Is Nutrient Quality of the Locally-Existing, EAT-Lancet-like Plant-Based Diet Better or Worse than the Average Diet in Taiwan? An Example of Local Translation
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Data Source
2.2. Dietary Data from 24-h Recall
2.3. Defining Local Populace Who Consumed a Low Red Meat Diet
2.3.1. Classification of the Low, Medium, and High Red Meat Groups
2.3.2. Substituting UPFs with Whole/Healthy Foods in the Low Red Meat Group to Mimic EAT-Lancet Diet
2.4. Comparing EAT-Lancet-like Diet with Recommendations Made by Taiwanese Food Guide
2.5. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Characteristics of the Three Red Meat Groups
3.2. Macronutrient Composition and Mean Micronutrient Intake Levels by Three Red Meat Groups
3.3. Comparing Taiwanese Diet Low in Red Meat and UPFs with Taiwanese Daily Food Guide and Specifying Future Directions for New Taiwanese Food Guide Adopting EAT-Lancet Principles
4. Discussion
4.1. Dietary Characteristics of the Taiwanese Low Red Meat Consumption Pattern in Contrast to the High Consumption One
4.2. Nutrient Profile of the Taiwanese Low Red Meat and UPFs Consumption Dietary Pattern
4.3. Potential Dietary Practices to Improve Vitamin B12 and Zinc Status
4.4. Implications and Proposal for the Future Taiwanese EAT-Lancet Guide and Food Innovations
4.5. Limitations
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
References
- Willett, W.; Rockström, J.; Loken, B.; Springmann, M.; Lang, T.; Vermeulen, S.; Garnett, T.; Tilman, D.; DeClerck, F.; Wood, A.; et al. Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 2019, 393, 447–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stubbendorff, A.; Stern, D.; Ericson, U.; Sonestedt, E.; Hallstrom, E.; Borne, Y.; Lajous, M.; Forouhi, N.G.; Olsen, A.; Dahm, C.C.; et al. A systematic evaluation of seven different scores representing the EAT-Lancet reference diet and mortality, stroke, and greenhouse gas emissions in three cohorts. Lancet Planet Health 2024, 8, e391–e401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gan, Z.H.; Cheong, H.C.; Tu, Y.K.; Kuo, P.H. Association between Plant-Based Dietary Patterns and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ojo, O.; Jiang, Y.; Ojo, O.O.; Wang, X. The Association of Planetary Health Diet with the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes and Related Complications: A Systematic Review. Healthcare 2023, 11, 1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Li, W.; Li, S.; Tu, H.; Jia, J.; Zhao, W.; Xu, A.; Xu, W.; Tsai, M.K.; Chu, D.T.; et al. Association between plant-based dietary pattern and biological aging trajectory in a large prospective cohort. BMC Med. 2023, 21, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beal, T.; Ortenzi, F.; Fanzo, J. Estimated micronutrient shortfalls of the EAT-Lancet planetary health diet. Lancet Planet Health 2023, 7, e233–e237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.Y.; Yeh, N.H.; Chang, H.Y.; Wang, C.F.; Hung, S.Y.; Wu, S.J.; Pan, W.H. Adequate protein intake in older adults in the context of frailty: Cross-sectional results of the Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan 2014–2017. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2021, 114, 649–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tu, S.H.; Chen, C.; Hsieh, Y.T.; Chang, H.Y.; Yeh, C.J.; Lin, Y.C.; Pan, W.H. Design and sample characteristics of the 2005-2008 Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 20, 225–237. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Trumbo, P.; Schlicker, S.; Yates, A.A.; Poos, M. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein and amino acids. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2002, 102, 1621–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neufingerl, N.; Eilander, A. Nutrient Intake and Status in Adults Consuming Plant-Based Diets Compared to Meat-Eaters: A Systematic Review. Nutrients 2021, 14, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pan, W.-H. Nutrition and Health Survey in Taiwan 2017–2020: Preliminary Results; Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Ed.; Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare: Taipei, Taiwan, 2020.
- Chen, K.J.; Pan, W.H.; Yang, F.L.; Wei, I.L.; Shaw, N.S.; Lin, B.F. Association of B vitamins status and homocysteine levels in elderly Taiwanese. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 14, 250–255. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Allen, L.H.; Carriquiry, A.L.; Murphy, S.P. Perspective: Proposed Harmonized Nutrient Reference Values for Populations. Adv. Nutr. 2020, 11, 469–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frank, S.M.; Jaacks, L.M.; Adair, L.S.; Avery, C.L.; Meyer, K.; Rose, D.; Taillie, L.S. Adherence to the Planetary Health Diet Index and correlation with nutrients of public health concern: An analysis of NHANES 2003–2018. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2024, 119, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paramastri, R.; Hsu, C.Y.; Lee, H.A.; Lin, L.Y.; Kurniawan, A.L.; Chao, J.C. Association between Dietary Pattern, Lifestyle, Anthropometric Status, and Anemia-Related Biomarkers among Adults: A Population-Based Study from 2001 to 2015. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 3438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, W.H.; Wu, H.J.; Yeh, C.J.; Chuang, S.Y.; Chang, H.Y.; Yeh, N.H.; Hsieh, Y.T. Diet and health trends in Taiwan: Comparison of two nutrition and health surveys from 1993–1996 and 2005–2008. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 20, 238–250. [Google Scholar]
- Storhaug, C.L.; Fosse, S.K.; Fadnes, L.T. Country, regional, and global estimates for lactose malabsorption in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 2, 738–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.S.; Wahlqvist, M.L.; Peng, C.J. Dairy foods and health in Asians: Taiwanese considerations. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2015, 24 (Suppl. S1), S14–S20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiang, K.-M.; Pan, W.-H. Causal link between milk consumption and obesity? A 10-year longitudinal study and a Mendelian randomization study. Food Nutr. Res. 2021, 65, 6300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministrt of Agriculture. Food Supply and Utilization Yearbook; Ministrt of Agriculture: Taipei, Taiwan, 2023.
- Volpe, S.L. Magnesium in Disease Prevention and Overall Health. Adv. Nutr. 2013, 4, 378s–383s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weng, L.C.; Lee, N.J.; Yeh, W.T.; Ho, L.T.; Pan, W.H. Lower intake of magnesium and dietary fiber increases the incidence of type 2 diabetes in Taiwanese. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2012, 111, 651–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, L.-C.; Yang, Y.-C.; Yu, H.-W. A Long-Term Follow-Up Study of Sugar Sweetened Beverages, Snacks and Desserts, and Refined Sugar Consumption among Preschoolers Aged 2 To 5 in Taiwan. Taiwan J. Public Health 2013, 32, 346–357. [Google Scholar]
n | Low | Medium | High | P for Trend 2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male | |||||
Red meat (Kcal) | 867/1749/619 | 25.0 ± 2.2 | 276.0 ± 6.1 | 743.4 ± 21.7 | <0.0001 |
Age (years) | 867/1749/619 | 49.7 ± 0.9 | 45.3 ± 0.5 | 45.0 ± 0.9 | 0.002 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 618/1212/419 | 24.9 ± 0.3 | 25.3 ± 0.2 | 25.7 ± 0.4 | 0.175 |
Educational level | 0.036 | ||||
Below junior school | 223/322/115 | 11.6 | 6.8 | 7.0 | |
Junior and high school | 364/712/250 | 40.4 | 39.9 | 36.7 | |
College or above | 280/715/254 | 48.1 | 53.4 | 56.3 | |
Marital status | 0.901 | ||||
Unmarried | 153/396/152 | 31.3 | 34.0 | 32.4 | |
Married | 598/1146/384 | 59.3 | 57.4 | 57.5 | |
Divorced, separated, or widowed | 116/207/83 | 9.4 | 6.7 | 10.1 | |
Cigarette use | 0.037 | ||||
Never | 370/691/198 | 50.0 | 46.5 | 42.1 | |
Quit | 299/527/188 | 24.3 | 22.4 | 20.5 | |
Current | 188/520/224 | 25.7 | 31.2 | 37.4 | |
Alcohol use | 0.055 | ||||
Never | 206/387/101 | 28.2 | 22.5 | 15.6 | |
Quit | 285/717/287 | 44.4 | 48.7 | 56.3 | |
Current | 175/377/137 | 27.4 | 28.8 | 28.1 | |
Female | |||||
Red meat (Kcal) | 1229/1592/482 | 20.7 ± 1.15 | 200.2 ± 4.7 | 578.5 ± 32.2 | <0.0001 |
Age (years) | 1229/1592/482 | 50.3 ± 0.7 | 46.7 ± 0.5 | 43.2 ± 1.0 | 0.0001 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 808/1120/325 | 23.8 ± 0.2 | 23.7 ± 0.2 | 23.8 ± 0.4 | 0.823 |
Educational level | 0.002 | ||||
Below junior school | 522/501/122 | 21.9 | 16.0 | 10.7 | |
Junior and high school | 398/574/190 | 35.9 | 36.0 | 37.1 | |
College or above | 309/516/169 | 42.1 | 48.0 | 52.2 | |
Marital status | 0.014 | ||||
Unmarried | 181/266/96 | 21.6 | 24.6 | 27.8 | |
Married | 690/978/279 | 58.5 | 62.5 | 61.1 | |
Divorced, separated, or widowed | 358/346/106 | 19.8 | 12.9 | 11.1 | |
Cigarette use | 0.372 | ||||
Never | 1107/1439/408 | 89.0 | 90.5 | 85.8 | |
Quit | 48/50/22 | 5.8 | 4.5 | 4.8 | |
Current | 52/86/47 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 9.4 | |
Alcohol use | 0.175 | ||||
Never | 689/774/199 | 46.6 | 42.8 | 37.2 | |
Quit | 224/338/143 | 27.6 | 27.6 | 37.7 | |
Current | 229/366/106 | 25.9 | 29.6 | 25.1 |
Male | Female | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low | Medium | High | P for Trend 2 | Low | Medium | High | P for Trend 2 | |
Grains and roots | ||||||||
Rice, wheat, and other grains | 258.5 ± 13 | 278.7 ± 4.9 | 230.5 ± 8.7 | 0.308 | 206.1 ± 5.5 | 194.2 ± 5.4 | 147.8 ± 6.3 | <0.0001 |
Potatoes, cassava, corn, and other roots | 29.7 ± 3.7 | 35.2 ± 3.1 | 21.8 ± 2.7 | 0.987 | 30.7 ± 2.4 | 34.0 ± 2.8 | 33.4 ± 5.1 | 0.997 |
Dry beans, lentils, and peas | 9.1 ± 5.7 | 8.1 ± 2.1 | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 0.789 | 3.1 ± 0.6 | 5.7 ± 0.9 | 7.1 ± 3.6 | 0.781 |
Protein foods | ||||||||
Beef and lamb | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 19.3 ± 1.8 | 62.0 ± 7.4 | <0.0001 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 12.7 ± 2.1 | 55.9 ± 19.1 | <0.001 |
Pork | 15.1 ± 1.0 | 109.1 ± 3.0 | 249.5 ± 10 | <0.0001 | 13.5 ± 1.0 | 82.6 ± 2.6 | 180.4 ± 10.4 | <0.0001 |
Poultry | 75.4 ± 7.0 | 69.3 ± 4.4 | 44.0 ± 5.6 | 0.014 | 52.7 ± 4.0 | 43.7 ± 3.1 | 25.6 ± 3.7 | <0.0001 |
Egg | 42.1 ± 3.2 | 49.2 ± 2.2 | 40.6 ± 3.8 | 0.500 | 38.9 ± 3.0 | 40.9 ± 1.7 | 36.6 ± 2.8 | 0.814 |
Fish and Seafood | 59.3 ± 6.1 | 58.2 ± 3.7 | 55.3 ± 6.1 | 0.806 | 41.0 ± 2.3 | 52.9 ± 3.3 | 31.8 ± 3.5 | 0.141 |
Soy | 26.0 ± 3.6 | 24.6 ± 2.2 | 19.5 ± 2.1 | 0.452 | 31.2 ± 4.4 | 16.7 ± 1.5 | 13.8 ± 1.7 | 0.005 |
Peanut | 3.8 ± 1.1 | 2.2 ± 0.3 | 2.0 ± 0.7 | 0.380 | 1.9 ± 0.4 | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | 0.629 |
Nut | 4.3 ± 0.8 | 2.2 ± 0.3 | 4.5 ± 2.0 | 0.330 | 5.2 ± 0.7 | 3.0 ± 0.4 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | 0.014 |
Dairy foods | 100.2 ± 12 | 132.3 ± 9.9 | 120.0 ± 14.8 | 0.213 | 126.8 ± 10.8 | 148 ± 13.3 | 112.2 ± 16.7 | 0.175 |
Vegetable | ||||||||
Dark green | 93.5 ± 7.4 | 85.2 ± 3.9 | 86.6 ± 7.3 | 0.096 | 88.0 ± 5.8 | 96.3 ± 5.0 | 81.6 ± 7.0 | 0.300 |
Red and orange | 12.2 ± 1.5 | 9.5 ± 0.9 | 7.4 ± 1.4 | 0.116 | 9.3 ± 1.0 | 9.9 ± 1.1 | 12.3 ± 2.0 | 0.482 |
Other | 155.7 ± 9.3 | 152.6 ± 4.3 | 171.2 ± 11.7 | 0.016 | 158.7 ± 8.7 | 150.5 ± 6.1 | 159.6 ± 13.2 | 0.456 |
Fruit | 176.3 ± 12.8 | 166.7 ± 8.9 | 138.9 ± 15.7 | 0.159 | 191.7 ± 10.8 | 185.7 ± 8.9 | 133.1 ± 12.7 | 0.008 |
Added sugar | 47.6 ± 3.8 | 56.9 ± 2.5 | 48.3 ± 3.7 | 0.973 | 38.3 ± 2.3 | 39.4 ± 1.8 | 37.4 ± 3.9 | 0.487 |
Added oils and fats | ||||||||
Palm | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 0.100 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 0.678 |
Vegetable | 13.9 ± 0.9 | 24.0 ± 1.0 | 20.5 ± 1.2 | 0.001 | 13.1 ± 0.8 | 17.6 ± 0.6 | 16.1 ± 1.4 | 0.415 |
Animal | 12.4 ± 1.3 | 12.5 ± 0.7 | 8.2 ± 0.7 | 0.049 | 11.7 ± 0.8 | 10.3 ± 0.5 | 9.0 ± 1.0 | 0.268 |
Before 2 | After 2 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low | Medium | High | P for Trend 3 | Low | Medium | High | P for Trend 3 | |
Male | ||||||||
Energy (Kcal) | 1984 ± 64 | 2433 ± 40 | 2607 ± 73 | <0.0001 | 1814 ± 58 | 2143 ± 31 | 2158 ± 62 | 0.002 |
Carbohydrate (%) | 55.9 ± 0.5 | 51.2 ± 0.4 | 42.7 ± 0.6 | <0.0001 | 53.9 ± 0.6 | 50.6 ± 0.4 | 45.1 ± 0.6 | <0.0001 |
Protein (%) | 16.0 ± 0.3 | 16.8 ± 0.2 | 19.1 ± 0.3 | <0.0001 | 18.0 ± 0.3 | 19.4 ± 0.2 | 23.5 ± 0.3 | <0.0001 |
Fat (%) | 28.1 ± 0.5 | 32.0 ± 0.3 | 38.2 ± 0.5 | <0.0001 | 28.2 ± 0.5 | 30.1 ± 0.3 | 31.5 ± 0.5 | 0.001 |
SFAs (%) | 8.6 ± 0.2 | 10.5 ± 0.1 | 13.3 ± 0.2 | <0.0001 | 7.9 ± 0.2 | 9.1 ± 0.1 | 9.9 ± 0.2 | <0.0001 |
Added sugar (%) | 7.6 ± 0.6 | 7.4 ± 0.2 | 6.1 ± 0.5 | 0.051 | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 0.757 |
Female | ||||||||
Energy (Kcal) | 1654 ± 38 | 1797 ± 27 | 1858 ± 55 | 0.013 | 1533 ± 40 | 1606 ± 24 | 1489 ± 36 | 0.194 |
Carbohydrate (%) | 54.3 ± 0.6 | 50.0 ± 0.3 | 41.4 ± 0.6 | <0.0001 | 52.6 ± 0.5 | 49.3 ± 0.4 | 42.6 ± 0.8 | <0.0001 |
Protein (%) | 15.8 ± 0.3 | 17.4 ± 0.2 | 19.4 ± 0.4 | <0.0001 | 17.4 ± 0.3 | 19.8 ± 0.2 | 24.4 ± 0.5 | <0.0001 |
Fat (%) | 29.9 ± 0.4 | 32.7 ± 0.3 | 39.2 ± 0.6 | <0.0001 | 30.1 ± 0.4 | 30.9 ± 0.3 | 33.0 ± 0.6 | 0.005 |
SFAs (%) | 8.9 ± 0.2 | 10.9 ± 0.2 | 14.1 ± 0.3 | <0.0001 | 8.3 ± 0.2 | 9.5 ± 0.2 | 10.9 ± 0.2 | <0.0001 |
Added sugar (%) | 6.9 ± 0.5 | 6.4 ± 0.3 | 6.6 ± 0.6 | 0.225 | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 3.1 ± 0.3 | 0.975 |
Before 2 | After 2 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low | Medium | High | P for Trend 3 | Low | Medium | High | P for Trend 3 | |
Male | ||||||||
Protein | 117 ± 2 | 124 ± 1 | 139 ± 2 | <0.0001 | 131 ± 2 | 143 ± 2 | 169 ± 3 | <0.0001 |
Vitamin B1 | 91 ± 1 | 120 ± 1 | 155 ± 6 | <0.0001 | 115 ± 1 | 174 ± 2 | 261 ± 8 | <0.0001 |
Vitamin B2 | 102 ± 3 | 102 ± 2 | 108 ± 4 | 0.084 | 112 ± 3 | 116 ± 2 | 131 ± 4 | <0.001 |
Niacin | 114 ± 4 | 119 ± 2 | 137 ± 3 | <0.0001 | 137 ± 4 | 147 ± 2 | 184 ± 4 | <0.0001 |
Vitamin B6 | 139 ± 4 | 136 ± 3 | 146 ± 4 | 0.034 | 158 ± 5 | 169 ± 3 | 208 ± 5 | <0.0001 |
Vitamin B12 | 214 ± 25 | 212 ± 9 | 258 ± 20 | <0.0001 | 231 ± 32 | 225 ± 9 | 298 ± 22 | <0.0001 |
Vitamin A | 162 ± 10 | 117 ± 4 | 127 ± 13 | 0.054 | 170 ± 10 | 127 ± 4 | 145 ± 14 | 0.131 |
Vitamin C | 179 ± 12 | 148 ± 6 | 127 ± 8 | 0.015 | 204 ± 14 | 171 ± 6 | 157 ± 10 | 0.024 |
Vitamin D | 74 ± 6 | 55 ± 2 | 53 ± 4 | 0.585 | 74 ± 6 | 52 ± 2 | 51 ± 5 | 0.219 |
Vitamin E | 84 ± 3 | 74 ± 1 | 66 ± 2 | <0.001 | 97 ± 3 | 92 ± 1 | 84 ± 2 | 0.003 |
Calcium | 59 ± 3 | 51 ± 2 | 44 ± 2 | <0.001 | 63 ± 3 | 56 ± 2 | 51 ± 2 | 0.005 |
Phosphorus | 155 ± 2 | 154 ± 2 | 155 ± 3 | 0.526 | 183 ± 2 | 182 ± 2 | 192 ± 3 | 0.009 |
Iron | 151 ± 4 | 154 ± 3 | 143 ± 4 | 0.317 | 167 ± 4 | 173 ± 4 | 173 ± 4 | 0.162 |
Zinc | 74 ± 2 | 81 ± 1 | 99 ± 3 | <0.0001 | 84 ± 2 | 92 ± 1 | 108 ± 3 | <0.0001 |
Magnesium | 86 ± 2 | 74 ± 1 | 69 ± 1 | <0.0001 | 109 ± 2 | 98 ± 1 | 97 ± 2 | 0.001 |
Potassium | 100 ± 2 | 90 ± 1 | 92 ± 2 | 0.329 | 114 ± 2 | 108 ± 1 | 120 ± 3 | 0.008 |
Sodium | 135 ± 4 | 151 ± 2 | 149 ± 4 | 0.032 | 130 ± 6 | 140 ± 2 | 146 ± 4 | 0.024 |
Dietary fiber | 63 ± 2 | 52 ± 1 | 43 ± 1 | <0.0001 | 74 ± 2 | 63 ± 1 | 56 ± 2 | <0.0001 |
P/S ratio | 1.25 ± 0.05 | 1 ± 0.02 | 0.75 ± 0.01 | <0.0001 | 1.41 ± 0.05 | 1.21 ± 0.02 | 1.00 ± 0.02 | <0.0001 |
M/S ratio | 1.25 ± 0.03 | 1.15 ± 0.01 | 1.14 ± 0.01 | 0.208 | 1.34 ± 0.03 | 1.22 ± 0.01 | 1.22 ± 0.02 | 0.084 |
Female | ||||||||
Protein | 109 ± 2 | 120 ± 1 | 134 ± 2 | <0.0001 | 120 ± 2 | 136 ± 1 | 166 ± 3 | <0.0001 |
Vitamin B1 | 103 ± 2 | 137 ± 2 | 178 ± 7 | <0.0001 | 124 ± 2 | 188 ± 2 | 298 ± 10 | <0.0001 |
Vitamin B2 | 115 ± 2 | 122 ± 2 | 121 ± 3 | 0.034 | 126 ± 3 | 136 ± 2 | 149 ± 3 | <0.0001 |
Niacin | 105 ± 4 | 113 ± 2 | 125 ± 3 | <0.0001 | 124 ± 4 | 134 ± 2 | 168 ± 4 | <0.0001 |
Vitamin B6 | 118 ± 4 | 113 ± 2 | 118 ± 3 | 0.094 | 132 ± 4 | 137 ± 2 | 172 ± 5 | <0.0001 |
Vitamin B12 | 151 ± 12 | 203 ± 13 | 207 ± 11 | <0.0001 | 154 ± 13 | 218 ± 15 | 244 ± 13 | <0.0001 |
Vitamin A | 164 ± 8 | 160 ± 7 | 132 ± 8 | 0.253 | 174 ± 9 | 173 ± 8 | 153 ± 9 | 0.898 |
Vitamin C | 175 ± 8 | 155 ± 8 | 124 ± 10 | 0.006 | 195 ± 9 | 175 ± 8 | 152 ± 11 | 0.039 |
Vitamin D | 58 ± 4 | 54 ± 2 | 38 ± 3 | 0.094 | 57 ± 4 | 52 ± 3 | 36 ± 3 | 0.043 |
Vitamin E | 75 ± 2 | 68 ± 1 | 59 ± 3 | <0.0001 | 87 ± 1 | 82 ± 1 | 74 ± 3 | 0.001 |
Calcium | 54 ± 2 | 49 ± 1 | 41 ± 2 | <0.001 | 59 ± 2 | 53 ± 1 | 48 ± 2 | 0.007 |
Phosphorus | 127 ± 2 | 130 ± 1 | 131 ± 2 | 0.037 | 147 ± 2 | 150 ± 1 | 162 ± 2 | <0.0001 |
Iron | 90 ± 2 | 88 ± 2 | 83 ± 2 | 0.330 | 98 ± 2 | 97 ± 2 | 100 ± 2 | 0.033 |
Zinc | 75 ± 1 | 85 ± 1 | 102 ± 4 | <0.0001 | 84 ± 1 | 95 ± 1 | 114 ± 5 | <0.0001 |
Magnesium | 87 ± 2 | 79 ± 1 | 70 ± 2 | <0.001 | 107 ± 2 | 100 ± 1 | 96 ± 2 | 0.028 |
Potassium | 96 ± 1 | 96 ± 2 | 95 ± 2 | 0.092 | 109 ± 2 | 112 ± 2 | 123 ± 2 | <0.0001 |
Sodium | 109 ± 3 | 124 ± 2 | 131 ± 6 | 0.003 | 105 ± 3 | 115 ± 2 | 123 ± 6 | 0.012 |
Dietary fiber | 75 ± 2 | 67 ± 1 | 54 ± 2 | <0.001 | 87 ± 2 | 79 ± 2 | 68 ± 2 | <0.001 |
P/S ratio | 1.29 ± 0.04 | 0.96 ± 0.02 | 0.71 ± 0.02 | <0.0001 | 1.45 ± 0.04 | 1.15 ± 0.03 | 0.92 ± 0.03 | <0.0001 |
M/S ratio | 1.25 ± 0.02 | 1.14 ± 0.01 | 1.13 ± 0.01 | 0.063 | 1.33 ± 0.02 | 1.22 ± 0.01 | 1.19 ± 0.02 | 0.033 |
Low Red Meat with Low UPFs Diet in Male | Taiwanese Daily Food Guide | Proposed Local Planetary Health Diet | Low Red Meat with Low UPFs Diet in Female | Taiwanese Daily Food Guide | Proposed Local Planetary Health Diet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Energy intake (Kcal) | 1814 | 2100 | 2100 | 1533 | 1600~1700 | 1650 |
Grains and roots (serving number) | 11.4 | 12 | 12 | 8.8 | 10 | 10 |
Rice, wheat, and other grains | 10.7 | 11 | 8.1 | 9 | ||
Potatoes, cassava, corn, and other roots | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.5 | ||
Dry beans, lentils, and peas | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | ||
Fruit & added sugar (serving number) | 1.7 & 0.9 | 3.5 | 3.5 & 1 | 1.8 & 0.7 | 2 | 2 & 1 |
Fruit | 1.7 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 1.8 | 2 | 2 |
Added sugar | 0.9 | 1 | 0.7 | 1 | ||
Vegetable (serving number) | 2.6 | 4 | 4 | 2.6 | 3 | 3 |
Dark green | 0.8 | 2 | 0.7 | 1 | ||
Red and orange | 0.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | ||
Other | 1.7 | 1.5 | 1.7 | 1.5 | ||
Dairy foods (serving number) | 0.4 | 1.5 (−0.5 *) | 1 | 0.5 | 1.5 (−0.5 *) | 1 |
Protein sources & nuts/seeds (serving number) | 6.1 & 0.5 | 6 (+0.5 *) & (+0.5 **) | 6.5 & 0.5 | 5.0 & 0.4 | 4.5 (+0.5 *) & (+0.5 **) | 5 & 0.5 |
Beef and lamb | 0.02 | Small amt | 0.02 | Small amt | ||
Pork | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | ||
Poultry | 2.1 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 0.5 | ||
Egg | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 0.5 | ||
Fish and seafood | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.1 | 1.5 | ||
Soy | 1.3 | 2.5 | 1.6 | 2.0 | ||
Nuts/peanut | 0.48 | (+0.5 **) | 0.5 | 0.36 | (+0.5 **) | 0.5 |
Added fats (serving number) | 4 | 5 (−1 **) | 4 | 4.6 | 3~4 (−1 **) | 2~3 |
Animal fats | 1.7 | 0 | 1.9 | 0 | ||
Palm oil | 0.04 | Small amt | 0.2 | Small amt | ||
Vegetable oils | 2.3 | 4 | 4 | 2.5 | 2~3 | 2~3 |
Nuts | 1 (−1 **) | 1 (−1 **) |
Male | Female | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Before 2 | After 2 | Proposed Local Planetary Health Diet 2 | Before 2 | After 2 | Proposed Local Planetary Health Diet 2 | |
Energy (Kcal) | 1984 | 1814 | 2155 | 1654 | 1533 | 1658 |
Carbohydrate (%) | 56 | 54 | 56 | 54 | 53 | 56 |
Protein (%) | 16 | 18 | 17 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
Fat (%) | 28 | 28 | 26 | 30 | 30 | 27 |
SFA (%) | 8.6 | 7.9 | 6.8 | 8.9 | 8.3 | 7.4 |
Added sugar (%) | 9.9 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 8.9 | 3.1 | 3.5 |
Nutrient adequacy ratio (% DRIs) | ||||||
Protein | 117 | 131 | 130 | 109 | 120 | 122 |
Vitamin B1 | 91 | 115 | 131 | 103 | 124 | 141 |
Vitamin B2 | 102 | 112 | 122 | 115 | 126 | 126 |
Niacin | 114 | 137 | 126 | 105 | 124 | 118 |
Vitamin B6 | 139 | 158 | 180 | 118 | 132 | 135 |
Vitamin B12 | 214 | 231 | 218 | 151 | 154 | 187 |
Vitamin A | 162 | 170 | 291 | 164 | 174 | 233 |
Vitamin C | 179 | 204 | 227 | 175 | 195 | 163 |
Vitamin D | 74 | 74 | 73 | 58 | 57 | 64 |
Vitamin E | 84 | 97 | 106 | 75 | 87 | 77 |
Calcium | 59 | 63 | 91 | 54 | 59 | 72 |
Phosphorus | 155 | 183 | 195 | 127 | 147 | 155 |
Iron | 151 | 167 | 197 | 90 | 98 | 102 |
Zinc | 74 | 84 | 90 | 75 | 84 | 90 |
Magnesium | 86 | 109 | 130 | 87 | 107 | 116 |
Potassium | 100 | 114 | 139 | 96 | 109 | 112 |
Sodium | 135 | 130 | 123 | 109 | 105 | 96 |
Dietary fiber | 63 | 74 | 95 | 75 | 87 | 95 |
PMS ratio | ||||||
P/S ratio | 1.25 | 1.41 | 1.55 | 1.29 | 1.45 | 1.36 |
M/S ratio | 1.25 | 1.34 | 1.30 | 1.25 | 1.33 | 1.20 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Pan, W.-H.; Wu, S.-Y.; Chang, P.-C. Is Nutrient Quality of the Locally-Existing, EAT-Lancet-like Plant-Based Diet Better or Worse than the Average Diet in Taiwan? An Example of Local Translation. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2775. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16162775
Pan W-H, Wu S-Y, Chang P-C. Is Nutrient Quality of the Locally-Existing, EAT-Lancet-like Plant-Based Diet Better or Worse than the Average Diet in Taiwan? An Example of Local Translation. Nutrients. 2024; 16(16):2775. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16162775
Chicago/Turabian StylePan, Wen-Harn, Szu-Yun Wu, and Po-Chen Chang. 2024. "Is Nutrient Quality of the Locally-Existing, EAT-Lancet-like Plant-Based Diet Better or Worse than the Average Diet in Taiwan? An Example of Local Translation" Nutrients 16, no. 16: 2775. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16162775
APA StylePan, W.-H., Wu, S.-Y., & Chang, P.-C. (2024). Is Nutrient Quality of the Locally-Existing, EAT-Lancet-like Plant-Based Diet Better or Worse than the Average Diet in Taiwan? An Example of Local Translation. Nutrients, 16(16), 2775. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16162775