You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Nutrients
  • Review
  • Open Access

21 January 2020

Performance Factors Influencing Efficacy and Effectiveness of Iron Fortification Programs of Condiments for Improving Anemia Prevalence and Iron Status in Populations: A Systematic Review

,
and
1
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. 260 Bevier Hall-MC 182. 905 Goodwin Ave, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
2
Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Fortification: Traditional and New Strategies to Combat Micronutrient Deficiencies

Abstract

Iron fortification of staple foods is a common practice around the world to reduce the prevalence of iron-deficiency anemia. More recently, fortified condiments, including salts, sauces, and powders, have been tested in various efficacy trials. However, there is limited information on how nutritional, environmental, and experimental factors affect their efficacy and effectiveness. The purpose of the present work was to systematically review performance factors affecting the efficacy of condiment fortification trials. Three databases were searched using a standardized keyword search and included based on four-point inclusion criteria. Studies were evaluated against a quality assessment tool and effect sizes were calculated. Studies were ranked as low or high performing, based on whether or not they significantly improved iron-deficiency outcomes (hemoglobin, anemia prevalence, and ferritin levels). Of the 955 retrieved studies, 23 were included—of which, nine performed poorly, eight performed highly, and six were classified as neither because they did not meet the criteria of assessing the three iron outcomes. Results showed that unsuccessful trials did not consider environmental factors such as parasitic infections, nutritional factors such as micronutrient deficiencies other than iron, consumer acceptability of the product or experimental factors such as monitoring and adherence to the trials. Two common performing factors identified among those studies performing highly vs. those that did not were the control of sensory changes and monitoring of consumption compliance (i.e., dose delivery). The present work can be used as decision-making support for nutrition policy makers when determining the appropriate implementation of condiment fortification programs.

1. Introduction

Iron deficiency and iron-deficiency anemia are the most prevalent and widespread nutritional conditions around the globe at all socioeconomic levels. The deficiency of iron affects children and women of reproductive age primarily, especially during pregnancy []. This condition is linked to poor neurological and cognitive functions in children, to impaired work capacity in adults, and greater mortality in pregnant women []. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the latest prevalence estimates of anemia in 2016 were 41.7% in children and 32.8% in women of reproductive age, being most prevalent in low- and middle-income countries []. Practically no progress has been made in the last seven years since 2012 when the United Nations World Health Assembly set a goal for lowering the prevalence of anemia by 50% in women of reproductive age by 2025 []. According to the WHO global health observatory, the prevalence of anemia in women was 30.3% in 2012 and 32.8% in 2016, while the prevalence of anemia in children (<5 years) has remained unchanged at 41.7% during the same period. []. This high anemia prevalence indicates a serious public health concern, particularly for children. Iron deficiency has been attributed to insufficient iron intake, consumption of plant-based diets containing inhibitors of iron absorption, and infections, especially malaria and hookworms [].
Several strategies have been used throughout the years to combat iron deficiency, including the promotion of dietary diversification with iron-rich foods, iron supplementation of women of reproductive age, and fortification of staple foods with iron []. Since 1994, the World Bank has recognized food fortification of staple foods as the most cost-effective intervention for improving lives and human development in a relatively short time []. Furthermore, in 2008 the Copenhagen Consensus identified food fortification as one of the most cost-effective public health interventions for best health and nutrition outcomes []. Following this strategic direction, continuing efforts have been made to eradicate iron deficiency by fortifying, with this essential mineral, staples such as cereal flours and more recently, regional foods consumed in certain parts of the world, such as condiments and seasonings, whose consumption is expanding globally [].
The fortification of seasonings and condiments have a particular interest as these are consumed locally and are culturally adapted to the population. Therefore, populations are expected to demonstrate greater adherence to the interventions []. Current food vehicles for iron fortification include soy sauce, fish sauce, table salt, flavoring powders, curry powder, and bouillon cubes, among others []. This modality of fortification has been evaluated in Asian and African countries. In some cases, technologies have been fully evaluated for their efficacy and effectiveness, and in limited cases, these are commercially available, or manufactured by the industry for government programs, in countries like India, China, Cambodia, Bangladesh, Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia [], and more recently, in Argentina [].
When assessing the efficacy and effectiveness of food fortification interventions, the outcome is often influenced by several nutritional, environmental, and experimental factors. They include health status, type of infection, parasitism, rate of anemia at baseline, quality of the diet, duration of the study, monitoring of compliance, adherence to the programs, reigning diet, education and communication components, and even deficiencies of other micronutrients such as vitamin B12 and/or folate, among others []. Nonetheless, the relative impact of these factors has not been comprehensively evaluated. The efficacy of iron fortification of already assessed condiments on increasing hemoglobin levels and decreasing the risk of anemia is well-established, particularly for double-fortified salt with iodine and iron [,,]. The effectiveness of these interventions is less documented and, although hemoglobin and ferritin levels may slightly increase, in some instances the prevalence of anemia does not change in the population [,]. Furthermore, results regarding the role of potentially influencing factors affecting the outcome of the interventions are often mixed, show no effect or are not reported [,]. This limited information justifies a more comprehensive analysis of the interplay and degree of impact of associated conditions influencing the performance of interventions with iron-fortified condiments, hoping it will contribute toward their optimization. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review is to conduct a comprehensive assessment of performing factors impinging, negatively or positively, on the outcomes of iron fortification of condiments and seasonings in studied populations, particularly on their impact on anemia prevalence and hemoglobin and ferritin levels. The populations investigated consisted of children, women and general population, with different degrees of anemia, iron deficiency or both. Within this context, we also wanted to know whether established iron-deficient individuals could benefit from iron fortification of condiments by lowering anemia prevalence and increasing iron stores, once performing factors are identified and optimized.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

Experts (n = 2) on novel fortification strategies were initially contacted to collect potentially relevant literature. The Pubmed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were searched by using the following keyword search: ((fortif *) AND “iron” AND (Condiments [MesH] OR Seasoned OR Seasoning OR Bouillon * OR “Soy sauce *” OR “Fish sauce *” OR Powder * OR “fortified salt *”)) NOT (“milk powder *” OR Noodle * OR “home fortification”)). A language filter was applied to specify only English and Spanish studies. Other languages were not considered. Once articles were collected, literature was back-searched to identify additional references that met the inclusion criteria. Review articles were used for back-searching references.

2.2. Study Selection Criteria

Articles were assessed by title and abstract to include or exclude those based on the following criteria: Include articles that assessed efficacy, effectiveness, anemia prevalence, hemoglobin, or serum ferritin outcomes; studies assessing iron-fortified condiments (sauces, curry powders, bouillon cubes, salts, spices, seasonings, MSG); human studies; randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials (either individual or cluster-level), cross-over trials, non-randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, community-based studies and prospective observational studies with a control group. Exclude articles not pertaining to the aforementioned fortification strategies; articles published prior to 1999; behavior change only outcome studies; animal studies; survey and consumption data, in vitro studies, or case studies. Articles were collected with publication dates in the last 20 years, January 1999–May 2019, to collect the most relevant and new information. All populations were considered, including children, women, iron-deficient populations, anemic populations, and general populations.

2.3. Data Extraction

Data were extracted from included articles into a Microsoft Excel table on the following characteristics: publication year/author/journal, study type, study aim, condiment type, iron source (and preparation of condiment), sample size, duration of trial, population (age, gender, physical status (pregnancy, severity of iron deficiency, infection), diet, geography (country, rural/urban) including setting of trial (school, home, refugee camp, etc.)), performance factors (education framework (if identified; i.e., Bronfenbrenner’s ecological framework, the community-based participatory research (CBPR) framework, the social cognitive theory, theory of planned behavior, the health belief model, peer learning theory), communication with participants, behavior change component, policies/legislation, parasite treatment/no treatment, access/coverage, delivery mechanisms, monitoring scheme, adherence to treatment/insufficient or sufficient consumption of fortified condiment, sensory, monitoring compliance, waste, consumption drift, outcomes (anemia, serum ferritin, hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, total iron binding capacity, C-reactive protein, serum iron, serum soluble transferrin receptor, morbidity outcome: diarrhea, number of days sick, mortality, any reported adverse effects). In the case of reviews or other article types not providing the relevant characteristics to extract, N/A was used as a placeholder.

2.4. Study Quality Assessment

The included studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the guidelines found in the ‘Quality Criteria Checklist: Primary Research’ of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Evidence Analysis Manual []. This comprehensive tool was designed for food and nutrition interventions []. The Quality Criteria Checklist for primary research consists of 10 questions. Depending on the type of design, each question has several sub-questions (n = 2–8) to guide the rating. One author (JEA) assessed the quality of the articles at the study level on clarity of the research question, aspects of selection (random sequence generation and concealment of allocation methods) and comparability of study groups, retention rate (completeness of outcome data), detection (blinding of outcome assessors), performance (blinding of participants) and validity of outcome measures and any intervening factors, quality of statistical analysis and conclusions made with consideration of study limitations and likelihood of sponsorship bias. Any emerging conflicting assessments were discussed with an independent reviewer. Manuscripts were rated as positive (+), neutral (0), or negative (−). The quality assessment was not used to exclude studies from this review, but to support the discussion of performing indicators.

2.5. Data Synthesis

Given that the methods used for assessing change in hemoglobin varied across studies (i.e., control or baseline to endpoint), change in hemoglobin between baseline and endpoint were expressed as a standardized mean difference (effect size) to compare all studies based on the same measure. The effect size on hemoglobin levels was calculated using an online software tool based on the difference between the two means at the end of the intervention period, divided by the pooled estimate of standard deviation []. This helps calibrate the difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of the standard deviation. Effect sizes are used to compare studies to one another, but not to categorize studies based on effect sizes []. This is commonly conducted in meta-analysis reviews and reported as an odds ratio or relative risk [,]. The effect sizes can be deemed small (≤0.2), medium (≥0.2–<0.8), or large (≥0.8), based on previous cutoffs [].

3. Results

3.1. Study Selection

In the initial search of the literature (first phase), 955 studies were identified from Pubmed (n = 260), Web of Science (n = 339), and Scopus (n = 356) databases. After duplicates were removed, 541 studies remained. In the second phase, distillation was conducted by two authors (AWW and LAM) who reviewed the 541 studies by title and abstract and agreed to exclude 514 papers. After the distillation phase, 27 papers were reviewed full-text in the final third phase. After independent full-text review, the reviewers (AWW and LAM) met to discuss the exclusion of four articles under doubtful deliberation. A final agreement was reached based on the following reasons: food matrix not a condiment (n = 1), missing information (n = 1), no iron deficiency indicators as outcomes (n = 1), and duplicate study (n = 1). A total of 23 papers remained for the data extraction, study quality assessment, and data synthesis stages (see Figure 1).
Figure 1. PRISMA study selection flow chart.

3.2. Data Analysis

The selected twenty-three studies [,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,], two including subgroups of children and adults [,], were then evaluated for the impact of the iron fortification interventions on changes in hemoglobin, the prevalence of anemia and serum ferritin levels. An effort was made to identify negative and positive performing factors that may have influenced the outcomes. As presented in Table 1, the most tested condiment, as a vehicle for efficacy or effectiveness of iron fortification, was salt. This fortification approach included 13 Double-fortified Salt (DFS) [,,,,,,,,,,,,] and five Multiple Micronutrient Fortified Salt (MMFS) studies [,,,,]. Only one study evaluated a seasoning powder [], two studies evaluated fish sauce [,], and two studies evaluated soy sauce [,]. The majority of studies evaluated the efficacy of the interventions, and only two [,] assessed effectiveness. There were no efficacy or effectiveness studies of iron-fortified bouillon cubes. All studies were conducted in Asia or Africa using as subjects children or women of reproductive age during different time lengths using as fortificants a variety of iron forms that included micronized ground ferric pyrophosphate [,,,], encapsulated ferrous fumarate [,], ferrous fumarate [], ferrous sulfate [,], microencapsulated ferrous fumarate [], unknown iron source [,,], ferrous sulfate monohydrate chelated with malic acid and sodium hexametaphosphate [], ferrous sulfate hydrate encapsulated with partially hydrogenated vegetable oil [], chelated ferrous sulfate [,,,], H-reduced elemental iron encapsulated with partially hydrogenated vegetable oil [], ferrous sulfate citrate [], or NaFeEDTA [,,,]. Blood hemoglobin was the main hematological indicator in all studies to evaluate the effect of iron fortification. Some studies reported anemia prevalence and only a few analyzed serum ferritin (with or without correction for inflammation). The majority of DFS and MMFS studies assessed urinary iodine excretion (UIE) and verified that iron fortification did not jeopardize iodine fortification. Furthermore, in order to assure the success of the interventions, some studies included as part of the research protocol, the monitoring of potential performing factors such as an education component, assessment of behavioral changes, parasitic treatment, assessment and correction of micronutrient deficiencies, dietary intake, sensory and acceptability evaluation of the product and adherence to the programs. Sensory evaluation and product acceptability were of foremost importance, since some studies reported changes in the color of the DFS and of some foods when DFS was used for cooking [].
Table 1. Data extraction for systematically selected 23 studies.
The level of success of iron fortification for increasing hemoglobin, correcting anemia, or improving iron status was not the same for the different studies. Table 2 presents the distribution of responses in changes of hemoglobin, anemia prevalence and ferritin levels in children, women of reproductive age and the whole population at the end of the interventions. Out of 16 children studies, 13 showed increases in the levels of hemoglobin, and there was no change in three of them. In women, six out of eight studies resulted in an increase in hemoglobin and there was no change in one. Of the one study covering the whole population, only one experienced a significant increase in hemoglobin. Anemia in children was reported only by 12 studies, 10 of them decreased the prevalence of this condition and two reported no change. Out of seven studies in women that reported data on anemia, its prevalence decreased only in four studies and there was no change in three. In the one study covering the whole population, anemia was not assessed. Regarding serum ferritin as an indicator of iron deficiency, only 11 out of the 16 studies in children reported data on this parameter showing an increase in nine studies and not change in two of them. In women, four studies showed an increase in ferritin and there was no data in the remaining four. In the whole population, the study did not assess ferritin levels. A general observation in all these studies was that often hemoglobin and/or ferritin levels increased but the prevalence of anemia did not decrease.
Table 2. Studies with statistically significant changes in markers of anemia and iron status.
We then investigated, based on information provided by the authors, why nine of the studies in Table 2 did not experience changes in the right direction—that is, increasing hemoglobin, lowering the prevalence of anemia or increasing serum ferritin, in either children, women or in the whole population. Such studies, associated with potential negative performing factors that may have jeopardized reaching optimal outcomes, are presented in Table 3. Based on the comments made by the authors, there were organoleptic changes in two of the studies, consisting of a change in color of the iron-fortified salt or changes in the color of food when cooking using DFS as an ingredient [,]. It was believed that these color changes of the food vehicle decreased the acceptance, and thus the consumption of the fortified product impacting the outcome of the interventions. Two other studies were believed to be impacted negatively in the iron outcome due to an insufficient amount of iron in the fortified product to fulfill iron requirements, especially in women [,]. Two studies reported environmental conditions, such as the presence of malaria and parasitism, as factors influencing the outcomes negatively [,]. Two other reported deficiencies of micronutrients such as folate and vitamin B12 as possible causes for not attaining a significant reduction in anemia prevalence [,]. On the other hand, three of these studies did not reach statistical significance in one or more iron parameters possibly due to statistical issues such as an uneven balance in the prevalence of anemia between experimental and control group at baseline or increases on iron parameters in control groups at the end of the interventions [,,].
Table 3. Low-performing studies of the efficacy of iron fortification of condiments. Impact on hemoglobin, anemia, and iron status.
There was no apparent association between the type of iron form used and the outcome in iron parameters, except when using FeNa-EDTA in soy and fish sauces, which showed a greater positive response of the intervention.

3.3. Study Quality Assessment

All twenty-three studies were assessed using a 10-point quality assessment tool [] and classified based on their responses to being strong, moderate, or weak studies. The full quality assessment table can be seen in Supplementary Materials Table S1. There were n = 12 studies classified as strong [,,,,,,,,,,,], n = 7 studies classified as moderate [,,,,,,], and n = 4 studies classified as weak [,,,].

3.4. Data Synthesis

Effects sizes were estimated for each study, disaggregated by gender, age, iron source, and/or iron concentration when possible (Figure 2). Effect sizes were considered negligible if the standard deviation crossed the 0 x-axis, which was seen in nine studies [,,,,,,,,].
Figure 2. Effect sizes of studies included in this review. The effect size was bias-corrected using the Hedges estimation. When a similar study is included, more information in parentheses indicates the difference. Double-fortified salt (DFS), fish sauce, soy sauce, multiple micronutrient salt (MMS), fortification. Deworming (DW), ferrous fumarate (FF), and ferric pyrophosphate (FPP).
Interestingly, Rajagopalan et al. [] demonstrated a negligible effect size for men, but a positive effect size for women, indicating that double-fortified salt may be a more effective treatment for women than men. DFS fortified with micronized ferric pyrophosphate showed the highest effect size for this condiment at 1.4 [], indicating that this iron source may contribute to its greater effect sizes over the other iron sources used for these studies. Seven of the 16 DFS data points (44%) showed negligible effect sizes. Organoleptic changes of the DFS could be associated with weak effect sizes.
Multiple micronutrient fortified salts showed mixed effect sizes. Most notably is the 1.55 effect size using micronized ferric pyrophosphate, vitamin A, and iodine in triple fortified salt []. Kumar et al. (2014) also showed a positive effect size (0.4) using chelated ferrous sulfate []. However, Kumar et al. (2007) showed a negligible effect size (0.13) using chelated ferrous sulfate amongst vitamin A, B1, B2, B6, B12, folic acid, niacin, calcium pantothenate and iodine [], as did Vinodkumar 2009 for children ages 5–15 years using the same combination and sources of micronutrients [].
Both studies that assessed fish sauce showed positive effect sizes. Interestingly, similar effect sizes were seen for fortified fish sauce using either NaFeEDTA or FeSO4 + citrate, indicating that either iron source can be used for positive effects in fish sauce [,].
The fortification of soy sauce showed the highest effect sizes [,]; all of the age/gender groups showed considerable effect sizes, with the exception of women 19–30 years of age []. Nonetheless, even at a low concentration of NaFeEDTA, the large effect size of 2.5 indicates the strength of this condiment as a fortification vehicle [].
Seasoning powder demonstrated a negligible effect size (n = 1). However, more studies will need to assess this vehicle as a fortification vehicle before complete conclusions can be drawn [].
Regarding the studies assessing iron-deficient populations (n = 4) [,,,], the average effect size was 1.18. On the contrary, studies assessing a general population (not necessarily iron deficient, n = 18) [,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,] had an average effect size of 0.39. This difference illustrates that iron-deficient populations show a relatively larger effect size because iron is absorbed more readily than in the general population.
Adherence and/or compliance was addressed by 15 studies, having an average effect size of 0.52 and those that did not address adherence or compliance (n = 7) had an average effect size of 0.67. This relative difference is not large, indicating a negligible effect between study outcomes that did or did not address compliance and adherence.

4. Discussion

Our review of studies conducted in the last 20 years revealed that during this period, there were 21 studies that assessed the efficacy of iron fortification of condiments in children and adults and only two studies evaluated the effectiveness of this type of intervention on the whole population [,]. Most of these studies used salt fortified with iodine and iron or salt fortified with multiple micronutrients. Only a limited number of studies were conducted using other vehicles such as soy and fish sauces. Various forms of iron had been used with the objectives of increasing bioavailability and maintaining the quality and stability of the fortified product, the iron compound and the levels of iodine in salt. Iron forms used included chelated ferrous sulfate, ferrous fumarate, iron pyrophosphate, and in some instances in microencapsulated forms to prevent unwanted interactions between iron and iodine that could jeopardize product quality and organoleptic properties of the fortified product. There has been no evaluation of bouillon cubes and there was only one assessment of a fortified powder when used as a condiment in food preparation. All studies were conducted in Asia or Africa, where the potential of fortifying condiments seems more promising due to culture and tradition. The main iron indicators monitored were the levels of hemoglobin, the prevalence of anemia and in some studies, the levels of serum ferritin.
As shown in Table 2, there was a variety of responses in iron indicators as a result of the iron fortification intervention in children, women, and the whole population. In some cases, the level of hemoglobin did not increase, and in others, the level of hemoglobin increased significantly but the prevalence of anemia did not decrease. Likewise, serum ferritin, as an indicator of iron deficiency, did not always increase. Interventions with children showed the most consistent positive efficacy result. In these studies, 13 out of 16 studies increased the levels of hemoglobin and nine out of 11 studies that measured ferritin showed a significant increase in this indicator. This observation was particularly more evident in children studied and maintained under confined conditions like schools or childcare centers, where monitoring and compliance are easier to control. While it seems that adherence had no effect on the study effect sizes, whether or not the population was iron-deficient at baseline showed an increase in the effect size. Thus, it is hypothesized that a large-scale effectiveness trial using iron-fortified condiments without monitoring adherence and compliance may not see a difference in results than its monitored counterpart. However, further studies are needed to prove this point. Additionally, it should be noted that iron-fortified condiments targeting a specific iron-deficient subgroup may see more preferable results than the general population. Policy makers should understand the risks of non-targeted individuals being exposed to iron fortification during targeted trials, specifically those individuals that might possess the thalassemia trait in which iron overload is a risk.
We identified nine studies in which one or more iron parameters did not change in the positive direction as a result of the iron interventions, either not increasing hemoglobin significantly, not lowering the prevalence of anemia, or not increasing serum ferritin (Table 3). Upon analysis, several of these studies using salt as a vehicle reported lower acceptability of the fortified product due to organoleptic changes. Those reporting changes, made particularly by women, included a different color appearance of the fortified salt or changes in the color of the food when cooking using fortified salt as an ingredient. Organoleptic changes of DFS, particularly color changes of the fortified product, have been reported by several investigators [,], and efforts are being made to correct or at least alleviate this unwanted phenomenon []. Visual and flavor modification instead influences the acceptability of the product with a consequential decrease in consumption of the fortified product lowering the iron intake. In addition, two of these nine low-performing studies reported an insufficient amount of iron in the fortified product to meet iron requirements as a cause of not improving iron deficiency. This observation coincides with the potential decrease in the consumption of fortified salt due to organoleptic changes that would also lead to lower iron intake. The need for adding meaningful amounts of fortificants to staple foods and their adequate consumption to fulfill dietary gaps has been demonstrated in successful fortification programs in Latin America, including fortifying foods with iron []. In some of these studies in Table 3, negative performing factors reported by the authors were also deficiencies of other micronutrients important in anemia, such as folate and vitamin B12. The lack of folate and vitamin B12 impairs the production of red blood cells and therefore the persistence of anemia despite adequate iron nutrition []. Furthermore, as suggested by two of these studies [,], environmental factors such as the presence of high parasite burden, particularly from hookworms, as well as malaria, can also contribute to the development of anemia by producing intestinal iron losses and red cell hemolysis, respectively []. One systematic review also found that iron supplementation, in addition to deworming of schoolchildren, showed greater changes in hemoglobin and reduction of anemia than studies that just dewormed (n = 8 studies) []. An interesting case was seen in one of the included studies, Reddy et al. (2014) [] where anemia prevalence significantly decreased (−6.3%) among participants consuming DFS and who were dewormed at baseline, but did not significantly decrease (+1.5%) among those who only consumed DFS and were not dewormed at baseline. Nonetheless, this finding is contradictory to a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Ramírez-Luzuriaga et al., in which they found deworming at baseline not to be a significant predictor of the risk of anemia and hemoglobin concentration response to DFS interventions [], and thus requires further investigation.
We then wanted to examine the other end of the spectrum, the most successful iron fortification interventions, as detailed in Table 4. That is, those studies that showed changes in all three iron indicators, (increased hemoglobin, decreased anemia prevalence and increased serum ferritin) in the right direction indicating clear efficacy of the iron fortification. We wanted to identify what was done in these particular studies associated with their success, particularly different or contrasting activities to the ones conducted in the less successful studies shown in Table 3. It was revealed that out of eight studies in this category, we found that five were carefully monitored in all aspects of the intervention, particularly the sensory characteristics and acceptability of the fortified product. This was especially important considering the changes in color in iron-fortified salt and when salt is used for cooking. The studies included in the present work using fortified soy and fish sauce did not report any taste acceptability issues. This observation supports the argument that changes in color and/or flavor of the fortified product are critical determinants of acceptability. Due to their distinctive dark brown color and strong flavor, the sauces used in these investigations masked any potential changes in color that could be produced by the addition of iron. In support of this notion, a study conducted in Thailand found good similar sensory acceptability when fortifying soy sauce with NaFeEDTA []. Although a metallic taste has been associated in some instances with the fortification of soy sauce with NaFeEDTA, in a systematic review by Huo et al. (2002), only one of 16 studies conducted in China assessing NaFeEDTA-fortified soy sauce reported negative taste effects []. In addition, the authors showed a pooled weighted mean difference in hemoglobin of 0.88 g/dL and a decrease in anemia prevalence of 25%, indicating a clear efficacy of these types of interventions. These findings illustrate the significant potential of reducing iron-deficiency anemia prevalence within an appropriate implementation context for condiments.
Table 4. High-performing studies of the efficacy of iron fortification of condiments. Studies were selected because all iron indicators (hemoglobin, anemia prevalence, and ferritin) demonstrated a positive impact.
Five of these studies also monitored and corrected as needed, micronutrient deficiencies, in particular vitamin A. The positive role of vitamin A in iron utilization has been documented since 1998 []. Only three of these studies conducted parasitic treatments of the subjects previous to the intervention. While all studies presented in Table 4 demonstrate positive effects in the three iron indicators extracted (hemoglobin, anemia prevalence, and serum ferritin), it should be noted that hemoglobin and serum ferritin are the best indicators of iron deficiency. Anemia prevalence can be an indicator of iron deficiency or other external factors such as other micronutrient deficiencies or parasitic infections. Thus, when analyzing randomized controlled trials, an outcome of lowered anemia prevalence can be attributed to a holistic treatment within the study design.
It needs to be indicated that the remaining six studies that did not conform to the low-or high-performing criteria [,,,,,] showed increases in hemoglobin but did not assess or report anemia, ferritin or both. Therefore, such studies were not classified as high performers based only on the criteria of lacking positive changes in the three parameters.
The purpose of the quality evaluation was to assess the internal validity of the studies, as well as to appraise the quality of the study design. This quality assessment was not used to exclude studies, but to add a layer of internal validity to the already extracted data. The degree of internal validity of study design is used in order to warn the validity of successful trials when it is presented that internal validity is also threatened. For example, Huo et al. showed the highest effect size of all 22 studies included for the effect size calculation (2.88 and 2.49, high and low NaFeEDTA, respectively) []. This iron fortificant is known for its higher bioavailability and limited effect on the organoleptic properties of food []. Despite these findings, this study [] was rated as moderate in the quality assessment due to a lack of blinding to prevent bias and inadequate description of statistical analyses. Therefore, its results must be cautiously analyzed, given these reasons for doubting its internal validity. Similarly, Reddy et al. (2016) showed a large positive effect size (0.81) using ferrous sulfate fortified DFS with pregnant women. However, blinding and statistical analyses (e.g., power calculations, ANOVA assumptions) were not used or described in the study design []. Blinding is a critical component in randomized, placebo-controlled trials []. In the case of those studies using salt that is visibly different from the control, any attempt to blinding will be difficult to accomplish. Thus, it is important that the investigator acknowledges this as a limitation. Many of the studies included in this review did not use blinding, and some that reported using it did not indicate how blinding was operationalized. These examples warrant caution when extrapolating results that might support policy decisions.
On the other hand, studies that showed positive effect sizes also had strong internal validity from the study quality assessment. These studies include [] (DFS, 0.91), [] (DFS, 1.36), [] (MMS, 1.55), [] (fish sauce, 0.46), [] (fish sauce, 0.48), and [] (soy sauce, 0.41 on average) [,,,,,]. Interestingly, all of the high-performing studies included in Table 4 also were classified as strong from the quality assessment. Thus, when rationalizing a fortification program using condiments as delivery vehicles, these studies illustrate the benefits of designing a strong efficacy study along with adequate monitoring and control of influencing covariates.
It is also important to mention the content of sodium that participants were consuming in the condiment fortification trials. In the salt trials, participants consumed an average of 10 g of salt per day. In the soy sauce and fish sauce trials, participants were also consuming 10 mL of sauce per day. Sodium content in soy sauce ranges between 1.9 and 5 g/100 g []. Sodium content in the fish sauce varies, but one study reported 3672 ± 580 mg/100 g []. The US Adequate Intake for sodium is 1.5 g/day for healthy individuals aged 9–50 years and 1–1.2 g/day for children 1 to 8 years []. The level of salt consumption as found by these evaluated fortification studies may lead to excessive amounts of sodium intake, not aligning with the WHO’s non-communicable disease-related target (<5 g salt per day) of reducing salt/sodium intake from current consumption levels by 30% []. Nonetheless, no adverse events, related or not to the level of salt intake, were reported by the only one of all reviewed studies who monitored adverse events in the population under investigation []. Therefore, the authors recommend the collection and reporting of adverse events within future fortified condiment trials.
Sodium intake continues to be high throughout most of the world, leading to increasingly high rates of hypertension []. As such, in populations where the prevalence of hypertension is dangerously high, condiments that are excessive in sodium should be cautioned when used as vehicles in fortification programs. Education and proper communication of benefits and associated risks are critical in program design and implementation.
This review has several limitations that require disclosure. A large proportion of the included studies were on the ability of DFS to address low hemoglobin or anemia, especially in India. A smaller proportion of included studies consisted of other vehicles such as sauces and seasoning powders. Most of the studies included were from India (n = 13) and African countries (Ghana, Morocco, and Cote d’Ivoire), but none from the Americas, Oceania, or Europe; thus, compromising the generalizability of the results to the whole Sub-Saharan Africa and other continents. Most of the studies included in this review were RCTs. Nonetheless, most studies lacked information on program implementation such as randomization, blinding, monitoring, and formative evaluation, which adds to the problem of abstracting and describing poor or good performing factors. Finally, this review included studies only published in English. This is a known limitation for most systematic reviews. However, we considered the findings of articles in other languages as these were included in other systematic reviews, such as in the case of using NaFeEDTA to fortify soy sauce as reported by Huo et al. [], which included 16 articles, the majority in Chinese.

5. Conclusions

The present review systematically collected and assessed the efficacy of 23 condiment-based iron-fortification trials conducted in the last 20 years and their associated performance factors. The internal validity of the study designs was assessed via a quality assessment, and effect sizes were calculated. Overall, it was found that effective condiment vehicles for fortification are those that can mask the organoleptic changes due to the physical characteristics of the fortified food, such as fish or soy sauces. These condiments also mask changes in taste due to their inherent strong flavor. The efficacy of fortified salt is well proven and can help to address iron deficiency. However, it is best when using an iron source that does not interfere with other fortificants (e.g., promote oxidation) and does not produce adverse organoleptic changes, as is the case of micronized ferric pyrophosphate. For best results, programs should rigorously address monitoring compliance and adherence. Furthermore, deworming is necessary to enhance the efficacy of programs implemented in areas with a high parasite burden. Studies are needed to determine the efficacy and effectiveness of bouillon cubes (n = 0 studies), curry powders (n = 0 studies), and seasoning powders (n = 1 study) before conclusions can be drawn for these vehicles. Special attention should be given to those studies that show positive effect sizes as well as a strong internal validity of study design, and caution to those studies that show positive effect sizes but with moderate or weak study design. This review can be used to advise policy makers and those in decision-making positions on best practices and protocols for condiment fortification programs. If implemented correctly, fortifying condiments is a potential nutrition-specific strategy for governments and NGOs to address iron deficiency in at-risk populations.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/2/275/s1. Table S1: Quality assessment of articles included in this review.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.A.M.; formal analysis, A.W.W., J.E.A., and L.A.M.; investigation, A.W.W., J.E.A., and L.A.M.; data curation, A.W.W., J.E.A., and L.A.M.; writing—original draft preparation, A.W.W. and L.A.M.; writing—review and editing, A.W.W., J.E.A., and L.A.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. McLean, E.; Cogswell, M.; Egli, I.; Wojdyla, D.; De Benoist, B. Worldwide prevalence of anaemia, WHO vitamin and mineral nutrition information system, 1993–2005. Public Health Nutr. 2009, 12, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Allen, L.H. Anemia and iron deficiency: Effects on pregnancy outcome. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 71, 1280S–1284S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. WHO. Global Health Observatory Data Repository. WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. Available online: apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main (accessed on 19 January 2020).
  4. WHO. WHO Sixty-Fifth World Health Assembly; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zimmermann, M.B.; Hurrell, R.F. Nutritional iron deficiency. Lancet 2007, 370, 511–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bank, W. Enriching Lives: Overcoming Vitamin and Mineral Malnutrition in Developing Countries; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  7. Consensus, C. Copenhagen consensus 2008—Results. Cph. Consens. Cent. 2008. Available online: http://www.luo.ch/win-win/files/001-2_vision_ranking.copenhagen.concensus.pdf (accessed on 6 January 2019).
  8. De Mejia, E.G.; Aguilera-Gutiérrez, Y.; Martin-Cabrejas, M.A.; Mejia, L.A. Industrial processing of condiments and seasonings and its implications for micronutrient fortification. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2015, 1357, 8–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mejia, L.A.; Bower, A.M. The global regulatory landscape regarding micronutrient fortification of condiments and seasonings. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2015, 1357, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Timbo. Celusal Salt. Available online: www.timbo.com.ar/eng/productos_hogar_sales.php (accessed on 19 November 2019).
  11. Venkatesh Mannar, M.G.; Hurrell, R. Food Fortification in a Globalized World, 1st ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2018; p. 414. [Google Scholar]
  12. Horton, S.; Wesley, A.; Mannar, M.V. Double-fortified salt reduces anemia, benefit: Cost ratio is modestly favorable. Food Policy 2011, 36, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hess, S.; Tecklenburg, L.; Eichler, K. Micronutrient fortified condiments and noodles to reduce anemia in children and adults—A literature review and meta-analysis. Nutrients 2016, 8, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ramírez-Luzuriaga, M.J.; Larson, L.M.; Mannar, V.; Martorell, R. Impact of double-fortified salt with iron and iodine on hemoglobin, anemia, and iron deficiency anemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv. Nutr. 2018, 9, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Association, A.D. Evidence Analysis Manual: Steps in the ADA Evidence Analysis Process; American Dietetic Association: Chicago, IL, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  16. Siopis, G.; Chey, T.; Allman-Farinelli, M. A systematic review and meta—Analysis of interventions for weight management using text messaging. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 2015, 28, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Centre for Evaluation and Monitoring. D.U. Effect Size Calculator; Centre for Evaluation and Monitoring: Durham, England, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ialongo, C. Understanding the effect size and its measures. Biochem. Med. Biochem. Med. 2016, 26, 150–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ross, S.D.; Fahrbach, K.; Frame, D.; Scheye, R.; Connelly, J.E.; Glaspy, J. The Effect of Anemia Treatment on Selected Health-Related Quality-of-Life Domains: A Systematic Review; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sullivan, G.M.; Feinn, R. Using effect size—Or why the P value is not enough. J. Grad. Med Educ. 2012, 4, 279–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Andersson, M.; Thankachan, P.; Muthayya, S.; Goud, R.B.; Kurpad, A.V.; Hurrell, R.F.; Zimmermann, M.B. Dual fortification of salt with iodine and iron: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of micronized ferric pyrophosphate and encapsulated ferrous fumarate in southern India. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 88, 1378–1387. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Asibey-Berko, E.; Zlotkin, S.; Yeung, G.; Nti-Nimako, W.; Ahunu, B.; Kyei-Faried, S.; Johnston, J.; Tondeur, M.; Mannar, V. Dual fortification of salt with iron and iodine in women and children in rural Ghana. East Afr. Med. J. 2007, 84, 473–480. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bathla, S.; Grover, K. Effect of supplementation of double fortified salt in mid day meal programme on the nutritional status of anaemic children. Indian J. Agric. Biochem. 2016, 29, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Haas, J.D.; Rahn, M.; Venkatramanan, S.; Marquis, G.S.; Wenger, M.J.; Murray-Kolb, L.E.; Wesley, A.S.; Reinhart, G.A. Double-fortified salt is efficacious in improving indicators of iron deficiency in female Indian tea pickers. J. Nutr. 2014, 144, 957–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nair, S.; Bandyopadhyay, S.; Skaria, L. Impact assessment on DFS supplementation Post NHE on nutrient intake of critically anemic pregnant mothers in a tribal set up of Gujarat. Indian J. Community Health 2014, 26, 170–174. [Google Scholar]
  26. Rajagopalan, S.; Vinodkumar, M. Effects of salt fortified with iron and iodine on the haemoglobin levels and productivity of tea pickers. Food Nutr. Bull. 2000, 21, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Reddy, K.J.; Nair, S. Double fortified salt and deworming—Game changers in the battle against iodine and iron malnutrition in Indian school children. Indian J. Community Health 2014, 26, 175–182. [Google Scholar]
  28. Reddy, K.J.; Nair, S. Double fortified salt: An effective measure to control micronutrient deficiencies in Indian pregnant women. Int. J. Community Med. Public Health 2017, 3, 679–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vinodkumar, M.; Rajagopalan, S.; Bhagwat, I.; Singh, S.; Parmar, B.S.; Mishra, O.P.; Upadhyay, S.S.; Bhalia, N.; Deshpande, S.R. A multicenter community study on the efficacy of double-fortified salt. Food Nutr. Bull. 2007, 28, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wegmüller, R.; Camara, F.; Zimmermann, M.B.; Adou, P.; Hurrell, R.F. Salt dual-fortified with iodine and micronized ground ferric pyrophosphate affects iron status but not hemoglobin in children in Cote d’Ivoire. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 1814–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Wenger, M.J.; Murray-Kolb, L.E.; Nevins, J.E.; Venkatramanan, S.; Reinhart, G.A.; Wesley, A.; Haas, J.D. Consumption of a double-fortified salt affects perceptual, attentional, and mnemonic functioning in women in a randomized controlled trial in India. J. Nutr. 2017, 147, 2297–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zimmermann, M.B.; Zeder, C.; Chaouki, N.; Saad, A.; Torresani, T.; Hurrell, R.F. Dual fortification of salt with iodine and microencapsulated iron: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial in Moroccan schoolchildren. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003, 77, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zimmermann, M.B.; Wegmueller, R.; Zeder, C.; Chaouki, N.; Rohner, F.; Saïssi, M.; Torresani, T.; Hurrell, R.F. Dual fortification of salt with iodine and micronized ferric pyrophosphate: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 80, 952–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kumar, M.V.; Rajagopalan, S. Multiple micronutrient fortification of salt and its effect on cognition in Chennai school children. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2007, 16, 505–511. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kumar, M.V.; Nirmalan, P.K.; Erhardt, J.G.; Rahmathullah, L.; Rajagopalan, S. An efficacy study on alleviating micronutrient deficiencies through a multiple micronutrient fortified salt in children in South India. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 23, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Vinodkumar, M.; Rajagopalan, S. Multiple micronutrient fortification of salt. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 63, 437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Vinodkumar, M.; Erhardt, J.G.; Rajagopalan, S. Impact of a multiple-micronutrient fortified salt on the nutritional status and memory of schoolchildren. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2009, 79, 348–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zimmermann, M.B.; Wegmueller, R.; Zeder, C.; Chaouki, N.; Biebinger, R.; Hurrell, R.F.; Windhab, E. Triple fortification of salt with microcapsules of iodine, iron, and vitamin A. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2004, 80, 1283–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Winichagoon, P.; McKenzie, J.E.; Chavasit, V.; Pongcharoen, T.; Gowachirapant, S.; Boonpraderm, A.; Manger, M.S.; Bailey, K.B.; Wasantwisut, E.; Gibson, R.S. A multimicronutrient-fortified seasoning powder enhances the hemoglobin, zinc, and iodine status of primary school children in North East Thailand: A randomized controlled trial of efficacy. J. Nutr. 2006, 136, 1617–1623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Longfils, P.; Monchy, D.; Weinheimer, H.; Chavasit, V.; Nakanishi, Y.; Schümann, K. A comparative intervention trial on fish sauce fortified with NaFe-EDTA and FeSO4+ citrate in iron deficiency anemic school children in Kampot, Cambodia. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008, 17, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Van Thuy, P.; Berger, J.; Nakanishi, Y.; Khan, N.C.; Lynch, S.; Dixon, P. The use of NaFeEDTA-fortified fish sauce is an effective tool for controlling iron deficiency in women of childbearing age in rural Vietnam. J. Nutr. 2005, 135, 2596–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Chen, J.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, X.; Yin, S.; Piao, J.; Huo, J.; Yu, B.; Qu, N.; Lu, Q.; Wang, S. Studies on the effectiveness of NaFeEDTA-fortified soy sauce in controlling iron deficiency: A population-based intervention trial. Food Nutr. Bull. 2005, 26, 177–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Huo, J.; Sun, J.; Miao, H.; Yu, B.; Yang, T.; Liu, Z.; Lu, C.; Chen, J.; Zhang, D.; Ma, Y. Therapeutic effects of NaFeEDTA—Fortified soy sauce in anaemic children in China. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002, 11, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Martorell, R.; de Romaña, D.L. Components of successful staple food fortification programs: Lessons from Latin America. Food Nutr. Bull. 2017, 38, 384–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Green, R.; Mitra, A.D. Megaloblastic anemias: Nutritional and other causes. Med Clin. 2017, 101, 297–317. [Google Scholar]
  46. Farid, Z.; Bassily, S.; Lehman, J., Jr.; Kent, D.; Haxton, J.; Patwardhan, V.; Hassan, A.; Mahran, A. Iron loss and reabsorption in Ancylostoma duodenale infection and bilharzial colonic polyposis. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1970, 64, 881–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Girum, T.; Wasie, A. The effect of deworming school children on anemia prevalence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Open Nurs. J. 2018, 12, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Watanapaisantrakul, R.; Chavasit, V.; Kongkachuichai, R. Fortification of soy sauce using various iron sources: Sensory acceptability and shelf stability. Food Nutr. Bull. 2006, 27, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Huo, J.S.; Yin, J.Y.; Sun, J.; Huang, J.; Lu, Z.X.; Regina, M.P.; Chen, J.S.; Chen, C.M. Effect of NaFeEDTA-fortified soy sauce on anemia prevalence in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2015, 28, 788–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mejía, L.A.; Chew, F. Hematological effect of supplementing anemic children with vitamin A alone and in combination with iron. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1988, 48, 595–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Bothwell, T.H.; MacPhail, A.P. The potential role of NaFeEDTA as an iron fortificant. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 2004, 74, 421–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Karanicolas, P.J.; Farrokhyar, F.; Bhandari, M. Blinding: Who, what, when, why, how? Can. J. Surg. 2010, 53, 345. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Syifaa, A.S.; Jinap, S.; Sanny, M.; Khatib, A. Chemical profiling of different types of soy sauce and the relationship with its sensory attributes. J. Food Qual. 2016, 39, 714–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Shahar, S.; You, Y.X.; Zainuddin, N.S.; Michael, V.; Ambak, R.; Haron, H.; He, F.J.; MacGregor, G.A. Sodium content in sauces—A major contributor of sodium intake in Malaysia: A cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e025068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. The National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes Tables and Application. Available online: http://nationalacademies.org/HMD/Activities/Nutrition/SummaryDRIs/DRI-Tables.aspx (accessed on 3 December 2019).
  56. World Health Organization. Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Noncommunicable Diseases 2013–2020; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  57. Hipgrave, D.B.; Chang, S.; Li, X.; Wu, Y. Salt and sodium intake in China. JAMA 2016, 315, 703–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.