1. Introduction
The topic of urban development has recently gained renewed attention, particularly in the context of creating green, competitive, and inclusive living spaces, as well as providing quality food [
1]. That is particularly relevant given the increasing prevalence of actions that contradict the concept, such as the removal of green spaces to facilitate the construction of additional buildings or the creation of areas that, due to the predominance of concrete, appear to be more easily maintained. The increasingly common elimination of greenery from urban spaces, including fruit orchards and vegetable gardens, not only results in limited access to nature but also has wider implications for the environment. There is a lack of such green spaces that could effectively promote a positive attitude towards gardening and serve as venues for organizing educational interventions promoting food security, diverse and balanced nutrition, and health, while simultaneously maximizing the health benefits associated with plant cultivation in urban spaces [
2].
This study forms part of a larger project that is investigating novel approaches to engaging urban residents in the development of solutions that optimize their access to nutritious foods while addressing the challenges posed by climate change. The intention of the paper is to contribute to the ongoing academic discussion on fostering green urban development by elucidating the health-related motivations that underpin the decision of early adopters of the implemented technological innovations to join the social experiment. The qualitative research conducted among the participants of the presented project aimed to ascertain how they determine health issues, their nutrient supply needs, and their motivations, attitudes, intentions and expectations towards the educational intervention tools created. The findings of the study can inform the design and development of innovative educational tools that promote pro-environmental behavior and foster the development of environmental literacy [
3]. This can bring multiple benefits to society and contribute to the creation of more sustainable future cities.
This article comprehensively analyzes the statements of participants in a unique educational experiment, drawing insights from interdisciplinary research, the results of which are presented in subsequent sections of the article. The “Current Study” section introduces theoretical aspects related to the article’s topic, introducing the reader to the subject of urban gardening, its connections to health issues, food security, and the introduction of innovative educational tools for the development of urban gardening. The “Materials and Methods” section defines the overarching goals and theoretical frameworks underlying this study, outlining its assumptions and course. The “Results” section delves into a meticulous analysis of the participants’ statements, emphasizing health issues that emerged during responses to questions about participants’ previous gardening experiences and their expectations for upcoming activities. The following section elaborates on the research findings in relation to the achievements of other authors and presents practical implications and recommendations for the project implementation team, as well as other researchers and practitioners interested in the research topic. The final section briefly summarizes the study, delineates its main contribution to the development of the discipline, presents the study’s limitations, and outlines plans for further research.
2. Current Study
Urban gardening, often associated with aesthetics and relaxation [
4,
5], has become a significant aspect of public health with rapid urbanization and population growth [
6]. The development of urban gardening can significantly contribute to improving the quality of life for residents, supporting efforts to enhance societal well-being, including health [
7]. Improving air quality, promoting physical activity, and ensuring access to healthy food are key aspects that can be incorporated into the development of urban green spaces.
Urban gardening promotes physical activity and a healthy lifestyle [
8]. Cultivating vegetables, fruits, and herbs in urban allotment gardens or on balconies encourages greater activity, including outdoor activities. Regular gardening can improve physical fitness and stamina, and reduce stress, contributing to overall physical and mental health improvement [
9]. Community urban gardens, squares, or parks with edible gardens provide residents with access to fresh and healthy agricultural products [
10]. Consuming fresh fruits and vegetables from one’s cultivation can contribute to maintaining a balanced diet rich in vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants, thereby improving overall health and immunity [
11].
However, despite these benefits, there are also health challenges associated with urban gardening. One of the main issues is soil contamination. Cities often have chemical pollutants, such as heavy metals and pesticides, which can accumulate in the soil and be transferred to cultivated plants. Consuming such products can pose a health risk to people [
12]. Another challenge is the presence of pests and plant diseases. In urban conditions, where gardens are usually densely packed, there is a greater risk of problems related to pests and plant diseases. The use of pesticides to control these pests can have negative effects on human health and the environment [
13]. There is also a risk associated with the quality of water used for watering plants. In some urban areas, water quality may be low due to chemical and biological pollutants. Using such water for watering plants can lead to the contamination of agricultural products and pose a health risk [
14].
In response to these challenges, efforts are being made to introduce innovative solutions that would mitigate the negative impact of urban gardening on human health. One of them is hydroponic food cultivation [
15]. One of the major advantages of hydroponics is its efficiency in resource utilization. This may be a significant factor in encouraging urban dwellers to utilize hydroponic techniques for the cultivation of food. In traditional agriculture, a large amount of water is lost through evaporation and absorption by the soil, whereas in hydroponics, water is directly supplied to the plant roots. This process allows for water conservation, which is essential not only in the context of human health but also in the context of climate change and global water resource shortages [
16].
Secondly, the pursuit of food self-sufficiency can serve as a motivating factor for the utilization of hydroponic cultivation [
17]. In urban areas where access to fresh produce may be limited, the ability to cultivate vegetables or herbs in one’s own home or on a balcony can be a highly appealing proposition. The implementation of hydroponics allows for the efficient management of space and resources, which is of particular importance in urban environments where land availability is limited. Future users may be encouraged by the fact that plants in hydroponics can be grown in a variety of locations, including indoors, on rooftops, in vacant lots, or even in desert areas where soil conditions are unfavorable. This gives the opportunity to produce food locally, reducing the need for long-distance transportation and the associated greenhouse gas emissions.
An additional rationale for utilizing alternative methods of cultivating food in urban environments is the ability to exert control over the environmental conditions that influence plant growth. Technological advances, including the development of advanced hydroponic systems, also influence the motivation to use this form of cultivation. The advent of modern technology has enabled the automation of the agricultural growing process, rendering it more accessible and easier to manage even for individuals lacking prior farming experience. In hydroponics, pH level, nutrient solution composition, temperature, and humidity can be precisely controlled, allowing for optimal growth conditions for different plant species. This, in turn, leads to faster growth and better crop quality. The products in question are typically greener, free of harmful chemicals and pesticides, and therefore safer for human health, more palatable, and nutritionally superior [
18].
However, hydroponics is not without drawbacks, negatively influencing the decision to use it. One of the main issues with this system is the initial investment cost. Building and maintaining a hydroponic system can be more expensive than traditional soil cultivation, especially initially. The hydroponic installation constituted a research contribution, funded by a grant, which enabled the realization of this unique project. Consequently, an analysis of the cost-effectiveness of hydroponic solutions in the city was not carried out as part of the project. However, it is worth noting that these issues are important when implementing innovative solutions requiring a significant financial contribution. Another challenge is maintaining balance in the nutrient solution. The regular monitoring and adjustment of pH level and nutrient solution composition are necessary to provide plants with adequate nutrition. Improper balancing can lead to nutrient deficiencies or excesses, which in turn can negatively affect plant growth [
19].
Despite the aforementioned limitations, the implementation of urban farming through hydroponic installations can provide a response to the challenges faced by contemporary cities in ensuring healthy and sustainable food for increasingly diverse and growing urban populations. Urban hydroponic farming represents an innovative strategy that not only promotes local food production but also alters the way residents make decisions regarding their diet and healthy lifestyle. It is therefore important to consider whether residents are inclined to adopt this strategy.
One of the key motivational factors could be the growing health awareness among urban residents. There is a growing recognition that a healthy diet based on fresh, local products can contribute to overall health improvements, reduce chronic disease risks such as obesity, diabetes and heart diseases, or support preventive actions. Previous studies on traditional farming have demonstrated that urban food cultivation in community gardens, school gardens, and backyard gardens provides residents with direct access to fresh vegetables, fruits, and herbs, which can encourage them to make healthier dietary choices [
20].
The pursuit of food self-sufficiency can be a significant motivating factor for engaging in traditional urban food cultivation. The capacity to cultivate one’s own vegetables or fruits engenders a sense of autonomy and gratification. Individuals value the ability to control the quality of their food and to avoid the use of artificial pesticides or herbicides, which are often employed in commercial agriculture. Fresh, locally grown products are richer in nutrients and vitamins than those available in supermarkets, which are often subjected to lengthy storage and transportation processes. Consuming fresh fruits and vegetables from one’s own garden is beneficial to one’s health, which in turn affects the overall physical and mental well-being of residents [
21].
In the case of traditional gardens, urban food cultivation can become a means of spending active time outdoors for a significant proportion of the population. The act of working in a garden provides a multitude of benefits, including physical exercise, relaxation, and a means of disconnecting from the urban environment. The combination of physical activity and food production serves as a motivating factor for individuals to engage in regular care of their garden or plot, as well as their health [
22].
Building a local community is also identified as a motivation that attracts individuals to engage in food production within urban areas. The health benefits associated with the consumption of collectively cultivated products contribute to the overall improvement of residents’ health and facilitate the modification of their dietary habits. Urban food cultivation is therefore not only a means of attaining a healthier lifestyle but also fosters the development of a health-oriented local community. Those who engage in this activity frequently establish connections with their neighbors and other enthusiasts of a healthy lifestyle. Community gatherings in community gardens or local farmers’ markets facilitate social integration and the exchange of experiences [
23].
The main goal of the presented study is therefore to gain a deeper understanding of the health-related motivations that influenced the decision of early adopters of technological innovations oriented towards self-food production. The research will aim to examine how they perceive health issues and their nutritional needs, and through them motivations, attitudes, intentions, and expectations related to the educational intervention tools being created. The intention of the study is therefore to deepen the understanding of whether the health-related motivations underpinning the unique project are analogous to those of conventional urban food gardens, or whether motivations and attitudes diverge when urban food growing is linked to innovative technology. These objectives are expressed through the following research questions:
RQ1—How do positive-emotional networks of semantic fields reveal the perception of health-related motivations by city residents planning to engage in innovative food self-production?
RQ2—How do neutral-emotional networks of semantic fields reveal the perception of health-related motivations by city residents planning to engage in innovative food self-production?
RQ3—How do negative-emotional networks of semantic fields reveal the perception of health-related motivations by city residents planning to engage in innovative food self-production?
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Theoretical Framework of the Study
The study was conducted based on Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovations Theory [
24]. This approach focuses on the experiences of early adopters, who are crucial in the diffusion of innovations. It is through their openness that new, innovative ideas are tested and then transferred between different peer groups. Early adopters are a social group that engages in the acceptance of new ideas or technologies, often preceding the majority of society. They stand out for their readiness to test and their openness to innovations. They frequently act as opinion leaders within their communities and derive satisfaction from experimenting with new solutions. An important factor determining the behavior of early adopters is their ability to assess the value of innovations. Perceived value, or the subjective belief in the utility of innovations, plays a crucial role in the adoption process. Early adopters are capable of quickly evaluating the benefits of a new technology or idea and making swift decisions regarding its adoption. Their willingness to try something new often stems from a belief in the potential benefits of a given solution [
24].
Furthermore, social networks play a significant role in shaping the behaviors of early adopters. These individuals often connect with others sharing common goals, facilitating information exchange, and encouraging decisions to adopt new innovations. Early adopters can also be inspired by other members of their social group who are more open to novelties and serve as role models. However, early adopters bear greater risks than those who wait for later stages of innovation diffusion. New technologies or ideas may still be underdeveloped or unreliable, carrying a risk of failure. Additionally, the early adoption of innovations can be time-consuming and may require additional effort in learning and adapting to new practices. Overcoming these initial challenges, the engagement of early adopters can accelerate societal acceptance of innovation, creating a snowball effect where positive experiences attract subsequent groups to adopt the innovation. Simultaneously, their actions can provide valuable feedback to innovation creators, enabling the improvement and customization of products to meet user needs [
24].
3.2. Procedure, Participants
Addressing the challenges of contemporary cities, this study is part of a project aimed at implementing innovative tools based on sustainable food consumption and production patterns, promoting healthy dietary habits, social inclusion, and reducing food waste. The project is likely the first such experiment conducted in Poland. As part of a controlled social experiment carried out in a selected residential block, residents participate in hydroponic food cultivation located in the corridors of their block [
25]. Due to the high installation costs, the project involves 20 residents responsible for individual hydroponic cabins.
The study involved two groups of respondents. The first group of residents selected for the project originated from Łódź, but due to legal constraints pertaining to the guarantee of an inhabited building, the experimental phase in this location was not feasible. Consequently, the first research group did not participate in the experiment, and a second residential community had to be selected. The second group of residents came from the city of Warsaw. Both cities are among the largest cities in Poland and are located in central Poland. The experimental phase of the project took place in a selected residential block in Warsaw, in the Mokotów district.
The study participants are owners or tenants of residential premises who expressed a willingness to participate in an innovative social experiment. Due to the need to understand their needs and expectations regarding project activities, the research sample was purposively selected. Here, 37 individual in-depth interviews lasting from 1.5 to 2 h were conducted with them. The interviews were conducted by a team of four professionals, all members of the research team. Two of the team members hold doctoral degrees, while the remaining two are PhD candidates. Prior to their participation in the interviews, the participants were informed of the nature of the study and gave informed consent to participate in the interviews. Participants were compensated with a monthly amount of approximately EUR 22 for participating in project activities. The first set of interviews was conducted from October to November 2022, while the second set was conducted from September 2023 to January 2024. The time gap between interviews was due to the need to select a second project site that met certain technical requirements.
The interviews were conducted prior to the commencement of the experimental phase of the project. At this stage, the participants had limited knowledge of the implementation of the project. They were aware of the purpose of the experiment and the benefits they would receive from participating in it. The project required the insertion of 20 hydroponic cabins in the corridors of the block, the installation of a photovoltaic system on the roof of the building to power the cabins and the installation of a water supply system for the cabins with the possibility of using rainwater. At the finished stage of the project, the residents’ community was presented with a choice: to keep the hydroponic cabins or to uninstall them. In contrast, the photovoltaic installation was to be permanently installed in the block. The planned interviews were intended to facilitate an early understanding of the project applicants, regarding their expectations, intentions, and needs, prior to the commencement of the experimental activities.
The interviews covered the following thematic areas: (1) introductory information, (2) neighborly relations, (3) issues related to participation in the project, (4) food waste. A total of 42 respondents participated in the interviews (Mage = 43.7, SD = 14.6, range 27–78), including 26 women (Mage = 46.1, SD = 16.1, range 27–78) and 16 men (Mage = 40.1, SD = 11.8, range 28–77). Eighteen participants were childless, eighteen had one child, including twelve minors, four participants had two children, including three minors, and one participant had three minors. Four participants had completed secondary education, 37 participants had obtained university degrees, and one participant did not specify their level of education. Four participants had received education in agriculture, while six participants had received education in healthcare. The remaining participants represented a range of other professions. Of the 19 individuals who participated in the initial interview phase and were subsequently deemed eligible for inclusion in the project, 19 ultimately did not take part in the project. The remaining 23 participants from the second wave of interviews proceeded with the project. The participants constituted the full experimental group.
3.3. Data Analysis
Participants’ statements were analyzed and interpreted according to the semantic field analysis method [
26]. This method involves selecting the object of study represented by a keyword (in this study, the keyword is “health”), and then analyzing statements containing this word (the so-called semantic field) based on their belonging to the selected network of meanings. This method allows for a more in-depth analysis of respondents’ perceptions of the issues relevant to the study. While this method is not commonly employed in non-linguistic disciplines, a number of valuable analyses conducted using it can be found in the literature [
27]. The presented study represents a novel research approach, employing methods originally developed for other disciplines in new areas.
Robin [
26] identifies six distinct networks of meanings. Three of them were selected for analysis in the context of this study: (1) network of associations with the analyzed keyword “health”; (2) network of opposites to the keyword “health”; (3) network of actions towards the subject, i.e., a set of words or phrases that describe actions or consequences of actions taken by others towards the analyzed keyword “health”.
The advantage of employing this methodology is that it not only provides insight into the specific health-related motivations that prompted the participants to engage with the project, but also allows for the observation of the contexts in which these motivations are discussed. The capacity to observe the context in which a given motive is discussed allows for the interpretation of the attitudes and intentions held by the participants. Statements belonging to the “associations” category, namely, what a keyword is associated with and what it accompanies, are interpreted differently. This is also true of statements belonging to the “oppositions” category, namely, what the respondents perceive as the opposite of health, and what health is opposed to. Conversely, statements belonging to the category of “actions towards the subject” permit the interpretation of the actions taken by respondents towards the subject, namely, their attitudes towards health.
The analysis also utilized the method of assigning one of the three emotional temperatures [
23] to each semantic field of the analyzed keyword “health”: (1) positively charged field; (2) negatively charged field; or (3) neutrally charged field. The classification of positively valued fields was based on the terms in the semantic field that indicated such a character of the utterance, for example, “I like to eat” and “it is nice to eat lettuce”. Conversely, negatively valued fields were classified based on terms such as “I can’t convince myself to eat these things”. Finally, statements that could not be considered positive or negative were classified as neutral.
In addition to the qualitative approach, the study employed quantitative methods of data analysis. The number of individual semantic fields categorized was counted and presented in descending order of frequency of occurrence. The analysis was conducted using MAXQDA 2022 Analytics Pro software. The research material used for analysis, in the form of interview transcripts, was prepared in Polish, in the language of the interviews.
5. Discussion
Among the interviewed respondents, the early adopters who expressed a willingness to participate in an innovative experiment aimed at growing their own vegetables and herbs using hydroponic cabins placed in the corridors of their apartment block, three main groups of people can be distinguished. The first group is composed of individuals who are very positively inclined towards health-related issues. They declare a high level of commitment to nutritional matters. Their preferences may result from a general increase in awareness of the benefits of such a lifestyle [
28]. On the one hand, they take active steps to prepare and consume balanced and healthy meals in their daily diet. Their efforts are focused not only on preparing meals themselves, but also on sourcing ingredients from smaller local suppliers. Through participation in the project, these participants aspire to enjoy similar access to fresh and healthy vegetables and herbs as users of traditional urban gardens [
20]. This access is ensured by independent growth control, which eliminates the harmful heavy metals and pesticides found in commonly available produce [
21].
The diffusion of innovations and the formation of environmentally conscious urban communities are processes that are greatly influenced by education, so issues related to the learning of future experimental participants were of interest to the study. Findings indicate that education plays an important role in the lives of individuals in the first group. They emphasized that they dedicate a lot of time to reading, watching programs, listening to broadcasts about nutritional components, optimal food combinations for health, seeking information on balanced and varied diets tailored to their individual needs, as well as health news. This confirms the relationship whereby conscious education has a positive impact on self-care and the environment [
29]. Participation in the project has the potential to allow one to deepen their knowledge of food, nutrition, and health topics, as well as acquiring additional related skills that they can implement in their daily practice. Of particular importance to them was the aspect of intergenerational social learning, namely, the opportunity to instill positive habits in their children and peer learning through neighborhood integration for the sake of caring for a shared quality of life and health.
From the perspective of the diffusion of innovations theory, their existing knowledge can be a valuable input for peer learning. Through conversations with others, which are intensified through participation in the intervention, there will be a deeper process of sharing knowledge and experiences [
23]. As individuals who are particularly sensitive to health issues and concerned about ensuring a variety of nutrients in their diet, they can have a positive influence on their neighbors’ behavior in this regard. Furthermore, they can encourage not only the consumption of a more balanced diet, but also the cultivation of a variety of plants that are less common or less commonly available in shops, but richer in nutrients. One respondent cited watercress as an example of such a less-common plant that could be cultivated.
The second group consists of individuals who have changed their dietary habits under the influence of other people or factors. For some, it was a suggestion from a doctor or partner, for others, a specific illness necessitating a particular diet, or simply concern for the state of our planet. The third group consists of individuals who, due to their lifestyle, do not attach great importance to health issues. This is most often due to a lack of time, which is also confirmed by other studies [
30]. Representatives of this group buy unhealthy products for the sake of convenience, or consume unhealthy meals that are easy and quick to prepare. The intention of these individuals is to increase motivation and opportunities to acquire knowledge about healthy eating through participation in the project.
Representatives of each group were critical of the quality of products available in stores. Available products in large chains contain enhancers, carcinogenic substances, antibiotics, or heavy metals [
21]. In their opinion, these products spoil relatively quickly, which increases food wastage. Participation in the project may therefore be a source of healthy food that is unavailable to them on a daily basis. A very important issue with a negative emotional temperature, recurring in the statements of participants, is the high cost of products prepared or grown in ecological conditions. It is the main barrier to consuming these products in their daily diet. For some participants, healthy products are clearly inaccessible due to their price, resulting in them replacing them with unhealthy alternatives, including fast-food dishes. Access to healthy products is a clear factor that influenced the decision to participate in the project.
6. Conclusions
The main contribution of this study is in helping us to better understand the health-related motivations, attitudes, intentions, and expectations of participants in an interdisciplinary project aimed at the self-production of food in urban settings. Through a unique educational social experiment, residents of a selected block in Warsaw have the opportunity for the hydroponic cultivation of vegetables and herbs in the corridors of their apartment block. The qualitative study revealed the individual profiles of project participants, individuals with a clearly pro-health lifestyle, individuals for whom health issues are the result of the actions of other people or factors, and busy individuals who declare a lack of time to care for their health. For each of these groups, the opportunity to access healthy products and educational benefits were factors that influenced the decision to participate in the project.
This study indicates that, despite the difficulties in conducting a social experiment, city residents are willing to participate in such innovative activities. It is therefore worthwhile to continue seeking ways to finance unconventional educational interventions utilizing the latest technological solutions. Through them, not only do residents’ access to healthy, nutritious products increase, but it also has the potential to motivate them to lifelong learning, influencing their environmental literacy. The findings of the study indicate that a significant proportion of urban dwellers have limited access to healthy and nutritious fruits and vegetables. This is due to a number of factors, including restrictions related to urbanization and the displacement of local suppliers, as well as lifestyle and the fast pace of urban life. The dissemination of innovative solutions could help to enhance awareness, prompting reflection on healthy habits and strengthening motivation to change eating habits.
However, the study is not without limitations. What on the one hand undoubtedly constitutes a strong point of the project—the uniqueness of the experiment—also represents a research limitation, due to the sample size and the deterministic nature of the study—qualitative interviews, the results of which cannot be generalized. On the other hand, the study aims to understand the profiles of individuals who by their nature constitute a small part of the community—early adopters in the process of technological innovation diffusion; therefore, the size of this group is significantly limited, and quantitative studies would not have a clear justification. Future research could be expanded to include a comparative aspect, comparing different groups of individuals who undertake the testing of similar technological solutions in other geographic locations.
This paper presents the results from the initial phase of the project, prior to the participants being included in the experimental phase. Consequently, the attitudes and intentions of the initial users were expressed prior to the innovation testing period. Further research will be conducted on a number of related issues, including the learning process during the adoption of an innovation, the productivity of urban hydroponic farming, and the sharing of food with neighbors, family, and friends. These findings will be presented in subsequent papers.
The results of the study can serve not only other researchers interested in understanding issues related to healthy eating or implementing technological innovations, but also educators interested in promoting a positive attitude towards urban gardening, as well as food safety, diverse, balanced nutrition, and health.