: The Role of Food Involvement and Health Engagement" Nutrients 16, no. 8: 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16081185
APA StylePalamenghi, L., Usta, D., Leone, S., & Graffigna, G. (2024). Food-Related Behavioral Patterns in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: The Role of Food Involvement and Health Engagement. Nutrients, 16(8), 1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16081185