Next Article in Journal
Adipose Tissue Development and Expansion from the Womb to Adolescence: An Overview
Next Article in Special Issue
The Influence of Cyclical Ketogenic Reduction Diet vs. Nutritionally Balanced Reduction Diet on Body Composition, Strength, and Endurance Performance in Healthy Young Males: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Storage Conditions on the Breast Milk Peptidome
Previous Article in Special Issue
Can Creatine Supplementation Interfere with Muscle Strength and Fatigue in Brazilian National Level Paralympic Powerlifting?
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Effects of Dietary Nitrates on Time Trial Performance in Athletes with Different Training Status: Systematic Review

Faculty of Sports Studies, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2020, 12(9), 2734;
Received: 25 August 2020 / Accepted: 4 September 2020 / Published: 8 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutrition and Athletic Performance)


Much research has been done in sports nutrition in recent years as the demand for performance-enhancing substances increases. Higher intake of nitrates from the diet can increase the bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO) via the nitrate–nitrite–NO pathway. Nevertheless, the increased availability of NO does not always lead to improved performance in some individuals. This review aims to evaluate the relationship between the athlete’s training status and the change in time trial performance after increased dietary nitrate intake. Articles indexed by Scopus and PubMed published from 2015 to 2019 were reviewed. Thirteen articles met the eligibility criteria: clinical trial studies on healthy participants with different training status (according to VO2max), conducting time trial tests after dietary nitrate supplementation. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to process the review. We found a statistically significant relationship between VO2max and ergogenicity in time trial performance using one-way ANOVA (p = 0.001) in less-trained athletes (VO2 < 55 mL/kg/min). A strong positive correlation was observed in experimental situations using a chronic supplementation protocol but not in acute protocol situations. In the context of our results and recent histological observations of muscle fibres, there might be a fibre-type specific role in nitric oxide production and, therefore, supplement of ergogenicity.

1. Introduction

Nitric oxide (NO) plays a crucial role in signalling and physiological regulatory functions of the human body which are crucial to exercise economy and performance (i.e., vasodilatation, mitochondrial respiration, glucose and calcium (Ca2+) homeostasis, skeletal muscle contractility and fatigue development). Because the NO molecule is highly unstable, there is a constant need for its regeneration [1,2,3,4].
Interestingly the substrates for NO syntheses (L-arginine and nitrates) come from our daily diet and therefore can be manipulated [5]. Increased availability of NO via diet has been linked to ergogenic effects [6,7]. However, not all athletes can benefit from these nutritional strategies [8,9]. It seems the effectiveness of NO inducing foods and supplements is limited by an athlete’s training status (aerobic fitness) and muscle fibre type ratio [10].

1.1. NO Metabolism and Physiological Importance

Nitric oxide synthesis in the human body is carried out via two pathways: the NO synthase (NOS)-dependent pathway and nitrate–nitrite–NO (NO3–NO2–NO) pathway [11]. Formation of NO via the NOS-dependent pathway is carried out through the utilisation of L-arginine and oxygen (O2). Thus, this reaction relies on the delivery of O2 [12]. Insufficient O2 delivery during high-intensity exercise may cause this pathway to become dysfunctional [13]. Therefore, the O2-independent pathway can substitute NO production [14] via the reduction of NO3 from the diet (e.g., green leafy vegetables, beetroot, radish) [15]. Nitrates are reduced by oral anaerobic bacteria to NO2 [16]. Subsequently, part of the total NO2 is reduced to NO in the acidic environment of the stomach where it protects the organism from some pathogens [17]. The rest of the NO2 is then transported via the upper gastrointestinal tract into the blood reaching its plasma peak level 2–3 h postprandially [18]. The reduction of NO2 to NO substitutes the O2-dependent NOS pathway in various tissues under hypoxic or acidic conditions [19]. These are conditions that typically occur in working muscles during vigorous exercise [20].
Increased NO bioavailability via food or supplements may increase exercise performance, as it is the critical factor in three physiological mechanisms related to physical exercise. Firstly, NO increases skeletal muscle O2 delivery via vasodilatation [21]. Secondly, it reduces the O2 cost of mitochondrial ATP resynthesis via an increased number of ATP molecules (P) formed per O2 molecules consumed (O) in the electron transport chain (P/O ratio) [22], possibly via the interaction with five-coordinated cytochrome C oxidase [23,24]. Lastly, it improves the efficiency of muscle contractility via reduced creatine phosphate (PCr) cost of force production [25] and changes in Ca2+ metabolism within the muscle cells [26]. Enhancing these physiological mechanisms leads to more efficient energy metabolism, lower O2 demands of the working muscles and higher muscle contractility [26] and therefore an increase in exercise economy and performance [1,22,25].

1.2. The Role of Dietary Nitrates in Exercise Physiology

Dietary nitrates (DN) have become a trendy topic in sports nutrition as even minor enhancement of human physiology may positively affect high-intensity exercise and, therefore, competition results. For example, there may be a decrease in the time of time-trial (TT) physical activities [27]. It is also important to note that these changes seem to be highly related to the dosage and supplementation protocol where exercise economy can be improved after a single dose of DN [28,29,30,31,32,33], but exercise performance is more likely augmented after chronic use of DN [34,35,36]. Interestingly, it seems ergogenicity is somehow related to the fibre-type ratio in muscles, augmenting the exercise economy and performance more likely via type II muscle fibres (MFs) than type I [37].
During high-intensity exercise, oxidative phosphorylation is diminished as the O2 supply is inadequate, and reliance on the anaerobic metabolic pathway of ATP regeneration is favoured [38]. Long-duration high-intensity exercise and intermittent high-intensity exercise lead to exercise-induced hypoxemia causing the muscles to become hypoxic and acidic [39]. This impairment in homeostasis may also disrupt the functioning of the NOS-dependent pathway, and continuation of exercise is highly dependent on the activity of type II MFs [40,41]. Therefore, the reliance on the substitutional NO3–NO2–NO pathway independent of O2 supply is increased [40,42]. Moreover, type II MFs have a lower blood supply which affects the partial pressure of O2 within the microvasculature (PmvO2) causing a lower O2 supply compared to type I MFs [43,44,45]. This phenomenon underlines the reliance on the NO3–NO2–NO pathway in type II MFs and even more under hypoxia [24,46]. Lastly, most recent studies suggest improvement in muscle force production and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation are more likely observed in type II MFs than in type I MFs after DN supplementation [47,48].
Furthermore, it has already been suggested in earlier studies that neither acute nor chronic DN supplementation can improve performance in highly trained cyclists [49,50,51], runners [52,53] or cross-country skiers [54]. These groups of endurance-trained athletes tend to have a higher type I MF ratio [55,56,57]. In contrast, high doses of DN (8.4–9.6 mmol) improved performance in highly trained kayakers and rowers [29,58] but not low doses (~4–5 mmol) [29,59]. In this context, the upper body muscles (e.g., biceps brachii, triceps brachii, deltoid, trapezius or latissimus dorsi) are well described as muscles with a higher type II MF ratio [60,61,62]. Moreover, as highly trained athletes develop specific adaptation to rowing [63] and kayaking [64], increased type II MF ratio or MF hypertrophy is more likely [65]. This exercise modality, which mostly involves muscle groups with a higher type II MF ratio [65], can be another example of the fibre-type specific effects of DN [37,66].

1.3. Training Status as a Limiting Factor

Nutritional strategies to increase the bioavailability of NO and possibly physical performance have been under the scope of research for many years, and there are some crucial variables (e.g., muscle fibre-type ratio, physiological limitations) which can influence their effectiveness [8,67]. Consumption of dietary NO3 (DN) in the form of either nitrate-rich foods or supplements generally increases plasma levels of NO2 [28] which interestingly does not always lead to improvement in exercise performance especially in well-trained endurance and elite endurance athletes [68].
Fibre-type specific effects of DN supplementation have been demonstrated in animal experiments where muscle force development increased in type II (fast-twitch glycolytic fibres type IIx) but not in type I MFs (slow-twitch oxidative fibres) [34]. Reliance on the NO3–NO2–NO pathway is higher in type II MFs due to the lower O2 tension (pO2) than in type I [43]. Therefore, an increase in the bioavailability of NO mainly affects type II MFs [37]. Endurance-trained athletes are likely to have a higher ratio of slow oxidative type I MFs compared to non-trained and recreationally active athletes [69] or the inactive population and the elderly [70]. This phenomenon also relates to higher aerobic fitness in highly and elite trained athletes which cannot be augmented any further [68]. These seem to be possible explanations for the lower ergogenicity of DN supplementation in highly trained or elite athletes, as some studies failed to enhance the performance of the participants [52,71]. It has been suggested that the efficiency of DN supplementation is related to an athlete’s training status, especially in high-intensity endurance exercises, e.g., time trial (TT) performance, where O2 delivery is impaired and reliance on type II MFs is higher [68].

1.4. Aim and Purpose of the Review

This article reviews the relationship between VO2max and DN ergogenicity in TT performance, defined as the athlete’s training status. We further discuss the relationship between simulated high altitude and DN ergogenicity in the context of increased reliance on type II MFs under hypoxic conditions, as it has been proposed that the DN ergogenicity is fibre-type related. Additionally, we wanted to stress the importance of inclusion of certain methodological tools in the evaluation of the results of experiments (e.g., smallest worthwhile change and typical error of measurement).

2. Materials and Methods

A review of the literature was carried out using articles indexed by Scopus and PubMed published from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2019. The PRISMA guidelines were followed to process the review [72].

2.1. Search Strategy, Data Extraction and Analysis

The following terms were used for the search: dietary nitrates, physical performance and physical exercise. All descriptors were searched using the Boolean operators to maximise the search quality as follows: ((dietary AND nitrates) AND ((physical AND exercise) OR (physical AND performance))). The title and abstract of each article were assessed for eligibility. After that, full-text articles were reviewed to determine their suitability for inclusion or exclusion. The inclusion criteria were: (i) studies on healthy human subjects, (ii) original, English-language research articles, (iii) inclusion of the training status of participants (VO2max, training load or other affiliation to training status group), (iv) experimental protocol consisting of time-trial testing, (v) results showing a change in time trial performance, (iv) supplementation protocol is described. The exclusion criteria were: (i) the above inclusion criteria were not met and (ii) the experimental test was combined with environmental modification (e.g., high-altitude simulation and high temperature). No restrictions were made on age, sample size, supplementation protocol or supplement form. Figure 1 describes the process of selecting the articles presented in this review using the PRISMA Flow Diagram.

2.2. Data Classification

Out of the 13 included studies, we analysed 22 separate DN experimental situations. The experimental situations were classified into five groups according to the mean group VO2max or VO2peak of the participants according to the preliminary testing of each study (Table 1), which allowed us to define their training status as previously published [73,74]. One study did not use the VO2max of participants for training status assessment but used training load instead [75]. Mean percentual change in time-to-completion of given exercise tasks in the experimental DN groups were either included in the article or calculated from the results.

2.3. Quality Assessment

Risk of bias was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale, which provides a reliable assessment of internal validity [76,77]. Each article was individually assessed by the reviewer (T.H.) using an adjusted 11 item checklist to yield a maximum score of 10.

2.4. Data Extraction

Data were extracted and reviewed by one of the researchers (T.H.). Additionally, the data were independently reviewed by the other researchers (M.K. and P.V.), following a systematic selection list which included the inclusion criteria mentioned in Section 2.1.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

A one-way ANOVA was conducted to determine whether there is a relationship between DN ergogenicity and training status level. Data were classified into three groups according to the training status of participants: untrained + recreationally trained (n = 5), trained (n = 4), well-trained + elite (n = 13). There were no outliers as assessed by a boxplot. Data were normally distributed for each group as assessed by the Shapiro–Wilk test (p > 0.05), and variances were homogeneous as assessed by Levene’s test of homogeneity of variances (α = 0.05). A Spearman’s rank-order correlation and Pearson correlation coefficient were used to assess the relationship between DN ergogenicity and VO2max after chronic/acute DN intake and between DN ergogenicity and TT test duration. A coefficient of variation (CV) was carried out to assess the frequency distribution of VO2max among the groups of participants and inter-study variability in performance effect. All data analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical package (version 25; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and the GraphPad Prism 8 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation.

3. Results

The reviewed articles included 22 experimental situations presented in Figure 2. The figure shows performance changes in all acute (blue bars) and chronic (red bars) experimental situations reviewed. The effect of DN supplementation is displayed as the percentual mean change in the experimental group. Improvement in performance is interpreted as a negative value as the TT test was finished faster compared to placebo.
The mean changes in performance across the selected experimental situations were −2.63%, −2.83%, −0.49%, −0.27% and −0.31% in untrained (n = 1), recreationally trained (I = 4), trained (n = 4), well-trained (n = 12) and elite (n = 1) groups, respectively.
One-way ANOVA presented a statistically significant difference in performance change among groups with different training status after DN supplementation F (2, 19) = 11.787, p = 0.001 and ω2 = 0.533. The positive performance change increased from well-trained + elite (−0.272 ± 0.671%) to trained (−0.490 ± 1.238%) and untrained + recreationally trained (−2.786 ± 1.629%) groups, in that order. Tukey’s post-hoc analysis revealed that the increase from well-trained + elite to the untrained + recreationally trained group (2.51, 95% CI (1.12 to 3.91)) was statistically significant (p = 0.001), as well as the increase from trained to untrained + recreationally trained (2.30, 95% CI (0.52 to 4.07), p = 0.010), but not from well-trained + elite to trained. Statistical analysis was done on a sample of all 22 experimental situations. Therefore, the data were divided according to the training status but not according to the supplementation protocol due to the small sample size for ANOVA analysis.
A Spearman’s rank-order correlation was run to assess the relationship between VO2max and DN ergogenicity in the TT tests after chronic intake of DN. There was a statistically significant, strong positive correlation between VO2max and performance change in TT, i.e., a positive ergogenic effect declines with higher training status (rs(9) = 0.810, p = 0.003; Figure 3.). However, Pearson’s correlation coefficient showed no significant correlation for acute supplementation (r(8) = 0.445, p = 0.198; Figure 4). One study did not report VO2max values of participants and, therefore, was excluded from the analysis [75].

Methodological Quality of Studies

All the reviewed studies that met the eligibility criteria scored 10 out of 10 in PEDro scale as they followed double-blinded crossover placebo-controlled experimental design. Overall, the quality of the reviewed studies was assessed as excellent.

4. Discussion

We reviewed the available research from 2015 to 2019 focused on the relationship between dietary nitrates and TT performance in athletes with different training status according to their VO2max. Statistical analysis of the data collected from 13 articles showed that the higher the training status, the lower the effect on TT performance.

4.1. Dietary Nitrates and Time Trial Performance

Our results demonstrate that DN ergogenicity in TT performance is more likely observed in less-trained individuals than in the highly trained and more consistently after chronic use. These results are in agreement with previously reported data [1]. In contrast, some reviews did not find a statistically significant change in TT performance [86,87]. It was proposed that the VO2max > 65 mL/kg/min is not related to ergogenic effects after DN intake [1,10]. However, our results suggest that DN ergogenicity may be lower even in trained athletes, as we did not find a significant difference between the trained and well-trained + elite groups. Significant ergogenic effects were evident in the groups of VO2max ≤ 50 mL/kg/min and less.
These results suggest there is a strong link between the athlete’s training status and DN ergogenicity. The real cause of this phenomenon is still debated. We further provide a discussion on possible causes.

4.2. Dietary Nitrates and Exercise Performance in a High-Altitude Environment

Our results are consistent with other studies suggesting the ergogenicity of DN is diminished in highly-trained endurance athletes, possibly due to the fact of their higher type I MF ratio [1,37,88].
To support the hypothesis of a relationship between ergogenicity and type II MFs, we also reviewed TT studies at simulated high-altitude through normobaric hypoxia (n = 3; Figure 5). A high altitude environment with lower pO2 leads to impairment in O2 delivery in tissues, and the aerobic energy metabolism pathway is diminished [89]. Therefore, the work efficiency of type I MFs is lowered, and reliance on the anaerobic metabolic pathway and type II MFs is increased [90]. Exercise-induced hypoxemia is amplified in high-altitude hypoxic conditions, and the reliance on type II MFs is expected to be increased [91,92]. Therefore, it has been hypothesised that DN ergogenicity in highly-trained endurance athletes could be augmented due to the increased involvement of type II MFs during TT tests in an environment with lower p02 [93,94,95]. Although performance improvement was observed in highly-trained athletes (VO2max > 65 mL/kg/min) after DN intake (−3.2%) [94], yet again, more consistent improvement was more likely observed in less-trained athletes (−3.6 ± 0.4%) [93,94].
Additionally, Arnold et al. [95] observed an improvement in the highly trained (−0.4%), but this was not of statistical significance (p = 0.6). To this day, data on the ergogenicity of DN at high altitude brings more or less mixed results and, so far, no additional benefits in general [96,97]. Despite the increased pulmonary NO availability and plasma NO2 concentrations [98] and lower altitude-induced reduction in endothelial function [99] that have been documented, solid conclusions as to whether a high altitude could augment ergogenicity in highly-trained athletes requires further research.

4.3. Dietary Nitrates Studies Methodology

Nyakayiru et al. [81] observed a statistically significant and positive response in six out of the total of 17 participants during TT performance. Whereas the mean VO2max (65.0 ± 4 mL/kg/min) classified the group as well-trained, the standard deviation suggested that some of the participants were less trained and potentially more likely to be DN responders. In future research, we suggest the grouping of participants to be carefully divided according to training status, because there seems to be a thin line between the high and low ergogenicity of DN and, therefore, statistical evaluation of the results may be affected.
Correctly classifying training status (e.g., VO2max and/or weekly training load) in various athletes may be an essential aspect of increasing the reliability of DN research [73,74]. Table 2 summarises the research characteristics of the reviewed studies, showing that specific TT criteria (distance, test duration) and DN supplementation protocols (acute/chronic, DN dosage) are different across the studies. Notably, groups of participants are somewhat mixed in terms of training status as the diversity of the athlete’s VO2max is in some studies quite high (CV = 21.5% in Oskarsson and McGawley [82]).
Twenty-two experimental situations were included in our review with highly variable TT test durations 881 ± 856 s (25–3300 s). No correlation was observed between the TT duration and performance effects (rs(20) = −0.237, p = 0.288). There was also no correlation after the TT duration adjustment (i.e., only situations with TT duration > 10 min included; rs(10) = 0.064, p = 0.843). However, it may be speculated whether long-duration TT tests (>720 s) could benefit more from DN supplementation as the authors of 10 out of the 12 experimental situations reported ergogenic effects. In contrast, only 5 out of 10 experimental situations (TT test duration < 720 s) reported improvement in exercise performance. It is becoming more evident that DN ergogenicity could be fibre-type specific. Therefore, the duration of the event should be taken into consideration as our results are in contrast with general recommendations for DN use (4–8 min events in Burke et al. [2]).
Inter-study variability in performance effect was high as the coefficient of variation (CV) reached 55%. The lowest and therefore more stable CV was obtained in trained (26%) and well-trained groups (26%) but not in the recreationally trained groups (58%).
Dosage, time-to-test intake, supplementation protocol and form of DN also differed across the reviewed studies. In eight studies, the dosage exceeded the amount of 8 mmol of NO3 (up to 12.8 mmol; n = 5) which is the generally recommended amount whether an acute or chronic protocol is chosen [6]. Time-to-test intake is 2–3 h in most studies (n = 11). In contrast, in some studies participants were instructed to consume the supplement less close to the test (3.5 h in Porcelli et al. [68]) or closer to the test (1 h in Callahan et al. [79]). A more consistent positive change in performance is likely observed in athletes following a chronic supplementation protocol [1]. Our results showed a strong positive correlation (rs(9) = 0.810, p = 0.003) between the VO2max and performance change after chronic DN intake but no correlation in acute intake studies (r(8) = 0.445, p = 0.198). This suggests that chronic DN intake provides more consistent results for all training status categories and underlines the lower ergogenicity in highly trained athletes. The most common form of DN supplementation is beetroot juice concentrate (BJC) [27,58,71,78,82,83,84]. Other forms of DN supplementation include raw beetroot juice (BJ) [85], encapsulated potassium nitrate (PN) [75,80] and beetroot crystals (BC) [79] or a water solution containing sodium nitrate (SN) [68,81]. All these variables in the supplementation protocol could potentially interfere with the ergogenic effects. It has been well documented that individual pharmacokinetic responsiveness after DN intake varies [10,28,31].

4.4. The Real Benefit for Elite Athletes?

Significant beneficial effects of DN intake in elite endurance athletes are less likely to be observed. This athletic group demonstrated a high proportion of type I MFs, elite exercise performance close to the athlete’s physiological limits or NO3-mediated vasodilation in non-prioritized muscles which may lead to reduced O2 delivery to the essential muscles working very close to their maximal cardiac output [100]. All these factors are now suggested as potential causes of the lower ergogenicity in highly trained athletes.
Although the available laboratory studies do not support DN ergogenicity in well-trained athletes by providing statistically significant outcomes, some might argue whether this is of concern in real sport events. From the perspective of more ecologically valid situations (e.g., sports competitions), even statistically insignificant improvement can change the overall result of TT performance. Therefore, it may be speculated whether the 0.63% change in performance found in our analysis in the well-trained group [27] could change the outcome in a real sports event. Other studies have discussed the same phenomenon. For example, Rokkedal-Lausch et al. [27] concluded: “The improvement in 10-km TT completion time and power output of 0.6% and 1.6%, respectively, in the present study, is of practical relevance for elite and well-trained athletes”. Seemingly, the improvement in performance of only 0.6% could make a significant difference when comparing the TT durations of elite cyclists. For example, during the 17 km TT at the 2019 Giro d’Italia (Verona-Verona, winning time 22:07) or during the 31 km TT at the 2019 Tour De France (Saint pée sur Nivelle–Espelette, winning time 40:52) only 0.3% and 0.04%, respectively, separated first and second position [101,102]. Nevertheless, in the laboratory environment, the smallest worthwhile change (SWC) and the typical error of measurement (TEM) should be taken into consideration when interpreting the results [103,104]. According to Hopkins [103], the improvement in an athlete’s performance cannot be considered as progressive until it reaches or goes over 0.3% in individual sports, defining this improvement as the SWC. Additionally, the TEMs for TT cycling tests are usually around ~1% depending on the ergometer and time variation for short (~60 s) and long-duration TT (~1 h) in elite athletes, also around ~0.5% and ~1%, respectively, depending on the method and the equipment [105]. Furthermore, if we would focus on a longer duration TT test (several minutes) then the athlete’s improvement would have to reach 1.3% (SWC + TEM), so it could be called beneficial [103]. Therefore, even the most considerable TT performance changes observed during cycling ergometry measurements in elite athletes may not be relevant (improvement is lower than SWC + TEM, therefore unclear) in real sports events [103]. Interestingly only 5 of the 13 reviewed studies observed performance improvement after DN supplementation ≥ 1.3% [68,75,81,84,85].
From this point of view, it is evident that translating athlete-specific DN research outcomes into practical interventions requires the determination of their true translational potential. To standardise this, Close et al. [106] recently proposed an excellent 9 step framework, that may assist practitioners in the proper evaluation of performance nutrition research and applying the findings into practice therefore making the dietary choices adopted by their athletes sport-specific and “evidence-based”.

4.5. Future Perspectives

Recent results from muscle histology studies show fascinating new insights into the role of NO3 in the human body [107,108,109,110,111]. Seemingly NO3 can be stored within the muscle tissue cells which could be a very elegant explanation of the crucial role of muscle tissue in NOS production, the NOS-dependent and NO3–NO2–NO pathways [88]. Wylie et al. [66] suggested that there is a relationship between VO2max and NO3 substrates within the MFs. In the light of these recent findings, significant improvements in TT performance in athletes with VO2max < 65 mL/kg/min may be explained by lower muscle NO3 disposal and NO bioavailability. Therefore, increased DN intake may increase muscle NO3 storage capacity and positively affect physical performance [112]. Moreover, it has been hypothesised there could be a potentially positive effect in the treatment of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases as NO3 levels are lower in the elderly, untrained and cardiovascular or diabetes patients [111,112,113]. Therefore, further research in the area of NO3 muscle storage and its role not only in physical exercise but also in therapeutic practice is needed.
Based on the above discussion, it remains unclear whether any statistically insignificant changes in highly trained athletes could be affected by MF ratio, non-specific tissue vasodilatation, physiological systems already at their maximal limit of adaption in elite athletes, supplementation protocol, NO3 muscle storage or other factors. As such, future research should focus on unifying the study design framework and strict classification of participants according to their training status. Additionally, in the light of recent observations of the fibre-type specific effects of DN, it would be reasonable to focus more on resistance and speed exercise tasks or lactate-anaerobic tasks to compare DN effectiveness among different sports disciplines.

4.6. Limitations of the Study

Our study has limitations which should be noted. Firstly, we only focused on articles published from 2015 and 2019, as we wanted to review the most recent studies and put them in the context of future perspectives as the NO3 muscle storage presents a new and fascinating approach in explaining the DN ergogenicity. Secondly, our study did not focus on data related to NO3/NO2 blood levels which are the critical substrates for NO production and bioavailability. We managed to associate performance enhancement with chronic use of DN. However, we may speculate whether increased levels of NO3/NO2 cause such a performance effect. We had not made the statistical analysis of biochemical data to verify such association (some studies do not provide such data as the authors did not focus on the biochemical analysis). Lastly, we analysed mean percentual changes in the performance of the experimental groups gathered from the selected studies resulting in a certain bias as the results can deviate across the group of participants.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, reviewed studies from 2015 and 2019 show that ergogenicity of dietary nitrates in time trial performance is more likely to be observed in lesser-trained athletes. Our results suggest that the higher the athlete’s training status, the lower the exercise performance improvement. These results are more consistent in chronic dietary nitrates supplementation studies rather than in studies following an acute supplementation protocol. Furthermore, even a minor and statistically insignificant improvement in performance of around 0.31% could make a difference for the elite trained, as the performance differences between the podium athletes are tight. However, research results in elite athletes are inconsistent (e.g., improvement/impairment, statistically significant/insignificant), and research samples are usually small. The smallest worthwhile change and typical error of measurement should be used for critical assessment when evaluating time-trial research results. The performance change should be considered as beneficial only when compared to the sum of the smallest worthwhile change and typical error of measurement for selected training status groups and laboratory tests.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.H. and M.K.; methodology, T.H., M.K. and P.V.; validation, P.V.; formal analysis, T.H. and P.V.; writing—original draft preparation, T.H.; writing—review and editing, T.H., M.K. and P.V.; supervision, M.K.; project administration, T.H.; funding acquisition, T.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This article was written at Masaryk University as part of the project “Effect of Dietary Nitrates on Physical Performance” MUNI/A/1201/2018 with the support of the Specific University Research Grant, as provided by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic.


The authors would like to thank our colleague Alexander Floyd for reviewing the grammar and critically reviewing the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Jones, A.M.; Thompson, C.; Wylie, L.J.; Vanhatalo, A. Dietary nitrate and physical performance. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2018, 38, 303–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Murad, F. Discovery of some of the biological effects of nitric oxide and its role in cell signaling. Biosci. Rep. 1999, 19, 133–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ignarro, L.J. Nitric oxide: A unique endogenous signaling molecule in vascular biology. Biosci. Rep. 1999, 19, 51–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Furchgott, R.F. Endothelium-derived relaxing factor: Discovery, early studies, and identification as nitric oxide. Biosci. Rep. 1999, 19, 235–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Clifford, T.; Howatson, G.; West, D.J.; Stevenson, E.J. The potential benefits of red beetroot supplementation in health and disease. Nutrients 2015, 7, 2801–2822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Burke, L.M. Practical issues in evidence-based use of performance supplements: Supplement interactions, repeated use and individual responses. Sports Med. 2017, 47, 79–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  7. Peeling, P.; Castell, L.M.; Derave, W.; de Hon, O.; Burke, L.M. Sports foods and dietary supplements for optimal function and performance enhancement in track-and-field athletes. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2019, 29, 198–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  8. Vitale, K.; Getzin, A. Nutrition and supplement update for the endurance athlete: Review and recommendations. Nutrients 2019, 11, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  9. Hord, N.G.; Tang, Y.; Bryan, N.S. Food sources of nitrates and nitrites: The physiologic context for potential health benefits. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 90, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Jonvik, K.L.; Nyakayiru, J.; van Loon, L.J.C.; Verdijk, L.B. Can elite athletes benefit from dietary nitrate supplementation? J. Appl. Physiol. 2015, 119, 759–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  11. Murad, F. Nitric oxide and cyclic GMP in cell signaling and drug development. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355, 2003–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rhodes, P.M.; Leone, A.M.; Francis, P.L.; Struthers, A.D.; Moncada, S. The L-arginine: Nitric oxide pathway is the major source of plasma nitrite in fasted humans. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995, 209, 590–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Lundberg, J.O.; Carlström, M.; Larsen, F.J.; Weitzberg, E. Roles of dietary inorganic nitrate in cardiovascular health and disease. Cardiovasc. Res. 2011, 89, 525–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kapil, V.; Weitzberg, E.; Lundberg, J.O.; Ahluwalia, A. Clinical evidence demonstrating the utility of inorganic nitrate in cardiovascular health. Nitric Oxide 2014, 38, 45–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lidder, S.; Webb, A.J. Vascular effects of dietary nitrate (as found in green leafy vegetables and beetroot) via the nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2013, 75, 677–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  16. Duncan, C.; Dougall, H.; Johnston, P.; Green, S.; Brogan, R.; Leifert, C.; Smith, L.; Golden, M.; Benjamin, N. Chemical generation of nitric oxide in the mouth from the enterosalivary circulation of dietary nitrate. Nat. Med. 1995, 1, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Benjamin, N.; O’Driscoll, F.; Dougall, H.; Duncan, C.; Smith, L.; Golden, M.; McKenzie, H. Stomach NO synthesis. Nature 1994, 368, 502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. James, P.E.; Willis, G.R.; Allen, J.D.; Winyard, P.G.; Jones, A.M. Nitrate pharmacokinetics: Taking note of the difference. Nitric Oxide 2015, 48, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lundberg, J.O.; Weitzberg, E. NO generation from inorganic nitrate and nitrite: Role in physiology, nutrition and therapeutics. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2009, 32, 1119–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Domínguez, R.; Maté-Muñoz, J.L.; Cuenca, E.; García-Fernández, P.; Mata-Ordoñez, F.; Lozano-Estevan, M.C.; Veiga-Herreros, P.; da Silva, S.F.; Garnacho-Castaño, M.V. Effects of beetroot juice supplementation on intermittent high-intensity exercise efforts. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2018, 15, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  21. Moncada, S.; Higgs, A. The L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993, 329, 2002–2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Larsen, F.J.; Schiffer, T.A.; Borniquel, S.; Sahlin, K.; Ekblom, B.; Lundberg, J.O.; Weitzberg, E. Dietary inorganic nitrate improves mitochondrial efficiency in humans. Cell Metab. 2011, 13, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  23. Sarti, P.; Forte, E.; Mastronicola, D.; Giuffrè, A.; Arese, M. Cytochrome c oxidase and nitric oxide in action: Molecular mechanisms and pathophysiological implications. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1817, 610–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Van Faassen, E.E.; Bahrami, S.; Feelisch, M.; Hogg, N.; Kelm, M.; Kim-Shapiro, D.B.; Kozlov, A.V.; Li, H.; Lundberg, J.O.; Mason, R.; et al. Nitrite as regulator of hypoxic signaling in mammalian physiology. Med. Res. Rev. 2009, 29, 683–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  25. Bailey, S.J.; Fulford, J.; Vanhatalo, A.; Winyard, P.G.; Blackwell, J.R.; DiMenna, F.J.; Wilkerson, D.P.; Benjamin, N.; Jones, A.M. Dietary nitrate supplementation enhances muscle contractile efficiency during knee-extensor exercise in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 2010, 109, 135–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  26. Coggan, A.R.; Peterson, L.R. Dietary nitrate enhances the contractile properties of human skeletal muscle. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2018, 46, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  27. Rokkedal-Lausch, T.; Franch, J.; Poulsen, M.K.; Thomsen, L.P.; Weitzberg, E.; Kamavuako, E.N.; Karbing, D.S.; Larsen, R.G. Chronic high-dose beetroot juice supplementation improves time trial performance of well-trained cyclists in normoxia and hypoxia. Nitric Oxide Biol. Chem. 2019, 85, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  28. Wylie, L.J.; Kelly, J.; Bailey, S.J.; Blackwell, J.R.; Skiba, P.F.; Winyard, P.G.; Jeukendrup, A.E.; Vanhatalo, A.; Jones, A.M. Beetroot juice and exercise: Pharmacodynamic and dose-response relationships. J. Appl. Physiol. 2013, 115, 325–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  29. Hoon, M.W.; Jones, A.M.; Johnson, N.A.; Blackwell, J.R.; Broad, E.M.; Lundy, B.; Rice, A.J.; Burke, L.M. The effect of variable doses of inorganic nitrate-rich beetroot juice on simulated 2,000-m rowing performance in trained athletes. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2014, 9, 615–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vanhatalo, A.; Bailey, S.J.; Blackwell, J.R.; DiMenna, F.J.; Pavey, T.G.; Wilkerson, D.P.; Benjamin, N.; Winyard, P.G.; Jones, A.M. Acute and chronic effects of dietary nitrate supplementation on blood pressure and the physiological responses to moderate-intensity and incremental exercise. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2010, 299, R1121–R1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  31. Wylie, L.J.; Ortiz de Zevallos, J.; Isidore, T.; Nyman, L.; Vanhatalo, A.; Bailey, S.J.; Jones, A.M. Dose-dependent effects of dietary nitrate on the oxygen cost of moderate-intensity exercise: Acute vs. chronic supplementation. Nitric Oxide 2016, 57, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  32. Thompson, K.G.; Turner, L.; Prichard, J.; Dodd, F.; Kennedy, D.O.; Haskell, C.; Blackwell, J.R.; Jones, A.M. Influence of dietary nitrate supplementation on physiological and cognitive responses to incremental cycle exercise. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2014, 193, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Muggeridge, D.J.; Sculthorpe, N.; Grace, F.M.; Willis, G.; Thornhill, L.; Weller, R.B.; James, P.E.; Easton, C. Acute whole body UVA irradiation combined with nitrate ingestion enhances time trial performance in trained cyclists. Nitric Oxide 2015, 48, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  34. Hernández, A.; Schiffer, T.A.; Ivarsson, N.; Cheng, A.J.; Bruton, J.D.; Lundberg, J.O.; Weitzberg, E.; Westerblad, H. Dietary nitrate increases tetanic [Ca2+]i and contractile force in mouse fast-twitch muscle. J. Physiol. 2012, 590, 3575–3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Haider, G.; Folland, J.P. Nitrate supplementation enhances the contractile properties of human skeletal muscle. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2014, 46, 2234–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Whitfield, J.; Gamu, D.; Heigenhauser, G.J.F.; van Loon, L.J.C.; Spriet, L.L.; Tupling, A.R.; Holloway, G.P. Beetroot juice increases human muscle force without changing Ca2+-handling proteins. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2017, 49, 2016–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jones, A.M.; Ferguson, S.K.; Bailey, S.J.; Vanhatalo, A.; Poole, D.C. Fiber Type-Specific Effects of Dietary Nitrate. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2016, 44, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sussman, I.; Erecińska, M.; Wilson, D.F. Regulation of cellular energy metabolism. The Crabtree effect. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerg. 1980, 591, 209–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nourry, C.; Fabre, C.; Bart, F.; Grosbois, J.-M.; Berthoin, S.; Mucci, P. Evidence of exercise-induced arterial hypoxemia in prepubescent trained children. Pediatr. Res. 2004, 55, 674–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  40. Lundberg, J.O.; Weitzberg, E. NO-synthase independent NO generation in mammals. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 396, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Modin, A.; Björne, H.; Herulf, M.; Alving, K.; Weitzberg, E.; Lundberg, J.O. Nitrite-derived nitric oxide: A possible mediator of “acidic-metabolic” vasodilation. Acta Physiol. Scand. 2001, 171, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Lundberg, J.O.; Weitzberg, E.; Gladwin, M.T. The nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway in physiology and therapeutics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008, 7, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Behnke, B.J.; McDonough, P.; Padilla, D.J.; Musch, T.I.; Poole, D.C. Oxygen exchange profile in rat muscles of contrasting fibre types. J. Physiol. 2003, 549, 597–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. McDonough, P.; Behnke, B.J.; Padilla, D.J.; Musch, T.I.; Poole, D.C. Control of microvascular oxygen pressures in rat muscles comprised of different fibre types. J. Physiol. 2005, 563, 903–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ferreira, L.F.; McDonough, P.; Behnke, B.J.; Musch, T.I.; Poole, D.C. Blood flow and O2 extraction as a function of O2 uptake in muscles composed of different fiber types. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2006, 153, 237–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Vanin, A.F.; Bevers, L.M.; Slama-Schwok, A.; van Faassen, E.E. Nitric oxide synthase reduces nitrite to NO under anoxia. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2007, 64, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Bailey, S.J.; Varnham, R.L.; DiMenna, F.J.; Breese, B.C.; Wylie, L.J.; Jones, A.M. Inorganic nitrate supplementation improves muscle oxygenation, O₂ uptake kinetics, and exercise tolerance at high but not low pedal rates. J. Appl. Physiol. 2015, 118, 1396–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Coggan, A.R.; Leibowitz, J.L.; Kadkhodayan, A.; Thomas, D.P.; Ramamurthy, S.; Spearie, C.A.; Waller, S.; Farmer, M.; Peterson, L.R. Effect of acute dietary nitrate intake on maximal knee extensor speed and power in healthy men and women. Nitric Oxide 2015, 48, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Cermak, N.M.; Res, P.; Stinkens, R.; Lundberg, J.O.; Gibala, M.J.; van Loon, L.J.C. No improvement in endurance performance after a single dose of beetroot juice. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2012, 22, 470–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  50. Christensen, P.M.; Nyberg, M.; Bangsbo, J. Influence of nitrate supplementation on VO₂ kinetics and endurance of elite cyclists. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2013, 23, e21–e31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mosher, S.L.; Gough, L.A.; Deb, S.; Saunders, B.; Naughton, L.R.M.; Brown, D.R.; Sparks, S.A. High dose Nitrate ingestion does not improve 40 km cycling time trial performance in trained cyclists. Res. Sports Med. 2020, 28, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Boorsma, R.K.; Whitfield, J.; Spriet, L.L. Beetroot juice supplementation does not improve performance of elite 1500-m runners. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2014, 46, 2326–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bescós, R.; Ferrer-Roca, V.; Galilea, P.A.; Roig, A.; Drobnic, F.; Sureda, A.; Martorell, M.; Cordova, A.; Tur, J.A.; Pons, A. Sodium nitrate supplementation does not enhance performance of endurance athletes. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2012, 44, 2400–2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Peacock, O.; Tjønna, A.E.; James, P.; Wisløff, U.; Welde, B.; Böhlke, N.; Smith, A.; Stokes, K.; Cook, C.; Sandbakk, Ø. Dietary nitrate does not enhance running performance in elite cross-country skiers. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2012, 44, 2213–2219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Coyle, E.F.; Feltner, M.E.; Kautz, S.A.; Hamilton, M.T.; Montain, S.J.; Baylor, A.M.; Abraham, L.D.; Petrek, G.W. Physiological and biomechanical factors associated with elite endurance cycling performance. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1991, 23, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Jeukendrup, A.E.; Craig, N.P.; Hawley, J.A. The bioenergetics of world class cycling. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2000, 3, 414–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yan, Z.; Okutsu, M.; Akhtar, Y.N.; Lira, V.A. Regulation of exercise-induced fiber type transformation, mitochondrial biogenesis, and angiogenesis in skeletal muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 2010, 110, 264–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  58. Peeling, P.; Cox, G.R.; Bullock, N.; Burke, L.M. Beetroot juice improves on-water 500 M time-trial performance, and laboratory-based paddling economy in national and international-level kayak athletes. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2015, 25, 278–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Muggeridge, D.J.; Howe, C.C.F.; Spendiff, O.; Pedlar, C.; James, P.E.; Easton, C. The effects of a single dose of concentrated beetroot juice on performance in trained flatwater kayakers. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2013, 23, 498–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Johnson, M.A.; Polgar, J.; Weightman, D.; Appleton, D. Data on the distribution of fibre types in thirty-six human muscles. An autopsy study. J. Neurol. Sci. 1973, 18, 111–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Polgar, J.; Johnson, M.A.; Weightman, D.; Appleton, D. Data on fibre size in thirty-six human muscles: An autopsy study. J. Neurol. Sci. 1973, 19, 307–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Jennekens, F.G.I.; Tomlinson, B.E.; Walton, J.N. The sizes of the two main histochemical fibre types in five limb muscles in man: An autopsy study. J. Neurol. Sci. 1971, 13, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Roth, W.; Schwanitz, P.; Pas, P.; Bauer, P. Force-time characteristics of the rowing stroke and corresponding physiological muscle adaptations. Int. J. Sports Med. 1993, 14, S32–S34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Shephard, R.J. Science and medicine of canoeing and kayaking. Sports Med. 1987, 4, 19–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Steinacker, J. Physiological aspects of training in rowing. Int. J. Sports Med. 1993, 14 (Suppl. 1), S3. [Google Scholar]
  66. Wylie, L.J.; Park, J.W.; Vanhatalo, A.; Kadach, S.; Black, M.I.; Stoyanov, Z.; Schechter, A.N.; Jones, A.M.; Piknova, B. Human skeletal muscle nitrate store: Influence of dietary nitrate supplementation and exercise. J. Physiol. 2019, 597, 5565–5576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  67. Bryan, N.S.; Ivy, J.L. Inorganic nitrite and nitrate: Evidence to support consideration as dietary nutrients. Nutr. Res. 2015, 35, 643–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Porcelli, S.; Ramaglia, M.; Bellistri, G.; Pavei, G.; Pugliese, L.; Montorsi, M.; Rasica, L.; Marzorati, M. Aerobic fitness affects the exercise performance responses to nitrate supplementation. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2015, 47, 1643–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  69. Tesch, P.A.; Karlsson, J. Muscle fiber types and size in trained and untrained muscles of elite athletes. J. Appl. Physiol. 1985, 59, 1716–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Proctor, D.N.; Sinning, W.E.; Walro, J.M.; Sieck, G.C.; Lemon, P.W. Oxidative capacity of human muscle fiber types: Effects of age and training status. J. Appl. Physiol. 1995, 78, 2033–2038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. McQuillan, J.A.; Dulson, D.K.; Laursen, P.B.; Kilding, A.E. Dietary nitrate fails to improve 1 and 4 km cycling performance in highly trained cyclists. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2017, 27, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Clarke, M.; Devereaux, P.J.; Kleijnen, J.; Moher, D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009, 6, e1000100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. De Pauw, K.; Roelands, B.; Cheung, S.S.; De Geus, B.; Rietjens, G.; Meeusen, R. Guidelines to classify subject groups in sport-science research. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2013, 8, 111–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  74. Decroix, L.; Pauw, K.D.; Foster, C.; Meeusen, R. Guidelines to classify female subject groups in sport-science research. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2016, 11, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Jo, E.; Fischer, M.; Auslander, A.T.; Beigarten, A.; Daggy, B.; Hansen, K.; Kessler, L.; Osmond, A.; Wang, H.; Wes, R. The effects of multi-day vs. single pre-exercise nitrate supplement dosing on simulated cycling time trial performance and skeletal muscle oxygenation. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2019, 33, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Maher, C.G.; Sherrington, C.; Herbert, R.D.; Moseley, A.M.; Elkins, M. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys. Ther. 2003, 83, 713–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  77. Verhagen, A.P.; de Vet, H.C.; de Bie, R.A.; Kessels, A.G.; Boers, M.; Bouter, L.M.; Knipschild, P.G. The Delphi list: A criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1998, 51, 1235–1241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  78. Glaister, M.; Pattison, J.R.; Muniz-Pumares, D.; Patterson, S.D.; Foley, P. Effects of dietary nitrate, caffeine, and their combination on 20-km cycling time trial performance. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2015, 29, 165–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  79. Callahan, M.J.; Parr, E.B.; Hawley, J.A.; Burke, L.M. Single and combined effects of beetroot crystals and sodium bicarbonate on 4-km cycling time trial performance. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2017, 27, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sandbakk, S.B.; Sandbakk, Ø.; Peacock, O.; James, P.; Welde, B.; Stokes, K.; Böhlke, N.; Tjønna, A.E. Effects of acute supplementation of L-arginine and nitrate on endurance and sprint performance in elite athletes. Nitric Oxide Biol. Chem. 2015, 48, 10–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  81. Nyakayiru, J.M.; Jonvik, K.L.; Pinckaers, P.J.M.; Senden, J.; van Loon, L.J.C.; Verdijk, L.B. No effect of acute and 6-day nitrate supplementation on VO2 and time-trial performance in highly trained cyclists. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2017, 27, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Oskarsson, J.; McGawley, K. No individual or combined effects of caffeine and beetrootjuice supplementation during submaximal or maximal running. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2018, 43, 697–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. McQuillan, J.A.; Dulson, D.K.; Laursen, P.B.; Kilding, A.E. The effect of dietary nitrate supplementation on physiology and performance in trained cyclists. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2017, 12, 684–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  84. Shannon, O.M.; Barlow, M.J.; Duckworth, L.; Williams, E.; Wort, G.; Woods, D.; Siervo, M.; O’Hara, J.P. Dietary nitrate supplementation enhances short but not longer duration running time-trial performance. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2017, 117, 775–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. de Castro, T.F.; Manoel, F.A.; Figueiredo, D.H.; Figueiredo, D.H.; Machado, F.A. Effect of beetroot juice supplementation on 10-km performance in recreational runners. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2019, 44, 90–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  86. McMahon, N.F.; Leveritt, M.D.; Pavey, T.G. The effect of dietary nitrate supplementation on endurance exercise performance in healthy adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2017, 47, 735–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  87. Hoon, M.W.; Johnson, N.A.; Chapman, P.G.; Burke, L.M. The effect of nitrate supplementation on exercise performance in healthy individuals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2013, 23, 522–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  88. Nyakayiru, J.; van Loon, L.C.; Verdijk, L. Could intramuscular storage of dietary nitrate contribute to its ergogenic effect? A mini-review. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Murray, A.J.; Horscroft, J.A. Mitochondrial function at extreme high altitude. J. Physiol. 2016, 594, 1137–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  90. Murray, A.J. Metabolic adaptation of skeletal muscle to high altitude hypoxia: How new technologies could resolve the controversies. Genome Med. 2009, 1, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Kelly, J.; Vanhatalo, A.; Bailey, S.J.; Wylie, L.J.; Tucker, C.; List, S.; Winyard, P.G.; Jones, A.M. Dietary nitrate supplementation: Effects on plasma nitrite and pulmonary O2 uptake dynamics during exercise in hypoxia and normoxia. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2014, 307, R920–R930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  92. Masschelein, E.; van Thienen, R.; Wang, X.; van Schepdael, A.; Thomis, M.; Hespel, P. Dietary nitrate improves muscle but not cerebral oxygenation status during exercise in hypoxia. J. Appl. Physiol. 2012, 113, 736–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  93. Shannon, O.M.; Duckworth, L.; Barlow, M.J.; Deighton, K.; Matu, J.; Williams, E.L.; Woods, D.; Xie, L.; Stephan, B.C.M.; Siervo, M.; et al. Effects of dietary nitrate supplementation on physiological responses, cognitive function, and exercise performance at moderate and very-high simulated altitude. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Shannon, O.M.; Duckworth, L.; Barlow, M.J.; Woods, D.; Lara, J.; Siervo, M.; O’Hara, J.P. Dietary nitrate supplementation enhances high-intensity running performance in moderate normobaric hypoxia, independent of aerobic fitness. Nitric Oxide Biol. Chem. 2016, 59, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  95. Arnold, J.T.; Oliver, S.J.; Lewis-Jones, T.M.; Wylie, L.J.; Macdonald, J.H. Beetroot juice does not enhance altitude running performance in well-trained athletes. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2015, 40, 590–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  96. Puype, J.; Ramaekers, M.; van Thienen, R.; Deldicque, L.; Hespel, P. No effect of dietary nitrate supplementation on endurance training in hypoxia. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2015, 25, 234–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Cumpstey, A.F.; Hennis, P.J.; Gilbert-Kawai, E.T.; Fernandez, B.O.; Grant, D.; Jenner, W.; Poudevigne, M.; Moyses, H.; Levett, D.Z.; Cobb, A.; et al. Effects of dietary nitrate supplementation on microvascular physiology at 4559 m altitude—A randomised controlled trial (Xtreme Alps). Nitric Oxide 2020, 94, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Cumpstey, A.F.; Hennis, P.J.; Gilbert-Kawai, E.T.; Fernandez, B.O.; Poudevigne, M.; Cobb, A.; Meale, P.; Mitchell, K.; Moyses, H.; Pöhnl, H.; et al. Effects of dietary nitrate on respiratory physiology at high altitude—Results from the Xtreme Alps study. Nitric Oxide 2017, 71, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Bakker, E.; Engan, H.; Patrician, A.; Schagatay, E.; Karlsen, T.; Wisløff, U.; Gaustad, S.E. Acute dietary nitrate supplementation improves arterial endothelial function at high altitude: A double-blinded randomized controlled cross over study. Nitric Oxide 2015, 50, 58–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Hultström, M. Commentaries on Viewpoint: Can elite athletes benefit from dietary nitrate supplementation? J. Appl. Physiol. 2015, 119, 762–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Giro d’Italia 2019 | Stage 21 (ITT) | Results. Available online: (accessed on 10 May 2020).
  102. Tour de France 2018 | Stage 20 (ITT) | Results. Available online: (accessed on 10 May 2020).
  103. Hopkins, W.G. Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Med. 2000, 30, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  104. Atkinson, G.; Nevill, A.M. Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Med. 1998, 26, 217–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Paton, C.D.; Hopkins, W.G. Tests of cycling performance. Sports Med. 2001, 31, 489–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Close, G.L.; Kasper, A.M.; Morton, J.P. From paper to podium: Quantifying the translational potential of performance nutrition research. Sports Med. 2019, 49, 25–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  107. Piknova, B.; Park, J.W.; Swanson, K.M.; Dey, S.; Noguchi, C.T.; Schechter, A.N. Skeletal muscle as an endogenous nitrate reservoir. Nitric Oxide 2015, 47, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  108. Piknova, B.; Park, J.W.; Lam, K.K.; Schechter, A.N. Nitrate as a source of nitrite and nitric oxide during exercise hyperemia in rat skeletal muscle. Nitric Oxide 2016, 55, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  109. Gilliard, C.N.; Lam, J.K.; Cassel, K.S.; Park, J.W.; Schechter, A.N.; Piknova, B. Effect of dietary nitrate levels on nitrate fluxes in rat skeletal muscle and liver. Nitric Oxide 2018, 75, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Srihirun, S.; Park, J.W.; Teng, R.; Sawaengdee, W.; Piknova, B.; Schechter, A.N. Nitrate uptake and metabolism in human skeletal muscle cell cultures. Nitric Oxide 2020, 94, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Kapur, S.; Bédard, S.; Marcotte, B.; Côté, C.H.; Marette, A. Expression of nitric oxide synthase in skeletal muscle: A novel role for nitric oxide as a modulator of insulin action. Diabetes 1997, 46, 1691–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Nyakayiru, J.; Kouw, I.W.K.; Cermak, N.M.; Senden, J.M.; van Loon, L.J.C.; Verdijk, L.B. Sodium nitrate ingestion increases skeletal muscle nitrate content in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 2017, 123, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  113. McDonagh, S.T.J.; Wylie, L.J.; Webster, J.M.A.; Vanhatalo, A.; Jones, A.M. Influence of dietary nitrate food forms on nitrate metabolism and blood pressure in healthy normotensive adults. Nitric Oxide 2018, 72, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Selection process diagram of articles meeting the eligibility criteria for our review.
Figure 1. Selection process diagram of articles meeting the eligibility criteria for our review.
Nutrients 12 02734 g001
Figure 2. Effects of DN supplementation on TT performance in athletes with different training statuses according to their VO2max. The graph presents the mean percentual changes in time-to-completion of given tasks in the experimental groups. Negative values represent improvement, as the task was finished in less time (bars to the left from y-axis) following acute (blue bars) or chronic (red bars) supplementation. Cited studies are listed in References [27,58,68,71,75,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85]. * Statistically significant improvement in performance following DN supplementation; # improvement was observed in 6 of 17 participants dividing the group of well-trained athletes into “responders” and “non-responders”. The two experimental situations are, therefore, divided into four according to the specific reaction to DN supplementation of the participants [81].
Figure 2. Effects of DN supplementation on TT performance in athletes with different training statuses according to their VO2max. The graph presents the mean percentual changes in time-to-completion of given tasks in the experimental groups. Negative values represent improvement, as the task was finished in less time (bars to the left from y-axis) following acute (blue bars) or chronic (red bars) supplementation. Cited studies are listed in References [27,58,68,71,75,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85]. * Statistically significant improvement in performance following DN supplementation; # improvement was observed in 6 of 17 participants dividing the group of well-trained athletes into “responders” and “non-responders”. The two experimental situations are, therefore, divided into four according to the specific reaction to DN supplementation of the participants [81].
Nutrients 12 02734 g002
Figure 3. Relationship between VO2max and DN ergogenicity in TT tests: chronic supplementation protocol. Negative values in time change represent improvement as the task was finished in less time.
Figure 3. Relationship between VO2max and DN ergogenicity in TT tests: chronic supplementation protocol. Negative values in time change represent improvement as the task was finished in less time.
Nutrients 12 02734 g003
Figure 4. Relationship between VO2max and DN ergogenicity in TT tests: acute supplementation protocol. Negative values in time change represent improvement as the task was finished in less time.
Figure 4. Relationship between VO2max and DN ergogenicity in TT tests: acute supplementation protocol. Negative values in time change represent improvement as the task was finished in less time.
Nutrients 12 02734 g004
Figure 5. Training status and ergogenicity in simulated high-altitude. Cited studies are listed in References [93,94,95]. * Statistically significant improvement in performance following DN supplementation.
Figure 5. Training status and ergogenicity in simulated high-altitude. Cited studies are listed in References [93,94,95]. * Statistically significant improvement in performance following DN supplementation.
Nutrients 12 02734 g005
Table 1. Participant training status classification defined by VO2max.
Table 1. Participant training status classification defined by VO2max.
Training Status (Number of Experimental Situations Included)SexVO2max (mL/kg/min)
1—Untrained (n = 1)Males<45
2—Recreationally trained (n = 4)Males45–54.9
3—Trained (n = 4)Males55–64.9
4—Well-trained (n = 12)Males65–71
5—Elite (n = 1)Males>71
Table 2. Relationship between DN supplementation protocol and training status in promoting the ergogenic effects.
Table 2. Relationship between DN supplementation protocol and training status in promoting the ergogenic effects.
ReferenceSexTraining StatusVO2max a/VO2peak bCVA/CSupplementation ProtocolTest (Test Duration)Ergogenic *
[75]M and FRecreationally trained--Acute8.0 mmol (NO3) of PN; 2 h before the test8 km cycling (~20 min)Yes
[84]MTrained62.3 ± 8.1 mL/kg/min a13.0%12.8 mmol (NO3) of BJC; 3 h before the test1500 m running (~6 min)Yes
10 km running (~45 min)No
[82]MTrained59.0 ± 2.9 mL/kg/min a4.9%6.4 mmol (NO3) of BJC; 2.5 h before the test1 km running (<3 min)No
F53.1 ± 11.4 mL/kg/min a21.5%
[80]MWell-trained69.3 ± 5.8 mL/kg/min a8.4%9.9 mmol (NO3) of PN; 2.5 h before the test180 m running (~25 s)No
5 km running (~17 min)No
[81]MWell-trained65.0 ± 4.0 mL/kg/min b6.2%12.8 mmol (NO3) of SN; 3 h before the test10 km cycling (~17 min)No #
[78]FWell-trained52.3 ± 4.9 mL/kg/min a9.4%6.4 mmol (NO3) of BJC; 2.5 h before the test20 km cycling (~35 min)No
[58]FWell-trained 47.8 ± 3.7 mL/kg/min b7.7%12.8 mmol NO3) of BJC; 2 h before the test500 m paddling (~2 min)Yes
[68]MUntrained37.8 ± 5.8 mL/kg/min b15.3%Chronic6-day 5.5 mmol (NO3) of SN; 3.5 h before the test3 km running (~15 min)Yes
[75]M and FRecreationally trained--15-day 8.0 mmol (NO3) of PN; 2 h before the test8 km cycling (~20 min)Yes
[68]MRecreationally trained52.0 ± 4.5 mL/kg/min b8.7%6-day 5.5 mmol (NO3) of SN; 3.5 h before the test3 km running (~12 min)Yes
[85]MRecreationally trained45.4 ± 5.9 mL/kg/min a13.0%3-day 8.4 mmol (NO3) of BJ; 2 h before the test10 km running (~55 min)Yes
[83]MTrained63.0 ± 4.0 mL/kg/min b6.3%8-day 6.4 mmol (NO3) of BJC; 2.5 h before the test4 km cycling (~6 min)No
[71]MWell-trained68.0 ± 3.0 mL/kg/min b4.4%7-day 12.8 mmol (NO3) of BJC; 2.5 h before the test1 km cycling (~80 s)No
4 km cycling (<6 min)No
[79]MWell-trained65.2 ± 4.2 mL/kg/min a6.4%3-day ~5 mmol (NO3) of BC; 1 h before the test4 km cycling (<6 min)No
[81]MWell-trained65.0 ± 4.0 mL/kg/min b6.2%6-day 12.8 mmol (NO3) of SN; 3 h before the test10 km cycling (~17 min)No #
[27]MWell-trained66.4 ± 5.3 mL/kg/min a8.0%7-day 12.8 mmol (NO3) of BJC; 2.75 h before the test10 km cycling (~15 min)Yes
[68]MElite72.4 ± 6.1 mL/kg/min b8.4%6-day 5.5 mmol (NO3) of SN; 3.5 h before the test3 km running (~10 min)No
a VO2max values; b VO2peak values; * Statistically significant change in performance; # ergogenic effects in 6 of 17 participants following supplementation [81]; 5 female athletes with VO2peak 47.8 ± 3.7 mL/kg/min (recreationally trained or trained) are presented in the “well-trained” section of this figure because they were described as international-level female kayak athletes and all were 2012 National Squad members with 3/5 athletes competing at the 2012 London Olympic Games [58]. VO2peak could have been lower due to the exercise modality [1]. VO2max/VO2peak values are presented as the mean ± SD. Abbreviations: dietary nitrates (DN); male (M); female (F); CV-coefficient of variation; beetroot juice concentrate (BJC); beetroot juice (BJ); potassium nitrate (PN); beetroot crystals (BC); sodium nitrate (SN).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hlinský, T.; Kumstát, M.; Vajda, P. Effects of Dietary Nitrates on Time Trial Performance in Athletes with Different Training Status: Systematic Review. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2734.

AMA Style

Hlinský T, Kumstát M, Vajda P. Effects of Dietary Nitrates on Time Trial Performance in Athletes with Different Training Status: Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2020; 12(9):2734.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hlinský, Tomáš, Michal Kumstát, and Petr Vajda. 2020. "Effects of Dietary Nitrates on Time Trial Performance in Athletes with Different Training Status: Systematic Review" Nutrients 12, no. 9: 2734.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop