Small and Medium Enterprises’ Perspectives on Food Fortification Amid the Growing Burden of Malnutrition
, Chiara Ferraboschi 1, Kesso Gabrielle van Zutphen 1,2, Breda Gavin-Smith 1, Daniel Amanquah 1 and Klaus Kraemer 1,3,*Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The authors have tried to review on the topic “Small and medium enterprises’ perspectives on food fortification amid the growing burden of malnutrition,”. The authors have meticulously written all the sections of the manuscript. Malnutrition among inhabitants is major challenge for the researchers and need to provide the fortified food through different stake holders. Authors have excellently reviewed and cited the examples from the LMICs. I recommend the manuscript to be accepted in the present form.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
We are grateful for your valuable feedback and have considered your suggestions. A spell check has been done.
Reviewer 2 Report
Authors have written and article entitled “Small and Medium Enterprises’ Perspectives on Food Fortification Amid the Growing Burden of Malnutrition”. A well written and interesting article. It is really good that the authors have used relevant examples such as COVID-19 and the Ukraine war. Latest references have been included. Please find some minor comments to improve the article.
Methodology
It would be good to add a methodology section to your review.
General comment
Change the word “we” to “the authors” or this “review paper”. In scientific writing we usually do not use the word we. Comment applies throughout the paper
Author Response
We would like to thank the reviewer for pointing out these important areas for improvement, which we have taken into consideration. Indeed, we have now included a paragraph with a methodology described in the first section of the review. In addition, we adapted the style by replacing “we” with a passive voice style throughout the paper.
