Next Article in Journal
Non-Pharmacological Treatments for Insulin Resistance: Effective Intervention of Plant-Based Diets—A Critical Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Neuroprotective Role of Lactoferrin during Early Brain Development and Injury through Lifespan
Previous Article in Journal
Depression, Is It Treatable in Adults Utilising Dietary Interventions? A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
Previous Article in Special Issue
Searching for a Longevity Food, We Bump into Hericium erinaceus Primordium Rich in Ergothioneine: The “Longevity Vitamin” Improves Locomotor Performances during Aging
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nutrients
Volume 14
Issue 7
10.3390/nu14071399
nutrients-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Lactoferrin Induces Erythropoietin Synthesis and Rescues Cognitive Functions in the Offspring of Rats Subjected to Prenatal Hypoxia

by
Alexey V. Sokolov
1,2,*,
Nadezhda M. Dubrovskaya
3,
Valeria A. Kostevich
1,
Dmitrii S. Vasilev
3,
Irina V. Voynova
1,
Elena T. Zakharova
1,
Olga L. Runova
1,
Igor V. Semak
4,
Alexander I. Budevich
5,
Natalia N. Nalivaeva
3 and
Vadim B. Vasilyev
1,2,*
1
Department of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Experimental Medicine, Acad. Pavlov Str. 12, 197376 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
2
Faculty of Dental Medicine and Medical Technologies, Saint Petersburg State University, 8A 21st Line V.O., 199034 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
3
Laboratory of Physiology and Pathology of CNS, Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry, 44 Thorez Ave., 194223 Saint-Petersburg, Russia
4
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology, Belarusian State University, Nezavisimisty Ave. 4, 220030 Minsk, Belarus
5
Scientific and Practical Centre on Animal Husbandry of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 11 Frunze Str., 222160 Zhodino, Belarus
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(7), 1399; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14071399
Submission received: 18 December 2021 / Revised: 18 March 2022 / Accepted: 24 March 2022 / Published: 27 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrition for Brain Development and Repair)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The protective effects of recombinant human lactoferrin rhLF (branded “CAPRABEL™”) on the cognitive functions of rat offspring subjected to prenatal hypoxia (7% O2, 3 h, 14th day of gestation) have been analyzed. About 90% of rhLF in CAPRABEL was iron-free (apo-LF). Rat dams received several injections of 10 mg of CAPRABEL during either gestation (before and after the hypoxic attack) or lactation. Western blotting revealed the appearance of erythropoietin (EPO) alongside the hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) in organ homogenates of apo-rhLF-treated pregnant females, their embryos (but not placentas), and in suckling pups from the dams treated with apo-rhLF during lactation. Apo-rhLF injected to rat dams either during pregnancy or nurturing the pups was able to rescue cognitive deficits caused by prenatal hypoxia and improve various types of memory both in young and adult offspring when tested in the radial maze and by the Novel Object Recognition (NOR) test. The data obtained suggested that the apo-form of human LF injected to female rats during gestation or lactation protects the cognitive functions of their offspring impaired by prenatal hypoxia.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Oxygen deficiency in the embryonic period results in a large spectrum of postnatal behavioral alterations and cognitive dysfunctions [1]. The periods of increased sensitivity of the brain to deleterious factors reflect the heterochronous ontogenetic development of the nervous system [2]. Detrimental effects in those critical periods of prenatal development can cause structure-functional perturbations at every level of cerebral organization. In particular, the impaired development of the brain cortex and hippocampus, which play the key role in learning and memory, can result in cognitive deficiency.
As shown in our studies in rats, prenatal hypoxia on embryonic days E13–14, when the generation and migration of the cells into the forming cortical areas take place [3], leads to delayed development of pups’ motor reactions and long-lasting cognitive dysfunctions observed at various stages of ontogenesis and underlined by impaired synaptic plasticity [4,5,6]. Along with the functional and structural alterations caused in animals by prenatal hypoxia, substantial rearrangements at the molecular and metabolic levels were observed in their nervous system. Firstly, this was manifested by the altered expression of various neuronal genes, resulting in the changes in mRNAs and protein levels of various enzymes and leading to malfunctioning of signal transduction systems, including cholinergic and purinergic mediation [7,8]. Understanding the molecular and cellular processes that underlie cognitive impairment is essential for monitoring the development of an organism and for designing the corrective interventions to preserve its vital functions. In recent years, lactoferrin (LF) was shown to possess some protective functions which suggested that it may be beneficial against the effects of prenatal hypoxia.
Lactoferrin (LF) is a cationic transferrin found in milk, some other exocrine secretions, and in neutrophils. It has been shown to possess antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral and antiparasitic, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and other activities [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Almost 90% of LF in human milk is iron-free (apo-LF) and has an extreme affinity toward Fe(III), which makes it an efficient iron chelator [18].
A bulk of evidence has been accumulated concerning the beneficial effect of breast feeding on brain development in neonates, especially in preterm babies [19]. The importance of LF in breast milk for neurodevelopment and cognition was emphasized in a comprehensive review [20].
We showed recently that at normoxia, the inactivation of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF-1α and HIF-2α) is prevented by apo-LF [21,22]. Our data were supported by the finding of another research group showing that HIF is upregulated in preterm piglets treated with bovine LF [23]. This endows LF with the capacity to protect an organism against experimental hypoxia and anemia. In the absence of apo-LF, as iron chelator, this effect is not observed, since hydroxylated HIFs undergo ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. In case of hypoxia or iron deficiency, HIF-1α and HIF-2α are not hydroxylated but make their way towards the nucleus to stimulate expression of about 200 genes, half of which secure the survival of a cell under stress.
Our studies demonstrated that various tissues of animals treated with recombinant human LF (rhLF) responded by expressing HIF-1α and HIF-2α target genes [22,24]. As a result, such proteins as erythropoietin (EPO) and ceruloplasmin, which both are products of HIF-2α and HIF-1α target genes, were synthesized in noticeable amounts [22]. These data allowed us to suggest that LF is an efficient natural anti-hypoxic agent. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether rhLF administration during gestation or lactation to rats exposed to hypoxia at pregnancy might mitigate or abrogate cognitive defects in their offspring.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

Recombinant human apo-lactoferrin (rhLF) purified from the milk of transgenic goats was obtained at the Belarusian State University and RUE «Scientific and Practical Centre of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus for Animal Production». The product is officially branded “CAPRABEL™” and contains about 90% of the iron-free form of LF (apo-LF) [25]. Monoclonal mouse antibodies against recombinant human EPO (A 171 PC/Unit 7, “Protein Contour Ltd.”, Saint Petersburg, Russia); monoclonal mouse antibodies against HIF-1α (clone H1a1pha67) and HIF-2α [ep 190b] («Abcam», Cambridge, UK); rabbit antibodies against mouse IgG; and dimethyl sulfoxide were all from Sigma (USA); horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat antibodies against rabbit immunoglobulins and dry skimmed milk were all from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA, USA); acrylamide, N,N′ -methylenebis(acrylamide), N,N,N′,N′—tetramethylethylene diamine («Medigen», Novosibirsk, Russia); ammonium persulfate, glycerol, Coomassie R-250, mercaptoethanol, sucrose and Tris were all from «Serva» (Germany); PBS (phosphate buffer saline)—0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.4, 1.9 mM Na2HPO4/8.1 mM NaH2PO4. Rabbit polyclonal affinity antibody against human LF was obtained in house as described earlier [26].

2.2. Animals

Wistar rats bred in the vivarium of the I.M. Sechenov Institute of Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences (St. Petersburg, Russia) were used. All experimental protocols, animal housing and tissue collection have been carried out in accordance with the ARRIVEguidelines for work with experimental animals [27] and the instructions of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Pregnant rats and their offspring were kept under 12-h light/dark cycle and with free access to food and water. The study was carried out in pregnant and lactating rats and their embryos, as well as in males from the offspring of females of the control and three experimental groups: prenatal hypoxia on E14 with saline injections; prenatal hypoxia on E14 with apo-rhLF treatment during pregnancy on E9, E11, E13, E15; and prenatal hypoxia with apo-rhLF treatment during nurturing on P0-P15.
Pregnant Wistar rats (200 g) were subjected to hypoxia on the 14th day of gestation (E14) in a special chamber as described below. Half the pregnant rats were treated by apo-rhLF, (i.p. injections of 10 mg CAPRABEL dissolved in 0.5 mL saline per rat) on the 9th, 11th, 13th, and 15th days of gestation (E9, E11, E13, E15) or during nurturing (daily after delivery on P0 up to P15) and were sacrificed for biochemical experiments on E14 and P14, respectively (Figure 1).
Organ homogenates of females, embryos and suckling pups were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-HIFs or anti-EPO. Another group of pups was allowed to grow up, and their memory tests were performed starting from postnatal days 22 (P22) or 90 (P90).
Table 1 shows the distribution of animals among groups and encompasses the variety of experiments accomplished.

2.3. Model of Prenatal Normobaric Hypoxia

On the 14th day of gestation, 2 groups of pregnant Wistar rats (200 g)—treated with saline or with apo-hrLF on E9, E11 and E13—were exposed to normobaric hypoxia in a 100 L chamber equipped with systems for ventilation, thermoregulation, adsorption of exhaled CO2 and gas analysis. To create hypoxic conditions, the oxygen level in the chamber was gradually reduced from 20.7 to 7.0% and maintained at this level for 3 h. CO2 concentration inside the chamber was kept below 0.2%, and the temperature was 22 °C. Control rats were kept for the duration of the experiment in the same room under normal oxygen content. Some pregnant rats and embryos from the control and experimental groups were taken for biochemical experiments 4 h after the end of hypoxic insult. The remaining pregnant rats were placed in individual cages and injected with saline or apo-rhLF on E15. On the 2nd day after birth, only 8 pups were left in each brood. When calculating the age of rat pups, the day of their birth was considered as P0.

2.4. Collection of Milk Samples

To analyze the presence of rhLF in milk 3 h after a single injection of apo-rhLF (10 mg in 0.5 mL of saline), intact lactating rats (n = 3) were separated from the pups (P14) for an hour and given an intraperitoneal injection of oxytocin (10 IU/kg body mass). After 10 min, rats were etherized, and ca. 1 mL of milk was obtained from each animal using a special peristaltic pump with a soft silicon tip on the tube. Samples of whole milk were centrifuged, and the supernatants collected for the analysis of rhLF by Western blotting with rabbit IgG against human LF. The presence of rhLF was also determined in gastric content of some nurtured pups selected at random (n = 6), which were etherized and decapitated.

2.5. Western Blotting

Animal tissues/organs were homogenized on ice and lysed in 3-fold volume (v/w) of a buffer (250 mM sucrose, 25 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4), containing a cocktail of proteinase inhibitors. Lysates were centrifuged for 15 min at 15,000 g (4 °C). The content of proteins in the supernatants was assayed according to Bradford’s method [28]. The samples containing 50 µg of protein in loading buffer were boiled for 10 min and applied on each lane of SDS-PAGE block for electrophoresis [29]. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred during 1 h to a nitrocellulose membrane by semi-dry electric transfer [30]. The nitrocellulose membrane was then soaked for 30 min in BLOTTO-T (3% solution of dry skimmed milk in PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20) and sequentially incubated for 12 h at 4 °C in BLOTTO-T containing murine monoclonal antibodies (a) to EPO (1:5000), (b) to HIF-1-α (1:1000), (c) to HIF-2-α (1:1000) or (d) to LF (1:5000). After 3 washings in BLOTTO-T, the nitrocellulose membranes were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with a secondary rabbit antibody against mouse IgG (except anti-LF) and then with HRP-labelled goat antibodies against rabbit immunoglobulins (1:1000). Immunoreactive bands were revealed using the following chromogenic mixture: 6 mg of 4-chloro-1-naphthol in 2 mL of methanol with 10 mL of 5 mM H2O2 in PBS. The developed violet bands were scanned, and the nitrocellulose membranes were further kept in the darkness.

2.6. Novel Object Recognition Test (NOR Test)

Assessment of the short- (STM) and long-term memory (LTM) by the novel object recognition test (NOR) [31,32] was performed as described previously [6]. At the beginning of the test, each animal was adapted for 5 min to a 100 × 100 cm box with 20 mm high non-transparent walls in the absence of any specific stimuli. During the first training session, following 2 h of acclimatization in the experimental area, two objects (number 1 and 2) were placed and left for the animal to explore them for 10 min. The test was repeated after 10 min to assess STM and then after 60 min and 24 h later to assess LTM. During each consecutive test, which lasted 5 min, one of the objects (object 2) was replaced by a new object (numbered 3 for STM testing, and 4 and 5 for testing LTM) while object 1 stayed unchanged the whole time. The time (in sec) during which the animals explored each object was recorded by an observer unaware of the experimental group and expressed in % of the total exploration time of both objects. The same scheme of experiments was used for testing the offspring of both ages (young—P22 and adult—P90) in each experimental group: control rats (n = 32), rats subjected to prenatal hypoxia (n = 32), rats subjected to prenatal hypoxia and treated with apo-rhLF during gestation (n = 22) and lactation (n = 24).

2.7. Working Memory Analysis in the Eight-Arm Radial Maze

Working memory of rats from all experimental groups was tested at the age of 3 months (P90) in the 8-arm radial maze as described in detail previously [33]. For this, following 24 h food deprivation, the rat was placed on a platform in the 2-level, 8-arm maze from where they could enter any of the maze arms. Each arm had a food pellet (35 mg, made of sugar and starch). The rat was allowed to perform only 8 visits of the arms, and any visit to the same arm was counted as an error. Working memory was evaluated and expressed as % of errors from 8 visits. The same scheme of experiments was employed for testing offspring of both ages in each experimental group: control rats (n = 7), rats subjected to prenatal hypoxia (n = 7), rats subjected to prenatal hypoxia and treated with rhLF during gestation (n = 7) and lactation (n = 7).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All statistical tests were performed using Statistica 8.0 software (Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA), SPSS 17.0 for Windows and GraphPad Prism 9.2.0 (San Diego, CA, USA). In the analysis of animal behavior, we used one sample t-test to identify the differences between the time of recognizing a novel object and the hypothetical 50% value which testifies to the equivalent preference of the novel and familiar objects and 1-way ANOVA with the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test for the radial maze test. An α level of 0.05 was used as a significance criterion for all tests. The data are given as mean ± standard error of mean. The two-tailed Fisher exact test was used in the analysis of the EPO and HIF-1α and HIF-2α presence.

3. Results

3.1. Lactoferrin-Induced Upregulation of EPO in Pregnant Rats and Their Pups

Immunoblotting analysis of the brains of pregnant rats and the brains and torsos of their embryos on E14 has revealed that in the animals of saline-treated control group and saline-treated group submitted to hypoxia there were no detectable amounts of EPO. Hypoxia on E14 has not affected the levels of EPO in all organs studied. However, in the group of rats which were subjected to hypoxia and received injections of apo-rhLF, there was a significant increase in EPO protein levels in the brain both of pregnant rats and their embryos, as well as in the fetal bodies but not in the placentas (Figure 2, Table 2, representative Western blotting images—Figure S1).
The number of pregnant females and embryos with detectable or undetectable EPO levels was analyzed by Fisher exact test. It confirms that the injection of apo-rhLF leads to a statistically significant increase in EPO in the brain tissue of embryos from pregnant females subjected to hypoxia (Fisher exact test, p < 0.05), but prenatal hypoxia itself did not significantly affect the content of EPO in the brain tissue of embryos (Fisher exact test, p > 0.05).
The increased synthesis of EPO in the pregnant rat brain and in the brain and bodies of their embryos correlates with apo-rhLF administration, since, previously, we have shown that CAPRABEL stabilizes the levels of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in the same organs of naïve pregnant rats and their embryos [21,24].
In a separate experiment, we have analyzed whether the injection of apo-rhLF to lactating dams resulted in the appearance of human apo-LF in their milk or in the gastric content of the pups (Figure 3). It was found that a single injection of human apo-LF led to the appearance of this protein in the milk of lactating dams and its persistence there for 4 to 24 h. It was also detected in the gastric content of the pups.
The analysis of the EPO, HIF-1α and HIF-2α levels in the pup (P14) brain, liver and spleen by Western blotting has revealed that they were detectable in these organs only in rats whose mothers received apo-rhLF (Table 3).
The number of pups with detectable or undetectable EPO levels was analyzed by the Fisher exact test, which confirmed that the injection of apo-rhLF during lactation led to the increase in EPO in the brain tissue of pups subjected to prenatal hypoxia (Table 2, Fisher exact test, p < 0.05). However, prenatal hypoxia itself did not significantly affect the EPO content in the brain of pups whose mothers have not been treated with apo-rhLF (Fisher exact test, p > 0.05).
These data strongly suggest that the treatment of pregnant rats with apo-rhLF results in the upregulation of the EPO protein both in their brain and the brains and bodies of their embryos. The injection of apo-rhLF to lactating rats led to the appearance of rhLF in their milk and the gastric content of their pups, which was accompanied by the upregulation of HIF-1α, HIF-2α and EPO in the brain, liver and spleen of the pups.

3.2. Effect of apo-rhLF Injections to Pregnant and Lactating Rats on the Memory of Their Offspring

The results of testing rat pups, whose mothers were subjected to hypoxia and treated with saline injections have demonstrated that both on P22 and P90 there was statistically significant impairment of their short- and long-term memory compared with control rats when examined by NOR and the two-level, eight-arm radial maze (Figure 4 and Figure 5).
Normally, intact rats prefer to spend more time exploring novel rather than familiar objects for 10 min, 60 min or 24 h intervals after training, which is indicative of normal short-term (STM) and long-term memory (LTM1 and LTM2) (Figure 4). In fact, in the offspring of rats not subjected to hypoxia during pregnancy, the time spent to recognize a novel object differed significantly from the hypothetical 50% level in the testing session performed 10 min after the first training session (STM, one-sample t-test: tyoung = 3.061, p = 0.007 and tadult = 3.554, p = 0.003), after 60 min (LTM1, tyoung = 2.609, p = 0.019 and tadult = 5.152, p < 0.001) or 24 h after the first training session (LTM2, tyoung = 4.476, p < 0.001 and tadult = 4.459, p = 0.001). On the contrary, rat pups subjected to prenatal hypoxia had no preference (p > 0.05) for the novel object but spent about 50% of the time exploring both objects (Figure 4).
Young (P22) and adult rats (P90) born from the mothers that experienced hypoxia and treatment with apo-rhLF during pregnancy showed the results in the test for the STM and LTM, similar to the control pups, as their recognition of the novel object significantly differed from the hypothetical 50%: 10 min after training (one-sample t-test: tyoung = 2.487, p = 0.026 and tadult = 4.523, p = 0.004); after 60 min (tyoung = 7.643, p <0.001 and tadult = 4.439, p = 0.004); and after 24 h (tyoung = 6.250, p < 0.001 and tadult = 4.797, p = 0.003). Moreover, young and adult rats born from the mothers subjected to hypoxia and treated with apo-rhLF during lactation had normal (like the control group) STM and LTM1 on P22 (one-sample t-test: tyoung = 5.437, p <0.001 and tyoung = 7.235, p <0.001, correspondingly) and normal STM, LTM1 and LTM2 on P90 (one-sample t-test: tadult = 2.923, p = 0.027, tadult = 3.510, p =0.013 and tadult = 2.856, p = 0.029).
The analysis of rat behavior in the two-level eight-arm radial maze showed that the number of erroneous runs in adult rats (P90) subjected to prenatal hypoxia increased by 3.6 times compared with the control rats (Figure 5, 1-way ANOVA with the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test, q = 6010, p =0.002). The treatment of pregnant rats with apo-rhLF during pregnancy prevented memory deterioration in their offspring, which resulted in the 2.9-fold decrease in the number of errors (one-way ANOVA with the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test, q = 5602, p = 0.003) (Figure 5), making them as successful as the pups from the control group. The number of erroneous runs in adult rats whose mothers were subjected to hypoxia and apo-rhLF treatment during nursing did not differ from the control (one-way ANOVA with the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test, q = 3615, p = 0.076) or the group treated with apo-rhLF during pregnancy (one-way ANOVA with the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test, q = 2395, p = 0.349).
These data obtained both by the NOR and the two-level, eight-arm radial maze tests suggest that the i.p. administration of apo-rhLF either to pregnant or lactating rats subjected to hypoxia during pregnancy has beneficial effects on cognitive functions (short-term, long-term and working memory) of their offspring in postnatal life.

4. Discussion

Lactoferrin is an iron-binding, sialic-acid-rich milk glycoprotein with multifunctional health benefits important for the development of cognitive functions during the period of rapid brain growth [20]. In preclinical models of antenatal stress and perinatal brain injury, bovine LF was shown to protect the developing brain from neuronal loss, improved neuronal connectivity, increased levels of neurotrophic factors and decreased inflammation in the neuronal tissue [34,35].
Our previous studies provided evidence that apo-LF rescues HIFs from hydroxylation by prolyl-hydroxylases followed by ubiquitination [21,24]. At the same time, another research group showed that after treatment of cultured cells with LF, the hydroxylated HIF-1α was revealed by specific antibodies, which evidenced the capacity of LF to inhibit iron-dependent hydroxylases of HIF [36]. Importantly, iron-saturated LF cannot provide the same or similar effect [21,22,24]. On the contrary, it is likely to cause adverse results, probably by increasing cellular iron content, which enhances the production of ROS and launches ferroptosis [37]. Protected from hydroxylation by apo-LF, HIF-1α and HIF-2α, which are potent transcription factors, stimulate expression of multiple genes, resulting in the synthesis of many proteins, including EPO. In recent years, the evidence that EPO is able to oppose or mitigate neural lesions has been accumulating [24,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Hence, the neuroprotective effect of apo-LF is likely to occur largely due to its capacity for inducing the synthesis of EPO via a HIF-signaling mechanism.
Rats belong to a limited number of mammals that have no LF in their milk [44]. This makes them a convenient object for investigating the functions of that protein, since no accessory effect of intrinsic LF is expected [45]. Our data demonstrate that the injection of apo-rhLF in the CAPRABEL formula to pregnant rats induces the appearance of HIFs and EPO in their brain, as well as in the brain and torsos of their embryos. Moreover, in lactating dams, apo-rhLF administration leads to the appearance of rhLF in their milk and in the gastric content of their suckling pups, resulting in the upregulation of HIFs and EPO in their organs.
In this study, we have demonstrated that the apo-form of rhLF is able to improve the impaired STM and LTM, as well as working memory in the offspring of rats exposed to hypoxia during gestation. In fact, injections of apo-rhLF to both pregnant rats and to lactating dams caused a beneficial effect on cognitive functions of their offspring both at the end of the first month of development (P22) and in adulthood (P90). This is in line with the data on the corrective effect of bovine LF on the brain functions in neonate rats subjected to ischemic hypoxia [46].
The detection of HIFs and EPO in the brain and some other tissues of suckling pups, whose mothers received injections of apo-rhLF, allows us to suggest its possible role in protecting the developing brain against the harmful effects of prenatal hypoxia. This observation supports our recent finding that apo-rhLF significantly mitigates neurological symptoms in rotenone-treated rats (a model of Parkinson’s disease) and is able to rescue rats with experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (a model of multiple sclerosis) from the lethal outcome [24]. The same study showed that an i.p. injection of human apo-LF to mice 1 h after they were subjected to the occlusion of the medial cerebral artery significantly diminished the necrosis area in the brain [24]. A beneficial effect of bovine LF during pregnancy has also been demonstrated in the model of restricted intrauterine development [47]. In a recent study, lactating rats received fodder supplemented with bovine LF, which significantly diminished the severe brain damage caused by hypoxia-ischaemia after occlusion of their pups’ common carotid artery [48]. In all these experimental models, the neural lesions are mediated via hypoxic and oxidative stress. No wonder that triggering the potent anti-hypoxic (and anti-oxidative) pathway, by rescuing HIFs from destruction with subsequent elevated synthesis of EPO, alleviates or abrogates neurological impairments which might result in cognitive dysfunctions. The capacity of stabilized HIF to improve memory by upregulating EPO was shown previously in experiments in healthy mice [49]. The results of the present study suggest that a similar molecular mechanism might also underlie the protective effect of apo-LF against the brain damage caused by prenatal hypoxia.
One of the possible pathways for neuroprotective effects of apo-LF observed in this study might be related to activation of cellular cascades caused by the translocation of the nuclear factor-erythroid 2 p45-related factor 2 (Nrf2) into the cell nucleus, which, as shown previously, is induced by apo-LF [24]. This effect mimics the reaction of the complex formed by Nrf2 and the Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) to oxidative stress. Under such conditions, Keap1 dissociates from Nrf2 and allows the latter to make its way to the nucleus, where it regulates the expression of numerous antioxidant stress genes [50]. This might activate neuroprotective mechanisms and protect neuronal cells and cognitive functions of animals as observed in this study through other anti-inflammatory mechanisms in which LF might be involved [51].

5. Conclusions

It can be concluded that the capacity of lactoferrin in its iron-free apo-form to rescue HIFs from destruction and, as such, to upregulate EPO and other target gene expression alleviates the detrimental effects of prenatal hypoxia on the brain of developing animals, both when apo-rhLF in the CAPRABEL formula is administered in pregnancy or lactation. As a result, apo-rhLF administration improves the cognitive functions of the offspring subjected to prenatal hypoxia and can be recommended for designing therapeutic strategies to reduce cognitive deficits caused by pathological pregnancy or labor.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu14071399/s1, Figure S1: EPO detection by Western blotting in various tissues of embryos from rats treated differently.

Author Contributions

All authors have been participating in the design and execution of the study, discussion of the results and preparation of the manuscript. Conceptualization—V.B.V., N.N.N., A.V.S.; data curation—N.M.D., E.T.Z., I.V.S., N.N.N., formal analysis—N.M.D., D.S.V., I.V.V., E.T.Z., I.V.S., N.N.N., behavioural studies—D.S.V., N.M.D.; blotting investigation—A.V.S., V.A.K., I.V.V., O.L.R.; recombinant lactoferrin obtaining—I.V.S., A.I.B.; methodology—V.B.V., A.V.S., D.S.V., N.M.D., statistics—N.M.D., D.S.V.; visualisation—N.M.D., N.N.N.; project administration—V.B.V., A.I.B., writing, review and editing—V.B.V., A.V.S., N.M.D., N.N.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Federation state budget (assignment 075-00408-21-00).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee at the Institute of Experimental Medicine (protocol 3/20 of 27 February 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This paper is dedicated to the memory of Igor A. Zhuravin.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Apo-LF—iron-free form of lactoferrin; BLOTTO-T—3% solution of dry skimmed milk in PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20; EPO—erythropoietin; HIF—hypoxia-inducible factor; LF—lactoferrin; LTM—long-term memory; NOR—Novel Object Recognition, PBS—phosphate buffer saline; rhLF—recombinant human lactoferrin (branded “CAPRABEL™”); STM—short-term memory.

References

  1. Nalivaeva, N.N.; Turner, A.J.; Zhuravin, I.A. Role of prenatal hypoxia in brain development, cognitive functions, and neurodegeneration. Front. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Rice, D.; Barone, S., Jr. Critical periods of vulnerability for the developing nervous system: Evidence from humans and animal models. Environ. Health Perspect. 2000, 108 (Suppl. 3), 511–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vasilev, D.S.; Dubrovskaya, N.M.; Tumanova, N.L.; Zhuravin, I.A. Prenatal hypoxia in different periods of embryogenesis differentially affects cell migration, neuronal plasticity, and rat behaviour in postnatal ontogenesis. Front. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Zhuravin, I.A.; Dubrovskaya, N.M.; Tumanova, N.L. Postnatal physiological development of rats after acute prenatal hypoxia. Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 2004, 34, 809–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhuravin, I.A.; Dubrovskaya, N.M.; Tumanova, N.L.; Vasilev, D.S.; Nalivaeva, N.N. Ontogenetic and phylogenetic approaches for studying the mechanisms of cognitive dysfunctions. In Evolutionary Physiology and Biochemistry: Advances and Perspectives; InTechOpen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 205–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Zhuravin, I.A.; Dubrovskaya, N.M.; Vasilev, D.S.; Kozlova, D.I.; Kochkina, E.G.; Tumanova, N.L.; Nalivaeva, N.N. Regulation of neprilysin activity and cognitive functions in rats after prenatal hypoxia. Neurochem. Res. 2019, 44, 1387–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kochkina, E.G.; Plesneva, S.A.; Zhuravin, I.A.; Turner, A.J.; Nalivaeva, N.N. The effect of hypoxia on cholinesterase activity in rat sensorimotor cortex. Zh. Evol. Biokhim. Fiziol. 2015, 51, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhuravin, I.A.; Dubrovskaya, N.M.; Vasilev, D.S.; Postnikova, T.Y.; Zaitsev, A.V. Prenatal hypoxia produces memory deficits associated with impairment of long-term synaptic plasticity in young rats. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2019, 164, 107066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Brock, J.H. The physiology of lactoferrin. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2002, 80, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Valenti, P.; Antonini, G. Lactoferrin: An important host defense against microbial and viral attack. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2005, 62, 2576–2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Puddu, P.; Valenti, P.; Gessani, S. Immunomodulating effects of lactoferrin on antigen presenting cells. Biochimie 2009, 91, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Puddu, P.; Lattore, D.; Carollo, M.; Catizone, V.; Ricci, G.; Valenti, P.; Gessani, S. Bovine lactoferrin counteracts toll-like receptor mediated activation signals in antigen presenting cells. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e22504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Brandl, N.; Zemann, A.; Kaupe, V.; Marlovits, S.; Huettinger, P.; Goldenberg, H.; Huettinger, M. Signal transduction and metabolism in chondrocytes is modulated by lactoferrin. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2010, 18, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. García-Montoya, I.A.; Cendón, T.S.; Arévalo-Gallegos, S.; Rascón-Cruz, Q. Lactoferrin a multiple bioactive protein: An overview. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1820, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Legrand, D. Lactoferrin, a key molecule in immune and inflammatory processes. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 90, 252–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Vogel, H.J. Lactoferrin, a bird’s eye view. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012, 90, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mayeur, S.; Spahis, S.; Pouliot, Y.; Levy, E. Lactoferrin, a pleiotropic protein in health and disease. Antioxid. Redox. Signal. 2016, 24, 813–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Aisen, P.; Harris, D.C. Physical biochemistry of the transferrins. In Iron Carriers and Iron Proteins; Loehr, T., Ed.; VCH Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 1989; pp. 241–351. [Google Scholar]
  19. Păduraru, D.I. The evidence for the benefits from breast milk in the neurodevelopment of premature babies. J. Mind. Med. Sci. 2018, 5, 151–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, B. Molecular determinants of milk lactoferrin as a bioactive compound in early neurodevelopment and cognition. J. Pediatr. 2016, 173S, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Zakharova, E.T.; Sokolov, A.V.; Kostevich, V.A.; Vasilyev, V.B. Human apo-lactoferrin as a physiological mimetic of hypoxia stabilizes hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha. Biometals 2012, 25, 1247–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kostevich, V.A.; Sokolov, A.V.; Kozlov, S.O.; Vlasenko, A.Y.; Kolmakov, N.N.; Zakharova, E.T.; Vasilyev, V.B. Functional link between ferroxidase activity of ceruloplasmin and protective effect of apo-lactoferrin: Studying rats kept on a silver chloride diet. Biometals 2016, 26, 691–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nguyen, D.N.; Yanqi, L.; Sangild, P.T.; Bering, S.B.; Chatterton, D.E.W. Effects of bovine lactoferrin on the immature porcine intestine. Br. J. Nutr. 2014, 111, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Zakharova, E.T.; Sokolov, A.V.; Pavlichenko, N.N.; Kostevich, V.A.; Abdurasulova, I.N.; Chechushkov, A.V.; Voynova, I.V.; Elizarova, A.Y.; Kolmakov, N.N.; Bass, M.G.; et al. Erythropoietin and Nrf2: Key factors in the neuroprotection provided by apo-lactoferrin. Biometals 2018, 31, 425–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Semak, I.; Budzevich, A.; Maliushkova, E.; Kuzniatsova, V.; Popkov, N.; Zalutsky, I.; Ivashkevich, O. Development of dairy herd of transgenic goats as biofactory for large-scale production of biologically active recombinant human lactoferrin. Transgenic Res. 2019, 28, 465–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Sokolov, A.V.; Zakahrova, E.T.; Kostevich, V.A.; Samygina, V.R.; Vasilyev, V.B. Lactoferrin, myeloperoxidase, and ceruloplasmin: Complementary gearwheels cranking physiological and pathological processes. Biometals 2014, 27, 815–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kilkenny, C.; Browne, W.J.; Cuthill, I.C.; Emerson, M.; Altman, D.G. Improving bioscience research reporting: The ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8, e1000412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bradford, M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Fling, S.P.; Gregerson, D.S. Peptide and protein molecular weight determination by electrophoresis using a high-molarity tris buffer system without urea. Anal. Biochem. 1986, 155, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Anderson, N.L.; Nance, S.L.; Pearson, T.W.; Anderson, N.G. Specific antiserum staining of two-dimensional electrophoretic patterns of human plasma proteins immobilized on nitrocellulose. Electrophoresis 1982, 3, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ennaceur, A.; Delacour, J. A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: Behavioral data. Behav. Brain Res. 1988, 31, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mello, P.B.; Benetti, F.; Cammarota, M.; Izquierdo, I. Effects of acute and chronic physical exercise and stress on different types of memory in rats. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 2008, 80, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Dubrovskaya, N.M.; Nalivaeva, N.N.; Turner, A.J.; Zhuravin, I.A. Effects of an inhibitor of α-secretase, which metabolizes the amyloid peptide precursor, on memory formation in rats. Neurosci. Behav. Physiol. 2006, 36, 911–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ochoa, T.J.; Sizonenko, S.V. Lactoferrin and prematurity: A promising milk protein? Biochem. Cell Biol. 2017, 95, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Sanches, E.F.; van de Looij, Y.; Toulotte, A.; Sizonenko, S.V.; Lei, V. Mild Neonatal Brain hypoxia-ischemia in very immature rats causes long-term behavioural and cerebellar abnormalities at adulthood. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Park, Y.-G.; Moon, J.-H.; Park, S.-Y. Lactoferrin from bovine colostrum regulates prolyl hydroxylase 2 activity and prevents prion protein-mediated neuronal cell damage via cellular prion protein. Neuroscience 2014, 274, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, Z.; Lu, M.; Chen, C.; Tong, X.; Li, Y.; Yang, K.; Lv, H.; Xu, J.; Qin, L. Holo-lactoferrin: The link between ferroptosis and radiotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Theranostics 2021, 11, 3167–3182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Jelkmann, W. Molecular biology of erythropoietin. Intern. Med. 2004, 43, 649–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Jelkmann, W. Erythropoietin after a century of research: Younger than ever. Eur. J. Haematol. 2007, 78, 183–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. van der Kooij, M.A.; Groenendaal, F.; Kavelaars, A.; Heijnen, C.J.; van Bel, F. Neuroprotective properties and mechanisms of erythropoietin in vitro and in vivo experimental models for hypoxia/ischemia. Brain Res. Rev. 2008, 59, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Genc, K.; Egrilmez, M.Y.; Genc, S. Erythropoietin induces nuclear translocation of Nrf2 and heme oxygenase-1 expression in SH-SY5Y cells. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2010, 28, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. van de Looij, Y.; Chatagner, A.; Quairiaux, C.; Gruetter, R.; Hüppi, P.S.; Sizonenko, S.V. Multi-modal assessment of long-term erythropoietin treatment after neonatal hypoxic-ischemic injury in rat brain. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ma, C.; Cheng, F.; Wang, X.; Zhai, C.; Yue, W.; Lian, Y.; Wang, Q. Erythropoietin pathway: A potential target for the treatment of depression. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Teng, C.T. Lactoferrin gene expression and regulation: An overview. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2002, 80, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Telang, S. Lactoferrin: A critical player in neonatal host defense. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. van de Looij, Y.; Ginet, V.; Chatagner, A.; Toulotte, A.; Somm, E.; Hüppi, P.S.; Sizonenko, S.V. Lactoferrin during lactation protects the immature hypoxic-ischemic rat brain. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2014, 1, 955–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. van de Looij, Y.; Larpin, C.; Cabungcal, J.-H.; Sanches, E.F.; Toulotte, A.; Do, K.Q.; Sizonenko, S.V. Nutritional intervention for developmental brain damage: Effects of lactoferrin supplementation in hypocaloric induced intrauterine growth restriction rat pups. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Sanches, E.; van de Looij, Y.; Sow, S.; Toulotte, A.; da Silva, A.; Modernell, L.; Sizonenko, S. Dose-dependent neuroprotective effects of bovine lactoferrin following neonatal hypoxia–ischemia in the immaturerat brain. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Adamcio, B.; Sperling, S.; Hagemeyer, N.; Walkinshaw, G. Hypoxia inducible factor stabilization leads to lasting improvement of hippocampal memory in healthy mice. Behav. Brain Res. 2009, 208, 80–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Myata, T.; Takizawa, S.; van Ypersele de Strihou, C. Hypoxia. 1. Intracellular sensors for oxygen and oxidative stress: Novel therapeutic targets. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Physiol. 2011, 300, C226–C231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lepanto, M.S.; Rosa, L.; Paesano, R.; Valenti, P.; Cutone, A. Lactoferrin in Aseptic and Septic Inflammation. Molecules 2019, 24, 1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Nutrients 14 01399 g001 550
Figure 1. The scheme of apo-rhLF administration to pregnant and lactating rats. Red lines—days of apo-rhLF administration to pregnant or lactating rats. Blue arrows mark the periods of collecting the material for Western blotting (E14 and P14).
Figure 1. The scheme of apo-rhLF administration to pregnant and lactating rats. Red lines—days of apo-rhLF administration to pregnant or lactating rats. Blue arrows mark the periods of collecting the material for Western blotting (E14 and P14).
Nutrients 14 01399 g001
Nutrients 14 01399 g002 550
Figure 2. Western blotting analysis with anti-EPO of brain homogenates from rat females and their embryos. 1 and 3: Brain samples of the embryos from rats subjected to hypoxia without injection of apo-rhLF; 4: brain sample of an intact pregnant rat injected with saline (no hypoxia); 5 and 6: brain samples of the embryos from rats injected with apo-rhLF during pregnancy; 7–10: brain samples of the embryos from rats injected with apo-rhLF; 2: molecular mass markers; arrow marks M 40 kDa. Hypoxia −/+ or apo-rhLF −/+ indicate whether hypoxia or apo-rhLF have been applied.
Figure 2. Western blotting analysis with anti-EPO of brain homogenates from rat females and their embryos. 1 and 3: Brain samples of the embryos from rats subjected to hypoxia without injection of apo-rhLF; 4: brain sample of an intact pregnant rat injected with saline (no hypoxia); 5 and 6: brain samples of the embryos from rats injected with apo-rhLF during pregnancy; 7–10: brain samples of the embryos from rats injected with apo-rhLF; 2: molecular mass markers; arrow marks M 40 kDa. Hypoxia −/+ or apo-rhLF −/+ indicate whether hypoxia or apo-rhLF have been applied.
Nutrients 14 01399 g002
Nutrients 14 01399 g003 550
Figure 3. Western blotting with anti-LF antibody of lactating rat milk and of the gastric content of their pups. 1–3: Gastric content of pups (P14) fed by the rats injected with apo-rhLF; 4: control sample of CAPRABEL (1 µg); 5: molecular mass markers, arrows mark 70 and 50 kDa; 6–8: milk from rats injected with apo-rhLF; 9–10 milk from control rats injected with saline.
Figure 3. Western blotting with anti-LF antibody of lactating rat milk and of the gastric content of their pups. 1–3: Gastric content of pups (P14) fed by the rats injected with apo-rhLF; 4: control sample of CAPRABEL (1 µg); 5: molecular mass markers, arrows mark 70 and 50 kDa; 6–8: milk from rats injected with apo-rhLF; 9–10 milk from control rats injected with saline.
Nutrients 14 01399 g003
Nutrients 14 01399 g004 550
Figure 4. Results of testing short-term memory (STM) and long-term memory (LTM1 and LTM2) in the offspring of hypoxia-treated rats by Novel Object Recognition test. Ordinate: mean ± SEM of the time spent exploring novel objects expressed in % of the total time spent exploring both the novel and familiar objects. (A)—Rats tested on postnatal day 22; (B)—Rats tested on postnatal day 90. *—p ≤ 0.05; **—p ≤ 0.01; ***—p ≤ 0.01 (one sample test) differences between the time spent exploring the novel object and the hypothetical 50% value (the horizontal line) in case of equal preference for the novel and familiar objects. The number of animals in each group is specified in the Methods. Hyp—hypoxia; Hyp+LF1—hypoxia and apo-rhLF during gestation; Hyp+LF2—hypoxia and apo-rhLF during lactation.
Figure 4. Results of testing short-term memory (STM) and long-term memory (LTM1 and LTM2) in the offspring of hypoxia-treated rats by Novel Object Recognition test. Ordinate: mean ± SEM of the time spent exploring novel objects expressed in % of the total time spent exploring both the novel and familiar objects. (A)—Rats tested on postnatal day 22; (B)—Rats tested on postnatal day 90. *—p ≤ 0.05; **—p ≤ 0.01; ***—p ≤ 0.01 (one sample test) differences between the time spent exploring the novel object and the hypothetical 50% value (the horizontal line) in case of equal preference for the novel and familiar objects. The number of animals in each group is specified in the Methods. Hyp—hypoxia; Hyp+LF1—hypoxia and apo-rhLF during gestation; Hyp+LF2—hypoxia and apo-rhLF during lactation.
Nutrients 14 01399 g004
Nutrients 14 01399 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of apo-rhLF on the working short-term memory of adult offspring (P90) tested in the two-level, eight-arm radial maze. Ordinate: number of erroneous runs in % (mean ± SEM). *—p ≤ 0.05; **—p ≤ 0.01—difference between Hyp and other groups (one-way ANOVA: F3,27 = 8.064, p = 0.001, Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). The number of animals in each group is specified in the Methods. Hyp—hypoxia; Hyp+LF1—hypoxia and apo-rhLF during gestation; Hyp+LF2—hypoxia and apo-rhLF during lactation.
Figure 5. Effect of apo-rhLF on the working short-term memory of adult offspring (P90) tested in the two-level, eight-arm radial maze. Ordinate: number of erroneous runs in % (mean ± SEM). *—p ≤ 0.05; **—p ≤ 0.01—difference between Hyp and other groups (one-way ANOVA: F3,27 = 8.064, p = 0.001, Tukey–Kramer post hoc test). The number of animals in each group is specified in the Methods. Hyp—hypoxia; Hyp+LF1—hypoxia and apo-rhLF during gestation; Hyp+LF2—hypoxia and apo-rhLF during lactation.
Nutrients 14 01399 g005
Table
Table 1. Groups of experimental animals and the means of their analysis.
Table 1. Groups of experimental animals and the means of their analysis.
Rat Groups (N)Substance InjectedBiochemical TestsBehavioral Tests
Control with salineSaline (0.5 mL; E9, 11, 13, 15)2 females and 10 embryos (E14); WB-EPONOR (P22, n = 17 and P90, n = 15)
8 arm-maze,
(P90, n = 7)
Hypoxia (E14) with salineSaline (0.5 mL; E9, 11, 13, 15) 2 females and 16 embryos (E14); WB-EPO
4 females and 11 pups (P14); WB: EPO, HIF1α and HIF2α		NOR (P22, n = 17 and P90, n = 15)
8 arm-maze,
(P90, n = 7)
Hypoxia (E14) with apo-rhLF during gestation—Hyp+LF1Apo-rhLF (10 mg in 0.5 mL of saline; E9, E11, E13, E15)2 females and 12 embryos (E14); WB: EPONOR (P22, n = 15 and P90, n = 7)
8 arm-maze,
(P90, n = 7)
Hypoxia (E14) with apo-rhLF during lactation—Hyp+LF2Apo-rhLF (10 mg in 0.5 mL of saline; daily from P0 to P15 days after birth) 4 females and 16 pups (P14); WB: EPO, HIF1α and HIF2αNOR (P22, n = 17 and P90, n = 7)
8 arm-maze,
(P90, n = 7)
Control with apo-rhLF during lactationApo-rhLF (10 mg in 0.5 mL of saline; daily from P0 to P15 days after birth)3 females and 9 pups (P14); WB: EPO, HIF1α and HIF2α;
Control with apo-rhLF during lactationApo-rhLF (single injection 10 mg in 0.5 mL of saline on P14)3 females and 6 pups (P14) WB: LF in dam milk and in the pup gastric content
Table
Table 2. EPO detection by Western blotting in pregnant rats and their embryos.
Table 2. EPO detection by Western blotting in pregnant rats and their embryos.
GroupsAnalyzed Part of Pregnant Rats or Fetus
Brain of Pregnant FemalesPlacentaBrain of the EmbryosTorso of the Embryos
Embryos (n = 10) from control pregnant rats (n = 2) with i.p. saline injections during gestationEPO presence0000
EPO absence2101010
Embryos (n = 16) from pregnant rats (n = 2) with hypoxia and i.p. saline injections during gestationEPO presence0000
EPO absence2161616
Embryos (n = 12) from pregnant rats (n = 2) with hypoxia and i.p. apo-rhLF injections during gestationEPO presence201212
EPO absence01200
Table
Table 3. HIF-1α, HIF-2α and EPO detection by Western blotting in organs of pups.
Table 3. HIF-1α, HIF-2α and EPO detection by Western blotting in organs of pups.
OrganPups (n = 9) of Control Rats with i.p. apo-rhLF Injections during Lactation (n = 3)Pups (n = 11)of Rats after Hypoxia and i.p. Saline Injections during Lactation (n = 4)Pups (n = 16)of Rats after Hypoxia and i.p. apo-rhLF Injections during Lactation (n = 4)
HIF1α HIF2α and EPO PresenceHIF1α HIF2α and EPO AbsenceHIF1α HIF2α and EPO PresenceHIF1α HIF2α and EPO AbsenceHIF1α HIF2α and EPO PresenceHIF1α HIF2α and EPO Absence
Brain90011160
Liver90011160
Spleen90011160
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sokolov, A.V.; Dubrovskaya, N.M.; Kostevich, V.A.; Vasilev, D.S.; Voynova, I.V.; Zakharova, E.T.; Runova, O.L.; Semak, I.V.; Budevich, A.I.; Nalivaeva, N.N.; et al. Lactoferrin Induces Erythropoietin Synthesis and Rescues Cognitive Functions in the Offspring of Rats Subjected to Prenatal Hypoxia. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14071399

AMA Style

Sokolov AV, Dubrovskaya NM, Kostevich VA, Vasilev DS, Voynova IV, Zakharova ET, Runova OL, Semak IV, Budevich AI, Nalivaeva NN, et al. Lactoferrin Induces Erythropoietin Synthesis and Rescues Cognitive Functions in the Offspring of Rats Subjected to Prenatal Hypoxia. Nutrients. 2022; 14(7):1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14071399

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sokolov, Alexey V., Nadezhda M. Dubrovskaya, Valeria A. Kostevich, Dmitrii S. Vasilev, Irina V. Voynova, Elena T. Zakharova, Olga L. Runova, Igor V. Semak, Alexander I. Budevich, Natalia N. Nalivaeva, and et al. 2022. "Lactoferrin Induces Erythropoietin Synthesis and Rescues Cognitive Functions in the Offspring of Rats Subjected to Prenatal Hypoxia" Nutrients 14, no. 7: 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14071399

APA Style

Sokolov, A. V., Dubrovskaya, N. M., Kostevich, V. A., Vasilev, D. S., Voynova, I. V., Zakharova, E. T., Runova, O. L., Semak, I. V., Budevich, A. I., Nalivaeva, N. N., & Vasilyev, V. B. (2022). Lactoferrin Induces Erythropoietin Synthesis and Rescues Cognitive Functions in the Offspring of Rats Subjected to Prenatal Hypoxia. Nutrients, 14(7), 1399. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14071399

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop