Next Article in Journal
Associations of 25 Hydroxyvitamin D and High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein Levels in Early Life
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Trajectories of Macronutrient Intake and Their Associations with Obesity among Chinese Adults from 1991 to 2018: A Prospective Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Resistance Training Improves Muscle Strength and Function, Regardless of Protein Supplementation, in the Mid- to Long-Term Period after Gastric Bypass

Nutrients 2022, 14(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14010014
by Gabriela S. Oliveira 1, Flávio T. Vieira 1, Fernando Lamarca 1,2, Ricardo M. Lima 1,3, Kênia M. B. Carvalho 1 and Eliane S. Dutra 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Nutrients 2022, 14(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14010014
Submission received: 25 September 2021 / Revised: 5 December 2021 / Accepted: 8 December 2021 / Published: 21 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Obesity)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This introduces a risk of bias, violates the principle of randomization and does not answer the question as to what proportion of a study population would benefit from the intervention. The study would have benefited from a per protocol analysis to confirm the efficacy of the RT and protein supplementation intervention but the true question should not be whether participant complaint resistance training invokes improvements in strength and physical function, but rather, whether this population was able to comply with a program and nutritional supplementation. The study findings are not novel, the population being investigated and whether there is efficacy in supervised training and supplementation was not clearly answered. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript is well written and demonstrates this question.  It provides sufficient background and designs appropriately.  It provides sufficient background and describes methods adequately. It's not novel enough but it presents results clearly.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have made a valid attempt to clarify some of the concerns but the novelty of the study is limited. The timing of the intervention post surgery is novel but the previous points regarding the challenges of implementing a nutrition and exercise intervention is the key point required to translate this to clinical practice. Thanks for clarifying your per protocol analysis but the study should have performed measures on all participants even if they declined the exercise and supplement.

Author Response

Please, see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop