Next Article in Journal
Heat-Processed Soybean Germ Extract and Lactobacillus gasseri NK109 Supplementation Reduce LPS-Induced Cognitive Impairment and Colitis in Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of Maternity Care Providers on the Implementation of Calcium Supplementation during Pregnancy in Three Public Hospitals in Argentina: A Qualitative Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Polyphenols in the Prevention and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence

by
Laura López-Gómez
1,2 and
Jose Antonio Uranga
1,2,*
1
Department of Basic Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University Rey Juan Carlos (URJC), 28922 Alcorcón, Spain
2
High Performance Research Group in Physiopathology and Pharmacology of the Digestive System (NeuGut-URJC), University Rey Juan Carlos (URJC), 28922 Alcorcón, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2024, 16(16), 2735; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16162735
Submission received: 8 July 2024 / Revised: 2 August 2024 / Accepted: 14 August 2024 / Published: 16 August 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Interaction between Polyphenols and Gut Microbiota in Cancer)

Abstract

:
Polyphenols are plant metabolites with potential anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative effects, which may be advantageous for disorders like colorectal cancer (CRC). Despite promising in vitro and in vivo evidence, human clinical trials have yielded mixed results. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical evidence of polyphenols for CRC prevention or treatment. A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA. Based on a PROSPERO registered protocol (CRD42024560044), online databases (PubMed and COCHRANE) were utilized for the literature search. A total of 100 studies articles were initially identified. After reviewing, 12 studies with a low risk of bias were selected, examining the effect of a variety of compounds. Curcumin demonstrated promise in various trials, mainly decreasing inflammatory cytokines, though results varied, and it did not lower intestinal adenomas or improve outcomes after chemotherapy. Neither epigallocatechin gallate nor artepillin C reduced the incidence of adenomas. Finally, fisetin seemed to improve the inflammatory status of patients under chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil). In summary, although certain polyphenols appear to exert some effect, their role in the prevention or treatment of CRC is inconclusive, and more clinical studies under more controlled conditions are needed.

1. Introduction

Polyphenols are a very large and diverse group of compounds with at least one aromatic ring with one or more hydroxyl groups attached. They are classified as flavonoids and non-flavonoids based on their chemical structure. Flavonoids comprise flavonols, flavones, flavanones, flavan-3-ols (catechins), anthocyanins, dihydrochalcones, chalcones and isoflavones. Non-flavonoids include phenolic acids, polyphenolic amides (capsaicinoids), stilbenes (resveratrol), lignans, and curcuminoids. All these of compounds are naturally occurring metabolites found in plants, and their concentration varies among different foods. The most important dietary sources include fruits and vegetables, cocoa, dark chocolate, soy products, cereals and wholegrains, olive oil, and drinks, such as coffee, tea, red wine, and juices [1]. There is a large body of evidence supporting polyphenols’ effectiveness in the prevention of various diseases through several biological mechanisms, including antioxidative and anti-inflammatory effects, cell cycle regulation, the induction of apoptosis, and hormonal regulation, and anti-angiogenic properties [2]. It has therefore been proposed that they may be beneficial for gastrointestinal (GI) inflammatory disorders, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) [3] and colorectal cancer (CRC) [4].
CRC is one of the cancers with the highest incidence in the world, with more than 1.9 million new cases diagnosed in 2020 [5]. Less than 5% of all CRCs are considered hereditary due to underlying genetic disorders [6]. It is therefore a type of cancer that is particularly sensitive to causes, such as age, gender and ethnic background, lifestyle, an inappropriate diet, microbiota dysbiosis, lack of exercise, and chronic inflammation [7,8]. Many efforts are therefore devoted to preventing the development of CRC through health education and the promotion of good habits. However, its incidence is steadily increasing worldwide, demonstrating that new approaches to its control are urgently needed. In this regard, it is of interest to focus on controlling carcinogenesis rather than attempting to cure the disease in its terminal stage [9].
Among the many benefits attributed to polyphenols are their anti-inflammatory effects, modulating the NFκ-β and the STAT3 transcription factor pathways, and the inflammasome. They have also been associated with the stimulation of detoxification, induction of apoptosis and the inhibition of cell proliferation, reduction of oxidative stress and angiogenesis, and metastasis through the inhibition of metalloproteinases [10]. These compounds might also act as sensitizers for cancer cells or reduce the oxidative stress caused by chemotherapy [11]. Specifically, it has been shown that polyphenols like xanthohumol can inhibit the growth of human colon cancer cell lines in vitro even better than that of some chemotherapeutic drugs like 5-fluorouracil. Other compounds have shown a synergistic effect in combination with chemotherapy, although differences in responses were observed depending on the tumor line tested [12]. Furthermore, these compounds reach the intestine where they or their metabolites may act as substrates or cofactors in biochemical and enzymatic reactions, inhibiting enzymes, ligands for cell receptors, and scavengers and promoting beneficial gastrointestinal bacteria, serving as fermentation substrates, and selectively inhibiting harmful intestinal bacteria [10].
Despite experimental evidence, in vitro and in vivo, and the numerous epidemiological studies indicating that consuming diets high in flavonoids is linked to a lower risk of developing cancer [10], the association between polyphenol intake and colorectal cancer risk have not yielded consistent results [4]. In this way, several case studies have suggested an inverse association between the high intake of certain compounds, mainly flavonoids, and CRC. For example, a significant effect of flavonols, catechins, and flavones on CRC has been described regardless of the cancer site [13,14,15]. However, other authors have observed differences depending on whether the primary tumor is in the colon, where high doses of flavonols, such as quercetin, would be beneficial, or in the rectum, where apigenin, a flavone, would be beneficial [16]. On the other hand, there are several prospective studies that have found no relationship between flavonoid intake and the occurrence of CRC [4], regardless of sex [17] or smoking status [18], although catechin intake could play a role in obese male patients [19].
To clarify the current situation on this subject, we aim to provide, in this paper, a systematic review of the clinical trials performed with polyphenols for the prevention and treatment of CRC.

2. Materials and Methods

This article is a systematic review and was performed in accordance with the guidelines provided by the PRISMA statements [20,21,22]. The protocol was registered in the international database PROSPERO for systematic reviews (CRD42024560044) to prevent the possibility of duplication and decrease the information bias by allowing for a comparison of the completed review with the planned protocol. This review tries to answer the following research question: is there evidence that the use of polyphenols and flavonoids in the diet or any of its formulations could be useful in preventing the development or progression of CRC.

2.1. Search Strategy and Selection Criteria

The search for information was conducted between 1 May 2023 and 1 May 2024. For the search strategy, the open-access search tool PubMed and COCHRANE database were used to identify eligible studies. As selection criteria, in this study, we have focused only on human clinical trials in which flavonoids have been used as a preventive method or as an adjunct to the treatment of colorectal cancer. The search for all relevant articles was performed by evaluating the title, abstract, and full text. We also conducted a search using a type of non-probability sampling called “snowballing” to identify additional studies through the bibliographic references of specific publications [23].
To facilitate the search query, general terms referring to polyphenols, flavonoids, and the different subfamilies into which they are divided (flavonoids, polyphenols, flavonols, flavanones, isoflavones, flavanols, flavones, or anthocyanins) were used. In addition, terms referring to specific widely used compounds were included, because of their interest: quercetin, myricetin, kaempferol, curcumin, resveratrol, procyanidins, epicatechin, catechin, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, cinnamon, or gingerol. In the query utilized for returning data from the databases, these terms were cross-referenced with colorectal cancer OR colitis using the AND Boolean operator and limiting the search to clinical trials in the advance options.
To ensure all data were appropriately extracted, the authors reviewed and assessed the results independently. The resulting articles were initially tested for duplicates across the databases, to remove them from the pool. Then, an initial reading of the title and the abstracts was made to detect and remove irrelevant articles included during the initial search. Finally, the complete contents of the remaining articles were read, and the reference lists of the articles were reviewed to detect relevant current articles that were not included in the search procedure. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to narrow down the result set and to include only relevant studies in the revision.

2.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

As inclusion criteria, no year of publication restrictions was applied; the relevant studies for reviewing had to be written in English, referring to the effects of polyphenol or flavonoid administration on colorectal cancer prevention or progression, and should only refer to human populations regardless of age, gender, or ethnicity. Both, pure isolated flavonoid intervention and controlled dietary interventions were considered. Healthy patients who developed cancer during the period of flavonoid administration, patients at all stages of colorectal cancer development, with presence of adenomatous polyps, or those with a family history of the disease were included.
As exclusion criteria, publications in other languages were removed. Case reports, editorial opinions, congress abstracts, conference proceedings, and trial registry records or trial protocols were eliminated, as they were considered not to contain complete information about the studies. Cell culture studies were not included due to their difficulty to compare the results with human population studies. Animal studies were also considered irrelevant and omitted. Articles that do not specifically address therapeutic aspects of polyphenols or flavonoids in CRC and only focus on determining safe and appropriate doses to administer in trials were discarded. Failure to meet at least one inclusion criterion classified a study as not interesting for inclusion.

2.3. Data Extraction

Data extraction was performed independently by two researchers using a piloted form onto a Microsoft Excel 365 spreadsheet. The following details were extracted from each study: title of the article, authors, year of publication, country, gender of patients, number of patients involved in the study, range of age, health status or cancer stage, type of study, type of flavonoid tested (route of administration, dose/concentration used, and duration of treatment), and objectives and main conclusions of the study. If the relevant data were not provided, we attempted to contact the authors to obtain the information. If, despite everything, it was not possible to obtain the necessary information, the study was eliminated from the review.

2.4. Assessment of Risk Bias

To help to establish the transparency of results, both investigators, using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and independently, assessed risk of bias at the individual study level [21]. The disagreement among the evaluators was resolved by consensus in a final discussion. Risk of bias was categorized as low, unclear, or high based on six domains including the following: random sequence generation (selection bias), allocation concealment (selection bias), blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias), blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias), incomplete outcome data (attrition bias), selective reporting (reporting bias), and other sources of bias. Based on these six domains, each trial was assigned an overall risk of bias: low risk (low for all key domains), high risk (high for one or more key domains), or unclear risk (unclear for one or more key domains). “Unclear risk of bias” denotes insufficient information to determine the possibility of bias. Studies with one domain with a high risk of bias or four domains with an unclear risk of bias were considered as a high risk of bias [21].

3. Results

3.1. Article Selection

Figure 1 summarizes the process of identification of the studies for this systematic review.
In the first literature search, 91 articles were found in PubMed and 131 in COCHRANE that were likely to be relevant to the review, and the first step of eliminating duplicates excluded 128 articles, leaving only 94 for the next phases of the screening.
In the next step, the title and abstract of the pre-selected articles were reviewed, and 14 articles were eliminated for the following reasons: no reference to colorectal cancer (n = 5), in vitro cell culture studies (n = 2), treatment of other unrelated pathologies (n = 2), or studies performed in healthy population (n = 5). After this step, 80 items were left to continue with the scrutiny.
Finally, the complete text of the articles was read to ensure that they contained information relevant to the study, and the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The application of the exclusion and inclusion criteria led to the elimination of another 52 articles. The specific reasons were meeting abstracts or short communications (n = 10), conference proceedings (n = 3), trial registry records (n = 27), protocol description (n = 1), studies in healthy patients not directly related with colorectal cancer (n = 1), in vitro studies or using biopsies (n = 2), or other types of cancers (n = 1). Lastly, articles that do not specifically address the therapeutic or preventive aspects of polyphenols and flavonoids in CRC (dosage determination, safety, bioavailability) (n = 7) were also removed.
After applying all the steps, 28 articles were finally selected for systematic review and were subjected to a bias screening (see Table 1).

3.2. Data Extraction

3.2.1. Characteristics of the Selected Studies

Among the 28 selected studies, 12 of them aimed to evaluate whether the compounds were able to prevent the development of CRC in patients with risk factors, such as a family history of CRC or premetastatic lesions, while 16 focused on their own potential to treat CRC. On the other hand, 26 studies used the pure compounds or preparations with known concentrations of polyphenols, while 6 of them performed dietary interventions in which the compounds were included as part of the usual intake of the patients.
Studies were conducted in 9 different countries: USA (12), UK (5), Netherlands (2), Iran (2), Italy (2), Taiwan (2), China (1), Japan (1), and Germany (1).

3.2.2. Patients

Although the studies have used patients of all ages, from 18 to 85 years, the average age was 51. In general, the studies included patients of both sexes, except for some cases in which only men [35] or only women [37,44] were used. In one case, the sex of the patients was not specified [25]. In the studies in which pure compounds were used, the total number of patients evaluated was 1408, whereas in the dietary interventions involving long-term follow-up, the number was higher, 161,946 patients.

3.3. Risk of Bias

The result of the analysis of bias is graphically represented in Figure S1 (see Supplementary Materials).
Random sequence generation was identified in 16 trials and classified as having a low risk of bias in this domain [26,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,46,50].
Sixteen studies reported data on allocation concealment [26,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,50]. The blinding of participants and personnel was described in 15 studies [26,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,38,40,41,42,43,44,47,50], but the rest of studies did not apply any blinding method, or this was unclear. Outcome assessment blinding was thoroughly described in 14 studies [26,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,38,40,41,42,43,44,50].
Twenty-three studies were considered as having a low risk of bias in terms of the incomplete outcome [4,24,25,26,29,30,31,32,33,35,36,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]. No selective reporting bias was detected in any of the studies, although in some cases, its presence is unclear [25,27,28,29,32,34,37]. Other sources of bias related to participant dropout data or the imbalance between the evaluated blocks were also considered in the analysis.
In summary, 14 studies were classified as having a high risk of bias due to having at least one high-risk domain among the six key domains, while 2 studies had an unclear risk of bias. Finally, only the 12 studies considered as having a low risk of bias were selected for the discussion of this review [26,30,31,33,35,36,40,41,42,43,44,50].

4. Discussion

After evaluating the articles found in the search, only 12 of them have been selected in this systematic review to explore the possibilities of the clinical use of polyphenols for the treatment or prevention of CRC.
Artepillin C, a prenylated derivative of p-coumaric acid, is one of the major phenolic compounds found in Brazilian Green Propolis, an important honeybee product. Different vegetal materials are collected by honeybees and mixed with wax and other substances to obtain this final product, called propolis. Baccharis dracunculifolia is the major plant source with several pharmacological benefits, including anti-cancer effects [51]. Preclinical studies have shown that this compound has good potential for the treatment of CRC. Artepillin C, added to human colon cancer cells, dose-dependently inhibited cell growth, inducing G (0)/G (1) cell cycle arrest [52]. In animal models, dietary artepillin C was shown to suppress the formation of aberrant crypt foci induced by azoxymethane in the colon, through the activation of the antioxidant-responsive element and induction of phase II enzymes in liver [53]. Similarly, in a Wistar rat model using 1,2-dimethylhydrazine induction, artepillin C decreased aberrant crypt foci amounts and prevented crypt cell clonal expansion [54]. However, a pilot study on a Brazilian propolis extract containing artepillin C found no evidence of effectiveness in preventing early-stage colon cancer changes and raised concerns about potential muscle tissue side effects, including the myocardial tissue [26]. The small sample size (only 15 patients treated) could be a reason for these results. In addition, poor bioavailability limits the biological effects of phenolic compounds, including artepillin C. In a study performed on Wistar rats, artepillin C presented low absorption and bioavailability due to greater susceptibility to hepatic elimination [55].
Curcumin, the active ingredient of the Curcuma longa plant, has triggered the interest of researchers as an antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer agent. Mainly, curcumin enhanced modulated tumor cell apoptosis by modulating levels of B-cell lymphoma protein 2-associated X (Bax) and B-cell lymphoma protein 2 (Bcl-2), two important molecules in the apoptotic pathway, and by activating p53 [56]. Another major pathway that curcumin targets is the matrix metalloproteinase gene expression [57]. Notably, curcumin’s pro-apoptotic effects are specific to cancer cells, with no significant impact on normal cells [58]. Several clinical trials have been performed using curcumin alone or combined with other products with very promising results. Its potential reaches from acting itself as an anticancer compound [30] to exerting preventive action in patients with adenomas [31,33] or as a coadjuvant to conventional chemotherapy [35,36].
Regarding its anticarcinogenic activity, clinical trials has shown that curcumin administration upregulates p53 expression in tumor tissue. P53 is a tumor suppressor protein responsible for a wide range of signaling events within cells, leading to necrosis or apoptosis. In this way, curcumin induces apoptosis in CRC cells [30]. In addition, its administration improves the general condition of the patients with CRC by increasing body weight and decreasing levels of serum TNF-α. Interestingly, TNF-α is elevated in extracellular vesicles from CRC patient serum samples and is related to the development of aggressive forms of CRC. Currently, it is known that the extracellular vesicles are critical for CRC progression by enabling intercellular communication and controlling the microenvironment of tumor cells. Functional experiments revealed that extracellular vesicles containing TNF-α promote CRC cell metastasis via the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) pathway [59]. The positive effects of curcumin on TNF-α levels may also contribute to its anticancer action.
The role of curcumin as a preventive agent in the development of CRC has also been studied. However, in a preventive trial, pure curcumin (3000 mg daily/12 months) did not produce any in mean number or size of lower intestinal tract adenomas. An insufficient dose of curcumin in this trial might be, among others, a major factor for these findings [31]. However, the administration of curcumin (200 mg daily/6 weeks) combined with anthocyanin (500 mg) to patients with pre-metastatic adenomas produced a reduction in the expression of NF-κB in their biopsies [33]. NF-κB has a key role in cancer-related processes, such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and metastasis [60]. Animal studies suggest that NF-κB is implicated in the early stages of the formation of adenomas with malignant potential formation [61]. But the fact that in this trial two compounds are combined makes it difficult to determine which one is responsible for the positive effects. In addition, there are major methodological differences between these two studies concerning doses and durations. The first study used 3000 mg of curcumin daily for 12 months [31], while in the second one, both the dose and duration were lower, 200 mg of curcumin daily for 6 weeks [33].
Curcumin has also been of interest from the point of view of an adjuvant, combined with established anticancer therapies. However, the addition of curcumin (8 g daily/6 weeks) to patients receiving preoperative chemoradiation therapy did not improve outcomes. In addition, the serum curcumin concentration was very variable, suggesting changes in the bioavailability of curcumin [36]. In this way, the administration of curcuminoids (500 mg day/8 weeks), including Biopiperine, a bioavailability enhancer, had a positive impact on levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and quality of life in patients with CRC undergoing chemotherapy. Curcumin improved the erythrocyte sedimentation rate, interleukin (IL)-1-a, and serum levels of C-reactive protein in CRC subjects and increased quality of life and functional scales compared to a placebo [35]. The inclusion of this compound to increase the bioavailability of curcumin may have contributed to the positive results in this case.
Curcumin has therapeutic potential for colorectal CRC through effects on multiple molecular targets, but its low bioavailability limits its clinical translation and is an important factor to be considered in the studies. Its low solubility, short half-life, and low bioavailability, with poor absorption, rapid metabolism, and rapid systemic elimination, reduces its applicability [62,63].
Isoflavones are phytoestrogens, naturally occurring nonsteroidal phenolic plant compounds, chemically comparable to vertebrate steroid estrogens. They can be obtained from different sources as soy or red clover [64]. Soy isoflavones (83 mg/12 months) used as a preventive did not reduce colorectal epithelial cell proliferation in a dietary intervention performed in a study population with previous adenomatous polyps [41]. There are studies in Asian populations that support the relationship between the consumption of large amounts of these compounds and a lower incidence of CRC [65,66,67]. However, the intervention by Adams et al. (2005) [41] was much shorter and performed in U.S. populations whose diet is much lower in isoflavones than Asians. Red clover is another source of isoflavones, mainly biochanin A and formononetin, which are metabolized to genistein and daidzein [40]. Interestingly, since isoflavones have weak estrogenic activity, they could produce an estrogen-like decrease in serum insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I concentrations [40]. The elements of the IGF system have an important function in the regulation of the growth, proliferation, and survival of cells. Prospective epidemiological studies indicate that higher circulating concentrations of IGF-I and II and reduced concentrations of insulin-like growth factor-I-binding proteins IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-2 are associated with an increased CRC risk [68]. Although at the doses used (84 mg daily/8 weeks), isoflavone supplementation did not influence circulating IGF concentrations in men at a high risk of CRC, a relative decrease in serum total IGF-I concentrations was found in equol producers only. An individual’s ability to produce equol, a potent estrogenic compound formed during the metabolism of daidzein, seems to be a relevant factor in the effect of isoflavones on IGF system components. As this study was carried out only in a male population, the researchers extended it to women with an increased risk of CRC and showed consistently that isoflavone administration did not significantly affect circulating levels of IGF system components or influence serum concentrations and tissue mRNA expression [42]. Therefore, the evidence for an association between isoflavones from red clover and reduced colorectal cancer risk is inconclusive.
Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) is a polyhydroxy phenolic compound extracted from tea, for which antitumor and radio-sensitizing effects on cancer cells has received attention [69,70,71]. This compound has been shown to inhibit in vitro cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in CRC cells in part by modulating the activities of various receptor tyrosine kinases. Additionally, EGCG activates stress signals, such as JNK and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and induces apoptosis in CRC cell lines [71]. The mechanisms underlying the anti-tumor efforts of EGCG may include the inhibition of epidermal growth factor and IGF/IGF1R signaling pathways as shown in animal and human studies [72,73]. In view of the promising results obtained in preclinical studies, a preventive assay tested the efficacy and safety of Polyphenon E (Poly E), a polyphenol preparation with EGCG (780 mg daily/6 months), in patients with rectal aberrant crypt foci (ACF), precursors of CRC [43]. Poly E was well tolerated and did not present significant toxicity at the dose studied but did not reduce total number of ACFs. The study presented limitations due to a small sample size of only 19 patients and a study population restricted to high-risk CRC subjects. These limitations could impact the generalizability of the findings [43].
Fisetin (3,3′,4′,7-tetrahydroxyflavone) is a dietary flavanol present in fruits and vegetables, such as grape, apple, persimmon, strawberry, cucumber, or onion, and has anti-inflammatory, apoptotic, anti-oxidative properties. It has shown good results in several preclinical studies as an adjuvant in chemotherapy or radiotherapy. In vitro models have shown that fisetin induces apoptosis by suppressing autophagy and down-regulating nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) [74] and may represent a relevant strategy in cancer pathogenesis and resistance cases. Fisetin improves radiosensitivity by blocking the repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks [75]. It is also capable of enhancing the radiosensitivity of p53-mutant human CRC cells [76]. A combination of fisetin with antitumor drugs, such as 5FU or oxaliplatin and irinotecan, increases the efficacy of these drugs and could be useful in cases of treatment resistance [77,78]. This compound could also be used for inflammation-related tumor progression. The administration of fisetin to patients with CRC (Stages I–II) revealed a decrease in IL-8 and C-reactive protein concentrations, improving the inflammatory status in CRC patients. In this way, the potential of this compound to increase the maximum-tolerated dose of chemotherapeutic agents may increase the chance of survival and the quality of life and associated comorbidities [44].
Most of the studies selected in this review opt for the use of pure compounds, as this allows for a better dose control. However, there have been studies with less controlled formulations as the herbal agent MB-6, as a potential adjunct to 5-FU–based chemotherapy [50]. MB-6 is a botanical product manufactured by Microbio Co., Ltd., in Taipei, Taiwan. It is formulated from diverse plants: fermented soybean extract (MicrSoy-20), green tea extract (Camellia sinensis O), Antrodia camphorata mycelia, spirulina (Arthrospira platensis), grape seed extract (Vitis vinifera), and curcumin extract (Curcuma longa L). MB-6 treatment produced a lower disease progression rate in CRC patients and reduced the incidence of adverse events and occurrence of increased serum creatinine [50]. However, the fact that MB-6 is a combination of several different herbs makes it extremely difficult to determine which of the compounds administered is responsible for the benefits it provides, as well as the proper dosage.

5. Conclusions

Some polyphenols have shown anticarcinogenic effects, and their benefits have been demonstrated in many in vitro and epidemiological studies, where they appear to exert anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory effects, and they have also been associated with the stimulation of apoptosis and the inhibition of cell proliferation, among other interesting properties. However, the limited number of clinical trials conducted with each compound does not allow us to be certain that they play a significant role in the prevention or treatment of CRC. There is still a need for more clinical trials before they can be recommended as effective elements for the prevention or clinical treatment of colorectal cancer.
This systematic review underscores the complexity of translating preclinical success to human treatments and the need for more controlled studies to determine effective doses and formulations of polyphenols.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu16162735/s1, Figure S1: Graphical representation of the bias analysis according to seven key domains.

Author Contributions

J.A.U.; conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, supervision. L.L.-G.; formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft preparation. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by: SAF2012-40075-C02-01 funded by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación-MICINN; PID2019-111510RB-I00 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033; Fundación Mapfre (Ayudas a la Investigación-Promoción de la Salud 2011), Grupo Español de Motilidad Digestiva (Beca Allergan, 2017) and Asociación Española de Gastroenterología y Motilidad (Beca AEG-ASENEM, 2021).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author and will also be available at the corresponding authors’ institutional repository (URJC).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Del Rio, D.; Rodriguez-Mateos, A.; Spencer, J.P.E.; Tognolini, M.; Borges, G.; Crozier, A. Dietary (Poly)Phenolics in Human Health: Structures, Bioavailability, and Evidence of Protective Effects against Chronic Diseases. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2013, 18, 1818–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Moon, Y.J.; Wang, X.; Morris, M.E. Dietary Flavonoids: Effects on Xenobiotic and Carcinogen Metabolism. Toxicol. Vitr. 2006, 20, 187–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hagan, M.; Hayee, B.H.; Rodriguez-Mateos, A. (Poly)Phenols in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Review. Molecules 2021, 26, 1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Nimptsch, K.; Zhang, X.; Cassidy, A.; Song, M.; O’Reilly, É.J.; Lin, J.H.; Pischon, T.; Rimm, E.B.; Willett, W.C.; Fuchs, C.S.; et al. Habitual Intake of Flavonoid Subclasses and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in 2 Large Prospective Cohorts. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 103, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Global Cancer Observatory (iarc.fr). Available online: https://gco.iarc.fr/en (accessed on 10 January 2024).
  6. Szylberg, L.; Janiczek, M.; Popiel, A.; Marszałek, A. Large Bowel Genetic Background and Inflammatory Processes in Carcinogenesis—Systematic Review. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015, 24, 555–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nakaji, S.; Umeda, T.; Shimoyama, T.; Sugawara, K.; Tamura, K.; Fukuda, S.; Sakamoto, J.; Parodi, S. Environmental Factors Affect Colon Carcinoma and Rectal Carcinoma in Men and Women Differently. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2003, 18, 481–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Slattery, M.L. Diet, lifestyle, and colon cancer. Semin. Gastrointest. Dis. 2000, 11, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Surh, Y.-J. Cancer Chemoprevention with Dietary Phytochemicals. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2003, 3, 768–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rudzińska, A.; Juchaniuk, P.; Oberda, J.; Wiśniewska, J.; Wojdan, W.; Szklener, K.; Mańdziuk, S. Phytochemicals in Cancer Treatment and Cancer Prevention-Review on Epidemiological Data and Clinical Trials. Nutrients 2023, 15, 1896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Hossain, R.; Jain, D.; Khan, R.A.; Islam, M.T.; Mubarak, M.S.; Mohammad Saikat, A.S. Natural-Derived Molecules as a Potential Adjuvant in Chemotherapy: Normal Cell Protectors and Cancer Cell Sensitizers. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2022, 22, 836–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fernández, J.; Silván, B.; Entrialgo-Cadierno, R.; Villar, C.J.; Capasso, R.; Uranga, J.A.; Lombó, F.; Abalo, R. Antiproliferative and Palliative Activity of Flavonoids in Colorectal Cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 143, 112241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zamora-Ros, R.; Not, C.; Guinó, E.; Luján-Barroso, L.; García, R.M.; Biondo, S.; Salazar, R.; Moreno, V. Association between Habitual Dietary Flavonoid and Lignan Intake and Colorectal Cancer in a Spanish Case–Control Study (the Bellvitge Colorectal Cancer Study). Cancer Causes Control 2013, 24, 549–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rossi, M.; Bosetti, C.; Negri, E.; Lagiou, P.; Vecchia, C.L. Flavonoids, Proanthocyanidins, and Cancer Risk: A Network of Case-Control Studies from Italy. Nutr. Cancer 2010, 62, 871–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Theodoratou, E.; Kyle, J.; Cetnarskyj, R.; Farrington, S.M.; Tenesa, A.; Barnetson, R.; Porteous, M.; Dunlop, M.; Campbell, H. Dietary Flavonoids and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2007, 16, 684–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chang, H.; Lei, L.; Zhou, Y.; Ye, F.; Zhao, G. Dietary Flavonoids and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Epidemiological Studies. Nutrients 2018, 10, 950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lin, J.; Zhang, S.M.; Wu, K.; Willett, W.C.; Fuchs, C.S.; Giovannucci, E. Flavonoid Intake and Colorectal Cancer Risk in Men and Women. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2006, 164, 644–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hirvonen, T.; Virtamo, J.; Korhonen, P.; Albanes, D.; Pietinen, P. Flavonol and flavone intake and the risk of cancer in male smokers (Finland). Cancer Causes Control 2001, 12, 789–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Simons, C.C.J.M.; Hughes, L.A.E.; Arts, I.C.W.; Goldbohm, R.A.; van den Brandt, P.A.; Weijenberg, M.P. Dietary Flavonol, Flavone and Catechin Intake and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in the Netherlands Cohort Study. Int. J. Cancer 2009, 125, 2945–2952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Higgins, J.P.T.; Thomas, J.; Chandler, J.; Cumpston, M.; Li, T.; Page, M.J.; Welch, V.A. (Eds.) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions; Version 6.2; (updated February 2021); Cochrane: London, UK, 2021; Available online: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook (accessed on 10 January 2024).
  22. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Streeton, R.; Cooke, M.; Campbell, J. Researching the researchers: Using a snowballing technique. Nurse Res. 2004, 12, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Aklilu, M.; Kindler, H.L.; Donehower, R.C.; Mani, S.; Vokes, E.E. Phase II Study of Flavopiridol in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2003, 14, 1270–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Dickson, M.A.; Shah, M.A.; Rathkopf, D.; Tse, A.; Carvajal, R.D.; Wu, N.; Lefkowitz, R.A.; Gonen, M.; Cane, L.M.; Dials, H.J.; et al. A Phase I Clinical Trial of FOLFIRI in Combination with the Pan-Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) Inhibitor Flavopiridol. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2010, 66, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Ishikawa, H.; Goto, M.; Matsuura, N.; Murakami, Y.; Goto, C.; Sakai, T.; Kanazawa, K. A Pilot, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Phase 0/Biomarker Study on Effect of Artepillin C-Rich Extract of Brazilian Propolis in Frequent Colorectal Adenoma Polyp Patients. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2012, 31, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Sharma, R.A.; McLelland, H.R.; Hill, K.A.; Ireson, C.R.; Euden, S.A.; Manson, M.M.; Pirmohamed, M.; Marnett, L.J.; Gescher, A.J.; Steward, W.P. Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Study of Oral Curcuma Extract in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2001, 7, 1894–1900. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Garcea, G.; Berry, D.P.; Jones, D.J.L.; Singh, R.; Dennison, A.R.; Farmer, P.B.; Sharma, R.A.; Steward, W.P.; Gescher, A.J. Consumption of the Putative Chemopreventive Agent Curcumin by Cancer Patients: Assessment of Curcumin Levels in the Colorectum and Their Pharmacodynamic Consequences. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2005, 14, 120–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cruz-Correa, M.; Shoskes, D.A.; Sanchez, P.; Zhao, R.; Hylind, L.M.; Wexner, S.D.; Giardiello, F.M. Combination Treatment with Curcumin and Quercetin of Adenomas in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2006, 4, 1035–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. He, Z.-Y.; Shi, C.-B.; Wen, H.; Li, F.-L.; Wang, B.-L.; Wang, J. Upregulation of P53 Expression in Patients with Colorectal Cancer by Administration of Curcumin. Cancer Investig. 2011, 29, 208–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Cruz-Correa, M.; Hylind, L.M.; Marrero, J.H.; Zahurak, M.L.; Murray-Stewart, T.; Casero, R.A., Jr.; Montgomery, E.A.; Iacobuzio-Donahue, C.; Brosens, L.A.; Offerhaus, G.J.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of Curcumin in Treatment of Intestinal Adenomas in Patients with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. Gastroenterology 2018, 155, 668–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Howells, L.M.; Iwuji, C.O.O.; Irving, G.R.B.; Barber, S.; Walter, H.; Sidat, Z.; Griffin-Teall, N.; Singh, R.; Foreman, N.; Patel, S.R.; et al. Curcumin Combined with FOLFOX Chemotherapy Is Safe and Tolerable in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Randomized Phase IIa Trial. J. Nutr. 2019, 149, 1133–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Briata, I.M.; Paleari, L.; Rutigliani, M.; Petrera, M.; Caviglia, S.; Romagnoli, P.; Libera, M.D.; Oppezzi, M.; Puntoni, M.; Siri, G.; et al. A Presurgical Study of Curcumin Combined with Anthocyanin Supplements in Patients with Colorectal Adenomatous Polyps. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 11024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Macis, D.; Briata, I.M.; D’Ecclesiis, O.; Johansson, H.; Aristarco, V.; Buttiron Webber, T.; Oppezzi, M.; Gandini, S.; Bonanni, B.; DeCensi, A. Inflammatory and Metabolic Biomarker Assessment in a Randomized Presurgical Trial of Curcumin and Anthocyanin Supplements in Patients with Colorectal Adenomas. Nutrients 2023, 15, 3894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Panahi, Y.; Saberi-Karimian, M.; Valizadeh, O.; Behnam, B.; Saadat, A.; Jamialahmadi, T.; Majeed, M.; Sahebkar, A. Effects of Curcuminoids on Systemic Inflammation and Quality of Life in Patients with Colorectal Cancer Undergoing Chemotherapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2021, 1328, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gunther, J.R.; Chadha, A.S.; Guha, S.; Raju, G.S.; Maru, D.M.; Munsell, M.F.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, P.; Felix, E.; Clemons, M.; et al. A Phase II Randomized Double Blinded Trial Evaluating the Efficacy of Curcumin with Pre-Operative Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2022, 13, 2938–2950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Patel, K.R.; Brown, V.A.; Jones, D.J.L.; Britton, R.G.; Hemingway, D.; Miller, A.S.; West, K.P.; Booth, T.D.; Perloff, M.; Crowell, J.A.; et al. Clinical Pharmacology of Resveratrol and Its Metabolites in Colorectal Cancer Patients. Cancer Res. 2010, 70, 7392–7399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Howells, L.M.; Berry, D.P.; Elliott, P.J.; Jacobson, E.W.; Hoffmann, E.; Hegarty, B.; Brown, K.; Steward, W.P.; Gescher, A.J. Phase I Randomized, Double-Blind Pilot Study of Micronized Resveratrol (SRT501) in Patients with Hepatic Metastases—Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics. Cancer Prev. Res. 2011, 4, 1419–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Chang, T.-K.; Yin, T.-C.; Su, W.-C.; Tsai, H.-L.; Huang, C.-W.; Chen, Y.-C.; Li, C.-C.; Chen, P.-J.; Ma, C.-J.; Chuang, K.-H.; et al. A Pilot Study of Silymarin as Supplementation to Reduce Toxicities in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with First-Line FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab. Oncol. Res. 2021, 28, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vrieling, A.; Rookus, M.A.; Kampman, E.; Bonfrer, J.M.G.; Korse, C.M.; van Doorn, J.; Lampe, J.W.; Cats, A.; Witteman, B.J.M.; van Leeuwen, F.E.; et al. Isolated Isoflavones Do Not Affect the Circulating Insulin-like Growth Factor System in Men at Increased Colorectal Cancer Risk. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 379–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Adams, K.F.; Lampe, P.D.; Newton, K.M.; Ylvisaker, J.T.; Feld, A.; Myerson, D.; Emerson, S.S.; White, E.; Potter, J.D.; Lampe, J.W. Soy Protein Containing Isoflavones Does Not Decrease Colorectal Epithelial Cell Proliferation in a Randomized Controlled Trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2005, 82, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vrieling, A.; Rookus, M.A.; Kampman, E.; Bonfrer, J.M.G.; Bosma, A.; Cats, A.; van Doorn, J.; Korse, C.M.; Witteman, B.J.M.; van Leeuwen, F.E.; et al. No Effect of Red Clover-Derived Isoflavone Intervention on the Insulin-like Growth Factor System in Women at Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2008, 17, 2585–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Sinicrope, F.A.; Viggiano, T.R.; Buttar, N.S.; Song, L.M.W.K.; Schroeder, K.W.; Kraichely, R.E.; Larson, M.V.; Sedlack, R.E.; Kisiel, J.B.; Gostout, C.J.; et al. Randomized Phase II Trial of Polyphenon E versus Placebo in Patients at High Risk of Recurrent Colonic Neoplasia. Cancer Prev. Res. 2021, 14, 573–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Farsad-Naeimi, A.; Alizadeh, M.; Esfahani, A.; Darvish Aminabad, E. Effect of Fisetin Supplementation on Inflammatory Factors and Matrix Metalloproteinase Enzymes in Colorectal Cancer Patients. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 2025–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hoensch, H.; Groh, B.; Edler, L.; Kirch, W. Prospective Cohort Comparison of Flavonoid Treatment in Patients with Resected Colorectal Cancer to Prevent Recurrence. World J. Gastroenterol. 2008, 14, 2187–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bobe, G.; Sansbury, L.B.; Albert, P.S.; Cross, A.J.; Kahle, L.; Ashby, J.; Slattery, M.L.; Caan, B.; Paskett, E.; Iber, F.; et al. Dietary Flavonoids and Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence in the Polyp Prevention Trial. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2008, 17, 1344–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wang, L.; Lee, I.-M.; Zhang, S.M.; Blumberg, J.B.; Buring, J.E.; Sesso, H.D. Dietary Intake of Selected Flavonols, Flavones, and Flavonoid-Rich Foods and Risk of Cancer in Middle-Aged and Older Women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 905–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bobe, G.; Albert, P.S.; Sansbury, L.B.; Lanza, E.; Schatzkin, A.; Colburn, N.H.; Cross, A.J. Interleukin-6 as a Potential Indicator for Prevention of High-Risk Adenoma Recurrence by Dietary Flavonols in the Polyp Prevention Trial. Cancer Prev. Res. 2010, 3, 764–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Bobe, G.; Murphy, G.; Albert, P.S.; Sansbury, L.B.; Lanza, E.; Schatzkin, A.; Cross, A.J. Dietary Lignan and Proanthocyanidin Consumption and Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence in the Polyp Prevention Trial. Int. J. Cancer 2012, 130, 1649–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chen, W.T.-L.; Yang, T.-S.; Chen, H.-C.; Chen, H.-H.; Chiang, H.-C.; Lin, T.-C.; Yeh, C.-H.; Ke, T.-W.; Chen, J.-S.; Hsiao, K.-H.; et al. Effectiveness of a Novel Herbal Agent MB-6 as a Potential Adjunct to 5-Fluoracil-Based Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer. Nutr. Res. 2014, 34, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shahinozzaman, M.; Basak, B.; Emran, R.; Rozario, P.; Obanda, D.N. Artepillin C: A Comprehensive Review of Its Chemistry, Bioavailability, and Pharmacological Properties. Fitoterapia 2020, 147, 104775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Shimizu, K.; Das, S.K.; Hashimoto, T.; Sowa, Y.; Yoshida, T.; Sakai, T.; Matsuura, Y.; Kanazawa, K. Artepillin C in Brazilian Propolis Induces G(0)/G(1) Arrest via Stimulation of Cip1/P21 Expression in Human Colon Cancer Cells. Mol. Carcinog. 2005, 44, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shimizu, K.; Das, S.K.; Baba, M.; Matsuura, Y.; Kanazawa, K. Dietary Artepillin C Suppresses the Formation of Aberrant Crypt Foci Induced by Azoxymethane in Mouse Colon. Cancer Lett. 2006, 240, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pelegrini, B.B.; Becker, A.A.; Ferreira, C.A.; Machado, G.R.; Gauer, M.A.; Mazarin, S.R.; Dembogurski, D.S.D.O.; Kaneshima, A.M.D.S.; Da Silva, D.B.; Becker, T.C.A. Antineoplastic Activity Evaluation of Brazilian Brown Propolis and Artepillin C in Colorectal Area of Wistar Rats. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2024, 25, 563–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Konishi, Y.; Hitomi, Y.; Yoshida, M.; Yoshioka, E. Absorption and Bioavailability of Artepillin C in Rats after Oral Administration. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 9928–9933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Song, G.; Mao, Y.B.; Cai, Q.F.; Yao, L.M.; Ouyang, G.L.; Bao, S.D. Curcumin induces human HT-29 colon adenocarcinoma cell apoptosis by activating p53 and regulating apoptosis-related protein expression. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 2005, 38, 1791–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bhatia, M.; Bhalerao, M.; Cruz-Martins, N.; Kumar, D. Curcumin and Cancer Biology: Focusing Regulatory Effects in Different Signalling Pathways. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 4913–4929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Shankar, S.; Srivastava, R. Involvement of Bcl-2 family members, phosphatidylinositol 3’-kinase/AKT and mitochondrial p53 in curcumin (diferulolylmethane)-induced apoptosis in prostate cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2007, 30, 905–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Xie, B.-W.; Guan, B.; Chen, W.; Zhou, M.; Gu, Q.; Liu, Y.; Yan, D. Tumor-Derived Extracellular Vesicles Delivering TNF-α Promotes Colorectal Cancer Metastasis via the NF-kB/LAMB3/AKT Axis by Targeting SNAP23. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2023, 741, 109605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Patel, M.; Horgan, P.G.; McMillan, D.C.; Edwards, J. NF-κB Pathways in the Development and Progression of Colorectal Cancer. Transl. Res. 2018, 197, 43–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Shaked, H.; Hofseth, L.J.; Chumanevich, A.; Chumanevich, A.A.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Taniguchi, K.; Guma, M.; Shenouda, S.; Clevers, H.; et al. Chronic Epithelial NF-κB Activation Accelerates APC Loss and Intestinal Tumor Initiation through iNOS up-Regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 14007–14012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Tran, P.H.L.; Tran, T.T.D. Developmental Strategies of Curcumin Solid Dispersions for Enhancing Bioavailability. Anticancer Agents Med. Chem. 2020, 20, 1874–1882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Anand, P.; Kunnumakkara, A.B.; Newman, R.A.; Aggarwal, B.B. Bioavailability of Curcumin: Problems and Promises. Mol. Pharm. 2007, 4, 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Křížová, L.; Dadáková, K.; Kašparovská, J.; Kašparovský, T. Isoflavones. Molecules 2019, 24, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Budhathoki, S.; Joshi, A.M.; Ohnaka, K.; Yin, G.; Toyomura, K.; Kono, S.; Mibu, R.; Tanaka, M.; Kakeji, Y.; Maehara, Y.; et al. Soy Food and Isoflavone Intake and Colorectal Cancer Risk: The Fukuoka Colorectal Cancer Study. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 46, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yu, Y.; Jing, X.; Li, H.; Zhao, X.; Wang, D. Soy Isoflavone Consumption and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 25939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Akhter, M.; Iwasaki, M.; Yamaji, T.; Sasazuki, S.; Tsugane, S. Dietary Isoflavone and the Risk of Colorectal Adenoma: A Case–Control Study in Japan. Br. J. Cancer 2009, 100, 1812–1816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Meshkini, F.; Ramezani-Jolfaie, N.; Sargazi, S.; Clark, C.C.T.; Soltani, S. The Effects of Lycopene Supplementation on Insulin-like Growth Factor-1 and Insulin-like Growth Factor Binding Proteins: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Phytother. Res. 2022, 36, 1633–1643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Wang, Y.; Jin, H.-Y.; Fang, M.-Z.; Wang, X.-F.; Chen, H.; Huang, S.-L.; Kong, D.-S.; Li, M.; Zhang, X.; Sun, Y.; et al. Epigallocatechin Gallate Inhibits Dimethylhydrazine-Induced Colorectal Cancer in Rats. World J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 26, 2064–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Enkhbat, T.; Nishi, M.; Yoshikawa, K.; Jun, H.; Tokunaga, T.; Takasu, C.; Kashihara, H.; Ishikawa, D.; Tominaga, M.; Shimada, M. Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Enhances Radiation Sensitivity in Colorectal Cancer Cells through Nrf2 Activation and Autophagy. Anticancer Res. 2018, 38, 6247–6252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Maruyama, T.; Murata, S.; Nakayama, K.; Sano, N.; Ogawa, K.; Nowatari, T.; Tamura, T.; Nozaki, R.; Fukunaga, K.; Ohkohchi, N. (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate Suppresses Liver Metastasis of Human Colorectal Cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2014, 31, 625–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Adachi, S.; Nagao, T.; Ingolfsson, H.I.; Maxfield, F.R.; Andersen, O.S.; Kopelovich, L.; Weinstein, I.B. The Inhibitory Effect of (-)-Epigallocatechin Gallate on Activation of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Is Associated with Altered Lipid Order in HT29 Colon Cancer Cells. Cancer Res. 2007, 67, 6493–6501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Shimizu, M.; Shirakami, Y.; Sakai, H.; Tatebe, H.; Nakagawa, T.; Hara, Y.; Weinstein, I.B.; Moriwaki, H. EGCG Inhibits Activation of the Insulin-like Growth Factor (IGF)/IGF-1 Receptor Axis in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells. Cancer Lett. 2008, 262, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Pandey, A.; Trigun, S.K. Fisetin Induces Apoptosis in Colorectal Cancer Cells by Suppressing Autophagy and Down-Regulating Nuclear Factor Erythroid 2-Related Factor 2 (Nrf2). J. Cell. Biochem. 2023, 124, 1289–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Khozooei, S.; Veerappan, S.; Bonzheim, I.; Singer, S.; Gani, C.; Toulany, M. Fisetin Overcomes Non-Targetability of Mutated KRAS Induced YB-1 Signaling in Colorectal Cancer Cells and Improves Radiosensitivity by Blocking Repair of Radiation-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks. Radiother. Oncol. 2023, 188, 109867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chen, W.-S.; Lee, Y.-J.; Yu, Y.-C.; Hsaio, C.-H.; Yen, J.-H.; Yu, S.-H.; Tsai, Y.-J.; Chiu, S.-J. Enhancement of P53-Mutant Human Colorectal Cancer Cells Radiosensitivity by Flavonoid Fisetin. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2010, 77, 1527–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Khan, N.; Jajeh, F.; Eberhardt, E.L.; Miller, D.D.; Albrecht, D.M.; Van Doorn, R.; Hruby, M.D.; Maresh, M.E.; Clipson, L.; Mukhtar, H.; et al. Fisetin and 5-Fluorouracil: Effective Combination for PIK3CA-Mutant Colorectal Cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2019, 145, 3022–3032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Jeng, L.-B.; Kumar Velmurugan, B.; Chen, M.-C.; Hsu, H.-H.; Ho, T.-J.; Day, C.-H.; Lin, Y.-M.; Padma, V.V.; Tu, C.-C.; Huang, C.-Y. Fisetin Mediated Apoptotic Cell Death in Parental and Oxaliplatin/Irinotecan Resistant Colorectal Cancer Cells In Vitro and In Vivo. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 233, 7134–7142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the selection process of scientific articles.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the selection process of scientific articles.
Nutrients 16 02735 g001
Table 1. Selected articles for the systematic review (28). The 12 articles that finally passed the bias evaluation and were used for the discussion are underlined for identification purposes.
Table 1. Selected articles for the systematic review (28). The 12 articles that finally passed the bias evaluation and were used for the discussion are underlined for identification purposes.
PolyphenolAdministrationCountryPatientsGenderAgeType of StudyObjectiveFindingsReference
Flavopiridol (synthetic flavone)Isolated compound 50 mg/m2/day via a 72 h continuous infusion every 14 days.USA20 patients Advanced CRC unresectable adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectumBoth42–80Phase II trial of flavopiridol in previously untreated patients with advanced CRCExamine flavopiridol as a chemotherapy modulating agentNo anticancer activity by itself[24]
Flavopiridol (synthetic flavone)Isolated compound (40–90 mg/m) 2–3 h after irinotecan and before 5FUUSA31 with CRC, 43 other tumors. No control group Plasma tumor biopsiesBoth19–83Open-label, non-randomized dose escalation study to Clinical trial Phase IDetermine if FOLFIRI in combination with flavopiridol presents therapeutic activityFlavopiridol enhance the effects of FOLFIRI[25]
Artepillin165 μ mol artepillin C (extract of Propolis)/day 3 monthsJapan30 patients (15 treatment, 15 placebo) Premetastatic adenomas BiopsiesBoth40–75Randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind trialEvaluate the effects of artepillin C on colon cancer formationNot effectiveness in preventing colon cancer.
Detrimental side effects on muscle cells
[26]
Curcuma extractCapsules at doses between 440 and 2200 mg/day, containing 36–180 mg of curcumin; 4 months.UK15 patients Advanced CRC refractory to chemotherapy Colorectal tissue biopsyBoth42–72Dose-escalation pilot studyInvestigate potential biomarkers of the systemic efficacy of curcumin: GST and M1G440 mg of Curcuma extract produced a decrease in lymphocytic GST activity[27]
Curcumin450, 1800, or 3600 mg of curcumin daily, for 7 days before surgeryUK12 patients (7 male, 5 female) No placebo CRC Colorectal tissue biopsyBoth47–72Dose-scalation studyTest pharmacologically active levels of curcumin measured based on effects on levels of M1G and COX-2 3600 mg of curcumin reduced M1G levels. COX-2 protein levels were not affected[28]
Curcumin + QuercetinCurcumin 480 mg and quercetin 20 mg orally 3 times a day 3–6 monthsUSA5 patients (3 men, 2 women) Adenomatous polyposis Both22–54Proof-of principleEvaluate the effect of curcumin and quercetin in familiar adenomatous polyposisDecrease in polyp number and size after a mean of 6 months of treatment [29]
CurcuminCurcumin capsules 360 mg curcumin, thrice/day during the period ahead of surgeryChina126 patients Curcumin (37 female and 26 male) Vehicle (34 female 28 male) CRC Biopsy/bloodBoth34–82Randomized controlled trialEffects of treatment with curcumin on CRC patients Increased body weight. Decreased serum TNF-α levels. Increased apoptosis of tumor cells and enhanced expression of p53 [30]
CurcuminPure curcumin (1500 mg orally, twice/day), or placebo, 12 months.USA44 patients (21 treatment, 23 placebo), Familiar adenomatous polyposisBoth18–35Double-blind, randomized trialDetermine safety and efficacy of curcuminFew adverse effects
No difference in mean number or size of adenomas
[31]
Curcumin2 g oral curcumin daily during chemotherapyUK27 patients (9 FOLFOX, 18 CUFOX (curcumin + FOLFOX)) CRC patient plasmaNot specified53–78Phase IIa open-labeled randomized controlled trialAssess safety, efficacy, and CXCL1 in patients receiving CUFOXCurcumin did not significantly alter CXCL1 over time. Curcumin is a safe and tolerable adjunct to FOLFOX chemotherapy[32]
Curcumin + AnthocyaninCurcumin: 100 mg, 2 times/day
Anthocyanin: 500 mg, 2 times/day
Italy29 patients (treated: 10 men + 5 women); 14 placebo: 7 + 7) Pre-metastatic adenoma biopsyBothTreatment 70.8 placebo 67.9Proof-of principle Evaluate the preventive effect of curcumin combined with anthocyaninReduction in NF-κB expression in adenoma tissue. Potentially favorable[33]
Curcumin + AnthocyaninDaily dose of 1 g of curcumin and 1 g of anthocyaninItaly29 patients (15 treatment, 14 placebo), Adenomatous polypBoth18–85Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II presurgical trialAnalyze the effects on circulating biomarkers of inflammation and metabolismNo modulation of circulating biomarkers. Increase in IL-6[34]
CurcuminoidsCurcuminoid capsules (500 mg/day), for 8 weeks.Iran64, treated 59, placebo CRC (stage 3) Blood samplesBoth58–63Double-blind placebo-controlled trialExplore the effects of curcuminoids
on pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and quality of life in patients undergoing chemotherapy
No improvement in cytokines. Decrease in erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein. Improved quality of life[35]
CurcuminIsolated compound 4 g orally, twice daily during radiotherapy and 6 days afterUSA22 patients (13 men, 8 treatment + 5 placebo and 9 women, 7 treatment + 2 placebo). Rectal cancer Biopsy/plasmaBoth28–75Phase II randomized double blinded trialEvaluate the efficacy of curcumin with pre-operative chemoradiation for rectal cancerNo increase in response rates in chemoradiation therapy due to unpredictable bioavailability of curcumin [36]
Resveratrol8 daily doses of resveratrol at 0.5 or 1.0 g prior to surgical resectionUK20 patients (9 male–11 female) CRC Blood/colorectal biopsyBoth46–83Clinical trialAnalyze the affect of resveratrol on Ki67 expressionReduction in tumor cell proliferation. Decreased tumor cell Ki-67 staining[37]
ResveratrolSRT501, micronized resveratrol 5.0 g daily for 14 daysUK9 Patients (6 treatment, 3 placebo) Stage IV CRC and hepatic Metastases Plasma/hepatic tissueBoth>18Phase I, randomized double-blind clinical trialAsses the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of the formulationCleaved caspase-3, a marker of apoptosis, was increased in malignant hepatic tissue[38]
Silymarin (4 compounds: silybin, isosilybin, silychristin, silydianin)Silymarin capsules (150 mg) 3 times/day for 7 days from the beginning of chemotherapyTaiwan70 patients (35 + 35) Metastatic CRC FOLFIRI plus bevacizumabBoth20–80Prospective open label pilot studyEvaluate the effect of silymarin supplementation reducing the toxicity of chemotherapy Fewer adverse effects like diarrhea and nausea. No significant differences in hepatic toxicities [39]
Isoflavones8-week isolated (84 mg/d). isoflavone tabletsNetherlands37 patients, 17 intervention 20 placebo Family history of CRC or a personal history of colorectal adenomasMen40–75Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blindInvestigate the effect of an isolated isoflavone supplementation serum concentrations of total IGF-INo influence on circulating IGF concentrations in men at a high risk of CRC. IGF-I-lowering effect in equol producers only[40]
Soy IsoflavonesSoy isoflavones Treatment (83 mg isoflavones Control group (3 mg isoflavones).USA125 Patients Adenomatous colorectal polyps
Biopsies colon and rectum
Both50–8012-month randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled dietary interventionTest if soy isoflavones decrease epithelial cell proliferaciónSoy isoflavones do not reduce colorectal epithelial cell proliferation[41]
Isoflavone8-week supplementation with red clover-derived isoflavones (84 mg/d)Netherlands34 Patients 15 isoflavone 19 placebo Colorectal adenomas or family history of CRC Plasma/biopsyWomen50–75Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, crossover trialInvestigate the effect of isolated isoflavones on IGF system componentsNo changes in circulating levels of IGF system components or in colorectal tissue mRNA expression[42]
Epigallocate chin gallatePolyphenon E (Poly E, epigallocatechin gallate); 6 months of ora (780 mg EGCG) dailyUSA39 patients 19 Poly E 20 placebo Rectal ACF (putative precursors of CRC)Both>40Randomized, double-blinded, and placebo-controlled trialStudy preventive efficacy and safety of Poly E in subjects with rectal ACFNo reduction of rectal ACF number relative to placebo[43]
Fisetin100 mg capsule of Wax-Tree-derived fisetin/day 7 consecutive weeksIran37 patients 18 treated, 19 control CRC Stages II-II Blood samples ChemotherapyBoth55Double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trialAssess the efficacy of fisetin supplementation the inflammatory status and MMP levelsFisetin reduced levels of IL-8 and MMP-7. Act as complementary antitumor agent[44]
Flavonoid mixtureDaily dose of 20 mg apigenin and 20 mg epigallocathechin-gallateGermany87 patients, 31 treated 56 control group Resected colon cancer and polypectomyBoth69–82Controlled clinical trial. Prospective and observational cohort studyInvestigate biological prevention with flavonoids the recurrence risk of neoplasia Sustained long-term treatment could reduce the recurrence rate of colon neoplasia[45]
DietIntake of the six flavonoid subgroups 4 yearsUSA1905 Patients (control 947; intervention 958) Colorrectal adenomasBoth61Randomized dietary interventionExamine the effectiveness of a low-fat, high-fiber, high-fruit, and high-vegetable diet on adenoma recurrenceHigh intake of flavonols was associated with a decreased risk of advanced adenoma recurrence[46]
DietIntake of flavonols (quercetin, kaempferol, and myricetin) and flavones (apigenin and luteolin).USA38,408 women, 3234 developed cancer after 11 years of follow-up All kinds of cancers/305 CRC Women>45Prospective studyInvestigate the association between the intake of selected flavonoids and risk of cancers There was no association between intake of flavonoid-rich foods and the incidence of cancers. No prevention[47]
DietLow-fat, high-fiber, high-fruit and vegetable, diet Flavonols isorhamnetin, kaempferol, and quercetinUSA872 participants Histologically confirmed colorectal adenomas BloodBoth>35Polyp Prevention Trial 4-yearExamine the effectiveness of a low-fat, high-fiber, high-fruit, and vegetable diet on adenoma recurrenceHigh flavonol intakes decrease IL-6 concentrations. Reduction of the risk of adenoma recurrence[48]
DietIntake of lignan and proanthocyanidinUSA1859 patients control 930; intervention 929 Presence of adenomasBoth55Randomized, nutritional intervention trialEvaluate if consumption of a high-fiber, high-fruit, high-vegetable, and low-fat diet would decrease the risk of adenoma recurrenceHigh lignan intake may increase the risk of adenoma recurrence in women[49]
DietMB-6 6 capsules of 320 mg each, 3 times/day Taiwan60 patients 29 treated 31 placebo CRC Follow-up assessment 77 weeksBoth63Proof-of-concept clinical study 77 weeks of follow-upTest if MB-6 would increase the effectiveness
of chemotherapy (FOLFOX)
MB-6 group had a lower disease progression rate and presented less adverse events and a decreased serum creatinine[50]
DietFlavonoid subclasses (flavonols, flavones, flavanones, flavan-3-ols, and anthocyanins) 26 yearsUSA42,478 male and 76,364 female 2519 CRC cases (1061 men, 1458 women) Evaluation of cancer riskBoth30–75Polyp Prevention TrialExamine if higher dietary intakes of flavonoids was associated with a lower risk of CRCHigher dietary intakes of flavonoids was not associated with a lower risk of CRC.[4]
Abbreviations: 5FU, 5-fluorouracil; ACF, aberrant crypt foci; COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; CRC, colorectal cancer; CXCL1, chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1; EGCG, epigallocatechin gallate; GST, glutathione S-transferase; IL, interleukin; M1G, pyrimido [1,2-a] purin-10 (3H)-one; MB-6, extracts from fermented soybean, green tea, Antrodia camphorata mycelia, spirulina, grape seed, and curcumin; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; mRNA, messenger ribonucleic acid; NF-κB, nuclear factor kappa B; Poly E, Polyphenon E; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; UK, United Kingdom; USA, United States of America.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

López-Gómez, L.; Uranga, J.A. Polyphenols in the Prevention and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2735. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16162735

AMA Style

López-Gómez L, Uranga JA. Polyphenols in the Prevention and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence. Nutrients. 2024; 16(16):2735. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16162735

Chicago/Turabian Style

López-Gómez, Laura, and Jose Antonio Uranga. 2024. "Polyphenols in the Prevention and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence" Nutrients 16, no. 16: 2735. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16162735

APA Style

López-Gómez, L., & Uranga, J. A. (2024). Polyphenols in the Prevention and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence. Nutrients, 16(16), 2735. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu16162735

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop