Next Article in Journal
Dietary Intake, Serum Hormone Concentrations, Amenorrhea and Bone Mineral Density of Physique Athletes and Active Gym Enthusiasts
Next Article in Special Issue
Nutritional Status and Feeding Behavior of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in the Middle East and North Africa Region: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Joint Effects of Prenatal Folic Acid Supplement with Prenatal Multivitamin and Iron Supplement on Obesity in Preschoolers Born SGA: Sex Specific Difference
Previous Article in Special Issue
Unhealthy Lifestyles and Retinal Vessel Calibers among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Ultra-Processed Food Consumption Is Related to Higher Trans Fatty Acids, Sugar Intake, and Micronutrient-Impaired Status in Schoolchildren of Bahia, Brazil

by
Camilla Almeida Menezes
1,
Letícia Bastos Magalhães
1,
Jacqueline Tereza da Silva
2,
Renata Maria Rabello da Silva Lago
3,
Alexvon Nunes Gomes
3,
Ana Marice Teixeira Ladeia
3,
Nelzair Araújo Vianna
1 and
Ricardo Riccio Oliveira
1,*
1
Gonçalo Moniz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Fiocruz, Salvador 40296-710, Brazil
2
Global Academy of Agriculture and Food Systems, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK
3
Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health, Salvador 40290-000, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2023, 15(2), 381; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15020381
Submission received: 23 November 2022 / Revised: 29 December 2022 / Accepted: 5 January 2023 / Published: 12 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 2023 Collection: Dietary, Lifestyle and Children Health)

Abstract

:
Ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption impacts nutrient intake and plays an important role in non-communicable diseases (NCD), even among schoolchildren. This cross-sectional study aimed to characterize the food consumption of this population and its relationship with laboratory and anthropometric aspects. A sample of 190 subjects aged 5 to 19 y was randomly selected for dietary, laboratory, and anthropometric assessment. Statistical inference was calculated using Spearman’s correlation. Excess weight was observed in 34%, a high Waist-to-Height Ratio in 9%, and hypertriglyceridemia in 17% of the subjects, higher among those from urban schools (45%, p = 0.011; 15%, p = 0.015; 24%, p = 0.026, respectively). UPF consumption represented 21% of caloric intake and showed a positive correlation with trans fatty acids (r = 0.70) and sugar (r = 0.59) intake. Unprocessed food consumption showed a weak, but significant, correlation with Body Mass Index (r = 0.22) and Waist Circumference (r = 0.23), while processed meat showed a negative correlation with serum ferritin (r = −0.16) and vitamins D (r = −0.20) and B12 (r = −0.15). These findings highlight the need for public policies to promote Food and Nutritional Security for schoolchildren to prevent NCD and nutritional deficiencies.

1. Introduction

Brazil follows the global trend of reducing thinness and increasing overweight and obesity prevalence in the school-age population, currently recognized as a public health problem [1]. The National School Health Survey [2] and the Surveillance System for Risk and Protection Factors for Chronic Diseases by Telephone Survey [3] revealed that overweight increased by 239% in the last 20 years, with 15% of Brazilians between 6 and 18 years old diagnosed with overweight and 5% with obesity. The Study of Cardiovascular Risks in Adolescents also pointed to a growing prevalence of comorbidities such as hypercholesterolemia (20.1%), systemic arterial hypertension (9.6%), and metabolic syndrome (2.6%) among Brazilians aged 12 to 17 years, although nutritional deficiencies are still considered public health problems in this population [4].
Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs) can develop because of multiple causes, with an unhealthy diet being one of the main modifiable risk factors. Although clinical manifestations are more frequently observed in adulthood, exposure to risk factors has been occurring at an increasingly early age [5]. The Brazilian population reveals a growing tendency to replace basic foods, such as rice, beans, fruits, vegetables, meat, and milk, with industrialized beverages and foods, such as cookies, processed meats, ready-to-eat foods, sugar, and salt. Analysis by age group shows that fruit and vegetable consumption is lower among adolescents compared to adults and the elderly. On the other hand, ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption is higher in adolescents [6].
UPFs are industrial formulations entirely or mostly made up of substances extracted from food, derived from food constituents, and/or synthesized in laboratories from organic materials [7]. Recent literature has shown that this group of foods has a negative impact on the quality of the population’s diet due to several factors, negatively influencing nutrient intake [8]. The increased consumption of UPF is associated with the risk of metabolic syndrome in adolescents and dyslipidemia in children [9]. According to the Food Guide for the Brazilian Population, the consumption of these foods should be avoided and should not contribute to the achievement of daily nutritional needs [10]. Despite this, UPFs are increasingly present in the eating habits of the population, especially children [11].
Therefore, the present cross-sectional study aims to describe the characteristics of food consumption in terms of processing level and nutrient intake, anthropometric measurements and serum concentrations of ferritin, hemoglobin, components of lipid profile, blood glucose, and vitamins D and B12 of students from rural and urban public schools in Bahia, Brazil. These results will contribute to the knowledge of the health conditions of the school-age population at the local level and may guide the implementation and realignment of public policies on Food and Nutrition Security for the public.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Population

Students from the cities of Barrocas, Biritinga, Serrinha, Teofilândia, and Valente, in the northeast of Bahia, Brazil, regularly enrolled in the municipal public school system in the years 2019 and 2020, including rural and urban areas, were invited to participate. Individuals aged between 5 and 19 years were considered eligible, excluding those with a previous diagnosis of food allergies and intolerances, resulting in a sample of 190 randomly selected individuals (95% CI, estimated overweight proportion of 15%, desired accuracy of 5%).

2.2. Data Collection

Clinical demographic, dietary, laboratory, and anthropometric information were included. Data collection took place between 2019 and 2020 and was carried out by a trained team, in the morning, at the school in which the individuals were regularly enrolled.

2.2.1. Clinical Demographic Assessment

A face-to-face interview was carried out, guided by a previously structured questionnaire containing questions about the individual’s clinical history, to be answered by the legal guardian. In addition to identification data, the questions included type of delivery, presence and duration of exclusive breastfeeding, disease history, family history, and medication use.

2.2.2. Food Consumption Assessment

The validated 24 h recall instrument was used, which is based on the identification and quantification of all foods ingested on the day before the interview. A photographic album of food portions was used to help fill in the information and more accurately determine the portioning of consumed food [12]. For the energy and nutritional intake assessment, the Brazilian Food Composition Table [13] and the Centesimal Food Composition Table of the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics [14] were used. Energy, protein, carbohydrate, total fat, fiber, and iron intake were assessed because of the requirements of the National School Feeding Program. Although not required, the assessment of saturated fatty acids, trans fatty acids, cholesterol, sugar, and sodium intake was included, because of its impact on the metabolic and nutritional status. The assessment of vitamins B12 and D intake was included because they are also considered important nutrients for children’s cognitive and structural development. For qualitative evaluation, the NOVA classification was used, classifying unprocessed food as Group 1 (i.e., cereals, legumes, vegetables, fruits, meat, eggs, dairy), processed culinary ingredients as Group 2 (i.e., sugar, salt, oil), processed food as Group 3 (i.e., canned beans, vegetables, and fish, processed meat, fruit jelly), and ultra-processed food as Group 4 (i.e., sausages, soft drinks, ice cream, snacks) [10].

2.2.3. Laboratory Evaluation

Blood samples were collected in fasting, by a specialized technical team, and analyzed by the local Central Public Health Laboratory and by local private laboratories under the support and responsibility of the Health Department of the municipalities involved. The following indicators were evaluated: full blood count, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol and fractions, triglycerides, ferritin, vitamin B12, and vitamin D (25-OH-vitamin D3). The following reference values for laboratory parameters were considered: low hemoglobin (girls aged 5 to 12 y < 11.5 g/dL, girls aged 12 to 19 y < 12 g/dL, boys < 13 g/dL); low ferritin (<15 µg/L); high fasting glucose (≥100 mg/dL); high total cholesterol (≥200 mg/dL); high LDL cholesterol (≥130 mg/dL); high triglycerides (5 to 10 y ≥ 100 mg/dL, 11 to 19 y ≥ 150 mg/dL); vitamin B12 deficiency (<200 pg/mL); vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL).

2.2.4. Anthropometric Evaluation

Nutritional status was classified using the Body Mass Index (BMI) for Age (BMI/A). With the individual wearing their school uniform, weight was measured using a digital electronic scale (Seca®, Hamburg, Germany) with a maximum capacity of 150 kg and an accuracy of 0.1 kg. Height was measured with the student not wearing shoes, using a portable vertical stadiometer (AVA-312®, Brazil) graduated in centimeters, with a maximum capacity of 2.10 m and accuracy of 0.001 m. BMI was calculated using the Quetelet formula (weight in kg/height in meters2) and BMI/A was classified according to the World Health Organization child growth curves [15]. Waist Circumference (WC) was assessed with an inelastic measuring tape (Balmak®, Riverwood, Brazil) with a measurement range from 0 to 150 cm and graduated in millimeters, and classified according to the curves proposed by Fernandez [16]. Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR) was calculated as proposed by McCarthy and Ashwell [17] and validated for children and adolescents by Nambiar et al. [18] to suggest cardiovascular risk (when ≥0.5). The Hypertriglyceridemic Waist Phenotype (HWP) was also investigated and considered to be present in the simultaneous occurrence of WC greater than adequate for sex and age, and hypertriglyceridemia [19].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

To characterize the sample, a descriptive analysis was performed. After verifying the normality behavior of the numerical variables, using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests, measures of central tendency and dispersion were established, considering the means and their respective Standard Deviation (SD) for the parametric variables, and the medians and their interquartile ranges (IR) for the non-parametric ones. To compare these measures, the Student’s t-test was used for parametric variables, the Mann–Whitney test for non-parametric variables, and the Kruskal–Wallis test for two or more non-parametric variables. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson’s chi-square test, and, when appropriate, Fisher’s exact test. Inferential statistics were performed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient for parametric variables, and Spearman correlation coefficient for non-parametric ones. p values lower than 0.05 were considered significant.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Demographic Assessment

Most of the sample was concentrated in the cities of Serrinha (35%) and Valente (34%), was studying in schools located in rural areas (57%) and was male (52%). The mean age was 9.6 years (SD 2.8 y). There was no statistically significant difference in terms of gender and age between rural and urban school locations. Most of the population was born via vaginal delivery (64%), more pronounced in the rural population (71%; p = 0.022). The presence of breastfeeding was reported in 92% of the individuals, being exclusive until the sixth month of life for 58% of them. Most of the sample reported having been exposed to antibiotic therapy before 5 years of age (73%).

3.2. Food Consumption Assessment

Table 1 presents the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the diet. Both added sugar and total sugar (naturally contained in foods, in addition to that added in preparations) consumptions were higher in the urban population, with total sugar representing 24% (p < 0.001) and added sugar 16% (p = 0.002) of total energy intake in the day before the interview. The consumption of added sodium and total sodium (naturally present in foods, in addition to that added in preparations) was higher among individuals who studied in rural schools (434 mg/1000 Kcal, p = 0.013; and 1639 mg/1000 Kcal, p = 0.007, respectively). In terms of fiber, consumption was lower in the urban population (7.2 g/1000 Kcal, p = 0.014). The saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and total sugar consumption exceeded the recommendation of 10% of total daily calories [20,21] in part of the evaluated individuals, regardless of the location of the population. In the qualitative aspect, it was observed that 48% of the calories consumed the day before the dietary assessment came from unprocessed foods, and 21% from ultra-processed foods (UPFs). The consumption of UPFs was more highly expressed in the urban population than in the rural population (18% vs. 23%, p = 0.039).
Figure 1 shows the correlation between NOVA food groups and nutrient intake. The consumption of unprocessed foods showed a moderate positive correlation with fiber (r = 0.67) and SFAs (r = 0.53) intake. The consumption of processed culinary ingredients was moderately positively related to fiber (r = 0.44) and saturated fat (r = 0.59) intake. The consumption of UPFs showed a moderate positive correlation with sugar intake (r = 0.59) and a strong correlation with trans FAs intake (r = 0.70).
Figure 2 shows the relative contribution of specific food groups to unprocessed, processed, and ultra-processed food consumption. Among unprocessed foods, most of the caloric contribution came from cereals (28%), such as rice, and meat (27%), especially red meat. Most of the processed culinary ingredients’ energy came from vegetable oils (62%), such as soy oil. Among processed foods, starchy foods contributed the most (93% of calories in this group), as well as in UPFs (71% of calories), especially bread, followed by sweetened beverages (11%), such as soda, and meat (9%), such as ham and sausage.

3.3. Laboratory Analyses

Laboratory data were presented in two ways, first as a continuous variable (Figure 3) and later as a categorized one, to investigate the inadequacy prevalence of the interest parameters (Table 2). Both analyses aimed to investigate differences between the rural and urban populations.
The ferritin level was lower among individuals in urban schools (p = 0.022), which did not imply a higher prevalence of iron deficiency in this population given that the categorized data show a 5% prevalence in both groups. The same occurred with vitamin D, in which serum levels were lower in the urban population (p < 0.001), but the difference in the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was not statistically significant when compared to the rural population. Another aspect that draws attention is the high prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia (17%), which was even more expressive in the urban population (24%, p = 0.026). Despite the omnivorous dietary pattern of the population, a high prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency was observed (14%), a nutrient found in animal food sources. All individuals diagnosed with vitamin B12 deficiency (n = 25) were instructed to undergo drug replacement of this nutrient.

3.4. Anthropometric Evaluation

The rural population showed a lower BMI than the urban population (p = 0.001, Table 3), which also reflects a higher prevalence of underweight in rural areas when those severely underweight and underweight were placed together (p = 0.011). Almost half (45%) of the urban students were classified as overweight, obese, or severely obese, against 24% of prevalence among rural students (p = 0.011). Equally relevant are Waist Circumference (WC) and Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR) data, which were significantly higher in the urban population (p = 0.029), and resulted in a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk in these individuals (p = 0.015).

3.5. Food Consumption and Nutritional Status Correlation

All tested correlations between food consumption or nutrient intake, and laboratory and anthropometric indicators, proved to be weak or very weak (Figure 4). Those with statistical significance were related to the serum status of nutrients (ferritin, vitamin B12, and vitamin D) and the anthropometric indicators BMI, WC, and WHtR. Ferritin levels were positively related to unprocessed meat consumption, but negatively related to the consumption of processed meats, as well as the intake of carbohydrates, total sugar, trans FAs, unprocessed fruits and juices, and UPFs in general. Processed meat consumption was also negatively related to vitamin D and B12 serum levels. Vitamin D status showed a positive correlation with fiber intake and unprocessed vegetable consumption. Vitamin B12 status showed a positive relationship with protein intake, unprocessed meat, and unprocessed food consumption. BMI was directly related to energy and unprocessed food intake. WC showed a positive correlation with several of the evaluated parameters, especially with sodium intake, unprocessed foods, and processed culinary ingredients consumption. The WHtR was directly related to unprocessed fruit and juice consumption.

4. Discussion

The energy and nutritional intake assessment revealed a high intake of sugar, with this profile being even more highly expressed in the urban population. Sodium consumption was higher among rural students. Regardless of the school location, a high consumption of saturated fat was observed in part of the evaluated individuals. This profile of food consumption was also observed by the Study of Cardiovascular Risks in Adolescents, in 2016, among students from public and private schools across the country [22].
The qualitative assessment of food consumption revealed that almost half of the energy consumed came from unprocessed foods. However, 21% of the calories were provided by UPFs, with greater consumption of UPFs in the urban area. A study carried out in 2013, with 816 preschool-aged individuals in public Early Childhood Centers in Paraná, Brazil, identified that UPFs represented 45.8% of total daily caloric intake [23]. A survey carried out with 50 adolescents from a private school in Minas Gerais, Brazil, identified that 84.6% of them allocated half of the financial resources of their purchases to UPFs [24]. Another study, carried out with data from the 2015 National School Health Survey, which was multicentric and included public and private schools, revealed that adolescents from higher socioeconomic levels consumed more unprocessed foods, but also UPFs when compared to those from lower socioeconomic levels [25]. These results demonstrate that UPF consumption is significantly present in the diet of the Brazilian school-age population, regardless of social, economic, and geographical issues.
UPFs are industrial formulations entirely or mostly made up of substances extracted from food (oils, fats, sugar, proteins), derived from food constituents (hydrogenated fats, modified starch), and/or synthesized in a laboratory from raw materials and organic ingredients (colorants, flavorings, sweeteners, flavor enhancers). The recent literature has shown that this food group has a negative impact on the quality of the population’s diet due to several factors, including negatively influencing the supply of nutrients. UPFs contribute to increasing energy density, sugar, and fat levels (saturated and trans), and to reducing the fiber content of the diet [8]. This was the nutritional profile found in the present study. The greater the UPF consumption, the greater the sugar and trans fatty acid intake, probably due to the greater caloric participation of starchy foods, sweetened beverages, and ultra-processed meat. According to the Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population, the consumption of these foods should be avoided and should not contribute to the achievement of daily nutritional needs [26].
Regarding the assessment of nutritional deficiencies, differences were observed between the students of rural and urban schools. Serum ferritin levels were lower in urban students, although this did not represent a higher prevalence of this nutrient deficiency or anemia in this population. Likewise, blood levels of vitamin D were lower in these urban students, probably reflecting the level of sun exposure of this population, which tends to be lower when compared to the rural population, given that the status of this vitamin in the body is more related to endogenous synthesis than to food intake. In any case, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was not relevant in the population evaluated in this study.
Although foods of animal origin are considered the best sources of iron in the diet, due to the presence of easily absorbed heme iron, it is known that plant-based diets are equally effective in maintaining iron status in the body [27]. In this study, a direct correlation was observed between unprocessed meat and vegetable consumption and serum ferritin levels, which did not occur with processed meat consumption and UPFs in general. This inverse correlation of processed meat consumption also occurred with serum levels of vitamin D, which showed a positive correlation with fiber consumption.
Regarding vitamin B12, although no difference in serum levels was observed between rural and urban populations, the fact that the prevalence of this nutritional deficiency was considerably higher than that of iron is noteworthy. Iron deficiency, as well as iron deficiency anemia, is still considered a public health issue both globally and among the Brazilian population. For this reason, more than two decades ago, Brazil introduced public policies for mass iron fortification, through wheat and corn flour, to reduce the prevalence of iron deficiency and anemia in the population [28]. However, vitamin B12 deficiency also has a great impact on the growth and structural and cognitive development of children and adolescents. The prevalence of this nutritional deficiency is increasing in the world, especially among parts of the population with lower socioeconomic status, children, pregnant women, and the elderly [29]. In this study, a direct correlation was observed between unprocessed meat consumption and vitamin B12 status, but the opposite occurred with processed meat consumption.
There is no consensus regarding the ideal serum levels of vitamin B12, which makes it difficult to determine the prevalence of this nutrient deficiency at a population level and to compare studies. In this research, individuals with vitamin B12 levels below 200 pg/mL were considered deficient. If a cutoff point above 300 pg/mL or 500 pg/mL had been adopted as sufficient, as suggested by other authors, the prevalence of nutritional deficiency would have been even more expressive [30,31]. The consumption of processed meat is a risk factor for the development of cancer in humans, classified as group 1 alongside cigarettes, solar radiation, and alcohol intake, according to sufficient scientific evidence. The consumption of unprocessed meat was classified as a probable carcinogen in humans, being part of group 2A, as well as acrylamide and the pesticide dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane [32]. These findings suggest the need for policies to combat vitamin B12 deficiency, in addition to recommending the intake of animal protein.
There was also a statistically significant difference between the studied individuals in terms of lipid profile. Hypertriglyceridemia was more prevalent in urban students, where higher UPF and sugar consumption and lower fiber intake were also found. Regardless of this difference, the prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia and high-LDL cholesterol were higher than the national standard observed by the Study of Cardiovascular Risks in Adolescents. The study also showed a higher prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia in the northeast population when compared to the rest of the country [33], and that the national prevalence of metabolic syndrome (2.6%) was higher among public school students (2.8%) [34]. These data suggest a negative evolution of the lipid and metabolic profile of the Brazilian school-age population in recent years and demonstrate the need to implement public policies to address this scenario.
The National Health Survey, considering data from 1974 to 2018, confirms the Brazilian population’s global trend of the increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity, including among children [6]. It is estimated that 15% of Brazilians between 6 and 18 years were diagnosed as overweight and 5% as obese [2,3]. In this study, as expected, the consumption of total calories showed a positive correlation with BMI. However, among the analyzed NOVA food groups, the unprocessed foods showed a positive relationship with BMI. This may be explained by the higher caloric share of cereals and meat in this group. The prevalence of overweight was 17%, as well as obesity (obesity and severe obesity added together), demonstrating that 34% of the individuals were overweight. The prevalence of overweight and obesity was higher among students from urban schools.
Sodium intake, unprocessed foods, and processed culinary ingredient consumption showed a positive correlation with Waist Circumference (WC), probably because the most consumed foods in these groups, in terms of caloric share, were cereals, meat, oil, and sugar. The Waist-to-High Ratio (WHtR), on the other hand, showed a positive correlation with unprocessed fruit and juice consumption, probably due to the presence of added sugar, since these foods represented 18% of the energy consumed in group 1, and fresh fruits, in general, have low energy density. The urban population also presented higher WC and WHtR when compared to rural students, which resulted in a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk in these individuals.
In brief, it was observed that unprocessed food consumption was positively related to anthropometric outcomes, while UPF consumption was positively related to micronutrient-impaired status. Almost half of the total energy consumed came from unprocessed food (48%), which was positively related to saturated fatty acids intake, and in which cereals and meat represented the most relative energy contribution. This may explain the correlations with the anthropometric findings. Conversely, 21% of total calorie intake came from UPF, which was most positively related to trans fatty acids intake, in which starchy food had the most relative energy contribution. This may explain the fact that, in this population, this food pattern is more related to lower micronutrient intake than to excess calorie consumption. It is suggested that further studies investigate the influence of physical activity on these findings.
An important aspect that needs to be discussed is that the assessment of food consumption presented in this study was performed using a single 24 h dietary recall. However, the instrument must be applied at three different, non-consecutive moments, representing two typical days and an atypical day of food consumption [35]. In the present study, due to logistical issues, it was not possible to apply the method in triplicate. Consequently, the presented data represent food consumption on the day before the interview, not the usual pattern of consumption, and the interpretations derived from these findings should be made taking this limitation into account. In any case, this study sheds light on important aspects of the nutritional and health conditions of a hitherto unassessed population.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the prevalence of overweight, cardiovascular risk, hypertriglyceridemia, hypercholesterolemia, and vitamin B12 deficiency appeared to be more highly expressed than as described by previous studies about the Brazilian school-age population. Likewise, higher consumption of UPFs has a positive correlation with nutritional inadequacies, such as high sugar and trans fatty intakes and micronutrient deficiency. These findings draw attention to the need to promote local public policies aimed at promoting food and nutritional security for the school-age population to prevent both the emergence and worsening of Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases and nutritional deficiencies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.A.M., A.M.T.L., N.A.V. and R.R.O.; data curation, C.A.M. and L.B.M.; formal analysis, C.A.M. and J.T.d.S.; investigation, C.A.M. and L.B.M.; methodology, A.M.T.L., N.A.V. and R.R.O.; project administration, A.M.T.L., N.A.V. and R.R.O.; supervision, A.M.T.L., N.A.V. and R.R.O.; visualization, C.A.M.; writing—original draft, C.A.M.; writing—review and editing, R.M.R.d.S.L. and A.N.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The first author of this study receives a research grant for a doctorate from the Bahia State Research Support Foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee for Research on Human Beings of the Bahiana School of Medicine and Public Health (protocol code: 2.962.623) on 17 September 2018.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the results presented in this article can be found at Harvard Dataset (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OUWFBX). Accessed on 10 January 2023.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks are extended to the Public Ministry of Bahia and the Health and Education Departments of the municipalities involved for enabling the logistics of data collection, as well as the nutritionists responsible for the National School Feeding Program in the municipalities; to nutrition students Bruna Cerqueira and Bruno Cruz, who voluntarily contributed to data collection; and to the public and private laboratories that supported the collection and analysis of laboratory indicators. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to any Author-Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dos Santos Farias, E.; Moreira, K.F.A.; dos Santos, J.P.; Gemelli, I.F.B.; da Costa, G.M.; de Souza, O.F. Overweight and Obesity: Prevalence in Children and Adolescents in Northern Brazil. J. Hum. Growth Dev. 2020, 30, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde Do Escolar. 2015. Available online: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv97870.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2022).
  3. BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde VIGITEL—Sistema de Vigilância de Fatores de Risco e Proteção Para Doenças Crônicas Por Inquérito Telefônico. 2017. Available online: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/vigitel_brasil_2017_vigilancia_fatores_riscos.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2022).
  4. Vergetti Bloch, K.; Henrique Klein, C.; Szklo, M.; Cristina Kuschnir, M.C.; de Azevedo Abreu, G.; Augusta Barufaldi, L.; Valeria da Veiga, G.; Schaan, B.; Luiz Nogueira da Silva, T. ERICA: Prevalências de Hipertensão Arterial e Obesidade Em Adolescentes Brasileiros. Saúde Pública 2016, 50, 9s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dos Santos, F.B.; Schneider, B.C.; Valença, M.S.; Peter, N.B.; Muniz, L.C. Fatores de Risco Comportamentais Para Doenças Cardiovasculares Entre Adolescentes Da Zona Rural de Um Município Do Sul Do Brasil. Cad. Saude Publica 2021, 37, e00241119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2017-2018—Análise Do Consumo Alimentar No Brasil; Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística: Brasilia, Brasil, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  7. Monteiro, C.A.; Cannon, G.; Levy, R.B.; Moubarac, J.C.; Louzada, M.L.C.; Rauber, F.; Khandpur, N.; Cediel, G.; Neri, D.; Martinez-Steele, E.; et al. Ultra-Processed Foods: What They Are and How to Identify Them. Public Health Nutr. 2019, 22, 936–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Segura, I.E. Avaliação Do Estado Nutricional e Consumo Alimentar de Escolares Da Rede Municipal de Educação de São Paulo. Master’s Thesis, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Sao Paolo, Brazil, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lane, M.; Howland, G.; West, M.; Hockey, M.; Marx, W.; Loughman, A.; O’Hely, M.; Jacka, F.; Rocks, T. The Effect of Ultra-Processed Very Low-Energy Diets on Gut Microbiota and Metabolic Outcomes in Individuals with Obesity: A Systematic Literature Review. Obes. Res. Clin. Pract. 2020, 14, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ministry of Health of Brazil Secretariat of Health Care Primary Health Care Department, B. Dietary Guidelines for the Brazilian Population; Ministry of Health of Brazil Secretariat of Health Care Primary Health Care Department: Brasilia, Brazil, 2015; ISBN 9788533422421.
  11. Pagliai, G.; Dinu, M.; Madarena, M.P.; Bonaccio, M.; Iacoviello, L.; Sofi, F. Consumption of Ultra-Processed Foods and Health Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Br. J. Nutr. 2021, 125, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Crispim, S.P. Manual Fotográfico de Quantificação Alimentar, 1st ed.; Universidade Federal do Paraná: Curitiba, Brazil, 2017; ISBN 9788568566084. [Google Scholar]
  13. UNICAMP. TBCA—Tabela Brasileira de Composição de Alimentos. Available online: http://www.tbca.net.br/base-dados/composicao_alimentos.php (accessed on 15 August 2022).
  14. IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. POF—Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2008–2009—Tabelas de Composição Nutricional Dos Alimentos Consumidos No Brasil. Available online: https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv50002.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2022).
  15. WHO. World Health Organization. Curva de Crescimento Infantil—IMC/I (5–19 Anos). Available online: https://www.who.int/toolkits/growth-reference-data-for-5to19-years/indicators/bmi-for-age (accessed on 15 August 2022).
  16. Fernández, J.R.; Redden, D.T.; Pietrobelli, A.; Allison, D.B. Waist Circumference Percentiles in Nationally Representative Samples of African-American, European-American, and Mexican-American Children and Adolescents. J. Pediatr. 2004, 145, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. McCarthy, H.D.; Ashwell, M. A Study of Central Fatness Using Waist-to-Height Ratios in UK Children and Adolescents over Two Decades Supports the Simple Message—‘Keep Your Waist Circumference to Less than Half Your Height’. Int. J. Obes. 2006, 30, 988–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Nambiar, S.; Truby, H.; Abbott, R.A.; Davies, P.S.W. Validating the Waist-Height Ratio and Developing Centiles for Use amongst Children and Adolescents. Acta Paediatr. 2009, 98, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Souza e Silva, L.C.; Barbosa e Silva, S.L.; de Oliveira, S.A.M.; de Araujo, J.R.; de Arrauda, I.K.G.; Maio, R.; da Conceicao Chaves de Lemos, M. Hypertriglyceridemic Waist and Associated Factors in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Rev. Paul. Pediatr. 2020, 38, e2019073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Fats and Fatty Acids in Human Nutrition: Report of an Expert Consultation; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008; ISBN 9789251067338. [Google Scholar]
  21. World Health Organization. Guideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  22. De Moura Souza, A.; Barufaldi, L.A.; de Azevedo Aberu, G.; Giannini, D.T.; de Oliveira, C.L.; dos Santos, M.M.; Leal, V.S.; de Assis Guedes Vasconcelos, F. ERICA: Intake of Macro and Micronutrients of Brazilian Adolescents. Rev. Saude Publica 2016, 50, 1s–15s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Retondario, A.; de Oliveira Alves, M.A.; Ferreira, S.M.R. Contribution of Ultra-Processed Food to the Nutritional Dietary Profile of Young Children School Feeding. Rev. Nutr. 2022, 35, e210106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Andrade, L.M.M.; Costa, J.A.; Carrara, C.F.; Netto, M.P.; Cândido, A.P.C.; Oliveira e Silva, R.M.S.; Mendes, L.L. Estado Nutricional, Consumo de Alimentos Ultraprocessados e Imagem Corporal de Adolescentes de Uma Escola Privada Do Município de Juiz de For a—MG. HU Rev. 2019, 45, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Da Costa, B.G.G.; del Duca, G.F.; da Silva, K.S.; Benedet, J.; Malheiros, L.E.A.; Quadros, E.N.; Streb, A.R.; Rezende, L.F.M. Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Consumption of Minimally Processed and Ultra-Processed Foods in Brazilian Adolescents. Cien. Saude Colet. 2022, 27, 1469–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. BRASIL. Ministério da Saúde Guia Alimentar para a População Brasileira. Available online: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/guia_alimentar_populacao_brasileira_2ed.pdf (accessed on 15 August 2022).
  27. Agnoli, C.; Baroni, L.; Bertini, I.; Ciappellano, S.; Fabbri, A.; Papa, M.; Pellegrini, N.; Sbarbati, R.; Scarino, M.L.; Siani, V.; et al. Position Paper on Vegetarian Diets from the Working Group of the Italian Society of Human Nutrition. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2017, 27, 1037–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Vellozo, E.P.; Fisberg, M. O Impacto Da Fortificação de Alimentos Na Prevenção Da Deficiência de Ferro. Rev. Bras. Hematol. Hemoter. 2010, 32, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Green, R.; Allen, L.H.; Bjørke-Monsen, A.L.; Brito, A.; Guéant, J.L.; Miller, J.W.; Molloy, A.M.; Nexo, E.; Stabler, S.; Toh, B.H.; et al. Vitamin B12 Deficiency. Nat. Rev. Dis. Prim. 2017, 3, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rosenthal, J.; Largaespada, N.; Bailey, L.B.; Cannon, M.; Alverson, C.J.; Ortiz, D.; Kauwell, G.P.A.; Sniezek, J.; Figueroa, R.; Daly, R.; et al. Folate Deficiency Is Prevalent in Women of Childbearing Age in Belize and Is Negatively Affected by Coexisting Vitamin B-12 Deficiency: Belize National Micronutrient Survey 2011. J. Nutr. 2017, 147, 1183–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Dang, S.; Yan, H.; Zeng, L.; Wang, Q.; Li, Q.; Xiao, S.; Fan, X. The Status of Vitamin B12 and Folate among Chinese Women: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study in Northwest China. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e112586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bouvard, V.; Loomis, D.; Guyton, K.Z.; Grosse, Y.; El Ghissassi, F.; Benbrahim-Tallaa, L.; Guha, N.; Mattock, H.; Straif, K.; Stewart, B.W.; et al. Carcinogenicity of Consumption of Red and Processed Meat. Lancet Oncol. 2015, 2045, 1599–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Faria-Neto, J.R.; Bento, V.F.R.; Baena, C.P.; Olandoski, M.; de Oliveira Gonçalves, L.G.; de Azevedo Abreu, G.; Kuschnir, M.C.C.; Bloch, K.V. ERICA: Prevalence of Dyslipidemia in Brazilian Adolescents. Rev. Saude Publica 2016, 50, 1s–10s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Kuschnir, M.C.C.; Bloch, K.V.; Szklo, M.; Klein, C.H.; Barufaldi, L.A.; de Azevedo Abreu, G.; Schaan, B.; da Veiga, G.V.; da Silva, T.L.N.; de Vasconcellos, M.T.L.; et al. ERICA: Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome in Brazilian Adolescents. Rev. Saude Publica 2016, 50, 1s–13s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Mascarenhas, J.M.O.; Silva, R.d.C.R.; Machado, M.E.P.C.; Santos, C.A.d.S.T.; Marchioni, D.M.L.; Barreto, M.L. Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire Designed for Adolescents in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Rev. Nutr. 2016, 29, 163–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Correlation between food consumption according to levels of processing and macro- and micronutrient intake. Statistical test: Spearman correlation. * Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Left Y-axis: Fiber (g); SFAs—Saturated Fatty Acids (calories); total sugar (calories). Right Y-axis: Trans FAs—Trans Fatty Acids (calories). NOVA—Group 1 (unprocessed food); Group 2 (processed culinary ingredients); Group 3 (processed food); Group 4 (ultra-processed food). Spearman r classification—very weak (0.00 to 0.19); weak (0.20 to 0.39); moderate (0.40 to 0.69); strong (0.70 to 0.89); very strong (0.90 to 1.00).
Figure 1. Correlation between food consumption according to levels of processing and macro- and micronutrient intake. Statistical test: Spearman correlation. * Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). Left Y-axis: Fiber (g); SFAs—Saturated Fatty Acids (calories); total sugar (calories). Right Y-axis: Trans FAs—Trans Fatty Acids (calories). NOVA—Group 1 (unprocessed food); Group 2 (processed culinary ingredients); Group 3 (processed food); Group 4 (ultra-processed food). Spearman r classification—very weak (0.00 to 0.19); weak (0.20 to 0.39); moderate (0.40 to 0.69); strong (0.70 to 0.89); very strong (0.90 to 1.00).
Nutrients 15 00381 g001
Figure 2. Relative contribution (%) of each food group to unprocessed, processed, and ultra-processed food consumption. NOVA Group 1 (unprocessed food); NOVA Group 2 (processed culinary ingredients); NOVA Group 3 (processed food); NOVA Group 4 (ultra-processed food).
Figure 2. Relative contribution (%) of each food group to unprocessed, processed, and ultra-processed food consumption. NOVA Group 1 (unprocessed food); NOVA Group 2 (processed culinary ingredients); NOVA Group 3 (processed food); NOVA Group 4 (ultra-processed food).
Nutrients 15 00381 g002
Figure 3. Laboratory characteristics of the participants according to school location. Statistical test: Mann–Whitney. * Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Laboratory characteristics of the participants according to school location. Statistical test: Mann–Whitney. * Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05).
Nutrients 15 00381 g003
Figure 4. Food consumption or nutrient intake and nutritional status correlation heatmap. Statistical test: Spearman correlation. The r values in bold indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). FER (ferritin), FG (fasting glucose), T-Chol (total cholesterol), LDL-C (LDL cholesterol), TG (triglycerides), Vit-D (Vitamin D), Vit-B12 (Vitamin B12), BMI (Body Mass Index), WC (Waist Circumference), WHtR (Waist-to-Height Ratio), SFAs (Saturated Fatty Acids), Trans FAs (Trans Fatty Acids), NOVA Group 1 (unprocessed foods), NOVA Group 2 (processed culinary ingredients), NOVA Group 3 (processed foods), NOVA Group 4 (ultra-processed foods). Measurement units: fiber (g), cholesterol and total sodium (mg), vitamins B12 and D (µg), and the others (calories).
Figure 4. Food consumption or nutrient intake and nutritional status correlation heatmap. Statistical test: Spearman correlation. The r values in bold indicate statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). FER (ferritin), FG (fasting glucose), T-Chol (total cholesterol), LDL-C (LDL cholesterol), TG (triglycerides), Vit-D (Vitamin D), Vit-B12 (Vitamin B12), BMI (Body Mass Index), WC (Waist Circumference), WHtR (Waist-to-Height Ratio), SFAs (Saturated Fatty Acids), Trans FAs (Trans Fatty Acids), NOVA Group 1 (unprocessed foods), NOVA Group 2 (processed culinary ingredients), NOVA Group 3 (processed foods), NOVA Group 4 (ultra-processed foods). Measurement units: fiber (g), cholesterol and total sodium (mg), vitamins B12 and D (µg), and the others (calories).
Nutrients 15 00381 g004
Table 1. Quantitative and qualitative nutritional characteristics of food consumption of the participants according to the school location.
Table 1. Quantitative and qualitative nutritional characteristics of food consumption of the participants according to the school location.
IndicatorsTotal 1 (n = 185)Rural 1 (n = 108)Urban 1 (n = 77)p2
Energy and Macronutrients
Energy (calories)1763 (1317–2284)1762 (1350–2315)1765 (1313–2115)>0.900
Protein (caloric%)14 (11–16)14 (11–16)13 (11–15)0.500
Carbohydrate (caloric%)53 (46–60)52 (45–59)55 (48–61)0.057
Total fat (caloric%)33 (28–40)34 (29–41)32 (27–37)0.056
SFAs (caloric%)11 (9–14)11 (9–14)11 (9–13)0.200
Trans FAs (caloric%)1.26 (0.94–1.81)1.22 (0.93–1.73)1.31 (0.95–1.91)0.400
Cholesterol (mg/1000 Kcal)86 (61–149)90 (62–143)81 (57–163)0.700
Total sugar (caloric%)20 (12–28)16 (10–24)24 (15–31)<0.001
Added sugar (caloric%)13 (6–18)11 (5–17)16 (9–22)0.002
Fiber (g/1000 Kcal) 7.6 (6.3–9.0)7.9 (6.8–9.1)7.2 (5.6–8.7)0.014
Micronutrients
Total sodium (mg/1000 Kcal)1601 (1316–1953)1639 (1365–2170)1516 (1173–1777)0.007
Added sodium (mg/1000 Kcal)395 (252–559)434 (260–597)364 (244–467)0.013
Iron (mg/1000 Kcal)4.80 (3.95–5.65)4.88 (3.98–5.72)4.55 (3.89–5.64)0.400
Vitamin B12 (µg/1000 Kcal)1.75 (1.03–2.76)1.79 (1.01–2.56)1.63 (1.04–2.86)>0.900
Vitamin D (mg/1000 Kcal)1.59 (0.96–2.36)1.59 (0.94–2.13)1.63 (1.05–2.41)0.400
NOVA classification
Group 1 (caloric%)48 (38–61)49 (39–65)47 (38–56)0.400
Group 2 (caloric%)13 (9–18)13 (9–20)13 (8–16)0.300
Group 3 (caloric%)10 (0–20)10 (1–19)10 (0–20)>0.900
Group 4 (caloric%)21 (11–36)18 (7–35)23 (16–36)0.039
1 Median (interquartile range); 2 Mann–Whitney test. p values in bold indicate statistically significant differences (<0.05). SFAs (Saturated Fatty Acids); Trans FAs (Trans Fatty Acids); NOVA—Group 1 (unprocessed foods); Group 2 (processed culinary ingredients); Group 3 (processed foods); Group 4 (ultra-processed foods).
Table 2. Absolute and relative frequencies of laboratory inadequacies in school children in rural and urban areas.
Table 2. Absolute and relative frequencies of laboratory inadequacies in school children in rural and urban areas.
IndicatorsTotal 1 (n = 190)Rural 1 (n = 109)Urban 1 (n = 81)p
Low hemoglobin15 (8%)10 (10%)5 (6%)0.433 2
High fasting glucose11 (6%)6 (6%)5 (6%)0.733 2
High total cholesterol22 (12%)11 (10%)11 (14%)0.768 3
High LDL cholesterol14 (7%)8 (8%)6 (7,5%)0.443 3
High triglycerides31 (17%)12 (11%)19 (24%)0.026 3
Low ferritin8 (5%)4 (5%)4 (5%)0.940 2
Vitamin B12 deficiency25 (14%)14 (13%)11 (14%)0.908 3
Vitamin D deficiency1 (1%)0 (0%)1 (1%)0.391 2
1 n (%); 2 Fisher’s exact test; 3 Pearson’s chi-squared test. p values in bold indicate statistically significant differences (<0.05). Reference values for laboratory parameters: low hemoglobin (girls aged 5 to 12 y < 11.5 g/dL, girls aged 12 to 19 y < 12 g/dL, boys < 13 g/dL); low ferritin (<15 µg/L); high fasting glucose (≥100 mg/dL); high total cholesterol (≥200 mg/dL); high LDL cholesterol (≥130 mg/dL); high triglycerides (5 to 10 y ≥ 100 mg/dL, 11 to 19 y ≥ 150 mg/dL); vitamin B12 deficiency (<200 pg/mL); vitamin D deficiency (<20 ng/mL).
Table 3. Anthropometric characteristics of the participants according to school location.
Table 3. Anthropometric characteristics of the participants according to school location.
IndicatorsTotal 1 (n = 190)Rural 1 (n = 109)Urban 1 (n = 81)p
Height (m)1.39 (1.26–1.53)1.38 (1.26–1.51)1.41 (1.27–1.55)0.600 2
Weight (Kg)33 (25–45)30 (25–43)37 (26–48)0.054 2
Body Mass Index (Kg/m2)17.0 (15.0–19.5)16.0 (14.8–18.8)18.0 (15.9–20.8)0.001 2
Nutritional status
Severe underweight2 (1%)2 (2%)0 (0%)0.011 3
Underweight8 (4%)5 (5%)3 (4%)
Eutrophy113 (61%)73 (69%)40 (51%)
Overweight32 (17%)15 (14%)17 (21%)
Obesity12 (7%)2 (2%)10 (12%)
Severe obesity19 (10%)9 (8%)10 (12%)
Waist circumference (cm)59 (54–67)57 (54–66)61 (55–70)0.029 2
Waist-to-Height Ratio0.43 (0.40–0.46)0.43 (0.40–0.45)0.44 (0.41–0.47)0.029 2
Cardiovascular risk17 (9%)5 (5%)12 (15%)0.015 4
Hypertriglyceridemic waist6 (3%)1 (1%)5 (6%)0.085 3
1 Median (interquartile range) or n (%); 2 Mann–Whitney test; 3 Fisher’s exact test; 4 Pearson’s chi-squared test. p values in bold indicate statistically significant differences (<0.05). Nutritional status was classified according to Body Mass Index for Age. Cardiovascular risk was classified according to the Waist-to-Height Ratio, being considered a present risk when ≥ 0.5. The hypertriglyceridemic waist phenotype was considered present in the simultaneous occurrence of waist circumference greater than appropriate for sex and age, and hypertriglyceridemia (5 to 10 y ≥ 100 mg/dL; 11 to 19 y, elevated ≥ 150 mg/dL).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Menezes, C.A.; Magalhães, L.B.; da Silva, J.T.; da Silva Lago, R.M.R.; Gomes, A.N.; Ladeia, A.M.T.; Vianna, N.A.; Oliveira, R.R. Ultra-Processed Food Consumption Is Related to Higher Trans Fatty Acids, Sugar Intake, and Micronutrient-Impaired Status in Schoolchildren of Bahia, Brazil. Nutrients 2023, 15, 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15020381

AMA Style

Menezes CA, Magalhães LB, da Silva JT, da Silva Lago RMR, Gomes AN, Ladeia AMT, Vianna NA, Oliveira RR. Ultra-Processed Food Consumption Is Related to Higher Trans Fatty Acids, Sugar Intake, and Micronutrient-Impaired Status in Schoolchildren of Bahia, Brazil. Nutrients. 2023; 15(2):381. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15020381

Chicago/Turabian Style

Menezes, Camilla Almeida, Letícia Bastos Magalhães, Jacqueline Tereza da Silva, Renata Maria Rabello da Silva Lago, Alexvon Nunes Gomes, Ana Marice Teixeira Ladeia, Nelzair Araújo Vianna, and Ricardo Riccio Oliveira. 2023. "Ultra-Processed Food Consumption Is Related to Higher Trans Fatty Acids, Sugar Intake, and Micronutrient-Impaired Status in Schoolchildren of Bahia, Brazil" Nutrients 15, no. 2: 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15020381

APA Style

Menezes, C. A., Magalhães, L. B., da Silva, J. T., da Silva Lago, R. M. R., Gomes, A. N., Ladeia, A. M. T., Vianna, N. A., & Oliveira, R. R. (2023). Ultra-Processed Food Consumption Is Related to Higher Trans Fatty Acids, Sugar Intake, and Micronutrient-Impaired Status in Schoolchildren of Bahia, Brazil. Nutrients, 15(2), 381. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15020381

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop