Next Article in Journal
Clearing Steatosis Prior to Liver Surgery for Colorectal Metastasis: A Narrative Review and Case Illustration
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of a Web-Based Weight Loss Program on the Healthy Eating Index-NVS in Adults with Overweight or Obesity and the Association with Dietary, Anthropometric and Cardiometabolic Variables: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Dietary Arachidonic Acid on Gut Microbiota Composition and Gut–Brain Axis in Male BALB/C Mice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential Benefits of Selenium Supplementation in Reducing Insulin Resistance in Patients with Cardiometabolic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association between Diet Quality and Index of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis in a Large Population of People with Type 2 Diabetes: Data from the TOSCA.IT Study

1
Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
2
Laboratory of Clinical Biochemistry, Hospital Pius XI of Desio, ASST-Brianza, 20833 Desio, Italy
3
Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20216 Monza, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2022, 14(24), 5339; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14245339
Submission received: 22 November 2022 / Revised: 10 December 2022 / Accepted: 12 December 2022 / Published: 15 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diet Quality and Risk of Cardiometabolic and Diabetes)

Abstract

:
Background: There are still open questions with respect to the optimal dietary treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and coexisting non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The aim of this study is to investigate, in patients with T2D, the association between NASH, dietary component intake, food groups and adherence to the Mediterranean diet. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of 2026 people with T2D (1136 men and 890 women). The dietary habits were assessed with the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) questionnaire. NASH was identified by the Index Of NASH (ION). Based on the cluster analysis two dietary patterns were identified: the NASH and the NO-NASH pattern. Results: The macronutrient composition of the diet was similar in the two patterns. However, the NASH pattern compared with the NO-NASH pattern was characterized by a significantly lower content of fibre (p < 0.001), β-carotene (p < 0.001), vitamin C (p < 0.001), vitamin E (p < 0.001), polyphenols (p = 0.026) and antioxidant capacity (p < 0.001). With regard to food consumption, the NASH pattern compared with NO-NASH pattern was characterized by higher intake of rice (p = 0.021), potatoes (p = 0.013), red (p = 0.004) and processed meat (p = 0.003), and a lower intake of wholegrain bread (p = 0.019), legumes and nuts (p = 0.049), vegetables (p = 0.047), fruits (p = 0.002), white meat (p = 0.001), fatty fish (p = 0.005), milk and yogurt (p < 0.001). Conclusions: NO-NASH dietary pattern was characterized by a food consumption close to the Mediterranean dietary model, resulting in a higher content of polyphenols, vitamins, and fibre. These finding highlight the potential for dietary components in the prevention/treatment of NASH in people with T2D.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) represents the most common liver disease worldwide affecting approximatively 20–30% of the general population [1]. The histopathological and clinical abnormalities of NAFLD spectrum ranges from the accumulation of triglycerides in the liver, i.e., non-alcoholic fatty liver (NAFL), to the inflammation and cellular damage of the hepatocytes, i.e., non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), that may progress to liver fibrosis and advanced cirrhosis [2]. The most serious clinical manifestations of NAFLD, i.e., NASH and cirrhosis, have very recently become the fastest growing indications for liver transplantation in western countries, heavily impacting on patient health, economic aspects and quality of life [3].
Interestingly, NAFLD is strictly associated with the features of metabolic syndrome such as obesity, type 2 diabetes (T2D), dyslipidaemia and hypertension [4]. In particular, the association between NAFL/NASH and T2D is well established and there appears to exist an intricate interrelationship whereby the existence of one drives progression to the other. T2D seems to be the most important risk factor for NAFLD and the most important clinical predictor of the advanced forms of NAFLD [5,6]. On the other hand, NAFLD is associated with a worse metabolic profile [7,8] and a higher prevalence of microvascular and macro-vascular complications of diabetes, independently of other known risk factors [9,10,11]. From an epidemiological point of view, it is not surprising that there is a high prevalence of NAFL and NASH in T2D, estimated at 55–70% and 20–40%, respectively [12], and higher in T2D with obesity [13].
Although liver biopsy represents the gold standard for the diagnosis of NASH, it is not feasible in large epidemiological studies. Several indices, based on non-invasive measures easily performed in clinical practice, have been proposed for the diagnosis of NASH [14], although none of these has been validated in people with diabetes. Among others, we used the Index Of NASH (ION), an algorithm constructed from the combination of triglycerides, visceral obesity, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and Homeostatic Model Assessment (HOMA-IR), and validated against liver biopsy in an obese population sharing several metabolic and clinical features with T2D (i.e., obesity, excess of visceral fat, insulin resistance and high prevalence of NASH) [15]; in this population, the ION has shown a good diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.88 [95%CI 0.82–0.95]), with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 60% [15].
No pharmaceutical approaches for NAFLD have been approved to date, and the cornerstone in the prevention and treatment of NAFLD and its severe forms is represented by lifestyle modifications, including diet-related factors [14,16]. Some attempts have been made to clarify the association between dietary components and NAFLD in the general population. Outside the context of clinical trials, epidemiological studies show that high glycaemic index foods and intake in saturated fats and simple sugars—fructose in particular—are associated with a higher prevalence in NAFLD [17,18,19,20,21]; whereas the intake of n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), and fibre [22] appears to be associated with a lower prevalence of NAFLD [18,21,22]. Among micronutrients, intake of vitamins [23] and polyphenols is associated with a lower prevalence of NAFLD and might beneficially impact on the progression from NAFL to NASH [24].
In individuals with coexisting T2D and NAFL/NASH, hypocaloric diets promoting a weight loss of 7–10% are effective in improving metabolic parameters of both diseases [14], but they are not feasible in the long term and the optimal dietary model for people with T2D and NASH, not subjected to caloric restriction, remains ill-defined [25,26]. Nutritional guidelines for the treatment of diabetes recommend 45–60% of carbohydrates, selecting those with a low glycaemic index and high in fibre, 25–35% of fats, preferring MUFA and PUFA, 15–20% of proteins, and limiting/avoiding the intake of free sugars, sugar-sweetened beverages and added fructose [26,27]. These recommendations are designed with the main focus on correction of hyper-glycaemia; furthermore, the patient’s compliance is generally low/very low. Indications based on food consumption, rather than on nutrients, may improve adherence, but evidence regarding the possible association between habitual food consumption and NASH in T2D is lacking.
The aim of this study is to investigate in a large population of patients with T2D the association of habitual diet (i.e., diet composition and food consumption) with NASH, in order to expand knowledge on the potential for dietary components in the prevention/treatment of NASH in people with T2D.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Population

We conducted a cross sectional study within the framework of the TOSCA.IT study (NCT00700856), a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the effects of sulfonylurea or pioglitazone, in add-on to metformin, on cardiovascular events in people with T2D. For the aim of the present study, we used data collected at baseline, prior to randomization to the study treatments.
The study participants were people with T2D, aged 50–75 years, on stable treatment with a full dose of metformin (2–3 g per day), and with a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) between 7% and 9%. Participants with incomplete data sets, those with alcohol intake exceeding 30 g/day if men and 20 g/day if women, or taking n-3 supplements were excluded from the analyses [28]; other exclusion criteria were severe hepatic dysfunction (plasma ALT values > 2.5 times the upper normal limit), serum creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL, history of congestive heart failure, (NYHA class I or higher), ulcer or gangrene of the lower extremities, cancer, substance abuse, and any health problem requiring special dietary treatments. Details of the study protocol have been published [29,30]. NASH was defined based on ION ≥ 50. To identify the association of the habitual diet with NASH, dietary patterns associated with ION ≥ 50 or <50 were derived using the K-means cluster analysis by which the sample population is classified into homogenous groups presenting different characteristics using a specific variable as the comparison criterion, in our case the ION. To perform this analysis, firstly the 248 food items were categorized into 59 food groups based on their similarity in term of nutrient composition. Then, the K-means clustering method was performed and the algorithm utilized to identify within each cluster the smallest variation. Two clusters were produced using a non-hierarchical K-means clustering method, with the random seed and 10 iterations to refine and optimize the classifications, and participants were grouped according to Euclidean distances. Two clusters were identified, one associated with an ION ≥ 50, the other associated with an ION < 50, respectively defined in the text and tables as cluster NASH or cluster NO-NASH. The anthropometric, metabolic and nutritional variables were compared in these two patterns. The study protocol has been approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Coordinating Center and of each participating center. All participant provided written informed consent before entering the study.

2.2. Assessment of Anthropometric and Laboratory Parameters

Body weight was measured by mechanic balance (Seca 721), height with bar-altimeter, waist and hip circumference using an anelastic meter. Waist circumference was measured halfway between the lower ribs and the iliac crest and hip circumference was measured at the largest point around the buttocks. All measures were taken with an accuracy to the nearest 0.1 kg and 0.1 cm, respectively, and with the patient in light clothing and no shoes. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m2). Blood pressure was measured in the sitting position by a standard protocol. Blood samples were obtained in the morning after an overnight fast and all biochemical parameters were analyzed in a central laboratory. Plasma glucose, total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, liver enzymes—ALT, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase (GGT)—and high sensitivity C-reactive protein were detected by standard methods. LDL-cholesterol was calculated according to the Friedewald equation for triglyceride values < 400 mg/dL. HbA1c was measured with high liquid performance chromatography standardized according to IFCC. Plasma insulin was detected by ELISA (DIAsource ImmunoAssays S.A., Nivelles, Belgium) on a Triturus Analyser (Diagnostics Grifols, S.A., Barcelona, Spain). Insulin resistance was evaluated by the HOMA method calculated as follows: fasting glucose (mg/dL) × fasting insulin (μU/mL)/405.

2.3. Assessment of Dietary Intake, Food Consumption and Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet

The evaluation of eating habits was performed through the Italian version of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) questionnaire, a validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for the assessment of dietary habits in large epidemiological studies [31,32]. Details have been reported elsewhere [33,34]. Briefly, the FFQ is based on 248 items for which the respondent has to report (1) the absolute frequency of consumption in terms of per day, week, month, or year, and (2) the quantity by selection of pictures showing the portion size as small, medium and large, with additional quantifiers (i.e., “smaller than the small portion” or “between the small and medium portion”, etc…). Incomplete questionnaires and questionnaires with energy intake less than 800 or greater than 5000 kcal/day were excluded. A specific software (Nutrition Analysis of food frequency questionnaire—FFQ) was used to obtain the average daily amounts of foods (g/day) [31,32] and the energy and nutrient composition of the habitual diet [35,36]. The intake of polyphenols was evaluated using the USDA database [37] in combination with the Phenol-Explorer®database [38], as reported in more detail elsewhere [33,34]. In order to evaluate the adherence to the Mediterranean Diet, the relative Mediterranean Diet (rMED) score was used [39] as described in a prior publication [40]. Briefly, the average daily intake of fruits, vegetables, cereals, legumes, fish, olive oil, meat and meat products, dairy products and alcohol was divided in tertiles and assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2 to the first, second or third tertile, respectively, for the groups fitting the Mediterranean model, whereas for meat and dairy products, we assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2 to the third, second and first tertile, respectively. Regarding alcohol intake, 2 points for moderate intake (i.e., 5–25 g/day for women and 10–50 g/day for men, respectively) and 0 points for a consumption at or below the sex-specific range were assigned. The rMED score ranged from 0 to 18.

2.4. Assessment of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis

NASH was calculated as indirect index by the ION according to the following formula: 1.33 waist to hip ratio + 0.03 × triacyclglycerols (mg/dL) + 0.18 × ALT (U/l) + 8.53 × HOMA − 13.93 for men; 0.02 × triacyclglycerols (mg/dL) + 0.24 × ALT (U/l) + 9.61 × HOMA − 13.99 for women. NASH was identified by an ION score of ≥50 [15].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as means ± standard deviation, frequencies and percentages, as appropriate. The t-test for independent samples was used to compare group means; for skewed variables, log transformed values were used. The χ2 test vas used to compare frequencies. A p-value < 0.05, two-tailed, was considered significant and all analyses were conducted with the SPSS Statistics software 28.0 (SPSS/PC; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).

3. Results

The study population consists of 2026 people with T2D (1136 men and 890 women) with a mean age of 62.1 ± 6.5 years, a mean BMI of 30.3 ± 4.5 kg/m2 and a mean duration of diabetes of 8.5 ± 5.7 years. The prevalence of NASH according to the ION was 32%.
In Table 1 are reported the general characteristics and the cardio-metabolic profile for participants in the two clusters. The BMI, waist and hip circumference, waist/hip ratio, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose and insulin, HOMA-IR, plasma LDL-cholesterol, plasma triglycerides, and liver enzymes were significantly higher among people in the cluster NASH as compared with those in the cluster NO-NASH, while age, diabetes duration and plasma HDL-cholesterol values were significantly lower. The proportion of smokers was similar in the two clusters, and a high proportion of the population was taking lipid lowering medications (62%) and/or antihypertensive medications (93%), with no significant differences between the two clusters.
In Table 2 are reported the energy intake and the nutrient composition of the diet in the participants in the two clusters. A significantly lower intake of energy, fibre, vitamin C, ß-carotene, vitamin E and polyphenols, was observed in the cluster NASH; accordingly the antioxidant capacity of the diet, estimated as Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity (TEAC), Total Radical-Trapping Antioxidant Parameter (TRAP), Ferric Reducing-Antioxidant Power (FRAP) was significantly lower. No differences were detected for the other components of the diet between the groups.
Coherent with these findings, the rMED score, an indicator of the overall quality of the adherence to the Mediterranean dietary pattern, was significantly lower in the cluster NASH (Table 3). This data was due to significant differences in individual foods and food group consumption (Table 3). People in the cluster NASH showed a significantly higher consumption of pasta, rice, potatoes, total meat, red meat, processed meat and a lower consumption of wholegrain bread, legumes and nuts, vegetables, fruits, white meat, fatty fish, total dairy products, milk and yogurt. The consumption of total cereals, white bread, total fish, lean fish, cheese, eggs, vegetable oils and fats from animal origin was not significantly different between the groups.

4. Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first large cross-sectional study evaluating the association between NASH and habitual diet in a well-characterized sample of adults with T2D.
The prevalence of NASH in the study population was high (32%) and in line with recent epidemiological data, as was the more adverse cardiovascular risk factors profile observed in the cluster NASH [12]. The association between nutrient composition of the diet and NAFLD, particularly NAFL, has been reported in prior epidemiological studies [41], but less is known regarding the association with more advanced stages of NAFLD (i.e., NASH) and no data are available on the association between habitual diet and NASH in patients with T2D. Here, we provide data on this association, thus expanding current knowledge.
The first remarkable finding is that the nutrient distribution was largely similar in the NASH or NO-NASH cluster. This is at variance with studies assessing the relation between NAFDL and diet composition in non-diabetic people which describe higher intakes of cholesterol, saturated fat [42,43] and added sugars [44,45] in individuals with NAFLD in comparison with matched controls without NAFLD. This inconsistency might be related to differences in the study design; in fact, we studied a population consisting of patients with T2D regularly attending diabetes clinics and who, therefore, may have restricted the consumption of the above-mentioned items as a result of medical advice, thus diluting the association.
The second relevant finding of this study is the association between fibre, micronutrient intake and NASH. Interestingly, despite the composition in macronutrients being similar between groups, the overall quality of the diet was very different between groups; with this regard, the intake of fibre, vitamins and polyphenols was significantly lower in the cluster NASH. These results are in line with epidemiological and clinical studies performed in patients without T2D [23,46,47]. All together, available evidence suggests that vitamins and polyphenols might prevent the advance of steatosis to NASH, probably restoring oxidative stress and reducing the transcription of the pro-inflammatory cytokines, which are the main drivers in the progression from NAFL to NASH [24,48,49]. Furthermore, dietary fibre might positively influence NAFL by acting on postprandial metabolic state, decreasing glucose absorption with a consequent reduction of the hepatic influx of glucose and de-novo lipo-genesis [22]. In addition, dietary fibre might stimulate a healthy gut microbiota, consequently decreasing the development of tissue inflammation and liver injury that led to NASH [50,51] and expanding also to NASH the interest in bioactive food compounds for T2D.
In terms of food groups, the cluster NASH was characterized by a lower consumption of whole grain bread, legumes and nuts, vegetables, fruits, fatty fish, milk and yogurt and a higher consumption of pasta, rice, potatoes, red meat and processed meat, providing data on the relation between food groups, NASH and T2D in line with those available for people without diabetes [43,52,53].
These data indicate that overall the NO-NASH dietary pattern is close to the Mediterranean dietary model, contributing to the growing evidence suggesting this model as the reference nutritional pattern to prevent and treat NAFLD [14,54], also in people with T2D. The beneficial effects of the Mediterranean diet on NAFLD might be related to dietary components such as dietary fibre, polyphenols and vitamins, that lead to the enhancement in the most important risk factors of NAFLD, such as BMI, insulin resistance and serum triglycerides [54], which are also key pathogenic factors for the development of T2D and major determinants of blood glucose control once diabetes has developed.
To our knowledge, this is the first epidemiological study on a large population of patients with T2D to evaluate the association between NASH and different dietary components and food groups, in a real-life setting.
There are still many open questions with respect to dietary treatment in individuals with both NASH and T2D. Importantly, in spite of the intimate relation between NAFLD and T2D, there are few nutritional intervention trials in which patients with coexisting T2D and NASH have been included. Therefore, it is unclear whether results from the numerous trials performed in patients with NASH and without T2D can be generalized to patients with both diseases. This study, by including a detailed analysis of both vegetable-based and animal-based foods, raises hypotheses on the overall dietary approach for NASH in people with diabetes, which could require confirmation in future large randomized-controlled trials.
Some limitations of the study must be acknowledged. First, the causal relationship between dietary components, Mediterranean dietary score and NASH cannot be proven due to the cross-sectional study design. Second, potential confounding from unmeasured lifestyle factors, such as physical activity level, might exist. Furthermore, data regarding dietary habits were collected only once and, consequently, could be prone to seasonal fluctuation and recall bias. Finally, NASH was detected by an indirect index currently accepted by NAFLD guidelines [16,55]. This index, although not specifically developed for people with diabetes was, however, validated in people with obesity who share several metabolic and clinical features with T2D (obesity, excess of visceral fat, insulin resistance and high prevalence of NASH), [15].
These limitations are counterbalanced by several strengths: a large sample size, a well-defined population of patients with T2D studied within the context of real-life clinical practice, the collection of nutritional and clinical data according to standard methods and biochemical measurements performed in a centralized laboratory.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this is one of the first epidemiological studies to investigate the dietary correlates of NASH in free living people with T2D focusing on foods and food groups. The results provide insights regarding habitual food consumption and dietary components as correlates of NASH in people with coexisting diabetes, showing that the NO-NASH dietary pattern is characterized by a higher intake of whole grain-based foods, legumes, nuts, fruits, vegetables, fatty fish, milk and yogurt, translating into a higher intake of polyphenols, vitamins and fibre and a higher Mediterranean dietary score. These findings expand current knowledge by highlighting the potential for dietary components in the prevention/treatment of NASH in people with T2D.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.V., G.D.P. and O.V.; methodology, M.V., G.C., P.C., L.B., S.S. and V.L.; formal analysis, M.V. and G.D.P.; data curation, M.V., G.D.P. and M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.V. and G.D.P.; writing—review and editing, M.M. and O.V.; supervision, O.V. and G.R.; funding acquisition, O.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported by the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) within the Independent Drug Research Program—contract number FARM6T9CET—and by Diabete Ricerca, the non-profit Research Foundation of the Italian Diabetes Society. The funding agency played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the FEDERICO II UNIVERISTY Ethics Committee (protocol code: 123/08; date of approval: 21 January 2008).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The participation of the patients in the study is gratefully acknowledged. We thank all the investigators and the dietitians in the TOSCA.IT centers for their excellent cooperation. We are also indebted to the administrative personnel of the Italian Diabetes Society (SID) for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Cotter, T.G.; Rinella, M. Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease 2020: The State of the Disease. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 1851–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Lazarus, J.V.; Colombo, M.; Cortez-Pinto, H.; Huang, T.T.; Miller, V.; Ninburg, M.; Schattenberg, J.M.; Seim, L.; Wong, V.W.S.; Zelber-Sagi, S. NAFLD—Sounding the alarm on a silent epidemic. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020, 17, 377–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Younossi, Z.M.; Koenig, A.B.; Abdelatif, D.; Fazel, Y.; Henry, L.; Wymer, M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology 2016, 64, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Targher, G. From nonalcoholic fatty liver disease to metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: More than a single-letter change in an acronym. Hepatoma Res. 2021, 7, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cusi, K. Time to Include Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in the Management of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2020, 43, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gastaldelli, A.; Cusi, K. From NASH to diabetes and from diabetes to NASH: Mechanisms and treatment options. JHEP Rep. 2019, 1, 312–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Lomonaco, R.; Bril, F.; Portillo-Sanchez, P.; Ortiz-Lopez, C.; Orsak, B.; Biernacki, D.; Lo, M.; Suman, A.; Weber, M.H.; Cusi, K. Metabolic Impact of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis in Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2016, 39, 632–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Bril, F.; Cusi, K. Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Call to Action. Diabetes Care 2017, 40, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Targher, G.; Bertolini, L.; Rodella, S.; Tessari, R.; Zenari, L.; Lippi, G.; Arcaro, G. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is independently associated with an increased incidence of cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2007, 30, 2119–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Targher, G.; Marra, F.; Marchesini, G. Increased risk of cardiovascular disease in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Causal effect or epiphenomenon? Diabetologia 2008, 51, 1947–1953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Hazlehurst, J.M.; Woods, C.; Marjot, T.; Cobbold, J.F.; Tomlinson, J.W. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and diabetes. Metabolism 2016, 65, 1096–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Stefan, N.; Cusi, K. A global view of the interplay between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022, 10, 284–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Diehl, A.M.; Day, C. Cause, Pathogenesis, and Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 2063–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL); European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD); European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2016, 64, 1388–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Otgonsuren, M.; Estep, M.J.; Hossain, N.; Younossi, E.; Frost, S.; Henry, L.; Hunt, S.; Fang, Y.; Goodman, Z.; Younossi, Z.M. Single non-invasive model to diagnose non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2014, 29, 2006–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Iqbal, U.; Perumpail, B.J.; Akhtar, D.; Kim, D.; Ahmed, A. The Epidemiology, Risk Profiling and Diagnostic Challenges of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Medicines 2019, 6, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Jensen, T.; Abdelmalek, M.F.; Sullivan, S.; Nadeau, K.J.; Green, M.; Roncal, C.; Nakagawa, T.; Kuwabara, M.; Sato, Y.; Kang, D.H.; et al. Fructose and sugar: A major mediator of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2018, 68, 1063–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Perdomo, C.M.; Frühbeck, G.; Escalada, J. Impact of Nutritional Changes on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Nutrients 2019, 11, 677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Della Pepa, G.; Vetrani, C.; Lombardi, G.; Bozzetto, L.; Annuzzi, G.; Rivellese, A.A. Isocaloric Dietary Changes and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in High Cardiometabolic Risk Individuals. Nutrients 2017, 26, 1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Valtueña, S.; Pellegrini, N.; Ardigò, D.; Del Rio, D.; Numeroso, F.; Scazzina, F.; Monti, L.; Zavaroni, I.; Brighenti, F. Dietary glycemic index and liver steatosis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2006, 84, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Berná, G.; Romero-Gomez, M. The role of nutrition in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Pathophysiology and management. Liver Int. 2020, 40, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Zhao, H.; Yang, A.; Mao, L.; Quan, Y.; Cui, J.; Sun, Y. Association Between Dietary Fiber Intake and Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Adults. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 593735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ivancovsky-Wajcman, D.; Fliss-Isakov, N.; Salomone, F.; Webb, M.; Shibolet, O.; Kariv, R.; Zelber-Sagi, S. Dietary vitamin E and C intake is inversely associated with the severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig. Liver Dis. 2019, 51, 1698–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Salehi-Sahlabadi, A.; Teymoori, F.; Jabbari, M.; Momeni, A.; Mokari-Yamchi, A.; Sohouli, M.; Hekmatdoost, A. Dietary polyphenols and the odds of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A case-control study. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2021, 41, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Parry, S.A.; Hodson, L. Managing NAFLD in Type 2 Diabetes: The Effect of Lifestyle Interventions, a Narrative Review. Adv. Ther. 2020, 37, 1381–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Evert, A.B.; Dennison, M.; Gardner, C.D.; Garvey, W.T.; Lau, K.H.K.; MacLeod, J.; Mitri, J.; Pereira, R.F.; Rawlings, K.; Robinson, S.; et al. Nutrition Therapy for Adults with Diabetes or Prediabetes: A Consensus Report. Diabetes Care 2019, 42, 731–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Hou, L.; Ge, L.; Wang, Q.; He, J.; Qin, T.; Cao, L.; Cao, C.; Liu, D.; Liu, X.; Yang, K. Nutritional Recommendations for Type 2 Diabetes: An International Review of 15 Guidelines. Can. J. Diabetes 2022, 2, S1499–S2671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vitale, M.; Masulli, M.; Rivellese, A.A.; Bonora, E.; Babini, A.C.; Sartore, G.; Corsi, L.; Buzzetti, R.; Citro, G.; Baldassarre, M.P.A.; et al. Pasta Consumption and Connected Dietary Habits: Associations with Glucose Control, Adiposity Measures, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in People with Type 2 Diabetes-TOSCA.IT Study. Nutrients 2019, 30, 101. [Google Scholar]
  29. Vaccaro, O.; Masulli, M.; Bonora, E.; Del Prato, S.; Giorda, C.B.; Maggioni, A.P.; Mocarelli, P.; Nicolucci, A.; Rivellese, A.A.; Squatrito, S.; et al. Addition of either pioglitazone or a sulfonylurea in type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled with metformin alone: Impact on cardiovascular events. A randomized controlled trial. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2012, 22, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Vaccaro, O.; Masulli, M.; Nicolucci, A.; Bonora, E.; Del Prato, S.; Maggioni, A.P.; Rivellese, A.A.; Squatrito, S.; Giorda, C.B.; Sesti, G.; et al. Effects on the incidence of cardiovascular events of the addition of pioglitazone versus sulfonylureas in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin (TOSCA.IT): A randomized, multicenter trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017, 5, 887–897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Pala, V.; Sieri, S.; Palli, D.; Salvini, S.; Berrino, F.; Bellegotti, M.; Frasca, G.; Tumino, R.; Sacerdote, C.; Fiorini, L.; et al. Diet in the Italian EPIC cohorts: Presentation of data and methodological issues. Tumori J. 2003, 89, 594–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Pisani, P.; Faggiano, F.; Krogh, V.; Palli, D.; Vineis, P.; Berrino, F. Relative validity and reproducibility of a food frequency dietary questionnaire for use in the Italian EPIC centres. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997, 26, S152–S160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Vitale, M.; Masulli, M.; Cocozza, S.; Anichini, R.; Babini, A.C.; Boemi, M.; Bonora, E.; Buzzetti, R.; Carpinteri, R.; Caselli, C.; et al. TOSCA.IT Study Group. Sex differences in food choices, adherence to dietary recommendations and plasma lipid profile in type 2 diabetes—The TOSCA.IT study. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2016, 26, 879–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Vitale, M.; Masulli, M.; Rivellese, A.A.; Bonora, E.; Cappellini, F.; Nicolucci, A.; Squatrito, S.; Antenucci, D.; Barrea, A.; Bianchi, C.; et al. TOSCA.IT Study Group. Dietary intake and major food sources of polyphenols in people with type 2 diabetes: The TOSCA.IT Study. Eur. J. Nutr. 2018, 57, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Salvini, S.; Parpinel, M.; Gnagnarella, P.; Maisonneuve, P.; Turrini, A. Banca Dati di Composizione Degli Alimenti per Studi Epidemiologici in Italia; Istituto Europeo di Oncologia: Milan, Italy, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  36. Carnovale, E.; Marletta, L. Tabella di Composizione Degli Alimenti; Crea-Nut (ex INRAN): Rome, Italy, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bhagwat, S.; Haytowitz, D.B.; Holden, J.M. USDA Database for the Flavonoid Content of Selected Foods, Release 3.1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. 2014; Nutrient Data Laboratory Home Page. Available online: http://www.ars.usda.gov/nutrientdata/flav (accessed on 16 September 2022).
  38. Rothwell, J.A.; Pérez-Jiménez, J.; Neveu, V.; Medina-Ramon, A.; M’Hiri, N.; Garcia Lobato, P.; Manach, C.; Knox, K.; Eisner, R.; Wishart, D.; et al. Phenol-Explorer 3.0: A Major Update of the Phenol-Explorer Database to Incorporate Data on the Effects of Food Processing on Polyphenol Content. Database. 2013. Available online: https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bat070 (accessed on 26 September 2022). [CrossRef]
  39. Buckland, G.; González, C.A.; Agudo, A.; Vilardell, M.; Berenguer, A.; Amiano, P.; Ardanaz, E.; Arriola, L.; Barricarte, A.; Basterretxea, M.; et al. Adherence to the Mediterranean diet and risk of coronary heart disease in the Spanish EPIC Cohort Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2009, 170, 1518–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vitale, M.; Masulli, M.; Calabrese, I.; Rivellese, A.A.; Bonora, E.; Signorini, S.; Perriello, G.; Squatrito, S.; Buzzetti, R.; Sartore, G.; et al. TOSCA.IT Study Group. Impact of a Mediterranean Dietary Pattern and Its Components on Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Glucose Control, and Body Weight in People with Type 2 Diabetes: A Real-Life Study. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Yki-Järvinen, H.; Luukkonen, P.K.; Hodson, L.; Moore, J.B. Dietary carbohydrates and fats in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021, 18, 770–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fan, J.G.; Cao, H.X. Role of diet and nutritional management in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2013, 28, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zelber-Sagi, S.; Ratziu, V.; Oren, R. Nutrition and physical activity in NAFLD: An overview of the epidemiological evidence. World J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 17, 3377–3389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. He, K.; Li, Y.; Guo, X.; Zhong, L.; Tang, S. Food groups and the likelihood of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Nutr. 2020, 124, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Chung, M.; Ma, J.; Patel, K.; Berger, S.; Lau, J.; Lichtenstein, A.H. Fructose, high-fructose corn syrup, sucrose, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease or indexes of liver health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 100, 833–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Bayram, H.M.; Majoo, F.M.; Ozturkcan, A. Polyphenols in the prevention and treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: An update of preclinical and clinical studies. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN. 2021, 44, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Abenavoli, L.; Larussa, T.; Corea, A.; Procopio, A.C.; Boccuto, L.; Dallio, M.; Federico, A.; Luzza, F. Dietary Polyphenols and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Nutrients 2021, 13, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Abe, R.A.M.; Masroor, A.; Khorochkov, A.; Prieto, J.; Singh, K.B.; Nnadozie, M.C.; Abdal, M.; Shrestha, N.; Mohammed, L. The Role of Vitamins in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review. Cureus 2021, 13, e16855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rodriguez-Ramiro, I.; Vauzour, D.; Minihane, A.M. Polyphenols and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Impact and mechanisms. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2016, 75, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Pérez-Montes de Oca, A.; Julián, M.T.; Ramos, A.; Puig-Domingo, M.; Alonso, N. Microbiota, Fiber, and NAFLD: Is There Any Connection? Nutrients 2020, 12, 3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bozzetto, L.; Annuzzi, G.; Ragucci, M.; Di Donato, O.; Della Pepa, G.; Della Corte, G.; Griffo, E.; Anniballi, G.; Giacco, A.; Mancini, M.; et al. Insulin resistance, postprandial GLP-1 and adaptive immunity are the main predictors of NAFLD in a homogeneous population at high cardiovascular risk. Nutr. Metab. Cardiovasc. Dis. 2016, 26, 623–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zelber-Sagi, S.; Ivancovsky-Wajcman, D.; Fliss Isakov, N.; Webb, M.; Orenstein, D.; Shibolet, O.; Kariv, R. High red and processed meat consumption is associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and insulin resistance. J. Hepatol. 2018, 68, 1239–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hashemian, M.; Poustchi, H.; Merat, S.; Abnet, C.; Malekzadeh, R.; Etemadi, A. Red Meat Consumption and Risk of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in a Population with Low Red Meat Consumption. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 2020, 29, 1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Akhlaghi, M.; Ghasemi-Nasab, M.; Riasatian, M. Mediterranean diet for patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and clinical investigations. J. Diabetes Metab. Disord. 2020, 19, 575–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Castera, L.; Friedrich-Rust, M.; Loomba, R. Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Disease in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 1264–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. General characteristics and metabolic profile in the clusters NASH or NO-NASH.
Table 1. General characteristics and metabolic profile in the clusters NASH or NO-NASH.
Cluster NASH
(n. 642)
Cluster NO-NASH
(n. 1384)
p-Value
Age (years)62 ± 763 ± 60.006
Smoking (%)34.432.60.209
Diabetes duration (years)8 ± 59 ± 60.004
BMI (kg/m2)32 ± 429 ± 4<0.0001
Waist circumference (cm)108 ± 11102 ± 11<0.0001
Hip circumference (cm)109 ± 11105 ± 10<0.0001
Waist/Hip ratio 0.99 ± 0.980.96 ± 0.910.003
Systolic blood pressure (mm/Hg)136 ± 16134 ± 150.004
Diastolic blood pressure (mm/Hg)81 ± 980 ± 90.002
HbA1c (%)7.8 ± 0.57.6 ± 0.5<0.0001
Plasma Glucose (mg/dL)185 ± 39159 ± 32<0.0001
Plasma Insulin (μU/mL)23.5 ± 12.29.4 ± 3.6<0.0001
HOMA-IR10.7 ± 7.03.6 ± 1.4<0.0001
Plasma HDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)43 ± 1248 ± 12<0.0001
Plasma LDL-cholesterol (mg/dL)104 ± 30101 ± 360.045
Plasma Triglycerides (mg/dL)184 ± 114137 ± 66<0.0001
C-reactive protein (mg/dL)0.5 ± 2.30.4 ± 1.70.246
eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2)91.4 ± 2.692.7 ± 2.50.311
AST (U/L)24 ± 1218 ± 9<0.0001
ALT (U/L)25 ± 1517 ± 10<0.0001
GGT (U/L)47 ± 5431 ± 28<0.0001
Use of antihypertensive drugs (%)95.391.20.652
Use of Lipid lowering drugs (%)63.661.10.441
Data are means ± SD. BMI: body mass index; HbA1c: glycated hemoglobin; HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; ALT: alanine aminotransferase; GGT: gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase.
Table 2. Energy intake and nutrient composition of the habitual diet in in the clusters NASH or NO-NASH.
Table 2. Energy intake and nutrient composition of the habitual diet in in the clusters NASH or NO-NASH.
Cluster NASH
(n. 642)
Cluster NO-NASH
(n. 1384)
p-Value
Energy (Kcal/day)1755 ± 6181843 ± 6920.006
Total Proteins (% TEI)18.4 ± 2.618.2 ± 2.60.272
Proteins from animal food sources (% TEI)12.7 ± 3.212.5 ± 3.20.276
Proteins from vegetable food sources (% TEI)5.7 ± 1.15.7 ± 1.10.574
Total Lipids (% TE)37.1 ± 6.236.6 ± 6.10.089
Saturated fatty acids (% TEI)12.2 ± 2.512.0 ± 2.50.179
Monounsaturated fatty acids (% TEI)18.3 ± 3.818.0 ± 3.80.105
Polyunsaturated fatty acids (% TEI)4.5 ± 1.14.5 ± 1.10.253
n-3 (% TEI)0.55 ± 0.110.55 ± 0.120.930
n-6 (% TEI)3.60 ± 1.033.56 ± 1.030.394
Total cholesterol (mg/1000 kcal/day)185 ± 53181 ± 540.130
Total Carbohydrates (% TEI)44.4 ± 7.745.1 ± 7.40.081
Added sugars (% TEI)2.37 ± 3.012.24 ± 3.240.376
Fibre (g/1000 kcal/day)10.5 ± 2.611.0 ± 2.7<0.0001
Glycemic Index51.6 ± 3.551.9 ± 3.40.172
Glycemic Load (%)105.1 ± 46.6111.4 ± 50.10.019
Alcohol (g/day)9.9 ± 15.211.0 ± 15.30.146
Vitamin-C (mg/day)105 ± 49115 ± 58<0.0001
β-carotene (mg/day)2286 ± 13072649 ± 1830<0.0001
Vitamin E (mg/day)6.42 ± 2.277.00 ± 2.90<0.0001
Vitamin D (mg/day)2.47 ± 1.292.53 ± 1.530.398
TEAC5.47 ± 2.256.00 ± 2.42<0.0001
TRAP8.15 ± 3.648.91 ± 3.76<0.0001
FRAP17.04 ± 7.1118.46 ± 7.45<0.0001
Total polyphenols (mg/1000 kcal/day)377.4 ± 163.1386.1 ± 165.40.026
Data are means ± SD. TEI: total energy intake; TEAC: trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity; TRAP: total radical-trapping antioxidant parameter; FRAP: ferric reducing-antioxidant power.
Table 3. Consumption of specific food items (g/1000 Kcal/day), in the clusters NASH or NO-NASH.
Table 3. Consumption of specific food items (g/1000 Kcal/day), in the clusters NASH or NO-NASH.
Cluster NASH
(n. 642)
Cluster NO-NASH
(n. 1384)
p-Value
Cereals97.9 ± 35.194.8 ± 36.60.075
Pasta28.2 ± 17.726.8 ± 16.30.016
Rice3.55 ± 4.363.09 ± 4.040.021
Bread35.6 ± 31.136.1 ± 32.60.738
Wholegrain Bread6.7 ± 15.88.7 ± 17.60.019
Legumes and Nuts13.6 ± 10.614.7 ± 11.80.049
Vegetables95.7 ± 49.697.4 ± 49.70.047
Potatoes11.7 ± 12.510.1 ± 14.00.013
Fruits151.1 ± 86.1164.3 ± 92.90.002
Meat73.7 ± 30.768.4 ± 29.1<0.0001
Red meat56.3 ± 26.852.7 ± 25.80.004
White meat1.5 ± 0.91.9 ± 0.50.001
Processed meat15.6 ± 11.214.0 ± 10.10.003
Fish23.7 ± 18.823.0 ± 17.10.390
Fatty fish14.6 ± 12.116.3 ± 11.80.005
Lean fish8.5 ± 6.08.2 ± 6.50.147
Dairy products100.4 ± 54.9125.3 ± 60.1<0.0001
Cheese20.1 ± 13.020.0 ± 13.40.965
Milk and Yogurt80.6 ± 76.0102.9 ± 88.0<0.0001
Eggs10.6 ± 7.210.4 ± 7.50.543
Vegetable oils14.0 ± 6.013.9 ± 6.00.897
Oils from animal origin1.56 ± 1.541.43 ± 1.420.067
rMED score8.1 ± 2.69.7 ± 2.50.001
Data are means ± SD. rMED: relative Mediterranean Diet.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vitale, M.; Della Pepa, G.; Costabile, G.; Bozzetto, L.; Cipriano, P.; Signorini, S.; Leoni, V.; Riccardi, G.; Vaccaro, O.; Masulli, M. Association between Diet Quality and Index of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis in a Large Population of People with Type 2 Diabetes: Data from the TOSCA.IT Study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 5339. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14245339

AMA Style

Vitale M, Della Pepa G, Costabile G, Bozzetto L, Cipriano P, Signorini S, Leoni V, Riccardi G, Vaccaro O, Masulli M. Association between Diet Quality and Index of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis in a Large Population of People with Type 2 Diabetes: Data from the TOSCA.IT Study. Nutrients. 2022; 14(24):5339. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14245339

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vitale, Marilena, Giuseppe Della Pepa, Giuseppina Costabile, Lutgarda Bozzetto, Paola Cipriano, Stefano Signorini, Valerio Leoni, Gabriele Riccardi, Olga Vaccaro, and Maria Masulli. 2022. "Association between Diet Quality and Index of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis in a Large Population of People with Type 2 Diabetes: Data from the TOSCA.IT Study" Nutrients 14, no. 24: 5339. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14245339

APA Style

Vitale, M., Della Pepa, G., Costabile, G., Bozzetto, L., Cipriano, P., Signorini, S., Leoni, V., Riccardi, G., Vaccaro, O., & Masulli, M. (2022). Association between Diet Quality and Index of Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis in a Large Population of People with Type 2 Diabetes: Data from the TOSCA.IT Study. Nutrients, 14(24), 5339. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14245339

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop