Next Article in Journal
The Associations of Maternal Hemoglobin Concentration in Different Time Points and Its Changes during Pregnancy with Birth Weight Outcomes
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Dietary Counselling on Achieving or Maintaining Normal Nutritional Status in Patients with Early and Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Undergoing Perioperative Chemotherapy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Food Service Staff in Bangladeshi Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study

by
Md. Hasan Al Banna
1,†,
Md Shafiqul Islam Khan
1,†,
Humayra Rezyona
2,
Abdul-Aziz Seidu
3,4,5,
Mohammad Tazrian Abid
6,
Tasnu Ara
2,
Satyajit Kundu
6,7,
Bright Opoku Ahinkorah
8,
John Elvis Hagan, Jr.
9,10,*,
Md. Abu Tareq
1,
Musammet Rasheda Begum
11,
Mohammad Faizul Tawhid Chowdhury
12 and
Thomas Schack
10
1
Department of Food Microbiology, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Science, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Patuakhali 8602, Bangladesh
2
Department of Food and Nutrition, College of Home Economics, Azimpur, Dhaka 1205, Bangladesh
3
Department of Real Estate Management, Takoradi Technical University, Takoradi P.O. Box 256, Ghana
4
Centre for Gender and Advocacy, Takoradi Technical University, Takoradi P.O. Box 256, Ghana
5
College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville 4811, Australia
6
Faculty of Nutrition and Food Science, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Patuakhali 8602, Bangladesh
7
School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
8
School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney 2007, Australia
9
Department of Health, Physical Education & Recreation, College of Education Studies, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast PMB TF0494, Ghana
10
Neurocognition and Action-Biomechanics-Research Group, Faculty of Psychology and Sports Science, Bielefeld University, Postfach 10 01 31, 33501 Bielefeld, Germany
11
Department of Agricultural Economics and Social Sciences, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram 4225, Bangladesh
12
Junior Consultant (Opthalmology), Sheikh Fazilatunnesa Mujib Eye Hospital and Training Institute, Gopalganj 8100, Bangladesh
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Nutrients 2022, 14(12), 2540; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14122540
Submission received: 10 May 2022 / Revised: 13 June 2022 / Accepted: 15 June 2022 / Published: 18 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition Methodology & Assessment)

Abstract

:
Food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices among hospital food service staff are crucial in the prevention of foodborne disease outbreaks, as hospitalized patients are more vulnerable to potential hazards. This study, therefore, sought to assess the food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices of food service staff in Bangladeshi hospitals. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 191 food service staff from seven different hospitals in Dhaka and Chattogram from October 2021 to March 2022 using pretested questionnaires. Multiple linear regression was used to identify the factors associated with the food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices. The findings showed moderate knowledge but high levels of attitudes and practices of food safety among hospital food handlers. Food safety knowledge was significantly higher among males, participants from private hospitals and participants working in a hospital that had a food service supervisor and dietitian in charge of food service operations. Moreover, participants from private hospitals and participants working in a hospital that had a food service supervisor and dietitian in charge of food service operations had more positive attitudes and better practices regarding food safety. Hospital management should consider these factors for enhancing food handlers’ knowledge and increase training and supervision on food safety practices to reduce foodborne diseases and outbreaks.

1. Introduction

Globally, food safety is a major concern for consumers, food service institutions and regulatory authorities. Every year, millions of people around the world are hospitalized and even death due to the consumption of contaminated food [1]. About 70% of those foodborne illnesses were associated with food service establishments or catering, and the risk of death from hospital outbreaks was estimated to be three times higher than in other settings [2]. Epidemiological and surveillance data show that hospitals are becoming breeding grounds for foodborne diseases [3,4,5]. It is evident that inappropriate practices in food service establishments play a vital role in the causal chain of foodborne diseases. This phenomenon has also been shown to be critical in some nosocomial foodborne outbreaks in hospitals [4,6]. Moreover, hospital kitchens are listed as one of the main sources of contamination [3] that cause outbreaks of foodborne illness by cross-contamination [2]. A study on hospital-acquired listeriosis (i.e., a foodborne disease) was found to be linked to utensils used in hospital kitchens [3]. Meakins et al. [2] reported that 65% of hospital inpatients and 12% of staff were affected by Salmonellosis, and mortality risk was highest in foodborne disease outbreaks. Generally, food safety is more sensitive for hospitalized patients because they are more vulnerable to foodborne diseases than the general population due to low immunity and malnutrition [6], but sometimes less attention is given compared to other institutions [7]. An outbreak of a foodborne disease in hospitals can cause morbidity and mortality for anyone infected, especially the already vulnerable patients, and also cause service disruption leading to increase hospitalization costs [8,9].
In hospitals, food service staff can be a potential source of food contamination and hospital-related foodborne outbreaks, as they may transmit pathogens into foods throughout the chain of food preparation, processing, storage and distribution [6,10]. Serving patients food that is contaminated by poor hygienic practices of food handlers can lead to food poisoning, which can lead to an outbreak throughout the hospital [11,12].
In Bangladesh, the prevalence of foodborne diseases is significantly higher due to overpopulation, underdeveloped infrastructure and poor water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) conditions [13]. Each year, approximately 30 million people suffer from one form of foodborne disease in Bangladesh [14]. Diarrheal diseases, enteric fever and hepatitis are the top three foodborne diseases in Bangladesh [15]. In 2018, there were approximately 1,122,681 cases of diarrhea at different levels of healthcare facilities in Bangladesh [16], and the country spent $79 million on diarrhea treatment, estimating about 4% of GDP per capita that year [17]. According to the foodborne illness surveillance of the Dhaka-based Institute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research (IEDCR), there were an estimated 30,000 and 500 cases of enteric fever and hepatitis in 2015, respectively [18,19]. However, there is no data on foodborne illness outbreaks or food poisoning directly caused due to the food service staff or food handlers of hospitals in Bangladesh.
The health system in Bangladesh has undergone a number of reforms, including extensive health infrastructural development. This infrastructure is pluralistically defined across four key areas: government, the private sector, NGOs and donor agencies, among whom the government, or public sector, is accountable, not only for policy and regulation but also for funding and recruiting health workers [20]. Hospitals in Bangladesh are often overcrowded with patients, family caregivers and visitors, have intermittent water supply and an inadequate number of handwashing stations and toilets [21,22]. A recent study reported that only 15.4% of service receivers were found to be satisfied with the dietary services in a cancer research hospital in Bangladesh [23]. Proper monitoring and resources for infection control in hospitals are severely limited in Bangladesh, which leads to infections in the hospital staff and family caregivers [21,24,25]. To control communicable diseases, the Government of Bangladesh has enacted various acts [20], but the enforcement of food safety laws and regulations in the country is weak due to several limitations within legal and regulatory systems [18]. The Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS) and IEDCR under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) are involved in the food safety with its enforcement and surveillance activities that collect information regarding the severity and prevalence of foodborne illness and identify hotspots and definite sources of foodborne pathogens across Bangladesh [18]. However, there is a need to create a framework for collaborative operation agreements between the Bangladesh Food Safety Authority (BFSA), MoHFW, and other food control agencies to take regulatory actions to reduce food safety risks.
Several studies have been done to assess food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices of food handlers in hospitals in different countries such as India [26], Sri Lanka [27], Malaysia [28], Lebanon [29], Sudan [30], Jordan [31], South Africa [32] and Saudi Arabia [33]. These studies reported diversified levels of knowledge, attitudes and practices scores in different countries. Associations were found between food safety knowledge and sociodemographic factors such as age, education level, working experience, previous training courses and type of hospitals in some studies [28,29,33]. Many studies emphasized educational intervention programs or training sessions on food safety knowledge as they commenced a significant positive improvement in food handlers’ knowledge after an intervention [26,29,33]. Moreover, food handlers’ education level and years of experience were associated with food safety practices [29,33].
In Bangladesh, few studies have been conducted to evaluate food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices of meat handlers, chicken vendors, fish farmers, food handlers of baking industries and consumers’ knowledge and awareness of food safety [34,35,36,37,38]. While food safety in hospitals is a great matter of concern, there is a scarcity of published research on the knowledge, attitudes and practices of food service staff in Bangladeshi hospitals. For fostering and enforcing food safety in healthcare facilities, it is imperative to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices of food handlers in hospitals in Bangladesh. In order to address the gap in the literature, the current study aimed to assess the food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices of food service staff in Bangladeshi hospitals. This study also aims to examine the factors associated with food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices among the sample.

2. Methods and Materials

2.1. Study Settings

The current survey was conducted on 7 hospitals from two different sectors, private and public. The hospitals were conveniently chosen from Dhaka and Chattogram, two major cities in Bangladesh. In these hospitals, the meals are prepared in the hospitals’ kitchen and/or foods are sold in the cafeteria by food service staff who manage food services for patients, medical staff and visitors. Dietary regimens, patients’ needs and preferences are taken into consideration when plating meals. To ensure appropriate quality standards are maintained, monitoring panels have been appointed by these hospitals to inspect food hygiene and quality aspects of food services systems.

2.2. Study Design, Subjects and Sampling

A hospital-based cross-sectional study was carried out from October 2021 to March 2022, aimed at assessing food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices among food service staff in the selected hospitals of Bangladesh. In this study, we defined food service staff as employees who work in the hospital kitchens (e.g., cooks, utensils cleaners and supporting staff), handle food from the kitchen to wards/cabins and work in the cafeteria dining for medical staff and visitors (e.g., storekeepers, waiters and catering staff). The study subjects were included when the following inclusion criteria were fulfilled: (i) food service staff aged 18 years and above and (ii) Bangladeshi by birth. Food service staff who were ill and out of the service during the data collection period were excluded from the study. A purposive sampling technique was applied to select the participants in this study [39]. The study protocols and design were reviewed, revised and approved by the Research Ethical Committee (REC) of the Department of Food Microbiology, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladesh (approval number: FMB: 13/09/2021:03).

2.3. Sample Size Calculation

A sample size of 384 was calculated using Cochran’s formula [34], n o = Z 2 pq e 2 , where no = Cochran’s sample size recommendation, Z is 1.96 at 95% confidence interval, e is the margin of error at 5% (standard deviation of 0.05) and q = 1 − p. Since there was no previous study on food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices among food service staff working in Bangladeshi hospitals, p = 50% was used. Later, the following modified Cochran’s formula [34] was used for calculating the adjusted sample size in a small population: n =   n o 1 +   ( n o 1 ) N , here n = adjusted sample size, no = 384 (Cochran’s sample size recommendation) and N = population size (assuming 1000 food service staff work in hospitals in these study areas). This calculation was given a minimum sample size of 277. We interviewed all the food service staff available on the day of data collection for each hospital. However, this study included a sample of 191 food service staff. Due to the exclusion procedures (i.e., illness and out of work station during data collection period), lack of resources and a limited number of hospitals included in the study, we were unable to obtain the optimum sample size.

2.4. Interviews and Data Collection

So as to obtain permission to collect the data, a letter was sent to the hospital administrator of each hospital explaining the purpose, implication and investigation process of the research. Following the administrative approval of the hospitals, research staff physically contacted the head of the kitchen or the dietary department in the study hospitals to know the rules of movement in the hospital areas, feasibility and appropriate time of data collection. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a structured questionnaire. Three interviewers, who were trained by the principal investigator of the study, visited the hospitals and were responsible for data collection. The lead investigator of the study arranged an online training session to train the data collectors about different sections of the questionnaire, interview techniques and the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the study. In terms of the food service staff of the patients’ kitchen, the interview was taken in the resting room of the kitchen as access to the kitchen was restricted. In the case of cafeteria food service staff, interviews were conducted in the cafeteria dining area where medical staff and visitors ate their meals. The interview was executed according to the convenient time of both kitchen and cafeteria food service staff so that their work might not be hampered. At first, trained data collectors explained the objectives of the study to the participants and asked for their voluntary participation. Written consent was obtained from those who were willing to participate in the survey (verbal consent was taken from those who were illiterate). Each interview took 12–15 min to accomplish. Unique identifier codes were assigned to the questionnaire to assure the anonymity of the participants.

2.5. Study Variables and Measures

Several published, reliable and validated questionnaires that had been used in similar studies [29,30,40,41] served as guides for developing the structured questionnaire. The questionnaire contained a total of 58 items of close-ended questions, divided into four parts, as follows: (i) sociodemographic and employment-related information (14 questions), (ii) assessment of food safety knowledge (18 questions), (iii) assessment of food safety attitude (11 questions) and (iv) assessment of food safety practices (15 questions).

2.5.1. Explanatory Variables

Participants’ sociodemographic information, such as their age (years), gender, marital status, education status, employment type, monthly income, work experience (years), current employment position, food safety training status and idea about hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) system were included. Different characteristics relating to the hospitals, such as the employed hospital type, number of beds in the hospitals, working sector, type of hospital, the number of beds in the hospital and the person in charge of food service operations, were also collected.

2.5.2. Outcome Measures

A set of 18 questions with three possible answers (“True”, “False” and “Don’t know”) was used to assess the participants’ knowledge regarding food safety. This section included information on personal hygiene and sanitation, cross-contamination, utensils cleaning, correct temperature, reheating of food and foodborne pathogens and illness. According to Banna et al. [34] and Bou-Mitri et al. [29], each correct answer that was addressed as “True” was marked as 1 point, while “False” and “Don’t know” responses were given zero points in this section, except question number five. For question number “5”, 1 point was attributed for “False” while zero points were given for “True” and “Don’t know” responses. Each participant could obtain a total score between 0 and 18, and a higher score indicated a higher level of food safety knowledge.
Participants’ attitudes toward food safety were assessed by an 11-items scale. This section included information on responsibility for food safety measures, the impact of foodborne illness on socio-economic developments, food contamination and maintenance of refrigerators. All questions had three possible answers: “agree”, “disagree” and “no idea”. For each response of “agree”, 1 point was given, whereas for responses of “disagree” and “no idea”, the score was 0 [29]. Summing up the total scores (range: 0–11) contributed to gathering estimation of the food safety attitudes of a participant.
Food safety practices included information on the role of personal hygiene, hand-washing practices and strategies against foodborne diseases and cross-contamination. A list of 15 questions was provided, and practices were evaluated on an ordinal scale of 0 to 4 (Never = 0, Rarely = 1, Sometimes = 2, Often = 3, Always = 4). Only 4 questions were scored in reverse (items 9, 10, 11 and 15) where “Never”, “Rarely”, “Sometimes”, “Often” and “Always” were considered as “4”, “3”, “2”, “1” and “0” points, respectively. The calculated total score of food safety practices ranged from 0 to 60, and a higher score indicated a good level of practice [34].

2.6. Validity and Reliability of the Questionnaire

The translation back-translation technique was used to check the content validity of the questionnaire [31]. The questionnaire was translated from English to Bengali (native language) by a bilingual translator, which was checked by an independent research assistant. Back-translation of the questionnaire was conducted by a separate independent bilingual research assistant to check for consistency and to avoid any bias in the questionnaire. Questionnaire reliability, the degree to which the food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices test was consistent, was measured using a pilot survey and internal consistency of the questionnaire. The questionnaire was pre-tested among a small sample of food service staff from the hospital cafeteria (n = 10) to ensure that there were no ambiguous or unclear questions. However, the results from the pilot survey were not included in the final analysis. The internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha, α) for the food safety knowledge, attitudes and practice sections was 0.79, 0.71 and 0.73, respectively, indicating an acceptable level of reliability.

2.7. Statistical Analyses

Descriptive statistics such as frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviations were computed to summarize variables of interest. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent sample t-test were used to compare food safety knowledge scores across the independent variables (normally distributed). When data follow a skewed distribution, non-parametric analysis is the most appropriate method for analyzing the data. Kruskal–Wallis tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare food safety attitudes and practices scores across their sociodemographic and employment characteristics. A multiple linear model was used to identify the factors associated with high scores of food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices. All assumptions were checked regarding linear regression after fitting the model. Regression coefficients (β) with 95% CI were used to quantify associations. All statistical analyses were done using Stata (BE version 17.0, StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA) and SPSS (IBM version 23.0, Armonk, NY, USA), and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Sociodemographic and Employment-Related Characteristics of Study Participants (N = 191)

Of the 191 participants, most of them (90.6%) were male. The mean age of the participants was 26.8 years (SD = 7.2), ranging between 18 and 50 years. Nearly half of the participants (46.1%) had a primary level of education, and about 20% had no formal education. Almost two-thirds of the participants’ (61%) monthly income was 10,000 to 20,000 Bangladeshi taka, BDT (111.63 to 223.26 USD). Only 18% of the employees served more than 10 years, while most were full-time employees (81.7%). Almost half of the respondents (43.5%) did not receive any training on food safety, and most of the respondents (76.4%) had no idea about HACCP. A majority (85%) of the employees were from private hospitals, where 40.8% worked in the patient meals sector (Table 1).

3.2. Food Safety Knowledge and Its Associated Factors among Food Handlers in Bangladeshi Hospitals

An assessment of food safety knowledge of food handlers working at hospitals is summarized in Table 2. The majority of the participants reported high knowledge of cross-contamination (87.4%), proper cleaning procedures of the equipment (94.8%), vulnerable groups for food poisoning (76.4%) and disease transmission such as wearing gloves while handling food reduced the risk of transmitting an infection to consumers (88.5%) and food service staff (86.4%) and necessary to take leave from work when affected by infectious diseases (87.4%). However, most of the participants showed lower knowledge regarding selected foodborne diseases (except for diarrhea) and foodborne pathogens (Table 2).
The mean food safety knowledge score was 10.75 on a scale of 18.0 (SD = 3.08, range: 3–18), and the overall correct response rate for the knowledge test was 59.7% (10.75/18 × 100), indicating moderate knowledge. The mean score of knowledge regarding food safety was varied significantly (all p < 0.05) by all the sociodemographic and employment-related characteristics of participants, except the participants’ age and marital status (Table 5).
The adjusted multiple linear analysis demonstrated that the knowledge score regarding food safety was significantly higher among male respondents compared to the females (β = 1.82, p < 0.05). Participants from private hospitals had higher knowledge of food safety than those from government hospitals (β = 4.00, p < 0.05). Compared to participants working in the patients’ meal sector, those who worked in the cafeteria were more knowledgeable (β = 4.69, p < 0.05). Similarly, participants working in a hospital that had a food service supervisor (β = 4.36, p < 0.05) and dietitian (β = 5.82, p < 0.05) in charge of food service operations had more knowledge compared to those from hospitals having a hospital administrator in charge (Table 6).

3.3. Food Safety Attitudes and Associated Factors among Food Handlers in Bangladeshi Hospitals

An assessment of food safety attitudes of food handlers working at hospitals is presented in Table 3. The majority of the respondents reported positive attitudes toward the responsibility for food safety measures (95.8%), food storage such as storing raw and cooked food separately (92.7%), food hygiene training (90.1%) and checking temperatures of refrigerators (80.6%). However, 41.9% and 60.7% of the respondents either disagreed or did not have any idea about the refrigeration of leftover foods and unsafe practice of leaving cooked food out of the refrigerator for more than two hours, respectively (Table 3).
The average food safety attitude score was 8.32 (SD = 1.96, range: 3–11) out of 11.0, and the overall correct response rate for the attitude test was 75.6% (8.32/11 × 100), indicating a higher level of positive attitudes. The average score of attitudes toward food safety significantly differed based on respondents’ work experience duration, employment type, employment position, receiving training on food safety, ideas about the HACCP system, hospital type, working sector and hospitals being in charge of food service operations (all p < 0.005) (Table 5).
The adjusted linear regression analysis showed that participants from private hospitals had a higher level of positive attitudes toward food safety than those from government hospitals (β = 2.29, p < 0.05). Those who worked in the cafeteria were more positive attitudes compared to participants working in the patients’ meal sector (β = 2.84, p < 0.05). Participants working in a hospital that had a food service supervisor (β = 2.11, p < 0.05) and dietitian (β = 2.37, p < 0.05) in charge of food service operations had more positive attitudes compared to those from hospitals having a hospital administrator in charge (Table 6).

3.4. Food Safety Practices and Associated Factors among Food Handlers in Hospitals

An evaluation of food safety practices of food handlers working at hospitals is shown in Table 4. The majority of the respondents reported that they always washed their hands before and after touching unwrapped raw and cooked food (70.2–89.5%) and maintained personal hygiene practices at workplaces such as wearing apron (70.7%), using hair cover (72.3%) and mask (77.5%) (Table 4).
The average score for food safety practices was 50.09 (SD = 9.58, range: 26–60) on a scale of 60.0, and the overall correct response rate for the practice test was 83.5% (50.09/60 × 100), indicating a higher level of practices. As shown in Table 5, the average score of practice was significantly varied by participants’ educational level, monthly income, work experience duration, employment position, receiving training on food safety, ideas about the HACCP system, hospital type, working sector and hospitals being in charge of food service operations (all p < 0.005) (Table 5).
Participants from private hospitals had higher practice scores regarding food safety compared to those from government hospitals (β = 15.93, p < 0.05). Participants working in a hospital that had a nutritionist (β = 5.15, p < 0.05), food service supervisor (β = 11.44, p < 0.05) and dietitian (β = 13.01, p < 0.05) in charge of food service operations had better food safety practice compared to those from hospitals that had a hospital administrator in charge (Table 6).

3.5. Association of Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice Scores

The adjusted regression models showed that participants’ food safety knowledge was positively associated with their attitude (β = 0.18, p < 0.05) but not with their practice (β = 0.31, p > 0.05). On the other hand, participants’ attitude scores were positively associated with their food safety practice scores (β = 0.87, p < 0.05) (Table 6).

4. Discussion

The current study assessed food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices of food service staff in Bangladeshi hospitals. Overall, this study found moderate knowledge among food handlers in the hospitals. The findings are consistent with previous studies in Malaysia [28], Sudan [30], Jordan [31], Saudi Arabia [33] and South Africa [32]. However, the findings differed from the study in Sri Lanka [27], which found that hospital food workers lacked basic food safety knowledge. It is critical to emphasize the importance of seeking continual improvement in the food service industry. These findings indicate the need for food handlers’ knowledge of food safety to be improved [10].
Specifically, the majority of the food service staff in the present study had poor knowledge of foodborne pathogens such as E. coli, Salmonella sp., Staphylococcus sp. and Clostridium botulinum and foodborne diseases such as hepatitis A and typhoid fever [except diarrhea]. These findings are similar to previous studies among hospital food service staff in Jordan [31] and Lebanon [29]. However, the majority of the respondents reported diarrhea as a symptom of foodborne illness; this was because it had been the most frequently occurring foodborne disease in Bangladesh [15]. Therefore, this study suggests the need for educational programs on food safety among hospital food handlers that include the causes of foodborne illnesses occurrence, pathogens associated with those illnesses, proper control measures and food handling practices, which can help to reduce foodborne disease outbreaks.
The mean score of knowledge regarding food safety varied significantly across sociodemographic characteristics. This is similar to other previous studies [33,34] on food safety knowledge. Specifically, the study showed that males had a significantly higher knowledge score compared to females. Sanlier and Konaklioglu reported a similar finding among males and females as far as food safety knowledge was concerned [42]. However, Patil et al. reported that men were found with poor food safety practices [43], while Alqurashi et al. in Saudi Arabia found that females had better food safety knowledge [33]. Despite this, Mclntyre et al. and Lee et al. did not find any association between gender and food safety knowledge [10,44]. The possible reasons for the variations in findings could be differences in study populations, setting and cultural variations.
As found in previous studies in Jordan [31] and Iran [45], this current study indicated that participants from private hospitals had higher knowledge, attitudes and practices scores on food safety than those from government hospitals. Begum et al. mentioned food service as one of the more emergent supporting services compared to other hospital services [23]. Usually, government hospitals have scarce funding, governance issues and a limited skilled workforce, although the Government of Bangladesh has been working hard to fill the gaps in the national healthcare system [23,46,47,48]. Another possible reason could be that most of the well-established private hospitals are located in the capital and divisional cities of Bangladesh. In addition, clients in private hospitals are monitored and subjected to regular refresher training on food safety compared to those in government hospitals, as explained by Osaili et al. [31].
Moreover, participants working in a hospital that had a food service supervisor and dietitian in charge of food service operations had more knowledge and had a more positive attitude toward food safety compared to those from hospitals having a hospital administrator in charge. Gruenfeldova et al. argued that guidance and supervision, in addition to training, are required for improved practices as training is not necessarily related to practices [49]. In addition, those who are supervised by food service supervisors, dietitians and nutritionists are usually given on-the-job training because of their knowledge of food safety practices [31]. This calls for the use of food service supervisors, dieticians and nutritionists who are well vexed in food management and safety to supervise food handlers to improve their knowledge and attitudes toward food safety.
Food handlers’ attitudes can influence their food safety behavior and practice, which can help to minimize the spread of foodborne diseases and other health conditions [50]. In terms of food safety attitudes, the study showed that the respondents had a higher level of positive attitudes toward food safety. This is consistent with previous studies in Bangladesh [50] and Sudan [30]. In terms of food safety practices, there was a higher level of practices among respondents (for example, the majority of them always washed their hands before and after touching unwrapped raw and cooked food). This is consistent with several previous studies in Indonesia [51], Malaysia [52], Jordan [53] and Bangladesh [50]. The study further showed that respondents with high monthly incomes were more likely to practice good food hygiene. Our finding confirms other studies in Ethiopia [54], Ghana [55] and Jordan [31]. The possible explanation is that those with high monthly income may be able to acquire additional materials needed to establish themselves in hygienic conditions [such as personal protective equipment, hand sanitizer] and acquire extra cooking training, including food safety practices [34]. In Bangladesh, hospital authorities generally provide PPE to staff; however, the quality and adequacy of PPE can be a concern, especially during the crisis period [56]. A recent study reported that nearly half of the respondents [50%] claimed that there was an inadequate supply of PPE for hospitals and healthcare workers [56]. Hence, financial solvency enables them to carry hygienic materials for their own use regardless of their workplace.
Consistent with previous studies [57,58], educational level and receiving training on food safety were associated with good food safety practices. The probable explanation is that those with a higher level of education can understand some of the regulations and instructions pertaining to food safety practices. In this study, training appears to have been significant for knowledge, attitudes and practice; yet only about half of the sample received food safety training. Training programs are therefore important for improving the knowledge of food handlers [59] and can be recommended for all food service employees, regardless of educational level. The study further showed that those with the idea that the HACCP system had good food safety practices. This calls for the need to raise more awareness about the HACCP system through training.

4.1. Strength and Limitations

Several limitations should be considered when interpreting the findings of this study. First, the study employed a cross-sectional study design; therefore, the findings can only be interpreted in terms of associations but cannot claim causality among the variables studied. Second, this study was unable to obtain the calculated sample size due to the exclusion procedures, lack of resources and a limited number of hospitals included in the study. Third, the hospitals and participants included in this study were selected from two major divisional cities of Bangladesh (Dhaka and Chattogram), so the findings cannot be generalized across the country. Further studies, particularly incorporating food service staff from other districts and sub-district-level hospitals, are highly recommended. Fourth, the selection of the hospitals and participants were both done using a non-probability sampling technique which might affect the findings of this study. Fifth, there was a lack of factor analysis to see if the scale items represent the same construct. Sixth, the female sample is much smaller than the male group. Further studies that include more hospitals and large and diverse samples are warranted to yield concrete statistical comparisons between male and female food service employees. Moreover, there is the possibility of social desirability and reporting biases from the respondents due to the self-report nature of the measurements used in this study. Despite these limitations, there are several strengths to this study. This was one of the first studies to consider the knowledge, attitudes and practice of food safety among hospital food handlers in Bangladesh. The findings of this study provide a baseline resource for policymakers and public health practitioners to aid with the development and implementation of evidence-based interventions and initiatives to improve food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices among food service staff in Bangladesh. Additionally, this study has methodological and analytical rigor with detailed and reproducible approaches for future research in other similar settings.

4.2. Implication for Practice

Foodborne illness and food safety are still significant public health issues in Bangladesh [13,60]. As hospitals are more susceptible to potential hazards, food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices among hospital food service staff are crucial in the prevention of foodborne disease outbreaks. The findings of our study can contribute to the growing body of literature and provide preliminary information on food service staff’s knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding food safety in Bangladeshi hospitals to inform policies and future research. Specifically, our study found that participants from private hospitals and those who work in the hospitals that had a food service supervisor and dietitian in charge of food services had higher knowledge, attitudes and practices on food safety compared to their counterparts. These findings highlight a dire need to appoint dietitians and nutritionists in Bangladeshi hospitals, particularly in governmental hospitals where there is an absence of food and nutrition experts who are proficient enough in dietary management, food safety and hygiene.

5. Conclusions

This current study found moderate knowledge but high levels of attitudes and practices of food safety among hospital food service staff. The knowledge, attitudes and practices varied by demographic and work-related characteristics. To increase food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices, the associated factors should be taken into consideration. Specifically, hospital management should increase training and supervision on food safety practices to reduce foodborne diseases and outbreaks. Further studies could also employ qualitative designs to gain a deeper understanding of the enablers and barriers toward food safety practices.

Author Contributions

M.H.A.B.: Conceptualization, Research design & Methodology, Writing—Original draft preparation. M.S.I.K.: Conceptualization, Research design, Writing—Reviewing, Editing & Supervision. H.R. and A.-A.S.: Visualization, Validation and Writing—Original draft, Reviewing & Editing. M.T.A. and T.A.: Data collection, Data curation, Writing—Original draft preparation. S.K.: Formal analysis, Writing—Original draft, Reviewing & Editing. B.O.A. and J.E.H.J.: Visualization, Validation and Writing—Original draft & critically revised the manuscript for intellectual content. M.A.T., M.R.B. and M.F.T.C.: Writing—Original draft, Reviewing & Editing. T.S.: Writing—Reviewing & Editing, the manuscript for intellectual content. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

1. This research was funded by Research and Training Center (RTC) of Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladesh (No: RTC-101/2021-2022). 2. The authors sincerely thank Bielefeld University, Germany for providing financial support through the Institutional Open Access Publication Fund for the article processing charge (APC).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the guidelines laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving study participants were approved by the Research Ethical Committee (REC) of the Department of Food Microbiology, Patuakhali Science and Technology University, Bangladesh [approval number: FMB: 13/09/2021:03].

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Data Availability Statement

Data used in this analysis can be obtained by contacting the first author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are also grateful to the hospitals’ authority for assisting the survey process. We would like to thank our study participants who humbly responded to our all questions and gave their valuable time.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization (WHO). World Health Day 2015: Food Safety. 2015. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/events/detail/2015/04/07/default-calendar/world-health-day-2015 (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  2. Meakins, S.; Adak, G.; Lopman, B.; O’Brien, S. General outbreaks of infectious intestinal disease (IID) in hospitals, England and Wales, 1992–2000. J. Hosp. Infect. 2003, 53, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Russini, V.; Spaziante, M.; Zottola, T.; Fermani, A.; Di Giampietro, G.; Blanco, G.; Fabietti, P.; Marrone, R.; Parisella, R.; Parrocchia, S.; et al. A Nosocomial Outbreak of Invasive Listeriosis in An Italian Hospital: Epidemiological and Genomic Features. Pathogens 2021, 10, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Guallar, C.; Ariza, J.; Dominguez, A.; Peña, C.; Grau, I.; Verdaguer, R.; Torrens, L.; Gudiol, F.; Domínguez, M.A. An Insidious Nosocomial Outbreak Due toSalmonella enteritidis. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2004, 25, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gikas, A.; Kritsotakis, E.; Maraki, S.; Roumbelaki, M.; Babalis, D.; Scoulica, E.; Panoulis, C.; Saloustros, E.; Kontopodis, E.; Samonis, G.; et al. A nosocomial, foodborne outbreak of Salmonella Enterica serovar Enteritidis in a University hospital in Greece: The importance of establishing HACCP systems in hospital catering. J. Hosp. Infect. 2007, 66, 194–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Maguire, H.; Pharoah, P.; Walsh, B.; Davison, C.; Barrie, D.; Threlfall, E.; Chambers, S. Hospital outbreak of Salmonella virchow possibly associated with a food handler. J. Hosp. Infect. 2000, 44, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Getachew, F. An Assessment of the Hygienic and Food Handling Practices in Selected Hospitals in Addis Ababa-Ethiopia. Master’s Thesis, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sudershan, R.V.; Naveen Kumar, R.; Kashinath, L.; Bhaskar, V.; Polasa, K. Foodborne Infections and Intoxications in Hyderabad India. Epidemiol. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 42961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Lund, B.M.; O’Brien, S.J. The Occurrence and Prevention of Foodborne Disease in Vulnerable People. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2011, 8, 961–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lee, H.K.; Halim, H.A.; Thong, K.L.; Chai, L.C. Assessment of Food Safety Knowledge, Attitude, Self-Reported Practices, and Microbiological Hand Hygiene of Food Handlers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Elward, A.; Grim, A.; Schroeder, P.; Kieffer, P.; Sellenriek, P.; Ferrett, R.; Adams, H.C.; Phillips, V.; Bartow, R.; Mays, D.; et al. Outbreak ofSalmonella javianaInfection at a Children’s Hospital. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2006, 27, 586–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ayliffe, G.A.J.; Lowbury, E.J.L.; Geddes, A.M. Control of Hospital Infection: A Practical Handbook; Springer: London, UK, 1992; 381p. [Google Scholar]
  13. Noor, R.; Feroz, F. Food safety in Bangladesh: A microbiological perspective. Stamford J. Microbiol. 2017, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Khairuzzaman, M.D.; Chowdhury, F.M.; Zaman, S.; Al Mamun, A.; Bari, L. Food Safety Challenges towards Safe, Healthy, and Nutritious Street Foods in Bangladesh. Int. J. Food Sci. 2014, 2014, 483519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Improving Food Safety in Bangladesh: Study Tour on Food-Borne Illness Surveillance. 2016. Available online: https://www.fao.org/in-action/food-safety-bangladesh/news/es/?page=2&ipp=5&no_cache=1&tx_dynalist_pi1[par]=YToxOntzOjE6IkwiO3M6MToiMiI7fQ== (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  16. DGHS. Real Time Health Information Dashboard. 2020. Available online: http://103.247.238.92/webportal/pages/dashboard_child_imci.php (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  17. Hasan, Z.; Mehdi, G.G.; De Broucker, G.; Ahmed, S.; Ali, W.; Del Campo, J.M.; Constenla, D.; Patenaude, B.; Uddin, J. The economic burden of diarrhea in children under 5 years in Bangladesh. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 107, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Suman, S.; Manyam, S.; Satyanarayana, K.V.; Vijayaraghavan, K. Food Safety System in Bangladesh: Current Status of Food Safety, Scientific Capability, and Industry Preparedness; Agreement No. 7200AA19LE00003; USAID: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  19. Institute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research (IEDCR). 2021. Available online: https://www.iedcr.gov.bd/website/images/PDF/foodborne_illness/AWD-2015.pdf (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  20. World Health Organization. Bangladesh Health System Review; WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific: Manila, Philippines, 2015.
  21. Rimi, N.A.; Sultana, R.; Luby, S.; Islam, M.S.; Uddin, M.; Hossain, M.J.; Zaman, R.; Nahar, N.; Gurley, E.S. Infrastructure and Contamination of the Physical Environment in Three Bangladeshi Hospitals: Putting Infection Control into Context. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e89085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Islam, M.S.; Luby, S.; Sultana, R.; Rimi, N.A.; Zaman, R.; Uddin, M.; Nahar, N.; Rahman, M.; Hossain, M.J.; Gurley, E.S. Family caregivers in public tertiary care hospitals in Bangladesh: Risks and opportunities for infection control. Am. J. Infect. Control 2014, 42, 305–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Begum, S.; Miah, K.A.; Saha, A.K.; Mittra, C.R.; Ahmed, M.J.A. Management of dietary services at National Institute of Cancer Research and Hospital (NICRH), Bangladesh. Asian J. Med. Biol. Res. 2020, 6, 548–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bhalla, A.; Pultz, N.J.; Gries, D.M.; Ray, A.J.; Eckstein, E.C.; Aron, D.C.; Donskey, C.J. Acquisition of Nosocomial Pathogens on Hands After Contact With Environmental Surfaces Near Hospitalized Patients. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2004, 25, 164–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Boyce, J.M. Environmental contamination makes an important contribution to hospital infection. J. Hosp. Infect. 2007, 65, 50–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dudeja, P.; Singh, A.; Sahni, N.; Kaur, S.; Goel, S. Effectiveness of an intervention package on knowledge, attitude, and practices of food handlers in a tertiary care hospital of north India: A before and after comparison study. Med. J. Armed Forces India 2017, 73, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Adikari, A.; Rizana, M.; Amarasekara, T.P. Food Safety Practices in a Teaching Hospital in Sri Lanka. Procedia Food Sci. 2016, 6, 65–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Norhaslinda, R.; Norhayati, A.; Mohd, A. Knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) on good manufacturing practices (GMP) among food handlers in Terengganu hospitals. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 8, 53–59. [Google Scholar]
  29. Bou-Mitri, C.; Mahmoud, D.; El Gerges, N.; Jaoude, M.A. Food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices of food handlers in lebanese hospitals: A cross-sectional study. Food Control 2018, 94, 78–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mohammed, H.A.; Eldein, S.; Ahmed, B.; Ahmed, F.A. Food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of the nutrition staff in three Sudanese hospitals. J. Saudi Soc. Food Nutr. 2020, 13, 10–16. [Google Scholar]
  31. Osaili, T.M.; Obeidat, B.A.; Hajeer, W.A.; Al-Nabulsi, A.A. Food safety knowledge among food service staff in hospitals in Jordan. Food Control 2017, 78, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Teffo, L.A.; Tabit, F.T. An assessment of the food safety knowledge and attitudes of food handlers in hospitals. BMC Public Health 2020, 20, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Alqurashi, N.A.; Priyadarshini, A.; Jaiswal, A.K. Evaluating Food Safety Knowledge and Practices among Foodservice Staff in Al Madinah Hospitals, Saudi Arabia. Safety 2019, 5, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Al Banna, H.; Disu, T.R.; Kundu, S.; Ahinkorah, B.O.; Brazendale, K.; Seidu, A.-A.; Okyere, J.; Rahman, N.; Mondal, S.; Matubber, B.; et al. Factors associated with food safety knowledge and practices among meat handlers in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2021, 26, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Siddiky, N.A.; Khan MS, R.; Sarker, M.S.; Bhuiyan MK, J.; Mahmud, A.; Rahman, M.T.; Ahmed, M.M.; Samad, M.A. Knowledge, attitude and practice of chicken vendors on food safety and foodborne pathogens at wet markets in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Food Control 2022, 131, 108456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hashanuzzaman, M.; Bhowmik, S.; Rahman, S.; Abu Zakaria, M.; Voumik, L.C.; Mamun, A.-A. Assessment of food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices of fish farmers and restaurants food handlers in Bangladesh. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jubayer, M.F.; Kayshar, M.S.; Hossain, M.S.; Uddin, M.N.; Al-Emran, M.; Akter, S.S. Evaluation of food safety knowledge, attitude, and self-reported practices of trained and newly recruited untrained workers of two baking industries in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Heliyon 2020, 6, e05021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Al Banna, M.H.; Kundu, S.; Brazendale, K.; Ahinkorah, B.O.; Disu, T.R.; Seidu, A.A.; Okyere, J.; Khan, M.S.I. Knowledge and awareness about food safety, foodborne diseases, and microbial hazards: A cross-sectional study among Bangladeshi consumers of street-vended foods. Food Control 2022, 134, 108718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tongco, M.D.C. Purposive Sampling as a Tool for Informant Selection. Ethnobot. Res. Appl. 2007, 5, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Akabanda, F.; Hlortsi, E.H.; Owusu-Kwarteng, J. Food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices of institutional food-handlers in Ghana. BMC Public Health 2017, 17, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Abdelhafez, A.M. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Food Service Staff about Food Hygiene in Hospitals in Makkah Area, Saudi Arabia. Life Sci. J. 2013, 10, 1097–8135. Available online: http://www.lifesciencesite.com.157 (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  42. Sanlier, N.; Konaklioglu, E. Food safety knowledge, attitude and food handling practices of students. Br. Food J. 2012, 114, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Patil, S.R.; Cates, S.; Morales, R. Consumer Food Safety Knowledge, Practices, and Demographic Differences: Findings from a Meta-analysis. J. Food Prot. 2005, 68, 1884–1894. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16161688/ (accessed on 26 April 2022). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. McIntyre, L.; Vallaster, L.; Wilcott, L.; Henderson, S.B.; Kosatsky, T. Evaluation of food safety knowledge, attitudes and self-reported hand washing practices in FOODSAFE trained and untrained food handlers in British Columbia, Canada. Food Control 2013, 30, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Askarian, M.; Kabir, G.; Aminbaig, M.; Memish, Z.A.; Jafari, P. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Food Service Staff Regarding Food Hygiene in Shiraz, Iran. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2004, 25, 16–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ahmed, S.M.; Hossain, M.A.; RajaChowdhury, A.M.; Bhuiya, A.U. The health workforce crisis in Bangladesh: Shortage, inappropriate skill-mix and inequitable distribution. Hum. Resour. Health 2011, 9, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Ali, M.M. Outbound medical tourism: The case of Bangladesh. World Rev. Bus. Res. 2012, 2, 50–70. [Google Scholar]
  48. Mannan, M.A. Access to public health facilities in Bangladesh: A study on facility utilisation and burden of treatment. Bangladesh Dev. Stud. 2013, 36, 25–80. [Google Scholar]
  49. Gruenfeldova, J.; Domijan, K.; Walsh, C. A study of food safety knowledge, practice and training among food handlers in Ireland. Food Control 2019, 105, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Das Shuvo, S. Assessing food safety and associated food hygiene and sanitary practices in food industries: A cross-sectional study on biscuit industry of Jessore, Bangladesh. Nutr. Food Sci. 2018, 48, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lestantyo, D.; Husodo, A.H.; Iravati, S.; Shaluhiyah, Z. Safe Food Handling Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Food Handlers in Hospital Kitchen. Int. J. Public Health Sci. 2017, 6, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Nee, S.O.; Sani, N.A. Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices (KAP) Among Food Handlers at Residential Colleges and Canteen Regarding Food Safety. Sains Malays. 2011, 40, 403–410. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sharif, L.; Obaidat, M.M.; Al-Dalalah, M.-R. Food Hygiene Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of the Food Handlers in the Military Hospitals. Food Nutr. Sci. 2013, 4, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Lema, K.; Abuhay, N.; Kindie, W.; Dagne, H.; Guadu, T. Food Hygiene Practice and Its Determinants Among Food Handlers at University of Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia, 2019. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2020, 13, 1129–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tuglo, L.S.; Agordoh, P.D.; Tekpor, D.; Pan, Z.; Agbanyo, G.; Chu, M. Food safety knowledge, attitude, and hygiene practices of street-cooked food handlers in North Dayi District, Ghana. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2021, 26, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nath, T.K.; Paul, A.; Sikdar, D.; Mahanta, J.; Paul, S.; Amin, R.; Chowdhury, S.; Bhuiyan, N.H.; Rob, A.; Rahim, A.; et al. Capacity development and safety measures for health care workers exposed to COVID-19 in Bangladesh. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2021, 21, 1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Rahman, M.M.; Arif, M.T.; Bakar, K.; Tambi, Z. Food safety knowledge, attitude and hygiene practices among the street food vendors in Northern Kuching City, Sarawak. Borneo Sci. 2016, 31, 94–103. [Google Scholar]
  58. Azanaw, J.; Gebrehiwot, M.; Dagne, H. Factors associated with food safety practices among food handlers: Facility-based cross-sectional study. BMC Res. Notes 2019, 12, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Seaman, P.; Eves, A. Perceptions of hygiene training amongst food handlers, managers and training providers—A qualitative study. Food Control 2010, 21, 1037–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Muhammad, F.; Chowdhury, M.; Arifuzzaman, M.; Chowdhury, A.A. Public Health Problems in Bangladesh: Issues and challenges. South East Asia J. Public Health 2017, 6, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table 1. Sociodemographic and employment characteristics of study participants (N = 191).
Table 1. Sociodemographic and employment characteristics of study participants (N = 191).
Characteristics FrequencyPercentage
Gender
  Male17390.6
  Female189.4
Age (in year)
  18–259449.2
  26–357036.6
  ≥362714.2
Marital status
  Single10756.0
  Married8444.0
Education status
  No formal education3618.8
  Primary8846.1
  Secondary4724.6
  Higher Secondary136.8
  Honors or above73.7
Monthly income (in BDT)
  <10,0004825.1
  10,001–15,0005830.4
  15,001–20,0005930.9
  20,001–25,000147.3
  >25,000126.3
Work experience (in years)
  <57941.4
  5–107740.3
  >103518.3
Employment type
  Full time15681.7
  Part time2111.0
  Temporal147.3
Current employment position
  Food service supervisor94.7
  Chef7137.2
  Support staff11158.1
Food safety training
  Yes10856.5
  No8343.5
Idea about HACCP system
  Yes4523.6
  No14676.4
Employed hospital type
  Government 2814.7
  Private16385.3
Number of beds in the hospital
  <2509449.2
  ≥2509750.8
Working sectors
  Patient meals7840.8
  Cafeteria for staff and visitors11359.2
In charge of food service operation in the hospital
  Hospital administrator12565.4
  Nutritionist84.2
  Food service supervisor3417.8
  Dietitian 2412.6
Table 2. Summary of questions and responses for assessment of food safety knowledge of food handlers working at hospitals in Bangladesh (N = 191).
Table 2. Summary of questions and responses for assessment of food safety knowledge of food handlers working at hospitals in Bangladesh (N = 191).
StatementsResponses, n (%)
TrueFalseDon’t Know
Preparation of food in advance could contribute to food poisoning.167 (87.4)14 (7.3)10 (5.2)
Reheating food is likely to contribute to food contamination.128 (67)43 (22.5)20 (10.5)
The correct temperature for storing perishable foods is 5 °C.99 (51.8)23 (12)69 (36.1)
Incorrect application of cleaning/sanitization procedures on equipment (refrigerator, slicing machine) can increase the risk of foodborne disease to consumers.181 (94.8)6 (3.1)4 (2.1)
Hand washing before handling food, using only water reduce the risk of contamination.32 (16.8)150 (78.5)9 (4.7)
Wearing gloves while handling food reduces the risk of transmitting infection to consumers.169 (88.5)7 (3.7)15 (7.9)
Wearing gloves while handling food reduces the risk of transmitting infection to food-services staff.165 (86.4)13 (6.8)13 (6.8)
Eating and drinking in the work place increases the risk of food contamination.114 (59.7)54 (28.3)23 (12)
During infectious disease of skin and eye, it is necessary to take leave from work.167 (87.4)13 (6.8)11 (5.8)
Cross-contamination is when microorganisms from a contaminated food are transferred by the food handler’s hands or utensils to another.167 (87.4)8 (4.2)16 (8.4)
All persons, including children, adults, pregnant women and old-ages are at equal risk for food poisoning.146 (76.4)27 (14.1)18 (9.4)
Typhoid can be transmitted by food.72 (37.7)32 (16.8)87 (45.5)
Diarrhea can be transmitted by food.173 (90.6)11 (5.8)7 (3.7)
Hepatitis A can be transmitted by food.53 (27.7)43 (22.5)95 (49.7)
E. coli is a food borne pathogen.32 (16.8)3 (1.6)156 (81.7)
Salmonella is among the foodborne pathogens.27 (14.1)2 (1)162 (84.8)
Staphylococcus is among the foodborne pathogens.21 (11)1 (0.5)169 (88.5)
Clostridium botulinum is among the foodborne pathogens.22 (11.5)1 (0.5)168 (88)
Table 3. Summary of questions and responses for assessment of food safety attitudes of food handlers working at hospitals in Bangladesh (N = 191).
Table 3. Summary of questions and responses for assessment of food safety attitudes of food handlers working at hospitals in Bangladesh (N = 191).
Statements Responses, n (%)
AgreeDisagreeNo Idea
One of the most important responsibilities of the food handlers is to maintain food safety measures.183 (95.8)6 (3.1)2 (1)
Raw and cooked foods should be stored separately to reduce risk of food contamination.177 (92.7)9 (4.7)5 (2.6)
Food hygiene training for workers is an important issue in reducing risk of food contamination.172 (90.1)9 (4.7)10 (5.2)
It is necessary to check the temperature of the refrigerator periodically to reduce risk of food contamination.154 (80.6)12 (6.3)25 (13.1)
Health status of the workers should be evaluated before employment.116 (60.7)40 (20.9)35 (18.3)
Foodborne illnesses can have deleterious health and economic effects on the society.143 (74.9)19 (9.9)29 (15.2)
Safe food handling to avoid contamination and diseases is part of food-service staff’s job responsibilities.166 (86.9)16 (8.4)9 (4.7)
After serving food, any leftovers should be kept in refrigerator.111 (58.1)63 (33)17 (8.9)
I think it is unsafe to leave cooked food out of the refrigerator for more than two hours.75 (39.3)44 (23)72 (37.7)
Using watches, earrings and rings will increase the risk of food contamination.118 (61.8)51 (26.7)22 (11.5)
Food handlers who have abrasions or cuts on hands should not touch foods without gloves.174 (91.1)13 (6.8)4 (2.1)
Table 4. Summary of questions and responses for assessment of food safety practices of food handlers working at hospitals in Bangladesh (N = 191).
Table 4. Summary of questions and responses for assessment of food safety practices of food handlers working at hospitals in Bangladesh (N = 191).
Food Safety PracticesResponses, n (%)
NeverRarelySometimesOftenAlways
Do you wash your hands before touching unwrapped raw food?9 (4.7)14 (7.3)26 (13.6)8 (4.2)134 (70.2)
Do you wash your hands after touching unwrapped raw food?5 (2.6)9 (4.7)25 (13.1)4 (2.1)148 (77.5)
Do you wash your hands before touching unwrapped cooked food?1 (0.5)2 (1)21 (11)7 (3.7)160 (83.8)
Do you wash your hands after touching unwrapped cooked food?1 (0.5)2 (1)12 (6.3)5 (2.6)171 (89.5)
Do you wear apron during work?12 (6.3)7 (3.7)24 (12.6)13 (6.8)135 (70.7)
Do you use hair cover during work?18 (9.4)3 (1.6)20 (10.5)12 (6.3)138 (72.3)
Do you use mask when you prepare or distribute foods?6 (3.1)5 (2.6)16 (8.4)16 (8.4)148 (77.5)
Do you use separate kitchen utensils to prepare raw and cooked food?16 (8.4)4 (2.1)14 (7.3)7 (3.7)150 (78.5)
If you have lesions on your hands, you treat yourself and complete your work? 118 (61.8)9 (4.7)14 (7.3)36 (18.8)14 (7.3)
Do you allow your finger nails to grow as wearing gloves protects the transmission of germs? 169 (88.5)2 (1)14 (7.3)2 (1)4 (2.1)
Do you thaw food at room temperature? 26 (13.6)14 (7.3)55 (28.8)41 (21.5)55 (28.8)
Do you ask for cleaning food contact surfaces before and after preparing food?4 (2.1)2 (1)25 (13.1)7 (3.7)153 (80.1)
Do you check shelf life of food products while using them?6 (3.1)5 (2.6)25 (13.1)9 (4.7)146 (76.4)
Do you check integrity of food packages while buying food products?17 (8.9)5 (2.6)30 (15.7)15 (7.9)124 (64.9)
Do you smoke inside food processing areas?172 (90.1)2 (1)14 (7.3)2 (1)1 (0.5)
Table 5. Respondents’ food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices by their sociodemographic and employment characteristics (N = 191).
Table 5. Respondents’ food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices by their sociodemographic and employment characteristics (N = 191).
Characteristics Knowledge ScoreAttitude Score Practice Score
Mean ± SDp Value Mean ± SDp Value ††Mean ± SDp Value ††
Gender 0.003 0.092 0.159
  Male10.96 ± 3.03 8.40 ± 1.94 50.16 ± 9.83
  Female8.72 ± 2.82 7.56 ± 2.04 49.44 ± 6.91
Age (in year) 0.576 0.579 0.533
  18–2510.57 ± 2.43 8.50 ± 1.80 51.66 ± 8.68
  26–3511.06 ± 3.37 8.13 ± 2.01 49.21 ± 9.97
  36–4510.56 ± 4.19 8.19 ± 2.35 46.89 ± 10.73
Marital status 0.188 0.476 0.378
  Single10.48 ± 2.52 8.26 ± 1.90 50.02 ± 9.79
  Married11.10 ± 3.66 8.39 ± 2.04 50.18 ± 9.36
Education status <0.001 0.062 0.006
  No formal education10.06 ± 2.76 8.56 ± 2.01 52.17 ± 7.57
  Primary10.33 ± 2.53 8.07 ± 1.90 49.62 ± 9.81
  Secondary10.66 ± 3.05 8.21 ± 2.19 47.49 ± 10.73
  Higher Secondary12.62 ± 4.21 8.92 ± 1.32 53.31 ± 8.26
  Honors or above16.71 ± 1.11 9.86 ± 0.69 56.71 ± 0.76
Monthly income (in BDT) <0.001 0.051 <0.001
  <10,0009.90 ± 2.68 7.94 ± 2.16 48.35 ± 9.09
  10,001–15,00010.26 ± 2.75 8.34 ± 2.05 51.53 ± 9.10
  15,001–20,00011.08 ± 2.57 8.41 ± 1.74 50.69 ± 9.51
  20,001–25,0009.71 ± 3.85 7.93 ± 2.06 41.93 ± 11.93
  >25,00016.08 ± 1.93 9.75 ± 0.62 56.58 ± 0.90
Work experience (in years) <0.001 0.031 0.003
  <59.78 ± 2.54 7.87 ± 2.05 47.94 ± 10.02
  5–1011.30 ± 3.12 8.62 ± 1.75 52.18 ± 8.21
  >1011.71 ± 3.56 8.66 ± 2.04 50.34 ± 10.53
Employment type 0.011 0.045 0.054
  Full time11.00 ± 3.06 8.45 ± 1.85 50.67 ± 9.38
  Part time8.86 ± 2.29 7.10 ± 2.47 44.29 ± 10.76
  Temporal10.79 ± 3.45 8.71 ± 1.68 52.36 ± 7.09
Employment position <0.001 0.023 0.042
  Food service supervisor15.33 ± 3.54 9.56 ± 1.42 54.78 ± 5.22
  Chef10.13 ± 2.89 7.94 ± 2.01 47.34 ± 10.93
  Support staff10.77 ± 2.85 8.46 ± 1.91 51.47 ± 8.47
Food safety training <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
  Yes12.13 ± 2.78 9.15 ± 1.34 54.81 ± 4.82
  No8.95 ± 2.46 7.24 ± 2.11 43.94 ± 10.70
Idea about HACCP system <0.001 0.006 <0.001
  Yes12.82 ± 3.39 9.09 ± 1.28 53.58 ± 6.97
  No10.11 ± 2.68 8.08 ± 2.07 49.01 ± 10.02
Employed hospital type <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
  Government 7.86 ± 1.96 6.07 ± 1.27 35.50 ± 6.36
  Private11.25 ± 2.96 8.71 ± 1.79 52.60 ± 7.60
Number of beds in the hospital 0.019 0.194 0.132
  <25011.28 ± 3.16 8.47 ± 1.99 50.90 ± 9.24
  >25010.24 ± 2.92 8.18 ± 1.92 49.30 ± 9.88
Working sectors <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
  Patient meals9.46 ± 3.31 7.10 ± 2.04 42.64 ± 10.92
  Cafeteria for staff and visitors11.64 ± 2.58 9.16 ± 1.38 55.23 ± 2.89
In charge of food service operation in the hospital <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
  Hospital administrator11.18 ± 2.86 8.86 ± 1.70 53.36 ± 6.54
  Nutritionist7.88 ± 2.53 5.63 ± 0.92 37.50 ± 7.11
  Food service supervisor
Dietitian
11.71 ± 3.29
8.08 ± 1.98
8.53 ± 1.90
6.13 ± 1.23
50.91 ± 10.22
36.08 ± 6.53
Note:  p-value was determined by one-way ANOVA or independent sample t-test. †† p-value was determined by Kruskal–Wallis test or Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test. Bolded and italic values indicates statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Table 6. Multiple linear regression models identifying the factors associated with food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices among study participants (N = 191).
Table 6. Multiple linear regression models identifying the factors associated with food safety knowledge, attitudes and practices among study participants (N = 191).
Variables Model 1:
Food Safety Knowledge
Model 2:
Food Safety Attitudes
Model 3:
Food Safety Practices
β95% CIβ95% CIβ95% CI
Gender
  Male1.82 *0.53, 3.100.49−0.36, 1.35−0.66−3.43, 2.11
  FemaleRC RC RC
Age (in year)
  18–25RC RC RC
  26–350.37−0.63, 1.37−0.02−0.68, 0.63−0.30−2.40, 1.80
  36–45−0.52−2.22, 1.080.60−0.44, 1.641.03−2.33, 4.39
Marital status
  SingleRC RC RC
  Married0.23−0.80, 1.26−0.04−0.71, 0.630.14−2.01, 2.29
Education status
  No formal educationRC RC RC
  Primary0.19−0.70, 1.07−0.39−0.97, 0.18−0.63−2.48, 1.23
  Secondary0.37−0.68, 1.42−0.00−0.68, 0.68−1.42−3.62, 0.78
  Higher Secondary0.70−0.86, 2.27−0.27−1.29, 0.750.69−2.60, 3.97
  Honors or above2.25−0.59, 5.10−0.54−2.40, 1.320.86−5.14, 6.87
Monthly Income (BDT)
  <10,000RC RC RC
  10,001–15,000−0.03−0.96, 0.900.20−0.40, 0.802.82 *0.87, 4.77
  15,001–20,0000.84−0.39, 2.060.68−0.13, 1.485.07 *2.47, 7.67
  20,001–25,0001.19−0.64, 3.021.39 *0.20, 2.591.22−2.69, 5.13
  >25,0003.19 *0.84, 5.550.13−1.44, 1.692.43−2.61, 7.48
Work experience
  <5 yearsRC RC RC
  5–10 years0.43−0.38, 2.050.13−0.40, 0.660.91−0.79, 2.62
  >10 years0.45−0.77, 1.660.09−0.70, 0.88−0.59−3.14, 1.95
Employment type
  Full timeRC RC RC
  Part time0.39−0.72, 1.500.09−0.63, 0.821.80−0.53, 4.12
  temporal0.19−1.03, 1.410.09−0.71, 0.870.05−2.51, 2.62
Employment position
  Food service supervisorRC RC RC
  Chef−0.51−2.90, 1.88−0.34−1.90, 1.220.77−4.24, 5.79
  Support staff0.14−2.25, 2.54−0.16−1.72, 1.401.01−4.01, 6.03
Food safety training
  Yes0.75−0.18, 1.680.12−0.49, 0.731.61−0.36, 3.57
  NoRC RC RC
Idea about HACCP system
  YesRC RC RC
  No−0.26−1.18, 0.650.27−0.33, 0.870.69−1.24, 2.62
Employed hospital type
  Government RC RC RC
15.93 *

10.15, 21.71
  Private4.00 *1.37, 6.642.29 *0.52, 4.05
Number of beds in the hospital
  <250RC RC RC
  ≥ 250−0.26−1.16, 0.640.14−0.44, 0.730.94−0.95, 2.82
Working sectors
  Patient mealsRC RC RC
  Cafeteria4.69 *2.99, 6.392.84 *1.63, 4.0413.729.60, 17.84
In charge of food service operation in the hospital
  Hospital administratorRC RC RC
  Nutritionist1.83−0.42, 4.080.33−1.14, 1.815.15 *0.39, 9.90
  Food service supervisor4.36 *2.63, 6.082.11 *0.91, 3.3211.44 *7.42, 15.47
  Dietitian 5.82 *2.71, 8.932.37 *0.26, 4.4713.01 *6.12, 19.89
Food safety knowledge scoreNI 0.18 *0.09, 0.290.31−0.03, 0.64
Food safety attitudes scoreNI NI 0.87 *0.37, 1.37
Food safety practices scoreNI NI NI
Note: CI = Confidence Interval, β = Regression coefficient, RC = Reference category, NI = Not included. The R2 for adjusted model 1, 2 and 3 was 0.8299, 0.6036 and 0.6198, respectively. Bolded and asterisk indicates statistically significant (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al Banna, M.H.; Khan, M.S.I.; Rezyona, H.; Seidu, A.-A.; Abid, M.T.; Ara, T.; Kundu, S.; Ahinkorah, B.O.; Hagan, Jr., J.E.; Tareq, M.A.; et al. Assessment of Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Food Service Staff in Bangladeshi Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2540. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14122540

AMA Style

Al Banna MH, Khan MSI, Rezyona H, Seidu A-A, Abid MT, Ara T, Kundu S, Ahinkorah BO, Hagan, Jr. JE, Tareq MA, et al. Assessment of Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Food Service Staff in Bangladeshi Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study. Nutrients. 2022; 14(12):2540. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14122540

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al Banna, Md. Hasan, Md Shafiqul Islam Khan, Humayra Rezyona, Abdul-Aziz Seidu, Mohammad Tazrian Abid, Tasnu Ara, Satyajit Kundu, Bright Opoku Ahinkorah, John Elvis Hagan, Jr., Md. Abu Tareq, and et al. 2022. "Assessment of Food Safety Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Food Service Staff in Bangladeshi Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study" Nutrients 14, no. 12: 2540. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14122540

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop